Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMUP 00-11U, ? a Ar �?ct f , PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE _#. 00-11 .----PROJECT TYPE: Minor Use Permit APPLICANT: AT & T Wireless Services ADDRESS: 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 OWNER: Paul & Pauline Satur REPRESENTATIVE:_ Richard Wickersham ADDRESS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co -located on an existing 150 foot tower PROPERTY ZONED: A-40,40 acre parcels LOCATED: on the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street Biggs AP#: 022-170-066 TOWN/AREA: Biggs GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Orchard & Field Crops 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Application complete: 2-16-00 Amount: $ 350.00 Receipt #: 18210 Comments sent to: E.H., Public Works, LAFCo, DDS, Assessor, Building, Ag. Commission, CDF & Ca -.Trans Comments received from: Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: Assigned To: Stephen Betts Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No: Subject to Fish & Game: No Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Environmental Impact Report ' 'Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA # 15061.(bx3) _ Other 8. Staff Report: Project Video: 9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: 10: Publication Notice Written: 3 - aD - CrV Display Ad Prepared: 11. Notices Mailed: o� -�D- D� Number of Notices: 12. Newspaper Publication Date: -2? - O O C P 13: Planning Comm?ssion Hearing(s): Action taken: Special Conditions: Commission Resolution No. 14. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: 15. Type Minor Use Permit/Send for signature: 16. N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G: Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No 17. Send validated Minor Use 18. Assessor's Memo: 19. Copy of Minor Use Permit / Variance to Planning Technician: AT&T Wireless Services, proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts and Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be colocated on an existing 150 foot tower on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural - 40 acre parcels). The property is located cn the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs. APN 022- 170-066. (SB) (File #MUP 00-11) Chairman Leland said he had a conflict with this item and abstained from voting. He said he would vote cn Item B only. He asked if anyone wanted to pull either of these from the consent agenda and the answer was no. It was moved by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Commission Mooney, and carried to approve a Minor Use Permit for AT&T Wilreless, APN 0227170-066, File # MUP 00-11, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Cage, Mooney, Nelson, and Lambert NOES: No one ABSENT: No one ABSTAINED: Chairman Leland Adopt a Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study did not identify any potential significant environmental,effects. B. The Planning Manager has independently reviewed, analyzed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration prior to making its decision on the project, and the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement of Butte County. II. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause .environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a "de minimus" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(S) and 14 CCR 753.5.,is not recommended. III. Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Minor Use Permit 00-11 for AT&T Wireless Services, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: A. That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Fire Department, and Caltrans. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Orchard and Field Crops and is zoned A-40. The Orchard and Field Crops land use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. The A-40 zone allows colocation of communication facilities with approval of a Minor Use Permit. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ APRIL 27, 2000 ■ B. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will he compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the existing monopole or extend beyond the existing antennas. 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and nD additional services or utilities are required. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The project site is already developed with a 150 -foot tall monopole tower. The proposed antennas to be mounted on the existing monopole will not hav: a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. The radio-frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very little vehicle traffic will be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment shelter. The communications facility is unmanned and only one to two site visits per month will be required after construction. The suitability of the site for the type and. intensity of use or development which is proposed: The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas will be mounted on the existing 150 -foot tall monopole. No walnut trees wit=. have to be removed for the equipment shelter. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use will cause any other relevant impact. C: Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Chapter 24, Section 262, of the Butte County Code. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ APRIL 27, 2000 ■ Conditions of Approval: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing monopole. 2. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. T1L. Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Buildin; Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height wiR withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. 6. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 7. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical_ clearance. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 9. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall generate, at any time, electromagnetic. frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. 1 If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES 0 APRIL 27, 2000 ■ i .. that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a. period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the Facility, the applicant shall obtain a detailed estimate from an appropriate building industry business or contractor for the removal of the Facility, including the proper disposal of all removed materials and the return of site to its original condition. A copy of the estimate shall be submitted to the Building Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of removal of the Facility, proper disposal of all removed materials, and return of the site to its original condition in the event that such Facility is abandoned, or if the permit has been terminated for violation of its conditions by the County after hearing, or has expired, and after notice has been given to the owner/operator by the County, no application for renewal has been filed. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 13. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 14. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 15. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 16. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 17. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 MINUTES 0 APRIL 27, 2000 ■ 18. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit I" and date-stamped February 16, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 19. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspecticn to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 20. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. 21. Obtain the necessary building permits from the Building Division. 22. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the existing gate on the site access road shall be moved further away from the edge of the State Route 99 traveled way by at least 3.6 meters as requested by Caltrans in their March 9, 2000 letter. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ APRIL 27, 2000 ■ AT&T Wireless Services, proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts and Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be colocated on an existing 150 foot tower on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural - 40 acre parcels). The property is located on the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs. APN 022- 170-066. (SB) (File #MUP 00-11) Mr. Wilson gave a brief summary of the project. He said staff recommends approval with the findings and 22 conditions listed in the Agenda Report. He said Caltrans is requesting that prior to issuance of a building permit, the existing gate on the site access road shall be moved further away from the edge of the State Route 99 traveled way by at least 3.6 meters as requested in their March 9, 2000, letter. The hearing was opened to the public. No one, including the applicant,, was present to speak on this item. The hearing was closed. Mr. Wilson concurred with staff's recommendation to recommend to the Planning Commission that the Minor Use Permit for AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11, be approved subject to the findings and conditions listed below. If the Planning Commission concurs with the recommendation, the Minor Use Permit can be issued after the 10 day appeal period. Mr. Wilson stated that this item will be on the April 27th Planning Commission Consent Agenda Adopt a Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study did not identify any, potential significant environmental effects. B. The Planning Manager has independently reviewed, analyzed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration prior to making its decision on the project, and the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement of Butte County. II. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a "de minimus" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5. is not recommended. III. Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Minor Use Permit 00-11 for AT&T Wireless Services, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: A. That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES - APRIL 12, 2000 ■ PAGE 1 ■ 0 which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Fire Department, and Caltrans. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Orchard and Field Crops and is zoned A-40. The Orchard and Field Crops land use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. The A-40 zone allows colocation of communication facilities with approval of a Minor Use Permit. B. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the existing monopole or extend beyond the existing antennas. 2. The availability of public facilities,, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and no additional services or utilities are required. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The project site is already developed with a 150 -foot tall monopole tower. The proposed antennas to be mounted on the existing monopole will not have a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. The radio-frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very little vehicle traffic will be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment shelter. The communications facility is unmanned and only one to two site visits per month will be required after construction. 5: " The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING 0 MINUTES - APRIL 12, 2000 ■ PAGE 2 ■ The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas will be mounted on the existing 150 -foot tall monopole. No walnut trees will have to be removed for the equipment shelter. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use will cause any other relevant impact. C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Chapter 24, Section 262, of the Butte County Code. Conditions of Approval: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing monopole. 2.' The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written. approval from the Division of Environmental Health. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING 0 MINUTES - APRIL 12, 2000 ■ PAGE 3 ■ 0 9. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities ' on the site shall generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the Facility, the applicant shall obtain a detailed estimate from an appropriate building industry business or contractor for the removal of the Facility, including the proper disposal of all removed materials and the return of site to its original condition. A copy of the estimate shall be submitted to the Building Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of removal of the Facility, proper disposal of all removed materials, and return of the site to its original condition in the event that such Facility is abandoned, or if the permit has been terminated for violation of its conditions by the County after hearing, or has expired, and after notice has been given to the owner/operator by the County, no application for renewal has been filed. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES - APRIL 12, 2000 ■ PAGE 4 ■ condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 13. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 14. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 15. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET• 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 16. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 17. . Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 18. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit .I" and date-stamped February 16, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 19. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 20. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. 21. Obtain the necessary building permits from the Building Division. 22. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the existing gate on the site access road shall be moved further away from the edge of the State Route 99 traveled way by at least 3.6 meters as requested by Caltrans in their March 9, 2000 letter. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES - APRIL 12, 2000 0 PAGE 5 0 9 ? DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME (If applicant is dif e=t from owaer as affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMB] PT4' -r ^W r-a/,e53 Jeer✓/ ce" OIL? -t-/'70- 06 ADDRESS: 71zq rev,5?Cof fete of. CTIY. STATE & ZIP CODE FILE NUMBER AOR CEI NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) A o ✓aj TELEPHONE Alorg err I -e RSG ( 742, 'yOZ - TZ50 LOCATION OF PROJE (Ma•oc cross streets and Address. if any) a. IV GE140tAL INFORMATION REQUIRED •::�': �•' ��.,.�%. Via.. �.. •�.w ^;....: %'j. >.»_:' •'e :»`.'::i�t'r:a`. .,"i'j '•!.r: 7•> ��.:. .Pi::•,!/.. *�:Ds :ri^ �.."!• o1•}p =' OWNER'S NAGE TELEPHONE ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE ZONE _GENERAL PIAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE (b Squra Feet ac Acro ) QFC 17 loz' EXIST STRG CTURFS (in Square Feet) %I�MX /� / X 30 PROPOSED STRU (in Square &Acee,+'4 A wlb A$a, #l.&Arr siefre4 d'A�rr'iu#05 eamer'e-tc bio'6; y he�'u pAvn w, ";< �fOpR�teo� oN 4So.s � �-�/ /!rono o6c. A!A►N't-ed �tiv eXrs/in )?ls�opo/e. ^ y Kbo& one) (Chat One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER y FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division . describe the number and size of parcels.) Sie a APPLICATION REQUESTED ❑ GFNERAI. PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ SONE RECEIVED ❑ USE PERMIT oR USE PERMIT FEB 16 2000 ❑ VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY P Q MINOR VARIANCE LANNING DIVISION ❑ ADMD45TRATWE PERMIT ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP Cl TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL. MAP ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIF`! THAT (Am PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE ALTHORCIED AGE147 OFTHE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY FURTHER. I ACKYOWLEDGE THE FtLC4G OF THIS APPLICATION An CERTIFY THAT ALL OFTHE ABOVE INFOR-MATION IS TRUE AND ACC1�tATE ([f an agent u to be authociled, execute an alYdavit of authaintian and de davit �p/ DATE: tet �6,ts*10- SIGNATURE: * � RECEIVED FEB 16 2000 COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FOUTTE COUNTY (To be Completed By Project Applicant) ANNING DIVISION Date Fledfio—h 14 General Information: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/orsrecnsor: �'r�el�9s �erv�oes 2. Address of project Assessor's Parcel Number: 2-26— /'9 0 — O 64 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be canttt conceming this project: 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing general plan designation: 6. Existing zoning district)Cl- A10 7. How island currently used? 8. Proposed use of site (P,r_olect for which this form Is filed): W1r'e 'ey3 a wr�aN�cafieYf.S Project Description: gio 5f. '. Site size: ��� ` ih� 4 "f/� (Acres/Sq. Feet' 10. Off-street parldng spaces: Full size: Compact NIf Total: 11. Plans attached Yes !!!�No _. 12. 13 Associated projects A9 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. if commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 0 Butte County (Department of Oevelopment Services 0 Planning Oivision 0 1 .n 5 , 18. If institutlonal, Indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy;' loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning applkatlon, or any development permits, state this and indicate arty why the application is nsqutred. If permits have alre�dyyP iss�ed, please axach as Exhibit Mr�l Need to iii_,- i`o-✓,c �TTu� s &'evAje _ Are the following items applicable to. the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons X or substantial alteration of ground contours. _. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing resirlMilel � areas or public lands or roads. 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _ k' 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. — X 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. — 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns.. — — 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. — — 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. — x 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, X such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. — 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services X (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). — 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption k (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). — — 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. -- CON JQf 416r0' Me"ralo D Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division v 2 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as t.eodsts betooe the project, Including information on topography,, soil stability,. pants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing strictures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, histo ical, or scerde aspectskxkate the type of land use (rresidenttal, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartrnent houses, shops, department stores. etc.), and scale of development (height frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity.. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements famished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for ttds initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the fads, statements, and information presentee are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and beBef. _ . Date Signature . ?moo . K:\FORMSISUBMITTAL\EW-INFO 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division: C 3 ` - - RECEIVED USE PERMIT and MINOR USE PERMIT FEB 1 6 2000 COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY BUTTE COUNTY APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST PLANNING DIVISION This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their application packet for a communications facility. Please include this checklist along with your submittal. Applicant Planner 1. ❑ CDiA completed, signed, Uniform Application and Environmental Information form. If the application is signed by an agent for the property owner, an agent authorization form must be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 2. El C.4 Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (any unused portion of the deposit wifl be returned upon'final action, if any remains.) (Planner advises applicant) 3. ❑ 'D'Thirty-five (35) copies of plans which shall include a detailed site plan drawn to scale. All. plans shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no greater than 24" x 36". The finished plans. shall be folded to 8'/2" x 11 ". The detailed site plan must include: a. ❑ ED Name and address of Applicant, Engineer and/or person who prepared the plan. b. ❑ 0' Property lines and lot dimensions. c. ❑ ED'- Assessor Parcel Number(s) and the street address. d. ❑ 0_ Proposed use and/or uses of the property. Nlr�- e. ❑ ❑ Proposed landscaping plan, if applicable. f. ❑ 2" Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the property (including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, parking areas, wells, septic tanks and leach fields). IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 1 g. ❑ ❑ h. ❑ ❑ 0 • NI �- Distances from any significant natural and constructed features of the property, such as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains, bodies of water, railroads, to the property lines. Location of all slope banks, ponds, creeks, buttes, sloughs, rock outcroppings, natural drainage courses, irrigation canals and existing vegetation worthy of consideration for preservation, such as oak trees. i. El 1:11 xisting faults or fractures and geologic hazards. j. ❑ ET" North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an engineering scat, with the preferred scale of 1" = 20', with a north arrow preferably oriented to the top of sheet. _ k. ❑ ❑ Building setbacks from the ultimate road right-of-way (front, rear, sides). 1. ❑ Proposed and existing on-site driveways and/or roads. m. ❑ ❑ Location, height, and materials of walls and fences (sections may be required). n. ❑ ❑ All driveways, drawn to. scale, on adjacent and across the street properties within 100 feet of the subject site. NIl�- o. ❑ ❑ Existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks and existing paving widths on-site or within 100 feet of the site, on adjacent and across the street properties. p. ❑ � Nearest cross streets on both sides with plus or minus distances from subject site. q. ❑ ❑ Approximate location of all buildings within 1,000 feet, on adjacent properties. N/Pr r. ❑ ❑ Existing and nearest fire hydrants. NIS s. ❑ Access, both pedestrian and vehicular, showing service areas and points of ingress and egress. t. ❑ ❑ Elevation contours, at a minimum per USGS maps. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 2 4. ❑ ❑ Conceptual Grading Plan Items to be shown include: a. ❑ ❑ Natural areas to be preserved. N /�- b. ❑ ❑ Proposed cut and fill areas in contrasting colors of zipatone pattern. N! 0- c. ❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contours within 100 feet of project boundaries. d. ❑ ❑ Proposed drainage and flood control facilities. N/Pr e. ❑ ❑ Erosion control measures (e.g. - slope landscaping). f. ❑ ❑ Natural drainage. N j 1�- g. ❑ Elevations and finished contours. h. ❑ ❑ Location of retaining walls, drainage channels and existing structures. i. ❑ ©'� Location, elevation and size of proposed building pads. j. ❑ Eg"� All plans must be clear and legible. 5. ❑ ❑ One copy of 8 %" x 11" transparency reduction of the detailed site plan. N /A-- 6. ❑ ❑ A vicinity map showing closest major cross streets, zoning and existing land use. The followine additional items are reauired Der Butte Countv Code Section 24-262.E. 7. ❑ [ Statement of Justification a. ❑ Lg' Includes a description of the proposed Facility, including the type of facility being requested. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 3 • 0 b. Height from natural grade to the top of proposed Facility. c. ❑ EB Support equipment proposed. d. ❑ M RFR/EMF and wattage output data including the number of channels. e. ❑ ❑'" Horizontal and vertical location coordinates. ❑ 0' Proposed elevations of the structure and any accessory buildings, including building height and other physical dimensions, drawn to graphic scale. 9. ❑ a, Visual impact assessment, photo montages, mock-ups as determined by the Director of Development Services or Planning Commission. The assessment shall identify any proposed trimming of vegetation that will be required for the normal operation of the Facility. Stealth technology is encouraged. 10. ❑ ❑ 401k=ups required (may be required at any time during the processing of the permit) NO- eu- Loc-*- Drj 11. ❑ ❑ A discussion of and supporting information regarding the alternative site selection of at least a minimum of three to four other sites, if available, including colocation opportunities, and a statement as to why these alternative sites and/or colocation opportunities were rejected. 12. ❑ D A complete service area map showing the entire wireless communications network of the provider's twenty (20) miles in all directions from the proposed site for the time period from the filing of the application to twelve (12) months from the filing of the application, for the purpose of visually aiding cumulative environmental analysis, with and without the proposed Facility or Facilities, showing all hand-off sites within the above specified area. 13. ❑ E3 - -A graphic depiction of the search ring and all other technical criteria used in determining the proposed Facility location. 1,1 J kGo Lvt-'ecru 14. ❑ Documentation which identifies failure characteristics of the Facility structure or tower and demonstrates that the site and setbacks are of adequate size to contain falling debris. 15. ❑ Pwritten evidence demonstrating that the selected Facility structure or tower design is as visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical and engineering considerations, which indicate what type of Facility is required to provide reasonably effective service and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. (D — UOC —( L a*J IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 4 • 0 The" use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness is mandatory. Z 16. ❑ a Applicants which operate common carrier facilities (specifically, but not limited to cellular, PCS, SMR and paging service licensees of the FCC) shall provide written evidence that the applicant has provided notice to all FCC licensed wireless communication service carriers operating within the County of Butte of the plans to develop the site. 17. ❑ D Evidence of a valid, current operating license or construction permit from the FCC or, if the applicant is not a wireless communications service provider, a user operating agreement for each and every such provider to which the applicant intends to rent space on the proposed Facility: 18. ❑ L" A report, signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer licensed by the FCC, prepared pursuant to FCC OET 65, stating whether the maximum radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic radiation (RF/EMF) to be emitted by the proposed Facility, taking into account all other Facilities, both existing and known future Facilities, at the proposed site and adjacent properties, conforms to safety standards adopted by the FCC, if applicable. The reports prepared for Facilities shall conform to the reporting requirements set by the County and FCC OET 65 human exposure standards. The report shall also analyze the evidence provided in support of the proposed Facility location, height and radiated power, frequency, the number of channels, and all other related data and present alternatives for the location, height and radiated power, pursuant to the requirements of this section. If the proposed Facility exceeds FCC OET 65 human exposure standards, applicant shall also provide additional comprehensive technical and planning information regarding how the applicant shall protect all persons from such excessive exposure consistent with all Federal and State requirements, and any additional County requirements. 19. ❑ 2 Landscaping and painting plans for the completed project. plA 20. ❑ Q� Projects in Agricultural Zones (A-5 through A-160) shall, prior to submitting an application for a proposed Facility, submit a site plan of the proposed Facility to the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner for comment and send a notification letter to all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County informing them of the proposed site location and tower height. No hearing on an application for a proposed facility in any agricultural zone will be scheduled, nor shall any Administrative Permit for any such facility be issued without proof that the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner and all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County have been notified, as specified herein. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 5 �lAr 21. ❑ ❑ All applications for Facilities that are proposed to be located within the boundaries of any Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan or Airport Area of Influence, as adopted or designated from time to time by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission, shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division, and a copy submitted to the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission for review regarding consistency with adopted Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plans and for recommendations addressing potential impacts to air navigation within the Airport Area of Influence. The County may in its sole discretion retain an independent consultant to review either individual elements of or the entire application and advise the County at the applicant's sole expense. Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Signature: Signature: Applicant/Representative Planner Receiving Application K:\FORMS\SUBMITAL\CHECKLIS'.CELLUP. WPD Date Date: IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 022170009000 SATUR PAUL & PAULINE S 190 B ST BIGGS CA 95917 022180010000 LUND PETER & EVELYN FAM REVOCABLE TRUST 213 B ST BIGGS CA 95917 IIiIiiiiiiiIiIiiiiiiiillillieIlI 025080048000 CHAND JAI & SATYA V CP PO BOX 31 GRIDLEY CA 95948 025080069000 GRIDER CYNTHIA ESTATE OF 1438 PEACEFUL GLEN CT SAN JOSE CA 95121 025080087000 BLAIR HAROLD K & JOAN L 11 E BIGGS RD BIGGS CA 95917 022-180-081 JOSE ALEJANDRO 2901 HWY. 99 ' BIGGS, CA 95917 022-100-022 DANIEL BAYLES P.O. BOX 367 BIGGS, CA 95917 022170030000 BAYLES LIVING TRUST P O BOX 536 BIGGS CA 95917 11111111111111111111111 022180072000 GAFFEN RICHARD & GLORI P O BOX 1012 BIGGS CA 95917 iiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiiiiiilliIIiIliI 025080053000 RAMIREZ ALEJANDRO & JOAN M 41 BIGGS EAST HWY BIGGS CA 95917 025080072000 HANSEN WILLIAM 123 PRYDR AVE BIGGS CA 95917 022-170-066 KEITH & CHERY'L ANDERSON 87 B ST. BIGGS, CA 95917 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 IIiiiiiiiIiIiIiiIIiiiillillililI 022170033000 KINGSLEY BETTY MAE P O BOX 590 MARYSVILLE CA 95901 025080004000 SEELEY REV INTER VIVOS TR 2750 MUSTANG LN NORCO CA 917602527 025080063000 COBB JERRY L & STEPHANIE L 31 E BIGGS RD BIGGS CA 95917 025080077000 LUMSDEN LOVEL I & DEBBIE A CP 199 BIGGS EAST HWY BIGGS CA 95917 022-170-041 BIGGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT P.O. BOX 397 BIGGS, CA 95917 025-300-022 DOS RIOS LAND COMPANY P.O. BOX 536 BIGGS, CA 95917 f1�1 +/V� r r -r 114V- i-tJ 1-1-A )v � G— Lt O (?2— J 7 0 y39�j t.GS� - `tel! 6ZZ -76 f 022—►80� i©i � L���j� e/ - '� D"ku) AI �0� dZtar•�, 2.�'�� � ✓ ! (� Go ��j I ✓ lIfzN-s(F,,J/vo I�77 LV'����� L� ✓ 00 8 1 U i . { .. _. . r• � I t �� 1 � ' 1 I v ' I 1 `,� s _ � •� OROJECT REVIEW CHECKAT Project Planners fill out this in-house checklist upon receipt of a new project. Project Number: Project/Application Name: Project Site Zoning: General Plan Designation: APN: Project Planner: Date completed: Is the project located within any of the following areas? ❑ 'North Chico Specific Plan ❑ Oroville Enterprise Zone ❑ Williamson Act Land CLCA: ACRES: ❑ 100 Year Flood Plain ❑ Within FEMA Floodway ❑ Within DWR Floodway ❑ Dam Inundation Area ❑ Watershed Protection Overlay Zone ❑ East Avenue Specific Plan ❑ Chico Area Greenline (Project in area where Greenline policies apply) ❑ Greater Chico Area Redevelopment Area ❑ Nitrate Action Plan Area ❑ Archaeological Sensitive Area ❑ Hazardous Site ❑ Other Critical of Sensitive Area ❑ Planning Areas ❑ Urban Reserve ❑ Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area ❑ Paradise Urban Reserve. ❑ Oroville Area Land Use Plan (Adopted 3/29/84) ❑ Oroville Urban Reserve ❑ Chico Area Land Use Plan (Adopted 3/18/90) ❑ Chico Urban Reserve ❑ Gridley -Biggs Land Use Plan (Adopted 8/586) ❑ Gridley Urban Reserve ❑ Honcut Area ❑ Cohasset Area ❑ Palermo Area ❑ Chapman/Mulberry Planning Area (in process of adoption 9-14-99) ❑ Deer Herd Areas ❑ Designated Development Zone ❑ Winter Range ❑ Critical Winter Range ❑ Summer Range ❑ Critical Summer Range ❑ Major Migration Corridor ❑ Intermediate Deer Range ❑ If Constrained, The Minimum Parcel Size Is acres. ❑ CLUP Area ❑ AIRPORT AREA OF INFLUENCE ❑ Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan ❑ Chico ❑ Paradise Skypark ❑ Paradise Skypark ❑ Ranchero ❑ Ranchero ❑ Oroville ❑ Oroville ❑ Airport Land Use Commission Review (ALUC) Required r:. ❑ Urban Area (As def"A in Improvement Standards for Chap(020) ❑ City of Chico ❑ Durham ❑ City of Gridley ❑ City of Oroville ❑ Mountain Recreational Area ❑ Sphere of Influence ❑ City of Chico ❑ City of Gridley ❑ City of Oroville ❑ City of Biggs ❑ City of Paradise ❑ Watershed Areas . ❑ Butte Creek ❑ Cherokee ❑ Big Chico Creek ❑ Wyman Ravine Study Area ❑ Little Chico Creek ❑ Rock Creek Study Area ❑ Sacramento River Conservation (SB1086) Essential Services ❑ Public Water District ❑ Well(s) ❑ Public Sewer District ❑ On-site Sewer If well and/or on-site sewage disposal, has Environmental Health determined the application filing requirements? ❑ Pre -application review complete ❑ Pre -application review not required El Drainage District/CSA ❑ Fire District ❑ Butte County ❑ El Medio Fire District n Federal Aid Roads). ❑ Other Permits required from other agencies ❑ Department of Water Resources (DWR) ❑ Department of Fish and Game (DFG) ❑ CALTRANS ❑ Regional Water Quality Control Board ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Butte County Air Quality Control District ❑ Other Comments: Version: 9/28/99 C:Wy DocumentsTROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST.doc Agency Special Review ❑ Office of Mine Reclamation ❑ Department of Fish and Game ❑ HCD (Mobile Home Parks) ❑ Other APPLICATION ACTIVITY LOG Action* Person Contacted** Phone Number** Time Spent/Date *Use more than one line if necessary. **If applicable. APPLICATION ACTIVITY LOG .;< BUTTE COUNTY NOY 15 2004 -AT&T DEVEI,OPME,NT AT&T Wireless Services SERVICES November 8, 2004 Mr. Steve Betts Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 RE: AP1V: 022-170-066 �2 PERMIT: MUP 00-11 AT&T Site Name North Gridley Site #C018 B Street and Hwy 99 Dear Mr. Betts, As you discussed recently with Ms. Rochelle Harry, AT&T Wireless is in the process of replacing three existing antennas and adding coax cable at an existing communications site located at the parcel listed above. No additional height or other modifications will be made to the tower. The replacement antennas will be painted to match the existing ones. I've enclosed drawing for your review. AT&T will be performing a. tower analysis to insure the structural integrity of the existing pole. Upon completion of this analysis, AT&T will be applying for the appropriate building permits. It is my understanding that no additional zoning approvals are necessary as the project satisfies substantial compliance with zoning requirements. If this is correct, please sign the attached copy of this letter where indicated and return in the enclosed -self-addressed stamped envelope. Please feel free to call me with any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, asil M. Rudnick Site Acquisition Consultant 916.769.7400 Acknowledged: Butte County Planning Division Planner Name: ej�'���.e�n *4s Signed: Date: MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 0 9 2000 DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) MUP 00-11 PERMIT NO. 022-170-066 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: AT&T Wireless Services is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: Minor Use Permit to install twelve (12), eight (8) square foot (1 -foot wide x 8 feet long) panel antennas on an existing 150 -foot tall monopole tower at the 110 -foot level, and to install a 240 square foot (12 feet X 20 feet) equipment shelter. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 12 months of the date of approval. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of approval, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. A Minor Use Permit subject to lapse may be renewed for an additional period of up to one year, provided that sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for renewal of the Minor Use Permit is filed with the Planning Division on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a permit. i Conditions of Approval: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing monopole. 2. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. 3. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 5. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. 6. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 7. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 8. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 9. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the Facility, the applicant shall obtain a detailed estimate from an appropriate building industry business or contractor for the removal of the Facility, including the proper disposal of all removed materials and the return of site to its original condition. A copy of the estimate shall be submitted to the Building Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of removal of the Facility, proper disposal of all removed materials, and return of the site to its original condition in the event that such Facility is abandoned, or if the permit has been terminated for violation of its conditions by the County after hearing, or has expired, and after notice has been given to the owner/operator by the County, no application for renewal has been filed. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 13. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 14. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 15. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 16. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 17. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 18. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit I" and date-stamped February 16, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 19. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 20. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. 21. Obtain the necessary building permits from the Building Division. Caltrans 22. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the existing gate on the site access road shall be moved further away from the edge of the State Route 99 traveled way by at least 3.6 meters as requested by Caltrans in their March 9, 2000 letter. NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Buildi• g and Health Department permits before starting const n o does i waiv y Cher requ dements. �� / Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF Assessor's Office Caltrans 4' SHEET NUMBER DESCRIPTION REV T1 TITLE SHEET 1 G1 GENERAL NOTES 1 Al OVERALL SITE PLAN 1 A2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN & [EI & [NI ANTENNA LAYOUTS 1 A3 SITE ELEVATIONS 1 A4 DETAILS 1 AS DETAILS 1 E1 GROUNDING DETAILS AND ELECTRICAL NOTES 1 ELECTRICAL WIRING (TURNING DOWN) BACKBOARD OHC OVERHEAD CONDUIT VL RECEPTACLE [N] NEW [E] EXISTING SPECIAL , RECEPTACLE r eDETAIL REFERENCE 6 OUADRAPLEX RECEPTACLE A-2 SYMBOL MASTER GROUND BAR ® SMOKE 1 ELEVATION R=FERENCE ISSUED FOR: CONSTRUCTION A-2 SHEET INDEX AT&T WIRELESS.SERVICES C01 8 NORTH GRIDLEY HIGHWAY 99 & B STREET GRIDLEY, CA. 95917 MONOPOLE/SHELTER APPLICANT: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE RANCHO CORDOVA. CA 95570 APPLICANT AGENT: STRATEGIC REAL ESTATE SERVICES. INC FOR GENERAL DYNAMICS WIRELESS SERVICES 10370 OLD PLACERVILLE ROAD #106 SACRAMENTO, CA 95827 CONTACT: DAVID FEIN PHONE: 916-857-1350 FAX: 916-857-1352 ARCHITECT: KOC ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS P.C. 4720 200TH STREET SW, SUITE #200 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 CONTACT: ERIC CAMP PHONE: 425-670-8651 FAX: 425-712-0846 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: KOC ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS P.C. 4720 200TH STREET SW. SUITE #200 LYNNWOOD. WA 98036 CONTACT: ERIC CAMP PHONE: 425-670-8651 FAX: 425-712-0846 PROPERTY INFORMATION SITE TYPE: MONOPOLE/SHELTER OWNER: AMERICAN TOWER SITE #82517 9828 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE, SUITE A SACRAMENTO. CA 95827 CONTACT: BASIL RUDWICK PHONE: 916-769-7400 ZONING: UNAVAILABLE ZONING JURISDICTION: BUTTE COUNTY AREA OF CONSTRUCTION: NONE AP NUMBER: 220-170-064 HANDICAP REOUIREMENTS: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESS NOT REQUIRED. PROJECT DIRECTORY — — — PROPERTY LINE EY SAFETY SWITCH QI + 0 PANEL BOARD —E—E E— ELECTRICAL SERVICE oo° a�11 0 0 OELECTRIC METER —T—T— TELCO SERVICE VICINITY MAP ELECTRICAL WIRING From Sacramento Metropolitan Airport: (TURNING UP) OND GROUNDING �� ELECTRICAL WIRING (TURNING DOWN) BACKBOARD OHC OVERHEAD CONDUIT VL RECEPTACLE [N] NEW [E] EXISTING SPECIAL , RECEPTACLE r eDETAIL REFERENCE 6 OUADRAPLEX RECEPTACLE A-2 SYMBOL MASTER GROUND BAR ® SMOKE 1 ELEVATION R=FERENCE DETECTOR A-2 SYMBOL f I GROUND ATTACHMENT f LEGEND THISPROPOSAL IS FOR THE MODIFICATION OF AN EXISTING UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY, CONSISTING OF ADDING NEW KATHREIN 739-648 ANTENNAS. (1) PER SECTOR, (3) TOTAL. NEW COAX ROUTE TO FOLLOW EXISTING ROUTE TO EXISTING EOUIPMENT CABINETS BELOW. I PROJECT SUMMARY DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES -' AT&T 0018 NORTH GRIDLEY HIGHWAY 99 & B STREET GRIDLEY, CA 95917 MONOPOLE/SHELTER Hk NI ISSU UAI : 10/15/2004 ISSUED FOR: CONSTRUCTION on, .—nwrr. QO 10/05/2004 ISSUED FOR 90% CO REVIEW JDM QI 10/15/2004 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION SIT oo° a�11 0 0 i 1 VICINITY MAP From Sacramento Metropolitan Airport: Turn RIGHT (South-West) onto Airport Blvd 1.7 mi Continue (South) on Romp 0.2 mi Merge onto 1-5 (East) 2.2 mi At 1-5 SR -70 Exit, turn off onto Romp 0.9 m; Merge onto SR -70 [SR -99] (North) 12.3 m Bear LEFT (North-West) onto SR -99 [Lourel Ave] 42.1 mi Turn LEFT (West) onto Local rcad(s) 87 yds DRIVING DIRECTIONS -' AT&T 0018 NORTH GRIDLEY HIGHWAY 99 & B STREET GRIDLEY, CA 95917 MONOPOLE/SHELTER Hk NI ISSU UAI : 10/15/2004 ISSUED FOR: CONSTRUCTION on, .—nwrr. QO 10/05/2004 ISSUED FOR 90% CO REVIEW JDM QI 10/15/2004 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION CJC GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE PROPOSED FACILITY WILL BE UNMANNED AND DOES NOT REQUIRE POTABLE WATER OR SEWER SERVICE. 2. THE PROPOSED FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND IS NOT FOR HUMAN HABITAT. (NO HANDICAP ACCESS IS REQUIRED) 3. OCCUPANCY IS LIMITED TO PERIODIC MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION, APPROXIMATELY 2 TIMES PER MONTH. 4. NO NOISE. SMOKE. DUST OR ODOR WILL RESULT FROM THIS PROPOSAL 5. CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS. TOOLS. EQUIPMENT, SAFETY EOUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION AND SERVICES NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL THE WORK OUTLINED IN THE DRAWINGS. SPECIFICATIONS. SCOPES OF WORK, BILL OF MATERIALS. AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENT. ISSUED BY GENERAL DYNAMICS AND AWS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL AND NATIONAL CODES. REGULATIONS AND SAFETY REGULATIONS. ALL OSHA REGULATIONS, ALL PUBLIC AND MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES. AND ANY UTILITY COMPANIES REGULATIONS AND DIRECTIVES. 7. ALL MATERIALS SUPPLIED BY THE OWNER, OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. AND THE CONTRACTOR, SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL AND NATIONAL CODES. LAWS. ORDINANCES. REGULATIONS AND AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 8. ANY CONTRACTOR SUBMITTING BIDS ON ANY OF THE WORK IS REQUIRED TO VISIT EACH SITE PRIOR TO THE BID SUBMITTAL AND FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF/ HERSELF WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND UNDERSTAND THE SCOPE OF THE WORK INTENDED FOR THE PROJECT. THIS WILL BE PERFORMED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 9. THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE A GENERAL DIRECTIVE FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK. EXACT DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS MAY CHANGE IN THE FIELD. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY THE DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS AND REPORT ANY AND ALL DISCREPANCIES TO GENERAL DYNAMICS PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE RELATED WORK. ANY MINOR ERRORS AND OMISSIONS IN THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS DOES NOT EXCUSE THE CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLETING THE PROJECT AND IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS. 10. ALL SITES SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AND FREE OF DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS. ALL TRASH AND MATERIALS NO LONGER BEING USED AT THE SITE MUST BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF ON A DAILY BASIS. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PROCEED WITH ANY WORK AT THE SITE PRIOR TO A NOTICE TO PROCEED (NTP) BEING ISSUED AND A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING AT THE SITE HAVING TAKEN PLACE. 12. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A WRITTEN ONE-YEAR WARRANTY STARTING AT THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE SITE FROM THE SITE OWNER. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A DESIGNATED MANAGER ON SITE AT ALL TIMES THAT ANY WORK IS BEING PERFORMED. A SUBCONTRACTOR IS NOT DEFINED AS BEING A DESIGNATED MANAGER. 14. THE SUCCESSFUL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SCHEDULE. LIST OF ALL SUBCONTRACTORS WITH ADDRESSES, CELL PHONE NUMBERS AND HOME PHONE NUMBERS, VERIFICATION OF INSURANCE, ANY AND ALL PERTINENT LICENSES, AND AN ACCURATE SCHEDULE FOR THE PROJECT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A NTP. 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO KEEP A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE SET OF DRAWINGS. SPECIFICATIONS, SCOPE OF WORK, AND A BILL OF MATERIAL ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. THIS WILL BE REFERENCED AS THE AS -BUILT DRAWINGS AND MUST BE KEPT CURRENT ON ON DAILY BASIS. THIS IS IN ADDITION TO THE PERMIT SET. 16. A NEW AND CLEAN SET OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WILL BE USED TO TRANSFER THE INFORMATION FROM THE FIELD COPY OF THE AS -BUILT DRAWINGS TO A NEW COPY. THIS NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO GENERAL DYNAMICS WITH THE CLOSE OUT DOCUMENTS. 17. ON ANY CO -LOCATION SITE. THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL ASSIGNS ARE NOT TO USE EXISTING POWER OR TAMPER WITH ANY EQUIPMENT BELONGING TO ANY OTHER CARRIER. FAILURE TO ADHERE TO THIS WILL CAUSE IMMEDIATE DISMISSAL OF THE T CONTRACTOR FROM THE PROJECT. 18. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SCHEDULING ALL INSPECTIONS AND TESTING REQUIRED FOR EACH PROJECT. A 24-HOUR NOTIFICATION TO GENERAL DYNAMICS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTIONS AND TESTING. A FIELD COPY OF ALL INSPECTIONS AND TESTING REPORTS AS WELL AS TRUCK TICKETS. MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE WITHIN 24 -HOURS OF THE INSPECTION OR TEST. 19. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY ALL MATERIALS ISSUED TO THEM AND REPORT ANY SHORTAGES AND DISCREPANCIES TO GENERAL DYNAMICS AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL -STORE THESE MATERIALS PROPERLY, ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND IN A MANNER THAT WILL NOT VOID THE WARRANTY OF ANY ITEM. IF ANY ITEM IS DAMAGED OR UNUSABLE DUE TO IMPROPER HANDLING AND STORAGE. THE CONTRACTOR WILL REPLACE IT AT THEIR EXPENSE. 20. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO FURNISH PROPER FACILITIES FOR THE WORKERS ON EACH PROJECT FOR THE DURATION OF THAT PROJECT. 21. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE PRESENT CONDITION OF ANY EXISTING BUILDINGS. LANDSCAPING. FENCING, EQUIPMENT, WALKS, DRIVES. AND ATTACHMENTS. IF ANY DAMAGE SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO RESTORE THE DAMAGE TO A BETTER OR NEW CONDITION. ' 22. THE GENERAL DYNAMICS REPRESENTATIVE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO RELOCATE ANY EQUIPMENT WITHIN LOFT. OF THE LOCATION SPECIFIED ON THESE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION BY THE CONTRACTOR. 23. IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CAN NOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE GENERAL DYNAMICS REPRESENTATIVE. 24. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD MEASUREMENTS TO CONFIRM LENGTHS OF CABLE TRAYS AND ELECTRICAL LINES. 25. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL ELECTRICAL PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK AND ACCEPTANCE. PROVIDE CERTIFICATES TO THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER VERIFYING THAT THE WORK CONFORMS TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL CODES AND AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. 26. NO DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS IS ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE GENERAL DYNAMICS REPRESENTATIVE. FAILURE TO OBSERVE THIS RULE MAY RESULT IN THE CONTRACTOR CORRECTING THE INSTALLATION AT THEIR EXPENSE. 27. VERIFICATION THAT THE EXISTING TOWER CAN SUPPORT THE PROPOSED ANTENNA LOADING IS TO BE DONE BY OTHERS. 28. PROVIDE SUPPORTS FOR THE ANTENNA CABLES TO THE ELEVATION OF ALL THE INITIAL AND FUTURE ANTENNAS. ANTENNA CABLES ARE TO BE SUPPORTED AND RESTRAINED AT THE CENTERS SUITABLE TO THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. 1 1 GENERAL NOTES Q 10/05/2004 ISSUED FOR 90% CD REVIEW JDM Q 10/15/2004 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION CJC THIS IS NOT A SITE SURVEY ALL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES, ORIENTATION OF TRUE NORTH AND STREET HALF -WIDTHS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM A TAX PARCEL MAP AND EXISTING DRAWINGS AND ARE APPROXIMATE. ANTENNA NOTE I. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING LUNUIIIUNS PRIUR IU UUNSIROC116N. 2. EXISTING ANTENNAS NOT SHOWN IN PIAN FOR CLARITY 3. REFER TO PLAN FOR ANTENNA LOCATIONS (2) NEW 1-5/8' COAX TO BE ADDED PER LOCATION FOLLOWING THE EXISTING ROUTE. z W m W I 0- Z - ZI o J Z O I N LJ X a L' n al o I W z Z p LL) W U Q ' � I ADJACENT - J PROPERTY LINE 2: Z J wl 0- 0 O EXISTING WATER VALVE 0' d LLJ zl U Q EXISTING 25'-0' Q PROPERTY LINE Bu7Lo1Nc SETBACK — O H 0 H O H O H _0k_—_ O H O H 0 H H O H— OH OH OH OH — PROPOSED H— PROPOSED I EXISTING OVERHEAD PROJECT I , POWER LINE (TYP) AREA EXISTING 12'-0• WIDE \ ACCESS GATE SEE A2 1J X _X X X 1 , • EXISTING AT&T 16'-0' WIDE ROLLING ACCESS x • I GATE EXISTING AT&T / 12'-0' X 20'-0" x I EQUIPMENT SHELTER = c I -? w u Z ISHIESTINGLTER EQUIPMENT Z x I w I m I I a1 I & I ri EXISTING AT&T x ANTENNA TO REMAIN * (TYP OF 6) I N 1 I x NEW AT&T KATHREIN EXISTING ICEBRIDCE 739-648 ANTENNA (TYP OF 3) (TO BE UTILIZED FOR NEW COAX RUN) - x EXISTING 150'-0' HIGH MONOPOLE [XISTING 6'-0• HIGH �•, I EXISTING OMNI HAINLINK FENCE ANTENNA (BY OTHERS, TYP OF 12) `X —X X X X X im-o I 37'-4'1 PROPE TY LINE TO C.L. OF NEW ANTENNAS APN #022-170-066 ATC #82517 11 OVERALL SITE PLAN z LLjW a LO z GO w L� O w L:) n w OH I OH d OH OH x O z W Q x 0_ O Z Z F- N X x W O W 0 w C.0 x b O W x O x O O O 0 EXISTING UTILITY POLE x O OH 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O z Z W W = Q O a 0 z N � W l� O W x � o 0 Ij I. I'SCALE:- T-10'-0' Qp 10/05/2004 ISSUED -FOR 90% CD REVIEW 3DM QI 10/15/2004 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION CJC 1 1 1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN sclux- Y SCALE o\g2iMuy p' C EXISTING AT&T TDMA ANTENNA TO REMAIN (TYP OF 6) FLPO EXISTING 150'-0' HIGH MONOPOLE DLISfTING ALLGON 7262.02 ANTENNAS TO REMAIN (TYP OF 3) 00 ja 10/05/2004 ANTENNA NOTE EXISTING AT&T Q ANTENNA MOUNT TO U > N� I I THIS IS NOT A SITE SURVEY ALL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES, ORIENTATION OF TRUE NORTH AND EXISTING ANTENNA LAYOUT I. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING a'°° ": m• scALE vaa-0• tmw-w STREET HALF -WIDTHS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM A TAX CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. I c PARCEL MAP AND EXISTING DRAWINGS AND ARE APPROXIMATE. 2. EXISTING ANTENNAS NOT SHOWN IN PLAN C FOR CLARITY ro I 3. REFER TO PLAN FOR ANTENNA LOCATIONS z (2) NEW 1-5/8' COAX TO BE ADDED PER LOCATION FOLLOWING THE EXISTING ROUTE. —x—x—z — x—x x x •� } /R EXISTING AT&T 16'-D' I WIDE ROLLING GATE / ' EXISTING 12'-0" WIDE ACCESS GATE / Ffl- / EXISTING AT&T GENERATOR x k RECEPTACLE I NEW AT&T I / MICROFLECT COAX ENTRY PORT #81449 I 1 3 EXISTING AT&T 12'-0' % 20'-0' I / AS A5 EOUIPMENT SHELTER I / NEW AT&T ICEBRIDGE TO MATCH EXISTING I ICEBRIDGE HEIGHT I 9 I i EXISTING AT&T ICEBRIDGE (TO BE UTILITZED FOR NEW RUNS OF (6) 1-5/8' COAX) IC I I 2 I EXISTING EDDIPMENT PROPOSED SHELTER . (BY OTHERS) x PROJECT AREA EXISTING 6'-0'I HIGH CHAIN LINK \ SEE nz FENCE \\`Illt EXISTING AT&T TDMA ANTENNA TO REMAIN ' (TYP OF 6) NEW AT&T KATHREIN 739-648 ANTENNA I (TYP OF 3) . I 3 I I, EXISTING 150'-0' ,�y/,h. \•O'• HIGH MONOPOLE o I o _ - 1 cZi o COAX--- x Lx—x—x—x-x —x-xx-x—x _� x—x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-z-x� L. . 24'-6' 1 1 1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN sclux- Y SCALE o\g2iMuy p' C EXISTING AT&T TDMA ANTENNA TO REMAIN (TYP OF 6) FLPO EXISTING 150'-0' HIGH MONOPOLE DLISfTING ALLGON 7262.02 ANTENNAS TO REMAIN (TYP OF 3) 00 ja 10/05/2004 ISSUED FOR 90% CD REVIEW EXISTING AT&T Q ANTENNA MOUNT TO U > N� I I REMAIN 2 EXISTING ANTENNA LAYOUT a'°° m• scALE vaa-0• tmw-w K N NOTE EXISTING ANTENNA PLATFORM AND EXISTING OMNI ANTENNAS NOT SHOWN IN PLAN FOR CLARITY JJv.NJJ\�S4V 0 �' C �\Oo ��I U � N ' c 3 PROPOSED ANTENNA LAYOUT EXISTING AT&T TDMA ANTENNA TO REMAIN (TYP OF 6) .NEW AT&T KATHREIN 739-648 ANTENNA (TYP OF 3) A4 P' 9 - EXISTING E%ISTING 150'-0" HIGH MONOPOLE EXISTING ALLCON 7262.02 ANTENNAS TO REMAIN (TYP OF 3) �- EXISTING AT&T ANTENNA MOUNT TO REMAIN r QO 10/05/2004 ISSUED FOR 90% CD REVIEW UDM Q 10/15/2004 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION CJC OQ 10/05/2004 ISSUED FOR 909 CO REVIEW UDM THIS IS NOT A SITE SURVEY ALL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. ORIENTATION OF TRUE NORTH AND ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION CJC STREET HALF-WIDTHS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM A TAX PARCEL MAP AND EXISTING DRAWINGS AND ARE APPROXIMATE. ANTENNA NOTE 1. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING T.O. OF EXISTING OMNI ANTENNAS (BY OTHERS) TO OF FYIGTINC. QUIVI ANTENNAS (BY OTHERS) 1 CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. Ififi'.-7':t 166'-7't L. LXISIINU ANTCNNAS NOT SHOWN IN PLAN \\ FOR CLARITY EXISTING OMNI Y ANTENNA (BOTHERS, EXISTING OMNI 3. REFER TO PLAN FOR ANTENNA LOCATIONS TYP OF 12) ANTENNA (BY OTHERS, (2) NEW 1-5/8' COAX TO BE ADDED PER TYP OF 12) LOCATION FOLLOWING THE EXISTING ROUTE. T.O. OF EXISTING MONOPOLE T.O. OF EXISTING MONOPOLE %1 150'-0"t 150'-0"t T.O. OF EXISTING OMNI ANTENNAS (BY OTHERS) T.O. OF EXISTING OMNI ANTENNAS (BY OTHERS) 136' 136'-Tt NEW AT&T KATHREIN 739-648 ANTENNA - (TYP OF 3) ' EXISTING AT&T EXISTING AT&T ANTENNA TO REMAIN ANTENNA TO REMAIN (ttP OF 6) (ttP OF 6) F EXISTING AT&T ANTENNAS T.O. O3't C.L. OF PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNAS T.O. OEXISTING AT&T ANTENNAS OF PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNAS C.L.F 112'- 112'-J'3 112'-3"f - -' 112'-3't C.L. OF E%ISTING AT&T ANTENNAS C.L. OF PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNAS 110'-0'3 C.L. OF EXISTING AT&T ANTENNAS 110'-0't C.L. OF PROPOSED AT&T VI NNAS $ 110'-0"t 110'-0"t EXISTING AT&T ANTENNAS C.L. OF PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNAS 8.0. E%ISTING AT&T ANTENNAS C.L. OF PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNAS 10T-9"f 107-9" 10T-9"t - 107'-9" NEW AT&T KATHREIN _ 739-648 ANTENNA (TYP OF 3) NEW (6) RUNS OF 1-5/8' COAX (2) NEW (6) RUNS OF 1-5/8' COAX (2) RUNS PER SECTORS WITHIN EXISTING RUNS PER SECTORS WITHIN EXISTING ' MONOPOLE MONOPOLE ' EXISTING 150'-0" HIGH EXISTING 150'-0" HIGH MONOPOLE MONOPOLE EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER (BY OTHERS) EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER (BY OTHERS) EXISTING ICEBRIDGE (TO BE UTILIZED FOR EXISTING AT&T 12'-0" EXISTING ICEBRIDGE E%ISTING AT&T 12'-0 NEW COAX RUN) X 20'-0" EQUIPMENT (TO BE UTILIZED FOR X 20'-0" EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEW COAX RUN) SHELTER EXISTING 6'-0" HIGH NEW AT&T ICEBRIDGE CHAIN LINK FENCEE%ISTING 6'- HIGH TO MATCH EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE ICEBRIDGE HEIGHT a - GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE 0'-0" 0'-0" 0'-0' 1 SOUTH'.> ELEVATION 5' '°' 2°' a'X98 BCAL.E° :Z.- 2 EAST ELEVATION 5' '°' 2°' °''7 SCALE- X,T scaLE:: >•�� : >•�� -W OQ 10/05/2004 ISSUED FOR 909 CO REVIEW UDM A 10/15/2004 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION CJC OPTIONAL DOWNTILT BRACKET 1 1 ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL 1�NOTE: `PANEL ANTENNA (TYP) SECTOR A VERIFY WITH RF DATA 4.60" SHEET NOTES AZIMUTH =50' X PIPE MOUNT (TYP) �''m ]).THE NUMBER OF VALMONT MICROFLECT CONNECTORS WILL VARY ,r ] PART #81478 OR BASED ON ANTENNA TYPE. APPROVED EQUAL ANTENNA PARTS: T.B.D. ITEM OTY DESCRIPTION ANTENNA QUANTITY 7 1 KATHREIN 738546 BRACKET I EXISTING 1 NEW 4 1 NEW 2O 1 (OR 110'-O"t 7}8546 - IF NO DOWNTILT 2. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY NEED FOR DUPLEXER/DIPLEXER AND VERIFY WITH CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT PARTS LIST AND DOWN TILT ANTENNA INSTALLATION WITH MANUFACTURERS 0' 0' SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 1 1 ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL 1�NOTE: MARKING LOCATIONS SECTOR A TAPE 4.60" LOCATIONS 1. DRAWING SCHEMATIC ONLY TYPICAL OF EACH ANTENNA, VERIFY WITH FINAL RF AZIMUTH =50' X BEFORE ANTENNA ANTENNA MODEL EXISTING EXISTING KATHREIN EXISTING DATA SHEET. MANUFACTURE ANTENNA T.B.D. 739-648 T.B.D. X ANTENNA QUANTITY 1 EXISTING I EXISTING 1 NEW SUPPORT PIPE 1 NEW RAD CENTER 110'-O"t 110'-O"t 11 o' -0'f 2. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY NEED FOR DUPLEXER/DIPLEXER AND VERIFY WITH NOT USED DOWN TILT 0' 0' 0' 0' 8. FINAL RF DATA SHEET PRIOR TO INSTALL (SHOWN ON SCHEMATIC FOR X DOWNTILT BRACKET CABLE SIZE (1) EXISTING 1-5/8' INFORMATION ONLY). (1) EXISTING 1-5/8" BY ANTENNA CABLE LENGTH 175'-0"t 175'-0"f 175'-0't 175'-O"t 350'-0'3 MANUFACTURER BLUE BLUE BLUE BLUE 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY NFFD FnP TlAAS' gn1Q %icnIFY WITH FINAL RF DATA POS 1 POS 2 POS 3 POS 4 POS 5 SHEET PRIOR TO INSTALL (SHOWN ON SCHEMATIC FOR INFORMATION ONLY). FRONT SIDE PERSPECTIVE ANTENNA KATHREIN 739-648 WIND AREA = 4.46 SOFT. WEIGHT = 26.00 LBS (11.8 KG) 2 1 ANTENNA DETAIL 4 13 1 ANTENNA SCHEDULE OAX ROUTE TO V [E) ROUTE 'ER PLAN) EXISTING TYPICAL ANTENNA / SECTOR CABLE MARKING TAGS ALL RF CABLE SHALL BE MARKED AS PER CABLE MARKING LOCATIONS TABLE BELOW: CABLE MARKING LOCATIONS SECTOR A TAPE TOTAL NEW LOCATIONS 1. AZIMUTH =50' X BEFORE ANTENNA ANTENNA MODEL EXISTING EXISTING KATHREIN EXISTING 3. MANUFACTURE T.B.D. T.B.D. 739-648 T.B.D. X ANTENNA QUANTITY 1 EXISTING I EXISTING 1 NEW 1 EXISTING 1 NEW RAD CENTER 110'-O"t 110'-O"t 11 o' -0'f 110'-0"3 NOT USED DOWN TILT 0' 0' 0' 0' 8. X X (2) NEW I-5/8' CABLE SIZE (1) EXISTING 1-5/8' (1) EXISTING 1-5/8" (2) EXISTING1-5/8" (1) EXISTING 1-5/8" 2 NEW CABLE LENGTH 175'-0"t 175'-0"f 175'-0't 175'-O"t 350'-0'3 13 1 ANTENNA SCHEDULE OAX ROUTE TO V [E) ROUTE 'ER PLAN) EXISTING TYPICAL ANTENNA / SECTOR CABLE MARKING TAGS ALL RF CABLE SHALL BE MARKED AS PER CABLE MARKING LOCATIONS TABLE BELOW: CABLE MARKING LOCATIONS SECTOR 8 TAPE TOTAL NEW LOCATIONS 1. AZIMUTH = 190' X BEFORE ANTENNA ANTENNA MODEL EXISTING KATHREIN EXISTING 3. MANUFACTURE T.B.D. T.B.D. 739-648 T.B.D. X ANTENNA QUANTITY 1 EXISTING 1 EXISTING 1 NEW 1 EXISTING 1 NEW RAD CENTER I10' -0"t 110'-O"t 11 0'-O'± 110'-0"t NOT USED DOWN TILT 0' 0' IT 0" 8. X X (2) NEW 1-5/8' CABLE SIZE (1) EXISTING 1-5/8" (1) EXISTING 1-5/8" G (2) EXISTIN1-5/8" (i) EXISTING 1-5/8" 2 NEW CABLE LENGTH 175'-O't 175'-0"t 175'-0"t 175'-0"3 350'-0't 13 1 ANTENNA SCHEDULE OAX ROUTE TO V [E) ROUTE 'ER PLAN) EXISTING TYPICAL ANTENNA / SECTOR CABLE MARKING TAGS ALL RF CABLE SHALL BE MARKED AS PER CABLE MARKING LOCATIONS TABLE BELOW: CABLE MARKING LOCATIONS SECTOR C TAPE TOTAL NEW LOCATIONS 1. AZIMUTH =290' X BEFORE ANTENNA ANTENNA MODEL EXISTING KATHREIN EXISTING 3. MANUFACTURE T.B.D. T.B.D. 739-648 T.B.D. X ANTENNA QUANTITY 1 EXISTING 1 EXISTING 1 NEW 1 EXISTING 1 NEW CERAD 110'-0"t 110'-0"t 110'-O'3 110'-O"3 NOT USED DOWN TILT 0' 0' 0' 0' 8. X X (2) NEW I-5/8" CABLE SIZE (1) EXISTING 1-5/8" (1) EXISTING 1-5/8" (2) EXISTING t-5/8' (1) EXISTING 1-5/8" 2 NEW CABLE LENGTH 175'-0"t 175'-0"t 175'-0't 175'-O"t 350'-O"t 13 1 ANTENNA SCHEDULE OAX ROUTE TO V [E) ROUTE 'ER PLAN) EXISTING TYPICAL ANTENNA / SECTOR CABLE MARKING TAGS ALL RF CABLE SHALL BE MARKED AS PER CABLE MARKING LOCATIONS TABLE BELOW: CABLE MARKING LOCATIONS NO. TAPE TAG LOCATIONS 1. X X BEFORE ANTENNA 2. X TDMA AFTER TMA (AS NEEDED) 3. X ONE BEFORE TMA (AS NEEDED) 4. X X END OF MAIN COAX 5. X X INSIDE OF BULKHEAD 6. X RED NOT USED 7. X X NOT USED 8. X X AT BTS SECTOR C GAMMA 18 1-6 5 1 2 3 4 6 17 7 16 1E 8 SECTOR Bg SECTOR A BETA 14 ALPHA 13-18 13 tp 7-12 12 11 NOTE: VERIFY FINAL SITE CONFIGURATION WITH RF DATA SHEET/ ENGINEER. ANTENNA POSITION AND CABLE DEFINITION CABLE MARKING COLOR CONVENTION TABLE TECHNOLOGY TYPE POS 7 POS 8 POS 9 POS 10 POS 11 POS 12 SECTOR UMTS 1900 T8 TDMA 850 T9 ALPHA, A, X ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX RED RED RED RED RED RED POS 13 POS 14 POS 15 POS 16 POS 17 POS 18 SECTOR B BETA, B. Y ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX BLUE BLUE BLUE BLUE BLUE BLUE POS 1 POS 2 POS 3 POS 4 POS 5 POS 6 SECTOR GAMMA, C, Z ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN POS 19 POS 20 POS 21 POS 22 POS 23 POS 24 SECTOR DELTA, D, W ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX YELLOW YELLOW YELLOW YELLOW YELLOW YELLOW NOTE: 1. USING COLOR BANDS ON THE CABLES, MARK ALL RF CABLE BY SECTOR AND CABLE NUMBER AS SHOWN ON "CABLE MARKING COLOR CONVENTION TABLE" (EXAMPLE SECTOR ALPHA, CABLE A3 WOULD BE THREE RED BANDS). 2. THE STANDARD CABLE MARKING TAPE IS BASED ON THE "4 NEMA" COLORED TAPES - RED, BLUE, GREEN AND YELLOW. 3. ON EXISTING SITE THE COLOR CODING SHALL FOLLOW THE EXISTING MARKET COLOR CODING. 4. IN THE ABSENCE OF AN EXISTING COLOR CODING AND TAGGING SCHEME, OR WHEN INSTALLING NEW COAXIAL CABLES, THIS GUIDELINE IS TO BE' IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE REGARDLESS OF TECHNOLOGY. NOTE: IF THERE IS NO EXISTING COLOR CODING REFER TO WNS-217 BRASS TAG LOCATIONS PER ABOVE DIAGRAM CALLOUT FOR ANTENNA # POSITION U9 CALLOUT FOR TECHNOLOGY LINE BRASS TAG CABLE CODE TECHNOLOGY TYPE G9 GSM 1900 G8 GSM 850 U9 UMTS 1900 T8 TDMA 850 T9 TDMA 1900 4 1 CABLE MARKING SCHEMATIC AND NOTES OQ 10/05/2004 ISSUED FOR 90% CD REVIEW JDM Q1 10/15/2004 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION CJC Q 10/05/2004 ISSUED FOR 90% CD REVIEW JDM Q 10/15/2004 NOTE: CJC EXISTING WALL (VARIOUS TYPES) 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE (6) 1-5/8" WEATHER PROOF BOOTS FOR NEW COAX RUNS. MICROFLECT 81449 WAVEGUIDE 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISCONNECT OPERATING ENTRY PANEL (6 PORTS). SEAL ANTENNAS. G ALL EDGES USING MICROFLECT 8184 SEALING TAPE AND MICROFLECT B195 _ - - - ' ALUMILASTIC SEALANT, TYP, COAXIAL CABLE(S) PER PLAN. USE MICROFLEXT WAVEGUIDE BOOT AT CABLE ENTRIES AND SEALING CAP AT SPARE OPENINGS, TYP. NEW MICROFLECT ENTRY PORT 1449 WHERE FIRESTOPPING IS REOUIRED. INSTALL INTERIOR WAVEGUIDE ENTRY ANDFILL VOID BETWEEN ENTRIES ® ® ® WITH KBS SEAL BAGS BY IPC .e (800-334-8796). (UL 1479. 3 HR. a RATED) NEW (6) RUNS OF 1-5/e" COAX (2) EXTERIOR ' w " RUNS PER SECTOR ® ® . d ANCHORAGE: AT CONCRETE USE HIITI KWIK BOLT II 304 SSCF 14-134 T W/1-1/8" MIN. EMBEDMENT; AT WOOD OR METAL USE #14 SS SCREWS FURNISHED BY MFR., TYP. (12 PLACES) SAW CUT WALL OPENING PER . PORT MANUFACTURER SPECS. 1 NEW ENTRY PORT 3 COAX PORT DETAIL 4 NOT USED SCALE- K a CUT POST LENGTH TO SUIT BY ' REMOVING UNCAPPED END 12" WIDE ICE BRIDGE CUT ICE BRIDGE CHANNEL - LENGTH TO SUIT (SEE NOTES) 0 0 0 0 m m z x TRAPEZE KIT w :2 < (2) TRAPEZE KITS ARE Z INCLUDED WITH ICE BRIDGE. a o ORDER ADDITIONAL TRAPEZE w I I KITS AS REQUIRED, TO o iv MAINTAIN MAXIMUM CABLE SPAN o " OF 3'-0" (TYP) - a z 3 0 ANTENNA CABLES _ ARRANGEMENT BY CONTRACTOR b•lO o ^ CONCRETE PIER .r 'Al 6 NOT USED 7 NOT USED 8 INOT USED INSTALL DRIP LOOP ON . ANTENNA CABLES AT BOTTOM OF TOWER/MONOPOLE. BENDING RADIUS PER MANUFACTURER'S STANDARDS NOTES: 1. WHEN USING COMPONENTS AS SHOWN IN STANDARD DETAILS. MAXIMUM - ALLOWABLE SPAN BETWEEN SUPPORTS ON A CONTINUOUS SINGLE , SECTION OF BRIDGE CHANNEL SHALL BE 9 FEET FOR 10 FEET BRIDGE ' CHANNEL. ' 2. WHEN USING COMPONENTS FOR SPLICING BRIDGE CHANNEL SECTIONS, THE SPLICE SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT THE SUPPORT, IF POSSIBLE, OR AT A MAXIMUM OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT. 3. WHEN USING COMPONENTS. SUPPORT SHOULD BE PROVIDED AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE ENDS OF ICE BRIDGES. WITH A MAXIMUM CANTILIVER DISTANCE OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT TO THE FREE END 4. OF THE ICE BRIDGE. CUT BRIDGE CHANNEL SECTIONS SHALL HAVE RAW EDGES TREATED WITH ' A MATERIAL TO RESTORE THESE EDGES TO THE ORIGINAL CHANNEL. OR - 5. EOUIVALENT, FINISH. ' ICE BRIDGES MAY BE CONSTRUCTED WITH COMPONENTS FROM OTHER MANUFACTURERS. PROVIDED THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION 6. GUIDELINES ARE FOLLOWED. DEVIATIONS FROM STANDARDS FOR COMPONENT INSTALLATIONS ARE 7. PERMITTED WITH THE RESPECTIVE MANUFACTURER'S APPROVAL. DEVIATIONS FROM ICE BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS REOUIRE ENGINEERING - APPROVAL. 9 ICEBRIDGE DETAIL 10 NOT USED SCALE 11 NOT USED 12 NOT USED Q 10/05/2004 ISSUED FOR 90% CD REVIEW JDM Q 10/15/2004 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION CJC NOTES i� 10/05/2004 ISSUED FOR 90% CD REVIEW JDM 1. DO NOT INSTALL CABLE GROUND KIT AT A BEND AND ALWAYS 10/15/2004 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION CJC DIRECT GROUND WIRE DOWN TO ANTENNA GROUND BAR. NOTES: ANTENNA GROUND BAR 1) ANTENNA INCLUDES A FEMALE 2. WEATHER PROOFING SHALL BE TWO—PART TAPE KIT. COLD TO ANTENNA W/0 INSULATORS, BONDED DIN CONNECTOR SHRINK SHALL NOT BE USED. DIRECTLY TO THE TOP OF MONOPOLE MONOPOLE SEE NOTE 1. - 2) JUMPER CABLE INCLUDES (2)—MALE MALE DIN TO ANTENNAS SEE DETAIL 005 (SIMILAR) DIN CONNECTORS CONNECTOR STANDARD GROUND 3) SURGE ARRESTOR INCLUDES (2)—FEMALE FEMALE DIN - KIT (TYP•)� - - - - - DIN CONNECTORS - CONNECTOR ANTENNA GROUND BAR W/O INSULATORS. ANTENNA WEATHERPROOFING #6 AWG (PROVIDED MOUNTED HORIZONTAL INSIDE OUTSIDE RXVTXIRXIK P.) WITH GROUND KIT TYP.) BELOW EXIT PORT SEE I . NOTE t, SFF DFTAII Of15 F,ARINFT f,ARINFT COAX JUMPERD KIT (IYP.) COAX EXIT PORT yt" JUMPER CABLE (TYp FORALL)EXOTHERMIC WELD )j2 AWG BCW MALE DIN ANDREW CONNECTOR TO SHELTER SOLID TINNED APTDC—BDFDF—WB CONNECTOR VIA TRAY OR (2 PLACES) SURGE ARRESTOR OR WEATHERPROOFING KIT (TYP.) SEE NOTE 2 A GROUND ICEBRIDGE MONOPOLE PIER #2 AWG BCW RING GROUND SOLID TINNEDTHOUT APPROVED EQUAL MALE DIN CONNECTOR (TYPICAL OF 2)ANTENNA CABLEORS. BONGED COAX CABLE Y TO TOP OFMAIN TO BTS EOUIPMENT OR TOWER. NOTE: FEMALE DIN CONNECTORLE FEMALE DIN (TYP.) 1. NUMBER OF GROUND BARS MAY VARY DEPENDING ON THE FEMALE DIN CONNECTOR CONNECTOR TYPE OF MONOPOLE, ANTENNA LOCATION AND CONNECTION MALE DIN CONNECTOR ORIENTATION. PROVIDE AS REQUIRED. CONNECTION OF GROUND WIRE TO )4" JUMPER TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR GROUND BAR, TOWER/MONOPOLE 1 GROUND BAR AT ANTENNAS PRE 2 1 MONOPOLE GROUND DETAIL: 3 1 NOT USED 4 1 CONNECTION DIAGRAM , MITI #6 AWG FROM ANTENNA CABLE GROUND KIT GROUND BAR 5 2 4 0 0 7/16*2' � 3/ ° ° o� ANTENNA CABLE 12" TO 24" ON WALL, ICE y o or o° o ° BRIDGE, FLOOR o ®° o o 3 WEATHERPROOFING KIT 2 1/2"o MAX. OR ON ANTENNA ° 0 o I SEE DETAIL 005 (SEE NOTE 3) TOWER 1 CABLE GROUND KIT LEGEND #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER GROUND WIRE (GROUNDED TO GROUND BAR) 1— COPPER GROUND BAR'(."4"X 20", NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. (SEE NOTE 1 & 2) 0 CAT. NO. B-6142 OR EQUAL. HOLE CENTERS TO MATCH NEMA DOUBLE LUG CONFIGURATION. (ACTUAL GROUND BAR SIZE WILL 0 O O O O O O O O OO VARY BASED ON NUMBER OF GROUND CONNECTIONS) CONNECTION OF CABLE GROUND KIT TO ANTENNA CABLE ------------ 2— INSULATORS, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CAT. NO. 3061-4 OR EQUAL 3— 5/8" LOCKWASHERS. NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. NOTES: 'TWO HOLE LUG, OR GROUND CONDUCTOR EXOTHERMIC WELD TO BE CAT. NO. 3015-8 OR EQUAL 1. DO NOT INSTALL CABLE GROUND KIT AT A BEND AND ALWAYS SHALL BE ELIMINATED USED WITH /J2 AWG BCW TO WHEN GROUND BAR IS 4— WALL MOUNTING BRACKET, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. DIRECT GROUND WIRE DOWN TO GROUND BAR. BUILDING SERVICE GROUND OR ELECTRICALLY BONDED TO CAT NO. A-6056 OR EQUAL 2. GROUNDING KIT SHALL BE ANDREW SUREGROUND TYPE KIT WITH GROUND RING METAL TOWER/MONOPOLETWO—HOLE 5— 5/8-11 X 1" HHCS BOLTS, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. LUG. STRUCTURE CAT N0. 3012-1 OR EQUAL ' 3. WEATHER PROOFING SHALL BE TWO—PART TAPE KIT, COLD SHRINK *GROUND BARS AT THE BOTTOM OF TOWERS/MONOPOLES 6— INSULATORS SHALL BE ELIMINATED WHEN BONDING DIRECTLY TO SHALL NOT BE USED. SHALL ONLY USE EXOTHERMIC WELDS. TOWER/MONOPOLE STRUCTURE. CONNECTION TO TOWER/MONOPOLE STRUCTURE SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. e 5 GROUND BAR CONNECTIONS 6 GROUND BAR DETAIL 7 CABLE GROUNDING DETAIL , I. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 8. WHEN SUPPLYING POWER FROM AN EXISTING PANELBOARD, PROVIDE NEW LATEST EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. CIRCUITRY PROTECTION DEVICE TO MATCH THE EXISTING PANELBOARD TYPE AND ' A.I.C. RATING AND AS NECESSARY TO MEET THE CIRUIT REQUIREMENTS SHOWN 2. CONFORM WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. THE ON THE DRAWINGS. NEW CIRUIT BREAKERS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND STATE CODES AND THE LATEST EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. AND UTILITY GUIDELINES. _REGULATIONS. 9. REARRANGE CIRCUITING AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE A BALANCED LOAD ACROSS 3. PERFORM ALL VERIFICATION, OBSERVATIONS, TESTING AND EXAMINATION OF, ALL PHASES OF PANELBORADS INVOLVED WITH THE PROJECT. WORK PRIOR TO THE OREDERING OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION. ISSUE A WRITTEN NOTICE OF ALL THE FINDINGS TO THE 10. PERMANENTLY TAG E4CH CONDUCTOR OF EACH SYSTEM IN EACH CONSTRUCTION MANAGER LISTING ALL MALFUNCTIONS, FAULTY EQUIPMENT AND PANELBOARD, PULL BOX, J—BOX, SWITCH BOX, ETC. DISCREPANCIES. 11. ALL CIRCUIT BREAKERS, FUSES AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL HAVE AN 4. MINIMIZE DISRUPTION TO EXISTING SERVICES WHERE NEW WIRING WILL BE INTERUPPTING SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT RATING EXCEEDING THAT TO WHICH THEY . CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING. ARRANGE WITH THE OWNER FOR A SHUTDOWN MAY BE SUBJECTED, (AS NOTED ON DRAWINGS), AND A MINIMUM 10,000 A.I.C. PERIOD SATISFACTORY TO BOTH PARTIES. 12. ALL INSULATED GROUND CABLE TO BE GREEN STRANDED COPPER. 5. ALL WIRING SHALL BE SIZED AS INDICATED, WITH A MINIMUM 60DV THHN _ INSULATION. ALL NEW WIRING SHALL BE COLOR CODED COPPER, MINIMUM #12 13. PROVIDE A SEPERATE GROUND WIRE IN ALL RACEWAYS AND CABLES. AWC THHN AND MINIMUM x/10 AWC OVER 75 FEET UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WIRE SHALL BE RUN CONCEALED IN EMT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONCEALED 14. ALL EXPOSED CIRCUITS SHALL BE ALIGNED WITH EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND AC -90 CAN BE USED FOR DROP DOWNS FROM OUTLET TO EQUIPMENT AND IN STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS. CONDUITS SHALL NOT BE RUN PARALLEL TO HOT WATER PARTITIONS UNLESS PROHIBITED BY CODE OR OTHERWISE NOTED. AC -90 MAY BE OR STEAM LINES. WHERE THE CONDUITS CROSS OVER EXISTING CONDUITS OR RUN UP TO 20 FEET IN CEILING SPACE. ALL AC -90 AND CONDUIT SHALL BE LINES, THE CONDUITS SHALL BE FASTENED WITH A 4' SEPERATION, MINIMUM. SUPPORTED AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE ABOVE CEILING TO ALLOW REMOVAL OF ALL CEILING TILES AND LUMINARIES ETC. CABLES ARE NOT PERMITTED TO REST UPON 15. ALL PANELBOARD DIRECTORIES INVOLVED WITH THE PROJECT SHALL BE SUSPENDED CEILING. UPDATED AND REPRINTED TO REFLECT ALL CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION/ RENOVATION. 6. ALL WIRING, DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE NEW AND UL APPROVED. EQUIPMENT OF THE SAME TYPE SHALL BE OF THE SAME MANUFACTURER. 7. THOROUGHLY INVESTIGATE ALL EXISTING PANELBOARD(S) INVOLVED WITH THE PROJECT AND DETERMINE WHICH CIRCUITS SERVE THE AREA OF THIS PROJECT. ENSURE CIRCUIT CONTINUITY OF ALL EXISTED AREAS ARE NOT AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT. 9 NOT USED S� 10 ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS 121 NOT USED KT18F: K a QO 10/05/2004 ISSUED FOR 90% CD REVIEW JDM Ql 10/15/2004 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION CJC -Mbl ATT A'&T Virelm Services December 22, 2004 W. Steve Betts Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 RE: APN:022-170-066 PERMIT: MUP 00-11 AT&T Site Name North Gridley Site #C018 B Street and Hwy 99 Dear Mr. Betts, AWS/.Cingular is performing and upgrade to the site referenced above. The upgrade requires replacing existing antennas with new antennas. An RF study has been prepared. The new antenna, model number Kathrein 739-664 do not emit any more RF energy than the old antenna, model number SC 10013 -DIN. The attached RF emission data supports this conclusion. Thank you very much for your consideration of this matter, (�d=dWilson Growth Project Manager BSEE/MSEE Cingular Wireless (formerly AT&T Wireless) Antenna System One Sector. S1-98 X Azimuth: 50 850 AO6on ,600 Dedod Al AR Ketl Antenna System Two .nib veb. A.—Monuf-.— Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits for ALL Antenna Systema. Aa,m Fr enc Bent MM. nr,d8yatamStyo ="' • ••'100%o/ CantroOed L'mdl Hodacnw Bee—Wih dwee. Uncontrolled MPE Result 7_82 02 1000 of CaneoW M Lmtlt 0 10000 10000 0 Ante .Gem dad 'too FCC lbrYt - 5 % of UnoonbeOed FCC LLNI H tel ra feelF4.0.4 ••"'•'100%of CanboOetl LIMI '100%of Umm�hoOed MPE aM. - - '100%of Umm�haYed 5 %oI U --"W FCCLOMt FCC Uror PwICh 1—Ant. W—BS Hey(Center.1 Rediebr TSxatem.D X20 un(.s5s fl) feet(.bore feet X20 cm (.858 fl) WDS7 YN7 Urim+hv.etl MPE —N.dicted Powm Dwd —PreNctetl Paw Deneity —20 an (0.858 ft) —Predkled Power .—kty 1000 1000 ,000 E too E too w 100 10 ,0 S f0 - -- -- oa 0.0+ 0.01- --'N o., 1 10 100 1000 ,0000 0., 1 10 100 1000 team 0.01 -14 - Horizontal Distance from Antenna, it Horizontal Distance from Antenna, fl o.1 1 10 Horizontal Distance 1000 +0000 From Antenna, It Antenna System One Sector. S1-98 X Azimuth: 50 850 AO6on ,600 Dedod Al AR Ketl Antenna System Two AM System TWO Owner. AWSC6,gularlGSM1900 Sector: C018 A Azimuth 50 Antenna System Three J (above —,id Ant System THREE Owner. AWS-CirguladGSM850 Sector. Cole Azimuth 50 Number of Antenna Systems: 3 .nib veb. A.—Monuf-.— Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits for ALL Antenna Systema. Aa,m Fr enc Bent MM. 1800 . Hodacnw Bee—Wih dwee. 25 Antenna Model N. 7_82 02 1000 Mecti-leas doan Mleeo 0 Mivc. ACer..f dB 0 Ante .Gem dad 1/ H tel ra feelF4.0.4 Chennele aM. ERPICh We.Mex PwICh 1—Ant. W—BS Hey(Center.1 Rediebr fentCakelation Pam aa,mM wDolanceloAntffi„ feet(.bore feet WDS7 YN7 AM System TWO Owner. AWSC6,gularlGSM1900 Sector: C018 A Azimuth 50 Antenna System Three J (above —,id Ant System THREE Owner. AWS-CirguladGSM850 Sector. Cole Azimuth 50 Number of Antenna Systems: 3 Poam DensityRHOriz Diw. 001— of OMt feet Mesta FCC Controllod Limits for ALL Antennas Systems (500%IhreohoM) Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits for ALL Antenna Systema. (100%NrerhoM) Mesta 5% of the FCC Uncontrolled Limits beyond (5%mrennom) No Further RF Exposure Analysis Required, all antennas meet uncontrolled MPE leve ID: C018 - Current Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George Site Name: North Gridley Site Location: Gridley, CA Date: 11232004 Site ID: C018- Current Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George Site Name: North Gridley She Location: Gridley, CA Date: 11232004 Page 2 AWS Version: MPEHQ608 Poam DensityRHOriz Diw. 001— of OMt feet Medmum Power Deno = 1 0.210.0] 700.00 2,830.27 tlmea lobar tl,en Me MPE belt for uncmtro0ed envhonment b Powm ERP = 750.00 waft ID: C018 - Current Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George Site Name: North Gridley Site Location: Gridley, CA Date: 11232004 Site ID: C018- Current Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George Site Name: North Gridley She Location: Gridley, CA Date: 11232004 Page 2 AWS Version: MPEHQ608 Antenna System One unim S.n. Ant—Manuf.cmror Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limit. for ALL Antenna Systema. A 8.ystern--Lein F enc Bend Uncontrolled MPE Result 10000 '. .......t00K N Cm.vOod trinit �^ 100 % of Unm10a0ed FCC LIml1 , W00 1000 10000 _ - - „' 100%0l CantroOed Lhdt 0 •'•'IW %o C—Ibfty Lhtlt 100 %a Uncatia0ed FCC lbNl dB 0 An --G 5 % of UrmnevEed FCC L'vNt 12 H t of 5 % of Urxm 111 FCC Lhrd' 1.3 aef Chminem '100%o/ Ur—booed MPE 3 Mex ERP/Ch —20 an low fl) 50 Mw Pwr/Ch lnm Ant W.. X 20 mn (.BSa fl) '. BS Heigh (Cenmr ci Radiator feel S %ol UncmtaOed MPE 1000 feat �Predlcmd Power DwWty 1000 feet 101.85 �Predlcmd POwa Dend 1000 —20 em (0.858 fl) �Predlcmd Power Dendy 0.1 E 100 0.1 1 w 100 1000 10000 �E 100 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, it 100 —� d f10 -$ 10 10 —- ; o 0.1 0.1 _ .. .. 0.1 0.01 - 0.01 .. 0.1 0.1 0.01 1 to loo 1000 10000 1 10 100 1000 10000 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, it Horizontal Distance from Antenna, it 0.1 1 ,0 Horizontal Distance 100 loon loaoo From Antenna, R Antenna System One Ant System ONE Owner. AWS-Cingular/TDMA Sector. Sl -98Y Azimuth: 290 850 Mean 1900 D.." Aeen ARC KN -hl Antenna System Two Ant System TWO tamer. AWS-Cingular/GSM1900 Sector: C018 B Azimuth 290 Antenna System Three I (.rove acerb od . I I Ant System THREEOwner. AWS-Ch1gular/GSM850 Sector. C018Y Azimuth 290 Number of Antenna Systema: 3 unim Volae Ant—Manuf.cmror Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limit. for ALL Antenna Systema. As - F enc Bend MM. 050 Hat w ae #, 99 Antenna MWd No. 1000 7130 1a 850 eclleniml down NI de ee e 0 Mims Attenuation dB 0 An --G dad 12 H t of feel 1.3 aef Chminem 0 3 Mex ERP/Ch W.m 50 Mw Pwr/Ch lnm Ant W.. 3.155 BS Heigh (Cenmr ci Radiator feel Ile Celaletion Pdn (shove malts and eurfec feat 0 Dla u,Ark a feet 101.85 WDS1 YM7 Ant System ONE Owner. AWS-Cingular/TDMA Sector. Sl -98Y Azimuth: 290 850 Mean 1900 D.." Aeen ARC KN -hl Antenna System Two Ant System TWO tamer. AWS-Cingular/GSM1900 Sector: C018 B Azimuth 290 Antenna System Three I (.rove acerb od . I I Ant System THREEOwner. AWS-Ch1gular/GSM850 Sector. C018Y Azimuth 290 Number of Antenna Systema: 3 Mesta FCC Controlled Limits for ALL Antennas Systema (500%tha:h.M) Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limit. for ALL Antenna Systema. (100%weans.) Meets 5% of the FCC Uncontrolled Limits beyond (516 Ihreandd) No Further RF Exposure Analysis Required, all antennas Intel, uncontrolled MPE leve Poem Dmdty �yHaiz Divt W1=1 of Wdt feet MexhamPawa Dend a 0.21 0.03 700.00 2,930.27 Wrma rows tr A, Ins MPE WNt fa uncmbe0ed envhonmmlt m Powm ERP - 750.00 Watts Site ID: Cole - Current Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George Site Name: North Gridley Site Location: Gridley, CA Date: 11132004 Site ID: C018 - Current Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George Site Name: North Gridley Site Location: Gridley, CA Data: 11232004 Page 2 AWS Version: MPEiQ608 Antenna System Three 10000100%or Con0a0etl U.91 '100 %of Un0a -ed FCC LWt - 5 96 of U_, FCC Lhdl X20 mn (.859 fl) 1000 �Pre6cmd Poem Dondly I E 3 a too - - a 10 a 0.1 0.01 0.1 1 w 100 1000 10000 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, it Site ID: C018 - Current Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George Site Name: North Gridley Site Location: Gridley, CA Data: 11232004 Page 2 AWS Version: MPEiQ608 10000 1000 171. ..•""100%dr_ j �PreNcbd Svatem.D im0edLMN 100%alUmm�trWFCCLbra 5%ofUmm�tro0e0FCCL.hn000%dUnoonbe0edMP20 cm (sw fl) Power Den Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits for ALL Antenna Systems. 1--..__...._.____...__. 1000 1--, enc Bend Antanne 91ra.[flt7LTtlL0 10000 low -.--_ Uncontrolled _._.__- MPE Result ••,. •, Y00%dConha0edLM1 X20 an (A56 fl) �Predkbd Powm Dena) 7130 16 B50 Me icftldownrill 00%dCarlho0ed Ltdt 5%dunconhaOed MPE �Predk(658 btl Powt) Dendly MI.. Atlenuaeon d8 .. Antenna Gain dad 7 H' td feet 4.3 0 d Chonnda 0 6 Mea ERP/Ch Watt 50 Moa Pwr/Ch int Ant. We 3.155 too Z owl 110 Cekutibn Pat (above pwnd and audam fee+ E too 42 n Diabnwb Arkeam fad 101.66 Wos? I YM? I w 100 a + j 0.1 j E J!L 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Imo l0000 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, 8 0.1 0.1 o.t 0.01 0.01 oe 0.1 0.01 t 10 loo 1000 10000 1 10 100 1000 l0000 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, 8 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, it 0.1 1 10 Horizontal Distance 100 1000 10000 From Antenna, It Antenna System One AM System ONE Owner. AWS-CilgularfTDMA Sector. S11 -98Z Azimuth: 190 1 650 AOpon law Dedbd All ARC Kathret Antenna System Two uNb Vele Antenna Monufmlurer Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits for ALL Antenna Systems. Alk- IF 1--, enc Bend MHa ew Horimnter Bemnwddb 96 Anbnna Model No. 7130 16 B50 Me icftldownrill 0 MI.. Atlenuaeon d8 0 Antenna Gain dad 12 H' td feet 4.3 0 d Chonnda 0 6 Mea ERP/Ch Watt 50 Moa Pwr/Ch int Ant. We 3.155 a5 Heldl (Canty of ROdielor owl 110 Cekutibn Pat (above pwnd and audam fee+ 6 Diabnwb Arkeam fad 101.66 Wos? I YM? AM System ONE Owner. AWS-CilgularfTDMA Sector. S11 -98Z Azimuth: 190 1 650 AOpon law Dedbd All ARC Kathret Antenna System Two Ant System TWO Owner: AWS -C tpular/GSM1900 Sector: C018 C Azimuth 190 Antenna System Three (above Ant System THREE Owner. AWS-Cirgular/GSM850 Sector. C018 Z Azimuth 190 . Number of Antenna Systema: 3 urdb value Anbnna Monubelurev Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits for ALL Antenna Systems. Aam F enc Bend MHz 1900 Harm WB 95 Antenna Mede) No. 7:62 02 1000 MeehenkWd Ult 0 MHc. A--tbn d0 0 Anbnne Geis di3d to H td test 4.3 0d Chen.. 0 2 Max ERPICh We9a 150 Mea P./Ch Inb Ant We0a 5.972 BS HN1h (Canty dlt d feel 110 cdantdan vole lobous 11mYM and sodas reel e DWt ton�,n lad 101.95 WOS7 YM7 Ant System TWO Owner: AWS -C tpular/GSM1900 Sector: C018 C Azimuth 190 Antenna System Three (above Ant System THREE Owner. AWS-Cirgular/GSM850 Sector. C018 Z Azimuth 190 . Number of Antenna Systema: 3 Meets FCC Controlled Limits for ALL Antennas Systems (wit%tnre-. ) Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits for ALL Antenna Systems. (100%weandd) Meete 5% of the FCC Uncontrolled Limits beyond (5%tbaanoM) No Further RF Ezposum Analysis Required, all antennas meet uncontrolled MPE leve Power Density d9Hedz Dial rWlana dtNt set Mealmum Power Den 03] O.04 700.00 2,297.x6 tlmea ewer ben be MPE bNt tar uma11ro0ed avtran—I Composite Power ERP . 000.00 Wort Site ID: C018 - Current Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George Site Nam: North Gridley Site Location: Gridley, CA Data: 11232004 Site ID: C018 - Current Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George Site Name: North Gridley Site Location: Gridley, CA Date: 11232004 Page 2 AWS Version: MPEiQ608 Anterms System Three t 0000 ' ,......100%d ConeoOad Lttlt 100% d Uncon0a0ad FCC Unit 6 %dUmm�ba0ed FCC LLrdt —20—(awn) n Predlct&IJPowerDwstty tape E 1 too . 10 a + j 0.1 j E J!L 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Imo l0000 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, 8 Site ID: C018 - Current Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George Site Name: North Gridley Site Location: Gridley, CA Date: 11232004 Page 2 AWS Version: MPEiQ608 Antenna System One unim Rmaoea Sawo. Onw - A.—Mendecwrm Mesta 5%oflhe FCC Uncontrolled Limits beyond Ali— taDL - MHz 850 Uncontrolled MPE Result ` 95 ,0000 feet I""'..,00%of Concd1wd LtrNt '100%ef Uncontrolled FCCLini ,0000 e 0 •••�, W% of Conce0ed LMdt •100% or UneonWW FCC LWI ,0000 — Anions Goin dBd 12 H,igh1cf,poftr. feel 1.3 100%dCaneoOed Lindt ',00%dUmm�trded MPE 3 Mm ERP/Ch - - 5%of Un tcled FCC Llnr 50 Mea P-1Ch Inb Ant - S%dUraantrarled FCC liNl i 3.155 BS Heigh (Cantor of Red— feet X20 an(.656 fl) Celwletfon Porn leeove hound roar-'f— feel 6 20 m1(.85e ft) i feel 101.85 WOS1 5%dUnemoeOed MPE �Prodkbd Power Dandy �Predkad Power Dendry I 1 10 100 1000 10000 —20 cm (O.ew e) —Predkted Powm Dead 1000 low Imo E ,m E 100 w 100 _ _ 10 ,o -- -- o s i 0.0, - 0.01 0.1 , 10 100 tom 10000 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 0.01 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, it Horizontal Distance from Antenna, 8 0.1 1 10 Horizontal Distance 100 1000 lama From Antenna, it Antenna System One Sector. Sl -98X Azlmuth: 50 650 Arleen 000 De Del Allen ARC KaNrein Antenna System Two Number of Antenna Systeme: 3 Meets FCC Controlled Limits for ALL Antennas Systems unim yews A.—Mendecwrm Mesta 5%oflhe FCC Uncontrolled Limits beyond Ali— F--,, F enc 13 M MHz 850 Horimnw Beemwidlh dW,, 95 A.—Model N. feet 1130 18 950 Mmhenbel darn MIee e 0 Mise. Atlmuetbl dB 0 Anions Goin dBd 12 H,igh1cf,poftr. feel 1.3 a of Chennete e 3 Mm ERP/Ch W.. 50 Mea P-1Ch Inb Ant W— 3.155 BS Heigh (Cantor of Red— feet "a Celwletfon Porn leeove hound roar-'f— feel 6 OiebnceloAnl - feel 101.85 WOS1 YM1 Sector. Sl -98X Azlmuth: 50 650 Arleen 000 De Del Allen ARC KaNrein Antenna System Two Number of Antenna Systeme: 3 Meets FCC Controlled Limits for ALL Antennas Systems (500%Inreshdd) Meet. FCC Uncontrolled Limit. For ALL Antenna Systema. (100%Oveshdd) Mesta 5%oflhe FCC Uncontrolled Limits beyond (5%Nrerhold) No Further RF Exposure Analysis Required, all antennas meet uncontrolled MPE leve Power Denny RHofc Dict. 20 cm (.858 n) Wlnm dtlmil feet �Predlosel Paw Dandy Mwd —Power Dsnd - 0.21 0.01 1 110.00 2,531.68 Omen bear Nen the MPE lirrdt for uncanborled envMnme'I 100 Conscsiis Poem ERP - 150.00 Were 3 Ant System TWO OlAmer. AWSCingularlGSM1900 Site 1D: C018 - Proposed Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George Sector. C018 A She Name: North Gridley Azimuth 50 Site Location: Gridley, CA Data: 11232004 Antenna System Three BS Am System THREE OWner. AWSCinguladGSM850 Sector: Cole Azimuth 50 Site to: CO18 - Proposed Antenna ConBguretion - Performed By: C. George She Name: North Gridley She Location: Gridley, CA Date: 11232004 Page 2 6Qivx-, A/ AWS Version: MPEHQ608 Amens System Three Iwo """'100%dCantrorled LiMl 'tor%d Ure bdlod FCC Un* 5%of UxmooOed FCC LM I 20 cm (.858 n) IM �Predlosel Paw Dandy E 100 . . . 3 10 O a 1 0.1 — 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, it Site to: CO18 - Proposed Antenna ConBguretion - Performed By: C. George She Name: North Gridley She Location: Gridley, CA Date: 11232004 Page 2 6Qivx-, A/ AWS Version: MPEHQ608 Antenna System One unite vatem-DOe Antenna M-vfc . Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits for ALL Antenna Systeme. A muLayat9m-Two F—ey Band MHz UmmntrrdW MPF Ravidt t 0000 1000 An—Madel No. .......100%o/CmbaOad Urm Hl:U Liiet - - g%dUncontraWd FCC LWII X 20 - (.658 a) �Predkted Poww D-dy I r_,.,- 1000 Mads-Icnl d 5110 r�,•,,, •nS5 .14,,,b,Ad kuru •1W%dU ricanboOed FCC lMtlI - - 5%d Una-.. FCC lard) X20 tan Less fl) �PreScrod Power D -d iWN1U , 1 1000 .. dB 0 Ad-ne Gain -%aUKtdhtldedd 12 H td led ,. ,`•,'.'100%d CmoaOed Unit '1W%dUnembaWd - - g%dUnoontroyed MPE —20 tan (O.BSB fl �Predkmd Pov r Dend MPE tl 3 Mea ERP/Ch Wdb �. . Max P -/Ch in. Ant. Wel1e 3.155 BS Hey JC -tend Redidu feet 110 Cd tit n Pdn (mtwa ownd rmleenam fast a DlItl—b Any_ E IN 101.65 wOS7 IYM7 YM? E 100 0.1 I w too i 0.01 - - - - - - -. Horizontal Distance from Antenna, ft 3 3 f �n 10 10 b 10 -- - 0 o i a 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.01 O.o1 L=, -7x 0.1 0.1 0.01 t 10 too 1000 10000 1 10 too 1000 INN Horizontal Distance from Antenna, ft Horizontal Distance from Antenna, ft 0.1 1 ,o,W Horizontal Distance 1000 10000 From Antenna, fl Antenna System One Ant System ONE Owner. AWS-CingulerRDMA Sector. S1-98 Y Azimuth: 290 850 Atiyon 1900 Defied A9 - ARC Kethratl Antenna System Two unite varve Antenna M-vfc . Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits for ALL Antenna Systeme. A F—ey Band MHz 050 Hod -W B 95 An—Madel No. 1000 7130 to 050 Mads-Icnl d 5110 o i Miac. AO-ueo- dB 0 Ad-ne Gain d8d 12 H td led 4.3 --N-.f Ch-nda tl 3 Mea ERP/Ch Wdb 50 Max P -/Ch in. Ant. Wel1e 3.155 BS Hey JC -tend Redidu feet 110 Cd tit n Pdn (mtwa ownd rmleenam fast a DlItl—b Any_ feel 101.65 wOS7 IYM7 YM? Ant System ONE Owner. AWS-CingulerRDMA Sector. S1-98 Y Azimuth: 290 850 Atiyon 1900 Defied A9 - ARC Kethratl Antenna System Two AM System TWO Dwner. AWS-Cinqular/GSM1900 Sector. Cot 8B Azimuth 290 Antenna System Three e Ant System THREE Owner. AWS-Cingular(GSMa50 Sector. ColoY Azimuth 290 Number of Antenna Systeme: 3 encu verve Ant--M-decWrer Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits for ALL Antenna Systeme. All -n F—y Bent MHi 1900 Hrdmnw 8eemwldt 96 Antenna Madel No. 1000 7262 02 1000 Mwh.nI.M down el0 a i Mivc. AO --d dB 0 An— Ginn d9d 14 H Id lad 4.3 0 Ch-nde 0 2 Mex ERP/Ch W.. 1So Mex P-1Ch In. Ant Wetln 3.972 BS Itaidl (Canter d Radiota, feet 110 Calculation Pain (move Rwnd and -dem foal a DW—tt7Art,-,feet 0 101.85 W OS7 YM? AM System TWO Dwner. AWS-Cinqular/GSM1900 Sector. Cot 8B Azimuth 290 Antenna System Three e Ant System THREE Owner. AWS-Cingular(GSMa50 Sector. ColoY Azimuth 290 Number of Antenna Systeme: 3 Mesta FCC Controlled Limbs for ALL Antennas Systeme (500%thl-ho1d) Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits for ALL Antenna Systeme. (100%th-hold) Wale 5%ofthe FCC Uncontrolled Limits beyond (5%tAraahald) No Further RF Exposure Analysis Required, all antennas nmet uncontrolled MPE leve P—D-dN AHv DI¢L ,wfama dlmdt root Meed-. Power D -el = 0.24 O.Oa 170.00 2.534.88 tin� l— Ih- e1e MPE Wdt fa errconoa0ed-vb-mtrnl Powm ERP a 750.00 Wda She ID: C018- Proposed Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George Site Name: North Gridley She Location: Gridley, CA Date: 11232004 Site ID: C018 - Proposed Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George Site Name: North Gridley Site Location: Gridley, CA Date: 11232004 Page 2 AWS Version: MPEHQ608 Antenna System Three 100110 ,,,,,•,100%dC-oaOetlI •100 %d U—lroW FCC Limit - 5%dUncant,.AWFCCUrnt —20- (.458 n) 1000 �Predicbd Powm Deed l rvE i y- IN - - - - - - i 10 i 0 1' 0.1 I i 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1 W O 10000 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, ft Site ID: C018 - Proposed Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George Site Name: North Gridley Site Location: Gridley, CA Date: 11232004 Page 2 AWS Version: MPEHQ608 Antenna System One Ccicftdon Pon (sews around ori feet I 8 .en �rewm �r - �1,erNtnarr � gym.. Seclor. 57-98 Z Azimuth: 190 850 Alison 1900 Deded Al ARC I(edudn Antenna System Two unite rntem-O An Mandecteror Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits for ALL Antenna Systema. A IItem_T.' Fr Bend ".-- Uncontrolled ., _._----_ MPE Result 1DMIl 95 ••••.•100%of Cmeosd L.hdt 1000 728 02 1000 uumlma vr•...,.o.0 r.... 0 Miac. AOenuetlon -__- "'•,"t0o%d Ceeeo5ed L0dt '100%d Unmlee0ed MPE Antenna Gein dad '1W %N UIIboHCdMe FUU leiY1� v 5%dU-1,11led FCC L" n.•. feet •100%dUrimi000ed FCC LOdt 5%dUncneaBed FCC Unit ad Chennde 0 2 spurt 1.055 fl) We. 150 =20 an(.BSB fl) Weee 5.972 BS Heigh (Center of Rodbbr feet 5%01 Unoon0a0e0 MPE. 1000 feel _Predicted Po- Dendty Iwo feet �PradEted Poway Dene) 1000 I YM? i _pun (0.858 fl) Predicted Powm Deed 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 E too Horizontal Distance from Antenna, fl E too w too a y zl g 10 10 b 10 7 0.1 0.1 0.010.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 0.1 1 to IN low 10000 0.01 • Horizontal Distance from Antenna, fl - Horizontal Distance from Antenna, It 0.1 1 to Horizontal Distance 100 1000 10000 From Antenna, it Antenna System One Ccicftdon Pon (sews around ori feet I 8 .en �rewm �r - �1,erNtnarr � gym.. Seclor. 57-98 Z Azimuth: 190 850 Alison 1900 Deded Al ARC I(edudn Antenna System Two Ant System TWO Owner. AWS-Cingww/GSM1900 Sector: C018C Azimuth 190 Antenna System Three BS Ant System THREE Osman.. AWS-CGgulw/GSM850 Sector. C018 Z Azimuth 190 Number of Antenna Systems: 3 unite vdua An Mandecteror Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits for ALL Antenna Systema. As— Fr Bend MH. +900 Hod—W Bemnwtd 95 Antenna Madel No. 1000 728 02 1000 Medlenkel down et 0 Miac. AOenuetlon dS 0 Antenna Gein dad to Heist. of feet e.3 ad Chennde 0 2 Max ERP/Ch We. 150 Mex P.1Ch I.. A.L Weee 5.972 BS Heigh (Center of Rodbbr feet "a Cdodebon Poth (above tewrd redwrl— feel 5 Dist— W Ani, feet 101.85 W DS? YM? i Ant System TWO Owner. AWS-Cingww/GSM1900 Sector: C018C Azimuth 190 Antenna System Three BS Ant System THREE Osman.. AWS-CGgulw/GSM850 Sector. C018 Z Azimuth 190 Number of Antenna Systems: 3 BtHerft DHL /eel Meets FCC Controlled Limits for ALL Antennas Systems (We%ove id) Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits for ALL Antenna Systema. (100%threshold) Monte 5%of the FCC Uncontrolled Limits beyond (5% threshold) No Further RF Exposure Analysis Required, all antennas meet uncontrolled MPE leve P—Dendty Wlanr *f" BtHerft DHL /eel MaNmum Power Dentl 0.27 0.08 ]00.00 2.211]-48 firma 10em Nen Ne MPE Meeh for urmiec0ed envhmment :..... 00%d Cmeobod L5d1 '100 %dUncerwiled FCC LEM tePowu ERP - 900.00 Wirths Site ID: C018 - Proposed Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George She Name: North Gridley She Location: Gridley, CA Date: 112312004 She ID: Cot8- Proposed Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George She Name: North Gridley Site LocaUon: Gridley, CA Date: 1123/2004 Page 2 AWS Version: MP&Q608 Antenna System Three 10000 :..... 00%d Cmeobod L5d1 '100 %dUncerwiled FCC LEM 8 %d UnconVow FCC L9rd 20 air (.850 fl) 1000 �Predlcod Power Dendy 100 . . 10 O a 1 i 0.1 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, fl She ID: Cot8- Proposed Antenna Configuration Performed By: C. George She Name: North Gridley Site LocaUon: Gridley, CA Date: 1123/2004 Page 2 AWS Version: MP&Q608 I BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING MANAGER AGENDA REPORT - April 12, 2000 Applicant: AT&T Wireless Services Parcel Size: 80.4 acres File #: MUP 00-11 Request: Minor Use Permit to install twelve (12) panel antennas on an existing. 150 -foot tall monopole tower and for a 240 square foot equipment shelter. G.P.: Orchard and Field Crops Zoning: A-40 (Agricultural, 40 -acre minimum parcel size) APN: 022-170-066 Location: On the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs.. STAFF COMMENT: Zone date: June 17, 1975 Project Planner: Stephen Betts Supervisor District: 4 Attachments: A. Conditions of Approval B. Vicinity Map . C. General Plan/Zoning•Map D. Radio -Frequency Analysis Report E. Photosimulation F. Initial Study G. Site Plan Staff recommends approval of the Minor Use Permit with conditions and findings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to install twelve (12) panel antennas on an existing 150 -foot tall monopole tower. The new panel antennas will be installed at the 110 -foot level, and extend from 106 feet to 114 feet above ground level. Each panel antenna is 8 square feet (1 -foot wide x 8 feet long) in size. A 240 square foot (12 feet x 20 feet) equipment shelter will be installed at the base of the monopole. The proposed panel antennas will provide digital wireless communications (cellular phone service) for the Highway 99 corridor north of Gridley. The proposed equipment shelter will be located within an existing 2,900 square foot (47 feet X 62 feet) lease area. The site is unmanned, and does not require a water source or a sewage disposal system. One to two visits to the site will be made per month by company. technicians to perform preventive maintenance. Access to the site is from Highway 99. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE I ■ The project site is zoned A-40 and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Orchard and Field Crops. Surrounding parcels range in size from .5 to 154 acres. Land uses on surrounding parcels include orchards, dwellings at rural residential densities, and Highway 99. The project site is 80.4 acres in size and is developed with a walnut orchard. The existing 2,900 square foot lease area is developed with the monopole and a 360 square foot equipment shelter, both of which are surrounded by a six-foot high chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire. The lease area is located approximately 70 feet west of the centerline of Highway 99. A locked gate provides access into the lease area. The 150 -foot monopole was permitted with a Use Permit (UP 92-55) and supports four vertical antennas centered at the top of the monopole and one small microwave dish antenna located 50 feet above ground level. The vertical antennas extend 163.9 feet above ground level. The monopole is painted white, and a'steady-burning red light is located on the top. An existing access extends from Highway 99 to the lease area. The project site is level. Hamilton Slough passes through the property. ANALYSIS: The project site is designated as Orchard and Field Crops by the Land Use Element Map of the General Plan, which allows public uses as secondary uses (note: cellular phone service providers are considered a public utility). Section 24-91 of Butte County Code states that wireless communication facilities are not permitted in the A-40 zone unless a Minor Use Permit is obtained, subject to the requirements of Butte County Code Section 24-262. The newly adopted Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance (Butte County Code Section 24- 262) allows colocation on existing facilities in the A-40 zone with approval of a Minor Use Permit, subject to numerous requirements. The project has been conditioned to meet the requirements of Section 24-262, including: • Submittal of bonds to cover the costs of a radio-frequency analysis and removal of the monopole. • Radio-frequency emissions in excess of FCC standards are not allowed. • Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered to be abandoned. • Verification submitted annually attesting that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The additional antennas mounted on the monopole will not create an aesthetic impact. The antennas will not increase the height of the monopole nor will the additional antennas extend beyond the existing antennas. A photosimulation of the proposed antennas on the existing monopole shows that the antennas will not be highly conspicuous. A condition of the project requires that the proposed antennas be painted white to match the color of the existing monopole. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 2 0 The proposed antennas will not expand the height or width of the existing monopole, so there will not be any additional impacts to agricultural aerial spraying operations in the walnut orchard located on the site. The additional antennas and the new equipment shelter will not require the removal of any walnut trees in the existing orchard. The radio emissions from the proposed antennas are regulated by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). A radio-frequency analysis written by a registered radio-frequency engineer indicates that the radio emissions from the monopole, including the existing and proposed antennas, will be well within FCC standards for cellular phone facilities for publicly accessible areas near the monopole. Caltrans requests that the gate on the existing site access road be moved further away from the edge of the Highway 99 right-of-way to provide increased distance between vehicles entering the site and vehicles traveling on Highway 99. All these recommendations are added as conditions of project approval. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Manager take the following actions: I. Adopt a Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study did not identify any potential significant environmental effects. B. The Planning Manager has independently reviewed, analyzed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration prior to making its decision on the project, and the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement of Butte County. II. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, anda "de minimus" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5. is not recommended. IIl. Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Minor Use Permit 00-11 for AT&T Wireless Services, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: A. That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 3 ■ Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Fire Department, and Caltrans. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Orchard and Field Crops and is zoned A-40. The Orchard and Field Crops land use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. The A-40 zone allows colocation of communication facilities with approval of a Minor Use Permit. B. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the existing monopole or extend beyond the existing antennas. 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and no additional services or utilities are required. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The project site is already developed with a 150 -foot tall monopole tower. The proposed antennas to be mounted on the existing monopole will not have a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. The radio-frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very little vehicle traffic will be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment shelter. The communications facility is unmanned and only one to two site visits per month will be required after construction. The suitability of the site for the type _and intensity of use or development which is proposed: 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 4 ■ The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas will be mounted on the existing 150 -foot tall monopole. No walnut trees will have to be removed for the equipment shelter. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use will cause any other relevant impact. C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Chapter 24, Section 262, of the Butte County Code. KAPROJECTSWPM�AT&T- I . MUPWTT. RPT 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 5 ■ EXHIBIT A MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) MUP 00-11 PERMIT NO. 022-170-066 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: AT&T Wireless Services is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: Minor Use Permit to install twelve (12), eight (8) square foot (1 -foot wide x 8 feet, long) panel antennas on an existing 150 -foot tall monopole tower at the 110 -foot level, and to install a 240 square foot (12 feet x 20 feet) equipment shelter. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must. be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 12 months of the date of approval. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of approval, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. A Minor Use Permit subject to lapse may be renewed for an additional period of up to one year, provided that sixty. (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for renewal of the Minor Use Permit is filed with the Planning Division on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 6 ■ 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a permit. Conditions of Approval: Planning Division: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing monopole. 2. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. 3. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair . area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. 6. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 7. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. - There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 9. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 7 0 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the Facility, the applicant shall obtain a detailed estimate from an appropriate building industry business or contractor for the removal of the Facility, including the proper disposal of all removed materials and the return of site to its original condition. A copy of the estimate shall be submitted to the Building Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of removal of the Facility, proper disposal of all removed materials, and return of the site to its original condition in the event that such Facility is abandoned, or if the permit has been terminated for violation of its conditions by the County after hearing, or has expired, and after notice has been given to the owner/operator by the County, no application for renewal has been filed. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be.. required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 8 0 13. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 14. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 15. ' The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 16. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 17. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 18. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit P' and date-stamped February 16, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 19. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 20. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. Building Division: 21. Obtain the necessary building permits from the Building Division. Caltrans 22. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the existing gate on, the site access road shall be moved further away from the edge of the State Route 99 traveled way by at least 3.6 meters as requested by Caltrans in their March 9, 2000 letter. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 9 ■ Dated: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF Assessor's Office Caltrans 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 10 0 AT.& T WIRELESS Y• { Memorandum Department of Development Services Planning Division DATE: July 29, 2009 TO: Jed Peters AT&T Representative FROM: Tim Snellings, Director Department of Development Services SUBJECT: Addition of six (6) new runs of 7/8" coaxial cables, in the existing cable trays, up the tower leg as currently permitted for existing AT&T Wireless Communications Facilities. Request for a Minor Change to Minor Use Permit MUP 00-11, APN 022-170-067, located on the west side of State Route 99, approximately 1,000 feet north of the intersection of State Route 88 and Biggs East Highway/B Street, east of the city of Biggs. PROJECT REFERENCE NUMBER: RFI09-0502 Summary: Based on analysis and recommendations from the staff of the Development Services Department we have deemed the proposed addition of six (6) new runs of 7/8" coaxial cables, in the existing cable trays, up the tower leg, is a "minor change" to Minor Use Permit MUP 00-11 approved by the Butte County Planning Commission on May 9, 2000. This memorandum grants approval of this minor change to this use permit. Description of Requested Minor Modification: The requested minor change consists of the addition of six (6) new runs of 7/8" coaxial cables, in the existing cable trays, up the tower leg. Analysis in Support of the Minor Change: The approval that granted the original wireless facility Minor Use Permit MUP 00-11 contained the following standard Special Condition of approval: Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated AT&T Wireless, Minor Use Permit MUP 00-11 Minor Changes Approval Memo, July 29, 2009 1 • written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. Staff assessed the potential impacts of the proposed changes, including visual and aesthetic impacts and finds the following: • The existing tower was built to a height of 150 feet, as permitted by UP 92-55. • The proposed addition will not add to the height of the existing 150 foot tower. • MUP 00-11 did not place limits on the number of coaxial cables to be mounted on the approved tower. • The addition of six (6) new runs of 7/8" coaxial cables will have a negligible visual impact on and off of the site. The coaxial cables will from the existing antennas (at the 110 foot level) to the ground and will have a negligible visual impact to the surrounding area and the project site. • A requirement below that the applicant must obtain all necessary building permits prior to installation of the new equipment will ensure the structural integrity and safety of the resulting structures. DETERMINATIONS: The Development Services Department has made the following determinations: 1) The application is deemed to be a valid request for a "minor change" to the approved minor use permit on the site. 2) The proposed change is consistent with the general Rule Exemption from Environmental Review determination for the originally -approved use permit. 3) The proposed changes are consistent with the County Code 24-262 Wireless Communications Facilities purpose, intent, applicability, exemptions, permit requirements, application requirements, development criteria, and general standards for the zones in which each is respectively located. 4) The applicant for this minor change determination has paid the actual staff time for processing this determination. 5) The approved addition of six (6) new runs of 7/8" coaxial cables, in the existing cable trays, up the tower leg will have no significant visual impact on or off and the site. 6) The applicant for this request for minor change to MUP 00-11 and all subsequent owners and users shall comply with all requirements listed below. AT&T Wireless, Minor Use Permit MUP 00-11 Minor Changes Approval Memo, July 29, 2009 2 • 9 REQUIREMENTS REGARDING THE APPROVED MINOR CHANGES: Planning Division: 1. All previous conditions for Minor Use Permit MUP 00-11 still apply. 2. All new equipment additions must be installed within the original footprint of the approved facility. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division. 3. The approved minor change consists of and is limited to the addition of six (6) new runs of 7/8" coaxial cables, in the existing cable trays, up the tower leg, within the existing approved footprint of the facility. Building Division: 4. Prior to installation of the new equipment, obtain all necessary building permits from Butte County Building Division. Butte County Fire Department/CDF: 5. Construction, installation or development of structures or facilities on the parcel shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations (Public Resources Code 4290) and all other applicable State and County codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of application for improvement permits. AT&T Wireless, Minor Use Permit MUP 00-11 Minor Changes Approval Memo, July 29, 2009 3 i ' i• :DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APRIOVAL: 1 hereby :approve the above-requested change to Minor Use Permit UP 00-11 as detailed above, with the. Determinations and Requirements listed above. I x fIX t Tim Snellings; Director of Development Services. Date: July 29, 2009 Applicant Acknowledgement and Acceptance: The applicant here acknowledges agreement with and acceptance of 'the determination and requirements detailed herein related to minor change to Minor Use Permit MUP 00-] L YX. Date: 20,09 CC: Scott Rutherford; Building,Chief 4 • July 13, 2009 Mark Michelena Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 RE: AT&T Wireless Telecommunications Facility Located at: Hwy 99 and B Street, Gridley, CA AT&T UMTS ID: CNU0243/North Gridley .. MUP: 00-11 — AT&T Wireless Dear Mr. Michelena: The proposed Minor Modification to the existing Wireless Telecommunications Facility is: Addition of six (6) new'runs of 7/8" coaxial cables, in the existing cable trays, up the tower lee as currently permitted. If you have any questions, please contact me at 925-354-1301 Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Jed Peters Authorized AT&T Representative i NORTH GRIDLEY CNU0243 at&t IDG 99d BSTREET GRIDITDL EY.G93941 ISSUE STATUS DATE oEstl6Pna+ Br -29-0 0100E NORTH GRIDLEY DRAWN BY A BUBOTI CHECKED BW. L XOIIGIMY � B B MCOMB CNU0243 DAZE: OD /09 PROJECT DESCRIPTION VICINITY MAP CODE COMPLIANCEa;'ppjp; a °eil MODFCARON TO M (E) UNMANNED TEIECONNUNICAMN FACILITY CON9SRHC OF ADDING. (6) (N) RUNS OF SS CORA W 1TO RD 99 TY NN Wowill Eounai ALL WORX d "01111 S1111 BE PERFONED a INITACED w ACCORDANCE MIM ME CURRENT EOOONS 0iK 111.10,01.11 CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE ODVE LOCAL NTNG AUTHORIRES NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORWNG TO THESE 001 I. tam CALIFORNIA ADwHISMAnvf Goof (wa. nnfs 24 a n) 2. 207 CALFORNIA BODING CODE 3. 200 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE a. 2007 CAUFObIA YEOIMICAI CODE 12007 CALIFORNIA PLUMEWG GOOD 6. 207 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE 7. LOCAL EUIICNG CODES d CITY/LODNiT ORDINANCES u iEej ds 9[69 via 1i9,1 p �'• N 5 lig S)TE s� Yy1,p O ` $ FC a '- `77 g Y�53E 3 �I�! PROJECT INFORMATION 91E NAPE: NORM GPoOEY SITE R ONUDtu CODNTY: BUTTE JJPoSIKCTION: BUIIE COUNTY ON: 012 -110 -06] -DOD POWER: PFd£ SITE ADORESC HIGHWAY 99 A 8 sM[ET ralp1ONE: AT&T GRDLEY. CA 95948 CURRENT ZONING: AGBCdTOLAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE: a OCCUPANCY m. - U B SiEET BIOS EAST XWf 9. MSI/CA-TLA-222-i ALONG WITH ANY OTHER APPUCABLE LOCATE d STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS Yy y PROPERTY Cam AMERICANROVR HANDICAP REQUIREMENTS �Q9O1 DIRECTIONS 115 HUNIIN O0N AVE £ BO TONW 2116RIVING MIS FACILITY IS UKYMNFD d NOT FOR XUYM HMITAnON. HMDICMPED ACCESS d TFCIWUIENR AIB: NOT REQUIRED W ACCORDANCE WIN CAUFORNA STATE ADNWSMADVE CODE. TIRE 24 PMT 2. SECTION 11058.14.2. EXCEPTION 1 _ APPLICANT'. AT&T 4420 ROSEWOOD OR BLDG 2. 7RD FLOOR PTEILNTON• CA 94588 TEASING CONTACT: A 25) _n PETER T (925) 751-1101 ZO-6 CONTACT: ARM: ED PETERS (944) 754-M LAnTUDE N 79' 25' 7.72• NM 87 - 10an1DE W 121' 11' 16.8' NM 83 FROM: 4420 ROSEWUO DR BLDG 2. M FLOG. PLEASANTO. CA 945M IO IDGHKAY 0 a B STREET. C OEY. CA 95948 1. START OUT GONG SOUTHEAST ON ROSEWOOD DR IONMp OLD TMG PoTA 1✓D. 0.5 MI 2 TURN LEFT ONTO SAN PoTA AD. 0.7 NI 1 010E ONTO I-580 E TOWARD STOCKTON. 17.0 MI 4. KEEP LEFT TO TAKE 1-205 E TOWARD MACY/ STDOGON. 11,6 MI 1 uEACE ONTO I-5 N. 66.7 MI 8 TAKE THE CA 99 EAT. EKT 5258. TOWARD YUBA CITY/ MMYSMLC O.B MI 7, WERGE ONTO CA -70 N. aT.6 NI 8. TRW RIGHT ONTO CA -20/ CA -70/ SIM ST. Oz NI 9. TUM LEFT ONTO CA -20/ CA -70/ B SL CONTINUE 10 FOLLOW CA -70. 111 NI 1O RQW LEFT ONTO E GIDEY RD. 4.4 NI 11. TURN RIGHT ONTO CA -99. 17 41 END AT: HIONWAY 99 a B SMUT. f1dOEY. CA 95948 v61a a 3 SHEET INDEX APPROVAL OE.$�A�G7i �/ T-1 TITLE _ RF A-1 SITE PLAN — A-2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN & DETAILS — LEASING A-3 ELEVATIONS - ZONING ESNGIED TIAL Z HOUR 30 MONIES fSTWATED aSTMCE 156.18 MILES CONSTRUCTION R 3 AT&T ERICSSON smmT2TLE TITLE shm Nu7®ER T-1 > MUM �y^A'FQ� N r' : Y � 11.51M -.!-M gig0 v 1 �g�s � MNAla 11 g v M, _ L. g, nor s4N a r 11 6����� gs m qI_giq� ad v a t 4M 16 g. Aix a 0$R„a Xi.11 i I Goose s@ 7 SZ-, r D z HIGHWAY 99 m z r D r^ 60606 O at8ct �tr¢amli�¢.f¢gi¢¢¢riAL A s N . �m —.- s. Egg � 2 � 8 Y a � �'� n � 7i y = _ Ate? ' ` $ ” RZ yr= ` i,xm a,.�a na, sae zo,we�m, cn esem & w r 88 y imN M. zcwme: Amer vn�e: sie xn.,eo tl g E g Ki0 AN. OOD DR BIDC $ 9RD FLOOR nd¢ EMOR �+M�eeomlMuiB.mn F®:5]08x3d19J 9 Y 4 $ i„`t r� FLEASANfOµ GBd588 N (P) COAX (E) COAX (P) COAX (E) 0la-0N HANGER (P) Ala -ON HANGER USE (E) WAYESBE PORTS FOR I (6) (P) RUNS OF W COAX (E) AT&T ICE BRIDGE (6) (P) RUNS O' V co. ON (E) ICE MM , r� (P) OIIX-OR RANGER E) Cla-ON HANGER \ V COAX CLICK -ON HANGER ADDITION DETAIL 2 NOT TO SCALE (E) 11' MID[ SUM GTE LL LOA;— C7.:;;; COAX J, Y (E) B' CAI"K PENCE — (E) Aft SHELTER — (E) VER CH SHELTER (E) 9ERZDN ICE BRD[E (E) HONOPORE (E) ACCESS GTE (5) (P) RUNS OF M- COM ATTATCHEO TO EXTERIOR OF TOWER EN ENLARGED SITE PLAN ,.eS. N NORTH GRMLEY CMU0243 HIGHWAY W & H 9TNPET GRIDIEY.CA9 M ISSUE STATUS DAIS OESCdP710H B1 -25-09 CO 90X -29-09 C) IOOX DRAWN BY. A BUAREIE CIEIXEO BC L MO CNTBY APPROWD 81: B. YQWB GAIL 06/29 T q a Hill, a tEe1 O V W" t� I� 37OU1 . N a %mTTII£ ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHM NUMBER A-2 (E) CHANNEL YOINRHC BRACKET (E) CGAs HANGER BRACKET (E) OOAX INSTALL (6) (P) COO U911 Cl -IN HANGERS (E) Abri GALY SUPPORT POST FRONT VIEW ICE BRIDGE DETAIL (P) COAX (E) COAX (P) COAX (E) 0la-0N HANGER (P) Ala -ON HANGER USE (E) WAYESBE PORTS FOR I (6) (P) RUNS OF W COAX (E) AT&T ICE BRIDGE (6) (P) RUNS O' V co. ON (E) ICE MM , r� (P) OIIX-OR RANGER E) Cla-ON HANGER \ V COAX CLICK -ON HANGER ADDITION DETAIL 2 NOT TO SCALE (E) 11' MID[ SUM GTE LL LOA;— C7.:;;; COAX J, Y (E) B' CAI"K PENCE — (E) Aft SHELTER — (E) VER CH SHELTER (E) 9ERZDN ICE BRD[E (E) HONOPORE (E) ACCESS GTE (5) (P) RUNS OF M- COM ATTATCHEO TO EXTERIOR OF TOWER EN ENLARGED SITE PLAN ,.eS. N NORTH GRMLEY CMU0243 HIGHWAY W & H 9TNPET GRIDIEY.CA9 M ISSUE STATUS DAIS OESCdP710H B1 -25-09 CO 90X -29-09 C) IOOX DRAWN BY. A BUAREIE CIEIXEO BC L MO CNTBY APPROWD 81: B. YQWB GAIL 06/29 T q a Hill, a tEe1 O V W" t� I� 37OU1 . N a %mTTII£ ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHM NUMBER A-2 (R�tlti tT Nn.!flM) Tars of EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION NORTH GRMLEY CNU0243 MG—AY99* BxONk2T GWDUY.CAZM ISSUE STATUS DATE DESWRON BY m-23- m m M-29CD 10OX t ou" at a oLqaml CHEWED 81 L NmDITBY .. ;T. .... JDATE. 06/2982 I",ng W. 1 wa lit! I t, 16 L mime ELEVATIONS SHM NUMUR A-3 ,• 0" Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile www.buttecounty.neVdds www.buttegeneraIplan.net ADMINISTRATION " BUILDING " PLANNING April 3, 2008 Frank Schabarum Wireless Site Development Specialist Authorized Representative for AT&T Wireless 10615 Quail Hollow Lane Redding, CA 96003 RE: Modification to MUP 00-11 Dear Frank: Thank you for the opportunity to review your request to modify Minor Use Permit 00-11. The Department of Development Services has determined that the proposed replacement of three (3) existing panel antennas with three (3) new "like -kind" panel antennas and the addition of six (6) RETS (remote electrical tilt units) to the 3 new panel antennas; 2 per antenna, are considered minor changes and can be approved administratively by the Department. Please find attached the signed letter you submitted for approval. If you have any other questions please do not hesitate contacting me. Sincerely, y�WLAIl- Mark Michelena, Senior Planner Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division (530) 538-7376 mmichelena@buttecounty. net • atat April 2, 2008 Mr. Mark Michelena Senior Planner Butte County 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: AT&T Mobility Site - CNU0243 Use Permit MUP00-11 — April 27, 2000 APN: 022-170-066 Hwy 99 and B Street, Gridley Dear Mark: E Reference is made to Use Permit MUP00-11 that entitled the predecessor to AT&T Mobility, the right to place antennas on the existing wireless communications tower at the subject site.. Currently, AT&T Mobility has a total of nine (9) panel antennas at the lower position of the tower as shown in the attached photo.. It is believed that minor changes may be approved administratively by the Director of Development Services upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant. Please accept this written request to allow AT&T Mobility to: 1) Modify the existing permitted wireless telecommunications facility by replacing three (3) existing panel antennas with three (3) new "like -kind" panel antennas. As a matter of fact, the new 51" x 10.3" x 5.5" antennas will be slightly smaller than the existing 52" x 11.4" x 11.4" panel antennas. 2) Add six (6) RETs (remote electrical tilt units) to the 3 new panel antennas; 2 per antenna. Each RET is inches in size and will certainly not be visible from the ground. I would appreciate it if you would confirm these minor changes are in substantial conformance of the original Use Permit and no further zoning procedures are necessary. If that is the case, please sign your name below signifying your acknowledgement. If your signature is pending additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 530-722-0743. I would appreciate it if you could have this letter, when signed by you, scanned and sent back to me using my frank. schabarum@sbcp?lobal.net email address. I would like to thank you in advance for your time and attention to this important'item. Frank Schabarum Wireless Site Development Specialist Authorized Representative for AT&T Wireless Acknowledged by Butte County Planning Division Name: Mark Michelena, Senior Planner Signature: �/j/%L Date: AT&T Mobility. Sacramento Regional Office. 3851 N. Freeway Boulevard . Sacramento CA 95834 0 • Page 1 of '1 file://C:\Documents and Settings\Frank Schabarum\Desktop\RealCom\AT&T UMTS Project Files\CNU02... 4/2/2008 �47 t 1.3 System Components 1.3.1 Remote Control Unit (RCU) Remote Control Unit (RCU) for Kathrein base station antennas' with adjustable electrical downtilt and appropriate mechanical Interface. VP tuo... 860:10025 Input voltage range 10 ,,, 15 V (pin tu10 ... 30 V (pin 6) Power consumption < 1 W (stand by); < 8.5 W (motor activated) Connectors 11 2 x 8 pin connector according to IEC 60130.9; conforming with AISG Daisy chain in: male; Daisy chain out: female Hardware interfaces RS 48SAlB (pin 5, pin 3); power supply (pin 1, pin 6); DC return (pin 7); conforming with AiSG Logical interface HEX coded commands based on HDLC protocol, conforming with AISG Adjustment time (full range) 40 sec (typically, depending on antenna type) Adjustment cycles > 50,000 Temperature range —40 °C ... +60 °C Protection class IP 24 Housing motorial Profile: Aluminium waled; cover. Zinc diecastcoated; varnished housing (RAL 7035, Ilghtgrey) Weight 525 g(without daisy chain termination) Packing size 245 x 93 x 102 mm Dimensions (H x W x D) 197.8 x 59.5 x 49.5 mm (with daisy chain termination) 1)Tightning torque for fixing the connector must Ile between 0.5-1 Nm. Standards EN 60950-1 (Safety) EN 55022 (Emission) EN 55024 (Immunity) ETS 300019-1-4 (Environmental) Ceriincaiion: CE Soope d supply: RCU with suitable attachment Interface for the antenna. . Detachabledaisy chain termination. Features: Compact size. Suitable far daisy chain and splitter solutions. •' r Easy attachment without dismantling of antennas. Suitable for operation under outdoor conditions. Filli, SEI. s i WAISG iuXtPN W48iMSudo64evp Daisy choln-tn Daisy chain out Bottom side of RCIJ 9 -Eatte county L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 July 3, 2002 AT&T Wireless Services Attention: Howard Yee 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Re: Minor Use Permit 00-11 for AT&T Wireless Services, APN 022-170=066, located on the west side of Highway 99, 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs, Butte County Dear Mr. Yee: i Thank you for submittal of the documents and pictures regarding removal of the gate on the site access road on the above referenced parcel. The condition of Minor Use Permit 00-11 requiring relocation of the gate has been satisfied by the permanent removal of the gate. it I have sent a memorandum to the Butte County Building Division Manager that states the Planning Division does not object to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the equipment shelter. You should contact the Building Division to determine if all their conditions have satisfied to allow issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter,:please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at (530) 538-7153 or via E-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner cc Building Division Interoffice Memorandum TO: Mike Vieira, Building Division Manager FROM: Steve Betts 10' SUBJECT: AT&T equipment shelter and antenna, APN 022-170-066 Planning Division Phone: 538-7153 DATE: July 2, 2002 FAX: 538-7785 Our previous memorandum to you allowed the applicant to apply power to the new equipment shelter and antenna on this property. However, we requested that the Building Division not issue a Certificate of Occupancy until such time as the matter of a gate on the site access road was resolved. The gate issue has been resolved to our satisfaction, and the Building Division can issue the Certificate of Occupancy once all of your conditions, if any, are met by the applicant. Enclosed please find documents that state the gate issue has been resolved. Interoffice Memorandum TO: Mike Vieira, Building Division Manager FROM: Steve Betts SUBJECT: AT&T equipment shelter and antenna, APN 022-170-066 DATE: July 2, 2002 Planning Division Phone: 538-7153 FAX: 538-7785 Our previous memorandum to you allowed the applicant to apply power to the new equipment shelter and antenna on this property. However, we requested that the Building Division not issue a Certificate of Occupancy until such time as the matter of a gate on the site access road was resolved. The gate issue has been resolved to our satisfaction, and the Building Division can issue the Certificate of Occupancy once all of your conditions, if any, are met by the applicant. Enclosed please find documents that state the gate -issue has been resolved. e A)6/26/02 WED 13:51 FAX lij 001 • June 26, 2002 Steve Betts, Senior Planner Planning Division Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 4 . ANTWireless 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 VIA FAX: 530-538-7785 Re: MUP 00-11/west side of Highway 99, 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs Dear Mr. Betts: As you know, a condition of the above referenced use permit requires AT&T Wireless to relocate the existing gate at least 3.6 meters from the edge of the existing pavement in order provide an adequate stacking distance for a vehicle entering the site. Because the landlord would not allow AT&T to relocate the gate, Cal Trans agreed to allow AT&T to widen the driveway and construct a shoulder area. Subsequently, American Tower Corporation (tower owner) agreed to pay the landlord $8,000 for the right to relocate the gate. After payment, ATC relocated the gate to provide for the stacking area for vehicles. As a result, AT&T did not construct the shoulder improvements because we complied with the original condition of the use permit to setback the gate. I'm forwarding a copy of the agreement between the landlord and ATC. Also, I'm having the contractor take pictures of the gate and access and will forward the pictures to demonstrate compliance with the use permit. I hope this information will clarify the access issue and allow AT&T to obtain a final occupancy permit. If you have any questions, please call me at (916) 798-6148. Yours truly, Howard Yee Contractor Representative for AT&T Wireless U JUN 2-6 2002 Recycled Paper BUTTE COUNTY _06/26/02 WED 13:52 FAX -r. June 8, 2001 Mr. Gregory Anderson Mr. Keith Anderson 87 B Street Biggs, CA 95917 AMMERICAN TOWER NYSE AMY • .® 0002. Re: Letter of Authorization allowing American Tower Delawarc Corporation ("ATC") to remove gate on a parcel of land, APN 022-170-059 in Butte County, California, owned by Keith Anderson and Cheryl Anderson, husband and wife as joint tenants as to an Y2 interest and Gregory Anderson and Linda Anderson, husband and wife as joint tenants as to a'/ interest ("Property Owners"); ATC Site No. 82517 `Biggs" Dear Property Owners: This letter shall represent the agreement between Property Owners and ATC allowing ATC to remove the gate currently located within ATC's access easement, as depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto. Property Qwnes agree that at�o tirrie-ovilI agate or �y othetol,s�t[on�in'sta';3ed'wittriri`ATC's accesseaietn��r` from Hwy 99 to the leased property, without the prior written consent of ATC. In valuable consideration for this authorization, ATC agrees to pay Property Owners a one-time payment of eight thousand dollars ($8,000.00), and by signature below acknowledge receipt of this consideration. Two original copies of this letter are enclosed. Please indicate your approval by signing each original letter in the space indicated below and initialing Exhibit A attached hereto. Please return one original copy of these items to ATC's Rcpresentative and retain one original copy for your records. Sincerely, Doug Murphy Real Estate Manager Authorization: By signing below and initialing the attached Exhibit A, the Property Owners bereby authorize the removal of the gate and acknowledge their agreement to other considerations referenced above. Keith Anderson CheW Andjlrson Grego arson Lin Anderson 9828 Business Park Drive, Su/re A • Sacramento, California 95827 Phone: (916) 364-8190 fino/7.0n'd 6RRc4 N0T.T.VW0.;W0') xaaeo.T. erWC)Tx57GTW Fax.- (916) 364-8334 RfVQ%0CQTF /S':nT 7nn7 07"Unn 06/26/02 WED 13:52 FAX 0 0 EXHMIT A 657. -mIii. . —w• • -. -----_ PRo�� Eo a ^ MGATES AT SI' T -95" -0M' F-1, AD - AREA 'Nt _,F OPQSED V C.L. FENCE Ng7' *'lTRAND- §--VA1r t A TOP, AT 6O' X.60' SITE -PERIMETER 'OPOSED 2:1. fLL ?E AT PEF.I>'iSETER PAC?EI; T0,95% FLOW LINE .FXTS'!'. BITCH N_. .-mow Q003 col xrrnanrn TC IC!nT 7n 117 A7•Idnn - ... • .' .:..:.::. j ' ,Ole f ........ :.! EXIST. CENTER LlK •_�� xrrnanrn TC IC!nT 7n 117 A7•Idnn ;06/26/02 FEED 13:53 FAX .rte • mww tie' - — 'Pa • tot Y. . piderof_ pp For +:L22101?06I: 000 2 5 2'? 3406 PAIL D00/D00'd SB2S# 0004. 1 CnT 7.nn7..47.am NOIIVVOdNOO tiSMOS NVOIVSKV 6%f.RD9f 9Th <s� r.r,• :fav n June 7, 2001 AT&T Wireless Services Attention: Howard Yee 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEA L. TY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 Re: Minor Use Permit 00-11 for AT&T Wireless Services, APN 022-170-066, located on the west side of Highway 99, 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs, Butte County Dear Mr.•Yee : Because Caltrans has requested that AT&T Wireless Services install a 100 -foot road approach, and not the standard 50 -foot approach as was anticipated by you, AT&T Wireless Services is granted an additional 30 days to complete the the driveway improvements requested by Caltrans. The additional 30 days should give you sufficient time to submit plans to Caltrans for review and approval, and to construct the required 100 -foot long road approach. The additional 30 -day period will end on July 7, 2001.. Per our May 1, 2001, letter to you, AT&T Wireless Services was allowed to connect the equipment shelter to electrical power for testing purposes only. This still applies. The County Building Division will not issue a Certificate of Occupancy for your equipment shelter until such time as the Caltrans -requested improvements are finished. Should you have any further questions regarding these comments, please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at (530) 538-7153 or via E-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner cc Building Division 06/01/01 FRI 09:50 FAX June 1, 2001 AT&T R Stephen Betts, Senior Planner 2729 Prospect Park Drive Planning Division Rancho Cordova. Ca 95670 Department of Development Services VIA FAX 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 Re: MUP 00-11/west side of 99, 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs Dear Mr. Betts: On May 1, 2001, the Planning Division allowed AT&T Wireless Semces to obtain a "green tag" to allow PG&E to provide electrical power to our wireless facility in Biggs. The approval was based on AT&T's commitment to complete the driveway improvements by May 31, 2001. As you know, our contractors have been working with Caltrans to obtain'an encroachment permit for the improvements. After providing me with the driveway standards, Caltrans decided to change the requirements whern our construction contractor applied for the encroachment permit. Caltrans requested improvement plans to include a 100 -foot of pavement (instead of 50 -foot) north of the entrance and adjacent to Highway 99. We have already directed our civil engineers to prepare the drawing and Caltrans agreed to expedite the review process. Unfortunately, we did not anticipate the delay and it will take additional time to obtain the Caltrans encroachment permit. AT&T is requesting a 30 -day extension to complete the improvements. Thank you for considering our request. Yours truly, Howard Yee Contractor Zoning Manager for -AT&T Wireless Services Cc: Craig Bloom, AT&T Shelly Neace, AT&T Joe Federico, ATC Bryan Mullen, Bechtel Recycled Paper a� 4Ito %43- 0 061 s April 30, 2001 Steve Betts Senior Planner Department of Development Services Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 0 ATT 2729 Prospect Park Dr Rancho Cordova. CA 95670 Re: MUP 00-11/west side of Highway 99, 800 ft. north of B Street, Biggs Dear Mr. Betts: Butte County approved MUP 00-11 subject to conditions to allow AT&T Wireless Serv- ices to co -locate on an existing 150 foot tower. Per Caltrans request, the County imposed a condition that requires AT&T to relocate the existing access gate at least 3.6 meters from the edge of the highway. However, the current property owner will not allow us to relocate the gate to comply with the condition. On April 27, 2001, Caltrans agreed to modify the condition and required AT&T to widen the'driveway entrance to 24 feet with a 15 foot radius. In addition, Caltrans will not al- lowparking on the shoulder and requires the use of a small pilot car when large trucks enter the property. As you'know,�AT&T completed the construction of its equipment shelter and antennas, and needs a "green tag" from the County in order to obtain electricity to the site. We need electrical service to test our equipment and get the site on the air. AT&T wants to obtain the green tag before it completes the driveway modification, which will involve a encroachment permit process and take additional time. The site is critical to provide ade- quate service to the area. AT&T will commit to completing the driveway modifications by May 31, 2001. During the next 30 -days, AT&T will bid and award a contract for the work, obtain an encroach- ment permit from Caltrans, coordinate with California Highway Patrol, and mobilize and construct the improvements. The estimated cost of the improvements is $8,000. If you have any questions on. our time frame,. please give me a call at (916) 7.61-9271 or Howard. -Yee at;(91.6) 798-6148.; :... ,.. _.. Yoi, S`` , 'J, t: t7 .%i.'. '''5;.. .... i��. .� ,., `ae �t . rr•:-A;:1..:.' �{ljC� '� , IVO Shelly Neace Site Acquisition Manager OD a(9 Recycled Paper MAY 7 2001 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 1 May 1, 2001 AT&T Wireless Services Attention: Shelly Neace 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Asutte Count, LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-33.7 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 Re: MUP 00-11/west side of Highway 99, 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs Dear Ms. Neace: The Planning Division has reviewed your April 30, 2001, letter concerning the above referenced project site. We will allow the Building Division to "green tag" the site to allow PG&E to provide electrical power to your equipment. However, this is with the understanding that the driveway improvements requested by Caltrans in their April 27, 2001, letter to you are completed by May 31, 2001. The Minor Use Permit for the project will be administratively modified to reflect the conditions requested by Caltrans in their April 27 letter. Additionally, the county Building Division will not issue a Certificate of Occupancy for your equipment shelter until such time as the Caltrans - requested improvements are finished. Should you have any further questions regarding these comments, please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at (530) 538-7153 or via E-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. Sincerely, �v r -- Stephen Betts Senior Planner INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION To: Mike Vieira, Building Division Manager From: Steve Betts Subject: AT&T equipment shelter and antenna, APN 022-170-066 Date: May 1, 2001 Previously we had requested that the Building Division not allow electrical power to be applied to AT&T's equipment shelter, and the final inspection not be performed, until such time as the gate issue was resolved with Caltrans. Based upon Caltrans' comments in their letter dated April 27, 2001, we will allow power to be applied to AT&T's equipment shelter and antenna. However, we request that the Certificate of Occupancy not be issued until the Caltrans -requested driveway improvements are completed. I will notify you when that has been accomplished. Enclosed please find copies of Caltrans' letter and a letter from AT&T regarding this issue. 04/30/01 MON 14:04 FAX April 30, 2001 Steve Betts, Senior Planner Department of Development Services Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 Z'(01 AT&T 2729 Prospect Park Or Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Re: MUP 00-11/west side of Highway 99, 800 ft. north of B Street, Biggs Dear Mr. Betts: Butte County approved MUP 00-11 subject to conditions to allow AT&T Wireless Serv- ices to co -locate on an existing 150 foot tower. Per Caltrans request, the County imposed a condition that requires AT&T to relocate the existing access ,gate at least 3:6 meters from the cadge 'of the highway. However, the current property owner will not allow us to relocate the gate to comply with the condition. On April 27, 2001, Caltrans agreed to modify -the condition and required AT&T.to widen the driveway entrance to 24 feet with a 15 foot radius.. ]n: addition; Caltrans: will. not al- low parking on.the:shoulder .and requires the use of a small pilot car when large trucks enter the -property. As you know, AT&T completed'the construction of its equipment shelter and antennas, and needs a "green tag" from the County in order to obtain electricity to the site. We need electrical service to test our equipment and get the site on the air. AT&T wants to obtain the green tag before it completes the driveway modification, which will involve a. encroachment permit process and take additional time. The site is critical to provide ade- quate service to the area. AT&T will commit to completing the driveway modifications by May 31; 2001. During the next 30 -days, AT&T will bid and award a contract for the work, obtain an encroach- ment permit from Caltrans, coordinate with California Highway Patrol, and mobilize and construct the improvements. The estimated cost of the improvements is $8,000. If you have any questions on our time frame, please give me a call at (916) 761-9271 or Howard Yee at (916) 798-6148. Yo , Shelly Neace Site Acquisition Manager OD Q)(9 Recycled Paper D C C FIVE APR 3 0 2001 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION .. a STATE O C/;._l-IF,ORNIA-BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOOAGENCY • GRAY DAVIS, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 P.O. BOX 911 MARYSVILLE, CA 95901 TDD Telephone (530) 741-4509 FAX (530) 741.5346 Telephone (530) 741-4025 April 27, 2001 Post -it® Fax Note 7671 Date s'3 pages 3 To � vror�cl Tor�•c5cJc From �4 5 Co./Dept. Co /^. o.. FIRnnirg Phone# P oe#S3811-iLS3 Fax #'4`U 4Si-oZSS I Fax# OOBUT0028 03 -BUT -99 PM 7.84 AT&T Cellular Antenna, North Gridley Site MUP00-11 Application, Revised Requirements Ms. Shelly Neace, Site Acquisition Manager AT&T Wireless Services 2729 prospect park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Dear Ms. Neace: Thank you for your patience in oui being able to adequately respond to your February 21, 2000 request for a revaluation of our recommendations to Butte County regarding their conditions for approval on your Minor Use Permit 00-11. These comments are also being provided in response to numerous phone requests for a re-evaluation of our prior comments of March 9, 2000 (OOBUT0033). The reevaluation required a Caltrans survey of the State Route (SR) 99 right of way fronting your project site and a traffic analysis based on the results of the revised boundaries. A color copy of the aforementioned Field Survey is enclosed with corrections to the Plot Plan that you submitted with your Use Permit Application. Note that it indicates that the existing gate leading to your project site is located on private land, 16 feet from the edge of pavement for the SR 99 travelled way. We understand that the landowner will not allow you to remove or move this gate to at least 3.6 meters from the highway as we had recommended. It also does not appear possible to reconstruct the driveway to regular Caltrans standards because it would at least entail removing the existing gate and replacing it with two gates: one at the entrance of the tower facility and one at the entrance of the property owner's road access. We also considered as a last recourse, if the driveway could not be reconfigured to Caltrans standards, whether the shoulder,could be widened to 10 feet, for 100 feet north of the driveway entrance:, without interferirig'with the flow of traffic. However, the proposed project should not have a significant impact on State Route (SR) 99 traffic operations,if all of the following alternative measures are taken - No parking on the shoulder will be allowed at any time for construction and/or maintenance vehicles and/or equipment. 0 ) -0 n \ j �,-3 'ALM aZ� i N W1 -3z O Thank you for your patience in oui being able to adequately respond to your February 21, 2000 request for a revaluation of our recommendations to Butte County regarding their conditions for approval on your Minor Use Permit 00-11. These comments are also being provided in response to numerous phone requests for a re-evaluation of our prior comments of March 9, 2000 (OOBUT0033). The reevaluation required a Caltrans survey of the State Route (SR) 99 right of way fronting your project site and a traffic analysis based on the results of the revised boundaries. A color copy of the aforementioned Field Survey is enclosed with corrections to the Plot Plan that you submitted with your Use Permit Application. Note that it indicates that the existing gate leading to your project site is located on private land, 16 feet from the edge of pavement for the SR 99 travelled way. We understand that the landowner will not allow you to remove or move this gate to at least 3.6 meters from the highway as we had recommended. It also does not appear possible to reconstruct the driveway to regular Caltrans standards because it would at least entail removing the existing gate and replacing it with two gates: one at the entrance of the tower facility and one at the entrance of the property owner's road access. We also considered as a last recourse, if the driveway could not be reconfigured to Caltrans standards, whether the shoulder,could be widened to 10 feet, for 100 feet north of the driveway entrance:, without interferirig'with the flow of traffic. However, the proposed project should not have a significant impact on State Route (SR) 99 traffic operations,if all of the following alternative measures are taken - No parking on the shoulder will be allowed at any time for construction and/or maintenance vehicles and/or equipment. 'April 27, 2001 Page 2 . • A small pilot vehicle shall provide an open entrance for large trucks prior to their arrival. • The driveway base must be reconstructed to commercial standards, with a 4 -inch minimum asphalt base. • The driveway configuration should be constructed to an alternative Caltrans commercial driveway standard (24 feet wide at the right of way line and using 15 -foot radii). A Caltrans Encroachment Permit will be required for any work conducted in the State right of way, including for installation or removal of signs, traffic control; culvert maintenance, changes in drainage patterns or construction of any new- or rehabilitated access. Grading and drainage plans with, before, and after hydraulic calculations will need to be submitted during the Caltrans Encroachment Permit process. Mr. Bruce Capaul, Caltrans District 3 Office of Permits, at (530) 741-5374, can be contacted for an application. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Terri Pencovic, Local Development/Inter-Governmental Review Coordinator, at (530) 741-4199. Sincerely, WAYNE SCHNELL, CHIEF Office of Regional and Transit Planning Enclosure C: Mr. Steve Betts, Planner, Department of Development Services, Butte County Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965-3397 & by fax Mr. Howard Yee, AT&T, fax 916-843-7522 0 m p O HIGH WA Y 99 ---------------------- -- ----------------- eP--------- --- grove I - gravel a - .... ................... - ............................... - ..........................--.---.-............ N � I Q I _ _ + ._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._..._._._._._ ................... / 1 + N m t L O + m > p O m J m p O O O C BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY, I HAVE LOCATED m p a THE VARIOUS TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES SHOWN - ON THIS PLAT AS THEY RELATE TO THE STATE J x o m RIGHT OF WAY. - lb. LS 3756 JAMES R. ADAMS LS 3756 Ezplr�:c/ a/as. o OFCAUF • 0 c 0) , O , 4 - HIGH H C� ----- ——ep-----------1----------.-------_------------� — ----'------------ep------------ -------- r, grove I i N ---------------------------------------------------------T--------------- ---- —-------------------------- - --------F------ ' � t W � tD i a _ _ _ o) °_._._._°_._°_._._._._°_._°_°_._°_._°_._°_._._°_°_°_°_°_°_._°_°_._._°_°_°_._°_ _°_°_°_._ _._._._._._._._ ._ _._.� + CL cr CL CL + n 0 L O + N O N Q ' N + O t ch O� SED ON A FIELD SURVEY, I HAVE LOCATED o °' c E VARIOUS TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES SHOWN — `� THIS PLAT AS THEY RELATE TO THE STATE aa) o rc i GHT OF WAY. O -k.Al ✓ � �_._._._:_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ jo L � P :a. LS ?756 . JAMES R. ADAMS LS 3756 Expires: ae - o LL N� ��OF CAS\F� i 4-27=2001 1:000M FROM D3-CALTRANS-PLANNING 530 741 5346 N STATE OF CALIFORNIA -BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND KOUSING AGENCY GRAY DAVIS. Govemor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 . P.O. BOX 911 V ARYSVILLE. CA: 95801 TDO T®lephww (550) 741-4509 FA7, (5-16) 741 "6` TWvD�1W+6'i53C}'Ta7-4.^25" . April 27, 2001 OOBUT0028 03 -BUT -99 PM 7.84 AT&T Cellular Antenna, North Gridley Site. MUP00-11 Application, Revised Requirements Ms. Shelly Neace, Site Acquisition Manager AT&T Wireless Services 2729 prospect park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Dear Ms. Neace: "PINED APR 2 7 2001 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION . OROV14 CALIFORNIA Thank you for your patience in our being able to adequately respond to your February 21, 2000 request for a revaluation of our recommendations to Butte County regarding their conditions for approval on your Minor Use Permit 00-11. These comments are also being provided in response to numerous phone requests for a re-evaluation of our prior comments of March 9, 2000 (OOBUT0033). The reevaluation required a Caltrans. survey of the State Route (SR) 99 right of way fronting your project site and a traffic analysis based on the results of the revised boundaries. A color copy of the aforementioned Field Surrey is enclosed with corrections to the Plot Plan that you submitted with your Use Permit Application. Note that it indicates that the existing gate leading to your project site is located on private land, 16 feet from the edge of pavement for the SR 99 travelled way. We understand that the landowner will not allow you to remove or move this gate to at least 3.6 meters from the highway as we had recommended. It also does not appear possible to reconstruct the driveway to regular Caltrans standards because it would at leastentail removing the existing gate and replacing it with two gates: one at the entrance of the tower facility and one at the entrance of the property owner's road access. We also considered as a last recourse, if the driveway could not be reconfigured to Caltrans standards, whether the shoulder could be widened to 10 feet, for 100 feet north of the driveway entrance, without interfering with the flow of traffic. However, the proposed project should not have a significant impact on State Route (SR) 99 traffic operations if all of the following alternative measures are taken: a No parking on the shoulder will be allowed at any time for construction and/or maintenance vehicles and/or equipment. 4-27-2001 1-00PM FROM D3-CALTRANS_PLANNING 530 741 5346 P.2. 4 0 April 27, 2001 Page 2 • A small pilot vehicle shall provide an open entrance for large trucks prior to their arrival. • The driveway base must be reconstructed to commercial standards, with a 4 -inch minimum asphalt base. • The driveway configuration should be constructed to an alternative Caltrans commercial driveway standard (24 feet wide at the right of way line and using 15 -foot radii). A Caltrans Encroachment Permit will be required for any work conducted in the State right of way, including for installation or removal of signs, traffic control, culvert maintenance, changes in drainage patterns or construction of any new or rehabilitated access. Grading and drainage plans with, before, and after hydraulic calculations will need to be submitted during the Caltrans Encroachment Permit. process. Mr. Bruce Capaul, Caltrans District 3 Office of Permits, at (530) 741-5374, can be contacted for an application. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Terri Pencovic, Local Development/Inter-Govemmental Review Coordinator, at (530) 741-4199. Sincerely, _ ;7C WAYNE SCHNELL, CHIEF Office of Regional and Transit Planning Enclosure C: Mr. Steve Betts, Planner, Department of Development Services, Butte County Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965-3397 & by fax Mr. Howard Yee, AT&T, fax 916-843-7522 60 ATT 2729 Prospect Park Dr Rancho Cordova, CA 95670= January 12, 2001 Tem Pencovic Local Development/Inter-Governmental Review Coordinator State of California Department of Transportation District 3 P.O. Box 911 Marysville, CA 95901 Re: AT&T Wireless Base Station Facility Hwy 99 near B Street, Biggs, CA Butte County - Minor Use Permit #00-11 Condition to Use Permit Dear Ms. Pencovic: Thank you for your time in discussing this matter with Richard Wickersham (a consultant to AT&T Wireless Services) on December 5th As expressed at that time AT&T Wireless respectfully requests CalTrans approval of AT&T's request to Butte County that the condition of moving the fence be removed from the above captioned use permit. In reference to the letter from Dennis Azevedo dated March 9, 2000, to Stephen Betts of the Butte County Planning Department regarding the matter of the relocation of an existing gate, which is in close proximity to Hwy. 99, located near the Anderson/CalTrans property line, Mr. Azevedo states, "We recommend that the gate at this site be moved further from the edge of the SR99 traveled way by at least 3.6 meters" (emphasis added) Since receiving planning approval for this facility, various actions have taken place, which have resulted in the gate being removed by contractors of AT&T Wireless and later replaced by the owner of the property, Mr. Anderson. Relations have become strained between Mr., Anderson and AT&T Wireless during the development of the site which could not have been anticipated. As a result of this situation, compliance with the request by CalTrans and consequently a condition of the Butte County use permit for this telecommunication facility is not possible. Mr. Anderson is steadfast that the gate remains in the location it was originally placed at the time Mr. Azevedo wrote his aforementioned letter. The impact of the gate and AT&T Wireless' site access should be of minimal impact on the traveled way. When providing periodic service to the facility, our technician will visit the site in a moderately sized panel truck. These service vehicles will visit the facility approximately one time per month. We feel that this is the least impact of all the vehicles traveling upon and impacting this access road. Telecommunication operations have been going on at this site since 1993. The AT&T Wireless facility is a collocation with Verizon Wireless (earlier known as Airtouch). , Also, PG&E most likely services its power lines running west from Hwy. 99 through the subject gate. PG&E trucks are larger than those used by either AT&T Wireless or Verizon. It is my understanding there have been no safety problems caused by either of these operations. Regarding the farming operation, it "appears" the gate is passed throu o access the surrounding orchard by the owner or others working the land. E C OEI V E ®1 JAN 16-1001 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISIOM Q& Recycled Paper OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA As of today, the land survey of the CalTrans/Anderson boundary line being conducted by Jim Adams of CalTrans has not been finalized. Once completed should the survey show the gate to be located on CalTrans land, AT&T is requesting that CalTrans relocate the gate if it is still deemed necessary at that time. If the gate is found to be located on the Anderson property, AT&T is requesting that Mr. Anderson should be required to relocate the gate if you still require this action. If it were within the power of AT&T to move the fence, it would gladly do so; However, AT&T does not own the land or the fence rendering AT&T powerless to perform this condition of the Use Permit. AT&T Wireless looks forward to operating this facility and providing improved service to its customers in this portion of Butte County. Your support of our request to remove the condition to the Butte County Use Permit so that we may proceed in the above-described manner is appreciated. If you should have any further questions or concerns Please feel free to contact me at (916) 761-9271 or on my desk phone at (916) 843-6596. I look forward to hearing from you soon and thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Thank you fo our time and attention in this regard, 62-, SANea Site Acquisition Manager. AT&T Wireless Services c.c. Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Betts, Steve From: WICKIE1@aol.com Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 7:09 PM' To: SBetts@buttecounty.net - Cc: shelly.neace@attws.com Subject: Re: Highway 99 Site (MUP 00- 11) - Removal/Relocation of Gate Dear Steve: Per your advice AT&T will proceed as noted and make contact with CalTrans. This is a very unusual situation.' Your fax was received, but not readable. I would greatly appreciate it if you would fax the document again to my alternate fax number, which is 240-250-5687. Thank you very much. Richard Betts, Steve From: Betts, Steve Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 4:02 PM To: 'WICKIE1 @aol.com' Subject: RE: Highway 99 Site (MUP 00= 11) -.Removal/Relocation of Gate Richard, I left a voice mail for you a little while ago today regarding the minor use permit for the colocation of additional antennas on the Highway 99 site(near Biggs), File # MUP 00-11. As you are aware, a condition of the project requires that the gate be moved further away from Highway 99. This condition was requested by Caltrans. Some time ago, I drove by the site and saw that the gate had been removed, which appeared to meet the requirement of the condition (removal vice relocation), and the building permit was allowed to be issued. However, the gate has been put back up in the same location, which is a violation of the condition of the minor use permit. I have spoken to the land owner, Greg Anderson, regarding the cutting down of the gate, and he has also sent us a letter protesting the removal of the gate. He feels as if he is being mistreated and his concerns ignored by the companies involved. He is very angry at the companies involved and with the County. He does not want the gate removed or relocated.. Because of the situation with the gate, we have told the Building Division not to issue the Certificate of Occupancy for the new antennas/communication shelter. This means that the new facilities cannot be legally used and could lead,to code enforcement actions if the new facilities are used without the.Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the gate situation is resolved. Additionally, there is also the possibility that the minor use permit for the new facilities could be revoked (at a noticed public hearing) due to non-compliance with the conditions of the permit. The minor use permit may also be deemed to be lapsed because the Certificate of Occupancy was not issued within one year of approval of the permit and/or because the use was not established within one year of approval. The project was approved by the Butte County Planning Commission on April 27, 2000. The easiest way to solve this situation is for Caltrans to state that the gate can stay where it is. Hopefully you can convince them of that. If not, the County may have to take the action(s) as outlined above. Please do your best to work with Mr. Anderson to resolve the gate issue. Thank you for your quick attention to this matter. Steve Betts Senior Planner Butte County Planning Division Mr. Steve Betts, • November 27, 2000 PIM" IN91Y ? YAN .4•i int;-;ii��1111G. I am writing this letter in regards to a situation which has come about involving American Tower, Bechtel Construction, AT&T and The Lyle Company. Several months ago Richard Wickersham approached my brother (Keith Anderson) and me to lease part of our ground out. Our property is on the Northwest corner of B Street and Hwy. 99E in Biggs, California. We had agreed to an amount and length of . time for the easement which AT&T wanted. While talking to Richard Wickersham we discussed that if everything goes through that we would be willing to work with them on a gate which is also believed to be on our property. (I say believed because it is now being surveyed.) Well, a few months later I get a call from Richard asking if anyone has contacted me because they have changed hands from AT&T to American Tower and they want to get going on this project as soon as possible. I told Richard, no one has called as of yet. A few weeks later I get a call from a person who wanted to know where to put our gate, which they had just cut down. I told this person that there was no contract signed as of yet and that they shouldn't have cut our gate down. I asked him how he would like it if I went and cut his fence down around his swimming pool without permission. He said he had to get the gate down to start things going on the tower and had instructions to do so. Well, I thought I would be getting a call shortly to put our agreement together. After a few months with no phone call, I gave Richard a call to ask what was going on with our easement agreement. Richard said that they decided to go a different route by using PG&E for the easement and would no longer need us. I told Richard then, that I wanted the gate put back up. He said he would check it out but that would hold them up. I said the way they went about this matter by leading us on was as poor as it gets, and I wanted that gate up. Later I got a call from Richard and Shelly Neace (Site Acquisition Manager) from AT&T. She said she didn't have to put up the gate because it wasn't on our property and if they did, it would take awhile. I told her when they wanted it down they had no problem getting someone over there. She stated her surveyor said it was on Cal Trans property and I responded by letting her know that Paul Satur (previous owner) had already gone over this with Cal Trans and according to him it is on our property. She then told me they had their own surveyors and we have ours and they were not putting the gate up anytime soon. I then contacted Jim Adams from Cal Trans and he is now still figuring out where the gate lies. He had told Richard that he felt the gate was on our private property. My brother and I welded the gate back up and then not too long after this Bectel cut the gate a second time. Post -it® Fax Note 7671 Datei 2 S 66 paoofgeslo.3 To From acv � 5 Co./Dept. Co. Phone # Phone Fax O SO- Seo Fax # r I believe these people have violated the conditions of the permit. The gate was to be cut down and moved back 3.6 meters before they could start building anything in this compound. They deceived you and us by cutting the gate down without permission and getting an OK to build and not moving the gate back.. They are also parking equipment on our corner property which I have told them twice now not to do. They have run over our walnut crop while it was on the ground, which I have also told them not to do. My brother and I are trying to cope with this, but their lack of manners and their way of doing business are very unprofessional. I know you are a busy individual, but if you could recheck the conditions of the permit and get back to me on this matter I would appreciate it. You can contact me at 530-751-6032. Thank you for you help in this matter. Respectfully, Greg Anderson OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 18392 ISSUED BY DATE RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC AFP0 PLANNING PUBLIC N \i FIRE NOE/NOD OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM NO. RECEIVED: WORKS SALES HEALTH. F/G FEE OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 18392 ISSUED BY .r. OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT . 18555 ISSUED BY �sm 7"; DATE RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC LAFC PLANNING PUBLIC ENV. '�IRE NQE MOD OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVE m D FROM NO. RECEIVED WORKS SALES' HEALTH F/G FEE OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT . 18555 ISSUED BY a OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 18555 ISSUED BY .77 DATE RECEIPT! NO. TOTAL RECEIVED PUBLIC WORKS LAFCO PLANNING PUBLIC SALES ENV. HEALTH FIRE F/G FEED OTHER APPLICANT rn up oc RECEIVED FROM OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 18555 ISSUED BY July 14, 2000 Mr. Tom Parillo, Director Butte County Dept. of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA. 95965-7785 Re: Compliance with MUP-00-11, Conditions 11 and 12. Dear Mr. Parillo, ATST 2729 Prospect Park Dr Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 OLUVE JUL i 7 2VU DVSTPLANNINGTTN Please find enclosed with this letter a bond in the amount of $50,000 which is posted as a surety guarantee for the removal of the cellular facilities entitled to AT&T Wireless Services under MUP 00-11 as required by Condition 12. We have also included an estimate of today's cost of removal of our proposed cellular facility from T -Com Construction. The $50,000 bond amount is sufficient to fund the removal of this facility for the anticipated 20 to 30 year lifespan of this facility. We have also included a check in the amount of $2,500 to cover the cost of having an independent RF test performed by a consultant selected by the County. This test is a requirement of Condition 11. The submittal of these two items should complete the information needed to be provided to the County prior to building permit issuance. The building permit should now be able to be released upon completion of plan review. Sincerely, A/ /. Arlan Nickel Real Estate Project Manager �6 Recycled Paper 07-05-00 15:48 BECHTEL AWS SAC ID=916 537 2600 TOM 6301 ANGELO CT.. SUITE #4 LOOMIS, CA 95650 (918) 652-8558 PHONE (916) 652-8788 FAX FAX TRANSMITTAL Date: 5/17/00 No. of Pages: 1 (including this sheet) To: KEN TAYLOR Fax No: 530-823-8961 Company: AT & T / BECHTEL From: _ Jeff Davenport Message: REGARDING DISMANTELING THE AT&T N. GRIDLEY SITE AND RESTORING THE AREA BACK TO ORINGONAL CONDITION. $ 15,000.00 06-06-09 12:40 TO:BECHTEL AW5 SAC FROM: P0= ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY St. Paul, Minnesota Bond No. SA6895 A Capital Stock Company LICENSE OR PERMIT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, AT&T Wireless Services of California, Inc. , of 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 , as Principal, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation, and having its principal office in the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto County of Butte, California Dept. of Development Services, 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 , hereinafter called the Obligee, in the penal sum of Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($ 50,000.00 ), lawful money of the United States of America to be paid to said Obligee, for which payment well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Signed with our hands and sealed with our seals this, the 7th day of July ) A.D. 2000 WHEREAS, a LICENSE or PERMIT has been granted by the Obligee to the above bounden Principal authorizing the Principal For removal of Cellular Tower and related Facilities upon abandonment of Site Now therefore, the Condition of this Obligation is such, that if the said Principal shall faithfully observe the provisions of the Laws, Ordinances, and Resolutions, governing the issuance of this License or Permit, then this Obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. The Surety may cancel this bond at any time by filing with the Obligee thirty (30) days written notice of its desire to be relieved of liability. The Surety shall not be discharged from any liability already accrued under this bond, or which shall _accrue hereunder before the expiration of the thirty day period. •4 T .A AT&T irvices "1"11 Principal ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARIME INSURANCE COMPANY BY $W0414 Terry A4fn Gonzales -Selman, tt ney-in-Fact 11077 Rev. 5-84 Printed in U.S.A.. STATE OF NEW JERSEY COUNTY OF SOMERSET On this 7th day of July 2000 , before me, the undersigned notary public, personally came:. Paul Riley to me known and who, being duly sworn by me, did depose and say that he works in Basking Ridge, New Jersey and that he is the Assistant Secretary of the corporation described within and that he executed the foregoing instrument. Brian E. Stuhr My Commission Expires 04-01-2001 (Notary Public) 7heStPaul Power of Attorney No. POWER OF ATTORNEY Seaboard Surety Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company 21637 United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. Certificate No. 406874 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Seaboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York, and that St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company are corporations duly organized und•:r the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Iowa, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein collectively called the "Companies'), and that the Companies do hereby make, constitute and appoint Migdalia Otero, Paula Yip-Ying, J. Holland, Shirley Dewely, Vincent Moy, Theresa Giraldo, Ana W. Oliveras, Tracey D. Watson, Sheilah McGuckin, Terry Ann Gonzales -Selman, Kimberly A. Bruno, Robyn Walsh, Beverly Woolford, Christopher J. McCarty and Debra L. Teplitzky New York New York of the City of , State , their true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fac-,, each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above, to sign its name as surety to, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertaking_=, contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons, guaranteeing th•- performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings req'utrea'or pennitted in any actions or proceedings allowed by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused this instrume Ctobei d a=sealed thi�,)6th day of March 2000 Seaboard Surety Company rO 1 �� �U ited States Fidelity and Guaranty Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurane'Com any t1 t Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurances pany� ! ��� Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, ( I C �v11977JOHN F. PHINNEY, Vice Presidenr�� r� State of Maryland 1 I� •. 1",C City of Baltimore MICHAEL R. MCKIBBEN, Assistant Secretary On this 6th day of March 2000 , before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared John F. Phinney and Michael R. McKibben, who acknowledged themselves to be the Vice President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and' Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and. Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.; and that the seals affixed to the foregoing instrument are the corporate seals of said Companies; and that they, as such, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signing the names of the corporations by themselves as duly authorized officers. �GGPEAt7. Q MM 2 � /tP " rtlt� In Witness Whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. vB49 41C My Commission expires the 13th day of July, 2002. CM �o REBECCA EASLEY-ONOKALA, Notary Public 86203 Rev. 11-99 Printed in U.S.A. This Power of Attorney is granted under and by the authority of the following resolutions adopted by the Boards of Directors of Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. on September 2, 1998, which resolutions are now in full force and effect, reading as follows: RESOLVED, that in connection with the fidelity and surety insurance business of the Company, all bonds, undertakings, contracts and other instruments relating to said business may be signed, executed, and acknowledged by persons or entities appointed as Attorney(s)-in-Fact pursuant to a Power of Attorney issued in accordance with these resolutions. Said Power(s) of Attorney for and on behalf of the Company may and shall be executed in the name and on behalf of the Company, either by the Chairman, or the President, or any Vice President, or an Assistant Vice President, jointly with the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary, under their respective designations. The signature of such officers may be engraved, printed or lithographed. The signature of each of the foregoing officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed-by facsimile to any Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Attomey(s)-in-Fact for purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and subject to any limitations set forth therein, any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company, and any such power so executed and certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is validly attached; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that Attomey(s)-in-Fact shall have the power and authority, and, in any case, subject to the terms and limitations of the Power of Attorney issued them, to execute and deliver on behalf of the Company and to attach the seal of the Company to any and all bonds and undertakings, and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such instrument executed by such Attorneys)-in-Fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if signed by an Executive Officer and sealed and attested to by the Secretary of the Company. I, Michael R. McKibben, Assistant Secretary of Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and Guarannsurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Powe omey executed by said Companies, which is in full force and effect and has not been revoked. T IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand this day of suRrly 0.E 6 'q pO`'M NS`' 4Jp+ 1M4Ugy�° l Flay 927 �tt°PV°q,, It,.m Z: wpVOYgl�:�" � •' � •"^niMWtFD 11 ---' 1 - �' �t•.SEAL •0'1 SEAL%n ,n 1896 1.977 O1.977 1951 ai�•yc�' „ s�F o°' ted:,, %y, >�.... . •;c" °.�O ��bF � Michael R. McKibben, Assistant Secretary ��� �� To verify the authenticity of this Power of Attorney, call 1-800-421-3�88O�an a4sk�tl:e Pow�er�of.Attorney clerk. Please refer to the Power of Attorney number, the above-named individuals and the details of the bond to which.th power0i, A;brhe& ��(Y\ ,�v. 4 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK • SURETY ACKNOWLEDGMENT - NY On the day of.. in the year , before me personally came Terry Ann Gonzales -Selman to rhe known, who, being by me duly sworn did depose and say that he/she resides in New York, NY, that he/she is the Attorney -in -Fact of the ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument that he/she knows the seal of said corporation that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal that it was so affixed by order and the affiant did further depose and say that the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York has pursuant to Section 327 of the Insurance Law of the State of New York issued to ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY his/her certificate of qualification of said Company and its sufficiency under any law of the State of New York as surety and guarantor and the propriety of accepting and approving it as such and that such certificate has not been revoked. ROBYN M. WALSH Notary Public. State of New York No. Ol't'IA5043427 Qualified inNm York County ('ommission Expires May 03, 1 aO0 Notary P lic Financial Statement — December 31, 1999 St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Companv Assets Bonds Stocks Mortgage Loans Real Estate Cash on Hand/Deposit Short Term Investments Other Invested Assets Receivable for Securities Agents' Balances Funds held dep. with Reins Co. Reinsurance Recoverable Guaranty Funds Receivable EDP Equipment Accrued Interest & Dividends Equity/Deposits/Pools &.Assoc. Other Assets Liabilities, Surplus & Other Funds $ 7,360,908,209 Losses $ 6,385,471,184 4,558,379,126 Reins. Payable on Paid Losses 27,670,770 8,000,000 Loss Adjustment Expenses . 1;463,836,071 698,641,132 Contingent Commissions 27,74=,641 22,860,772 Other Expenses 149,951,089 447,292,427 Taxes, Licenses and Fees 40,34_,096 934,058,820 Federal & Foreign Income Taxes 268,546,766 35,349,217 Unearned Premiums 1,485,861,391 937,767,434 Dividends Unpaid - Policyholders 41,785,039 70,860,431 Fund Held - Reins. Treaties 50,255,311 67,589,140 Funds Withheld 88,285,579 5,490,800 Remittances and items not allocated 42,155,768 28,595,201 Provision for Reinsurance 78,176,068 135,892,908 Adjustment for Foreign Exchange 59,916,030 47,919,540 Drafts Outstanding 92,875,598 138,379,316 Payable to Affiliates 41,551.585 Payable for Securities 7,905 189 ,Other Liabilities 305,469:450 Special Reserve -Guaranty Fund 1,000°,000 TOTAL LIABILITIES 10,658,805,625 Guaranty Surplus Fund 1,000,000 Capital Paid Up 20,000,000 Surplus 4,818,178,848 Surplus as Regards Policyholders 4,839,178,348 TOTAL ASSETS $15,497,984,473 TOTAL LIABILITIES & SURPLUS $15.497.984,473 Securities carried at $676,702,264 in the foregoing statement, are deposited as required by law. STATE OF MINNESOTA SS COUNTY OF RAMSEY John C. Treacy, Vice President and Controller of the St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the above described officer of said company; that said company is a corporation duly organized, existing and engaging in business as a surety company under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Minnesota, and has duly complied with all requirements of the laws of said state applicable to said company and is duly qualified to act as surety under such laws; that the above is a true statement of the assets and liabilities of said company of the 31" day of December, 1999. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 28`s day of February, 2000.. ?i4 � BOIS John C. Treacy, ice Pre dent Controller NOTARY PUBLIC • MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION g_`fcdgr\statVLcptcomm\paul\ EXPIRES JAN. 31, 2003 N � TO: FROM: SUBJECT: • NOTICE OF DETERMINATICe Office of Plan.& Research Dept. 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 MAY 2 4 Butte County Clerk �► ' NDA 6 U C .CLERK DEPU Butte County Planning 7 County Center Dr., Oroville 95965 Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: MUP 00-11, Minor Use Permit AP Number: 022-170-066 Applicant: Richard Wickersham AT & T Wireless Services, 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 State_ Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to clearinghouse): Contact Person: Stephen Betts Telephone Number: 538-7601 Project Location: on the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs Project Description: Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co -located on an existing 150 foot tower This is to advise that the Butte County (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approved the above-described project on April 27, 2000, and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will, _X_ will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. _X_ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were, _X_ were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, _X_ was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at: Date received for filing and posting at OPR Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 16dy Wilson Principal Planner DECLARATION OF FEES DT• California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Richard Wickersham AT & T Wireless Services 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 FILING NO. Project Title/file number: CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION () A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee (X) B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED () A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. () OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). 2. () NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: Randy Wilson Title: Principal Plannei Lead Agency: Butte Col L��►IF�%�►.ilI1Z1 TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. • CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FILING FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding (Fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14, California Code of Regulations) Project Title / Butte County Location: MUP 00-11, on the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs Project Description: Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co -located on an existing 150 foot tower Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The County of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a (Negative Declaration or Enviornmental Impact) so as to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact: 2. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence before the County. that the project will have potential for an adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. 3. The County of Butte -has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5 (d), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations, if applicable. 4. The project is hereby found to be de minimis in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Certification: I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. By: Randy ilson Principal Planner Lead Agency: County of Butte Date: May 15, 2000 :... APPENDIX G ' NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACT 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the project described below has been reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code 21100, et. seq.) and a determination has been made that it will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Assessor's Parcel No. 022-170-066 2. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT: Richard Wickersham AT & T Wireless Services, 2729 Prospect Park Drive,Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 3. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co -located on an existing 150 foot tower 4. LOCATION OF PROJECT: on the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs 5. 'MITIGATION MEASURES: None 6. A copy of the initial study regarding the environmental effect of this project is on file at 7 County Cei.ter Drive, Oroville. This study was: X Adopted as presented. Adopted with changes. Specific modifications and supporting reasons are attached. 7. A public hearing on this Negative Declaration was held by the decision making body. Hearing Body: Butte County Planning Commission Date of Determination:rip l 27,2000 Determination: On the basis of the initial study of environmental impact, the information presented at hearings, comments received on the proposal and our own knowledge and independent research: X We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby adopted. We find that the project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, but will not in this case because of attached mitigation measures described in item 5 above, which are by this reference made conditions of project approval. A conditional NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby adopted. Richard Leland, Chairman Butte County Planning Commission Date: 3f �� TO: FROM: SUBJECT: • NOTICE OF DETERMINATIOPO Office of Plan.& Research Dept. 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 NkY 2 4 levo Butte County Clerk ISte-11-am_< Butte County Planning 7 County Center Dr., Oroville 95965 Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: MUP 00-11, Minor Use Permit AP Number: 022-170-066 Applicant: Richard Wickersham AT & T Wireless Services, 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to clearinghouse): Contact Person: Stephen Betts Telephone Number: 538-7601 Project Location: on the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs Project Description: Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co -located on an existing 150 foot tower This is to advise that the Butte County (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) p; has approved the above-described project on April 27, 2000, and has made the following determinations > '~ regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will, _X_ will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. _X_ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were, _X_ were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, _X_ was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at: Date received for filing and posting at OPR May 15 2000 RECEIVED JUN- 0.1 2000 PI ANNING M ON Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 "'nz "2 _LL 16d Wilson Principal Planner SLED' • DECLARATION OF FEES DUl• (California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Richard Wickersham AT & T Wireless Services' 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 FILING NO. Project Title/file number: CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION () A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee (X) B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED () A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. ( ) OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). 2. () NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official r By: Randy Wilson Title: Principal Planner Lead Agency: Butte County Department of _ Development Services Date: May 15, 2000 TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THRE . COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING.- ALL ILING ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. a • 11 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FILING FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding (Fish and Game Code Sec: 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14, California Code of Regulations) Project Title / Butte County Location: MUP 00-11, on the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs Project Description: Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co -located" on an existing 150 foot tower Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): ,1. The County of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a (Negative Declaration or Enviornmental Impact) so as to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact: 2. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence before the County that the project will have potential for an adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. 3. The County of Butte has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5 (d), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations, if applicable. 4. The project is hereby found to be de minimis in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Certification: I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. By: Randy ilson Principal Planner Lead Agency: County of Butte Date: Mayes, 2000 May 30, 2000 AT&T Wireless Services Attention: Richard Wickersham 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 . utte countil LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAJTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-339 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Re: Bonding for a Radio -Frequency Test, File # MUP 00-11 Dear Mr. Wickersham: Condition # 11 of the above referenced Minor Use Permit requires that AT&T Wireless Services. post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that.is.sufficient to cover the cost of a.one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. The Director of Development Services has determined that the bond is $2,500.00. In the event that a RF test is required and the $2,500.00 is not completely expended, the remaining funds will be returned to AT&T Wireless Services. Should you have any questions regarding these matter, please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner Betts, Steve From: WICKIE1@aol.com Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2000 9:32 PM To: sbetts@buttecounty.net Cc: mike.addamo@attws.com; shelly.neace@attws.com; arlan.nickel@attws.com; bigdad@foothill.net; kcvanhe@bechtel.com; craig.bloom@attws.com Subject: MUP 00-11 -- Condition #11 -- ATTWS N. Gridley Site Dear Steve: For AT&T Wireless processing of this item, please provide a short.statement addressing the amount ($2,500.00 per your voice mail) to be posted for a performance security... to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant... sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. Please note any amount over the projected cost will be returned to AT&T Wireless. Please call me with any question. Thank you very much. Richard c- SENDER: ■Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive: the m i'Complete itbms 3, 4a, and 4b. Swe following services (for an H ' ■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form can retum this extra fee): card to you. •Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address m permit. ry ■ Write'Retum Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery ■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date AT & T Wireless Services C delivered. 0 Consult postmaster for fee. 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number d f� -7 (1 O3 ; CL E Richard Wickersham 4b. Service Type e a 0 AT & T Wireless Services ❑ Registered O Certified a W2729 Prospect Park Drive xpress Mail ❑ Insured fl c Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Ef Retum Receipt for Merchandise P COD G a 7. Date of Delivery J z S �I 0 5. Received By: (Print Name) 8. Addressee's Add ess my if req -jested ,I W and fee is paid) j g p 6. Sign e: ddre a or Agent) � A a1 PS Form 3811, December 1994 Domestic Return Receipt UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE . First -Class Mail Postage & Fees'Paid USPS Permit No. G-10 • Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in this box Y COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 Ok eu tte, co, L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y f PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 April 28, 2000 Richard Wickersham AT & T Wireless Services 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 022-170-066, MUP 00-11 Dear Mr. Wickersham: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held April 27, 2000, your request for a Minor Use Permit, was approved subject to the conditions listed on the permit. Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, you must do so in writing, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to 5:00 p.m., Monday, May 8, 2000. The. appeal fee of $50.00 must be paid at that time. If you do not appeal and if there are no other appeal within the 10 calendar -day appeal period, the action of the Planning Commission is final. For purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, a Notice of Exemption must be filed. The fee for the filing of a Notice of Exemption is the $25.00 documentary handling fee. A check made payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $25.00 should be submitted to the Planning Division in order to complete the process. You will receive your valid permit, if there are no appeals, after it has been signed by the"Planning Commission Chairman and we have received your recorded Certification of Ownership. Pursuant to Section 66020. (d) (2) of the Government Code you are hereby notified that you have 90 days to register a protest challenging any fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions imposed as conditions of approval for this project. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant May 9, 2000 Richard Wickersham AT & T Wireless Services 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 022-170-066 Dear Mr. Wickersham: .PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Enclosed is your validated Minor Use Permit No. MUP 00-11 to allow additional antennas to be co - located on an existing 150 foot tower. The property is located on the west_ side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.n:. and 4:00 p.m., Monday.through Friday. Sincerely, . Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services Tamm ie Powell Office Assistant II Enc. cc: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health. t Count _ .LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY May 9, 2000 Richard Wickersham AT & T Wireless Services 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 022-170-066 Dear Mr. Wickersham: .PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Enclosed is your validated Minor Use Permit No. MUP 00-11 to allow additional antennas to be co - located on an existing 150 foot tower. The property is located on the west_ side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.n:. and 4:00 p.m., Monday.through Friday. Sincerely, . Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services Tamm ie Powell Office Assistant II Enc. cc: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health. • rj P 4.98 037_ 984 - 'Receipt for`%(J Certified Mail :Nolnsurance Coverage Provided uM*�osr•*� Do not,use foranternati Pr I l .usf a .Mail (See Reverse) f e t _ t I r Street and No. n ., State and P Co e Postage I f � I Certified Fee ` Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee y (3) Return Rece�Delive,ed rn to Whom & at Return ReeC .Date, and A I TOTAL Postage - r & Fees s 0 Postmark or Date I th o` f ai MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 0.9 2000 DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) MUP 00-11 PERMIT NO. 022-170-066 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: AT&T Wireless Services is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: Minor Use Permit to install twelve (12), eight (8) square foot (1 -foot wide x 8 feet long) panel antennas on an existing 150 -foot tall monopole tower at the 110 -foot level, and to install a 240 square foot (12 feet x 20 feet) equipment shelter. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 12 months of the date of approval. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of approval, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. A Minor Use Permit subject to lapse may be renewed for an additional period of up to one year, provided that sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for renewal of the Minor Use Permit is filed with the Planning Division on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a permit. • 0 Conditions of Approval: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing monopole. 2. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. 6. - The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 9. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the Facility, the applicant shall obtain a detailed estimate from an appropriate building industry business or contractor for the removal of the Facility, including the proper disposal of all removed materials and the return of site to its original condition. A copy of the estimate shall be submitted to the Building Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of removal of the Facility, proper disposal of all removed materials, and return of the site to its original condition in the event that such Facility is abandoned, or if the permit has been terminated for violation of its conditions by the County after hearing, or has expired, and after notice has been given to the owner/operator by the County, no application for renewal has been filed. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original .condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 13. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 14. The Facility may not encroach into; under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 15. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 16. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 17. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 18. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit I" and date-stamped February 16, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 19. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 20. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. , 21. Obtain the necessary building permits from the Building Division. 22. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the existing gate on the site access road shall be moved further away from the edge of the State Route 99 traveled way by at least 3.6 meters as requested by Caltrans in their March 9, 2000 letter. NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining BuilT�ng and Health Department permits before starting cons 49n,/io does it)waive,/,Qiy Other req4-0ements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF Assessor's Office Caltrans MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: Butte County Assessor's Office FROM: Butte County Planning Department SUBJECT: Richard Wickersham AT & T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 DATE: May 9, 2000 Pursuant to Section 65863.5 of the Government Code, the following parcel identified as AP # 022-170-066, was: Rezone from to zoning district. Granted a variance to X- Issued a conditional Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co -located on an existing 150 foot tower, on the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800. feet north of B Street, Biggs. Zoned A-40,(Agricultural 40 acre parcels). j Atemp\assessor lJ May 9, 2000 Tom De Luca Mericom 4700 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 160 Sacramento, CA 95834 Re: Skyway Site Dear Mr. De Luca: LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 The Butte County Building Division reviewed the estimate of $12,000.00 submitted by Chris Lee, Construction Manager for AirTouch Cellular, for the removal of AirTouch Cellular's Skyway facility. The Building Division concurs that a $12,000.00 bond is adequate for removal of the facility and restoration of the site to its original condition. The Planning division concurs with your estimate of $2,500.00 for a radio-frequency analysis. This amount is required for each site. As a reminder, building permits cannot be issued until such time as the bonds are submitted to the Planning Division. Should you have any further questions regarding the amounts of the bonds, please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, g64 Stephen Betts Senior Planner Post-Itm brand fax transmittal memo 7671 # of pages ► -2- T�_C_rr J zm�dar i 4n From Co. Co. Dept. Phone # Fax lb QZa=23y3 Fax # MAY -03-2000 12:56 FROM:MERICOM CORPORATION 916 920 2343 TO:15305382140 MERICOM'- C D R P O R A T 1 O N May 2, 2000 M.r. Philo Hunt Butte County Building Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: AirTouch Cellular "Skyway" Application Dear Philo: The following is an estimated cost and scope of work relating to the removal of the above-mentioned site as per the MinoT Use Permit Condition No: 12 Remove existing antenna and lines, 50' ft. mono pole and concrete pier. 6" below existing grade, electrical cabinets, feeder cables from the site to the PG&E meter, concrete pad 6" below existing grade, fencing, and return the site to the existing condition prior to construction. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $12,000.00 If there are any other materials required for issuance of this building permit, please contact me at (916) 717-3517. Otherwise, I hope you could proceed with the processing of this application at your earliest convenience and advise me of this permit's availability. Thank you very much_ Sincerely, Chris Lee . Construction 1v.Manager..for. AirTouch Cellular P.001/0e.1 NOI2TmwrsTL•RN REGIONAL OFFICE CORPORATE 11EADQUARTERS I 4700 Nown-it:A•n: Bimo , SUITIt 160 20472 CRESCENT BAY DR., SUITE 104 SACRAMENTO. CA 95834. U.S.A. LAKP. FOKJ:S'1'. CA 92630 U.S.A. TF.I_EI•HONE: (916) 920-7900 / FAX: (916) 920-2343 TELEPIioNE: (949) 470-7990 / FAX: (949) 470-7969 C7 CA April 28, 2000 Richard Wickersham AT & T Wireless Services 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND REALTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 022-170-066, MUP 00-11 Dear Mr. Wickersham: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held April 27, 2000, your request for a Minor Use Permit, was approved subject to the conditions listed on the permit. Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, you must do so in writing, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to 5:00 p.m., Monday, May 8, 2000. The appeal fee of $50.00 must be paid at that time. If you do not appeal and if there are no other appeal within the 10 calendar -day appeal period, the action of the Planning Commission is final. For purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, a Notice of Exemption must be filed. The fee for the filing of a Notice of Exemption is the $25.00 documentary handling fee. A check made payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $25.00 should be submitted to the Planning Division in order to complete the process. You will receive your valid permit, if there are no appeals, after it has been signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and we have received your recorded Certification of Ownership. Pursuant to Section 66020 (d) (2) of the Government Code you are hereby notified that you have 90 days to register aprotest challenging any fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions imposed as conditions of approval for this project. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION To: Planning Commission From: Stephen Betts, Senior Planner Subject: Consent Agenda Item - Minor Use Permit application for a Communications Facility for AT&T Wireless Services, on APN 022-170-066, File # MUP 00-11 Date: April 27, 2000 Attachments: April 12, 2000, Planning Manager Agenda Minutes Attached please find the minutes from the April 12, 2000, Planning Manager's hearing on AT&T Wireless Service's Minor Use Permit project. This item was inadvertently omitted from the material included in the packet for the Commission's April 27 meeting. K:\PROIECTS\UPM\WT&T- I .MUP\PC.MEM 1 April 13, 2000 Richard Wickersham AT & T Wireless Services 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 022-170-066, MUP 00-11 Dear Mr. Wickersham: At the regular meeting of the Planning representative on April 12, 2000, your request for a Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co -located on an existing 150 foot tower was recommended for approval. An approval recommendation by the Planning representative, has been forwarded to the Planning Commission as a consent item for final action on April 27, 2000, at 9:30 a.m., in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Consent items are set for approval in one motion. These items are considered non -controversial. No presentations will be made, however, some questions may be asked. The Chair will ask if any Commissioner or member of the public wishes to pull a consent item for discussion. The Minor Use Permit will be issued after approval by the Planning Commission. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts at this office. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson P lanning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Ir April 4, 2000 AT & T Wireless Services 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 e LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 022-170-066, MUP 00-11 Dear Mr. Wickersham: Your request has been scheduled for hearing in front of the Planning representative on April 12, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held in the Planning Division Conference Room, at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. A recommendation by the Planning representative will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as a consent item for final action. Consent items are set for approval in one motion. These items are considered non- controversial. No presentations will be made, however, some questions may be asked. The Chair will ask if any Commissioner or member of the public wishes to pull a consent item for discussion. The Minor Use Permit will be issued after approval by the Planning Commission. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Ir �J • BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING MANAGER AGENDA REPORT - Aphl 12, 2000 Applicant: AT&T Wireless Services Parcel Size: 80.4 acres File #: MUP 00-11 Zone date: June 17, 1975. Request: Minor Use Permit to install Project. twelve (12) panel antennas on Planner: Stephen Betts an existing 150 -foot tall monopole tower and for a 240 Supervisor square foot equipment shelter. District: 4 G.P.: Orchard and Field Crops Zoning: A-40 (Agricultural, 40 -acre minimum parcel size) APN: 022-170-066 Location: On the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs. STAFF COMMENT: Attachments: A. Conditions of Approval B. Vicinity Map C. General Plan/Zoning Map D. Radio -Frequency Analysis Report E. Photosimulation F. Initial Study G. Site Plan Staff recommends approval of the Minor Use Permit with conditions and findings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to install twelve (12) panel antennas on an existing 150 -foot tall monopole tower. The new panel antennas will be installed at the 110 -foot level, and extend from 106 feet to 114 feet above ground level. Each panel antenna is 8 square feet (1 -foot wide x 8 feet long) in size. A 240 square foot (12 feet x 20 feet) equipment shelter will be installed at the base of the monopole. The proposed panel antennas will provide digital wireless communications (cellular phone service) for the Highway 99 corridor north of Gridley. The proposed equipment shelter will be located within an existing 2,900 square foot (47 feet x 62 feet) lease area. The site is unmanned, and does not require a water source or a sewage disposal system. One to two visits to the site will be made per month by company technicians to perform preventive maintenance. Access to the site is from Highway 99. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE I ■ • 0 The project site is zoned A-40 and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Orchard and Field Crops. Surrounding parcels range in size from .5 to 154 acres. Land uses on surrounding parcels include orchards, dwellings at rural residential densities, and Highway 99. The project site is 80.4 acres in size and is developed with a walnut orchard. The existing 2,900 square foot lease area is developed with the monopole and a 360 square foot equipment shelter, both of which are surrounded by a six-foot high chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire. The lease area is located approximately 70 feet west of the centerline of Highway 99. A locked gate provides access into the lease area. The 150 -foot monopole was permitted with a Use Permit (UP 92-55) and supports four vertical antennas centered at the top of the monopole and one small microwave dish antenna located 50 feet above ground level. The vertical antennas extend 163.9 feet above ground level. The monopole is painted white, and a steady -burning red light is located on the top. An existing access extends from Highway 99 to the lease area. The project site is level. Hamilton Slough passes through the property. ANALYSIS: The project site is designated as Orchard and Field Crops by the Land Use Element Map of the General Plan, which allows public uses as secondary uses (note: cellular phone service providers are considered a public utility). Section 24-91 of Butte County Code states that wireless communication facilities are not permitted in the A-40 zone unless a Minor Use Permit is obtained, subject to the requirements of Butte County Code Section 24-262. The newly adopted Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance (Butte County Code Section 24- 262) allows colocation on existing facilities in the A-40 zone with approval of a Minor Use Permit, subject to numerous requirements. The project has been conditioned to meet the requirements of Section 24-262, including: • Submittal of bonds to cover the costs of a radio-frequency analysis and removal of the .monopole. • Radio-frequency emissions in excess of FCC standards are not allowed. • Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered to be abandoned. • Verification submitted annually attesting that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The additional antennas mounted on the monopole will not create an aesthetic impact. The antennas will not increase the height of the monopole nor will the additional antennas extend beyond the existing antennas. A photosimulation of the proposed antennas on the existing monopole shows that the antennas will not be highly conspicuous. A condition of the project requires that the proposed antennas be painted white to match the color of the existing monopole. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 2 0 The proposed antennas will not expand the height or width of the existing monopole, so there will not be any additional impacts to agricultural aerial spraying operations in the walnut orchard located on the site. The additional antennas and the new equipment shelter will not require the removal of any walnut trees in the existing orchard. The radio emissions from the proposed antennas are regulated by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). A radio-frequency analysis written by a registered radio-frequency engineer indicates that the radio emissions from the monopole, including the existing and proposed antennas, will be well within FCC standards for cellular phone facilities for publicly accessible areas near the monopole. Caltrans requests that the gate on the existing site access road be moved further away from the edge of the Highway 99 right-of-way to provide increased distance between vehicles entering the site and vehicles traveling on Highway 99. All these recommendations are added as conditions of project approval. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Manager take the following actions: I. Adopt a Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study did not identify any potential significant environmental effects. B. The Planning Manager has independently reviewed, analyzed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration prior to making its decision on the project, and the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement of Butte County. II. The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a "de minimus" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5. is not recommended. III. Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Minor Use Permit 00-11 for AT&T Wireless Services, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: A. That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 3 ■ 0 • Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Fire Department, and Caltrans. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Orchard and Field Crops and is zoned A-40. The Orchard and Field Crops land use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. The A-40 zone allows colocation of communication facilities with approval of a Minor Use Permit. B. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the existing monopole or extend beyond the existing antennas. 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and no additional services or utilities are required. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The project site is already developed with a 150 -foot tall monopole tower. The proposed antennas to be mounted on the existing monopole will not have a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. The radio-frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very little vehicle traffic will be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment shelter. The communications facility is unmanned and only one to two site visits per month will be required after construction. 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 4 ■ The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas will be mounted on the existing 150 -foot tall monopole. No walnut trees will have to be removed for the equipment shelter. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use will cause any other relevant impact. C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Chapter 24, Section 262, of the Butte County Code. K:\PROJECTS\UPM\AT&T- I .MUP\WTT.RPT 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ni PAGE 5 ■ rI L EXHIBIT A MINOR USE PERMIT CJ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) MUP 00-11 PERMIT NO. 022-170-066 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: AT&T Wireless Services is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: Minor Use Permit to install twelve (12), eight (8) square foot (1 -foot wide x 8 feet long) panel antennas on an existing 150 -foot tall monopole tower at the 110 -foot level, and to install a 240 square foot (12 feet x 20 feet) equipment shelter. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the.granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 12 months of the date of approval. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of approval, the permit shall become'null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. A Minor Use Permit subject to lapse may be renewed for an additional period of up to one year, provided that sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for renewal of the Minor Use Permit is filed with the Planning Division on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 6 ■ 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a permit. Conditions of Approval: Planning Division: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing monopole. 2. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. 3. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code: 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from, the Division of Environmental Health. 6. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 7. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 9. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the, authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 7 ■ 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the Facility, the applicant shall obtain a detailed estimate from an appropriate building industry business or contractor for the removal of the Facility, including the proper disposal of all removed materials and the return of site to its original condition. A copy of the estimate shall be submitted to the Building Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of removal of the Facility, proper disposal of all removed materials, and return of the site to its original condition in the event that such Facility is abandoned, or if the permit has been terminated for violation of its conditions by the County after hearing, or has expired, and after notice has been given to the owner/operator by.the County, no application for renewal has been filed. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 8 ■ 13. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life'of the Facility. 14. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 15. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 16. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 17. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 18. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit I" and date-stamped February 16, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 19. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 20. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. Building Division: 21. Obtain the necessary building permits from the Building Division. Caltrans 22. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the existing gate on the site access road shall be moved further away from the edge of the State Route 99 traveled way by at least 3.6 meters as requested by Caltrans in their March 9, 2000 letter. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. . ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 9 ■ Dated: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF Assessor's Office Caltrans 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 10 ■ At.1 W, * 611 102716;12000 11:45 70799652J@ 91 HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS RADIO AND TELEVISION BY FACSIMILE 916/843-7522 February 16, 2000 Mr. Richard Wickersham AT&T Wireless Services 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, California 95670 Dear Richard: HAMMETT & EDISON lie PAGE 01 WILLIAM F. HAWETT, P.E. DANE E. Elucxsm, P.E. GERHARDJ. STRAUS, P.E. STANLEY SALEK, P.E. ROBERT D. WELLM P.E. DANIEL G.P. MANs6RGH MARY, D. NEuMANN Consultants to the Firm RoHERT L. HAMMETT, P.E. EDWARD EDISON, P.E. As requested, we have reviewed the RF exposure analysis performed by Harpaul Nagra for the AT&T Wireless "N. Gridley" site, No. C018A. We agree that the proposal will comply with the prevailing safety standards limiting human exposure to RF energy in publicly - accessible (uncontrolled) areas.. Our analysis does not include any areas of occupational (controlled) access, such as the tower on which the antennas are to be mounted. Results of Independent Calculations Based upon the technical information you provided, we calculated the peak RF field levels near the ground using the method of FCC/OET Bulletin No. 65, and our results agreed substantially with those of Mr. Nagra. We calculated the maximum value to be 0.037% of the public limit, versus 0.03% reported by Mr. Nagra. We calculate the location of the maximum to be at a distance of about 735 feet from the base of the tower, versus 800 feet reported by Mr. Nagra. Our calculations, as well as those of Mr. Nagra, assume that the site is flat and that there are no buildings of similar height in the vicinity. Existing AirTouch Cellular Facility Mr. Doug Picard of AirTouch has provided technical information concerning their existing operation at the site. The AirTouch facility operates omnidirectionally using Decibel Products Type DB81OK-XC antennas at an effective height of 157 feet above ground, and has a maximum ERP of 1,700 watts. The AirTouch facility described was modeled, and is calculated to produce by itself a maximum of 0.014% of the public limit at ground level. When added to the proposed AT&T Wireless facility, the worst-case power density for the combined operation would be 0.045% of the public limit. The maximum value for the combined operation is less than the sum of contributions from the individual facilities because the antennas types and heights used by each carrier differ. Because of these differences, the locations of the calculated maxima do not coincide. Because RF levels in excess of the occupational exposure limit may exist near the antennas themselves, it is recommended that access in the immediate vicinity be restricted while the facility is energized. It is expected that AT&T Wireless and AirTouch have, or will have, an occupational exposure guide in place to prevent inadvertent exposure in excess of the e-mails rweller®h-e.com US Mail: Box 280068 • San Francisco, California 94128 Delivery: 470 Third Street West • Sonoma, California 95476 Telephone: 707/996-5200 San Francisco 9 707/996-5280 Facsimile • 20V396-5200 D.C. -02/1612000 11:45 7079965280 HAMMETT & EDISON PAGE 02 i� Mr. Richard Wickersham, page 2 February 16, 2000 occupational limit to its employees and contractors. It is my professional opinion that the site will comply in all publicly accessible areas with the prevailing standards limiting human exposure to RF energy. Should you have questions concerning this matter, please call me. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. Very truly yours, A No. E-12627 Exp. 9-3H3 1� Robert D. Weller, P.E. FCC General Radiotelephone License No. PG -12-26684 en 1000 100 w 10 d v m 0 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 10 100 1000 100001 0.1 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, It ' 10000 .. Frequency MHz 1000 # of Channels ' 0 12 E 100 60 Max Pwr/Ch Into Ant. Watts i BS Height (Center of Radiator) feet 110 Calculation Point labova ground or roof surface) feet 6 _ Antenna Model No. 10 Max Ant Gain dOd f] Down tilt degrees 0 d 0 dB 0 Height of aperture a. 12.6 ............... ................ ............... ................ ............... ................ degrees 83 Distance to Ante.,,,,, feet 97.75 WOSt - Y/Nt - n 0.1 1000 100 w 10 d v m 0 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 10 100 1000 100001 0.1 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, It ' units Value Frequency MHz 860 # of Channels ' 0 12 Max ERP/Ch Watts 60 Max Pwr/Ch Into Ant. Watts 2.867 BS Height (Center of Radiator) feet 110 Calculation Point labova ground or roof surface) feet 6 _ Antenna Model No. D8674H83-X Max Ant Gain dOd 12.43 Down tilt degrees 0 Miscellaneous Att. dB 0 Height of aperture feet 12.6 Ant HOW degrees 83 Distance to Ante.,,,,, feet 97.75 WOSt - Y/Nt - n Site IP: CO BA Site Name: N. Gridley Site Location: Hwy 99/N• Gridley Meats FCC Controlled Limits. Meats FCC Uncontrolled Limits. Meets 5% of FCC Uncontrolled Limits. No Further Analysis Required 1 10 100 1000 10000 Horizontal Distance From Antenna, it Sector: A Performed By: Harpaul Nagre - RF Engineer AWS HiQ. Version Date: Power Density @Horiz. Dist. PW/CM' % of Ilmlt feet Maximum Power Density = 0.18 0.03 800.00 3,126.73 times lower than the MIRE Iltnit for uncontrolled environment Com oshe Power IERP) 600.00 Watts Sector: A Performed By: Harpaul Nagre - RF Engineer AWS HiQ. Version Date: 1000 100 W 10 a v m 1 8 c 0 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 10 100 1000 10000 0.1 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, ft Site ID: C0188 Site Name: N. Gridley Site Location: Hwy 99/N. Gridley Meets FCC Controlled Limits. Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits. Meets 5% of FCC Uncontrolled Limits. No Further Analysis Required 1 10 100 1000 10000 'Horizontal Distance From Antenna, ft units ' Value Frequency MHz 860 a of Channels # 12 Max ERP/Ch Watts 60 Max Pwr/Ch Into Ant. Watts 2.857 BS Height (Center of Radiator) feet 110 Calculation Point (above ground or root surface) feet 6 Antenna Model No. DB874HB3-X Max Ant Gain dBd 12.43 Down tilt degrees 0 Miscellaneous Att. dB 0 Hel ht of aperture feet 12.6 Ant HBW degrees 83 Distance to Anty o feet 97.75 WOS7 Y/N1 n Site ID: C0188 Site Name: N. Gridley Site Location: Hwy 99/N. Gridley Meets FCC Controlled Limits. Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits. Meets 5% of FCC Uncontrolled Limits. No Further Analysis Required 1 10 100 1000 10000 'Horizontal Distance From Antenna, ft Sector: B Performed By: Harpaul Nagra - RF Engineer A'NS HD Vets on Date: Power Density µw/cm, j % of limit @Horiz. Dist. feet Maximum Power Density = 0.18 0.03 800.00 3,126.73 limes lower than the MIRE limit for uncontrolled environment Composite Power (ERP) = 600.00 Watts Sector: B Performed By: Harpaul Nagra - RF Engineer A'NS HD Vets on Date: 1000 100 w 10 a 4) d � 1 c 0 u c 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 10 100 1000 10000 0.1 Horizontal Distance from Antenna, ft Site ID: C01 BC Site Name: N. Gridley Site Location: Hwy 99/N. Gridley Meets FCC Controlled Limits. Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits. Meets 5% of FCC Uncontrolled Limits. No Further Analysis Required I 1 10 100 1000 10000 Horizontal Distance From Antenna, ft units Value Frequency MHz 850 g of Channels N 12 Max ERP/Ch Watts 60 Max Pwr/Ch Into Ant. Watts 2.867 BS Height (Center of Radiator) feet 110 Calculation Point (above ground or roof surface) feet 6 Antenna Model No. D08741183•X Max Ant Gain d8d 12.43 Down till degrees 0 Miscellaneous All. d8 0 Height of aperture feet 12.5 Ant HBW ;agrees 83 Distance to Ant„o fast 97.75 WOS1 Y/NT 0 Site ID: C01 BC Site Name: N. Gridley Site Location: Hwy 99/N. Gridley Meets FCC Controlled Limits. Meets FCC Uncontrolled Limits. Meets 5% of FCC Uncontrolled Limits. No Further Analysis Required I 1 10 100 1000 10000 Horizontal Distance From Antenna, ft Sector: C Performed By: Harpaul Nagra - RF Enoineer AWS H 1 Version Dare: Power Density W/cm2 %of limit @Horiz. Dist. feet Maximum Power Density = 0.18 0.03 800.00 3,126.73 times lower than the MPE limit for uncontrolled environment Composite Power (ERP) = 600.00 Watts Sector: C Performed By: Harpaul Nagra - RF Enoineer AWS H 1 Version Dare: Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 COUNTY OF BUTTE INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I. BACKGROUND: 1. Name of Proponent: AT&T Wireless Services (Richard Wickersham) 2. Address: 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Phone: (916) 402- 7750 3. Name of Proposal: N/A 4. Type of Project: Minor Use Permit 5. Proiect Description: This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to install twelve (12) panel antennas on an existing 150 -foot tali monopole tower. The new panel antennas will be installed at the 110 -foot level, and extend from 106 feet to 114 feet above ground level., Each panel antenna is 8 square foot (1 -foot wide X 8 feet long) in size. :240 square foot (12 feet X 20 feet) equipment shelter will be installed at the base of the monopole. The proposed panel antennas will provide digital wireless communications (cellular phone service) for the Highway 99 corridor north of Gridley. The proposed equipment shelter will be located within an existing 47 -foot X 62 -foot (2,900 sq. ft.) lease area. The site will be unmanned, and does not require a water source or a sewage disposal system. One to two visits to the site will be made per month by company technicians to perform preventative maintenance. Access to the site is from Highway 99. 6. Location of property: On the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs. 7. Setting: The project site is zoned A-40 and has a General P1an,Land Use designation of Orchard and Field Crops. Surrounding parcels range in size from .5 to 154 acres. Land uses on surrounding parcels include orchards, dwellings at rural residential dwellings, and Highway 99. The project site is 80.4 acres in size and is developed with a walnut orchard and the 150 -foot tall monopole. The existing 2,900 sq. ft. lease area is developed with the monopole and a 360 sq. ft. equipment shelter, both of which are surrounded by a six-foot high chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire. The lease area is located approximately 70 feet west of the centerline of Highway 99. A locked gate provides access into the lease area. The 150 -foot monopole was permitted with a Use Permit (UP 92-55) and supports four vertical antennas centered at the top of the monopole and one small dish antenna located 50 feet above ground level. The vertical antennas extend 163.9 feet above ground level. The ■ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 monopole is painted white, and a steady -burning red light is located on the top of the monopole. An existing dirt road extends from Highway 99 to the lease area. The project site is level. Hamilton Slough passes through the property. Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 022-170-066 9. Date Checklist Submitted: March 20, 2000 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): Butte County Building Division, Butte County Public Works Department, Butte County Fire Department/CDF, Caltrans. II. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: © I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, ❑ there will NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been ❑ adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, El NEGATIVE all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or Mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. `� /oa Prepared by: Stephen Betts, ssoci3 /Z zate Planner Date 3 22- a Reviewed by: andy Wilson, Principal Planner Date, ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 2 9 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 III. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Hazards/Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population VHousing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in, the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone).. A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards, (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a project -specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 3 0 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Less Than Significant Potentially with Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact a) Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? K ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 4 0 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Potentially Significant Impact c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Response: Less Than Significant Less With Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact X X a. - d. The twelve 8 square foot (1 -foot wide X 8 feet long) antennas will be attached to the existing 150 -foot monopole at the 110 -foot level, extending from 106 -feet to 114 -feet above ground level. The monopole will not increase in height or width due to the proposed antennas. A photosimulation of the proposed antennas on the existing monopole shows that the antennas will not be highly conspicuous. A condition of the project requires that the proposed antennas be painted to match the color of the existing monopole, which is white. This project will not affect a scenic vista nor will it have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. The project will not create any sources of new light or glare. Mitigation: None required. 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation` as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 5 C� Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Potentially Significant Impact b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? 0 Less Than Significant Less With Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact X X a. - c. A large walnut orchard is located on the site. There is no Williamson Act contract affecting the property. The proposed antennas will not expand the height or width of the existing monopole on the site, so there will not be any additional impacts to agricultural aerial spraying operations. The addition of the proposed antennas on the existing monopole and the new equipment shelter will not require the removal of any walnut trees in the existing orchard. The project will not have an impact on agricultural uses on or off the site. Mitigation: None required. 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? X 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division 0 • Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Potentially Significant Impact d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? _ Response: n Less Than Significant Less W ith Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact X X a. - c. Butte County, and all northern Sacramento Valley Air Districts, have been designated as "moderate" nonattainment areas for the state standards for ozone (03) and fine particulate matter (PM10). Currently, Butte County is in attainment for all the federal (less stringent) air quality standards. The only emissions that will be generated by the project will be from vehicles during installation activities and during occasional site visits for inspection and preventative maintenance. A very small amount of dust emissions will occur due to vehicle traffic on the site access road. No other dust emissions are anticipated because no grading will be necessary and only a very small amount of soil disturbance for the construction of a small concrete pad for the equipment shelter will occur. d. No sensitive receptors, such as schools or hospitals, are located near the project site. e. The project will not create any odors. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 7 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Potentially Significant Impact ` b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? _ d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or -with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy ordinance. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Response: L' Less Than Significant Less With Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact x x x x Y a. - d. No riparian vegetation, wetlands, or vernal pools are located on the site. The project is not known to be inhabited or provide habitat for any rare, endangered animal or plant species (Butte County Master Environmental Assessment, Figure Bio -2). No ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ H Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 1"] Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact vegetation will be removed as a result of this project because the lease area is already cleared and graded. This project will not have an impact to fish and/or wildlife and the payment of fees under Public Resources Code Section 21089 and as defined by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 is not required. e.. The proposal will not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy ordinance. f. The proposal will not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Mitigation Measure: None required. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? X c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? k d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Response: a. - d. According to Butte County constraints mapping, the project site is located in an area considered to have a low to medium archeological sensitivity. No impacts to cultural resources are expected because the proposed antennas will be mounted on an existing IN Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 9 0 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Less Than Significant Potentially With Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact monopole and the area where the equipment shelter will be located has already been graded. . Mitigation Measure: None required. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1) Rupture of a known earth- quake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other sub- stantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 2) Strong seismic ground shaking? 3) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? 4) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on -'Or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 10 X X X X X 0 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Potentially Significant Impact d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating sub- stantial risks to life or property? _ e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal or waste water? _ Response: • Less Than Significant Less with Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact X V4 a.1. The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. No known faults are located in the project area. The monopole was constructed to Uniform Building Code standards and the proposed antennas should not impact the strength of the monopole. No impact is expected to occur. a.2. The intensity of ground shaking at any specific site depends on the characteristics of the earthquake, the distance from the earthquake, and on the local geologic soils and conditions. At present, there is insufficient data to predict accurately the expected ground motions at various locations in Butte County. a.3. The Butte County Seismic Safety Element's Liquefaction Potential Map indicates that the site has a low potential for liquefaction. No impact is anticipated. a.4. The Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that there is no potential for landslides in this area. No impact is anticipated. b. The Erosion Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that the project site does not have any potential for soil erosion. No soil erosion impacts are anticipated because no grading will occur and only a very minimal amount of soil disturbance for the foundation of the 240 square foot equipment shelter will occur as a result of this project. C. No impact is anticipated from instability, landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 11 n u Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Less Than Significant Potentially, With Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact d. The Conservation Element's Expansive Soils Map indicates that the project site has a low expansive soil designation. No impact is anticipated. e. A waste disposal system is not required. No impact will occur. Mitigation Measure: None required. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? _ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 12 Y X Y X 11 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Potentially Significant Impact people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Response: LJ Less Than Significant Less With Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact X X X X a. - d. The project will not create any hazardous materials, and is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials. The radio emissions from the proposed antennas are regulated by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). A radio-frequency analysis written by a registered radio-frequency engineer indicates that the radio emissions from the monopole, including the existing and proposed antennas, will be well within FCC standards for cellular phone facilities for publicly accessible areas near the monopole. e. - g. The property is not located within the vicinity of an airport, airport land -use plan, private airstrip, or interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the monopole. No impact is anticipated. h. The project is not located within a State Response Area for wildland fires. The nearest fire station is Station # 73, located approximately 1 mile to the west of the property in Biggs. The Butte County Fire Department/CDF does not object to this project and did not recommend any conditions. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 13 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Mitigation Measure: None required. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? 1t b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in- a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off-site? X d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? k e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 14 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Potentially Significant Impact f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or l mudflow? Response: Less Than Significant Less with Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact X X X a. - f. This project will not have an impact to surface and ground water quality or quantity. g. - i. The project site is not located within a 100 -year. flood zone as shown on Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map 06007C -0975C, dated June 8, 1998. j. The property is not located in an area prone to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact will be incurred with respect to these natural hazards. Mitigation Measure: None required. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project? a) Physically divide an established community? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 15 • Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Conflict with an applicable land use. 4 plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an* environmental effect? �t c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? �t Response: a. The proposal will not physically divide an established community. b. The project site is zoned A-40 (Agricultural, 40 -acre minimum parcel size) and is designated by the Land Use Element Map of the Butte County General Plan as Orchard and Field Crops. Colocation of antennas is permitted in the A-40 zone with a Minor Use Permit. Public uses are allowed as a Secondary Use under the Orchard and Field Crops General Plan land use designation. Cellular phone service providers are considered a public utility. Surrounding parcels are zoned A-40 and SR -1 (Suburban Residential, 1 -acre minimum parcel size) and have a General Plan land use designation of Orchard and Field Crops and Agricultural -Residential. Surrounding and nearby parcels range in size from approximately .5 to 154 acres. Land uses on these parcels are orchards and dwellings at rural residential densities. The project site is not located within the City of Biggs' Sphere of Influence. C. The property is not within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact will be incurred. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 16 • Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Less Than Significant Potentially with Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability ofa locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Response: Less Than Significant No Impact Impact 0 V X a. - b. The property is not known to contain any important mineral resources of value to the region. The project will not prevent the future extraction of any potential mineral resources located outside of the 2,900 sq. ft. lease area. No impact will be incurred. Mitigation: None required. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels: )t c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 17 • Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Potentially Significant Impact e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Response: 11 Less Than Significant Less with Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact Y a. - d. Ambient noise on and around the project area is affected primarily by vehicle traffic on the nearby Highway 99. These noises are intermittent and short-term in nature and will not expose people to significant levels of noise. Installation of the antennas and the equipment shelter will generate a small amount of noise, mostly in the form of vehicles arriving and departing the site. No large machines, which generate loud noises, will be required for this project. The proposed antennas will not generate any noise. The only noise that the equipment shelter will generate will be from two attached air conditioning units. This noise will not be significant. e. - f. The project is not located in the vicinity of an airstrip or within an airport land use plan. No impact will be incurred. Mitigation Measure: None required. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure? X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 18 • Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Response: Less Than Fire protection? Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact u u a. The project will not induce any population growth nor will it create a need for any new infrastructure which could induce population growth. b. - c. The project will not displace individuals or housing. No impact will be incurred. Mitigation: None required. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b) Fire protection? c) Police Protection? d) Schools? e) Parks? ' f) Other public services? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 19 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially I With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Response: a. The.project will not create a need for any new public services. b. The project will not create an increase in demand for fire protection services. C. ` The proposal will not cause an increase in demand for police protection services because the communications facility does not require such services. d. The proposal will not result in a demand for school facilities in the area. e. The proposal will not result in a demand to area parks and facilities. f. The project will not have an impact on any other public services: Mitigation Measure: None required. 14. RECREATION. a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?= b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Response: a. - b. The project will not increase the use of existing parks or other recreational facilities nor will the project create the need for any new parks or recreational facilities. Mitilzation: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 20 0 0 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: . n L� Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existingtraffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumula- tively, a level of service standard established by the county' congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? _ e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 21 Y X Y X Y X Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Response: a. - e. The project will generate additional vehicle trips on Highway 99 during site development. The increase in vehicle trips during development will not be significant because very little construction will be required. The project will generate very few vehicle trips after construction because the communications facility will be unmanned and only an occasional vehicle trip will be required for inspection and preventative maintenance. Caltrans requests that the gate on the existing site access road be moved further away from the edge of the Highway 99. right-of-way to provide increased distance between vehicles entering the site and vehicles traveling on Highway 99. This will be added as a condition of project approval. f. There is adequate area on the parcel to handle the parking needs of vehicles during development activities. g. The project will not conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. Mitigation: None required. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 22 r� L Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Potentially Significant Impact d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Response: • Less Than Significant Less with Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact V W X X a. - e. The communications facility does not require a source of water or a sewage disposal system. The project will not have an impact on any water or wastewater treatment facilities. No additional storm water facilities will be necessary as a result of this project. f. The project will not increase the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill because the project will not generate any solid wastes. g. No impact will be incurred to federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Mitigation: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 23 • Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively consider- able" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 1t Response: The project does not have the potential to cause impacts to the environment and no mitigation measures are recommended. V. MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: None. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 24 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 DATASHEET A. Project Description 1. Type of Project: Minor Use Permit to install twelve 8 square foot panel antennas at the 110 -foot height on an existing 150 -foot tall monopole and a 240 square foot equipment shelter. 2. Proposed Density of Development: N/A 3. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Minimal. 4. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): The parcel fronts on Highway 99. 5. Method of Sewage Disposal: None proposed or required. 6. Source of Water Supply: None proposed or required. 7. Proximity of Power Lines: Electrical power is already established on the project site. 8. Potential for further land divisions and development: The project parcel has the potential to be divided into two 40 -acre parcels under the current A-40 zoning. B. Environmental Setting 1. Terrain a General Topographic Character: Level valley floor. b. Slopes: 0 - 1%. C. Elevation: 110 feet above sea level. d. Limiting Factors: None. 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics: Wyman Loam - 9 to 4 inches thick, with a subsoil 30 to 62 inches in depth. Friable, contains a moderate amount of organic material, absorptive and retentive, of moisture, good drainage. 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. b. Erosion Potential: None. C. Landslide Potential: None. d. Fire Hazard: Unclassified -'irrigated area. e. Expansive Soil Potential: Moderate. 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: Hamilton Slough. b. Ground Water: Large valley aquifers. C. Drainage Characteristics: The parcel generally drains to the west. d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 22 to 24 inches per year. e. Limiting Factors: None. 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good, except for the existing 150 -foot monopole located on the site. 6. Acoustic Quality: Poor - noise from vehicles on Highway 99 heard throughout project site. 7. Air Quality: Good, except when stagnant air conditions persist in the valley. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 25 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 8. Vegetation: Walnut orchard. Oaks along Highway 99 and B Street. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Birds and mammals common to valley orchard areas 1.0. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: None known. Low to moderate archaeological sensitivity area. 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Orchard and Field Crops. 12. Existing Zoning: A-40. 13. Existing Land Use on-site: Walnut orchard, 150 -foot tall monopole tower. 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: Orchards, dwellings at rural residential densities. b. Zoning: A-40, SR -1 C. Gen. Plan Designation: Orchard and Field Crops and Agricultural - Residential. d. Parcel Sizes: .5 to 154 acres. 15. Character of Site and Area: Valley orchard area. 16. Nearest Urban Area: Biggs and Gridley. 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: None. 18. Improvement Standards Urban Area: None. 19. Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Station # 73, approximately 1 mile to the west in Biggs. b. Water Availability: Fire tankers. 20. Schools: Union School District(s): Gridley Unified School District. ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1, Safety Element. Oroville, CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3, Safety Element.- Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV -1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic HighwUs Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Map. Oroville, CA. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 26 Project: AT&T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 11. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 11. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1989. 13. USGS Quad Maps. 14. Soil Map, Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 15. Soil Survey of Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 16. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. K:\PROJECTS\UPMWT&T- I . M U P\ATTB IGGS.IS ■ Butte County,Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ 27 March 30, 2000 AT&T Wireless Services Attention: Richard Wickersham, 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Re: Application for a Minor Use Permit to install twelve (12) panel antennas on an existing 150 -foot tall monopole tower and for a 240 square foot equipment shelter, APN 022- 170-066, File # MUP 00-11 Dear Mr. Wickersham: Thank you for the submittal of the above referenced application. Your project application, maps and related items have been reviewed by County Agencies in order to determine the completeness of your application. Enclosed please find copies of the comments we have received from agencies regarding your project. These comments have been received as part of the initial thirty (30) day review of your project. Please review these comments and the conditions that are requested as part of the project's approval. Please note that Caltrans is requesting that the existing gate on the access road to the lease area be moved at least 3.6 meters further away from Highway 99. . Should you have any further questions regarding these comments, please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Associate Planner Enc. PROOFS'F PUBLICATION No. In the Matter of Public hearing AT&T MUP 00-11 State of California) County of Butte & Sutter) ss The undersigned resident of the County of Butte, State of California, says: That I am, and at all time herein mentioned was a citizen of the United States and not a party to nor interested in the above entitled matter; that I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of: The Gridley Herald That said newspaper is one of general circulation as defined by Section 6000 Government Code of the State of California, Case No. 27,207 by the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Butte & Sutter; that said newspaper at all times herein mentioned was printed. and published twice a week (on Wednesdays and Fridays in the City of Gridley and County. of Butte; that the notice of which the annexed Is a true printed copy, was published in said newspaper on the following days: March 22, 2000 I certify (or declare), under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct, at Gridley, California. Dated March 22, 2000 at Gridley, California (Signature) RECEIVED MAR 2 3 2600 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DTVISIO-A F'UDL O r7V 9 wr- — - ,. ' BtjTTE COUNTY PLANNING MANAGE�c s f NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIRG I•= • , ;� - ..M'�.."{lt!vj.t�'t7 Planning�Manager.aha4 public Notice is hereby given 6y the Butte Counh+ 00 n; t e�gutte,,County. hearing 'will be held on..xWednesday,April'12,200 Mtq M , Development' Services Conference Room 7 County Center Drive,Orovill California, regarding the following item _ y�� �•. .� � mss-; ,. < ;TIOtt�' �� 9 yea �• ,.2in�•e tiGr'n'nVEbEG'L'ARA •� -" r .� � winnti►"cNTAL Ih"PACTS HAS BEEN ocrritu1N1FNDED ; Y, p0 am - gntennasrto be So ocated onl an- existing 150 tootl o er o09- 9: pn Pertyi rce s .The grope' -Is: located {; zoned A 40 (A ricultural .40 acre, pa • ). . k:on the west side of Highway go, proximately 800 feeYnorth' of B 22 ISE File #MUP 00-11) ;.Street, Biggs. A. 0 -170-066. (S ). ( ; . The above mentioned a�pPplication and tmyap are on file, and available for publ e viewing at the office of a! Centee.D u OtovilleloCalifomfaeFo� lnfoimation calf:;. Planning Division, 7 County to 4:00 p.m.}Commehts may'W (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Friday; 8:00 a.lri. submitted in writing at any time prior to',the hearing or, oraily_at.th.e, meetingg listrel above or as may. be contin to the PlanningaCommissiion as a conseommendation nt emrfor fine Manager will be forwardeda pa n in% Commission on the project a app action. Upon action taken by you may be limited to raisir+g 110 may be filed with the Clerk of the,B�ca on nucourt.,you Thy appeal period ►sing days. If you challenge the above L pP.. 8ised at the• public hearing described n only. those issues you or someone awe red to the Planning Commission, at this notice or ipn written corrrespondence ,. or pri TE theCOUNTY PLANNINGCOMMISSION ' ' , THOMAS A. PARILO, DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Gridley Heradt Publish: March 22. 2000 n - March 23, 2000 Alk Meeouni LAND .OF NATURAL WEALTH 'AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 To: Responsible and Trustee Agencies Re: NOTICE OF INTENT - To Adopt a Proposed Negative Declaration for a Minor Use Permit for AT&T Wireless Services, File # MUP 00-11 (Biggs Site), APN 022-170-066 The Butte County Planning Division has completed an Initial Study, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), of potential environmental consequences anticipated in connection with the above-mentioned project, a copy of which is enclosed. This letter serves as a Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration to allow responsible and trustee agencies a 20 -day review period in accordance with Sections 15072 and 15105 of the CEQA Guidelines. Please review the enclosed Initial Study and proposed Negative Declaration. This review should focus on your agency's area of expertise and jurisdiction. Any comments must be sent to the above address prior to April 12, 2000. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed environmental document, please contact this office between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, 261;�t_ Stephen Betts Associate Planner cc: Richard Wickersham, AT&T Wireless Services Stu Edell, Butte County Land Development Division 0 . USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION December 16, 1992 DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) 92-55 PERMIT NO. 422-170-059 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of B•tte and the special conditions set forth below: Pac Tell Cellular is hereby granted a Use Permit in accordance with application filed: 8/4/92 to allow a 163 foot cellular monopole antenna and 12 x 28 ft. equipment building on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural - 40 acre parcels) located on the west side of Statc Highway 99, approximately 900 feet north of B Street, Biggs. I. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-62. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed by the Permittee within l2 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the Permittee. 3. If any use for which a use permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the Permittee, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. 4. The terns and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. The tower shall not exceed 200 ft. in height. 2. Antenna colors shall blend with the natural environment and be approved by the Director of Planning or designee. 3. Obtain all necessary building permits from the Building Division of the Butte County Department of Development Services. 4. Tower to be adequately sighted so the tower is visible to agricultural aircraft. Strobe lights are prohibited. 0 • 5. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which w e nosed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree to abide fully by s ' nditions. Dated: // App cant acTel Cellular BY: Ronald C. Waddell, Mr. R E & Construction NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Health Department Department of Forestry Well - N Or e] 1 1.1.x t 997 c 997 SR -1 w 06007CO970 7: �-� - UP92-55, 163 ft. cellular mor MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Larry Painter FROM: Lynn SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR EXHIBITS AND PUBLIC NOTICE LIST DATE: March 20, 2000 Project Name: _AT&T File #: _MUP 00-11 THIS IS A REQUEST FOR: Black & white reproducible exhibit map Planning Commission Development Review Planning Manager _X @ 9:00 a.m. Vicinity Map Planning Manager Color Exhibit Map Extension of Time Exhibit Map Color Planning Commission Exhibit Map Color Board -of Supervisors Exhibit Map Public Notice List Special Exhibits Backread Ordinance Public Notice List: Special instructions: The above request is due no later than _ 3/23/00 Special Instructions and/or research: Meeting Date 4/12/00 Number of Copies i I NOTE: Exhibits should be saved until project is through process, which includes appeal period. Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Manager that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 12, 2000, in the Butte County Development Services Conference Room, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following item: 9:00 a.m. - AT&T Wireless Services, Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be colocated on an existing 150 foot tower on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural - 40 acre parcels). The property is located on the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs. APN 022-170-066. (SB) (File #MUP 00-11) The above mentioned application, Initial Study, and map are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Development Services Department, Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. For information call: (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. A recommendation by the Planning Manager will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as a consent item for final action. Upon action taken by the Planning Commission on the project an appeal may be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The appeal period is 10 days. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION THOMAS A. PARILO, DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Gridley Herald on Wednesday, March 22, 2000. • BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: LAFCo FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: AT & T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 DATE: February 25, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to beco-located on an existing 150 foot tower on property zoned A-40, 40 acrean rcels located on the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Diggs, identified as APN 022-170-066. Supervisorial District No. 4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON May 24, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 10, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. DS -7 Do -z COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): I- CSA 31 Niggc SN� P."1) 2, CSA 37 �(7v dley-(3:c�yc Anbwli.,cc� us —Y 4 u —¢1- &r CeIIeaz PAR t 3 2900 p, CSA I(z 'Irli Y a.erV RTTTTE CC)JTXTfrV PLANNING DIVISION BY (—:�L L%O t As Date: 3/ A o 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 . W3 � , STATEOF CALIFORNIA -BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION ANISSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 P.O. BOX 911 MARYSVILLE, CA 95901 TDD Telephone (530) 741.4509 FAX (530) 741-5346 �/� Telephone (530) 741-5130 Y O P ORO P RI 0?Op March 9 2000 FpT OOBUT033 03 -BUT -99 PM 7.84 A,T&T Antenna, North Gridley Site MUP00-11 Application ' Ms. Lisa Purvis Wilson, Manager RECEIVED Attention: Mr. Stephen Betts Department of Planning MAR 14 2000 City of Oroville 1735 Montgomery Street BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION Oroville, CA 95965-4897 Dear Ms. Wilson: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the above referenced document. The proposed project should not have a significant impact on State Route (SR) 99 traffic operations. There is a concern however with the gate that exists in the driveway. The gate is located very close to the edge of pavement and when a northbound vehicle turns into the driveway its location affects the amount of time an operator would take to clear the travelled way. The length of the vehicle could also affect the rate of clearing of the travelled way. While the vehicle sits in the right of way, and the operator gets out to open the gate, the vehicle would be very close to the travelled way. The same would hold true when exiting the site. If the visitor were towing any apparatus the operator would need to make additional movements to get into or out of the site. Typically, when gates are located along Caltrans R/W a pocket is developed beyond the neat R/W line to avoid the situation that exists at this site. We recommend that the gate at this site be moved further from the edge of the SR 99 travelled way by at least 3.6 meters. Ms. Lisa Purvis Wilson March 9, 2000 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Terri Pencovic, Local Development/Inter-Governmental Review Coordinator, at (530) 741-4199. Sincerely, DENNIS AZEVEDO, Chief Office of Rural Regional Planning BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Environmental Health, Oroville FFQ 7 )Joo / UOUlity vo-ar-f Vrlyt Orov1Ne, Ca FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: AT & T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 DATE: February 24, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to , 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co -located on an existing 150 foot tower on property zoned A-40, 40 acrean reels located on the west side of Highway 9_ approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs, identified as APN 022-170-066. Supervisorial District No. -4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON April 27, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 9, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): . • .. �..► .. ►' MAR 0 8 2000 BUTTE �COUNTY 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 • BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Building Department FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: AT & T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 DATE: February 25, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co -located on an existing 150 foot tower on property zoned A-40, 40 acreap rcels located on the west side of Highway 99. approximately 800 feet north of B Street, Biggs, identified as APN 022-170-066. Supervisorial District No. 4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON May 24, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 10, 2000. !f no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): B110106 M941 t AO-CEW'UIM �e NL�kJ Ar�1T �t1APc ic�bclT o� 611 S N C 7WER, ER 44D iD F PCA4 S G4-[.CclWCAI CyQe1FY1a16 w«Sp 40Wih OF POW &S&D � 6'XISn!j1 l(o 44 � h S /$ u� �j�/� DES/Citi 2441 r o� FX( /AJC ka00GE 7b W- &e- PuW s e &e.&.s S9 4Gc- Ser ftapnea BY 4 uceAJs&o oe xra/s E2ED AnwrserlaJ4,%siam AurAAoRd%sb T•o WgqICE iN Tlf6 S1�TE D� G4[/F• PIE CETZ6TTi'ffid T) MAR n 6 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIV1610N By: Date: d 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR MINOR USE PERMITS APPLICANT: AT & T Wireless Services DATE: February 24, 2000 AGENT: APN: 022-170-066 FILE #: MUP 00-11 PLANNER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co -located on an existing 150 foot tower Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS E. BUILDING PERMITS 1. Prior to building permit issuance for a new residential dwelling unit(s), the applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of acceptance of the application. Such fees, shall include, but not be limited to: Park Fee, School Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, and -Fire Protection Fees. 2. Prior to building permit issuance for a new commercial or industrial development, or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of acceptance of the application. Such fees shall include, but not be limited to: School Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and- Sewer Service Fees, and Fire Protection Fees. F. EXISTING STRUCTURES 1. Comply with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire -resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended new use of the building(s) or the existing building(s) shall be demolished. BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: CDF FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: AT & T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 DATE: February 25, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co -located on an existing 150 foot tower on property zoned A-40, 40 acrean rcels located on the west side of Highway 99, approximately 800 feet north of B Street. Biggs, identified as APN 022-170-066. Supervisorial District No. 4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON May 24, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 10, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): r � ' RECEIVED MAR 0 12000 BUTTE eE)UNTY PLANNING DIVISION By: Date: Z -z -1-©v 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Public Works FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: AT & T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 DATE: February 24, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: The Planning Division has received a project application for the propertydescribed below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Tenor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co located on anexisting 150 foot tower on property zoned A -4Q 40 acre parcels located on the west side of Highway 9Q, apnrox� imately 800 feet north of B tree, Biggs, identified as APN 022-170-066. Supervisorial District No. -4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON Al2ri127, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 9, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): 'y D� 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 9596fR fM - FAX 530-538-7785 FEB 2 4 2000 COUNTY OF GUTTL LAND DEVELOPMENT DN. Z #'W.life LEAD IN SHEET I • ►Ill' 11 022-170-066 REPRESENTATIVE: Richard Wickersham ugossnam MOMS Ms. Fins I • • •1 1' 1" •• •_ 1 • : •• :11 •. 11. :11 1•� 1 • i 1 i SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT #A—EXISTING ZONING: A-40,40 acre parcels ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: A-40, 40 acre parcel I SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Orchard & Field Crops APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Date Rec'd 2-16-00 COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST APPLICATION: AT & T Wireless Services DATE: February 24, 2000 County Offices and Cities: Chief Administrative Officer Environmental Health Sheriff LAFCo Biggs Oroville Irrigation District: Butte Water OWID Table Mountain Irrigation Domestic Water _ Butte Water District OWID Sewer _X_ Develop. Services Director Assessor BCAG Air Quality Mgmt. Gridley Paradise Animal Control _ Butte Water District _ Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) Fire Protection _X_/ California Department of Forestry Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Paradise Recreation & Park Utilities X V1 Public Works Director Building Manager ALUC Butte Co. Farm Bureau Chico _ Chico Airport Commission _X Agricultural Commission Biggs/W. Gridley Water _ Paradise Irrigation Thermalito Irrigation California Water Service Co. _ Thermalito Irrigation District Themalito Irrigation L.O.A. PUD El Medio Fire Protection District Durham Area Recreation _ Richvale Recreation & Parks Durham Irrigation Richvale Irrigation Other Del Oro Water Co. Other Sterling City Sewer Main Feather River Rec. & Park _ PG&E North - Chico _ Chambers Cable TV _ Pacific Bell PG&E South - Oroville Viacom Cable TV State Agencies CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept. of Water Resources _ Dept. of Fish and Game Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter)_ Dept of Parks and Rec. _ Highway Patrol Central Reg. Water Quality Cont _ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program Department of Conservation _ Off. of Mining Reclamation _ Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations Dept.Social Services, Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management _ US Fish & Wildlife Service Army Corps of Engineers Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association _ Mosq. Abatement. OroviIle/Butte Co Drainage _ Butte Env.] Council _ Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society Butte Co. Mining Committee _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _ Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancv School Districts Biu 4 0 • BUTTE COUNTY . DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: AT & T Wireless Services, MUP 00-11 DATE: February 24, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if 'additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co -located on an existing 150 foot tower on property zoned A-40, 40 acrean rcels located on the west side of Highway 99,approximately800 feet north of B Street,Bi�Pgs, identified as APN 022-170-066. Supervisorial District No. -4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ONApril27,2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 9, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): I: Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR MINOR USE PERMITS APPLICANT: AT & T Wireless Services DATE: February 24, 2000 AGENT: APN: 022-170-066 FILE #: MUP 00-11 PLANNER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Minor Use Permit to allow additional antennas to be co -located on an existing 150 foot tower Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS G. SECOND UNITS 1. The Second Unit may be attached to the primary residence or may be a separate, on-site detached dwelling. The attached second unit shall be architecturally compatible with the primary residence and the appearance of the building shall be that of a single family dwelling. The size of the attached second unit shall not exceed 640 square feet or 30% of the size of the primary dwelling, whichever is greater, in no case shall the second unit exceed 1200 square feet. A detached second unit shall not exceed 1200 square feet. The parcel or lot upon which the Second Unit is to be located must meet the minimum acreage requirements for which the parcel or lot is zoned. 5. In addition to the off-street parking required for the primary dwelling, one off-street parking space shall be provided for second units of 640 square feet or less; two additional off-street parking spaces shall be provided for larger units. 6. An attached or detached garage or carport with a maximum exterior dimension of 12' by 20' is permitted for second units of 640 square feet or less. A garage or carport with a maximum dimension of 20'x 24' is permitted for larger second units. 7. Adequate sewer and potable water facilities shall be provided as determined by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. A second unit may not be placed on a parcel or lot where a temporary mobile home, in accordance with Section 24-295 and 24-295.20, has been approved or on a lot that has more than one dwelling located upon it. 9. Either the existing single family dwelling or the second unit shall be owner occupied. Verification of ownership shall be required prior to permit issuance and annually thereafter by submittal of a declaration in a form specified by the Director of Development Services or designee. February 16, 2000 Craig Sanders, Planner County.of Butte Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 _==== ATST AT&T Wireless Services 10,000 Goethe Rd. Sacramento, CA 95827 916 362-2600 RECEIVED FEB 16 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION Re: Minor Use Permit Application -- Wireless Base Station Facility N. Gridley Site Collocation with Airtouch Cellular B Street and Hwy. 99, Gridley, CA APN: 220-170-064 Dear Mr. Sanders: Please find attached to this letter the application materials as required by the County of Butte for consideration of approval of a Minor. Use Permit for a new cellular "base station" telecommunications facility for AT&T Wireless Services',which is proposed to be located at the above referenced assessor's parcel. Proiect Justification AT&T Wireless Services is proposing to install a new wireless. "base station". facility in the Gridley/Hwy. 99. area for several reasons which are explained in greater detail below.. AT&T's engineers have identified that our current coverage in this area of Butte County -is unsatisfactory for several reasons. The adjacent cellular base stations which currently serve this area are inadequate for providing needed coverage in the area north of Gridley, Hwy. 99, and east/west arterials including Hwy. 162. The condition compromises AT&T's radio signal quality within the N. Gridley area leading to poor call quality.. The. area has the second highest complaint factor in the North Valley System due to. poor voice quality and dropped calls. These factors are the primary reasons that AT&T's engineers have identified a need for a new cellular. base station facility in the North Gridley area. AT&T Wireless Services have investigated several different potential sites in the area. We found that the proposed site, situated within an agriculturally zoned area (AG -40) with an existing Airtouch Cellular site there as a collocation partner provides an excellent location, which best meets the AT&T Wireless coverage objectives for this area of the County. �� Recycled Paper Furthermore, the existing Airtouch Cellular site was constructed to structurally accommodate an additional wireless carrier. We found that the proposed site provides good overall coverage to the target coverage area while collocating with another wireless carrier. Project Description The proposed project consists of mounting up to 12 antenna panels on an existing Airtouch Cellular 150.5 ft. steel monopole. Each antenna panel measures approx. 12" wide and (8) feet long. Each panel will be mounted at a height of 110 feet AGL. with the antenna panels extending four (4) feet below and above the point where mounted on the tower. Thus the overall height of the antennas and tower will not exceed 114 ft. above ground level on the existing 150.5 foot tower. Airtouch Cellular will continue with occupancy at the top of the tower. The cellular radio equipment will be housed within a 12' x 20' concrete shelter in the existing Airtouch Cellular leased and fenced premises. Support Equipment for the Facility and Operations The proposed North Gridley cellular base station will be an unmanned telecommunications facility which is very compatible with it's surroundings. As an unmanned facility, it produces no smoke, dust, noise, odors, uses no water nor generates any waste water. This facility will be connected to telephone and electrical power. In addition, this site will not generate any significant vehicular traffic volumes since AT&T's technicians need to only visit the site one or two times a month. RFR/EMF and Wattage Output Data (Enclosure #1) The AT&T Wireless N.Gridley site will produce Maximum Power/Channel Into Antennas of 2.857 watts. There will be twelve (12) channels. Horizontal and Vertical Location Coordinates (Enclosure #2) See enclosed FAA I Accuracy Statement by Evans Surveys, Inc., dated April 26, 1999 Elevations, Dimensions, Etc. (Enclosure #3) See enclosed drawings completed by Fallon Engineering Visual impact assessment, photo montages, mock-ups as determined by the Director of Development Services or Planning Commission. (Enclosure #4) Enclosed, is a photo simulation of the proposed facility. Discussion. and Supporting Information Regarding Alternative Sites One other collocation site exists to the south of Gridley. The site is too far to the south and close to the existing AT&T Wireless Site located in Live Oak. The stated southerly collocation site would be of no value to the network. The proposed collocation site is perfect for satisfying the coverage objectives addressed above in Project Jusification. A Page 2 collocation was pursued with Airtouch Cellular to best satisfy both the coverage requirements of AT&T Wireless and the Ordinance Amending Chapter 24 of the Butte County Code addressing Wireless Communication Facilities. Complete Twenty (20) Mile Radius Service Area Map Showing the Network with and without Proposed Site. (Enclosure #5) Enclosed, is the required documentation depicting the AT&T Wireless system for the North Valley region. Graphic Depiction of Search Ring (Enclosure #6) Enclosed, is the relevant detail of the search ring. Documentation Identifying Failure Characteristics of the Facility The tower engineering will included wind loading calculations per EIAMA-222 specification for 80 mph winds. In the unlikely event that the tower were to fail, it would fold down onto itself and potentially impact a radius area no larger than its height of 163.9 feet (includes omni antennas of Airtouch Cellular extending above the top. of the tower.) Written Evidence Demonstrating Visual Unobtrusiveness of the Facility The collocation site with Airtouch Cellular was selected as noted above to meet this requirement. AT&T Wireless will locate equipment within an existing fenced area and place panel antennas on an existing monopole at a height substantially below the top of the tower. The Airtouch Cellular omni antennas are located at the top of the tower with a total height of 163.9 feet. Horizontal distance of the proposed panels antennas from the monopole does not exceed that of the existing Airtouch antennas. Written Evidence of Notification to all FCC Licensed Wireless Carriers in Butte County (Enclosure #7) A copy of the letters sent to the wireless carriers is enclosed with this application. Evidence of a valid, current operating license or construction permit from the FCC (Enclosure #8) Enclosed, is the document titled, "United States of America Federal Communications Commission Radio Station Authorization Cellular Radiotelephone Service." A Report, Signed by a Qualified Radio. Frequency Engineer Licensed by the FCC, Prepared Pursuant to FCC OET 65 Regarding Maximum (RF/EMF) (Enclosure #9) Page 3 Enclosed, is the relevant study completed by Robert D. Weller, P.E. with FCC Radiotelephone License No. PG -12-26684 of Hammett & Edison, Inc. referring to results of Document #1, which is enclosed and also analysis of the existing Airtouch facility.. Landscaping and Painting Plans for the Completed Project The Project Site is a Collocation, which was painted and landscaped by Airtouch Cellular. AT&T Wireless will paint its antennas the same color as the existing monopole. Site Plan to be submitted to Butte County Agricultural Commissioner and Notification Letter to Aerial Applicators. (Enclosure #10) Both these items have been completed. Enclosed, are copies of the letter sent to the agricultural commissioner and the letters sent to the aerial applicators. Applications for Facilities to be located within boundaries of Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan or Airport Area of Influence. In reviewing the aforementioned plans, the proposed Facility is not located within or close to any airport land use .areas. Please call me at 916-402-7750 with any question regarding this application. Sincerely, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition Enclosures Page 4 R T 0 Lf C F, "ir7ouch Cellular i 5`. �Eliuia!� 2 -.. 1•arhsiiore Drive Folsom, G, 95630 lelephone: 916 35:' 1000 March 19, 1999 Mr. and Mrs. Paul Satur 190 B Street Biggs, California 95917 RE: Sublet of space at AirTouch Cellular's Biggs Site. Dear Mr. And Mrs. Satur, In reference to the Ground Lease Agreement dated July 13, 1992, entered into by and between you and Sacramento -Valley limited Partnership (referred to herein as "AirTouch Cellular"), this letter is formal notification that AT&T Wireless Services desires to sublet space in AirTouch Cellular's Ground Lease area located on your property at 190 B Street, Biggs, California. Please acknowledge your approval to AirTouch Cellular subletting space in our leased premises to ATULWir.eless Services by signing the acknowledgment below and returning two signed copies to ,.,,..Qwr office. 'If you have any questions please contact me at my office telephone # 916-9 or on acellular telephone # 916-764-2013. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, lm Lawrence Acknowledgment a d approval for AirTouch Cellular to Enter into a Sublease agreement with AT&T lires 5ervio657 Sub�the attached letter of amendment. By:��"�f'�` Date: Paul Satur By: ,✓ .�� �. Date: Pauline S. Satur NOTICE: We have signed and attached an amendment to'this.letter for your consideration. el-P flu+ALqy-1zqj;i7? AMENDMENT OF LETTER OF MARCH 19, 199P FROM AIRTOUCH CELLULAR'TO MR. AND MRS. PAUL SATUR: SUBJECT: SUBLET OF SPACE AT AIRTOUCH CELLULAR'S BIGGS SITE Amendment as follows: Each party co -locating on the subject ground lease area is subject to all terms, covenants, conditions, provisions and restrictions of the AirTouch Cellular Ground Lease Agreement dated July 13, 1992. Lessor shall require a separate ground lease .from each co -locating party. In any case, the leaseholder shall receive compensation for each sublease agreement entered into. We will be willing -to enter into negotiations to sublease to ATT subject to agreement on. additional compensation. ,XXIXXXXXXX ?'iul Satur January 20, 2000 ,telG 1 1, Pauline S. Satur January 20, 2000 _ TEL. 1-530-868=1035 E3 ---g> �fsweetbriar B2 G3 Haney Mtn. Sugarloaf� F1 Bunchgrass__�,,�->\ Burney Grey Rocks Round Mtn. Whiskeytown Redding IJ DT ReddingEl Hilltop Table Mtn. • Shingletown Anderson Cottonwood Tuscan Buttes Turner Mtn C1 DT Red Bluff Tomhead Vinan, KNVR Magalia Orland R003 N. Chico (FParadise B3 Red Mtn/R011 South Chico Hamilton City Bloomer 4) Durhm-Dayton Wicks Crnr 'PDT Oroville cr, Willows A3 Butte City Ophir Rd. Grapevine/R010 Y008 Oregon Pk Sites/R002 N. -Yuba City - Marysville Colusa 4/ Williams T Yuba City Beale AFB Sutter Bypass Olivehurst an, 9" Current NVALLEY W/O the N. Gridley Site Arbuckle Nicolaus 3 JAN 2000 Wheatland • AT&T PROPRIETARY Approximately 17 miles Catlett Knights Landing E3� j✓ Sweetbriar / / F1 Sugarloaf v �\ \� Grey Rocks Whiskeytown Redding DT Redding Hilltop Anderson Cottonwood B2 G3 ��� Haney Mtn. Bunchgrass--�>� Burney Round Mtn. / E1 j� Table Mtn. Shingletown Tuscan Buttes (Y( C1 DDT Red Bluff Tomhead�-� Red Mtn/R011 �T Orland / R003 Willows B3 Hamilton City Turner Mtn KNVR Magalia r N. Chico Paradise South Chico I f Bloomer Durhm-D yton Wick;DT r� Oroville A ' Butte City /06phir,Rd. Grapevine/R010 N. Gridley Y008 Sites/11002 N. Yu6a'City " Marysville Colusa WilliamsDT Yuba City f Sutter Bypass Olivehurst Beale AFE NVALLEY W/ Proposed N. Gridley Site 3 JAN 2000 AT&T PROPRIETARY 1" = Approximately 17 miles Arbuckle .T Nicolaus Catlett Knights Landing Wheatland DP Oregon Pk ,f EVANS SURVEYS INC. 420 Union Avenue Fairfield, CA 94533 April 26, 1999 GEODETIC POSITION REPORT JOB NAME: NORTH GRIDLEY COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA For A.T.& T. WIRELESS Page I Site Location: City of Biggs Butte County, CA A.P.N. 220-170-064 Survey Date: 03/10/99 Survey methods: Geodetic Positioning and standard surveying procedures. Equipment used: Trimble 4600LS GPS Receivers, Topcon GTS 3-B. GEODETIC POSITION AT: The center of the existing monopole. HORIZONTAL DATUM NAD83 HORIZONTAL DATUM NAD27 North Latitude: 39°25'03.67' North Latitude: 39°25'04.07" West Longitude: 121°41'18.36" West Longitude: 121041'14.46" GEODETIC CONTROL: HPGN Monumentation. ELEVATION OF GROUND AT CENTER OF MONOPOLE. NAVD 88 NGVD 29 100.5 feet AMSL (Above Mean Sea Level) 98.3 feet AMSL STRUCTURE HEIGHT=163.9 feet AGL (Above Ground Level) Top of omni antenna FAA IA ACCURACY STATEMENT I certify that the latitude and longitude as denoted hereon are accurate to within t15 feet horizontally, and that the ground elevation shown hereon is accurate to within ±3 feet vertically. The horizontal datum (coordinates) are expressed as degrees, minutes and seconds, to the nearest tenth of a second. The vertical datum (heights) are determined to the nearest foot. Prepared 04/26/99 by: Charles L. Evans P /':q L !. u No. 3 C;9 C , ��: ' Axorao wur otaoN fSOP ' ' iNOM OLL fRA%OC SNpO GOOD . iXE PRESSES! HEAVENS! TILL fA1R0(SNDIO OMIT (ILL GNAPNN SNg0 SOD NAS DONT LL AGAINI r (NI SAYE Uf NOWI -6XS`F6R'DEM'[RR[Y- ;DE.'16H ...FOR P,E,M.6[RRCY-..DE316N f8R,DEM .[RR[Y DE I O O L O� OQO Y 1 Graphic Design Illustration + Direct Logo/Identity Systems Advertising Graphic Design + Illustrat. i + Advertising Graphic Design + Illustration Direct vil + Logo/Identity Systems + Advertising • • • • •: • ' •19161441-0768—' 0 • • • •: AT&T • NORTH GmDLE-Y SITE 4 I t j Y►�!G D� � e 'f't OrYI !� G�Q� � �� of �� n Y� Seaxr- Ring - Tzcfiaictt Description �vje� `lams vus�l G2�c�.d C--il Type: .a C:- (� C--1 ( ) Tower Type: �O�SI btu Vt YCA Cm=m=aa (} z =-nna Type C. �► -,;rt,r o>ma ( ) = C,��m�: r►nn O C'nm9gnrr do OTI�r I I Lax I RX I I � ei... �I A t �jI j - Quadringde Llan tYa*'^e_ "\tcteS: `iK �..�i.LL, 3 ,g GD�wc,r�e;� ST�� i,✓( (, 1�-+�`' c'"t� MONc:QOI��G f l��i h11,J� �j 5' , ��fu<Q"fl1 (�C �D( f�,✓ PROJECT WORT{ A=ORiZATION FORM Project Name NJ6(z`m C. q--MJL9--kJ Budgered "On Air" Market . l4Oz,,g 0 AcLi;-:Y Project Number External Project Management (include company name) Project Description.` New Cell Site.- Coverage ite: Coverage Quality (fig Capacity Site Type: .`Mimi Cell () Full Site �Sf Microced ( ) Enhancer ( ) Expansion Project ( ) Other. Existing site expansion ( ) Scope of Work: Site Acquisition Construction ( ) Permitting/Zoning () Other ( ) VJ7-� Ari E2c�,7t�•s� Approvals: Initiator Date Site Development Manager Date Director of Technical Operations Date N Regional RF Engineer Date Capital Management Manager Date { amp- =.3 - � 1, r ).... . - . .;\ uumlsltti i C. 10 0. \�11 .0; C US CE Sw a, ` ' ' - I Table xa Road' Ro 1-.J26 Ln. c6ttonwoo ad' mountain 0 Nelson .3 Road ,:Llano Seca; Nelson NELSON a he ...... ne B�. Y is _NilsoiiShime Road LAKE O��V��t Nelson I Shippee Road Gardenti Road 48'STATE COURTHOUSE A Avenue Z 10 i3radford . Road x Nelson '9 nerm SIV T I A :0 1iyA to ortib Blvd. > C C Tres Vias s Road 0 1 F- Carlson U P.7. lyRd. THERMALITO, 1 0 Or" r 411 Richvaie . wav F E;Mle H-Y.. S OROILLE2 Z� \ -it AIRPORT \1� % W fgren. Rd. 12 Las ss 26 R1 HVALE be Z: Ch R45 IL U ::` U. erma I a 4�.;' 1 ­ ;., '. I ( L U). Ht STATE % ro K Butte City Hi hwav Ju LZ . . . . . . 7 6- toph :!"R ;d­ V C 0 ast, x, ;m!.ion ?oaa on 79 lujuk h S Ro0Cr essina > Q .l an- e Ave.AREA CIL Z./ E . / East Road, HoNcur -77.7 Rio nito 10 Rd. Paleimhd t I �, _� ilia Ave. U) 12 �S­ V UN 11;cnoL r alms[ Road Olt. A , flon q5, 9933 ;,A ice tj n Rcad 7_7 -7 *CFO (3 iq ST. . .. aaitchzAa. ;7 AM , 75 1 �i : - -ve. 12 :6 : a �T ! Watson Waik. a BIGS 0 1 RO. geld Rd. PaimtWAye Lane Tree 23 fcttj T. em cc Ave. Almond Drake Ave. ".0 F�ncrr Rd. ..j x :Farris Road H Ave. '9 P deQ South M, 70 teadrin a :` / ivi` r' ( ♦ _ n = Ave.l ter Lane 19 28 ca ! It Jiinni 7__Cox I' i :?. ; " 25 fax: Rose ...... : V5 z :s- ! :.,2, Ord Ranch 1. Ross 4i Lively cc -S Cc 5, 1 �.elody Lane V Wr Rd..- O",*,M;FaSdO Prather' Ea" ..3. E 36 D d'Q 3% 32 _­' : T i GRI EY Coiusa Wgh 11081 ONS i Caiusa Highway Archil And )N N u t t"WWJ WAN r Obermeier CORNER 6 12' >1 Pd. �""0jwfer 2 Central SLOUGI'�' S i i -u.it Liberty Road Imich xWes Ro T.17 .411UN -C=r West Liberty Road . ........ Keith 12 'CLUB A 9 % Brien'� �reiio:n ardw A C,$ =n Id US to die Honcut Road =a R E\v ORdVILTLEW�H' 1: 1.- r.-F-17•T.: 0 ;UNS11riniz. S W. E,.' ne Reimer E 17 G -Reimer Road H 014( :­1 cLuiB a. 1,&GaosE 4jZ is I -Rd. cut ----�GRAY LODGE :3 '3 181 Hart r,,GtM CLUB STATE .7.4.1 Road C, .-ZLowor 7; Vy I LD LIFE R. Z cc. a AREA L�d- 'usher ,Of -1.. 19 Owbiaof Carripbell e. OM ela kin on A' ED 2 o J 0 Z7 ei'Lo GOOSE .&F� 9 F, Lukeh. R ur rouNTRY CLUB S Riviera a 'SUTTER COWNTY handler R Ln Honcut Ocw f- lid. rA LEGEND Road U VE CIA X E Ramirez Ft3ad Road ACCESS ROUTES SHOWN WV FREEWAY Boyer STATE /`\ 99 MAIN THRU STREETS Rd. ra A- PRIMARY ROADS C3 ;ICHVALE c`""9A- Ave70 T_ CUL OE-SACS SECONDARY ROADS .4ord A CITY STREETS -4WHEEL -0 jRE-AROADS- )0".l it Rci.!�f �'n 77n :'.T. tY L AIRPORT Rn. 2 C 0 [(= 1: gF CITY Limi- is], Sod �S K 'Woodruff GOLF CO :%ICHVALE COUNTY � COURSES C .. W Lane_�_HIGHWAY POINTS OF INTEREST Z�l SCHOOLS 3: orae Rd e ,2 ■ civic - able.• BUILDINGS A_ CAMPGROUNDS d. joll�oocii 4 is Ave. I Rd. C-11, I ir. PICNIC AREAS Ir PARKS Swrev VVV. I '01 0 xrQ� C<)#�� MCPS.- Eager Md. d Ave Mayer IR Rd. Copyright MC-ALXVIII Edition of 1992 Walnut PcwellRd.. moass Maps. Inc- 1172 Kansas Avenue 0 Miles2mi ami. Ave. esto. CA 95351 -ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDI C% A toureilen of 1 0 Pyr 0 Kilometers Skm 0 nOR d MAR I uq� t AUT Cellular Division AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento. CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 January 11, 2000 Sprint PCS Network Development Department 3875 Hopyard Rd., Suite 245 Pleasanton, CA 94588 Re: Butte County — Chapter 24 of the Wireless Communications Ordinance Notification to Wireless Carriers of Plans to Develop a Wireless Facility North Gridley Site— Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 Latitude 39-25-01.07/Longitude 12141-14.46 (NAD 27) To whom it may concern: This letter is to advise you of AT&T Wireless Services' intent to develop a cellular base station at the above reference location.. The proposed site will be located north of B Street in Gridley, CA and immediately west of Hwy 99, Please feel free to call me with any question at 916-402-7750. Sincerely, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Butte County Planning Department OD qj(g Recycled Paper 1 Cellular Division January 11, 2000 SpectraSite Communications, Inc. Network Development Department 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 570 Cary, NC 27511 AT&T AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento, CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 Re: Butte County — Chapter 24 of the Wireless Communications Ordinance Notification to Wireless Carriers of Plans to Develop a Wireless Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 Latitude 39-25-01.07/Longitude 12141-14.46 (NAD 27) To whom it may concern: This letter is to advise you of AT&T Wireless Services' intent to develop a cellular base station at the above reference location. The proposed site will be located north of B Street in Gridley, CA and immediately west of Hwy 99. -' Please feel free to call me with any question at 916-402-7750. Sincerely, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Butte County Planning Department Qj(9 Recycled Paper • Cellular Division January 11, 2000 Delmar Tompkins Network Development Department Pacific Bell Wireless 3851 North Freeway Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95834 Sacramento, CA 95833 U AUT AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento, CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 Re: Butte County — Chapter 24 of the Wireless Communications Ordinance Notification to Wireless Carriers of Plans to Develop a Wireless Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 Latitude 39-25-01.07/Longitude 12141-14.46 (NAD 27) To whom it may concern: This letter is to advise you of AT&T Wireless Services' intent to develop a cellular base station at the above reference location. The proposed site will be located north of B Street in Gridley, CA and immediately west of Hwy 99. Please feel free to call me with any question at 916-402-7750. Sincerely, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning. CC: Butte County Planning Department �& Recycled Paper l . ] ART Cellular Division AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento, CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 January 11, 2000 Nextel Communications Network Development Department 2180 Harvard Street, Suite_ 220 Sacramento, CA 95815 Re: Butte County — Chapter 24 of the Wireless Communications Ordinance Notification to Wireless Carriers of Plans to Develop a Wireless Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 Latitude 39-25-01.07/Longitude 12141-14.46 (NAD 27) To whom it may concern: This letter is to advise you of AT&T Wireless Services' intent to develop a cellular base station at the above reference location. The proposed site will be located north of B Street in Gridley, CA and immediately west of Hwy 99. Please feel free to call me with any question. at 916-402-7750. Sincerely, t Richard Wickersham • Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Butte County Planning Department . OD i�2C9 Recycled Paper ATT Cellular Division AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento, CA 95827 January 11, 2000 FAX 916 857-6438 Airtouch Cellular Network Development Department 2150 River Plaza Drive Sacramento, CA 95833 Re: Butte County — Chapter 24 of the Wireless Communications Ordinance Notification to Wireless Carriers of Plans to Develop. a Wireless Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 Latitude 39-25-01.07/Longitude 12141-14.46 (NAD 27) To whom it may concern: This letter is to advise you of AT&T Wireless Services' intent to develop a cellular base station at the above reference location. The proposed site will be located north of B Street in Gridley, CA and immediately west of Hwy 99. Please feel free to call me with any question at 916-402-7750. Sincerely, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Butte County Planning Department ?n(9 Recycled Paper United States of America Federal Communications COninzission RADIO STATION AUTHORIZA_ ,ION Cellular Radiotelephone Service AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA INC. 1150 CONNECTICUT AVE, N.W. - 4TH FLOOR WASHINGTON, DC 20036 Call Sign.- i(XI,k692 File Number: 04114 -CL -MR -98 Market: 0215 Channel BlockA-1 SID: 0513 Market Name: CHICO, CALIFORNIA .................................................................... ........................... The Licensee hereof is authorized, for the period indicated. to operate a radio transmitting station in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter described. This authorization is subject to the provisions of tate Corrununications Act of 1934, as amended, subsequent Acts of Congress. international treaties and agreements to which the United States is a signatory, and all pertinent rules and regulations of the Federal Conmuutications Commission, contained in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Initial Grant Date ..................... .....March 03, 1989 Expiration Date ............................. .................................................... Novern er- 27, 2008 WAIVERS / CONDITIONS: Pursuant to Section 309(h) of the Communications Act 1934, as amended. (47 U.S.C. § 309(h)). this authorization, is subject to the following conditions: (1) This authorization does not vest in the licensee any right to operate a. station nor any right in the use of the electromagnetic spectrum designated herein beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. (2) Neither this license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transfereed in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (47 U.S.C. § 151. er. seq. ). (3) This authorization is subject in tents to the right of use or control conferred by Section 706 of the Commanications. Act of 1934. as amended (47 U.S.C. § 606). This authorization does not convey to the licensee the right to receive protection from the capture of subscriber triflic, co -channel interference or first -adjacent -channel interference in any area outside of tine authorized cellular geographic service area (CGSA) of the system. Moreover. anv facility authorized herein with a service area boundary (SAB) extending into the CGSA of any other operating cellular system on the same channel block. regardless of when such other cellular system was authorized, is subject to the following condition: In the event that the licensee of the other cellular system requests that the SAB of the facilities authorized herein be removed from its CGSA, the licensee herein must reduce transmitting power or antenna height (or both) as necessary to remove the SAB from the CGSA, unless written consent from the licensee of the other cellular system, allowing the SAB extension to remain, is obtained. Issued by IFG on Monday November 30, 1998 FCC Form 463A Page: 1 o:'? �; •. CONTROL POINTS: i - Number Street Address Citv State Rhode Num-)er 1 10030 GOETI lE ROAD SACRAMENTO CA (916)857-64)0 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA INC. KNKA692 Page: 2 of 2. January 7, 2000 Ribhud,Pdee', ,8utte=C-ounty.A-grjc*r,o.CdT'.nhi*' J County of Butte 31Nelson .Avenue Orovilte., CA 95965 Re; North -Gridley AT&T -Wireless Proposed Telecomm-imbeatibms Site, SiteP.lan-ofFacility --Collocation with Airtoudh C 11 uja.r Dear. Mr. Price:. Pursuant to the provisions..of the -Butte County Wireless Telecommunications Otd e, is enclosed a copy of the site plan and survey. Indicated- therein, are the Assessor's Parcel Number- aind. the Latitude and Longitude for your,re,fe.re.nce,i,iievaluating the site. As referenced. above.,, the AT&T Wireless, facility will be a colloca.tipn, on an. existing AiTto,ucb Cellular tower. AT&T Wireless will be locating antennas at approximately I 10 feet above ground level on, the, tower, whicb. has. a total height, 9f apPTQN ty- t§4 feet above ground :level. yourrespqpsqto this application Qn ftem isanticipate P�45q­M!MV-y;th any question 916-402-1150, Thank you for your, cooperation, -My warm- estregaTds Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition #,go Zoning. Enclosures -, Cellular Division January 9, 2000 Clarence Williams Williams Ag Service P.O. Box 474 Biggs, CA 95917-0474 ATT AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento, CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 Re: AT&T Wireless Services Notification Letter of Proposed Telecommunications Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 — Latitude 39-25-04.07/Longitude 121-41-14.46 (NAD 27) Dear Mr. Williams: This letter is to serve as notification of AT&T Wireless' proposed telecommunications facility as referenced above. The planning application with Butte County will be submitted shortly. Of particular note is that the proposed facility will be a collocation on an existing tower as so captioned. The site is located north of Gridley on the West Side of Hwy. 99 and immediately north of B Street. The existing tower has a total height of approximately 164 feet AGL. AT&T Wireless will be locating its antennas at approximately 110 feet AGL on this tower. In short, the proposed site does not call for an increase in height of the existing tower. Should you have any question, please call me at 916-402-7750 My warmest regards, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Richard B. Price Butte County Agricultural Commissioner q(9 Recycled Paper ® NT Cellular Division January 9, 2000 Norman Parker Western Helicopter Services, Inc. P.O. Box 369 Newberg, OR 97132-0369 Re: AT&T Wireless Services Notification Letter of Proposed Telecommunications Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 — Latitude 39-25-04.07/Longitude 121-41-14.46 (NAD 27) Dear Mr. Parker- This arker AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento, CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 This letter is to serve as notification of AT&T Wireless' proposed telecommunications facility as referenced above. The planning application with Butte County will be submitted shortly. Of particular note.is that the proposed facility will be a collocation on an existing tower as so captioned. The site is Iocated north of Gridley on the West Side of Hwy. 99 and immediately north of B Street. The existing tower has a total height of approximately 164 feet AGL: AT&T Wireless will be locating its antennas at approximately 110 feet AGL on this tower. In short, the proposed site does not callfor an increase in height of the existing tower. Should you have any question, please call me at 916-402-7750. My warmest regards, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Richard B. Price Butte County Agricultural Commissioner ?36 Recycled Paper AUT Cellular Division AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento, CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 January 9, 2000 Frank "Wayne" Sue Sutter Butte Dusters P.O. Box 213 Live Oak, CA 95953 Re: AT&T Wireless Services Notification Letter of Proposed Telecommunications Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 — Latitude 3925-04.07/Longitude 12141-14:46 (NAD 27) Dear Mr. Sue: This letter is to serve as notification of AT&T Wireless' proposed telecommunications facility as referenced above. The planning application with Butte County will be submitted shortly. Of particular note is that the proposed facility will be a collocation on an existing tower as so captioned. The site is located north of Gridley on the West Side of Hwy. 99 and immediately north of B Street. The existing tower has a total height of approximately 164 feet AGL. AT&T Wireless will be locating its antennas at approximately 110 feet AGL on this tower. In short, the proposed site does not call for an increase in height of the existing tower. Should you have any question, please call me at 916-402-7750. My warmest regards, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Richard B. Price Butte County Agricultural Commissioner QD& Recycled Paper AUT Cellular Division AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento. CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 January 9, 2000 Rick Patterson RPI Helicopters 94 Second Street Yuba City, CA 95993 Re: AT&T Wireless Services Notification Letter of Proposed Telecommunications Facility North Gridley Site - Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 — Latitude 3925-04.07/Longitude 121-41-14.46 (NAD 27) Dear Mr. Patterson: This letter is to serve as notification of AT&T Wireless' proposed telecommunications facility as referenced above. The planning application with Butte County will be submitted shortly. Of particular note is that the proposed facility will be a collocation on an existing tower as so captioned. The site is located north of Gridley on the West Side of Hwy. 99 and immediately north of B Street. The existing tower has a total height of approximately 164 feet AGL. AT&T Wireless will be locating its antennas at approximately 110 feet AGL on this tower. In short, the proposed site does not call for an increase in height of the existing tower. Should you have any question, please call me at 916402-7750. My warmest regards, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Richard B. Price Butte County Agricultural Commissioner ��� Recycled Paper Cellular Division January 9, 2000 PM Dusters, Inc. P.O. Box 1534 8562 Aquas Frias Road Chico, CA 95927-1534 Re: AT&T Wireless Services Notification Letter of Proposed Telecommunications Facility North Gridley Site — Airteuch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 — Latitude 39-25-04.07/Longitude 12141-14.46 (NAD 27) Dear Mr. : AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento, CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 This letter is to serve as notification of AT&T Wireless' proposed telecommunications facility as referenced above. The planning application with Butte County will be submitted shortly. Of particular note is that the proposed facility will be a collocation on an existing tower as so cWtioned. The site is Iocated north of Gridley on the West Side of Hwy. 99 and immediately north of B Street. The existing tower has a total height of approximately 164 feet AGL. AT&T Wireless will be locating its antennas at approximately 110 feet AGL on this tower. In short, the proposed site does not call for an increase in height of the existing tower. Should you have any question, please call me at 916-402-7750. My warmest regards, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Richard B. Price Butte County Agricultural Commissioner �� Recycled Paper • Cellular Division January 9, 2000 ATT AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento, CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 Charles Onstott Onstott Dusters, Inc. P.O. Box 709 Yuba City, CA 95992-0709 Re: AT&T Wireless Services Notification Letter of Proposed Telecommunications Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 — Latitude 39-25-04.07/Longitude 12141-14.46 (NAD 27) Dear Mr. Onstott: This letter is to serve as notification of AT&T Wireless' proposed telecommunications facility as referenced above. The planning application with Butte County will be submitted shortly. Of particular note is that the proposed facility will be a collocation on an existing tower as so captioned. The site is located north of Gridley on the West Side of Hwy. 99 and immediately north of B Street. The existing tower has a total height of approximately 164 feet AGL. AT&T Wireless will be locating its antennas at approximately 110 feet AGL on this tower. In short, the proposed site does not call for an increase in height of the existing tower. Should you have any question, please call me at 916-402-7750. My warmest regards, , Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Richard B. Price Butte County Agricultural Commissioner �(9 Recycled Paper • Cellular Division January 9, 2000 Larry Roady Moore Aviation P.O. Box 185 Colusa, CA 95932-0185 • AUT - AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento. CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 Re: AT&T Wireless Services Notification Letter of Proposed Telecommunications Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 — Latitude 39-25-04.07/Longitude 121=41-14.46 (NAD 27) Dear Mr. Roady: This letter is to serve as notification of AT&T Wireless' proposed telecommunications facility as referenced above. The planning application with Butte County will be submitted shortly. Of particular note is that the proposed facility will be a collocation on an existing tower as so captioned. The site is located north of Gridley on the West Side of Hwy. 99 and immediately north of B Street. The existing tower has a total height of approximately 164 feet AGL. AT&T Wireless will be locating its antennas at approximately 110 feet AGL on -this tower. In short, the proposed site does not call for an increase in height of the existing tower. Should you have any question, please call me at 916-402-7750. My warmest regards, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Richard B. Price Butte County Agricultural Commissioner O Recycled Paper ATT Cellular Division AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento, CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 January 9, 2000 Frank Michaud Michaud Aviation P.O. Box 1279 Willows, CA 95988-1279 Re: AT&T Wireless Services Notification Letter of Proposed Telecommunications Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 — Latitude 39-25-04.07/Longitude 121-41-14.46 (NAD 27) . Dear Mr. Michaud: This letter is to serve as notification of AT&T Wireless' proposed telecommunications facility as referenced above. The planning application with Butte County will be submitted shortly. Of particular note is that the proposed facility will be a collocation on an existing tower as so captioned. The site is located north of Gridley on the West. Side of Hwy. 99 and immediately north of B Street. The existing tower has a total height of approximately 164 feet AGL. AT&T Wireless will be locating its antennas at approximately 110 feet AGL on this tower. In short, the proposed site does not call for an increase in height of the existing tower. Should you have any question, please call me at 9I6402-7750. My warmest regards, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Richard B. Price Butte County Agricultural Commissioner �& Recycled Paper Cellular Division January. 9, 2000 Jean Mann Mann & Sons Ag Aviation 175 County Road G Willows, CA 95988 Re: AT&T Wireless Services Notification Letter of Proposed Telecommunications Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170--064— Latitude 39-25a04.07/Longitude 121-41-14.46 (NAD 27) Dear Mr. Mann: ATT AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento, CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 This letter is to serve as notification of AT&T Wireless' proposed telecommunications facility as referenced above. The planning application with Butte County will be submitted shortly: Of particular note is that the proposed facility will be a collocation on an existing tower as so captioned. The site is located north of Gridley on the West Side of Hwy. 99 and immediately north of B Street. The existing tower has a total height of approximately 164 feet AGL. AT&T Wireless will be locating its antennas at approximately 110 feet AGL on this tower. In short, the proposed site does not call for an increase in height of the existing tower. Should you have any question, please call me at 916-402-7750. My warmest regards, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Richard B. Price Butte County Agricultural Commissioner O qC9 Recycled Paper ATT Cellular Division AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento, CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 January 9, 2000 Dale Jones Jones Flying Service P.O. Box 497 Biggs, CA 95917 Re: AT&T Wireless Services Notification Letter of Proposed Telecommunications Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 — Latitude 3925-04.07/Longitude 121-41-14.46 (NAD 27) Dear Mr. Jones: This letter is to serve as notification of AT&T Wireless' proposed telecommunications facility as referenced above. The planning application with Butte County will be submitted shortly. ` Of particular note is that the proposed facility will be a collocation on an existing tower as so captioned. The site is located north of Gridley on the West Side of Hwy. 99 and immediately north of B Street. The existing tower has a total height of approximately 164 feet AGL. AT&T Wireless will be locating its antennas at approximately 110 feet AGL on this tower. In short, the proposed site does not call for an increase in height of the existing tower. Should you have any question, please call me at 916402-7750. My warmest regards, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Richard B. Price Butte County Agricultural Commissioner OD 9 (9 Recycled Paper Cellular Division January 9, 2000 ATT AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento, CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 Gene Muir Jones Aviation, Inc. 3664 Hankins Williams, CA 95987 Re: AT&T Wireless Services Notification Letter of Proposed Telecommunications Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN:. 220-170-064 — Latitude 39-25-04.07/Longitude 12141-14.46 (NAD 27) Dear Mr. Muir: This letter is to serve as notification of AT&T Wireless' proposed telecommunications facility as referenced above. The planning application with Butte County will be submitted shortly. Of particular note is that the proposed facility will be a collocation on an existing tower as so captioned. The site is located north of Gridley on the West Side of Hwy. 99 and immediately north of B Street. The existing tower has a total height of approximately 164 feet AGL. AT&T Wireless will be locating its antennas at approximately 110 feet AGL on this tower. In short, the proposed site does not call for an increase in height of the existing tower. Should you have any question, please call me at 916402-7750. My warmest regards, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Richard B. Price Butte County Agricultural Commissioner OD 3& Recycled'Paper Cellular Division January 9, 2000 AT&T AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento, CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 Gary Dibble Dibble, Inc. P.O. Box 2361 Marysville, CA 95901-2361 Re: AT&T Wireless Services Notification Letter of Proposed Telecommunications Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 — Latitude 39-25-04.07/Ungitude 121-41-14.46 (NAD 27) Dear Mr. Dibble: This letter is to serve as notification of AT&T Wireless' proposed telecommunications facility as referenced above. The planning application with Butte County will be submitted shortly. Of particular note is that the proposed facility will be a collocation on an existing tower as so captioned.. The site is located north of Gridley on the West Side of Hwy. 99 and immediately north of B Street. The existing tower has a total height of approximately 164 feet AGL: AT&T Wireless will be locating -its antennas at approximately 110 feet AGL on this tower. In short, the proposed site does not call for an increase in height of the existing tower. Should you have any question; please call me at 916402-7750. My warmest regards, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Richard B. Price Butte County Agricultural Commissioner M OD•� QCp Recycled Paper Cellular Division January 9, 2000 Darrell Wahl Chico Aerial Applicators P.O. Box 3549 Chico, CA 95927-3459 Re: AT&T Wireless Services Notification Letter of Proposed Telecommunications Facility North Gridley Site — Airtoech Cellular Collocation AM 220-170-064 — Latitude 39-25-04.07/Longitude 12141-14.46 (NAD 27) AT&T AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento. CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 Dear Mr. Wahl: This letter is to serve as notification of AT&T Wireless' proposed telecommunications facility as referenced above. The planning application with Butte County will be submitted shortly. Of particular note is that the proposed facility will be a collocation on an existing tower as so captioned. The site is located north of Gridley on the West Side of Hwy. 99 and immediately north of B Street. The existing tower has a total height of approximately 164 feet AGL. AT&T Wireless will be locating its antennas at approximately 110 feet AGL on this tower. In short, the proposed site does not call for an increase in height of the existing tower. Should you have any question, please call me at 916-402-7750 My warmest regards, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Richard B. Price Butte County Agricultural Commissioner OD �(q Recycled Paper ATT Cellular Division AT&T Wireless Services 10030 Goethe Road Sacramento. CA 95827 FAX 916 857-6438 January 9, 2000 Craig Compton AVAG, Inc. P.O. Box 156 Richvale, CA 95974-0156 Re: AT&T Wireless Services Notification Letter of Proposed Telecommunications Facility North Gridley Site — Airtouch Cellular Collocation APN: 220-170-064 — Latitude 39-25-04.07/Longitude 121-41-14.45 (NAD 27) Dear Mr. Compton: This letter is to serve as notification of AT&T Wireless' proposed telecommunications facility as referenced above. The planning application with Butte County will be submitted shortly. Of particular note is that the proposed facility will be a collocation on an existing tower as so captioned. The site is located north of Gridley on the West Side of Hwy. 99 and immediately north of B Street The existing tower has a total height of approximately 164 feet AGL. AT&T Wireless will be locating its antennas at approximately 110 feet AGL on this tower. In short, the proposed site does not call for an increase in height of the existing tower. Should you have any question, please call me at 9161402-7750. My warmest regards, Richard Wickersham Site Acquisition and Zoning CC: Richard B. Price Butte County Agricultural Commissioner CD Q(9 Recycled Paper tV., N 112 SEC 13 T,18N, R,2E, MD,B, & M9 PTN, SEC, 12 T,18N, R12E1 MID,BI & M, 300.00 1.81 AC± 11 1293" 114 co = = 2 1.55,15 50 t4 54 1131-97 18 CO '0' m 48 O 20.50 Act 53 41 18 .4 30.27 AC 3.80AC0,4C Cn 44 co C4 CP 52 M'r MW IWC 6 MAX 1 611 7-12-104 n@1VD MtWVM A UAD IOU IL-it-eam NOTE, These Parcels are For 137-71 ITUAT 51.00 AC 80.41 AC± C- Em ,,Rt,PHI,- SCALE 1 o' C, LAl---),FD �)N THE NORTH LINF 0;7 rHE'LANUS `)A -UP, PFR' 1,37 MAP' 71, BUTTE CCIUNITY PELOFT)S. EIEVAI�ONQ 'r_-ASFt') ON WND 21) DATUM. x x h- N A U �j,5 :777-77- x - , I n' . . I . I I I I , , - I I 1� � - I I I I I . I . I I I . I . I I I I I 1 �DHtt. I NUMIJLK, t4AD83 70TTfiCO C)7", NAD27 PROJECT BENCH PLA 14NING DIVIS ION PREPARED '0 4/ 26/99 BY: 1 -1 'l 4.4 F) NAD27 TOP OF, CONCRETE PAD EL=98,3' AW:�Lx. 7; DIRT �7 CHARLw. ES L EVANS.. PLS '3709 v REC 'ROJECT AREA. ENLARGEMENTI ........................... . 70TTfiCO PLA 14NING DIVIS ION C D [ A F< I h ',-, S A,.- 11 R Tt Tll[-- 1\1 0' -1 Llr3L 'HF '�_ANDS ( ( 1 T 1- Ci ( J N T r R E A- PIER YAR' 7 1, FA'Flt (J� r,4C \,'Fi L)AIUM, N A m 11 1 t t1 DI,1 E N F 41)4 I I {1 r 1148 *39'48'T_ F �El. 09 JIL Ci Y 0 1--1"JATER VALVE `vALLvL F CP I Li < [1,37 MAPS 711 9'__9'48 E F-77 7 17 ,,ATE POQITj '-�ATIJP P3 DOI t.18 T, r' { v J L7 y1 I � t1J / t ti A �/L c) 1 'r I i 7 - PR o P E 21 _cL 18'.-4 4 9'-1 E t,,� L EA' ARE 1. SEL Ln 0 W= I K ��w^ r� U (.: T_ �I­_ -1 _- DIRT 1 I � 'j D 8 j } .', PROJECT BENCH N AD 2 1--Vi'14.-4-6", NAD27 TOP OF CONCRETE PAD EL -98.3' AMSL DIR T J) T AR { =i EWE( EA ENLARGEMENT a E w • T e S' i 1. s. e i v c PROJECT PJAME L .)RT'H GRIDLEY DRAWN E3 -,Y - CHECKED BY rV EVA'�S DATE ISSUE L #1 04/26/93 100% FIN. MAP APPPOVAL" Proy!ct W)ncqei' Dote Cote, L N 0 RT " �`� RDLE?.IDB CELLLTLIkR SAT f Cl TY OF GRI DLEY, BUTTS COUNTY'. A CA11FORNIA : SACRAMENTU CELLULAR TELE P*HQNE E T H E F. 0 AD A(_: r A V E �..l (0, C A 9;5 8,2 7- JITLE PLOT PLAN AND SITE TOPOGRAPHY,— SHEET NLIMR-ER D 1 OF Ilj i I IIS! I (E)EQUIPMENT I (N) 240 SQ. FT. ( I I I I PRE-FAB W NC STOOP I SHELTER � EQUIPMENT i0 III " 1 SHELTER �- (N)16 SLIDING GATE III)-------------_____-----------� � III, f11ti' J111 li � III Liw il! f I� AC UNITS III I i (N) A'i �T ANTENNA ARRAY I ! i I I i; I } (9) 110' - Tr