Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MUP 01-01
l FILE #: MUP 01-01 PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET APPLICANT:, UBIO IT .. Leasing Company REPRESENTATIVE: American Tower Corporation PROJECT TYPE: 1blinor Use Permit ADDRESS:_ 140 Independence Circle,'Suite A Chico, CA 9597.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To colocate un to nine panel antennas on an exsting 150 Foot tall monopole and un to seven equipment cabinets PROPERTY ZONED: P-O(Public -Quasi Puhlicl LOCATED: On the northwest corner of Lincoln Boulevard and Monte Vista at the Oroville Memorial Cemetarv, at 5646 Lincoln Boulevard, Oroville, AP#: 036-160-046 TOWN/AREA: Oroville CA. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Public 1. Application complete: Amount: $350.00 Receipt #: 18519 2. Comments sent to: 3. Comments received from: 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 6. Assigned To: Stephen Betts 7. Environmental Determination: 8. Staff Report: 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. State Clearinghouse No: � ✓ Categorical Exemption-CEQA# ('3 -3 Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Subject to. Fish--& Game: W e Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA # 15061.(bx3) Other Project Video: N6 Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes (!N�)Date Sent to SCH: Publication Notice Written: ��a.��!D Display Ad Prepared:_ Notices Mailed: Number of Notices: Newspaper Publication Dater Planning Commis on'Hefiring(s):_ Action taken: Special Conditions: Commission Resolution No Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: 15. Type Minor Use Permit/Send for signature: 16. N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G: 17. Send validated Minor Use Permit: 18. Assessor's Memo: 9 ejoA'tn .1 3-,r) �q , r).7 Ordinance No: Adopted: Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No 19. Copy of Minor Use Permit / Variance to Planning Technician: UbiquiTel Leasing Company, (Item determined to be categorically exempt from environmental review), Minor Use Permit to colocate six 3 square foot panel antennas centered at the 130 foot height on an existing 150 foot tall monopole, and three 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets. The property is located on the northwest corner of Lincoln Boulevard and Monte Vista, at the Orovill-- Memorial Cemetery, at 5646 Lincoln Boulevard, Oroville. APN 036-160-046 (SB) (MUP 01-01) I. Find that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15311. Section 15311 consists of construction of minor structures accessory (appurtenant) to existing commercial facilities. Antennas colocated on an existing tower ar, considered to be accessory structures. 1 II. Approve a Minor Use Permit 01-01 for UbiquiTel Leasing Company, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: A. That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Environmental Health Division, and the Butte County Air Quality Management District. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Public and is zoned P -Q. The Public lane - use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. The P -Q zone allow: colocation of communication facilities with approval of a Minor Use Permit. B. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the existing monopole or extend beyond the existing antennas. 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and no, additional services or utilities are required. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The project site is already developed with a 150 -foot tall monopole. The proposed antennas to be mounted on the existing monopole will not have a ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 ■ harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. 'The radio-frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very little vehicle traffic will be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment cabinets. The communications facility is unmanned and only one to two site visits per month will be required after construction. 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which i3 proposed: The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas will be mounted on the existing 150 -foot tall monopole. The project will not have an impact to any agricultural operations or to the cemetery use. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use will cause any other relevant impact. C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated of maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Chapter 24, Section 262, of the Butte County Code. Conditions of Approval: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing monopole. 2. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and.towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 4. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES 0 SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 ■ The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 6. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 7. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standard. - and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time. electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 10. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of person: working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the, cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 11. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 ■ 12. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 13. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 14. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of, or retained by, the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 15. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 16. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 17. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained he Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit E" and date-stamped July 7, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 18. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 19. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. 20. Prior to storage of fuel or other hazardous materials at the facility submit a Hazardous Materials Release Response Plan or complete a Hazardous Materials and Emissions Questionnaire, and submit to Environmental Health. 21. Building permits are required for antennas and equipment facilities/cabinets. Engineer design calculations are required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings with addition of co -located antennas. It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconed by Commissioner Mooney, and unanimously carried to approve Item A, B, C, and D on the Consent Agenda. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 ■ UbiquiTel Leasing Company, (Item determined to be categorically exempt from environmental review), Minor Use Permit to colocate six 3 square foot panel antennas centered at the 130 foot height on an existing 150 foot tall monopole, and three 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets. The property is located on the northwest corner of Lincoln Boulevard and Monte Vista, at the Oroville Memorial Cemetery, at 5646 Lincoln Boulevard, Oroville. APN 036-160-046 (SB) (MUP 01-01) Mr. Betts gave a brief summary of the project. Mr. Wilson asked if the RF analysis was cumulative? Mr. Betts said the operation is within the FCC guidelines for both the existing and proposed antennas. The hearing was opened to the public. Ms. Yilma again stated the same concerns she said during the first hearing on Conditions 10 and 14. The hearing was closed. Mr. Wilson concurred with staff's recommendation to recommend to the Planning Commission that the Minor Use Permit for UbiquiTel, MUP 01-01, be approved subject to the findings and conditions listed below: Staff recommends that the Planning Manager take the following actions: I. Recommend that the Planning Commission find that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15311. Section 15311 consists of construction of minor structures accessory (appurtenant) to existing commercial facilities. Antennas colocated on an existing tower are considered to be accessory structures. II. Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Minor Use Permit 01-01 for UbiquiTel Leasing Company, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: A. That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General. Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Environmental Health Division, and the Butte County Air Quality Management District. The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Public and is zoned P -Q. The Public land use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. The P -Q zone allows colocation of communication facilities with approval of a Minor Use Permit. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 ■ PAGE 14 ■ B. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures; or natural resources, with consideration given to: 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the existing monopole or extend beyond the existing antennas. 2. - The availability of public facilities, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and no additional services or utilities are required. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The project site is already developed with a 150 -foot tall monopole. The proposed antennas to be mounted on the existing monopole will not have a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. The radio-frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very little vehicle traffic will be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment cabinets. The communications facility is unmanned and only one to two site visits per month will be required after construction. 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas will be mounted on the existing 150 -foot tall monopole. The project will not have an impact to any agricultural operations or to the cemetery use. - 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility `! application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use will cause any other relevant impact. C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design,' and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions. under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 ■ PAGE 15 ■ D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Chapter 24, Section 262, of the Butte County Code. Conditions of Approval: 1; The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing monopole. 2. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. 3. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 4. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division. of Environmental Health. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 6. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a fortythousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 7. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 8. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 10. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety; or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 ■ PAGE 16 ■ s Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director .of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may'lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 11. All Facilities that are not in continual use fora period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 12. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 13. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 14. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of, or retained by, the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by,the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 15. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 16. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 17. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit E" and date-stamped July 7, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 18. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEET-ING ■ MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 ■ PAGE 17 ■ 19. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. Environmental Health Division: 20. Prior to storage of fuel or other hazardous materials at the facility submit a Hazardous Materials Release Response Plan or complete a Hazardous Materials and Emissions Questionnaire, and submit to Environmental Health. Building Division: 21. Building permits are required for antennas and equipment facilities/cabinets. Engineer design calculations are required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings with addition of co -located antennas. Mr. Wilson said the above hearing items will be placed on the September 28, 2000, consent agenda of the Planning Commission. He said if these items are approved, there will be a 10 .day appeal period. He explained the procedure to appeal, whether it be the applicant or the public. 0 r + -- ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING 0 MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 13, 2000. ■ PAGE 18 ■ ]up DEPARTME T OF DEVELOPM TT SERVICES BUTTErr UNY UNIFORM APPA TION WMICAlVT: Agent informauon to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME ( U applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: T U u= C- ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) 40EN - c C. CzRCL'IF<'Urru- A « c NAME bF PROPOSED PROJECT( U any) TELEPHONE cr, nrn c-rr�R`I (53D 8 C1 a- Soo S LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address, if any) 56 � J-� 10Cp C�N 13LV � (ZO\(.T.LLE GENERAL. INFORNIATON RFOI rIRFn OWNER'S NAME `T t.iT NST tiJ U TELEPHONE C-te-CA-N qD u) 't'Z7-:R CcR Phe n- o Fl1 (51 p) X3b - 3-40 C ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: �0 � Pf� r�-c� 5'TR Gt r 5 �'� � QO ��.1T �CKr'r►o tJ Ca CA �i `-� a ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE O F 12>0I SITE SIZE (in Square Feet or Acres) EXISTING STRUCTURES ( in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Squar: Feet) I -Fow VI ` ISO � 1' e 1 it �3 a g a (Check One) N/A (Check one) NIA ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APYLiCATIUN REQUESTED ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION NIAP ❑ REZONE ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ USE PERMIT RECEIVED ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL NLALP MINOR USE PERMIT JUL 07 2W ❑ BOUNDARY LfNE MODIFICATION ❑ VARLatNCE ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ MINOR VARLANCEPIANNIINGDTMSION UNTY 13CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ DEVELOPNIENTAGREENIENT ❑ OTHER PR0rFCTnFC(RTPTffl�f .. FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and size of parcels.) --o0 (- �-h6 ua,-T Qv�TML I.LLf ZE L.G sS Co n,) (Inury T cn-Tyo 0 `T t.iT NST tiJ U - S EU EIJ u -r ('rteE T C = CT 5 ` ' r ryl- Fl1 QSS sr n SFCJ-DRS wT 2 T 0ll-' V9 U 1 i0 E A 6701C.N SEC -TDR W2.4 -L G LOC -F96-0 rw Cis ` o- R O F 12>0I 01J T14 G GAS S1-1 Q U M O 0 o r� U( OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY ITIAT l Aft PRESENTLY IIIE LEGAL OWYER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER. I ACKNOWLEDGE TIIE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION A:ND CERTIFY TEL -\T ALL OF TFIF. ABOVE INFOR."IATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and inc the affidavit with this application.) DATE: -JL,..— .1 �b X SIGNATURE: IN 4 AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; Print Name of Agent and Phone Number Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Print Name Print Name Signature Signature Architect and/or Engineer: Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number Mailing Address 04. :J':I il,. :;;ti:Jv'r ,Sr Vit• .FA•' 1 •.} :`.• - FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: '1 Le o ✓ AP Number(s) ✓' Owners Authorization ✓ Project Description Taken by bA Receipt No. L25 q E.H. Total Amount Received: 4� 3 S�o • ®o N/A Legal Description Zoning Requirements Copies of plot plan LD Plan3SO. oo FD Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ as of Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". 0 0 q COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM ( (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed General Information: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or projectsponsor: UMQU'=TtL. LeffSZ-oG t'r P q s u�� A c t-�CD CACI, at S CA -4 3 2. Address of project 1n4 (oLZ-VCOL0 &Q\j17 nRduT-LLC Ca Assessor's Parcel Number: 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: S-fT-V RU P E TH oto zo06 G30G"ct� crQcue s u-xm-- A Ct12Lo 9 C-0 - 5005 ciq 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: C`SAX) (L USE PERmXT 5. Existing general plan designation: ��- 6. Existing zoning districtu6L- . C aUfts '- flu 6 L'a: C 7. How is land currently used? HS A CEf 'r)EVEK\4 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed):. "�OQ Ot )c r , RN T"E� N R-,$ RN O 9,eufr t Q GP,ou O F&UT-Prn -M-1 00 THC G,KTs`i7u� W Project Description: 9.Site size: 106y'..;t ' x 1'7-� a / (Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: 64- Compact: 0 /!V Total: O mt 11. Plans attached Yes,%_ No 12. Proposed development schedule RE?P-b nfn PTS04 �-� wFE KS 13. Associated projects WOU E✓ - 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development ►,j O1 Attach description of project containing the following information: is. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size :expected. WA 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionallyoriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. EJ/Pt 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. V/A D Butte County Department of Development Services D Planning Division 1 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employmenttper shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. IA 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearty why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach :as �n 6 UzL_ra-TN U PC7R r R[- R uT R c o - ft'PFX(O-vLO S R Eco �t��-(LEp P &c r --vu S C w E (iRE C e� — t�o C( N (,- CO►� ('� ry EX z S � N G 'i s✓ 1 a c ornMU N_ -ct�-�r��S C-t�-c�-C`Z�`i• Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. — 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. — 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. — 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _ 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality V� /-- or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage pattems. — 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. more. 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or — 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. — '29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). —` 30. Substantially increase. fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). —/ — 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. E�s P A-�r OF FT V E ✓—/ E r -W P U'yCr�-L-X S w c- oVJ C S�a3f'�S'f'�-rvG' TO 60�L0C'�a �' it 1�'( �rnrn�rvTCf ^rZeT T S .�Iv aUTTS wU o D Butte County Department of Development Services D Planning Division i.i C • • Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site ask exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plEnts and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. S -6 ('YTiPI-CK C� 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historic' -al, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. S'ec nt-v e -H Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and informaion required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date *S'a f K:\FORNIS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 3 COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Attach description of project containing the following information: Environmental Setting: 32. Describe the project as it exists before the project, including information of topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. RESONSE The property is currently used as a cemetery. There is a telecommunications tower on the property, which is used to co -locate antennas. We will not be disturbing the soil at the site. There are no observed cultural, historical, or scenic aspects to the property. Agate surrounds the property and no animals have been observed. Attached is a Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Ed Hendrick of Earthtec Ltd. The report was prepared in 1989 for the original construction of the tower. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. RESPONSE The property is located on 5646 Lincoln Blvd., in Oroville CA. The surrounding properties include a gas station, a couple of houses and undeveloped farmland There are no observed cultural, historical, or scenic aspects to the property. 9 COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Attach description of project containing the following information: Environmental Setting: . 32. Describe the project as it exists before the project, including information of topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. RESONSE The property is currently used as a cemetery. There is a telecommunications tower on the property, which is used to co -locate antennas. We will not be disturbing the soil at the site. There are no observed cultural, historical, or scenic aspects to the property. A gate surrounds the property and no animals have been observed. Attached is a Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Ed Hendrick of Earthtec Ltd. The report was prepared in 1989 for the original construction of the tower. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. RESPONSE The property is located on 5646 Lincoln Blvd., in Oroville CA. The surrounding properties include a gas station, a couple of houses and undeveloped farmland There are no observed cultural, historical, or scenic aspects to the property. 036160046000 036160004000 OROVILLE CEMETERY DISTRICT KINGS ROSE 5670 LINCOLN BLVD 7309 SUNLEAF LN OROVILLE CA 95966 SACRAMENTO CA 95828 036160057000 RUEFENACHT R LESLIE & SANDRA K 1523 E EL CAMINO DR CLAYTON CA 94517 036181016000 DUGGER FANNY TRUSTEE 5445 WALMER ROAD OROVILLE CA 95966 036182005000 LANDERS RICHARD 15 BUEHLER AVENUE OROVILLE CA 95966 036182010000 PELLETREAU ALICIA G 5386 WALMER RD OROVILLE CA 95966 036183008000 036174004000 FICHTER ROBERT & JERRY A 590 HAZEL ST GRIDLEY CA 95948 036181017000 MORRIS ELMER L & MAXINE 1805 ELGIN ST OROVILLE CA 95966 036182006000 WORKMAN J B & SHIRLEY A 2136 ROSEDALE AVE OROVILLE CA 95966 036182015000 WILSON RICHARD SCOTT 3488 MORNINGSIDE CT OROVILLE CA 95966 NEW HOPE MISSIONARY BAPTIST 036183009000 CHURCH RANKIN E & PRATT M J TRUSTEES 2732 FAY WAY 5280 LOWER WYANDOTTE ROAD OROVILLE CA 95965 OROVILLE CA 95966 036370002000 036370003000 ONEAL DANNY & JEANNETTE JT HOLLAND REX 5528 FARLEY STREET 854 E 5TH STREET APT 2 OROVILLE CA 95966 CHICO CA 95928-5874 036370005000 . PRITCHARD DANIEL M & MICHELLE M 2 VALINDA CIR OROVILLE CA 95966 036370006000 FAIN BRADLEY E,ETAL 90 SHADOW OAK CT OROVILLE CA 95966 036370008000 036370009000 BROWN L M & MILLER EARL LEE RUDOLPH DOLOROS A SS 5624 FARLEY ST 5640 FARLEY ST OROVILLE CA 95966 OROVILLE CA 95966 036370011000 036370012000 PERES JUDY A APPLEGATE FAMILY TRUST 5672 FARLEY STREET 2041 APPLEGATE LN OROVILLE CA 95966 DURHAM CA 95938 9 036160051000 COLBY LEE B TRUSTEE P O BOX 540 DURHAM CA 95938 036181014000 MCGIBBON LISA ANN 5459 WALMER RD OROVILLE CA 95966 036182004000 MADSEN-SMITH KAREN 6243 CLARK RD PARADISE CA 95969 036182009000 GRAVES LARRY G SR,ETAL 15 MEDLEY LN OROVILLE CA 95966 036182016000 LACKEY ELSIE A 5075 LINCOLN BLVD OROVILLE CA 95966 036200015000 STEVE PETERSON P O BOX 4000-98 HAYDEN LAKE ID 83835 036370004000 "SMITH CYNTHIA D 5560 FARLEY ST OROVILLE CA 95966 036370007000 STEIDLEY KENNETH LYMAN & DEBORAH JO JT 5608 FARLEY ST OROVILLE CA 95966 036370010000 SPEESE LLOYD M & LILLAINE M 5656 FARLEY ST OROVILLE CA 95966 K:\Planning\1 Front Counter\1 inbox\LABELS\mup 01-01.doc 036370015000 HADDOCK J F & JO BILLIE 5653 FARLEY ST OROVILLE CA 95965 036182017000 RASMUSSEN S P & MARY C 5424 WALMER RD OROVILLE CA 95966 K:\Planning\1 Front Counter\1 inbox\LABELS\mup 01-01 2doc HOLLAND JEFFREY D HUBIQUITEL LEASING CO AMERICAN TOWER COP.P HOLL 107 RIVERVIEW DR ` 140 INDEPENDENCE CIR #A 501 CANAL ST STE E OROVILLE CA 95966 CHICO CA 95973 POINT RICHMOND CA 94801 +a: p Y p L, J O �) k :oil coo -� ate; r3 !p5 c�Lr3 y (DOB 1 ' j �� �P� .qL�C��; �C k I RFjCEIVED JUL, ol .2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION C 0' R P O R . A 11 271 North Avenue, Suite 711 P.O. Box 1620, New Rochelle. N)'1 0802-1620 Phone: 914-576-6530 Fax: 914-576-0576 SCINGTICS C O R P O R A T 1 O N ENGINEERING REPORT SUMMARY JUNE 21, 2000 THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED AND SIGNED BY LOUIS G. CORNACCHIA, BEE, PRESIDENT EVALUATION OF RADIO EMISSIONS FROM THE PROPOSED UBIQUITEL, LLC, PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE (PCS) ANTENNA INSTALLATION (SITE #SF03UB318A) FOR A INTEGRATED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, TO BE MOUNTED TO AN EXISTING MONOPOLE, LOCATED ON APN #036-160-0469 5646 LINCOLN BLVD, OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA. 1 271 North Avenue, Suite 711 P.O. Box 1620, New Rochelle. NY 10602-1620 Phone: 914-576-6530 Fax: 914.576-0576 SCINETKS C O R P O R A T 1 O N Mr. Ed Frawley, Program Manager Ubiquitel, LLC ' 1175 West Moana Lane, Suite 201, Reno, NV 89509 Subject: Evaluation of Radio Emissions from a proposed ' Ubiquitel, LLC, Personal Communications Service (PCS) Antenna Installation (Site #SF03UB318A) for a Integrated Wireless Communications Network, to be mounted to an existing Monopole, located . on APN #036-160-046, 5646 Lincoln Blvd, Oroville, California. Attn.: Ed Frawley As per the applicants request, Ubiquitlel, enclosed please find: A. An analysis of findings and conclusions prepared by SCINETICS Corporation, Staff Engineers on the following:' 1. Power Density of the combined field at the point where it is at it's maximum strength and concurrently at the closest point to the source, Ubiquitlel, LLC, Personal, Communications Service (PCS) Antenna Installation and at radial distances of 10, 400, 500, 1000 and 2000 feet from the PCS Transmitting Antenna, where people can be. 2. Calculated levels compared to allowable EMF continuous Exposure levels as per ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992/NCRP, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Continuous Exposure Standards, OSHA. A 11 1 SUMMARY This report is the result of an extensive study of Electromagnetic Field Intensities (EMF - Power Densities) emitted by the Proposed Ubiquitlel, LLC, PCS Antenna Installation, (Site #SF03UB318A) for a Integrated Wireless Communications Network, to be mounted to an existing Monopole, located APN #036-160-046, 5646 Lincoln Blvd, Oroville, California. The study incorporated the most conservative considerations to determine practical combined worst case Power Densities contributed by the proposed Ubiquitlel, LLC antennas, as well as the existing Airtouch antennas, the Oroville community could encounter. CONCLUSIONS ' The Power Densities emitted by the proposed PCS Radio Antenna Facility are many orders of magnitude below the Health Standards adopted or proposed in the United States and any Health Standard used anywhere in the world. The issue of EMF compliance is pre-empted from the municipality regulatory powers beyond the applicants stating that it has examined the emission's in accordance with "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97- 01, August 1997" and that the applicant is in compliance with the newly adopted FCC MPE/NCRP of 1000 microwatts/cm. sq. residential or "uncontrolled environment" Standard. Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 states that; " No State or local government or instrumentality thereof, may regulate the placement, construction and modification of personal ' wireless services facilities on the basis of environmental effects of radio frequencies emissions to the extent that such Facilities complies as to the Commissions (FCC) Regulations concerning such emissions". The results of this theoretical worst case safety analysis clearly indicate that the EMF levels attributed to the emissions caused by the proposed PCS Facility, will be far below EMF continuos Exposure levels as per ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991* (49 CFR 1.1310), Federal Communications Commission (FCC Continuous Exposure Standards, OSHA, and 1986 NCRP Recommendations. The emissions broadcast from the Ubiquitel, LLC transmitters are in the non -ionizing 1950- 1965 Mhz frequency band, a band previously assigned to 11 1 FIXED/MOBILE communications. Presently the FCC has assigned ' these same frequencies in the 1950-1965 Mhz band to the PCS Industry, capable of transmitting at power levels of 200 Watts ERP. The Frequency band has in fact been a part of the EMF environment 1 for over forty years. The EMF levels attributed to the emissions caused by the PCS Broadcast Systems are well below applicable EMF evidence, are well below threshold effects. The derived Standards have added safety limits to the threshold levels. When EMF levels encountered are at or below the Standard, no health effects occur, therefore no cumulative effect is possible regardless of exposure duration. ' This analysis and the results of this analysis assumes an antenna power output of three hundred sixteen (316) Watts ERP per channel. ' The theoretical maxima of combined RF emissions, resulting from the proposed Ubiquitlel, LLC, PCS Installation, to which the public (non -occupational) is exposed to in and around normally accessible ' areas surrounding the PCS antenna installation and the Oroville community, is far below the strictest continuous exposure limit legislated and proposed in the United States. Specifically, the theoretical maximum levels of RF energy (see Table II) resulting from the simultaneous and continuous operation of all combined Ubiquitlel LLC, PCS Radio Facility transmitting antennas are less than one 1) microwatt/cm. sq.. The EMF levels are hundreds and thousands of times below the Maximum Permitted Exposure limits 1 (MPE) proposed by 1982 ANSI, 1992 ANSI/IEEE, NCRP and the MPE criteria of all states that regulate Radio Frequency Installations and meets the safety criteria specified by the FCC in accordance with the Telecommunications Act of 1996. 7 The theoretical- highest-- combined -e-missions - from all proposed and ---existing herein—named ---carriers — the community could be exposed to at an –elevation of 24 f et above gro.n ! radial distance of 500 (Note: Future co -locating carriers must complete an FCC Compliance analysis, including the proposed carrier Emissions as determined herein, [if this application is approved], showing cumulative EMF emissions impact.) FI L C IC These EMF levels and all other levels presented in Table II, IIA and IIB are theoretical maximas that could occur only under worst case events, assuming conditions such as in phase reflections occurring steady state, all transmitters operating simultaneously and continuously and excluding resistance or attenuating characteristics of construction material used in homes, schools and other similar structures. In reality, actual field measurements continually provide readings of power density levels far lower than the more conservative analytical levels indicated. The Telecommunications act of 1996, is the applicable Federal Law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of PCS Radio facilities. It is the conclusion of this report, that the proposed Ubiquitlel L.P. PCS application meets the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) present criteria and the FCC criteria as it is effected by the Telecommunications act of 1996, with respect to environmental considerations of RF emissions. Furthermore, Mobile PCS interfere with television reception due to the wide as mandated and monitore d ANALYSIS Radio Frequency Bands do not reception, telephones or radio separation of the Broadcast Bands by the FCC. (See Table I) This critical analysis* incorporated PCS Radio antenna emission characteristics and included the following assumptions which exceed realistic conditions of operations, but will yield worst case EMF - Power Densities ordinarily not realized and never exceeded. 1. All antennas are located at the lowest elevation indicated in the construction drawing to absorb errors in actual locations and to bring the antenna cluster closer to facilities and citizens than would normally be the case. 2. All antennas will be transmitting continuously, 24 hours a day. 3. All channels will be communicating simultaneously. 4. Power levels emitting from the antennas are increased by a factor of 4 to take into account possible in - phase reflections at any point in the community, which is rarely the case, and if so, are never continuous. 5. At all distances greater than 2000 feet, the Power Densities decrease by a factor of four (4) with every doubling of distance. The PCS Installation in question is an assembly of low power antennas that emits radio energy at levels 100 to 1000 times below those of Commercial Broadcast Antennas. Given the distances between the antennas studied in this report and the community field points in question, as well as the overall community, the densities of the radio energy are extremely low. * Reference Basis for calculations: 1 - "Evaluating Compliance With FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. OET Bulletin No. 65 -Edition 97-01 " 2- Copies of :data, sketches and specifications submitted by Ubiquitlel, LLC are the basis for our studies, calculations and ' analysis. EMF. STANDARDS REVIEW - The U.S. Congress adopted "The 1 National Environmental Policy Act of 1969" (NEPA) which required all government agencies to take into account the potential environmental impact of their actions. The agencies had to consider whether their actions significantly affect the "the quality of the human environment". To implement this mandate, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted rules covering the NEPA in licensing and 'approving 1 facilities and operations under its jurisdiction. Rules adopted were codified in the code of Federal Regulations, Part 1, Subpart I, of the FCC Rules and Regulations. Facilities or operations specified must provide information assessing the environmental effect of their proposal. In the case of RF radiation, the environmental effect would 1 be the relative health risk to people living or working near or at the facility in question. ' The FCC was required by NEPA to make a determination as to whether the facilities or operations it approves may significantly affect the human environment with regard to the emission of RF ' radiation. As there was no federal standard for exposure to RF radiation, the FCC chose to rely upon a recognized non-government standard. The FCC selected the "American National Standard Safety ' Level With Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, "300 KiloHertz (kHz) to 100 GigaHertz (GHz)" ' prepared by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in 1982. The protection guides recommended by ANSI were the guidelines the FCC. has identified for using in evaluating 17 L E environmental significance with respect to Human Exposure to RF Radiation. The FCC adopted rules which required preparation of environmental assessment if the particular facility or operation would cause exposure of workers or the general public to levels of radio frequency radiation in excess of the ANSI protection guides. The rule is contained in 47 CFR 1.1307(d). That rule applied to facilities or operations licensed or authorized under the following parts of the Commission's Rules, 5,21 Subpart K), 25, 73, 74 (Subparts A, G, I, and L), and 80. The facilities and operations licensed or authorized under all other parts, subparts or sections of the Commissions Rules were categorically excluded from consideration. In 1986 the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Sub -Committee SC -53, published recommended limits for occupational and public exposure (NCRP - "Biological effects and exposure criteria for radio frequency electromagnetic fields." NCRP Report No. 86, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland). Sub -Committee SC -53 independently retained Radiation Frequency Protection Guidelines (RFPGs) similar to those of the 1982 ANSI 1 Standard but with one notable exception: two tiers appear, one for occupational exposure and one for exposure of the general public. The results of the studies, carefully analyzed, proposed exposure levels of approximately 5000 microwatts per centimeter square (at 1950) MegaHertz (MHz) frequencies) for continuous occupational exposure and approximately 1000 microwatts per centimeter square for continuous exposure of the public sector is used in the comparative analysis herewith. In 1990, Sub -Committee IV (SC -IV of C95), formed by the IEEE using rigid selection criteria for their studies and critical reviews, 1 recommended two tiers (NCRP) but with differences in rational. ANSI soon accepted the recommendations of IEEE Sub -Committee IV and the recommendations were proposed, adopted and termed ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 1992. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law 104-104- February 8, 1996 recommended adoption of portions the ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 1991/NCRP Standards, and in August of 1996, the FCC did adopt the F u 1 t ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 1991 two tier Standards, to be implemented on applications. beginning September 1, 1997. The Power Densities emitted by the proposed PCS Radio Communications Antenna Installation base station are many orders of magnitude below the Health Standards adopted or proposed in the United States and any Health Standard used anywhere in the world. The attached photograph indicating acceptable EMF emissions from various household appliances provides a further perspective for better understanding the EMF levels encountered in this. summary. For additional information addressing the environmental impact of EMF Emissions please refer to the section in the report titled "References" which provides current names of agencies, contact personnel and phone numbers. Frequency Bands - According to most authorities, microwave (MW) frequencies cover the approximate band from 900 MegaHertz (MHz) to 300 Giga_Hertz (GHz). One MegaHertz (MHz) is a million cycles and One GigaHertz (GHz) is a billion cycles per second. Table I lists several other communication and interrogation frequencies used in the United States. Clearly, a large fraction of commercial and private telecommunication involves MW Frequencies. TABLE I (Some Frequency Type of System FM Radio VHF TV UHF TV Mobile Radio Telephone/PCS Typical Radar Systems Definitions) Frequency Interval 88 MHz to 108 MHz 174 MHz to 216 MHz 470 MHz to 806 MHz 806 MHz to 2.0 GHz 200 MHz to 3.0 GHz G W I-] The Principal Features Of The Proposed Installation And The ' Assumptions Considered In The Analysis Are, As Follows: a) The proposed Ubiquitlel, LLC, (PCS) radio antennas will be mounted to an existing Monopole as indicated by the Ubiquitlel LLC drawings. The elevation from the centerline of the proposed Ubiquitlel antennas to the base of the Monopole will be approximately 135 feet. The closest a person can approach the transmitting antenna is 129 feet. This assumes a 6 foot tall person, 1 with the distances being measured from the top of that person's head at the base of the existing Monopole, to the centerline on the antenna panel in question. b) The antenna cluster will consist of three (3) Sectors, three (3) Directional type antennas (RV90-17-OODP). in each sector, for ' transmission and receive. The physical arrangement of these antennas is illustrated in drawings given by Ubiquitlel LLC (Assumed 2 degree downtilt for all antennas in this analysis.) c The maximum number of channels that wille assigned b ass g ed to the 1 antenna array, in any direction, it is assumed, will not exceed three (3). The power from the transmitting antennas for each of the three (3) channels in each sector, is assumed not to exceed 316 Watts, ERP. The radio transmissions could be at frequencies between 1950 and 1965 MegaHertz. Maximum power from the transmitting Ubiquitlel LLC. (PCS) Antenna, in any direction will be 948 Watts, ERP. d) It was assumed that the elevation of the Oroville community within a radius of 2000 feet from the PCS Antenna perimeter is equal to the elevation at the base of the Monopole, with exceptions as noted in Table H. e) All field points are at Radial distances indicated from the base of the Monopole where the vertical line of PCS Transmitting antenna intersects. I f) The additional EXISTING Carriers co -located on the existing Monopole including transmitting data, are as follows: AIRTOUCH (proposed) Maximum ERP/Channel 100 watts ERP Number of Channels 20 Number of Transmit/Receive Antennas 5 Antenna centerline height above grade 147 feet Antenna Model ASP -952- OmniDirectional-Gain= 9 dBd Frequency of transmission- 880Mhz Maximum continuous residential Exposure- 550 microwatts/cm.sq. AIRTOUCH (uronosed Maximum ERP/Channel 40 watts ERP Number of Channels/sector Number of Sectors Number of Transmit Antennas/Sector Number of receive Antennas/Sector Antenna centerline height above grade 50 & 100 feet Antenna Model -Andrews PL4-59D- 4 foot Dish -Gain 35.4 dBi Frequency of transmission- 6.1 Ghz Maximum continuous residential Exposure- 1000 microwatts/cm.sq. J TABLE IIA -1 EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ./ PERCENTAGE OF STANDARDS PROPOSED UBIQUITEL MONOPOLE INSTALLATION 5646 LINCOLN BLVD, OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA Field Point- 1 -Any point of - (16) feet above surface Antenna System Elevation Power Standard Calculated Percent of r Feet WERP FCC/NCRP EMF Density Standard Residential UBI UITEL (12) - 1950 MHz ' (Proposed) 135 316 1000 0.104 0.011 AIRTOUCH (5) - 880 MHz ' (existing) 147 100 550 0.421 0.076 AIRTOUCH (2) - 6.1 GHz (existing) 50 40 1000 N/A N/A Total Percentage Of All Antenna Sources 0.087 tNOTE: 1. N/A is less than 0.001. 2. Unless Indicated - Total Percentage of All Antenna Sources = less than 0.01%. 3. WERP - power output per channel ' ** EMF emissions contributed by transmitting antennas in differing frequency bands are regulated by MPE Standards for the specific bands in which the emissions are analyzed. When adding the ' emissions resulting from transmissions in differing frequency bands, the resulting percentages of the emissions compared to the governing MPE standards are added. Per the FCC, percentages of EMF Density ' levels of applicable Standards, as specified by the FCC OET Bulletin No. 65 Edition 97.01, are addressed as follows: "Therefore, in mixed or broad band fields, where a number of different frequencies are involved, the contributing of all RF sources , ' must be considered. When different limits are recommended for different frequencies, the fraction of (or percentages) the limit incurred within each frequency interval should be determined and ' the sum of all such fractions (or percentages) should not exceed 1.0 (or 100 percent)" See section 4.1 in Appendix A). K References for EMR recommended ceilings, data and comments to radiation sources, radiation hazards and available reports on studies of household appliances emitting electromagnetic radiation: Summary of International, Federal, State and Consensus Safety ' Criteria For Exposure to Radio Frequency Energy at Frequencies Used for PCS Communications Organization/Government Agency Exposure Power, Population Density (µW/cm sq.) 1 International -World Occupational 4,875 Health Organization-(EHC 137, 1993) Public 975 International -National Radiological Occupational 10,000 ' Protection Board (NRPB, 1993) Public 10,000 ' International -European Prestandard (CENELEC ENV.50166-2, 1995 Occupational Public 4,875 975 ' Federal -Federal Communications Occupational 5,000 Commission(follows NCRP-1986) Public 1,000 ' Consenus Standards American National Standards Institute Occupational 5,000 (ANSI C95.1-1982) Public 5,000 ANSI & Institute of Electrical & Occupational 6,500 ' Electronic Engineers (ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 Public 1,300 National Council on Radiation Occupational 5,000 Protection & Measurements Public 1,000 (NCRP Report 86,1986) ' State Codes_ New Jersey (NJAC 7:28-42) Public 5,000 Massachusetts Public 1,000 (Dept. of Health, 105 CMR 122) New York State Public 1,000 (Dept. of Health follows NCRP-86) 1 TABLE II EMF LEVELS IN MICRO FA TS/CM.SO. 5646 LINCOLN BLVD -SITE #SF03UB318A OROVILLE, CA Proposed Lower than the 1996 Lower than the 1996 UBIQUrML Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points Combined Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Act/ANSMEEE C95.1-1991 Antenna Residenel/Cont. Exposure Occupation/Cont. Exposure (5000) Emissions (1000) by a factor of by a factor of Point 1 0.052 19000 95000 R=10' -Base of tower Elev. - 6' Point 2 0.104 9600 48000 R=400'- Nearest home Elev. - 16' Point 3 0.127 7800 39000 R=500'- Oroville community Elev. -16' . Point 4 0.142 7000 M 35000 R=1000'-Oroville community Elev. -16' Point 6 0.133 7500 37000 R=2000'-Oroville community Elev. - 16' Note: N/A =factor over 100000 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE IIA EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ,, 5646 LINCOLN BLVD -SITE #SF03UB318A OROVILLE CA Proposed Lower than the 1996 Lower than the 1996 Aiirtouch Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points Combined Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Antenna Resident'l/Cont. Exposure (550) Occupation/Cont. Exposure (2750) Emissions by a factor of by a factor of Point 1 0.280 1900 9500 R=10' -Base of tower Elev.- 6' Point 2 0.402 1300 6500 R=400'- Nearest home Elev. - 16' Point 3 0.167 3200 15000 R=500'- Oroville community Elev. -16' ' Point 4 0.140 3900 19000. R=1000'-Oroville community Elev. -16' Point 6 0.131 4000 20000 R=2000'-Oroville community Elev. - 16' Note: N/A =factor over 100000 2 1 Ll i u 3 TABLE IIB EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ= 5646 LINCOLN BLVD-SITE #SF03UB318A OROVILLE CA Proposed Lower than the 1996 Lower than the 1996 Aiirtouch Dish Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points Combined Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Act/ANSWEE C95.1- @50 foot Elevation Antenna Resident'l/Cont. Exposure Occupation/Cont. Exposure (5000) Emissions (1000) by a factor of by a factor of Point 1 0.0001 N/A N/A R=10'-Base of tower Elev. - 6' Point 2 0.0002 N/A N/A R=400'- Nearest home Elev. - 16' Point 3 0.0003 N/A N/A R=500'- Oroville community Elev. -16' Point 4 0.0066 N/A N/A R=1000'-Oroville community Elev. -16' Point 6 0.0050 N/A N/A R=2000'-Oroville community Elev. - 16' Note: N/A =factor over 100000 1 1 1 F 71 77 FERSO L -RES LJ ME NAME-: Louis G. Cornacchia STATUS: Married, Four Children EDUCATION: Manhattan College, BEE Iona College, Computer Language Courses* Manhattanville college, Business Law Co'u.t*ses SCINF-TICS COrPOration - President Engineering Consultants, After. Market Wireless. p1jone Patent Applied for- US Patent Office_ Charger tech Services, 0 Itic.-President Engineering Services Clearance -Secret OTHER ACTIVITIES: School Board President-. - New Rochelle, New York, Finance Campaign Manager - Mayoral Campaign, New Rochelle,- New Yo,. -k. SDA District Chairman - Boy Scouts of America. New Rochelle, New yO-rj.<, Chairman Of Board of Dixectots Reliance Batik, 'Whi-te Plains , New York Member of Adviso-rY Board. o. .Patriot National Batik Stamford. Con1jecticut, Licensed Real l-sstate Broker State Of New York I 1 t n t t Mr. Cornacchi.a has been ej.-n.ployed in the Electronics Industry as Electronic Engineer after rece.i.vin.g his BEE from Manhattan College, School of Engineering. Prior to for.in.ing Collins Consultants Intl in 1959 and subsequently Charger Tech Services Itic. it, 1974, Mr. Corn.acchi.a was em.pl.oyed. by Hazeltine E.lectrotlics Corp. as Engineer, Designing Signal. Processor and. Radar Display Module for The SAGE System, Primary Early Warning System or DEW LINE, The TPS -1 - GROUND BASED SEARCH RADAR SYS'T'EM and AWACS (A5E) Power Systems. Subsequently, Lou. was employed by .Loral Systems Design Team developing the AN/ALQ58 Reconnaissance System and developed. (two man team) the precursor YIG TUNER - [ALR -2.0] Crystal Scanner covering the :Cull 200 megahertz - 12 gigahz Frequency Range Surveillance System for interception of Enemy Navigational Fire Control and. homing Devices for purposes of Identification and Signal Jammialg. Sevcta years after receiving his degree Mr. Corn.acchia was .hired. as Chief Engineer by Victory Electronic to Develop the Image - Intetisi:Ci.er or Night Vision Scopes (Using Star Light) for the Fort Dix Army Command, At Norden Systems, Mr. Cornacchia developed unique, more aggressive programs incorporating Built -In Test Equipment (BITE) to detect on- coming circuit failures of the F111D-E Avionics to increase reliability and was responsible for Ai.r. Force change of Automatic Test Equipment Specifications to accommodate this :innovation. In 1959 Collins Consultants Intl, LTD was formed to contrtrue servicing Norden Systems in devel.opi.tlg Automatic Test Programs for AIRBORNE Computers and. Navigational. Radar Modules. ' In 1974 Charger Tech Services, a Now York Corporation tvas .fo.rrne.d by Cornacch.i.a (President), with Mr. Robert Harris to service additional companies in both. tb.e Nuclear and Industrial com.tnuilities ' on an Engineering level.. 7 L In 1987 SCINETICS was formed. by Mr. Cornacchia (President), and application for a service marls was f:i.l.ed with the United States Patent Office, and. granted. KINETICS Col.porati.on assumed responsibilities for all Mobile Cellular and. Broadcast Channel Radio Frequency Environmental. Impact Studies as of July 1992. A partial. listing of companies SCINETICS and. Charger .h.as been contracted with, employing 30 to 50 state of the art. Engineers, Technicians and Programmers, are as follows: 1 1 t 1 n 1 Westinghouse Corp. Martin Marietta IBM Allied. Signal. - Bcndix United. Technologies Corp. Loral Electronics Systems ITT New York Telephone Co. Fairchild Camera Division Airborne Instruments Labs Gruman.n Corp. Miles Inc. Perkin Elmer. Corporation NYNEX Shore Media Iuc. Syracuse Scientific Corp. Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems Mobile Radio Cellular. EMl='' Studies and Testinnonics Pt•ovided by Sci.netics For. the Following Cornm.unities. Case law decisionsi` favoring Applicant, where KINETICS Corp. was mentioned as providing critical written technical support data and. Expert testit7lony in applicant's application process. (Partial. Listing); Hillsborough, New Jersey Valley Cottage, New York Fair Lawn, New Jersey* New York City, New York Hastings, New York Bedm.ini.ster, New Jersey Martinsville, .New Jersey Little Silver, New Jersey* Hazlet, New Jersey* Readington, New Jersey4= Garwood., New Jersey* Huntington, New York Hernps Lead., New York Armonk, New York* Favorable Supreme Court, SLI- cri.o:r and Appellate Court Decisions Benefiting Cellular Service OO S $ SCD CD N W V cc m O N cc 2 W_ w W 3 0 CL 08Z e wz O Ea: ELEC"OMAGNETIC Non -Ionizing Radiation Ionizina Radiation AM Radio: 535 - 1605 kHz Light CB Radio: 27 MHz ,�� Cordless Phones: 49 MHz s TV Ch 2-6: 54 - 88 MHz FM Radio: 88 - 108 MHz Marine Radio: 160 MHz TV Ch 7-13: 174 - 216 MHz TV UHF Ch 14-69: 470 - 800 MHz Cellular Radio, Specialized Mobile Radio, Paging: 806 - 946 MHz Antitheft devices: 10-20 kHz and/or 915 MHz Microwave oven: 915 and 2450 MHz Personal Communication Services: 1800 - 2200 MHz Intrusion alarms / door openers: 10.5 GHz Power Microwave radio: 1 - 40 GHz Frequency Satellite Communications: 100 MHz - 275 GHz -103 1-106 109 1012 1015--�-!1018 . 60 Hz 1 kHz 1 MHz 1 GHz Frequency (Hz) mmOm® UbiquiTel Leasing Company SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR MINOR USE PERMIT Presented By: LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC. Steve Ruppenthal, Project Manager Messeret Yilma, Zoning Specialist Jason Buckholz, Site Acquisition Specialist Hassan Mahmood, RF Engineer BUTTE COUNTY Telecommunication Antenna Placement Property Address 5646 Lincoln Blvd. Oroville, California INTRODUCTION The applicant, UbiquiTel Leasing Company, a Delaware limited liability company authorized to do business in the State of California, by and through their agent, LCC International (LCC) is hereby petitioning the County of Butte to grant the Minor Use Permit. UbiquiTel seeks to co -locate six (6) PCS antennas and related base station equipment on the existing 150' American Tower Telecommunication Facility, located at 5646 Lincoln Blvd., Oroville, California. The proposed site is zoned Public Quasi (PQ). WHO IS UBIQUITEL UbiquiTel is a Delaware State registered company that has signed an affiliation agreement with Sprint PCS, headquartered in Kansas City Missouri. The company, headed by Donald A. Harris, former president of Comcast Cellular Communications, Inc. in Pennsylvania, is the exclusive .provider of Sprint PCS digital personal communication services, generally known as PCS, to midsize and smaller markets in the Western and Midwestern United States with a total population of approximately 7.7 million residents. UbiquiTel expects to cover approximately 55% of the resident population in those markets by the end of 2001 and expects to cover approximately 63% upon completion of the build -out. A copy of the UbiquiTel's FCC license is attached as Exhibit "A". UbiquiTel will utilize all the "back office" capabilities of Sprint PCS through its affiliate relationship, such as network monitoring, billing and collections, and customer service. In addition, all of Sprint PCS' national distribution agreements with retailers such as Radio Shack, Office Max, Best Buy and Circuit City will also be available to UbiquiTel. The PCS network (using Code Division Multiple Access "CDMA") will be constructed by UbiquiTel and will be 100% compatible with Sprint PCS. Each Sprint PCS affiliate, including UbiquiTel, follows an overall national strategy that includes: • Nationwide network on a single 100% digital, 100% PCS platform • State-of-the-art CDMA technology • Unique national service offerings and pricing • Economies of scale to achieve lower costs of operation • Mass market services (national advertising and promotions) UbiquiTel is uniquely poised to bring the highest quality all digital, 100% PCS service to markets not currently served by Sprint PCS, and offer its customer state-of-the-art wireless'service at affordable prices. 1 WHAT IS PCS PCS base stations are low-power facilities. The power of a typical PCS system is less than 20 watts per sector. In fact, this is extremely low when compared with other familiar radio systems, such as AM/FM radio and broadcast television, which operate from 5,000 — 50,000 watts. PCS broadcasts at power levels no greater than a common reading lamp. PCS is a state of the art portable telephone and paging system. PCS is competitively priced and more dependable than analog system. PCS is more private than cellular because it utilizes digital technology that makes possible many new capabilities including the ability to transmit and receive data (E-mail, conference calling, caller ID, call forwarding, and information services such as news headlines, weather forecasts, stock quotes, and also eliminates the need for a separate pager. The broadband PCS being offered by UbiquiTel is one of the newest entrants in the wireless communication services. In 1994, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decided to allocate additional spectrum space on the radio frequency to broadband PCS. In the "Matter of Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, "GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum and Order FCC94-114 (June 1994), the FCC explained that it was taking action "to foster rapid creation of a competitive market" to deliver broadband PCS services. Issuance of the new PCS licenses is intended to enhance competition "not only on price, but also on quality and the types of new products and services" that can be offered. The FCC specifically found that "rapid deployment" and wide -area coverage" of new PCS services are important and necessary for this new competition in the filed of wireless communications. HOW PCS WORKS While this site is only one of many sites in our entire market area, it is an essential link within the network. In fact, you can look at this base station facility (site) like a bulb on one of those old strings of Christmas lights. If one bulb goes out, it affects the whole string. If the site at the Cemetary cannot be constructed, the entire network is affected. Wireless technology, PCS in particular, is classified as a "line of sight" technology. In other words, the height and number of base station facilities needed to provide coverage depends greatly on the topography of the area to be covered. The antennas must be at a height that enables the signal to transmit with no significant obstructions, such as tall buildings or a dense stand of trees. The antenna must also be able to "see" the boundary of the next facility, in order to provide uninterrupted signal coverage between base station 2 facilities. However, the antennas can't be too high or they won't be able to provide coverage directly below, and may interfere with other surrounding sites. In that way, a PCS base station facility is like a lighthouse. For the signal light to be seen, the lighthouse must shine from a point higher than the surrounding landscape. If a nearby hill is higher than the light source, the light cannot be seen from the other side of the hill. For the light to be seen the lighthouse must either be built higher than the hill or an additional lighthouse must be built on the other side of the hill. FACILITY SITING Some people may wonder why we need this particular base station facility at this particular location. "Why here?" In general, the design objective is seamless coverage on Highway 70, Highway 162 and the towns of Oroville and Palermo. Each base station facility in a PCS network, whether co -location or new build, covers a limited area. The signal is handed off from facility to facility, just like a baton in a relay race. And much the same as light from a lighthouse, to be effective and maintain coverage, a PCS signal cannot be obstructed by tall structures or topography. UbiquiTel will respond to the questions in the same order in which Butte Code Section 24-262.E is written. 7. Statement of Justification a. Includes a description of the proposed Facility, including the type of facility being requested. RESPONSE The proposed project is to co -locate six (6) PCS antennas, model RV-90- 17-02DP (Exhibit `B"), at 130' on the existing 150' monopole, and related base station equipment on the property located at 5646 Lincoln Blvd., Oroville, CA. The base station equipment is manufactured by Lucent Technologies and is called PCS CDMA Enhanced Primary Minicell and Growth Cabinet (Exhibit "C"). The Minicell is a small, cost-effective modular base station used as the primary building block for PCS networks. Operating at 1.8 GHz, the Minicell's can be used indoors and outdoors and several pre-engineered configurations allow flexible coverage options. The growth cabinets allow for the expansion of the network when increased capacity or sectorization is required. We are proposing to install three cabinets now with a possibility of four in the future. b. Height from the natural grade to the top of proposed Facility. RESPONSE The height from the natural grade to the top of the existing monopole is 150'. The height from the natural grade to the top of the proposed UbiquiTel antennas is 130'. c. Support equipment proposed. RESPONSE As stated above, the proposed support equipment is a PCS CDMA Enhanced Primary Minicell and Growth Cabinet. The Enhanced Primary Minicell is 30"W x 30"L x 60"H. The growth cabinet is 22"W x 30"W x 60"H (Exhibit "C"). d. RMEMF and wattage output data including the number of channels. RESPONSE The wattage output will be 200 per sector and one channel. What are EMFs and do they pose a health risk? Whenever there is an electrical current there will also be an electromagnetic field (EMF) surrounding it. We are constantly surrounded by electrical currents. They are in household appliances such as light bulbs, computers, television, and radio. They also occur naturally in electrical phenomena that emanate from the sun, lightning bolts, -and the electrical charges our bodies produce. These electromagnetic fields are produced across a wide frequency range. For example, power lines emanate frequencies at 60 Hz, while television transmits at 50 MHz to 950 MHz and PCS transmits in the 1800 MHz band. (Hz stands for hertz, or cycles per second). The following example shows the frequency spectrum and the various frequency bands. 0 T4 wavelength (meters) 1E9 1E7 1E5 1E3 1E1 1E-1 1E-3 1E -5E-7 Q) Mo M xA `+M rn rtS �: �, p In 0 ELECTRICITY RADIO LIGHT IONIZING r 0 3E1 3E3 3E5 3E7 3E19 3E11 3E13 3E15 frequency (hertz) (In the above picture, for e.g., 3E5 = 3 times 105 = 3,00,000 and so on) t As the diagram above indicates, PCS technology operates at Radio frequencies, which are at a higher frequency than power lines. Power lines and other low frequency. emissions are the focus of media attention and health studies. On the other hand, PCS operates at a lower frequency than ionizing frequencies like X-ray machines that operate above 100,000,000,000 MHz (or 100,000 THz). While much mention has been made of EMF, there has been little to differentiate between EMFs that are harmful and EMFs that pose no threat. Recently, studies that focus on health effects regarding EMF are considering the amount of power that pushes the radio signal. A television station transmits frequencies at 500,000 watts, a radio station can transmit at 100,000 watts, and a PCS transceiver usually transmits at less than a few hundred watts. In large cities, where more transceivers are necessary to supply adequate coverage due to the shadowing of buildings, PCS transceivers may transmit as low as 10 watts. This is because the signal of any given site need only be strong enough to overlap the signal of its neighbor sites. Since PCS frequencies are much higher than the Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) of power lines, the absorption of energy by humans at PCS frequencies is substantially less that at ELF frequencies of the power lines or at VHF frequencies used for TV broadcasts. PCS frequencies are much smaller than the ionizing radiation frequencies of X-rays and gamma rays, which have been established as a health risk at high energies and long exposures. PCS facilities transmit well within the safety limits set by FCC for their frequency range and do not nose as a health risk to the surrounding exposed community. 5 FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency ENVIFs The FCC has adopted the standards set by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), and the National Council of Radiation Protection (NCRP). These standards have set the maximum permissible exposure levels and label the exposure level in terms of density, measured in milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm). It measures the amount of power that a radio frequency emits onto one square centimeter of body surface. According to the FCC exposure diagram below, the acceptable exposure for radio frequencies at 1850 MHz (PCS band) are 1.0 mW/cm2 and 5.0 mW/cm2 foreg neral public and occupational cases respectively. "The rationale takes into consideration that the extremely short wavelengths do not penetrate very deep into the body tissues"'. Because these guidelines are based upon the same limits as those in the IEEE/ANSI and NCRP guidelines, they also include safety factors of 10 and 50 for occupational and general public scenarios respectively from what is believed to be a health risk. General public/uncontrolled exposure limits apply in cases where the general public may be exposed. Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply in cases where persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and are fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. 31 IIAI�19��� !paiiiivieeni� (The above figure has been adapted from the FCC document — OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, Aug 1997, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio frequency Electromagnetic Fields") RF Exposure Compliance of a Typical PCS Cell Site Because of the nature of frequencies above the 1600 MHz level, they are line of sight propagations. This means that you have to be directly in the path of the beam to be exposed to the full power of the transmission. Antennas are directed so they radiate most of the energy away from buildings towards the horizon, at another antenna. Also, .the further you move away from the transmitting antenna, the less powerful the power density becomes. This decrease in power is equated by power density decreasing as the inverse square of the distance. Most transmitters are placed on a tower/monopole or a tall building. Measurements taken for a 145 foot tower, with 22 transmitters radiating 100 watts each (2200 total effective radiated power), were 0.04094 mW/cm2. Densities at ground level easily fall within the standards for the general population, put forth by ANSI2. Data submitted to the FCC showed that exposure from a 45 meter tower was hardly more than typical background levels. Measurements taken at the bottom of a tower, operating at 100 watts per channel, 96 channels, omni -directional collinear arrays, were 0.002 mW/cm2 per channel3. This analysis reported on a worst case scenario, so it assumed that the antenna focus was straight down. Building attenuation caused density exposures to be even lower. - The same distances from an antenna on the outside, as in the inside, are as much as 10 to 100 times lower depending on the building construction. Measurements taken inside nearby buildings from the same tower yield levels between 0.0002 mW/cm2 and 0.00002 mW/cm2. Rooms directly below and to the rear of the antenna face are even lower (IEEE May' 1992). Portable cellular phones also fall under the regulation of the FCC/ANSI C95.1-1992 standard [18]. According to an IEEE article dated December 1994, "cellular phones operating at 0.6 watts, exposed the head to 0.86 mW/cm2, while lower extremities received 0.57 mW/cm2". Transmission power levels for PCS antennas are very low. In January 1993, the FCC reported: "Measurements that have been made around typical cellular base stations have shown that ground -level power densities are well below limits recommended by currently accepted RF (radio frequency) and microwave safety standards." Eight prominent researchers and agencies researched, studied, and continue to study the effects from radio frequencies in the PCS industry. Today, there is no data establishing a correlation between radio wave transmissions at these power levels with any adverse health effects. There has been much discussion recently about electromagnetic fields (EMF) and alleged health affects associated with them. The vast majority of these reports are associated with the EMF resulting from high power electric utility transmission lines. The following 7 paragraphs detail the differences between transmission lines and Personal Communication Services (PCS) facility electromagnetic fields. It is important to note that any electronic device or transmission facility generates electromagnetic fields. Items such as lamps, power lines, stereos, garage door openers, CB radios, etc. generate these fields. There are two main properties, which distinguish these fields. They are the strength of the fields, which is associated with the amount of electricity going through the device, and the frequency of the fields. A PCS transmission facility, by design, transmits very low power, which results in weak electromagnetic fields. Low power is used at these facilities due to the nature of a PCS network. Each PCS base station is designed to provide service to only a small geographic area, typically about a 2 to 3 mile radius. Beyond this distance, another PCS base station in the network provides service. Also, the frequency of the fields used at a FCS facility is much different from that used in high power electric utility transmission lines. A technical analysis of a generic PCS transmission facility is depicted in Appendix A. The analysis is presented for a relatively short structure of 45'; for taller structures the exposure would be significantly lower. Appendix A shows that the "worst case" electromagnetic field density at the base of a 45' tower is about 1.5 times weaker than the standard adopted by the Federal Communications Commission governing PCS operation. As a point of comparison, manufacturers of microwave ovens (these ovens operate at generally a similar frequency to PCS transmitters) are required to design their products such that the field strength "leaking" out does not exceed 1.0 mW/cm2 at a distance of 5 cm from the oven's surface. The "worst case" analysis for the PCS facility is still much lower than the permissible guidelines governing microwave ovens. The "average case" analysis is again a 100 times below the acceptable levels for microwave ovens. Conclusion: The PCS cell site applied for is well within the safety region for exposure to humans. Even in the worst-case scenario with the antennas pointing straight down at the tower base and with full power, it easily meets the FCC limit for exposure to general public. f^; 8 References: 1 The American Radio Relay League, Now You're Talking!, 2" d edition, pg. 8. 2 Denny & Associates, PC, Engineering Exhibit: Human Exposure to Radio -Frequency Emissions, Kansas City, Missouri, August 17, 1995 3 IEEE, Human Exposure to RF Emissions from Cellular Radio Base Station Antennas, May 1992. a IEEE, Current and SAR Induced in a Human Head Model by the Electromagnetic Fields Irradiated from a Cellular Phone, vol. 42, no. 12, December 1994. 9 ,a Appendix A: Typical PCS Field Density "Worst Case" Analysis Conditions for "Worst Case" Analysis Where; -All available transmitter power is utilized -The antennas are pointing straight down at the base of the tower Power Density = (P * s * c * A * r) / (4 * pi * R) P = Transmitted Effective Radiated Power of each Carrier (600 Watts) s = Number of Sectors (3) c = Number of carriers per sector (2) A = Antenna Gain Factor (1.64) r = Ground Reflection Factor (2.56) pi = 3.14 R = Distance to the Antennas at tower base (45' = 1459 cm) J Substituting in these numbers; Power Density = 0.64 milliWatts/cm2 Comparing to FCC limits for general population of 1-.0 milliWatts/cm2 (1.0 milliWatts/cm2) /(0.64 milliWatts/cm2) = 1.55 (i.e. approximately 1.5) Conclusion: It is seen that even in the worst scenario, with maximum power transmitted, with 2 carriers and the antenna pointing at the base of the tower, the RF exposure at the worst location at the base of the tower, is still 1.5 times below that allowed by the FCC for the more stringent general public exposure limit. (It should be noted that this worst case scenario is never implemented, since pointing the antennas., at the tower base would drastically reduce the coverage area of the cell site). Additional information pertaining to PCS Antenna Safety is attached as Exhibit "D" 0 10 e. Horizontal and vertical location coordinates. RESPONSE LAT (NAD 27): 039-28-43 & LAN (NAD 27): 121-32-57 8. Proposed elevations of the structure and any accessory buildings, including building height and other physical dimensions, drawn to graphic scale. RESPONSE Please see site plan page Z-2. 9. Visual impact assessment, photo montages, mock-ups as determined by the Director of Development Services or Planning Commission. The assessment shall identify any proposed trimming of vegetation that will be required for the normal operation of the Facility. Stealth technology is encouraged. RESPONSE Please see attached photos and photosims as Exhibit "E". The original photos are marked "P" and the rendered versions are marked "R". 10. Mock-ups required (may be required at any time during the processing of the permit. RESPONSE See response to number 9 and Exhibit "E". 11. A discussion of and supporting information regarding the alternative site selection of at least a minimum of three to four sites, if available, including colocation opportunities, and a statement as to why these alternative sites and/or colocation opportunities were rejected. RESPONSE While this site is only one of many sites in our entire market area, it is an essential link within the network. In fact, you can look at this site like a bulb on one of those old strings of Christmas lights. If one bulb goes out, it affects the whole string. As you can see in the propagation maps (Exhibit F) the first map shows a gap in coverage amongst the sites and the second map, now with the proposed site in place, fills in that gap giving seamless coverage to the area. 11 Wireless technology, PCS in particular, is classified as a "line of sight" technology. In other words, the height and number of base station facilities needed to provide coverage depends greatly on the topography of the area to be covered. The antennas must be at a height that enables the signal to transmit with no significant obstructions, such as tall buildings or a dense strand of trees. The antenna must also be able to "see the boundary of the next facility, in order to provide uninterrupted signal coverage between base station facilities. However, the antennas can't be too high or they won't be able to provide coverage directly below, and may interfere with other surrounding sites. Each base station facility in a PCS network, whether co -location or new build, covers a limited area. The signal is handed off from facility to facility, just like a baton in a relay race. And much the same as light from a lighthouse, to be effective and maintain coverage, a PCS signal cannot be obstructed by tall structures or topography. With the tower already existing and being within the search ring area, there was no need to pursue any other facility. 12. A complete service area map showing the entire wireless communications network of the provider's twenty miles in all directions from the proposed site for the time period from the filing of the application to twelve (12) months from the filing of the application, for the purpose of visually aiding cumulative environmental analysis, with and without the proposed Facility or Facilities, showing all hand-off sites within the above specified area. RESPONSE See attached Exhibit "G". 13. A graphic depiction of the search ring and all other technical criteria used in determining the proposed Facility location. RESPONSE See attached Exhibit "H". 14. Documentation which identifies failure characteristics of the Facility structure or tower and demonstrates that the site and setbacks are of adequate size to contain falling debris. 12 RESPONSE A copy of the structural report completed by Kenneth Charles Lerhardt, Engineer is attached as Exhibit "I". 15. Written evidence demonstrating that the selected Facility structure or tower design is as visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical and engineering considerations, which indicate what type of facility is required to provide reasonably effective service and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. The use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness is mandatory. RESPONSE UbiquiTel believes that utilizing the existing structure would be less obtrusive then proposing to construct a new tower within the general area. As the photos (Exhibit "E") show, the addition of six (6) antennas to the existing tower will not make this structure any more obtrusive. 16. Applicants which operate common carrier facilities (specifically, but not limited to cellular, PCS, SNIR and paging service licensees of the FCC) shall provide written evidence that the applicant has provided notice to all FCC licensed wireless communication service carriers operating within the County of Butte of the plans to develop the site. RESPONSE Copies of the certified letters are attached as Exhibit "P. 17. Evidence of a valid, current operating license or construction permit from the FCC or, if the applicant is not a wireless communications service provider, a user operating agreement for each and every such provider to which the applicant intends to rent space on the proposed Facility. RESPONSE A copy of UbiquiTel's FCC license is attached as Exhibit "A". The FAA Registration letters are attached as Exhibit "K". 18. A report, signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer licensed by the FCC, prepared pursuant to FCC OET 65;, stating whether- the maximum radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic radiation (RF/EN1F) to be emitted by the proposed Facility, taking into account all other Facilities, both existing and known future 13 Facilities, at the proposed site and adjacent properties, conforms to safety standards adopted by the FCC, if applicable. The reports prepared for the Facilities shall conform to the reporting requirements set by the County and FCC OET 65 human exposure standards. The report shall also conform to the reporting requirements set by the County and FCC OET 65 human exposure standards. The report shall also analyze the evidence provided in support of the evidence provided in support of the proposed Facility location, height and radiated power, frequency, the number of channels, and all other related data and present alternatives for the location, height and radiated power, pursuant to the requirements of this section. If the proposed Facility exceeds FCC OET 65 human exposure standards, applicant shall also provide additional comprehensive technical and planning information regarding how the applicant shall protect all persons from such excessive exposure consistent with all Federal and State requirements, and any additional County requirements. RESPONSE A copy of the Scinetics Engineering Report is attached as Exhibit "L". The report concludes that the power densities emitted by the proposed PCS radio antennas are many orders of magnitude below the health standards adopted or proposed in the United State and any health standard used anywhere in the world. 19. Landscaping and painting plans for the completed project. RESPONSE As you can see from the photos (Exhibit "E") this site has plenty of natural landscaping surrounding it, however, if the County request more landscaping around the fenced area UbiquiTel will comply with the request. . The antennas will be painted to match the color of the tower. 20. Projects in Agricultural Zones (A-5 through A-160) shall, prior to submitting an application for a proposed Facility, submit a site plan of the proposed Facility to the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner for comment and send a notification letter to all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County informing them of the proposed site location and tower height. No hearing on an application for a proposed facility in any agricultural zone will be scheduled, nor shall any administrative Permit for any such facility be issued without proof that the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner and all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County have been notified, as specified, as specified herein. RESPONSE This site is located in the Public Quasi (PQ) zone, which makes it no applicable. 14 21. All applications for Facilities that are proposed to 'be located within the boundaries of any Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan or Airport Area of Influence, as adopted or designated from time to time by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission, shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division, and a copy submitted to the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission for review regarding consistency with adopted Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plans and for recommendations addressing potential impacts to air navigation within the Airport Area of Influence. RESPONSE This is not applicable since the Site exists and has already been approved. CONSLUSION UbiquiTel respectfully requests that the County of Butte approve its application for a Minor Use Permit to co -locate six (6) PCS antennas and related base station equipment on the existing 150' monopole. r' 15 Exhibit "A" UbiquiTel's FCC License i A.N. L J. C U J U G r•:rl .4- Coi64A4 J V. . : J (,•hired St:lies orAntcrica Federal ComillunicationS C01,11liiiton it.. Jug L RADIO STATIO\r AUTHORIZATIOlN Commercial .N(obiie p:tdi0 Sen-tcci Personal Commttuieariotls Se—icc - !•jrJ:tdb:md WIRELESSCC. L.P. 9221 -Ward Parkway Kansas City. Nt0 64114 Call jim:l KNLF208 Market: M004 SAN ►R-Ar1CISC0-0aKLA,COSAN JOS_ Charnel Tock: A FiI;� Number 00005 -CW -L-95 The Iieetlsc: Itereer is authorized• ror ih: period indicated, to construct and operate raCio transnu,.. ng facilities in accordance t�itlt the terms and conditions h.crcinaft:r described. This authorization i; suojcct to the provisions of the Communications Act of 193:1, as amended, subsequent Acts o(Congress. int_rnationai treaties and a.-r,cmencs to which the United States is a si- .,na:ory, and all pertinent rules and regulations of Etc F:dera! Communications Commission, contained in Elie Tid:47 of tltc U.S. Cod: of Federal Regulations. c Initial Grant Date . - . . . , . • . . • _ . . . . . . . . , June 23,1995 Five-year Build Out Dace . . . . . . . . . ' . . . • • June 23, 2000 Expiration Date . . . • . - . • • _ - • . . , . . . • . . • . . June 23, 2005 CO`'DITIO`_ PursuZnt to Sec"n :09(h) Of the COmnttirlCatiasi .pct at 1971. a; amendeC. (47 U.S.C. is sub;ect to the follot%itzg conditions: This limas: does not vest in d:e license: art, ngtit to Okra:: a stt:ion nor anv right in the use of frequencies beyond the tern thereornor in any other manner than audlo:izcd herein. v-itncr ,!us license nor Elle right g -anted dtereundcr shall be assigned or Other\.isc traisferTcd in .iolauon of t.Nc Carttrtucucado,is Act o, 1911• as amended (J7 U.S.C. 5 151• c(seq.). Tlus lic:nsc is subjcc: in ::ruts to dic rigilt or use or control conferred by SccLion 706 of the COmmutucaUons Act of I9;1• as ameaCed (17 U.S.C. § 606). Conditions continued on Page 2. No wa:vcrs associated %kith dtis audiorizitioo. :sit:: Osie. Juni 23. 1995 FCC Farm :5;a Pa*c t or 2 cu. CuUu-� GWIRELESSCO, L.P. C0ND(Tl0,N S: This ;tuthori2uti0n is subjca c0 the ;onditi0rt :112:, in the cvtnt chat S)Stcr,is u;rnv nt_ ;_n frcc,cc:ui:i as,:anc:d herein a:c audtorizcd it ir. adjacent rorcign t-rri•ory c (C�nad:vutu;:d to;ci;.6iturc eoordrnatiou Oram base st mon traasntielcrs within 72 km (li miles) of tli flniccd border Slcall be required to eliminate anv harnihil in(crfcrcnCc Io OFc-6ons in the adjacent foreign tcm;orY a+td to ensure cantinuanee orequtl access to the frequencies by both countries. This authonzation is subject to the condition that 11+e remaining balance of the winnin, bid amount %.i11 be paid in accoraance with P;trt 1 0( the COmMISS101+'s rules. 17 C.F.R. part 1. lssue.Date: June 23, 1995 FCC Form J6;.i u0005-CW-L-9 Page 2 or 2 Exhibit "B" Antenna EMS 2.75" 811 56" RF CONNECTOR Electrical Azimuth Beamwidth 90° Elevation Beamwidth 6° Gain 16.5 dBi (14.4 dBd) Polarization Vertical Front -to -Back Ratio > 25 dB (> 30 dB Typ.) Electrical Downtilt Options 0°, 2°, 4°, 6° VSWR 1.35:1 Max Connectors 1; 7-16 DIN (female) Power Handling 250 Watts CW Passive Intermodulation < -147 dBc Lightning Protection [2x20W (+43 dBm)] I I Chassis Ground 11 OptiRangeT" RV90-17-XXDP Mechanical 90° beamwidth 16.5 dBi gain Vertical Polarization 56 inch Dimensions (L x W x D) j 56in x 8in x 2.75in I (142 cm x 20.3 cm x 7.0 cm) Rated Wind Velocity 1150 mph (241 km/hr) Equivalent Flat Plate Area 3.1 ft' (.29 mz) Front Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 kph) ' 90 lbs (400 N) Side Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 kph) 31 lbs (139 N) Weight 18 lbs (8.2 kg) Note: Patent Pending and US Patent number 5, 757, 246. Values and patterns are representative and variations may occur. Specifications may change without notice due to continuous product enhancements. Digitized pattern data is available from the factory or via the web site www.emswireless.com and reflect all updates. Model Number Description Comments MTG-P00-10 Standard Mount Supplied with antenna)- Mounts_to Wall or 1.5 inch to 5.0 inch O.D. Pole (3.8 cm to 12.7 cm) Mounting kit providing.azimuth adjustment. i MTG-S02-10 Swivel Mount MTG-DXX-20' MTG Mechanical Downtilt Kits 00 -10° or 0° - 15° Mechanical Downtilt - - - — -- - - CXX 10' Cluster Mount Kits 3 antennas 120° apart or 2 antennas 180* apart L MTG-CO2-10 U -Bolt Cluster Mount Kit 3. antennas 120° apart, 4.5_0_D, pole. MTG-TXX-10' Steel Band Mount Pole diameters 7.5" - 45" section for specific model number. Model number shown represents a series of products. See mounting options 90 Azimuth 90. Elevation 0° Downtilt 90' Elevation 2° Downtilt Elevation 4° Downtilt 90• Elevation 6° Downtilt �fi: Dov '," a o�o� := '�®Me. t+ -+�®� ►pu � -m®��. ,,•,,uird ;�, � E �� 90 Azimuth 90. Elevation 0° Downtilt 90' Elevation 2° Downtilt Elevation 4° Downtilt 90• Elevation 6° Downtilt Exhibit "C" Lucent Cabinets Lucent Technologies Bell Labs Innovations PCS CDMA Enhanced Primary Minicell and Growth Cabinet Technical Specifications Lucent Technologies' Personal Communications Services (PCS) Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) Minicell is a small, cost-effective modular base station used as the primary building block for PCS networks. Operating at 1.8 GHz, these Minicells can be used indoors or outdoor-, and several pre-engineered configurations allow flexible coverage options. Growth cabinets expand the network when increased capacity or sectorization is required. PCS CDMA Minicell and Growth Cabinet Parameter General Spectrum Filter Blocks Digital Cellular Switch Handoff Speed Vocoder Support Cell Site Installation Cell Site Configurations Cell Site Synchronization Cell Site Alarms Cell Site Diagnostics Enhanced Primary. Cabinet Carriers RF Train Antenna Support CDMA Clusters Channels Channel Units Expanded capacity Channel Unit (ECU) Growth Cabinet(s) Carriers RF Train CDMA Clusters Channels Channel Units 2nd Carrier Antenna Support 3rd to 6th Carrier Antenna Support Expanded capacity Channel Unit (ECU) Power Input Power IndoorlOutdoor Outdoor Only RF Output Power Per Standard CDMA Transmit Unit (CTU) Per High Power CDMA Transmit Unit (HPCTU) Backup Power Facilities Connections Types T1 or E1/CEPT Specification* 1.8 GHz PCS A, B, C, D, E or F Blocks 5ESSO-2000 Switch Up to 65 MPH soft handoff (cell radius at least 2500' [762.5m]) Both 8 Kbps (includes Enhanced -Variable Rate -Coder [EVRC] support) & 13 Kbps Indoor/Outdoor Omni/1, 2, 3 or 6 Sector Global Positioning System (GPS) Reference -Internal & User Definable Alarm Capability (Remote Monitoring) Integrated Diagnostic Capability (Remote Monitoring) Up to 3 carriers (one carrier/sector or 3 -carrier Omni) Three Duplex (each train contains Transmit & Diversity Receive) Duplex Filter Configuration (2 Antenna/Sector) Up to three Supports 40 physical channels per cluster ,Up to four per CDMA cluster 10 Physical Channels at 8Kbps (supports EVRC) or 13Kbps Provides an additional carrier per sector Adds 1 Transmit/Sector & uses Enhanced Primary's diversity receive RF trains Up to three per cabinet Supports 40 physical channels per cluster Up to four per CDMA cluster Uses existing Enhanced Primary Duplex Filters (No additional Antenna/Sector) Simplex Filter Configuration (1 Additional Antenna/Sector/Carrier) 10 Physical Channels at 8Kbps (supports EVRC) or 13Kbps +24V DC 240V AC 8 watts @ Antenna Interface 16 watts @ Antenna Interface Both support up to 200mW digital terminals at 1.8 GHz Optional Battery or Generator Backup cabinets Upto6 PCS CDMA Minicell and Growth Cabinet (continued) Parameter Specification* Installation & Maintenance Installation & Mounting Indoor Raised Floor or non -raised floor environment Outdoor Rooftop or Streetside (slab) mountable Access Front & Back Maintenance Cabinet Access Front only for most routine maintenance Cell 1.9 Maintenance action per year per cell Upgrade Options Field upgrade options available Compatibility Compatible with Lucent Technologies Mobile Switching Center (MSC) Environmental Storage Temperature Outdoor Cabinet -40° to +158° F (-40° to +70° C) Indoor Cabinet +32° to +158° F (0° to +70° C) Humidity Indoor Cabinet (operating) 5% to 85% RH (storage) 0% to 95% RH Outdoor Cabinet (operating and storage) 0% to 100% RH Operating Altitude 197 feet (60m) below to 10,000 feet (3,050m) above sea level. Physical Weight (Fully Loaded) Enhanced Primary Cabinet 8501b. (385.9kg) Growth Cabinet 6001b. (272kg) 66EC Primary Power Cabinet 16001b. (726.4kg) 60C Primary Power Cabinet 11001b. (499.4kg) 60EC Battery Backup Cabinet 26001b. (1180.4kg) 60C Battery Backup Cabinet 26001b. (1180.4kg) 60C Generator Backup Cabinet 7001b. (317.8kg) CP54024 (H569-424) Indoor Power Frame 21601b. (980.6kg) PCS CDMA Minicell and Growth Cabinet (continued) Parameter Specification Physical (continued) Cabinet (Outdoor) Dimensions Growth Cabinet(s) (Outdoor) Enhanced Primary Cabinet 30"W x 30"L x 60"H (Indoor/Outdoor) (76.2cm x 76.2cm x 152.4cm) Growth Cabinet(s) 22"W x 30"L x 60"H (IndoorlOutdoor) (55.9cm x 76.2cm x 152.4cm) 66EC Primary Power Cabinet 31 "W x 30"L x 66"H -40° to +115° F(-40° to +46° C) (78.7cm x 76.2cm x 167.6cm) 60C Primary Power Cabinet 31 "W x 30"L x 60"H (78.7cm x 76.2cm x 152.4cm) 60EC Battery Backup Cabinet 31 "W x 30"L x 60" H +41 ° to +104° F (+5° to +40° C) (78.7cm x 76.2cm x 152.4cm) 60C Battery Backup Cabinet 31 "W x 30"L x 60"H (78.7cm x 76.2cm x 152.4cm) 60C Generator Backup Cabinet 31 "W x 30"L x 60"H (78.7cm x 76.2cm x 152.4cm) CPS4024 (H569-424) 32.25"W x 19.75% x 84"H Indoor Power Frame (81.9cm x 50.2cm x 213.4cm) Ambient Operating Temperature Range Enhanced Primary -40° to +126° F (-40° to +52° C) Cabinet (Outdoor) Growth Cabinet(s) (Outdoor) -40° to +126° F (-40° to +52° C) 66EC Primary Power Cabinet -40° to +115° F (-40° to +46° C) 60C Primary Power Cabinet -40° to +115° F (-40° to +46° C) 60EC Battery Backup Cabinet -40° to +115° F (-40° to +46° C) 60C Battery Backup Cabinet -40° to +115° F(-40° to +46° C) 60C Generator Backup Cabinet -40° to +115° F(-40° to +46° C) CPS4024 (H569-424) Indoor -40° to +149° F (-40° to +65° C) Power Frame Enhanced Primary Cabinet (Indoor) +41 ° to +104° F (+5° to +40° C) Growth Cabinet(s) (Indoor) +41 ° to +104° F (+5° to +40° C) Regulatory Air Interface Standards Safety/Regulatory Bellcore Application Code Enhanced Primary Cabinet Growth Cabinet ANSI J -STD -008 Upbanded IS -95A (cdmaOner"^) Meets U.S. FCC Part 15 & Part 24 Requirements ULt 1950, 3rd Edition CSA C22.2 #234 UL 50 -Type 3R Cabinets meet elements of GR 487 -CORE & GR 63 -CORE WP WK l Third Carrier Growth Cabinet When you want to talk wireless, give tis a call. Our one -network solution offers you a total communications system. With Lucent Technologies' vast experience, dedication to customer satisfaction, and continuous search for innovations. through our Bell Laboratories, we provide advanced wireless products that can move your network seamlessly into the next generation. For more information on Lucent Technologies' wireless communications, please contact your Lucent Technologies Account Representative or call: 800-344-0223 x7020 (United States) 314-536-1886 (outside United States). Visit our web site at http://www.lLlcent.com 5ESS is a registered trademark of Lucent Technologies Inc. cdmaOne is a trademark of the CDMA Development Group (CDG). 'UL is a registered trademark of Underwriters Laboratories. * Unless otherwise stated, specifications are applicable to both indoor ✓7 outdoor cabinet models. This document is for planning purposes only and is not intended to modify or supplement any specifications or warranties relating to these products or services. Copyright O 1998 Lucent Technologies Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. Lucent Technologies Inc. AIbIPS/PCS Messaging 501OTS NAK 9/98 Lucent Technologies Belt Labs Innovations 0 Lucent Technologies Bell Labs Innovations 66EC-PWR Power Cabinet Completely Integrated System Solution Designed to Provide a Reliable, Uninterrupted DC Power Source. (;(E(: -I 4VR Power Cuhinw — Va k Vii u- 6GIir:-I'IVK Vollvr (,1rhirr"1 — I�nvn Vicir The GGfiC-PbVR IN)vvcr Cur PCS CDMA was dcsi,,ncd 11) tic a 1(,rnvcr Cabin(.[ sululio�n fOr CUSIuniCrS SCckino lralicry CalraCily lwyinid VVlial is ultcral wills Ilic 60C-I'bVR Prnvcr Cal incl. Whillc Ilic GGISC adds nwny nc%v tea - 1111 -CS, 111c CalrinCl haS Ihccn dCSi ncd Su Mal inSlalltlliuil Will 1W Csscnlially IllC Sank as 111,11 trn* Ille 60C. A Comiparisim ut IIIc Iwu lu)%wc1' siflillio�nS is sliil%.Vll in 1110 f�rllnwin lalrlc. 66EC-PWR 60C-PWR Number Battery 2 1 Shelves: Maximum Number 4 2 24V Battery Strings: Enhanced Cooling Yes No in Battery Compartment: Cabinet Height: 66" 60" Footprint: 31"w x 30"d 31 "w x 30"d Placement of Same Same Mounting Holes: Grounding: Same Same Product Overview TIIC 661`(-PVVR I'o(wcr (.:lbincl twill pnwidi 111) In 6 kW ui 24V from 1 2(11/241) VOIt AC inplll SOl11'CC. -Illi Primary I'owcr Cabinct Call II011sc 1111 10 Iwo CI'S Iluwir SIIcIViS C(IIIIl)lli(l with up to IO Ili h cfliCicncy 24 volt, 27 amp plug -ill, I'(•Cllll(•I'S III an cnvirunnlcnlally sialyd cicilmniis ncl. 'IIIc cabilICI Can 11MISC 1111 10 10111. 24V sn'ings of batteries. prOvidim, kill to 5 IIo111's 0I baOcry reserve it 2 kw load. The CTS Alarm F C-Illvll Uilil hrnvi(Ics nnnlilOrin_ 1111(1 C0nIr01 of IIIc power syslcnl, al,lrnl si,,nal aiccss, and visual LFI) indiialors. II also Ilas a provision lir thermal 111onit0rim. of IIIc hallcrics. 'I'IIC SySlcln a11IM11,16CMlly adjusts IIIc 110111 v01111 (• IlrOvi(Ic(I by IIIc rcClificrs as M funition of 11110cry Icnlperann-c. A low V011,1---L'diSCOMWO (IND) Cil.C11il IlrcvcnlS IIIc 11110Cry icll V011a c irOnl fallin;"' below 1.75 volts/Cell (or 1 ClISIrmICr scicilcd val0c) and Imssibly (11011 in'. lilt' 1).111CIlCS. The 22 position DC I)islrib111i0n Panel is c(lnipped willi CirC11il brCak('I'S (21 pOsilitms available) and IIIC I..VD. RC1-111111C(I DC power and p0rvcr Cabincl al11rinS arc iahlCd dircill)+ 10 IIIc adj11Cc111 PCS iblini-Cell c.y11ipnlenl Clbincl. 1.11Ccill TciIInOlogics• palcntcd i(mlinl; syslclll nlainlains IIIc Cytlipnlcnt inside IIIc Cabincls wilbill its Salt. operalin Icnlperal11rc ran . willimil tilt. list- of uulsi(Ic air. This inn0vltivC dcsi"n Keeps water,(VISI, and p01b1I11r1IS 0111 01 IIIc cicClrOniis area, IIIcrcby preventing i mdcnsalion in IIIC CabinCl and ionllnl inali0n and c0rrosi0n of CICCnvnic C(IIIIpillcill. 'I'IIc 11a11cry c'unlparinlcnl 11lilir.cs LIICcnl Tcclllmllwics' I nIIanecd C001ill" SySlcnl 10 nlininliM 1111cry WIllperal11rc 111(1 si; Benefits • Heavy-duty Alumintim Const ruction (:orn,siul,, twcalher, fire and vandal I'csisl;ttll prwcilioli I:nitanied i,u,litt, Willi cnvirt,nntcil c„nln,ls • Sealed Cooling System I'rcvcnlS comalllit Ill itIII, cundcnsa- li„n, and corr)sioll 1`1111anccd Ileal Iransler cal,ahilily. • 13altery Compartment Equipped with Enhanced Cooling System - tii,nifiianlly inll,ruvcs battery lila lx•rG,rnwncc • Completely Factory Assembled and Tested --fh„r,rtt,hly SySlcni-ICSICII • Electrostatically Applied, Baked on Polyester Paint Finish I li;"ll tlualily dtn'ahlc finish Allraclivc appearanic • Cost. Effective Enclosure Design - Neal lnr lat;,i Scale dcl,luynu•nls • CPS Alarm Fr Control Unit: Mollilnrs and c„ruruls IItC 1141tvcr. system Pnwides alarm signal access antl visu- al IJ31) indicalt,rs 1'ruvides 1'ut' Ihcrnlal nuutilurin, of Ow haucrics • Temperature Compensated Float Voltage - Increases hallery life and,rcally redticcs risk t,l hallCry Ihcrn,al runaway by redlicin;., haucry self hcalin, IS Ihr battery Cncltsul-c Il'lllllcrallll'C Illirl'1SCS • Low Voltage Disconnect Funclion - l'r('VCItIS hallcry dan,a,e duC W cell reversals I'nrtn dcvp discltar,c In Ic'SS Than 1.75 vnlls/cell and lu'cvinls c,luilmlcnl daul,tc M. ntallnncliun from nln'raliw. hcluw ininiii,unl eyuilmncnl inl,ul vulla,c. The iuslunu r can Sl,icily dit' disct,nneil vulla,c value. • Silent. Security System Alerts icnn'al li,cali„n of tlnaulhr, riA-d cahincl entry General Specifications r Cabinet Dimensions: - Height: 66 in. (167.6 (m) Width: 31 in. (78.7 cm) Depth: 30 in. (76.2 (m) I Approximate Weight: - 1600 lbs. (Fully E(Juipped) Floor Load: 1.72 lbs/sq. inch (Fully Equipped) Cabinet Operating Temperature Range: -40"C to 46°C Rated Output Power: 6 M with N+1 Redundancy Primary Power Cabinet Weight Maximum It Batter} Strings Load (KW) 2 4 6 k Rectifiers 4 7 10 Total Weight (lbs.)` 1505 1570 1600 Floor Load (lbs/sq.in) 1.62 1.69 1.72 Rectifiers versus Load Primary Radio Only 2.1 kW 2.1 4.9 Load (KW) 2 4 6 It Rectifiers 4 7 10 Cabinets Powered Primary Radio Primary + Growth 1 Primary + Growth 1 & 2 Battery Reserve Times Battery Reserve Time Initial Capacity (hoursi,` Maximum It Batter} Strings Configuration DC Loadt 2 4 Stanclarcl CTUs Primary Radio Only 1.6 kW 2.9 6.9 Primary and One Growth 3.1 kW 1.3 3.0 Primary with Two Growth 4.6 kW 0.8 1.8 High Power CTUs Primary Radio Only 2.1 kW 2.1 4.9 Primary and One Growth 4.05 kW 0.9 2.2 Primary and Two Growth - 6.0 kW 10.6 1.3 " The reserve time assumes initial battery capacity and 777 (25"C) ambient temperature. Battery Reserve Time End of Life Capacity (hairs)"' Maximum 0 Battery Strings Configuration DC Loadt 2 4 Standard CTUs Primary Radio Only 1.6 kW 2.3 5.5 Primary and One Growth 3.1 kW 1.0 2.4 Primary with Two Growth 4.6 kW 0.6 1.5 High Power CTUs Primary Radio Only 2.1 kW 1.7 3.9 Primary and One Growth 4.05 kW 0.7 1.7 Primary. and Two Growth 6.0 kW 0.4 1.1 **The reserve time defines end of life as 80%• of initial capacity and 77°F (25°Q ambier•t temperature. t These are maximum numbers. Actual wVues can be lower by a few hundred watts pen cabinet depending on traffic load and environmental conditions. Exhibit ISD" Questions & Answers - PCS Safety/ j-, A __ct-RIC 'WIRELESS CO?viMUNTICATION TECHNOLOGY Questions and Answers About PCS Antenna Safety • U71c: do °ersor-- Coirmuric.:I:Gr. Sts:=rrs (?CSS s.':es emir? PCS s\•src.ms cni; -alio w'z\•cs in the -11 GHz" f-ccucncy band which is a band of non - ion izine -adiz:ion. "Radia::on" s: -ply ..,cans the pzssagc of cnergy.;:,rough space. The to us_ in PCS tcc noloeics z c czllcd "Aon ionizing- radii on ..eouencies,brzuse q ._.,_.__ -d thei- c' -ey is 7i.11on5 Of times is5S .: an :ae P. -Io --n: - u7rcd to sc!ect ons from zto, Is or moicc ids. Tcxvisian b,ozdcas-s, radio w'z\-cs. Mic-owa\'cs- PCS, \;siblc light: inf-aced rzdla:lC .. 2.71c 0:a:- Sir i!ar ;o,:,?s of raciz:ion arc 250 - - ed to as non-lonizlne cir_�o -zg c:ic .gid:z ion. 1-ncsc a -c a!i fo=s ofracian: e 1e-gy that contain both electric and magncdc compo:,c-,u. Eleromagnetic crier gy savcis or -radiates",awav from" u source in waves like the ripples which form when a small pebble is thrown into a still pond. Specifically, PCS radio waves arc produced in a frequency band bem-cen 1.85 - 1.98 GHz (gigahc:-:z or billion c\c)cs per second). Frcouency rcfc-s to the number of waves passing a given point during a given ti;.ie. CELL't-7-AR ?:-:ON ES.&- E\r'.A\CED SPSCiA: -=D M09IL5 RADIO (ESMR) I'! S3 L17RA .v-!C.RO'.:A _ 17FLaRED ! 1G..VIOLET X-RAYS U 0'103 I01 i 0' 10" 10" 10's 10" 1019 : 0 1 I ?ERSONAL COM.14L1ICATJON SERVICES (PCS) I RA.DIO=REQUr-- C1' RADIATION PCS facilities do not emit x-mys. X-,z.,s and eam_r;a rays like those used in medical diagnosis and thc:apy have billions (i.e., more than 1,000 million or 1,000,000,000) of times more energy than the mic.-ow-a\'es utilized in PCS cc! eco u-nunications. X-rays and gamr na rays are called "ionizing radiation" because their high energies arc sufficient to strip electrons from (i.e., "ionize') 2,0 M. or molecules. Ionizatior. ;-..as been established as a cancer risk factor. Th: more lo -:zing radiz:ion one is :xposed :b :he g -cater their risk of dc\•clopir.s car c_.. T -r -.us the _.__:-o.-na=L-:ic spe.-.:,:. s COMDOSC—;of -0- 'Or. I1,12 -adia;ion z; -�:' a -,d ; io':z:-� rad:a:;o- z:. o-,. :.:c :c l�:cs Arid h ' - -^c � .- - .sac- cad-�•. All of the clecz:-0M?- :c:ic radiz:ion (EMR) below :c far u!`z\-iolet, including \isibic light, PCS microwaves, and radio "•ayes arc ;\pcs ofaon-ionizing radiation. As explained below, PCS facilities arc safe and mec: or dreg:d all professionally recognized G.S. safe -y standards. • .4re exposures highest immediateh• adjacent to the PCS site? No. Most PCS antenna a: c locates on monopoles or on the sides of buildings. Tito PCS sle-W is designed to be broadcas: to% -ands the horizon with a fairly well focused pattern :hat has the result o.`prod ucine a weak signal directly bolo%- the PCS antenna cornpa-cd to distances u �'i:, a�� ay. This des._ :s apical of PCS an:ea.-izs %-:tier wan,: the signal to :each their customers a: some dis:ance I -Om the source. • Hots- does the irtersi:v of the e .00sure change as you move a,vaY from the PCSsite? Like all .`o. -,s o: _._-'-o-as c.:c _-_- ��c . :c it<' if t^.c �cic dcc:cascs �'c �' rapidl; as SOL' m0�: 2��'a�' C=C: Cas: "i is^.�'.'S�'�' - : o7o': o'a; :o stile scL;z-_ o tic ._ ;�c cO-sccucnc: o tic :ac::�a:.:�c s - ac_ 2:,-a o:a sprit -c inc-cases c_ SCU27_ 0: ::.0 72Z:' -S. i nus i; one docoi:s _,cit dis:a.-,ce -orn the so -c:, the expos:::: dcc-cases ��' (: �)" or =. If one r novas fou t.,:,es as .`a7:. o the y source ;heir expoa*_::: %'ili d:c-:ase by (ii-)- or 1/16. For eCa :,pie, if tae exposure frOM an PCS source art 00 feet Was 10 micro -%watts per square ccntimece- (microW,'cm-) the exposure at 1,000 feet %-ould be (I: 10)- or 1,.*,, 00 x 10 microW/cm- = 0.1 r:.ic.oW..'c,t" (i.e., a decease in intensic�• of 100 :gimes for an increase in distance of 10 times). This relationship holds for perfectly uniform sources; and t�c PCS fields are more complex, this re!aaonship v6ill still ser�c as a L,00d :irst a proximz:ion. A good a_nalogv -:sing a di::e-e.., 7,oc o::adiation to dc. -:ors -ate this principal) :o -.is in% -c -se sOt:a7e late' is the .-arid c a -.se i :=Dcrature you .ec! as you move ot- hard closer to or fu:— r 71 ,e- a%•av fro: -le ?mc o a ca-d:c. Thr. c is a zo;:e near the I arae w?tc. c you can comfo-;ab: feel the heat, _0k,.-CvC7 if you move your hand au•av - om the fla.:,e :he temperature drops rapidly until you ca_ -:'no lone: pc:ceive tate heat from the candle. The .rapid change in tic:-perature with dis:ante is L5c c ect of infrared electromagnetic ene:w which is felt as hca: a: -td be-iavcs the sa:7,- way as all othe::o,:rs of e!eczror..ag.*teac c: e: w including PCS —=ns-issions. • Hox' doe .jos pries : %trip t'CS fccili:ies ccrr.7cre %vi:h other cor^ntor. Sources of smiler fours Of e.'ec:romco zea:c ere. s:? Common sources o; ENfR cxposL,--c incit:dc ,aic-owaves ovc , tori r.,c:tial ;alio and television broadcasts, amatcur, poiice: t:c and CB radios. and o:hc:s. Table 1 shows the exposure lcvcls associated with some comirnon forms of radio wave and mic:o%'ave . tcchnolo�. As ca -be seen, cxpos1-e o,,. a PCS facilities a:c ;%picall% only a -1-action of o:nc- co _-nortt' c. -:e-cd sources. Exposures'=o.m. t:;cs:common the cxpos,.res fro- -�• - sources are arc be:ott. es:abii:..cd sat _.=..da:ds ane a- ncra:-. ,_:oP^ize.' as save. I- so :a: °CS s 's: - �ic_'t :1 _CS t^.ar...._ O:a:.:xpos:..:s iis:__ .....,a as pubiic expos:::_- -O- • :- _._ - .. - tabic z.�.da.-_- .. is -:_sen_ ._ :o co-_._ce .na:.- a.e aiso sa:c. i able 1: Exposure Levels from Common Forms of Radio Wave and.kficrowave Technology Facility Near She -riffs Mobile Radio I _250 Near Large Fm Radio Tower i -100 Near CB Nfobile Radio I 30 In Room with Vficrowa%e O%•cn I T,,-Dical Public EzOOsure Near PCS Site I <1 ► • If' -no /i:zs e,.-c!uc:ec the sate. ofpuolrc e;oosure :o PCSjrequerc:• e!ec:ramcone:ic erersV,•? t :c sa:�n' o: :o PCS im.;a.- - - ' . s ,:d_ :.__ cCe:,..0-rbr. Or pr0.c_SlOna! S:;e.^.ii:1C O:c?-EZ2JOr s and QOl'e-:-;G:i:at a_oG C:GS :r L7- :C_^. S:" e$ a ?C around .;.c .� o: id. i ie '%% _ d - 0 : OS: w'1Ce:y : ccOgn:ZC S:a,_ards :or �rOie":J .dZ11:^.S �C10 frequcnc}' (RF) aZc mic:owavc (�fti� ric!d cxpos;`c a:G thoscpub!ishcd b� the A IC:zCan Nationa! Standards Institute (ANSr) in their report entitled -Standard for Safer- Levels with Respect ro-Human Exposure to Radio Frcquencv Fields,'3 kHz to 300 GHz. RCport No. EEE'.4NSI C9S.I-'.992 and the National Council on Radiation Protection, aid `icasurcment (N -CRP) in their report authored by Scientific Comininec 5: entitled "Expel,::e Criteria for RadioEiectromane:ic Fields, NCRP Report No. S6. Ii ra::'s :he cr:orcl Courcl or Rcdie:.0 Prorec:ion. crd afezrure.,n e•^t n CRPj? The NCRD is privare,.Congressionally charted ins,:: No. with the charge to provide.expert .analysis o' a va,;eL-%- of issues (especiaP.v hcil:h and safc:v rccommendarions) on radiations of all forms. The scientific analyses ofu'ie.NCRP are held in high esteem in. dne scientific and regulatory community both natioralIy and inrcmat;'onal!v. In fact, the vast majority of the radiological health regulations currendy in existence can trace their.ori-;n in some way to the recomnendatiors of the NCRP. A total o 16 p;:y;ical. biological, and medical sci_:,tists pa.,ic:pa:ed is the del" a,. o- Scient:tic Coi-•.7;rC_ 53 (SC -53) ir, the arepa;-z:ion oft^c c-ite.:a docu- _^t fo,- limit: o exposure to RF radiations. Three %vc.c physical scientists, nine were biological scicntiscs, three were vfDs, and one was a veterinary phvsic:an (D.V.M.). All 16 scientists were employed in acadcrnc or by :`ede.al aecacies eneaged in :csearch or in reg:laron of RFaf%V radiation. A!rhOL:en the NCR? selects the membe.ship ofis sc1en(illc_on:j_z1i :Ccs on the bases of expo-ise as scientiss. dive: -sin., of specialization and discipline, and balance of vie"?Oirts, it r Cuires them :o reach a u-ar.imocs corse^sus or ex:)OsL:c c-:te.ia and limits beiorc a docs....... is :_!ea;CS for publication. • 97a.'2id :he .\-C?-Dcons ice -:n ir.o:h' e.rr se:' "r;'CrO--c:•e;reotrerc'. (;L 'ViT'Public exposure sere. S::r.GCrc After sevcral ve1-s o: Cvaluarng thc-a;:ena! and :rtcma,:oral scic::a;•,c and biomedical literari,res (ircludine those of the So% -ie: L'r.:on and Ocne._ estee n bloc councics). [he members of ^.0 NCRP scic rtitic co:- M; cc SC!=Cd 931 publications it the scic::rtic lite:a,^.c:c or. w'-ich ro base L`C:r recommcn,da::ons. P -c zzditional NCRP pHosopr:v of prop:ding a 'IQ C: s:,2ndard Oi prOtCc::cr nor mcmbers of :ne eC:1C:3i population L -tan for occ pat:or,ali}' cxpesr it:dig :duals prof— -Cd a __cond tic: in their expos.:.. s=dar" by which levels of allowable exposure were substantially reduced for "uncontrolled and continuous exposures." This measure was taken to account for the fact that workers in an industrial environment arc apically exposed no more than eight houu: s a day while members of the general population in proximi"y to a source of RF.'zl«' ene azy may be exposed continuously. This additiona! protc=:ion factor a!so provides 2 ucater rnargin of safcy for children. the infl.—n. aged. or ot_?Ie:s tt'ho might be more sensitive :o R.F.1-1«' exposu e. • ii,`het •is the currert_continuous whole bodV.public exposure sci-vy standard set by the . CRP? ThC'cSl . car NCR -P :.cot .mc—ndarion for public exposu:: at t.:c r.•.05:.:sC. iclive PCS I.S: GHZ) lira-ks CX:;os r: to 1.23micro « C :Or con Cinuous.Cxposu7c. HIQh:. Cxposr. _ 2"_,2::0'•t'eC :Or S.-=:"- pC::OCS 011 CmC pro 'C: .'2: no .0 :.1. CmC wci.Oht:d 2•.c: -22c cx:__cs '..3=3 .,.c:o «' cm-. P::b!iPCS :ac.....cs a. -e typically IL -ss ^at i micro «':cin- 2.-.c :hus a:c f2: beiow• t..: cap::mous whoie body public exposure iimit sc. by \CRP. • Does the FCC recuire the te/ecommuricatiors industry to limit exposure to the public to a certain leve,*.' ffso. 1, --ha., is the maximum pern::'ssible continuous :Whole bode -public exposure standard for erposures froth ?CS telecommunic- tions? Yes. The !99' ANSI s:ancard was adopted by : e Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 117 O:Ze: to acd:eSs is responsibilities und:: r;hc National Environ.;�enta! Policy Act (..-EPA) to co nsice. tt'ne: er its actions Will "s:gni:icantly affect the quality ofthe human cmuorim,cnt." In so fa: as tie.e was no ofticiai s:zldarcl issued by a federal agency such as the Er,.iror'Lnentzi Pro::c:ion Agency (EPA) &,e FCC used that it considered to be the best available s:2ada:d at the timne. The 1992 ?.-\SI standard w•as chosen because it was widely accepted and technically supportable. This standard is identical to the NCRP.standard for the PCS tclecom.m unica6on facilities and L,Is would allow- continuous public exposure at their must restrictive i=eeu:ncy (i.e., 1.85 GHz) be!o%v an intensity of 1,2:3 micro W'/cm2. Higher exposures a:e ailot: cd for briefpe:i0c5 provided _rax no 30-:inuze :irne weig:,ted average exposure exceeds 1 21:: micro W/cm'. Public exposures ' om PCS st'S:crn are t<pically less than I micro W. -cm: and a.s far below :he allowed exposure stanca:cs utilized by the FCC. • Does the ne:,'.4 X Si standerd consider non -thermal (athermal) and cumulative elfects of non- ioni_ing radic!ior, e .00sure? Yes, the cu.:ent ..\SI suncard conside:cd both ^.e potential impac: o'.'auherma! and cumu!atit'e of ecs. To quote From the ! 992 A.NSI standard scien:itic data exist incic2:.-S .n2: ... d2.7n :O :XJCSI::.. to ..._mor- 2g-c.:c :ic:cs is cumula:-.ve, or Non - the.;: ai (a:1c.—a!) (otic_... _.. s::oc;;) o: of expos:::c mat' be rnca-IM2 .1!!t':_12:_,.:o .._m.....ea1:h' 1722e2:.:99' .A.NSL s:2-cz:d). T^,_ s:]pos t:or.:`2t [h,-.-Ctt•111 .._ 2-"-';!75: b:OcOe :2: _.:e:a '0.^.. !0'•t' .:t':: 'Z: :X'05 ._ _5 ..._ ":5 .. 0: cuT:uiaiit'c e:._.: S iS n0: 5L::7o77:'4 Jt' .-e :. SCen.ii3C :i:_:2:•_7_ Or nt %'as: "2; 0: Of SCIC71 :flC Omn!on and Mus as Such is c0's:de:Cc :hC s: ie't :1C CO=L:7:!'-,,,' as . ;Q':l; spcculatit•C. •%': If a person 's exposure exceeded the NCRP or A. -%-SI standard. >,,hot effect ►could that have on c their body or their health? r It is important to realize that the current ANSI and `CRP maximum allowable exposures are not set at a threshold bcn%•cen safer• and known i-azard but rather at SO times below a level that the ma;ority of the scientific community believes may pose a health risk to human popularior.s. Thus continuous public exposures 2s .;.uc as 61.6:0 mic:o «••c.-t(ire. SO x — 1.�:� micro �.cm") a-: below' the minimum lc%.c'.: z: a%' post a health ;:sk. The starda-ds a!so allow for exposures to higher levels for brie: pc-iods of rime pro,'idcd t.`.a: no :0 minute time w'ei¢hted average exceeds 1.233 micro W: cm . Thus it would be safe fora ne be- of the public to be exposed :o 2.000 micro «'fern- for 10 :es as long as tic exposure during rihe oche. 20-in'_:cs Wzs less :h? -n. 8:0 MIC70 AV.cm CO^S_ide:ing :hc :cos:.pub'iic exposures fro r.'PCS fac'!i:ics a:_ !ess t;zn 1 rnicro «'.cm . on: ca- app' '2:- =ha:'o cxpcsures to -tut... ie e!s •�'... no: pcs_ a hcal:h hazz-c*. ?CS{recuer.c 'z-_7GS:4r?1 QDOu: z.JOSures 1G:2�GSJrGmpower:r�r.Srr:SS:Gr. Cr.C.di r:Jzc Or..i:r.?S. r RcCcn:'.v the:c7t2s been a lot of media at on �ic possiblc'biological cifcc:s of yz^;ous tvpcs of non -ionizing radiation. It is important to ,,cOz, izc tint the physical properties of and bioloeica! responses to cx7 emely low Eequcncy (ELF) fields dial come from power transmission and disinbu:ion lines (also referred to as 60 -Hz :fields) diger ma:kcdly from those ofthc higher PCS i eauencv fields. As uhe frcauencv of an clec.:om,.agnetic wave incrc2ses. i s w'z�'ei:^g ;. etc:cases. .At 1.S4 Gr z. for cxznpic, &,e w'a%'e!c.lL,.h ofthis PCS C'ecut::Cv iS approxi-2:c1v i6 Cerrarne:e-S (app:0MMa:a:�' 6 I:CneS). A 60-H' ae:G, L^. cOn%ast, has 2 wave:e^� .^.:' eYCeSS Ot ,000 The Oi :ie �'e:�' -'gi frcquc-cy (� :�iF) ba d (�0 30G �.Z) a.:c rn xi -alio absorbs: oec2 sc the w'a�:!erg hs are closest to the physical -lengths of human beings. i ne aosot?tio o t e:g�' ov people at PCS frequencies is substa:t,�al!v less u.an in the %,TE band that co,=-nonly utilized for teieyision broadcas:s. Tne bioiogica! tf.eC:_ data base de�eiopcd to 2, _ate. c"__tib-. about:he _:ie :s o power line freau-t-Cv`eiK,: C 2 : ZZ71etic :fields cannot be _se, :O :ec:., is e bi010c;C21 ::S Of PCS Fecue-cas. To do so ,void be :0 Com:,2re "20DieS :e o-anSg S Fo: example. is t. ouid be no m0.'e a77rODr.ate to cornpare the biological efi_.":s O"tpOt:'e; !::�e eq[:e 1Cv t1zC: and magnenic fields to PCS f'ecucncy exposure that it would be to cor,part tie biological s ects liicraru:c on radiof-ceucncv exposure to that �isiblc Iight. «;rile they are all for.;ts of non - ionizing glee -or7aer eche energy, their properties and 7o:tnr.zl biological of ec:s a t quirt diffcrcni. ComparisorS be:wccn PCS, radio, mic:0w2vc.:e'sev isio.n, and similar broadcast bands is :.-asor.ab!c because :hey occupy the sa ,, c SVIC7a'. region of the c!cc:-0�::agne:ic socc.. _- 2::d hat'. s:- :'.art enL-7S_ f-:cuenc-' 21c 2ssoC:a:td :::0 0 --:cal t.` efts. • Cc.-, .'Gx ...n:»: r:.? .:? S' 2: c✓r.S:�erC.:G�:S S. SC. :?G .�.:�: �` S :e: ?_O�r.:r.:�r.:c ::Gr.S PCS -a&O''_.^.5 ' .'�: _. b•• ..mss; . 2-C m2x!mai e:c- xDOS:._ o....:or.S in which ail -he fu!! Pette:.- :a=e circu,:.s:a:tC: cu --g rou::ne ooe-2:ion), publ:c ex=e__es -o- _ PCS facilir: w•:J be less than -1 micro This exposu:_ is .;tore .-c- ...OG •••••es'.ott c.* .^2 t c c_._ -t \SI or NCRP public :xpcsu:t ^dards. Exhibit "E" Photosims TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS A4 3 TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Exhibit 'IF" Propagation Maps s Exhibit "G" Service Area Map Ah Exhibit IIH" Search Rings Priority SITE NAME: Oroville SF03UB318 3�i i'1- t llfhh 2 `r. .. g STATE BOX RD °gyp .E OIN m _s FORT WAYNE FORT WAYNE :OREEP. � , (iFiFGFGNIRILE 5.F` 1t J 15i r1 ` r 3 Irl JL tr U.� r t r ofto '' IDORA ITKAt:A.- JEFFERSO =_ yt/gmEottn,5ms�m V7 RD� 1' 1 1 13iy 4 'y 5r; ifs; 3:a�t't. t li d r. MW 29 759 PAL d :g: 3;=.r;;; w171-re359' S'"•$ id�i:i'd�C.r.'; �P�GER %'r..•:%'�:. Ls {.I .,•t"., Li•• .t'C'�:i f'!i �r� ir�rLrL•r.. ..r; c••.x:x. .: •.•.•i/r.'4:1 f.:�,i �.,:;,rg.�f d'r ,} .. S., ORO _ .. y.. .t7G RD y6 ar• y C. 5 - t t V �•' is Lti 411 $R 3t d ! / /S� ..... 4 4.' 1 G 0. y__ T. v1Va 4 ,: Bono CaDp9 A / it 1 W " ;';1: �:'iyts;:t't` ••`;L'•' 1, 3 ,� `, ., :' ,. ., :.:: :.: 9: 51;:: }; ii;•Jt i�!: iiNh3i e: r, t - StW: CA • RJ . .. r: j� r i rt )^}'. zrp(.) in wa: - 1 Y141 I}i`'1� 95965 is r r u VPAY tK t SIMPig CO' Hfil OAK KNOLL 2 •9 J7 2W r li fY t f 7 } f7 f T yi :'Ft 1 1 11! 1 } 17 1311 113 1 3'1. 1 3 u BLOB QOS/TA OKAY �,• r 3 3 f j attfTON Gr. J'lO LAS pt„(}MAS WAY O ROSEDALE LAS PUMAS qP �� IY � t4 t4 L. 4� d i fit t(t } d! tsl 4t2' 4 t ttf< kt4341 y 1'•' �` f D y :i•T. is':S }i. a _.0 rt ddlr. [Lt s 1.L4 rltt fG• .. , ....... .. . ....... .... .. ..... ...: :S is •..... r _._."." t' .._. .. _. s.. . .. Site ID Latitude ' I Longi ve m Rau I, ••• I ...." T --- - f ------ SF03UB318 W 39-29-13 N 121,33-20 54 56 54 59 53 Site Objectives: To provide coverage on SR -70 and SR -162, the towns of Oroville and Palermo, and surrounding rural areas. This site is designed to hand-off to SF03UB314 (Honcut) going South on SR -70, to SF03UB317 (Richvale) going Weston SR -162, and to SF03UB319 (Shippee) going North on SR -70 Additional Comments: Union Pacific tower called "UP-Oroville" located at the center of the SAR. it is OK to search for friendly sites just north of the SAR in the downtown area. Englneer: Hasan Mahmood / Hildebrando R. Macedo Release M1.0 Release Date: 317:00 Exhibit 66159 Structural Report MICROWAVE ^:TOWER MTower Service, lnc. 1C1�W�V8 . 110 FIs Stud S,E. . ' ,8aletn, Oregon 97302 • . , . (60.311'7080 - • povmbar 21 1904 u Mick Sedlar 605 Hove Avaunue Suit • AM Secs:asnto, C4. 93025 •, Fauadstlaa Infomntion Ast 150' Monopole witb.rust at • Ni6i+t on Faund tLQU 20,000 lbw. ovetturnUI& ,lomat en-lust/on foundation 1,191.00 ft. lbs. 3asad an 100 ►S.Y.H. vied safety factor 1.78 8inasroly, Townie n. Carpenter Frosidant OpUctlons Tsx/zmb CA IL TP - 4 I -lo /z 9>' 14XI,aL -':;L,91Z- �GE;O2/99 '44 �c 1 = A r 17 0000A. . r C -0293,Q7 `4 I/go-,9,6 Af-I 24 '89 NIDVALLEY OROVILLE LK tl z.., ,41 CJ7eC-lC ;2 A :�- r r -= SF Tr -2- p ZJO N C. J.. ?;;ri 34 '$3 15:34 MIUVALLEY CIFLVILLE I i L�;,/ _ , P.._'i'...i n De p+k off- LAT.3EA+2� OCG ro 2 FTC-1 --rOTAL. -DtpTF4 o F FTC. BELOV/ Ftllisi-I C? RAPE CSCE rcpP-T-p\10 Ge,-olr /c pFBSI���,� � �-' .fit`' F'�• `�= v " C-029387 Exp. 3/31/9: / 3 L Z err or, P9 i/ :/9 /1 =20 329, Z7 347, 56 3G5.F,5 - 3� - 36 l - 400 /,6,5- 338.4 1 - 34Zrz5- De p+k off- LAT.3EA+2� OCG ro 2 FTC-1 --rOTAL. -DtpTF4 o F FTC. BELOV/ Ftllisi-I C? RAPE CSCE rcpP-T-p\10 Ge,-olr /c pFBSI���,� � �-' .fit`' F'�• `�= v " C-029387 Exp. 3/31/9: / i�., a .:-c ��D, - ❑...' ....,.� /`✓'� 1 nl . /S 5 7L = ✓ ,Cil i� � i s b'AC ' n i l I 12. 63 r 6- 1-(- i -0 -TVA, Vii: A 7'rO 13.9 I m OF rf GG EE.v I NGI t7>c HGO i • '' �'I' I rxTleN�iIGN • �, TYrlu.l � Z' � O�• riq- HOOP Tltw E -NO VL' FC't. ��GTIoN Y -Y 1 06 SPECIAL MUTES TOUE1 FOUNDATION 1. Soils Report: A copy of the Foundation Investigation is on file in the Architect's Office and all Contractors are free to review it prior to submitting.bids for the work. 2. DRILLED PILE: A. Pile shall be drilled, inspected and approved and filled with concrete wJthin the same working day. The pile shaft shall not be left open over -night. B. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to provi/eed g, cribbing and/or casing as necessary to prevent caving, raveling or tground water. C. All shoring, cribbing or casing shall be pulled as cproceeds. D. Bottoms of shaft shall be clean and -free of loose mawater wconcrete Is placed. E. All pile drilling shall be in the presence of the FoEn neer,Gorian and Associates, Inc. who will ipspect and appaft prior toplacing any concrete. F. Contractor shall be responsible for scheduling the wobtainingi s eWdM as regUitea oy the local Building ueparL -{YRYLATi� pr( OWN WK X n p ^ 3. CONCRETE: 9 1 0, -x ��Spo°� Iva�TK �t1NDJ+T�`l �}'� LINE /�ZUW7HOP'TH14 INti WILL X13 ►'iZO�/ r<7 g+( T H K. X pXJt.T4v I.NGHOKt e0LT4 TOr or pfb. 0 L eV.1T I Ohl Exhibit "J" Certified Letters To Other Carriers Z1,0LCC Program Management LCC International, Inc. .140 Independence Circle Suite A Chico, CA 95973 Tel: (530) 897-5005 Fax: (530) 897-5007 June 27, 2000 Pacific Bell Wireless Services P.O. Box 755 Atwater, CA 95301 (800) 574-7000 Dear Sir or Madam: As required by the Butte County Minor Use Permit Application Procedure, we are hereby giving you notice of our intent to co -locate our PCS antennas on the following towers located in Butte County: 1. American Tower located on Hwy 99 in Gridley, CA 2. American Tower located on 5646 Lincoln Blvd., Oroville, CA 3. American Tower located on 8222 Schalf Drive, Chico, CA 4. Spectrasite located on 3902 Esplanade, Chico, CA 5. Spectrasite Tower in Oroville, CA Sincerely, Messeret Yilma Zoning Specialist — LCC International Z60LCC Program Management LCC International, Inc. 140 Independence Circle Suite A Chico, CA 95973 Tel: (530) 897-5005 Fax: (530) 897-5007 June 27, 2000 Nextel Communications 2001 Edmund Halley Dr. Reston, VA 20191 Dear Sir or Madam: As required by the Butte County Minor Use Permit Application Procedure, we are hereby giving you notice of our intent to co -locate our PCS antennas on the following towers located in Butte County: 1. American Tower located on Hwy 99 in Gridley, CA 2. American Tower located on 5646 Lincoln Blvd., Oroville, CA 3. American Tower located on 8222 Schalf Drive, Chico, CA 4. Spectrasite located on 3902 Esplanade, Chico, CA 5. Spectrasite Tower in Oroville, CA Sincerely, M/-V�1& YL�'r� Messeret Yilma Zoning Specialist — LCC International VOLCC Program Management LCC International, Inc. 140 Independence Circle Suite A Chico, CA 95973 Tel: (530) 897-5005 Fax: (530) 897-5007. June 27, 2000 AT&T Wireless Services P.O. Box 3611 Bothell, Washington 98041-3611 (800) 462-4463 Dear Sir or Madam: As required by the Butte County Minor Use Permit Application Procedure, we are hereby giving you notice of our intent to co -locate our PCS antennas on -the following towers located in Butte County: 1. American Tower located on Hwy 99 in Gridley, CA 2. American Tower located on 5646 Lincoln Blvd., Oroville, CA 3. American Tower located on 8222 Schalf Drive, Chico, CA. 4. Spectrasite located on 3902 Esplanade, Chico, CA 5. Spectrasite Tower in Oroville, CA Sincerely, qYL; &ia,,4, y6orq, Messeret Yilma Zoning Specialist — LCC International ZOOLCC Program Management LCC International, Inc. 140 Independence Circle Suite A Chico, CA 95973 Tel: (530) 897-5005 Fax: (530) 897-5007 June 27, 2000 Airtouch Communications One California Street San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 658-2000 Dear Sir or Madam: As required by the Butte County Minor Use Permit Application Procedure, we are hereby giving you notice of our intent to co -locate our PCS antennas on the following towers located in Butte County: 1. American Tower located on Hwy 99 in Gridley, CA 2. American Tower located on 5646 Lincoln Blvd., Oroville, CA 3. American Tower located on 8222 Schalf Drive, Chico, CA 4. Spectrasite located on 3902 Esplanade, Chico, CA 5. Spectrasite Tower in Oroville, CA Sincerely, Messeret Yilma Zoning Specialist — LCC International p M P- 117 -� Ct:rufied Fe-,, �46 R.:t::rn Receipt = e /c" (Enicrsen:ant R:q�.ura,7) -- .............. '- --- - '` • . r -q p Restricte:J Oeli•: e,•, Fee C--1 (En;+orsement Required Gp Q vim Total Postage 8 Fees � �,, / J ,✓ •: = Ln Rc'cl :nt'S P)ame (Plea..e lPrint learly) (To be com ' 7�na•7er- M If le Street, Apt. flo.; or PO BOC No. C. • ---•-............ C:3 rel _, f7 f S., 11 p City. St�te ZIPr 9 i k C. r -i �- Postage S 3 3 .C� M1 Certified Fee 9 Return Receipt Fee (Enc!orsament Required) -- _ - r� S P M R,�s,ricted QaliFe= C3 (Err-ro.el ent Required) _ -_ OU% j CM3 Total Postage 8 Fees $ U ��nC u7 Rec' ent's /dame P/e f 7 ED ;C i ( i(%FlPrinf Clearly) (TO be completed by rn,I/,) Street, Apt.Plo, • or PO Bo 1•-- r. ,/'+. -r ` City: S+�te. ZIP. 4 �-----••---:.,. S b�,,•. +P., 2a + r � .y r � •ss;4'R ,(Dopa .ewe af0n�,o �nsurn .:¢-A����3�•i�. �'.'� {,f7!\ ��R.¢JaM 1 ��.ii b tS-5 `t� [r�:YR7' ''' ry _. Covera e� ��oV`ded) brf'� w..l� �fr.<i ,�.•�¢�Iiy' N �Yr r r� Ir Postage S_ 33 rr- GO CA �. Certified Fee l T� lzig�\ Un\ \`fit CO Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) o2 IjI6 PoS H ri p r� Restricted Delivery Fez (Endorsement Required) .. ReZUrn Receipt Fee o00 Z Total Postage & Fees $ '�9 G ( (J C:3 US S -U .n REc' lent Name (Please Print Clearly) (To be f�v. completed by maller) ,I ...: Sbee , q pt. o.; or PO Box No. , ' J..__ City,Sl----------------........... Gam% p M P- 117 -� Ct:rufied Fe-,, �46 R.:t::rn Receipt = e /c" (Enicrsen:ant R:q�.ura,7) -- .............. '- --- - '` • . r -q p Restricte:J Oeli•: e,•, Fee C--1 (En;+orsement Required Gp Q vim Total Postage 8 Fees � �,, / J ,✓ •: = Ln Rc'cl :nt'S P)ame (Plea..e lPrint learly) (To be com ' 7�na•7er- M If le Street, Apt. flo.; or PO BOC No. C. • ---•-............ C:3 rel _, f7 f S., 11 p City. St�te ZIPr 9 i k C. r -i �- Postage S 3 3 .C� M1 Certified Fee 9 Return Receipt Fee (Enc!orsament Required) -- _ - r� S P M R,�s,ricted QaliFe= C3 (Err-ro.el ent Required) _ -_ OU% j CM3 Total Postage 8 Fees $ U ��nC u7 Rec' ent's /dame P/e f 7 ED ;C i ( i(%FlPrinf Clearly) (TO be completed by rn,I/,) Street, Apt.Plo, • or PO Bo 1•-- r. ,/'+. -r ` City: S+�te. ZIP. 4 �-----••---:.,. S b�,,•. +P., 2a + r � .y r � •ss;4'R ,(Dopa .ewe af0n�,o �nsurn .:¢-A����3�•i�. �'.'� {,f7!\ ��R.¢JaM 1 ��.ii b tS-5 `t� [r�:YR7' ''' ry _. Covera e� ��oV`ded) brf'� w..l� �fr.<i ,�.•�¢�Iiy' �Yr r rr- Postaqj Certified Fee IjI6 mk .. ReZUrn Receipt Fee C:3 Res:Jcled Delivery ,I L C3 Total Postage & Fees s ru Lrl ect-Name R pi ent" (Please Print Clearly) (To be completed by mai P080 N Exhibit "K" ATC - FAA Determination Letter A I R T o U C H• AirTouch cellular Cellular 1 l A Rivcr plaza Drive, Succe 400 Sacnmenco. CA 9i913 Telephone: 9l6 646 3773 August 4, 1995 Mr. William F. Caton Acting Secretary Federal Communications Commission 1919.M Street, N.W., Room 222 Washington, DC 20554 RE: Call Sign - KNKA 463 Chico California Block B Cellular System Dear Mr. Caton: AirTouch Cellular, on behalf of the Sacramento -Valley Limited Partnership and.in accordance with Part 22 of the _ Commission's rules, hereby submits the attached FCC Form 489 for the following base station: FCC Location Number Address 003 Oroville Cemetery Oroville, CA This filing includes notification of administrative changes in the location for the above site. The resulting 32 dBu contour falls entirely within approved limits. Sincerely, Gary N. Schindler. Vice President, General Manager AirTouch Cellular, General Partner Enclosures: FCC Form 489 and Attachments $70.00 FCC Microfiche Title*Information Requirements Account Number: 4074 Date:_ August 4. 1994 Client: . Sacramento -Valley Limited Partnership Bill To: Ship To: Jennifer Hardwick Alejandra Carvajal AirTouch Cellular AirTouch Communications 2150 River Plaza Drive, Suite 400 1818 N Street, N.W. Sacramento, CA 95833 Washington, D.C. 20036 (916) 646-2268 (202) 293-3800 Service Requested: Same Day Q 24 -Hours ❑ 48 -Hours ❑ Regular ❑ Titling: In order to insure accurate preparation of all microfiche titles, please provide the following information for each filing to be microfilmed: Applicant Name:__ Sacramento -Valley Limited Partnership City/State: Oroville, California (of cell site/s) Market Name: Chico Market Number/Frequency Block: 0215B Call Sign: KNKA 463 File Number: Date (filed). Number of Pages: 11 For Legal Proceedings: Type of Pleading: - Please number fiche pages (i.e. fiche 1 of 1 or card 1 of 5, etc.) * Please forward a copy of the signed original application for microfilming. To avoid loss or damage, please do not include checks I -CC 489 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIe...S COMMISSION Approved by OME Washington, D'. 20SS4 3060-0318 Expires 02/28/96 Est. A.,. Burden Hrs. Per Response: 3.62 Hrs NOTFICATION OF STATUS OF FACILITIES UNDER PART 22 OF FCC RULES Read Instructions Before Completing Form All applicants must complete Items 1 through 7 and Certification. 1. Legal Name of Applicant Sacramento -Valley Limited Partnershi Assured Name Used for Doing Business (if any) FCC US- ONLY Call Sign or Other FCC Idem fie, 003; Oroville Mailing Street Address or P.O. Box, City, State and ZIP Code Area Code - Telephone 2150 River Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95833 1(916) 646-3773 2. Fee Data. Refer to 47 CFR Section 1.1105 or Cammon Carrier Services Fee Filing Guide for inferrrz6on. FCC Use Only (a) Fee Type Code (b) Fee Multiple (if required) (c) Fee Due For Fee Type Code in 3(a) CDC 1 1 $ 70.00 3. Name of Contact Representative (if other than applicant) Jeffrey H. Chessher F:r-i or Company Name AirTouch Cellular Mailing Street Address or P.O. Box, City, State and ZIP Code Area Code - Telephone No. 2150 River Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95833 1(916) 646-2254 4. Call Sigri 5. File No. of Authorization to which this application applies 6. Indicate frequency block, if calf�lar KNKA 463 ❑ Block A ® aIOCk a 7. TA,s form is to notify or request that: Complete Iterr(s) a. ❑ Facilities have been constructed exactly in accordance with the authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 b. ❑ An extension of tine to complete construction is being requested .... ... . .... .. . . .. .: 9 & 10 c. ❑ Application is being submitted within 30 days after expiration of authorization, and reinstatement is requested .. . .. . • .. . .. ........ ... . .... ...... ... ... .. .. .. . . .. . 9, 10 & 1 d. ❑ Facilities have been constructed with minor modifications ' from those authorized . . . . . . . . . .. . 12 e. ® Minor modifications have been made to existing facilities (major modifications require the filing of FCC 401% or that changes have been made in the authorization covering ownership, citizenship, station control, business connections, and monopolistic practices ..... . ... . . . .. . . . . . . . 13-19 f. ❑ Assignor requests FCC records on facilities be returned to original status because partial assignment not completed within 60 days ... ... .. . .. .. ... .. .... ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 1 - 7 . Any applieafle g. ❑ Permanent authorization is being requested prior to the expiration of a developmental authorization . . . Item 8. Have the facilities constructed per the File No. in Item 5 been constructed exactly in accordance with the authorization? ❑ Yes ❑ No 9. (a) Has equipment been delivered? (b) From whom ordered? (If no order has been placed, (1) Date Ordered so indicate). ❑ Yes ❑ No If "NO", answer items 9(b) -(d). (2) Date Delivery Promised (c) Has installation .commenced? (d) Estimated date by which construction can be cc•mpleted ❑ Yes ❑ No If "YES', submit as Exhibit a description of the extent of installation and the date installation tormented. 10. Submit as Exhibit reason(s) why construction has not been completed or other reason(s) for reinstatement. 11. Is reinstatement being requested? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "YES" give expiration date of authorization- 12. Are the representations contained in the granted application for authorization still true and correct? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "NO", give particulars in Exhibit , and include in referenced exhibit applicable pages of FCC 401 and exhibits attached thereto showing changes from representations made in granted 23pncation for authorization. FCC 489 April 1993 FCC Form 489 Exhibit No. 1 Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC INTEREST STATEMENT These notification is being submitted by the Sacramento -valley . Limited Partnership in order to post administrative changes to an existing site in the Chico MSA. Interference protection .is desired for this site. FCC FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSIr 600 Schedule c Technical Data (Block Channel Assignment) Cellular Radiotelephone Service Personal Communications Service (Broadband) Air -ground Radiotelephone Service (Commercial Aviation) LOCATION FCC Use Only App --.d bl 0"S 7066x{23 F-pl- 173//97 HK A.q 0-d- "._ Fv A..p--: & wz C1. Action Requested (M ) Add Delete Modify C2. FCC Location Number (Key to Schedule F) C19. Transmitting ERP 3 C3. Street Address or other Description of Location OROVILLE CEMETERY C4. City OROVILLE C5. County C6. State BUTTE • CA C7. NAD 27 North Latitude C8. NAD 27 West Longitude FCC Use Only (DD -MM -SS) (00 -MM -SS) 100.0 39 28 42 121 32 54 900 C9. NA083 North Latitude C10. NA083 West Longitude (DD -MM -SS) (DD -MM -SS) 135° If changing antenna location, provide coordinates, FCC location number and datum for old location: C11. North Latitude C12 West Longitude C13. FCC Location Number (DD -MM -SS) (DD -MM -SS) C14. Datum (NAD 27 or NAD 87) TECHNICAL PARAMETERS ximum ERP (Watts) C15. Height of Antenna Center of Radiation AAT (meters) C16. Height to Top of Antenna AGL (meters) C17. Ma -1.9 50.0 100.0' RADIAL DATA Azimuth C18. Antenna Height C19. Transmitting ERP C20. Distance to SAB C21. Distance tc CGSA (degrees from true North) AAT (meters) (Watts) (kilometers) Nlometen=) 0. -108.0 100.0 17,7 456 -93.9 100.0 17.7 900 -205.5 100.0 17.7 135° 21 100.0 17,7 180, 103.6 100.0 26.8 1850 2250 103.9 100.0 26.9 2700 100.1 100.0 26.5 3150 82.2 100.0 24.8 FCC 600 Sch,adule C January 1995 FCC FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS App faMs 600 Schedule F Et -% e.,d- m. P -R_,,,,_,4 Antenna Structure Data (All Services) i FCC Use Only Licensee Name FRadio Service Call Sign or Station Location (City, State) Sacramento -Valley Limited Partnership KNKA 463 STATUS AND IDENTIFYING INFORMATION LOC F1. F2. Location New or Number Existing F3. Call Sign of Existing Station F4. F5. Radio Tower Owner's Name and Telephone Number Service A 2156 E KNKA 463 CL Applicants (916) 646-3773 B C C E D F E F STRUCTURE TYPE AND HEIGHT F6. F7. LOC Figure Structure Type Number F8. Height of Support Structure (b) (meters) F9. F10. Overall Height of Structure (d) FCC (meters) Tower Number A 7 Pole 45.7 50.0 B 95 -AWP -0559 -OE B C D E D F E FAA NOTIFICATION LOC F11. FAA notified? yes No F12. F13. Date FAA FAA Regional Office Notified Notification Fled F14. FAA Study Number A Y 5/5/95 Hawthorne, CA 95 -AWP -0559 -OE B C D E F FCC 600 - Schedule F January 1995 :t Figure 1 a = height to tip of antenna (AGL) FCC 600 - Schedule F January 1995 a, Figure 2 Figure 3 b = height of support structure c = ground elevation d = overall height of structure (AGL) (AMSL) including all appurtenances (AGL) , , FCC Form �, ilr , �.._._�, � rr✓� „r rrrrrr v:. .. IZn 489 ..no r'vrrrr ���:,.. _.Exhibit -No.. Z No ice of Proposed Page' i" '*l' of trathmrr,.ere or :.t,.,,x,a„e., '.f P-530 Const coon or Alteration ►.a..d Av.vnon brw•r.vnon ' ;1 1. Nature of Proposal Site 'i Service 2, Complete Descri tion of Structure Type S. Class C. Work Schedule Oates Please describe, on a separate sheet of paper it necessary, ONew Construction ® Permanent N/A :he Segmnmg proposed construction or alteration. ®Alleradon * Temporary (Duration monthsl End N/A A. For proposals involving transmitting stations, ineude # If Alteration. provide previous FAA Aeronautical Stuey Number, r1 —available : effective radiated power (ERP) and assigned frequency of all proposed or modified transmitters on the sw=lure. (K 3A. Name. address, and telephone number of Individual, company corporation, etc. proposing the not known, give frequency band and maximum RP). conatructlon or a[torn Not,. (Number, Street. City, State, and Zip Code) B. For proposals involving overhead wire. Vansmisoion lines, AirTouch Cellular etc., include the size and the configuration of the wires and 2150 River Plaza Drive, Suite 400 their supporting structures. . Sacramento, CA 95833 C. For al( proposals, include site orientation,dimerteions, and Attn : Dan Neumann construction materials of the proposed or altered structure. ( 916 . ) 646-177-1 0. Optional— Describe the type of obstruction marking and Area Cade Telephone ,Number lighting system desired for your structure. The FAA will recommend appropriate marking and lighting to -the 38. Name, adcress and telephone number of pr000neni s representative, it different than 3A. above. structure in accordance with the standards of Advisory Circular AC 70/7460-1. An FAA marking and lighting recommendation will reflect the minimum acceptable level DrOv 1 1 1 e of conspicuity necessary to warn pilots of the presence of an object However, the FAA, under certain circumstances, will not object to the use of a system (such as a medium intensity flashing white light system or a dual ( I Area coda TelephoneNumoar lighting system) other than the recommended s3nddar (See Attachment 4. Location Of Structure A5. Height and Elevation tnncarestteat I :O ntindreoel3 0l 3«oras- A. Coordinates ., kna„nh 6. Nearest City or Town C. Nearest public or military airport A. Sovadon of site above mean Latitude 0 11 n and State heliport nightpant, or seaplane base sea level. 39 28 42 Oroville CA Oroville Municipal Longitude 01 n (1). Distance to 48 (1), Distance from structure to nearest B. Height at structure including all 121 32 54 point of nearest runway appurtenances and lighting above 1.0 mile ground or water. 40. Source of coordinate information 3.3 miles es 170' for item 4A, above. (2). Direction to WEJ (2). Direction from structure to airport C. Overall height above mean sea level USGS 75' Other CJ Quad Chart C1Survey El specify( 6) specify North West 477' I Indicate trhe reference eatum of eta coordinates, dknowrt 4E.Describe, on a separate sheet of paper, the location of the site with respect to highways, streets, airports NAO 27 El NAD 93 [] S'" prominent terrain features, existing structures, etc. Attach a copy of a U.S. Geological Survey quadrangle map 7.5 PeciN minute series (or equivalent) showing the construction site. If available, attach a copy of a documented sate survey with the surveyor's certification. ( See Attachment B) FAILURE TO PROVIDE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION MAY DELAY PROCESSING OF YOUR NOTICE Notice is required try Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Reguladons (14 C.F.R. Part 77) pursuant to Section 1101 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended 149 U.S.C. app. § 1501), Persons who I knowingly and willfully, violate trio Notice requirements of Part 77 are subject to a civil penahy'of 51,000 per day until the notice is received, pursuant to Section 901(a) of trio Federal Aviw: cn Ar, of t 9sa, as amended 149 V.S.C. app i 1471(a)) as well as me Ana tcriminal penalty) of not more than 5500 for die first onense and not mate than 52.000 for subsequent offenses, pursuant to Section 902(al of me Federal Avili`509 Act of 1958, as amended (49 U.S.C. aop I 1472(a)). I HEREBY CERTIF) f the above statements made by me are true, complete, and correct to the gest of my knowledge. In addition, I agree to obstni r light the structure In accordance with established marking & lighting standards as nese ry. ZNart» andlid. of Person Fong Nancery eumann, Director of En ineerin �/ FOR F AUS 0 F C -Q 4 FAA wilt either return�tt?iSforM or iss separate ackno fedjemenL The Proposal: Suppi.m«iWNotice of CoriatructloFAA Form 74517 is requieC ary Cmc crc p jabakontr �,cr Coes R/7 not require a ncAce to FAA At least 48 hours be#xa d,e sant of const, xoom, S s not derrofied as an atxmuoon under any F {+�Y�S Zr�? El Within 6" days after she cans x6on ea&cNas its r�eaitrst hec�R Suopart C. and mould not be a hezard b navigation. k This daeerminadon expires on _ -%C-4-, --,.Y,- -z' o S- - ` unt it Cendfied as an oosatx.5orh under e+e starsdarCs d FAR, Part 77, (aI extended. revised a terminated by cia ivuvng o16cc, Subpart C, but would na Da a hazard)o navigation, (bl tie cWanctw is slbje.t to Che r-cmning audhorxy of e» Federal Ccrrmun'ic� Commission (FCC) and as appsc`xoen for a construction permit a made b Tw FCC on or t ak" tfv'above expiration dna In such rases she dewrrr+adas ❑ Shedd be ebsoucdan ❑ rnaAad ❑ righted par FAA expves on the darn prescribed try ev FCC for compsedon of tortz ucon, or on the data the FCC denies e» Advisory Circular 70/74 esu ry 60-1, Request for artw len of 0,*erl c ,v period d eve de erminadon M -sl be p=. shed a deimxed rn eser>r% 1, Creepers ' at bast 15 days prior to er e=pic dais, jEgCtmrucdon marking and I"ng are not necessary. K chi s?uckwl is subject to ese I'rcans;N authdity of tr» FCC, a copy of this deMnination ..ill be $am to chat agency. �emarts NAD 83 COVfdII rates (ttry,re ar esgpnp.nce aid,Q.e FAAI LIIIML de 39 o r y/ . S Lon Itude ra/�O11 n- ru—m r,ou-1 11.731 .. .. /_ „-y --- • `. I.1_•,yu _�.•• r: c � L � - ^A. 1.' �..•• •JJ � +\ ( ' .1_ \ n `�.I II' .... .,,;•\. ;. •. v._ '-;•J •.; J.�i N 'h' , r r' �"•!�;•� -r'�c�,���r•;• :�•'.!:"/� C-•-1'r.�l;::����u�,l...r y�c� �. 1' I' M �',,�•, s-�� "" /� ;'°'" • 1 I �` �1Irr' u Sacramento - Valley Limited Partnership •.�-•' 1..rr 1, •.�. r�••"+'� •''' 'r:ri'n sr' .r.,'`-' Domestic Public Cellular Radio 1• t• ruh. [�,: ?.. • , • • �t,r, ' ,.,• ,� ,%,' Telecommunications Service Market 215 B, CHICO CA MSA 32 dBu ,.I - � .� �j`r'.* c,. •. :,�� .., �.•�- • .1 Cell Site 1 MSA ') .wed. ° `• 1.. i "w'il 'u I •t�.:i Latitude I analtude FCC i "/ �' sp'�'' `"••�" c' �:, '.ti '�a'' Oroville 39-28-42 N 121-32.54 W 003 „1... � •F .,..ul..,' ':�� - The CGSAs of the Chico MSA, Modoc RSA, Redding MSA, .r 'and the Tehama RSA are being consolidated i ..y mGlr \ 'CFS`' •�, 1 - -'� t•, File number 01 ,t -- .-,�'�1•- o t �:y- - -, --•. 4196-CL-MP•93 r1l ••�" �• v"r I , ) 1{I. „IJr Mry: � . I �� ^• � II�. .17 1 o,�• — me �� � •) -N• Ifl r.n..i.�c� r.onr^� 't% ';7 V , • I I I T- ` ..:7t. dl.ln.• "Y' I•'-./''.'' �j(/.� ,• •O .-:'. II •: •� r.a.. l\ •,"•• 1R � .: i •J .... � lJ 1 \ � /�. 9• ',.%, � •••x.1.,•1'. ... 1-r�� •`�. l`•• 4. 1 �I �` J I .... �—! : `" ' �. .1'.I •/'`.'• 9v''f.. i• I � >ti0 .��1'..�'y J •t l� y...•� t ... FYI 1 ` [. �'. ' .r.,. L'• rti�n. � J. � i�,'.:. �"• _-! '.-.t _ v , I _.".--""111 rv.f�N 01. .,..I 1 111.1.•1, .�I. .. I; '' ✓' I-••: � fit• •:1 r' � ,. �. o,n ( _ I.1j i I ,m 1_ ..mom^-n �1.. ' '/.•! 4. ID �. 1 •.I M %t m - r•uy'.�,.}% •. V ^ ��'ti - - I . , �. '003- n.r-.. 71X' 1 _ .., - r..•. y�o I 1 I . 1 1� - u.r1 `"w-' •�h .n. ,' .. oi, U A•'� ' ','�nw.,1 0,:. I � � / Ib" ••,, � 1 I .�.. � ""' `.. ":`. : ' I'j °-earl' �"; l�-... - �_ ! o c yI` l•. , i / u./•, n•":., "ice -I ..moor.. V :1 4 I cd h7 W n • 4 �"} ��• 1 ..� I �,'.. � .. � � _ ' '• ,. , _ - ,,� - to n :]/ I i m�vf. •'; `ut !{I.• �I wr* •qo ^moi —.j.• 'a' :...r1.. W. r ` L l' r. (D I— -- I .:i.`o. I,. ---:�A,•!t f"' I rI• •v '`CL. - ....y�:•./ .1 _ i-:.:^':'/>ir`.It 1�.•^-� ,O 0 !'-.'r.n.,, I: : `J V• Scale 1:500,000 '" }.Ir. �' w I'1 s• I"" '. i n c ,into. OD•o.�m.ldr6mdrt '' •"•c" G'(' 1 •Il..• I Sm.I.d 10 0 10 70 __— b 0 N:Irt r 03 ' •In,1nlun l L U — - - - I 1 alto to o lo' :o ;o .o w tdo .u,t Ln«clr LOIIIOUi I4I0Nil ]UU liil nw ►:..c +...a••+• .} + DL.•nuTt J —'�t ' Oott.o I... .P•+••nu tn• lU0•lool conlou• • t� I G u. ••' ••1�:1 .1 ; I �r ', ' N.1�°nd Y.oa•IK .•.oul 0avm 01 1929 �'� I 1. � � �,; I •�. �'�.'-• • _ .. ..-._..___ .. _IMI..• L)OmetiL.11. L1 V1 VCiLu 1Gl ---- - -- - - - Chico Cellular SvS[em T.oc, jon A t re Counry. CA FCC FEDERAL C-%4MUNICATIONS COMMISSION A—roved by OMB ; FCC Use Only Kington. D.C. 296154 3068.0318 File No. 489 �.pires 4/30/87 ' NOTIFICATION OF STATUS OF FACILITIES UNDER PART 22 OF FCC RULES INSTRUCTIONS ZC 489 is to be submitted to notify the Commission of the circumstances described below. Mark (X) in the box at the left to indicate the purpose for submining the form. Fallow the corresponding instructions at the right. All applicants must complete items 1 through 4 and certification. Submit two copies to the Federal Communications Commission Washinaton D.C. 20554. Attention: Mobile Services Division. This form is to notify or request that: Comoiete Item(s) A. LJ Facilities have been constructed exactly in accordance with the authorization ...................................... S B. An extension of time to complete construction is being requested ................................................ 6 b 7 C. L_ Application is being submitted within 30 days aher expiration of authorization• and reinstatement is being requested ... 6. 7, b 8 D. U Facilities have been constructed with minor. modifications from those authorized ................................... 9 E. `�Q Mingr modifications have been made to existing facilities (major modifications require the filing of FCC 401): or that changes have been made in the authorization covering ownership, cituenship. station control, business connectioru, and monopolistic practices................................................................................. 10.16 A--mgnor requests FCC records on facilities be returned to original status because partial assignment not completed within 60 days 1-4 G. Permanent authorization is being requested prior to the expiration of a developmental authorization .................. Any apolicable — item aoove. 1. Legal Name of Applicant lif person, enter last name first) Sacramento -Valley Limited Partnership Assumed Name Used fdr'Doing Business (if any) Mailing Street Address or P.O. Box, City, State and ZIP Code Area Code—Telephone No. 650 Howe Avenue, Suite 300, Sacramento, CA 95825 ! (916) 646-3773 2, Name of Contact Representative (if other than applicantl Michael J. Erich Firm or Company Name .PacTel Cellular Mailing Street Address or P.O. Box, City, State and ZIP Code Area Code—Telephone No. 650 Howe Avenue, Suite 300, Sacramento, CA 95825 (916) 646-3773 3. Call Sign 4. File No. of Authorization S. Have the facilities constructed per the File No. in Item 4 been constructed exactly in accoraznce to which this application with the authorization? KNKA463 applies Yespp 1 ❑ No Does Not Apply :00969 -CL -L-88 6. ta) Has equipment been delivered? Ib) From whom ordered? (If no order has been placed, so (1) Date Ordered indicate) U Yes ❑ No If "NO", answer , items 6(b)-ldl 1 (2) Date Delivery Promised Does Not Apply (c) Has installation commenced? ! ld) Estimated date by which construction can be completed. ti LJ Yes ❑ No If "YES"', submit as Exhibit a description of the extent of installation and the date installation commenced. 7. Submit as Exhibit reason(s) 1 8. Is reinstatement being requested? why construction has not been completed ori other reasonts) for reinstatement. I i ❑ Yes ❑ No If "YES," give expiration date of authorization: �-- Does Not Apply Does Not apply 9. Are the representations contained in the granted application for authorization still true and correct? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "NO," give particulars in Exhibit and include in referenced exhibit applicable pages of FCC 401 and exhibits anached thereto showing changes from representations made in granted application for authorization. Does Not Apply FCC 489 Januar' 1996 10 It for mioortication of license naicate IA) 000aeo changes:i 11. Shor, a fNkry rig for licensed tranarrvners wrvch °' sing Oek+ed• Does Not Apply A. Ci Addition of Transmmer on Sarno ❑ Changets) of Control Point(%) I (a) I (b) Frequency as Existing Transmitter D. ❑ Change in Points' of Communication i Location Number Trsnsmirter Number B. LJ Change in Authorised Power. E. Change in Other Particulars Changes are described in Exhibit 1 N for additional trartsniner. Exhibit rrxrst state I i exdicitty that reliable service area contour IRSAC) and interference contour (ICI of new i transmrner are resoertrvely containea entirely within RSAC and IC of previously autho- : 12. Is the stetson now operating) rized facilities. It modifications involve items shown in FCC 401, Exhibit shall include no- I ❑ Yes No pticable pages of FCC 401, showing items modified. l 13. Prooasaa Location of Transmmer If Changed From Authorization hal Current I (b) Pr000sea (11 (2) ; (3) (4) 1 (5) FCC U; -- Location xLocation No. l Transmmer Proposed Location North West I Only No. I (Street Address. City or Town, State) Latitude I Longitude Loc. N"o. 1 (Deg—Min—Sec) 1 (Dep -Min -Sec) 1)03 I 5646 Lincold Blvd. 390 28' 42"' 121 32 56 I Oroville. Butte County. CA I I I I I I 14. (a) Have trlere been any changes in tree oats furnished in the application tot authorization covering ownersnio, crtaenship, station control, business connections. ano monopolistic pracvccs) L Yes ❑ No Does Not apply •Ib) Have sucn changes been reportea to trie Commission) Cl Yes ❑ No If "NO show changes in Exhibit 15. If this application is for modification of license, show in Exhibit NO . 4 why the proposed changels) is tare) deemed necassary and the purpose it will sends. Has applicant been denied state cartification for the f4ciWits proposed in dha application? ❑ Yes ® No If '-YES", anach ■s Exhibit , a tswarrient describing the state authority's action and any pend- ing appeals, or wbedter the sots appeal process has been exhausted. Attached copies of any state autt►oriry dees+oru. 17. Certification The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or of the electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the previous use of the same. whether by.license or otherwise, aha requests a station license in accordance with this appica- tion. All the answers on this application are ■ material part of the application. The applicant reoresents that this application in not filed for the purpose of impeding, obstructing or delaying determination on any other application with which it may as in conflict. All statements made in the attached exhibits are ■ material part hereof and are incorporned herein as if set out in full in this application. The undersigned. individually and for the applicant. herby cerdrfms that the statairnentz made in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his her) knowledge and belief, and are made in good taith. Date Typed Name of Applicant (Must Correspond With Item 1) 02/24/89 Sacramento—Valley Limited Partnership SignatuWSchndler, Dasignats Appropnate Classification ❑ Individual ® Aemhnt Corporation officer ti Applican Applicant ❑ Corporation or Garyrea Vice President Partnership Association WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT. U.S. CODE.TTTL E 1E SECTION 1001. NOTICE —he information requested by this form will be used by Federal Communications Cornmission staff to determine eligibility for issuing authorizations in :ie use of hequency spectrum and to effect the orovisiorts of regulatory reaponsibiiitiezrandered the Commission by the Communications Acs of 1934. as amended. Information requested by this form will be available to the public. The foregoing Notice is required by the Privacy Act of 1974, P.L. 93-579, December 31, 1974 and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980. P.L. 9&511, Section 3504(cl (3). FCC 489 January 1985 Domestic ?ublic Cellular I Lo Telecommunications Service Chico Cellular Svscem "ocation C Butte Countv, CA FCC 401 Schedule B (Complete One Schedule B Per Antenna location) Exhibit' No. 1 Page 1 of 5 Approved by OM3 3060-0046 Expire• 11/30/89 Three are l Scbc&Lle B's with this applicariao. Thu is Schedule B T ,• mr l 27. An== locatSon Reed. (For Temporary Fired Stations. set Innnicnan S(B). a. Strut Addxcu. City, County and Stue (If in arta nor designed by trreer, give 6. North Larimtdc FCC Use Only dinanee and &rtcrion from, and neon of, mearto sown) oeg-Min-stc) L.ocuion No. •39°28'42" 5646 Lincoln Blvd. e. w iorr�a a-- Oroville, Butte County, CA 95965 Meg-MNStd 121°32'56" 2g. Applkitioo Type. (Mark "X" m maty ar applicable.) A. ❑ Radio Station Authorization B. C Amendment of Pending Application (At indicnttd in Item 2 on Schedule A). C. L Fill in D. LYi Modificcatioa of Authorization E. L� Partial Auignment (A separate FCC 401 it to be filed by asrignte and assignor) (Mark "X" Ont) Fie No. ❑ Aaaipee ❑ Auignor F. ❑ . Sub6diary Coomamtaicariona Authorization 29. Does the spok- request waiver of any rcquir=xnn of FCC Rales] ❑ Yes. No If "YES." -oath Exhibit specifying Rulc(s) for which waiver is requested and demonsaanng good ff„V for each waiver. (Set Lasmiaion No. 9). 30. Are these any otbei pendia applicarioc known to the applicant with which this application is believed ❑ Ya JU No to be muttuhl exchuive7 If "YES." provide the following - a. File Number i b. Call Sign c. Frequencl (MHz) i- t t i � t 31. Natter: of Request. (Mark "X" as many as applimble.) A. ❑ Change Frequency D. ❑ Ina. Power G. ❑ Change Control Point Location B. ❑ Add Fmqutany E. ❑ locresse A-,--• Height H. ❑ Addidoaal Ant rmna L- C. ❑ D lcte Frey. y F. © Change Antcanalrraasmitrer I. ❑ Change Antenna System Location J. ❑ Other (specify). Attach as Exhibit it •bowing of sped Se detalls of changes. 32. Would gran[ of Chia application have a significant environmental effect per Rule Cl •Ycs No Section 1.13077 If -YES." attach Exhibit as the required environmental assessments per Rule Sections 1.1308 and 1.1311. FCC 4o - Sdw&dr B - Page I August 1987 Domescic Public Cellular 'io Telecommunications service Chico Cellular Svscem Location C Butce Councv, CA cxnl.oic Ao. Page 2 of 5 FCC Use Only ]]. Table MOH -2 ANTENNAS. RADIATION AND POINTS OF COM,MJNICATIO\. Anzeaaa No. 1. One Table MOB -2 is to ba completed for each new or modified antenna Byrum at each site. including the addition or modificaoon of t:immitun which will change power output from a amen rt,}r, or effective ndutod power or emissions. Much separate Table MOB -2 if authori}.arina of more than one rystem u requested. 3. Supplementary Explaaanons of Certain Items: d - Mremoru of M.}„m,,,, Gain. The m•xi�, number of dirocnoos to be ahorWo is 4. Specify beatings of directions of ma}Lm..m gain. to degree from true north. If omnidirectional. specify -Omni - e - Maximum Antenna Glia. Maximum power gain aver rtfe.-mce half -wave dipole. in decibels. h - Beam Width of Maior Lobe of Antenna Pamcm. Defined ss the art. in degioes. including only points on the polar dugram which art within 3 decibels (half power points) of the pant of maumum gun. For ornatd&ecdonal antennas, the beam width is defined as 360 degrees. i j(2) - Clue of Station. Use the following codes: BS - Base Station TS - Tot SB - Subscriber Station CT - Control Stauon DI - D•upateh RX - Relay Station RP - Repeater SI - Signaling 10 - Inrcr-Office ST - Sandby CO - Central Office 1 Table MOB -2 Theft are Table MOB -2's with this Schc d B. This is Table MOB -2 number 1 of Schedule B number 1 a. Antenna Stuns b. Matra of A-1— c. Type No. of Anecnna 1•'—' Fxisung-• E2Pr-md i Antenna Specialists ASP -953 d. Dirtcaons of Mu.m+.m Gain C. Maximum Amssru f. Maximum EScctive Radiated g. Height of Antenna Tip Above Omni Gain Power 10 Da;, 100 Ground Levcl We=164 Fces h. Beam Width of Major Lobe of I. Polarizz o (Mart "X" Au) Antenna Paaetn 360 DgPvcs 1. ® vertical 2. ❑ Horizaaxal 3. ❑ Cl,n 4. ❑ Pnipocal j. Trimmmaa (Sons fine Awftben aPP17 to Imo rnasardaers) FCC Use (1) (2) (3) (4) Only line Froqicay CLss of Station Emission Designamn T ranxminu Tnasmimer No. (Mair) (— Outpttt Powa No. Code) (wain) I ISee Exhibit .)2 SI 40KOF1D 42.7 2 I BS 40KOF3F 4 2.73 4 3 6 7 g Trwm, vzrs. coonnued Line No. (5) Points of Communication (6) rn Azimtth of Radio Length of Radio Path (Degrees Pith (Mile) From True North) I I :Mobile units authorized For this v' 2 3 4 3 6 7 a FCC 401 - Schcdssle B - Pap 2 Auguac 1987 litimescic rubiic ueilular Y •.o Telecommunicacions service c.xnloic ,vo. i Chico Cellular System Location C Butte Councy, CA Page 3 of 5 Applisaat's Name Ft. Jae Only: I FUa No. i Sacramenco—Valley Limited Partnership II 34. Hu the applicant oaaiocd reasonable assurance that it can use the propos-ed Lite? &J Yu _ No 33. ' Amass, Stroctnri 8tauemaat (b) Overall Heights of A-,--- Strucm m (Feet) (a) Scants of Strucstice (Kant "X" One) (Hdahu should incLde obnrucrian Udht, if nquirtd, and airy other _ ttsrmotutrina aPPururtartce.) 1. t� New Strttcmtte 2. : r Existing Stntenue. Height Not ! Above Oround Site Elcvadon Above Mein Su Increased Level Level 3. ❑ Existing Sorucrum. Height 1naT:3od 164 4. 288 452 i (c) Will proposed trins icing rattans be supported by the antenna (d) D"utanrt from uiummiaing ■-tT , struru= to oearest runway saucm m of any other radio ataoon? i of ocirest aircraft landing arca (Miles): ❑ Yu © No If "YES." give Call Sign: I 3.29 (e) Is the ant—na mounted on an —ining auucu a or building which can=dy bears lighring and markiaga prescribed by FCC Rules Part IT. ❑ Yu 'JE' No If "YES." give FCC Antenna Tower No. or FAA Aeronautical Smdy No. if known: (f) Has FAA been notifwd? 1. Date Filed (Month -Day -year) 2. Name Under Which Filed � 8-5-88 1 PacTel Cellular IA1 Yu ❑ No If "YES." answer 3. Regional Office Wbcre Filed (City. State) items (f)1-3. Hawth:.rne, Western Pacific. Region, •CA (g) Aerotuuucal Hazards. List any naasral formation or a iating•truo-made tuucmre (hills.,aves, water tusks, tower. -etc.) that applicant believe would tend to shield the •n—, savcmrre frem aircraft and thereby minimi+ the ,^xonautsr hazard of the ■=cz= structure. See Exhibit No. 3 ti FCC 401 —_Schedule B — ?age )utguac 1987 Domestic Public Cellular h .o l:elecommunicatluttti 3rLV.LUC Chico Cellular System-ocacion C Butte County, CA 36. Vfikwctt d Aaur" avvaa a uoe tmrm new" Draw a Y=M= Do NOT smm a wpmr ¢ Exhibit Line avr toe S.m= Pmrxkd Eales. (Not to Scale) *'CC 401 - %d-dKk B - Ps e 4 �..�ui v.iI v. Page 4 of 5 Antenna Tip 164. Feet AGL (452.Feet AMSL) 159 Feet AGL (447 Feet A,IKSL) Centerline Omni -directional Transnit Antenna ASP953 (880-890 MHz) - I Centerline Omni -directional Receive antenna ASP953 (835-84.5 MHz) Ground Elevation 288 Feet AMSL Domestic Public Cellular io Telecommunications �)ervlce Chico Cellular System location C Bucce County, CA 37. Table MOB -3 HEIGET AND POW, ENGL`IEEXING DATA C.Xii-LULL .'.J. 1 Pace 5 of 5 1. One Table MOB -3 must be completed for each antenna. DO NOT SUBSTTT U E A SEPARATE EXHIBrr FOR THIS TABLE. 2. All dituncca specified in feet in this Table are to be toundod to the nzarut whole number. 3. Supplemeatary engineering informanon may be included in as Exhibit 1 Table MOB -3 1 1 There are Table MOB -3'a with this Schedule B. Thu is Table MOB -3 number of Schedule B autabcr i (Q (b) I (e) I (d) i (e) List here the frcmuacies which R -Ai al.Bca.-ing Avenge Elevation Along Height of Ann— Radiation Effective Radiated I Dimaee to have identical Column (c) and I (Depees From Radial (2-10 mi.) Above I Ca=r Above Avenge ELva- Power in Radial I Reliable Column (d) value. True North) M= Sea Level non of Radial (2-10 tui.) Direction i Service Area. i(Foot) (Fax) '(Watn) ( Contour I I (Miles) 1 5 -368 2 1 7 -315 1 100 3. 90a iliaI -671 100 8.35 4. 133• 643 4 100 5. arse° 125 i 322 1 100 t . 6. 225• 124 323 100 i 270• 1 138 309 i 100 12.22 12.23 12.04 g. 315' T 195 t 252 100 t i • I I I 11.23 • t (f) Avenge Terrain Elevation (Fax) (&) Atnrana Radiation Centez Height Above Average 452 Terrain (Pax) -18 .Show radials and aasociatod data in direction of each cocbaancl xattion as prescribed by RuLe Sac:iw 22.113(&): If more apece is Deodod for additional radial, -tach as ExhiDiit (h) If the valva in Table MOB -3. column (b) above have beta computer gam. identify the We (dart bue) used to obtain rise v -lues: 30 second point file topographic database, National Geophysical Data Center (i) Ls aau*^• c midirvcdonal and teamed at the top of the atueaaa savcnae? KI Yu LJ No If "NO." atmch u PXhibit a dirccl;,,. •i atrteffit peasrn (polar di Lgmm)showing power disuibouon (expressed .in decibels of power pia over a reference half -wave dipole antes an) of signal radiated in the bonzonal place, as well at say en_ancering drawings required by Section 22.15()x(4) of FCC Rules and Regulsuons. 6) Are there say co-ehannd fscilinea within the mileage s^x•rd• specked in Seessoa 22.15(b)(1) of FCC Rules and Cl Yes ❑ No Regulations? Lf "YES." attach as Exhibit interference msdiea required by Rule Section 22.15(b)(2). Does Not Apply 38. Table MOBA LOCATIONS OF FD= ANTENNAS REGULARLY RECEIVING SIGNALS OF THE STATION Does . No t (AU frequnuiet amoc4u•a with each fixed antenna art to be ;romped together. Lia.each fooauon once.) APPlV (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (motion t rin.Ae Longitude Call Sign (City or Town. Counry and Stare) (Deg -,Win -Sec) (Deg-MinSee) Froqu=ey WHz) FCC 401 - Schafnle B - Page 5 Aug -use. 1987 .SME _:. rflEL.ii' T_ 7- -:Ai1I TEi, rt;i:..... EG -.MM 'c?I�' . '^ LLlJl�R : ": - :E;•'='.'T': ... r:�t•IT`:. :iy. '')NTROL ,,hannF-.1. '=at 2 !'HAN _ BASF -PF:) '11Ettlilr'1 ^r t L0 ;;HAN EASE =78 '381..3, 4 :`.3`.3 881.:=7 -i',2,o X382. 130 441 383.23 462383.86 882.31 433 +384.49 514 885.1:' `•25 885.75 546 386.38 567 887.01 598 887 _ r34 4309 888 _27 6:30 888.'-�.:) 616 888.48 '11Ettlilr'1 ^r t L0 ;;HAN EASE +it-). FREQ r L.8I I. _•. 385 381 . `:5 406 .682.18 427 882.31 448 883.44 469 _.884.07 490 884.701 511 885.33 532 885.96 553 686.59 574 887.2:.' 595 887.85 616 888.48 637 389. 1i 658 889.74 Channel 1 e r- L+ t'HAN BANE +it-). FREC) r L.8I I. _•. •392 ,381. 413 582.39 434 383. 02' 455 883.65 476 -884.28 497 384.91 518 385.54 539 886.17 560 :386.80 581 x387.43 602 688.06 623 x388.69 644 869.32 nh', =,80 . �c : 5 �393.o "'?1 891 .:.3 723 ' 91.34 756 892.68 742 892.36 749 1392.47 ^7 x393...;1 763 892, 69 7 70 i?!? LU 7?8 893.34 784 893.`2 7.91 893.73 343 88( . 29; !'OLOR C,DE: DIGITAL C*0 ANALOG 6000 O NOT REMOVE CARBONS I !" "' (AMOtt*uuCai �IuuY tvuntw. - NOTICE OF QR' UhLu LUNSTRUCTION'OR ALTERATInN I 38 -AWP -825 -OE 1. Nature of Proposaa a r1w e. Gon3truct on _ :aerat,dn 2A_ Name and address of Individual. company, corporation. etc. proposing the Construction or alteration. INilnioer, a: eel L.ry .21itst litu 1:r %:-,Idl l y16 t r.r^_ 1771 tie* Cppe reivonon* Numow PacTel CELLULrAR 650 Howe Ave., Suice 300 Sacramento, California 95825 Cid3] :. t.1• -):n.Nt.re KXpc(manent V �iyrnninq FQC iPPRQV�1 ❑ i2rnaa(dfV IOul alrOn .'untn5 Ella 36 Mencn�Isce Nant*, auofese ano tataonon* numoef of proponent s reotesentattve rl umerent Inan a agave A. Location of Structure • :.Ja(alnates 3 Nearest C.,tv u! ru,rrn, a:•a ]:al46 ro naiwast seconal South Oroville.CA C •' t 11 C S:rr.:e to -&u 1 2 Complete Oescrlptlon of Structure ., br.;4iUC CIIrCUve ld]•'eu L7vrcr 4nd.ISSrgnea u�lucl l._v .til e.rsunq utuuusea or mcluo,cO:.M, FM (,r TV nrpac.ea .' U rl,ons utrt. nnlf In.s tm.ctul e A InClltoe Srfl'.1I'U CUni.qulat..'n ni (1uv. C1 ItanSmr: Stun:r.ne5 ,Ana their SuuUUtIq 1u.1• t S •n :re -1 ;AA I4C.I1t.eS .urn ouanc .u1p•;ns I- Ire:uuc rn l Ormat.gn 1nr•w,r�U e.tc Or.e. ridnirn U•rnen LOn 1. arra:OnslrlrCluln nr.11+1..1�, til Ire Cfuuut,UO Stfrll:utr! A tree -standing :'onopole support Ing a triangular platform 154'AG whip-111ce antennas mounted ac placrorm corners extend the height an additional 10'. This installation will operate in che. 870-890 ,IHz range with an ecfec- tive radiated power of 100 warts ( SEE ATTACHMENT A) (11 rrore soave a recullsa. CVnrinue On a s*oarau an**LI 5. HelghtandElevation . mof+rerofnenralesrloor L: :lame UI nearest al(putt r+noun 11•gnt L.u• A Elu.ruon of S•le aoo•,C fr•nan Sea .eve' 73O r „r r.iotaneoase VroviIle JO Municiole Airoor ( t) p :tante In)m Sltuctulc to r•ealv>1 „u•111 •.1 B. Mergnt rH Structure r qr .ftnq an aoounenances ana i:grt-nq (d anYl aooY* F 4' . 2 '.lrita neare•St nin-ay 3.29 grouno, or water .I s0 saualeo i3 42 t ae C O.eraii nugm 1oo.e mf'�,4,,A •' 12) 0_(Kjl.7n to stj (2) o.tecllon trans structure 10 ai(pOtt 56 North East -Southeast 12 lig es cle Clotiosnowing ono s-te - ]mp 00ufts / onstruclon sUe to neareSi oOrrlslnlrf mCle 10.7ulacn au e0.ICorffinuelon a seoaaIle snew 01 Dtial o or Oroville Cemetery District 5646 Lincoln Blvd. Orovill CA 95966 s. TSEE ATTAM-1ENT B) .Vertu 1s reauu+o oy?tit 17 or the r+uuaf Aviation r;*gwafluns 1 14 C f.A Prtr // I sx,nwnr ro Sxnun r IUs u( tree r+aero A ••+rfan Act or Wed a, �.r:wwea f a9 a 5 C. l 101 r Persons was anowingiy ana wlu.ngry viola(* me Notice teaufram*nts of Part 17 Le sunrect to a firer 1 cnmrndt 0411+ttyr Or rW mora roan SStJU far re f:rsr Dorn_ ie manor mero 1 Pearl 5 s ion for sul>seouent orlensos. oursuan( to Seci.un 902tal or me F.raerrr A-Al,dn Act of 1958 r.s .n,v,ned 149 u i C rtl2ral) ete, and correct to the best of my I HEREBY CERTIFY that all of the above. statements made by me are true. compl knowledge. In addition. I agree to obstruction mark and/or light the structure in accordance with established marking & lighting standards it necessary. Signature Types Namssi of Penn•• If -1-119 Notice Austusc 5, 1988 Michael J. Erich, tanager Network FAA w1f1 Millerrorurn roti lam or Issue a :ep+lale ecxnorreagerr>en FOR FAA USE ONLY Nolte* OI COnslNellan FM Form l+ei0.2 1t feaVlleo anY I1me IM pr Oleet .s ab*noor+.a• of $uppyms-vi The Proposal: ❑ AI fust.+a now, t) -:lune Ine start ul Const tocl,dn. C1pl sas nut reouv+ a notice to FAA. C1 Witnin live Oaya anef Ina eonslfYCl.on relCnet its Qt *steal hergnl I Is unless: not 1~tili*d as an 0011"U"'' uncty Tnn oel*tminutiOn eRDirts on Any a1&naara of FAR Pan 77. SubrArt C. ana wa,to not be a rug -LA at(nevipallon. lalevla"'s�.re..srdalertmr�tea oY the .isu.11UolliG*: ❑ Is iwntJl�O as an eoalrueuon unset the Ib) ne eonauuUlon1a wot to'Ir» uuens•nq .udnonly al ate Federrt t.l:mmuii.cuoum Cammnvrn ana a^ ollptevn sl antluas of FAR Pen 17. Subpart C. but ,na nelefMIral oll el u71un n* date O(eaclim-d yClre 1'CC'ar C L)frt"'e1rUn UI Con>tf Q'.a)tA. Iaf do NCS lt* wwW not W a natar0 l0 NI navlgatwn. Ire FCC Jan-$ Ise luW,4;3Il0n ❑ Snoura be ob Yruetlon C] marked. NOTE rtefrueot lot OHans.on of Ino eI1Kl�H De••nd of inn Uefe(MMA1ru.1 "'USI ae FC S'mateearel ltifhva+�a 10 tM lignted pef FAA Aavladry Circuur .•uuuip office of feat 15 U.lya Dr+ur to tr+ e.puatron rials. 111 nn dalrmmnuon ""11 :'4 s+nt to Irat 7d'7t• Cnapleft]1 II the Stru CluN 1a Subleel to Ine UC entinq .lu lnOuly OI tree FC . a LADY Y� obstruction mratnq ana Irgntnq are not Agency. • ret eaaary. Remarks: o.t.. / '"`^� . C�� '""— ��• 00 NOT REMOVE CAA801% FaA ro.m r+eo t tb+„ acramenCo- valley Limited Partnership FCC Form 489 Domestic Public Cellular Radio Telecommunications Service Exhibit No. 3 Chico Cellular System Location C Butte County, CA FCC Form 489 Exhibit No. 4 Page 1 of . 1 SACRAMENTO -VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DOMESTIC CELLULAR RADIO TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE CHICO CELLULAR SYSTEM, LOCATION C, BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Response to Item No. 15: FCC Form 489 Exhibit No. 1, Page 1, Item No. 31 lists changes to the original FCC 401 applications. Locations of changed information: Item No. 31 F is'located on FCC Form 489, Exhibit No. 1, Page 1, Items No. 27(a), (b), and (c). Response to FCC Rules, Section 22.913(a)(2): A base map showing the granted CGSA and the proposed.39.dBu contour is located in the back of the application behind the exhibits'. Sacrament. Jallev Limited Partnership Domestic Public Cel' -lar Radio Ie lecommunications Se—ice . Chico Cellula System; Butte Councy, Californ_ CHICO FCC Form 489 Base Map LOS ANGELES — 0M 11A � __ � •—. � � � n. L\I .• w \ cl o\oc%.. w.... w� o�w �n Y •\\ O....w.. nw ?AC. Ij TEL :eilular February 22, 1989 Ms. Donna Searcy Secretary Federal Communications Commission 1919 M Street N.W., Room 222 Washington, D. C. 20554 RE: Call Sign - KNKA 463 File No. - 00969 -CL -L-88 Chico California Block B Cellular System Dear Ms. Searcy: On behalf of the Sacramento -Valley Limited Partnership (SLVP), and in accordance with Part 22 of the Commission's Rules, PacTel Cellular, General Partner, hereby submits the attached FCC Form 489 (Construction Completion of Licensed 'Facility), notification of service initiation to cover the following cell site. FCC Location No. Local Site I.D. Address 003 C 5646 Lincoln"Blvd. Oroville Butte County, CA This filing includes notification of a minor change from the location., for the site originally identified in Construction Permit, File No. 42881 -CL -CP -86. The 39 dBu contour for the new site remains within the. originally granted CGSA. All particulars are set out in detail on the attached form. Operation of this station will begin no sooner than the date this notice is filed with the Commission. Attached to the original application is a check in the amount of $50.00, made payable to the Federal Communications Commission, in payment of the required filing fees. i Sincerely, J Chessher Director Network JC/nm Enclosures: FCC Form 489 and Attachments $50.00 CELL SITE CHECK LIST DATE CELL SITE AREA Dari//e ��e�ery 1 COUNTY Bu LOCATION PLAT LOT BOOK REPORT ORDERED REC'VD. PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT ORDERED REC'VD. /� B prd��-# /uof96 TAXES CURRENT/DELINQUENT AMOUNT $ LEASE PREP. LEGAL ORDERED REC'VD. ITEMS SENT TO LEGAL PROPOSED LEASE TERMS INITIAL TERM LEASE RENTAL $.3%Q�.°= MO. Y& DEED OF TRUST SUBORDINATION SITE APPROVAL ITEMS ZONING DEPT. /O/aoArl USE PERMIT /(�/� VARIANCE /Y1,P F.A.A. CHECK � F.C.C. PERMIT PLANNING DEPT. BUILDING PERMIT REQUESTED BUILDING PERMIT COST BUILDING TYPE TOWER TYPE TOWER HEIGHT YRS. OPTIONS / YR. REC'D CK# MONO LATICE i2. 1 L 1 3 1 4 5 6•T 7 ,.3, w.., 8 - 9 10 TP°p 11T 12 THEMALITO FOitMY"1 ® �, a �\ �F ewn✓'/ , RECREATIONM — NRTiI Sf.• oy ^`'`` �` , �...�. '"" ^^` • II l�•�Q �- ` y OROVILLE _ •,`�; J` Ir AR 01.1 E� OROVILLE ..Ir:.::.1• D DAM KGOLI �� ItLS � .. ii CEV RO �� ' or t'�" � 3. ` gOf,A �2 J,� _ �., .'J ;�• .� CCCU.HrTE Fri / A.1,� t 1 er,deml F• •'' ' •�. �� ::" . ^•`'i r �bo�/ � tAir,..�- •1. �.d " C. 'blr,•q ( ^•.•000` I A». 7 r. .,..A an� \ SM only f°"•'" 0.� 1 Y dr` d". ` � �. •v, r..l�\ C w.w.. // e.n.»A.. �° \ • , e ... D�.O o w.o L P� A-.e •' �yd Aw J• SL t A tK-0-A".� o� { x .. :ar \ ./ n1 /"•1 NI c'c ..� r +u (_L -� ri ••. �--._ jet l e CSI L1. Pte' 1 OIVIrtrOR DW P Uo e v \� r- ` •i b " p1 Qj �" 1 All ELS •VENUE - •L.. °n: 6 rf•% "� r t jc �.' y 'n •�: 1 _ p u; ' •.e.. C ' 11 Aw. " e I"•wn Y • Cr. ,f .t •� r' � V..- � P, Or. / 'b�`• � O � t T H 3S en,c.n s .I e w I.rl < .. 7 � O•' ,.• ay,e ♦e f „^,^� f �' R fYI11 L T O „ ;" •,..1 wl �•.�•A+; ��' , a d �'� _ ., ... mnm A. 7A.A r�•+< �� //' y c• " < `" �.>, Nnn°,, �" 17 r1= p •(?�, 6" ,l II D i _ _ r c ';�4� ! • { r �• .. ,�O 1 1 ln' Y f' 9 Pr AV I AY.. M H _., f . o.e..wwl to '� Afb J x• v✓"'` f �'2 ///------_ w` �; l,. T to.., .�, .�1 � l �j• 'S!•' Oi ,n ` s AfH`vwslSMA. . .t/ » Ye A.°atwfAal.One•'.d_ e3l' , ....idA O P 1^, ) Z • o i D+cO,1 •.\''' H• A•.. N DR rhnn .11 Ae,-:py1V3 �. 3• Rw.dr J Jr O Y O F _ ncY �. .; s�.. A».�t fl cr AY•. ! .i �cN S� y � s'r sw. ~, , � t•,,, � b' c'��'....Ar.n 'r Ne.rr� w.• < a /I. r..Jf s. r Ird .1 �^ t Sir.a. c SA 99 0 y •.. =ti � �A A•� ,;i,.r J r •• ''a`� ♦> .w�"'Ro.' �' A-Y.1. A.. Nr.+r• Z J' U s OVt f' ✓�yr v I ' ur.: ..9. X �t<E• w.:r ? y ,., . aE�jr`"- Rror1 rI'wArd_ = t , / c � Tl 'i J'.,rf`�• Y/ b S »11Nrw ( D 8, m ° ` � t $ Chx,1 WAY ✓/� N.vG,,.. et VD ^!:•' t ii , _ car 3. r„ A•. c. A.t w.w..r �r� tJ•or. • T 7 ro �1+�'a' � ler 1 0 •( E � /r ; fQ `tt O 9 Hild.l• �, F� •'+ O�T-W� ~ L ,� ` /'CRI'1TQ— � � fA.. • , ,br 3 r• � O 4„ rtrl Nill Ur yeo "mA.rrv. • ♦ I sr. ( o g,C d` 7` .e•, ,rrros. • > y [ e 6 . n M1oeo i u i rwrr ..die , .1 4 e I ,� e; /! > 1 G.ec AY.. w N`• d.r• r A..nn. rrmrrrrlii •1':: 4 'r�s� ., < _ n no 9� 4,. l 1. w�..,..1 i ea ,+ 1 �•d` e```Dr �{ yi OA ed tle..p m r et's • i i O.LY.1. Cr ♦. �... J 'ti'' •' , y 1 i �^ 'o Sp 7n ." �'�t` 'p: `` s r: f > i . •... t,'•`•''1• •...•'�.�; .:; ' br . Jrtlw�vr y rnyr 3 V. Rd. e„ A rrie3 e, A.r L ` Q J o r Yl o t^ ['\': i1n.; r: ;:;, :::.5 :��!!:. '�`,�:•.t w o- i •;d1c .rn Awiww Ph Oft S •Au •�' i • 1 7.: '�!I'�: rl' 1 5 A > t t Oro.7tr 7 e, .1 rh DA 1 ... �• yl�l.• ... •',, I...••_ .. � •1.•`. •: •' � m VE m Rob o •.>w•„��' d'dr,, ../.00 �r,• s J {' r4' r.:.. : }:: 1 /;r.•r,....d A.w s. o � W t e�M•' _ ��'•� d.•' �; PO' "9 s� �,3`' •:.'.!:' :�i� � 'i„il., � > < ■ f.rr,.., sr. • b �.� �� OL O i Lm. Y D�•^ � 3 .�'% 1: i 7 l o { 1 er` 4 Sr rJO l'1+•s9,r'�',. rlal Ih:•`s b;�;t`';{.` a 4 0. Rover w. ? .� l� ( 2 Ori Kll W.y � E'ij• .7�,Jt G:�'1%n.r,'�?i•Y V1;}. s^'< no �C{.*�.,� if �C.•�� ����'',,��,1. I• 'ii.': ' � 1 uw A'• sro.e a •i 3 A t `•� ' ^ �' a -4v, Oroville Cemetery District �`�'.� r( �14@:V: •...: ..:... ROI F CIF $ _ au.l. tt..r� . � .� �"' � n•»r., D, �. `7 Y�1•p.... a �_ h w Rasa. r� '—..•�. o. Rrw,rl 31F1. Vran r, t . r�AtYtR. _ ,� Nancy E. 'Trinidad S,n. = m I R Y�iwr., am•,°'D' Distrlct Manager +}7 ` f c't• i �" '`� ° .,h/ 5646 Uncoln Blvd., d. Orovlllc, CA 95966 cc 1 I 1 l co t Office 533-2920 Home 533 366E nemortal Park • Orovllle Cemetery • Jesyf3h Cemetery • Wyandotte Ccmeter 4� OPHI ROA p ' �••• wtrRln 2 IY ,.•d Its t A 't SI6]:41116 ;tel.. .r•x P yr. t!4•� � \4. .-� i r'�i^�:'kN �e t � - F:� ��.q• i°���^.w� • �` � '•fid' ��9Mv� "1 -!,�¢• ? ��^� ,.i�yl. •i. S� 'tri � .,�a �.�:• �ro� ;n, h� : :�� '� �? aiM!liWe Elelow Tower Lnnkine Oroville - APN 036-160-046 Looking North 1 �`� ... 't� ��.i*",`.Mf {f. �'�S�L'-�!_ . ♦� T`� �l 4` ,t:'lytnlS )%�, •,,,j''S�• Jia h• ;y _.:•���'i t. ti L'r a :r q Oroville - APN 036-160-046 WA FAM VIR 1, Looking South At Tower From Town Same Location - Zoom Shot GEi`ERAL GEOTECHNICAL STUDY PAC -TEL MICROWAVE TOWER Lincoln, Boulevard near Walmer Street Oroville, California EARTHTEC, LTD. JOB NO. 88-286 ERRTHTEC'Itd. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS GEOLOGISTS ENVIRONMENTAL cbNSUITANTS 1830 Vernon Street, Suite 7 Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 786-5262 969-5252 Itch. EARTHTEC GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS - GEOLOGISTS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS GENERAL GEOTECHNICAL STUDY PAC -TEL MICROWAVE TOWER Lincoln Boulevard near Walmer Street Oroville,-California EARTHTEC, LTD. JOB NO. 88-286 Prepared for-, "PAC -TEL CORPORATION C/O GDA ENGINEERING 220 Grand Avenue Oroville, California January 4, 1989 Prepared by: Ed Hendrick Principal Consultant 1830 Vernon Street. Suite 7 - Roseville. CA 95678 -Phone (916) 969-5252 - (916) 786-5242 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS TITLE PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Purpose and :cope of Study FINDINGS Site Description Generalized Soil Conditions Groundwater Generalized Geology' Faults and Seismicity "CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSIONS Site Suitability and Geotechnical Considerations Bearing Capacity Expansive Soil Conditions Materials Suitability Proposed Foundation RECOMMENDATIONS Earthwork Site Clearing and Stripping Subgrade Preparation Material for Fill Compaction Trench Backfill Slopes and Drainage Construction Observation and Guide Specifications Criteria for Foundation Design Lateral Resistance Active Earth Pressures Floor Slab -On -Grade Support LIMITATIONS APPENDICES A. Authorization and Description of Project B. Field Exploration C. Laboratory Testing D. Graphic Presentations E. Guide Specifications for Earthwork i -iv 1 3 3 4 5 6, 7' T 7 Job No. 88-286 SUMMARY Note: This summary is provided as a 'convenience to the reader. This summary is not to be utilized for. design and/or construction. The reader is cautioned that he should study the full text of the following report. A General Geotechnical Study has been performed .for the proposed Pac-Tel Microwave Tower site to be located on a parcel situated in.the northeasterly corner of the Oroville Cemetery; which is ...situated easterly .of .Lincoln Boulevard near Walmer Street in Oroville, California. This study was authorized by Mr. Ron Waddell of Pac-Tel.. Field exploration and laboratory testing are contained in the Appendices. Eurfa.e conditions at the time of our field study included topography that was generally gently sloped down easterly. Elevation changes were estimated to be on the order of 1 to 2 feet in the area of the proposed tower. The land sustained light volunteer grasses and weeds. Subsurface cQnditions as encountered in our test boring below existing ground surface included top soil consisting of very H Job No. 88-286. loose red -brown gravelly sandy SILT, (Unified Soil Classification: ML).. This soil was found to a depth of about 1-- 1/21 feet. Hard red gravelly CLAY (CL) was found beneath the top soil to a' depth of about 3 feet. This clay layer was discovered. to be underlain by dense .red -brown silty SAND (SM) to a depth of about 6 feet. The SAND soil was discovered to be underlain to z the maximum depth explored of about 24 feet by dense light red - brown silty fine to coarse sandy GRAVEL (GM). Free groundwater was not observed in the test boring. i s Site earthwork should include all loose and/or disturbed soil removal and stripping vegetation. and organic laden topsoil in _ areas to support slab -on -grade. Areas to receive engineered fill should be loosened, moisture conditioned to over optimum, j and uniformly compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction per ASTM D 1557-78, or to the method that might be determined by the Geotechnical Engineer. Inability to achieve the stated compaction and/or any other indications of soft (or loosened soils due to construction equipment) may be used as - criteria to overexcavate such soils. Fill material could include on-site soils processed to remove deleterious substances and/or approved imported earth materials of non -expansive nature. Fi 11 js should be of uniform thickness across each pad where needed and Job No. 88-286 constructed in uniform 8 inch thick lifts (uncompacted), moisture conditioned, and compacted to at. least 95 percent relative compaction per ASTM D 1557-78. All site earthwork should be •- observed and tested by a representative of this firm. Permanent excavation -and embankment slopes in soil -should not exceed an inclination of 2 horizontal to 1 vertical. Refer to Appendix E for guide specifications for earthwork. r Slab-oii-grade support should include subgrade preparation as discussed. Slabs -should be underlain by a 4'inch.thick crushed rock or pea gravel capillary moisture break. Ultimate active earth pressure against the sides of 'the piers is calculated to be about 34 pounds per cubic foot, equivalent fluid pressure, for granular soil with no surcharge pressures. iii f LI Foundation design criteria for recommended -cast -in -drilled hole piers designed in end -bearing include an axial soil bearing pressure of 7500 pounds per square foot for dead plus live loads with a one-third increase for any transient load. The piers should be at least 16 inches in shaft diameter, be at least .3 feet in depth below pad grade, and penetrate at least 2 feet into native, undisturbed sandy gravel. r Slab-oii-grade support should include subgrade preparation as discussed. Slabs -should be underlain by a 4'inch.thick crushed rock or pea gravel capillary moisture break. Ultimate active earth pressure against the sides of 'the piers is calculated to be about 34 pounds per cubic foot, equivalent fluid pressure, for granular soil with no surcharge pressures. iii Job No. 88-286 Resistance to lateral ford could be computed by either frictional resistance or passive pressure; if both are combined. the larger should be reduced by 50 percent. An ultimate friction factor of 0.45 is considered appropriate between the undersurface of foundations and the underlying granular soil subgrade. Ultimate passive earth pressure is calculated to be,about 500 pounds per cubic foot, equivalent fluid pressure, for uniform native granular earth materials. The uppermost 4 feet of th-3 piers should be disregarded in foundation design. Refer to the text for study limitations. and for detailed discussions of geotechnical considerations important to this project. It is emphasized that this summary should not be used without thorough study of the full report. iv Job No. 88-28E GENERAL GEOTECHNICAL STUDY PAC -TEL MICROWAVE TOWER Lincoln Boulevard near Walmer Street Oroville, California INTRODUCTION Furoose and Scone of Study This report presents the results of our General Geotechnica= Study for the proposed microwave tower site -to be located at the above -referenced site as shown ori the attached Location Plan. Figure 1, Appendix D. The purposes of our study were to - preliminarily evaluate the general subsurface earth materials a", the site in order to provide preliminary recommendations .concerning the geotechnical engineering aspects (earth grading, 1 r soil bearing capacity, slab -on -grade support, and potential expansive soil conditions) of the site. The general scope of our work included establishing the general. subsurface conditions at the site and determining soil parameters for earth grading, foundation design, slab -on -grade support, ani expansive soil conditions. The attached Appendices contain further information and description of this project, (Appendix A); as well as site !! investigation•procedures (Appendix B); laboratory testing and 1 Job No. 88-286 procedures used (Appendix C); graphic presentations -- site.plan, boring logs, and legend -- (Appendix D); and, guide specifications for earthwork (Appendix E). rl 2 a Job No. 88-286 FINDINGS -- Site Description At the time of our study, December 21, 1988, surface conditions included topography that was generally gently sloping down easterly. Elevation changes were estimated to be on the order of it 1 to 2 feet in the area of the. proposed tower. The land -- :.sustained light volunteer grasses and weeds. 2 _ F Other indications of surface and/or subsurface structures and/o=, Lj man caused disturbances were not observed, although the possible "• presence of such structures/disturbances cannot be precluded. Generalized Soil ConddtiQns ra Subsurface conditions as encountered in our test boring below existing ground surface included top soil consisting of, very loose red -brown gravelly sandy SILT, (Unified Soil Classification: ML). This soil was found to a,depth of about 1- 1/2 feet. Hard red gravelly CLAY (CL) was found beneath the tc:p soil to a depth of about 3 feet. This clay layer was discovered f to be underlain by dense red -brown silty SAND (SM) to a depth cf about 6 feet. The SAND soil was discovered to be underlain to the maximum depth explored of about 24 feet by dense light red- �..s brown silty fine to coarse sandy GRAVEL (GM). i 3 Job No. 88-286 Since the earth material profile is very generalized, the reader is advised 'to consult. the Test Boring Logs .contained in Appendix D, if the earth material conditions at a :.specifie,lo.ea,tion are desired. On the logs can be found a more detailed earth material description regarding color, earth material type, and Unified Soil Classification symbol. Earth .material conditions cannot -be fully determined by test. borings and earth material sampling. Hence, unexpected earth i material conditions might be encountered during construction. Therefore, we suggest a contingency fund for additional expenditures that might have to be made to attain a properly constructed project. QrQundwater Free groundwater was not observed in the test boring. It is our opinion that the areal groundwater is considerably deeper than 2�: feet and should not effect the construction and performance o the proposed tower. Water might become perched in uppermost soils during heavy winter rains or due to irrigation, which should be considered. 4 Job No. 88-286 ..Generalized Geology As previously discussed, silt, sand, clay and gravel were encountered in the test' boring. These eoile are indicated on the "Geologic Map of California, Chico Sheet" (CDM&G, 1962) to be continental alluvial deposits which formed during the Pliocene - Pleistocene periods of geologic time (duration about 4 to ] million years before present). The thickness of this rock unit .at this site was not determined. Faults and Seismicity Not a part of this study. R Job No. 88-286 CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSIONS Site Suitability and Geotechnical Considerations From a geotechnical engineering standpoint, the site is considered suitable for the proposed microwave tower provided the conclusions and recommendations presented .in this report are incorporated into the design and construction of the.project.. Important geotechnical .considerations that were evaluated by our A office are discussed in the following section of this report. Baring Capability Field and laboratory tests show. that affirmed undisturbed for soils encountered at the boring location are' capable of sustaining low to moderate foundation loads. Any loosened and/or soft, wet soils are considered incapable of adequately supporting new structural loads without being reworked as engineered fill. The underlying undisturbed native granular soil materials are considered to be capable of supporting moderate to heav7 foundation loads. i. Engineered fills, composed of approved materials placed and L Job No. 88-286 compacted -.per ..-our. recommendations, are.:considered:competent for support of.low to moderate loading increases. Expansive Soil Conditions It. is our opinion that the granular soils found in our boring are of low plasticity. These materials might be subject to low volume changes.during seasonal fluctuations in moisture content. 'i Materials Suitability On-site. soils similar .to those encountered. in the test boring ;s �s which have been processed to remove rubble, rubbish, significant organic matter or other objectionable substances are consideree suitable for use in engineered fill from -the standpoints of quality and compaction characteristics. ly `J Proposed F,iundation A number of possible foundation alternatives are available to support the proposed tower. However, as discussed with Ren Lenhardt, Civil Engineer, the foundation system considered appropriate for this structure at this site is one consisting of cast -in -drilled hole (CIDH) piers. Criteria for such a system i•, discussed below. 7 G RECOMMENDATIONS . SitF Clearing and Stripping Job No. 88-286 In conjunction with clearing, the tower site Should be stripped S 1 Si to sufficient depth to remove all surface vegetE;tion and organic �3 laden topsoil. At the time of our field study, we estimated that r about 2 inches would be required. The actual stripping dept's should, however, -be determined by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative at the time and place of construction. The cleared and stripped materials should be removed from the building site(s); or, stockpiled for later use in landscaped areas, if desired. Alternatively, the vegetation could be close cut and removed from {= the site. The remaining stubble should be thoroughly mixed with i 8 The microwave tower area should be cleared of all obstructions including debris, rubble, rubbish, loose and/or wet, soft soil: and any buried utility lines to be removed. Excavations resulting from the clearing operations should be cleared .to expose firm, undisturbed earth material and backfilled with - i approved earth materials compacted to the .requirements given below under "Compaction". i In conjunction with clearing, the tower site Should be stripped S 1 Si to sufficient depth to remove all surface vegetE;tion and organic �3 laden topsoil. At the time of our field study, we estimated that r about 2 inches would be required. The actual stripping dept's should, however, -be determined by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative at the time and place of construction. The cleared and stripped materials should be removed from the building site(s); or, stockpiled for later use in landscaped areas, if desired. Alternatively, the vegetation could be close cut and removed from {= the site. The remaining stubble should be thoroughly mixed with i 8 Job No. 88-286 the underlying soils (e.g., by discing and cross-discing). Any .concentrations of organics remaining after discing should be stripped per the above paragraph. ubgrade Preparation Once the tower area has been cleared and any excavations made, t the soils exposed in those areas to receive engineered fill and/or slabs -on -grade should be scarified to at least 6 inches. The loosened soils should be -uniformly moisture conditioned 'to 1 to 3 percent over optimum and compacted to the requirements for engineered fill given below under "Compaction". Inability to achieve the stated compaction could be used as a further criteria for the removal of loose and/or wet, soft. soils, or special stabilizing measures might be recommended. Material for Fill All on-site and import soils which are free of significant vegetation and other undesirable, deleterious substances,. which have a plasticity index of 15 or less, do not contain rocks or lumps greater than 6 inches in greatest dimension with not more than 25 percent larger that 2-1/2 inches, and approved by this firm prior to use/importation to the site are considered suitable for use as fill.- Borrow areas should be observed. and representative samples taken at least 4 days prior to any i. 9 Job No. 88-286 material being imported to the site. Compaction All engineered fill placed at the site and loosened native subgrade soils should be uniformly compacted to at least 95, percent relative compaction, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D 1557-78, or to the method as might be determined by the Geotechnical Engineer. Fill materials should be -spread and compacted in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompactec z thickness. The moisture content of fill.materials should be .s determined based upon the compaction characteristics of the earth. material. If:construction proceeds during or shortly after the wet winter months, it may require time to dry the on-site soils to be reused as fill since their moisture content will probably be appreciably above the optimum. In addition, if subgrade soils are wet at the time of construction, they could be loosened and disturbed to several feet of depth under the influence of construction equipment, which might require further overexcavation. Construction occurring in later summer or early fall (subsequent .1 to the on-site earth materials becoming relatively dry) may 1 require substantial amounts of water to be added during earthwork 10 Job No. 88-286 operations to enable the appropriate .moisture content and. compaction to be achieved. Sl ones an�D�,i name 1.-1 Permanent excavation and embankment slopes in soil should be L3 graded at an inclination of 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter. The crowns of all slopes should be constructed so that surface run-off water is not allowed to flow over the faces of the slopes. Where drainage concentrations occur, the on-site soils are anticipated to' be slightly to moderately erodible. Concentrated flowing water should be either dissipated o; channeled to appropriate discharge facilities. In addition, positive surface gradients should be provide3 11 Trench Backfill Utility trenches should be backfilled with mechanically compacted fill placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompacted :# thickness. Sufficient water should be added during the trench backfilling operations to prevent the soil _from bulking during ' compaction. If on-site soil is -used, the material should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. Importec �3 sand.could also be used for backfilling trenches provided it ie, compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. Sl ones an�D�,i name 1.-1 Permanent excavation and embankment slopes in soil should be L3 graded at an inclination of 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter. The crowns of all slopes should be constructed so that surface run-off water is not allowed to flow over the faces of the slopes. Where drainage concentrations occur, the on-site soils are anticipated to' be slightly to moderately erodible. Concentrated flowing water should be either dissipated o; channeled to appropriate discharge facilities. In addition, positive surface gradients should be provide3 11 Job No. 88-286 adjacent to the tower area to direct surface water away from foundations. and toward suitable discharge -facilities. Ponding of surface water should not be allowed adjacent to :the structure. Construction Qbservation and Guide Specif i cations As previously discussed, variations in subsurface conditions are possible and may be encountered during construction. In order to. permit correlation between the preliminary subsurface data and the actual subsurface conditions encountered .during, construction.. as well as affirm substantial conformance with -the -plans and specifications, a representative of this firm should be present during all phases of the site earthwork to make tests and observations of the site preparation, selection of satisfactory fill materials, and placement and compaction of the fills. 'Any - site earthwork performed without the presence of our representative will be entirely at the grading contractor's and/or owner's risk and no responsibility for such operations will be accepted by our firm. Sufficient notification (at,leas, 48 hours) is necessary to assure that our work will coincide with the construction schedule. Earthwork specifications which may be used as a guide in the preparation of contract documents for site grading are included in Appendix E. The conclusions and recommendations contained in 12 Job No. 88-286 this report should be incorporated into the guide -specifications. Criteria for Foundation Design We recommend that the .structure be.supported upon CIDH piers designed in end -bearing, supported upon undisturbed granular .- native soils. The piers should be at least 16 inches in shaft diameter, be at least 6 feet in depth below pad grade, anc penetrate at least 2 feet into native, undisturbed dense sandy. GRAVEL. - c. Field and laboratory tests indicate that at the above minimum i> depth and bearing in such earth materials, the pier could be designed for allowable axial soil bearing pressures of 5,000 pounds per square foot due to dead loads, 7500 pounds per square foot for dead plus live loads, with a one-third increase for any transient load (including wind or seismic). The allowable bearing pressures are net at ground line; therefore, the weight of the foundation below grade could bE� neglected for design purposes. In addition, any part of the footings located adjacent to utility trenches should also have the bearing surface below an imaginary 1.5 horizontal to 1 vertical plane projected upward from the bottom of the trench. 13 Job No. 88-286 Lateral_ Resi st.anc Resistance to lateral forces could be computed by either frictional resistance or passive pressure; if both are combined, the larger should be reduced by 50 percent. The uppermost 4 feet of the pier should be disregarded in foundation design.. An ultimate friction factor of 0.45 is considered appropriate # between the undersurface of foundations and the underlying S granular soil subgrade; for fine grained soil subgrade, a 1 friction factor of 0.35 is considered appropriate. For..formed concrete on site soils, an ultimate friction factor of 0.25 is considered appropriate. Ultimate passive earth pressure applied against vertical faces is calculated to be about 505 pounds per cubic foot, equivalent fluid pressure, for uniform native granular earth materials. If the soil is not fully drained, the ultimate passive earth pressure equivalent to that exerted by a fluid weighing about 328 pounds per cubic foot should be applied. Appropriate factors of safety should be applied to either mode of resistance selected for design computations. 14 Job No.. •88-286 Active Earth Press�i. res An ultimate active soil pressure of 34 pounds per cubic foot, equivalent fluid pressure, could be used for granular soils against foundation(s). This value is predicated upon complete drainage of the soils adjacent to the foundation(s). If drainage of the soils is not provided, the foundation could be. subjected to combined full hydrostatic and either at -rest or active lateral earth pressures equivalent to those exerted by fluids weighing about 90 pounds per cubic foot and 80 pounds per cubic foot, respectively. For design computations, appropriate factors of safety should be - applied to the values above. Slab -On -Grade Support Subgrade soils constructed in accordance with the criteria contained within the "Earthwork" section, above, and maintained at 1 to 3 percent over optimum moisture content, are considered suitable for support of any slabs -on -grade without further treatment. :.' We recommend that light duty slabs -on -grade be at least 4 inches 15 Job No. 88-286 thick and underlain by a 4 -inch thick layer of:crushed washed rock or pea gravel which is intended to serve as a capillary moisture break. Gradation of this material should be such that 100 percent will pass a 1 -inch sieve and 0 to 5 percent passe. the No. 4 sieve. Optionally, the slabs -could be reinforced with.at_least 6X6.7 W1.4 -W1.4 welded steel wire mesh or number 3 bars.on 24 inch centers both ways to mitigate opening of any. cracks that migh,. form. Alternatively, micro -reinforcement fibers might be utilized to minimize cracking. No vapor barrier would be required with the 4 -inch rock section. However, for more assurance against moisture infiltration into covered floor slab, we suggest a 6- to 10 -mil moisture vapor barrier be placed above the gravel moisture break. Furthermore, a 1- to 2 -inch thick layer of clean, damp sand might be placed above each membrane to promote uniform curing of slab concrete and to aid in protection of the membrane from puncture during construction. 16 Job No. 88-286 LIMITATIONS The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based in part- upon the data from the test borings and on information provided by the client. The nature and extent of subsurface variations between the test borings .may not become evident until further exploration or construction or remediation, if deemed necessary for any reason in the future. If variations. then appear evident, then the conclusions, opinions, and recommendations in this report shall be considered invalid, unless the variations are reviewed and the conclusions, opinions, and recommendations are modified or approved in writing. This report was prepared in order 'to 'assist the owner in: -the evaluation of the site. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the owner's responsibility to ensure ' that the information and recommendations contained herein are called to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies and that necessary steps are also taken to see that -the. recommendations are carried out in the field. The findings in this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of the property can occur with. the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man, on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards occur, whether they result from legislation or from the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings in this report might be invalidated wholly or partially, by changes outside of our control. Therefore, this report is subject to both our review and revies by controlling governmental agencies on a semiannual basis. This report is applicable only for the project site studied, and should not be used for analysis and/or construction on any other site. We consider this report has addressed County and State regulatory agency requirements at this time. Should you have any questions regarding our work, please feel free to call. Sincerely; EARTHTEC, LTD. � If C. Edward Hendrick R.G.E. No. GE002021 APPENDICES. A. AUTHORIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT B. FIELD EXPLORATION C. LABORATORY TESTING D. GRAPHIC PRESENTATIONS E. GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR EARTHWORK 18oa3a 30 KOIlaI8OSZQ QNB KOIIVZIEOHIOV H XIQNsaav Job No. 88-286 APPENDIX A AUTHORIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT This report -has been prepared for the exclusive use of Pac-Tel for specific application to the proposed Microwave Tower site described herein in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in the Oroville, California, area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This study was performed as authorized by Mr. Ron Waddell by subscription to and by execution of EARTHTEC, LTD.'s contract and proposal letter dated December 19, 1988, and executed by GDA Engineering for Pac-Tel on January 4, .1989. Any user •of this report agrees to all terms and conditions of EARTHTEC,-. LTD.. 'S contract, a copy of which can be made available upon request. The subject tower is located on a 40 by 50, foot rectangular - parcel situated at the Oroville Cemetery which is westerly of Lincoln Boulevard near Walmer Street in Oroville, California, as shown on Figure 1, Appendix D. It is indicated that one 150 feet, high monopole with mast at 150 feet will be erected on the site. The load on the foundation will be 20,000 pounds. Location of.parcel boundaries, the study area limits, and related information are referenced to a plan entitled: "DEPICTION OF THE PROPERTY A2" (undated: no scale:) by GDA Engineering, Oroville, California. Cultural features and other characteristics described in this report are those observed at field exploration December 21, 1988. or the property the time of our APPENDIX B FIELD EXPLORATION Job No. 88-286 APPENDIX B FIELD EXPLORATION Field exploration included a general geotechnical engineering - reconnaissance within the study area, as well. -as .excavation of a test boring at the approximatelocation shown on the Site Plan, Figure 1, Appendix D. The test boring was advanced and the soil sampling performed under the direction of an Engineering Geologist. The borings were excavated with an 8 inch diameter continuous flight helical hollow stem augers driven by a Mobil B-53 truck inourited drill rig. Relatively undisturbed soil samples were recovered from the borings by a 2.0 -inch ID California type sampler advanced with standard 350-foot/lb striking force (140 lb hammer freely falling 30 inches). The number of blows the 'hammer required to drive the samplers each 6 -inches to. 18 -inch interval of each drive i -- denoted by the penetration resistance or "blow count" ane. provides a field estimate of soils consistency. . Selectee undisturbed- samples were retained in moisture -proof containers for laboratory testing and reference. Soils were field classified by an Engineering Geologist as to color, gradation, texture, type, etc., on the basis of inspection of samples and auger cuttings. Groundwater observations were made in the borings and after excavating operations. Approximate location of the Test Boring is referenced to the Location Plan, Appendix D. Elevation is referenced to the existing ground surface. The Test Boring Log, Figure 2, Appendix D, contains the Engineering Geologist's descriptions of earth materials encountered in the boring as well as groundwater observations. An explanation of -the symbols and classifications system used on the log is shown on the Legend, Figure 3, Appendix D. APPENDIX C LABORATORY TESTING Job No. 88-286 APPENDIX C LABORATORY TESTING Soil .mechanics laboratory tests ,.were performed :on -soil samples recovered from the test borings to -further determine the physical and engineering properties of the soils. These tests included dry unit weight and natural moisture content (ASTM D 2216). The results of these tests are shown on the Test Boring Log at the depth that each sample was recovered. APPENDIX D GRAPHIC PRESENTATIONS I DEPICTION OF THE PROPERTY POR. SECTION 29, T..19N.R.4E.-M.D.R. b H. r� , I , , i i 16E SBE Bi6-4-4-9-1 PACTEL LEASED AREA IROSEOALE I I ! \ � t 1 /F- UJI5—20 GG. OAKO7f 31i. B1 1� F371 1 I 40' X 50' FENCED 1 EXISTING FENCE zt 1 OROWLL crw T£Rr -j -L 6 OL 1 EXISTING v BUILDINGS _2 J ' 2 , 1 1 t IT. 58E 87a -4-4C-21+ t t 14' 1 1 1 V/ LT W t �.p LESSOR'S PROPERTY � I I m I IW i EXHIBIT '•A?" NOTES: 1. 'Location Plan provided by the client. 2. Location of test boring (shown as dot) is approximate only. z lu q JP ^ CO d L q C 7 L- L U .o m N U 1 co o a Y v O z a c n CL >t� OW A I&A3 %[= ARTHTEC Rd. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS GEOLOGISTS + ELEV.: EXISTING GROUND SURFACE TEST BORING LOG BORING N0: 1 Job No. 88-286 Appendix"D Figure 2 Page 20 of 3D TYPE. 8" .HOLLOW 'STEM AUGER Ik Nn Ir $1 m01r: $tm0it Penelr tlrOn t"0i"':slwql. U, GenY Monrult CO,Inl UncOnlintC COmpesiv$l M$pmltOna1l f..l Nr I]$0fltnct .Inche CtSCIOI-On ..;t: Very loose.red-brown gravelly sandy SILT. .ML ', � Hard red gravelly CLAY, moist.' 1 1.4 42 ' — — — ---- L1 — --•---I Dense red -brown silty fine to coarse SAND, dry. I 5 2 1:4 39 116 12.7Sm ` = c=:• Ii �/. Dense light .red -brown .silty .fine to .coarse sandy coD GRAVEL. I I 1 3 1.4 40 120 9.9 l Sand lens. X,. GM o 15 4 1.4 2504 , %mac Very dense. I� •°� O ` O v b v 0 20- 25- 25 TOTAL DEPTH Notes: 1. Free groundwater was not observed in the test boring. 2. Explanation of symbols and classification system shown on the Legend, Figure 3. 3. 'The test boring log shows subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated and it is not warranted that it is representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. Logged By. cEH Date of Exploration: 12i21i88 Job No. 88-286 T i fTE C Md. Appendix D GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Figure 3 GEOLOGY Page 30 of 3D UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION PT OH CH I MH OL I CL ML SC I SMSP Peat or SW GC I GM GP JGW Highly V Sands with fines 'Clean sands Gravels with lines Clean gravels Silts and clays Silts and clays > 12% fines < 5% fines > 12% fines < 5% lines organic soils Liquid limit greater than 50 Liquid limit less than 50 Sands -more than 50% of coarse Gravels -mare than SO% of coarse '' 0-4 Very loose < 2 Very soft fraction is smaller than No. 4 sieve. fraction Is larger than No. 4 sieve. Fine grained soils Coarse grained soils (More than 50% is smaller than No. 200 sieve) (More than 50% is larger than No. 200 sieve) X W 0 Z r U F- 0. io I - , o .asass .....= LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA fp L-)2- GW and SW -C• ° 6O greater than 4 for GW & 6 for SW; C - Jbetween 1 & u 010 c 010 XD60 GP and SP -Clean gravel or sand not meeting requirements for GW and SW. GM and SM-Atter4erg limits below "A" line or P.I. less than 4. GC and SC-Atterberg limits above "A" line with P.I. greater than 7. Fine Medium Coars Fina Come Fines (silt or clay) Cobbles Boulders sand sand send gravel gravel o c Sieve sizes t i t t p Classification of earth materials shown on this sheet is based on field inspection and LIQUID LIMIT should not be construed to imply laboratory analysis so stated. MATERIAL SYMBOLS CONSISTENCY CLASSIFICATION N N Peat or _ FOR SOILS ' Gravel ^%^r organic matter V According to the Standard Penetration Test Sand ® No. of Blows Granular No. of blov}s Cohesive Silt Shale '' 0-4 Very loose < 2 Very soft Clay Sandstone 5-10 Loose 3-4 Soft Sandy clay or � 11-20 Semicompact 5-8 Medium clayey sand Limestone 21-30 Compact 9-15 Stift Sandy slit or ® Metamorphic 31-50 Dense 16-30 Very Stiff silty sand / Silty clay or rock i 50 Very dense > 30 Hard clayey silt Igneous rock where standard penetration test has not been performed, Consistencies shown on logs are estimated. Sample Location Casing set LEGEND OF BORING Material Description Symbol Conformable Material Change Approximate Material Change Unconformable Material Change G.W.S. Ground Water Surface.' Date Observed A Bottom of Boring ^ — APPENDIX E GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR..EARTHWORK I GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR EARTHWORK Appendix E 1. This item shall consist of all clearing and grubbing, removal of existing obstructions, preparation of the land to be filled, filling the land, spreading, compaction and control of the fill, and all subsidiary work necessary to complete the grading of the cut and fill areas to conform with the lines, grades and slopes as shown on the accepted plans. 2. The Geotechnical Engineer is not responsible for determining line, grade elevations or slope gradients. The property owner or his representative shall designate the party that will be responsible :for those items of -work. B. Geotechnical Report 1. The Geotechnical Report has been prepared for this project by ' EARTHTEC, LTD., Roseville, California, (916-969-5252). This report was for design purposes only and may not be sufficient to prepare an accurate bid. A copy of the report is available for review at EARTHTEC, LTD.'s office. 2. Contents of these g_uJ_d_P. specifications shall be integra-ed with the Geotechnical Report of which they are a part and shall not be used as *a SP1f- ontain d do um n -t. Where a conflict occurs between these guide specifications and the conclusions -and recommendations contained in the report, tHen the conclusions and recommendations shall take precedence -and these guide specifications adjusted accordingly. 1. Clearing Area(s) to be Filled:All trees, brush, logs, rubbish and other debris shall be removed and disposed of so as to leave the areas that have been disturbed with a neat appearance. Underground structures shall be removed or may -be crushed in place upon approval by the Geotechnical Engineer. Excavations and depressions resulting from the removal of the above items shall be cleaned out to firm undisturbed soil and backfilled with suitable materials in accordance with the +< specifications contained herein. Stockpiles of clean soil may be reused as fill material provided the soil is free of significant vegetation, debris, rubble and rubbish and is approved by the Geotechnical Engineer. Appendix E 2. Surfaces upon which fill is to be placed, as well as subgrades of building pads left at. existing grade, shall have all organic material removed; or, With permission of the Geotechnical Engineer, close cut and remove the vegetation and thoroughly disc and blend the remaining nominal organics into the upper soil. Discing must .be thorough so that no concentrations of organics remain,, which might require =e- discing or cross-discing several times. 3. Organic laden material removed per paragraph C.2. above, nay be used as fill in landscaped areas provided that the material shall not extend closer than ten (10) feet to any structure, shall not exceed two (2) feet in thickness or be used where the material could, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Engineer, create a. slope stability problem, and shall be compacted to at least eighty-two (82) 'percent relative compaction per ASTM Test Designation D 1557-78. Alternatively, �. the organic laden material may be hauled .off-site and suitably disposed of. 4. Upon completion of the organic removal, the exposed surface shall be plowed or scarified to a depth of at least'six (6) inches, and until the.surface•is free from ruts, hummocks, or other uneven features which would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. Where vegetation has been close cut and removed and remaining organics blended with the upper soil, further scarifying may not be necessary. T: Where fills are to be placed on hill slopes, scarifying. shall be to depths adequate to provide bond between fill and fill foundation. Where considered necessary by the Geotechnical Engineer, (typically where the slope ratio of the original ground is steeper than five- (5) horizontal to one (1) t vertical), the ground surface shall be stepped or benched to achieve this bond. Vertical dimension of the required benches shall be as .determined by the Geotechnical Engineer, based upon location, degree and condition of the hill slope. 5. After the foundation for the fill has been cleared and scarified, it shall be disced.or bladed until it is uniform and free from large clods, uniformly moisture conditioned to the range specified by the Geotechnical Engineer, and compacted to not less than [refer to report - if not recommended, use 90] percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557-78, or to such other density as may !` be determined appropriate for the materials and conditions and !' acceptable to the Geotechnical Engineer and the owner or his representative. 2 i. AppendixE D. Fill Materials Materials for fill shall consist of material approved by the Geotechnical Engineer. 2. The materials used for fill shall be -free from vegetable matter and other deleterious substances and shall not. contain rocks, clods, lumps or cobbles exceeding four (4) inches in greatest dimension with not more than fifteen (15) percent larger than two and.one-half (2-1/2) inches. 3. Imported materials to be used for fill shall be non -expansive [typically, have a plasticity index not exceeding twelve (12)], shall be of maximum one (1) inch size, and shall be tested and approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to commencement of grading and before being imported to the site. 4. The Geotechnical Engineer shall -be notified by the Contractor at least four (4) -::working days in advance of the. Contractor's intention to import soil; shall designate the borrow area; and, shall permit the Geotechnical Engineer to sample the .borrow area for the purposes of examining the material and performing the appropriate tests to evaluate the quality and compaction characteristics of the soil. Compaction requirements for the material shall be based upon the characteristics of the material as determined by the Geotechnical Engineer. E. Placement of Fill The selected fill material shall'be placed in level, uniform layers (lifts) which, when compacted, shall not exceed six ;6) inches in thickness. Water shall be added to the fill or ,he fill allowed to dry as necessary to obtain fill moisture content at which compaction as specified can be achieved. Each layer shall be thoroughly mixed during the spreading to obtain uniformity of moisture in each layer. 2. The fill material shall be compacted within the appropriate moisture content range (typically optimum to slightly above the optimum) as determined. by the Geotechnical Engineer for the soil(s) being used. 3.. Each layer of fill shall be compacted to not less than [refer to report; if not recommended, use 90] percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Test Designation D 1557-78. Compaction equipment shall be of such design that it will be able to compact the fill to the specified density. 3 Appendix E Compaction shall be accomplished while..the fill material is within the specified moisture content range.. Compaction of each layer shall b ' e continuous over its. -entire area and the compaction equipment shall make sufficient- trips to insure that the required density has been obtained. No ponding -or jetting is permitted. 4. If work has been interrupted for any reason, the .Geotechnical Engineer shall be notified by the contractor at least two (2) working days prior to the intended resumption of grading. F. Geotechnical Rnaineer, 1. Owner is retaining Geotechnical Engineer to .make observaticns and tests to determine general. compliance with Plans and Specifications, to verify expected -or unexpected variations in subsurface conditions, and to give assistance in reaching the appropriate decisions. Cost of Geotechnical Engineer will be borne by the .Owner, except that costs incurred for re -tests and/or re -observations caused by failure.of the.Contractor..to.- meet specified requirements will be. paid by Owner and backcharged to the Contractor. Field density tests shill be made by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative of the compaction of each layer of fill. Density tests shall be taken in the compacted material below any surfaces disturbed by the construction equipment. When these tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill or content, the particular layer or portion shall be rewor:Ked until the required density or moisture content has been obtained. 2. All aspects. of the site earthwork shall be periodically observed and tested as deemed necessary by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative so that he can render a professional opinion of the completed fill for substantial compliance with plans and specifications and design concepts. The grading contractor shall give the Geotechnical Engineer at least two (2) working days notice prior to beginning any site earthwork to allow proper scheduling of the work. H. Seasonal Limits 1. No fill material shall be placed, spread or compacted during unfavorable weather conditions. When the work in interrur-ted by heavy rain, fill operations shall not be resumed'until.the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative indicates that the moisture content and density of the previously placedfill are as specified. EARTHTEC, LTD: November 1985 GGRDON IM. HART STRUCTURAL ENCINEER ' Mi6r-o F-rOw, SO(I 0,4 1/ LoJ5 P, To OM PA.' t; iL 1� • •, STRUCTURAL DV c7 _ c{ , o F 1 S'ODO ���I� , .r: r� 12-6-, ce ©A _ l 9 000 01 <�Tr` 1 d -az x s -O l � 156 EY Iv o CO�-L il►•� =1.fZ q coo )� l 21.5 ,. �(Ify�,O,6)�z 1-)I (?-2.5) = I (..2 0%p, 2O nr1h- 2`f ,v ax �003� lkflo t� SOpo Ell? (3-Z4 FSI FT DOLI-6 4 Ply = I I R�coo 3 2Lv 2`I N F- I A _ i,y z 1029 Coldwell Avenue Modesto, CA 95350 1 ,_ (209) 52--1143 1:12 MICROWAVE TOWER �1C1`OWd� r encs, Inc. 3 7010 MOYNO.. 2i. i'f•d1 , )nax 6lGiaC 4p) ]lard AVAUGYS Cult+ P1 al. 1709) O�T•s.�ro, •, Joua4ALiaa InlorfutiOn Aar 170' DtoaoPol• vieb.fut� rn i7o'• . + WLOt on 7nundactaa• 10,000 ltif. .*mast an ionitl.on tauodaCloA i,t\1.c0 (� 9 •r t.?a •~•`' I�f�d Ch 100 K�a�l�• wind �tlfey ! GOT N i -2,•00 eira•*•ir. Tow$ a l, p.c1+n+.D ➢t.cLd+nt OPr=..tion• tso/tnb ��7 Job No. 88-286 .:.this --report. should: be. incorporated. into the -..guide.=sp.ecificat ions. Criteria Tyr Foindation Design We recommend that, the structure be supported upon'CI:DH piers designed in end -bearing, supported upon undisturbed.granula'r- native soils. The piers should be at least 16 inches in shaft diameter, be at least 6 feet in depth below pad grade, and penetrate at least 2 -feet into native,,und,isturbed dense sandy GRAVEL. Field and'laboratory tests indicate that at...the ..above. minimum depth and bearing in such earth materials, the pier could be designed for allowable axial soil bearing pressures o 5,000 pounds per square foot due to dead loads, 7500 pounds per square foot for dead plus live loads, with a one-third increase for any- transient nytransient load (including wind or seismic). The allowable bearing pressures are net at ground line; therefore, the weight of the foundation below grade. could be neglected for design purposes. In addition, any part of the footings located adjacent to utility trenches should also have the bearing surface below an imaginary 1.5 horizontal to,l vertical plane projected upward from the bottom of the trench. 13 Job No. 88-286 Lateral R si st- Resistance to lateral forces could be .-.-computed by either. frictional resistance or passive pressure;.if both are combined, the larger should be reduced by 50 percent. The uppermost 4 feet of the pier should be disregarded in foundation design. An ultimate friction factor of 0.45.is.considered appropriate between the undersurface of foundations and the underlying granular soil subgrade; for fine. grained' soil subgrade, a- friction factor of 0.35 is considered appropriate. •For forrped. concrete on site soils, an ultimate friction factor of 0.25 is considered appropriate. Ultimate passive earth pressure applied against vertical faces is calculated to.be about 505 pounds per cubic foot, equivalent fluid pressure, for . uniform native granular earth materials. If the soil is not fully drained, the ultimate passive. -earth pressure equivalent to that exerted by a fluid weighing abou 3Z8 pounds per cubic foot should be applied. Appropriate factors of safety should be applied to either mode of resistance selected for design computations. 14 CORDON M. HART �T Im STRUCTURAL ENGINEER iyytLr-OWa:Y,O_ To Qcr c 1`g � re I 6�-o v / I (o r A-- BQse �P- + bW!s sv?pl)Ed I �11 1 y r Q.c- - I el ,(-Zll ta./L- Z O' _a z Q d w F BA RIC 4- HOOP TIF -!S '2a IONGr D�ILLEb .F I �FZ x r24 Max FILL W/3000 T51 60NLQFTS- 11 -4P 12- I YF�T GONG, 15pEt'.. - cl = 3oa0 P -,I IY�- v a>, aq , II 2 vv�Ll k � v w► � ML,75 bp— yibraf e f SCI m F, A rM A6 1029 Coldwell Avenue Modesto, CA 95350 1 (209) 5114143 ti e �a• \�aai Axv v L � N � m N J76 J ... nib' ti ♦ � �ST '� PAC/ r ^•01/ n�41 w) - ...♦♦ . 39 a ; O r r O = r Y q -o D r o m zp- V / / COLLAHU BL✓ - - Zo- r 100 � C m 0 D W'�gp 'tel N b ' o Y r.l r a GI Li 1 � N _---------©! 1 I - -___-_-_-- N Y w FcD] Zo- r 100 � C m W'�gp 'tel w FcD] , ,4IMEWS RRTHTEC ltd, ♦�� �dEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS • GEOLOGISTS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS February 8, 1989 PAC -TEL Cellular Attention: Mr. Ron Waddell 650 Howe Avenue, Suite 300 Sacramento, California 95825 RE:. OBSERVATION OF DRILLED PIER PROJECT NO. 88-286(G) PAC -TEL MICROWAVE TOWER Lincoln Boulevard near Walmer Street Oroville, California Dear Mr. Waddell: In accordance with your authorization,.on February 7, 1989, we performed observation of drilled pier excavation and concrete placement therein. Previously we performed a ".GENERAL GEOTECHNICAL STUDY" (report dated January 4, 1989) for the subject site. The earth materials observed in the excavation for the pier were similar to those encountered in our test boring made for the above referenced study. The depth of the pier shaft was about 23'-4" from the high side.of the surrounding ground surface. The diameter of the pier hole was about 5 feet. The excavation contractor was Parrish Drilling Company. The general contractor represented by Kurtis. Carman, was ModerrL, Building Company. Your representative, Michael :,edl.ak.., was also on site . The excavation was machine cleaned and dry. Th -- contractor placed about one yard of concrete in the. bottom of the 1830 Vernon Street, Suite 7 • Roseville, CR 95678 • Phone (916) 969-5252 - (916) 786-5262 Project No. 88-286 Page 2 pier excavation and agitated it with.a t•wo-by-four to mix-up any remaining soil slough with the concrete. The steel reinforcement. was placed in the excavation. The pier concrete was pumped into the hole with not more than a -two foot drop. The concrete was vibrated by the contractor. Based upon our observations, it is our opinion that -the pier was excavated into bearing soil materials described in our above referenced report and that the concrete was properly placed. If you have any questions concerning our work, please call. Truly yours, EARTHTEC, LTD. Ed Hendrick Registered Geotechnical Engineer No. GE 002021 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME ( If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: T Lam t C-Pr� C— P" 03 Li ----1 b - Llb ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) 40 T - EN - C G CIRCLE arm A C e0g NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT( U any) TELEPHONE CC rr1 erPrR\4 (S.?o) 8 Ct - SCO S LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major dross streets and Address, if any ) �6 ) _ tJ C L44 G LV O ROY ZI-L6 .:.......... :.......:.:.-.. ' ::..... ..:..........:.•::.:.. :_ .,.:, GENERAL INFORiVIATIOiY REOUIItED .:':.:._;:; ..;.:: ' ..°<.-_ :..' ..:-'-::., .:..;..:::.:: •:.'... :.., OWNER'S NAME .:. ' .'... .:....:..' : - :::. • GENERAL PLAN ANIENDNIENT TELEPHONE 1AMefZZCftrj <1DLJ cP- Q)RPoK(ao ❑ (51 Q) - 3 0 ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: 1 LCL S'TRi S tE portJT RC.Krhg QO ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE anECEIV, SITE SIZE ( in Square Feet or AL=s ) P& I MLl-C I cc-rrc-rerr-y Lqnl x so' EXISTING(in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) CXIt �iSTIEXISTINGSTRUC;T�URES Jo ' LIJ t/ (Check One) N/A (Check One) 11J/A ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION ATI N REQJESTED _ .. ... ❑ GENERAL PLAN ANIENDNIENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ REZONE CO F 2, 2FL-TOR5 C6t ?STTrr1L ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MaP ❑ USE PERMIT anECEIV, ED ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL NLAP 3/LMINOR USE PERMIT JUL Q 7 2000 ❑ BOUNDARY LIVE )MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERNIINAT[ON COUNTY' ❑ MINOR VARIANCEBUTTE 'LANNTNG DBUSTON ❑ CERTIFICATE OF NIERG ER ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ OTHER :.... ... .. .. �: • t)onrCrr ntcr-orm-rnu :.<:: � ` :.::... -. • FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division . describe the number and size of parcels.) J- 0 fJ(- 11A6 G L QaRELr.S5 CO n-rnrn r\j3 Cf) -M0 v �L�T NSi T31JCr ( S6U6t-j T' EV'- C _TC—TS Ot/ LA E - ANIll]vR5 QSsG.V CO F 2, 2FL-TOR5 C6t ?STTrr1L 1 Fur -I, P rE R Irt N S E CID R LL2L.l.G Loc -PA -6-0 1-lEtJ c6p 1t—;(Z O F I r tJ G L x_T S r3 Q C-- M o IJ O co V OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY TIIAT l Ail PRESENTLY TILE LEGAL. OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PRDPERTY. FURTHER. I ACKNO\VLEDGE TILE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY TK -\T ALL OF THE ABOVE INFOR.tATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. Of an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and in�the affidavit with this application.) DATE: u"..s. �-�j SIGNATURE: AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; . Print Name of Agent and Phone Number Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all . documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title - interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Print Name Si,*nature Architect and/or Engineer: Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number. Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: i et /oo ✓ AP Number(s) ✓' Owners Authorization ✓ Project Description Taken by s_ Receipt No. L95 q E.H. Print Name Signature Total Amount Received: 3 S78 • G0 N%a Legal Description Wool Zoning Requirements ✓ Copies of plot plan LD Plan 350. oo FD Payment. of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit), will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is .$ Make check payable to " Butte County Treasurer". as of COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed General Information: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or prof S�ponnsor: (03MOviTE, - l.C�tQC- - M uz�rt C Ira- Go Go ""�� _ 2. Address of project l_ R VZLI-ia Assessor's Parcel Number: 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: S`rsy 6 J1,u rH 40 z006 -a CC Cie S crzCti i4 C Co 9 Co q Ct13 525c) cls– 5005 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: r nw 2 uSG PER rn-XT 5. Edsting general plan desig 6. Existing zoning district: = Ct LZ G QU Z U �3 C.-► C 7. How is land currently used? F6 14 G E f�2y 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): 'Tp) rtri-O 0 D F )c ON 1-Gt'� N R5 pn O Re.g-T'E O FRou Q F-&uT+Prn -tj7- oto Tl -t C- C s't i Project Description: Acres) Feet 9. Site size: go y� x a ( . ) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: ij jt4 Compact: ll Total: 04r 11. Plans attached Yes% No _ 12. Proposed development schedule—RAT Vbx:Lpl :101 -SiA WFE 13. Associated projects U E✓ 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sate prices or rents, and type of household size .expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage,of sales area and loading facilities. FJ/R 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. D Butte County Department of Development Services D Planning Division 1 18. If institutional, Indicate the major function, estimated employment_ per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project .'VIA 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, stale this and indicate clearly why the application Is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as M-uJ�LS��Z7 A.No G ( I.r1r-T-NG Pt-RryaT Rt u't 2 G 0 - R'PpLtrp-C (� Ec3 �zKC-p 6 C-�AuS u 3 E F}KE Go' CA CR`R N fr O� Priv EXsSTI N (r 'frr 1, t o�W Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary).. YES 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. — - 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. — 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or fitter. -- . 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. — 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of.existing drainage patterns. — 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. — 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more.. — 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. — 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption �Q (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). —/ 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ✓—/ E 1144';f l� P L=► -C a:5 PP -9T VP Fes' V E Fwp acff r3�c� S Su�rn L OC �Z; 0 0 CX�S'�fi---1VLE(-Z r''rnu NT �t TO CO— W — rEs >su� COU `r Cl Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division J 2 S Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, Slants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the she and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back. rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be. accepted. SES F�'R� H C-ro Certification I hereby certify that the statements fumished above -and In the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability. and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date S' a e f K TORNIS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 3 1 2 3 T 4 ^w N[ISON AV61!Vfi � �•'": ' r r"';; I,. 5'+1^ —�/• I ' .i! r.1 /,,•�rI F! ( THE • M 1 ,rr 1• JRJA w::`QAA ERMAIII() OREBAYRECREATION IT. rt." I 0 ��� .. 4" ••`'+r I� 'L •"r� 1 :�i AREA ti()U111 .:rlc. .. ,.I s .,.. �':t ;,r•r.f r Ate• ( ,• 1 ,d. u.r;: \ � Mt•' ILA ROVIIIC •' DAM A V vAR ••�"�- T w..r'. ., —h / �'4 w•..r�.w crM r.{.. 1 \ •Q.�'•�•y,� �T' o 1 f..r... �ri..°r'o•railmr4 > • F tE to �� J. i•nA.w / 7U I.Ilal (7.A n.r..rl IAr"�; m IIArtr �THERMATO •AFTERBAY - rr n v C'' `':`:'' �•:• _ 1 .TAsMOUNTAIN' •• t Ir,Al. VAST 11. ,n M,. w.,q. • GOIIlr COURSE. RECREATION !91815.1,11,111 un ,rqy, u.rl I .;j•'' ,u• o a= /\ .•1'`'c:. 'l REAL rrr.l 11 R.e.,, % IHI I AIRPORT Il/t' rnr 1n 1RM' ��. .�;' �'• • Alnr.r T j o fr•wr it ` _ .I rwr 1q 5111 Arrnn 11 IIN1rnM r J'' t A ��............. �, � ,d' I ( 1 rrw. r tl.rJ m.M/I I'.• r 5r THERMALITi7 W Y+ IClmgroln� lItww sl M•gtl ..// .. ,� �I. X11 .IIW 1 •n. St , •q i � �... _...• Lr••J-fin— '�'� � - �.. _ ._....._......._..... % 1 r � irr.•. I ��. ( s � arc• P• ��, ,� � •" �, •- Nw / 1q PACIF Wqy AFTERBAY CIAY PIT V[IIICULAR RICA AIION I; �pn O q .f ,� I ' Alrn•erlM Mn. ARIA 1 a o L LL p0I IIR ROApTO 3 1 I \ � ' I ` • OI__l�M .� �' I,nV• I. 11J•.I / I• � ` �-•.__ P5J``1•�••� 1-�.-_•/�� �� _.•�,, '`t r l JIAI••w.t.J. LEGEND 1 I 1II r IIAMILTON AD sr•rlrk.nr•!'ir ' ' ' Irlltu `5' r`tnu•nrunsqu.. EAST 70 Ir colm 25.701 AC. 1 PT S.B.E. 886 -4 -4F -I Pr SBE. 886- -4F- / 3 SBEWS- 4 • 4 35 i I PTH 2 1 36 SEE PG ,48 • I � 24 1 2.3 AC GEpRe'4 I 1 M ' - x • /,n PU 71-4 3AC. T.19URAE-=-N.D•B., 81 M. 1 FJC 35 1 1 „ 1 1 i L/NTON AVE 0.A J LE HEI HILL 8 DALE 'Q UNI T 1 Y J7 / ASE Q'. / AR Rr7SEDALE i -ll 20 AC. Q ' N 2.84 A� 15 SSE -4-K-1 OROV/LL CEMETERY r SSE 972- 4- 46-24 ,141 16 A21 i 41Ts/a i R 1 1TAto I WY ' I � 55 >• ' L PLIUMNAS IWY , 1 I LAS PLUMAISPARK UNITS 182 LAS PLUMAS AVE I I 1 1 1 � 1 I 1 - • r 1 4..97A16. I - ... I I .. •I I I I I 11 OAKD 1 © 1 1 1 I I U 1 I�HTS i I I I I I IJ • i 1 O 1 /A9 AC. I I IJ 37 s 1 P 7 I I O 1 13 i 1 i 1St49 ac. //.194.AC 1 I 1 1 •I AVE. V M O N T E V 1 5 TA 2 329.89 1 _ 44 N 46 0 plAo 44-14'1 1 s _ Z4 Z '4 / { 2 3 1 r z—^u j 5 I- i 5► t Q , s a —4i Ocr. 13.478AC 4.282 � 0.01 AC .A f 39Ac • i s _ 9 V !a T. -< Ck V1L L A; VE ON N .I e 7 7 I 6 I 3 6 O , &48Ac I IIOI-72 15 I .47AC. I ' RS I I � 329.89 �,for w,esarr►.r,tperP 20 Assessor's Map Nc�: 3�-l� NOTF: onY Mg • �►w^w . 3 6 -160- o4 6 NOTE -ASSESSOR'S PARCEL BLOCK County of. Butte, Calif.. VILLA VrFONI. M.O.Fi. Wo// �s:op A -o./2 October 16, 2000 CONSUMER SERVICES DIVISION California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: 'UbiquiTel Site Number SF03UB318A (Cemetery) q u i Te L- A Sprint Affiliate 1 Bala Plaza East, Suite 402 Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 Phone (610) 660-9572 Fax (610) 660-9558 This is to provide the Commission with notice pursuant to the provisions of General Order No. 159A of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California ("CPUC") that for the project described in Attachment A: [check appropriate box] (a) ® The cellular company has obtained all requisite land use approval. (b) EJ No land use approval is required because: A copy of this notification letter is also being provided to the appropriate local governmental agency for its information. Should there be any questions regarding this project, or if you disagree with any of the information contained herein, please contact Leonard Pirkel at (925) 570-7501. Very truly yours, Leonard R. Pirkle Attorney for Ubiquitel PCS Attachment cc: Lori Badock Utilities Enforcement Branch Consumer Services Division California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 cc: Thomas A. Parillo, Director Department of Development Services, Planning Division, Butte County 7 Country Center Drive Oroville, CA 95964 —� Sp tU q U Te ,- A Sprint Affiliate p lr 1 Bala Plaza East, Suite 402 Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 Phone (610) 660-9572 Fax (610) 660-9558 CPUC ATTACHMENT A 1. Project Location: Site ID Number (Name) Site Address: Site Location: County: Assessor's Parcel Number: SF03UB318A (Cemetery) 5646 Lincoln Blvd Oroville, CA Butte 036-160-046 Latitude: NAD 83 039-28-41.8 Longitude: NAD 83 121-32-59.0 2. Project Description: Number of Antennas to be installed: Six (6) five-foot tall panel antennas and one (1) GPS antenna Tower Design: Installation on existing American Tower Corp. monopole Tower Appearance: Monopole Tower Height: 150 -foot -tall, with panel antennas centered at 130 -foot height Building Size(s): Three (3) equipmnet cabinets on 9 -foot x 18 -foot concrete slab 3. Business addresses of all Governmental Agencies Thomas A. Parillo Director County of Butte Department of Development Services, Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 4. Land Use Approval: On September 28 2000, Ubiquitel PCS, a Sprint Affiliate obtained land use approval from the County of Butte for the construction of PCS CDMA Wireless Facility. The permit number is: MUP# 01-01. 0. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: _ Office of Planning and Research FROM: Butte County Planning Division, 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 7 County Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95814 Oroville, CA 95965 X County Clerk County of Butte O fl 25 County Center Drive L� - Oroville, CA 95965 OCT 1.2 2000 Project Title: MUP 01-01, Minor Use Permit CANp_Aq 1,r(,RUBYS/gU1TE CO. CLERK_ I Assessor's Parcel No.: 036-160-046. Applicant: UBIQUITEL Leasing Company, 140 Independence Circle, Suite A. , Chico, CA 95973 Project Location -Specific: On the northwest corner of Lincoln Boulevard and Monte Vista, at the Oroville Merrorial Cemetary, at 5646 Lincoln Boulevard, Oroville. Project Location -City: Oroville Project Location -County: Butte Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: Colocate six pannel antennas on an exsting 150 Foo: tall monopole and three equipment cabinets. Name of Person or Agency Approving Project: Butte County Planning Commission. Exempt Status: (Check (One) Ministerial (Sec. 15073) Declared Emergency (Sec. 15071(a)) Emergency Project (Sec. 15071 (b) and (c)) X Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: 15311 Reasons why project is exempt: Placement of seasonal or temporary use items such as lifeguard towers, mobile food urits, portable restrooms, or similar items in generally the same locations from time to time in publicly owned parks, stadiums or other facilities designed for public use. Contact Person: Steve Betts If filed by applicant: Telephone: (530) 538-7601 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Date Received For Filing: 9" VJ4, � - ignature, R dy Wilson Principal Planner K:\P LAN N I NG\PROJ ECTSW P M\U B I QU IT\CEM ETERY\NOE&F E ES.WPD DECLARATION OF FEES D falifornia Fish and Game Code Secti�11.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT UBIQUITEL Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A. Chico, CA 95973 FILING NO. Project Title/file number: Minor Use Permit/MUP 01-01 CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION (X) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED () A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. () OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). 2. () NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: Randy Wilson Title: Principal Planner Lead Agency: Butte County Department of Date: TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. K:\PLANNING\PROJECTS\UPM\UBIQUIT\CEMETERY\NOE&FEES.WPD 7 tt Co, .. ue LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY November 2, 2000 LLC International, Inc. 140 Independence Circle, Suite A Chico, CA 95973 RE: Minor Use Permit, File No. MUP 01-01 Minor Use Permit, File No. MUP 01-05 Minor Use Permit, File No. MUP 01-06 Ladies & Gentlemen: DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3-397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net Enclosed are Receipt Nos. 18902, 18903 and 18904 for the above -referenced files. As of this date, the accounts have a zero balance and are closed. Your quick response is greatly appreciated. Thank you. Sincerely �a C� Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services TAP:jb Enclosures Date 11/02/00 Development Services DepaRment Time 8:10 am Applicant Billing Worksheet MUP 01-01 * :UBIQUITEL Leasing Company (continued) TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS TOTAL NEW CHARGES PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 07/06/00 Deposit - Receipt #18519 11/01/00 Deposit - Receipt #18902 TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS NEW BALANCE TOTAL NEW BALANCE e Page 2 15.25 $734.25 $D.00 (350.00) (384.25) $734.25 ($73,1.25) $0.00 EM October 20, 2000 Ubiquitel Leasing. Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A Chico, CA 95973 �ufte L'ounty •' LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY RE: Minor Use Permit, File No. MUP 01-01 Ladies & Gentlemen: DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net The total cost for the processing of the above -referenced application which was approved by the Planning Commission on September 28, 2000, is $734.25. As of July 6, 2000, a deposit was made in the amount of $350.00. The costs exceeded the deposit by $384.25. Below is a breakdown: Deposit on 7-6-00, Receipt No. 18519 $350.00 Professional Planner $309.75 Mapping $147.50 Clerical $277.00 Total $734.25 Total Amount Due & Payable $384.25 Please make a check payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $384.25 and remit it to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 within 30 calendar days. Should you have any questions, please contact Brian Larsen in this office Monday thru Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at 538-7601. Sincerely, a4i�� -4 - Thomas A. Pardo Director of Development Services TAP:jb / NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: _ Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 X County Clerk County of Butte 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Project Title: MUP 01-01, Minor Use Permit Assessor's Parcel No.: 036-160-046. FROM: Butte County Planning Division 7: County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 nil CO. CLERK Applicant: UBIQUITEL Leasing Company, 140, Independence Circle, Suite A. , Chico, CA 95973 Project Location -Specific: On the northwest corner of Lincoln Boulevard and Monte Vista, at the Oroville Memorial Cemetary, at 5646 Lincoln Boulevard, Oroville. . Project Location -City: Oroville Project Location -County: Butte -- Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: Colocate six pannel antennas on an exsting 150 Foot tall monopole and three equipment cabinets. Name of Person or Agency Approving Project: Butte County Planning Commission. Exempt Status: (Check (One) Ministerial (Sec. 15073) Declared Emergency (Sec. 15071(a)) Emergency Project (Sec. 15071 (b) and (c)) X Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: 15311 Reasons why project is exempt: Placement of seasonal or temporary use items such as lifeguard towers, mobile food units, portable restrooms, or similar items in generally the same locations from time to time in publicly owned parks, stadiums, or other facilities designed for public use. Contact Person: Steve Betts If filed by applicant: Telephone: (530) 538-7601 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Date Received For Filing: ignature, R dy Wilson Principal Planner K:\PLANNING\PROJECTS\UPM\U BIQU IT\CEMETERY\NOE&FEES.WPD ._ s W ECLARATION OF FEES DUE (California Fish and Game Code Section 71.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT UBIQUITEL Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A. Chico, CA 95973 FILING NO. Project Title/file number: Minor Use Permit/MUP 01-01 CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION (X) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee O B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED () A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. ( ) OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). 2. () NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: Randy Wilson Title: Principal Planner Lead Agency: Butte County Department of 1071� • . ii�►•TIIIZI TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. K:\PLANNING\PROJECTS\UPM\UBIQUIT\CEMETERY\NOEBFEES.WPD MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: Butte County Assessor's Office FROM: Butte County Planning Department SUBJECT: UBIQUITEL Leasing Company, MUP 01-01 DATE: October 12, 2000 Pursuant to Section 65863.5 of the Government Code, the following parcel identified as 036-160- 046, was: Rezone from to zoning district. Granted a variance to X_ Issued a conditional Colocate six pannel antennas on an exsting 150 Foot tall monopole and three equipment cabinets., On the northwest corner of Lincoln Boulevard and Monte Vista, at the Oroville Memorial Cemetary, at 5646 Lincoln Boulevard, Oroville.,P-Q (Public -Quasi Public) K:\PLANNING\PROJECTS\UPM\UBIQUIT\CEMETERY\MEMO.WPD • P 298 037 9139 Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided tttttttt Do not use for• International Mail POS (See Reversel. Sent to J A _ W ' Street and No. nZp P.O., State and ZIP Code. 0 0 m m D Postage m ! (0 Zr . Certified Fee _ m D -4 W Special Delivery Fee 0 Z M ' Restricted Delivery Fee - 0 0 O p� Return Receipt Showing to Whom & Date Delivered Return Receipt Showing to V m Addr( D e 7 Date, and Addressee's TOTAL Postage c& Fees 00 Postmark or Date M----..- — - — E a ILL U) CIL • Count u to LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION t�+ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 October 12, 2000 UBIQUITEL Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A. ' Chico, CA 95973 CERTIFIED MAIL Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 036-160-046 Gentlemen: Enclosed is your validated Minor Use Permit No. MUP 01-01 to allow Colocate six panel antennas on an exsting 150 Foot tall monopole and three equipment cabinets.. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Roland Parks OA III Enc. cc: Land Development Division (g) . Building Division (y) Environmental Health (p) Department of Forestry (gr) Date; 11/02/00 Development Services Depatent Time 8:10 am Applicant Billing Worksheet MUP 01-01 * UBIQUITEL Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A Chico, CA 95973 In reference to MUP 01-01 Rounding None Full Precision No Last bill Last charge 10/13/00 Last payment / / Amount Date/Slip# Description 07/10/00 Larry P. / P #31119 Processing 07/24/00 Steve B. / P #31331 Processing 07/24/00 Tammie P. / C #31404 Clerical 07/24/00.Tammie P. / C #31410 Clerical 08/07/00 Steve B. / P #31601 Processing 08/18/00 Lynn R. / C #32301 Clerical 08/21/00 Lynn R. / C #31819 Clerical 09/04/00 Lynn R. / C #32071 Clerical 10/02/00 Roland P. / C #32547 Clerical 10/02/00 Diana / P #32585 Processing : $0.00 Page ' 1 HOURS/RATE. AMOUNT TOTAL 2.00 118.00 59.00 3.25 191.75 59.00 2.50 85.00 34.:00 . 2.00 68.00 34.00 2.00 118.00 59.00 1.00 45.00 45.00 . 0.50 22.50 45.00 0.50 22.50 45.00 1.00 34.00 34.00 0.50 29.50 59.00 • • MINOR USE PERMIT OCT 12 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) . MUP 01-01 PERMIT NO. 036-160-046 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: UbiquiTel Leasing Company is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: Minor Use Permit to install six 3 square foot (8 inches wide x 56 inches high) panel antennas at the 130 -foot level on an existing 150 -foot tall monopole, and to install three 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 12 months of the date of approval. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental _Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of approval, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. A Minor Use Permit subject to lapse may be renewed for an additional period of up to one year, provided that sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for renewal of the Minor Use Permit is filed with the Planning Division on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a permit. Conditions of Approval: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing monopole. 2. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility: 4. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. 5. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 6. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 7. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 8. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 10. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. 2 Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF%EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 11. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 12. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 13. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 14. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owrier/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of, or retained by, the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 15. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 16. Applicant shall implement measures to . prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. 17. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit E" and date-stamped July 7, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 18. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 19. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. 20. Prior to storage of fuel or other hazardous materials at the facility submit a Hazardous Materials Release Response Plan or complete a Hazardous Materials and Emissions Questionnaire, and submit to Environmental Health. Building Division: 21. Building permits are required for antennas and equipment facilities/cabinets. Engineer design calculations are required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings with addition of co -located antennas. NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not w 've requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before start o no,' /wa/. any jer requirements. ' Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF F l 4 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING MANAGER AGENDA REPORT - SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 Applicant: UbiquiTel Leasing Company Vista, at the Oroville Memorial Cemetery, at 5646 File #: MUP 01-01 Lincoln Boulevard, Oroville. Request: Minor Use Permit to colocate Parcel Size: 65 acres six 3 square foot panel antennas centered at the 130 Zone date: February 28, 1984 foot height on an existing 150 foot tall monopole, and three Project 6.25 square foot equipment Planner: Stephen Betts cabinets. Supervisor G.P.: Public District: 1 Zoning: P -Q (Public -Quasi Public) Attachments: A. Conditions of Approval APN: 036-160-046 B. Vicinity Map C. General Plan/Zoning Map Location: On the northwest corner of D. Photosimulation Lincoln Boulevard and Monte E. Site Plan STAFF COMMENT: Staff recommends approval of the Minor Use Permit with conditions and findings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: This project will allow for the installation of six 3 square foot panel antennas centered at the 130 -foot level on an existing 150 -foot tall monopole. Each panel antenna is 3 square feet (8 inches wide X 56 inches high) in size. Three 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets will be installed at the base of the monopole. The proposed panel antennas will provide digital wireless communications (cellular phone service) for the Oroville area. The existing communication facility is unmanned, and does not require a water source or a sewage disposal system. One to two visits to the site will be made per month by company technicians to perform preventative maintenance. Access to the site is from the Oroville Memorial Cemetery. The project site is zoned P -Q (Public -Quasi Public) and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Public. The monopole is surrounded by the Oroville Memorial Cemetery. The project site is developed with the cemetery, the 150 -foot tall monopole, and a communication equipment shelter. The existing monopole and equipment shelter are located in a 2,500 square foot ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 1 ■ lease area that is surrounded by a eight -foot high chain link fence. A locked gate provides access into the lease area. The existing 150 -foot tall monopole was installed at a time when a Use Permit was not required for communication facilities. The monopole supports three vertical antennas mounted at the top and two microwave antennas. The existing tower is painted white. ANALYSIS: The project site is designated as Public by the Land Use Element Map of the General Plan, which allows public uses as secondary uses (note: cellular phone service providers are considered a public utility).. Section 24-216 of Butte County Code states that wireless communication facilities are not permitted in the P -Q zone unless a Minor Use Permit is obtained, subject to the requirements of Butte County Code Section 24-262. The Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance (Butte County Code Section 24-262) allows colocation on existing facilities in the P -Q zone with approval of a Minor Use Permit, subject to numerous requirements. The project has been conditioned to meet the requirements of Section 24- 262, including: • Submittal of a bond to cover the cost of a one-time radio-frequency analysis. • Radio-frequency emissions in excess of FCC standards are not allowed. • Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered to be abandoned. • Verification submitted annually attesting that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The additional antennas mounted on the existing monopole will not create an aesthetic impact. The antennas will not increase the height of the monopole, nor will the additional antennas extend horizontally beyond the existing antennas. A photosimulation of the proposed antennas on the existing monopole shows that the antennas will not be highly conspicuous. A condition of the project requires that the proposed antennas be painted white to match the color of the existing monopole. The radio emissions from the proposed antennas are regulated by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). A radio-frequency analysis written by a registered radio-frequency engineer indicates that the radio emissions from the monopole, including the existing and proposed antennas, will be well within FCC standards for cellular phone facilities for publicly accessible areas near the monopole. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Manager take the following actions: ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 2 0 I. Recommend that the Planning Commission find that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15311. Section 15311 consists of construction of minor structures accessory (appurtenant) to existing commercial facilities. Antennas colocated on an existing tower are considered to be accessory structures. II. Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Minor -Use Permit 01-01 for UbiquiTel Leasing Company, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit A and subject to the following findings: A. That the.proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Environmental Health Division, and the Butte . County Air Quality Management District. The.project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated Public and is zoned P -Q. The Public land use designation allows public utilities as Secondary Uses. The P -Q zone allows colocation of communication facilities with approval of a Minor Use Permit. B. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas will not increase the height of the existing monopole or extend beyond the existing antennas. 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and no additional services or utilities are required. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The project site is already developed with a 150 -foot tall monopole. The proposed antennas to be mounted on the existing monopole will not have a harmful effect upon the. neighborhood character. The radio-frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 3 ■ 0 • 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very little vehicle traffic will be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment cabinets. The communications facility is unmanned and only one to two site visits per month will be required after construction. 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: The site is ideally suited for the project because the proposed antennas will be mounted on the existing 150 -foot tall monopole. The project will not have an impact to any agricultural operations or to the cemetery use. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use will cause any other relevant impact. C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Chapter 24, Section 262, of the Butte County Code. K:\PROJECTS\UPM\UBIQUInCEMETERY\CEMETERY.RPT 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 4 ■ EXHIBIT A MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) MUP 01-01 PERMIT NO. 036-160-046 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: UbiquiTel Leasing Company is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: Minor Use Permit to install six 3 square foot (8 inches wide X 56 inches high) panel antennas at the 130 -foot level on an existing 150 -foot tall monopole, and to install three 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 12 months of the date of approval. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for.amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of approval, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. A Minor Use Permit subject to lapse may be renewed for an additional period of up to one year, provided that sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for renewal of the Minor Use Permit is filed with the Planning Division on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 5 ■ 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a permit. Conditions of Approval: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing monopole. 2. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. The Facility operator shall submit certification from a registered structural engineer to the Building Division, that all associated monopoles and towers in excess of thirty (30) feet in height will withstand sustained winds as required by the Uniform Building Code. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 4. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 6. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) f6ot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 7. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 8. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 10. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 6 ■ to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 11. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 12. All ground level support Facilities shall be painted and/or screened from view with adequate landscaping appropriate to the surrounding environment. All aesthetic treatments, including landscaping shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 13. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 14. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of, or retained by, the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division no later than January 31 of each year. 15. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 16. Applicant shall implement measures to prevent fugitive dust emissions during all construction activities. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 7 0 17. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit E" and date-stamped July 7, 2000, and is incorporated herein by this reference. 18. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 19. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. 20. Prior to storage of fuel or other hazardous materials at the facility submit a Hazardous Materials Release Response Plan or complete a Hazardous Materials and Emissions Questionnaire, and submit to Environmental Health. 21. Building permits are required for antennas and equipment facilities/cabinets. Engineer design calculations are required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings with addition of co -located antennas. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions, that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: Applicant NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 8 ■ WMIA City of Orovilld ------------------ AN R-1 Location :... •F ..tom. �' . . :Xv :i," 036160446 1 M-1 R-4 C-2 W Ave PUDI L-1 500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Feet BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING MANAGER Applicant: UBIQLML Leasing Company Owner: American Tower Corporation Hearing Date: September 13, 2000 @ 9:00 am. Existing Zone:P-Q (Public, Quasi -Public N Supervisorial Request: Minor Use Permit to colocate up to nine panel antennas on an existing 150 foot tall monopole District # 1 antenna and up to seven equipment cabinets. Assessor Parcel No: 036-160-046 Me: N1<TP 01-01 n Hutto �'ourItU LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 September 1, 2000 UBIQUITEL Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A. Chico, CA 95973 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 036-160-046, MUP 01-01 Gentlemen: Your request has been scheduled for hearing in front of the Planning representative on September 13, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held in the Planning Division Conference Room, at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. A recommendation by the Planning representative will be forwarded to. the Planning Commission as a consent item for final action. Consent items are set for approval in one motion. These items are considered non- controversial. No presentations will be made, however, some questions may be asked. The Chair will ask if any Commissioner or member of the public wishes to pull a consent item for discussion. The Minor Use Permit will be issued after approval by the Planning Commission. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00'. p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Administrative Support Services Assistant Ir Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Manager that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 13, 2000, in the Butte County Development Services Conference Room, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following items: 9:00 a.m. - UbiquiTel Leasing Company, Minor Use Permit to colocate six 3 square foot panel antennas centered at the 130 foot height on an existing 150 foot tall monopole, and three 6.25 square foot equipment cabinets. The property is located on the northwest corner of Lincoln Boulevard and Monte Vista, at the Oroville Memorial Cemetery, at 5646 Lincoln Boulevard, Oroville. APN 036-160-046 (SB) (MUP 01-01) The above mentioned application and map are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Development Services Department, Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. For information call: (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. Upon action taken by the Planning Commission on the project an appeal may be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The appeal period is 10 days. If you challenge the above application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION THOMAS A. PARILO, DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUP 01-01 AP 036-160-046 Ubiquitel kv Location ................... .................. ................... .................. ................... .................. .......... I I I I [ 0 LL - ............. . ... ... ... ............. .......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ................... .............................. ................................ .................................... ................................... .................................... ................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . THIS IS WHAT THE FINAL EXHIBIT WILL LOOK LIKE, PLEASE NOTIFYME OFANYMODIRCATIYONS TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS •qui,.. r �i ,SJ •a . FOR DISCUSSIOP! PU40SES ONLY 0 RECEIv ' " 3 AUG 14 ZEE BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION 1, .PLANNING DTVTSI0N TO: Public Works FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: UBIQUITEL Leasing Company, MUP 01-01 DATE: July 11, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Diyision has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Minor Use Pemit to colocate up to nine panel antennas on an exsting 150 Foot tall mono opal and up to seven equipment cabinets. on property zoned P -Q (Public -Quasi Public) located on the northwest corner of Lincoln Boulevard and Monte Vista, at the Oroville Memorial CemetaryJ, at 5646 Lincoln Boulevard, Oroville CA 95965 identified as APN 036-160-046. Supervisorial District No. -#1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE _X _ PLANNING MANAGER ON September 13, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN July 26 , 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): / /C/> l i 00 By: Date: ��'�.t�C,a� ��, Z ZJ 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 -'530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 RECEIVED J U L 1 1 2000 COUNTY Of 3UTTE LAND DEVELQPMENT DIV, 2525 Dominic Drive, Suite J Chico, California 95928 (530)891-2882 (530) 891-2878 Fax aAZ'. � 0 August 9, 2000 Stephen Betts, Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: MUP-01-01 Dear Mr. Betts: Lawrence D. Odle Air Pollution Control Officer W. Janes Wagoner Asst. Air Pollution ::ontrol Officer RECEIVED AUG 14 2000 BUTTE COUNTY P%ANXTTXT(: T)TVISION The District has reviewed the request for comments for a minor use permit to permit a 150 foot monopole and equipment cabinets for wireless communications located on 5646 Lincoln Boulevard, in Oroville. Based on the information submitted the District recommends incorporating measures to control fugitive dust emission from all road and other construction activities during project improvements. Measures may include site and driveway watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed project. If you have any questions, please contact the District at 891-2882. 1 Sincerely, Gail Williams Air Quality Planner File No 3451.1 f \apps\wpdocs\ev\bcmupO l O l.doc 1AFCo BUTTE COUNTY dg U L 2 7 Zoon DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION Oroville, California TO: LAFCo FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application:, UBIQUITEL Leasing Company, MUP 01-01 DATE: July 25, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or'mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated. below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to colocate'up to nine panel antennas on an exsting 150 Foot tall mono and up to seven egltinment cabinets. On property zoned P -Q (Public -Quasi Public) located on the north west corer of Lincoln Boulevard and Monte Vista, at the Oroville Memorial Cemetarv, at 5646 Lincoln Boulevard Oroville CA 95965 identified as APN 036-160-046, Supervisorial District No.Al THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X _ PLANNING MANAGER ON October 25, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN August 9 , 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): lVo LA rco 6 By: Date: / — �--7-66 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY P1,A ``°"vr_ (DIVISION BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION RECEIVED AUG 0 2 2001 P ANNTNG DIIV StON TO: California Department of Forestry FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: , UBIQUITEL Leasing Company, MUP 01-01 DATE: July 25, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to ' 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to colocate up to nine panel antennas on an exsting 150 Foot tall mono oDl and rap to seven equipment cabinets. On property zoned P -Q (Public -Quasi Public) located on the north west corner of Lincoln Boulevard and Monte Vista, at the Oroville Memorial Cemetary, at 5646 Lincoln Boulevard, Oroville CA 95965 identified as APN 036-160-046. Supervisorial District No.Al THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X _ PLANNING MANAGER ON October 25, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN August 9 , 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): , By: Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 i i BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPME PLANNING DIV]ffi- TO: Environmental Health FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Appli, DATE: July 11, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: A s'� '�1`d` ..1'y i s 4 - c n n h x { The Planning Division has received a project application for the pry COIR 10�`� r Q sheet is to: = .s I. Determine if the information contained in the applicatton O ` ,raurl ly project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to pre�C�?�, environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measL' If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of204 date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted wrthm ;--�, M-17- 77?ySr ''�'' needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your tµ This is an application for a Minor Use Pernit to colocate 0 to nine panel antennas on an exsting 150 Foot tall monop and un to seven equipment cabinets, on property zoned P-Q(Public -Quasi Public) located on the northwest corner " of Lincoln Boulevard and Monte Vista,atthe Oroville Memorial Cemetary, at 5646 Lincoln Boulevard, Oroville CA 95965 identified as APN 036-160-046. Supervisorial District No. - 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE _X _ PLANNING MANAGER ON September 13, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN July 26 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach, additional pagesLif necessary): Date: GG 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-77 EdJEIE JUL 2 5 2a30 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION ` w RECEIVED JUL 2 7 2000 BUTTE COUNTY BUTTE COU1VrY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNINGBUTTECOUN IOIV PLANNING DIVISION TO: Building Manager FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: , UBIQUITEL Leasing Company, MUP 01-01 DATE: July 25, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Minor Use Permit to colocate up to nine panel antennas on an exsting 150 Foot tall mono op& and up to seven eq jnment cab'ne s. On property zoned P -Q -(Public -Quasi Public) located on the north west corner of Lincoln Boulevard and Monte Vista, at the Oroville Memorial Cemetarv. at 5646 Lincoln Boulevard, Oroville CA 95965 identified as APN 036-160-046, Supervisorial District No.Al THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X _ PLANNING MANAGER ON October 25, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN August 9 , 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): u/Rft AM, AN E> Alk p-WcATIyAl AiVP gq uF&,w77m Calwe P"laxi CA-CWtA716AIJ R-6iVulk&b 7T ile" "giVqW o r EYI ViN0* AM 4FAI M AQ;W#6 s 60/7-4 ADD/ 7/O u 01= Co- !P(, � ACUTE, WA By: ACV Date: % Z % (/ 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 r 0 July 19, 2000 Steve Betts Senior Planner Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Betts, :7 Program Management LCC International, Inc. 140 Independence Circle Suite A Chico, CA 95973 530-897-5005 (phone) 530-897-5007 (fax) Enclosed you will find a Butte County Uniform Application form for the Cemetery site we submitted to you. I have made corrections on the form pertaining to the owner's name, phone number and address. I have sent to you, in another letter, the agent authorization form for this site. If you have any questions regarding this application or any of our other applications please feel free to contact me at the above phone number. Thank you, jyvm,q�,j goo, , Messeret Yilma L11KA - ED- JUL 2 4 2000 PLANNING DI1V BION DEPA.RTM TT OF DEVELOPLM �T SERV ICES BUTTOUNTY UNIFORj APACAON PLICA-NT: Aeent information CO De Drovide I is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME ( U applicant is different fcoer owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL '\;U,\IBER: ugTOCITTEa'-��INC, COMPANY Oe2�6 I bo ~ ADDRESS: CIT'', STATE & ZCP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (=0R OFFI--E (;S7) t`'.\�lE Oc PROPOSED PROJECT ( LF any ) C ESL—TC--2 \J 1 d A LOCATIO-N OF PROI ECT (,Major ero;s street; —and .11d e;5, li any ) G�t�\LTIO:\ REO(IED i Ei EPHONE ( 530) 897 - 5005 0%V-NER'S N.\,%lE TELEPHONE . i3- LL P- v ogi sT?-Tc 153p)s33-a zo ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & "Z_(l` COD;: DROvILLE Y CA q CU5 ZONE GENER=AL PLmN EXISTING L\ND USE S(- SIZE ( i:; Sciva:c Fcec P� C�-r —2y I �/ �rX It ,/, , E.`i(Sll.,;G STa C i ULS ( is Sciva e Fcer) PROPOSED SYRUC-CU2ES ( in Sy -._a Fe--,.) Ft3l�PMEnrs 5HL-�-�2 ISO' MOVWDPOLIE -OU-)EK (Choc' Onz:) ❑ PROPER"['Y IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SE%' EKED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑ PROPEP.TY lS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY (S OR PRO?OSED TO DE 0:`'TELL y•'ATc.R . .. ....:;.:•...,, 4 . �YiLIC_-\IIOT F i=t)IFF=: TFn ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMEND-MENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBD(V(SION ❑ REZONE ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL IAP ❑ USE PEP, -IIT O Vi'AIVER OF PARCEL �,L\P vt`,11- OR USE PERtt-I(T ❑ BOUND.MZY LI E MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE ❑ LEGAL LOT DETER:NII•NATION ❑ i\.([.NOR VAR[. -NCE ❑ CFRT(F(CATEO; :MERGER. ❑ AD`•1lNISTR\TIVE PERMIT ❑ 1-11- TNG AND RECLAMATION' PLAN ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEt`9ENT a OTHER rKV1Cl- 1 1)cJC.h1Y1 IU:` FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Aaacn r.eee;;a / ;h.c�. size of Parcels.) G -T -XT`C- L 6C-T,cr-lm [f this npplicatiun i; ter a land di:i;ion , describe the n:mber arm f S--rK PCS aNfEwNels rtyv o ` `f'EC:ECp (n u W I c 'T L2 l * O K) TR E Ro VI t, i -c � Q,zS,oac-r M.Q RO vT'u F? . tVFER CERTLFICATION 1 CERTIFY T'r(.\T I .\N1 PRESE'NTLY 111E LEG:\L O`•v`zR 0? ITIS AU'l?(ORI�ED �GE�I'0= Ttl OWNER O -THE ROVE DESCRBED P FCRTH–ER. t ACKNOWLEDGE T'r(E FILING OF -MUS APPLICATIt) ,AND CERTIFY Ti AI' AL.(. 0"THE )` E IS"0RMAT10.N IS TRC :\CCPR -\T i. (It L> >�cnt ii W th iuth,:cizcd• ac_cuce is a,'a—i-,it of au lorization and inaudc L`u atli :lvit With otii; DATE: �vr1 0�-� t 20 0 S[G-NATURE: 1175 West Moana Lane, Suite 201, Reno, NV 89509 Phone: (775) 829-4500 Fax: (775) 829-4555 0140 Independence Circle, Suite A, Chico, CA 95973 Phone: (530) 897-5005 Fax: (530) 897-5007 Q7925 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA 22102 Phone: (800) 439-2529 Fax: (703) 873-2600 TO Stephen Betts Department Of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 WE ARE SENDING YOU .Attached ]Shop Drawings QCopy of Letter Prints • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE 7/17/00 JOB NO. 650173 Attention Stephen Betts RE: Agent Authorization -As requested QReturned for corrections QUnder separate cover via _ Plans QSamples QChange Order n the following iterr.s: 0 Specifications COPIES 1 DATE 7/17/00 NO. 318A DESCRIPTION Site Agent Authorization Form -As requested QReturned for corrections THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For Approval Approved as submitted a For your use QApproved as noted -As requested QReturned for corrections QResubmit copies for approval QSubmit copies for distribution Q Return corrected prints For review and comment n QFor BIDS DUE 20 QPRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO: RECEIVED Sincerely, JUL j 9 2000 Messeret Yilma ANNING PLDIVISION n LCC Program Management LCC International, Inc. 140 Independence Circle Suite A Chico, CA 95973 530-897-5005 (phone) 5307897-5007 (fax) July 17, 2000 Stephen Betts Senior Planner Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Beets, Enclosed you will find a singed agent authorization form for Cemetery (318A). Additionally, enclosed you will find a signed consent letter from the Oroville Cemetery District. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (530) 897-5005. Thank you, Messeret Yilma Zoning Manager M 06/2(3/231,9 10:01 5309975007 • LCC CHICO • AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; Print Name of Al -int and Ption• Number t �D'tjyj I f- (.\,-�1 ailing Add eccs PAGE 04 13 is hereby authorized to process t.,;, at,pucAtion For I .i_� on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number n'fa — 160-C 46 This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processinla, but not including document(s) rel'ting to record titic interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and1pri nt name) L� Z, L� n►: S ig nature Architect and/or Engineer: t��lnt (�J�ttt: J11-7 Si=oxur. TC. C_ -1 T C - LN CC-g7,k - si3- ��+a-CAS 3p Print Same of ArchuecdEnjiUer 4 O Phone Number fl o o M..,r,.,j Adde.e, f.1 iy (2(),T lJ Sfu- - loo Ct (—(--5 1- 7 & l': 10_0 H 4cQ6 l FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Duet: Received: Total Amount Received: AP Number(s) Owners Authocizatiurl Legal Description �.•.,,_,_ ___�___� Zoning Requirements Project Description _� Copies of plot plan Taken by Receipt No. E.H. LD Plan PD Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Mposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon renal action. so, �� M; nor 0!- Pt,4,:4 Current fee for this application is S s of f e Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". P NA -i6--66 lut 04;ou rt'l Ok�OV1LLE CEMETERY DISTRICT 5646 T.TNCOLN BLVD. oaovYLLS, CA. 95966 Oroville Cemetery District 5646 Lincoln Blvd. Orville, CA 95965 • r nA flu, MZRICAN TOWER CC R V On AT I n N April 13, 2000 0 Rc: Tower Site Access Operated by AirTouch Communications, Inc. or AirTouch Affiliates ("Premises"). Dcar Property Owner: r, ut As described in previous correspondence to you, American Tower Corporation ("ATC") proposes to sublease that portion of the Premises consisting of the tower and compound areas that are not currently being used by AirTouch or the AirTouch Affiliate (`'Tenant') 'this sublease arrangement will not change or amend any terms, covenants, conditions or provisions of the Agreement, and the Tenant will continue to remain liable to you under the Agreement. ATC wants to confirm your approval of this transaction. The Premises will continue to be used for telecommunication purposes by ATC and will, in turn, be subleased by ATC to its customers. In connection with your consent to the sublease, ATC is willing to pay you twenty percent (201A) increase in the current ground rent ("Ground Rent Increase"). The Ground Rent lnerease would .take effect daring the next full calendar month following the date that ATC begins to Sublease the Premises from Tenant. This is ATC's final Ground Rent Increase offer .to you. In the event that you do not consent to the proposed Sublease, the premises will remain with the CLurcni Tenant and you will not receive a Ground Rent Increase, American Tower looks forward to a productive working relationship with you in the coming years. Your sil natftre below indicates Your consent to the sublease to American Tower and your acceptance of the Ground Rent Increase. Please sign below as signaturc(s) appear on original ground lease_ Thank you for your attention to this matter. ICyou have any questions, please feel free to call nte. Sine v Gary Wayne Project Mann r LANDLORD FIEREBY CONSENTS TO THE FOREGOING TH US -6- DAY OF _ _� 2000 Name (Please Print); —f1�LS Lc%01G Title (if Landlord is not an individual); , .-> r-3 -S 7- L ./ :�/AJf�.'Ll/ lv�J Name (Plo se Print): Title (if Landlord is not individual): (:V117a0/cam G 1300 Rcyiuolds Ave. Suite 110 4% inc, CA 92614 • Telcphanc (949) 955-5300 Fay (949) 955-3301 PV11 1051 01175 West Moana Lane, Suite 201, Reno, NV 89509 Phone: (775) 829-4500 Fax: (775) 829-4555 .140 Independence Circle, Suite A; Chico, CA 95973 Phone: (530) 897-5005 Fax: (530) 897-5007 07925 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA 22102 Phone: (800) 439-2529 Fax: (703) 873-2600 TO SCE—VE (be1�7_( S 3 u -(� Cb u NTS t .A-rU N -W � WE ARE SENDING YOU Shop Drawings F—] Copy of Letter OAttached O Prints r. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE �' �(J� JOB NO. ATTENTION RE: rn0 R LASE C—K ►"� rruTrt 0 2 r►7 0 Under separate cover via the following items: 0 Plans Samples Specifications F] Change Order Q COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION D 3 L8 A W 3 ( EfLr,)rJ �- ab 3 ( I t c� '' L.(-�- ,5 S L E'TG rrf 1P 6k r e-cI D w 0 E -Z rruTrt 0 2 r►7 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: F__] For Approval DApproved as submitted OResub mit copies for approval OFor your use DApproved as noted OSubmit copies for distributicn .As requested Returned for corrections OReturn corrected prints 0 For review and comment F --]For BIDS DUE 20 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO:�ET E�D Sincerely, JUL.0*7 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DTVTSTON LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: ►Ill' 1 1 •'• 036-160-046 APPLICANT: UBIQLJITEL Leasing Company, 140 Independence Circle, Suite A., Chico, CA 95973 �illiillllllllllllililililililililililI 11 liq ��� III, IMM! MIA 161111-11, Ili • To colocate UP to nine 12anelantennas on .n existing 150 Foot tall monopole and .• to • menment cabinets. SIZE: 40'X 50' Feet LOCATION: On the northwest comer of Lincoln Boulevard and Monte Vista, at the Oroville Memorial a ,• on 5646 Lincoln Boulevard,• • SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT #LEXISTING ZONING: P -Q (Public -Quasi Public) ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Public APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Date Rec'd July 07-2000 COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST APPLICATION: UBIQUITEL MUP 01-01 DATE: July 11, 2000 County Offices and Cities: _ Chief Administrative Officer X. Environmental Health Sheriff LAFCo Biggs Orovil le Irrigation District: Butte Water OWID Table Mountain Irrigation Domestic Water _ Butte Water District OWID Sewer _ Butte Water District _ Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) Fire Protection _XV California Department of Forestry Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Paradise Recreation & Park Utilities Biggs/W. Gridley Water Paradise Irrigation Thermalito Irrigation Chambers Cable TV _ X�'/ Develop. Services Director _X Assessor _ BCAG Air Quality Mgmt. Gridley Dept. of Water Resources _ Paradise _ _X4,,***' Animal Control _ Butte Water District _ Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) Fire Protection _XV California Department of Forestry Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Paradise Recreation & Park Utilities Biggs/W. Gridley Water Paradise Irrigation Thermalito Irrigation California Water Service Co. _ Thermalito Irrigation District Themalito Irrigation _ L.O.A. PUD El Medio Fire Protection District Durham Area Recreation _ Richvale Recreation & Parks Del Oro Water Co. Other Sterling City Sewer Main Feather River Rec. & Park _ PG&E North - Chico ' _ Chambers Cable TV _ X� Public Works Director Building Manager _ ALUC State Agencies Butte Co. Farm Bureau Chico Dept. of Water Resources _ Chico Airport Commission _ _X4,,***' Agricultural Commission Highway Patrol Durham Irrigation _ . Caltrans, Aeronautics Program Richvale Irrigation Department of Conservation _ Other California Water Service Co. _ Thermalito Irrigation District Themalito Irrigation _ L.O.A. PUD El Medio Fire Protection District Durham Area Recreation _ Richvale Recreation & Parks Del Oro Water Co. Other Sterling City Sewer Main Feather River Rec. & Park _ PG&E North - Chico ' _ Chambers Cable TV _ Pacific Bell PG&E South - Oroville Viacom Cable TV State Agencies CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept. of Water Resources _ Dept. of Fish and Game Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) Dept of Parks and Rec. _ Highway Patrol _ Central Reg. Water Quality Cont _ . Caltrans, Aeronautics Program Department of Conservation _ Off. of Mining Reclamation _ Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations _ Dept.Social Services, Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies _ US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management _ US Fish & Wildlife Service Army Corps of Engineers Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association _ Mosq. Abatement. OrovilleButte Co Drainage _ Butte Env.l Council _ Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society _ Butte Co. Mining Committee _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy School Distri USE PERMIT and MINOR USE PERMIT COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their application packet for a communications facility. Please include this checklist along with your submittal. Applicant Planner 1. A completed, signed, Uniform Application and Environmental Information form. If the application is signed by an agent for the property owner, an agent authorization form must be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 2. Lid Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (any unused portic•n of the deposit will be returned upon final action, if any remains.) (Planner advises applicant) ;. U Thi -five 35 copies of plans which shall include a detailed site plan drawn to scale. All rty ( ) P P plans shall be drawn on uniform size sheets norg eater than 24" x 36". The finished plans shall be folded to 8'/z" x 11 ". The detailed site plan must include: a. Name and address of Applicant, Engineer and/or person who prepared the plan b. Property lines and lot dimensions. C. Assessor Parcel Number(s) and the street address. d. L� .2 Proposed use and/or uses of the property. 0 e. ❑ ❑ - Proposed landscaping plan, if applicable. f. Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the property (including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, parking areas, wells, septic tanks and leach fields). IF rNSUFFICIENT [NFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED rNCONIPLETE I g. 1i EZ Distances from any significant natural and constructed features of the property, such as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains, bodies of water, railroads; to the property lines. h. ❑ ❑ Location of all slope banks, ponds, creeks, buttes, sloughs, rock outcroppings, natural drainage courses, irrigation canals and existing vegetation worthy of consideration for preservation, such as oak trees. VIA i. ❑ ❑ Any existing faults or fractures and geologic hazards. j. North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an engineering scale with the preferred scale of 1" = 20', with a north arrow preferably oriented to the top . of sheet. k. Ei Ea' Building setbacks from the ultimate road right-of-way (front, rear, sides). 1. Proposed and existing on-site driveways and/or roads. P g M. Location, height, and materials of walls and fences (sections may be required). n. All driveways, drawn to scale, on adjacent and across the street properties within 100 feet of the subject site. o. Existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks and existing paving widths on-site or within 100 feet of the site, on adjacent and across the street properties. P Nearest cross streets on both sides with plus or minus distances from subject site. q. Q� Approximate location of all buildings within 1,000 feet, on adjacent properties. 0A r. ❑ ❑ Existing and nearest fire hydrants. s. 1 Access, both pedestrian and vehicular, showing service areas and points of ingress and egress. t. Q� Elevation contours, at a minimum per USGS maps. IF INSUFFICIENT INFOR�iMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOtvIPLETE. 2 �1 4. ❑ ❑ Conceptual Grading Plan Items to be shown include: VIN a. ❑ ❑ Natural areas to be preserved. IN b. ❑ ❑ Proposed cut and fill areas in contrasting colors of zipatone pattern. 1*' c. ❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contours within 100 feet of project boundaries. VIA d. ❑ ❑ Proposed drainage and flood control facilities. VlP e. ❑ ❑ Erosion control measures (e.g. - slope landscaping). PIA f. ❑ ❑ Natural drainage. g. ❑ Elevations and finished contours. h. 61J ❑ Location of retaining walls, drainage channels and existing structures.. i. ❑ Location, elevation and size of proposed building pads. j. ❑ All plans must be clear and legible. 5. One copy of 8 '/z" x 11" transparency reduction of the detailed site plan. 6. A vicinity map showing closest major cross streets, zoning and existing land use. The followine additional items are required per Butte County Code Section 24-262.E. 7. Z 12r Statement of Justification: a. Includes a description of the proposed Facility, including the type of facility being .requested. IF INSUFFICIENT FNFORNIATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE - 3, 8. 9 10 12 13 14 15 • b. 1� a Height from natural grade to the top of proposed Facility. C. L� Ef Support equipment proposed. I and wattage output data including the number of channels. e. Horizontal and vertical location coordinates. NJProposed elevations of the structure and any accessory buildings, including building height and other physical dimensions, drawn to graphic scale. Visual impact assessment, photo montages, mock-ups as determined by the Director of Development Services or Planning Commission. The assessment shall identify any proposed trimming of vegetation that will be required for the normal operation o the Facility. Stealth technology is encouraged. N % ElMock-upsrequiredA (may be required at any time during the processing of the permit:. A discussion of and supporting information regarding the alternative site selection of al least a minimum of three to four other sites, if available, including colocation opportunities, and a statement as to why these alternative sites and/or colocation opportunities were rejected: t as A complete service area map showing the entire wireless communications network of the provider's twenty (20) miles -in all directions from the proposed site for the time perioc from the filing of the application to twelve (12) months from the filing of the application, for the purpose of visually aiding cumulative environmental analysis, with and witho-i the proposed Facility or Facilities, showing all hand-off sites within the above specified area. LtCI A graphic depiction of the search ring and all other technic al'criteria used in .determining the proposed Facility location. LSU Documentation which identifies failure characteristics of the Facility structure or tower and demonstrates that the site and setbacks are of adequate size to contain falling debris. Written evidence demonstrating that the selected Facility structure or tower design is as visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical and engineering considerations which indicate what type of Facility is required to provide reasonably effective service and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. IF INt SUFFICIENT rNFORNIATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEENIED rNCONIPLETE. 4 16 17. 18 M 20 The use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness is mandatory. 4LJ Applicants which operate common carrier facilities (specifically, but not limited to celll-lar, PCS, SMR and paging service licensees of the FCC) shall provide written evidence that the applicant has provided notice to all FCC licensed wireless communication service carriers operating within the County of Butte of the plans to develop the site. Ed ET Evidence of a valid, current operating license or construction permit from the FCC or, i= the applicant is not a wireless communications service provider, a user operating agreement for each and every such provider to which the applicant intends to rent space on the proposed Facility. A report, kLlsigned by a qualified radio frequency engineer licensed by the FCC, prepared pursuant to FCC OET 65, stating whether the maximum radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic radiation (RF/EMF) to be emitted by the proposed Facility, tZking into account all other Facilities, both existing and known future Facilities, at the proposed site and adjacent properties, conforms to safety standards adopted by the FCC, if applicable. The reports prepared for Facilities shall conform to the reporting requirements set by the County and FCC OET 65 human exposure standards. The report shall also analyze the evidence provided in support of the proposed Facility location, height and radiated power, frequency, the number of channels, and all other related data and present alternatives for the location, height and radiated power, pursuant to the requirements of this section. _f the proposed Facility exceeds FCC OET 65 human exposure standards, applicant.shal. also provide additional comprehensive technical and planning information regarding how the. applicant shall protect all persons from such excessive exposure consistent with all Federal and State requirements, and any additional County requirements. ❑ Landscaping and painting plans for the completed project. ❑ ❑ Projects in. Agricultural Zones (A-5 through A-160) shall, prior to submitting an application Wk for a proposed Facility, submit a site plan of the proposed Facility to the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner for comment and send a notification letter to all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County informing them of the proposed site location and tower height. No hearing on an application for a proposed facility in any agricultural zone will be scheduled, nor shall any Administrative Permit for any such Facility be issued without proof that the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner and al' aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County have been notified, as specified herein. IF ENSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED IivCOiiNIPLETE. 21. ❑ ❑ All applications for Facilities that are proposed to be located within the boundaries of any Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan or Airport Area of Influence, as adoptee or designated from time to time by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission, shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division, and a copy submitted to the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission for review regarding consistency with adopted Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plans and for recommendations addressing potential impacts to air navigation within the Airport Area of Influence. The County may in its sole discretion retain an independent consultant to review either individual elements of or the entire application and advise the County at the applicant's sole expense. Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the a::)ove submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. • •• Signature: Planner Receiving Application K FOR,%1S'SUB.IITAL'.CHECKLIS CELLUP w'PD ' Date Date: `T(co/,Do IF INSUFFICIENT INFORM-ATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLE-7E. 6 b � .�Ia, m n>4 roca.I a» "mp1 (1SA 8LE TRAY SUPPORT ON PAD SATE PLAN .mnla �o,a CABLE TRAY SUPPORT ON GRAVEL @EQUIPMENT PAD PLAN o-q&A, 1. i LCC la: N1f4M�li0ul. C Ai! All an.x1>, MK ' Y6[MI. v� IIIW Ublquffel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCIL S1RTE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE Y6a0CUQN COeagm N THIS SET OF DOCA( S S PROPREDR7 BT kAJUE. IN7 USE OR 06IIOSUE OM ILw THAT Taal Kwa TO Uawm S STHCg7 PRDIOm CEUETARY SF03UB318A aIu Vm1 aIn 11M1L a PTD[ET AD 26B3.Y319 DIMVN BY, CL' CED2D BY, SE SITE PLAN, CLEVATIM C DETAILS Z-2 • .. JI O T 19R R.4E.= M.D.B. & M ��� 35 .2 36-16. 1 (C 21 - /9 20 r r OA D LE HEI S I U1�lIT6 /8 I R I ITA I WY .0 29 I L:INTON AVE J� I i HILL 0 DALE Q I �_ I ' UNIT / Y I / AR D pVE Q 'i I L PLiUMAS I WY a ROSEDALE I LAS PLU S PARK UNITS 182 I I AVE LAS LAS PLUM S - r � I I 25.71 AC. �' ! J \ I r j }'�,; 4..97Ar- I O i a 2 I 3 I 4 T. S.I I PB.E. 886-4-4F-/ I I I , / I I i i b I I , w ,• I I I 20 :1C. `I AK GH IGNTS i a 2 \ U it 3 I 1 i I I I IJ �� � I I 1 1 ---- ----- I PT SBE. 886- -4F- ! �� 3 S� I 1 I t �..' AC. RIse t. [ X33 / 16 I I /AB I I _ 1-,1 37 s 1 y , P , , 6 SBEbIl6- 4- 4 0 FTN 2 4 35 j' I �A49.rsc. ; //.i4A� I _I 1 36 I r I i 1 SEE ! 2 I 1 ! 24 PG 48 r ORGY/LLE CE�I/EFERr ! 2.3 AC ® AVE. V M O N T E V 1ST A I i 2 329.89 - 4s N /32Cr 1 v/� 44-14.1 3 _ - 4Q Z 2 i 3 I 4 / 42 C, 42 i s a _ (n�C,,A PM 7r-4 3AC. 5f 1. 6 v s a —41 0 O© T 4 4o I PT. SBE 872-4-40-24 I I 13.478AC 4.28tAC. 1io.01AC 739Ac --39 W V I i N t - ' °/ b 1'41 i I �� NN 1 3a V @ �' 1 _ �• N _ J ! 2.B4A� —� W !T.VE I - 0 Y1 L L A, e 7 I / 15 7 I 6� I s 6 / SBE 8 -4 -4 -K -I O 648Ac I i .1 n r p36�I60-O`1-4 i✓ Iu I / 13.47 A.C. / RSIOI-72 I II 329.89 NOTE: These pRrcefa are /or ae.esa�+� pfxPo°"° — 2d assessor's Map No. 36-16 0* ,,d,,,-y,roc MWWO $99WPwwiL County of_Butte, Calif.. NOTE—ASSESSOR'S PARCEL BLOCK VILLA VEFO//!. A1.0.R. Wo// A:op G; IGENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PIANS, EMSTING CONDITIONS, AND DIMEN90NS OF THE JOB SITE PRIOR TO STARTING WORK IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAYE. 2. FIGURED DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR SWILL BE SOLELY RESPOF&.LE FOR WORK PROCEEDING IN A SAFE AND ORDERLY MANNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND REOUIREMENTS OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. CONTRACTOR AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES MUST IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY UNSAFE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF WORK 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL {AWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY, MUNICIPAL AND UTIUTY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THE WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AND THE MATERIALS INSTALLED SHUT BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. 5. THE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS, EOUIPMENT, LABOR AND ALL OTHER MATERIALS AND LABOR DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK/PROJECT AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. RECEIVED JUL .0 7.2000 r BUTTE COUNTY 1 PLANNING DIVISION Ubiq lTel APPROVED � SEP 2 8 eZ0001e1'1l f'Idil DATE CEMETARYUSE PERMIT VARIANCE 5646 LINCOLN BLVD. MINOR U.P. ✓_ ADM.PERMIT OROVILLE9 CA PLANNING COMMISS. DIRECTOR OF SF03UB318ADEVELOPMENT SERVICES CO -LOCATION OF ANTENNAS 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EOUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S / VENDOR'S SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIOUES, SEOUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, PAVING, CURBING, ETC. DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SWILL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE GENERAL WORK AREA CLEAN AND HAZARD FREE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND REMOVE EOUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY. PREMISES SHALL BE LEFT IN CYAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. 10. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED FOR 24'x36- (SIZE D). DO NOT SCALE OTHER SIZED VERSIONS OF THESE DRAWINGS. (GENERAL LEGEND SECTION NUMBER x x -x SHEET NUMBER DRAWING SECTION SECTION NUMBER x x -x SHEET NUMBER DETAIL SECTION NUMR x x -x \ SHEET�NUMBERo' J\ DETAIL ENLARGEMENT NTS = NOT TO- SCALE SHEET INDEX SHT. REV. NO. SHEET TITLE NO. T-1 TITLE SHEET I Z-1 PLOT PLAN I Z-2 SITE PLAN, ELEVATION 6 DETAILS 0 PROJECT SUMMARY SITE NUMBER SF03UB318A PROPERTY OWNER ORVILLE CEMETARY DISTRICT SITE DATA: SITE NAME: CEMETARY LATITUDE: 3528'41.8' LONGITUDE: 121'32'59.0', SITE ADDRESS: 5646 LINCOLN BLVD. OROVILLE, CA APPLICANT: Ubiquffel ELEVATION: 309.3' 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE, SUITE A USGS YAP: N/A CHICO. CA 95973 DEED BOOK/PAGE: N/A PARCEL NUMBER: 036-160-46 CONTACT PERSON: STEVE RUPPENTWAL (530) 897-5005 REFERENCE YAP: ASSESSOR'S MAP LOT NUMBER N/A PACE 36 CURRENT ZONING: PO = PUBLIC OUASI PUBLIC JURISDICTION: BUTTE COUNTY GRID: 16 PROJECT DESRIPTION INSTALLATION OF THE UBIOUITEL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY CONSISTING OF SEVEN EOUIPMENT CABINETS (3 INITIAL k 4 FUTURE). ANTENNAS CONSIST OF (3) SECTORS WITH (2) INITIAL k (1) FUTURE. PANEL ANTENNAS AT EACH SECTOR ARE LOCATED AT AN ANTENNA CENTER OF 130 ON THE EXISTING MONOPOLE. VICINITY MAP 70 162 NORTH MONTE VISTA SITE m 3 U OPHIR RD. NTS DRIVING .DIRECTIONS FROM 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE TAKE HWY 99 SOUTH TO HWY 162 EAST TO HWY 70 SOUTH. FOLLOW HWY 70 SOUTH TO OPHIR RD, TURN LEFT. GO TO LINCOLN BLVD. TURN LEFT k GO TO CEMETARY. SITE IS ON CEMETARY GROUNDS. APPROVALS LANDLORD LEASING R.F. ZONING CONSTRUCTION ALE TECTONIC ENG/NEEMJVG CONSULTANTS P.C. 9100• Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 Welt Chester, OH 45069 Phone: (511) 942-9530 Fox: (513) 42-9531 t�o LCC LCC WTiRHAnONAL, INC 7925 JO1ff5 BRANCH OMVE Y�IEAN, VA 22102 UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO UBIOUREL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. rlaw CEMETARY SF03UB318A 5W (IRM BLVD. ORN" G PROJECT NO: 2683.SF318A DRAVN BY: CLS CHECKED BY: SCJ SUBMITTALS 1 1 /A I OL N/ ,I uraren 9w em ' 1' F.( Z r�r, No. 33226 j C_1c�a. /3c/G Tem / \SIC \1 e F GIF A��� TITLE SHEET 91EE' "" T-1 I W A NOTES THE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE AT THE CENTER OF THE MONOPOLE WAS DETERMINED BY CPS OBSERVATIONS. LAT. 39'28'41.8 N. NAD 83 LONG. 121.32'59.0' W. NAD 83 ELEV. 309.3 NAVD 88 (BASIS OF DRAWING) LAT. 3728'42.2' N. NAD 27 LONG, 121'32'55.1' W. NAD 27 - ELEV. 307.1 NGVO 29 The information shown above meets of exceeds the requirements sal forth in FAA order 8260.19c far 1-A . accuracy ( t 15' horixontaly and t 3' vertically). The horizontal datum (coordinates) are "pressed as degrees. minutes and seconds, to the nearest tenth of a second. The vertical datum (heights) aro expressed in feet and decimals thereof and am determined to the nearest 0.1 foot. GROUND ELEV. - 309.3 AM.S.L. (NAVO 88) TOP OF STRUCTURE ELEV. - 461.0 A.M.S.L. (NAVD 88) STRUCTURE HEIGHT - 151.7' VICINITY MAP Lan eiaE (Trow) .. TRArRDIOFDt \ w NOTE: ALL INFOWMI10e TAxEII FROM SLOKY R AQWWCED oCgW CDMM&t m GATED 05/14/at< LEGEND n TECTONIC ENGINEERING I . CONSULTANTS P.G 9100 Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 West Chester, OH 45069 Phone: (513) 942-9530 Fax: (513) 42-9531 t�o LCC LCC INTERNATIONAL. INC YmYEA'� 2�1-C, ORryE UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO, CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAPIED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT W141CH RELATES TO U80AEL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. HOQT CEMETARY SF03UB318A 5N6 Lox" BLVD. DRDWA CA PROJECT PC 2683SF3194 DRAVN BY: as CHECKED BY: SCJ SUBMITTALS M n Nv U. 33 25 ` r C A l.` Day TILL PLOT PLAN 9QT 14F LER Z-1 � snAl40TTE AME e2 CRCWMLLt 51 RD ve GEST Is= y� S ONt K%CU. 1W . MOVIE VWA AVE SITE VICINITY MAP Lan eiaE (Trow) .. TRArRDIOFDt \ w NOTE: ALL INFOWMI10e TAxEII FROM SLOKY R AQWWCED oCgW CDMM&t m GATED 05/14/at< LEGEND n TECTONIC ENGINEERING I . CONSULTANTS P.G 9100 Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 West Chester, OH 45069 Phone: (513) 942-9530 Fax: (513) 42-9531 t�o LCC LCC INTERNATIONAL. INC YmYEA'� 2�1-C, ORryE UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO, CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAPIED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT W141CH RELATES TO U80AEL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. HOQT CEMETARY SF03UB318A 5N6 Lox" BLVD. DRDWA CA PROJECT PC 2683SF3194 DRAVN BY: as CHECKED BY: SCJ SUBMITTALS M n Nv U. 33 25 ` r C A l.` Day TILL PLOT PLAN 9QT 14F LER Z-1 SD[ RAM BASED ON SAYEr Bf ADIAICm DES. EDMS LTANIS DYED 04/14/00 OrOeff/D POeER/R1L0 T. COAXU SNAP -N D COCRErE S TRWgWORMER jog r \ \ . SITE PLAN .MEa.E MlCROn R MIECIADE 8150 13R= Dr aim COAs CABLE W/ SST FxVAN zEo CUP ANGLE CUP ANCUE SNAP -IN CABLE ,L11D01 1' SQUARE SLEEPER ).Vn s e n n n n n /_PWC SLEEPER CABLE TRAY SUPPORT ON PAD _-= SCALE: Mrs (2) CABLE TRAY SUPPORT ON GRAVEL _-= SCALE. MIS EQUIPMENT PAD PLAN _-= SCALE. NTS WEED BARRIER T7PAR LANDSCAPE 3/4• CRUSMM 57ONE �FABRC OR COUAL ASTM C -M SSE N0. 57 COMACrED SUBOADE — (2)GRAVEL SURFACING DETAIL _-= SCALE: fm Nm NnMO rNAs sloeM PAAYITE Lr,1s TERMei ar. TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS P.C. 9100 Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 West Chester, OH 45069 Phone: (513 942-9530 Fo:: (51}) 42-9531 t�o LCC ICC DtTERNATIONAL, INC 7925 JONES BRANCH DRIVE YdEAN, VA 22102 UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. MY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO UBKIUITEL IS SWTLY PROHIBITED. PROW CEMEI•ARY SF03UB318A 5616 L COIN B.VD. OROMIL CA PROJECT NO: 2683SF318A DRAVN BY: CLS CHECKED BY: SCJ SUBMITTALS A wo.a/ h----1�;I 33 2S 1 1, I / n T�OF CYLj SHST TIME SITE PLAN, ELEVATION 6 DETAILS 9EET ,1E11ER Z-2 Joe 303 I'D- ` / \ rVNK \ \ \ SAM" \ ♦ ♦ \ �\ CABPI[T PROPOSED \ ` ` \ Paw CABUETFUIURE` MEKISTMOMOP,DLWE : )\\ , •\\ NIS 6 `�tr EARO Rrt' \\ \\ \\\ PROPOSED a AM1EMNt4 , \ \ vAOaOSE17'P6eEP Z-2 \\\ \\ tt<�, CPS TO E MQUNTED \ \ / \ 0 \ �• TO PPC. \ \ \ \ \ ` / \ PROPOSED WWAC C \ AREAS ONLY \ J7 \ \ \PROPOSED 7�\ ♦ 3 ♦ \\ 1 \ UNDERGROUND \ \ \ \ \ z-2 Z -I I �• CLECIRC e TnEPr,ONE \ \\; ` SEF OVALS \� •MK D `VP0.�r �,b) CARET �. \ \\ \\ \ EDUW4Ni rAO \ \ . A.� �\;e, : 1EAY AREA PRO Umny ^ EASCIACW \ ♦ � M � ♦ \ J D . SITE PLAN .MEa.E MlCROn R MIECIADE 8150 13R= Dr aim COAs CABLE W/ SST FxVAN zEo CUP ANGLE CUP ANCUE SNAP -IN CABLE ,L11D01 1' SQUARE SLEEPER ).Vn s e n n n n n /_PWC SLEEPER CABLE TRAY SUPPORT ON PAD _-= SCALE: Mrs (2) CABLE TRAY SUPPORT ON GRAVEL _-= SCALE. MIS EQUIPMENT PAD PLAN _-= SCALE. NTS WEED BARRIER T7PAR LANDSCAPE 3/4• CRUSMM 57ONE �FABRC OR COUAL ASTM C -M SSE N0. 57 COMACrED SUBOADE — (2)GRAVEL SURFACING DETAIL _-= SCALE: fm Nm NnMO rNAs sloeM PAAYITE Lr,1s TERMei ar. TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS P.C. 9100 Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 West Chester, OH 45069 Phone: (513 942-9530 Fo:: (51}) 42-9531 t�o LCC ICC DtTERNATIONAL, INC 7925 JONES BRANCH DRIVE YdEAN, VA 22102 UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. MY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO UBKIUITEL IS SWTLY PROHIBITED. PROW CEMEI•ARY SF03UB318A 5616 L COIN B.VD. OROMIL CA PROJECT NO: 2683SF318A DRAVN BY: CLS CHECKED BY: SCJ SUBMITTALS A wo.a/ h----1�;I 33 2S 1 1, I / n T�OF CYLj SHST TIME SITE PLAN, ELEVATION 6 DETAILS 9EET ,1E11ER Z-2 mm •3 6 - ► bo' D'� 6� 25.71 AC. Pr SB.E.886-4-4F-I 2 PT SBE 986- -4F- I 3 104' R/a, At_L — '33 S8FOff 4 - 4 / 35 r r PTH 2 4 1 36 I SEE t J 1 O PG 48 1 1.•(•�(i 1 2.3 AC � t PAI 71-4 W) 3 AC. 1 N 2.841 I 1 4-4-K-1 T.19ft R.4E.= M.D.-B. & M. ��� 24 2/ t - t 1 .1 'OA DLE NEI S 1 J�IIT6 %/8 I i 1 I WY ' 1 L/NTON AVE W I I- t 1 R ITA 1 Q HILL 8 DALE UNIT I AR f L PL,UMAS t WY 1 1 LAS pLuMAS PARK UNITS 182 LAS PLUMS A t I 1 I t I I ' I 4.97AG I 1 I 4 , �/ , 2 3 1 4 I I 1 1 � OAKD U 1' GH TS 1N, 37 5 I C 1 P i 7 1 4O 1 IQ i I I 1 R49 Esc. 1 �//.94AC. 1 i t 1• t � r � i 1 t � 1 1 • 1 I 20 q OROY/L L ®rETERY PT. SSE 872-4- 46-24 L (VOTE: These parcels am 11:1r astmt�rtt p+pis 2d a,ry and may not 00netwo VILLA VE F 0111. M.O.R. Wo// A:op 4'o. /2 NOTE—ASSESSOR'S PARCEL BLOCK Assessor's Map No: 36--16 County of- Butte, Calif.. INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION To: File MUP 01-01 for Ubiquitel Leasing Co. (Oroville Memorial Cemetery Site), APN 036-160-046 From: Steve Betts, Senior Planner S� Subject: Bond for a radio frequency analysis . Date:' October 10; 2000 Check # 3454' for $7,500.00 from Ubiquitel Inc. was received this date. $2,500.00 of this amount is for a one-time radio-frequency analysis on Ubiquitel's facilities located on the Oroville Memorial Cemetery tower. The remainder of the funds are for radio-frequency analysis for two other Ubiquitel facilities. The funds received were placed in the EIR Trust Account, Account # 1001. cc: Ubiquitel, 140 Independence Circle, Suite A, Chico, CA 95973 ►I 0 September 29, 2000 UBIQUITEL Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A. Chico, CA 95973 s butte C LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3-397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 036-160-046, MUP 01-01 Gentlemen: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held September 28, 2000, your request for a Minor Use Permit, was approved subject to the conditions listed on the permit. Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, you must do so in writing, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to 5:00 p.m., Monday, October 9, 2000. The appeal fee of $50.00 must be paid at that time. If you do not appeal and if there are no other appeal within the 10 calendar -day appeal period, the action of the Planning Commission is final. For purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, a Notice of Exemption must be filed. The fee for the filing of a Notice of Exemption is the $25.00 documentary handling fee. A check made payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $25.00 should be submitted to the Planning Division in order to complete the process. You will receive your valid permit, if there are no appeals, after it has been signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and we have received your recorded Certification of Ownership. Pursuant to Section 66020 (d) (2) of the Government Code you are hereby notified that you have 90 days to register a protest challenging any fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions imposed as conditions of approval for this project. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Z-;P� ¢o�� Lynn Richardson Administrative Support Services Assistant /lr dab�\ . . . . . . 6,affe Couni LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 September 13, 2000 UBIQUITEL Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A. Chico, CA 95973 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 036-160-046, MUP 01-01 Gentlemen: At the regular meeting of the Planning Manager on September 13, 2000, your request for a Colocate six pannel antennas on an exsting 150 Foot tall monopole and three equipment cabinets. was recommended for approval. An approval recommendation by the Planning representative, has been forwarded to the Planning Commission as a consent item for final action on September 28, 2000, at 9:30 a.m, in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Consent items are set for approval in one motion. These items are considered non -controversial. No presentations will be made, however, some,questions may be asked. The Chair will ask if any Commissioner or member of the public wishes to pull a consent item for discussion. The Minor Use Permit will be issued after approval by the Planning Commission. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact at this office. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Administrative Support Services Assistant Ir LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND B=AUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-=3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 September 22, 2000 UBIQUITEL Leasing Company 140 Independence Circle, Suite A. Chico, CA 95973 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 036-160-046, MUP 01-01 Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Colocate six pannel antennas on an exsting 150 Foot tall monopole and three equipment cabinets. On the northwest comer of Lincoln Boulevard and Monte Vista, at the Oroville Memorial- Cemetary, at 5646 Lincoln Boulevard, Oroville.. A public hearing has been set for September 28, 2000, at -9:30 a.m. on the Consent Agenda. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact of this office at 538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Administrative Support Services Assistant Enc. cc: American Tower Corporation j Awpdocs\pc1ts\schedule.mrg JI; MEMORANDUM . DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION To: Planning Commission From: Stephen Betts, Senior Planner Subject: Consent Agenda Item - File # MUP 01-01 - Minor Use Permit application for UbiquiTel Leasing Company to allow the colocation of antennas on an existing tower, APN 036-160-046 Date: September 28, 2000 Attachments: September 13, 2000, Planning Manager Minutes September 13, 2000, Planning Manager Agenda Report On September 13, 2000, a Planning Manager's meeting was held on the above referenced project. No negative comments, written or orally, were received with regards to this project. Attached please find the minutes from the September 13, 2000, Planning Manager's hearing. The Planning Manager recommends that the Planning Commission approve the project, subject to the findings and conditions contained in the attached agenda report. K:\PROJECTS\UPM\UBIQUMCEMETERY\PCMEMO.WPD 1 2 4 AvvHu- - ON AVENUE N LSON \! N11 YEN AlNUI -': rl; /.. •r C t-.: 1 r •y 1. ... .�,. • I • �.... .,��. \ =r /•�'(, i 1�• THER77777 MALIT .. ._ �; ��..=.''"�'� : �j(V _ . - - -- •- •I,l> _ ter• �. /. t-: -A.,194 ,.,r t • r:�� I•.• I . m,. r K.rI1 NANf j (�� 11 • , •..y •! I. ,1,.1,, ,r1 .� �.�� •�r}� Ifr" �I n, C:i 1 ,, 1 •t: } :n -^ -•• •rl. ' r��i H AA •'r .�Y •r° 5n `. l i '• I, S tok . i Iola •r. -- G � - � ... ;. , _ THERMAIITI) _ t °�• , 7+ 2 FOREBAY I r.." ' r~y:� , �\ . 11; I�rr� l .9Yt RECREATION AREA SOUTH '— ^.1 a `' •",. r 7e r i' // II 1133 f t •�,-T ii I j"i ?4'� '-� ���\ - I M.., . r� ` , �' ... 'w _ A .j - •.r 7 d A ir'/ ��.'�?`•` /-�- // �_ r .aoo� i=S G; rnr ' a ^,�' _ •^ Y _ 'Hyl i .°v.rrrrnn n E ��L AOVILLE __ DAM !1 U_VA II _ 1 1 ' -ln •la i .r.r c.n crW 't r.r�.: _q• . ..... A - .... .. . .. i7 ��.\ �-'_ :i�•d.l \'? THERMAI .'.::: :•��`r�'a�.l�'...:.:' .' ds° ' 'a1 0"' n„ad: ITO (70r T ;—AFTERLBAY mLn,r�l.'n m• °oy Imr: .c- t:gAl. VASI U. In uf. r• n w.”. • GOLI COURSE ^ ; 5 i, r�r .vo c:J RECREATION (71FI5.1,71J11 un ,lnpn unl ir+. OROVILLE / T` % nA^' I\ I "' ti REA'I furl 7f nrgrn MAUI IMfI AIRPORT : 17 1115' wr J11 IRM' In S_4'? 5 Arron 'I,1 IINIrnM ��• ,ntFc qd I I' Si � • '� \ �'. �'� 177 II �...... � 4.v1 mnwxr � I ' / .. ... _ 1 r M•x C THERMAL112� ) .1 / > s�«l^ :I. �:. ... ....• i L.v J -V n_ � � - :� ._...___.-_- - GT_. _......._ A ....... ...... r rt -tel � p,Q- .:fir � � • nn ' 1 - DfOq 7a one - waY AFTERBAY I(�` "' ►� 1 ��•� 7 � � a Alr<.°1 r^ C ` O� I � .i � O - I Merwnrlal i M°nr CLAY r" SUrf G I crm. I V[InCULAR RrCRf ATI[1N % ` a� 1 Pin. 90 �` '...., \ ARIAix •b i Gr: 4 D .. 1 ... -.. - . .``, I i7 Op llln nOADRI J IN �� ,1 �• IAI•Wxx•Y 4.%h LEGEND T HAMILTON.. .AO rc'l"r.v.:Ur. lur n•Ii-i. �.t ... W�..,. •cf� r 70EAS Ir/ ' xl. Inn 70 9?In r.A.. 1A.1 ! r L.4l rvl�=nils �, Ir.anFrtrp (ann - �/ tj,'.- SI f, 114nlnv qn Anc � rr�� 3 is Ar DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES "gov5`y`A" BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: _ Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME ( If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUN:3ER: T U-- b ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICr USE) 40 T = 0 EN O&V CG CIRCLE LX(E A CR 06q NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT( If any) TELEPHONE C5 ryl ervftz`l (.S�) $q- - Soo S LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address, if any) 'S6 1-1N cut Gw O RDvZL.LC- :........... ....::.`.::.>;. � GENERAL INFORMATION REOL7Il2ED,- OWNER'S NANIE If this application is for a land division, describe the number and _ L6 S C0 t'Y)M r\3 c0-Is0 v TELEPHONE EtczCA-N <IUu) CP- C = CTS ►`iL- ('51Q) b -3-400 ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: TrE e po��T C Nrno � p CA q� a 1 ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE Fn- 00 fWc6tjTgR SITE SIZE (in Square Feet or Act -es) G Mo0oAOVG- u e-z�- CI✓-me-F-rZ \4 90, x so' EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES ( in Square Feet ) SO��t '� - l t tr i r a (Check One) N/A (Check One) N/A ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC NFATER ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER .. ..:I A _ APPL C T[ON REQUESTED .;= :-::: ;..--..<.::..:,::..:::::>�,:.:;.:..:::,.;:�,:; : �.:.-� :::.: �.•.: -:.... • . . ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ REZONE �]�j ❑ USE PERMIT .Uri �l .II:J� 3/NIINOR USE PERMIT JUL 0 7 2000 ❑ VARLANCE ❑ MINOR VARLANCEBUTTE COUNTY .PLANNING DT-VTSTON ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ DEV ELOPMENT AGREENI ENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION NfAP ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL NIAP ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL NIAP ❑ BOUNDARY LIME MODIFICATION ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ CERTIFICATE OF NI ERG ER ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ OTHER ... .... .. .: .: �: oontt•�'r ntcr-flrn-r-rn�r :-:..... - _ FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. size of parcels.) -t- 0 6 I -h 6 QG& If this application is for a land division, describe the number and _ L6 S C0 t'Y)M r\3 c0-Is0 v L3.T NSi TT_►J U ( SCv 6tJ cauTprn&V C = CTS ►`iL- Or/ L4 Fli E - RNESQvA'S tJSsg�% O F 2ECTOR5 W —Lt 2Z Zl,MI--r r11, 1 EUTUPE .? R CE A. RCN S e C i D R W -j LL G LCC-FffE-0 Fn- 00 fWc6tjTgR UI' 12,0, OL) G Mo0oAOVG- OWNER CERTIFICATION - I CERTIFY THAT I ANI PRESENTLY 1"HE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PRDPERTY. FURTHER. I ACKNO�%-'LEDGE TILE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY TH.-\T ALL OF THE. ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an•agcnt is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and i5LLuk the affidavit with this application.) DATE: ��K ��j �OOV SIGNATURE: AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; Print Name of Agent and Phone Number Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including documents) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Print Name Signature Architect and/or Engineer: Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: 114/00 ✓ AP Number(s) V, Owners Authorization ✓ Project Description Taken by s1%_ Receipt No. LES I E.H. Print Name Signature Total Amount Received: 3 E;70. 00 t4 /A Legal Description Zoning Requirements Copies of plot plan LD Plan 3So. 00 FD Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit', will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". as of COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) ` Date Filed U General Information: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or project �on or: M y S uTTE AC K -r- Ca (.4 011 5� 2. Address of project CDL R VT -LU Assessor's Parcel Number: o - 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: '�,u rt -I 4o zu06 -1 Er000- Cue I S u -x G A co W CJ o cls 5005 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: IJo R USC PER>Y17�T u 'XIJ C- T 5. E)dsdng general plan designation: 6. Existing zoning district: u G Ql1 �' tl� L"' C 7. Now is land currently used? G 2 y 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): ZUj!5F3L . TASO O (atv1�� N A5 ANO i�G-t-r D FQou Ft3UZ�PrnC-t�T otJ TN E C S'TaU G� r-nC009tLG. Project Description: 9. Site size: 4Jy oo, x l a(Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: !� jtA Compact: 0 %!'�- Total: 0 -OA 11. Plans attached Yes%)L No 12. Proposed development schedule�rn��Ax f,d3KS 13. Associated projects WCJ U E✓ 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development IJ OG E Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. -If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size .expected. WA, 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 0/R 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services D Planning Division .:: 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment_ per shift, estimated occupancy, Icading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project IA. , 19. if the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application Is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as t`r1-TJ r LS t= rns-7' ftNQ Q UIL-0 ' NG Pt�6ZM— Rg:(I uz 2 G.O - R PFi�C REc3� t=n �C-�AvSC tisE ARE L0-L0CR"MNfi Ott r -M EXXSTiN(r Il L tvwti Are the the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). — -� 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption �Q (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). —/ — 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ✓—/ E � E -Ci-t S (-lfl P L C p-T-EI—� !_ s P Pr-iV O F f= -r E (� p+P �C i�NS T S rvG- TO co � L D C a-' o o &x-XG TN(/- o CJ i Su�r� U Butte County Department of Development Services D Planning Division J 2 S YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any -hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. -- 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. — 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _- 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. — 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of.e)dsting drainage pattems. — 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels \„ in the vicinity. 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. — 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as tobc substances, flammable or explosives. — 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). — -� 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption �Q (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). —/ — 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ✓—/ E � E -Ci-t S (-lfl P L C p-T-EI—� !_ s P Pr-iV O F f= -r E (� p+P �C i�NS T S rvG- TO co � L D C a-' o o &x-XG TN(/- o CJ i Su�r� U Butte County Department of Development Services D Planning Division J 2 S Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, Flants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and. the use off th��ctures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indkate the" of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family. apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. SEE A'tTFrC- H Imo Certification I hereby certify that the statements fumished above -and In the attached exhibits present the data and information required for.this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowiedge and belief. Date S' a e f K:\FORNIS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division a l ON AVENUE N ISON •.• 1 ' _ 1 •• r 1 THERMALITO,too- 19 • \ r•r. r.. •" - Lam` t:�l f•._ \ 11.1 t yr AA • .e It • 't ` n..rl. �/ 1 i j, l •,If TIRRMA1110�.' w. 0 �••!:•.I .��a •/a�r°, FORIBAY RECREAII )N• c 1 LI�_. rt.• •':' 'I_ a `` .�i�� 'f Xtt AREA SOUIII I ' ":I > . t.. �� :.••! r '� .Aay�� r>• �� ,�j , 0r.• ` „` :f I .. i ..� a A O OV` } �• Sy_ O � /. , ..-•t _ w.n r lige, � 1) R Vlll DAM R U vAa i —le _ .y w'ca.c 6 : t r.i..• , e: /� '... ..... . 1 ...� ` I 1 Aw• wrl 4 t nl. n,l. n.l ' � I � ••'�� � •'^ P .,..1 /�.r.. w Is a �~ tE o \\; THERMALITO t 'AETERBAY '— JAM11 MOUNTAIN' '. I g \ ^'•, `-' rn..,,. �,•� 1.0 11 VASE 1), m rr n w• • GOU COURS[ v ` RECREATION 1918 M' ' /^ I%1.111.11 1.1Ao nm I �'' ORO' .',..u• c •u�ir y I 1 REAM in.f ,. R,,.., YA.1 IMe I AIR ILLS = 4 TA»..,, 4 41W ..Y M rRM' A,— !J Ila�fnN 1�........... THERMALI TO / • �• � ] 1 ... � �" W n to ' n,••• s AI,e sl - f• :j ♦.. :II.INrIA^• y,=� � ;I / � Q IF I.. a nhe.e. %� fA PACIF Wq R i AFTERf3AY I'\ .1 1 I r I r ff cur mir SMR ��, :P f o ' AOewlrrlrl Mnei 1 �.'•.._. - V9111CUTAR RICRfATION i P,1,^ qo > 1 1 1 Ciw. ARTA I? b I V ..� Sega • e _- I D g0A0 y • r� (,,� r �^•A Q�����="� ^ I 1 � ��i— • tai f<��'�. ���// J fl `� + � � z 1�1•.w.i.;,' � / O .�_Pltr • � ?I a c D:.11 _ olive ,.1,.� / 0 j LEGEND �•.�,. 1../ I (/ �,.��_... �.'. ._6 Q• I • ��l/I� IIAMILiON A0EAST •11'1111 'I 'i10y1 In• 1,1`/ eanly•y rmmuAe.m.I••uny ,1IIP•, 111 70 7 \n...aeM yII I1/• I I I 1 -- --- ---- - T 19N. R.4E. -; M.D. E . 8i M. .��.� ,��� 35 2 36-16 - A21 - 13 1,9 20 • I t . 1 t i OA D LE HEI S U� lT8 18 1 i , WY I .3O 29 � ► L /NTON AVE ► W 1 R ITA t t. / t HILL 8 DALE Q I i/ t r 1 !O ' ' �iL 1 l i t UNIT I 17. Y r 55 t / AR AV �t I LA WAS I WY ROSEDALE I ' : 1 p 1 t•f � ' I Q I LAS PLU SPARK UNITS 182 t LAS PLUMS A •� �` 1 t t 25.71 AC. 497AG 1 PT S.B.E. 886-4-4F•1 1 ,,a t � t / I 2 I 3 � 4 I I 20 ^AC. I OAKD GH TS 2 �, �J I u 1 3 PT SBE. 886- •4F- J 3 SB— r t O I 1 I _A 4m i33 / 16 I� 3 7 AC. I SBE61ei6-4 - 4 �. Im 6 1 I P 1 T 6 t y I PTN 2 r I t R49 4c t 11104Ar- t I 1 I SEE PG, 48 , � 24 OROY/CLE CEMETERY r t i 1 Z- 3 AC O AVE. C3 MO NTE VIS TA ' 1 - 2 I , 329.8-9 ' 1 — ss N /320' i v/m 44-14 ; r� M 2 i 3 t 4 / ( 2 3 P71-4 1 3AC. 4 - 1 V PT. SSE 872-4-4G-24 t t 13.478AC 4.28*AC, f39Ac • ; ? --- _., 10.0/AC 39 W 141 i `_9 _A+, 311 v t N 2.841 N VIL L A, VE ' 15 7 I 6 ( 3 > j SBE 8-4-4-K-1 6 I ; I I I 6,48Ar I 1C` 37 13.47AC.) /1 RSIOI-72 I I 329.89 NOTE: TIew P am 'or wee ""d p" - 20 Assessor's Map N. 3�-l� '3 6 bn - O`i 6 "01 and may rwi owwwd• �►POWIL VILLA VE F 0I/r M.O. F+ W011o// �s:op �'o. /2 NOTE—ASSESSOR'S PARCEL BLOCK County of. Butte, Calif.. -1 rl!p (GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS, EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF THE JOB SITE PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK DR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME 2. FIGURED DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE, OVER SCALED -DIMENSIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR SWILL BE SOLELY RESPON3if>tE FOR WORK PROCEEDING IN A SAFE AND ORDERLY MANNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND REOUIREMENTS OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. CONTRACTOR AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES MUST IMMEDIATEY NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY UNSAFE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF WORK. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY. MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THE WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AND THE MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH AL APPUC48LE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES 5. THE SCOPE OF WORT SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, LABOR AND ALL OTHER MATERIALS AND LABOR DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WDRK/PROJECT AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. UbiquiTel CEMETARY 5646 LINCOLN BLVD. OROVILLE9 CA SF03UB318A CO -LOCATION OF ANTENNAS & CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EOUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S / VENDORS SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE 7. CONTRACTOR SWILL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCR18ED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS. TECHNIQUES, SEOUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. & CONTRACTOR SWILL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, PAVING, CURRING, ETC. DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. 9. CONTRACTOR SWILL KEEP THE GENERAL WORK AREA CLEM AND HAZARD FREE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE OF AL DIRT, DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REYNNING ON THE PROPERTY. PREMISES SHALL BE LEFT IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PANT SPOTS, DUST, OR NUDGES OF ANY NATURE. 10. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED FOR 24'x36' (SIZE D). 00 NOT SCALE OTHER SIZED VERSIONS OF THESE DRAWINGS. (GENERAL LEGEND I SECTION NUMBER X x -x SHEET NUMBER DRAWING SECTION SECTION NUMBER x x -x SHEET NUMBER DETAIL SECTION NUMBER x x -x \ SHEET NUMBER J\ DETAIL ENLARGEMENT NTS = NOT TO SCALE SHEET INDEX N0. SHEET TITLE NO. 0 T-1 TITLE SHEET I PROPERTY OWNER ORVILLE CEMETARY DISTRICT Z-1 PLOT PLAN I Z-2 SITE PLAN, ELEVATION L DETAILS 0 LATITUDE 3728'41.8' SITE ADDRESS: 5646 LINCOLN BLVD. LONGITUDE: 121'32'59.0' OROMLLE. CA APPLICANT: UbiquiTel ELEVATION: 309.3' 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE. SUITE A lSGS MAP: N/A CHIOD; CA' 95973. DEED BOOK/PAGE: N/A PARCEL NUMBER 036-160-46 CONTACT PERSON: STEVE RUPPENTHAL PROJECT SUMMARY SITE NUMBER: SF03UB318A PROPERTY OWNER ORVILLE CEMETARY DISTRICT SITE DATA- ATASITE SITENAME: CEMETARY LATITUDE 3728'41.8' SITE ADDRESS: 5646 LINCOLN BLVD. LONGITUDE: 121'32'59.0' OROMLLE. CA APPLICANT: UbiquiTel ELEVATION: 309.3' 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE. SUITE A lSGS MAP: N/A CHIOD; CA' 95973. DEED BOOK/PAGE: N/A PARCEL NUMBER 036-160-46 CONTACT PERSON: STEVE RUPPENTHAL (530) 897-5005 REFERENCE WAP: ASSESSORS YAP LOT NUMBER N/A PAGE. 36 CURRENT ZONING: PO = PUBLIC OUALSI PUBLIC. JURISDICTION: BUTTE COUNTY GRID: 16 PROJECT DESRIPTION INSTALLATION OF THE UBIOUITEL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY CONSISTING OF SEVEN EQUIPMENT CABINETS (3 INITIAL k .4 FUTURE).. ANTENNAS CONSIST OF (3) SECTORS WITH (2) INITIAL do (1) FUTURE. PANEL ANTENNAS AT EACH SECTOR ARE LOCATED AT AN ANTENNA CENTER OF 130' ON THE EXISTING MONOPOLE. JULl.. 2000 AIDPLNNNG� ON VICINITY MAP 70 162 (D NORTH MONTE VISTA Q SITE m z OPHIR RD. NTS DRIVING DIRECTIONS FROM 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE TAKE HWY 99 SOUTH TO HWY 162 EAST TO HWY 70 SOUTH. FOLLOW HWY 70 SOUTH TO OPHIR RD. TURN LEFT. GO TO LINCOLN BLVD, TURN LEFT k GO TO CEMETARY. SITE IS ON CEMETARY GROUNDS. APPROVALS LANDLORD LEASING R.F. ZONING CONSTRUCTION A&E TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS P.C. 9100 Centra Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 West Chester, OH 45069 Phone: (513) 942-9530 Fox: (513) 442-9531 ZOLCC LCC INTERNATIONAL. INC 7925 ,ZONES BRANCH ORvE Md.EAN, VA 22102 UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET of DOCUMENTS IS . PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO USIOUIIEL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. pow CEMETARY SF03UB318A 5618 Ill w BLVD. ORONALG C1 PRO ECT ND: 268TSF318A DRAVN BY: CLS CHECKED BY: Sci SUBMITTALS F. e No. 33226 f k4;/ S� �FOF CR��� I c4>ur<T I TITLE-SI'm ml N11EA T-1 NOTES THE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE AT THE CENTER OF THE MONOPOLE WAS DETERMINED BY GPs OBSERVATIONS. IAT. 39'28'41.8' N. NAD 83 LONG 121.32'59.0' W. NAD 83 ELEV. 309.3 NAW ee (BASIS OF DRAWING) IAT. 39'28'42.2' N. NAO 27 LONG. 121'32'55.1' W. NAD 27 ELEV. 307.1 NGVD 29 The information sho.n atlove meets or esceees the requirements set forth in FAA order 8260.191 for 1-A accuracy ( 3 15' horizontally and t 3' varticaly). The hor;=antol datum (Capdirlates) am exprefse - as degrees, minutes and seconds, to the nearest tenth of a second. The vertical datum (heights) am expraasad in feet and decimals thereof and are determined to the nearest 0.1 foot. GROUND ELEV. - 309.3 A.M.S.L (NAVD 88) TOP OF STRUCTURE ELEV. - 461.0 ALM.S.L (NAVO 88) STRUCTURE HEIGHT - 151.7' VICINITY MAP Our Mw (Trp.) TRANSFORMER Ab J41 _ O"16`AD PONEVMW — —Jo` \ -1 \ T . jow, \ ba.+\.. �. RIMY ` Joe \ / MONOPOLE 15I.r Mw PLOT PLAN 2-1 SCAIC 1' - 20' (2SITE LOCATION ' =-1 SCALE. I- - 400' Mm. ALL NIFINI ATOW TAKEN FROM SURVET, RY ACMV Cm OEM C0/6UUANTS GATED 06/14/00. RANOOTIE AYE - fu -t- - — - - -T- - -T- - - �- --4- - UNDOCROIPNO ..TEA UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL - �- - �- - UMDOMROM GAS OREENMUL 51 SITE 9O1lbAR,r UNE PROPEIM LAK o 8 O FL000 UOR aD $iC i D0. WATER VALVE vs CAF3T RIOQ $ ® WATER METER - OAK KNOLL war `kJ �pA$ � .� ELVATION AT EDGE OF PANUNEM x�W UEWITION AT NAIWAL MUM � 3 axlERufE of STREET L45 PWWS ANE MONTE VISTA AYE SITE ' op. a0 VICINITY MAP Our Mw (Trp.) TRANSFORMER Ab J41 _ O"16`AD PONEVMW — —Jo` \ -1 \ T . jow, \ ba.+\.. �. RIMY ` Joe \ / MONOPOLE 15I.r Mw PLOT PLAN 2-1 SCAIC 1' - 20' (2SITE LOCATION ' =-1 SCALE. I- - 400' Mm. ALL NIFINI ATOW TAKEN FROM SURVET, RY ACMV Cm OEM C0/6UUANTS GATED 06/14/00. LEGEND - Q -t- - — - - -T- - -T- - - �- --4- - UNDOCROIPNO ..TEA UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL - �- - �- - UMDOMROM GAS - - - - - - - —pOWERLw — SITE 9O1lbAR,r UNE PROPEIM LAK o POWER PPE roD3 O FL000 UOR FIRE 1TfORWT D0. WATER VALVE m ELECTRIC METER ® WATER METER - �pA$ OEMT1pN AT TOP OF CONCRETE ELEVATION AT FWMJNE .� ELVATION AT EDGE OF PANUNEM x�W UEWITION AT NAIWAL MUM axlERufE of STREET t6 -O' \ Q 2 GRAPHIC SCALE ( 1N r68T ) I Inch - Rp R (,OR 24' s 00' f4On TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS P.C. 9100 Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 West Chester, OH 45069 Phone: (513) 942-9530 Fox: (513) 942-9531 Zii�LCC LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC 7925 JONES BRANCH DRIVE CLEAN. VA 22102 Ublquffel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY' MTURE ' M .r. USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO UBOTUITEL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. 11 Paw CEMETARY SF03UB318A 5616 11COlN OLVD. OR0MULE q PROJECT ND 268 M318A DRAVN BY: CCS CHECKED BY: SCJ SUBMITTALS EXISI. 0 L PL'0T RAN` I SEEr MRSA Z-1 •�c CON AAM S D eN 5/14/ er APMMCEO L1E9lil CpIISIATANTs MTm oe/,A/ep Jr� CMN C48LE W/ SST SNAP -21 CARE MANGER SWEC1ACIE 8155 CLI' ANGLE SITE PLAN CM2 C4KE W/ SST SNAP -al CAKE wilm TRANSFORMER ♦ nl /7 Jos �� Y)\ acaNO , N , ONE ♦ `jb�p \ \ 0 T VIVECLAOE 1 81]5 b CLIP ANIZE SOUARE : SLEEPER (s ) CABLE TRAY SUPPORT ON PAD (-;-'\ CABLE TRAY SUPPORT ON --GRAVEL •� _-= YALE: NTS =-= Sme NTS r•----- ---- -- OWN=- -OWN= i CAS i CAfl1[T CABINETi r' wmacm /, /2 - 3 WICNWETI L ---- J _--}---}---� "EQUIPMENT PAD PLAN _-= SCAM NTS SEE z AST' : ELEVATION LAYOUT ' SCALE: NTS ' WEED WRIER I CMAL GRAVEL SURFACING DETAIL _-= SCALE:- MTS DOW E IE TECTONIC ` ENCTNEER/NC CONSULTANTS P.C. 9100 Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 west Chester. OH 45069 Phone: (513) 942-9530 For. (513) 412-9531 to LCC LCC INTERNATIONAL. INC 7923 .ONES BRANCH DRIVE IMCLEAN. VA 22102 UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO. CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS 1S PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANT-" v USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO UBIOUITEL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. CEMMEETARY SF03UB318A Sas LINE" BLVD. OROAAE, a PROJECT NO: 2683-S 1`318A IDTA;N-BY: CLS CHECKED BY: SCJ SUBMITTALS F. A 33 2 m1l civi. BEET TITLE SITE PLAN, ELEVATION' 6 DETAILS MT "" Z-2 COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 7 County Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 R RAM SES �FICE REQUESTED PUBLIC HEARING, NOTICE AUMP 036370006000 FAIN BRADLEY E,ETAL 5 V� 90 SHADOW OAK CT ( V OROVILLE CA 95966 FAIN090* 959662166 1700 22 08/29/00 i RETURN TO SENDER FAIN 5592 FARLEY4 OROVILLE CA 95966-69.1.5 77 I,'l�;.Illf * . �' // / '/ ' ' �� `^�' n� ��r~� COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 7 County Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 RMRM SERVICE REQUEST PUBLIC FEARING NOTICE OVIL Mi v5 s 4 `�` �p FLF ROBERT,9-, JERRy A c.n.n.n FICF�590 959462155 1300 2208/,28/00 RETURN TO SENDER BOB FICHTER BUILDERS 946 HAZEL ST GRIDLEY.:CA 95946-2114 AUMP ��1�111�'f11�11611'�111'1.�111�11 �.' Im GENERAL NOTES CEMETARY SITE ADDRESS: 5646 LINCOLN BLVD. 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS, EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL .EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING N/A DIMENSIONS OF THE JOB SITE PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. IMMEDIATELY 036-160-46 TO THE MANUFACTURER'S / VENDOR'S SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED N/A NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, BEFORE PQ =. -PUBLIC QUASI PUBLIC OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. PRECEDENCE. 2. FIGURED DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS, 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL 3, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR WORK PROCEEDING CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND IN A SAFE AND ORDERLY MANNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH .THE PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK APPLICABLE CODES AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY UNDER THE CONTRACT, AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. CONTRACTOR AND/0R THEIR EMPLOYEES MUST IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT UNSAFE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF WORK. EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, :PAVING, CURBING, ETC, DURING CONSTRUCTION, UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, THE 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL .NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, CONTRACTOR SHALT. REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. PUBLIC AUTHORITY, MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES BEARING ON THE 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE GENERAL WORK AREA CLEAN AND PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THE WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT HAZARD FREE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, .AND THE MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY, PREMISES SHALL BE LEFT IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF 5. THE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS, ANY NATURE. EQUIPMENT, LABOR AND ALL. OTHER MATERIALS AND LABOR DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK/PROJECT AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. 10. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED FOR 24"06" (SIZE D). DO NOT SCALE OTHER SIZED VERSIONS OF THESE .DRAWINGS, PROJECT SUMMARY 0 SITE NUMBER: SF03U6318A PROPERTY OWNER: ORVILLE CEMETARY DISTRICT SITE DATA: SITE NAME: CEMETARY SITE ADDRESS: 5646 LINCOLN BLVD. ELEVATION: OROVILLE, CA DEED BOOK/PAGE: N/A PARCEL NUMBER: 036-160-46 LOT NUMBER: N/A CURRENT ZONING: PQ =. -PUBLIC QUASI PUBLIC APPLICANT: UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE, SUITE A CHICO, CA 95973 CONTACT PERSON:. STEVE RUPPENTHAL (530) 897-5005 JURISDICTION: BUTTE COUNTY LATITUDE: 39'2'8' 41.8" LONGITUDE: 121"32'59.0 ELEVATION: 309..3' USGS MAP: N/A REFERENCE MAP: ASSESSOR'S MAP PAGE: 36 'GRID: 16 SHEET INDEX Na' SHEET TITLE EV RNO T -i TITLE SHEET 1 Z1 PLOT PLAN 1 Z-2 SITE PLAN, ELEVATION &DETAILS 0 PROJECT DESRIPTION INSTALLATION OF THE UBIQUITEL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY CONSISTING OF SEVEN EQUIPMENT CABINETS (3 INITIAL & 4 FUTURE). ANTENNAS CONSIST OF (,3) SECTORS WITH (2) INITIAL & (1) FUTURE. PANEL ANTENNAS AT EACH SECTOR ACRE LOCATED AT AN ANTENNA CENTER OF' 130' ON THE. EXISTING MONOPOLE. RECEIVED JUL, o,-7 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION VICINITY MAP 70 162 A NORTH MONTE VISTA ,1 SITE 1 m .J OPHIR RD. =' NTS DRIVING DIRECTIONS FROM' 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE TAKE HWY 99 SOUTH T6. HWY 162 EAST TO HWY 70 SOUTH. FOLLOW HWY 70 SOUTH TO OPHIR RD, TURN LEFT., GO' -TO LINCOLN BLVD, TURN LEFT & GO TO CEMETARY: SITE IS ON CEMETARY GROUNDS. APPROVALS LANDLORD LEASING R.F, ZONING CONSTRUCTION A&E TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULrAINTS P.C. 9100 Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 West Chester, OH 45069 Phone: (513) 942---9530 Fax: (513) 94.2--9531 cc LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC 7925 JONES BRANCH DRIVE McLEAN, VA 22102 UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO, CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO UBIQUITEL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PfROJECT CEMETARY SF031UB318A 5646 LINCOLN BLVD. OROWILLE, CA PROJECT ND 2683,7318A DRAWN BY; CLS CHECKED BYi SCJ SUBMITTALS 1 06/29/00 UPDATED SHEET INDEX 0 06/23/00 ISSUED FOR ZONING ENGINEER SEAL SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER TRANSFORMER GUY WIRE (TYP.) TRA11 OVERHEAD .POWER/TELCO 1106 30 3 \ �0 309 370 CABLE 3 \ TRAY MONOPOLE J 151.7' HIGH 1 \ \ \ SERVICE \ \ POLE NOTES THE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE AT THE CENTER OF THE MONOPOLE WAS DETERMINED BY GPS \ OBSERVATIONS. N. NAD 83 \ LAT. 39'28'.41,8"\ LONG. 121'32'59.0" W. NAD 83 ELEV. 309.3 NAVD 88 (BASIS OF DRAWING) �° LAT. 39'28'42.2" N. NAD 27 \ LONG. 121'32'55.1 " W. NAD 27 ELEV. 307.1 NGVD 29 The information shown above meets or exceeds the requirements set forth in FAA order 826.0.19c for 1—A accuracy ( f 15' horizontally and f 3' vertically). The horizontal datum (coordinates) are expressed as degrees, minutes and seconds, to the nearest tenth of a •second. The vertical datum (heights) are expressed .in feet and decimals thereof and are determined. to the nearest 0.1 PLOT PLANis��, foot. SCALE: 1 " T 20' F� GROUND. ELEV. = 309.3 A.M.S.L. (NAVD 88) ��eF . ss TOP OF STRUCTURE ELEV. = 461.0 A.M.S.L. (NAVD 88) STRUCTURE HEIGHT = 151.7' 1 70 T WYANDOTTE AVE GREENVILLIE ST a 0 n V6 IRD 3 CREST RIDGE �7 0 OAK KCNOLL WAY LAS PLUMAS AWE MONTE VISTA SAVE Z:ZZ SITE m OPHIR RD VICINITY. MAP 1 l MONTE VISTA >j OROVILLE CEMETERY Z APN: 036-160-46 O 5t Z 1A J. SITE -LOCATION. SCALE: I" = 400' 16-0* V Z C GRAPHIC SCALE 20 40 1 AM—, ( IN FEET ) 1 inchL = 20 fL (FOR 24"' x 36" PLAT) NOTE: ALL INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY BY ADVANCED DESIGN CONSULTANTS DATED 06/14/00. LEGEND -- -'W UNDERGROUND WATER INC UNgERGROUND TELEPHONE -- --E— — --E — UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL — —G— — --0-- — UNDERGROUND GAS — — •- — -- — -- SITE BOUNDARY LINE POWERLINE I� PROPERTY LINE • POWER POLE (P.P.) # FLOOD LIGHT WYANDOTTE AVE GREENVILLIE ST a 0 n V6 IRD 3 CREST RIDGE �7 0 OAK KCNOLL WAY LAS PLUMAS AWE MONTE VISTA SAVE Z:ZZ SITE m OPHIR RD VICINITY. MAP 1 l MONTE VISTA >j OROVILLE CEMETERY Z APN: 036-160-46 O 5t Z 1A J. SITE -LOCATION. SCALE: I" = 400' 16-0* V Z C GRAPHIC SCALE 20 40 1 AM—, ( IN FEET ) 1 inchL = 20 fL (FOR 24"' x 36" PLAT) NOTE: ALL INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY BY ADVANCED DESIGN CONSULTANTS DATED 06/14/00. LEGEND -- -'W UNDERGROUND WATER -- T-- -- I -- UNgERGROUND TELEPHONE -- --E— — --E — UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL — —G— — --0-- — UNDERGROUND GAS — — •- — -- — -- SITE BOUNDARY LINE POWERLINE PROPERTY LINE • POWER POLE (P.P.) # FLOOD LIGHT FIRE HYDRANT M WATER VALVE O ELECTRIC METER D' WATER METER 10 ELEVATION AT TOP OF CONCRETE 100 00 ELEVATION AT FLOWLINE 1 f ELEVATION AT EDGE OF PAVEMENT 1 ELEVATION AT NATURAL GROUND 1b 0 CENTERLINE OF STREET TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSUL, TAN1 TS P, C. 9100 Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 West Chester, 0H 45069 Phone: (513) 942--9530 Fax: (513) 942-9531 LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC 7925 JONES BRANCH DRIVE McLEAN, VA 22102 UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO, CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO UBIQUITEL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PROJECT C EM IETARY SF03UB318A 5646 LINICOLN BLVD. OROMILLE, CA PROJECT. NO 2683,SF318A DRAWN BY: CLS [CHECKED BYE SCJ SUBMITTALS. FA06/29/00 DELETED EXIST. ANT. ELEV. 06/23/00 ISSUED FOR ZONING ENGINEER SEAL /??.OFESSI�N P. L� � y G f Na. 33 26 C 7-^ CALI SHEET TITLE PLOT PLAN SHEET Z--1 SITE PLAN BASED ON SURVEY BY ADVANCED DESIGN CONSULTANTS DATED 06/14/00 OVERHEAD POWER/TELCO COAX CABLE W/ SST SNAP -IN CABLE HANGER CONCRETE SLAB 3p� `T06 TRANSFORMER 3p� LA •1� \` 1109 30 + \ — s ` e `• � ` �` ., � 0�j�� FUTURE A BATTERY \ \ \ CABINET :`• \ PROPOSED \ \ POWER CABINET \ \> \ + �� FU17URE _ \ EXISTING 150 ��� t.\ GROWTH 6 ' 306 \ \ Z x\ MONOPOLE / \ + \ CABINETS \ \ \ \ PROPOSED ANTENNAS / \ \ • PROPIOSEB' POWQR Z-2 \ \ \ PROTECTION CABINET,, GPS TO BE MOUNTED--, v' \PROPOSED SURFACING \ (DISTRUBED AREAS .ONLY) \ \ 3 2 a'" \ \ I1\ PROPOSED \ UNDERGROUND + a\ :�\ . ELECTRIC do \ + TELEPHONE \ \ \ \ PROPOSED CABLE .TRAY, +. \� \ \ \ \ SEE. DETAILS P OSEO\ 11 \ \ \ / HANCED UTILITY o2. / MI `Q \ CABINETS, _� -. r.,1 �...: POLE \ \ x \ /+ \\ \\ w \ ! \ + OPOSED \ \ \ +/-6"x1a'-6". \' \ \ CONCRETE \ ` + EQUIPMENT PAD \+ \ do LEASE AREA \ PROPOSED. 5' UTILITY�y�� \ \ EASEMENT 2 2 \ \ Z-2 N + \ 00 PPC SEE c° I r DETAIL MICROFLECT WAVEGUIDE BRIDGE KR 61595 'GALVANIZED CLIP ANGLE 4" SQUARE /— PVC SLEEPER CABLE TRAY SUPPORT ON PAD SCALE: NTS SITE PLAN Z-2 SCALE: 1 "=10' SN MICROFLECT WAVEGUIDE BRIDGE KIT 81595 GALVANIZED CLIP ANGLE: 4" SQUARE /—PVC SLEEPER CABLE TRAY SUPPORT ON GRAVEL SCALE: NTS ---- ---T— --- I I 66EC EN14ANCED IGRowrHOGROWTHIGROWTHI I CI ATTERY POWER MINICELL I #1 ri #2 p #3 CABINET I M I, I CABINET CABINET ICABINET 11 CABINET IICABINETI I II II I N L---JL---JL---J r 121 31 " 161 31P 0 30" It' 22" ' 1Ir' 22" 1IC' 22" 1 37" EQUIPMENT` PAD PLAN SCALE: NTS --EXISTING LIGHTING ROD r7-� ELEVATION Z-2 SCALE: NTS 3/4" CRUSHED STONE ASTM C33 SIZE NO. 57 ) PANEL MOUNTING ,NTENNAS SHOWN SEPARATE ANALYSIS DETERMINE F POLE, TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS P.C. 9100 Centre Pointe Dr. Ste. 100 West Chester, OH 45069 Phone: (513) 942-9530 Fax: (513) 942--9531 LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC 7925 JONES BRANCH DRIVE McLEAN, VA 22102 UbiquiTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO, CA 95973 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE, ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO UBIQUITEL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PRWECT CEM1ETARY SF031UB318A 5646 MOM BLVD. OROWILLE, CA FROJECT NO: 26B3,SF318A MONOPOLE DRAWN BY, CLS CHECKED BY; SCJ AD JLL VLInIL 1 OR LAYOUT 5 z-2 WEED BARRIER TYPAR LANDSCAPE FABRIC OR EQUAL COMPACTED SUBGRADE —' GRAVEL :SURFACING DETAIL 2 SCALE: NTS SUBMITTALS 0 06/23/00 ISSUED FOR ZONING ENGINEER SEAL Q��rES$ tau. 3223 F CA10��f� SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN, ELEVATION & DETAILS SHEET NUMBER Z--2