Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMUP 02-14z PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE #: MUP 02-14 PROJECT TYPE: Minor Use Permit APPLICANT: Cingular Wireless .. '-."_ .. 'ADDRESS: 3851 N Freeway Blvd., Sacramento, CA 95833 • OWNER: American Tower/Western Canal Water District ADDRESS: 2003 Nelson Road, Oroville, CA 95965 REPRESENTATIVE: ADDRESS: , PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Minor Use Permit to add six (3 proposed and 3 future) antennas to an existing 194 foot communications tower PROPERTY ZONED: A-40 (Agricultural - 40 acre parcels) LOCATED: approximately 1.5 miles west of the Town of Nelson on Nelson Road, and approximately 3,000 feet east of Durnel Drive, Nelson. AP#: 038-250-025 TOWN/AREA: Nelson GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Orchard and Field Crop 1. Application accepted: January 16, 2002 Amount: $ 485.00 Receipt #: 20170 2. Comments sent to: DDs, PW, EH, LAFCo, Assessor, Ag. Comm. CDF 3. Comments received from: 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 6. Assigned To: Craig Sanders T. Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No: Categorical Exemption-CEQA# 'Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Subject to Fish & Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA # 15061.(bx3) Other 8. Staff Report: Project Video: 9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: 10. Publication Notice Written: Display Ad Prepared: I L Notices Mailed: — — v Number of Notices: 12.- Newspaper Publication Date: A/ .0 C P G B 13. Planning Commission Hearing(s):_ PIV V -d -o 1- `1. 0 A /n Action taken: Special Conditions: Commission 14. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: 15. Type Minor Use Permit/Send for signature: 16. N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G: Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No 17. Send validated Minor Use Permit: 18. Assessor's Memo: 19. Copy of Minor Use Permit / Variance to Planning Technician: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 Cingular Wireless, Minor Use Permit to colocate six flush -mounted panel antennas and a 4 -foot microwave dish to an existing 194 -foot lattice tower at a height of 123 feet with .two ground -mounted equipment cabinets on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural — 40 acre parcels) identified as APN 038-250-025. The property is located on the south side of Nelson Road, approximately 3,000 feet east of Durrell Drive, west of the town of Nelson. (CS) (MUP 02- 14) It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconded by Commissioner Leland and unanimously carried to approve a Minor Use Permit for Cingular Wireless subject to the findings and conditions listed below: I. Find that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15301. Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) consists of the leasing and minor alteration of existing public utility structure(s) involving negligible or no expansion of use. The proposed wireless communication facilities colocated on an existing lattice tower constitutes a negligible expansion of the existing use: H. Approve the Planning Commission of Minor Use Permit 02-14 for Cingular Wireless, subject to the following findings and conditions found in Attachment A. A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Environmental Health Department, and the Butte County Air Quality Management District. The project is Butte County General Plan in that the Agricultural Residential ldnd use designation allows public uses as a Secondary Use and cellular telephone facilities are considered a public use. The project also complies with the Agricultural 40 -acre (A-40) zoning provisions and the Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance in that proposed colocated facilities mounted to an existing antenna are permitted with approval of a Minor Use Permit. B. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas would not increase the height of the existing tower and would not be visually conspicuous in this setting. 2. The availability of public facilities, services, and utilities: ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ MAY 23, 2002 ■ PAGE 5 ■ Electrical power service is already established to the property and no additional services or utilities are required. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: y The project site is already developed with a 194 foot lattice tower. The proposed additional antennas would not have a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. The radio frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very few vehicle trips would be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment shelter. No significant change in the number of vehicle trips to the site would occur. 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: The site is well suited for the project because the proposed antennas would be mounted on the lattice tower. The operation and maintenance of the facility would not impact surrounding agricultural uses. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use would cause any other relevant impact. C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. D. The proposed use would comply with all applicable provisions of Chapter 24, Section 262 of the Butte County Code. E. The radio-frequency emissions generated by the antennas on the monopole are below the limits set by the Federal Communications Commission. F. The proposed antennas would not create any impacts to aircraft operations. Conditions of Approval: ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION■ MINUTES ■ MAY 23, 2002 ■ PAGE 6 ■ Planning Division: 1. The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height they will be located. 2. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County, and any other agency of the Federal or, State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. 3. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 5. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. 6. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 7. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 8. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. ■BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION w MINUTES ■ MAY 23," 2002 ■ PAGE 7 ■ Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility; the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant. selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (3 0) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expenses. 13. All equipment cabinets shall be screened from view with a minimum six (6) foot tall wooden fence surrounding the equipment pad. All screening treatments, including landscaping, shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 14. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 15. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division no later than January 31 of each year. . 16. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 17. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit D" dated 12/03/01 and is incorporated herein by this reference. 18. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING'COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ MAY 23, 2002 ■ PAGE 8 ■ 19. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. Building Division 20. Building permits are required for the antennas and equipment cabinets. Engineer design calculations may be required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings when additional antennas are installed. There is a 10 -day appeal period on all decisions with the Clerk of the Board. } ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ MAY 23, 2002 r PAGE 9 ■ ,. t . i Cingular Wireless, Minor Use Permit to colocate six flush -mounted panel antennas and a 4400t microwave dish to an existing 194 -foot lattice tower at a height of 123 feet with two ground - mounted equipment cabinets on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural — 40 acre parcels) identified as APN 038-250-025. The property is located on the south side of Nelson Road, approximately 3,000 feet east of Dumell Drive, west of the town of Nelson. (CS) (MUP 02-14) Mr. Sanders gave.a brief summary of the project. In answer to a question by Mr. Meleka, Mr. Sanders stated that the height and width of the tower would not change. The hearing was opened to the public. Linda Langston said that she was concerned with Condition 13 requiring a wood fence around the pad. She stated that the equipment pad would be behind a building and would not been seen from the road. She noted that the pad will be raised three feet because it is in the flood plain and putting a wood fence around the pad would be difficult. There was a brief discussion on the location of the pad. Mr. Sanders agreed that Condition 13 could be eliminated. Ms. Langston was also concerned with Condition 11. She said that the EMF study has already been ordered and she did not see the need to do a security bond also. Mr. Sanders agreed that if the test is done within the next 60 days the bond would not be needed. He said that this would need to be done prior to issuance of the Minor Use Permit and Ms. Langston agreed. The hearing was closed. Mr. Meleka concurred with staffs recommendation to approve the Minor Use Permit for Cingular Wireless subject to the findings and conditions listed below, deleting Condition 13, and changing the second half of Condition 11 to read "Prior to the issuance of Minor Use Permit provide a test by a radio frequency consultant to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. As an alternative, the applicant may, prior to the issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion." Recommend that the Planning Commission find that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15301. Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) consists of the leasing and minor alteration of existing public utility structure(s) involving negligible or no expansion of use. The proposed wireless communication facilities colocated on an existing lattice tower constitutes a negligible expansion of the existing use. 11. Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Minor Use Permit 02-14 for Cingular 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING 0 MINUTES 0 APRIL 24, 2002 0 PAGE 5 0 Wireless, subject to the following findings and conditions found in Attachment A. A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: Project conditions of approval have been applied to' this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Environmental Health Department, and the Butte County Air Quality Management District. The project is Butte County General Plan in that the Agricultural Residential land use designation allows public uses as a Secondary Use and cellular telephone facilities are considered a public use. The project also complies with the Agricultural 40 -acre (A-40) zoning provisions and the Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance in that proposed colocated facilities mounted to an existing antenna are permitted with approval of a Minor Use Permit. B. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas would not increase the height of the existing tower and would not be visually conspicuous in this setting. 2. The availability of public facilities, services, and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and no additional services or utilities are required. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: Theproject site is already developed with a 194 foot lattice tower. The proposed additional antennas would not have a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. The radio- frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very few vehicle trips would be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment shelter. No significant change in the number of vehicle trips to the site would occur. 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: The site is well suited for the project because the proposed antennas would be mounted on the lattice tower. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES ■ APRIL 24; 2002 ■ PAGE 6 0 The operation and maintenance of the facility would not impact surrounding agricultural uses. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use would cause any other relevant impact. C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. D. The proposed use would comply with all applicable provisions of Chapter 24, Section 262 of the Butte County Code. E. The radio-frequency emissions generated by the antennas on the monopole are below the limits set by the Federal Communications Commission. F. The proposed antennas would not create any impacts to aircraft operations. Conditions of Approval: Planning Division: 1. The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height they will be located: 2. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County, and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. 3. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 5.' The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health: 6. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 7. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING M Iv INUTES ■ APRIL _24,2002 ■ PAGE 7 ■ i The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. Prior to the issuance of Minor Use Permit provide a test by a radio frequency consultant to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. As an alternative, the applicant may, prior to the issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 13. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING 0 MINUTES 0 APRIL 24, 2002 0 PAGE 8 ■ 14. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division no later than January 31 of each year. 15. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 16. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit D" dated 12/03/01 and is incorporated herein by this reference. 17.. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 18. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. Building Division 19. Building permits are required for the antennas and equipment cabinets. Engineer design calculations may be required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings when additional antennas are installed. 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING 0 MINUTES - APRIL 24, 2002 0 PAGE 9 ■ s L A N D O F NAT U RA L W EA LTH A N D BEAUTY DIRECTOR'S OFFICE c4°MR L� DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 www.buttecounty.net October 29, 2002 Cingular Wireless 3851 N. Freeway Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95833 RE: Minor Use Permit, File No. MUP 02-14 APN# 038-250-025 Ladies and Gentlemen: Enclosed is Receipt No # 20769 in the amount of $62.00 for the above -referenced file. As of this date, the account has a zero balance and is closed. Your quick response has been greatly appreciated. Thank you. Sincerely, Diane Lewellen Office Assistant III Enclosure MUP 02-14.1tr Date 10/29/02 Time 10:12 am MUP 02-14 Ovelopment Services Departntnt Applicant Billing Worksheet Pacific Bell Wireless dba Cingular Wireless 3851 N. Freeway Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95833 Rounding : None .Full Precision : No Last bill Last charge 08/30/02 Last payment 09/26/02 Amount Date/Slip# Description 01/19/02 Lynn R. / C #38877 Clerical 02/02/02 Larry P. / P #39003 Processing 02/16/02 Craig S. / P #40006 Processing 03/30/02 Lynn R. / C #39739 Clerical 04/13/02 Craig S. / P #39830 Processing REPORT 04/13/02 Lynn R. / C #39879 Clerical 07/06/02 Diane L. / C #41124 Clerical NOE 08/17/02 Diane L. / C #41780 Clerical TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES : $62.00 Page 1 HOURS/RATE AMOUNT- TOTAL 1.00 45.00 45.00 1.50 88.50 59.00 2.50 147.50 59.00 1.00 45.00 45.00 0.50 29.50 59.00 0.50 22.50 45.00 0.50 17.00 34.00 0.50 17.00 34.00 es $412.00 Date 10/29/02 Ovelopment Services Depart#nt Time 10:12 am Applicant Billing Worksheet MUP 02-14 :Pacific Bell Wireless dba Cingular (continued) TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS TOTAL NEW CHARGES PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 01/16/02 Deposit - Receipt # (350.00) 09/26/02 Payment - thank you (62.00) TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS NEW BALANCE Page 2 $0.00 $412.00 ($412.00) TOTAL NEW BALANCE $0.00 a�B August 29, 2002 Cingular Wireless 3851 N. Freeway Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95833 RE: Minor Use Permit, File No. MUP 02-14 APN# 038-250-025 Ladies and Gentlemen: B E A U T Y ucrwn i mcm i yr ucvcwrmcw 1 acnvn.ca 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 The total cost for the processing of the above -referenced application which was approved by the Planning Commission on May 23, 2002, is $412.00. On January 16, 2002, a deposit was made in the amount of $485.00, of which $92.00 was disbursed to Environmental Health Division, $43.00 to CDF/Fire Department. The amount received on account to Planning Division was $350.00. The cost exceeded the Planning Division deposit by $62.00. Below is a breakdown: Professional Planner $ 177.00 Mapping $ 88.50 Clerical $ 146.50 Total $ 412.00 Deposit on 1/16/02, Receipt # 20170 $ 350.00 Total Amount Over Deposits $ 62.00 Total Amount Due and Payable $ 62.00 Please make a check payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $62.00 and remit it to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 within 30 calendar days (September 28, 2002). Should you have any questions, please contact this office Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at 538-7601. Sincerely, Diane Lewellen Office Assistant III JAmup 02-14.doc Date 08/29/02 Time 2:20 pm MUP 02-14 Rounding Full Precision Last bill Last charge Last payment Ovel'opment Services DepartnInt Applicant Billing Worksheet Pacific Bell Wireless dba-Cingular. Wireless 3851 N. Freeway Blvd. Sacramento, CA 958.33 YI1OoZ-I None I'� i O No I y6.5� 08/30/02 Amount $0.00 Date/Slip# Description 01/19/02 Lynn R. / C #38877 Clerical 02/02/02 Larry P. / P #39003 Processing 02/16/02 Craig S. / P #40006 Processing 03/30/02 Lynn R. / C #39739 Clerical 04/13/02 Craig S. / P #39830 Processing REPORT 04/13/02 Lynn R. / C #39879 Clerical 07/06/02 Diane L. / C #41124 Clerical NOE 08/17/02 Diane L. / C #41484 Clerical BILLING HOURS/RATE AMOUNT 1.00 45.00 45.00 1.50 88.50 59.00 2.50 147.50 59.00 1.00 45.00 45.00 0.50 29.50 59.00 0.50 22.50 45.00 0.50 17.00 34.00 0.50 17.00 34.00 Page 1 TOTAL TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES 8.00 $412.00 Date 08/29/02 Time 2:20 pm MUP 02-14 evelopment Services Departnnt Applicant Billing Worksheet :Pacific Bell Wireless dba Cingular (continued) TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS TOTAL NEW CHARGES PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 01/16/02 Deposit - Receipt # TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS NEW BALANCE New Current period TOTAL NEW BALANCE (350.00) 62.00 Page 2 $0.00 $412.00 ($350.00) $62.00 ---------------------------------------- NODINOE CLERK'S FILING FE GENL 0010 4703001 4612319 101oo1 ($25) Project Number Amount of Fee MUP 02-14 LINGULAR V'4RELESS - APN: 035-250-025 $25A0 $ AUNT MINNIE DEPOSITS PLAN -PERF TR 1001 280 1011305 (1500r2ow) Project Number Amount of Fee .ADM 02-28 BECKY YOUNT- 040-030-054 $1,500.00 44805 6/12/2002 AMOUNT 330.00 �f TOTAL $ 1,835.00 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER- TREASURER white=treasurer. ink=auditor canary --depositor golden rod=file COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROVILLE, CA ATR NO RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAG # 328 DATE FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE 'CODE CODE CODE DEPOSIT DATE: 6112 RECEIPTS: PLANNING APPL FEES GENL 0010 480001 4210900 101001 NODINOE CLERK'S FILING FE GENL 0010 4703001 4612319 101oo1 ($25) Project Number Amount of Fee MUP 02-14 LINGULAR V'4RELESS - APN: 035-250-025 $25A0 $ AUNT MINNIE DEPOSITS PLAN -PERF TR 1001 280 1011305 (1500r2ow) Project Number Amount of Fee .ADM 02-28 BECKY YOUNT- 040-030-054 $1,500.00 44805 6/12/2002 AMOUNT 330.00 �f TOTAL $ 1,835.00 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER- TREASURER white=treasurer. ink=auditor canary --depositor golden rod=file `��' l&UAAV 201'20 �/g� 3s0 9� y3 - IA16Vt-4ee cIIV6:u � DATE RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC LAFCO PLANNING PUBLIC SALES ENV.NOE/NOD HEALTH FIRE F/G FEE OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM NO. RECEIVED WORKS G,98I�1(3 q y-5- OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE* OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 20170 ISSUED BY A 1] -Wrk -T V DEPART DEVELOPN&W SERVICES.,'. UNTYtNUORMANLMATION kFPL-1(,AN'Jr: —Agent informatioii to be provided is on other side: OT6,;:; ; ggp&1:5 I+r v° APPLICANT"S NAME Qf applicant is different from owner an affidavit' ffidavit is required ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NU BER: DJ5A (f11n!2LJ Y, 01 reje_ss ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FII ENUMBER: (FOR OFFICE `USE) ' E i3O_A 0 dps?%�etv 6 LV o to # NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) TELEPHONE N-e_fzorl - 'SA -G83 (431 (0 )8 3 a_ ICI LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross scree) and Address, if any 10V -15T � WIIQ2�i 9 ov-, NVJ--C>V1 Q_CA GENIERAT.TNFORmATTnwpprirTrDpr-, OWNER'S NAME -A TELEPHONE � er ica;-) 1_3 Dep - 04d- c;L b4s1.4 ADDRESS: A,003 Aldso.,-) Ae-dl CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE: 0,-,0 Qd /C ZONE A A GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE ohcice'� SITE SIZE in Square Feet or Acres &rid- EXISTING STRUCTURES ( in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) (Check One) (Check One) 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED C3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC C3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER 0 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 REZONE 0 USE PERMIT )10 MINOR USE PERMIT C3 VARIANCE 0 MINOR VARIANCE 0 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT 0 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPLICATION REQUESTED ;94;, 13 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 0 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 0 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP C3 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION 0 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION 0 CERTIFICATE OF MERGER 0 MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN C3 OTHER r)F..qrRTP-n(-)m PRome-r FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and size of parcels.) av)4e4nos QtJZQQ6<r 04d- c;L b4s1.4 ill e- 1.06at-eA wro) _tg-P gi S U . OWNER CERTIFICATION .:II CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OP THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.) I � 0 DATE: SIGNATURE- 2 AGENT AUTHORIZATION• To Butte County, Department of Development Services; Print Name of Agent and Phone Number Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this 'application for on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Print Name Signature Architect and/or Engineer: Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: ©a Print Name Signature Total Amount Received: y g's- • d!PD AP Number(s) --Legal Description Owners Authorization Zoning Requirements Project Description -� Copies of plot plan Taken by 0.0 Receipt No. 2006 E.H. �.? O7� LD Plante FD' -"/2 Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit)' will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". as of DEPART )WA)JT OF DEVELOP AWW SERVICES., r. LINTY UNIFORM AMLrATION ArrL-11.;A.N 1: - Agent intormation to be provided is on other side: t77i' 51410a5 'A APPLICANT'S NAME ( If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N-UbBER: rel Gi n!a LJd'-Y- U.) I re-je-ss ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFI—CM-USE) 3 8 E) I � F CA 95833 TELEPHONE NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) Ne-ltsorl - SA -t'83 (91b)63a- qoi LOCATION OF PROJECT (Major cross stree I and Address, if any) C1 C) VN N'ejsOvl Q-6 GENERAL INFORMATION RHOMED OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS: A 00 3 Alelsol-) Ae&l CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: 01-no"lle- 'ce ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING0�rLAND USE I SITE SIZE ( in Square, Feat or Acres EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) - PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) (Check One) (Check One) 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION REQ UESTED C3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP C3 REZONE 0 USE PERMIT )0 MINOR USE PERMIT C3 VARIANCE C3 MINOR VARIANCE 0 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT C3 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT V: - C3 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 0 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP 0 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION 13 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION M CERTIFICATE OF MERGER E3 MD41NG AND RECLAMATION PLAN 13 OTHER FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and size of parcels.) -fest ✓►GtS'1Qt-L)QQ1C&d .3 e-ki S�Itoa 4 ac r 11 be- LonxfeA wt -m -i'4 6­4-fS74-1,-W lfasf, OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER. I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.) DATE: SIGNATURE -�ZIL6 d' GENT AUTHORIZAT& To Butte County, Department of Development Services; 'Szv e- f- _7TH Print Name of Agent and Phone Number Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Print Name Signature Architect and/or Engineer: Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: , Date Received: Jho t',-1 Print Name Signature Total Amount Received: 410.5- - �' ___1 AP Number(s) Legal Description X,,, -Owners Authorization Zoning Requirements Project Description —� Copies of plot plan Taken by Receipt No. 6�0/;70 E.H. �� LD Plan .4, FD `3 Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit)' will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ as of Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". r COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) _General Information: E 3. of �,_A_ Address of project: Assessor's Parcel Numbei Name, address, and teleO Date Filed and/or developer, and/or project sponsor: ;�� F= number of person to be contacted concerning this project: 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regions state and federal agencies: Cl`pun-}-N lou, 1 dt►%oo, Ove i n rb�/c412iP4210.nJ0 I 5. Existing. general plan designation. 6. Existing zoning district: 7. How is land currently used? d.�,�{ ,� �nm,n.,► ��� �,.� 2�v1 Si.l_r ax ` 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this o is filerf). acld 10-% Project Description: 9. Site size: Se e__ Feet) (Acres/Sq. . 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes ✓No r 12. Proposed development schedule 13. Associated projects 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development Attach description of project containing -the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division ❑ 1 facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items'checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES - NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. — 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality . or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. — 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. _ 1Z ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 2 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. . Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach. photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. _ 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one - family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development -(height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature for / K:\FORMS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 3 • � J X cingula, WIRELESS January 9, 2002 �. County of Butte Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Minor Use Permit Application — Pacific Bell Wireless (DBA Cingular Wireless) Proposed Collocation of Telecommunication facility on an existing telecommunications tower located at 2003 Nelson Road, Oroville. Dear Sir/Madam: I have enclosed herewith the following information required for submittal of a minor use permit application to locate telecommunications equipment/antennas on an existing telecommunications tower located at 2003 Nelson Road, Oroville. • Department of Development Services Application Form; • Environmental Information Form; • Letter of Agency/Authorization to File Permit Application; • Application Fees in the amount of�lrgs' • Vicinity Map; • Justification Statement, Including RFR/EMF Verification; • 35 Sets of Photo Simulations; • Service Area Map, Showing All Handoff Sites, Before & After Build of This Site; • Search Ring Map; • Copy of FCC License; • RF Study Showing Cumulative Effects of All Equipment at Site; • Photos of Site • 35 Sets of Proposed Site Plans (folded to 81/2" X 11');and • 1 Set of Reduced Plans, (81/2 " X 11). If there are any questions regarding the application, please contact me at (916) 561- 4187. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. Sincerely *Uidal gst n, Project Planner enclosures Cingular Wireless • 3851 North Freeway Blvd. • Sacramento, CA 95834 • USE PERMIT and MINOR USE PERMIT COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their application packet for a communications facility. Please include this checklist along with your submittal. Applicant Planner 1 • 0//A"completed, signed, Uniform Application. and Environmental Information form. If the application is signed by an agent for the property. owner, an agent authorization form must be submitted. along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 2. R Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (any unused portion of the deposit will be returned upon final action, if any remains.) (Planner advises applicant) 3. Ll Thirty-five (35) copiePs of plans which shall include a detailed site � lan drawn to scale. All plans shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no greater than 24" x 36". The finished plans shall be folded to 8'/z" x 11 ". The detailed site plan must include: a. L..7 Name and add - ress of Applicant, Engineer and/or person who prepared the plan. b. tom" Property. lines and lot dimensions. P C. E3 --Assessor Parcel Number(s) and the street address. d• u L_f` 'Proposed use and/or uses of the property. e. [:: Proposed landscaping plan, if applicable. f LTJ Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the ro erty P property (including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, parking areas, wells, septic tanks and leach fields). IF INSUFFICIENT rNFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCObIPLETE. I • • 0 g. 12 0 Distances from an significant natural and Y gni constructed features of the property, such as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains, bodies of water, railroads, to the property lines. h. Location of all slope banks, ponds, creeks, buttes, sloughs, rock outcroppings, natural drainage courses, irrigation canals and existing vegetation worthy of consideration for preservation, such as oak trees. i. ❑ 3 Any existing faults or fractures and geolo . gis hazards. j• North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an g eng ineerin scale with the preferred scale of 1" = 20', with a north arrow preferably oriented to the too of sheet. k• Building setbacks from the ultimate road right-of-way (front, rear, sides). 1• D____�roposed and existing on-site driveways and/or roads. m.' Er -'Location, height, and materials of walls and fences (sections may be required). n. All driveways, drawn to scale, on adjacent and across the street properties within 100 feet of the subject site. o. LJ Existingcurbs utters sidewalks and existing v , g g pa ing widths on-site or within 100 feet of the site, on adiacent and across the street.proyerties. P. U Nearest cross streets on both sides with plus or minus distances from subject site. q• " El' Approximate location of all buildings within 1,000 feet, on adjacent properties. r. ❑ ❑ -Existing and nearest fire hydrants. S. U Access, both pedestrian and vehicular, -showing service areas and points of ingress and egress. t. ❑ ❑ Elevation contours, at a minimum per USGS maps. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 2 The following. additional items are required per Butte County Code Section 24-262.E. 7. , U State l ment of Justification: a• Includes a description of the proposed Facility, including the type of facility being requested. 5. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 3 4. ❑ Conceptual Grading Plan Items to be shown include: a. ❑ ❑ Natural areas to b preserved.. b. ❑ ❑ Proposed cut fill areas in contrasting colors of zipatone pattern. c• ❑ ❑ Existing and roposed contours.within 100 feet of project boundaries. CNd• ❑ ❑ Proposed ' ge and flood control facilities. e. ❑ ❑ . Erosio control measures (e.g. - slope landscaping). f ❑ ❑ N al drainage. g• ❑ ❑ Elevations and finished contours. h• ❑ Location of retaining walls, drainage channels and existing structures. i ❑ ❑ Location, elevation and size of proposed building pads. j ❑ All plans must be clear and legible. 5•- ❑ ❑ One copy of 8 %" x.1 V transparency reduction of the detailed site plan. 6. =1 ❑ A vicinity map showing closest major cross streets, zoning and existing land use. The following. additional items are required per Butte County Code Section 24-262.E. 7. , U State l ment of Justification: a• Includes a description of the proposed Facility, including the type of facility being requested. 5. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 3 00 b. fHeight from natural grade to the top of proposed Facility. c. 'El D'Support equipment proposed: d. 1E EJ"'RFR/EMF and wattage ou ut data g out including the number of channels. e. 'El Horizontal and vertical location coordinates. 8. 0 Proposed elevations of the structure and any accessory buildings, including building height and other physical dimensions, drawn to graphic scale. 9. Visual impact assessment, photo montages, mock-ups as determined by the Director of Development Services or Planning Commission. The assessment shall identify any proposed trimming of vegetation that will be required for the normal operation of .the Facility. Stealth technology is encouraged. 10. 0 Mock-ups required (may be required at any time durin g the processing of the permit). 11. l A discussion of and supporting information reardin the alternative site selection of at -regarding least a minimum of three to four other sites, if available, including colocation opportunities, and a statement as to why these alternative sites and/or colocation opportunities were rejected. 12. 13"'A complete service area map showing the entire wireless communications network of the provider's twenty (20) miles in all directions from the proposed site for the time period from the filing of the application to twelve (12) months from the filing of the application, for the purpose of visually aiding cumulative environmental analysis, with and without the proposed Facility or Facilities, showing all hand-off sites within the above specified area. 13. U' A graphic depiction of the search ring and all other technical criteria used in determining the proposed Facility location., 14. D' Documentation which identifies failure characteristics of the Facility structure or tower and demonstrates that the site and setbacks are of adequate size to contain falling debris.. 15. LJ Written evidence demonstrating that the selected Facility structure or tower design is as � ty visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical, and engineering considerations, which indicate what type of Facility is required. to provide reasonably effective service and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 4 00 •0 The use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness is mandatory. 16. EM U Applicants which operate common carrier facilities (specifically, but not limited to cellular, PCS, SMR and paging service license f the FCC) shall provide written evidence that the applicant has provided notice to all censed wireless communication service carriers operating within the County of Butte of the plans to develop the site. 17. 'S E Evidence of a valid, current operating license or construction permit from the FCC or, if the applicant is not a wireless communications service provider, a user operating agreement for each and every such provider to which the applicant intends to rent space on the proposed Facility. 18. Q A report, signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer licensed by the FCC, prepared pursuant to FCC OET 65, stating whether - the maximum radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic radiation (RF/EMF) to be emitted by the proposed Facility, taking into account all other Facilities, both existing and known future Facilities, at the proposed site and adjacent properties, conforms to safety standards adopted by the FCC, if applicable. The reports prepared for Facilities shall conform to the reporting requirements set by the County and FCC OET 65 human exposure standards. The report shall also analyze the evidence provided in support of the proposed Facility location, height and radiated power, frequency, the number of channels, and all other related data and present alternatives for the location, height and radiated power, pursuant to the requirements of this section. If the proposed Facility exceeds FCC OET 65 human exposure standards, applicant shall also provide additional comprehensive technical and planning information regarding how the applicant shall protect all persons from such excessive exposure consistent with all Federal and State requirements, and any additional County requirements. 19. ETA 0 Landscaping and painting plans for the completed project 20. E�fl 13—Projects in Agricultural Zones (A-5 through A-160) shall, prior to submitting an application fora proposed Facility, submit a site plan of the proposed Facility to the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner for comment and send a notification letter to all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County informing them of the proposed site location and tower height. No hearing on an application for a proposed facility in any agricultural zone will be scheduled, nor shall any Administrative Permit for any such facility be issued without proof that the Butte.County Agricultural Commissioner and all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County have been notified, as specified herein. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 5 21. 00 Is • LJ All applications for Facilities s that are proposed to be located within the boundaries of any Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan or Airport Area of Influence, as adopted or designated from time to time by the Butte County Airport Land- Use Commission,,shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division, and a copy submitted to the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission for review regarding consistency with adopted Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plans and for recommendations addressing potential impacts to air navigation within the Airport Area of Influence. The County may in its sole discretion retain an independent consultant to review either -individual elements of or the.entire application and advise the County at the applicant's sole expense. Additional information may be required in order to clarify; amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Signature: Applicant eprese tative Signature: a-1 z4�:` Planner Receiving Application K FORMT-SUBMITAU'.CHECKLIS CELLUP. WPO Date � -11O,29, Date:. cid IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 6 PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST Project Planners fill out this in-house checklist upon receipt of a new project. Project Number: Project/Application Name: Project Site Zoning: General Plan Designation: APN: Project Planner: Date completed: ❑ Is the project located within any of the following areas? ❑ ❑ North Chico Specific Plan Summer Range ❑ Oroville Enterprise Zone ❑ ❑ Williamson Act Land CLCA: ACRES: ❑ 100 Year Flood Plain ❑ Within FEMA Floodway ❑ Within DWR Floodway ❑ Dam Inundation Area ❑ Watershed Protection Overlay Zone ❑ East Avenue Specific Plan ❑ Chico Area Greenline (Project in area where Greenline policies apply) ❑ Greater Chico Area Redevelopment Area ❑ Nitrate Action Plan Area ❑ Planning Areas ❑ Urban Reserve ❑ Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area ❑ Paradise Urban Reserve ❑ Oroville Area Land Use Plan (Adopted 3/29/84) ❑ Oroville Urban Reserve ❑ Chico Area Land Use Plan (Adopted 3/18/90) ❑ Chico Urban Reserve ❑ Gridley -Biggs Land Use Plan (Adopted 8/586) ❑ Gridley Urban Reserve ❑ Honcut Area ❑ Cohasset Area ❑ Palermo Area ❑ Chapman/Mulberry Planning Area (in process of adoption 9-14-99) ❑ Deer Herd Areas ❑ Designated Development Zone ❑ Winter Range ❑ Critical Winter Range ❑ Summer Range ❑ Critical Summer Range ❑ Major Migration Corridor ❑N ❑ Intermediate Deer Range ❑ If Constrained, The Minimum Parcel Size Is acres. CLUP Area ❑ AIRPORT AREA OF INFLUENCE ❑ Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan ❑ Chico ❑❑ Paradise Skypark ❑ Paradise Skypark Ranchero ❑ Ranchero ❑ Oroville ❑ Oroville ❑ Airport Land Use Commission Review (ALUC) Required ❑ Urban Area (As defined in Improvement Standards for Chapter 20) ❑ City of Chico ❑ Durham ❑ City of Gridley ❑ City of Oroville ❑ Mountain Recreational Area ❑ Sphere of Influence ❑ . City of Chico ❑ City of Gridley ❑ City of Oroville ❑ City of Biggs ❑ City of Paradise ❑ Watershed Areas ❑ Butte Creek ❑ Cherokee ❑ Big Chico Creek El Wyman Ravine Study Area Little Chico Creek ❑ Rock Creek Study Area ❑ Sacramento River Conservation (SB 1086) ❑ WP Overlay Zone Area Essential Services a NJ Public Water District Public Sewer District ❑ Well(s) ❑ On-site Sewer If well and/or on-site sewage disposal, has Environmental Health determined the application filing requirements? ❑ Pre -application review complete ❑ Pre -application review not required ❑ Drainage District/CSA ❑ Fire District ❑ Butte County ❑ El Medio Fire District ❑ Federal Aid Road(s ❑ Other Permits required from other agencies ❑ Department of Water Resources (DWR)/ Reclamation Board ❑ Department of Fish and Game (DFG) ❑ CALTRANS ❑ Regional Water Quality Control Board ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Butte County Air Quality Control District ❑ Other Comments: Version: 9/28/99 CAMy DocumentsTROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST.doc Agency Special Review ❑ Office of Mine Reclamation ❑ HCD (Mobile Home Parks) ❑ Department of Fish and Game ❑ Other PERMITTING AUTHORIZATION AGREEMENT This Permitting Authorization Agreement ("Permitting Authorization") is made and entered into this 12th_ day of _November_, 2001 by and between American Towers, Inc., a Delaware corporation having a business address at 501 Canal Boulevard, Suite E, Point Richmond, California 94804 ("ATC") and Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company dba Cingular Wireless -having a business address at 3851 North Freeway Blvd. Sacramento, CA. 95834. For purposes of this Permitting Authorization, ATC. shall be deemed to include any affiliate or subsidiary of ATC. 1 RECITALS 1. Customer and ATC desire to enter into an agreement for the use of space (the "Agreement") at a tower site owned or leased by ATC located at 2750 I. H. 27, Nelson, CA - Nelson - 082603. 2. Customer has determined that certain local government permits or approvals will be required as a condition to installing and operating its equipment at the Tower Site; 3. Customer desires to commence operations at the Tower Site as soon as possible after executing the Agreement; 4. Customer desires to commence applications for permits and approvals ("Permits") at Customer's sole risk prior to executing the Agreement and ATC is willing to allow Customer to do so, contingent upon certain terms and conditions and the execution of this Permitting Authorization by Customer. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the payment of One Dollar ($1.00) from Customer to ATC, receipt of which is acknowledged, Customer and ATC agree as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Permitting Authorization, this Permitting Authorization is expressly contingent on the authorization of the owner or landlord of property underlying the Tower Site if applicable. 2. Customer shall submit any and all plans, surveys, permit applications and other documentation to ATC for ATC's review and approval prior to filing with government authorities or agencies having jurisdiction. No plans or documentation shall be submitted to any government authority or agency without ATC's prior express written approval. The rights granted Customer hereunder shall automatically lapse upon the earlier of (i) 180 days following the execution of this Permitting Authorization or (ii) execution of the Agreement. If the rights granted hereunder shall lapse without Customer and ATC having executed the Agreement, then Customer shall immediately terminate all activities in connection with the pursuit of Permits, including withdrawal from any scheduled hearings, or at ATC's sole option, assign to ATC the right to pursue and obtain Permits in its own name. In no event shall Customer record any Permit in the public records without ATC's prior express written consent. 4. If Customer shall obtain any Permits without having executed the Agreement within 180 days of the date of execution of this Permitting Authorization, Customer shall, at ATC's sole option and direction (i) assign to ATC all such Permits that are permitted to be assigned by the issuing authority; or (ii) file a statement with the Permit issuing authorities and ATC relinquishing the Permits. If Customer shall fail to make such assignment or filing as directed by ATC, then ATC may elect to act as agent of Customer for such purpose, without any further action being required of Customer or ATC. • • • • Customer shall indemnify and hold harmless ATC, its directors, officers, employees, shareholders, successors and assigns from all loss, claims, costs or damage to persons or to the Tower Site arising out of Customer's breach of this Permitting Authorization. The indemnity provisions contained herein shall survive the expiration of this Permitting Authorization. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Customer and ATC have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC, a Nevada Limited LiabMPBRAMOW.FJR. r Wireless By: Its: REGIONAL MANAGER Date: NETWORK ncoi nVAer�t rrc�-nvr�r�uroTn �— American Towers, Inc., A Dela are corporation By: a:::� lu Its: �; !'. 164 wA1uJ Date: • 0 • 0 PROPOSAL JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT Pacific Bell Wireless (DBA Cingular Wireless) Proposed PCS Facility Site #SA 683 Nelson, CA APN: 038-250-025 Introduction Cingular Wireless is continuing to deploy the infrastructure of its wireless communications network in California, called a "Personal Communication Service" (PCS). PCS, like cellular telephone systems, employs transceiver stations that carry and hand off phone. signals as the caller moves from one area to another. In addition to wireless voice communication, PCS technology offers paging, message sending, and data transmission on a wireless platform. The objective of the proposed project is to provide continuous coverage along Highway 99 as well at the western portions of Oroville Lake. Approval Requests Cingular Wireless hereby respectfully requests approval to allow for installation of six (6) additional antenna panels, (3 proposed and 3 future), one 4' microwave dish (future) with related ground mounted equipment, on an existing ATC (American Tower) lattice tower located at 2003 Nelson Rd in an area zoned agriculture. Project Description The current ATC tower is located near the northwest edge of the parcel. The area is generally used for agriculture surrounding the property. The Western Canal Water District office occupies the eastern portion of the parcel. The proposal includes: • Add to existing 194' lattice tower, 6 dual polar antennas (3 proposed and 3 future) on two sectors at a centerline height of 123, and one 4' microwave dished, a future installation with the height to be determined at a future time. The Height of the antenna support structure with all equipment will not increase as a result of the proposal. • Two Base Transceiver Station (BTS) equipment cabinets (one proposed, one future), 5'8" tall x 43"wide x 2'4" deep, will be located in an irregular shaped lease area in close proximity to the base of the lattice tower. This equipment will be placed on a 52" raised concrete platform with safety rails surrounding the top of the platform. • Electrical and telephone connection panels will be located adjacent to the equipment cabinets. Electrical and telephone connections will be supplied to the equipment cabinets from existing utility systems on the subject parcel. 1 00 Site Description • 0 The subject parcel is an irregular shape, consisting of the existing facility, the Water Canal office and vacant land. The proposed lease area will be located entirely within area owned/leased or controlled by ATC.. The proposed project area is currently fenced. Area Description The zoning to the north, south, east and west of the site is zoned Agricultural. Location Choice Discussion The proposed location utilizes an existing lattice tower. The project, as it is proposed, eliminates the need for an additional tower within the vicinity as well as meets Cingular Wireless' objective of providing continuous coverage along Highway 99 as well as in the western Lake Oroville region. Other possible sites in the area were dismissed due to lack of vertical height or the need to construct a new facility. The overall height of the lattice tower will not be increased and Cingular Wireless antennas will be below other existing antennas and microwaves. _ Closing Discussion The establishment and operation of this wireless communications facility, as proposed, will not be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use, or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood of the proposed use, or to the general welfare of the County of Butte. a). The proposed addition to the existing lattice tower will help to reduce the proliferation of freestanding communication sites. b) The facility is proposed at a location that will not interfere with existing land uses on the subject parcel and throughout the surrounding area. No additional parking, utilities, or services are required at this site as a result of this proposal. The location of the facility will not interfere with future uses of the subject parcel and surrounding parcels that are consistent with the provisions of the zoning ordinance for the respective districts or the General Plan of the County of Butte. c) The proposed facility will contribute to the provision of an enhanced wireless communication technology for general public and emergency services use. d) The establishment and operation of the proposed wireless communication facility is not expected to have a negative effect on the environment. 2 11-MI(J. Uldf JCd[L;ll 1'11111y IU1 O11C OM -000, IVCIJUII, Ueti11V11lld 1 _ f� O t oto N'N elson 1 ®Ison-eta 0.616 mi ___U_—Nelson Stippee-Rd— ;==Nelson=Shipp-'-- ee�d j F -`�'. nmi n7 n4 nR n -R 1 12 9 40 Copyright ©1988.2000 Microsoft Corp. and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. http://www.microsott.comtStreets m Copyright 1999 by Geographic Data Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. m 1999 Navigation Technologies. All rights reserved. This data includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities ® Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Page 1 © Copyright 1999 by Compusearch Micromarketing Data and Systems Ltd. ��� f'z.+..'� v.<r-...r .•,... ,, -- ',.h�i.•t'G•�i •fir �=!`:a •:t�f:;_' ^• f.0 v't`scaiia i., It.•rN :v ice_ .. -•�-•""•l<•!sii� `�Y�� .r;i ���Vr�*. •air-:)�..,. .: ;�..rf .M-+� Lii.� I. ..1 r f � y ..>•. e . �� (�+• �� �.�•- . :F tA+DI0S'TA'iHON=A•U'iHORIZ_ATION V a'� •o- rte• �•.t: ��rr�� :� .{�'•?�.��.� ..}.- .f�.. - "'+'� i"'•i �s._ �•- �-%}-_ r �! RsditiScrikes'�"•t:t.�—' �:.x. ��a;;'.:� •^�• : _ 47 w.' '+i:: k.�..•:•r`^.�.::Ki:aY�} ...� Y} _r .. .. .l,r .� . '1"'E�'-.�}•:rl� i`_'`r'J. , .• _ .� • "._�<N� tri„_ ...:. .g�Y.. _ � ._ ..: j ��. �..}:'...—.: � PACIFIC Taxgs moexe SSS` as20 Rosawpo_a Ori�i • .. •• __ � V _'; •�. _.. • - • - :, - ^ ,:�.. .... Bids. Z 41 Floor - = ' ` '' � `j "- _ ,.... , _. ; _am m 147 Tie 6ccawe hoof >< aatborimdL Bt the period Ir3ir. b mriitrad asd operik ladbo=mlktiv4 bcfls do tie - ==r u*= with dn, k"" amd oosdeid" l�+eissAdt driT�t7d. Ti�L ambo at n is b da proritioii d the Camataaiptiostl Act d 1 att as�eadod, tot�rent Acta d Lse:ttio�sl ttattiat asd apoe�cats ' -':; w .hats the tJ't>blod S�tiot iti sipiloeY• ad ail peYtincs tsits aid 1 d dt y'Sadcni - fcca aeon ameaitiod Is ow 47 ddc US Cada mood" Re�daat:: Itsitial Cwm Date. . Fc+Fyew Quad Out Osie :.. Juni 23, i m .-June 23, 2000 ' - .. Jump 23,206, Mast to Sac600 f0 ") d the commmcmimm Amt at I Im. as mcadw (41 USC! 3090M obilt boom , t11[ idliO�t� T tt1ClIC d0a ane ttQ V tbt Ifc> t t t b OQtl7ft a Qattlon bw a�.. tit m the Mc d lfodfecam - brand the tram tbceod am s a� a otba Am= than adehotuc>da ad bacm,d , cies bcnpc mar do nck rseecd Sama+da t:hall be nota d tx attacrntsc uma dfltrcd in %wLaooa of the C An d 19Lt• a aocadad (+, U S C. ; IS 1. a sad 1 Tbss iectaec a aAllca in lcraa to &C tt¢t at I= or 906091 cadarod b% Scam `(X d tic C Act d 1911, as nn=dod (CUSC Ital Coa fesome csaetsa Kd ca PW 1 r •A. A all. FAt :j '4�0 .ancrs aMncsats+d •MS tbtt aet>torv�tiort t lwwc l)ec S.ae 2J. 1"S fC[ Fars +6za psttt I K:\PROJECTS\1VIINOR USE. PERMIT\Cingular Wireless\maillistMUP0214.doc 038250025000 WESTERN CANAL WATER DISTRICT P O BOX 176 RICHVALE CA 95974 038250002000 R GORRILL RANCH ENTERPRISES P O BOX 427 DURHAM CA 95938 038250010000 BJORKLUND GLENN ETAL 1428 GILSTRAP AVE GRIDLEY CA 95948 038250043000 BROCKMAN GERALD MANTFORD POBOX 66 NELSON CA 95958 038250046000 HASTEN MICHAEL J & JULIE A P O BOX 1058 DURHAM CA 95938-1058 038270059000 ARBUCKLE MERRITT & MARGARET P0BOX 954 DURHAM CA 95938 '38250025000 CINGULAR WIRELESS 3851 N FREEWAY BLVD. SACRAMENTO CA 95833 038130026000 BORGNINO ELIZABETH B 32 EDWIN DR KENSINGTON CA 94707 038250008000 PETERSON RODNEY W P0BOX 476 DURHAM CA 95938 038250011000 SHEPPARD L JOHN & CHUDEEN L 600 BIGGS EAST HWY BIGGS CA 95917 038250044000 SHEPPARD L JOHN & CHUDEEN 734 E BIGGS HWY BIGGS CA 95917 038270009000 HOSKISON THOMAS L 2500 ZANELLA WAY STE D267 CHICO CA 95928 •38250025000 AMERICAN TOWER/W.C.W.D. 2003 NELSON RD OROVILLE CA 95965 038130045000 MEL BAY FARMS 2661 ENCINAL RD LIVE OAK CA 95953 038250009000 PETERSON RICHARD TRUSTEE ETAL P O BOX 1222 DURHAM CA 95938 038250015000 LUNDBERG HARLAN D & CAROLYN P O BOX 337 RICHVALE CA 95974 038250045000 MCFARLANE & MCFARLANE 7717 E BARSTOW AVE CLOVIS CA 93611 038270058000 JAUREGUI FELIPE & CARMEN POBOX 43 NELSON CA 95958 - � � lti�'a tL L.i ��- -�'` �038�`�D-..025 • 1� V P p ` 1 , - c3 — `LSC) -- -.. 00.5 G�rzso� . r 04 T . a. 1 a s 9 V=Nrusao C II<—L "v.- / v O LterofftiqeOMemorandum - O TO: File MUP 02-14 (Cingular Wireless), APN 038-250-025 FROM: Steve Betts, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Height Increase Planning Division Phone: 538-7153 DATE: October 15, 2002 FAX: 538-7785 Received this date a request from the applicant to increase the height of the antennas from 123 feet above ground level to 126 feet above ground level. After review of the site plans showing the revised height it was determined that the change in height was minor and would not have any impacts to humans or the environment. The reason for the increase height in the antennas was to provide required separation between antennas. cc: Building Division X cingularw WIRELESS October 11, 2002 County of Butte Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Approved MUP 02-14 at Nelson. Cingular Wireless Collocation of Telecommunication Facility on an existing telecommunications tower located at 2003 Nelson Road, Oroville. Dear Mr. Betts: Please find the enclosed revised drawings showing the new center line height of 126' for our approved facility located at 2003 Nelson Road, Oroville. The change in height was necessary due to additional separation requirements between antennas. The height of the tower will not change as we will be located well below the top of the existing tower. We are requesting Butte County Planning Department approval of the change in antenna height. Please let me know if you need any additional documentation to approve this change. I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience and if there are any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (916) 561-4187. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. Sincerely Linda Langston, Project Planner enclosures D 6 E U UI r. n OCT 15 2002 ' BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION Cingular Wireless.- 3851 N. Freeway Blvd. • Sacramento, CA 95834 RE: Planning permit Page 1 of 2 Betts, Steve From: Langston, Linda [Linda. Langston@cingular.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 10:18 AM To: 'Betts, Steve' oZ-.y Subject: RE: Planning permit 0o P. Great. I will submit revised plans shortly, probably next week. 9/11 for that hearing date will really be helpful. I am assuming that is in front of a different hearing body than my planning Cmsn hearing on 9/12 for my project in Magalia? Thanks again, Linda Linda Langston Planner-Cingular Wireless Ofc 916-561-4187 Cell 916 832-1901 Fax 916 561-4154 -----Original Message ----- From: Betts, Steve [mailto:SBetts@ButteCounty.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 3:05 PM To: 'Langston, Linda ' Subject: RE: Planning permit No problem, we can approve the change administratively. It is a minor change since the overall height of the tower will not increase. I will need a new set of plans, though, to sign off on and place in our file. I just looked in scheduling for the Planning Manger hearing for MUP 03-03 (west Chico) and it looks like we should be able to schedule it for 9/11, not 9/25 as I indicated in my previous e-mail to you. The cutoff date for scheduling is next Monday (26th) and I am sure we can make it. Again, this is just a tentative date. -----Original Message ----- From: Langston, Linda[mailto: Linda. Langston@cingular.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 1:39 PM To: 'Betts, Steve' Subject: RE: Planning permit Steve, Itis MUP 02-14 at Nelson. The tower is .1.94 feet overall so we are not increasing the overall height We are only needing to move_ up 3 feet on the tower. It won't change the look, photosims or design at all. Thanks, Linda 8/28/2002 RE: Planning permit Page I of I Betts, Steve From: Langston, Linda [Linda. Langston@cingular.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 1:39 PM To: 'Betts, Steve' Subject: RE: Planning permit Steve, Itis MUP 02-14 at Nelson. The tower is 194 feet overall so we are not increasing the overall height. We are only needing to move up 3 feet on the tower. It won't change the look, photosims or design at all. Thanks, Linda Linda Langston Planner-Cingular Wireless Ofc 916-561-4187 Cell 916 832-1901 Fax 916 561-4154 -----Original Message ----- From: Betts, Steve [mailto:SBetts@ButteCounty.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 12:48 PM. To: 'Langston, Linda ' Subject: RE: Planning permit Linda, First Question: The west Chico project (File # MUP 03-03) is still waiting for comments to come back in. The due date is August 26th. Once that date has passed, I will schedule the project for a hearing. Most likely it will be on Sep. 25th. This is a tentative date only. The application looks good and I don't expect any negative comments to come back in for County agencies. I have pretty much completed the staff report for this project. Second Question: 1 will need additional information before I can answer this question. What tower site are you referring too? I will have to look at the approved plans to see what it looks like. I don't see this as being'a problem and we may be able to call it a minor change and sign off on it. However, I need to review the plans and other information in the file before I can make a decision. Be forwarded that the increase in overall height may require another minor use permit. Let me know what site you are referring too, preferable with our file number. Steve 8/28/2002 ■ Complete items 1!2,13. Also complete I I IA. R item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. C. S ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, X or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed t67 Cr"l�ular ��1T 3 85 f1�N�'' Eregeg.,�� S aeramento mco oa-iy �ay6BlvdL 9AiW:95833 D. Is If .eived by (Please Pri rly) W Date )kms I /c c. .'k q ❑ Agent 1 ❑ Addressee ,ry address different from item 1? ❑ Yes enter delivery address below: ❑ No ` 3. Service Type Ij %4 Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number(CI-?001"1940, 0005- 44?6- 2833"Z- PS 833• is t I, — .,. a , �• PS Form 3811, July iw§ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' co' estic keturn Receipt' ' ' ' ' ' 102595.00-M-0952 UNITED STATESP S gr' •'i! "irb' c 'f' ' f i 'i 'is � R { {( {{(,I First -Class Mes' Postage &Fees Paid USPS Permit No. G-10 • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DE EL N S VT E PLANNING DIVISION0 ], 7 County Center Drive 2002 Oroville, CA 95965-3397 SEP 9 BUTTE GOUN'ry R pi At, SION V service -CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT' rance Covera (b6mesticonly; maiii / M TO ru .A Postage $~ V zr Certified Fee �. Postmark Retum Receipt Fee Here ul (Endorsement Required) C3 p Restricted Delivery Fee -P 0 (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ O �- .� ular Cr tib; sei��i�. ing�,}:: y B1Vd3'` t aF�Y •@c •.. ^c P. ste i85E1fFNFreewa� . o 5833 y O Gry,,5 ggrClnlento, K August 29, 2002 Cingular Wireless 3851 N. Freeway Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95833 RE: Minor Use Permit, File No. MUP 02-14 APN# 038-250-025 Ladies and Gentlemen: B E A U T Y utrwrt I mtry i yr utvrwrmtry I arrsvwta 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 The total cost for the processing of the above -referenced application which was approved by the Planning Commission on May 23, 2002, is $412.00. On January 16, 2002, a deposit was made in the amount of $485.00, of which $92.00 was disbursed to Environmental Health Division, $43.00 to CDF/Fire Department. The amount received on account to Planning Division was $350.00. The cost exceeded the Planning Division deposit by $62.00. Below is a breakdown: Professional Planner $ 177.00 Mapping $ 88.50 Clerical $ 146.50 Total $ 412.00 Deposit on 1/16/02, Receipt # 20170 $ 350.00 Total Amount Over Deposits $ 62.00 Total Amount Due and Payable $ 62.00 Please make a check payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $62.00 and remit it to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 within 30 calendar days (September 28, 2002). Should you have any questions, please contact this office Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at 538-7601. Sincerely, �JlCL%u2, (�2LU� Diane Lewellen Office Assistant III JAmup 02-14.doe ■ Complete items 1, 2, AW.•Also complete A. R ceiyed by (Please Prirlirly) B. Dqte of Pelivery item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse C. Signa re - so that we can return the card to you. / J ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,X IV ❑ Agent or on the front if space permits. �`� ❑ Addressee D. Is Oelivery address different from item 1? •❑ Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No .� rp _ 3851•NT r'e %;Y�YY K M1�'1F;:•4tA`wS a� �V'�J'+,1!fMR•,..Y.yr�, �Ye ,G . .',�l/•I Sac'toC�AX95833 F �" 3. S rviceTYP y Certifi ail ❑ x 8ss Mail ❑ Registered=---__ - Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ,C]-C.O.D. MAP b)-- H 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number (Copy 'roe--;7 ro-; 7001"--1 940"0005". I . . ... r • . - .- tf PS Form 3811, july'1999 M1 Domestic`Return Receipt ' ..... 102595.00-M-0952 UNITED STATESP TAL SERVICE 0 First -Class Mail Postage & Fees Paid USPS Permit No. G-10 • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965.3397 Y 'S --3 4 Ill till IIIf III I Ill IIIll IIIll IIIfill t„If If I,II„i DECLARATION OF FEES DUE p (Coornia Fish and Game Code Section 6.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Cingular Wireless 3851 N Freeway Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95833 FILING NO. Project Title/file number: MUP 02-14, MINOR USE PERMIT CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION (X) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt. $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED () A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. ( ) OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). #20588 2. () NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: M. A. Meleka Title: Principal Planner Lead Agency: Butte County Department of Development Services Date: July 15, 2002 TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. KAPlanningTROJECTSWINOR USE PERMI'Mingular Wireless\noempd • APPENDIX A i NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 X County Clerk County of Butte 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Project Title: MUP 02-14, Minor Use Permit Assessor's Parcel No.: 038-250-025 FROM: Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Applicant: Cingular Wireless, 3851 N Freeway Blvd., Sacramento, CA 95833 Project Location -Specific: approximately 1.5 miles west of the Town of Nelson on Nelson Road, and approximately 3,000 feet east of Durnel Drive, Nelson. Project Location -City: Nelson Project Location -County: Butte Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: Minor Use Permit to add six (3 proposed and -3 future) antennas to an existing 194 foot communications tower Name of Person or Agency Approving Project: Butte County Planning Commission Exempt Status: (Check One) Ministerial (Sec. 15073) _ Declared Emergency (Sec. 15071(a)) Emergency Project (Sec. 15071 (b) and (c)) X Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: 1.5305 (a) Reasons why project is exempt: Minor lot line adjustments,. side yard, and set back variances not resulting in the creation of any new parcel; Contact Person: Craig Sanders Telephone: (530) 538-7601 If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes _ No Date Received For Filing: Signature, M. Principal Plann 4r j:\linda\noe.nod\noe. # 1 --——————— ———— ------------- ------------- COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROVILLE, CA ATR NO 4M05 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAG # 328 DATE 6/1212002 FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE 'CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 6112 RECEIPTS: PLANNING APPL FEES GENL 0010 480001 .4210900 101001 330.00 A NODINOE CLERK'S FILING FE GENL 0010 470001 4612319 101001 ($25) Project Number Amount of Fee IMUP 02-14 CINGULAR VARELESS - APN: 038-250-025 $25.00 AUNT MINNIE DEPOSITS PLAN -PERF TR 1001 (150012000) Project Number .ADM 02-28 BECKY YOUNT - 040-030-054 $ 280 1011305 Amount of Fee $1,500.00 TOTAL $ 19855.00 APPROVED. BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER / r , By: white --treasurer ink --auditor canary --depositor golden roc;=file l LAND OF N A T U RAL W E A L T H AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 August 29, 2002 Cingular Wireless 3851 N Freeway Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95833 CERTIFIED MAIL Re: Minor Use Permit, MUP 02-14 APN# 038-250-025 Gentlemen: Enclosed is your validated Minor Use Permit No. MUP 02-14 to allow Minor Use Permit to add six (3 proposed and 3 future) antennas to an existing 194 foot communications tower. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, U.S'4�*sta'l Service (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Covera *Iovided) Diane Lewellen .olL U S El OAIII rY - ,, r _ .. I - _.- Postage $ - .- I- 0 Certified Fee /p i. �'" 1t Postmark ' Return Receipt Fee \ Here O(Endorsement Required) rt Enc. o Restricted Delivery Fee �4V, (Endorsement Required) C3 1,.— Total Postage & Fees cc: Land Development Division (g)-- Building Division (y) se��TLC`` 11Tgulawlreless AALI 'I"�"t, Lstie 385"l N�Freewa tB`1'v�d IEnvironmental Health (p) �' s rq Department of Forestry (gld) ! o }Sacramento, CA�95833 REVISED MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AUG 2 1 DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) MUP 02-14 PERMIT NO. 038-250-025 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Cingular Wireless is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with the application filed: Minor Use Permit to install six 4 square foot panel antennas at a height of 123 feet on an existing 194 -foot lattice tower and a 4 -foot diameter microwave dish antenna and two ground -mounted equipment cabinets. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 12 months of the date of approval. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of approval, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. A Minor Use Permit subject to lapse may be renewed for an additional period of up to one year, provided that sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for renewal of the Minor Use Permit is filed with the Planning Division on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 1 i^ 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a permit. Conditions of Approval: Planning Division: 1. The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height they will be located. 2. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County, and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. 3. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 5. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. 6. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 7. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 8. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property 2 owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use fora period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 13. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 14. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division no later than January 31 of each year. 15. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 16. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit D" dated 12/03/01 and is incorporated herein by this reference. 17. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 18. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. 3 0 Buildiniz Division 19. Building permits are required for the antennas and equipment cabinets. Engineer design calculations may be required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings when additional antennas are installed. NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission airman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF Assessor E r' DECLARATION OF FEES DUE (Ce ornia Fish and Game Code Section1 .4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Cingular Wireless 3851 N Freeway Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95833 FILING NO. Project Title/file number: MUP 02-14, MINOR USE PERMIT CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION (X) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt . $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED () A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee () B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee. 3. ( ) OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT / NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). #20588 2. ' ( ) NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: M. A. Meleka Title: Principal Planner Lead Agency: Butte County Department of Development Services Date: July 15, 2002 JUL1 7 200;I �l TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. KAPlanningTROJECTSWINOR USE PERMITMCingular Wireless\noe.wpd H TO: • APPENDIX A • NOTICE OF EXEMPTION Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 X County Clerk County of Butte 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Project Title: MUP 02-14, Minor Use Permit Assessor's Parcel No.: 038-250-025 FROM: Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965. Applicant: Cingular Wireless, 3851 N Freeway Blvd., Sacramento, CA 95833 Project Location -Specific: approximately 1 .5 miles west of the Town of Nelson on Nelson Road, and approximately 3,000 feet east of Durnel Drive, Nelson. Project Location -City: Nelson Project Location -County: Butte Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: Minor Use Permit to add six (3 proposed and'3 future) antennas to an existing 194 foot communications tower Name of Person or Agency Approving Project: Butte County Planning Commission Exempt Status: (Check One) Ministerial (Sec. 15073) Declared Emergency (Sec. 15071(a)) Emergency Project (Sec. 15071 (b) and (c)) X Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: 15305 (a) Reasons why project is exempt: Minor lot line adjustments, side yard, and set back variances not resulting in the creation of any new parcel; Contact Person: Craig Sanders Telephone: (530) 538-7601 If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Date Received For Filing: j:\linda\noe.nod\noe.# 1 Signature, M:q. Mele Principal Plann r ------------ - ---------- COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROVILLE, CA RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAG # 328 FUND DESCRIPTION TITLE ATR NO 44805 DATE 6/1212002 FUND DEPT ACCT CASH CODE 'CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 6112 RECEIPTS: PLANNING APPL FEES GENL 0010 480001 4210900 101001 q NODINOE CLERK'S FILING FE GENL 0010 470001 4612319 101001 (325) Project Number Amount of Fee UUP 02-14 (INGULAR VARELESS - APN: 038-250-025 $25.00 AUNT MINNIE DEPOSITS PLAN -PERF TR 1001 (15002000) Project Number ADM 02-28 BECKY YOUNT- 040-030-054 280 1011305 Amount of Fee $1.500.00 TOTAL $ 1,855.00 -� APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER By_ Bye ,rJ:„L� white --treasurer ink—auditor canary --depositor golden rod=file & L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 July 12, 2002 Cingular Wireless 3851 N Freeway Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95833 CERTIFIED MAIL Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 038-250-025 Gentlemen: ' Enclosed is your validated Minor Use Permit No. MUP 02-14 to allow Minor Use Permit to add six (3 proposed and 3 future) antennas to an existing 194 foot communications tower. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, r lCe�� ��2cv,eQQ� Diane Lewellen OAIII Enc. cc: Land Development Division (g) Building Division (y) Environmental Health (p) Department of Forestry (gld) � 4t. ru Ln 0 F FF I C I A L U ru —0 Postage $ Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee Ostmark C3(Endorsement Required) Here C3 Restricted Delivery Fee C3 (Endorsement Required) L O Total Postage 8 Fees se Er nt i l l �i. . ; Cingr;W rales"s' Street{' 4 b3 is 'rJii? Tt�ri" Ay�34 f+L 0,POF1)3851"NJ46eway1B1vd �` , t;,ty SIgacr`am�n� o, CA`. 958.3.,3 �k,�4 _ MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION I 2 M DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) MUP 02-14 PERMIT NO. 038-250-025 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Cingular Wireless is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with the application filed: Minor Use Permit to install six 4 square foot panel antennas at a height of 123 feet on an existing 194 -foot lattice tower and a 4 -foot diameter microwave dish antenna and two ground -mounted equipment cabinets. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 12 months of the date of approval. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of approval, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. A Minor Use Permit subject to lapse may be renewed for an additional period of up to one year, provided that sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for renewal of the Minor Use Permit is filed with the Planning Division on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 1 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a permit. Conditions of Approval: Planning Division: 1. The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height they will be located. 2. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County, and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. 3. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 5. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. 6. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 7. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 8. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property 2 A owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 13. 14. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 15. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division no later than January 31 of each year. 16. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 3 17. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit D" dated 12/03/01 and is incorporated herein by this reference. 18. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 19. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. Building Division 20. Building permits are required for the antennas and equipment cabinets. Engineer design calculations may be required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings when additional antennas are installed. r t NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chai I an CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF Assessor 0 MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: Butte County Assessor's Office FROM: Butte County Planning Department SUBJECT: Cingular Wireless, MUP 02-14 DATE: July 12, 2002 Pursuant to Section 65863.5 of the Government Code, the following parcel identified as 038-250- 025, was: Rezone from to zoning district. Granted a variance to X Issued a conditional Minor Use Permit to add six (3 proposed and 3 future) antennas to an existing 194 foot communications tower, approximately 1.5 miles west of the Town of Nelson on Nelson Road, and approximately 3,000 feet east of Dumel Drive, Nelson.,A-40 (Agricultural - 40 acre parcels) Gerald L. Moore Broadcast Cosa/tact Mr. Michael Di Grazia Cingular Wireless 3851 North Freeway Boulevard Sacramento, CA 95834 Dear Michael; • June 7, 2002 Phone: 571-0449 (Area 209) Fax: 571-0676 (Area 209) 1101 N. Rosemore Avenue MODESTO, CALIFORNIA 95358-1203 This firm Gerald L. Moore Broadcast Consultant has made an assessment of the proposed facility, Cingular site no. 82603, in Nelson, California. The Assessment was made to comply with the requirements of Butte County zoning rules paragraph 12. The assessment consisted of measurements of the existing facility with Verizon and several microwaves in operation and analysis included the proposed Cingular Wireless facility. On June 3, 2002 I conducted measurements at the Cingular proposed site no. 82603 in Nelson, California. The results of these measurements determined of the current operations compliance with the FCC guidelines for human exposure following the methodology of the Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, August 1997. I measured the field from the current operation at levels below 1 µW/cm2 or 0.2% of the standards for public exposure. Analysis of the proposed operation with both Verizon and Cingular in operation at maximum capacity predicted worst-case power densities over the area studied of 0.46 µW/cm2 (0.07% of the FCC public exposure standards). Therefore, the current operation and proposed operation of this site is in compliance with the FCC, ANSI and IEEE requirements for public exposure to RF radiation. Enclosed is the report detailing the measurements and analysis results, which support the conclusion of compliance to the FCC standards. Respectfully submitted DR, EC�EOWE 0 JUN 1 1 200210 Gerald L. Moore BUTTE COUNTY Enclosures: Report on the RF environment at Nelson, CA, 14 pages (6 copies) • • Report on the Independent Assessment of the RF Environment at the Proposed Lingular Wireless Site No. 82603 Nelson, CA Performed by Gerald L. Moore Broadcast Consultant June 2002 • Introduction • This firm Gerald L. Moore Broadcast Consulting was retained by the Cingular Wireless to make an independent assessment of the RF environment at the Nelson Site Number 82603, Nelson Rd., Nelson, CA. The assessment was made to comply with the requirements of Butte County zoning rules paragraph 12 cited below: "12) A report, signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer licensed by the FCC, prepared pursuant to FCC OET 65, stating whether the maximum radio frequency radiationtelectromagnetic radiation (RF/EMF) to be emitted by the proposed Facility, taking Into account all other Facilities, both existing and known future Facilities, at the proposed site and adjacent properties, conforms to safety standards adopted by the FCC, if applicable. The reports prepared for Facilities shall conform to the reporting requirements set by the County and FCC OET 65 human exposure standards. The report shall also analyze the evidence provided in support of the proposed Facility location, height and radiated power, frequency, the number of channels, and all other related data and present alternatives for the location, height and radiated power, pursuant to the requirements of this section. If the proposed Facility exceeds FCC OET 65 human exposure standards, applicant shall also provide additional comprehensive technical and planning Information regarding how the applicant shall protect all persons from such excessive exposure consistent with all Federal and State requirements, and any additional County requirements." Measurements were taken at the site in its current configuration with enly Verizon Wireless and microwaves in operation. Also provided are predictions for the site with the addition of Cingular Wireless proposed facilities. The facility studied consists of a tower with the above cellular and proposed PCS services. Figure 1 is a photograph of the existing tower installation with Verizon Wireless at 108 feet up the tower and 9 microwave dish antennas. FIGURE 1 Existing Facilities Studied Verizon Facility Parameters ✓ Effective Radiated Power (ERP) per channel 100 watts ✓ Maximum number of Channels 13 ✓ Maximum Total ERP. 1300 watts ✓ Center Line of Emissions 108 feet Above Ground (AGL) ✓ Antenna Manufacturer Decibel Products ✓ Antenna Model Number DB810K-XC ✓ Gain 10 dBd ✓ Downtilt p° Microwave Installations ✓ Effective Radiated Power (ERP) per channel ✓ Maximum number of Channels ✓ Maximum Total ERP ✓ Center Line of Emissions ✓ Antenna Manufacturer ✓ Antenna Model Number ✓ Gain ✓ Downtilt 1000 watts 1 1000 watts See table below See table below See table below various dBd 0° Center Line of Emissions AGL Antenna Model 180 feet HP MW Dish 6' diameter 170 feet Std MW dish w/radome 6' diameter 150 feet HP MW dish, 6' diameter 140 feet Std MW dish w/radome 6' diameter 110 feet Grid MW dish, 6' diameter 80 feet Grid MW dish 6' diameter 70 feet HP MW. dish, 6' diameter 35 feet I HP MW dish, 6' diameter 25 feet I Std MW dish w/radome 4' diameter Assumptions ;o Ground is level out from the antenna to 1000 feet P Predicted Power Densities are at 6 feet AGL P Measurements were made throughout the area surrounding the tower The assessment of the RP environment in and around the tower consisted of both analysis and measurements. Measurements were made with Holaday Industries, Inc. H13001 meter (Figure 2). The measurements and analysis were done using the methodology of the Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, Eyalugting Qmpliance with PCC Guideffin-eo-'Arm uman Exposure to Radiofreauencv Electromaanetic Fields. August 1997. K E E H13001 Isotropic Broadband Field Strength Meter FIGURE 2 Summary For Additional Information Call or Write; .' HOLADAY INDUSTRIES, INC: , General Offices: 1.4825, Martin Drive Eden PrairlerMN 55344 1. "'Telephone: (612) 934.4920 Telez:;29.0922' , The site is compliance with the FCC, ANSI and IEEE requirements for public exposure to RF radiation. The analysis predicted worst-case power densities over the area studied of less than 0.50 gW/cm2 (0.07% of standard). Predictions were made per OET Bulletin No. 65. Measurements in the area surrounding the tower found levels below 1 µW/cm2. Fields of between 0.5 to 6.7 µW/cm2 were measured below the power lines and to 40 feet on either side of them. The power lines are at the edge of Nelson Road and on the driveway into the home to the west of the tower. A field of 7 µW/cm2 is 1.15% of the standard at 880 MHz, the most stringent FCC standard for the frequencies transmitted at this facility. Methodology Measurements Measurements were made with the use of the Holaday Industries, Inc. meter shown in Figure 2 above. The meter is designed to detect and measure signals from 0.5 MHz to 6.0 GHz down to a level of 1 gW/cm2. The probes are isotropic (omnidirectional throughout the sphere) and accurate regardless of orientation. The meter indicates the field strength on the analog meter. The levels during test periods were also recorded on a digital recorder HI -3320 in specified units at 4 measurements per second. Measurements were taken throughout the area surrounding the tower, on the fenced property of the Western Canal Water District, within the offices of the Water District and on the driveway to the property to the west of the tower, the nearest home. 3 • Analysis E The ANSI/IEEE/FCC standards are expressed in terms of power density, electric field strength squared and magnetic field strength squared. The power density S can be calculated per equation (6), page 20 FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65 as follows: S + EIRP/(n x R2), where S is - the calculated power density from a RF antenna in µW/cm2. EIRP is - Effective Radiated Power (ERP) referenced to an Isotropic radiator = ERP (watts) x 1.64 x 106 (micro-watts/watt) x Gain(A) n = 3.142 R is - the line of site distance from the antenna in centimeters A - antenna gain -angle b \ below main beam H - height in feet above ground R - distance to calculated field S - Calculated power density in A. µW/cm2 D - distance from antenna structure The parameters used and calculated are FIGURE 3 Power densities are calculated at 6 feet above ground AGE, to represent the height of a person's head. The head is the closest part of the body to the antenna, therefore, the point where the highest level is received by the body. The results are shown graphically as a function of distance from the antenna base (D). The cellular antenna is designed to radiate most efficiently in the horizontal plan. Therefore, the power at angles below the horizontal is reduced. The reduction is expressed as the vertical pattern of the antenna. The Gain(A) of the antenna varies as a function of the angle below the main beam, o. The angle e, R and Gain(A) are determined by H - the height above ground of the antenna center of radiation and D - the distance on the ground from a point directly below the antenna. OET Bulletin 65 states, "For a truly worst-case approximation, 100% ground reflection should be assumed resulting in a potential doubling of predicted field strength and a four -fold increase in (far -field equivalent) power density." Equation (6) provides that worst-cAse approximation. 4 • Results Measurements 11 The area near the cell tower was walked and measurements taken. The first set of measurements, Tag No. 1001, was taken along the canal to the west as far as the driveway/Nelson Road. The second set, Tag No. 1002, was taken beneath the power lines along the driveway into the home on the property to the west of the tower. The third set, Tag No. 1003 was taken in the office building of Western Canal Water District. The fourth set, Tag No. 1004 was taken walking around the fence property of Western Canal Water District. The fifth set, Tag No. 1005 was taken situated under the power lines across the drive way to Western Canal Water District. The measurements are printed out from the HI3320 dataloger at the end of this report. In all areas more than 40 feet from the power lines the measured field was less than 1 µW/cm2. Fields of between 0.5 to 6.7 µW/cm2 were measured below the power lines at the edge of Nelson Road and along the driveway into the home to the west of the tower. The field dropped to below 1 µW/cm2 at distances greater than 40 feet on either side of the power lines. The power lines are located at the south edge of Nelson Road and go into the property west of the tower along the driveway into the home. The fields were measured below the power lines from the east side of the Western Canal Water District Property to beyond the driveway into the house along Nelson Road. Bursts of up to 6.7 µW/cm were observed near the gated entrance to the Water District yard. The fields did not vary with distance from the tower, and appeared to be unrelated to the transmissions from the tower. Even so the fields do not represent an RF hazard to human exposure as outlined in the FCC OET Bulletin No. 65. A field of 7 µW/cm2 is 1.15% of the standard at 880 MHz, the most stringent FCC standard for the frequencies transmitted at this facility. No signal was detected above 0.25 µW/cm2 except below the power lines, This level is less than 0.02% of the FCC standard for public exposure at the lowest transmitting frequency of 880 MHz. These areas designated as Tag No. 1001 through 1005 are shown on Figure 4. Analysis The predicted received fields in µW/cm2 are as shown in Figure 5. The predictions were calculated at 6 feet AGE. The most stringent standard for the facilities at this site is 587 µW/cm2 per the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) C95.1-1992 and the Federal Communications Commission Rules and Regulation as of August 1, 1996. The lowest transmitted frequency is 880 MHz. Facilities Studied Verizon Facility Parameters ✓ Effective Radiated Power (ERP) per channel 100 watts ✓ Number of Channels ✓ Maximum Total ERP ✓ Center kine of Emissions ✓ Antenna Manufacturer ✓ Antenna Model Number ✓ Gain ✓ Downtilt 5 13 1300 watts 108 feet Above Ground (AGE) Decibel Products DB810 K -KC 10 dBd 0° Cingular Wireless Facility Parameters ✓ Effective Radiated Power (ERP) per channel 14 watts ✓ Number of Channels ✓ Maximum Total ERP ✓ Center Line of Emissions ✓ Antenna Manufacturer ✓ Antenna Model Number ✓ Gain ✓ Downtilt 40 560 watts 110 feet Above Ground (AGL) Decibel Products DE961 DD90E 15 dBd 0° Microwave Installations ✓ Effective Radiated Power (ERP) per channel ✓ Maximum number of Channels ✓ Maximum Total ERP ✓ Center Line of Emissions ✓ Antenna Manufacturer ✓ Antenna Model Number ✓ Gain ✓ Downtilt 1000 waits 1000 watts See table below See table below See table below various dBd 0° Center Line of Emissions AGL Antenna Model 180 feet HP MW Dish, 6' diameter 170 feet Std MW dish w/radome 6' diameter 150 feet HP MW dish, 6' diameter 140 feet Std MW dish w/radome 6' diameter 110 feet 80 feet 70 feet Grid MW dish, 6' diameter Grid MW dish, 6' diameter HP MW dish, 6' diameter 35 feet HP MW dish, 6' diameter 25 feet Std MW dish w/radome 4' diameter Assumptions 1�, Ground is level out from the antenna to 1000 feet io Predicted Power Densities are at 6 feet AGL 1�, Measurements were made throughout the public area near the facility C - ­ .,! , .." I I -, � ; - , , . "J,'�.i,ax,Al . �', ­�g,�,4"% 4 ,"I � 'j, � - % �, ., v . I t ,-,-, i , . . .�w , tq.- ,4, 3. 11 - , , - , t. - . I,r , I---,' ,V. U 4, 'i ,.Z,i - * , 1, , I - "" .,- -,,�A-,-",t, - t+ 1+ x ,.. ata {•+ - �. I '. I I � , " 1�-',, ,,�,Af. I., , , �,. ,U- � -- - - �t,�, - ,- J -J , ­�(; � ,-:t - ­�`%:" ;;(-7,,' .: '�; , , I,,- j, t - , .v,f V ',J��:Ar - �". . . . �v , "i � , , � - ;, ;4_`V_, -,44,1�_,�� - , I �, 7 Z;e�, 4. j � ,X. f I ; , . -�,� . '50 A �j , , - , - ,, t , " N � �4, , , ,,,• .�,, - I, .V&jj _. . ��­ -".- 4a, �,,, I ,).)��-, ,�sp, ,�,­ , I , "4., 1, - � � ,'" , " �'i` , 'I" , 4,*41 "'W-4- - '( ". � �­ �:;, 'T. I ; ." - . " , 'J'� ,*, � ; I•.- I.,,?, ", _rV� ­'* , " - N� 4, ..Z, . �'. , '*.,* , �, 3z, 't� 7-�, 1 �r !_ '. ,-: wl N't ;.� , "� .1 � _ - .. t t , A 1, I y e '. , rt uf� - - �1' " , .` , - &�,' - , � ,' -, :,%, je�-,-eW4�,, �l �' , ';, , i :i.,� ." -- i�,,�, , - V , � " I ,�.. " � �Ki:T; " - "'. "', ��, 4�., 1�, �,i�-� • ., I , . , - - , Aq � i i�­ N �.$ .7 t , - 'N, i . t, -,�;, 'L � --�'� , - 'I yl- I I � ��,t �­ t;,---. 11' I - ,,.t' i�v f � 4- � I .� V �) , - V� , e4 tfS - - I I _( , ­!: , . Az; � c �(,,- I 1., -7� k -, � - i I - , - L:,�, . � , if`�_l I .P, V, ,( , . A; � � lj�t, %,, , " - , , *Y' :� , . - " -q , -%�o , --f., .41 .-� t '1,4j- ��N. .-,:� ��!,V�&,�,. - �.� , , ,;s.,; ­.�e,* "', �, :� '14�_,:: - -, , ­, ` , , . - _1 , , % � I , " .. . I %I c 17 - � I ,, I -1, ,u* -,T.," ,� v"P.4 , "_ .�4,iie4k- "', ; -v - .- l":,,;x,�.,f.- t .. "' ;V1 -1, -, 1. v, " " I I I Q A - t,� ;k - ,�. !! v _� - . . I . !'F,,, : -i [" , - -�_ v�c � . � . .. �4 1�, - -1 - .�, - , -'.' - - rIV-, I V k7 � N I `�- 0 ;�.,t , " i-t_�F * T -i T1.11, " jt L". � I , Vil�m ,rj �jj , , . . � I . - , , . , - 't 0 f, "o I � * � i;,li " , '1� , , ,�� , , .NI .Qm - k 4, ,• . " , , . . f',� " , '. - * I � I . m�i,,­' , ,I - . , .�,;� j -'��-',,� �� - I K�j .. � , N, tu ,; - , � , . 1r., , . io, �, "� 0, �, t m,r . . .i$ . �,! r t�'. .-I � , ,�U!' - , I , - - -C . � ,% .,� . .; - "I l 7, , . . . f ',�J_j�t.;P�� . 14 , . _,; ; - t , 11 -( . .pk, ,;� .,� -'_, 'x,$ ,;:" - 7`�O�­_,�-kk- , "'! __ 'c. " �. , , ,,, .�; �l I. ., . . . ,�,-i�� , ,�l I � . I , , 't i v - le 1,1!� � , -4 ­�l .-� -;o,�A.. .".. � , , � - , �r. , �. . _.,,� , ­ , I , .j , "i , i 1�1.o , . , � r . � I I - I -..,. . 4 , � :� , !i� � 4, - 4 ,��, 4 ; "'o. . - I .�'�,� - " - ".c." ',-,, ,�;.--, �� � ;;NELSON CELL SITE MEASUREMENT POINTS I . 7� �.. 1` I 'i I I 11 . � , � - , . , .4 1 � , 1. 3%. ..� ­. � -,. , �1. ..� . I I � ­ 1: - , �­.-,, � , , �; L" t - 11; — � �l ­.. — ­­ ".. — I I � - I . — I i - I 11 w � - 7 .- I 71 __ 7 7 -V_ � 1. - I ", , � �' � . " 1. �,_,lv - 0 . I ii�., ," .; � , , ,ol4 - I- �- P-1- - �� If I + 11, I , .1 f . , ,-,..-"k ". A_ I - � ts ` , - I , ; ,�. �, 0 ( .-,�, �, " '. � ;.1t � � , ,.!". 4,1_v, 1, .__', ! L.Jqt �'.�;­%4­1 A 4 , - �i . ,i�, - , k5,;,% , " " -, , , - . 4C4- , � " � _% ��.-,,�, , ,-a,A� XI.. 't., � i r� a; , . --,, ,� ai, ,� � �,,,- . ,- " , � -�- 2 ' � '. � -4-f �. J:l - lq 4: - , , , I � . . I,, "r- I ." I ;� 1, ­� 0 ,1J', - 1. k . Az - ' x l� . .1 - � 11 , , � 11, it� "i Q _ .. I , 1��,f ., }� , " - - i t;.:t'7,c j ` - I , � �,.- , 1: .v _#1 �"."... I . . f ,. Awa . .,- , } TZ, IZ, L .4 , - 1, - ", ,� , ", _;_ " t. " r , e I . ul'. . - _. . 4� t - � " - ., .. % i, ,if $11 1 1 1 - 4,- ". -�p " ,T2I -A.,, ­­,­ ;� I � t'. , ."; 3� 1 .,4;1 141 _2 �' - . ,." � . J " _,�61 'I - - � , , �. f I> fj ." :, ; , ,,,� ;f 14", - � . - V,i '01, ,� r, ��, ,,� 4 ;, I ." - F , 11 I , . � , 1� � t � , - . , ,,� . � . " . t . � - "4 : � � � 4 , ._t , i , I 'I ";', I ;, " .4, , X ".., � r It-;;, - - " , . , � � ,�,,,,,­, 1, , , . r , . , i,- ll�I i , , " t r a,. e .) . .­�l 1w t " , t " , , ;'*I ., . - ,� .7 4 L, , �Zlit, t, I -I t. , , , I ,- - , . , " I � 11 � ,(. -1 , . - , , , " . - , , � , - 4. 4 I - - " - i , , ­� " , , , ') - -2 , �i , -%, 7, " "i- 4 qef ri­; l� , !;" �Aq t r , . a , ,_ It - , t,,-e-.,llz �. � " , - lt� - , " 4 r " , �- � 1 '­* � I - . . , - , . , . -�,e I .* � , L.f. ,"l. "et �., -;, i, - ls*, ;,I , i � ,�._-.,a-,,- J, 1 . , -� . 1, " I . r. A Ir' ,, , ei-,r, t._ .�,�-' �- "�,' . -4, , ,- �,, J .� " �.. '- �' .% � -1 0�,r, - t,: C' ? � I ! ; -v icy.^:E" � . ,X,. -- , . �­,_ �t _. I .�` I � , ':,,t I. m V ?) 1 : '1� I 9 - , .,- �� , q. . Yll f��'��_ I 'I f I � I , I. -I, - .e , J, r� . s 11 .. . . - - - .I'-.-.. ,•w ,X:". . ., . ��, .:.-.:.-. 4 - - .....'. v ....... ­_......... I ........ ­... I ..,..%, . - : .. , ...... ...,­.­ . .- . *es,3D— N, � : ...... - ......... . , * _..:'-::-.":: . ..", * , I 11 - , I '-':. . . ... : :..::.11l.�,.l:,_..;; ll.lwl %.11 .: ., . . -.1 .............. .......... ... , / , ... - -A:-'---...: .. .. .... .... ... ............... ..'....... �: ...... ... � ............ I..... . .... ... ; ..... I... .,. . ....... - � � ­.. � ... I .... .............. .............. ....;....,.." � r . ., - . . . �--.�--...�,�..:..�.--,-! . - . * . . , .....,..,....... . - . �- ,.:-:.'-,.-.-:-:.�.:,:::.!::�:-"�:-.� X_ V, ..­...,... . � .4 r ... ,_ '.". i . . ... .:;V.'�' I ....... � ................ � ...... W. -.-,7.-., � I ....... 11 . ..... ..... . v. ..l.l.*.*;.11ml.l-*.% �,%v:......�?v:-:-... , . * -�-:-:-"�;:,:-:- ,...,..,.�.. , ..,....:. � :.o. , ­ . .l.. , I. "I . � .. . . -1 ',.._,..._..% . ..... . . . .,- . _"****­ "" ' ' :.:-*j �:::, ' '. * - %.. '�­ ' I-.,. - - �Z% .. - .......".- . ... '..�'."� - ..,:,.,.,. %Vjr'.��*.,.'­ ... .­.......oi...:t... ­.. .­ . .. �:: , ..-..: *.,..-:...-. ';-.'. � ...... — - - .�....... � �­ , , 1.4 .. _.�:.', . ....... . ..... I ......... : ."...........,,... ........... ::::::,:V.V.,.` ............... , - -.'..'v'-.: ....... . ... :t.,......., x - - -` --, -', . - . * , 11 .7. ..,..7. , . r . _ �; " .,.,_:,, . � A**,� :.,:��, . -11. .. . *1 I ,,-.-, � . - , ,:��:"._:-:,�:,� - . _:.:...l lc-:- -:-:t? . . .. . .. , . . . -. - :: .%r:.. 1�.. 1%1:1.%%�*: ,.'- .......... :. .,-A. * ....... � 1'� . * ... ...... .. * . ._�.' , : .i'", I -.,.l.l..l - . ......... ........... ­ ... ,-::,:,",*- ,.'...'..... , , , , , ...... N-'-_.`-'-% ,%-'.'.' ­ ,'-',- ,�;"-`.-!i- ..'. "-, .,.z-, .,-,:-!- . . I 1. .... �._., . - .... , ,4:-,-Xl­, .­....­... .-:.-�:.-_-... ­ � ......... ­­ .............. _ ........ ............ ............ ....................... �,,_... ... .. ......... , . , -, * ....... . ­:.:w-­;:-:--`�-,'-';­ ........ �, "'..,'. .. � _,..., '.. .... . � � - ..;.:%. -,-.-.%-.!.-. . .�!, �i:,:,:r . .1 . I.... ... � l';'-' -MV-1- ": ,k::!,:-.', . ...... ......... �:..%. � ..... ....... .,-...-,-.v, ,:, . .:.�� " *" ,.;,:l: �tt .. ::-,.:.,. . .`1.1.1.1..._-:��XY. ,_l.%.,_,,- V.% 7., . .. �.-.'.'.' . -.-.�-... ..... _ I—%, *' Vi"_,-.7�.'.'. %v.'..%*,',-:, %l;X,­ , .. . , ­ ;'�.-�.".:!:.".:.:.: :.. I . . . I... _ml. .'.'.'m'll.%,._.,:;%. ....,.-.,.l.... :.�,.,.:::,:.,-,.:::�..�.......',,.,....... .... . .J:: ---��-,.,:K:t.-:-:7,'.�,::� - - ­ - .'-' :',-:i:- .. .. - .... I ... .. - - . - ... I . .. ..:. . '� ,t._, . �-.se..:,'V:-:- -�.-Xr* I .".-..,....-.:.:..!,.., .-:-X.T:'.�.'.v ` . I %1.1.1.1. I ..... .. - ........ .... . . . . . . .%%"r�:.l.i. 6 ..... . - "I'J""." - - .:.:.,-I:,:,".,. �:....,.,.-.-�.........:,.....-.- :-*�::,...,-1,.-:--: I . ........ ............. . I .... ,. I � - -, , ;1.7;--i; .,� '.­:X.�-%,". --.:.,�:.-..�,.-,:::.-::::--.:--,*:!-.-.:,.,:�":,..:-: ........ �"-:-,�: .*:::;*-! ,-, . . ... � , . . - - . . ., . . J. . '. . :-,:.-.`..:l:-r.".'!,.%,:'.', . ,.., . .......... �,.%,.% . , ... :� ...... I-- ... I .. . - �. . . ." .,---�-;. , � '. . . . .�_.,,.%.%%� . ..­­�:.,..... .�."�'.....;.,....,.......,;... . ;: ............. ..�,_.. A � . � ... � ........... ......... . . 4 ..... %_ 1) . . � ....... . .. . . . . .....-.-.-.-n ... ,.:,..:..4'. � ...... , , , * �. :-x-:-:��:, - i ... . .. ..... � ... ........... I I ................ ".. .,. . _-11.1 I. -0 . �. - __ - � 71* -'j 7::'_-.,*:::::::�:]: - __ - - - - -�4 ., � %'.l�:l.*.%_: ... . . . I . -14.11.11.-. .'.'.V.%'.'.-:' .. .. .... �_ - - - .. ­­ ...- :'�v ­ ....... ­­' . ... , - - .1 .... .... N-.,.;",�",.: . ...,..�:� . ....... � ......... I ........... ­.....­ .......... .1.1.1.1.1.%:. . .�. . � . '.*.,.,., .-:-:-;,; - .1� '-'. �:." 4':,%,•", ... I e-, ­­ ­. . �*"4' ...:�..' :.� , , ... . ........... . , I ,,.:.,�.�:"...�-,-:-.,.. . .. .,....., , , -� . .-":-..'-,.-,'.-",:: :� :. . . . . .%l.l.,.l * '." - . .. . 1. .:l%%,..'�,.':,:%,. .*.N •.%'.'il.'.'.'. . . I-- ............ .. .. ..... .. - .; --t!-%*-,-,, .......... 1. - ........... .I.-, ,% , .. :7.,.:O..:.:.-%.','-'.-,�.',-�.:". :.::, :-;.:..,*�*; .. . ..'...". . '-:..,--,.",Z ..%% '�.:,:,:.:_:�:-:-_i:-:-:-�. - . .. :-l..,_,.��lr�l.l:-:-:. . ........ .. , :�:: - . I . � .. I ...... .- , _... .1 . ..... . .:..:.:-:.;,:-:.:-:-.' ::::::::::::::,* __ ..... ...... I . ...;....... -I .;,��'_-, , I .11 . - -:.:-.,-:-.-:-.-.,x,-:-. �/:`- : . . :-.,"l :.. .'.%%l_ll'.':.V�_ : .. .......... ,. "W" . . %,.;i,...,: .. - _� - -.: - .,.: - - .. :. ' .. '. -, .,,r _...� ., .. .:.. _:...:i'�j�.l.'� ".� --v ';*;'.-.',.. . ... � ...... ........ I 1. . ­.... : .. " .... �%'.�.�.---.-��.,..* ..; _­ .,.%*1 I . .. %:- ,� , .- -.-7�%-.-.,_-m;.-,„�.:”, ,.__: -.....l. . . . 1. .. 1. � �, .7!.'.� , ".,.,:..%'.'.*;' �.-:-­'� I-e-li; � ... , " '*:,.,.,.`,:�"'�l'i_ .: * , , " 1* '.'l'.%l.'.. ... .... 11 ....... . . . - " I .. .',.. .11 I : . . ;,.!.' .-.-. . � , . . . . .. ..,.,.%'l ..... - ..... ...'..%,7.' .l.... ... . ". .. ��. _.:....l. - X:,X-,y,- -3��,X' ;,-­...�::�-'%,.`�-:v,,-,,��:,:.:,.i I -l-.:i%%-; .1 I ........ .- ... �­T.'.-,;'.*.'.', .­ .­_­.,�,.T.,.,;� - * - � . _ , , ::::.;::�,-",:`. .. .,: *.*.l.T.*.*.'.11l.l.l. X1. . . . . z -.�,.:­%..;',-:,�-':,:: ... , ". . , , , , , .%%,�Vtl.l I - .. : �-,,;, :!: ;v,��:-;l.-:1_1f-_--- . -­ -::-`�.::��:--,�,�".::, -.'. -.'� :�:�::::, .. .� ,::-:­- -iX.. . . .1. .., .. . .. , I ........ I ....... � ... 1%."I'V­ 1'�'.'_V. , . ... � . :v.l.,.,.-.,.,.,.,., ­ .. .­ I . .1 .. , , , .T. , **' . ., � :4x'-Z�W��:_". , , , � � . .� ,:�� � . _'� ...... _ - .',',.; - .. .. ...I. .. I I ... � . .?. A* -:-�' ':`.:�-_-': 'a,• * p .,.X'i',.%.R- . , ............ ­ . ­ , '.. , , * . ......... � .............. mmmmmtmm� A , & !" - -�%,..r.%,.,�.' . . ... ... � - - - .. .. - ...... � . " I �!.'- .::I��'."�.���,.�'.-',,-�:..-..!. _ , * - ,..� , .1 . ..­ �,.*.^:,�,.,:.-�..........,.�,... . : �,;.,.`.�IIF _. * 11. , , .11. .. .��, �.,� � , :: ­ ­...% ......... ...'.......v ...... . , . , . , . , _'. 1�'�'.%'_' ..... -;*.-.,�%*.,.,.,.-., ,,'........- .... ........ � ..... .';'. -, ��'.-,.;":",'�'.,': 5 - . . - . - - .:, " � ..V. I V";, 7*'•x . �l -1. I - - a . � I ­ � l - �T.��%:-:� -, - - `e� , 7., %..:1. I .� . . .... I'.%, , � . '�'.' , .:-:,- l6catedit : , , - ...... ... . . . .% :--,- 1. p ...................... I . ­.. ... _* - 0 , -1 .`�..,:-? JZ "I _%. ..._.To�v& , , I t:� �'.%�r.' ­... � 4i .,.,:.,...I- .- .,:,%,.!:,.,�',%','.'.'.*..'.'.'.'...•..:.:., . " .. ,-:-,.:, ..... I . _ .... '. - . ....... I - I N', -390 *'.-:"., .;. . ,.-,,,. .33' %*,"l � .'.' 7' 7.:.:.:--.m, - , . ­ .... ... ­ - . . ..T, mo 0"m._­_­T­ ... �tm. - , . I ....... . � .......... I ...... .. . fit�,71 . ��,.*,�:,-.-!-.'�,�..':'-:-*-,.,.,.,"- . . : -,,.. , . . ., .._,,;�'.,'.v..,..,.�y,%- . , . ....,.,:.,.",.,",*.,.'.,�,.",:. ..., . ­...­ �,k� :,., w ", v ':::'::r - - W, 1210 48 � _ :' 54'% ' : - I ...... I .. i-.% . ' - .. :..:::::::, ill ...%.�, '� .Vl%l.'.'.'.'. .,,-,.,.*".:.,.,:".,.,�,.". ......... %'.'.4v`.v.'. :.-....::,�%%%� ..?.,.%,.,.,........_. � 0, . -11 ... �4­ - - , I.%, ­.­ � .... � . ::. I . . .1 .:...-.-.-. . � ........ � .... .... . ­ . - - ,.:.-.--,-.��.-"...,..�-..,-...-. .-.-.-.-_-.%-: ,... � ..... � . ...... I _,....,,..'�,.,. .,..-...-....,........-".,.,�-,'.'.'. I , ­­ .. 'i 'l -y: -P.:- ...... , :I.,.:::,- -.-- — I .... —:1 , . . ­.. .. . ... ...... �,,%V. , :J,v_-_-:,: ...",.. - �-:,:�',!_�t,�­:�. . . :::,;.,-%*­�..,..*..�­­_., " -..,.. . -_l._`.--_. . — ,.!�� ...... XX1-IX.Ir ......... I I ... ­ ,.;..... I ... ... � I ......-I. . I ..:-:.:.-.. 'I.%,.*.,.,.,. ._:.�. .. % .... ........ ,*X.V .,;:,%:.::�,,,. .. ........... �_-'....- ...l;_*.-"__ , .111.1 ::--'- - t=5= ___ ilz� 0 1 *." ... 714'. .. .., �-..'j,-_-.- -.-. .. .... �'-p.....".-.I;.�l....P....7.1........-,..�..,..... I ....... �, _... ............ - ....... - 991;m - - - - - � I..... - , ...... I . � I%'.". !PO3 ......... ........... ......... %V�sl.%-:-, is :-:_l-:-:_l'_:-� ...... � .... - I . " .-..,..-: . .. .:.: .... � ... ­ :v ------- � ... "'. � , ".1.1_1 c � � .:.:",.".,."".."-..,.::,.-�%-:-,�.-.-.-- ' _.'.*.,�' . . . •. 'm' - .., - ­ I—— . � .,%, , - - ,. - .7,::e,_,-,, ... .......... ;..,..l;,:;l.l....... . - , ". ­_... -L. .­­ . � .............. .l._�_.c;,:r_: , ...... 1%;:.-. '�:.-.-,,-*--.-.!-:.:.��7:... , :.-." 1'.77 ...... : , 't .*Jok�:-" ......... . ­ -.;:.-.7. ­­ 'w" k . . '.... p I I .......... . � . .... . 1* , 'Tlllyoi� 1-- � I . . . f.. ,?r �-','.' ,�-���-.:�:.:-,:,.:.*�L,-:.�".:.,.:,.��l;-.,-",­-.1.k. .. . .�%- X, !-,-.�%%!�%�%......,�.,. - -_-:�:-i-X-,:,: 1( ..*.%i;.., 4 ­ �% .I'*.'-,- * , , .., . 1 �.:.Yj.,��. I t:-.'�:-� - , X, "'. 02 .1. ., . . :­.., . .1� . r'.. - - i*.'. ,� :_ .. .... .1 .. ...; ... . � - .: - : � "... . .. � ..... ..... - - - :: I � , .;,..I . "' , , _-.t��'...., .;r:!,��-" p '. 4*,.,..-.%, ... .... � - - ., .. . �'- . .". A . ...... �%v.,.,:� i- ,.. . 1,,...... ... 1. I ­ . 1. ..... , * ....... * , �-*;�.�.".:?..:.:-: - , , , ,-_.- x.--_ x -i�,­ ­.. . . . . . . . . . . ,. . .1: 1. .. . . , .. , p . � 11 W_ — . .. I.V.1-1.1.1.1; .� .. ... ...... 1. ... . . . ­_ ......�.,l.l;.;.,. % '. �%,.,. .V". ., I%. . 4�� .%.%';X� � - .%'. .1 . .". .. . . .,.,. . .! ....,..�P.t... ,.:. ..p " ..%.. ­ . ....,.: ...... V. , :: ...... I .... ....... �­ - . �. ­. 1--,.,.,__. , , ��,_. , , � '-�-`�j�'�-�:,: ----- � ---- I �. . . , . 4-,.... p ,-, � I - .., " "y'... ........- -:*;,. ..I . '._'_;,,'; - . - , . ... .1 ,...-.- .-�.*. �, .. .. .. - .. .. .... ­ V.,,... 4 -*-:-!-!-: . . , ,.,..,.,. �."":.-,:��I 1 .... " ........ - ... ��: a -�-�.--:�:-:-:.,- .'-"*.'. .I.".- ­ . .... . - ,;7' �'-.,*,-'� �..��:�;� ., ." , � * . .......... ^ "..., ...li.%*�*. :::::,: C -.,...-�'-�7.,!:.:�;,-,.,.,,-��'�'..;�,::�:,. , I '. . . 1� %%y '.*.* ., ....... - - '.%"� ..... :.:.:_:.:I. .. r ...... .... I ..... I .... I .......... ­ . I .............. ., ..... 1. . "i , ..-�-�.-i�,,!-.k;-.-:-�,.:.?..!-:.� -1.....l....l.... ...- 1* , .7 . � ""' � -.. �% . . . ..- ,.:�.-',.:-:-�-;�. .�.. , :-:-j�:- .,:-"f.*-:.:.:�'.-:.:�."�-,.-:.:�:.:- ,X.'.-;-: " _.. ,*-'. ... -r:-,-:,�:-.,:--,: . I .. . ... ,...-.,.. -11. � . . ........... ..... � ...... . :. ..,.: .-_l.l.!.%'.%l.: ...... �_ .... r; ........... I-- ...... A�._- - - .- - I ��a-:7- . :.:..,!:�,.'�.:�:.;�-..:.:.!.-...��.:.�:.:,.., -* .....,. - --- :!:' "- . �, . - :-:l.,:",., �-:-'%" , W- '1...Z�.'%.i.: , 'J.4-:":!:�: . . � ......... 1.) ., . I., % I It , , ­­ i - -.%" �. i , , 1.* , . . ... :: ­........%.,..._,, �X.­ -�%*.'.'.' -'.'.' .......... ......... .. .. . : ....... :.-.-.-.-.-.-_ . . ::��:�:::;::::"::�:::: _ ........ , - -y-v...": X. - _. . .,.,::�, .::."��l",:;�".. :. : JK..': , . . -, le. -;-� .* "', - -:..'.....�".. �' %. 1, �_._. V.- . . t:-�� -':r - 1.101J2�:.!�, 1* ..�-.;�-:--., .,-_�:",':'_-_.�X-:':-'.�:' , . 11 ,.'l� .-Z-.--�;�-.-7;-.11',.�4�.,,,', . * 11" - __ -:t , , ... . . .,:..- ....... 7 ...... . I ...... �Z:�,%.,:i:-x:, .:. -...-.-.-.-.-. ......:,. )_11.%, ,� o-,-04- " . , � _. .... , ,:-:-:-:-:-",: ,�: ". -,-,..!.,.�.....ir. . : :,:.-:.j,.. -_i,.­f7X7i:-:-.-.-,-.-j ,--,�.:,.,..,�- I,— ..�...... �...­­ ..... � ..... � . ......... ', � .,.'.",.,�.'.'....,...,-,..,-... ....... I ... ­­ . , %1. .. �....­ �r­­.N' -, ,!. -.;.. , ­­ .-r1.1.1.111::7. mb. . * , , "114N -p ,_ * � , " �'. , `_ � :rl I-,--,- �: : -::".:!:-.��.'�!:"-,P.:-,--,-"--..:-"-.:�.�,.,:I:.-;-�.:.:.��� �p �.'.�y:-,.', .. ��- - .. - -.-""­ - �. 1� . ��.,:_ . ­�. �­_­- ­_. I? ,:,.�!�: ;.:..'.-'� . . p;"_--'!i-,�'. - -, , * , , . :.-.-:!: 1. pv.-,..�.,.�,-.%-. �- :�..:.:... � , ":** " , ..::�:._Q- - - ! -�......-:I � I "*** ......... . -1 .,.,.­.'.*.lT.%'.'. -%... .... ... � 1. - .,.*. �. �­::. , -,.:.:.;-:... "- . I . ..... � ... .- - I . .. - .____ ll" ... -� � - .- - - -�.:-x�,.��.,:-:---...:�.�.!:7 ...%-: ,'.�.'.'.'.'_�'�, -. ­.i:*:A* .. p.., : - ,-Xw, -"X%-:-*".,.:- '..lr.1.111;T..._: ..-%.,:."�:-��.--�: ........... - ,:-." ... ....... I ........... . 1 4.1 � I...... 1. � .....;...­ ... 0, .11". . . . IV -1, .:. ,.­.,.,.".,.l'l _� ,..-.,xx .11' . *o*a:� .. . �,'. . ,." � " ,--� , , ,,- ��. , ...... . �: . :.!: : : �%. . ; * �-�!mo_ 61., .. ­� I . " . , . I . - , - -�j,:-:�:-- - - , ',*� - * ',� . .. .N.�l.V_*.';.l;.%l.l. .r. , V. _, ,..-.%V� . , : . , .%%,:*.,_` . - � .......... - I . _. ,� �:%, ...... .............. :. , � .dw%,:.X.*.'.', __ I X - - - _'rl'__ - ,_....'..,-� .Z.--.,�.�.-.",f�7���.�-..��� ; I I ..........."....% ��,,!.%%%�, ,i'-,-.;:;-. ..;,.,-.;.!�,,�.�',",T , ,K�_,.,, .:!..: �",:.:.*,I.,.,.:'-�,,-�..�:.:.,..� . .. "'! ............. �12�1 .1,1........... .. - .,J.. . , * :..I-,- , V, �� .,:.-'.'-.�`.,l,r�,_v.­ . . . ... -, , :�-:�z".%x..*, : , *-, - , ,- i� -` � 7, -�: - +-�, -:--*�:-:-,:-",:-, i. . � ...... I .......... � . , - , Nl� � .. .. , --: , .... ...... :,: : . '. '%t+:-:;:-;-�%-,...,.:.:. � - . N'. ,7.,Z�v . �. _ ......... � . . - . ..�:.�'-..:!�.:...,.�,:-::�.,-"-:�:�":..,-:, I ..... . , � .... , .A , . ., �,:� , .. 7111.�.,..; , - X!, .. _ �::- -.;,��. 7Z., p , , . . I .... ,::i: �:-�*:i`., .:..-:-:-:z.:,:, ............... � ... - . . . . _- -1. - , s'.,..-,v�.%�.,. .-E ­­�%�-­ ,'­-, , , . , , .:�:.:-�-�-.-_-.-.-,,_�.,,�-z , , . . irk ­,­ . L � v.- - - , - .,- n , 'l. ...... ..,:.. . -:-.'-!-:-,. -,-�-A-,��,.,;-, . � . , .. . . .. .- %:,�.�,X ­­... * � . ..... * , , " x.n"-:.:-.r . .. ­ .. .. - ­ . � :::�-:. . : : . � ..... : 7.:. � X, . ­ .. .... I - - .,.%%N:�,.� - , , !�, - �:::-,-:----��: - - , 'i ,,-- �,� - ,;,.�. %,.;� . 1, -,i...-:.. !-..�,-.-.-'-E.:"l . � . � -.­�v:W.., , ,.",.,.,,, ,.,-:�' � :.";, �.Vlt .%.,.t.%,. ...'-v. , " �.%' I -.'-.,.;..-.-'- *. ',tS T_�� .. . .. - -:::::;. �, .; .... �:::: .:" ,-;.,.�-*.::,..:.:��:,.-.:..-t.i. . .,.,.,�. . .l.l."I.V.1.1.1 ..... - � . .,. . .".,...Y.%p.%7 . ............ . ,.",?,*. .. .... , .. , .. . �_ t %� , . _ :;N" .. - s-�t-;,�`,�­-�;;� j. , �t - - - :. :_ ..�-:- , _-'.:tl. m - I ... I . .... : . ,.:.:; - ... . � . .. � ...... . . , ...... ;-,.,_'�.1_1l'.l.% � "' , I .. . .. . . . I .x..r::,:--,,:­:r'!-'.',. �" " , , ..'.:.!_:., . , : .--,.-,..�.�.-..:.:..-�-.:,:�..,.:�,-,:!:., � _.�,*W�:�'.i!_:-_%: ,Z_; . Xv�%, ll� '_--.','l:. . .. . � .. ............ . : .... I ... ... f 1: ....... �, ... �.�� .- �. ., . _A.�-,� I �:,-.'�F,�-_Y,:!2._�01. , :� :,.... � '.- . ., .! �-,- �..`� ,,X%-__.-: ... ­­. ., . - ­. -, - ....... I ..,. ..."... ,.,.,: �--:*, % 7 �%-, -!,,:,. -t] I - _.. �w .. . -I..."-.'W��l - , ... I..... .,.- 7 . , _� -:-`­." 777 � X.X, - . �. -.-:.:��: �-_,-- .,.-.,::: _*�..I,v - * :.�.�-_-:-:� ,�,, , - , , : ....... * .. ..... : .. :: . : .....�....,�..., , , ..,. . . ..I.. .�, _.,7..l.- ... ': . lf..Alwllle._111�1 . .� - . .:r.*l;. - . . ; . - - ,..-:!.-,-,�..�_,,�,��-�*:�*�,�.-�: j:"*;-.1�-;,�;w.,.v , .*,;.�-.,-:" , * - - ...v-%%__ I � , : .- ,L�_ ..,--ll_:`,_ - - .,...'� ,X-:-:.: - ...... ­­ I . _ . " .1 . I . !, ., -,t1 �,Y,!'1!1' 'w =?* - 11 � � ."t, -, I - � ,�, , � t � - I "I : , . t &; � 4 I 11 "- I tv - , , f", I " " . , f , I . , ". "', - , Z,i .,� , -a .� , A , 1% t. �'.,'� -, " . . . 1. I at , , -, v , ,�T l, -:i:_;. , .,� 'E. 4, 11 A'a." ; .� ',�-. ii� .N . v,�x , , fr -�� � �-. i, Q� - .. ­ I - . � . !t-1 -,, . - f. j - •., , .5 I ,�,4,-,,,?, I �r� a x el I A�* * " 2e . ,., I e tt . , In 1, �.l � , l 4 ,ft �,A, ill 41 ., , � , I I At li I I . 1." , � .1. - t - ^I, ii , , . I ,? , .. , �_4I � 4, " ., ., , h �, "i 't" I -,, e, �$ -. 1, ;4� - V-, to 5a --fl. i� ". ,- " .t- . F 1 ,L, . � � - , A rl 4 '. Z' I ­ , , ji 4 '�' I �.,_ - ". � , . � I ld I -"o' .. I , I'l � :. i.;: � t, �, I , � . � I .,- ., - -1 , . 4 �. . 1;? � ,4 14. 1 - ts,-- > � - I . ,V, " a_ )��", ;r , , - # � >9 V�� ` :� - t -_ 1, , . ' i L _.� ....." ' ' ' I t. - � f, � I - �'. ' . L, . ' IY�,: '-sI i _. . I �, � , . . - , � , 1,I a j 44 : "". -r. 1 ,,, " ,3 " . � V , ! � ,1 I % , �., I I i ,ItI , ,. % "� _." , , ,rA, 1. ,., d 4- .. 4 . r , t, ,v - , ­� _,�_ . , , "'ll'- � , I �� i, � '. . it', � . .4. it. I I , % , .� ,,, � � � . . , I , . , . ; , ! p . r�,j' L _19�` - '�., _z - � " i - - I 4 ,; .r . s ." r , . , 1 I - '. � - I - ,4" , , J. I � 7 l - , c I f -, .., . , " J� 4. 1, T, , .. ,,� - , , - "�, " 4 -, -� " -1 11 "; 11 ` " '. ,_., � - I . q :' , e, .0, , ; . . � ;i , , "� ,,� , , - ; I ,l -.z �,$�. ,,,, 1, , � ?. . � �, , I 1 3 " 6' , t'-'� 'w , 41 - Aw " .. , . . , . -1 . . 1. � . . . � - � I . . - . . ­ ... .. ..., I .... . ­ . -1.1 ­ -4. . � , 1� I I . ...... . ,I - -'f, - %. .3DT.cp*Qmb @MDdq=Yarmd4ME0M S=mDdzU= ­­­­ *440 Dald 154 1)��N�W�!�','.7-7-'-'-'-'-�-"'�'-'�"-'�:�'---'-" -:1 � I A I �j ", � ,�l 11-1 .. ........... . . I . I � I ­­ %�� ld3ft scok I- , ...... ,.,:�:-:!:-:.:-".:-:�"-'.,-.*-,!:� �Vlll.%... - , t 1, , . I.. - . . . I .. . , . . - , . , .� '. ,4�� - , ,� S. " - � .1 .- � .. , , *: X .:.:. - ".:,.,-;:::�� ."p 'I - .� � .�.:. :.:.��-,'-��-,..*.7*-.""i.:.":.;.:.-.�.��,�:�:.:.,-..-.,*,.,---.-,: �-�-:,,..,.....,..,�.;..�.?....,-.- 1 W k 1 i �- ,'�,,:-S�.*:-,, . V., , - p -":-,��-�:-:,:-:-� -� .::`X-:.� - ... ". ­,.j...:,� .......... . --..:,.* �.:.�'.�* -,X;:;�,-:�.-`i,X- 4.-,-:,:.:-:�-:.`,::� -:-,.::-:-:r-z-,�:-",. _ .. - ", �4 1 . .- " I - . . , r, ..- .. , 1.10o , (I. _li;.l.'r.l.iv .._�!. _­ �.':-.,.-,.:.��....;.:,.��.-,-,,.-i- , �-rpt, - , ,:.:.,..,:.?��'-,.'-',�:..,:-,:-�,:�.-..:-:.-..:.:.�-:.,�.,*..:-:;*,..: .1�.t�...-".�,.r,-,.�A � , , , L� . , F ;l ".: -.-',4 - _.: !::!; .W, . .�-. ...- ,-:-_-.��*-),-,l;.,.:�%, - . .,.;.,.-".,�-,.-.-: - I � ) ,:.`� , 4 , t ,� . 1. ":-.,,-�-.-.�.-.-.-,",*.'.'.',.*.':-.�*�,.��7,7,*,.,�:.:�,-.%.- - , , , 1.1, . .. �- �` 'A "S'. )l - .-,��:..,.:.:.�.,:-"�..:.:t:���,�'���!,:.:�,, ,..�_ ".',••r ,, -1 %n . 1, � , ', V, " ., , I. � , - I �, �� I *,, , I , - A�, R � - �,:A J ,� 4e�;; � i, - '. 4,;iA. t .rl , ,� � ,.-, *I.. � V,,. , . * I , " .� - ." �l i _V1., . . . , .. � �.' 'I - _�'" , ,I ­� ", 'i%"_'l e 'r. -' ;t�,�." �-" . �, ; � ' I � ' "4.j �, , 1'�'P)064_ -.-At ' 7� li�-,A , V " " '.`v,,�l -,am - ,,� ,,, . - ;,. , , . , j4, t,�,),p_-i�_,i�� � I 1�' I' '. k A, , Z. I , - ,t , 4" - , I . i, I . lr� , ,; . 3"- , -- ". ^ ,�! '� �, _ 7 .,;., , ,., '�', , J�. ��y I. - 9 Z4 - 1. , I ­ I, -, _ J� *,:+'_.l t +*�' V. �� It ;�' ,-% , C - 1r, t,r . i4, - 'v , , � . _ �l r! ,. - , , .;�. -1, 4.k"u - i , T 7 11 _.., 1, -1 -4w 1 , I � i , , " .. , -1, - , '."-' , - ; 4 - 0 ,�, I : -t , , " N I . � �,Ll , :..�� , , - , - - - A -�', I '. � - _� , . A't � "I - , f 4, � ��', " - ��' g�, �'* , , , � 1� �. 1.11 . � , ) 4, . , ,,, I, -- '. - - 1. �. " . -'��l �, 'Al, � -!�_� 4,11 -;�,l -Y. , _�s , I � '. � � 'r A ;4, W'.& .* , ;"�-�:4, �;"r� tt-, ; , , . . " . -, ,° ��,,j #' � , , �,k;,-2 ,i-�, - --.'F;Jj. q� , '-t I . � v -'.. K, ". , ., , ,� , '..,� ,,,r�.�%- D. , 5 . I. , - , " ��. - 'A I . -�� r, � - . : I ; , ­�,jft� ,, - •* . � �� , A f e ., 4 w , IV rli , "', , I , 'I t - k ;�-�-�, .. 1 41- � t�. .- , - .� �j . t!. -, " 1. �� . -.x ".;�, I X', ,,ZZ,+.,�,.� , , 1.� �, - � L � i I I I I It . ,_ � �l .,I - , - - , 1�� ,5;,V;:l4g­'p, �, , 4- ,, t 4* ` FIGURE 4 S, �4, F -` `_ - - "I, - 1. -, " � : I - . i- ". I , �ft - .", __ � � a � . , ; . ti�,.- - ��J�� � , - , " f -&Lt'. - "N . 1, �(Xl­ I ` b , ­; !, � m �� . , .1 #,'-;,v -. i ."of -I ".j I �, .4 . 4, - "' 1Y --l ... I .i. C P% , - � r�*,*'­"�" ;�j .'� - , � - � . , , , . •- " --i,w ,VY -,;W,4'­V._ .. . '41 .�L♦-l'. - 1, � _� ..t L' ,. " L X.f �, � " xk�, - . . k . . . . . �� . -j� , 1. - , '. , . ,� , fy 'J�_ ki�L�J;C �'J" , -'_j 'j '__ � L j'�"tj .' ' ' I L 11, - . JA, . `­ , ' * _ '_ ' ' '' -ri' � -V1 �,7 -i,. e , - I , , , 1,1 . , , . , , ";,:* , - � . -, t" . ,,, , . � A,. .,,-�- •%,' :�ot-, .;,�,,.�<` �.-:-­;�k, .--,,.*, '� r .. ., - -4 � , , , vt�V,i.., 'CJ -,,z i , ­; -,I�,�;,. It � ,W' �ltl;i - ., :., , ", " ", , � - . - -J_�'.l -1 � 4i . tp�.�t,, ;j Lj - 't _,p .1, ,,, ,r _, t - " � - 4 V .'� . j, .1 . �, , 4, , or t�� " - �". , ,, , �__,� " " 4 1 . , ;_ � _ L �*. -I-. �j ,, _. e, .. L�, . , � - "�'." ,tt,. - , p -, , � . , , , , ,•:.. � U� . " -t', �t.;�L 0 - "' -,� �-W f ­', , , I . I . -j t -`;�f4-�` " f- ' ., I L , , J* I �, . � . �a�, , � ,-� - --i ,ter I . L 4 - , " � e_, , " _� ,� ,�k" , 4 , I I .. .1 . . , ". %, V - , � , '1'�V, � - , , � L. , ,­-�% " � �,y�,t, "; -t I t %,, - . " _ � r - ,_�., , _ _ _�,.l � " L � -)�K, , , . U� � .a� w'. "14, " �"' 1� '�," 0- , - , 'J'� " '? - , , . ' ' ,_ - - � !� - ,�, ,.5­5�". . ,;a , f., , , ,�' ';L , "� L" , - � ' , , � Ll.'.j L . .r i; .. .� I �l " , I, - t L .., ,,I � . I . - 1, , 1. _' ,4 - ,�',�iml 7 � - �J�,;4.'!' ir ,'2_,, �, ' ". ", ' �� Y" �. ,,4 11211, 1 T.' I'. ", ' , , �L�r "' - I L � L - 'a, �. ,a . . , r. - -, _ , . , "! , ,-.l. 1� . - " � 'Li ' .:�� a . - . w. L �I _ _ . � - 11 - 1'111­,�, _1�4_ I 4", ­� t, - - �, � ' L� ?-.,; .. . I � , " . ,t,,� ­ "o, 'L � , , ,_. E, I . , i 't? L,• - I �, ­;.", ': . , . , 'N, " - t, .,­� - �? , - A - -t � 1. I .1 - , ' A ;f .�­'� ' . # " � ,- ",,t` t I � ­' '� k� ;' �� , � ,� �,�. �fi"--.;.,,� ,fj � , , A �' " � tL _/ - , P , �� � I v -� �*- , " , 'I , *�' 'L- 4 ", - ,. '� _ , w t­� I �., 1.,t� �;,,, " . '. )4 �, "i, 'L , N , - "" .��. .. " ., - � " � ,�� �' 11 , , - 1. I *. I. � - " . " ,, I " 2 1 I .;,� , .,�Lt.. " f, �;. ;�, I " ,� j � L'6", I It, ", ', � � � , , 1. . . ..�­ t .,, - -, . �_L -' - ' . C�. L, 7t'fl'4 *1 - ,, , - " Vt. -v -q, - , . _ - -� - �� %, jA� i , ? J�?o i - - . � ; . � . '? � 'L" � - , M ,r , ' � - �" ', , _, , L ,4 , ..., -1 �. " ' '­"� '��., .�.l �l -, , . , - . � f y , I' . 'L , - , - , , , , - , ? 2, Xl � . ­ ,vy,�, .*� Z, p.�. .7',.-,, - - j'_­J-,_­ '_ - q , L-, 14 ".J_t , � .;� I F , L " - - "I•- LA ,,� , � .. ' �7 , , .�( ,q , `t� �' - '. "' " , , � - I I - I ­ - - "7:,t ,�r ,��'!. : - - - - � ,�,_ ,;i> ",�� - i- - - -.1Y 1, . : ., ? - �' , , "" . L 4 ' 1 4� : L %"`� " , " - " , " -.4 ". " " , 1" , _ ', . 11 '-' , ; 4,� , "".., ­ % L , , :� - - , ­ ' I'll, L k " � .. - �l )".- - ­- ". . , . I " � ' _j .. 1-1 - ll_:�l - -�� f , - , * 4., . ,z ".�,- �+ I '.., �_ ;,LL � ' , . - , �,; -A ,;� - , . e , -, � , . . - . I ,:v ,�, 'i , !� I- .��s„; " � . . . 'I ' _'; L4�. . '�'4' �it 4 ” �' .. i F , , � Ir , " , _ , f- , _� 2 ', " , ' "Xj', _� .� , itf J, .. � � 4. 1-1.1 .. _ I t, d k � , , ,L " , , , ," I" , , . , t L . _� � ., � .., ' 'L I _ . f , � f . . , :i � . �, � � , I " -,O� �-,­�, " -• 1" I � . z" -, - -i �;v -, , �i,f , m, .1 ,� ,.- " - , 1 -E-, . - I , . jr, %-A � -4 "' , �, - , . L , . I , , . . - * . I , . I � � .z .) ,, � ,$ ", 4 ,�� ., , _ _ , �, . , � .,�• .-I 4 - . I - .�­,.. 1, " ,�, . J�.�i * 't . , , L ' M�, .. , " .4� , v'_j � � ;l . �V , : - I - I �­ , , , 'r � - '. - � v" ,�, tv�.� , ' - _' . i't ;t - - 4 ,I ) , I I - - - _-�_ - .. - - � I'll , .. ..e• . " ,&, ,.� , ,,, ,'.� I - - - - �.�,� . . -1 , I I ;, I ': il � 1 4 .� -1 "_ - , 1. -- �., i It! v , . 1, - I d I rl . - t W - 'w - . . '. . �.%L;l- , `_., I -IJ f KA ,.? , I -- I Y ll�: � I" . : , t�'ll, I ,b - "" -� 4Z' , . .0 - 11 -� � "' �;_'��'� " - 4 I , . �,41* ' L' f .� . �� I - ,� , _ . L , 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.0 0 o • Predicted Power Density at 6 Feet AGL Total Field Microwave at 35' -� Cingular 100 200 300 400 500 500 700 Distance from Tower Base ago goo luau 1FIGURE 5 The maximum predicted for the existing operation with Verizon and 9 microwaves is 0.44 µW/cm2. The predicted additional RF field from the proposed Cingular facilities as proposed would add less than 0.1 µW/cm2. The combined RF environment from the existing and proposed facilities is predicted to be less than 0.46 µW/cm2, or less than 0.07% of the FCC standards for public exposure. USER Standard Maximum Power Density CR AGL, Distance from Tower Ease in gW/cm2 in feet to Maximum (ft.) % of Standard W/cm Verizon 587 0.069% 0.39 108 30 Cingular 1000 0.004% 0.034 126 45 All Various 0.11 >800 microwaves combined All users combined Various 0.07% 0.46 Various 30 TABLE 1 8 • Nelson Measurements Area (looking toward the nearest home to the south-west of the tower) FIGURE 6 Conclusions The general level of Human Exposure to RF as measured is less than 1 µW/cm2, the sensitivity of the Holaday meter. This level is less than 0.2% of the FCC standard for the current operation at 880 MHz. Fields of between 0.5 to 6.7 µW/cm2 were measured below the power lines at the edge of Nelson Road and along the driveway into the home to the west of the tower. The field dropped to below 1 µW/cm2 at distances greater than 40 feet on either side of the power lines. This field does not appear to be related to the emissions from the Nelson tower. Since they are well below the acceptable standards for public exposure no effort was made to ascertain the exact source. The addition of the proposed Cingular Wireless facilities will not significantly alter the current conditions. The predicted additional RF field from the Cingular PCS facility is less than 0.1 µW/cm2. The combined field from all existing and proposed facilities is 0.46 µW/cm2 or 0.07% of the FCC standards for the facilities proposed at Nelson. 9 Statement of Qualifications The forgoing statement and related data therein, have been prepared myself, the undersigned, Gerald L. Moore, Broadcast Consultant, with offices at 1101 N. Rosemore Avenue, Modesto, CA 95358-1203. The undersigned holds a FCC GENERAL RADIOTELEPONE OPERATOR LICENSE, license no. PG -12-20326 (originally issued as a First Class Operators License). The engineering education and experience of the undersigned include degrees of BSEE from the University of the Pacific at Stockton, Ca. and MBA from the University of Santa Clara at Santa Clara, CA, with thirty years employment involving research and technical projects at Stanford Research Institute, the Ampex Corporation, the Lockheed Corporation, and in the broadcast engineering field. Dated at Modesto, California June 6, 2002 10 NELSON CELL SITE MEASUREMENTS PRINTOUT HOLADAY HI -3320 SN 1094 V2.6 6/90 CURRENT DATE: 6/03/02 CURRENT TIME: 15:10:58 CALIBRATION 0.000 V = 1.000 V = LOWER ALARM: UPPER ALARM: UNITS: uw/c 0.00 uw/c 23.87 uw/c 0.00 uw/c 0.00 uw/c INPUT READS: 0.24 uw/c TEST STARTING DATE: 6/03/02 TEST STARTING TIME: 14:24:05 ELAPSED TIME: 0 DAYS 0:14:35 OVERALL AVG: 0.55 uw/c OVERALL MIN: 0.00 uw/c MIN OCCURRED 6/03/02 @ 14:24:05 OVERALL MAX: 6.73 uw/c MAX OCCURRED 6/03/02 @ 15:00:46 NO STEL PERIOD FINISHED TIME HISTORY PERIOD LENGTH: 0:00:10 (each period represents 40 combined measurements) # OF PERIODS COMBINED: 1 MIN AVG MAX IO DATE; 6/03/02 TIME: 14;24:05 TAG #: 1001 (along canal west of tower) 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.02 0.12 0.24 *+ 0.17 0.26 0.41 -*+ (approximately 30 feet from power lines) 0.31 0.41 0.53 1-*+ 0.45 0.53 0.62 1 -* 0.36 0.50 0.64 1 *+ 0.38 0.60 0.74 1 -*+ 0.24 0.38 0.60 1-*+ 0.17 0.24 0.31 -* 0.12 0.19 0.36 -*+ 0.07 0.19 0.33 _* 0.00 0.02 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.12 * • 0.10 0.36 0.62 - *+ 0.48 0.57 0.64 1 -* NELSON CELL SITE MEASUREMENTS PRINTOUT @ 0.50 0.55 0.60 1 -* DATE: 6/03/02 TIME : 14:28:54 TAG #: 1002 (south of Nelson Rd on property near the tower installation under the power lines) 0.93 1.17 1.43 I -* +. 0.17 1.24 1.58 - * + 0.86 1.93 2.46 I - * + 1.58 1.79 2.05 I -*+ 1.67 1.89 2.29 1 -* + 1.74 1.89 2.03 1 *+ 1.84 2.05 2.27, 1 -* + 2.01 2.24 2.41 1 - * 2.24 2.39 2.53 I *+ 2.24 2.44 2.75 1 -*+ 2.46 2.67 2.86 1 -*+ 2.51 2.67 2.84 1 -*+ 2.32 2.55 2.98 1 -* + 2.60 2.79 3.01 1 -*+ 2.53 2.86 3.18 1 - * + 1.27 2.29 2.89 1 - * + 0.55 0.79 1.27 1 -* + 0.48 0.57 0.72 1 -*+ 0.21 0.38 0.55 1-*+ @ 0.12 0.19 0.31 -* (approximately 30 feet from the power lines) DATE: 6/03/02 TIME: 14:50:15 TAG #: 1003 (inside the building of Western Canal Water District) 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.06 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 @ 0.00 0.00 0.02 NELSON CELL SITE MEASUREMENTS PRINTOUT DATE: 6/03/02 TIME: 14:57:14 TAG #: 1004 (inside the gate to the Western Canal Water District property) 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.24 *+ 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.17 * (at the entrance gate to the Water District property - 30 feet from the power lines) 0.10 0.91 5.13 - * + 0.17 0.45 4.23 - * + 0.21 0.53 1:81 1- * + @ 0.21 1.43 6.73 I- * + DATE: 6/03/02 TIME: 15:02:02 TAG #: 1005 (at the entrance gate to the Water District property directly under the power lines) 0.31 0.38 0.48 I-* 0.33 0.38 0.50 I-* 0.43 0.48 0.55 1 *+ 0.36 0.45 0.55 I *+ 0.31 0.36 0.43 1-* 0.38 0.38 0.43 I 0.33 0.38 0.45 I-* 0.21 0.31 0.43 1*+ 0.29 0.43 0.55 1-*+ 0.45 0.50 0.55 1 *+ @ 0.48 0.50 0.55 1 *+ L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 May 23, 2002 Cingular Wireless 3851 N Freeway Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95833 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 038-250-025, MUP 02-14 Gentlemen: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held May 23, 2002, your request for a Minor Use Permit, was approved subject to the conditions listed on the permit. Should you desire to appeal any of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, you must do so in writing, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to 5:00 p.m., Monday, June 3, 2002. The appeal fee of $50.00 must be paid at that time. If you do not appeal and if there are no other appeal within the 10 calendar -day appeal period, the action of the Planning Commission is final. For purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, a Notice of Exemption must be filed. The fee for the filing of a Notice of Exemption is the $25.00 documentary handling fee. A check made payable to the Butte County Treasurer in the amount of $25.00 should be submitted to the Planning Division in order to complete the process. You will receive your valid permit, if there are no appeals, after it has been signed by the Planning Commission Chairman. Pursuant to Section 66020 (d) (2) of the Government Code you are hereby notified that you have 90 days to register a protest challenging any fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions imposed as conditions of approval for this project. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Craig Sanders at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service.Assistant ma C CA L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 May 16, 2002 Cingular Wireless 3851 N Freeway Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95833 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 038-250-025, MUP 02-14 Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Minor Use Permit to add six (3 proposed and 3 future) antennas to an existing 194 foot communications tower approximately 1.5 miles west of the Town of Nelson on Nelson Road, and approximately 3,000 feet east of Durnel Drive, Nelson.. Should you have any concerns with the report or conditions of approval, please contact us in advance of the meeting so that we may work together to resolve your concerns. A public hearing has been set for May 23, 2002. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Craig Sanders of this office at 538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, XJi�e—ocu�^� Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Enc. cc: j:\wpdocs\pc1ts\schedu1e.mrg i � • MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION To: Planning Commission From: Planning Division Subject: Consent Agenda Item - Minor Use Permit for Cingular Wireless Communications, File # MUP 02-14, APN 038-250-025 Date: May 23, 2002 Attachments: A. April 24, 2002, Planning Manager Agenda Report with attachments B. April 24, 2002, Planning Manager Minutes C. April 23, 2002 Letter from Margaret Arbuckle On April 24, 2002, a Planning Manager's meeting was held on the above referenced project. After the hearing, a letter was received from the owners/residents of a nearby parcel objecting to the proposed project (A copy of their letter is attached to this memorandum). No testimony was received against the project at the Planning Manager's hearing. The applicant was present at the hearing and raised concern over two of the conditions, specifically the conditions 11 and 13. Condition 11 was re -worded to allow the applicant to provide an EMF study rather than a bond. Condition 13 was removed because the equipment panels are behind a structure and not visible from the road. In addition, the site is in a flood plain and the equipment pad will have to be raised approximately 3-4 feet above grade. This made meeting the fencing requirement more difficult. . The Planning Manager recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Minor Use Permit for Cingular Wireless Communications subject to the findings and conditions as listed in the April 24, 2002, Planning Manager's Minutes. This is a Consent Agenda item, and if the Commission takes any action other than that recommended by the Planning Manager this item must be pulled from the Consent Agenda and set for a .public hearing at a later date. KAPROJECTS\MINOR USE PERMIT\Cingular Wireless\Cingular PC Memo.doc 0 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING MANAGER AGENDA REPORT - April 24, 2002 Applicant: Cingular Wireless File #: MUP 02-14 Request: Minor Use Permit to colocate six flush -mounted panel antennas and a 4 -foot microwave dish to an existing 194 -foot lattice tower at a height of 123 feet with two ground -mounted equipment cabinets. G.P.: Orchard and Field Crops Zoning: Agricultural 40 -acre minimum parcel size APN: 038-250-025 STAFF COMMENT: Location: Located on the south side of Nelson Road, approximately 3,000 feet east of Durnell Drive, west of the town of Nelson. Parcel Size: An approximately 2 -acre portion of a 24 -acre parcel. Project Planner: Craig Sanders Supervisor District: 4 Attachments: A. Conditions of Approval B. Vicinity Map C. General Plan/Zoning Map D. Site Plan Staff recommends approval of the Minor Use Permit with findings and conditions. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Cingular Wireless is requesting approval of a Minor Use Permit to colocate six panel antennas and a 4 -foot microwave dish on an existing lattice tower and corresponding equipment cabinets on a site already developed with communications facilities. The project site is located on the south side of Nelson Road, approximately 4,000 feet west of the Town of Nelson.. The zoning is A-40. The objective is to provide Personal Communications Services (PCS) along Highway 99, as well as western portions of Lake Oroville. Proposed improvements include six panel antennas, each approximately four square feet in size (56" H x 8" W x 3" D), mounted at a height of 123 feet on a 194 -foot lattice tower. Additionally, there will be two equipment cabinets (68" H x 51" W x 28" D) containing the electronic equipment necessary to transmit the signal. The cabinets placed.on a 52 -inch raised concrete platform to keep the equipment out of potential flood waters. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE I ■ • 0 Existing use of the subject parcel is as a communications facility. Proposed antennas would be required to be painted to match the color of the pole. The proposed lease space for equipment cabinets is located within an existing fenced area. Access to the facilities will be via an existing driveway off of Nelson Road. ANAI.,YSIS: General Plan and Zoning Compliance: The General Plan land use designation of the project site is Orchard and Field Crops, which allows public and quasi -public uses as a Secondary Use. Zoning of the project site is A-40 (Agricultural -40 acre parcel), which allows public and quasi -public uses with approval of a Use Permit. However, in 1999, Butte County adopted a Wireless Communication Facility Ordinance establishing special permit provisions for wireless communication facilities based on potential impacts. Under this Ordinance, collocation of wireless communication facilities that are mounted to an existing tower in an Agricultural zoning district requires approval of a Minor Use Permit. To ensure that the proposed project complies with all applicable provisions of the County's Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance (Butte County Code Section 24-262), the following conditions have been incorporated. ➢ Radio-frequency emissions in excess of FCC standards are not allowed. ➢ Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six months shall be considered abandoned. ➢ Verification submitted annually attesting that the radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. ➢ Access to the site must be at least 12 feet wide and capable of supporting a 40;000 - pound fire apparatus. Aesthetic Impacts The proposed facilities (colocated panel antennas and equipment cabinets) would not have any significant negative aesthetic impact to the area. There are no residences nearby. The site is visible to passing motorists on Nelson Road but Nelson Road is not a highly traveled roadway. The addition of six panel antennas in relationship to the 194 -foot tower will not .be significantly noticeable to this traffic. Radio -Frequency Emissions ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 2 ■ The radio emissions from the proposed antennas are regulated by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). The FCC rules categorically exclude certain transmitting facilities from outline evaluation for compliance with radio frequency (RF) emissions based on the Commission's determination that they are extremely unlikely to cause workers or the genral public to become exposed to emissions that exceed the guidelines. Broadband PCS facilities, like the one's being proposed, are categorically excluded if they are located ten meters or more off the ground (other than on a roof top), or if the total power of all channels is 2,000 watts ERP or less. The proposed facilities will have a power rating less than 2,000 watts ERP. The FCC has also determined power density limits for the general population in uncontrolled areas for the proposed frequency band it is 1,000 micro -watts per square centimeter. The proposed facility will subject people on the ground to a maximum of 0.0034 micro -watts per square centimeter, far below the allowable limit. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Manager take the following actions: I. Recommend that the Planning Commission find that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15301. Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) consists of the leasing and minor alteration of existing public utility structure(s) involving negligible or no expansion of use. The proposed wireless communication facilities colocated on an existing lattice tower constitutes a negligible expansion of the existing use. II. Recommend approval to the Planning Commission of Minor Use Permit 02-14 for Cingular Wireless, subject to the following findings and conditions found in Attachment A. A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County because: Project conditions of approval have been applied to this project pursuant to the applicable requirements of Section 24-262 (Wireless Communication Facilities), the Butte County Building Division, the Butte County Environmental Health Department, and the Butte County Air Quality Management District. The project is Butte County General Plan in that the Agricultural Residential land use designation allows public uses as a Secondary Use and cellular telephone facilities are considered a public use. The project also complies with the Agricultural 40 -acre (A-40) zoning provisions and the Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance in that proposed colocated facilities mounted to an existing antenna are permitted with approval of a Minor Use Permit. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 3 ■ B. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with, and will not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density: The proposed antennas would not increase the height of the existing tower and would not be visually conspicuous in this setting. 2. The availability of public facilities, services, and utilities: Electrical power service is already established to the property and no additional services or utilities are required. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character: The project site is already developed with a 194 foot lattice tower. The proposed additional antennas would not have a harmful effect upon the neighborhood character. The radio-frequency emissions from the proposed antennas must meet FCC standards. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets: Very few vehicle trips would be generated during installation of the antennas and equipment shelter. No significant change in the number of vehicle trips to the site would occur. 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed: The site is well suited for the project because the proposed antennas would be mounted on the lattice tower. The operation and maintenance of the facility would not impact surrounding agricultural uses. 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use: The Planning Division has circulated the proposed communication facility application to County Agencies and has received no evidence that the use would cause any other relevant impact. C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 4 ■ D. The proposed use would comply with all applicable provisions of Chapter 24, Section 262 of the Butte County Code. E. The radio-frequency emissions generated by the antennas on the monopole are below the limits set by the Federal Communications Commission. F. The proposed antennas would not create any impacts to aircraft operations. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 5 ■ EXHIBIT A MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) MUP 02-14 PERMIT NO. 038-250-025 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Cingular Wireless is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with the application filed: Minor Use Permit to install six 4 square foot panel antennas at a height of 123 feet on an existing 194 -foot lattice tower and a 4 -foot diameter microwave dish antenna and two ground -mounted equipment cabinets. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this use permit, all conditions must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within 12 months of the date of approval. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of approval, the permit shall become null and void and reapplication and a new permit shall be required to establish the use. A Minor Use Permit subject to lapse may be renewed for an additional period of up to one year, provided that sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date, an application for renewal of the Minor Use Permit is filed with the Planning Division on the prescribed form and accompanied by the necessary data and fees. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 6 ■ 5. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a permit. Conditions of Approval: Planning Division: The new antennas shall be painted to match the color of the existing tower at the height they will be located. 2. The Facility must meet or fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, the County, and any other agency of the Federal or State government with the authority to regulate such Facilities. 3. The installation of the Facility shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. 4. No advertising or display shall be permitted on the Facility. 5. The placement of any antenna or structure shall not adversely affect any on-site sewage disposal system or its repair area without written approval from the Division of Environmental Health. 6. The installation of the Facility shall not violate any existing deed restrictions. 7. The Facility shall have a twelve (12) foot wide all-weather access to a publicly maintained road capable of supporting a forty thousand (40,000) pound fire apparatus with fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. 8. The Facility shall fall within current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other State and/or Federal agency with the authority to regulate such Facility. If such standards and regulations are changed, the property owner or responsible party shall bring the Facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety (90) days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling agency. 9. There shall be no outdoor vehicle or equipment storage except for emergency purposes. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 7 ■ 10. The Facility or combination of the Facilities on the site shall not generate, at any time, electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) or radio frequency radiation (RF) in excess of the FCC adopted standards for human exposure, as amended over time. 11. If it is found that the Facility is or will be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of persons working or residing near such facility, then the service provider(s) and property owner shall be jointly and solely responsible for the removal, adjustment, or replacement of the Facility. In no case shall the Facility remain in operation if it is found to create a hazard to health, safety, and welfare. The Facility shall not be found to create a hazard to health, safety, or welfare as a result of EMF or RF emissions from the Facility so long as it meets all current standards established by the FCC, pursuant to FCC OET 65_ Prior to issuance of the building permit for the installation of the Facility, the applicant shall post a performance security in an amount and form determined by the Director of Development Services that is sufficient to cover the cost of a one-time test by a radio frequency consultant selected by the County, sufficient to determine whether the Facility's RF/EMF emissions comply with FCC standards. If the Facility's emissions are determined to exceed FCC standards, the applicant is required to pay for such other tests and other corrective measures as are necessary to establish compliance with FCC OET 65 and its successors and such noncompliance shall constitute sufficient grounds to commence a permit revocation hearing which may lead to permit revocation. The applicant shall cooperate in all respects with the County's consultant to assist the consultant to reach his/her conclusion. 12. All Facilities that are not in continual use for a period of six (6) months shall be considered abandoned. Abandoned Facilities are hereby designated as unlawful and as public nuisances, requiring no amortization period. If the Director of Development Services determines that the Facility is abandoned, the applicant may be required to remove all equipment belonging to the applicant from the premises and return the site to its original condition within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice to abate. If such Facility is not removed and the site returned to its original condition within thirty (30) days, the County may remove the Facility at the applicant's and/or land owner's joint and several expense. 13. All equipment cabinets shall be screened from view with a minimum six (6) foot tall wooden fence surrounding the equipment pad. All screening treatments, including landscaping, shall be maintained as approved for the life of the Facility. 14. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 15. The owner/operator of the Facility shall annually submit a written verification, attested to under penalty of perjury, signed by both the owner/operator and an FCC licensee in the employ of or retained by the owner/operator, that the radio frequency ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 8 ■ radiation/electromagnetic frequency (RF/EMF) emitted by the facility conforms to safety standards set forth in FCC OET 65. The reports prepared for the Facility shall conform to reporting requirements set by the FCC and the County. The reports shall be submitted to the Planning Division no later than January 31 of each year. 16. The Facility shall be secured at all times to prevent access by the public. 17. The project site shall be developed in accordance with the approved project site plan and the conditions contained herein. Said site plan is on file in the Planning Division, is identified as "Exhibit D" dated 12/03/01'and is incorporated herein by this reference. 18. Prior to use of this project, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a field inspection to verify all conditions of approval and ordinance requirements have been met. 19. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. Building Division 20. Building permits are required for the antennas and equipment cabinets. Engineer design calculations may be required to verify adequacy of existing tower structure and footings when additional antennas are installed. NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire Department/CDF Assessor ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 9 ■ Ln Ave C X Vicinity Map Ni It Ekiggy Ln I n -td 0 Dove Rid a Road o a' `� �,E r. ifin Ln Brothers Ln C& "TO' Nelson Rd so U) Rd Nelsm"hi Road' Nelson-Shippee Project Location Nelson Ave • Bradford.Rd.". ...... ...... r� 0 4 Y 0 LLI Fruitvale Rd t a Ms%tfa Ln BIGGS Ri ale MUP 02-14. 038-250-025 LAFt u#0 count, L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 April 12, 2002 Cingular Wireless 3851 N Freeway Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95833 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 038-250-025, MUP 02-14 Gentlemen:: Your request has been scheduled for hearing in front of the Planning Manager on April 24, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held in the Planning Division Conference Room, at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. A recommendation by the Planning representative will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as a consent item for final action. Consent items are set for approval in one motion. These items are considered non -controversial. No presentations will be made, however, some questions may be asked. The Chair will ask if any Commissioner or member of the public wishes to pull a consent item for discussion. The Minor Use Permit will be issued after approval by the Planning Commission. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Craig Sanders at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, xe' Z'A-t4L� Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Ir Dear Sirs: I live just off Nelson Highway and the proposed site of the cellular tower. I am terrified of the fact that this could possibly happen since my family moved out here partially to avoid such horrendous circumstances. These have been proven to cause health hazards to people nearby and I assure you that since my husband just died from pancreatic cancer I will not allow anyone to threaten the health of my children, myself, neighbors and friends. I will fight this all the way! Please find another location to set this hazard! I would have written sooner but in grief, things get confusing. I am getting neighbors and others apprized of this situation so that we may further band together for health and security. Thank you. , Please let me know of any questions. Sincerely, Margaret Arbuckle 899-8657 P.O. Box 954 Durham, CA 95938 . ... APR 2 3 2002 D BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVIW Rp,�aiv4; BUTTE COUNTY JAN 30 2002 9 VYATEk DIV. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES <' �/ PLANNING DIVISION 9`'"UC7URE% TO: Agricultural Commissioner FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Cingular Wireless, MUP 02-14 DATE: January 25, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor Use Permit to add six (3 proposed and 3 future) antennas to an existing 194 foot communications tower on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural - 40 acre parcels) located approximately 1.5 miles west of the Town of Nelson on Nelson Road, and approximately 3,000 feet east of Durnel Drive Nelson., identified as APN 038-250- 025. Supervisorial District No. 4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON April 24, 2002. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN February 14, 2002. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): (10 eDYVN nye-,-ls 4_) f VZ L _Z_0WtA4ar( L -L By: ��-�°-���-til r.C�-►a ti.. Date: 7Z FIN 7 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION TO: FROM: RE: DATE: nt� nta He8ith BUTTE COUNTY 0 Environ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES JAN 2 9 2002 PLANNING DIVISION Environmental Health 7 County' yencer urive BttttP r,,,,,..... n,- - — Oroville, Ca The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below sheet is to: The purpose f this comment 1 • Determine if the information contained in the application is ade ❑ o and submit conditions, if any; and to Q ate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project 2• Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want in to identify particular If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard a indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within incorporated. the time frame given, or if addirionalemfortrion is ed a needede please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for •� Qua six s ro osed and 3 future antennas to an existin 194 foot communications tower on property zoned A-40 A acre arcels Town of Nelson on Nelson Road and a roximatel 3 0 0 fee 4� st of Darnel DriveeNel r x � � o imately l .5 miles west of the 025: Supervisorial District No. 4. son., identified as APN 03 THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE ON A ril 24, 2002. COMMENTS, IF ANY RE THE PLANNING comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will MANAGER= REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN Febru14i 2002.'•lfno comment. be made that your agency has no i� By: / Date: �//Qa BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION" TO: Public Works FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Cingular Wireless, MUP 02-14 DATE: January 25, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please cal1538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor Use Permit to add six (3 proposed and 3 future) antennas to an existing 194 foot communications tower on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural - 40 acre parcels) located approximately 1.5 miles west of the Town of Nelson on Nelson Road, and approximately 3,000 feet east of Dumel Drive, Nelson., identified as APN 038-250- 025. Supervisorial District No. 4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON April 24, 2002. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN February 14, 2002. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): A/o 1-mr- M IN E FEB 4 2002 1i N FY Date:A!, 3/ zay-/ DECEIVE® JAN 2 9 2002 COUNTY OF BUTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT DIV. 9 • BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Development Services FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Cingular Wireless, MUP 02-14 DATE: January 25, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor Use Permit to add six (3 proposed and 3 future) antennas to an existing 194 foot communications tower on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural - 40 acre parcels) located approximately 1.5 miles west of the Town of Nelson on Nelson Road, and approximately 3,000 feet east of Durnel Drive, Nelson., identified as APN 038-250- 025. Supervisorial District No. 4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON April 24, 2002. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN February 2002. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): LAFCo BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION J A N r 2? TO: LAFCo OrOViiic, vole ornia FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Cingular Wireless, MUP 02-14 DATE: January 25, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor Use Permit to add six (3 proposed and 3 future) antennas to an existing 194 foot communications tower on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural - 40 acre parcels) located approximately 1.5 miles west of the Town of Nelson on Nelson Road, and approximately 3,000 feet east of Dumel Drive Nelson., identified as APN 038-250- 025. Supervisorial District No. 4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON April 24, 2002. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN February 14, 2002. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): _ �n/a conte.•• rr /ufad i» Pouf /%c/r e.i� aQr%a/ G>�s�'cu�•I By: S{e,�.. (.�C"J Date: Z11- .� D ECE"E LFE8 1 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION 0 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: CDF FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Cingular Wireless, MUP 02-14 DATE: January 25, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor Use Permit to add six (3 proposed and 3 future) antennas to an existing 194 foot communications tower on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural - 40 acre parcels) located approximately 1.5 miles west of the Town of Nelson on Nelson Road, and approximately 3,000 feet east of Durnel Drive, Nelson., identified as APN 038-250- 025. Supervisorial District No. 4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON April 24, 2002. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN February 14, 2002. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): • AP 038-250-025 Cingular Wireless MUP 02-14 0 1 Mailinq List Distribution Jroiect LOCA BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Cingular Wireless, MUP 02-14 DATE: January 25, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor Use Permit to add six (3 proposed and 3 future) antennas to an existing 194 foot communications tower on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural - 40 acre parcels) located approximately 1.5 miles west of the Town of Nelson on Nelson Road, and approximately 3,000 feet east of Dumel Drive Nelson., identified as APN 038-250- 025. Supervisorial District No. 4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON April 24, 2002. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN February 14, 2002. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: r APPLICATION: DATE: County Offices and Cities: Chief Administrative Officer X Environmental Health _ Sheriff X LAFCo Biggs _ Oroville Information Systems Dept. Irrigation District: _ Butte Water _ OWID Table Mountain Irrigation Domestic Water Butte Water District OWID Sewer Butte Water District _ Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) Fire Protection X California Department of Forestry Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Paradise Recreation & Park Utilities PG&E North - Chico _ PG&E South - Oroville State Agencies El COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST _)L Develop. Services Director X Assesor _ BCAG Air Quality Mgmt. _ Gridley Paradise _ Animal Control _Biggs/W. Gridley Water _ Paradise Irrigation _ Thermalito Irrigation _California Water Service Co. Thermalito IrrigationDistrict Themalito Irrigation L.O.A. PUD EI Medio Fire Protection District Durham Area Recreation Richvale Recreation & Parks _ Chambers Cable TV _ Viacom Cable TV CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept. of Water Resources _ Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rec. _ Central Reg. Water Quality Cont. _ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program _ Department of Conservation _ Off. of Mining Reclamation _ DeptSocial Services, Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management _ Army Corps of Engineers _ National.Marine Fisheries Sservice Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. _ Lime Saddle Dist Drainage Reclamation Butte Co. Mining Committee Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. _ Mosq. Abatement. Oroville/Butte Co Community Association Butte Env.l Council _ Cal Native Plant Society _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _ Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy _ 2L_Public Works Director Building Manager ALUC Butte Co. Farm Bureau _ Chico Chico Airport Commission X Agricultural Commission _ Durham Irrigation Richvale Irrigation _ Other Del Oro Water Co. Other _ Sterling City Sewer Main Feather River Rec. & Park Pacific Bell Dept. of Fish and Game _ Highway Patrol _ Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations US Fish & Wildlife Service School Districts K:\PLANNING\FORMS\DISTR.LIS "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: % %rte �� �� AP# 0-39-- OTO —2�� oK 0-;3,57 APPLICANT: 4-4,-elc's5738S( N- F^.ecw.±7 5-4c, G4 2MES-7 OWNER: Az, -02mg CSF r� REPRESENTATIVE: Ci A,i u(/2 44/ ,c /`=ss ��-�u CC Bc=u- (�yeks-5-) PROPOSED REQUEST: (to be filled out by person taking in application) -JJ Sh4. a3✓20nos4=!9 A -AM 3 C-Avle A•,✓ 147,41 , 'oo r �i¢U/73e.2. FINAL REQUEST: (to be filled out by project planner) SIZE: 4&1--" A of ry -s'ERi✓ C-t� Lvc- #oL.crafc-r VA &'4r,) LOCATION: -\4:,-,+ LS /O/Lc= 1ii�s?, off= Tl-fc= Towti vr= /r/�Lso,✓ 6Q .v .Ue s.0,✓ ZA0 14 0 t 4,10 460Jr 3 000 �o� t= ,*s- or aL)R"I =G 0,P/4= , SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # t EXISTING ZONING: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: 0 GG \ 1 PLANXIER0( i I Date �� �i ► ✓. Date 'Assimed 1 . vii a ,!..:►/ Preset Hearing 1 . 4-c!0 PLANNERS INITIALS �3 0 Date: January 15, 2002 To: Linda Langston From: Adil Ahad — RF Manager - RE: SA -683 Power Density Study X cingular WIRELESS The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) have published a standard called ANSMIEEE C95.1-1992, which until recently set recommended maximum power density levels for RF energy originating from communication sites and other sources. The FCC has also produced its own guidelines, which are more stringent and supersedes the ANSI Standard. For this reason, all power density determinations should be based on the FCC standard, not the ANSM EEE standard. The FCC's Standard is based upon recommended exposure guidelines published by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) in "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields," NCRP Report No.86, Sections 17.4.1, 17.4.1.1, 17.4.2, and 17.4.. Copyright NCRP, 1986, Bethesda, Maryland 20814. The FCC has produced rules which categorically exclude certain transmitting facilities from routine evaluation for compliance with the RF emission guidelines based on the Commission's determination that they are extremely unlikely to cause workers or the general public to become exposed to emissions that exceed the guidelines. This is saying that for those cases, the FCC has already determined that as long as the total transmitted power does not exceed the standard there is no chance of exceeding the power density threshold. Broadband PCS facilities, which includes Cingular Wireless' facilities, are categorically excluded if they are located ten meters or more off the ground (other than on a rooftop), or if the total power of all channels is 2000 watts ERP or less. Since all Cingular Wireless' facilities transmit less that 2000 Watts ERP, Cingular Wireless is categorically exempt. The FCC has also determined power density limits for the general population in uncontrolled areas. The limit for Cingular Wireless' frequency band is 1,000 microwatts per square centimeters (µW/cm2). As a comparison, the old ANSI Standard set the limit at 1,233 RW/cm2. Therefore, in using the FCC's testing as an agency independent of Cingular Wireless, it is reasonable to conclude the no Cingular Wireless facility will exceed the 1,000 µW/cm2. The table below shows the maximum power densities at various locations on the ground related to the fully configured site. Maximum Power Density: At the site 0.0002 (µW/cm2) 100 feet away from the site 0.0034 1000 feet away from the site 0.0013 2000 feet away from the site 0.0013 FCC exposure limit for the general population 1000.0 Cingular Wireless • 3851 North Freeway Blvd. • Sacramento, CA 95834 12/06/2001 16:09 8472401522 .a. eng•ineerin3 s12Tv�•GG''S AMERICAN TOWER PAGE 02 Shared Site Interference Analysis American Tower Nelson -82603 1 Analysis Performed for Cingular December 6, 2001 Table of Contents s t.: .; .. 12/06/2001 16:09 8472401522 AMERICAN TOWER PAGE 03 ,i 1.0 Analysis Summary ..............................................................................................1 2.0 Site Configuration...............................................................................................2 2.1 Airtouch Airtouch AMPS/CDMA B Configuration...................................................................3 2.2 Airtouch Dish Antenna 10Ghz Configuration 2.3 Airtouch Dish Antenna 11Ghz Configuration....................................................•..•.................•7 2.4 Airtouch Dish Antenna 2 Ghz Configuration...........................................................................9 2.5 Airtouch Dish Antenna 5.8 GHz Configuration......................................................................11 2.6 Cingular GSM PCS B 6ant Configuration ................................... 13 .............................................................16 3.0 Analysis Details .................................. - - 3.1 Transmitter Noise Analysis.......................................................................................................16 -` 3.1.1 Worst Case Example Transmitter Noise...............................................................................17 3.2 Receiver Desensitization Analysis...........................................................................................19 3.2.1 Worst Case Example Receiver Desensitization...................................•....•.....................•••••.20 3.3 Transmitter Intermodulation Analysis .............. " . 3.4 Receiver Intermodulation Analysis..........................................................................................:23 :.:. 3.5 Harmonic Analysis .................. ......24 3.6 Spurious Analysis...................................................................................................................25 12/06/2001 16:09 8472401522 • AMERICAN TOWER • Limited Warranty Galaxy Engineering Services warrants tbat this analysis was performed substantially using the methods that are referenced and described in this report using the information on the antenna site that was provided to Galaxy. Engineering Services. Galaxy Engineering Services disclaims all other warranties, either express or implied, including, but not limited to, implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. This limited warranty gives you specific legal rights. You may have others, which vary from state to state. Galaxy Eugineering Services' entire liability and your exclusive remedy shall be return of the price paid to Galaxy Engineering Services for the analysis. In no event will Galaxy Engineering Services be liable to you for damages, including any loss of profits, lost savings, or other incidental or consequential damages arising out of your use or inability to use the analysis. Because some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages, the above limitation may not apply to you. 12/06/2001 16:09 8472401522 • ATC -Nelson, Cingular AMERICAN TOWER • The site interference analysis at ATC -Nelson site was completed for Cingular. The results predict no interference with the configurations and antenna separations used for the analysis. This site analysis included 2 tenants with 6 configurations. The configurations include 17 antennas. 88 frequencies were used in the analysis. Further information on the configurations used for the analysis is given in section 2.0. A full description of the results of the analysis is given in section 3.0. Here is a summary of the analysis results: PAGE 05 Analysis Status Detailed Information Worst Case Margin dB Transmitter Noise Passed All Receiverspassed 44.1 Receiver Desensitization Passed All Receivespassed 73.3 TX 2 Intermodulation Passed No Interference N/A TX 3 Intermodulation Passed No Interference N/A TX 4 Intermodulation Passed No Interference N/A TX 5 Intermodulation Passed No Interference N/A Total TX Intermodulation Passed No Interference N/A RX 2 Intermodulation Passed No Interference N/A RX 3 Intermodulation Passed No Interference N/A RX 4 Ioterrnodulation Passed No Interference N/A RX 5 intermodulation Passed No Interference N/A Total RX Intermodulation Passed I No Interference N/A Harmonic Interference Passed No Interference N/A Spurious Interference Passed No Interference N/A Here is a summary of the analysis options: Intermodulation Parameters Values Highest Order 11 Transmitters Mixed 5 Intermodulation Offset 20 dB Susc22tibility bevel 6 dB Below Noise Proprietary and Confidential Page I ,r 12/06/2001 16:09 8472401522 ATC -Nelson, Cingular AMERICAN TOWER • � I -ff lit-� rl! i.ai qli ,"r a ` �� If`I iIi� II.I�I jl jOIII { I}'� it I�'II I li �U ;�I 0 i r r pti Description: ATC: 82603 Owner: American Tower Address: Nelson Road Oroville, CA 95965 Latitude: 39-33-03.990 N Loogitude: 121-46-53-1000W The following table lists the 6 configurations at this site. Tenant Configuration Name Technology Frequency Band Airtouch Airtouch AMPS/CDMA B 800 MHz CDMA, AMPS 800 Cellular B Airtouch Dish Antenna 100hz Microwave link 10Ghz Airtouch Dish Antenna IIGhz Microwave link 1IGHz Airtouch Dish Antenna 2 Ghz Microwave link 2 GHz Microwave Airtouch Dish ADteooa 5.8 GHz Microwave, Digital 6 GHz Mierowavc Cinplax GSM PCS B Gant GSM I PCS B PAGE 06 ,tea �r ��T��h�,ep�p��following Ise(cttions describe each configuration �iiMn��� d��rye�t7'a'q',rill.7ry��,ryr1�ryl,,' {p(�����jr®9�p��p��q��rrrr�� �p����ry� YIW(II �,IY.rt6,{{�{rr� .I`II:IIYWUHW4111111111:,+],1,I�WmITu]] �WI]t�� .!f .Y;r4 Proprietary and Confidential 12/06/2001 16:09 8472422 AMERICAN TOWER ATC -Nelson, Cingular imminnipmom BILI PAGE 07 The 2 OMNI antennas are mounted with the base of the antennas at 195.0 and 189.0 feet. The system, operates in the Cellular B band. The transmit frequencies are between 880 MHz and 895 MHz. The receive frequencies are from 835 MHz to 850 MHz. Figure 2.1-1 shows the top and side views of the amtennas with the associated antenna mounts. t' i 195 97 ft Oft 1101 V 1110 "A I I I Oft 8 f 17 ft Antenna Type ffei ht [t Azlmuth °N DB806 OMNI 195.0 0.0 DB806 OMNI 189.0 0.0 Figure 2.1-1 Airtoueh System Proprietary and Confidential Page 3 ; 12/06/2001 16:09 8472401522 AMERICAN TOWER ATC -Nelson, Cingular Figure 2.1-2 shows the model of the system used by the UNIstar interference prediction software. Figure 2.1-2 Airtouch Configuration The frequencies used for transmit and receive are listed in the following tables. RR0.02 RR0.651 981.29 RR1.91 882.54 993.17 881.9 1 R94.43 885.06 1 885.691 881.52 893.25 Figure 2.1-3 Airtouch Transmit Frequency Plan (MHz) Figure 2.1-4 Airtouch Receiver, Frequency Plan (MHz) PAGE 08 a 1� � I11�� . f8�llif'f�lf�ifl8!��G��Uq�I���V �ll�lf IIGI�f � �-j Proprietary and Confidential 12/06/2001 16:09 8472401522 ATC -Nelson, Cinigular AMERICAN TOWER • PAGE 09 QARP,' U�t.+FA�i4,..��ll� .. •, uAll��dl4tUUilBIf�UWllipllffl�Jl�IUN�NII The 1 DISH antennas are mounted with the center of the antennas at 25.0 feet. The system operates in the JOGhz band. The transmit frequencies are between 10640 MHz and 10680 MHz. The receive frequencies are from 10540 MHz to 10580 MHz, Figure 2.2-1 shows the top and side views of the ='. antennas with the associated antenna mounts. 195 ftr Mrsty 1 I oft aft 17 ft Antenna Type HOW MY Azimuth °N P4-102 DISH 25.0 0.0 Figure 2.2-1 Airtouch System 4 Proprietary and Confidential r - t`f oft aft 17 ft Antenna Type HOW MY Azimuth °N P4-102 DISH 25.0 0.0 Figure 2.2-1 Airtouch System 4 Proprietary and Confidential r 12/86/2001 16:09 8472401522 AMERICAN TOWER PAGE 10 ATC -Nelson, Cingular Figure 2.2-2 shows the model of the system used by the UNistar interference prediction software. Figure 2.1-2 Airtoueh Configuration The frequencies used for transmit and receive are listed in the following tables. 17f457 106Rn Figure 2.2-3 Airtoueh Transmit Frequency Plan (MHz) � nsao 10.5R(1 Figure 2.2-4 Airtouch Receiver Frequency ,Plan (MHz) Proprietary and Confidential Page 6 12/06/2001 16:09 8472401522 AMERICAN TOWER ATC -Nelson, Cingular it 6 11t , i -Millis �".L ,I�: u�Ii The 2 DISH antennas are mounted with the center of the antennae at 180.0 and 150.0 feet. The system operates in the l IGhz band. The transmit frequencies are between 10840 MHz and 10880 MHz. The receive frequencies are from 10740 MHz to 10820 MHz. Figure 2.3-1 shows the top and side views of the antennas with the associated antenna mounts. 195 97 ft 1 >I Oft aft 17 ft PAGE 11 111uupi ► t N 30 0 ft Antenna Type I Height Azimuth °N UHX6-107C DISH 1 180.0 1 60.0 UHX6-107C DISH 1 150.0 j 60.0 Figure 2.3-1 Airtouch System Proprietary and Confidential Page 7 12/06/2001 16:09 847240#2 AMERICAN TOWER • ATC -Nelson, Cingular Figure 2.3.2 shows the model of the system used by the UNIstar interference prediction software. LDF7-50A � Rx I GHX Mleawa Figure 2.3-2 Airtouch Configuration The frequencies used for transmit and receive are listed in the following tables. PAGE 12 _rY-z'yu 10R40 10RR0 ` Figure 2.3-3 Airtouch Transmit Frequency Plan (MHz) 10740 10920 10740 107R0 Figure 2.3-4 Airtouch Receiver Frequency Plan (MHz) lHI4U17fIN! NUWIIgUHII�I�lkftll lglfliulllWUllIHf91f11Nui�ItUNINtINI 11U��<�! �IUiI Proprietary and Confidential Page 8 'E 12/06 . /2oel 16:09 84724*2 ATC -Nelson, Cingular AMERICAN TOWER 0 .0 -11 The 4 DISH antennas are mounted with the center of the antennas at 170.0 and 110.0 and 140.0 and 80.0 feet. The system operates in the 2 GHz Microwave band. The transmit frequencies are between I MHz and 2 MHz. The receive frequencies are from I MHz to 2 MHz. Figure 2.4-1 shows the top and side views of the antennas with the associated antenna Mounts. 195 97 ft Oft 0 N Oft 8 ft 17ft Antenna Type Height (ft) Azimuth (*NL _ P6F-21C DISH 170.0 240,0 PA -21A72 DISH 110.0 90.0 P6F-21C DISH Oft 8 ft 17ft Antenna Type Height (ft) Azimuth (*NL _ P6F-21C DISH 170.0 240,0 PA -21A72 DISH 110.0 90.0 P6F-21C DISH 140.0 240.0 PA -21A72 DISH 80.0 90.0 Figure 2.4-1 Airtouch System Proprietary and Confidential Page 9 12/06/2001 16:09 847240#2 AMERICAN TOWER ATC -Nelson, Cingular Figure 2.4-2 shows the model of the system used by the UNlstar interference prediction software. LDF7-50A Tx Rx Iz nwj— POW MW LDF75oA Tic ti- E - Rx ;� �Q MW�aaev . ...• ......:. .. .... Z Hz M Ouplaw 2 OW MW Figure 2.4-2 Airtouch Configuration The frequencies used for transmit and receive are listed in the following tables. 210 1 21Rn 1 2175 1 21R5 I I I I Figure 2.4-3 Airtouch Transmit Frequency Plan (MHz) 2120 1 2130 1 211.5 1 2125 1 2120 2130 1 2115 1 212.5 ,Figure 2.4-4 Airtouch ,Receiver Frequency Plan (MHz) PAGE 14 �.f 9798 Proprietary and Confidential Page 10 12/06/2001 16:09 847242 AMERICAN TOWER ATC -Nelson, Cingular i � i u,, � i h' �I�•{ I `� i�'il � it � t �I ISI{+ �.i{I I�ji � a{I ;I' i !i I I � � I� II i �i({ ; The 2 DISH antennas are mounted with the center of the antennas at 70.0 and 35.0 feet. The system, operates in the 6 GHz Microwave band. The transmit frequencies are between 5925 MHz and 6925 MHz. The receive frequencies are from 5925 MHz to 6925 MHz, Figure 2.5-1 shows the top and side views of the anteunas with the associated antenna mounts. 195 ft 97 ft am 1 i I Oft 8 f 17ft Antenna Type Height (ft) Azimuth °N UHX6-59H DISH 70.0 0.0 UHX6-59H DISH 35.0 0.0 Figure 2.5-1 Airtouch System Proprietary and Confidential Page 1 l PAGE 15 tN •_e 12/06/2001 16:09 847242 AMERICAN TOWER ATC -Nelson, Cingular Figure 2.5-2 shows the model of the system used by the UNIstar interference prediction software. 6 DWaWSGHZXw Figure 2.5-2 Airtouch Configuration The frequencies used for transmit and receive are listed in the following tables. 6155 16215 Figure 2.5-3.4 irtouch Transmit Frequency Plan (MHz) L-ri-955 1 601.5 1 595.5 1 6015_ Figure 2.5-4,4 irtouch Receiver Frequency Plan (MHz) PAGE 16 zu 12/06/2001 16:09 8472402 ATC -Nelson, Cingular AMERICAN TOWER 0 PAGE 17 I t.Y dcl; t'`�i' nt t ury n pu u i e: i i I i ii ► , ik ,1.,,i;1;•,+ ;:4�>�c k d'tIT , � „f.I�.1�1�It�l IIS iIpI�I ll rl ii !Ilii t� 1►1!II �iil, � ��iad,!�VNh !I�1��;11;�lIIIV �h;llih lh iil� IIS! IIf ��, il� �t illli, The 6 PANEL antennas are mounted with the center of the antennas at 126.0 feet. The system operates in the PCS B band. The transmit frequencies are between 1950 MHz and 1965 MHz. The receive frequencies are from 1870 MHz to 1885 MHz. Figure 2.6-1 shows the top and side views of the antennas with the associated antenna mounts. ' 195 fit! 97 ft Oft Oft 8 f 17 ft Antenna Tye Height ft Azimuth N DB961DD90-M PANEL 126.0 0.0 DB961DD90-M PANEL 126.0 0.0 DB961DD90-M PANEL 126.0 120.0 DB961DD90-M PANEL 126.0 120.0 DB961DD90-M PANEL 126.0 240.0 I)B961DD90-M PANEL 126.0 240.0 Figure 2.6-1 Cingular System Proprietary and Confidential Page 13 I E'r= 12/06/2001 16:09 8472002 AMERICAN TOWER PAGE 18 ATC -Nelson, Cingular Figure 2,6-2 shows the model of the systems used by the UNIstar interference prediction software. Y'" I Rx LDF7-60A..•_• r� ^_ LDF7-50A Proprietary and Confidential �.r Rx •• Nokia GSM Figure 2.6-2 Cingular Configuration Nw; 12/06/2001 16:09 8472402 AMERICAN TOWER ATC -Nelson, Cingular i The frequencies used for transmit and receive are listed in the following tables. 1950.2 1953 1955.8 1959.6 19-5-071 1953.6 1956.4 1959.2 1951.4 1954.2 1957 1959.8 Figure 2.6-3 Cingular Transmit Frequency Plan (MNz) 1 R70.2 1873 1975.R 1878.6 1870.2 IR -71 1 R7S.R 1 URA 1870.8 1873.6 1876.4 1879.2 1870.8 1873.6 1876.4 1879.2 1870.8 1873.6 1876.4 1879.2 1870.8 1873.6 1876.4 1879.2 Figure 2.6-4 Cingular ,Receiver Frequency Plan (MHz) Proprietary and Confidential page 15 PAGE 1.9 • ':fps 3 12/06/2001 16:09 847242 AMERICAN TOWER PAGE 20 i.i ATC -Nelson, Cingular iiW. ;C•: a• ry ldl .IRi .T' "1''' ';1 r',i ,;1I I�.•1r; •: r?r,m• e, : 4 �y s . ; l•:. .;.�a ilti� ; ! f•.lili �`•ipl: I II),. I.,: :ilii �' � I?.. j . : ,: ;' 1 i 11":M I` :,II�:. `".I .• ��.N;g! I.. ; 611) j�i�iij.�' '.:I.�Elii� ii : tlh � � '�� �.Ir(>'L. ,.1. � : I`•;p:..�l �''' ',''h;�j � • d.l:...�, ; ,:� I�'li'i �' 1.1111: � c::: , I'•'� ..1:1,�:.�,i'%I' : � � ':'li;i�'. `` 1 I.;• .,,V.i (�;•l,� ..1,,,. : •::1.1.1.1 �;�i;l;:. ..I .. .:..;, . •.:: �.'��•��• ,4�,,>.��• •:.:1.:+1111,::.,:..., ,.flJ .rl:��.i .:,�Il;�i,;..:.,.ICII ��::� :•�:,,N,lla:, The site analysis was completed using UNtstar and no interference was predicted. The following sections give a detailed report on the analysis performed. 'Section 3.1 describes the results of the transmitter noise analysis. Section 3.2 describes the results of the receiver desensitization analysis. ..F' Sections 3.3 and 3.4 describe the results of the transmitter and receiver intermodulation analysis. Sections 3.5 and 3.6 respectively describe the harmonic and spurious interference analysis. 'f �IIIW1g1�ly� 1�118Ni��liANf I1N�i� - Transmitter noise is interference caused by noise generated by a transmitter that falls within a receiver's bandwidth. This noise level is compared with the receiver's susceptibility. Receiver susceptibility is determined by calculating the equivalent noise floor of the receiver system. This is based on the sensitivity of the receiver and the modulation scheme. For this analysis, susceptibility is considered to be 6 dB below z the noise floor. The analysis predicts the transmitter power level in the receiver bandwidth at the receive ra frequency. The difference between the receiver susceptibility and the predicted interfering power level is called the noise margin. If the noise margin is positive, the number represents the margin before interference occurs. If the margin is negative, the amount represents the level of improvement in isolation . required between the transmitter and receiver. The system also accumulates the effects of all transmitters on a receiver at a site. The levels in figure 3.1-1 show the predicted worst-case transmitter noise margin between receivers and transmitters at the site. TX System TX iFlz RX Salem RX Hz Nrx dBm Lnt-Ata dB L AOMAnttd dB S.t Ant dBm N Merom dB blah Antanna IOGhz 10640 Dish Amenna 10Ghz 10580 -55.8 76.7 -0.0 -86.4 44.1 Dish Antatna 1lplu 10840 osM PCS B bent 1870.8 -67.0 78.2 72.7 -117.3 100.7 GsM PCS B Gant 1950.2 Dish Antenna 2 Gliz 2120 -45.4 106.3 61.0 •85.1 127.6 QSIvt PCS B haat 1940,8 GSM PCS B Gant 1879.2 50.1 120.6 0.0 -170.1 •116.6 54.1 Figure 3.,1-1 Transmitter Noise Summary The general formula and worst case example is given in following figure. uIN pll�lq �IfnN1N61W181f ..IUII�IINm!I�INWOiUIi{IIIII Proprietary and Confidential f. Page 16 The worst case example of transmitter noise is from the transmitter (10640 MHz) on circuit 'TX/RX - P4 102' in aystem 'Dish Antenna l OGhz' to the receiver (10580' MHz) in circuit 'TX/RX - P4 102' in system 'Dish Antenna 100hz'. UNIstar calculated an acceptable noise margin of 44.1 d13 using the following method: LAm-Ant NANT SAnt N 7 LTX -Aro NFAX �Y7 Y NFA.,�c TX Circuit "81� Circuit RX GAN -M Step 1: Calculate transmitter not§e at receiver's antenna. FTx =10640 MHz Transmit frequency FRx =10580 MHz Receive frequency BWRx = 40000 kHz Receiver bandwidth Prx = 30.0 dBm Transmitter power PSDTx = -161.8 dBe Relative power emitted by trans. in receiver band (from transmitter's power spectral density curve) LTX -Ant = 76.7 dB Loss from transmitter to transmitter's antenna at FRx LAt,t-Ant = -0.0 dB Antenna (or coupler) isolation at F" NTxc = PSDTx + 10 x log (BWttx) = -161.8 + 10 x log (40000000.0) = -85.8 dBc NTx - PTx + (NTxc) = 30.0 + (-85.8) = -55.8 dBm NAnt = NTx - (L Tx•Ant + L Ant -Ant) = -55.8 - (76.7 + -0.0) = -132.5 dBm Proprietary and Confidential Noise emitted by transmitter in receiver's baud relative to carrier Noise at transmitter in receiver's band Transmitter noise at receiver's antenna 12/06/2001 16:09 84724022 AMERICAN TOWER • ATC -Nelson, Cingular Step 2: Calculate the susceptibility of the receiver at its antenna. SenseRx — -76.0 dB1n Receiver sensitivity [C/N] = 7.0 dB Equivalent carrier -to -noise level for specified receiver sensitivity NFAnt_Rx x 0.6 dB Equivalent noise figure of sector from antenna (or coupler) to receive input Nsim _ -47.0 dBkTB Site noise from Site Noise curve relative to kTB GA,u.Rx = -0.6 dB Gain from antenna (or coupler) to receiver kTB = Thermal noise in the receiver bandwidth at room = -174.0 + 10 x log(BWRx) temperature. _ -174.0 + 10 x log(40000000.0) _ -98.0 dBm NFRx = SenseAx - [CM] - (kTB) -76.0 - 7.0 - (-98.0) =15.0 dB N1FVA,jt 1 O(NFA.4010 + ((10(NP-"0)-I)/ 100A.,U110)] =10(0.6)'10 + [(1015.0"0)-1)/ 10(-0.610)] = 36.4 NFAnt 10 x log(NF'Ans) 10 x log(36.4) =15.6 dB NFSYBAnt = l0xlog(10(" ,,-,,0)+ 10m.110)) = lOxlog(10(15.6110) + 10(-47.0"0)) =15.6 dB SRX Ant = kTB + WSYSAnt - 6 --98.0+15.6-6 = -88.4 dBm Step 3: Calculate the noise margin. NMergln = SRX Ant - NA,), = -88.4- (-132.5) = 44.1 dB Noise figure of receiver Noise factor at antenna Noise factor at antenna in decibels System noise figure at antenna adds external noise at the site to the internal noise at the antenna. Susceptibility of receiver to interference at receive antenna Margin between noise reaching receive antenna and level of susceptibility at antenna ue+i U1Afl6101WIIN1IWi{11�IGIAI�IgIgiIIR1111NnN11Ni WI10GP�IWIH 11lANIIGIIIW Proprietary and Confidential Page 18 PAGE 22 12/06/2001 16:09 84724022 AMERICAN TOWER PAGE 23 ail i .. .•Lra:l ri dy ATC -Nelson, Cingular Receiver desensitization is interference caused by transmitter signals coupling into a receiver and desensitizing the receiver. The leakage power is compared with the receiver's desensitization level. For this analysis, receiver desensitization level is defined as level that degrades the receiver sensitivity by l dB. A positive desensitization margin represents the margin before interference occurs. If the margin is negative, the amount represents the level of improvement in isolation required between the transmitter and A;a receiver at the transmitter frequency. The system also accumulates the effects of all transmitters on a .,. receiver at a site. The levels in figure 3.2-1 show the worst-case receiver desensitization margin between the receivers and transmitters at the site. TX System TX z RX System RX Hz PTx dBm Lrx-.0 0 LApt-.&M dB L AW -RX dB P.,nx d8m D .,ax dBm D M„gj. dB Dish Antenna 10Gbz 10640 Dish Antonns 10540 30.0 0.9 -0.0 76A -47,3 26.0 73.3 Dish Antenna 2 Ohz 2180 GSM PCs B 6nnt 1870.8 30.0 2.3 61.5 93.9 -127.7 26.0 153.7 GSM PCs B dant 1950.8 Dish Antenna 10740 43.0 3.5 73.9 77.7 -112.1 26.0 136.1 GSM PCs B dant 1950.8 OSM PCs a Gant 1870.8 43.0 3.3 21.6 71.7 -53.8 26.0 79.8 Figure 3.2-1 Receiver Desensitization Summary An asterisk next to D M�gia value indicates the desensitization occurred at an LNA in the receive circuit. Three columns are affected: L AMM P st l:x, D at Rx. These columns indicate values at the LNA instead of the receiver. The general fonnula and worst case example is given in following figure 6��iMllly1111[fdN9q�9�t1�8�i ilfNUlg9� IUl�llltllUttlt Proprietary and Confidential Page 19 12/06/2001 16:09 8472401522 ATC -Nelson, Cingular AMERICAN TOWER . • PAGE 24 u• p iu¢I A i�ipgi,,....'+iypulu , 1 iii il„ t f' � dlccl It i ! i I , t! CI ''lll� i ,t! C I'1 I;' � ��d:%It �;.� ,.� ; ,o� ill; Ir r ,:�r.�: fjI ll•,l 11IIt f Ili dt Illi( II,ti{IiIII111113au 11111111lllilliti Ii.!I 1111,1 ,il�il� The worst case example of receiver desensitization is from the transmitter (10640 MHz) on circuit `TX/RX - V4 102' in system 'Dish Antenna IOGhz' to the receiver (10540 MHz) in circuit 'TX/RX - P4 102' in system 'Dish Antenna IOGhz'. UNIstar calculated an acceptable margin of 73.3 dB by using the. following method, wbich compares the LNA and receiver desensitization and selects the Iowest margin of the two: �am•a„ Pix, l PRX TX Circuit Y Circuit RX Step 1: Calculate transmitter power at receiver. FTx - 10640 MHz Transmit frequency FRx = 10540 MHz Receive frequency BWRx = 40000 kHz Receiver bandwidth PTx = 30.0 dBm Transmitter power LTX -Am= 0.9 dB Loss from transmitter to transmitter's antenna at FTx L,t,,,-A„t--0.0 dB Antenna (or coupler) isolation at FTx Lau -Rx = 76.4 dB Losses from (receiver's antenna to receiver at FTx Pttx Power emitted by transmitter in transmitter's band = Prx - (Lrx-Ao, + LA., -A,,, + LA„t- reaching receiver Rx) = 30.0 - (0.9 + -0.0 + 76.4) = -47.3 dBm Step 2: Calculate desensitization margin at receiver. Desensem = 26.0 dBm Desensitization level of receiver at FTx. This value is derived from the LNA's power rejection mask curve, DRx margin = DesenseRx - (PRx ) = 26.0 - (-47.3) = 73.3 dB Margin between desensitization level of the receiver and the transmitter power reaching the receiver Proprietary and Confidential Page 20 12/06/2001 16:09 8472422 AMERICAN TOWER ATC -Nelson, Cingular LAh" PTx � --� LAnuNA PLM TX Circuit Circuit LNA Step 3: Calculate transmitter power at LNA (if applicable). LAn4LNn = N/A Losses from receiver's antenna to LNA at FTX PLNA Power emitted by transmitter in transmitter's band = PTx - (LTx-A,,,+ LAW -A..+ LAnr• reaching receiver's LNA LNA) = 30.0 - (0.9 + -0.0 + N/A) = N/A dBm Step 4: Calculate desensitization margin at LNA. DesenseLNA = N/A dBm Desensitization level of LNA at FTx. This value is derived from the LNA's power rejection mask curve. DLNA Margin Margin between desensitization level and power at LNA = DesenseLNA - (PLNA) = N/A - (N/A) = N/A dB Step 5: Compare the LNA and receiver desensitization margin and select the lowest margin. DMaTain Minimum desensitization margin between the LNA and = min (DLNA Margin ) Dwc Marain) receiver = min (N/A, 73.3) = 73.3 dB Proprietary and Confidential 4� Page 21 PAGE 25 12/06/2001 16:09 847240522 ATC -Nelson, Cingular AMERICAN TOWER _ 1 � • I IIIINU,F't alt.I�.o11�Po1W One of the most common shared site interference mechanisms is transmitter intermodulation. Signals coupled into the output stage of a non-linear base station transmitter can result in intermodulation products being generated that interfere with other receivers at the site or with mobile receivers near the site. Intermodulation products are generated at frequencies described by the following expression: fintamodulation — mfl +nf2 where m and n are integers and (Iml + Inj) is the order of the intermodulation product. Part of the output spectrum of a non-linear device excited by two signals ft and fz is shown in the following figure. f, f2 v Non linear device t<IN Vi < M Frequency Figure 3.3-1 Spectrum of a non-linear device The UMstar software models the intermodulation characteristics of each transmitter and takes into consideration filtering, isolation, and antenna coupling between transmitters. The analysis considered combinations of 5 transmitters mixing up to the ill" order. No interference was predicted between receivers and transmitters at the site, The levels are so low that the intermodulation products will be attenuated. The transmitter victim is the system where the non-linear device is located. The transmitter interferer is the source of the power that is causing the non-linear device to produce intermodulation products. The receiver affected is the system where the affected receiver is located. The frequencies shown are the ones that produce the worst case interference level. The intermodulation order is shown under IM. The margin level, if negative, shows the amount of added isolation required between the systems to prevent the interference. Proprietary and Confidential Page 22' 12/06/2001 16:09 847240 522 ATC -Nelson, Cingular IU 21M.E.10, AMERICAN TOWER • Similar to the transmitter intermodulation analysis, intermodulation products can occur internal to the receiver system at a non-linear device. These products are caused by two or more signals entering a receiver at a relative high power level. No interference was predicted between receivers and transmitters at the site. The levels are so low that the intermodulation products will be attenuated. Proprietary and Confidential 12/06/2001 16:09 8472422 AMERICAN TOWER PAGE 28 ATC -Nelson, Cingular • 1UNq�i►p�a� .� �I�IuiIIgIN4R The non-linear characteristics of the transmitter result in each transmitter generating a series of harmonic outputs. These characteristics are modeled in UNlstar. The harmonics are caused in the transmitter or in the faltering between the transmitter and antenna. If the resultant harmonic signal falls within the band of a receiver, the signal may interfere with the receiver. Once the level of the harmonic level at the receiver's ' antenna is calculated, the power level of the interference reaching the antenna is compared to the receiver's susceptibility at antenna. The interference margin is the result of this comparison. If the margin is positive, interference will not occur. If the margin is negative interference may occur. No interference was predicted between receivers and transmitters at the site. There were no harmonies at this site. 1111��1�.�l�llfp8�q�i1�91�11 i� I� .�;•;_=: 1; Proprietary and Confidential Page 24 k P 12/06/2001 16:09 8472422 ATC -Nelson, Cingular AMERICAN TOWER ,, �i+, i1 aV,1lri!'►fil iil,a The UNIstar database models the spurious characteristics of each transmitter. If the resultant spurious signal falls within the band of a receiver, the signal may interfere with the'receiver. To determine if interference occurs, the power level of the interference reaching the receiver is calculated as shown in the following figure. This level is compared to the receiver's susceptibility. The interference margin is the result of, this comparison. If the margin is positive, interference will not occur. If the margin is negative interference may occur. No interference was predicted between receivers and transmitters at the site. There were no spurious results at this site. Proprietary and Confidential A664 �A535 A53 41 A690 A 33 9A532 • �A683 A531 VQSA530 A537 Planet DMS V2.2 Metapath Software International Ltd. Mon Sep 10 15: 05: 42 2001 Centre Long:121 37'50.4"W Lat: 39 33'01.4"N Scale: 1:400874 — Connecting Foad Primary load 5 a 9 dr �, • • 4 1r � /-k! III i. N y � C6 �0- ! 5e4 ' e - Planet DMS V2.2 Metapath Software International Ltd. Mon Sep 10 16: 27: 10 2001 Centre Long:121 42'11.8"W Lat: 39 31'i9.0"N Scale: 1:297532 — Connecting Road — Primary_Road Signa2(81ock) dBm >_ -95 -90 >_ -90 -85 >_ -85 ,s • )AFY-eig Planet DMS V2.2 Metapath Software International Ltd. Wed Sep 12 16: 12: 56 2001 Centre Long:121 43'02.7"W Lat: 39 31'32.0"N Scale: 1:268226 — Connecting Road Primary load Signal(Block) dBm >_ -95 -90 >_ -90 -85 >= -85 J^' ~~~--_-�--��---- -------_-�--_- -__--`- -_-__- eOr i/ I ZIU �[- Pyr ;. 1 ,`-\'t. �'� :� i x�n5 �'1��E" yy M1 l .�}•„� 1!!t: ...?_. SIR r�j���• Z"'S.+'+t;-l�Rw"rri�il�\'RS�T1iiER: iF 'wiP,rk'.-. '�+Y"S't":..: a 1 - . .. . _ *. . i is n .. .. _ .. •. � � t. T tri{i �t �S '�- �'� , �r%1%�' �i -, '•n.e,t� :J. • • t ' 4 .�� . J „.GENERAL NOTES 4 1. D awiCUNSTONS 1 PRECEDENCE. R KT — S I"ENCED o . SED — �K PVRPoYs MY. MRlSs NOIED MNERAY. TIC CENTRAL CONTRAaD'S SCD[ Or MRA SNA,, ..— YURmswM ALL MATERVaS. CWPUCNT, LABOR, AM ARYT . a. OCEN[D Ma$— TO COAAPLCIC M51At1A1OAS AS CCSCF,K ICREM. 2. PROR 10 1M SMUKSNN OF RNs. ME C —,M _VEO —, NSC IMAW M WE AFAMILIARIZE TKMsCLKS OM ONDOI1 ALL CI AE— YC TI[ —I PROTECT. AYIN INE tOrIS1R1IC1gN ARD COMRACI OOCUNETYS, rMLD COINRNN4 AID CONFIRM FIAT INT PROTECT WV BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SYCAN PROR 10 TWENCE No AIN —ITT ETION AM [ARDS, OYRSOrS. D OS TRIPWnC2 AM 10 BE BROUGNI f0 06 .FFNI_ OF FIC ARCNITECTATAGNCER, J. YE PROCEED AIH CO 1 RIKOOICONTRACTOR �PgORM ICE TMTNC MRN ONZAYOW 1. — "IN IN ELEARLY OEr1NEo BY. INE COTStPUCFEN ORAWMGS/ —1-1 DOCUMENt9. IM COMRKIOR SALL SERfmSE AND CWECT IM PROTECT DESCRIBED NCREAl. MC COMRACIOR SULL BE SOLELY .SPONSML[ FD ALL CONSIRVCINN AICANS. uEl.—. 1ECMMOUCS YOUOACES — PROCEGRMS AND rD CWR I.c ALL PDTONS D It MRN UNDER 1M CO 1. 5. THE COMRKTOP sINL WSTNlALL EOUPIIaN ARD MATERULS ACCOROPIc TO M Vo,R'S rTFNOR'S SPCCPKAIONS' UNLESS —I OtNERASE D WIC. LOCH C S OR ORCMMas RANT PMCE".. 8. MRN PERFORMED ON PROIECF MD MAICRIALLL 9 MSAED sIIALL M BE ALL LRICI N:OEII VA. All ALL APPLIUBLE COas. RECULAIOMs. AND 01mxA4El. COMRKtOR SULL GVE ALL NOTICES AID —1 MI ALL w5. DDMMCCS. AVLCS. R[GuulONs AND LA— GNC. OF AM PUBLIC AvIN tY. —.1. AID VW Y —PANY SPECUIGIONS. ALIO LOUa AND IEA[ _SAC_ EWES REARAG D LIN PERFDMMCE Or TIE MRA. ). CENTRAL CONTRACTOR SOUL PRMa A TNT PRDIECI STC A I SET OF CONSFRUCI- DOGWEMS IPOAAD MN TIE LATEST RI:LYSgxS AND NICE Ou. D —ONS FD IM IRC 87 NL PCRSONNa PFA0.KD AlN IM PROECCI. e. TNT SNUAT,VRN COMPOYCNTS OF INIS PROTECI STE/ FACRIIY ARE ANI i0 Y AL1CREO BY OOS C0T51PUCiOI PROTECT UNLESS N01C0 AY OTN[R. S. �DsuMOOFY IONS NTUi ARE INTENNED 1. a REMAREO i0 SMI 9CKILULI OF af. ONSFIOIS O II.L SBUAt10NS. AID SuCN uOCMFGAI— SULL BE MRUOCD As PAR1 OF 112 LPENETRATION$ 1MAI( I IF RARE BLE 1 WFIF M.L. LKT[D D rP[ ULL ATA -1. wl[RMLs P APPLICABLE 10 INK FA, — MD D ACE SOI. I I OC .7 PGNABU RY UFOOLSYF WON A RAIMC a NET LC55 IIIAII 2-A D 2 -Al. m1ruN 11 ICE' TRAVEL GSTAIa 10 ALL PORT -I OF 1M PRORCI MEA DURING CON, RUCION, I}. 1M COFTRATIC sNAL NAM NECESSARY PRONSOYS 10 PROTECT EASRNc MPREVEICMS• EASEMENTS. PAVING. CURBMG. ETC. OURYC CDSTRUCl-, UPON COu0.EiOY OF ROOK CDiPIE1D SPALL REPAIR AM DAMAGE RIAT w wK Oa 1 — TO CONSIAICiOx D OR AEON III PROPERTY. I]. CDIRKID SwLL YC 10 P INAT CENTRAL MRA ARU K ICPT DUCAN AND w2MD FREE DURING CONSIRIKIION AM OSPOY a AL DMF. DEBRIS. P SI AM REUP2 CnrPNENI MI SACC6EO AS RCMNANG III INT PROPERII. PREMISES s BE LEFT M a[AN CONOUIGN AND FMC FROM FAINT IPOEI. OUST. D S,UCGEs - AM' NA "I'M IA. OIC AREITCCTS/CNON[C. wK MAa EVERY EFFORT 10 SCI FORM M M CO.TR C7W ANO CDFRACT DDNMCNIS LIC COMPLETE SCOPE OF MRA. cDratTDs aoGxc INE AD ME NTKRTMLEss uuTNNm rxA NET NUIOR LCULE ONS CO ERRDs M 1M DAWMCs AM D TWIT AND SwLL ..CAUSE sMD CONTRACTOR FROM IC ATEIMG F F E. 000 AND OFT INQUS w R TIE a MI LIC MTUII a IMA OOCUMEYK. FM &OCEP SwLL BUR MC RESP ONTUCT Y D "”. MG 1 wTATIT tM PRORiEtr/[MC.. OF ANY COMURS. EPRDR6. D OUKSO. PROP 10 CIE SIE CONTN CI R SVILL D'S TIE M E MMC R Or GSDCP LESS LIE CDTRACTD swat vRKE 1M MOR[ COSRY D [OGSK M.. UNLESS OM[C1CD OTNCRAS[. c nr LEGEND A ANTENNA CABLE (ABOVE MOUND) I TELEPHONE SERVICE (ABOVE GROUND) E POWER SERVICE (ABOVE GROUND) G MOUND LONG (ABOVE mcum) A — — — — ANTENNA CABLE (BURIED) - — — — - T — — — — TELEPHGNE SERVICE (BURIED) — - E — — — — POWER SERVICE (BURIED) — — — — C — — — — MOUND RING (BURIED) PROJECT SUMMARY STE NAME: NELSON SITE NUMBER: SA -603-01 STE ADDRESS: 2003 NELSON Ro. MONLLE, CALIFORNIA, 95965 OWNER: WERCAN TONER me BVSx[s5 PARR DM 2+ ADDRESS: SACRAMENTO, CA 85821 SITE CONTACT: BOB SCNROEOER (916) 612-A663 APPLICANT: ETACULM WIRELESS APPUCANTS ADDRESS: U51 NORM FREEWAY BLVD. SACRAMENTO, CA 9583+ ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER(S): OSB -250-025 WIND; I VICINITY MAP I CONTACTS I I au GNanM ARRF<o e® S IROEDM AN PRFPARAOON 1. LEE BUOU .-. ARENITECT )631 NDM FRaWAY BOULEVARD I.. LMCELN WAY• SAIL 200 SAfAAYENII, CAWObOA 93NA (810) 561-AO]O WSITY. CALIFORNIA 9360) IM. (5J0) 666-0750 GEF. rNGNFFRINc• GNOULAR WIRELESS 51110 CEO EYGxCERMC .11 xDM FREEWAY 80AEVARD SADAMENTO -C- 9l6N 1236 .. 11110EI AUBURN. CAUFDTRA 95683 IAL (SJO) 66f0A26 NELSON Title Sheet Site No. SA -683-01 SITE ADDRESS: 2003 NELSON ROAD ORONLLE. GWFORT A 95965 BUTTE COUNTY • cingdar LEe 3851 NORTH FREEWAY BOULEVARD SACRAMENTO, CAUFORNIA 95834 .0 J. 1 ee buck i ngMnn 13620 I— Cln W.Y. suite 200 auburn —k.for-nl0 95603 O 1930, 886-0750 C 9622 !Ox zo,DNrim+ I 901E M0 OOC's "-..2 2 IOOTL ZONLNG DOT'S NELSON TITLE SHEET SHEET INDEX T TITLE SHEET C-1 SURVEY SHEET A-1 SITE PLAN A-2 ELEVATIONS NELSON Title Sheet Site No. SA -683-01 SITE ADDRESS: 2003 NELSON ROAD ORONLLE. GWFORT A 95965 BUTTE COUNTY • cingdar LEe 3851 NORTH FREEWAY BOULEVARD SACRAMENTO, CAUFORNIA 95834 .0 J. 1 ee buck i ngMnn 13620 I— Cln W.Y. suite 200 auburn —k.for-nl0 95603 O 1930, 886-0750 C 9622 !Ox zo,DNrim+ I 901E M0 OOC's "-..2 2 IOOTL ZONLNG DOT'S NELSON TITLE SHEET SEE PROJECT ,\ APN me-y5o-oo2 // AREA ENLARGEMENT I ]525' ♦/- APN 038-250-025 2830' ♦/- - +- - - ('JN11. 'p APN 036-tSd-olo 80' ♦/ 1 It APN 036 -Z50 -04s APH o3e-250-ao9 � �; Y u SCALE 1" = 500' OVERALL SITE PLAN 0.appc.d 20. 1 wnmllily Eo . .avP..d e• ily Eo•1mm1 Om.PLa (E) lD Co• o-, LEI ------------- tico A vm am (E) S.dc. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR \ J-PqO ./ irm•lom. (E) CNgNPF W.1"S P. 7851 N. rr.... y E_ S9CForento. CA 95971 P- (916) 622-1657 (E) (E) (q 808 SCRODER PFoiml NI./H- SA -6W-01 / NELSON Prtpoa.d 5' Utloty Ea•.mmt PIOPfI St. Local'wn: 2003 .- Rd. a. . CA Data of Ce._LNI; 11-06-01 OIICo (E) ehr (E) SA-683-01 Try. of Mt- M-; Ed•IN9 LIItk. TP.. NELSON Kane. or Antmnm On•...d: 1I LPtlka To.. (E) HAD W CPadNam (TP..) De.v dap (E) S.r To.. Oay.n La: 79'33'01.57" N (n A0 83) (NAv08B) 19i.]' AM0. SURVEY LoNg: 121'4WM.47*W (NAD 63) lk-Ad CN CERTIFICATION: I, m..nd.e0n.d. do ham; Cally Al -I.. RAI.d mow 1. d,•.d ah o I.d Lti� oa `9f II -o- m0 ,rv. and 1-- to VIA era of my VnPEm9. mG -ii.L i.N 1/`./' Nmncln D. G.. Cdil-I. R.C.C. 14803 D.I. S DAIS Or SURVEY: 11-06-01 SURKTEO BY ON UNDER DIRECTION OF: KENNETH 0. GCI. R.C.E. 11603 LOCATED IN ME ECUNTY O BUTTE. STATE OF CALFQRHIA BEARIN SHOWN ARE BASED UPON MONUMENTS FOUND AND RECORD INFORMATION. MIS 1S NOT A BOUNDARY SURKT. CLCVATIONS SHOWN ON MIS PLAN ARE CASCO UPON U.S.C.S. M.A.V.D. e8 DAVM. ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. N.OV.0. 1929 CORRECTION: SUBTRACT 2.N' room ELEVATIONS SHOWN. CONTOUR MTERVM: N/A ME LATIIUDC AND' WERE OCICRNMED USNC TMMBLE PATHFINDER PRO XI, G.P.S AND UTILNIMG PrMOER OTrICE ON'TERENTIM CORRECTION SO'TWAR AT THE EXISTING LA1l= TOWER As SHOWN ON PROJECT AREA ENLARGEMENT. LAT. 39'3SO3.37' HAD 83 LONG. 121'16'46.1)- HAD 63 LAT. 39'33'04.02' HAD 22 LONG. 121'16'52.65" HAD 22 THIS SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS FAA IA ACCURACY TOLERANCES. SHE NAME • WUNBER: NELSON / SA -6&1-01 STE ADDRESS: 2003 NELSON ROAD ORDWLLE. CALIFCMIMA 94965 BUTTE COUNTY AssESSOR's PARCEL NUMBER: 036-240-025 CURRENT ZONING: A-40 LADLORO(S$ AMERICAN TOWER SITE CONIACI: BOB SCHROEDER (916) 522-4653 IRU REPORT WAS HM AVAILABLE AT THE ME OF THE MUD SURMI. BOUNDARY SHOWN IS BASED DTI SOHUMENr•TION FOUND AND RECORD wrpRMARDN. THIS Is NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. THIS IS A PEZEDTOPOGRAPNIC MAP WITH PROPERTY MES AND EASEMENTS BEIIO A GRAPHIC CEPICTIOn BASED ON INTORMATION CATHERED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES OF RECORD AND AVAILABLE MONUMEMTATION FOUND OU NG ME FIELD SUPVEI'. NO MENEM WERE RESEARCHEO OR PLOTTED. PROPERTY LINES AND LINES O IOU WERE NOT MKSTIOATED HER SURVEYED. NO PROPERn MONUMENTS WERE SCT. Fmc... �O're W (E) gore, PROJECT AREA ENLARGEMENT I TOWER DIAGRAM I VIl.11Y 11! MAY All rTo. No.r .a e.N9 . P.O. o1 ,no -H.", au- of soclkn 31. 1-1.20 N.. Rm�9r 2 E.. M.D.M. OWWg morn wto,Iy dlwaod oa alt- Co.nmmPNy al Mr Nath- coma Po•l 0l th. r.d,N9 -km F.I. I.- .hk21 era• Sov,n 02='09' E... Nom m.aln.ra coma P 1 01 m ..iaa9 mPN fn. Imc.: Mmcr Swtn 33'12'01• E- A188 IWH ,o tn. PPNI P1 b.,".a: mmcc SCu1H 3Y13' 10' 1].00: mmc. south SIT WW E-12.91 1-: tnmcr or n 0156'16" EO., 15.29 fvc thmco nam 4616'60" Mul 19.91 lot to me point of e.9NeN9. Tope,n..(Ih m -1 lar u1H1y WPP.rA .d 1111 N .Idle tho --W. PI mkn Ir woad P. mldre a gl-W, 01 o poinl Mkh e.ar. -Ih 5616'10' CP11 I'- ,n SINT -1 cam. oT W. ad.. d.A.am .-AA am: In -c. s U, 33-1310' -1 1.00 lral: to 56'1650• -1 32.22 Frac m-1. norm 0200'09" x- 3.20 M1.. Io 9 PON, . *W rn•onw AI e. d...a.d 1A PON, '/.. Am lo9amAr am oH m•ammt la Acw• and UlN1y vcpaAr• I.mty I— N .Idln tar UmtMN. of mtch 1. do.aed oa Idl**3:• e.9Nnn9 91 oA d --d eD mu Nan 020D'09' - 142.e2 bat to o PoWl .n1a.o.n n.mnv e. Jrward o. i1 •B lhmw 0-09 N- 0200'09" WAIT 28.02 f- mar a I... Io thr pvm. lynl c al by. Fam to91m..1h m m4mm1 I UtAty MPOaeA At Imt N .lath to m. PI m d.""'d OA 1yb.a:0 9Nna9 0l PONT • downed Pepw lnmc. -H8)59'41 cn E-158.63 lael mac .Lev Io m .daN9 u1Mty Rack.. = ro log tap I. 111 l N Nr I .1 ..AN,HTHI rkN .ala... .a.y to oc-A. W.I.. and ENONEERwC • SURKYMG • PLANMNC 1226 HIGH STREET AUBURN, CALIFORNIA 95603 phone: (530) 885-0426 to.: (530) 823-1309 )ATE: I1-07-01 iURVEYOR: N. GEIL IRAWN BY: N. RONDE DATE I DESCRIPTION IINITIAL� CWIgIA.r Yeaev 2851 N r ..... y DTd. S -l-to, CA 95821 Z., (916) %1.4026 GN E•oN..1y INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR EnyN.aa9 Snwyn9 • Mmnln9 226 Hqn SUm, CNgNPF W.1"S dun, W.L.- 95603-5015 Pnma: (530) 885-0426 • Fo.: (530) 823-13M 7851 N. rr.... y E_ S9CForento. CA 95971 P- (916) 622-1657 AAS.A.C. PCS E vW-�t Survey ram 808 SCRODER PFoiml NI./H- SA -6W-01 / NELSON PIOPfI St. Local'wn: 2003 .- Rd. a. . CA Data of Ce._LNI; 11-06-01 Coadaola•: T-III1 PIHhIW . Pre XL Poet IN-- N--SA-683-01 .Tin USO; -1..D6mN vpiniMdv 011ke SA-683-01 Try. of Mt- M-; Ed•IN9 LIItk. TP.. NELSON Kane. or Antmnm On•...d: 1I HAD W CPadNam (TP..) LOUtuer: N 39.33'03.52• Lm9nvd.: W 171ve'S6,4Y (NAv08B) 19i.]' AM0. SURVEY s'rRUCTI,REONpPHT (Top of T-) OVERALL HEIGHT (Top of W*bI 182.8' A0. CERTIFICATION: I, m..nd.e0n.d. do ham; Cally Al -I.. RAI.d mow 1. d,•.d ah o I.d w>> donr und. my AWNNN m and W.l n. occur y of in c tlrwllm. _' IN .'c- 1 -A 51-d, dlfHAd N Mr FAA ASAC mf Sn.rt 91:003• Mat racy 11 II -o- m0 ,rv. and 1-- to VIA era of my VnPEm9. mG -ii.L i.N 1/`./' Nmncln D. G.. Cdil-I. R.C.C. 14803 D.I. 61 ---------Nelson Road -7z — — - -t - - - - (E)ACCESSACCESS Pw - ri ( POLE W/ �POEER I I J - PROPOSED 6' (E) PNCE UNE $$y N411T �� Olfze (F) P2 I 'EI (E) sorvltt POLE I E) LATTICE TOWER 1m PROPOSED 6' I CDQIUA •t� UTILITY EXSEYDIT LEASE AREA UDU �I YY� (() EUR lD1E e0're \ • OVERALL SITE PLAN SCALE: I' . 60' NEW STARS NEW TESCO ELECT. I 3' FUTURE JRD NEV HANDRAIL 0 Y ABOVE SU BIS UNIT NEW wow CONE. SPLICE PEDESTAL NEW TELCO ON DOUBLE UNISTRUT SUPPORT . '. BOX SET RUSH TO SLAB 30OW HALOGEN FLOOD- LIGHT h SWITCH `' ' FUTURE BTS UNIT • ,4 - SCALE: 1/4- .1'-0- Y �,;'. NETT RASED NC_ rORU YYY.. p ; I. R tt• 2' TIDE. tONC STIR SLAB _ tI `,:. :: I oRum CKUOC6l SSD FLUSH .. < EO TOP Of CDNc FOR O � V •-6%, . `' NEW NEW COAX CABLE RUN (E) FENCEWIE A. 7— � (E) LATTICE TOM I \ NEW TESCO ELECT. I ° PEDESTAL NEW TELCO ON DOUBLE UNISTRUT SUPPORT 30OW HALOGEN FLOOD- LIGHT h SWITCH EQUIPMENT PAD LAYOUT - SCALE: 1/4- .1'-0- { I I . O � V O Q f OO ' - AFS PETAL PEDESTAL 0 { TESCO�; BTS COMMUNICATION BOX \ \ \ SCALE: N.T.S. (E) FENCEWIE A. 7— � (E) LATTICE TOM I \ ° EW STAR TESCO�; \ \ \ NEW \ PPEEDESTALN:. \ TO— I' a • \ \' / PANEL ,: 42y \ \ / NEW FLOOD UWIT . !� \� W/ SWITCH g GENERAL NOTES: ENLARGED SITE PLAN A t' CLEAN CRUSHED ROCK OVER CLASS Two SCALE: 1/4- .1'-0- AGOREWTE BASE IxLOE LEASED AREA — IURASGPE LAN09GP[ FABRIC NEED BWRRR (BETWEEN) GRAPHIC SCALE B.IN —IN LO EOAPYENT AND TOWER SME REDUIRENENTS. LEASED AREA SNENJ D COHSDER SUCH RENS AS. NNNIENu10E, 0 2 4 8' I6 CRANE ACCESS AND 1,NEs APDRG. C. ON WE DRNNAOE SHALL BE ICTAFEO BY WE CONDTTONS D. ORCNTAMN OF TELCO PANEL D "'1"PEDESTAL SHA' BE , FIELD KRUCD 24' CDQUILAR PROPOSED ANTENNAS ) FUTURE TOTAL PROVIDE NEW CABLE IAODER UP EXISTDIG ' TOPER (USE SAYE AUR. AS TOM) FUTURE RTS UNIT NEW SPLICE BOX NEW 16• DR.UN CHANNEL FOR COAX CABLES NEW WNOPM 0 3' ABOVE TOP Of SLAB SITE ADDRESS: 2003 NELSON ROAD OROWRLE. CAILTOR_ 95965 BUTTE C.— bng p WOMEN 3851 NORTH FREEWAY BOULEVARD SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95834 j, lee buck ingnhnn X10.6.111 hate LL 1362!0 tTncoln NOV, 0sulte 200 0 b.— CDIIfor I 95603 0 n153 y 886-0750 C 962, NELSON— SITE PLAN MIIEs AS w L NOTED p.nxo HP. 1i -OJ -OT A-1 O g1FIc') O cz bI� �l N �7 C a 'y ti O C 0 m PQ -Q a • € \ F z € N pill pqa 8 � ,o 6 u o K 0 �o m D Z f O 6 $i vg,XRc 51' U777 N i_ o N y�8m D OHS 6 u v Irj 8 r a O 9 o$ oCRo 3 �5;� � �'P� M R d beb �% oT-ci9 `V 3 o N y�8m D OHS /3 T. 20 N. R. 2 E. M. D. B. bt M. SA -683 AREA MAP County of Butte, Co REVISED: 8-93 38-25 4 z l ° ►200' �— 22 -25 -T - , r OFC � A-40 1 I I , 1 1 r I 1 I r 1 , 1 r 1 , 1 OFC A-40 COUNTY OF BUTTE OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE RDF Q r �R1ZGZ Fr / - 410 G } r�T0 4382A25000 25000 O yoF , RICAN TOWER/W.C.W.D. yyG 9 vy 03 NELSON RD OROVILLE CA 95965 owEn APR 1 7 2002 BUTTE COUNTY ANNING DIVISION 0.3 2 146Tca �• - 14680 R.S. POSTAGE