HomeMy WebLinkAboutUP 03-12FILE #: UP 03-12 f
PROJECT TYPE: Use Permit
APPLICANT: Bruce and Sue Miller
ADDRESS: 9451 Jones Avenue, Durham, CA 95938
PHONE #: (.53D) 89
OWNER: Bruce and Sue Miller
ADDRESS:
REPRESENTATIVE:
ADDRESS:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for expansion of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin). Existing cabin will be demolished and replaced
with a new, larger cabin.
PROPERTY ZONED: U (Unclassified) LOCATED: on the west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from the
intersection of Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road, at 9533 Jones Creek Road, Forest Ranch
AP#: 060-250-003 TOWN/AREA: Forest Ranch
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: TM (Timber Mountain)
1. Application accepted: March 6, 2003 Amount: $ 1114.00 Receipt #: 21018
2. Comments sent to: Environmental Health, LAFCo, California Department of Forestry, County Counsel,
Development Services Director, Assessor, Public Works Director, P. G. & E. North - Chico
3. Comments received from:
4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked:
5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet:
6. Assigned To: Mark Michelena
7. Environmental Determination:
8. Staff Report:
9.
10
11
12
13
14
State Clearinghouse No:
Subject to Fish & Game:
Categorical Exemption-CEQA#
::Zegative Declaration
mMitigation Negative De`laration
Environmental Impact Report
Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA # 15061.(bx3)
Other
Project Video:
Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH:
Publication Notice Written: 6�% 9I 2 Display Ad Prepared:
Notices Mailed: sz 9�3 Number of Notices:
Newspaper Publication Date: O rC) P G
Planning Commission Hearing(s):_
Action taken:
Special Conditions:
Commission Resolution No.
Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s):
Action taken:
Board Resolution No.:
15. Type Use Permit/Send for signature:
16. N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G:
17. Send validated Use Permit:
18. Assessor's Memo:
19. Copy of Use Pennit / Variance to Planning Technici
& - 4 -03
Ordinance No:
K
Adopted:
Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No
Bruce and Sue Miller, proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding
environmental impacts and Use Permit to allow for replacement and expansion of a legal
nonconforming dwelling (cabin). The existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with a
new, larger cabin. The parcel is zoned "U" (Unclassified) and currently has a General Plan
designation of Timber Mountain and is zoned U (Unclassified). The property is located on
the west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from the intersection of
Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road, at 9533
Jones Creek Road, Forest Ranch. APN 060-250-003 (MM) (UP 03-12)
Mr. Sanders gave a brief summary for the reason this hearing was continued. He submitted a letter
from Stewart Humphreys Burchett and Molin, LLP.
Commissioner Nelson said the letter states that the Miller's lease the cabin.
Mr. Sanders explained the leases. He said he understands that there are leases on the property and
there is a homeowners association, of which every cabin owner is a member and has an undivided
interest in the 90 acres. He said he understood that the Millers went before the Cabin Owners
Association for a project to increase the size of their cabin and the request was approved. He said
there is another request with the Cabin Owners Assoc. for review of this project and that review is
pending.
Second -Vice Chairman Marin asked if the people with the cabin just having a leasehold estate have
any problem with being petitioners for this permit if they do not have title to the property.
Mr. Wannenmacher believed that the Department of Development Services assumes when someone
comes in with an application that they have the authority to ask what they are asking for. He said he
does need to look into this matter.
The hearing was opened to the public.
Ann Rutherford said she is on the Board of Cabin Owners Inc. She said the forty-seven cabin
owners own their cabins as personal property as you would a car or boat, etc. She said the cabin
owners do not own the land. She explained that according to the CC&Rs there is no new
construction allowed without the approval of the Board of Cabin Owners. She said the cabin owners
are issued year-to-year use permits. She informed the Commission that this is not a subdivision and
that the Millers are not the property owners or agent of any real property. She said the corporation
has not approved this project. She said there has been no approval for this size of a cabin. She said
the Board would not approve this project without knowing where the well was going to be, where
the septic was going to be, etc. She said the next meeting of the Corporation is in July. She asked if
staff would like a copy of the deeds, Articles of Incorporation, CC&Rs, By-law, and Use Permit.
Mr. Sanders said the documents would be helpful.
Commissioner Nelson said he would like to know about the process for other cabins to go through.
Mr. Wannenmacher said that the County needs to grant a Use Permit to allow expansion of a
nonconforming use for this cabin to be enlarged. The cabin owner would have to have approval
from the Corporation of Cabin Owners. He said the process needs to be looked at.
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ JUNE 26, 2003 ■ PAGE 3 ■
It was moved by Commissioner Evans, seconded by Commissioner Nelson, and unanimously carried
to continue this hearing to August 14, 2003, have staff verify the ownership and check that the
application is complete. He said he would also like to request additional site information as
discussed by Ms. Rutherford.
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ JUNE 26, 2003 ■ PAGE 4 ■
Bruce and Sue Miller, proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding
environmental impacts and Use Permit to allow for replacement and expansion of a legal
nonconforming dwelling (cabin). The existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with a
new, larger cabin. The parcel is zoned "U" (Unclassified) and currently has a General Plan
designation of Timber Mountain and is zoned U (Unclassified). The property is located on
the west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from the intersection of
Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road, at 9533
Jones Creek Road, Forest Ranch. APN 060-250-003 (MM) (UP 03-12)
Mr. Michelena gave a brief summary of the project. He asked that the hearing be continued to June
26, 2003 to allow for the notification of the other cabin owners on the property.
It was moved by Commissioner Evans, seconded by Commissioner Marin, and unanimously carried
to continue this hearing open to June 26, 2003, at 9:00 a.m.
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ JUNE 12,2o63 of PAGE 12■
County of Butte
Oroville, California
GENERAL CLAIM
DATE OF CLAIM: 9/11/03 a
' e
CLAIMANT: Bruce & Sue Miller
ADDRESS: 9451 Jones Avenue
CITY & STATE: Durham, CA 95938
SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES
DATE REV
DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM (DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY).
TOTAL
REFUND CLAIM - ATR #61767, Receipt #21018, Check
#0125, APN#060-250-003-Refund
of
l
remainingfunds on deposit for application UP 03-12.
Pz
�x w,
06/13/03
Application #UP 04-05
PAID
RETAINED
REFUND
Development Services
$ 700.00
$ 169.51
$ 530.49
Y
WON
NOD/NOE recording fee
$ 36.00
.$ -
$ 36.00
�y
TOTAL
$ 736.00
$ -
$ 566.49
(i�yst
3.?
vn;'i,�Ty ,"y�`
• _
dam`?`,'f:Y'y"i
:..:: BREAKD:OiN::<:::;:;:>>::::::>;::::.:::::;
AC
><:BUDET
............:....:.:..
....::.:...:
Development Services
440001
4210900
$ 530.49
NOD/NOE
470001
4612319
$ 36.00'
3
� RM..
TOTAL
$ 566.49
$ 566.49
, ,,
I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the services. or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that this
claim is true and correct as stated.
Dated this day of 2003, at Calif._
Signature of Claimant
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above have been performed or
delivered and that there is, a Budget AppropriationBoard Approval (Check o or fte�ame,
(�or�S—pecfic
rtrt I
Dated this ` day of, 2003, at Oroville ali
ent Head or Authorized Deputy
Dept. SEE Exp.
Code BREAKDOWN Code PAYABLE FROM FUND
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - AUDITOR'S USE ONLY
DEPT & SUB.
PROJ
SUB. OBJ
CLAIM NO.
INV NO.
INV. DATE
ENCUMB.
GROSS AMT.
• ..
-
County of Butte
Oroville, California
GENERAL CLAIM
DATE OF CLAIM: September 2, 2003 IMPORTANT:
CLAIMANT: Bruce 8Sue Miller .� w ,„ SEE INSTRUCTIONS
r c i BELOW
ADDRESS: 9451JonesAuenue;,, a..x� , ,.ws� ..
CITY, STATE: Durham,CA:959, 38,x.: a»»
SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES.
DATE
DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM (DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY)
AMOUNT
September 2, 2003
REFUND of remaining funds on application UP 03-12, befor e the Planning
Commission 8/14/03)
$ 530.49
TOTAL
$ 530.49
I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that this
claim is true and correct as stated.
Jr''�7��a�Daied`"tli�s�r � ��� tl��ay,�'of����-
Signature of Claimant
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the, best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above have been
delivered and that there is a Budget AppropriatEl or Specific Board Appr one) fome.
performed or `❑(Check
E '04
Dated this �_ day of 2003, at Oroville C `� 1J
Department Head or Authorized Deputy
INSTRUCTIONS TO CLAIMANTS
All claims against the County must be itemized, giving dates and character of service rendered or work performed, quantities, description and
unit prices of articles furnished or delivered.
Claims must be certified by the claimant and submitted to the Department head for approval. Upon approval, the Department head will
forward claim to the County Auditor for payment. Do Not file with the County Auditor first.
Claims should be presented to officials for approval immediately upon completion of services requested or material ordered.
Compliance with the above instructions will expedite payment of claim. Failure to do so may delay payment.
Dept. Exp.
Code 440-001 Code 4210900 / 101001 PAYABLE FROM GENERAL FUND
DO NOT WRITE
BELOW THIS LINE • AUDITOR' USE ONLY
DEPT & SUB.
PROJ.
SUB. OBJ.
CLAIM NO.
INV. NO. 14V.
DATE E
CUMBER.
GROSS AMT.
Claimant - Submitted for your approval/signature. Please return signed form to:
Development Services Department
Accounts Receivable
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
C
AV
103
County of Butte
Oroville, California
GENERAL CLAIM
DATE OF CLAIM: September 2, 2003 IMPORTANT:
CLAIMANT: B, ryceue Miller. n� SEE INSTRUCTIONS
4x
5
ADDRESS: 94.51 Jones Avenue�� §�°',r,, .3 a BELOW
CITY, STATE:
SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES
DATE
DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM (DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY)
AMOUNT
September 2, 2003
Return of NOD/NOE filing fee on application UP 03-12 (before Planning
Commission 8/14/03)
$ 36.00
TOTAL
$ 36.00
I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that this
claim is true and correct as stated.
0"M, ` ofd Callf`su s
Signature of Claimant
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above have been
performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriat❑ or Specific Board Approval ❑(Check one) for the same.
\.
Dated this day of , 2003, at Oroville Calif.
Department Head or Authorized Deputy
INSTRUCTIONS TO CLAIMANTS
All claims against the County must be itemized, giving dates and character of service rendered or work performed, quantities, description and
unit prices of articles furnished or delivered.
Claims must be certified by the claimant and submitted to the Department head for approval. Upon approval, the Department head will
forward claim to the County Auditor for payment. Do Not file with the County Auditor first.
Claims shouid be presented to officials for approval immediately upon completion of services requested or material ordered.
Compliance with the above instructions will expedite payment of claim. Failure to do so may delay payment.
Dept. Exp.
470001 Code 4612319 / 101001 PAYABLE FROM GENERAL FUND
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS
LINE - AUDITOR -P
USE ONLY
DEPT & SUB.
PROJ.
SUB. OBJ.
CLAIM NO.
INV. NO. 14V.
DATE ENCUMBER.
GROSS AMT.
Claimant -Submitted for your approval/signature. Please return signed form to:
Development Services Department
Accounts Receivable
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
r
DEPOSIT REQUEST FOR
AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT
DEPARTMENT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING DIVISION
DATE: 3/7/2003 REVISED
BAG # 312 By:
RECEIPTS: 21016-21022 PREPARED BY: oor, Ext. 6571
FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH
DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT
PLANNING APPLICATION FEES GENERAL 0010 440001 4210900 101001 $ 2,750.00
Proiect Number ( detail information MUST be provided) Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19, APN 042-90-098, 099, Chk "#11793• Paiva $ 1,000.00
UP 03-12, APN 060-210-003 Chk #0125 Miller $ 700.00
ADM 02-11, APN 047-100.136 Chk #4555 $ 50.00
TPM 03-20, APN 004-490-020 Chk 93246 Holiday Prop(Niderost) $ 1,000.00
LAND DEVELOPMENT GENERAL 0010 440004 4611700 101001 $ 730.00
Project Number ( detail information MUST be provided) Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19, APN 042-90-098, 099, Chk #11793 Paiva $ 290.00 ,
UP 03-12, APN 060-210-003 Chk #0125 Miller $ 150.00
TPM 03-20, APN 004490-020 Chk 93246 Holiday Prop(Niderost) $ 290.00
ENVIRONMENTAL HLTH GENERAL 0010 540003'
4614901 101001 $ 658.00
Prolect Number ( detail information MUST be provided)
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19, APN 042-90-098, 099, Chk #11793 Paiva
$
241.50
UP 03-12, 'APN 060-210-003 Chk #0125 Miller
$
185.00
TPM 03-20, APN 004-490-020 Chk #3246 Holiday Prop(Niderost)
$
231.50
FIRE PLNG APPL FEE FIRE PROTECTION 0100
D.O.T - ALUC PLANNING GENERAL 0010 440001
4617240 101001 $ 301.00
Prosect Number ( detail information MUST be provided)
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19, APN 042-90-098, 099, Chk #11793 Paiva
$
129.00.
UP 03-12, APN 060-210-003 Chk #0125 Miller
$
43.00
TPM 03-20, APN 004-490-020 Chk #3246 Holiday Prop(Niderost)
$
129.00
NODINOE CLERICS FILING FEE GENERAL 0010 470001
4612319
101001 $ 108.00
($36) Prosect Number ( detail information MUST be provided)
TPM 03-19, APN 042-90-098, 099, Chk #2618 Sierra West(Paiva)
Amount of Fee
$ 36.00
/
UP 03-12, APN 060-210-003 Chk #0125 Miller
$
36.00
✓
TPM 03-20, APN 004-490-020 Chk #3246 Holiday Prop(Niderost)
$
36.00
D.O.T - ALUC PLANNING GENERAL 0010 440001
4617241
101001 $ 300.00
Prolect Number ( detail information MUST be provided)
Amount of Fee
ALUC, APN 048-012-073, Chk 21114 Salvation Army
$
300.00
DOCUMENTICOPY SALES
FOR FUNDS RECEIVED ON: 3/6/2003
GENERAL 0010 440001 4711910 101001 $ 16.00
TOTAL $ $ 4,863.00
())V 0 3 __ /'�.
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT 21018
ISSUED BYcl
�.
0
County of Butte '
Oroville, California ,¢g'
GENERAL CLAIM
DATE OF CLAIM: 9/11/03
CLAIMANT: Bruce & Sue Miller"
ADDRESS: 9451. Jones Avenue
CITY & STATE: I Durham, CA 95938
SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES
DATE REV
DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY
TOTAL
REFUND CLAIM - ATR #61767, Receipt #21018, Check
#0125, APN#060-250-003--Refund
of��
06/13/03
remaining funds on deposit for application"UP 03-12.
g,
Application #UP 04-05
PAID
RETAINED
REFUND
`
Development Services
$
700.00
$ 169.51
$ 530.49x„
s�
NOD/NOE recording fee
36.00
$
$ 36.00$
'
TOTAL
$ 736.00
$" -
$ 566.49
�5r Y17% r14#:1''�'�
§h
e.. ._
"•:• :::':'.:•':i:::i:.i.•i::::i::::i::::i::::i' - .: . .... .: •n..:.:.:::::. .... ::::.
BREAICllOWN :.>::.»>>;:...'
....--
BUDGET
..
',ACCOUNT
.....
AMOUNT
Ir w
Develo mellit Services
440001
4210900
.$ 530.49
NOD/NOE
470001
4612319
$, 36.00
ISL
t"
TOTAL
`�
$
. " .�
.566.49
$ 566.49
I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and. that this
claim is true and correct as stated.
Dated this day of 2003, at Calif._ "
Signature of Claimant
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above have been performed or
delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriation or Specific Board Approval (Check one) for the same.
Dated this . day of " 2003, at Oroville Calif.
Department Head or Authorized Deputy
Dept. SEE Exp.
Code_ BREAKDOWN Code_ PAYABLE FROM FUND
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - AUDITOR'S USE ONLY
DEPT & SUB.
PROD
SUB. OBJ
CLAIM NO.
INV NO.
INV. DATE
ENCUMB.
GROSS AMT.
C�
County of Butte
Oroville, California
GENERAL CLAIM
DATE OF CLAIM: September 2, 2003 IMPORTANT:
CLAIMANT: Bruce.8� Sue Mille' S: E�" #" "=
....,,.,..e_a�.."fu-.: �.:._SEEINSTRUCTIONS
ADDRESS: [$4 e ._, 4 z �. BELOW
CITY STATE EDu�harn CA95938
SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES
DATE
DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM (DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY)
AMOUNT
September 2, 2003
REFUND of remaining funds on application U 03-12, before the Planning
Commission 8/14/03)
$ 530.49
TOTAL
$ 530.49
I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that this
claim is true and correct as stated.
Dated thisv� d of 2003; at Cali —'— o
Signature of Claimant
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above have been
performed or delivered and that there is a Budget AppropriatO or Specific Board Appr [](Check one) fo�t#► me. q
Dated thisday of 2003, at Oroville Cak� t
Department Head or Authorized Deputy
INSTRUCTIONS TO CLAIMANTS
All claims against the County must be itemized, giving dates and character of service rendered or work performed, quantities, description and
unit prices of articles furnished or delivered.
Claims must be certified by the claimant and submitted to the Department head for approval. Upon approval, the Department head will
forward claim to the County Auditor for payment. Do Not file with the County Auditor first.
Claims should be presented to officials for approval immediately upon completion of services requested or material ordered.
Compliance with the above instructions will expedite payment of claim. Failure to do so may delay payment.
Dept. Exp.
Code 440-001. Code 4210900 / 101001 PAYABLE FROM GENERAL FUND
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS
LINE -AUDITOR'
USE ONLY
DEPT & SUB.
PROJ.
SUB. OBJ.
CLAIM NO.
INV. NO. 14V.
DATE
CUMBER.
GROSS AMT.
Claimant - Submitted for your approval/signature. Please return signed form to:
Development Services Department
Accounts Receivable
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
5/
County of Butte
Oroville, California
GENERAL CLAIM
DATE OF CLAIM: September 2, 2003 IMPORTANT:
CLAIMANT: +BruceK& S�ue'Miller:..: '� 4" ;SEE INSTRUCTIONS
Y.E1g x..M,}` rt;..%a_�:.::u,s.�
ADDRESS:19451' ;low, nes Avenue ,� s"� xvx BELOW
CITY, STATE:Durham A 9593,8 ��s "`�
SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES
DATE
DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM (DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY)
AMOUNT
September 2, 2003
Return of NOD/NOE filing fee on application UP 03-12 (before Planning
Commission 8/14/03)
$ 36.00
TOTAL
$ 36.00
I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that this
claim is true and correct as stated.
t - Datedlthls d a o 2003 "at tom'i G(
S
Signature of Claimant
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above have been
performed or delivered and that there is a Budget AppropriatO or Specific Board Approval ❑ (Check one) for the same.
Dated this day of 2003, at Oroville Calif. ��, a u i� Q ilj
Department Head or Authorized Deputy
INSTRUCTIONS TO CLAIMANTS
All claims against the County must be itemized, giving dates and character of service rendered or work performed, quantities, description and
unit prices of articles furnished or delivered.
Claims must be certified by the claimant and submitted to the Department head for approval. Upon approval, the Department head will
forward claim to the County Auditor for payment. Do Not file with the County Auditor first.
Claims should be presented to officials for approval immediately upon completion of services requested or material ordered.
Compliance with the above instructions will expedite payment of claim. Failure to do so may delay payment.
Dept. Exp.
470001 Code 4612319 / 101001 PAYABLE FROM GENERAL FUND
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS
LINE - AUDITOR' USE ONLY
DEPT & SUB.
PROJ.
SUB. OBJ.
CLAIM NO.
INV. NO. I
V. DATE ENCUMBER.
GROSS AMT.
Claimant - Submitted for your approval/signature. Please return signed form to:
Development Services Department
Accounts Receivable
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
x
IEPOSIT REQUEST FOR
AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT
DEPARTMENT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING DIVISION
DATE: 3/7/2003 REVISED
BAG # 312 By:
RECEIPTS: 21016-21022 PREPARED BY: oor, Ext. 6571
FUND FUND DEPT
ACCT
CASH
DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE
CODE
CODE AMOUNT
PLANNING APPLICATION FEES GENERAL 0010 440001
4210900
101001 $ 2,750.00
Protect Number ( detail information MUST be provided) Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19, APN 042-90-098, 099, Chk #11793 Paiva $ 1,000.00
UP 03-12, APN 060-210-003 Chk #0125 Miller
UP 03-12, APN 060-210-003 Chk #0125 Miller
$ 700.00
ADM 02-11, APN 047-100-136 Chk #4555
$ 50.00
290.00
TPM 03-20, APN 004-490-020 Chk #3246 Holiday Prop(Niderost)
$ 1,000.00
4614901
LAND DEVELOPMENT GENERAL 0010 440004
4611700
101001 $ 730.00
Prolect Number ( detail information MUST be provided)
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19, APN 042-90-098, 099, Chk #11793 Paiva
$
290.00
UP 03-12, APN 060-210-003 Chk #0125 Miller
$
150.00
TPM 03-20, APN 004-490-020 Chk 93246 Holiday Prop(Niderost)
$
290.00
ENVIRONMENTAL HLTH GENERAL 0010 540003
4614901
101001 $ 658.00
Protect Number ( detail information MUST be provided)
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19, APN 042-90-098, 099, Chk #11793 Paiva
$
241.50
UP 03-12, APN 060-210-003 Chk #0125 Miller
$
185.00
TPM 03-20, APN 004190-020 Chk #3246 Holiday Prop(Niderost)
$
231.50
FIRE PLNG APPL FEE FIRE PROTECTION 0100
4617240
101001 $ 301.00
Prolect Number ( detail information MUST be provided)
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19, APN 042-90-098, 099, Chk #11793 Paiva
$
129.00
UP 03-12, APN 060-210-003 Chk #0125 Miller
$
43.00
TPM 03-20, APN 004-490-020 Chk #3246 Holiday Prop(Niderost)
$
129.00
NOD/NOE CLERK'S FILING FEE GENERAL 0010 470001
4612319
101001 $ 108.00
($36) Prolect Number ( detail information MUST be provided)
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19, APN 042-90-098, 099, Chk #2618 Sierra West(Paiva)
$
36.00
UP 03-12, APN 060-210-003 Chk #0125 Miller
$
36.00
TPM 03-20, APN 004-490-020 Chk #3246 Holiday Prop(Niderost)
$
36.00
D.O.T - ALUC PLANNING GENERAL 0010 440001
4617241
101001 $ 300.00
Prolect Number ( detail information MUST be provided)
Amount of Fee
ALUC, APN 048-012-073, Chk 21114 Salvation Army
$
300.00
DOCUMENT/COPY SALES GENERAL 0010 440001 4711910 101001 $ 16.00
TOTAL $ $ 4,863.00
FOR FUNDS RECEIVED ON: 316/2003
*9
0,12 03_1'�-
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT 21018
ISSUED BY
AUW�/����C
�m
�;A /
i
0 s
Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services
Administration - AR
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
(530) 538-7601 Telephone
Use Permit
Applicant: Bruce& Sue: Miller
9451 Jones Avenue
Durham, CA 95938
Deposit Date: March 10, 2003
Receipt: 21018
Deposit Date: June 12, 2003.
Receipt: 21217
Deposit Date: March 10, 2003
Receipt: 21018
File: Up 03-12
APN: 060-250-003
Date: September 2, 2003
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PLANNING DEPOSIT $ (700;00)
$ (724.73)
TOTAL PLANNING FEES PAID $ (1,424.73)
NOD/NOE FILING FEE $ 36.00
REFUND UD 03.12
Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice, the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program.
There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program, and are not reflected on
this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed, you will
receive a FINAL INVOICE.
following charges have been applied to the processing of your application:
Professional Planner $ .569.36
Mapping 73.75
Clerical 190.58
Publishing 60.55
TOTAL CHARGES $ 894.24
TOTAL PLANNING DEPOSIT REFUND $ (530.49)1
NOD/NOE FILING FEE REFUND $ (36.00)1
Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees; deposits; billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to
amount equal to 25% of the original deposit, no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore a balal
equal to the amount of the initial deposit, or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event the applicant dl
A negative amount reflects a credit. Please sign and return the enclosed General Claim form.
Should you have any questions, please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
REFUND DUE TO YOU $ (566.49)
CS
KAFISCAL ADMIMBILLINGS & REFUNDSIREFUNDS\Miller UP 03-12 090203.xis
r
rc
County of Butte
Oroville, California
GENERAL CLAIM
DATE OF CLAIM: September 2, 2003 IMPORTANT:
CLAIMANT: Bruce & Sue Miller SEE INSTRUCTIONS
ADDRESS: 9451 Jones Avenue - BELOW
CITY, STATE: Durham, CA 95938
SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES
DATE
DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM (DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY)
AMOUNT
September 2, 2003
REFUND of remaining funds on application UP 03-12, before the Planning
Commission 8/14/03)
$ 530.49
TOTAL
$ 530.49
I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that this
claim is true and correct as stated.
Dated this day of 2003, at Calif.
- ...__..._ __._�
Signature of Claimant
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above have been
performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriat0 or Specific Board Approval [I (Check one) for the same.
Dated this day of 2003, at Oroville Calif.
Department Head or Authorized Deputy
INSTRUCTIONS TO CLAIMANTS
All claims against the County must be itemized, giving dates and character of service rendered or work performed, quantities, description and
unit prices of articles furnished or delivered.
Claims must be certified by the claimant and submitted to the Department head for approval. Upon approval, the Department head will
forward claim to the County Auditor for payment. Do Not file with the County Auditor first.
Claims should be presented to officials for approval immediately upon completion of services requested or material ordered.
Compliance with the above instructions will expedite payment of claim. Failure to do so may delay payment.
Dept. Exp.
Code 440-001 Code 4210900 / 101001 PAYABLE FROM GENERAL FUND
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - AUDITOR -P USE ONLY
DEPT & SUB.
PROJ.
SUB. OBJ.
CLAIM NO.
INV. NO. I
W. DATE ENCUMBER.
GROSS AMT.
Claimant - Submitted for your approval/signature. Please return signed form to:
Development Services Department
Accounts Receivable
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
•
County of Butte :
Oroville, California
Gt:NERAL CLAIM
DATE OF CLAIM: . September 2, 2003 IMPORTANT:
CLAIMANT: Bruce &:Sue Mlller; " _ ;SEE INSTRUCTIONS
ADDRESS: BELOW
CITY, STATE: Durham; CA'`9593O
SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES
DATE
DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM (DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY)
AMOUNT
September 2, 2003
Return of NOD/NOE filing fee on application UP 03712 (before Planning"
Commission 8/14/03)
$ 36.00
TOTAL
$ 36.00
I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that this
claim is true and correct as stated.
Dated this; ....;. ......... to z'" 3!-- r- ..��
_........................................., _._
Signature of Claimant
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above have been
performed or delivered and that there is a,Budget Appropriat❑ or specific Board Approval [](Check one):for the same.
Dated this day of 2003, at Oroville Calif.
Department Head or Authorized Deputy
INSTRUCTIONS TO CLAIMANTS
All claims against the County must be itemized, giving dates and character of service rendered or work performed, quantities, description and
unit prices of articles furnished or delivered.
Claims must be certified by the claimant and submitted to the Department head for approval.' Upon approval, the Department head will
forward claim to the County Auditor for payment, Do Not file with the County Auditor first.
Claims should be presented to officials for approval immediately upon completion of services requested or material ordered.
Compliance with the above instructions will expedite payment of claim. Failure to do so may delay payment.
Dept. Exp.
470001 Code 4612319/ 101001 PAYABLE FROM GENERAL FUND
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS
LINE - AUDITOR' USE ONLY
DEPT & SUB.
PROJ.
SUB. OBJ.
CLAIM NO.
INV. NO. I
W. DATE ENCUMBER.
GROSS AMT.
Claimant -Submitted for your approval/signature. Please return signed form to:
Development Services Department
Accounts Receivable
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
8/27/2003
7:45 AM
Nickname
Full Name
Address
Business
Home
Project Type
Deposit Status
Planner
Salutation
•
Butte County Department of Development Services
Pre -bill Worksheet Page 1
Miller.UP 03-121 UP 03-12
• P�a� , 3(
Miller �jrUGL-+-�� 7 3: 75-
4
—4- S l tW'� Fax
'gov* V o-wiCA OtherHO
Deposit Project
Mark Michelena
Date Employee Rate
,/�
Task /4 10* &00- zz-0-0�3 Markup %
3/6/2003 Mark 59.00
Circulation - Planner
Determine an application's completeness/circulate for staff
comments/analysis.
3/6/2003 Mark 59.00
Circulation - Planner
Determine an application's completeness/circulate for staff
comments/analysis.
3/10/2003 Cheryl 45.00
Administrative -Clerical
Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to
processing .
3/11/2003 Mark 59.00
Report
Reports & analysis related to the application/report.
q 2
Hours Amount G` Total
DNB Time DNB Amt
0.50 29.50 Billable
c53�,�g
0.50 .29.50 Billable
0.08 3.75 Billable
0.50 29.50 Billable
3/11/2003 Roni 34.00 1.58 53.83 Billable
Clerical Activities
File set up
3/11/2003 Mark 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable
Report
Reports & analysis related to the application/report.
3/11/2003 Mark 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable
Report
Reports & analysis related to the application/report.
3/13/2003 Larry 59.00 1.25 73.75 Billable
Mapping
Mapping
3/27/2003 Mark 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable
Report
Reports & analysis related to the application/report.
8/27/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
7:45 AM Pre -bill Worksheet
Miller.UP 03-12:Miller (continued)
Date Employee Rate Hours
Task Markup % DNB Time
Amount
DNB Amt
Page 2
Total
4/22/2003 Mark 59.00
1.00
59.00
Billable
CEQA
Prepare initial studies, mitigations, neg. dec EIRs including analysis.
4/23/2003 Mark 59.00
0.42
24.58
Billable
Report
Reports & analysis related to the application/report.
4/28/2003 Mark 59.00.
0.33
19.67
Billable
CEQA
Prepare initial studies, mitigations, neg. dec EIRs including analysis.
5/2/2003 Mark 59.00
1.75
103.25
Billable
CEQA
Prepare initial studies, mitigations, neg. dec EIRs including analysis.
5/8/2003 Mark 59.00
0.50
29.50
Billable
CEQA
Prepare initial studies, mitigations, neg. dec EIRs including analysis.
5/12/2003 Mark 59.00
0.58
34.42
Billable
CEQA
Prepare initial studies, mitigations, neg. dec EIRs including analysis.
5/12/2003 Mark 59.00
0.50
29.50
Billable
Report
Reports & analysis related to the application/report.
5/14/2003 Mark 59.00
0.25
14.75
Billable
Report
Reports & analysis related to the application/report.,
5/19/2003 Lynn 45.00
1.00
45.00
Billable
Notification - Clerical
Notification activities related to applicants.
5/20/2003 Mark 59.00
0.25
14.75
Billable
CEQA
Prepare initial studies, mitigations, neg. dec EIRs including analysis.
5/29/2003 Mark 59.00
0.33
19.67
Billable
Report
Reports & analysis related to the application/report.
6/3/2003 Mark 59.00
0.25
14.75
Billable
Meeting - Planner
Time spent in meetings (Not incl. Public Hearings).
8/27/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
7:45 AM Pre-bill Worksheet Page
Miller.UP 03-12:Miller (continued)
Date Employee Rate Hours Amount
Task Markup % DNB Time ' DNB Amt
6/3/2003 Maris 59.00 0.25 14.75
Report
Reports & analysis related to the application/report.
6/4/2003 Mark 59.00 0.33
Report
Reports & analysis related to the application/report.
6/5/2003 Lynn 45.00 0.32
Packets - Clerical
Prepare packets for meetings/mailings.
6/12/2003 Lynn 45.00 0.07
Mtg - Clerical
Arrange/attend associated with project review (not incl Public Hearings).
6/12/2003 Lynn 45.00 0.07
Letters - Clerical
Prepare & process correspondence.
6/12/2003 Lynn 45.00 0.05
Clerical Activities
Minutes
6/12/2003 Mark 59.00 0.08
Hearing - Clerical
Time spent at the Public Hearing for the application, including all
continuances
6/12/2003 Roni 34.00 0.25
Clerical Activities
NOD
6/16/2003 Cheryl 45.00 0.08
Administrative-Clerical
Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to
processing .
6/23/2003 Mark 59.00 0.25
Phone Calls/Counter - Clerical
Time spent making/receiving phone calls and counter contats regarding
project.
6/26/2003 Lynn 45.00 0.37
Mtg - Clerical
Arrange/attend associated with project review (not incl Public Hearings).
19.67
14.25
3.00
3.00
2.25
4.92
8.50
3.75
14.75
16.50
3
Total
Billable
Billable
Billable
Billable
Billable
Billable
Billable
Billable
Billable
Billable
Billable
X
8/27/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
7:45 AM
Pre -bill Worksheet
Page 4
Miller.UP 03-12:Miller (continued)
Date Employee
Rate
Hours
Amount
Total
Task
Markup %
DNB Time
DNB Amt
6/26/2003 Lynn
45.00
0.08
3.75
Billable
Circulation -Clerical
Letter
6/26/2003 Lynn
45.00
0.37
16.50
Billable
Minutes - Clerical
Minutes related to application.
7/7/2003 Lynn
45.00
0.08
3.75
Billable
Administrative -Clerical
Time spent on billing and other administrative tasks not related to
processing .
8/7/2003 Lynn
45.00
0.25
11.25
Billable
Clerical Activities
Proof / Packets
8/14/2003 Lynn
45.00
0.06
2.53
Do Not Bill
Letters - Clerical
0.06
2.53
Prepare & process correspondence.
8/14/2003 Mark
59.00
0.07
3.93
Billable
Hearing - Planner
Withdrawal of project
8/15/2003 Lynn
45.00
0.07
3.03
Do Not Bill
Minutes - Clerical
0.07
3.03
Minutes related to application.
8/15/2003 Lynn
45.00
0.03
1.50
Billable
Mtg - Clerical
Arrange/attend associated with project
review (incl. Public Hearings)
TOTAL Billable Fees
15.57
$833.69
Do Not Bill
0.13
$5.56
Date Employee
Price
Quantity
Amount
Total
Expense
Markup %
7/7/2003 Lynn
60.55
1.000
60.55
Billable
Publishing Expense
Publish in Newspaper -Chico Enterprise
Record Thurs. 5/22/03
TOTAL Billable Costs
$60.55
8/27/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
7:45 AM Pre -bill Worksheet
Miller.UP 03-12:Miller (continued)
Total of Fees (Time Charges)
Total of Costs (Expense Charges)
Total new charges
Accounts Receivables
Date Type Description
3/10/2003 CRED Credit -Initial Deposit
Receipt #21018, Check #0125
3/10/2003 INV Invoice-NOD/NOE filing fee due
3/10/2003 PAY Payment - Receipt 21018
6/12/2003 PAY Payment - Receipt 21217
Total Accounts Receivable
Total New Balance
Page 5
Amount Total
$833.69
$60.55
ZOOU4. L4
($700.00)
$36.00
($36.00)
($724.73)
($1,424.73)
($530.49)
• • Page 1 of 1
Spoor, Cheryl
From: Thornton, Roneva
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:32 PM
To: Spoor, Cheryl
Subject: UP 03-12, Bruce and Sue Miller
Cheryl, I just wanted to make sure that you are aware that this project was denied at the August 14,
2003 Planning Commission. If they are due a refund, their $36.00 for an NOD/NOE should be a part of
it. Roni
8/29/2003
• • Page 1 of 1
1b,
Spoor, Cheryl
I
From: DeBrunner, Deborah
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 2:52 PM
To: Baker, Joseph
Cc: Spoor, Cjryl;_Michelena, Mark; Lewellen, Diane
Subject: Mille P 03-12
I spoke with Sue Miller about her bill. She will pay the $700 restoration. of deposit the First of
next week. As per the information you provided, she was told you are shooting for a 6/26
hearing date.
I explained to Ms. Miller that when her deposit balance reached $175, we were to have stopped
work until the deposit was restored. to $700. 1 told her Mark was at the Assessor's pulling owner's
names at that moment.
I told Ms. Miller that we would do are best to process any refund due her ASAP.
Mrs. Miller indicated that Mark had told her that we would only be billing about $200 against
the $700. I explained to her that even though Mark felt that the majority of the work was
completed and that it would only require several more hours Of time to finish, that we have
thought that before and something else came up.
Not to discount you Mark, but I told her that you were a "Planner", not a fiscal person, and I
couldn't guarantee that we wouldn't use more than Mark had guessed. (There are other charges
too — Lynn/Boni/Cheryl, publishing, etc. —that may not have been reflected on the bill).
QUESTION: How do we provide good customer service, in letting applicants know the status of
their project, without making projections as to charges? This is bound to come up again.
Deb-qrg h,DeB rwn4ie-r
Principal Analyst
:Department of Development Services '
7 County Center Drive, Orovil.le, CA 95965
(530) 538-7464 538-7785 Fax
6/9/2003
2
C/
6/16/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 61131103
11:50 AM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 1
Selection Criteria
Applicant (hand sel Include: Miller UP 03-12
Nickname Miller UP 03-12 1 UP 03-12
45.00
0.08
3.60
Full Name Bruce & Sue Miller
42571 Administrative
Address 9451 Jones Avenue
Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application
Durham CA 95938
3/11/2003 Mark Michelena
59.00
Phone 1 (530) 891-8035 Phone 2
29.50
Billable
42695 Reports
Phone 3 Phone 4
In Ref To APN # 060-250-003
Fees Arrg. By billing value on each slip
3/11/2003 Roni Thornton
34.00
1.62
Expense Arrg. By billing value on each slip
Billable
42697 Clerical/Input
Tax Profile Exempt
File set up
Last bill 3/10/2003
Last charge 6/16/2003
59.00
0.50
29.50
Last payment 6/12/2003 Amount
$724.73
Date Employee
Rate
Hours
Amount Total
ID Task
Markup %
DNB Time
DNB Amt
3/5/2003 Larry P.
59.00
1.25
73.75 Billable
42760 Mapping
Generate maps for current projects (corrected on 6/2/03 from 1
hr 25 min
TO 1 hr. 15 min.)
3/6/2003 Mark Michelena
59.00
0.50
29.50 Billable
42556 Circulation
3/7/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable
42564 Circulation
3/10/2003 Cheryl S.
45.00
0.08
3.60
Billable
42571 Administrative
Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application
3/11/2003 Mark Michelena
59.00
0.50
29.50
Billable
42695 Reports
Report & analysis on application
3/11/2003 Roni Thornton
34.00
1.62
55.08
Billable
42697 Clerical/Input
File set up
3/17/2003 Mark Michelena
59.00
0.50
29.50
Billable
42735 Reports
Reports & analysis on applications
6/16/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
11:51 AM Pre -bill Worksheet
Miller UP 03-12:13ruce & Sue Miller (continued)
Date Employee Rate Hours
ID Task Markup % DNB Time
Amount
DNB Amt
Page 2
Total
3/21/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00
0.25
14.75
Billable
42800 Reports
Reports & analysis on applications
3/27/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00
0.25
14.75
Billable
42812 Reports
Reports & analysis on applications
4/22/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00
1.00
59.00
Billable
43014 CEQA
Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes
analysis
4/23/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00
0.42
24.78
Billable
43066 Reports
Reports & analysis on applications
4/28/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00
0.33
19.47
Billable
43087 CEQA
Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes
analysis
5/2/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00
1.75
103.25
Billable
43164 CEQA
Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes
analysis
5/8/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00
0.50
29.50
Billable
43230 CEQA
Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes
analysis
5/12/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00
0.58
34.22
Billable
43260 CEQA
Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes
analysis
5/12/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00
0.50
29.50
Billable
43261 Reports
Staff Report
5/14/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00
0.25
14.75
Billable
43272 Reports
Reports & analysis on applications
5/19/2003 Lynn R. 45.00
1.00
45.00
Billable
43255 Clerical/N
Publish
6/16/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
11:51 AM Pre-bill Worksheet
Miller UP 03-12:13ruce & Sue Miller (continued)
Date Employee Rate Hours
ID Task Markup % DNB Time
Amount
DNB Amt
Page 3
Total
5/20/2003 Mark Michelena
59.00
0.25
14.75
Billable
43285 CEQA
Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes
analysis
5/29/2003 Mark Michelena
59.00
0.33
19.47
Billable
43410 Reports
Reports & analysis on applications
6/3/2003 Mark Michelena
59.00
0.25
14.75
Billable
43453 Meetings
Meeting
6/3/2003 Mark Michelena
59.00
0.25
14.75
Billable
43455 Reports
Report
6/4/2003 Mark Michelena
59.00
0.33
19.47
Billable
43481 Reports
Reports & analysis on applications
6/5/2003 Lynn R.
45.00
0.32
14.40
Billable
43475 Clerical
Packets
6/12/2003 Lynn R.
45.00
0.07
3.15
Billable
43540 Meetings
Arranging and attending meetings (does
not incl. public hearings)
6/12/2003 Lynn R.
45.00
0.07
3.15
Billable
43544 Correspondence
Letter
6/12/2003 Lynn R.
45.00
0.05
2.25
Billable
43546 Clerical/Min
Minutes related to applications
6/12/2003 Mark Michelena
59.00
0.08
4.72
Billable
43549 Hearings
Public hearing
6/16/2003 Cheryl S.
45.00
0.08
3.60
Do Not Bill
43534 Administrative
0.08
3.60
Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application
6/16/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
11:51 AM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 4
Miller UP 03-12:Bruce & Sue Miller (continued)
Amount Total
TOTAL Billable Fees 13.78 $750.26
Do Not Bill 0.08 $3.60
Date Employee Price Quantity Amount Total
ID Expense Markup %
5/27/2003 Lynn R. 60.55 1.000 60.55 Billable
43388 Publishing
Publishing in newspaper -Chico Enterprise Record Thurs. 5/22/03
TOTAL Billable Costs $60.55
Calculation of Fees and Costs
Amount Total
Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips
By billing value on each slip.
Total of billable time slips $750.26
Total of Fees (Time Charges) $750.26
Costs Bill Arrangement: Slips
By billing value on each slip.
Total of billable expense slips $60.55
Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $60.55
Total new charges
Accounts Receivables
DatellD Type Description
3/10/2003 CRED Credit - Receipt #21018, Check #0125
2170
3/10/2003 INV NOD/NOE Recording Fee Due
2171
3/10/2003 PAY Payment, Receipt 21018
2172
6/12/2003 PAY Payment Receipt #21217. Check No. 1007
2426
Total Accounts Receivable
($700.00)
$36.00
($36.00)
($724.73)
$810.81
($1,424.73)
6/16/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
11:51 AM Pre -bill Worksheet
Miller UP 03-12:Bruce & Sue Miller (continued)
New Balance
Current
Unapplied
Total New Balance
Amount to replenish account to $700.00
Page 5
Amount Total
$810.81
($1,424.73)
($613.92)
$700.00
COUP OF BUTTE
AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT
OROVILLE, CA
TOTAL$ 1,290036.
APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY:
AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER
RER r -
ATR NO
64543
RECEIVED FROM PLANNING
BAG 0330
DATE
611312003
FUND
FUMED DEPT ACCT
CASH
DESCRIPTION TITLE
CODE CODE CODE
CODE
AE40UNT
DEPOSIT DATE: 6813
RECEIPTS: 21216 - 21221
PLANNING ADPL FEES GENL
0010 440M 4210900
101011
1,2L9.36
Project Number
Amount of Fee
ACDid;:060-003 BRUCE BILLER - UP 03-42.8
$729.73' f
TOTAL$ 1,290036.
APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY:
AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER
RER r -
�J
"J
RECEIPT JOURNAL
COUNTY OF BUTTE
OFFICE OF PLANNING
I
•
10
0-�a-o3al���
�ayj3
�ay�3
UP 0- Q,
RECEIPT
TOTAL
' PUBLICS
-
PUBLIC
ENV.
NOEMOD
DATE
- NO.
RECEIVED -
WORKS
LAFCO
PLANNING
SALES
HEALTH
FIRE
F/G FEE
OTHER
APPLICANT
RECEIVED FROM T
OFFICIAL RECEIPT .
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT 21217,
2
6
0
BRUCE MILLER . 1007
SUE MILLER
RENTAL ACCOUNT 530-891-8035
`9451 JONES AVE- .so-az02/Izn
DURHAM, CA 95938 Date ✓ 0
Pay to the
Order of -
.,^-Dollars 8. =-
'Butte
Community
. Bank
= 900 MANGROVE • CHCO. CA 9592600 • (530{•696-260
For' n. t>P�S�,n
G 1: L 2 L 1,4 20 .2 51:0 700 1,0 6 3 6 20 1,00 7
i
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT- 21217
DATE
RECEIPT
TOTAL
PUBLIC
LAFCO
•PLANNING
PUBLIC
ENV.
FIRE
NOE/NOD
OTHER
APPLICANT
RECEIVED FROM '
NO.
RECEIVED
WORKS
SALES
HEALTH
F/G FEE
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT- 21217
0
0
Butte County De ar&nent ofDevelo meet
P p Services
Administration - AR
7 County Center Drive
BUTTE
Oroville, CA 95965 COUNTY
(530) 538-7601 Telephone
JUN 12 2003
DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
•
Use Permit
Applicant: Bruce & Sue Miller
9451 Jones Avenue
Durham, CA 95938
File: UP 03-12
APN: 060-250-003
Date: June 2, 2003
I INVOICE P03.12
Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice, the following charges had been recorded and entered into -our billing progl
There may be additional charges In the piocessii ig of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program, and are not refle
on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed,
will receive a FINAL INVOICE.
The following charges have been applied to the processing of your application:
Professional Planner $476.72
Mapping 83.78
Clerical 103.68
Publishing 60.55
TOTAL CHARGES:,, 724.73
The following payments have been applied to your application: -
Deposit Disbursement:
Deposit Date: March 6. 2003 Environmental Health $185.00
Receipt: 21018, Check 0125 Land Development $150.00
CDF/Fire Department $43.00
NODINOE FILIN
Total Payment DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING DEPOSIT700.00
$1,114.00
BALANCE DUE $ 24.73
An additional deposit is required to continue processing this application $ 700.00
TOTAL PLANNING FEES DUE $ 724.73
County
checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address.
J you have any questions, please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m. to 4 p.m..
K:IFISCAL ADMIMBILLING LETTERS\SENT BILLINGSWIler 03-12 060203.xis
IMPORTANT ME0 SSAG
FOR
T�MiE(
DATE
CAME TO SEE YOU
M
WANTS TO SEE YOU
t
RUSH,
OF
l
PHONE
AREA CODE
— NUMBER . EXTENSION
FAX
.
mosaeNUMBER
AREA CODE
TIME TO CALL
i
TELEPHONED
PLEASE CALL
CAME TO SEE YOU
WILL CALL AGAIN '
WANTS TO SEE YOU
t
RUSH,
RETURNED YOUR CALL
SPECIAL ATTENTION
-..St, I l L�. UD' ; ,
-/3
SIGNED
Butte County Deparanent ofDevelopment Services
Administration - AR
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
(530) 538.7601 Telephone
Use Permit
Applicant: Bruce & Sue Miller
9451 Jones Avenue
Durham, CA 95938
File: UP 03-12
APN: 060-250-003
Date: June 2, 2003
INVOICE UP 03.12
Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice, the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing progl
There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program, and are not refle
on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed,
will receive a FINAL INVOICE.
The following charges have been applied to the processing of your application:
Professional Planner
Mapping
Clerical
Publishing
TOTAL CHARGES:
The following payments have been applied to your application:
$476.721.
83:78''
103.68'
60.55
724.73
Deposit Disbursement:
Deposit Date: March 6. 2003 Environmental Health $185.00
Receipt: 21018, Check 0125 Land Development' $150.00
CDF/Fire. Department $43.00
NOD/NOE FILIN
Total Payment DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING DEPOSIT 700.00
$1,114.00
BALANCE DUE $ 24.73'
$ 700.00
An additional deposit is required to continue processing this application
TOTAL PLANNING FEES DUE $ 724.73
Butte County
checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address.
J you have any questions, please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m. to 4 .m., Monday through Friday.
AMOUNT DUE`AND PAYABLE
June 11; 2003 ` y: 724.73
K:\FISCAL ADMIMBILLING LETTERS\SENT BILLINGS\Miller 03-12 060203.xis
6/2/2003
11:13 AM
Butte County Department of Development Services
Pre -bill Worksheet
Selection Criteria
Applicant (hand sel Include: Miller UP 03-12
Page 1
Nickname Miller UP 03-12 �` ��� UP 03-12 �,, '�* I `CV
Full Name Bruce & Sue Miller l
Address 9451 Jones Avenue W) 93,-7
Date Employee
ID Task
3/5/2003 Larry P.
42760 Mapping
Generate maps for current projects
o_` C9 63,to9
�(9
OA-�_ C
CP
Rate Hours A Total
Markup % DNB Time KB Amt
59.00 1.42 83.78 Billable
3/6/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.50 2910 Billable
42556 Circulation
3/7/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.50 2! Billable
42564 Circulation
3/10/2003 Cheryl S. 45.00 0.08 c 360 Billable
42571 Administrative
Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application
3/11/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.50 (29.50' Billable
42695 Reports
Report & analysis on application
3/11/2003 Roni Thornton 34.00 1.62 \-_--55.,08, Billable
42697 Clerical/Input ,-
File set up
3/17/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.50 50 Billable
42735 Reports
Reports & analysis on applications
Durham CA 95938
Phone 1
(530) 891-8035 Phone 2
Phone 3
Phone 4
In Ref To
APN # 060-250-003
Fees Arrg.
By billing value on each slip
Expense Arrg.
By billing value on each slip
Tax Profile
Exempt
Last bill
3/10/2003
Last charge
5/20/2003
Last payment
3/10/2003 Amount $36.00
Date Employee
ID Task
3/5/2003 Larry P.
42760 Mapping
Generate maps for current projects
o_` C9 63,to9
�(9
OA-�_ C
CP
Rate Hours A Total
Markup % DNB Time KB Amt
59.00 1.42 83.78 Billable
3/6/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.50 2910 Billable
42556 Circulation
3/7/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.50 2! Billable
42564 Circulation
3/10/2003 Cheryl S. 45.00 0.08 c 360 Billable
42571 Administrative
Billing/administrative tasks not related to actual processing of application
3/11/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.50 (29.50' Billable
42695 Reports
Report & analysis on application
3/11/2003 Roni Thornton 34.00 1.62 \-_--55.,08, Billable
42697 Clerical/Input ,-
File set up
3/17/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.50 50 Billable
42735 Reports
Reports & analysis on applications
;J
6/2/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
11:13 -AM Pre -bill Worksheet
Miller UP 03-12:Bruce & Sue Miller (continued)
Date Employee Rate Hours
ID Task Markup % DNB Time
Amount
DNB Amt
Page 2
Total
3/21/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.25
14.75�
Billable
42800 Reports
Reports & analysis on applications
3/27/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.25
14'75
Billable
42812 Reports
Reports & analysis on applications
4/22/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 1.00
< 59..00
Billable
43014 CEQA
Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes
analysis
4/23/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.42
24 78
Billable
43066 Reports
Reports & analysis on applications
4/28/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.33
1.97/
Billable
43087 CEQA
Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes
analysis
5/2/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 1.75
1.05'
Billable
43164 CEQA
Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes
analysis
5/8/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.50
(29.50
Billable
43230 CEQA
Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes
analysis
5/12/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.58
34,22
Billable
43260 CEQA
L/
Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes
analysis
5/12/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.50
29:50)
Billable
43261 Reports
f
Staff Report
v
5/14/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.25
14`75
Billable
43272 Reports
Reports & analysis on applications
6/2/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
11:13 AM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 3
Miller UP 03-12:Bruce & Sue Miller (continued)
Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total
ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt
5/19/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 4r` 5:00 ! Billable
43255 Clerical/N ��—�
Publish
5/20/2003 Mark Michelena 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable
43285 CEQA
Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes
analysis
TOTAL Billable Fees 12.20 $664.18
Total of billable expense slips $0.00
Calculation of Fees and Costs
Amount Total
Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips
By billing value on each slip.
Total of billable time slips $664.18
Total of Fees (Time Charges) $664.18
Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $0.00
Total new charges
$664.18
Accounts Receivables
DatelID Type Description
3/10/2003 CRED Credit - Receipt #21018, Check #0125
($700.00)
2170
3/10/2003 INV NOD/NOE Recording Fee Due
$36.00
2171
3/10/2003 PAY Payment, Receipt 21018
($36.00)
2172
Total Accounts Receivable
($700.00)
New Balance
Current
$664.18
Unapplied
($700.00)
P •
6/2/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services
11:13 AM Pre -bill Worksheet Page 4
Miller UP 03-12:Bruce & Sue Miller (continued)
Total New Balance
Amount to replenish account to $700.00
Amount Total
$700.00
($35.82)
�f •
COUNTY OF BUTTE
OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA
S Chico Enterprise Record
U Attn: Donna
P P.O. Box 9
P Chico, CA 95927
L
I
E
R
FIELD + NUMBER
PURCHASE ORDER 292.604
Issued By DDS/Planning Division
Department
DATE
QNTY
INVOICE NUMBER AND -DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CHAF.6E%0=VO..
#
5/19/03
AMOUNT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
10
440-001-53-V'
2
To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record
3
on Thursday, May 22, 2003.
4
Please furnish this office two copies of the affidavit of
5
Publication.
6
Miller -UP 03 -12 -and Cha la UP 03-08
- I
Butte County Planning
Lynn - 538-7602
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
TOTAL / c—,Q
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above have been performed
or delivered or, where authorized, are hereby contracted for and that there is aBudget Appropriation for the same. F 292604
Date:
( epa men ea or u orize epu y
Submit WHITE, CANARY and PINK to PURCHASING SERVICES with supplier's invoice. Retain GOLDENROD
SUrrutK NU.
DEPT
ACCOUNT NO.
PROJECT NO.
INVOICE NO.
INV. DATE
ENCUMBRANCE
AMOUNT
1
2
3
4
5
6
Submit WHITE, CANARY and PINK to PURCHASING SERVICES with supplier's invoice. Retain GOLDENROD
DEPOSIT REQUEST FOR
AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT
DEPARTMENT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING DIVISION
DATE: 3/7/2003 REVISED -.11
BAG # 312 By:
RECEIPTS: 21016-21022 PREPARED BY: poor, Ext. 6571
.FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH
DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT
PLANNING APPLICATION FEES GENERAL 0010 440001 4210900 101001 $ 2,750.00
Prosect Number ( detail information MUST be provided) Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19, APN 042-90-098, 099, Chk #11793 Paiva $ 1,000.00
UP 03=12, APN 660
r---210=003 Ctik #0125 Miller "' — -- -$ - 700.00
- - - _ _
ADM 02-11, APN 047-100-136 Chk #4555 _ "' $ 50:00
TPM 03-20, APN 004-490-020 Chk #3246 Holiday Prop(Niderost) $ 1,000.00
LAND DEVELOPMENT GENERAL 0010 440004
4611700
101001 $ 730.00
Protect Number ( detail information MUST be provided)
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19, APN 042-90-098, 099, Chk #11793 Paiva
$
290.00
UP 03-12, APN 060-210-003 Chk #0125 Miller
$
150.00
TPM 03-20, APN 004-490-020 Chk #3246 Holiday Prop(Niderost)
$
290.00
ENVIRONMENTAL HLTH GENERAL 0010 540003
4614901
101001 $ 658.00
Prolect Number ( detail information MUST be provided)
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19, APN 042-90-098, 099, Chk #11793 Paiva
$
241.50
UP 03-12, APN 060-210-003 Chk #0125 Miller
$
185.00
TPM 03-20, APN 004490-020 Chk #3246 Holiday Prop(Niderost)
$
231.50
FIRE PLNG APPL FEE FIRE PROTECTION 0100
4617240
101001 $ 301.00
Prolect Number ( detail information MUST be provided)
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19, APN 042-90-098, 099, Chk #11793 Paiva
$
129.00
UP 03-12, APN 060-210-003 Chk #0125 Miller
$
43.00
TPM 03-20, APN 004490-020 Chk #3246 Holiday Prop(Niderost)
$
129.00
NOD/NOE CLERK'S FILING FEE GENERAL 0010 470001
4612319
101001 $ 108.00
($36) Prolect Number ( detail information MUST be provided)
Amount
of Fee
TPM 03-19, APN 0_42-90-098, 099, Chk #2618 Sierra West(Paiva)
$
36.00
�UP 03-12,-APN 060-210-003 Chk#0125 Miller: _ . _�' _�=""- _$�
y
-36.00, __•,
TPM 03-20, APN 004-490-020 Chk #3246 Holiday Prop(Niderost)
$
36.00
D.O.T - ALUC PLANNING GENERAL 0010 440001
4617241
101001 $ 300.00
Protect Number ( detail information MUST be provided)
Amount of Fee
ALUC, APN 048-012-073, Chk 21114 Salvation Army
$
300.00
DOCUMENT/COPY SALES GENERAL 0010 440001 4711910 101001 $ 16.00
TOTAL $ $ 4,863.00
FOR FUNDS RECEIVED ON: 3/6/2003
-' COUNTYOF BLUE
AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT
OROViLLE, CA
RECEIVED FROM PLANNING
BAG # 392
DESCRIPTION
DEPOSIT DATE: 3-10
RECEIPTS: 21016-21022
FUND
TITLE
ATR NO
DATE
FUND DEPT ACCT CASH
CODE CODE CODE CODE
PLANNBNG APPL FEES GENL 00110
44=1
421MM 901001
Frplei t Number
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19 #042-90-098.099 Paiva___—
_$1,000
UP 03-9 2 #060-210-003 Miller
ADM 02-11 #057-100-063 w
$50
TAM n20 #004-490-020 Holidanj Prov
$1,000
LAND DEVELOPMENT GENL 0010
4411=4
4611700 1010ti91
'Project Number
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19 #042-90-098, 099 Paiva
$290
UP 03-12 #00(1-210-003 Miller
$150
EWRONMENTAL 14LT H GENL 0010
54MM
4614901 101001
Project Number
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19 #042-90-098, 099 Paiva
$241.50
UP 03-12 #060-210-003 Miller
$185
FIRE PLNG APPL FEE FIDE PROTECT 0100
4617240 101001
PMJect Number
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19 #€342-90-098, 099 Paiva
$129
UP 03-12 #060-210-003 Miller
$43
NODINOE CLERK'S FILING FE GENL 0010
470MI
4612315 110110011
,($.38) Project Number
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-1-9-#042-90-098, 499 Paiva
UP 63-12 #060-210-003 Miller
_$36
$36
DOT ALUC PLANNING
Project Number
Amount of Fee
ALUC #048-012-073 Salvation Army
$300
DOCt. MENTICOPY SALES GENL 0010
440MI
47119163. _. 101001
3/10/2003
AMOUNT
2,750.00
71.011
301.00
103:0iD ,.
31�i9.i93i 1
i
1.
i
16.E
{ TOTAL. 4§86000
APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY:
AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER
By:
wnite•=treasurer pink --auditor canary --depositor golden rod=fale
3'��
Oil -
COUNTY OF BUTTE
AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT
OtROVILLE, CA
RECEIVED FROM PLANNING
BAG * 312
DESCRIPTION
FOLD
TITLE
ATR NO 61767
DATE M012003
FON® DEPT ACCT CASH
CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT
DEPOSIT DATE: 3401 .
RECEIPTS: 21016-21022
PLANNING APPL FEES GENL 0010
440M1
42109M 101001
Project Number
Amount of Fee
TPNI Q3.19 #042-90-098, 099 Paiva
$9.000
UP Q3-12 *Q60 -2i0 -0Q3 Miller
$700
ADM 02-11 #Q57-100-003
$50
' TPM 03-20 #004490-020 Holiday Prop
$1,000
LAND DEVELOPMENT GENL 0010
44CM4
4611700 101001
'Project Number
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19 #042-90-Q98, 099 Paiva
$290
UP 03-12 #080-210-003 Miller
$150
EWRONMENTAL I-ILTI-I GENL 00101
..
4614901 101001
Project Number
Amount of Fee
TPM 0349 al042-90-098, 099 Paiva
$241.50
UP 03-12 #060-210-003 Miller
$185
FIRE PLNG APPL FEE FIDE PROTECT 9100
4917240 101001
Project Number
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19 #042-90-098, 099 Paiva
$129
UP 03-12 # Q%210-003 Miller
$43
_ _
I1IODINOE CLERIC'S FILING FE GENL J LtOiili
470MI
4612319 101001
_( ) Project Number
Amount of Fee
TPM 03-19 #042-90-098, 099 Paiva
$36
UP 03-12 #080-210-QQ3 Miller
$36
�
DOT ALUC PLANNING.___GI=NL - 70010 -
440161`
4517241 101001
Project Number ,
Amount of Fee
ALUC #048-012-073 Satvaton Array
$300
DOCUMENTICOPY SALES GENL 0010
440MI
47119101 1OW01
2,750.00
730.00
301.00
102.66
300.00
16-00
TOTAL. $ 4 886100
APPROVED BY: DECEIVED BY:
AUDITOR -CONTROLLER TREASURER
BY:,
BY:
white ---treasurer pink—auditor Lamar --depositor golden md=file
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE Of CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT 21018
ISSUED BY
BRUCE F MILLER 0125
SUE R MILLER 90-3896/1211
JONES AVE �n f
DURHAM, CA 95938 �l
DURHAM,
ate
aytothe
er of e. �v n 1 S
Or er of
1 2 d se .............
I NO M STATE Fifth 8 Salem
P.O. CNOT VALID FOR LESS THAN $500.00
NATIONAL h co A 95927-3235
BANK (5310) 893-1573
For
,�4:i2Ai3891
NP
■■e■■ I? SOun 28,S
31r,,105.
�l019
II(
"700-
19s,
30'
/h 11-I- re-ere
DATE
RECEIPT
NO.
TOTAL
RECEIVED
PUBLIC
WORKS
LAFCO
PLANNING
PUBLIC
SALES
ENV.
HEALTH
FIRE
NOE/NOD
F/G FEE
OTHER
APPLICANT
RECEIVED FROM
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE Of CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT 21018
ISSUED BY
BRUCE F MILLER 0125
SUE R MILLER 90-3896/1211
JONES AVE �n f
DURHAM, CA 95938 �l
DURHAM,
ate
aytothe
er of e. �v n 1 S
Or er of
1 2 d se .............
I NO M STATE Fifth 8 Salem
P.O. CNOT VALID FOR LESS THAN $500.00
NATIONAL h co A 95927-3235
BANK (5310) 893-1573
For
,�4:i2Ai3891
NP
■■e■■ I? SOun 28,S
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT 21018 O1O
ISSUED BY /
BRUCE F MILLER 125
SUE R MILLER 90-3896/1211
JONES AVE
DU �n — �
DURHAM, CA 95938 (Datep V lC�,
ander
Order of �� �V 1` S !)I I y. U q
l
D b 1 a �---R�-rr� B secaur rooa,o.
-IIOIIdIS aciaa>e.
oeena as ma.
I lem
NO STATE Fifth 8 x 323 NOT VALID FOR LESS THAN $500.00
NATIONAL Chiico CA 95927-3235
BANK (530) 893-1573
FOrIYP',
-I: 12 1 138 9 6 L1: 0 L 2_511'00800 L 7.50n' 28.5
0
OLS 0 pc
.'CPd''ziw
0C)o-a�3
3;(0(05.
'3! of
IIS �
fSo'
-700~
_
jBS�
�{3
3G�J
A/I-I-e7z,S'L6
c'-:' , i (,/lam
DATE
RECEIPT
TOTAL
PUBLIC
LAFCO
PLANNING
PUBLIC
SALES
ENV.
HEALTH
FIRE
NOE/NOD
F/G FEE
OTHER
APPLICANT
RECEIVED FROM
NO.
RECEIVED
WORKS
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF PLANNING
RECEIPT 21018 O1O
ISSUED BY /
BRUCE F MILLER 125
SUE R MILLER 90-3896/1211
JONES AVE
DU �n — �
DURHAM, CA 95938 (Datep V lC�,
ander
Order of �� �V 1` S !)I I y. U q
l
D b 1 a �---R�-rr� B secaur rooa,o.
-IIOIIdIS aciaa>e.
oeena as ma.
I lem
NO STATE Fifth 8 x 323 NOT VALID FOR LESS THAN $500.00
NATIONAL Chiico CA 95927-3235
BANK (530) 893-1573
FOrIYP',
-I: 12 1 138 9 6 L1: 0 L 2_511'00800 L 7.50n' 28.5
0
Alk
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION
APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on page 2
APPLICANT'S NAME: (If application is different from owner an affidavit is required.)
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:
r 4- (n %i
0 0 C) - - b 3
ADDRESS: STREET, CITY, STATE, & ZIP CODE
cl q l5 y
FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE)
TELEPHONE:
NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (if any) `: 4 ;: •r
LOC ON OF PROJECT (Major cross streets and Address, if any) `
x� ?"A
GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED
ONAINER'S NAME:
&0cp-
TELEPHONE:
ADDRESS: j V �� �eZy D (IC, _CITY, STATE
`Y1 ZIP CODE��q ( n
1O�G_ /�`Y1
ZONE
GENERAL PLAN
EXISTING LAND USE
I SITE SIZE (in Square Feet or Acres)
EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet)
PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet)
(b 8
(Check One)
(Check One)
❑ PROPERTY 1S OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED
❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER
PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC
PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER
APPLICATION REQUESTED
❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
❑ REZONE ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
OUSE PERMIT BUTTE ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP
❑ COUNTY MINOR USE PERMIT ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION
❑ VARIANCE MAR 0 6 2003 ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION
❑ MINOR VARIANCE DEVELOPMENT ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER
❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT SERVICES ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN
❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ OTHER
PROJECT DESCRIPTION.
FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and size
of parcels.)
n
OWNER CERTIFICATION
I CERTIFY THAT 1 AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY.
FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.)
DATE: 3 & �0 SIGNATURE: C
KAFORMS\UNIFORM APPLICATION
Page I of 2
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
TO: Butte County, Department of Development Services:
M Phone Number (53d) gg 1- $
Print Name
Mailing Address 1 V
is hereby authorized to process the application for
on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number:
APN# O Qo O- 2 S 0 - 0 0
This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents
necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest.
Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name)
Print Name Print Name
Signature ignature
Architect and/or Engineer:
Print Name of Architect/Engineer
Mading Address
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Verify:
Date Received: -3 (�0�
[AP Number(s)
ET Owners Authorization
[3"'Project Description
Phone Number ( -
Total Amount Received: ( 1 C4 . oo
--D-Legal Description
,"Zoning Requirements
-Copies of plot plan
Taken by:
M NLV- M ( C. ffL-rL '�jAl-
Receipt No.
PW/LD
Plan --700— E.H.
CDF q) r
NOD/NOE Fees 3
Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon
final action.
Current fee for this application is III �-A as of �—
Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer".
K:\F0RMS',UNI170RM APPLICATION
Page 2 of 2
E
•
COUNTY OF BUTTE— _
ENVIRONMENTALANFORMATION-FORM
(To be completed By Project Applicant)
Date Filed
GENERAL INFORMATION: (�
1. Name and address. of owner, and/or developer, and/orproject sponsor: SmCE!�S&P_ Pyl! �
r _ � (� I
2. Address of project: °1533 Jdc1eS C�c %�� qSq q�_
Assessor's Parcel Number: Olo(1- ;)-Sv - OQ :5�
3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project:
v
4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project,
including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
5. Existing general plan designation: I (7-1 ✓ 1300 W,0UA/T74-�ry
6. Existing zoning district: VA (. J C.C_tt-SSt FC(: /J
7. How is land currently used? C &r_>, +y S - J oNCSQIL�. CA -(3,,,j owNs-5 A-rSoC _
8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed):
RQ 0 l a ce rel., `G�a er S�Y�cy CR
Project Description:
9. ' Site size: 0, 00 A"C (Acres/Sq. Feet)
10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: - - Compact:
Total:
11. Plans attached: Yes No
12. Proposed development schedule �eYn�� �� 0(� 14- (Sz3 n a}"& d n l�
13
14
Associated projects �-
Anticipated incremental or phased development
❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑
9
i
Attach description of project containing the following information:
15. If residential, include the number ofu, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and
type of household size expected. 0
16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage.
of sales area and loading facilities.
17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.
19. If the project involves a minor variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development
permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If p rmits have already been
issued, please attach as Exhibit e7c 00na i n e l n
Are the following items applicable to the projector its effects?
checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary).
YES
20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons
or substantial alteration of ground contours.
21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential
areas or public lands or roads.
22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project.
23. . Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.
25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality
or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns.
26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels
in the vicinity.
27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more.
28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials,
such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives.
29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services
(police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts).
30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption
(electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
Discuss below all items
❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑
NO
W
Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description)
32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or
Polaroid photos will be accepted.
33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity
of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of
development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity.
Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted.
Certification
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to'the best of my knowledge and belief.
r'Date_ -- FSignature�
e Co NTY
MpR 4 6 2403
DES RVIMy
K:\Planning\FORMS\Submittal\ENV-INFO.FRM
❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division O
M_
•
USE PERMIT
•
APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST
This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their
application packet. Please include this checklist along with your submittal.
Applicant Planner
Ci . ❑ E] A completed, signed, Uniform Application and Environmental Infonnation form. If the
application is signed by an agent for the property Yowner an agent authorization form must
be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted
unless signed by the owner or authorized agent.
02. ❑ LJ' Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of
the deposit will be returned upon final action, if any remains.) (Planner advises applicant)
3. ❑ Thirty-five(35) copies of plans which shall include a detailed site plan drawn to scale.. All
plans shall be drawn on uniform size sheets norg eater than 24" x 36". The finished plans
shall be folded to 8 ''/2" x 11 ". The detailed site plan must include:
a. ❑ ❑ Name and address of Applicant, Engineer and/or person who prepared the plan
b. ❑ ❑ Property lines and lot dimensions
c. ❑ ❑ Assessor Parcel Number(s) and the street address. �B UTy F
d. El 1:1 Proposed
0 6 2003
Proposed use and/or uses of the property. AR o 6DF
20 NT
SERVICES
e. ❑ ❑ Proposed landscaping plan, if applicable.
1'. ❑ ❑ Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the property
(including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, parking areas, wells, septic tanks
and leach fields).
❑ ❑ Distances from any significant natural and constructed features of the property, such
as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains,
bodies of water, railroads, to the property lines.
IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION 1S SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE.
1
CJ
•
I1 . ❑ ❑ Location of all slope banks, ponds, creeks, buttes, sloughs, rock outcroppings, natural
drainage courses, irrigation canals and existing vegetation worthy of consideration for
preservation, such as oak trees.
I. ❑ ❑ Any existing faults or fractures and geologic hazards.
j. ❑ ❑ North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an engineering scale
with the preferred scale of 1" = 20', with a north arrow preferably oriented to the top
of sheet.
k. ❑ ❑ All plans must be clear and legible.
4. ❑ ❑ One copy of 8 %i" x 11" transparency reduction of the detailed site plan.
5. ❑ ❑ A vicinity map showing closest major cross streets, zoning and existing land use.
After a meeting with a Butte County Planner the following checked items will be required to be submitted
at the time of application: (optional)
6. ❑ ❑ One (1) set of colored plans mounted on foam boards, which shall include an illustrative site
plan, illustrative building elevations, and any necessary cross-sections. Portions of this
requirement may be waived by the Planning Manager. Portions waved ❑ YES ❑ NO
7. ❑ ❑ One (1) full size reproducible sepia for each sheet in the plan set of the detailed site plan.
8. ❑ ❑ Building materials on a sample board, 8 ''/2" X 11 ".
9. ❑ ❑ Detailed site plan including the following:
a. ❑ ❑ Building setbacks from the ultimate road right-of-way (front, rear,.sides).
b. ❑ ❑ Proposed and existing on-site driveways and/or roads.
c., ❑ ❑ Location, height, and materials of walls and fences (sections may be required).
d. ❑ ❑ All driveways, drawn to scale, on adjacent and across the street properties within
100 feet of the subject site.
IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE.
2
0
e. ❑ ❑ Existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks and existing paving widths on-site or within 100
feet of the site, on adjacent and across the street properties.
F. ❑ ❑ Typical street section(s).
g. ❑ ❑ Nearest cross streets on both sides with plus or minus distances from subject site.
h. ❑ ❑ Approximate location of all buildings within 100 feet, on adjacent properties.
1. ❑ ❑ Proposed method of sewer and water connection or alternative method of sewage
disposal and potable water supply.
j. ❑ ❑ Existing and nearest "fire hydrants.
I:. ❑ ❑ Access, both pedestrian and vehicular, showing service areas and points of ingress and
egress.
1. ❑ ❑ Internal circulation pattern.
m. ❑ ❑ Elevation contours, at a minimum per USGS maps.
10. ❑ ❑ Illustrative Site Plan
The plan should include a graphic scale and north arrow, all proposed and existing improvements, landscape
concepts such as earth mounding and meandering walkways, walls, ground cover, trees, shrubs, shadows, paving
and other ele»>ents as may be necessary to illustrate the site plan. (Dimensions may be excluded from this plan.)
11. ❑ ❑ Conceptual Grading Plan
Items to be shown include:
a . ❑ ❑ Natural areas to be preserved.
b. ❑ ❑ Proposed cut and fill areas in contrasting colors of zipatone pattern.
c.. ❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contours within 100 feet of project boundaries.
IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE.
3
0 •
d. ❑ ❑ Proposed drainage and flood control facilities.
e. 0 ❑ Erosion control measures (e.g. - slope landscaping).
f. ❑ ❑ Natural drainage.
g. ❑ ❑ Elevations and finished contours.
h. ❑ ❑ Location of retaining walls, drainage channels and existing structures.
I. ❑ ❑ Location, elevation and size of proposed building pads.
1 ? . ❑ ❑ Illustrative Building Elevations
Illustrative building elevations showing all sides of existing and proposed buildings and structures. Illustrative
building elevations means architectural elevations showing typical materials to be used, trees, landscaping and
shadows to give the elevations graphic dimension.
Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above
submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by
the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire
Department, or Agriculture Commissioner.
Signature:.
Applicant/Representative
Signature: -
Planner Receiving Application
K:iPlanninc6FORKIMSubmittal\CH ECKLlMUSEPL'-RMLFRM
Date '3'T�-q 3
Date:
IF INSU FFICI ENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE.
4
K:\PROJECTS\UPC\MILLER.03-
12\LabelsUP03-12.doc
060050001000
SIERRA PACIFIC IND/JACK FROST
P O BOX 496014
REDDING CA 96049
MILLER BRUCE SUE
9451 JONES AVE
DURHAM CA 95938
060130003000
WESELOH KAREN TRUSTEE
P O BOX 1115
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067-1115
PIV,* AlLf SA %\-F 951,
060250003000
JONESVILLE CABIN OWNERS INC
P O BOX 1950 '
CHICO CA 95927
060250002000
HOEVER JAMES M
1473 GREAT HERON DR
SANTA ROSA CA 95409-4359
060250004000 060230001000
060230015000
BULAKLAKAN LOYLESS JOHN
GILMORE JOSEPH D & HEIDI R
1650 BIDWELL AVE 875 EL MONTE AVE
6889 COUNTY RD 9
CHICO CA 95926 CHICO CA 95928
ORLAND CA 95963
060230002000 060230011000
060230012000
MORRIS JIM & MARGARET HART GARLAND & JEANIE H
SOSNOFF GEORGE
1655 COOKS WAY 262 PICHOLINE WY
BOX 601
. CHICO CA 95926-1601 CHICO CA 95928
FOREST RANCH CA 95942
060230013000 060230014000
PELTON NORMAN D TRUSTEE BALDEZ RAY & CAROLYN
P O BOX 3748 1845 OSWALD RD
YUBA CITY CA 95992-3748 YUBA CITY CA 95991
£9656 VD CEKVZ2I0 8Z696 VD ODIHD
9Z656 V D
6 NnOD 6889 _ --- aA`v' BLNOYI SLB–
PAEfffi-699i
2I IQIEIH W Q Hdasd g2Iow II9 NHOf SSE IAO'I
N`'Id'I}Ib gnEI
OOOST00£Z0.Q0 OOOI000£Z090
000170009090
65£17-601756 VD VSOU VJMVS 9111-00Z6`VC Q IXVS OHO
617096 VD JNIGGaU
?IQ NO2IHH LVg2I2£L.b_-T–_ ---I ff-O d-- 17I096b XOg O d
S�Y\iVf
2IaABOH aa.LSn-dl, T;='IHSaM
LS02I3 �IDVf/QNY'JI VzI S
OOOZOOOSZ090 000£000£I090---
000100090090
LZ696 VD ODIHD-
___-T=XO.g_O_d__-� 8£656 VD Y\lVH2If1Q
ooP'ZT--O siaQE I\Zi
dAV�SIOf T.�
DNI S2I3N11c10 LII ' d I"IIASd1�IOf
000£OOOSZ090 af1S BDf12Ig 2I3I'IIY�I
-£0'2Id'TIIY�i\ -7ftsl— -- 2Id\ I
0091S aoj a;eldwal ash
w.LS1884S PaaA 410OWS.
060250003000 060250003000 060250003000
STOCKING RALPH C STILE W L JR MIILER BRUCE & SUE
213 BAZEMORE LANE P O BOX 671 9451 JONES AVENUE
TRINIDAD, CA 95570 CHICO CA 95927 DURHAM CA 95938
060250003000 060250003000 060250003000
ALLEN-ROGERS HELEN K. BLACKSTOCK DAN & BETSY WRIGHT L LUCILLE REV LIV TRUST
78 CERES CIRCLE 1.181 MANCHESTER ROAD 415 MISSION SANTA FE CIRCLE
CHICO CA 95926 CHICO CA 95926 CHICO CA 95926-5112
060250003000 060250003000 060250003000
ADAMS ROBERT F & CHARMION PARSONS ETTA MAE MORRIS KEITH A & MARY HELEN
2176 BIDWELL AVENUE 1732 DIAMOND AVE 8 JOY LANE
CHICO CA 95926 CHICO CA 95928 CHICO CA 95926
060250005000 060250003000 060250003000
PETRONAVE FAY LEHMKUHL FRED ORENDORFF JOHN E & ERMA L
202 MISSION SERRA TERRACE 23911 STAR COURT 365 E SACRAMENTO AVENUE
CHICO CA 95926 AUBURN CA 95602-8272 CHICO CA 95926
060250005000 060250003000 060250003000
BROWN JACK MOORE VERNON C GAYLORD WARREN & LUCYLLE
14183 CRESTON ROAD P O BOX 622 1241 SALEM STREET
MAGALIA CA 95954-8829 DURHAM CA 95938 CHICO CA 95928
060250003000 060250003000 060250003000
KELLY ANN BAKER ETAL BAKER WM P & JANET CROWSON ALLAN C
169 WILD ROSE CIRCLE P O BOX 226 2703 MONTEREY STREET
CHICO CA 95926 ARTIOS CA 95913 CHICO CA 95926
060250003000 060250003000 060250003000
BECHARD ROBERT & KATHY THOMPSON CECIL & NANCY CROWSON STEVE & NANCY
2555 RAMADA WAY 2560 KENNEDY AVENUE 9460 DILLON COURT
CHICO CA 95926 CHICO CA 95973-9666 DURHAM CA 95938
060250003000 060250003000
BROWNING ROB & SCOTT BARBARA TAYLOR MARVIN D
885 W 12TH AVENUE 1024 GREENWICH DRIVE
CHICO CA 95926-2139 CHICO CA 95926
060250003000
060250003000
CASEY W J
BENSON GEORGE & BETTY TRUST
2165 OAK WAY
921 LABURNAM AVENUE
CHICO CA 95973
CHICO CA 95926
060250003000
060250003000
KELLY THOMAS
MAGGI BARBARA
P O BOX 3550
10508 FIMPLE ROAD
CHICO CA 95927
CHICO CA 95928
060250003000
MANN AARON D
2303 E PARKSIDE DRIVE
MOHAVE VALLEY AZ 86440
060250003000
KORACH JANICE ETAL
217 MESA VERDE DRIVE
WATSONVILLE CA 95076
060250003000
PATTON FAMILY TRUST
7067 COUNTY ROAD # 20
ORLAND CA 95963
060250003000
POUNDSTONE CRAIG & DIANE
3280 SHELTERING OAK COURT
CHICO CA 95973
060250003000
BORNEMAN MARY ELLEN
36527 MONTECITO DRIVE
FREMONT CA 94536
060250003000
KERMEN VIRGINIA A ETAL
2050 SPRINGFIELD DR #311
CHICO CA 95928
060250003000
BABER BENJAMIN & OLIVIA
P0BOX 661
CHICO CA 95955
060250003000
GOLDBERG RONALD & JESSIE
1014 SUMMIT AVENUE
NAPA CA 94559-1407
060250003000
MOREHEAD JON & LOIS
2200 PARK AVENUE
CHICO CA 95928
060250003000
EDWARDS JAMES & CAROLYN
1251 OROVILLE CHICO HWY
DURHAM CA 95938
060250003000
GORE PAT
P O BOX 28
DURHAM CA 95938
060250005000
FORTIER STANLEY & EMILY
9160 FRIAS ROAD
CHICO CA 95928
060250005000
ROHWER CLAUDE & LYNN
27276 MEADOWBOOK DR
DAVIS CA 95616
060250005000
PIERCE LYNNE E
P O BOX 112
DURHAM CA 95938
060250005000
IHLE JOHN & MARGUERITE
49 SHELL ROAD
MILL VALLEY CA 94941
060250003000
LUGG JAMES & MARILYN
238 RIO VERDE DRIVE
SALINAS CA 93901
060250003000
LEWIS SAM & VICKY SUE
3560 DURHAM DAYTON HWY
CHICO CA 95928
060250003000
MILLER MIKE P
985 SAN MATEO DRIVE
MENLO PARK CA 94025
060250003000
BERGER ROBERT J
13 LAGUNA COURT
CHICO CA 95928
060250003000
RUTHERFORD ANN H
8666 TH STREET
CHICO CA 95926
'Ls
1 A ti. L S'r0&0 - b-
6 -I
`Z
WC-..stL-o �4 1e-, .
o ho- ZsO =
o
0 6 to -
Q
#0L0-1 U —
.
41
Bruce and Sue Miller, proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding
environmental impacts and Use Permit to allow for replacement and expansion of a legal
nonconforming dwelling (cabin). The existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with a
new, larger cabin. The parcel is zoned "U" (Unclassified) and currently has a General Plan
designation of Timber Mountain and is zoned U (Unclassified). The property is located on
the west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from the intersection of
Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road, at 9533
Jones Creek Road, Forest Ranch. APN 060-250-003 (MM) (UP 03-12)
Mr. Michelena said the applicant requested that this application be withdrawn and staff is asking that
the application be denied without prejudice.
It was moved by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Commissioner Leland, and unanimously
carried to deny without prejudice the Use Permit, for Bruce and Sue Miller.
I
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■ AUGUST 14, 2003 ■ PAGE 7 ■
�County
'S'atte
ME L A N D O F NATU RAL WEALTH A N D B E A U T Y
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530) 538-7785
August 14, 2003
Bruce and Sue Miller
9451 Jones Avenue
Durham, CA 95938
Re: Use Permit, AP 060-250-003, UP 03-12
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held a meeting on August 14,
2003, your request for a Use Permit for expansion of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin).
Existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with a new, larger cabin, was denied without
prejudice.
Should you desire to appeal this decision you must do so, in writing, with the appeal fee of $50.00
to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to the
expiration of the 10 -day appeal period which is at 5:00 p.m., Monday, August 25, 2003.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mark Michelena at this office
between 8:00 a.m and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
Lynne chchardson
Planning/Administrative
Support Services Assistant
/lr
cc: Land Development
Environmental Health
CDF
Building Division
kAfortns\denial.frm
August 7, 2003
Bruce and Sue Miller
9451 Jones Avenue
Durham, CA 95938
Re: Use Permit, AP 060-250-003, UP 03-12
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller:
Hutto C
L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH A N D B E A U T Y
PLANNING DIVISION .
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530)538-7785
Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Use Permit for expansion
of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin). Existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with
a new, larger cabin on the west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from the
intersection of Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road, at
9533 Jones Creek Road, Forest Ranch.
The public hearing has been continued to August 14, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. This meeting will be held
in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California.
The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be
present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mark Michelena of this office
at 538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
Lynn Richardson
Planning/Administrative
Support Services Assistant
Enc.
cc:
j:\wpdocs\pc1ts\schedu1e.mrg
Memorandum
TO: Honorable Chairperson and Commissioners
FROM: Mark Michelena, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Bruce and Sue Miller Use Permit (UP 03-12)
DATE: August 14, 2003
Attachment: August 1, 2003, Letter of Withdrawal from Bruce and Sue Miller
Department of Development Services
Planning Division
The Use Permit application was originally heard on June 12, 2003, and continued in order to
properly notify the other cabin owners on the property. At the June 26, 2003, Planning
Commission hearing it was continued again to determine the ownership issue, check to see if
application is complete and request additional site information. On August 1, 2003, the applicant
requested the application to be withdrawn. According to County Counsel, the application is not
considered withdrawn until the hearing body formally denies the applications without prejudice.
The following is a summary of the Use Permit application proposed for this property:
1. UP 03-12 (application received March 6, 2003, letter of withdrawal received August
1, 2003)
The Use Permit proposes to replace and enlarge a nonconforming dwelling, a seasonal
cabin (#21), in the Jonesville Cabin Association. The dwelling is to be enlarged from
468 square feet to 1,641 square feet in size. The area where the proposed addition would
be located currently consists of pine trees, grasses and dirt. The current dwelling is
served by septic that will be required to be removed and replaced with an approved septic
system for the expanded dwelling. Currently water for the dwelling is provided by
pumped in spring water. A propane tank would have to be relocated to make room for
the addition. The existing septic tank removed and replaced with a new septic tank and
two (2) 37.5 foot leach lines per Butte County Environmental Health Department for the
proposed expansion. The proposed expansion would not encroach into any required
building setback.
KAPROJECTS\UKWiller 03-12 SPC Memo -Withdrawal.doc
AUG -01-2003 10:59 AM MILLER GLASS INC 530 343 5215 P.01
August 1,2003
9NNO 3ll(18
$ - env U
Dear Mark Michelena, 0 ,
LI: �
We wish to withdrawal our permit application for 9533 Jones Creek Road,
Jonesville, Ca. Permit #up 03-12.
We would also like to thankyou for all your help with this matter.
Sincerely,
Bruce & Sue Miller
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT —June 12, 2003
Applicant: Bruce & Sue Miller
File #: UP 03-12
Request: Use Permit to expand a legal
nonconforming dwelling.
Existing cabin #21 will be
demolished and replaced with Parcel Size:
a new, larger cabin.
Planner:
G.P.: Timber Mountain
Zoning: U (Unclassified)
APN: 060-250-003
Location: On the west side of Jones
Creek Road, approximately
one-quarter mile from the
STAFF COMMENTS:
intersection of Humboldt
Road and Shake Mill Road,
and 260 feet southeast of
Humboldt Road, at 9533
Jones Creek Road, Forest
Ranch
90 acres +/- (portion of)
Mark Michelena
Associate Planner
Supervisor
District: 5
Attachments:
A. Vicinity Map
B. General Plan/Zoning Map
C. Site Plan
Staff recommends approval of this project subject to the findings and conditions.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The applicant is requesting a Use Permit to replace and enlarge a nonconforming dwelling, a
seasonal cabin (#21), in the Jonesville Cabin Association. The dwelling is to be enlarged from
468 square feet to 1,641 square feet in size. The area where the proposed addition would be
located currently consists of pine trees, grasses and dirt. The current dwelling is served by septic
that will be required to be removed and replaced with an approved septic system for the
expanded dwelling. Currently water for the dwelling is provided by pumped in spring water. A
propane tank would have to be relocated to make room for the addition. The existing septic tank
removed and replaced with a new septic tank and two (2) 37.5 foot leach lines per Butte County .
Environmental Health Department for the proposed expansion. The proposed expansion would
not encroach into any required building setback.
The original dwelling, along with all the other original cabins, was built prior to the requirement
of building permits. They were originally constructed as fishing and hunting cabins during the
early and mid 1920's. Since that time, the cabins have been sold to individual owners and are
part of the Jonesville Cabin Association. A couple of the cabins have been enlarged/replaced
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE I ■
a
over the last few years. The dwelling units (cabins) are considered to be a legal, nonconforming.
Butte- County Code section 24-35.20 states that no nonconforming use may be expanded or
enlarged unless a Use Permit is approved by the Planning Commission.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
The project site is part of the Jonesville Cabin Association, approximately 90 acres, which is
developed with forty-seven cabins, a hotel, and a barn. Access to cabin is from a private road off
of Humboldt Road. The area is a seasonal use, due to restricted access during the winter months
because of snow and the access road not being cleared. The road is closed by the Butte County
Public Works from January 1 to March 1, unless there is still snow on the.ground and the date is
extended. The road is closed approximately 4.5 south of the Jonesville Cabin Association.
The cabin is not located within any required building setback. Vegetation on the site consists of
pine trees, grasses, and non-native trees. The project site is surrounded by open land owned by
the federal government and camp grounds. Surrounding and nearby parcels are zoned U
(Unclassified) and TPZ-160 (Timber Preserve Zone), and range in size from 46 to 650 acres.
Jones Creek Road is a very narrow road, but does not have much vehicular traffic. The project
site is not located within an airport compatibility zone or within a 100 -year flood zone.
ANALYSIS:
The replacement and enlargement of the legal nonconforming dwelling unit (cabin) is not
expected to create any significant impacts to the area. The nonconforming dwelling unit has
been in use for over 80 years and has not created any problems to the area. The proposed
replacement and enlargement could result in additional people staying in the dwelling, which
would result in an increase in vehicle traffic, noise, sewage generation, and water consumption.
These potential impacts are not expected to be significant and would not have an adverse impact
to the area.
The project site is surrounded by Pine forests and open meadows and the occupants of the site
are subject to impacts associated with normal vacation uses, such as noise, dust, and smoke.
These impacts already exist and the proposed replacement/expansion to the nonconforming
dwelling unit would not create additional impacts.
General Plan and Zoning:
The General Plan land use designation of the project site is Timber Mountain which lists
dwellings as Secondary Uses. The proposed project is located in an area zoned Unclassified for
agricultural uses on parcels of ten acres or more in size. The proposal would allow the
replacement/expansion of an existing legal nonconforming dwelling unit, which is permitted by
issuance of a Use Permit.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 2 ■
For the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to present information, including
plans or other information that is sufficient to allow the Planning Commission to make an
informed decision. The Planning Commission may grant a Use Permit if:
"The proposed uses of property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in
which the land lies, and that the use would not impair the integrity and character of the
zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible
with, or injurious to, surrounding properties or detrimental to the health and general
welfare of the persons residing or working in -the neighborhood or the general health,
welfare, and safety of the residents of the county" (Butte County Code, Section 24-
45.10).
Section 24-35.20 of the Butte County Code states that when considering a Use Permit for a
nonconforming use, the Planning Commission shall grant the Use Permit when it finds that the
change, expansion, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, or structural alteration of such use
will not conflict with, impair or be detrimental to the uses both permitted and conditional of the
zone in which it is located and/or adjoins. This finding shall be in addition to the findings
required by Section 24-45.10 of the Butte County Zoning Ordinance. Pursuant to Section 24-
45.15, the Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the issuance of the Use Permit
which are reasonably related to the use of the property for which the Use Permit is requested. In
addition, the Planning Commission may at its own discretion establish a date for either the
termination of the use or review of the Use Permit.
Local Agency Review:
The project was reviewed and conditions applied by local agencies. The Butte County
Environmental Heath Division requires a permitted waste water disposal system, with approval
of the destruction of the old septic tank. They also require an approved source of water for the
new structure.
The California Department of Forestry requires the development of structures shall comply with
the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, and all other applicable State and County codes,
ordinances and regulations. They also require building identification and/or address by installed
in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290.
The Butte County Department of Public Works and the Local Agency Formation Commission
had no comments.
CEQA ISSUES:
The project was reviewed for environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) in accordance with State Law. The following discussion summarizes issues and
impacts identified in the Initial Study. These issues resulted from the preparation of an initial
study.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 3 0
• 0
Hydrology/Water Quality
All wastewater generated by the replacement dwellings on the site would be handled by
individual, on-site septic systems. The Butte County Environmental Health Division will require
a permitted waste water disposal system and approval of the destruction of the old tank.
The current dwelling uses spring water as its water source. The Butte County Environmental
Health Division has determined that an approved water source for the replacement and expanded
dwelling is required. The majority of dwellings in the Jonesville Cabin Association use spring
water. If a well is required, and as more cabins are either replaced or expanded, there could be a
small impact to local groundwater levels. But do to the fact these dwellings are seasonal uses,
the impact is determined to be less than significant
This project would ultimately result in a small increase of new impervious surfaces due to the
increase in size of the replacement dwelling. There is a small potential for a minor increase in
surface water runoff due to the reduced absorption rate created from the impervious surfaces.
The cumulative effects of future enlargement of the existing dwellings within the project site
should be closely monitored to ensure no adverse drainage impacts to on-site swales.
The proposed project would not alter the existing drainage pattern of the area. No additional
grading will occur due to the replacement and expansion of the dwelling. The area of the proposed
project is located approximately 300 feet north of Jones Creek and would not result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off site.
Traffic
The project will not cause an increase in traffic since only a replacement of one existing dwelling
(cabin) is proposed. Also, the area is primarily a seasonal use, due to restricted access during the
winter months because of snow and the access road not being cleared. The road is closed by the
Butte County Public Works from January 1 to March 1, unless there is still snow on the ground
and the date is extended. The road is closed approximately 4.5 south of the Jonesville Cabin
Association.
Cultural
According to Butte County constraints mapping, the project site is located in an area considered
to have a high archaeological sensitivity. This mapping is general in nature and basis the
probability of archaeological significance on the physical characteristics and history of different
areas of the County. The location of the project is in an area that may have potential for
historical or cultural resources. Often such sites are found in foothill areas, rock outcroppings, or
areas overlooking deer migratory corridors. Even though the site does not contain the physical
features normally associated with high archaeological sensitivity, the proposed dwelling
replacement has the potential for undiscovered archaeological resources to be uncovered during
excavation activities.
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 4 ■
•
To mitigate the potential impact, the Planning Division would require that all construction
activities cease in such an instance. Ground disturbance would not resume until clearance is
provided by a qualified archaeologist.
ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions:
I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings:
A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act. Said study did identify the area to have a high archeological
sensitivity; a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed.
B. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with comments received during the review process.
C. On the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the
Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Agenda Report and any comments
received, there is no substantial evidence that the Use Permit for Bruce and Sue
Miller, Planning Division File No. UP 03-12, will have a significant effect on the
environment.
D. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment
and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency.
E. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts, as
detailed in the Agenda Report dated June 12, 2003.
II. Adopt a "de minimis" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat.
The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage
to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game
Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR 753.5 is not required. The project site is not known
to contain any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special statusspecies
in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The project will not have a substantial
adverse effect on any riparian habitat; have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; interfere
substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species; conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources; or
conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan.
III. Approve Use Permit 03-12 for Bruce & Sue Miller, subject to the following findings and
the conditions in Exhibit "A":
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 5 0
0 0
A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed
use are in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone
in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development
policies and standards of the County because:
The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies
and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated as
Timber Mountain. The Timber Mountain land use designation allows dwellings
uses as Secondary Uses. The Butte County Zoning Ordinance allows the
expansion of a nonconforming use upon approval of a Use Permit.
B. The location, size, design., and operating characteristics of the proposed use would
be compatible with, and would not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent
uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration
given to:
Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density:
Although the replacement/expansion is larger than current dwellings, the
overall scale, bulk, coverage, and density will not have a significantly
adverse affect on the area or be detrimental to surrounding dwellings.
2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities
The replacement/expansion to the nonconforming dwelling unit would not
create a need for new public facilities, services, and utilities because
telephone and electrical services already extend to the project parcel. The
Butte County Fire Department requires compliance with standard
California Fire Safe Regulations, Public Resources Code 4290.
3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character:
The replacement/expansion to the existing nonconforming dwelling would
be a change from the existing style original cabins, but it would be an
improved change for the older, rundown dwellings of the Jonesville Cabin
Association.
4. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or proposed
development:
The site is suited for the project because the property is of a sufficient size
to contain the modified nonconforming replacement/expansion of the
dwelling unit, because the property does not contain any physical
constraints that would impact the dwelling.
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 6 ■
0
5. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use:
The Planning Division has circulated the proposed replacementlexpansion
of the dwelling unit application to County agencies and has received
responses that indicated there is no evidence that the use, with
appropriate conditions, would cause any other relevant planning -related
impact.
C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating
characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be
operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
D. The replacement/expansion of the nonconforming dwelling unit will not conflict
with, impair or be detrimental to the uses both permitted and conditional of the
zone in which it is located and/or adjoins because:
The nonconforming dwelling unit has been on the property for
over 70 years and has not caused any significant impacts to
adjoining properties. The adjoining parcels have not significantly
impacted the users of the nonconforming dwelling units.
k:\projects\upc\miller\Miller UP PC Agenda Report.doc
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 7 ■
0
USE PERMIT
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
0
DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.)
UP 03-12
PERMIT NO.
060-250-003
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special
conditions set forth below, Bruce and Sue Miller are hereby granted a Use Permit to
replace/expand a legal nonconforming dwelling (Cabin #21), located at 9533 Jones Creek Road,
Forest Ranch, which is part of the Jonesville Cabin Association, from 468 square feet to 1641
square feet on APN 060-250-003, subject to the following conditions:
1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of
application and issuance of Permit constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance,
including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65.
2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions
must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use.
The use granted by this permit must be established within two years of the date of
approval.
3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development
Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written
request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification
shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the
application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved.
Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for
amendment.
4. If any use for which a Use Permit has been granted is not established within two years of
the receipt of the Permit by the Permittee, the Permit shall become null and void and
reapplication pursuant to Section 24-45 (of the Zoning Code) shall be required to
establish the use previously granted under the expired Permit unless, 30 days prior to the
expiration date, a request for a one-year extension is submitted to the Planning
Commission together with sufficient evidence that the time limits for processing
development permits under federal or State regulations require time limits which exceed
one year. Upon application, and for good cause by the Permittee, at a public hearing
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 8 0
0 •
pursuant to Section 24-45.25 above, the Planning Commission may extend any time
limitation previously made a part of any condition to a Use Permit.
5. The terms and conditions of this Permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon
and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the
Permittee.
6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally
omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged
material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development
Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute
sufficient grounds to revoke a Permit.
Conditions of Approval:
Planning Division:
Building permits are required. Prepare three (3) sets of construction plans and make an
application for permit. Construction shall comply with federal, state, and local
regulations. Plans shall be prepared, sealed, and signed by a California Licensed
Architect or Registered Engineer for non-residential buildings and certain residential
buildings.
2. Development fees for the proposed residential* or non-residential improvements shall be
paid prior to the issuance of building permits. The fees shall be those in effect at time of
application, and shall include, but not be limited to, School Fees, Park and Recreation
District fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, Permit and Plan Check fees, and Fire
Protection Fees.
3. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances,
and regulations.
4. All outstanding application processing fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the Use
Permit.
Environmental Health Division
5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, apply and obtain a permit to install sewage
disposal system for proposed remodel.
6. Under County approval, remove old septic tank serving the dwelling unit (Cabin #21).
7. There must be an approved source of water for the new structure.
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 9 0
r 9
Butte County Fire Department/CDF
8. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public
Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and
maintained continuously thereafter.
9. Construction, installation or development of structures or facilities on the parcels/lots
shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, (Public Resources Code
4290), and all other applicable State and County codes, ordinances and regulations in
effect at the time of application for improvement permits.
County Counsel
10. If this entire matter or any finding, action or condition of this matter is appealed to the
Board of Supervisors, the applicant or any other developer/operator other than the
applicant agrees to indemnify the County of Butte from liability or loss related to the
approval of this project and agrees to sign an indemnification agreement in a form
approved by County Counsel before the Board's appeal hearing. If the application is not
appealed, this condition is deemed satisfied.
NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and
Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other
requirements.
Butte County Planning Commission Chairman
cc: Land Development Division
Environmental Health Division
Animal Control Division
Fire Department/CDF, Assessor
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 10 ■
'e.
DATE
TO
0 46
AUTOMATIC COVER SHEET
AUG -01-2003
FAX U: 53E7785
FROM MILLER GLASS
FAX U: 530 343 5215
10 :5S AM
INE
2 PAGES WERE EENT
(INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET)
P. ®2
June 24, 2003
Via Facsimile Transmission & U.S. Mail:.
Commissioners
Butte County Planning. Commission
7.County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Attn: Lynn Richardson
Re: June 26, 2003 Continued Hearing on Use Permit
For Bruce and Sue Miller
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
(530) 538-7785
This office, represents Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc , a,Californla.c6rpQraticin which is
the owner of the property upon. which, an application for a Use* Permit has. been filed by
Bruce and Sue Miller. We understand that. the hearing on that Use Permit application
has been continued to June 26, 2003.' Our client objects 'to the issuance of this Use
Permit on the following basis:
1. Bruce and Sue Miller are not the owners of the property and are not, at
this time, authorized to make application for a Use Permit on behalf of the owner of the
property Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc. By way of background, Jonesville Property
Owners Association (the "Corporation") became the fee owner of approximately 115
acres of real property in 1993. The previous owner of the property had allowed
approximately 47 cabins to be built on the property pursuant to various license
arrangements. The current owners of cabins situated on the property are shareholders
in the Corporation and are issued a use permit by the Corporation to use a portion of
the property for the location and maintenance . of structures and. improvements on. a
portion of the. property_ : The, Corporation's use. permit requires thepermtfee.to comply
fully with and. be. bound by all. restrictions contained' in the. Articles , of Incorporation,_
Bylaws and CC&R's of the corporation. Section 7.12 of the CC&R's provides in `part:
"No new. construction .of improvements shall be permitted upon the property without
the consent of the Board."
•
BUTTE
LAW OFFICES
COUNTY
STEWART HUMPHERYS BURCHETT & MOLIN, LLP
JUN 2 6 2003
DEVELOPMENT
530-891-6111
SERVICES
RONALD E. STEWART-
Chico Lav Center
KEITH S. HUM PHERI'$
ALAN E. BURCHETT
Far: 530-894-2103
RICHARD J. MOLIN
w%vw.chicolaw.com
DAVID R.H, FFITH
Firm e-mail: Shbm@chicolaw.com
RICHARD H. DA
DALRITIPLE III
*Alember-American Board of Trial Advocates
June 24, 2003
Via Facsimile Transmission & U.S. Mail:.
Commissioners
Butte County Planning. Commission
7.County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Attn: Lynn Richardson
Re: June 26, 2003 Continued Hearing on Use Permit
For Bruce and Sue Miller
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
(530) 538-7785
This office, represents Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc , a,Californla.c6rpQraticin which is
the owner of the property upon. which, an application for a Use* Permit has. been filed by
Bruce and Sue Miller. We understand that. the hearing on that Use Permit application
has been continued to June 26, 2003.' Our client objects 'to the issuance of this Use
Permit on the following basis:
1. Bruce and Sue Miller are not the owners of the property and are not, at
this time, authorized to make application for a Use Permit on behalf of the owner of the
property Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc. By way of background, Jonesville Property
Owners Association (the "Corporation") became the fee owner of approximately 115
acres of real property in 1993. The previous owner of the property had allowed
approximately 47 cabins to be built on the property pursuant to various license
arrangements. The current owners of cabins situated on the property are shareholders
in the Corporation and are issued a use permit by the Corporation to use a portion of
the property for the location and maintenance . of structures and. improvements on. a
portion of the. property_ : The, Corporation's use. permit requires thepermtfee.to comply
fully with and. be. bound by all. restrictions contained' in the. Articles , of Incorporation,_
Bylaws and CC&R's of the corporation. Section 7.12 of the CC&R's provides in `part:
"No new. construction .of improvements shall be permitted upon the property without
the consent of the Board."
sti
June 24, 2003 • •
Re: Use Permit for Bruce and Sue Miller
Page 2
The Millers did obtain approval from the Board of Directors for certain modifications to
the structure which they own on a portion of property owned by the Corporation, but
the Board of Directors of the Corporation has not approved the construction described
in the application filed by the Millers which is the subject of the scheduled hearing.
Accordingly, Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc., as the owner of the property objects to the
granting of the requested Use Permit.
2. Additionally, Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc. did not authorize the filing of
an application for a use permit and objects to the suggestion that there is a requirement
that a Use Permit be obtained in connection with the construction of improvements to
its property. Such has not been required in the past and should not be required in the
future.
AEB:cav
cc: Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc.,
c/o Daniel V. Blackstock, Esq.
Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc.,
Attn: Steve Crowson, President
Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc.,
Attn: Erma Orrendorf, Treasurer
Bruce and Sue Miller
PrnFPscinnal Plaza 119.0 C.nhacsPt Rd. C711tP 6 C'hirn CA 95971 MAihno,Ar1drp.CS! PO Rnv 720 C'hirn CIA 95927.079.0
i)
06-/24/03 14:36 $530 894 2103 SHB&M ATTORNEYS
• LAW OFFICES •
STEWART HUMPHERYS BURCHETT & MOLIN, LLP
RONAIA) F. STF,IWART-
KEITH S. HUMPHERYS
ALAN R. OURCHETT
RICHARD). MOL1N
DAVID R. CRIPPITH
RICHARD H. DALRYMPLYIII
-Irt..-ha.A.-..ia-, R -...I OfTsivi Aa. 1.
530-891-6111
June 24, 2003
Via Facsimile Transmission & U.S. Mail:
Commissioners
Butte County Planning Commission
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Attn: Lynn .Richardson
Re: June 26, 2003 Continued Hearing on Use )Permit
For Bruce and Sue Miller
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
10001/002
Chko 4w Ccntat
Fax: 530-894-2103
WWW *C-hiC0IR W.Co,rI
Firm a-mat7: ahbm@chicolRw.com
(530) 536-7785
CO��
TY
JUN 15 2003
D SE VICES
This office represents Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc., a California corporation which is
the owner of the property upon which an application for a Use Permit has been filed by
Bruce and Sue Miller. We understand that the hearing on that Use Permit application
has been continued to June 26, 2003. Our client objects to the issuance of this Use
Permit on the following basis:
I. Bruce and Sue Miller are not the owners of the property and are not, at
this time, authorized to make application for a Use Permit on behalf of the owner of the
property Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc. By way of background, Jonesville. Property
Owners Association (the "Corporation") became the fee owner of approximately 115
acres of real property in 1993. The previous owner of the property had allowed
approximately 47 cabins to be built on the property pursuant to various license
arrangements. The current owners of cabins situated on the property are shareholders
in the Corporation and are issued a use permit by the Corporation to use a portion of
the property for the location and maintenance of structures and improvements on a
portion of the property. The Corporation's use permit requires the permittee to comply
fully with and be bound by all restrictions contained in the Articles of Incorporation,
Bylaws and CC&R's of the corporation. Section 7.12 of the CC&R's provides in part:
"No new construction of improvements shall be permitted upon the property without
the consent of the Board."
08/24/03 14:38 '0530 894 2103 SHB&M ATTORNEYS 2002/002
V June 24, 2003
Re: Use Pernut for Bruce and Sue Miller
Page 2
•
The Millers did obtain approval from the Board of Directors for certain modifications to
the structure which they own on a portion of property owned by the Corporation, but
the Board of Directors of the Corporation has not approved the construction described
in the application filed by the Millers which is the subject of the scheduled hearing.
Accordingly, Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc., as the owner of the property objects to the
granting of the requested Use Permit_
2. Additionally, Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc. did not authorize `the filing of
an application for a use permit and objects to the suggestion that there is a requirement
that a Use Permit be obtained in connection with the construction of improvements to
its property. Such has not been required in the past and should not be required in the
future.
AEB:cav
LY: Jonesville Cabin Owners, tnc.,
c/o Daniel V. Blackstock, Esq.
Jonesville Cabin owners, Inc-
Attn: Steve Crowson, President
Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc.,
Attn: Ema OrrendorE, Treasurer
Bruce and Sue Miller
PmfPsein�a lava X171 ( nhoesnr Rrt CigirP C rgirn f A 95n7; MuT+no Artd.r.oLc• P()Rn 775 nnirn r 05477-n770
Butte County Planning Commission - Amendment of Butte County
Cede Section 24-•v7 (Non -conforming uses) (item d.-t.ermined to
be Categor-ically E::empt from environmental revir:w)
clarifying definitions, continued use of non -confirming
s, sc::)eLi"Lt`i.n of rer::ident iLAI non-eonforminr) tinvs
fin - lulling m::bi IF' hones) , ab .ndoriment, rest oratrrnr,
r.. intenancA arc :pairs of r.er!--cc;nforming user, !•ffr•r-t of
nne• ur rnr;:} et..:., on pr..ious'_y issr_r�d brtilrJrnr� )�r.rmii
i� u•>,.e p!ern:ts 01•fect_ or r:on-eon'orming parcel-., and
c•dcing pravit:cr, fcr e::par!_;icn of non-conformirn) rr -r-s by
rh.`:tir.ing it usc• pernit.
c;C •:� !'r•[! Lh_,t thewzv; ) -• C!'1 min �:
-y to allo•:r fur e::peur:;r•,n .and t:o
L.J...... _ .. ,1'._� G1�_.._._.� t!._ f'i_l.:?r:�Lr-...JtiGn ii• flL1:! r�r•
'' :' •;troyod
t_ •!. nr.r^ cr.::".::':.1. Fitr? r.>,r:m:n:n..'.�.7 nu limitaL'iow if being
C!::Co, Vc.11ey Cor.structior. Exchange, discussed
r: ..•d re•e, :.r:-:nrj Approval.
th_:t he had to exp-ind to stay
7!-•: , . - :. (jt:: -=.I: i .7 th= t : r-= i n. 2S i r t! : s was approved.
^! }r ti:i _ t:.: .� = f•::r::ard t:. the Board and if approved it
4r7.- 'he dato of _ipproval .
t:ar.-'ir:ed to the Commission and
}_rc l
!"c::..._ ___,ter Avis qL..:.tirr. d the tlr,nl: spaces in the draft ordinance.
H- wi!,!;-.pprovin, so:��`.hing that would not conform to
th=.t tt.._ trr.t-,l r' bo with pre-existing uses.
r r'.v i c. r r•. r. :.. .is.: the f r: l l oa:i ng changres to the ordinance,
(!:?l 1t e• i i c'. e a:�:.' .t:id Sect i on 4-47; page 4 dal et
":r : ,! 9 --.rid t. -.i "i s obtained" on lino 9; change line lir to
r•^-' "or r!r::trn;ter:, tc•'.t'i; c: ir. p. rt, n.ay be restored to a"• page 5
p t. ..: Cr:propr:i1 t::! _miction numbers on lines 11 and
Tt by Cur^:.:.: .: rrr.•>.r Ari s, iL,eConc!-2J by Commissioner Vercruse
t•: '-- •.-nrer' app;- )•:::: thi5 ord.n.:nce frith the .ihove stated changes.
F1'r� Commissioner Avis, Vercruse, Behunin, Lambert, and Chairman
F_hrader.
V e o VJAAW"y ryd`
s d� 14V v, ye., 0 4-lam►, 14A r ►1 V L V%4AA5 64
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT — June 12, 2003
Applicant: Bruce & Sue Miller intersection of Humboldt
Road and Shake Mill Road,
File #: UP 03-12 and 260 feet southeast of
Humboldt Road, at 9533
Request: Use Permit to expand a legal Jones Creek Road, Forest
nonconforming dwelling. Ranch
Existing cabin #21 will be
demolished and replaced with Parcel Size: 90 acres +/- (portion of)
a new, larger cabin.
Planner: Mark Michelena
G.P.: Timber Mountain Associate Planner.
Zoning: U (Unclassified) Supervisor
District: 5
APN: 060-250-003
Attachments:
Location: 'On the west side of Jones A. Vicinity Map
Creek Road, approximately B. General Plan/Zoning Map
one-quarter mile from the C. Site Plan
STAFF COMMENTS:
Staff recommends approval of this project subject to the findings and conditions.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The applicant is requesting a Use Permit to replace and enlarge a nonconforming dwelling, a
seasonal cabin (#21), in the Jonesville Cabin Association. The dwelling is to be enlarged from
468 square feet to 1,641 square feet in size. The area where the proposed addition would be
located currently consists of pine trees, grasses and dirt. The current dwelling is served by septic
that will be required to be removed and replaced with an approved septic system for the
expanded dwelling. Currently water for the dwelling is provided by pumped in spring water. A
propane tank would have to be relocated to make room for the addition. The existing septic tank
removed and replaced with a new septic tank and two (2) 37.5 foot leach lines per Butte County
Environmental Health Department for the proposed expansion. The proposed expansion would
not encroach into any required building setback.
The original dwelling, along with all the other original cabins, was built prior to the requirement
of building permits. They were originally constructed as fishing and hunting cabins during the
early and mid 1920's. Since that time, the cabins have been sold to individual owners and are
part of the Jonesville Cabin Association. A couple of the cabins have been enlarged/replaced
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 1 0
• 0.
over the last few years. The dwelling units (cabins) are considered to be a legal, nonconforming.
Butte County Code section 24-35.20 states that no nonconforming use may be expanded or
enlarged unless a Use Permit is approved by the Planning Commission.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
The project site is part of the Jonesville Cabin Association, approximately 90 acres, which is
developed with forty-seven cabins, a hotel, and a barn. Access to cabin is from a private road off
of Humboldt Road. The area is a seasonal use, due to restricted access during the winter months
because of snow and the access road not being cleared. The road is closed by the Butte County
Public Works from January 1 to March 1, unless there is still snow on the ground and the date is
extended. The road is closed approximately 4.5 south of the Jonesville Cabin Association.
The cabin is not located within any required building setback. Vegetation on the site consists of
pine trees, grasses, and non-native trees.. The project site is surrounded by open land owned by
the federal government and camp grounds. Surrounding and nearby parcels are zoned U
(Unclassified) and TPZ-160 (Timber Preserve Zone), and range in size from 46 to 650 acres.
Jones Creek Road is a very narrow road, but does not have much vehicular traffic. The project
site is not located within an airport compatibility zone or within a 100 -year flood zone.
ANALYSIS:
The replacement and enlargement of the legal nonconforming dwelling unit (cabin) is not
expected to create any significant impacts to the area. The nonconforming dwelling unit has
been in use for over 80 years and has not created any problems to the area. The proposed
replacement and enlargement could result in additional people staying in the dwelling, which
would result in an increase in vehicle traffic, noise, sewage generation, and water consumption.
These potential impacts are not expected to be significant and would not have an adverse impact
to the area.
The project site is surrounded by Pine forests and open meadows and the occupants of the site
are subject to impacts associated with normal vacation uses, such as noise, dust, and smoke.
These impacts already exist and the proposed replacement/expansion to the nonconforming
dwelling unit would not create additional impacts.
General Plan and Zoning:
The General Plan land use designation of the project site is Timber Mountain which lists
dwellings as Secondary Uses. The proposed project is located in an area zoned Unclassified for
agricultural uses on parcels of ten acres or. more in size. The proposal would allow the
replacement/expansion of an existing legal nonconforming dwelling unit, which is permitted by
issuance of a Use Permit.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 2 0
For the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to present information, including
plans or other information that is sufficient to allow the Planning Commission to make an
informed decision. The Planning Commission may grant a Use Permit if:
"The proposed uses of property will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in
which the land lies, and that the use would not impair the integrity and character of the
zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible
with, or injurious to, surrounding properties or detrimental to the health and general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or the general health,
welfare, and safety of the residents of the county" (Butte County Code, Section 24-
45.10).
Section 24-35.20 of the Butte County Code states that when considering a Use Permit for a
nonconforming use, the Planning Commission shall grant the Use Permit when it finds that the
change, expansion, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, or structural alteration of such use
will not conflict with, impair or be detrimental to the uses both permitted and conditional of the
zone in which it is located and/or adjoins. This finding shall be in addition to the findings
required by Section 24-45.10 of the Butte County Zoning Ordinance. Pursuant to Section 24-
45.15, the Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the issuance of the Use Permit
which are reasonably related to the use of the property for which the Use Permit is requested. In
addition, the Planning Commission may at its own discretion establish a date for either the
tern-iination of the use or review of the Use Permit.
Local Agency Review:
The project was reviewed and conditions applied by local agencies. The Butte County
Environmental Heath Division requires a permitted waste water disposal system, with approval
of the destruction of the old septic tank. They also require an approved source of water for the
new structure.
The California Department of Forestry requires the development of structures shall comply with
the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, and all other applicable State and County codes,
ordinances and regulations. They also require building identification and/or address by installed
in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290.
The Butte County Department of Public Works and the Local Agency Formation Commission
had no comments.
CEQA ISSUES:
The project was reviewed for environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) in accordance with State Law. The following discussion summarizes issues and
impacts identified in the Initial Study. These issues resulted from the preparation of an initial
study.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 3 0
Hydrology/Water Quality
All wastewater generated .by the replacement dwellings on the site would be handled' by
individual, on-site septic systems. The Butte County Environmental Health Division will require
a permitted waste water disposal system and approval of the destruction of the old tank.
The current dwelling uses spring water as its water source. The Butte County Environmental
Health Division has determined that an approved water source for the replacement and expanded
dwelling is required. The majority of dwellings in the Jonesville Cabin Association use spring
water. If a well is required, and as more cabins are either replaced or expanded, there could be a
small impact to local groundwater levels. But do to the fact these dwellings are seasonal uses,
the impact is determined to be less than significant
This project would ultimately result in a small increase of new impervious surfaces due to the
increase in size of the replacement dwelling. There is a small potential for a minor increase in
surface water runoff due to the reduced absorption rate created from the impervious surfaces.
The cumulative effects of future enlargement of the existing dwellings within the project site
should be closely monitored to ensure no adverse drainage impacts to on-site swales.
The proposed project would not alter the existing drainage pattern of the area. No additional
grading will occur due to the replacement and expansion of the dwelling. The area of the proposed
project is located approximately 300 feet north of Jones Creek and would not result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off site.
Traffic
The project will not cause an increase in traffic since only a replacement of one existing dwelling
(cabin) is proposed. Also, the area is primarily a seasonal use, due to restricted access during the
winter months because of snow and the access road not being cleared. The road is closed by the
Butte County Public Works from January 1 to March 1, unless there is still snow on the ground
and the date is extended. The road is closed approximately 4.5 south of the Jonesville Cabin
Association.
Cultural
According to Butte County constraints mapping, the project site is located in an area considered
to have a high archaeological sensitivity. This mapping is general in nature and basis the
probability of archaeological significance on the physical characteristics and history of different
areas of the County. The location of the project is in an area that may have potential for
historical or cultural resources. Often such sites are found in foothill areas, rock outcroppings, or
areas overlooking deer migratory corridors. Even though the site does not contain the physical
features normally associated with high archaeological sensitivity, the proposed dwelling
replacement has the potential for undiscovered archaeological resources to be uncovered during
excavation activities.
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 4 0
To mitigate the potential impact, the Planning Division would require that all construction
activities cease in such an instance. Ground disturbance would not resume until clearance is
provided by a qualified archaeologist.
ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions:
I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings:
A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality - Act. Said study did identify the area to have a high archeological
sensitivity; a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed.
B. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with comments received during the review process.
C. On the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the
Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Agenda Report and any comments
received, there is no substantial evidence that the Use Permit for Bruce and Sue
Miller, Planning Division File No. UP 03-12, will have a significant effect on the
environment.
D. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment
and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency.
E. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts, as
detailed in the Agenda Report dated June 12, 2003.
II. Adopt a "de minimis" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat.
The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage
to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game
Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR 753.5 is not required. The project site is not known
to contain any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species
in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The project will not have a substantial
adverse effect on any riparian habitat; have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; interfere
substantially with the movement of any native. resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species; conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources; or
conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan.
III. Approve Use Permit 03-12 for Bruce & Sue Miller, subject to the following findings and
the conditions in Exhibit "A":
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 5 ■
A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed
use are in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone
in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development
policies and standards of the County because:
The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies
and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated as
Timber Mountain. The Timber Mountain land use designation allows dwellings
uses as Secondary Uses. The Butte County Zoning Ordinance allows the
expansion of a nonconforming use upon approval of a Use Permit.
B. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use would
be compatible with, and would not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent
uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration
given to:
1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density:
Although the replacement expansion is larger than current dwellings, the
overall scale, bulk, coverage, and density will not have a significantly
adverse affect on the area or be detrimental to surrounding dwellings.
2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities
The replacement/expansion to the nonconforming dwelling unit would not
create a need for new public facilities, services, and utilities because
telephone and electrical services'already extend to the project parcel. The
Butte County Fire Department requires compliance with standard
California Fire Safe Regulations, Public Resources Code 4290.
3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character:
The replacement/expansion to the existing nonconforming dwelling would
be a change from the existing style original cabins, but it would be an
improved change for the older, rundown dwellings of the Jonesville Cabin
Association.
4. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or proposed
development:
The site is suited for the project because the property is of a sufficient size
to contain the modified nonconforming. replacement/expansion of the
dwelling unit, because the property does not' contain any physical
constraints that would impact the dwelling.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 6 ■
5. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use:
The Planning Division has circulated the proposed replacementlexpansion
of the dwelling unit application to County agencies and has received
responses that indicated there is no evidence that the use, with
appropriate conditions, would cause any other relevant planning -related
impact.
C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating
characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be
operated or maintained would. not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in :the vicinity.
D. The replacement/expansion of the nonconforming dwelling unit will not conflict
with, impair or be detrimental to the uses both permitted and conditional of the
zone in which it is located and/or adjoins because:
The nonconforming dwelling unit has been on the property for
over 70 years and has not caused any significant impacts to
adjoining properties. The adjoining parcels have not significantly
impacted the users of the nonconforming dwelling units.
k:\projects\upc\miller\Miller UP PC Agenda Report.doc
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 7 0
EXHIBIT A
USE PERMIT
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.)
UP 03-12
PERMIT NO.
060-250-003
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special
conditions set forth below, Bruce and Sue Miller are hereby granted a Use Permit to
replace/expand a legal nonconforming dwelling (Cabin #21), located at 9533 Jones Creek Road,
Forest Ranch, which is part of the Jonesville Cabin Association, from 468 square feet to 1641
square feet on APN 060-250-003, subject to the following conditions:
Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of
application and issuance of Permit constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance,
including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65.
2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions
must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use.
The use granted by this permit must be established within two years of the date of
approval.
3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development
Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written
request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification
shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the
application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved.
Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for
amendment.
4. If any use for which a Use Permit has been granted is not established within two years of
the receipt of the Permit by the Permittee, the Permit shall become null and void and
reapplication pursuant to Section 24-45 (of the Zoning Code) shall be required to
establish the use previously granted under the expired Permit unless, 30 days prior to the
expiration date, a request for a one-year extension is submitted to the Planning
Commission together with sufficient evidence that the time limits for processing
development permits under federal or State regulations require time limits which exceed
one .year. Upon application, and for good cause by the Permittee, at a public hearing
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 8 0
pursuant to Section 24-45.25 above, the Planning Commission may extend any time
limitation previously made a part of any condition to a Use Permit.
5. The terms and conditions of this Permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon
and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the
Permittee.
6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally
omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged
material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development
Services, to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute
sufficient grounds to revoke a Permit.
Conditions of Approval:
Planning Division:
1. Building permits are required. Prepare three (3) sets of construction plans and make an
application for permit. Construction shall comply with federal, state, and local
regulations. Plans shall be prepared, sealed, and signed by a California Licensed
Architect or Registered Engineer for non-residential buildings and certain residential
buildings.
2. Development fees for the proposed residential or non-residential improvements shall be
paid prior to the issuance of building permits. The fees shall be those in effect at time of
application, and shall include, but not be limited to, School Fees, Park and Recreation
District fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, Permit and Plan Check fees, and Fire
Protection Fees.
3. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances,
and regulations.
4. All outstanding application processing fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the Use
Permit.
Environmental Health Division
5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, apply and obtain a permit to install sewage
disposal system for proposed remodel.
6. Under County approval, remove old septic tank serving the dwelling unit (Cabin #21).
7. There must be an approved source of water for the new structure.
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 9 0
Butte County Fire Department/CDF
8. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public
Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and
maintained continuously thereafter.
9. Construction, installation or development of structures or facilities on the parcels/lots
shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, (Public Resources Code
4290), and all other applicable State and County codes, ordinances and regulations in
effect at the time of application for improvement permits.
County Counsel
10. If this entire matter or any finding, action or condition of this matter is appealed to the
Board of Supervisors, the applicant or any other developer/operator other than the
applicant agrees to indemnify the County of Butte from liability or loss related to the
approval of this project and agrees to sign an indemnification agreement in a form
approved by County Counsel before the Board's appeal hearing. If the application is not
appealed, this condition is deemed satisfied.
NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and
Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other
requirements.
Butte County Planning Commission Chairman
cc: Land Development Division
Environmental Health Division
Animal Control Division
Fire Department/CDF, Assessor
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 10 0
Vicinity Map
Cxd J1 f
LMMMM
Project Location
mewows
dAll
PhAbrwk
Reserv*
Cl
UP 03-12
060-2 03
t
r utte 0,
�pr+�.�-•.: 1, -. ..._
LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
PLANNING DIVISION
'•' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530)538-7785
June 26, 2003
Bruce and Sue Miller
9451 Jones Avenue
Durham, CA 95938
Re: Use Permit, AP 060-250-003, UP 03-12
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held June 26, 2003, the public
hearing was continued open to August 14, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. to consider your application for a Use
Permit for expansion of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin). Existing cabin will be demolished
and replaced with a new, larger cabin.
This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville,
California.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mark Michelena at this office
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
Lynn Richardson
Planning/Administrative
Support Services Assistant
/lr
cc:
Ofomi skonti n u e. fmi
wl�
08/24/03 14:38 '$330 894 2103 SHB&M ATTORNEYS
LAW OFFICES
STEWAR`><' HUMPHERYS BURCHETT & MOLIN 'LLP
RONAIA) F. STF.RiART-
KSITH S. HUMPHERYS
ALAN S. 8URCHITT
RICHARD J). MOLIN
DAVID R. CRI6PITH
RICHARD M. DALKYWLS 111
rMrmh.r-Mnrricu. 8-4 dIT" AAvur Id
830-891-6111
June 24, 2003
Via Facsimile Transmission & U.S. Mail.
Commissioners
Butte County Planning Commission
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Attn: Lynn Richardson
Re: June 26, 2003 Continued Hearing on Use Permit
For Bruce and Sue Miller
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
Q001/002
Chico Law CCntur.
Fax: 53OM44103
wuvw.chicolnw.ce,sn
Firm e-mail: shbm a,,chicohtw.aom
(530) 538-7785
BU
TV
JUN 15 2003
D SE VICES
This office represents Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc., a California corporation which is
the owner of the property upon which an application for a Use Permit has been filed by
Bruce and Sue Miller. We understand that the hearing on that Use Permit application
has been continued to June 26, 2003. Our client objects to the issuance of this Use
Permit on the following basis:
1. Bruce and Sue Miller are not the owners of the property and are not, at
this time, authorized to make application for a Use Permit on behalf of the owner of the
property Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc. By way of background, Jonesville Property
Owners Association (the "Corporation") became the fee owner of approximately 115
acres of real property in 1993. The previous owner of the property had allowed
approximately 47 cabins to be built on the property pursuant to various license
arrangements. The current owners of cabins situated on the property are shareholders
in the Corporation and are issued a use permit by the Corporation to use a portion of
the property for the location and maintenance of structures and improvements on a
portion of the property. The Corporation's use permit requires the permittee to comply
fully with and be bound by all restrictions contained in the Articles of Incorporation,
Bylaws and CC&R's of the corporation. Section 7.12 of the CC&R's provides in part:
"No new construction of improvements shall be permitted upon the property without
the consent of the Board."
08/24/03 14:36 0530 894 2103 SHR&M ATTORNEYS 01002/002
,lune 24, 2003
Rc: Use Pennit for Bruce and Sue Milts
Page 2
tThe Millers did obtain approval from the Board of Directors for certain modifications to
f the structure which they own on a portion of property owned by the Corporation, but
the Board of Directors of the Corporation has not approved the construction described
in the application filed by the Millers which is the subject of the scheduled hearing.
Accordingly, Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc., as the owner of the property objects to the
granting of the requested Use Permit.
2. Additionally, Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc. did not authorize the filing of
an application for a use permit and objects to the suggestion that there is a requirement
that a Use Permit be obtained in connection with the construction of improvements to
its property. Such has not been required in the past and should not be required in the
future.
AL•B:cav
M Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc.,
c/o Daniel V. Blackstock, Esq.
Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc-
Attn: Steve Crowson, President
Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc.,
Attn: Erma Orrendod Treasures
Bruce and Sue Miller
irrnfPasin�a la�o 'i1 !1 f nh,ecrr Rr+ S,,ivP A rhirn rA geMT; M. i1ino AAArocc• PO RAY 775 ('hien r A QS(07-0710
trite 0
FA
L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
z PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530)538-7785
June 12, 2003
Bruce and Sue Miller
9451 Jones Avenue
Durham, CA 95938
Re: Use Permit, AP 060-250-003, UP 03-12
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held June 12, 2003, the public
hearing was continued open to June 26, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. to consider your application for a Use
Permit for expansion of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin). Existing cabin will be demolished
and replaced with a new, larger cabin.
This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville,
California.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mark Michelena at this office
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
Lynn Richardson.
Planning/Administrative
Support Services Assistant
Ar t
cc:
Bformskonti nue. fnn
D
June 9, 2003
sutte Count
L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530) 538-7785
REVISED
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AND
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be
held on June 12, 2003, and will be continued to June 26, 2003, in the Butte County Board of
Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville,
California, at 9:00 a.m. regarding the following item:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been
prepared for the following project:
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/ USE PERMIT
A. Bruce and Sue Miller, Use Permit to allow for replacement and expansion of a legal
nonconforming dwelling (cabin). The existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with ,a
new—larger larger cabin. The parcel is zoned "U" (Unclassified) .and currently has a General Plan
designation of Timber Mountain and is zoned U (Unclassified). The property is located on the
west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from the intersection of
Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road, at 9533 Jones
Creek Road, Forest Ranch. APN 060-250-003 (MM) (UP 03-12)
The initial study for the project identifies potentially significant effects, but revisions in the
project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects or
mitigate the -effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. Therefore,
Planning Division staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project are on file for
public review starting, May 22, 2003, through June 11, 2003, at the Butte County Planning
Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California and the Butte County Chico Library, 1108
Sherman Avenue, Chico, California. All interested persons are invited to review the document.
Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address.
If you challenge either the Mitigated Negative Declaration or the Use Permit in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described
in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
For further information regarding this project, please contact Mark Markelena, project planner,
at the Butte County Planning Division at (530) 538-7376.
YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
REVISED
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AND
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be
held on June 12, 2003, and will be continued to June 26 2003 in the Butte County Board of
Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville,
California, at 9:00 a.m. regarding the following item:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been
prepared for the following project:
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/ USE PERMIT
A. Bruce and Sue Miller, Use Permit to allow for replacement and expansion of a legal
nonconforming dwelling (cabin). The existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with a
new, larger cabin. The parcel is zoned "U" (Unclassified) and currently has a General Plan
designation of Timber Mountain and is zoned U (Unclassified). The property is located on the
west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from the intersection of
Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road, at 9533 Jones
Creek Road, Forest Ranch. APN 060-250-003 (MM) (UP 03-12)
The initial study for the project identifies potentially significant effects, but revisions in the
project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. Therefore,
Planning Division staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project are on file for
public review starting, May 22, 2003, through June 11, 2003, at the Butte County Planning
Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California and the Butte County Chico Library, 1108
Sherman Avenue, Chico, California. All interested persons are invited to review the document.
Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address.
If you challenge either the Mitigated Negative Declaration or the Use Permit in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described
in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
For further information regarding this project, please contact Mark Markelena, project planner,
at the Butte County Planning Division at (530) 538-7376.
YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Bruce and Sue Miller
9451 Jones Avenue
Durham, CA 95938
Re: Use Permit, AP 060-250-003, UP 03-12
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller::
Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Use Permit for expansion
of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin). Existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with
a new, larger cabin on the west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from the
intersection of Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road, at
9533 Jones Creek Road, Forest Ranch. Should you have any concerns with the report or conditions
of approval, please contact us in advance of the meeting so that we may work together to resolve
your concerns.
A public hearing has been set for June 12, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board
of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California.
The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be
present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mark Michelena of this office
at 538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
Lynn Richardson
Planning/Administrative
Support Services Assistant
Enc.
cc:
j:\wpdocs\pclts\schedule.mrg
:..}. fir: Mk 1(iYM1f:i
Count
16U
A LAND
OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530) 538-7785
June 5, 2003
Bruce and Sue Miller
9451 Jones Avenue
Durham, CA 95938
Re: Use Permit, AP 060-250-003, UP 03-12
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller::
Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Use Permit for expansion
of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin). Existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with
a new, larger cabin on the west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from the
intersection of Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road, at
9533 Jones Creek Road, Forest Ranch. Should you have any concerns with the report or conditions
of approval, please contact us in advance of the meeting so that we may work together to resolve
your concerns.
A public hearing has been set for June 12, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board
of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California.
The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be
present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mark Michelena of this office
at 538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
Lynn Richardson
Planning/Administrative
Support Services Assistant
Enc.
cc:
j:\wpdocs\pclts\schedule.mrg
• 0
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT —June 12, 2003 .
Applicant: Bruce & Sue Miller intersection of Humboldt
Road and Shake Mill Road,
File #: UP 03-12 and 260 feet southeast of
Humboldt Road, at 9533
Request: Use Permit to expand a legal Jones Creek Road, Forest
nonconforming dwelling. Ranch
Existing cabin #21 will be
demolished and replaced with Parcel Size: 90 acres +/- (portion of)
a new, larger cabin.
Planner: Mark Michelena
G.P.: Timber Mountain Associate Planner
Zoning: U (Unclassified) Supervisor
District: 5
APN: 060-250-003
Attachments:
Location: On the west side of Jones A. Vicinity Map
Creek Road, approximately B. General Plan/Zoning Map
one-quarter mile from the C. Site Plan
STAFF COMMENTS:
Staff recommends approval of this project subject to the findings and conditions.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The applicant is requesting a Use Permit to replace and enlarge a nonconforming dwelling, a
seasonal cabin (#21), in the Jonesville Cabin Association. The dwelling is to be enlarged from
468 square feet to 1,641 square feet in size. The area where the proposed addition would be
located currently consists of pine trees, grasses and dirt. The current dwelling is served by septic
that will be required to be removed and replaced with an approved septic system for the
expanded dwelling. Currently water for the dwelling is provided by pumped in spring water. A
propane tank would have to be relocated to make room for the addition. The existing septic tank
removed and replaced with a new septic tank and two (2) 37.5 foot leach lines per Butte County
Environmental Health Department for the proposed expansion. The proposed expansion would
not encroach into any required building setback.
The original dwelling, along with all the other original cabins, was built prior to the requirement
of building permits. They were originally constructed as fishing and hunting cabins during the
early and mid 1920's. Since that time, the cabins have been sold to individual owners and are
part of the Jonesville Cabin Association. A couple of the cabins have been enlarged/replaced
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT 0 PACE 1 ■
over the last few years. The dwelling units (cabins) are considered to be a legal, nonconforming.
Butte County Code section 24-35.20 states that no nonconforming use may be expanded or
enlarged unless a Use Permit is approved by the Planning Commission.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
The project site is part of the Jonesville Cabin Association, approximately 90 acres, which is
developed with forty-seven cabins, a hotel, and a barn. Access to cabin is from a private road off
of Humboldt Road. The area is a seasonal use, due to restricted access during the winter months
because of snow and the access road not being cleared. The road is closed by the Butte County
Public Works from January 1 to March 1, unless there is still snow on the ground and the date is
extended. The road is closed approximately 4.5 south of the Jonesville Cabin Association.
The cabin is not located within any required building setback. Vegetation on the site consists of
pine trees, grasses, and non-native trees. The project site is surrounded by open land owned by
the federal government and camp grounds. Surrounding and nearby parcels are zoned U
(Unclassified) and TPZ-160 (Timber Preserve Zone), and range in size from 46 to 650 acres.
Jones Creek Road is a very narrow road, but does not have much vehicular traffic. The project
site is not located within an airport compatibility zone or within a 100 -year flood zone.
ANALYSIS:
The replacement and enlargement of the legal nonconforming dwelling unit (cabin) is not
expected to create any significant impacts to the area. The nonconforming dwelling unit has
been in use for over 80 years and has not created any problems to the area. The proposed
replacement and enlargement could result in additional people staying in the dwelling, which
would result in an increase in vehicle traffic, noise, sewage generation, and water consumption.
These potential impacts are not expected to be significant and would not have an adverse impact
to the area.
The project site is surrounded by Pine forests and open meadows and the occupants of the site
are subject to impacts associated with normal vacation uses, such as noise, dust, and smoke.
These impacts already exist and the proposed replacement/expansion to the nonconforming
dwelling unit would not create additional impacts.
General Plan and Zoning:
The General Plan land use designation of the project site is Timber Mountain which lists
dwellings as Secondary Uses. The proposed project is located in an area zoned Unclassified for
agricultural uses on parcels of ten acres or more in size. The proposal would allow the
replacement/expansion of an existing legal nonconforming dwelling unit, which is permitted by
issuance of a Use Permit.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 2 0
For the approval of the Use Permit, the applicant is required to present information, including
plans or other information that is sufficient to allow the Planning Commission to make an
informed decision. The Planning Commission may grant a Use Permit if:
"The proposed uses of propefty will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in
which the land lies, and that the use would not impair the integrity and character of the
zone in which the land lies, and that the use would not be unreasonably incompatible
with, or injurious to, surrounding properties or detrimental to the health and general
welfare of the persons residing or working .in the neighborhood or the general health,
welfare, and safety of the residents of the county" (Butte County Code, Section 24-
45.10).
Section 24-35.20 of the Butte County Code states that when considering a Use Permit for a
nonconforming use, the Planning Commission shall grant the Use Permit when it finds that the
change, expansion, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, or structural alteration of such use
will not conflict with, impair or be detrimental to the uses both permitted and conditional of the
zone in which it is located and/or adjoins. This finding shall be in addition to the findings
required by Section 24-45.10 of the Butte County Zoning Ordinance. Pursuant to Section 24-
45.15, the Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the issuance of the Use Permit
which are reasonably related to the use of the property for which the Use Permit is requested. In
addition, the Planning Commission may at its own discretion establish a date for either the
termination of the use or review of the Use Permit.
Local Agency Review:
The project was reviewed and conditions applied by local agencies. The Butte County
Environmental Heath Division requires a permitted waste water disposal system, with approval
of the destruction of the old septic tank. They also require an approved source of water for the
new structure.
The California Department of Forestry requires the development of structures shall comply with
the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, and all other applicable State and County codes,
ordinances and regulations. They also require building identification and/or address by installed
in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290.
The Butte County Department of Public Works and the Local Agency Formation Commission
had no comments.
CEQA ISSUES:
The project was reviewed for environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) in accordance with State Law. The following discussion summarizes issues and
impacts identified in the Initial Study. These issues resulted from the preparation of an initial
study.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 3 0
Hydrology/Water Quality
All wastewater generated by the replacement dwellings on the site would be handled by
individual, on-site septic systems. The Butte County Environmental Health Division will require
a permitted waste water disposal system and approval of the destruction of the old tank.
The current dwelling uses spring water as its water source. The Butte County Environmental
Health Division has determined that an approved water source for the replacement and expanded
dwelling is required. The majority of dwellings in the Jonesville Cabin Association use spring
water. If a well is required, and as more cabins are either replaced or expanded, there could be a
small impact to local groundwater levels. But do to the fact these dwellings are seasonal uses,
the impact is determined to be less than significant
This project would ultimately result in a small increase of new impervious surfaces due to the
increase in size of the replacement dwelling. There is a small potential for a minor increase in
surface water runoff due to the reduced absorption rate created from the impervious surfaces.
The cumulative effects of future enlargement of the existing dwellings within the project site
should be closely monitored to ensure no adverse drainage impacts to on-site swales.
The proposed project would not alter the existing drainage pattern of the area. No additional
grading will occur due to the replacement and expansion of the dwelling. The area of the proposed
project is located approximately 300 feet north of Jones Creek and would not result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off site.
Traffic
The project will not cause an increase in traffic since only a replacement of one existing dwelling
(cabin) is proposed. Also, the area is primarily a seasonal use, due to restricted access during the
winter months because of snow and the access road not being cleared. The road is closed by the
Butte County Public Works from January 1 to March 1, unless there is still snow on the ground
and the date is extended. The road is closed approximately 4.5 south of the Jonesville Cabin
Association.
Cultural
According to Butte County constraints mapping, the project site is located in an area considered
to have a high archaeological sensitivity. This mapping is general in nature and basis the
probability of archaeological significance on the physical characteristics and history of different
areas of the County. The location of the project is in an area that may have potential for
historical or cultural resources. Often such sites are found in foothill areas, rock outcroppings, or
areas overlooking deer migratory corridors. Even though the site does not contain the physical
features normally associated with high archaeological sensitivity, the proposed dwelling
replacement has the potential for undiscovered archaeological resources to be uncovered during
excavation activities.
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 4 ■
•
To mitigate the potential impact, the Planning Division would require that all construction
activities cease in such an instance. Ground disturbance would not resume until clearance is
provided by a qualified archaeologist.
ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions:
I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings:
A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act. Said study did identify the area to have a high archeological'
sensitivity; a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed.
B. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with comments received during the review process.
C. On the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the
Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Agenda Report and any comments
received, there is no substantial evidence that the Use Permit for Bruce and Sue
Miller, Planning Division File No. UP 03-12, will have a significant effect on the
environment.
D. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment
and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency.
E. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts, as
detailed in the Agenda Report dated June 12, 2003.
II. Adopt a "de minimis" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat.
The design of the proposed project improvements will not cause environmental damage
to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game
Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR 753.5 is not required. The project site is not known
to contain any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species
in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The project will not have a substantial
adverse effect on any riparian habitat; have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; interfere
substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species; conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources; or
conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan.
III. Approve Use Permit 03-12 for Bruce & Sue Miller, subject to the following findings and
the conditions in Exhibit "A":
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 5 0
A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed
use are in accordance with the purpose of this Ordinance, the purpose of the zone
in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development
policies and standards of the County because:
The project is in accordance with the purpose of the zone in which the land lies
and the Butte County General Plan because the project site is designated as
Timber Mountain. The Timber Mountain land use designation allows dwellings
uses as Secondary Uses. The Butte County Zoning Ordinance allows the
expansion of a nonconforming use upon approval of a Use Permit.
B. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use would
be compatible with, and would not adversely affect, or be detrimental to adjacent
uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration
given to:
1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density:
Although the replacementlexpansion is larger than current dwellings, the
overall scale, bulk, coverage, and density will not have a significantly
adverse affect on the area or be detrimental to surrounding dwellings.
2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities
The replacementlexpansion to the nonconforming dwelling unit would not
create a need for new public facilities, services, and utilities because
telephone and electrical services already extend to the project parcel. The
Butte County Fire Department requires compliance with standard
California Fire Safe Regulations, Public Resources Code 4290.
3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character:
The replacementlexpansion to the existing nonconforming dwelling would
be a change from the existing style original cabins, but it would be an
improved change for the older, rundown dwellings of the Jonesville Cabin
Association.
4. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or proposed
development:
The site is suited for the project because the property is of a sufficient size
to contain the modified nonconforming replacementlexpansion of the
dwelling unit, because the property does not contain any physical
constraints that would impact the dwelling.
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 6 ■
5. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use:
The Planning Division has circulated the proposed replacement/expansion
of the dwelling unit application to County agencies and has received
responses that indicated there is no evidence that the use, with
appropriate conditions, would cause any other relevant planning -related
impact.
C. Based on the above findings, the proposed location, size, design, and operating
characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be
operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
D. The replacement/expansion of the nonconforming dwelling unit will not conflict
with, impair or be detrimental to the uses both permitted and conditional of the
zone in which it is located and/or adjoins because:
The nonconforming dwelling unit has been on the property for
over 70 years and has not caused any significant impacts to
adjoining properties. The adjoining parcels have not significantly
impacted the users of the nonconforming dwelling units.
k:\projects\upc\miller\Miller UP PC Agenda Report.doc
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 7 ■
EXHIBIT A
USE PERMIT
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
0
DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.)
UP 03-12
PERMIT NO.
060-250-003
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special
conditions set forth below, Bruce and Sue Miller are hereby granted a Use Permit to
replace/expand a legal nonconforming dwelling (Cabin #21), located at 9533 Jones Creek Road,
Forest Ranch, which is part of the Jonesville Cabin Association, from 468 square feet to 1641
square feet on APN 060-250-003, subject to the following conditions:
Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of
application and issuance of Permit constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance,
including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65.
2. Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions
must be completed prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use.
The use granted by this permit must be established within two years of the date of
approval.
3. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development
Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written
request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification
shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the
application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved.
Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for
amendment.
4. If any use for which a Use Permit has been granted is not established within two years of
the receipt of the Permit by the Permittee, the Permit shall become null and void and
reapplication pursuant to Section 24-45 (of the Zoning Code) shall be required to
establish the use previously granted under the expired Permit unless, 30 days prior to the
expiration date, a request for a one-year extension is submitted to the Planning
Commission together with sufficient evidence that the time limits for processing
development permits under federal or State regulations require time limits which exceed
one year. Upon application, and for good cause by the Permittee, at a public hearing
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 8 0
• 0
pursuant to Section 24-45.25 above, the Planning Commission may extend any time
limitation previously made a part of any condition to a Use Permit.
5. The terms and conditions of this Permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon
and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the
Permittee.
6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally
omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged
material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development
Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute
sufficient grounds to revoke a Permit.
Conditions of Approval:
Planning Division:
1. Building permits are required. Prepare three (3) sets of construction plans and make an
application for permit. Construction shall comply with federal, state, and local
regulations. Plans shall be prepared, sealed, and signed by a California Licensed
Architect or Registered Engineer for non-residential buildings and certain residential
buildings.
2. Development fees for the proposed residential or non-residential improvements shall be
paid prior to the issuance of building permits. The fees shall be those in effect at time of
application, and shall include, but not be limited to, School Fees, Park and Recreation
District fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, Permit and Plan Check fees, and Fire
Protection Fees.
3. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances,
and regulations.
4. All outstanding application processing fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the Use
Permit.
Environmental Health Divisi
5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, apply and obtain a permit to install sewage
disposal system for proposed remodel.
6. Under County approval, remove old septic tank serving the dwelling unit (Cabin #21).
7. There must be an approved source of water for the new structure.
0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 9 0
Butte County Fire Department/CDF
8. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public
Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and
maintained continuously thereafter.
9. Construction, installation or development of structures or facilities on the parcels/lots
shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, (Public Resources Code
4290), and all other applicable State and County codes, ordinances and regulations in
effect at the time of application for improvement permits.
County Counsel
10. If this entire matter or any finding, action or condition of this matter is appealed to .the
Board of Supervisors, the applicant or any other developer/operator other than the
applicant agrees to indemnify the County of Butte from liability or loss related to the
approval of this project and agrees to sign an indemnification agreement in a form
approved by County Counsel before the Board's appeal hearing. If the application is not
appealed, this condition is deemed satisfied.
NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and
Health Department permits before starting construction, nor does it waive any other
requirements.
Butte County Planning Commission Chairman
cc: Land Development Division
Environmental Health Division
Animal Control Division
Fire Department/CDF, Assessor
■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 PAGE 10 0
1. Vicinity Map I
Project Location
Buft
Mwdows
Snag
Jr
wi
/*
Phlbmk
. . . ... .......
LIP 03-12
060-203
IPA I LLE Ft
U
CP
K",
TPZ-160
U
BUTTE
MEADO
TPZ-160
4 r---- - -
U
TPZ-160
TPZ-160 A
U
%1N
On
TM-alpa%f
TPZ-1(
MW 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000
18000 Feet
BUTTE'COUNTY PLANNING CONMUSSION
N
Applicant: Brum & Sue Nfillff
Owner: Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc.
Hearing Date: June 12, 2003 @ 9:00 am.
EAsting Zone: U (Unclassified)
Supervisorial
Request: use Permit to replace a preexisting legal non -conforming structure (cabin) with a new, larger cabin.
District # 3
1 Assessor Parcel No: 060-250-003
Me: Up 03-12
� �rI
0
g;�ISqT '14f
FL
,COM..
•. � Meq R�_ �r`"�.1�
1 t7�
OOP-SqT
oni ,�1srr�+U nidti7 �IIi re3rwL :t-111rrU z slliAJf ,uC .arn£! :3ur.�ilgcll,
(boilimAxi'J) U ;efl(kx pnitziis rr.s 00:0 ,; WOL c! u:,uL :etr;O gni-itofi
!tt'rrozi�n��u? -
f -t 1mi2ia nidv)%P;rr..r ;Hm c (nidL ;,nd:.uvx Ut:ilmolrcou-tion t; o1 tian-A wu :)a,�up,3Si
SJ -Eo (IrJ :AR UOO-OU-Udo :u% b!)-le'i-rot?!)dOA
N
Q.
,,,� f•MILLER pass, rr�C,
"'****24 MOOR EMERGENCY�, .
'**RESIDENT?AL***COMMER SERVICE*****
STATE CONTRACTORS LICENSE #424495 E* *
CHICO
744 CHERRY Sr,
CHICO, CA. 95928
PH: (530) 343-7934
FX: (530) 343-0141
PARADISE
5999 ASTER RD
PARADISE, CA, 95969
PH: (530) 877-9300
FX: (530) 877-5712
DATE: ,., v _ 03
NO OF PA
GES:
FAX.
FROM: An ma Mins..
REF:
REMARKS;
to *J SLZS 202 0£S
ORLAIVD
116 WALKER Sr.
ORLAND, CA. 95963
PH: (530) 865,9839
FX: (530) 865-5299
Oki sswin 21311 I W W" f £ : 60 £00Z-OZ-Avw
Project: Butte County, File # *12
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
BUTTE COUNTY
INITIAL STUDY AND
PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FOR
UP 03-12 (Miller)
f
Project: Butte County, File # *12
COUNTY OF BUTTE
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY FOR
UP 03-12 (Miller)
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
A. Applicant/Owner: Bruce & Sue Miller
B. Representative: Same
C. Engineer: NA
D. Staff Contact: Mark Michelena (530) 538-7376
E. Proiect Name: Miller (UP 03-12)
F. Proiect Location: On the west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from the intersection
of Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road, at 9533 Jones Creek Road,
Forest Ranch
G. Type of Application(s): Use Permit
H. Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 060-250-003
I. Proiect Site Size: 90 acres +/- (portion of)
J. Current Zoning: U (Unclassified)
K. General Plan Designation: TM (Timber Mountain)
L Environmental Setting: The project site is part of the existing Jonesville Cabin Association which includes 47
individually owned cabins, a hotel and a barn.
M. Surrounding Land Uses: The project site is part of the Jonesville Cabin Association. The association includes
47 cabins on approximately 90 acres. Land to the north, west, east and southeast vacant and owned by the
Federal Government.
N. Proiect Description: This is a Use Permit application for replacement and expansion of a legal
nonconforming dwelling (cabin). The existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with a new, larger
cabin. The parcel currently has a General Plan designation of Timber Mountain and is zoned U
(Unclassified).
O. Public Agency Approvals: Butte County Environmental Health Department, Butte County Public Works
Department, Butte County Development Services Director, Air Quality Management District, California
Department of Forestry, PG&E, and LAFCo.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 1 ■
Project: Butte County, File # R-12
2.0 DETERNIINATION
[ ] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[X] I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will
NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project
proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[ ] I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
[ ] I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless
mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,
but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
[ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier 'EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed
upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
1&k&/Az" tea,- 03
Prepared by: Mark Michelena, Associate Planner Date
( �j, - f n", -,/, ?�� /
S
Reviewed by: Joseph W. Baker, Planning Manager Date
3.0 POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS CHECKLIST SETTING
A. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected:
The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact
that is a "Potentially Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
[ ] 4.1 Aesthetics [ ] 4.2 Agriculture Resources [ ] 4.3 Air Quality
[ ] 4.4 Biological Resources [X] 4.5 Cultural Resources [ ] 4.6 Geologic Processes
[ ] 4.7 Hazards/Hazardous Material [ ] 4.8 Hydrology/Water Quality [ ] 4.9 Land Use
[ ] 4.10 Mineral Resources [ ] 4.11 Noise [ ] 4.12 Housing
[ ] 4.13 Public Services [ ] 4.14 Recreation [ ] 4.15 Transportation/Traffic
[ ] 4.16 Utilities/Service Systems [X] 4.17 Mandatory Findings of Significance
B. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by
the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact'
answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not
apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact'
answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards, (e.g.,
the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a project -specific screening analysis.)
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 2 ■
Project: Butte County, File # U0-12
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative
as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, and then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impactis potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or
less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an
effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the
determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation
of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less Than
Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they
reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, `Earlier Analyses,"
may be cross-referenced).
5) "Reviewed Under Previous Document." Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program
EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative
declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis -Used: Identify and state where they are available for review
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and
state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
C) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier
document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential
impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document
should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals
contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 3 ■
Project: Butte County, File # A-12
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
4.1 AESTHETICNISUAL RESOURCES:
0
Would the
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Reviewed
proposal:
P P
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
X
b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
X
within a state scenic highway?
c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
X
d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
X
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
X
area?
X
Impact Discussion:
The site is not located within a State or County designated scenic highway. The project is not anticipated to create any
significant sources of new light or glare. This project will not affect a scenic vista nor will it have a demonstrable
negative aesthetic effect. The proposed larger dwelling is replacing an existing dwelling and will not remove any
existing trees or native vegetation or degrade the existing visual character of the site.
Mitiiation Measure: None required
4.2 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:
Would the
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Reviewed
proposal:
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous .
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
X
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act Contract?
X
c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion
X
of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 4 ■
Project: Butte County, File # *12
Impact Discussion:
n
U
The project site is not used for any agricultural uses. The site has a Soil Classification of VI which is determined to
severe limitations for agricultural production. There is no Williamson Act contract affecting this property. No impact
is anticipated to agricultural resources as a result of this Use Permit.
Mitigation Measure: None required
4.3 AIR QUALITY:
Would the
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Reviewed
proposal:
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable
air qualityplan?
X
b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
X
c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
X
quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
X
e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people?
X
Impact Discussion:
Both the California Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency have established air pollution
standards in an effort to protect human health and welfare. Geographic areas are designated "attainment" if these
standards are met and "non -attainment" if they are not met. In addition, each agency has several levels of
classifications based on severity of the problem. The project is located within the Sacramento Valley Air District.
According to the Butte County Air Quality Management District (BCAQMD), Butte County and all northern Sacramento
Valley Air Districts have been designated as "moderate" non -attainment areas for the state standards for ozone (03) and
fine particulate matter (PMio). Currently, Butte County is in attainment for all the federal (less stringent) air quality
standards.
There is no anticipated increase in vehicle traffic generated by the proposed project which in turn would not result in
any additional impacts on air quality. The proposed is project is for an expansion of an existing dwelling (cabin).
Therefore the project is well below the 97 -lot threshold established by the Butte County Air Quality Management
District for determining the need for additional air-quality analysis (1997 Air Quality Attainment Plan).
The creation of fugitive dust emission during site development activities, such as grading, excavation for foundations
and utilities, and other soil work will be less than significant and not require mitigation.
Mitigation Measure: None required
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 5 ■
Project: Butte County, File # *12
4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES:
•
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Significant
No
Impact
Reviewed
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
X
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the
X
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 or the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
X
etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means)?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish and wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
X
or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources such as a tree preservation policy
X
ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan,
or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
X
conservationplan?
g. A reduction in the numbers, a restriction in the range, or an
impact to the critical habitat of any unique, rare, threatened,
X
or endangered species of animals?
h. A reduction in the diversity or numbers of animals, onsite
(including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish or
X
invertebrates)?
i. A deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat (for
foraging, breeding, roosting, nesting, etc.)?
X
j. Introduction of barriers to movement of any resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species?
X
k. Introduction of any factors (light, fencing, noise, human
presence and/or domestic animals) which could hinder the
X
normal activities of wildlife?
Impact Discussion:
The project site vegetation consists of Yellow Pine forest and grasslands. Jones Creek traverses the property in a
northeast to southwest direction approximately320 feet south of the project site.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 6 ■
Project: Butte County, File # *12
Although pines are not an endangered species and are not protected by local ordinance, efforts should be made to
ensure that projects protect of pine trees. The proposed development is a replacement of an existing and no proposed
trees are to be removed, therefore no impacts are anticipated.
The project site is located within a deer herd area (development permitted) summer range for the East Tehama Deer
Herd. The use permit is for a replacement dwelling, which shall not pose any additional impacts to the deer herd area.
The property includes Jones Creek running east to west. The replacement dwelling is well over 200 feet away and will
have no direct effect on the creek.
The project is not known to be inhabited or provide habitat for any rare, endangered animal or plant species (Butte
County Master Environmental Assessment, Figure Bio -2).
Because the project would not have an impact to fish and/or wildlife habitat the Department of Fish and Game fees
pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR 753.5 are not required.
The proposal would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree
preservation policy ordinance.
The proposal would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.
There will be no additional factors that could hinder normal activities of wildlife. No additional human presence or impact
will be created by the Use Permit.
Mitigation Measure: None required
4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES:
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Reviewed
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
a historical resource as defined in §15064.5?
X
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
X
c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
X
d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
X
Impact Discussion:
Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites; historical features, such as rock walls,
water ditches and flumes, and cemeteries; and architectural features. Cultural resources consist of any human -made
site, object (i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past. There does not appear to be any historical or
culture resources in the proposed development area.
According to Butte County constraints mapping, the project site is located in an area considered to have a high
archaeological sensitivity. This mapping is general in nature and basis the probability of archaeological significance
on the physical characteristics and history of different areas of the County. The location of the project is in an area
that may have potential for historical or cultural resources. Often such sites are found in foothill areas, rock
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 7 ■
Project: Butte County, File # R-12
•
outcroppings, or areas overlooking deer migratory corridors. Even though the site has a high archaeological
sensitivity, the site does not contain the physical features. Therefore, the proposed dwelling replacement has the
potential for undiscovered archaeological resources to be uncovered during excavation activities.
Staff recommends that a mitigation measure be included that would require that all construction activities cease in
such an instance. Ground disturbance would not resume until clearance is provided by a qualified archaeologist.
Mitigation Measure #1:
Include a condition in the Use Permit stating: "Should any archaeological artifacts be discovered during construction or
excavation, the Planning Division shall be notified immediately, and all work shall cease until a qualified archaeologist has
examined the artifacts and the site and submitted his or her findings to the Planning Division, and recommended clearance
to continue. Recommencement of construction shall be upon the approval of the Planning Division."
Plan Requirements: The required note shall be as a condition in the Use Permit.
Timing: Ongoing throughout the earthwork phase of the development of the site.
Monitoring: Department of Development Services shall check plans prior to approval and shall spot check in the
field. Additional monitoring shall be on an incident basis. State Law requires the reporting of any human remains or
artifacts.
4.6 GEOLOGIC PROCESSES:
Would the
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Reviewed
proposal:
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated
X
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and
Geology Special Publication 42.
2. Strong seismic ground shaking?
X
3. Seismic -related ground failure, including
X
liquefaction?
4. Landslides?
X
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
X
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that
would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
X
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of
the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
risks to life or property?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system
where sewers are not available for the disposal or waste
X
water?
Impact Discussion:
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 8 ■
Project: Butte County, File # *12 is
The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate
Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone or an after. shock
epicenter region. The nearest active fault, the Cleveland Hill fault, is located approximately 28 miles to the south of
the site. The site is also located approximately 26.4 miles north of the Big Bend Fault, 11.3 miles west of the Rich
Bar Fault, and 12.9 miles west of the Melones Fault.
The intensity of ground shaking at any specific site depends on the characteristics of the earthquake, the distance from
the earthquake, and on the local geologic soils and conditions. At present, there is insufficient data to predict
accurately the expected ground motions at various locations in Butte County. However, strong seismic ground
shaking is closely related to the proximity of active fault lines. With the site being approximately 28 miles from the
only known active fault in the County, ground shaking and resultant building damage would not be a significant
concern because the Uniform Building Code contains standards to address this seismic potential.
Seismic risk is not limited to faults which have been currently identified. Some earthquakes originate from unknown
sources sometimes characterized as "background seismicity" or "floating earthquakes". The Butte County Master
Environmental Assessment indicates that it is reasonable to assume that background seismicity could produce
earthquakes as large as Richter magnitude (modified Mercalli intensity scale) 6.5 virtually anywhere in Butte County.
There is no current evidence that an earthquake larger than magnitude 6.5 would occur at this location. Earthquakes at
this magnitude are generally felt by all persons, but damage is generally slight to minor, with fallen chimneys and
cracked plaster the most prominent damage. Richter magnitude 6.5 is not subjectively characterized on the intensity
scale, but a magnitude 7 is generally characterized by negligible damage, especially in buildings of good design and
construction. Considerable damage can occur in poorly built or badly designed structures. However, the impact
would be less than significant due to compliance with the Uniform Building Code.
The Butte County Seismic Safety Element's Liquefaction Potential Map indicates that the site has a generally low
potential for liquefaction. The impact would be less than significant.
The Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that
there is moderate potential for landslides in this area.
The Erosion Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that the soil erosion
potential for the project site is moderate. The site, has a gradual slope from northeast to south west, is not subject to
significant erosion, due to the combination of existing vegetation and the relatively level property. The area does have
high rainfall intensity (75-80 inches/year). The elevation of the site is over 5,000 feet and during the winter months.
In addition, it is expected that a very small amount of the site would be disrupted for residential improvements.
The Butte County Environmental Health Department does not object to the use of septic systems on the property.
Septic systems installed- on the site are required to comply with the County Improvement Standards. No impact is
anticipated.
Mitigation Measure: None required
4.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Reviewed
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environmental through the routine transport use, or disposal
X
of hazardous materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into
X
the environment?
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 9 ■
Project: Butte County, File # A-12
i
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Significant
No
Impact
Reviewed
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
X
quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
X
significant hazard to the public or the environment?
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of
a public airport or public use airport, would the project
X
result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would
the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
X
working in the project area?
g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation
X
plan?
h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
X
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Impact Discussion:
The project site is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials and would not create any hazardous
materials. No impact is anticipated. The proposed dwelling will not emit hazardous emissions or deal with hazardous
substances or waste. Also, the project site is not within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.
The property is not located within the vicinity of an airport, airport land -use plan, or private airstrip, and does not
interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact would occur.
The project is not located within a State Response Area for wildland fires and construction of the replacement would
not increase the difficulty of fighting potential wildfires. The nearest fire station is Butte Meadows Volunteer Station
# 10, located approximately 4.8 miles southwest.
The Butte County Fire Department/CDF is requiring the replacement dwelling to comply with the latest California
Fire Safe Regulations (Public Resources Code 4290).
Mitigation Measure: None required
4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY:
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Significant
No
Impact
Reviewed
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
X
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 10 ■
Project: Butte County, File # #12
•
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Significant
No
Impact
Reviewed
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of
X
preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would
not support existing land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in
X
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount
X
of surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or off-site?
e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted
X
runoff?
f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
X
g. Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
X
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h. Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which
would impede or redirect flood flows?
X
i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss,
injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
X
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
X
Impact Discussion:
All wastewater generated by the replacement dwellings on the site would be handled by individual, on-site septic
systems. The Butte County Environmental Health Division will require a permitted waste water disposal system and
approval of the destruction of the old tank.
The current dwelling uses spring water as its water source. The Butte County Environmental Health Division has
determined that an approved water source for the replacement and expanded dwelling. The majority of dwellings *in
the Jonesville Cabin Association use spring water. If a well is required, and as more cabins either expand or use well
water, there could be a small impact to local groundwater levels. But do to the fact these dwellings are seasonal uses,
the impact is determined to be less than significant
This project would ultimately result in a small increase of new impervious surfaces due to the increase in size of the
replacement dwelling. There is a small potential for a minor increase in surface water runoff due to the reduced
absorption rate created from the impervious surfaces. The cumulative effects of future enlargement of the existing
dwellings within the project site should be closely monitored to ensure no adverse drainage impacts to on-site swales.
The proposed project would not alter the existing drainage pattern of the area. No additional grading will occur due to the
replacement and expansion of the dwelling. The area of the proposed project is located approximately 300 feet north of
Jones Creek and would not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off site.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 11 ■
Project: Butte County, File # A-12
•
The project area is not located within a flood zone or prone to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact would occur
with respect to these natural hazards. The replacement and expansion of the existing dwelling would not be placed in
a 100 -year flood hazard area, nor would the project expose people or the structure to significant risk or loss due to
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam.
Mitigation Measure: None required.
4.9 LAND USE:
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Reviewed
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
Incorporated
a. Physically divide an established community?
X
b. Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan,
X
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan?
X
Impact Discussion:
The current established community is a 47 cabin association, primarily used during the late spring, summer and fall
seasons. The proposed project is to replace an existing dwelling. While the new dwelling will be larger in size,
approximately three times the existing size, it will not divide the established community. The property is currently
zoned U (Unclassified).
The General Plan Designation for the site is Timber Mountain (TM) which allows primary uses of agriculture and one
single family dwelling at rural densities. The U -Zone (Unclassified) also allows only one single family dwelling per
parcel. The current use (dwelling) is considered a legal nonconforming use of the land. The project does not conflict
with these and other applicable land use plans, policies or regulations. Under Section 24-35.20, any nonconforming
use may be changed to another nonconforming use, expanded, enlarged, extended, reconstructed, or structurally
altered upon obtaining a use permit from the Planning Commission.
The property is not within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact would
occur.
Mitigation Measure: None required
4.10 MINERAL RESOURCES:
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Significant
No
Impact
Reviewed
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
X
residents of the state?
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 12 ■
Project: Butte County, File # U91-12
•
Would the
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Reviewed
proposal:
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
Incorporated
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important
X
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general
X
plan, specific plan, or other land useplan?
Impact Discussion:
The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to known
mineral resource areas. The project is located within an area where there are no known mineral resources. Therefore,
the project would have no impact on mineral resources.
Mitigation Measure: None required
4.11 NOISE:
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Significant
No
Impact
Reviewed
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan or
X
noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground
borne vibration or ground bome noise levels?
X
c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in
the project vicinity above levels existing without the
X
project?
d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
X
without theproject?
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or public use airport, would the project
X
expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
L For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working in
X
the project area to excessive noise levels?
Impact Discussion:
Since the proposal is for a replacement of an existing dwelling, the only noise impact would be during the removal of the
existing dwelling and construction of the replacement dwelling. The increase in noise will be for a short period of time and
will not generate substantial increase in noise levels..
The project is not located in the vicinity of an airstrip or within an airport land use plan. No impact would occur.
Mitigation Measure: None required
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 13 ■
Project: Butte County, File # U9-12
4.12 HOUSING:
•
Would the
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Reviewed
proposal:
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of
X
roads or other infrastructure?
X
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
X
elsewhere?
c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
X
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
X
Impact Discussion:
The proposal is for a replacement and expansion of an existing dwelling (cabin). It will not induce any additional new
dwellings in the area. The project would not displace individuals or housing. No impact would occur.
Mitigation Measure: None required.
4.13 PUBLIC SERVICES:
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Reviewed
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of which
X
could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other
erformance objectives for any of the public services?
b. Fireprotection?
X
c. Police Protection?
X
d. Schools?
X
e. Parks?
X
f. Other public services?
X
Impact Discussion:
The proposed replacement and expansion of the existing dwelling (cabin) would not have any effect on public
services. The site is generally used during the summer months. No additional dwellings are being proposed so there
will be no additional demands on public services. The site is not located in high fire hazard area designated by the
Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan and is not within a State Response for fire protection. The Butte
County Fire Department/California Department of Forestry requires the new dwelling shall comply with Public
Resources Code 4290.
No significant impact is anticipated to other public services.
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 14 ■
Project: Butte County, File # U9-12
Mitieation Measure: None required
4.14 RECREATION:
E
Would the
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Reviewed
proposal:
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
X
accelerated?
b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which might have an
X
adverse physical effect on the environment?
X
Impact Discussion:
The proposed use is for replacement and expansion of an existing dwelling (cabin). It is part of the Jonesville Cabin
Association and is used primarily during late spring, summer and fall. There would be no impact to existing area
parks or recreation facilities.
Mitigation Measure: None required
4.15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC:
Would the
.Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Reviewed
proposal:
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation
to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system
(i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of
X
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or
congestion at intersections)?
b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
X
management agency for designated roads or highways?
c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results
X
in substantial safety risks?
d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
X
uses e.g., farm equipment)?
e. Result in inadequate emergency access?
X
L Result in inadequate parking capacity?
X
g. Conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
X
bicycle racks)?
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 15 ■
Project: Butte County, File # #12
Impact Discussion:
0
The project will not cause an increase in traffic since only a replacement of one existing dwelling (cabin) is proposed.
Also, the area is primarily a seasonal use, due to restricted access during the winter months because of snow and the
access road not being cleared. The road is closed by the Butte County Public Works from January 1 to March 1,
unless there is still snow on the ground and the date is extended. The road is closed approximately 4.5 south of the
Jonesville Cabin Association.
The project area is not near any airports and would not result in a change in air traffic patterns, or increase traffic
levels that could result in substantial safety risks.
There is no additional required parking since the proposal is for only a replacement of an existing dwelling. There will
be no change in emergency access. As stated before, the nearest fire station (volunteer) is located approximately 4.8
miles southwest of the site.
This proposed project does not conflict with accepted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative
transportation.
Mitieation Measure: None required
4.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS:
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Significant
No
Impact
Reviewed
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
X
b. Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
X
environmental effects?
c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
X
environmental effects?
d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
X
new or expanded entitlements needed?
e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand
X
in addition to theprovider's existing commitments?
f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity
to accommodate theproject's solid waste disposal needs?
X
g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
X
Impact Discussion:
Sewage disposal for replacement dwelling on the project site would be handled by individual on-site septic system.
The Butte County Division of Environmental Health has reviewed the project and determined that the new structure
must have a permitted waste water disposal system and approval of the destruction of the old tank.
■ Butte County Department of Development,Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 16 ■
Project: Butte County, File # UP -12
Domestic water supply for new dwellings on the site would be obtained from on-site wells. The Butte County
Division of Environmental Health has there must be an approved water source for the replacement dwelling. The
proposed replacement dwelling will be using the existing well that serves the current dwelling. The project would not
have an impact on any water treatment facilities.
No additional storm water facilities would be necessary as a result of this project due to the dwelling being a
replacement for an existing dwelling and only a minimal amount of new impervious surfaces will be created.
The project would not increase the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill. According to the Butte
County Public Works Department, the Neal Road Landfill is expected to reach maximum holding capacity by the year
2018. The project would not have a significant impact on solid waste disposal.
No impact would occur with respect to federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste.
Mitigation Measure: None required
4.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (Section 15065):
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Significant
No
Impact
Reviewed
Under
Impact
with
Impact
Previous
Mitigation
Document
Incorporated
a. Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict
X
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
X
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects and the effects of probable future projects)?
c. Does the project have environmental effects which would
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
X
directly or indirectly?
Impact Discussion:
The project impacts are both individually and cumulatively limited with respect to Initial Study Checklist Item 4.5
Cultural Resources. Impacts to this area would be mitigated by the inclusion of Mitigation Measures #1, as itemized
under Section 5 — Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Requirements.
5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS:
Mitigation Measure #1:
Include a condition in the Use Permit stating: "Should any archaeological artifacts be discovered during construction or
excavation, the Planning Division shall be notified immediately, and all work shall cease until a qualified archaeologist has
examined the artifacts and the site and submitted his or her findings to the Planning Division, and recommended clearance
to continue. Recommencement of construction shall be upon the approval of the Planning Division."
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 17 ■
Project: Butte County, File # U030-12
•
Plan Requirements: The required note shall be as a condition in the Use Permit.
Timing: Ongoing throughout the earthwork phase of the development of the site.
Monitoring: Department of Development Services shall check plans prior to approval and shall spot check in the
field. Additional monitoring shall be on an incident basis. State Law requires the reporting of any human remains or
artifacts.
ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL:
1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element.
Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977.
2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville,
CA: CH2M Hill, 1977.
3. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1, Safety Element.
Oroville, CA C112M Hill, 1977.
4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: C142M
Hill, 1977.
5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M
Hill, 1977.
6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV -1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA:
CH2M Hill, 1977.
7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA:
CH2M Hill, 1977.
8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4 Safety Element Oroville, CA:
CH2M Hill, 1977.
9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Mai). Oroville, CA: James P. Manning,
1983.
10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Map. Oroville, CA.
12. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
1989 and 2000.
13. USGS Quad Maps.
14. Soil Map, Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture.
15. Soil Survey of Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture.
16. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map Butte
County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989.
7.0 CONSULTED AGENCIES:
[X]
Environmental Health [X]
Public Works
[ ] Building Manager
[ ]
BCAG [ ]
ALUC
[X] LAFCo
[ ]
Air Qual. Management Dist. [ ]
City of Chico
[ ] City of Biggs
[ ]
City of Gridley [ ]
City of Oroville
[ ] Town of Paradise
[X]
CA Department of Forestry [ ]
CalTrans (Traffic)
[ ] Central Reg. Water Quality
[ ]
Department of Conservation [ ]
CA Dept. of Fish and Game
[ ] Highway Patrol
[ ]
Army Corps of Engineers [ ]
US Fish & Wldlife Service
[ ] Agricultural Commissioner
[ ]
Butte Co. Farm Bureau [ ]
Oroville Unified School Dist.
[ ] Feather River Rec. Dist.
[ ]
El Medio Fire Dept. [ ]
OWID
[ ] LOAPUD
[X]
PG&E [ ]
Pacific Bell
[ ] Palermo Union School Dist.
[X]
County Counsel [X]
County Assessor
K:\PROJECTS\UPC\Miller.03-12\Miller IS.doc
■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 18 ■
0
Project: Butte County, File N UP 03-11
PROJECT SPONSOR(S) INCORPORATION OF MITIGATION INTO
PROPOSED PROJECT:
I/We have reviewed the Initial Study for the Miller Use Permit, removal and replacement of a legal
nonconforming dwelling (APN # 060.250-003 portion,) application and particularly the mitigation
measure identified herein. I/We hereby mods the application on file with the Butte County
Planning Department to include and incorporate all mitigations set forth in this Initial Study.
Ste- 0.3
�Brucc �84SUC Miller/Project Applicant Date
/Project Agent Date
Butte County Department of Development Services • Planning Division ■ Page 19 a
ZO-d SIZS £b£ 0£S 31,1I ssVin M311IW W" 1£:60 £0OZ-0Z-AVW
Sent By: Daniel V. Blackstock; 530 345 3871; Jun -4-03 12:47PM; Page 1/3
DAMEL V. BLACKWMW Ilei MmohesterRoM Phone: U"42r1221
Aftnwy at 1AW Chlor. CA 95M PAR: 390.45.3871 UM
/k r
To: ri ay r'C — r4gft ••
®Fax:
From: Danjill V. 81arJlatoris
Date:D ._.
Time:
Pages: .3_� including this cover page, from fax C --
number 530.345.3871. Should you not receive the above
noted pages, please contact us at 530342.1221. Thank
YOU.
IMPORTANT NOTICE This message is confidential, may be subject to an attomoy-eUent privilege,
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. TMs moss&=@ Is Intanded only for the ase of ft
indMdual or entity In whom er 101111th it is addressed. M You soler that Communication'horror,
please notify us immsdivioly by tslegbon@. end Please return dw original message to us at no above
address via mall/pest. It the reader of We message is not the Untended feeipient. or the employee
or agent responsible for delivering We message to dw int@nded recipient, YOU are hereby notified
that any dlsseminaUon, distribution or coprlas of this co nmuakeuon and &syr att@chm@@ts hereto is
stfttty proMbited. Thank YOU.
Sent By: Daniel V. Blackstock; 530 345 3871; Jun -4-03 12:48PM;
JONEMLLE CABIN OWNERS, INC -
2002 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
STEVE CROWSON, (Nancy) PRESIDENT
Home: (530) 345-6934 9460 Dillon Ct, Durham 95938
Cabin: No Phone 9445 Jones Creek Rd
FAX: e-mail:
JIM EDWARDS, (Carolyn)
Hoche:
(530) 342-1962
Cabin:
(530) 873-3080
FAX:
(530) 891-1931
ERMA OltIL+NDORFF
Home:
(530) 342-8615
Cabin:
(530) 873-3046
FAX:
BARBARA MAGGI
Home: (530) 342-2476
Cabin: No Phone
FAX : (530) 894-2554
SHARON GORE, (Pat)
Horne: (530) 343-0568
Cabin: (530) 873-0815
FAX : (530) 894-7562
OLIVIA BAKER, (Ben)
home: (530) 438-2679
Cabin: (530) 873-4407
FAX:
VICE PRESIDENT
1251 Oro -Chico Hwy, Durham 95939
9057 Shake Mill Rd
TREASURER
365 E. Sacramento Ave, Chico 95926
9495 Jones Creek Rd
e-mail:
RECORDINGSFsCUTARY
10508 Fimple Rd, Chico 95928
9564 Jones Creek Rd
e-mail: bgmaggi@aol.com
CURRFSPONDIIVG SECR67ARY
POB 28, Durham, CA 95938
9021 Shake Mill Rd
e-mail: PandSOore@thegrid.nct
POB 661, Maxwell 95955
9091 Shake Mill ltd
e-mail:
BOB BERGER, (Becky)
Home: (530) 893-3430 13 t.aguna Ct, Chico 95928
Cabin: (530) 873-5212 9073 Blueberry Meadow Lal
FAX: e-mail:
Page 2/3
Sent By: Daniel V. Blackstock;
4,
530 345 3871;
Jun -4-03 12:48PM;
DAN BLACKSTOCK, Met.'y)
Home:
(530) 342-1221
1181 Mmcbester Rd, Chico 95926
Cabin:
(530) 8735076
9446 Jones Creek Rd
FAX:
a -mail. _.
JACK BROWN
How:
(530) 873-9531
14183 Creston Rd., Map& 95954
Cabin:
(530) 873-1107
9232 Mckey Trail
FAX:
C -mail:
AL CROWSON (Velma)
Home: (530) 342-4934
Cabin: (530) 873-0496
FAX .
LYNN ROHWER (Claude)
Home: (530) 758-5944
Cabin: (530) 873-6806
FAX:
2703 Monterey St, Chico 95973
9461 Jones Creek Rd
e-mail:
27276 Meadowbmok Dr, Davis 95616
9124 Meadow Edge Trail
e-mail: Rohwer2@aol.com
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: JCO, Inc. Bylaws addition 8/31/97
ARTICLE 111 Directors, .Section 3.1 S Executive Committee Compoxition The
executive committee shall include the President, Treasurer, Recording Secretary and
two members -at -large elected by the board of directors from among Its members.
The president ,shall be the chair of the executive committee.
President, STEVE CROWSON, CbRi mam
Treasurer, ERMA ORENDORFF
Recording Secretary, BARBARA MAWI
Member -at -large, BOB BERGER
Member -at -large, JACK BROWN
Page 3/3
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AND
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be
held on June 12, 2003, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration
Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at 9:00 a.m. regarding the following item
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been
prepared for the following project:
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/ USE PERMIT
A. Bruce and Sue Miller, Use Permit to allow for replacement and expansion of a legal
nonconforming dwelling (cabin). The existing cabin will be demolished and replaced
with a new, larger cabin. The parcel is zoned "U" (Unclassified) and currently has a
General Plan designation of Timber Mountain and is zoned U (Unclassified). The
property is located on the west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile
from the intersection of Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of
Humboldt Road, at 9533 Jones Creek Road, Forest Ranch. APN 060-250-003 (MM)
(UP 03-12)
NEGATIVE DECLARATION/USE PERMIT
B. Darren Chapla, Use•Permit for an expansion of an existing kennel for 20 to 35 dogs on
property zoned "A-160" (Agricultural — 160 acre parcels). The property is located on the
west side of Cana Pine Creek Road, approximately 1 mile north of Broyles Road, at
15593 Cana Pine Creek Road, Chico. APN 047-060-056 (MM) (UP 03-08)
The initial study for the project identifies potentially significant effects, but revisions in the
project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. Therefore,
Planning Division staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project are on file
for public review starting, May 22, 2003, through June 11, 2003, at the Butte County Planning
Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California and the Butte County Chico Library, 1108
Sherman Avenue, Chico, California. All interested persons are invited to review the document.
Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address.
If you challenge either the Mitigated Negative Declaration or the Use Permit in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone, else raised at the public hearing described
in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
0 10
For further information regarding this project, please contact Mark Markelena, project planner, at
the Butte County Planning Division at (530) 538-7376.
YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Thursday, May 22, 2003
+r s
AP 060-250-003,
Bruce Miller
UP 03-12
0 w wa..- �Jwol
Mailing List Distribution
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
7 County Center Drive LAFCo
Oroville, CA 95965-3397
Telephone: (530) 538-7601 pip g
FAX: (530) 538-7785 LIAR 9 3 2003
TO: LAFCo
FROM: Mark Michelena, Butte County Planning Division
SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application - BUTTE
APPLICANT: Bruce and Sue Miller, Use Permit - UP 03-12 COUNTY
APN: 060-250-003 APR v 3 2003
DATE: March 11, 2003
DEVELOP1yyENT
The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This applsn io' Weing
provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness
of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your
agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for expansion of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin).
Existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with a new, larger cabin.
PROJECT LOCATION: on the west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from
the intersection of Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road,
at 9533 Jones Creek Road, Forest Ranch
County Supervisor District No: 5
ZONING: U (Unclassified)
GENERAL PLAN: TM (Timber Mountain)
If a response cannot be submitted prior to May 25, 2003, please call Mark Michelena at (530)
538-7376. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank
you for your attention to this matter.
A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for May 8, 2003 before the:
Fx—]Planning Commission
F-1 Development Review Committee
COMMENTS: (Please be specific. Letters or additional comments may be attached):
µ. B-Nt (.l/.toe
s_ csa IGy
By: S71 -eve C e4j Date: 1 h 7/,,.7
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION
APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on page 2 S rnc" Ij der
APPLICANT'S NAME: (If application is different from owner an affidavit is required.)
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:
c
ADDRESS: STREET, CITY, STATE, & ZIP CODE FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE)
NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) TELEPHONE:
53� �
LOC ON OF PROJECT (Major cross streets and Address, if any)
GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED
OWNER'S NAME:
TELEPHONE:
(� )���- �a�►
--
ADDRESS: J eS fee% <eSiTYI\C � ZI DEq Sq q
ZONE
GENERAL PLAN
EXISTING LAND USE
SITE SIZE (in Square Feet or Acres)
EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet)
PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet)
1
(Check One)
(Check One)
❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED
❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER
PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC
PROPERTY 1S OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER
APPLICATION REQUESTED .
❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
❑ REZONE ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
USE PERMIT BUTTE ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP
COUNTY
❑ MINOR USE PERMIT ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION
❑ VARIANCE MAR 0 6 2003 ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION
❑ MINOR VARIANCE DEVELOPMENT ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER
❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT SERVICES ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN
❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ OTHER
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and size
of parcels.)
�non
l
OWNER CERTIFICATION.
I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY.
FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
ACCURATE' (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.)
DATE: A, I L � SIGNATURE: �
i
K:\FORMS\UNIFORM APPLICATION
Page I of 2
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
TO: Butte County, Department of Development Services:
1 p� k t:)OQ M I I )" -- Phone Number (5.jd) gq 1 - S -
Print Name
qySl Com. Gs93(2)
Mailing Address
is hereby authorized to process the application for
on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number:
APN# O�oC - D -SO - 0 C11,
This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents
necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest.
Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name)
Print Name Print Name
Signature5-19—nature
Architect and/or Engineer:
Phone Number
Print Name of Architect/Engineer
Mailing Address
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Verify:
Date Received: �� �(�: �()� Total Amount Received: l �� . CO
AP Number(s) .- Legal Description
Er—o-wners Authorization []'Zoning Requirements
0 Project Description �Q-Copies of plot plan
Taken by: PA ika' � Y14 ( C HL.`Ze_ r,;,+ Receipt No. j 1 G 1 C
PW/LD Plan E.H. CDF t4'3r NOD/NOEFees 3
Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon
final action.
Current fee for this application is as of
Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer".
K:IPORMS,,UNIFORM APPLICATION
Page 2 of 2
!
COUNTY OF BUTTE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To be completed By Project Applicant)
Date Filed
GENERAL INFORMATION: Q
1 . Name and address. of owner, and/or de eloper, and/or project sponsor: VJ(11C� `S �� e ')n
' I,
y 5 1 \id nP s Fh)_e ,1 < h c- ,.
G� 3 3 .J manes c c aS 1 q,)
2. Address of project: �F' }
Assessor's Parcel Number:
3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project:
4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project,
including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
5. Existing general plan designation: �� C ' / r en& -:r UAJ 1-74 A-
6. Existing zoning district: LA C �J i LttSStF(e0
7. How is land currently used? C'A6, &JS
8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed):
R� l a c e �,Q `r )I, 6i c,)J 3 re
Project Description:
9. Site size: �0- peg AC (Acres/Sq. Feet)
10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: - Compact:
Total: _ ------
11. Plans attached: Yes _ No
12. Proposed development schedule � i-n0O i; Cf)
13. Associated projects �-
14. Anticipated incremental or phased development
❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑
0
0
•
Attach description of project containing the following information:
15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and
type of household size expected. G)
16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage
of sales area and loading facilities. /,,e-
17: If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.
19. If the project involves a minor variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development
permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If p rmits have already been
issued, please attach as Exhibit C7c goal nZ 12a,G
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items
checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary).
YES NO
20.
Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons
or substantial alteration of ground contours.
21.
Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential
lands
areas or public or roads.
22.
Change in pattern or character of general area of project.
�l
23.
Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
24.
Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.
25.
Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality
or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns.
26.
Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels
in the vicinity.
27.
Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more.
28.
Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials,
X.
such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives.
29.
Substantial change in demand for municipal services
J
(police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts).
J�
30.
Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption
(electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
31.
Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0
Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description)
32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or
Polaroid photos will be accepted.
33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity
of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of
development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity.
Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted.
Certification
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
3-5-t 3
Date Signature
-tT'TTE
cqu'STV
�pR 4 6 2403
sEP'o c s�vT
K:\Planning\FORMS\Submittal\ENV-INFO.FRM
0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0
a
w
-
R
herford
-'
W
Ann
Miller,
Michael
Lommel,
Lisa
o
a
z
ra
a
- 44
En
Berger,
Lewis,
Sam &
Becky
a
Vickie
Sue
�4
�4
4
- 43
.�
S4
0
�� Y
42
Pierce ,'•
.,� Ihle, John
Lynne -�4 & Marguerite
a Rohwe r ,
w Claud & Lynn w
P4
a
a39
Fortier,
Stan & Emily
w
P4
0
U
t.
` II
Gore, Pat &
x Sharon -
W
1
137 -
U dwards ,
ul Jim & Caro n `
o
� 131• �.. .
orehead, •t�
Jon & Lois
35 ,. �
J� s S i E
HUMBOLDT COAD
r � 3 0
aber, Ben U) �1 Kermen, �
& Olivia HUMBOLDT ROAD /-� Borneman Virginia
�t Jim & Kathy
_ Poundstone, Scheuffele,
Stockin 8 Patton Craig & Diane Morris , Al & Lucille L d
g�` Wes & Jane Crowson Gaylord, Orendorff, Keith &���� /
Ralph Mann, Crowson Y
Doug & Barbara Steve & Al & Dwayne 9 Erma & Mary Helen (?� /
Velma Lucylle
G -- `® Korach, Nancy 26 - ( 23 22 EQ
Kathy & Janice 1271-
Rogers
Don & Hel n _ + Boa + <
3 - - - U 1 o 11 122 jL31 15 ,-� L7D 18
Adams,Bob Browning, Casey,Kelly StileBlackstock PBaker,
Benson, Maggi,
,
Champ Bill & Mike Etta Larry &Norman , Taylor, Betty Barbara
Judy Walt & Dan & Ter Wm. &
Patsy Betsy ' Janet -t� Marvin
4' 7�I o� rD
TNN�y
Petronave, JONES CREEK e�+�
1 Faye
Brown, Jack
JONESVILLE - 2001 (Not drawn to Scale)
Tebo, -'
Kristen KellWard� -BUTTE
Y
a- ► CoUN'g Y
+��,,ewrvi.L1 G Mickey Trail MAR 0 6 2003
U Bechard,
Bob & Kathy DEVELOpMENT
SERVICES
0
50.00&
LA 94rp- ADZ EA
ulo.
\4
ON'
Ao
BUTTE
COUNTY
MAR 0 6 2003
DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
c
n
1. �'n\� -�
z
:0
B11WE
COUNTY
DEPARTMENT 0 VELOPM NT SERVICES MA 2003
PLANNING DIVISION '/7V/40n v r
7 County Center Drive Aj o _ o
Oroville, CA 95965-3397 7 R % 0
Telephone: (530) 538-7601 G` 17tyC a?443 °C�UN,�•�0
FAX: (530) 538-7785 "ille, C$ Ir.
TO: Environmental Health MAR 1 2 2003
FROM: Mark Michelena, Butte County Planning Division
SUBJECT: —P - equest for Comments on a Developments /Landse Application Chico, Califomi
APPLICANT: Buce -an Sue Miller, Use Permit - UP 03-12
APN: 060-250-0033
DATE: March 11, 2003
The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being
provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness
of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your
agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for expansion of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin).
Existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with a new, larger cabin.
PROJECT LOCATION: on the et side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from
the intersection of Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, `and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road,
at 9533 Jones Creek Road, Forest Ranch
County Supervisor District No: 5
ZONING: U (Unclassified)
GENERAL PLAN: TM (Timber Mountain)
If a response cannot be submitted prior to May_ 25, -2003, -please call Mark Michelena at (530)
538-7376. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank
you for your attention to this matter.
A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for May 8, 2003 before the:
171 Planning Commission
1-1 Development Review Committee
COMMENTS: (Please be specific. Letters or additional comments may be attached):
DEPARTMENT ORDEVELOPMENT SERVICES!
PLANNING DIVISION
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965-3397
Telephone: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530) 538-7785
TO:
Public Works Director
FROM:
Mark Michelena, Butte County Planning Division
SUBJECT:
Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application
APPLICANT:
Bruce and Sue Miller, Use Permit - UP 03-12
APN:
060-250-003
DATE:
March 11, 2003
The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being
provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness
of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your
agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for expansion of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin).
Existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with a new, larger cabin.
PROJECT LOCATION: on the west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from
the intersection of Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road,
at 9533 Jones Creek Road, Forest Ranch
County Supervisor District No: 5
ZONING: U (Unclassified)
GENERAL PLAN: TM (Timber Mountain)
If a response cannot be submitted prior to May 25, 2003, please call Mark Michelena at (530)
538-7376. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank
you for your attention to this matter.
A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for May 8, .2003 before the:
Planning Commission
F-1 Development Review Committee
COMMENTS: (Please be specific. Letters or additional comments may be attached):
By:
Date:
OF BUTTE
LANG OrIVELOPMENT DN
4.
1
0
BUTTE COUNTY
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR
USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: Bruce and Sue Miller DATE: March 11, 2003
AGENT: APN: 060-250-003
FILE #: UP 03-12
PLANNER: Mark Michelena
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for expansion of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin).
Existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with a new, larger cabin
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR. COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS:
A. STREETS
1. Prior to the issuance of building permits obtain encroachment permit for all new or existing driveway
approaches and construct them to County standards, as specified in County Improvement Standards.
2. Prior to the issuance ofbuilding permits deed to Butte County, in fee simple, _ feet of right-of-way from
the centerline of . The right of way shall be sufficient
for the installation of standard No. S-5 at all street intersections.
3. Prior to the issuance of building permits submit road and drainage improvement plans for the installation
and construction of the street frontage improvements on to
standard, including but not limited to P.C.C. curb, gutter and sidewalk and the required street section for
parcels with gross acreage of one acre or less. Construct or install the required improvements.
4. Prior to the issuance of building permits dedicate a one foot "no access strip" or relinquish abutters rights
to Butte County, along the frontage of parcels except at approved access
points.
B. DRAINAGE
1. Prior to the recordation of the issuance of building permits a plan for a permanent solution for drainage
shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify
how drainage waters shall be detained on site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly
maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow
runoff to said channel or facility.
_ 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits establish 100 year floodplain elevations and the lowest floor
elevations for any structures. Show on the site plan map for building permits the elevations (by contours)
and the location of an accepted NVGD benchmark and a temporary benchmark on-site.
C. LEGAL LOT STATUS
1. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit, prove, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, that the
parcel of the subject application is a legal parcel.
RECEIVED
MAR 9 I
coutin OF 8UTQ
LAND DEVy�),M'A[Pri NV,
v'-
•
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965-3397
Telephone: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530) 538-7785
TO: California Department of Forestry
FROM: Mark Michelena, Butte County Planning Division
SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application
APPLICANT: • Bruce and Sue Miller, Use Permit - UP 03-12
APN: 060-250-003
DATE: March 11, 2003
The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being
provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness
of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your
agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for expansion of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin).
Existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with a new, larger cabin.
PROJECT LOCATION: on the west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from
the intersection of Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road,
at 9533 Jones Creek Road, Forest Ranch
County Supervisor District No: 5
ZONING: U (Unclassified)
GENERAL PLAN: TM (Timber Mountain)
If a response cannot be submitted prior May 2 , 2003, please call Mark Michelena at (530)
538-7376. You do not have to. respond t this quest if you have no comments to include. Thank
you for your attention to this matter.
A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for May 8, 2003 before the:
Fx_1 Planning Commission
1-1 Development Review Committee
COMMENTS: (Please be specific. Letters or additional comments may be attached):
BUTTE COUNTY
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR
USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: Bruce and Sue Miller DATE: March 11, 2003
AGENT: APN: 060-250-003
FILE #: UP 03-12
PLANNER: Mark Michelena
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for expansion of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin).
Existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with a new, larger cabin
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
PLEASE CONTACT THE BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS:
1. Construction, installation or development of structures or facilities on the parcels/lots shall comply with
the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, (Public Resources Code 4290), and all other applicable State
and County codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of application for improvement permits.
X2. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code
4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and maintained continuously thereafter.
3. Fire hydrant identification, reflector or post reflectors shall be installed acceptable to the County Fire
Warden.
4. In lieu of a pressurized water system or water storage tank, payment of $200.00 per created parcel into
the Battalion _ water tend fund, is required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
5. A pressurized community water system for fire protection is required. The specific locations and fire flow
requirements shall be in accordance with the Fire Department specifications and to the satisfaction of the
County Fire Warden. Average required hydrant spacing _ feet, hydrant size _ inches, and residual
fire flow _ gpm. Submit plans to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction of
facilities.
6. In lieu of hydrant installation, payment may be made into the hydrant fund at a cost of $1.72 per
lineal foot of street frontage. The estimated fee amount is $
7. Prior to recordation of the Map or application for a building permit, the applicant shall pay the then
current fee for the West Chico Fire Station Fund.
8. Provide an all weather access of at least 10 foot wide and with a vertical clearance of 15 feet that will
accommodate a 40,000 pound fire apparatus to all structures.
BUTTE
Pacific Gas and Electric Company 460 Rio Lindo Avenue Don Chambers COUNTY
Chico, CA 95926 Chico Land Rights Office
530/894-4423 MAR 14 2003
FAX 530/894-4414
DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
March 13, 2003
Mr. Mark Michelena
Butte County
Department of Development Services
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
RE: Minor Use Permit (Miller)
File: MUP 03-12, APN: 060-250-003
Dear Mr. Michelena:
We have reviewed the subject map.
Any relocation or rearrangement of any existing PG&E facilities in the area to accommodate
this project will be at the expense of the developer. There shall be no building of structures, or
the storage of any materials allowed over or under any existing PG&E facilities, or inside any
easements that exist.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this matter. If you have any questions, please call me
in Chico at 894-4423.
Sincerely,
Donald W. Chambers
Land Agent
(file: MUP03-12.doc)
AP 060-250-003
Bruce Miller
UP 03-12
GO H :-
p q a
-
A
PPo pct Location
,r
- a
° i yp
?k'>N' t � �' ,?' • �. pp , ,sF v.+�. tn.' a6 ...�a �g� .�` "tea• '$`s ,. 6•'' '8� u, '! , cps 4 � � Nu ra .6 �} ., �x'.b;PYX .
�"
"H' 1^."+
tr� .� �,,'*`j` k 66� ;i4•. 4'm'C� �'� ^� 4tU c-'--48�'.�s -�•••° �' � d k s � 3 � i
4 04
```3 k , r •; , ; - 'Bgt .,. �
W�X ,5* p K-
- a•`F, �, `' rhe - 4 �' k A� @�' r� b �° � � _ °P'- s{ •y� E: , -,� � 1 �, ,
�(, ''F
+$�
,:' �, ,,. ..'` . N, • s<� w •rat .yi Y ° aW" ti w a -q .
«e R
n
r 4 I,*
c yy } {$r 44
�,� 'c g�
o (� a 4 .o- -04, y R_ P}` •aa+.vimim +excva,.- r
d, .w, � a r � � 1L'. Ry 6 r �` �`` ' b4 �- N` N . '-'A" �\ ,� :i ¢ � a r•+ � �c � � +«� ��
2000 0 2000 4000 6000 80-00 1-0000 12000 14000 16000 18000 Feet
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNINGC®MSSI®N
Applicant: Bruce & Sue Miller Owner: Jonesville Cabin Owners, Inc.
Hearing Date: Existing Zone: U (Unclassified) N
Supervisorial
Request: Use Permit to replace a pre-existing legal non -conforming structure (cabin) with a new, larger cabin. District # 3
Assessor Parcel No: 060-250-003 fie: UP 03-12
' pkv\��'`y i.
r t1w.. --jar.
trcAiC--Ic% i t. -t.\- . .
aer �eeaw.sr.. .+IQ.,
:I
! • '- rxr �^ T+. "r-ae^-r--ri;,c �c-,�e•..�. _ � s,�v^w -ij. `)'S
. :'7' a.' .e�tr •tt
3
1 y�,.• +r �� � ar- +f
LI
lop
_ `• F a i k a
I ti i_ �fh� r�ll
2a7'�YO�:.'�w111
l�
I
1 ll
• ry� i
!_ �� ". ..iC ^r•�f "'!A' ^";';r t;'+,'Ot 4��� �Q;n� CC'? fl`^S Q C,i^
una\�e�wmvacrf�•r:'"n"'S°��ca.�wr��`�itanraaec�,�e7.a..•c+.a�.,�enwrs�.s.: �srreca+.°'��s'esa
S! -EO qT..1 :olo
:)rd .rl.Ll rO ffSfii i 91+1'Je:,7'1% ;'mite d{() 1:�l1rl Lflc� �� 9JS?'t', :ItLL�lia(l�/
A
'airy,=SRO_ -f1•% 'I I(,^"II S� t+n:.r r :f' ILS(' A Ut LIT:"i) :i"'
F00-1 1--000 :+)! firt+"I-1winw.d.
0 0
LEAD IN SHEET
FILE NO: UP 03-12 AP# 060-250-003
APPLICANT: Bruce and Sue Miller, 9451 Jones Avenue, Durham CA 95938
PHONE#:: (530) 891-8035
OWNER: Bruce and Sue Miller
REPRESENTATIVE:
REQUEST: Use Permit for expansion of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin) Existing_
cabin will be demolished and replaced with a new, larger cabin
SIZE: 90.0 acres
LOCATION: on the west side of Jones Creek Road approximately one-quarter mile from the
intersection of Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road
at 9533 Jones Creek Road, Forest Ranch
SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT # 5 EXISTING ZONING: U (Unclassified)
ZONING HISTORY:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
SITE HISTORY:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: TM (Timber Mountain)
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
ASSIGNED PLANNER: Mark Michelena
Date Application Received 03/06/03
Date Project Assigned 03/10/03
30 Day Complete ' 04/04/03
Preset Hearing Date 05/08/03
"DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET
FILE NO: ( a Y 0 3- 1 a AP#
APPLICANT: Dr -U G( d- ,SU E�- m I c.CE2
O&v- aso - 0b3 CPvunotJ)
OWNER: Swce d- SUE rK (Lcem-� CA -.6w ow,� � (/jC.
REPRESENTATIVE: f)y7— C( d- S U L M (LGEr-
PROPOSED REQUEST: (to be filled out by person taking in application) OS' fe4f'"7- Fa-
�'xp�+vs«.., (Or CFL it t- A,0P-C0NfC)zMnyC—OEAJCeCC,-r9,.v)GJ,��rz*✓�
Cj:Ri.v (;JtL(: C 06T"L/)(ft7)q A_Aj✓> )ZE-fcs+-eL-*q (y, rzf NE(.Ur
FINAL REQUEST: (to be filled out by project planner) USE PEW-Yn EKP6'Q St orq
OF A LEC -A(_ k/ o,,iCON FoP-n4 t A/ G e6s i 6QE/VCC-
DEMccuS(JGO Anip AEPC,qCen Lo,'rH /vow LA2c--«2- Cfh/3iti/.
SIZE: ��� U !-CAS
LOCATION: O ti TH-(�- (.mr657-s,96--6r- .lo ,J 65 Ca-6�r-- fl --&A-0, APPP-cj�t wc, rez-f onu(^ -
Lb o So\ -`j"1 -E-Pd 1- Ori-- rE-c�nti. OLo r-2d� AL 9r33 Jrj Nes eaE�� ,�a� lkecc
rE,5
aKT /�-f+ Mcbt , rh/0- .✓?32sWCRUN
ovo �fT/nsFloc o r
SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # EXISTING ZONING:
� C,(
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: �FI M 6- M O UAJ T7I r ti (710
SZE-] Eel 121 Do 11 w WTI► I ► 124 : s`
Date Application Received 3/b/03
Date Project Assigned610
30 Day Complete 1 L 3
Preset Hearing Date 51'�o3
PLANNERS INITIALS4 ! 1/2/
0
County Offices and Cities:
_ Chief Administrative Officer
X Environmental Health
_ Sheriff
X LAFCo
_ Biggs
_ Oroville
Information Systems Dept.
X County Counsel
Irrigation District:
_ Butte Water
_ OWID
_ Table Mountain Irrigation
Domestic Water
_ Butte Water District
OWID
Sewer
_ Butte Water District
Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21)
Fire Protection
0 -
COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST
X California Department of Forestry
Recreation Districts
_ Chico Area Recreation
Paradise Recreation & Park
Utilities
PG&E North - Chico
PG&E South - Oroville
State Agencies
_ CalTrans (Traffic)
_ Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter)
_ Central Reg. Water Quality Cont.
_ Department of Conservation
_ Dept.Social Services, Comm.Care Licensing
Federal Agencies
_ US Forest Service
_ Army Corps of Engineers
Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc.
_ Lime Saddle Dist
_ Drainage
_ Reclamation
_ Butte Co. Mining Committee
_Paradise Pines Com. Assoc.
_Mosq. Abatement. Oroville/Butte Co
X Develop. Services Director
7 Assesor
_ BCAG
_ Air Quality Mgmt.
_ Gridley
_ Paradise
Animal Control
—Biggs/W. Gridley Water
_ Paradise Irrigation
Thermalito Irrigation
_California Water Service Co.
Thermalito Irrigation District
_ Themalito Irrigation
L.O.A. PUD
EI Medio Fire Protection District
_ Durham Area Recreation
Richvale Recreation & Parks
Chambers Cable TV
Viacom Cable TV
_ Dept. of Water Resources
_ Dept of Parks and Rec.
_ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program
Off. of Mining Reclamation
_ US Bureau of Land Management
National Marine Fisheries Sservice
_ Community Association
_ Butte Env.l Council
_ Cal Native Plant Society
_ Forest Ranch Community Assoc.
Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy
X Public Works Director
_ Building Manager
_ ALUC
_ Butte Co. Farm Bureau
_ Chico
_ Chico Airport Commission
Agricultural Commission
_ Durham Irrigation
_ Richvale Irrigation
Other
_ Del Oro Water Co.
Other
Sterling City Sewer Main
Feather River Rec. & Park
Pacific Bell .
_ Dept. of Fish and Game
_ Highway Patrol
Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations
US Fish & Wildlife Service
School Districts
K:\Planning\Forms\DISTR.wF
0 0
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965-3397
Telephone: (530) 538-7601
FAX: (530) 538-7785
TO:
FROM:
Mark Michelena, Butte County Planning Division
SUBJECT:
Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application
APPLICANT:
Bruce and Sue Miller, Use Permit - UP 03-12
APN:
060-250-003
DATE:
March 11, 2003
The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being
provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness
of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your
agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit for expansion of a legal nonconforming residence (cabin).
Existing cabin will be demolished and replaced with a new, larger cabin.
PROJECT LOCATION: on the west side of Jones Creek Road, approximately one-quarter mile from
the intersection of Humboldt Road and Shake Mill Road, and 260 feet southeast of Humboldt Road,
at 9533 Jones Creek Road, Forest Ranch
County Supervisor District No: 5
ZONING: U (Unclassified)
GENERAL PLAN: TM (Timber Mountain)
If a response cannot be submitted prior to May 25, 2003, please call Mark Michelena at (530)
538-7376. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank
you for your attention to this matter.
A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for May 8, 2003 before the:
Fx1 Planning Commission
F—lbevelopment Review Committee
COMMENTS: (Please be specific. Letters or additional comments may be attached):
By: Date:
' °TN. SEC. 13; T.26N. R. 4E. M.D.B. &M.
• 13
vv -LTJ
1'=400'
'cmim BY 00 NEW=
CK
ROM Br Do
EFf�A4E �1-QZ .'Ral
PMVIM nook 6Q, NO is' .
ft aft i O1Boe
��I
m
I
rp 'A
Ti 73
rn
fv
0
-4
-4
I -n
Ti 73
rn
fv
0
rn
-4
-4
I -n
7:3
rn
:,`
- 42
Pierce,
P4
M
Ihle, John
& Marguerite
40
0
R
herford
,d
a ,,
w
Ann
Miller,
Michael
cn
�
Lommel,
Lisa
0
a
0Q
' -
o
ra
zs
_
z
Berger,
ani
Lewis,
Sam &
Bebky
a
Vickie
Sue
�4
�4
-P
N
� 4 3.
.ilM1r.vlA��c� ti
�O
�
ar
:,`
- 42
Pierce,
Lynne
M
Ihle, John
& Marguerite
40
El
0
Rohwer, ,
,d
Claud & Lynn
w
39
Fortier,
Stan & Emily
1
Gore, Pat &
w Sharon
37
dwards ,
u) Jim & Caro n
0
orehead, b
Jon & Lois a
I 5 5 /E ' ROAD:---
HUMBOLDT R
114 { 33\ o
aber, Ben
20 Kermen, m
& Olivia HUMBOLDT ROAD i ` Borneman -Virginia m i
ou Jim & Kathy Scheuffele, �{J.,��'
Pounds tone, ✓
l g� ~-Patton Craig & Diane Morris, Al & Lucille i.�
Stocking,-, Wes & Jane Crowson Gaylord, Orendorff, Keith & *nti.J�d
Ralph Mann, Crowson Erma & T
Doug & Barbara Steve & Al & Dwayne R�� Mary Helen (?J
Nancy Velma Lucy! le 4 �� 23
Korach, 26 . 2 ,
f
Kathy & Janice 27:
Rogers, oa '
Don & Hel n _ _ y
- i 9 .i 10 11 12 C3) 15 16 � 18 `
Adams,Bob Browning, Casey,Kelly Parsons,Roberts,Moore, Benson, Maggi,
Stile Blackstock, Baker,
Champ Bill & Mike Etta Larry &Norman Taylor, Betty Barbara
Walt & Dan & Wm. & Marvin
4 Judy ? Patsy Betsy Terry Janet Tr!o�
Petronave, JONES CREEK
MFaye
Brown, Jack TeboKristen .Kelly Ward,f� Ke 1 ly UT TE
`%' B
COUNTY
d-- I
Mickey Trail MAR 0 6 2003
T U Bechard,
Bob & Kathy DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
JONESVILLE - 2001 (Not drawn to Scale)
I
0
50.0a4c
G F- FE
ENLA94E�b . AtZEA
PA 6-T a 2.
@ 20-5aick
I
USA
PA
IL.W
CAVA
BUTTE
COUNTY
MAR 0 6 200
DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
E
rt
F-- T. I ', '/
• I
7z
N
�fn
0
T
0
0
y
s
O
E
rt
F-- T. I ', '/
• I
7z
N
�fn
0
T
0
0
y
s
SF -F-
A 94rE t> . Atz EA
PAG -r F— 2
0 2a
0
25.oa4c
4� rTE fq--,�f4
GAP -,,t
BUTTE
COUNTY
MAR 0'6 1003
_ DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
4-
r" TO LARRY PAINTER REIM TO CHI -,CO Eli
a SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
Date: — AP# 0(0 0—
Permit Number (if applicable)
APPLICANT INFORMATION Parcel Size:
Owners Name:
Owners Address: q9 G 1 c) U n P 5 Pria lJu ( kaw
Telephone No.:
Situs Address: e c fe,e , J CUyw S O )
Proposed Use:
Residential
New Single Family Residential
❑ Single Family Addition
❑ Mobile Home
❑ Residential Accessory
❑ Permanent Second Dwelling
❑ Temporary Mobile Home (Aunt Minnie)
❑ Temporary Travel Trailer
❑ Multi -family
Non-residential
❑ New Commercial
❑ Commercial Addition
❑ New Industrial
❑ Industrial Addition
Other
® Septic
❑ Agricultural Exempt Building
❑ Other:
Brief Explanation (if necessary):
FE
JAN 2 J 2003 �I
r
PtBUTTE COUNTY
fV N NG DIV S CN
❑ Commercial Remodel
❑ Industrial Remodel
❑ Well
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INFORMATION (For Staff Use)
❑ Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved O�Resolve Problems Prior to Approval
❑ Site Plan Stamped Approved
By Date
Page 1 of 5
w
ALL ITEMS CHECKED APPLY TO THE PROPERTY
.4
Parcel Is In: '
[]Snow Load Area: ;000=SSoo Ft—
❑ Land Conservation Act Minimum Acreage: ❑ Verify residence can be built per contract
❑ Nitrate Action Plan (See Environmental Health for standards)
❑ Watershed Protection Overlay Zone (See attached standards and requirements)
xpansive Soils (Test for expansive soils and if verified proper foundation design required) ~1`
Lj SRA - (CDF to determine specific requirements)
❑ 100 -Year Flood Plain: (See attached)
• Flood Zone:
• Flood Panel No.: Index Date:
❑ Sacramento River Reclamation District (Approval must be obtained from the California Reclamation Board)
❑ Feather River Reclamation District (Approval must be obtained from the California Reclamation Board)
❑ North Chico Specific Plan (See Development Fees Section and attached standards and requirements)
❑ Chapman/Mulberry (See attached standards and requirements)
❑ Cohasset Area (See attached standards and requirements)
❑ Grading Zone (See attached handout)
Use Requires: - �--
�Use Permit �~ ❑ 1Minor Use Permit ❑ Administrative Permit
] Minor Variance ❑ Variance
1z std � .
-------------------------------a--. -.. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
❑ Detached Building Use Form ❑ Encroachment Permit
❑ Agricultural Worker Affidavit ❑ Agricultural Acknowledgement Statement
Zoning:_U
Applicable Building Setbacks:
❑ Setbacks drawn on site Plan. ❑ CDF approval needed for encroachments into SRA setbacks.
Page 2 of 5
Zoning Code
Streets & Highways
Fire Prevention
Subdivision Map
Front
IL a-0
Side
5
Side Street
�d
Rear
15
Height
Waterway
N/A
N/A
N/A
❑ Setbacks drawn on site Plan. ❑ CDF approval needed for encroachments into SRA setbacks.
Page 2 of 5
80915 7nn
Applicable Developn-Aent Fees:
Standard Fees Amount
❑ Fire
❑ School*
❑ Parks/Recreation
❑ Roads
❑ Sheriff
❑ Drainage
❑ NCSP/CSA 87
❑ Chico Urban Area — Road
❑ Thermalito Impact
❑ Other
--------------------------------------
Subdivision Map Special Fees
Formula
❑
Water Tender
❑
Road Improvement
❑
North Oroville Area
❑
Other (per map)
* Check with school district to verify actual fee if pre -application review. A final determination will be made at the time of
the building permit.
Parcel Created By
❑ .Deeds:
Date of Creation: Legal Access Provided: ❑ No Yes
Deed of Reference: Legal Access equiredq No El Yes
Parcel Frontage on Publicly Maintained Road: ❑ No es, Road Name: yvt o L -o -r Ro
Complies with County Standards for Deed Creation:❑ No ❑ Yes
Comments:
[Parcel Deemed to be legal
❑ Verify Legal Parcel ❑ Verify Legal Access ❑Provide Deed of Creation
❑ Obtain a Certificate of Compliance
❑ Obtain a Merger . ❑ Obtain a Lot Line Adjustment
❑ Comply with Old Subdivision Lot Ordinance (Maps recorded prior to Book 17 of Maps Page 23).
❑ Construct road to: ❑ Meet Parcel size required by zone
❑ Meet current Environmental Health Department requirements
Page 3 of 5
❑ Subdivision Map/Parcel Map:
Map Date of Recording:
Lot: Book: Page:
❑ Use Permit/Minor Use Permit
Permit Number:
Date of Approval:
Parcel Map/Subdivision Map/Use Permit Conditions
❑ Comply with the following Conditions of Approval:
❑ Meet the Fire Safe Regulations of Butte County and P.R.C. 4290
❑ Automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in accordance with the
National Fire Protection Association Standard for installation of sprinkler systems in one
and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized
community water system, with hydrants that meet the Fire Department specifications, serves
the parcel.
❑ Wood stoves and fireplace inserts shall be EPA approved and designed to meet the emission
requirements of the California Clean Air Act of 1988, as amended.
❑ Provide an erosion control plan for building and land disturbance. The Erosion Control Plan
must be prepared by a registered civil engineer or other qualified professional and be
submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works.
❑ In lieu of a pressurized water system or water storage tank, payment into the appropriate
Battalion Water Tender Fund may be required.
❑ Measures shall be taken to control fugitive dust emissions from all driveway and other civil
construction associated with residential development. Approved dust control measures are
found in the fugitive dust control plan for the site approved by the Butte County Air Quality
Management District, a copy of which can be obtained from the Butte County Department
of Development Services, Building Division."
❑ Engineered foundations are required.
❑ Class A roofs are required.
❑ Property owners responsible for roa
INK
Page 4 of 5
�i ❑
—1
0
Summary of Specific Requirements:
Lo OA k
— W —
_
Llr.s � Ca�uUu.pteccc,� U1 -e dVr� Irsf��1
This information provided in this summary is based on the application information and on the best available data at the time
of review.
CALarryABuilding Permit Site Plan Reviewl.doc
Page 5 of 5
BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
TEL: (530) 538-7281
FAX: (530) 538-2140
AP
Owner's Name
411 Main Street
P.O. Box 5364
TEL: (530) 891-2727
FAX: (530) 895-6512
TION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
- i zeal'e_
or's Parcel No.124-0 r003
Applicant's Name �����r�-z-� Phone No. 671-e6S.' CS -SOS
Mailing Addresse-4-V 4W-7 ell--
1. Construction Site 52 -Totes cue � �� �c�rvQs J , ten-
(Street and number or direction and distance to nearest crossroad)
2. Lot Size feet x feet. acres
3. APPLICATION FOR: New system for new building k Auxiliary or secondary system ❑
Repair of or addition to old system ❑ New system to replace existing facilities ❑
4. Type of building to be served by proposed system:
Mobile Home ❑
House '5
Other ❑
(size __ ) No. Bedrooms Garbage disposal?
No. Bedrooms / Garbage disposal?
(specify)
5. Water supply for premises: (Must be safe, potable water) Community ❑ Private well ❑ Other
Water supply for ajoining properties: Community ❑ Private well ❑ Other
6. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code.
Which requires every employer to be Insured against liability for Workmen's
Compensation.
❑ 1 have placed an file with the County of Butte a certificate of Workmen's
Compensation Insurance.
❑ I certify that In the performance of the work for which this permit Is
Issued I shall not employ any person In any manner so as to become sublecl to
the Workmen's Compensation Laws of California.
SCALE PLOT PLAN TO BE FURNISHED
Sketch to scale on reverse side hereof, or attach scale sketch of plot plan of the premises showing:
a. Property lines.
b. Location of all proposed and existing buildings,
structures, driveways and parking areas.
c. Location of large trees, rocks, or other obstacles.
d. Location of any well, spring, creek or other body of
water on the parcel and within 100feet of property line.
e. Show direction and approximate amount of slope.
f. Source of water.
g. Water lines.
h. Set back lines and easements.
i. Proposed sewage disposal system and area for
replacement.
I hereby state that the information above and on the reverse side hereof or attached hereto is correct and
true to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the permit must be obtained before any construction is
begun either on the building or on the sewage disposal system, and that a satisfactory inspection of the system
is required before the new building or dwelling may be occupied or the system backfilled, or put into use. I also
understand that a safe otable water us be supplied to the new building or dwelling before occupancy can
take place
Sig Cd Owner 13 Authorized agent ❑ Licensed contractor ❑
Date (An original letter of authorization must accompany this application in order for
an authorized agent to sign.)
Legal parcel?
Access
Water plans cleared
Comment
S4 -579R
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Zoning- Use permits .
Rcpt. No. _ � Amount f
Potable water
O
MONO
t
G)
50.0a4c
zap
O
25.oa4c
i=
P�
GAPst i�
�V
Environmental Health
JAN 1 6 2003
Chico, California
t-4
Zt, V L E:X I ST D t .`
��
7IfJ57ALL H e& 5�ic, TNN K &
(-1) S7, 5' LEACH U+4 � P
130T r E CO, 4r:A L7H pr--PT, - �►
. _ . ...
( Environmental Health a d►
-2 ( J 01- E5 o4z5 k [zp, JAN 1 6 2003
Aq,r, -+4, 06c) -Z rDO Chico, Califomia
A
IV,
C
777
M
0'
t: -
{- j _ r
Gore, Pat &
Sharon
a R herford f37 '
a Ann Miller, Michael U dwards,
9Q r Lommel, Lisa LO Jim & Caro n `
a 0
3 h E91
'0 4 4 .
z b a orehead, ('
Berger, Jon & Lois a
a) c Lewis, Sam &
Becky a Vickie Sue 35 -
P 4J
zc
74 to / C� r .Jc_55iE
0 0 43 _ HUMBOLDTtOAD
V 33
n aber, Ben cn 32 , Ker n, (D
ar & Olivia HUMBOLDT ROAD`
/;y Borneman Virginia
Pierce 4 2 `•
Ihle, John
Lynne -� & Marguerite
a Rohwer,
44ClaudClaud & Lynn w
P4 F(3Fer,
S& Emily
w
P4
0
U
(�
1
Ho
��
1'
Poundstone,
Jim & Kathy
Scheuffele
Hot ki_
Stocking-
8 Patton
�•
Craig &
Diane
Morris Al & Lucill
Orendorff,
Ralph
k Mann, Wes & Jane
Doug & BarbaraSteve
Crowson,
Crowson Gaylord, Keith &
Erma & T
Al & Dwayne 9 Mary He
�j+✓�i%�
&
�i2 -
Korach,
Nancy
Velma
26 -
Lucylle 4 `�/
2 23 22
Rogers,
Kathy & Janice
27:
—�;
Don & Hel
a - -
n
L$,� U 10
11
1
�1
oa
® r11-5-1
Adams ,Bob Browning, Casey,Kelly
Stile,
Parsons
Blackstock,
Roberts Moore , L1J _
Baker,
Benson,
Maggi, V
Champ
Bill & Mike
Walt &
Dan &
Etta
Larry &Norman Taylor,
Wm' &
Betty
Barbara/
Jud
Judy
Patsy
Betsy
Ter ' Marvin
Janet _rdo�°tPsz�t/
Petr n' ve
JONES CREEK
► Faye
Brown, Jack
si't�A 2A SCG , T
JONESVILLE - 2001 (Not drawn to Scale)
Tebo, Ward,
Kristen Kelly
Mickey Trail
� 1
E7 Bechard,
Bob & Kathy
BUTTE
COUNTY
MAR 0 6 2003
DESERV C SST
1 fied)'arid.currently has`<a
General Pian 'designs
tion of;Timber.Mountaln
E is zoned U (Unclas,
sified). The property is,,
located on the•west side'
of Jones "Creek Aced
(SPACE FOR FILING STAMP ONL approximately one quart;
ter„ mile from the.'inter,
section, •,'of';= Humboldt•'.
Road -and:" Shake.. Mill.'
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Road,' andf HumboldtS
southeast of Humbold
RoadIN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE Creek --Road 3:.'Fo a is
In The Matter Of
Notice of Public Hearing.
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
State of California
SS.
County of Butte
The undersigned resident of the county of
Butte, State of California, says:
That I am, and at all time herein mentioned n
was a citizen of the United States and not a party
to nor interested in the above entitled matter;
that I am the principal clerk of the printer and
publisher of
The Chico Enterprise -Record
The Oroville Mercury -Register
That said newspaper is one of general circula-
tion as defined by Section 6000 Government
Code of the State of California, Case No. 26796
by the Superior Court of the State of California,
in and for the County of Butte; that said newspa-
per at all times herein mentioned was printed
and published daily in the City of Chico and
County of Butte; that the notice of which the
annexed is a true printed copy, was published in
said newspaper on the following days:
May 22, 03.
Dated May 22, 2003.
at Chico, California.
1
(Signat )
Ranch.','APN ?060-250;
'003 (MM) (UP 03-12)
NEGAATIVE DECLARATION/
L.;", USE PERMIT
+BUTTE COUNTY ` ' I'_B . Darren` Chapta,
PLANNING COMMISSION Use Permit fora kennel',
No. I ,..11311GE 0 ,%!N for up:'to,.49' dogs on;
PUBLIC HEARING AND y property zoned-"A-160:�
NOTICE OF INTENT -TO,; (Agricultural -„16.0 acre:
< ADOPT A MITIGATED':. pparcets):The property is'
LNEGATIVE DECLARATION r located on the west•side;
> Notice is hereby given of Cana , Pin6',ACras
Py'. e"• Butte County Road_ ;approximate ly ,.t:
Planningt;,Commission Imile,:'north`of•;Broyles-
tfiat -public hearing will IR6ad,`,;at'4;15593:'Cana.
tie', held=on June^ 12j Pine Creek Road, Chico
2003, in:the Butte�Coun; 1APN 047-060-056 (MM)
ty Board of Supervisors (UP 03=08) , ,
Doom"County Admmis );,_ The initial 'study fol the,
tration Center; 25:.Coun ipro 11'ect-identifies poten-;
ttyyCenter.DriJes"Qroville; ball y,signif!cant •effects;
California; at 9:00"a,rn,; but revisions in the piio
regarding, the' following ject plans *of proposals
item ,XQi%�,; }rfn made by or agreed:to by
In accordance with the. the .;: applicant;' would'
Calrfornia Environmental. avoid the�effects•or•mitp
Quality:Act (CEQA) •an gate, the;='6 ects 'to a
Initial- St I Ihas�been point -where clearly no
Prepared;for,the' follow- significant effects would
mg pprojecft r : ,l,;;I. y,,: occur. Therefore;' Plan, '
d-VEATED NEGATIVE,'L ping :Division staff is rec
USE P RMIITs yr Negative Dec arationated
A. `Bruce andRSue Vjhe',Initial Study and
MIIWr, ;UseTPermityto Proposed7;=•Mitigated
allow:. foilireplacement Negative Declaration for
and.ezpansion ota legal this project are cn!file for
nonconformmgdwelling public.. review "starting
(cabm).4-,jher existing 'May 22, 2003 through
cabin will be demolished 'June ' 11,'•2003; "at the.
y_ �.: , ,;e Ntlrcei uivision, 7 County Can-
is; zoned (1J (Unclassi- .ter Drive;'Oroville, Cali=
fled) and c`urrently:has a fornia • and s the;;,Butt"
GeneraiPlanldesigna, County;ChicocLitira ;
tion;of;Timber, Mountain ,11.08. Sherman Aven
antl is':ioned U (UiiclaSL Chico;,;CaliforniaT' Alf'
Sified):1Tfie';property:�is interested' persons are:
located
'.t_,
we§tside invited to review th doc
of liones Creek; Road;; ument:2�WritteKiicoin-
app
roximately one-quar-•' merits will;be accepted
ter mile `:from the inter:; by the Plannin,gg Division'
sechon qdf Humboldt{ at the above address.:
Roadkandlr Shake,. Mil), 5 if you. challenge either
Road;, a ld', 260''Vfeet' the � Mitigated; Negative
southeast'of; Humboldt; Declarabon'o�.the Use
Road, at�9533''Dgpe's' Permitin-court,�you'may
Creek j Road'i°Forest
be limited to raising only
Ranch :APN, 060-250.=those `issues;;'you. or
003 (AAM) , 03=12);5; someone else raised 'at
INE GATIVE DE'.0
LARATION/. 'the „public `•; baring
= rUSE.PERMIT` ;0' described in'this notice,
s;B,;:Darren ;ChaP1a, or,injWrindn`correspon-
Us.e Permit fora kennel -dance delivered to the
for; up to `49 dog_— on, Planning Divisioh at; or.
propertyJzonedkA i6Q Prior to; the public:hear-
(Agncu tural'&160; acre in - . s.
parcels) `The property is ( For further informahonj
located on'the West side. regarding -,this,-,j- ecf,;
ofrxCanatl`Pine Creek PPlease ;contact _Mark..
,Road,- appproximately,',-i Markelem profect-plan-•
mile:;•n=-'Tbf''Broyles ner,"at the Butte County:
Roan; rat ,15593 ;Cana' Planning, , Division:,} at.
-PineCreek Road„ Chico;' (530),538-7376..:.,' ,
; :
APN,047-060=056"(MM) JVONNE CHRISTOPHE.R,
(UP 03-08);:,M �� �: �;, ; DIRECTOR OF
f yTlie rnitial study for,the DEVELOPMENT SERVICES`
project identifies pot6h' 292604
tially significant effects; Publish May,03t
but revisions in the pro= r-
jecfiplanpra proposals '
made by 'or agreed to_ by •_��
the applicant' would
3void.the:effects`or`_'MM_'_
COUNTY OF BUTTE
OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE
OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED
PUBLIC
HEARING
NOTICE
.... -...�� ,r
4,4% ...�...�.. .
o r 'JUN 0 9'0 3 ~ 0.3 5 2 A
� m A
PB METER
CA : _ 7128153 U.SPOSTAGE
060250003000
MANN AARON D
2303 E PARKSIDE DRIVE
MOHAVE VALLEY AZ 86440
aurm
C UNT y
JUN 101003
DEVT ANT
MANN303 T864403035 1503 05 06/14/03
RETURN TO SENDER
MANN
TEMPORARILY AWAY
RETURN TO SENDER J
�ia�=la�s�tliau�l;ara.i-�e�l�i1yaiars'illi,�;-�i�tali;lt�j�-�sa!atat'it�e��ss'i31!si :1
4
��
COUNTY OF BUTTE!'
OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPA.I.ffMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DRV
OROVILLE, CALIFORNFA 99 349 '
RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED
PUBLIC
HEARING
NOTICE
t060250003000
BABERYNJAMI
R 0 BO
-CHICO CA
VIA
10
i so. 0
BurrE,
COUNTY
JUN 2 3 21:'23
DEVELOP'M&-,�
SERVICES