Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
UP06-0017
PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE NO.:-U4LO-7-41 CSO 1—} PROJECT TYPE: Use Permit APN: 069-360-008 APPLICANT: Omnipoint Communications ADDRESS: 1755 Creekside Oaks Dr., Sacramento, CA 95833 PHONE: 916-743-8775 OWNER: James &Ruth Rackerby ADDRESS: 135 Riverview Dr. Oroville, CA 95966 C 1 ti (a J REPRESENTATIVE: Jerry Jazmadarian ADDRESS: 1755 Creekside Oaks Dr., Sacramento, CA 95833 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: new 120' wireless communication tower with 12 (6 immediate - 6 future) panel antennas at the 100' height, and associated ground equipment. Future collocations are possible, but not specified at this time , LOCATED: on the east side of Riverview Drive, 1,145 feet (.2 miles) north of the Gleness Drive -Riverview Drive intersection (135 Riverview Drive, Oroville) PROPERTY ZONED: AR -1 (Agricultural -Residential, 1 -acre parcels) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: AR (Agricultural Residential) TOWN/AREA: Oroville 1. Application accepted: 7/6/2006 Amount: $ 3954.5 Receipt #: 456095 2. Assigned To: Chris Tolley 3. Comments sent to: Public Works Director, Environmental Health, Assessor, LAFCo, Agricultural Commissioner, CDF, Building Manager, County Counsel 4. Sent to Inter -Departmental Review Committee (IDR): 5. Status Letter sent to applicant: 6. Date scheduled for IDR: 8/2/2006 7. Comments received from: 8. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 9. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 10. Environmental Determination: Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: State Clearinghouse No. Categorical Exemption-CEQA# Negative Declaration De Minimis: Mitigation Negative Declaration Subject to Fish & Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. — CEQA # Other 11.. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Staff Recommends: Approval Denial Date Notices Mailed: Neg Dec. Hearing Number of Notices: Newspaper Publication Date: Neg Dec. Hearing O C P G B Planning Commission Hearing(s): Action taken: Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: Type Use Permit, Send for signature: N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G: Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No Send letter if approval/denial to applicant/representative: Copies to Environmental Health, Building, Land Development: Assessor's Memo: Copy of Use Permit to GIS: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on page 2 APPLICANT'S NAME: (If application is differ nt from owner an affidavit is required.) CKDv� ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBEF•: YV1vt1 Ot✓-- m-V;llCP�l�No �I�I)I:I:titi: STREET, CITY, S ATE, & ZIP CODE Spc-t Qp O15g33 FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) NAMEO PROPOSED PROJECT (If an SGSkao TELEPHONE: LOCATIO OF PROJECT (M r cross streets and Address, if any) ��� lJ 2ry lei r014, div lt� GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED O 1�NLR'S NA�};� {� J. TELEPHONE: A wts s YL►ti-C' cr--, /Lib -1 (S� D ADDRES CITY, STATE, & ZIP CODE: (�S «� �f t"I Lt , <!Dkov t l Le, CA ZONE IGENERALPLAN I E(I�STIN LAND USE SITE SIZE (in Square Feet or Acres) LSI�Q,v`�Jl%l� « •13 CiCr.2 J I:\is* I IN(; S'I'RUCTURIOSED 1 aS' O ST- STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) N�4 (Check One) (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY 1S OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ® PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC (� PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATEF APPLICATION REQUESTED ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ REZONE BUJU � ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP USE PERMIT COUNTY ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT JUL 0 6 2006 ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ MINOR VARIANCE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER F-1 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ OTHER i I PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number anj size of parcels.) II n j a -V Jul YvUt,� O-� Gl to S�,-vu AA c�,I 41A C, o o 12 �Se & OWNER'CERTIFICATION I l L•RTIFY TI IAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTI IFR. I ACKNOWI_I DGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURA I]. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.; DATE: SIGNATUR qd VV U ,-1 KAFORA4S\UNIFORM APPLICATION Page 1 of 2 AGENT AUTHORIZATION TO: Butte County, Department of Development Services: Phone Number ('' VOR(6 - 4090 J Print Name Mss C����csio� ��s 10Ya-4C., CA asp,S3 Mailinu Address is hcreby authorized to process the application for 0 MAA p Otn C �.�tcp��b 0s on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number: APN# This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) P,rhame 71 I'l'' Architect and/or Engineer: <:� t"i , c"WN Print Name Signature Phone Number no )W Print Name of Architect/Engineer QOSS yy Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: .7 4 G e �� Date Received: ® AP Number(s) �C] Owners Authorization Project Description Total Amount Received: ?, ( '5-!J • �5"D Legal Description Zoning Requirements [$ Copies of plot plan Taken by: Receipt No. 1'\V,'LD ��� Plalil2�--� O E. H"I L-tO'l CDF NOD/NOE Fees 4.3 (O dW,. f,3Z.so Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is ��, , 0 as of� `lam" 0`P A'lake check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". KAFURMSUINIrORM APPLICATION Page 2 of 2 COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM. (To. be completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or. developer, and/qr project sponsor',, ✓L 2. Address of project: ISS- D\rl j Q I 8llov d ,, , �A Assessor's Parcel Number:,S)CQcI -3(oO -O`I8 3. N me, addre , and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: ��1�-I �sA-i.y�Aba>u p�r'i l b "113=�'1`lr 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: t� A 5. Existing general plan designation: 6. Existing zoning district: 7. How is land currently used? 10(�A /At ten 1r 8. Pro osed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): \,APA9J( C6 vK VVX- nllca1-o 01 Project Description: 9. Site size: +Asks/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: I Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached: Yes ( No 12. Proposed development schedule �206tvt, 13. Associated projects 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development N�A U ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ FBI Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type .of household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 19. If the project involves a minor variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate crly why the application is required. If permits have already teen issued, please attach as Exhibit ATC S CjUnri'-d C6Di Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as :toxic substances, flammable or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. ' Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. Discuss below all itams NO 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any exist ng structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of. the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), inten-ity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach .photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. . Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data end information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, Fnd information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. � 6�0i�, Date ,v Ignature KAPlanning\FORMS\Submittal\ENV-INFO. FRM 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 1-1 0 • USE PERMIT and MINOR USE PERMIT COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their application packet for a communications facility. Please include this checklist along with your submittal. Applicant Planner 1. ❑ LYI A completed, signed, Uniform Application and Environmental Information form. If the application is signed by an agent for the property owner, an agent authorization form must be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 2. ❑ ❑ Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (any unused portion of the deposit will be returned upon final action, if any remains.) (Planner advises applicant) ❑ L'J Thi -five 35 i f T3.rty ve ( )cop es o plans which shall include a detailed site plan drawn to scale. All plans. shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no greater than 24" x 36". The finished plans shall be folded to 8V2" x 11". The detailed site plan must include: ` a. ❑ D/ Name and address of Applicant, Engineer and/or person who prepared the plan. b. ❑ Property lines and lot dimensions. C. ❑ d. ❑ / COBUTTE 8 Assessor Parcel Number(s) and the street address. 4 JUL 0 6 2006 Proposed use and/or uses of the property. DEVEIAPMEI%-T SERVICES IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 1 0 • t e. ❑ 0 Proposed landscaping plan, if applicable. f. ❑ Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the property (including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, parking areas, wells, septic tanks and leach fields). g. ❑ Distances from any significant natural and constructed features of the property, such as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major twee stands, storm drains, bodies of water, railroads, to the property lines. h. ❑ Location of all slope banks, ponds, creeks, buttes, sloughs, rock outcroppings, natural drainage courses, irrigation canals and existing vegetation worthy of consideration for preservation, such as oak trees. i. ❑ 0/ Any existing faults or fractures and geologic hazards. j. ❑ 12North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an engineering scale with the preferred scale of 1" = 20', with a north arrow preferably oriented to the top of sheet. k ❑ Building setbacks from the ultimate road right-of-way (front, rear, sides). 1. ❑ LTJ Proposed and existing on-site driveways and/or roads. in. ation, height, and materials of walls and fences (sections may be required). n. ❑ All driveways, drawn to scale, on adiacent and across the street properlies w* thin 100 feet of the subject site. o. 11Existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks and existing paving widths on-site or within 100 feet of the site, on adiacent and across the street properties. p. ❑ Nearest cross streets on both sides with plus or minus distances from subject site. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE: 2 IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 3 • q. ❑ ❑ Approximate location of all buildings within 1,000 feet, on adiacent properties. r. ❑ ❑ Existing and nearest fire hydrants. ❑ 0 s. Access, both pedestrian and vehicular, showing service areas and points of ingress and egress. t.contours, ❑ 0///'Elevation c nt minimum r at u USGS maps. per 4. ❑ ❑ Conceptual Grading Plan Items to be shown include: a. ❑ ❑ Natural areas to be preserved: b. ❑ ❑ Proposed cut and fill areas in contrasting colors of zipatone pattern. c. ❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contours within 100 feet of project boundaries. d. ❑ ❑ Proposed drainage and flood control facilities. e. ❑ ❑ Erosion control measures (e.g. - slope landscaping). C ❑ ❑ Natural drainage. g. ❑_ ❑ Elevations and finished contours. h. ❑ ❑ Location of retaining walls, drainage channels and existing structures. i. ❑ ❑ Location, elevation and size of proposed building pads. j. ❑ ❑ All plans must be clear and legible. 5. ❑ ❑ One copy of 8 %z" x 11" transparency reduction of the detailed site plan. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 3 • • 6. ❑ ❑ A vicinity map showing closest major cross streets, zoning and existing land use. The following additional items are required per Butte County Code Section 24-262.E. 7. 1111 Statement of Justification: a. ❑ Includes a description of the proposed Facility, including the type of facility being requested. b. ❑ Height from natural grade to the top of proposed Facility. C. ❑ Support equipment proposed. d. ❑ �RFRXMF and wattage output data including the number of channels. P g e. ❑ ❑ Horizontal and vertical location coordinates. 8. ❑ E Proposed elevations of the structure and any accessory buildings, including building height and other physical dimensions, drawn to graphic scale. 9. ❑ Visual impact assessment, photo montages, mock-ups as determined by the Director of Development Services or Planning Commission. The assessment shall identify any proposed trimming of vegetation that will be required for the normal operation, of the Facility. Stealth technology is encouraged. 10. ❑ 0//Mock-ups required (may be required at any time during the processing of the ermit � 11. ❑ a A discussion of and supporting information regarding the alternative site selection .of -at least a minimum of three to four other sites; if available, including colocatipn opportunities, and a statement as to why these alternative sites and/or colocatinn opportunities were rejected. 12. ❑ a A complete service area map showing the entire wireless communications network of the provider's twenty (20) miles in all directions from the proposed site for the time period from the filing of the application to twelve (12) months from the filing of the application, for the purpose of visually aiding cumulative environmental analysis, IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 4 with and without the proposed Facility or Facilities, showing all hand-off sites within the above specified area. 13. ❑ OZA graphic depiction of the search ring and all other technical criteria used in determining the proposed Facility location. 14. Documentation which identifies failure characteristics of the Facility structure or tower and demonstrates that the site and setbacks are of adequate size to contain falling debris. 15. ❑ 0 Written evidence demonstratingthat the selected Facility structure or tower design is as tY g visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical and engineering considerations, which indicate what type of Facility is required to provide reasonably effective service and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. The use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness is mandatory. 16. ❑ EY/Applicants which operate common carrier facilities (specifically, but not limited to cellular, PCS, SMR and paging service licensees of the FCC) shall provide written evidence that the applicant has provided notice to all FCC licensed wireless communication service carriers operating within the County of Butte of the plans to develop the site. 17. 110-- Evidence of a valid, current operating license or construction permit from the FCC or, if the applicant is not a wireless communications service provider, a user operating agreement for each and every such provider to which the applicant intends to rent space on the proposed Facility. 18. ❑ U A report, signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer licensed by the FCC, prepared pursuant to FCC OET 65, stating whether the maximum radio frequency radiation/electromagnetic radiation (RF/EMF) to be emitted by the proposed Facility, taking into account all other Facilities, both existing and known future Facilities, at the .proposed site and adjacent properties, conforms to safety standards adopted by the FCC, if applicable. The reports prepared for Facilities shall conform to the reporting requirements set by the County and FCC OET 65 human exposure standards. The report shall also analyze the evidence provided in support of the proposed Facility location, height and radiated power, frequency, the number of channels, and all other related data and present alternatives for the location, height and radiated power, pursuant to the requirements of this section. If the proposed Facility exceeds FCC OET 65 human exposure standards, applicant shall also provide additional comprehensive technical and planning information regarding how the applicant shall protect all persons from such excessive exposure IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 5 consistent with all Federal and State requirements, and any additional County requirements. 19.Landscaping and painting plans for the completed project. 20. Projects in Agricultural Zones (A-5 through A-160) shall, prior to submitting an application for a proposed Facility, submit a site plan of the proposed Facility to the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner for comment and send a notification letter to all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County informing them of the proposed site location and tower height. No hearing on an application for a proposed facility in any agricultural zone will be scheduled, nor shall any Administrative Permit for any such facility be issued without proof that the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner and all aerial agricultural applicators registered in the County have been notified, as specified herein. 21. [JITAll applications for Facilities that are proposed to be located within the boundaries of any Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan or Airport Area 'of Influence, as adopted or designated from time to time by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission, shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services, Planning Division, and a copy submitted to the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission for review regarding consistency with adopted Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plans and for recommendations addressing potential impacts to air navigation within the Airport Area of Influence. The County may in its sole discretion retain an independent consultant to review either individual elements of or the entire application and advise the County at the applicant's sole expense. Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Signature: Signature: Date'l � ~d�-G Date: ' YG Receiving Application IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 0 RESOLUTION 09 - 49 A RESOLUTION OF THE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE USE PERMIT UP06-0017 Omnipoint Communications WHEREAS, Use Permit UP06-0017 application for Omnipoint Communications, on Assessor's Parcel Number 069-360-008 was submitted to Butte County on July 6, 2006; and : WHEREAS, the application has remained incomplete for processing; and WHEREAS, the applicant of record Omnipoint Communications has informed staff via phone on September 3, 2009 that he was no longer representing the project; and WHEREAS, successors, to the original applicant T -Mobile USA, Inc. have neither made contact with staff nor responded. to requests for discussion about the project; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 2009 the property owner informed staff that he was not interested in placing the tower on his property at a modified location, as require_ d to meet County setback requirements; and WHEREAS, this application was considered by the Planning Commission at duly noticed public meeting held on November 12, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered public comments and a report from the Planning Division. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission; I. Denies without prejudice Use Permit UP06-0017 application for Omnipoint Communications, subject to the following findings: A. The application has been incomplete since it was submitted on July 6, 2006. B. The property owner does not support placing the tower on his property at a location consistent with the requirements of Butte County Code. C. The applicant of record informed staff via phone on September 3, 2009 that he was no longer representing the project, and new contacts from T -Mobile USA, Inc. have neither made contact with staff nor responded to requests for discussion about the project. D. Persistent applications that fail to provide the necessary materials required for completion the project result in significant ongoing costs to Butte County. These costs are due to the duplication of effort needed to update, recreate, and restart project processing, and from changes in development standards. The significant costs to the County of "holding" applications indefinitely are not covered by the "flat -rate" nature of the County's application fee structure. To allow for Page 1 of 2 continued processing of such a non-compliant application would result in the need to subsidize the continued processing of this application from the County's General Revenues Fund.. DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of November, 2009, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Becker, Moore, Nelson, and Wilson NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioner Marin C arles S. Nelson, Vice -Chair Planning Commission County of Butte, State of California AT ST: Tim Snellings, Secretary Planning Commission County of Butte, State of California Page 2 of 2 "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: AP# �a AGO - APPLICANT: a wNErvRiF ! as 1AF4Af IWS OWNER: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSED REQUEST: (to be filled out by person taking in application) N V W k1t/ zLcvg GowuVL4..l,�c i-t��c Qf ��� 2 c FMAT. RF.OTTEST: (to be filled out by project planner) -2-0' S'TOAY, O SIZE: I B-7 C LOCATION: OK -t /d`u=' ""A-4' / Ff�Z. Z N csEfCOP I Gt.� oRo�tEu,� SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT # EXISTING ZONING: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: AF�Jca0&1` ;i Date Application Received S LLLl 6 Date Proiect Assiyed 0-4 -I. O G IDR Date T-�> 1 I ajno 30 Day Complete 1:e) I � I�.� Tentative Hearing Date K:\P1anning\Forms\Lead In Sheet.doc PLANNER'S INITIALS BUTTE aY �COU1V1' JUL 0 0 2006 DEVELDF,' SERVWM COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST APPLICANT: S.F.W & P. Agency (OWID) California Water Service Co. Utilities: _ PG&E North - Chico PG&E South - Oroville Irrigation District: Biggs / West Gridley Water Butte Water District Thermalito Irrigation District Pacific.Bell Viacom Cable TV Durham Irrigation Dist. Richvale Irrigation Dist. _ Table Mountain Irrigation Dist. Sewer: , ti(p L/.O.A.P.U.D. _ Sterling City Sewer Main Drainage Districts: Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage Dist. Drainage District 200 Reclamation District No. 2056 _ State Agencies: NO Del Oro Water Co. Other Chambers Cable TV Paradise Irrigation Dist. Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) Reclamation District No. 833 Reclamation District No. 2054 CalTrans Dept. of Water Resources Federal Agencies: U.S. Forest Service Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc.; K:\Planning\FORMS\APPLICATIONS\Lead-in Sheet Distribution Ust.doc 4 Dept. of Fish and Game U.S. Bureau of Land Management PLANNING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: &J'a !�R ��� �' FILE NO.: 6'7 — 8 �+ DATE:c)�Z-, Lq / 2 , 2<� AP NO: County Offices and Cities: Planning Division X Assessor's Office - Mapping BCAG X Environmental Health City of Biggs ALUC X Building Manager City of Chico APCD X LAFCo City of Gridley Butte Co. Farm Bureau X Agricultural Commission 5C City of Oroville Chico Airport Commission X Public Works/Land Dev _ Town of Paradise Chief Administrative Officer X.- County Counsel Fire Protection: X California Department of forestry _ EI Medio Fire Protection District Domestic Water: S.F.W & P. Agency (OWID) California Water Service Co. Utilities: _ PG&E North - Chico PG&E South - Oroville Irrigation District: Biggs / West Gridley Water Butte Water District Thermalito Irrigation District Pacific.Bell Viacom Cable TV Durham Irrigation Dist. Richvale Irrigation Dist. _ Table Mountain Irrigation Dist. Sewer: , ti(p L/.O.A.P.U.D. _ Sterling City Sewer Main Drainage Districts: Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage Dist. Drainage District 200 Reclamation District No. 2056 _ State Agencies: NO Del Oro Water Co. Other Chambers Cable TV Paradise Irrigation Dist. Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) Reclamation District No. 833 Reclamation District No. 2054 CalTrans Dept. of Water Resources Federal Agencies: U.S. Forest Service Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc.; K:\Planning\FORMS\APPLICATIONS\Lead-in Sheet Distribution Ust.doc 4 Dept. of Fish and Game U.S. Bureau of Land Management 0 LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: UP 07-01 APN: 069-360-008 APPLICANT: Omnipoint Communications 1755 Creekside Oaks Dr. SacramentoCA95833 OWNER: James & Ruth Rackerby REPRESENTATIVE: Jerry Jazmadarian REQUEST: new 120 ' wireless communication tower with 12 (6 immediate - 6 future) panel antennas at the 100' height, and associated ground equipment. Future collocations are possible, but not specified at this time , LOCATION: on the east side of Riverview Drive, 1,145 feet (.2 miles) north of the Gleness Drive -Riverview Drive intersection (135 Riverview Drive, Oroville) SIZE: .12.87 acres SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT # 1 EXISTING ZONING: AR -1, ((Agricultural -Residential, 1 -acre parcels)) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: AR(Agricultural Residential) ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: ASSIGNED PLANNER:Chris Tolley Date Application Received: 7/6/2006 Date Project Assigned: 7/11/2006 IDR Date: 8/2/2006 30 -Day Complete: 8/4/2006 x BUTTE COUNTY • STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Omnipoint Communications, DATE: 7/6/2006 AGENT: Jerry Jazmadarian APN: 069-360-008 FILE #: UP 07-01 PLANNER: Chris Tolley PROJECT DESCRIPTION: new 120 'wireless communication tower with 12 (6 immediate - 6 future) panel antennas at the 100' height, and associated ground equipment. Future collocations are possible, but not specified at this time Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH. THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS: A. STREETS ❑ 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, obtain an encroachment permit and improve all new and existing driveway approaches to publicly maintained roads as specified in the County Improvement Standards and the terms of the encroachment permit. ❑ 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, deed to Butte County in fee simple _ feet of right-of-way from the centerline of along the entire property frontage. The right-of-way shall be sufficient for the installation of Improvement Standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. ❑ 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, submit road and drainage improvement plans for the installation and construction of the street frontage improvements on to County Improvement Standards. Improve parcel frontage to a street section on to an RS-_ road standard including, but not limited to curb, gutter and sidewalk for parcels with gross acreage of one acre or less. Construct or install the required improvements. ❑ 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits, relinquish abutter's rights of access to Butte County along the frontage of parcels except at approved access points. B. DRAINAGE ❑ 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a plan for a permanent solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall detail existing drainage conditions and shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained or retained on- site and/ or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. ❑ 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, establish 100 year flood plain elevations and the lowest floor elevations for any structures, in accordance with Butte County Code §26-25. Show on the additional map sheet the elevations (by contours) and the location of an accepted NGVD29 (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929) benchmark and a temporary benchmark on-site. C. LEGAL LOT STATUS ❑ 1. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit, prove to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works that the parcel of the subject application is a legal parcel. BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT a APPLICANT Omnipoint Communications, DATE: 7/6/2006 AGENT: Jerry Jazmadarian APN: 069-360-008 FILE #: UP 07-01 PLANNER: Chris Tolley PROJECT DESCRIPTION: new 120 'wireless communication tower with 12 (6 immediate - E future) panel antennas at the 100' height, and associated ground equipment. Future collocations are possible, but not specified at this time Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS: D. SEWAGE DISPOSAL AREAS ❑ I. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall meet the sewage disposal requirements of Butte County Code Section 26-26 for the installation of sewage disposal systems within a flood plairdfloodway. Q 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, those wells indicated on the site plan that are proposed to be destroyed in order to provide required usable sewage disposal areas, shall be destroyed under a valid Butte County Environmental Health Division permit. ❑ 3. In the nitrate area record executed Future Sewer Service and Storm Drainage Agreements. ❑ 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, meet the requirements of the (Watershed Protection Zone) (Villa Verona Moratorium Area) (Cohasset Specific Plan). E. INDIVIDUAL WATER SUPPLY ❑ I. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, provide a source of domestic water for the building on (lot) (parcel) ❑ 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, verify that domestic water can be provided to meet minimum standards for and other suspected contamination. F. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY ❑ 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, verify that domestic water can be provided to meet minimum standards for and other suspected contamination. G. . EXISTING COMMUNITY SEWER FE -1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, under a permit issued by the Environmental Health Division, abandon the septic tank and connect the dwelling(s) on (lots) (parcel(s)) to public sewer. BUTTE COUNTY is STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Omnipoint Communications DATE: 7/6/2006 AGENT: Jerry Jazmadarian APN: 069-360-008 FILE #: UP 07-01 PLANNER: Chris Tolley PROJECT DESCRIPTION: new 120 'wireless communication tower with 12 (6 immediate - 6 future) panel antennas at the 100' height, and associated ground equipment. Future collocations are possible, but not specified at this time Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS: H. BUILDING PERMITS ❑ 1. Building Permits Required. Prepare # sets of construction plans and make an application for permit. Construction shall comply with federal, state, and local regulations. Plans shall be prepared, sealed and signed by a California Licensed Architect or Registered Engineer for non-residential buildings and certain residential buildings. ❑ 2. Proposed improvements constitute a "change in use" or "change in the character of use" as stated in the building code. Improvement plans shall incorporate all code -required elements for the new use. ❑ 3. All structures shall be made accessible to the disabled. Disabled accessible parking and an accessible path of travel shall be provided. ❑ 4. Proposed improvements shall comply with Title 24 energy conservation regulations. Appropriate compliance forms (two sets) shall be submitted indicating compliance with those standards. ❑ 5. Proposed improvements shall comply with Butte County Code and FEMA Flood Hazard Prevention regulations. A FEMA Elevation Certificate, prepared by a qualified professional, shall be completed and submitted with improvement plans for the Building Division. ❑ 6. Proposed improvements shall comply with recorded map conditions applicable to construction. ❑ 7. Proposed improvements shall comply with Public Resources Code 4290 Fire Safe Construction standards. ❑ 8. Development fees for the proposed residential or non-residential improvements shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. The fees shall be those in effect at time of application, and shall include, but not be limited to, School Fees, Park and Recreation District fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, Permit and Plan Check fees, and Fire Protection Fees. I. EXISTING STRUCTURES ❑ 1. Comply with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. ❑ 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended new use of the building(s) or the existing building(s) shall be demolished. • BUTTE COUNTY • STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT APPLICANT Omnipoint Communications, DATE: 7/6/2006 AGENT: Jerry Jazmadarian APN: 069-360-008 FILE #: UP 07-01 PLANNER: Chris Tolley PROJECT DESCRIPTION: new 120 'wireless communication tower with 12 (6 immediate - 6 future) panel antennas at the 100' height, and associated ground equipment. Future collocations are possible, but not specified at this time Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS: J. FIRE CLEARANCE ❑ 1. Construction, installation or development of buildings and/or roads, driveways, gates anc bridges on parcels/lots shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations—Public Resources Code 4290, 4291 and current Butte County Improvement Standards, whichever is stricter. ❑ 2. Prior to construction, a pressurized community water system for fire protection IE required. Bonding may be allowed with the approval of the County Fire Chief. Average required hydrant spacing is feet, hydrant size inches, and residual fire flow of GPM. Fire hydrant identification, road reflectors or post reflectors acceptable to the County Fire Chief shall be installed or bonded, prior to Parcel or Final map recordation. Submit plans to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction. ❑ 3. Place a note on a separate document and recorded concurrently with the Parcel, Final map or an additional map sheet stating that "Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential dwellings in accordance with NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized community water system with hydrants that meet Fire Department specifications serves the property." A note stating "Automatic Fire Sprinklers conforming to NFPA Standard 13D required" is to be added to all affected building plans. ❑ 4. In lieu of hydrant installation, prior to recordation of the Parcel or Final map, payment shall. be made into the hydrant fund at the current rate per lineal foot of street frontage. ❑ 5. Prior to building construction, provide an all weather access of at least 10 feet wide and- vertical ndvertical clearance of 15 feet that will allow for ingress and egress and accommodate a. 40,000 -pound fire apparatus to within 150 feet of all structures. ❑ 6. Place a note on a separate document, which is to be recorded concurrently with the Parcel or Final map, or on an additional map sheet stating, "Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the time of permit issuance and maintained continuously thereafter. U P06-0017 a, - _ '• o: ` - _;%, � ; _...."... Cir `:�, � m , t _ caro = r 1225' aks F Considered Location: site inadequate IR CD ."P tnam Dr a`r' Existing utility aeo�r pole colocation t �d F+dlcrestAr Sh rla,Ln P Lozif a aew ; Z 1�9verv9ew �`<- - �cc Ward NO f ,triJ, a i Lr�7 Considered Location: owners rejected offer -'.., - , WalnutPwe " 2 1125 w ji z 162 Nosagna/Way y >. `o ,;,t Eas Project Location (1 08T) (D 9' CD t m a J T'; i 0) - 'A t ' "m nail Hdl PI F Considered Location w/ 120' Tower CD oCL c a Considered Location w/ 120' Tower 7� �a %U) oma Ln, TuCkerAve a fhe2; U P06-0017 0 SC15420 coverage at 100 ft. i ■ 1. � L ■ ■ Il L ■ Ir �L � ■ ■ 'T. • 'MobileM. Get more, from life Lei J .ONC provMltiQ QY, SC15420 coverage at 120 ft. . •I' tobile ■' Get more from lift' O . r, 1� � O`o�,tile ��s�e�Gyy1vuY O 0 f 2mond Services • 3860 Industrial Way Benicia, Ca 94510 Ph: (707) 751-5900 Fax: (707) 751-5901 RADIO FREQUENCY ANALYSIS PROPOSED T -MOBILE SITE NO. SC15420 "OROVILLE DAM" 135 RIVERVIEW DRIVE, OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA By: Diamond Services Date 06/13/2006 1 T -Mobile Site No. SC 15420 Page 1 of 7 sCOUNBUTTE Ty JUL 0 61006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Diamond Services Report Summary Based upon information provided by T -Mobile and the design engineer, and using the calculated method for determining RF field strength, it is the engineer's opinion that the telecommunication facility which will be located at 135 Riverview Drive, Oroville, California will comply with the FCC's current prevailing standard for limiting human exposure to RF energy. Due to the mounting method utilized, the general public would not normally be able to approach the antennas. Therefore, no significant impact on the general population is expected. The calculated electromagnetic field strength level in publicly accessible areas is less than the existing standard allows for exposure of unlimited duration. Additionally, due to the mounting method used, no significant impact on the environment is expected. General Recommendations For personnel who maintain or work near the antennas, a training program in exposure to RF fields is recommended, since any access closer than ten feet to the face of a T -Mobile antenna at this site could expose personnel to RF field levels greater than the occupational limits, and such access should be prohibited. At this site, public access to the face of an antenna is not expected. Maintenance personnel should be instructed to contact T -Mobile prior to working in front of an antenna RF warning signs should be placed at the base of the monotree. Background Diamond Services' has been retained by T -Mobile to conduct a Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic analysis for a proposed telecommunication facility to be located at 135 Riverview Drive, Oroville, California. This analysis consists of a review of the proposed site conditions, calculation of the estimated RF field strength of the telecommunication facility, and the provision of a comparison of the estimated field strength with the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) recommended guidelines for human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields. Site Description Based upon the drawings provided by the design engineer, six antennas will be mounted on a new monotree. The antennas will be mounted approximately 97'- 9" (to bottom of lowest antennas) above ground level. The antennas will be oriented such that the main lobes are oriented toward the horizon. Normal public access to the front of the antenna is not expected due to the mounting location and method utilized. Occupational access to the front of the antennas is not normally expected. I PGI Group db.a. Diamond services T -Mobile Site No. SC 15420 Page 2 of 7 • Diamond Services • RF Field Strength Calculation Methodology A generally accepted method is used to calculate the expected RF field strength. The method uses the FCC's recommended equation which predicts field strength on a worst case basis by doubling the predicted field strength. The following equation is used to predict maximum RF field strength: Equation 1 S = (?) 2 PG — PG — EIRP =E7r R' Ir R' 7r R2 Where: S = power density P = power input to the antenna G = power gain of the antenna in the direction of interest relative to an isotropic radiator R = distance to the center of radiation of the antenna The ground level effect of the T -Mobile emissions was calculated using a maximum downtilt of 5'. and a maximum ERP of 131 watts. Results were calculated for a height of 6'-6" above ground level. Using these factors, the maximum calculated T -Mobile fields at ground level are 0.11% of the existing standard for general population uncontrolled exposure. Calculations were performed for the main antenna lobe, the -3dB point, and the first and second lower lobes. See Table 1 for the FCC's guidelines on Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE). Note that the RF range referenced for this analysis is the range of 1500 —100,000 Mhz shown in Table 1, which is included in Appendix A. 2 Reference Federal CovmwScation Commission Office of Engineering Technology BuUcfm 65 T -Mobile Site No. SC 15420 Page 3 of 7 0 • Diamond Services Exposure Environments The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependent on the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to exposure. The decision as to which tier applies in a given situation should be based on the application of the following definitions. Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general population/uncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. General population/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public always fall under this category when exposure is not employment-related. For purposes of applying these definitions, awareness of the potential for RF exposure in a workplace or similar environment can be provided through specific training as part of a RF safety program. Warning signs and labels can also be used to establish such awareness as long as they provide information, in a prominent manner, on risk of potential exposure and instructions on methods to minimize such exposure risk. For example, a sign warning of RF exposure risk and indicating that individuals should not remain in the area for more than a certain period of time could be acceptable. Another important point to remember concerning the FCC's exposure guidelines is that they constitute exposure limits (not emission limits), and they are relevant only to locations that are accessible to workers or members of the public. Such access can be restricted or controlled by appropriate means such as the use of fences, warning signs, etc., as noted above. For the case of occupational/controlled exposure, procedures can be instituted for working in the vicinity of RF sources that will prevent exposures in excess of the guidelines. An example of such procedures would be restricting the time an individual could be near an RF source or requiring that work on or near such sources be performed while the transmitter is turned off or while power is appropriately reduced. T -Mobile Site No. SC 15420 Page 4 of 7 Diamond Services Qualifications of Reporting Engineer Mr. Runte has been involved in the measurement of RF emissions since 1979. He has designed numerous RF systems including both site design and RF system design. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of California, and all contents of this report are true and correct to the best of his knowledge. Signed: 14 Matthew I Runte, P.E. '10�" .1071 \zo. LU'15-15Ur`' „ Ex 1). 6/30%07 Professional Engineer Stamp T -Mobile Site No. SC 15420 Page 5 of 7 Date: 06/13/2006 0 Diamond Services APPENDIX A Term Definitions 0 Exposure Exposure occurs whenever and wherever a person is subjected to electric, magnetic or electromagnetic fields other than those originating from physiological processes in the body and other natural phenomena. Exposure, partial -body. Partial -body exposure results when RF fields are substantially nonuniform over the body. Fields that are nonuniform over volumes comparable to the human body may occur due to highly directional sources, standing -waves, re -radiating sources or in the near field. General population/uncontrolled exposure. For FCC purposes, applies to human exposure to RF fields when the general public is exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public always fall under this category when exposure is not employment-related. Maximum permissible exposure (WE). The rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane -wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with an acceptable safety factor. Occupational/controlled exposure. For FCC purposes, applies to human exposure to RF fields when persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a, location where exposure levels may be above general population/uncontrolled limits (see definition above), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. T -Mobile Site No. SC 15420 Page 6 of 7 Diamond Services Table 1. LUMTS FOR MAXIMUM PERNHSSIBLE EXPOSURE (WE) (A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure I.63 (100)$ 30 1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (18042)* 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 Frequency Electric Field Magnetic Field Power Density Averaging Time Range Strength (E), Strength (H) (S) JE12, jH%j or S (MHz) (V/m) (A/m) (mW/cm) (minutes) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f. (900/f)* 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1500 -- -- f/300 6 1500-100,000 -- -- 5 6 (B) Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure Frequency Electric Field Magnetic Field Power Density Averaging Time Range Strength (E) Strength (H) (S) (E12, IH12 or S (MHz) (V/m) (A/m) (mW/cm2) (minutes) 0.3-1.34 614 I.63 (100)$ 30 1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (18042)* 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1500 -- -- f/1500 30 1500-100,000 -- -- 1.0 30 f = frequency in MHz *Plane -wave equivalent power density NOTE 1: OccupationaUcontrolled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment provided those persons are fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Limits for occupational/controlled exposure also apply in situations when an individual is transient through a location where occupational/controlled limits apply provided he or she is made aware of the potential for exposure. NOTE 2: General population/uncontrolled exposures apply in situations in which the general public may be exposed, or in which persons that are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be fully aware of the potential for exposure or can not exercise control over their exposure. T -Mobile Site No. SC 15420 Page 7 of 7 I Id Get mn r e from Liffe" July 7, 2006 Butte County ' BUTTE COUNTY Department of Development Services JUL 0 6 2006 7 County Center.:Drive DEVELOPMENT OroviRe, California 95965 SERVICES Dear Development Services: Omnipoint Communications Inc. (T -Mobile) respectfully submits the enclosed application to develop a wireless facility in the Oroville area. The subject property is located at 135 Riverview Drive along Kelly Ridge in Oroville, Assessor's Parcel Number 069-360-008. The property is owned by James and Ruth Rackerby and is currently zoned AR -1. The parcel is 12.73 acres and presently contains a 1950 square foot residence along with a barn and a lean-to for recreational boat storage. On this property, T -Mobile proposes to develop and operate a 120' stealth monopine communications tower. The structure will be designed to resemble a typical pine tree. At the base of the structure, T -Mobile proposes to locate three equipment cabinets within a 30' X 30' leased area. The entire compound will be enclosed with a chain-link fence. The purpose of this project is. to develop a facility that will provide enhanced wireless servicesthroughout the eastern portion of the Oroville area and Lake Oroville. T - Mobile currently has extremely limited service in this area. The overall height of the facility was necessitated by the fact that the location is .approximately fifty feet downhill from the crest of the ridge. This decrease in ground elevation has necessitated the slight increase in overall height in order to achieve the required coverage objective. The facility is proposed to be located east of the barn on this property. At its planned Location, the facility will be completely outside of the view of any residences. The parcel directly north is vacant and undeveloped. Prior to selecting this location, T -mobile conducted an exhaustive research of any co - 'location possibilities in this general,area and found no existing towers or vertical T -Mobile - 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 190, Sacramento, CA 95833 - (916) 743-8775 Get m,o r. from lift? elements that could be used for this project. The only existing communications facility is a wooden pole tower located at APN 069-360-010 on property owned by Jeffrey Holland. The residence on this property is currently rented. The wood pole appears to be owned by Ubiquitel (Sprint). The equipment is located in the back of the home on this parcel. The tower is relatively unattractive and there are panel antennas and a microwave dish on the wood pole. A co -location at this location would add to the considerable visual impact of the existing facility. T -Mobile made several attempts to contact this landowner to gauge any interest in leasing additional ground space for a possible co -location. All attempts at communication remained unanswered. We assumed that the landowner is not interested in another wireless carriers placement at this location. We also contacted the landowners of APN 069-360-009, Mr. Jack Burns and Ms. Jackie Burns. Mr. 6t Ms. Burns are presently divorced and living separately. Mr. Burns lives in Butte County and Ms. Burns lives in Orange County. While Ms. Burns was supportive of this project, Mr. Burns felt that this project would impede the total development of this parcel and could not support this effort. Based on these two prior attempts, we subsequently contacted Mr. Rackerby, the owner of the parcel that is the subject of this application. Mr. Rackerby was supportive of our effort under the caveat that the entire facility could not be visible to any of his neighbors. It was on this basis that we developed this project. T -Mobile feels that this is an outstanding project that will bring valued wireless services to this portion of the County and to the nomadic users in the recreational areas. We appreciate your review and consideration of our application and the supporting documents. If you require any additional information, please contact me at 916.743.8775 or by email at jazmadarian@sbcglobal.net. Thank you very much, Respectfully submitted, hely 4; rW4d&V40r T -Mobile - 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 190, Sacramento, CA 95833 - (916) 743-8775 , ADDENDUM ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 32. The project site is on the east side of Kelly Ridge, the ridge that separates most of Oroville from the Lake. The area is predominantly rural with some large lots and some smaller lots. The subject parcel is wooded with predominantly Oak, Manzanita and some Digger Pines. The parcel slopes to the east and has a view of the Lake. The only existing structures on the site are a residence of approximately 1950 square feet, a barn and a lean-to that is used to house the boat. 33. The surrounding properties consist of a mix of a few large undeveloped lots and some smaller lots that are currently developed. All of the homes front Riverview Drive. There does not appear to be any cultural or historic aspects of the parcel. BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES T -Mobile • 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 190, Sacramento, CA 95833 • (916) 743-8775 4 • a a � iet .m,oe from 11"fe June 13, 2006 Mr. Robert McNamara Nextel of California 2001 Edmund Haley Drive Reston, VA 20191 Dear Mr. McNamara: This letter is being sent to you pursuant to the requirements of the Butte County Development Services Department. Omnipoint Communications Inc. plans to submit an application to develop a new wireless facility at 135 Riverview Drive in Oroville, Butte County, California. The coordinates of the proposed tower are Latitude 39-30-55.53 and Longitude 121-28-10.33. At this location, Omnipoint Communications proposes to construct a 100' stealth communications tower and install 6 each of the Decibel DB932QDG90EM antennas at the 100' centerline. Omnipoint Communications operates in Butte County under license WPSL624 and operates in the PCS Broadband range with frequencies of 1870MHz - 1885MHz and 1950MHz- 1965M Hz. If you'have any questions or concerns about this project, please contact me at the below address or telephone number. Thank you very much. O � Jerrt�azwt.adar'aw C �JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES T -Mobile • 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 190, Sacramento, CA 95833 •916.743.8775 fl 0 ch" 'Get m,arle from Fifes? June 13, 2006 Mr. Alvin Souder Point BTA 79 LLC 715 Broadway, Suite 320 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Dear Mr. Souder: This letter is being sent to you pursuant to the requirements of the Butte County Development Services Department. Omnipoint Communications Inc. plans to submit an application to develop a new wireless facility at 135 Riverview Drive in Oroville, Butte County, California. The coordinates of the proposed tower are Latitude 39-30-55.53 and Longitude 121-28-10.33. At this location, Omnipoint Communications proposes to construct a 100' stealth communications tower and install 6 each of the Decibel DB932QDG90EM antennas at the 100' centerline. Omnipoint Communications operates in Butte County under license WPSL624 and operates in the PCS Broadband range with frequencies of 1870MHz - 1885MHz and 1950MHz- 1965M Hz. If you have any questions or concerns about this project, please contact me at the below address or telephone number. Thank you very much. JerrlWcamadarLaw Ir Coin JUL 0 61006 DEVELOPMENT, SERVICES T -Mobile • 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 190, Sacramento, CA 95833 •916.743.8775 0 A OT 0 @'1 M-0 I He :het ma f He June 13, 2006 Mr. Mark Stachiw MetroPCS California LLC 8144 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 800 Dallas, TX 75231 Dear Mr. Stachiw: This letter is being sent to you pursuant to the requirements of the Butte County Development Services Department. Omnipoint Communications Inc. plans to submit an application to develop a new wireless facility at 135 Riverview Drive in Oroville, Butte County, California. The coordinates of the proposed tower are Latitude 39-30-55.53 and Longitude 121-28-10.33. At this location, Omnipoint Communications proposes to construct a 100' stealth communications tower and install 6 each of the Decibel DB932QDG90EM antennas at the 100' centerline. Omnipoint Communications operates in Butte County under license WPSL624 and operates in the PCS Broadband range with frequencies of 1870MHz - 1885MHz and 1950MHz- 1965MHz. If you have any questions or concerns about this project, please contact me at the below address or telephone number. Thank you very much. Jerrdjazmadar%aln. COUNE 1'y Jut 062006 D SYEL��CSNT T -Mobile - 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 190, Sacramento, CA 95833 -916.743.8775 D n Mob -i -I Get more from I" e June 13, 2006 Ms. Robin Cohen Wirelessco, Inc 2001 Edmund Haley Drive Reston, VA 20191 Dear Ms Cohen: This letter is being sent to you pursuant to the requirements of the Butte County Development Services Department. Omnipoint Communications Inc. plans to submit an application to develop a new wireless facility at 135 Riverview Drive in Oroville, Butte County, California. The coordinates of the proposed tower are Latitude 39-30-55.53 and Longitude 121-28-10.33. At this location, Omnipoint Communications proposes to construct a 100' stealth communications tower and install 6 each of the Decibel DB932QDG90EM antennas at the 100' centerline. Omnipoint Communications operates in Butte County under license WPSL624 and operates in the PCS Broadband range with frequencies of 1870MHz - 1885MHz and 1950MHz - 1965MHz. If you have any questions or concerns about this project, please contact me at the below address or telephone number. Thank you very much. JerrUJazmadot r-Laln, COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOP SEEVICE5I4T T -Mobile - 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 190, Sacramento, CA 95833 -916.743.8775 D o oM bfle'n Get m-o r �� e ��� I i�E? June 13, 2006 Ms. Pamela Hoof Verizon Wireless One Verizon Place Alpharetta, Georgia 30004 Dear Ms Hoof: This letter is being sent to you pursuant to the requirements of the Butte County Development Services Department. Omnipoint Communications Inc. plans to submit an application to develop a new wireless facility at 135 Riverview Drive in Oroville, Butte County, California. The coordinates of the proposed tower are Latitude 39-30-55.53 and Longitude 121-28-10.33. At this location, Omnipoint Communications proposes to construct a 100' stealth communications tower and install 6 each of the Decibel DB932QDG90EM antennas at the 100' centerline. Omnipoint Communications operates in Butte County under license WPSL624 and operates in the PCS Broadband range with frequencies of 1870MHz - 1885MHz and 1950MHz- 1965MHz. If you have any questions or concerns about this project, please contact me at the below address or telephone number. Thank you very much. jerrj61Z maolarLaw BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 61006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES T -Mobile • 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 190, Sacramento, CA 95833 • 916.743.8775 `, bHee Get m, -ore from life. June 13, 2006 Ms. Kellye Abernathy Cingular Wireless LLC 5601 Legacy Drive Plano, Texas 75024 Dear Ms Abernathy: This letter is being sent to you pursuant to the requirements of the Butte County Development Services Department. Omnipoint Communications Inc. plans to submit an application to develop a new wireless facility at 135 Riverview Drive in Oroville, Butte County, California. The coordinates of the proposed tower are Latitude 39-30-55.53 and Longitude 121-28-10.33. At this location, Omnipoint Communications proposes to construct a 100' stealth communications tower and install 6 each of the Decibel DB932QDG90EM antennas at the 100' centerline. Omnipoint Communications operates in Butte County under license WPSL624 and operates in the PCS Broadband range with frequencies of 1870MHz - 1885MHz and 1950MHz- 1965MHz. If you have any questions or concerns about this project, please contact me at the below address or telephone number. Thank you very much. BUTTE COUNTY JerrWazw-alar-yaw JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES T -Mobile - 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 190, Sacramento, CA 95833 -916.743.8775 O •� cZ V c O O� M V on • � cry O c: . > c0 a --j 4-J on � O MEMO 4� O Q � ComB JUL 0 61006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES i 1 { l i { I a 4 i. t ComB JUL 0 61006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES i 1 { l This illustration represents a monopole atop a hill. • The height is required so that the signal beams down the side of the hill, and clears variances in the topography. } • I �4 This illustration shows that if the same height pole is placed down from the crest of the hill, the hill itself blocks the signal from the area on the other side of the hill. To counter this blocking, a taller pole must be used so that the signal can clear the crest of the hill. Please note that the scale is exaggerated to communicate the concept. So to achieve the same coverage, a downhill pole will need to be taller than a pole at the crest of the hill. This presentation prepared by Previsualists Inc. For more information, visit www:photosim.com T -Mobile Site ID SC 15420 c0 z T 4 } I - C050'16A COas35A C06880A l �s;l°e�,R , i � N -� 20�Mn C0G690A 06 08 as33A SC14162Z 1 y e L 1 SCO0532A 00683A 1 1 4 t f �a9 c-, 5214' = s - Lyv l I 06530A S` ,s C153432 f Sn l 0 5 7 1 0 } i' ?`i r _ 5;9801 ti n1 s r �i ms � l 0090;18 rMIWA 0 "MUMS Imand(YI2FA3Q IUNIIOa ding 6 40 CArnia, United States, North An*ca O (�' Lake Oroville ONa C�i gf B2 Lake Oroville State Recreation Areai et a0���� 135 Riverview Drive — - - `i Oroville California i SS L G-�c�e-0r Quail=1FP4=�) S Lire !v 162 Q > CD /a 6TIT D ODn�. w 0 mi 0-2 O.i 0.6 0.8 Copyright ®1988-2005 Microsoft Corp. and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. http:/Avww.microsoft.conVstreets/ ® 2004 NAVTEQ. All rights reserved. This data includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities ® Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. ® Copyright 2004 by TeleAtlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. 9 • ( . ^ wa Coli JUL 0 6 ZW wl PTN. SEC. l Z T. 19N. RAE. M.D.B. &M. N86'47'00'W 33 USA$ I a 47 GLS„ .87Ac O� 5.1Oft " — 1.09Ac 48 O n a a ro r • SUNSET T C r ,1sT k a 1.04Ac 57 Imes i 182RS54 1628554 3.97Ac 55 41 63 5.47Ac Pefl1s O.W.W. RES. .62Ac 64 3.67Act 2.464c i 6.60AI 2f4.0013JRS75 � Was msr }y 38 i/4 COR SECS 12 s 13 a L[4WW MANOR UNIT /2, 30 M.O.R. 20/21, 5-16-1963 a4LL4NTR4E MANOR 24 M.O.R. 42/43 : GLENDALE RIDGE TRACT It M.O.R. 25/26 BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 57 69-36 33 I•= 'Mal SW57'00-W UALUM"`AL MANN` """ f` Butte County Assessor's Map 52 Book 69, Page 36 MAIM BY OB CREATED rCWON J-4-2002 NOTE Tlbse parcels are for ast+enemm,t purpoa� Ri1�SE0 F REVISED OW 3-4-2002 only and may rrot ooAS&4de 189a parcels EFWn Of 2002-03 ROLL R,evkwe Book 34Portion 0! 43 Compw 4P Db aft comfy Ammore OfRn • i 7• t .(� r a � .� � � �` Fra. �•, • . W.`.. ; ¢}••- � ' 'a+`.`. �'�'''* try, �' - x ♦ i �' � ` 1`4 r S - ', ,�rvk,,t'j�s � � jv�t�'���� V.� {���, ��sy, <l��•�~i ,.•„:, ,,,,��,///'''�����4 a�l� r♦ .. '; �# �� *a • �� V >'x' jlTi'innl • 'M 1n,'- f, �T r� J _.� (� "'L•�:.. A'� , i. 41 t .,y� i � ..►;•}�.��! � �'I�•�j� 1 �•� ��;,yr�`��. •i"r�t' ly,l� rb 4.00 ��� •+r•�=��'� 1'1�f,-'�' � /� • f� � •'' -.. . 1 C �', ,f i 1, J. ,4Ae� - •• , • . '-% s 1, ' � r�y . '. to ^ ' ♦ l � • ♦ �yef•' ..,1. • y! `, mil r , ' f - � vv v .'''�._ a rK � v • ±i• r .... • ,- i rirJf, �:'i. , f - . ".�.�t .� - _`• .'w' i . +'.. -K dr a J / r,r, t .f • ♦ r. i+a- s . �'4 e't ' n. . • �7- `� r y} 'IIIj art I All ;+'+� x,71• - • 4 �,� i '�c: �i� ,+ . Y`".•�fi• �f ,.� Sj F/� • .-•i`• t�. �y�. �)L R'► - cf . •a'��I 4 ?3� rpt • f'• �,fi ' �•� ' ' A << •' y �-� r ►'' N ,+�"'ShSS+hhh��---�.�+' ,,,r{!mss �r'j � '� � j'r,yF? ;' yrx'r' • �� ! � r� -a�• Fi'?�- j r • r 7' (!�� �• .���t� �ioi:'S�_ �i',���i�'' = I y Fr.• rr Ji t r F c I • �.��! >,d 1444 1 •[ nn t� •4�'..� ' s F • r .k`.. lel. n f J• ' _'`r n'!� . `�•rYuR M : •Y �" '� �. .r.• JNk..• �:Y . �'T. �n nx,` k4n , .. - 1. i. } �• .. � •i 0 • BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES r 'y '�. �"` ♦ '`'. -A, ll V AH[T� `J V � �I I .I.�"•' 1•r�� M V Tit 1VZ yf�} 1.� J�j, • �,C%u' _ 'a' �M.i• "'�,"'k rri � • . t`Y .i{ ti `°1 • I�� �..�.'�"� s"'a�s2� :� ,J! .1- �j� L.4'� b• i�. ... �. � �j .,'�r�',.t 1=�t•,i.� • � ,+�5 ri r : �t '� ' 3 ` X;1�' v '� . e•i�„-�''�ft�7"�+r+Y�{'�' •.r� .��'"���e TX t'��•+ t 'r.r� � 3}7 `fir"t ��{ '�.::�-• .� , ��,>• t�r. � .�� y' /t,' �'j j�"t • 4 ✓.. a ^1 •rt4 r �y g�. � ,•S„� 1 rt Y � Sy, �,,{ a � y �' � k kv-,f'y`'^+ti`� '��s ,'� f� • r ��! � _ . w _ � is .. T�-,-•r.*..��� �,_ . - Mp t..1� ii'►.s. 'i +�' . ' �yC.,.s._i lr,'F fice, i, S93t ' ,�,Y :7"`yf`:,vy• �'jc. 11' 1�y r•y 1:. A y�� � �� �..I, �.7k:� - �L� 'f.�. y,T, •9 * . ,•,� D' y, - �v S..S-. (. ti.f,+'Ja�✓t 11,.; �" i4 t . �dY�i ;�ti.7.v r�i +a i, 'lam y •': =ra -T. .,. �.. tr•e-..- 1p. � fJ, t� J 7 d�' '''♦ �+ -."«Z '�K., Y" ,. �`` � t' "f �.^. 2 t� '3. ' l,;t^ '� Y�yrl `L'�•. Fat t �i�a'�r�r�".{'.I1�!-nZ r'"”' ��"T� �� -ire � Y .. y, i� "' arS .► h� .j +�,t ��R.rj�.,�.r.,,+ �a„�y,4 t '`• •����,p..' r r Qer, 3.'.'..» ,,� _ +�.� s`r�jw�,,; 4+.if. c , }Ci �y t': i'{' y 3�.:"�f� a Y, `�♦,=i�O Yl.a aMip4 r -„Y �� i � � ,,a.�X�,y.,, • # � ;�.r1�yw,�`.,` Z�Y�•R,f,.��,rry � �",+�iT.�Srt� �,,r �.t'Si ,f �', v�v,.�,,, ate,' i.{J...£�'"� `' .`. +.��. �� sy ��' r� �, 4„ , .T S-]TY��!'�. �+.:i4"`. y � �,� �t�is�� !� � ` ^ �*i'� ...,L'' a m '� • .� .� � �,� �i�.y1�I� .,� `�{C?•�•�;���.in,���1.'�'4� r.�r�" .t t4,,."�' �`L1�y'r' '"�'+•,�,� .��s ^��'•a,-• -: �'-. ,� • .. try, ��,,i� 14i1.�•tk�-'`:iv'��•}7�+►r.:l:�"�r���.L�.+�»Mi:4..;*..'+cT75-i'2�.iS�.sv'11.('$/�?`�?`'C+�cSy��t`htr`�"�9w7,*•:� L.1�i'... � ii.�"�'r zsk i i{k fry itir•� i L �"' r� � fr' i t �=.r - .r iii •+ a 3•n i+M+�. .� k; h fa .. � } i i � � -4 • t � dies �✓ .c. � �� � y �y{� •a •; pt .•. I.il _`� +,,,,. �. ��,iDr, � �=a - +>t;�� a 1� y{.�K.. a'; "f • J'=y •y+ _� ' f - 741- 7 { M +rto✓- �j ,ye'� _ .1� ?e. _ r ,a -+L �''�+„' a yY;:r ati r. ` �� . . vj f=�Y. Mme,:-. � ♦� ��R 'V'�`�� �'�,'" �L' 10 L ' �i+i-J t � � ��15''l�'��' Y�G�'�. _'.y."" .--.��"'.".�.•-,ter.,.► _�,�.-. _—�^-�^ -�. _— I ✓- _..., � -� •; Yat .,,;, cT" � �- ':'+' • P COUP JUL 0 6 Sacramento Search Area Map T m -Mobile Site Name: Oroville Dam Site Number: SC15420Z ,,��) yes:,`.. _• . -P it, \. yth g uttY � �i9 v T"�' Cendlaece�l•:Huuse�ri•r�Rop:'" ti 39.51636-N 121A7011 -w I A Search Area Information Latitude(NAD83): 39.51636 Gnd Elev (AMSL-ft): 1128 Number of Sectors: 3 Site e: Suburban Comments: Primary candidate is #1. Lonaitude(NAD 83): 421.47011 RC (ft): 100 Ant. Orientation (TN): 0,120,240 Neigbbor Sites: SC06531A,SC15338A Coverage Objectives: Improve coverage in Oroville. Market: Sacramento City: Oroville County: Butte BTA: Engineer: David Cotner Release Date: 10/04/2005 App. B ` BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2106 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ULS License PCS Broadband License - WPSL624 - Omnipoint NY MTA License, .LLC ® This license has pending applications: 0002624529, 0002624524 Call Sign WPSL624 Radio Service CW - PCS Broadband Status Active Auth Type Regular Market , Market MTA004 -San Francisco- Channel Block B Oakland -San Jose Submarket 16 Associated 001870.00000000 - Frequencies 001885.00000000 (MHz) 001950.00000000- 001965.00000000 Dates Grant 06/30/2005 Effective 09/29/2005 Buildout Deadlines 1st Notification Dates 1st Licensee FRN 0002145696 Licensee Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC 12920 SE 38th Street Bellevue, WA 98006 ATTN Dan Menser Contact T -Mobile USA, Inc. Dan Menser 12920 SE 38th Street Bellevue, WA 98006 Expiration 06/23/2015 Cancellation 2nd 2nd 06/17/2005 Type Limited Liability Company P:(425)378-4000 F:(425)378-4840 E:dan.menser@t-mobile.com P:(425)378-4000 F: (425)378-4040 E: dan.menser@t-mobile.com Ownership and Qualifications Radio Service Type Mobile Regulatory Status Common Carrier Interconnected Yes Alien Ownership Is the applicant a -foreign government or the representative of No any foreign government? Is the applicant an alien or the representative of an alien? No i BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GENERAL NOTES DR4TT.. DLT FLANS 9 IN_6EO TO Be UDSCD FOUR DIAGGI'P�iw�CD[NLL, RURPTOH9E5 ONLY, NILESD NOTED CT.—Se. THE GENERAL TgRRACTOR'S I.IBOR,DA �ANTTSNI RLGL EL9[UDF D N�CLL� RRY ALL TO ECOIIPLETDUIPTIENf, 9TAUATION9 A9 DEKRIBED HEREIN. TNC JOB SITE AND 9UBI1 1 DE TIDDi�L19ELVCC9iiRN wLWLDGpIDITIp19 IECALL TIIN4 DE PROYBED PROJECT, H RUCTKM ANDCOTTRACT CCWIEM9 FIELD CWDITNAp µDFIRH TNAT THE PROJFOT MY Be ACta7P1.IS1ieD AS SFIOHN —To PROCEEDING NIN —TRLCT-. AM S. PTII¢ImLECD F LH---'01—PRWRETO 9 A�IILIR— ON AIDRfrt — CLEARLY DEFINED BY THe CCNSTR 1- DRAM.. CORGCT DOCUnENT9. �. HEREIN..NTHCC NTR IAACFOR SHKLLISBe — ESFONSIS E FOR AixRIBCD AND FOR COMDIRARITION ATIIIGITALL,IDDDPOiIT10N9 D�TME SIII uNOCR THE El awrE RDUACT'. D. TRE COTTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL FOUDRIENF AND nATERIALS ACCORONG TO MNUPACTU R- VENDOR'S 9PPLIIICATKN9 UNLESS NOFCD OTHERN6E OR WILERE ORAL LOPES OR ORgNANCES TAKE PRFLLD E. 9TRNORK PCRFORnCD OR PROJECT AND FUTERI INSTALLED SMALL ESE IN KT AC[OTDANGe WITH ALL APPLK 1 CODES REGULATIW9 D ORDINANCES. COTTRACT00. SMALL LIVE ALL NlTKE9 AMD LOnPLIT NITR ALL �M9 ORDIN� IF.C^.bRLU d LITEim fmPAµNYDB ullw4T°ODNg,9AND Lo L K TmD STAT LRISDKTKNAL CODES BEARING ON YNC PERFORMANCE DF TMC RK. T. ..ERA' .ERACACTI_ IXXUI ` UPDATE_ SHALL D HI?M THE LAYISTTRE 19GN9 AND IT DP AODDENDUFS OR CTARI—TIONS FOR TNS USC DY ALL PERSONNEL INVWVCD TNS PR6lELT. D. TML STRUCTURAL COIPOICM9 OF TRIS PRN[CT SITE/ —1.1 ARE NOT TO BC ALTERED BY THIS -TR PROJECT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9 nwCTAwI':IonI.C�DTIP19 RF41 Y BEEERFOU.iReo TTOOSUR°"-D—DY-5 R 91TWTKNS, AND SUCH MOOFKATION9 SNALL W INCLUDED AS PART OF YNC OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATION 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 190 • Sacramento, CA 95833 S°PE°`TRAT OFINIFVINT (LFWUNKA.TIONS INC. CREEKSIDE OAKS DRIVE wITE LEGEND PROJECT SUMMARY IO. R9NP:'ITAl— DTMr+ ERuu FIRE-RATED LI°. E io T.IS'I-IL.1 NADITD FIRE A-2 IRRL NIGH STREET AUBIRN U 95`-03 (SSD) D65-OADL ppAUFKi DITe. IL PORTABLE RATING 1AREA SITE NAItE. ORD✓ILLE DATI OR �KBC NN YFEET TTRRAVE. D19 -E TOALL iWTIDNB WSTI P4D.JER RING CON9TRUCTIW. A ANTENNA CABLE (ABOVE GROUND) SITE NUMBER, SC-IS9D0 TNC CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECf9MRY PROVISIOu9 TO PROTECT IX191TING I] PROVEMEM9 Ew9EMENT9, PAVING, WRBNG, ETC. WRING CON9T0.UCTIOTI. T TELEPMONe SERVICE (ABOVE GROUND) SITE ADDRESS, 135 RIVERVIEN DRIVE wa+ corwLeTbN ar WORK coMRR_ 4YLL RePA1R AM vATIA4e THAT FMY NAVE OCCNRED WC TE AKNF THE PROPERTY. OROVILLE. U 95956 IT TNATUCTKNWW B. GORRKIRE SHALL SEE TO rt THAT WORK AREA IS KEPT CLEAN AND _E_ PWER SERVICE (ABOVE GRpUND) SITE CONTACT, JERRY C DOER AND .1 RD PRCL DURING TON9T AND DISPOSE W ALL DINT, DEBRIS, G GROUND RING (ABODE GROUND) 590 -BLS -7910 - NO PI BEER AND REMOVE EWI BE NOT BPECIPIED A9 IT- AND ON THE ROPERTY. ENALL Be LFP` IN CLAN CNDITIW AND FREE PRO'1 PwIM ONNER� JAMES 1 RUTH RKKERBY T. ORPRETlIES SPOTS, wnr, oa 9RnFxED w AM ruTu4e. H RC ARCHITECTO/EN41NEERS HAVE MADE EVERY EFFORT TO SET FORTH IN THE A ANTENNA CABLE (BFRIED) DINNER ADDRESS, FAMILY TRUST 135 RIVCRVICN DRIVE —1—TION AND CONT DOCUMENTS YNE COMPLETE SCOPE OF CRRODR9 TWEE. 14AT 1N! AND �SPELIFKATIIOS T TELEPHRIE SERVICE (BRIED) QROVILLI. CA 954LL MI —1515 OR N .—S AND SMALL IXCU9E SAIDCWTRKTOR FROM— EY. 1.PRWECT AND IN ACCORDANCE NITN TNC IMEM OF THCDL OOCVI'tENT9. TNC APPLICANT, DSONIPOINT WMIUNIUTION3 CAF &PROVEMENTS DDER SMALL BEAR THE RE9PON91BILITY W NOFIPYING ((1 N4) THC bWR9 ! POWER SERVICE (BURIED) APPLICANTS ADDRESS, QPCRATIONS, LLC RC OFOT/ENGINEER DF ANY CGNFLKT9 ERRORS m OTl A bR TD TMe 9UBMI99KN p CONTiRKTOR'9 PRdP0311. 1W TME EVENT OF OSS CREERSIDE OAKS DRIVE m—ES TRE DOlTILNCTOR ENALL PRYC TNC TYRE COSTLY OR ORFNSIVC Y✓oRK, UNLESS DIED OTHERNISC. G GROUND RING (BURIED) SUITE 190 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95033 ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER(S). OSA-360- VICINITY NAP CONTACTS rnNSYRDLT1ou OFWIPQNT COMMUNICATIONS INC. JERRY CHANDLER (SW) 810-0131 ITSS CREEKSIDE OAKS DRIVE SUITE ISDTSS OFINIFVINT (LFWUNKA.TIONS INC. CREEKSIDE OAKS DRIVE wITE CALIFORNIA 933 SACRAMENTO,8 RO SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA RSM A -I "'a" I G11L CNGINelR1NG A-2 IRRL NIGH STREET AUBIRN U 95`-03 (SSD) D65-OADL DRIVING DIRECTIONS �9L�X PNS bT4 T4D D TURN RCM OI 9R -9T CLNt IOIT 901R4CA5T TSI LEFT WTD NEERRMD ARE. AT M DG VE DRNE, ORD,ILLG U SWEET INDEX T TITLE SHEET C -I SURVEY SHEET A -I SITE PLAN A-2 ELEVATIONS -DETAILS OROVILLE DAIS Site No. SC15420 SITE ADDRESS QS RIvewle DRIVE OROVILLE; U 94966 T- ..Mobile- OMNIMOIpNeTCOMMUNICATIONS � Peek Site -Com 'A' Ltnwin WayT Suite t06 Aubum, ColifoL 95603 Phone (530) 885-6160 E -Mil info0peek3ite .COm IN P sP x of om r N IN .v ni Iw�ns�o .,mn msia V OVERALL SITE PLAN 0 w200' 460 6CO SCALE I'• 200' GENERAL NOTES: A. ON SITE DRAINAGE SMALL 0E DICTATED BY SITE CONDITIONS B. IN ADDITION TO EQUIPMENT AND TONER SPACE REOUIREMENT9 LEA5ED AREA SIWLD CONSIDER SUCH ITEMS AS, nAINTENAa, CRANE ACCESS AND LANDSCAPING. C, IF CABINETS SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INSTALLED. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE NEW .1X CONC. CRISTT SPLICE BOR H/ ALL CONDUITS NEBBESSARY FOR FUTURE CABINETS. ENLARGED SITE PLAN 0 2' q I 7 SCALE Uq'- I'-0' KEY NOTES: NEW BTB UNITS R NEW TELCO CABINET 5 NEW 200 AMP PPC ELECTRICAL PED. NEW IO HIDE ACCESS GATE 5 NEW MONOPINE PAINTED DARK BROWN 6 NEW PRE -FAB COAX CABLE TRAY OPEN G�RQyAy�yT]2E0 p1104T-II¢¢S�LLIP WALK-ON TYPE. T NEN UN19TRUTE9U�PORT9 REAKER SET ON 0 NNEWGPT UNIT TO MOUNT TO UNISTRUT SUP9 NEW CMU BLK. HALL APPROX. 56• NIGH 10 NEW S SITE LIGNT AT S' AGL II NEW T -MOBILE WIRELESS ANTENNAS FFOR O 01 IROP(paS)ED PER SECTOR 12 NEW UNDEETRGAROUND ELECTRICAL RUN 15NEW UNDERGROUND TELCO RUN 14 NEW V T.K. CONC. SLAB HIT. aq REBAR AT R• M. EAC. WAY AT MID. SLAB OVER q• CRUSHED R -K BASE ME 6' 6' TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE 16 FUTURE BITS CABINET IT NEW SPLICE BOR FOR FUTURE BTS CABINET SITE ADDRESS ISS RIVE VIEW DRIVE OROVILLE, CA 95966 T • .Mobi e- OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS nen D.nNr wL. mw, m6 Im.Now.mmA n meB Peek Site -Com 653 Lincoln "yN Suile 106 Auburn, CDlifOrnla 95603 Ph— (530) 685-6160 EE -Mil in(o®peek5ita".com w a.YkNn wY�me� .Ne w McK�In MM ruw �.a^w .Mm mums REVISIONS I 904 ZONING DOC.'S 6-0-06 TAP 2 1001 ZONING DOC.'S 6-20-06 CON 7OROVILLE DAN' N SITE PLAN eG TAP ^ 9CI9420 ef@ oe NOTEDro m BD6ID * 6_IO-06 A — I ��[F fXNf�T eHn a TYP. BTS DETAIL NOT TO SCALE- Z. TOP VIFN FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW TYP, ANTENNA DETAIL NOT TO SCALE. SOUTH ELEVATION YALE VB' - I'-0' KEY NOTES: NEW BTS UNITS 1 NEW 100A METER 4 MAIN BREAKER SET ON NEW UNISTRUT SUPPORTS 3 NEW 100 AHP PPC ELECTRICAL CABINET 4 NEW TELCO CABINET ON UNISTRUT SUPPORTS 5 NEW MONOPINE PAINTED DARK BROWN 6FINISH GRADE T NEW GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED TO UN15— SUPPORT SNEW CMU BLK. WALL APPROX. %' NIGH 4 NEW 3GOw 51TE LIGWT AT 5' AGL IO TTP. O )1LP WROPDEED PEESS R NEL ENn SECTOR TOTAL OF (13) 11 NEN 6' THK. CONC. SLAB WITH aq REBAR AT 11' 01 EACH WAY AT MID. SLAB OVER 4- CRUSHED ROCK BASE 11 NEW 6' TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE 13 —STING EARN TO REMAIN 14 EXISTING ROCK WALL TO REMAIN SITE ADDRESS 135 RIVERVIEW DRIVE OROVILLE, CA 93966 T- - -Mobile- OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS neeem6 I • min. I lava Peek Site -Com B53 LInC01n Woy, Suite 10( Ph" Cal) 885 61603 Plm (530) BB5-6160 E -Mail infafip:Ek5it.w .— REVISIONS I 90% ZONING DOC. -5 6.10-06 TAP 1 100% ZONING DOL.'S 6-20-06 CDN — OROVILLE DAM ELEVATIONS -DETAILS TAP SC15410 41�ygtY� nacres BAIID. f L-IOo O6 sf a $ f£8S6 rNaolnn 'UNMYNOVS v R 061;11 SNVO MISH3383 SSLI 6 111 11 CQ SNOIIYoIN011A00 1NIOdINNO life m.• y r g �: 6� [ Ly � 3 jazz� gfi�9 a8 p $¢ 9 a g { { 5 J ga x s� off lies t So s a x a as L4>3 �C 39g-�35¢ 29992 5 5 B Na / co 1 ffi qiv I \ y' / o . . . . . . . . . . 1� `4 31- _0 % V % , Aj 4� "R Top of 45 ft scale pole w'rth*-re_d'Iy Im *A Oroville Dam 135 Riverview Drive ixi s. Oroville, CA 95966 SC1 5420 T .. Mobile - pose ole jj- .114.- ;Nn rj, 4, IN Ut" 4. 'Q ...... . . . ., 4z 4^ Z* y21 cz" . TVRC_;� 4!Woi k - 7t, ■ ��a�'r- •"+F' rte- •+.r � •v :a5 51� 'r 'i� i°s tai n d�.'Y.�1'.. t �q' 4• / � tK`F-'- X� r% t ��] �T. Y' � p�MJ!'� rj. S: r ti 11.1 f•!;- �' A7G 7�es tt' v ,S. }.1 F. r . y `� Y•r•S,.r\ ,^ 1 7 •t syr r'�'r �.:. rte. i. '' 1. 1 ,mow ' •t �`� ^T•.`; 5 I `;. .:T +` t4 1' '�'.`�k�i.Fir ♦ w.' a .'cl �.'1,.:,•. ''K � ,SAY '., d ;.t ,�• ,,��C( � ',d'F�:l: '� : t.}�' �.,i` ;.�y� '=r 1. y.v t,�i•� �:��.� ;t�ir�f jti�rr� t�,-.., - 'r' a y y �+,+, �:r R�'-f: p '�./4, i`�/ 4t7'•. R c ^�'r i� :•r,',1'' b n. ' .� r.. S •t�<y! e�.� :-�f�r.• f. S' ;�, 'i'�. yyu r .f•«i�Ky _ �,- '�}'= -1rL _ -�+2 �+.fF Mme" tr",M��. a . � G �"1.,. �. i�F ; Ii � a ) '.� •C <7 r4j .. rti ac � � �+• • .��� .,�+n' ,Y. ° . •max ^ '•F•.• -�. . -+._ r tisk �'1 � .r�i3`i A'v �� ;4 ''.) � .I �!u is a ''� •� %;trsF t � k � 6 �rK ...fir. '�5�; -, y •* e� �, � s Y. •`' tC .f,��'+t!!�� rnLFi,,,ddd �v fiM_pS }y�I ry}., }� }+yL, ori rr ;,. �,�.. Y S•-+,f"it �T �i:D�4 [7rnvlllra 91 � i �}.iuY. 7Rr �} Jf• wS: ri /4 ,•f .� t .. tj J4 .'.:-F 5 d Y 1 P,� ode•• �� �,f :- ��] f ^M i ('. d�.'Y.�1'.. t �q' 4• / � tK`F-'- X� r% t ��] �T. Y' � p�MJ!'� rj. S: r ti 11.1 f•!;- �' A7G 7�es tt' v ,S. }.1 F. r . y `� Y•r•S,.r\ ,^ 1 7 •t syr r'�'r �.:. rte. i. '' 1. 1 ,mow ' •t �`� ^T•.`; 5 I `;. .:T +` t4 1' '�'.`�k�i.Fir ♦ w.' a .'cl �.'1,.:,•. ''K � ,SAY '., d ;.t ,�• ,,��C( � ',d'F�:l: '� : t.}�' �.,i` ;.�y� '=r 1. y.v t,�i•� �:��.� ;t�ir�f jti�rr� t�,-.., - 'r' a y y �+,+, �:r R�'-f: p '�./4, i`�/ 4t7'•. R c ^�'r i� :•r,',1'' b n. ' .� r.. S •t�<y! e�.� :-�f�r.• f. S' ;�, 'i'�. yyu r .f•«i�Ky _ �,- '�}'= -1rL _ -�+2 �+.fF Mme" tr",M��. a . � G �"1.,. �. i�F ; Ii � a ) '.� •C <7 r4j .. rti ac � � �+• • .��� .,�+n' ,Y. ° . •max ^ '•F•.• -�. . -+._ r tisk �'1 � .r�i3`i A'v �� ;4 ''.) � .I �!u is a ''� •� %;trsF t � k � 6 �rK ...fir. '�5�; -, y •* e� �, � s Y. •`' tC .f,��'+t!!�� rnLFi,,,ddd �v fiM_pS }y�I ry}., }� }+yL, ori rr ;,. �,�.. Y S•-+,f"it �T �i:D�4 [7rnvlllra 91 _ - June 16,-2006 Ph otosimulstion of View looking .west from the Saddle Dain. n. - .,� rc...o ..s. Lr - r . - .rr;,, 4-M.{,1.4:3 .. F4..... 'tom' .. ,. ^Y �.+ .5" s �� •. yr Im (_. S. :r.`a.de«ra.,a.,.snk Y- s>�`so,�. :�3G.•.. .,<.,Ky f�: a �. "..r.. � ., .., rY. i .s. ;ah` ras•'hrx. :... ��., a. Y.t';:n:r...-. � t,., � d.. ..Xx: vi;� . e ..-4 Y .:-•�»,T -%-r r ..�: x r I h,., .r.;'� �, 3��x k..r".v�,. o r.,c i , �S,- • :ca- '-.;; a.^.,,�i .w�. K:,w �"✓r;...I,.rry z 1 � Y , " 7 ...- a ,r - . •a h. �id°3' 0,;?4 . '�'I'?o 7,sY.-..n..�e r,>n, �r;Y "fc� f",.»e-a '4rr,.1,.•,. '' �, 3: �r .�S.r� r' Y..: s+7`ii '^35- ''._r.`.5' `-j Xr'�r�"''c^:" fes . Hk' •�, t ,� <�'•� k✓+� i �' ,i . ,.. �`' w ��,.,r X„a"pf�9^ ;rxji�, kr'+,•�wrK Y •#r'�Fi��"..`n'.!'`'Tx �g+�S; • 11 Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile www.buttecounty.net/dds ADMINISTRATION'' BUILDING * PLANNING July 13, 2006 TO: Enter Agency or Department FROM: Chris Tolley, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Omnipoint Communications, Use Permit UP 07-01 APN: 069-360-008 DATE OF Inter -Departmental Review: 8/2/2006 IDR RESPONSE REGARDING COMPLETENESS OF APPLICATION DUE BY: 07/31/06 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS/MITIGATION MEASURES DUE BY: 08/17/06 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, to be determined at the Inter -Departmental Review (IDR) Committee meeting on 8/2/2006, and/or to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: new 120 'wireless communication tower with 12 (6 immediate - 6 future) panel antennas at the 100' height, and associated ground equipment. Future collocations are possible, but not specified at this time. PROJECT LOCATION: on the east side of Riverview Drive, 1,145 feet (.2 miles) north of the Gleness Drive -Riverview Drive intersection (135 Riverview Drive, Oroville). COUNTY SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO.: 1 ZONING: AR- I((Agricultural-Residential, 1 -acre parcels)) GENERAL PLAN: AR(Agricultural Residential) If a response cannot be submitted prior to the due dates listed above, please call Chris Tolley at (530) 538-7603 or send him an email at MMICHELENA@buttecounty.net. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please return response to project planner. IDR COMMITTEE — APPLICATION COMPLETE ❑ No Name: Date: ❑ Yes Name: Date: Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile July 13, 2006 To: Inter -Departmental Review Committee Subject: Evaluation and Completeness of Application Applicant: Omnipoint Communications,, UP 07-01 Planner: Chris Tolley APN: 069-360-008 Location: on the east side of Riverview Drive, 1,145 feet (.2 miles) north of the Gleness Drive -Riverview Drive intersection (135 Riverview Drive, Oroville) 30 -Day Complete 8/4/2006 Date of IDR 8/2/2006 This application is being provided to you for comments. Please see attached documents. A hard copy of the application, including maps, has been sent to Environmental Health, Building Manager, LAFCo, Agricultural Commission, Public Works, Assessor, and CDF. All Environmental Health correspondence is routed through Karen Frederick at 7 County Center Drive. The purpose of this notice is to give you the opportunity to comment on the completeness of this application electronically to the planner, so that preparations can be made for the IDR meeting on 8/2/2006. Do you find this application complete? ❑ NO. Please respond prior to or at the IDR meeting07/31/06, regarding completeness_ of application. What is needed to make the application complete? ❑ YES. My Department's conditions and/or mitigation measures are attached or will be provided at the IDR meeting. If conditions cannot be provided at or prior to the IDR meeting they must be provided no more than 1 week after the meeting. Standard Conditions are attached for your convenience. (PLEASE SEND YOUR RESPONSE TO: mmichelenammichelena@buttecounty.net). Signature: _ Department: Date: UPlanning/Projects/A New File/IDR Memos/IDR Completeness 8/30/05 • .Page 1 of 2 Tolley, Chris From: Jerry Jazmadarian oazmadarian@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 1:08 PM To: Tolley, Chris Subject: Re: UP 07-01 (APN 069-360-008) - New Wireless Communications Tower Chris: T -mobile is seeking approval for twelve antennas, 4 antennas per each of the three sectors. They may initially only install 6 antennas but would like to permit the facility for the maximum possible number of twelve. This is indicated in Key Note #11 on the A-1 sheet. T -Mobile makes their sites available for future co -locations and the landowner has agreed to lease additional ground space, if required, for any future co -locators. The only company I know that is currently interested in this site is Cingular but that development may not be completed until next year or possibly 2008. If you need any additional information, please contact me. Thanks greatly, Jerry "Tolley, Chris" <ctolley@buttecounty.net> wrote: Jerry, Good afternoon. I have a few questions about the proposed facility. 1. How many antennas are proposed within this application? 2. Will the tower be collocated at any point in the future (it would be very beneficial to identify all possible collocations at this point in time)? Thanks, Chris Christopher J. Tolley Associate Planner Butte County Planning Division Phone (530) 538-7601 Fax (530) 538-7785 07/11/2006 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT —November 12, 2009 Applicant: Omnipoint Communications Owner: James & Ruth Rackerby File #: UP06-0017 Request: Construct and operate a 120' wireless communications tower with 12 panel antennas and associated ground equipment. G.P.: Agricultural Residential Zoning: AR -1 Zone Date: February 28, 1984 APN: 069-360-008 Parcel Size: 12.87 acres Location: 135 Riverview Drive (east side of Riverview Drive, 0.2 - mile north of the Gleness Drive and Riverview Drive intersection:, east of the City of Oroville Supervisor District: Planner: Attachments: 1 Stacey Jolliffe A: Resolution for Denial B: General Plan/Zoning Map and Vicinity Map C: Correspondence with applicant and owner D: Photo Simulations E: Site Plan RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission deny this application without prejudice, allowing the filing of a new application if applicable code requirements can be met. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This request for a Use Permit UP06-0017 was submitted on July 6, 2006 and has not been deemed complete for processing, due to non-compliance with setback requirements with BCC Section 24- 262 (g) (2) b. which states in part that "all new facilities shall be located on a lot so that the distance from the base of the facility to the parcel or lot boundary is equal to or greater than the height of the facility." The proposed tower does not meet setback requirements for wireless communications facilities, provisions in the County Code to allow setback requirements for wireless facilities are not applicable to this property, as it is zoned AR -1. . The applicant of record, Jerry Jazmadarian (Omnipoint Communications), has indicated that he is no longer the representative for the project. He referred staff to two representatives from T -Mobile, who have not returned email messages requesting to discuss the project. See Attachment C for e- mail correspondence with the property owner and wireless representatives, for whom staff was not able to locate office mailing addresses. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ 0 Planning Commission 0 "Omnipoint Communications UP06-0017 0 November 12, 2009 ■ Page 1 ■ The property owner indicates the tower is not being pursued, and that he is not interested in relocating the tower to meet setback requirements. The tower was located as shown in the application packet because an existing barn shields it from the direct view of his neighbors. He said moving the tower +60 feet was not acceptable because it places the equipment, fence and tower base within his neighbors' view of Lake Oroville. The Department of Development Services has an expectation that project applicants will respond in a reasonable amount of time to requests for materials necessary for completion of project processing. The County is unable to approve this application without a tower meeting either the setback requirements of the BCC, or the criteria for modifying setback requirements. It is important to the Department's operations that applications not persist in processing without reasonably timely action to provide information required for continued processing. Persistent, incomplete applications result in significant ongoing costs to the County due to the duplication of effort needed to update, recreate, and restart project processing, and from changes in development standards. The significant costs to the County of"holding" applications indefinitely are not covered by the "flat -rate" nature of the County's application fee structure. To allow for continued processing of such an application would result in the need to subsidize the processing of this application from the County's General Revenues Fund. Staff no longer has an active applicant of record, and the property owner is not in support of locating the tower in a location consistent with the requirements of Butte County Code. For these reasons, it is recommended that this application be "denied without prejudice", thereby allowing the applicant to reapply if applicable code requirements can be met without having to wait the normal period of one year before submitting the same or substantially the same application. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/CEQA ISSUES: The recommended denial of this project is Statutorily Exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15270(a). This section states that "CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves." If the Planning Commission chooses not to deny this project, appropriate analysis under CEQA would be required prior to consideration of approval. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ 0 Planning Commission 0 "Omnipoint Communications UP06-0017 0 November 12, 2009 0 Page 2 ■ RESOLUTION - A RESOLUTION OF THE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE USE PERMIT UP06-0017 Omnipoint Communications WHEREAS, Use Permit UP06-0017 application for Omnipoint Communications on Assessor's Parcel Number 069-360-008 was submitted to Butte County on July 6, 2006; and WHEREAS, the application has remained incomplete for processing; and WHEREAS, the applicant of record Omnipoint Communications has informed staff via phone on September 3, 2009 that he was no longer representing the project; and WHEREAS, successors to the original applicant T -Mobile USA, Inc. have neither made contact with staff nor responded to requests for discussion about the project; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 2009 the- property owner informed staff that he was not interested in placing the tower on his property at a modified location, as required to meet County setback requirements,; and WHEREAS, this application was considered by the Planning Commission at duly noticed public meeting held on November 12, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered public comments and a report from the Planning Division. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission: I. Denies without prejudice Use Permit UP06-0017 application for Omnipoint Communications, subject to the following findings: A. The application has been incomplete since it was submitted on July 6, 2006. B. The property owner does not support placing the tower on his property at a location consistent with the requirements of Butte County Code. C. The applicant of record informed staff via phone on September 3, 2009 that he was no longer representing the project, and new contacts from T -Mobile USA, Inc. have neither made contact with staff nor responded to requests for discussion about the project. D. Persistent applications that fail to provide the necessary materials required for completion the project result in significant ongoing costs to Butte County. These costs are due to the duplication of effort needed to update, recreate, and restart project processing, and from changes in development standards. The significant costs to the County of "holding" applications indefinitely are not covered by the ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ 0 Planning Commission 0 "Omnipoint Communications UP06-0017 0 November 12, 2009 0 Page 3 ■ C� "flat -rate" nature of the County's application fee structure. To allow for continued processing of such a non-compliant application would result in the need to subsidize the continued processing of this application from the County's General Revenues Fund.. DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of November, 2009, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Fernando Marin, Chairman Planning Commission County of Butte, State of California ATTEST: Tim Snellings, Secretary Planning Commission County of Butte, State of California ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ 0 Planning Commission ■ "Omnipoint Communications UP06-0017 0 November 12, 2009 ■ Page 4 ■ A AM s MUID From: Jolliffe; Stacey Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 2:43 PM To: 'jimrackerby@att.com' Subject: Use Permit UP06-0017 (Omnipoint) Hello Mr. Rackerby, Thank you for taking my call this afternoon and informing me about the status of the above - referenced use permit. (I have been unable to contact new representatives referenced by former representative Jerry Jazmadarian,) Would you please confirm my understanding that the project has been abandoned by OmniPoint (now T -Mobile) and that the application should be closed? Thank you for your assistance. Stacey Jolliffe Principal Planner, Current Planning Section Butte County Dept, of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Phone: 530.538.6573; FAX 530.538.2140 Email: sjolliffeebuttecounty.net Website: www.buttecounty.net/dds COUNTY OF BUTTE EMAIL DISCLAIMER: This email and any attachment thereto may contain private confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. 'Any review, copying, or distribution of this e0mail he any attachments thereto) by other than the County of Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto. 7 E Jolliffe, Stacey From: Jolliffe, Stacey Sent: Monday, September.21, 2009 11:10 -AM To: 'doug.murphy@t=mobile.com ;'bruce:piland@t-mobile.com' Subject: FW: omnipoint'tower off Riverside Dr. UP06-0017 Importance; High Page 1 of 2 Hello.Dennis, and/or Bruce, , Please 'cairme at 530=538-6-611: IDo you know the'status of the:use permit request UP06-0017:off Riverside Drive? We are planning to take the project forward for denial.. Would like to speak with you. Stacey Jolliffe Principal Planner, Current' Planning Section Butte County:Dept. of. Development •Se.rvices, .7 County Center'Deive. Oroville, CA •95965 • Phone: '530.538.6573; FAX 530.538.2140'. Email: siolliffe@buttecountv.net Website: www:buttecourity.net/dds; :COUNTY OF BUTTE EMAIL DISCLAIMER: This email and any attachment thereto may..contain` private confidentiali and privileged material for the. -sole use -of the -intended,recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of -this e=mail'(or', any attachments thereto) by other than the County of Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. 'If you -are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the °sender immediately and permanently delete the originall'and any, copies, of this e-mail and any attachments thereto: From: Jolliffe, .Stacey Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 934 -AM To: 'dmurphy@t-mobile.com'; 'bpiland@t-mobile.com' Subject: FW omnipoint tower off Riverside Dr, UP,06=0017 Hello Gentlemen, Jerry asked me to-4orward this email -to you as he is no longer the representative. Would one of you: kindly provide me with the status, of this project;'your,site number SC15420? Stacey Jolliffe. Principal Planner, Current Planning Section Butte 'County Dept. -of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA' 9596 Phone.: :530.538.7541; FAX `530.53. 8.2140 Email:. Molliffe@buttecountV:nei Website: 'www.buftecountv.net/dds, COUNTY OF BUTTE EMAIL DISCLAIMER: This email and any attachment thereto may contain private confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the, intended recipient: Any review; copying, or diWibution of this e-mail (or any attachments thereto) by other than the County of 10/21/2009, Page 2 of 2 Butte or the intended'recipient 'is Strictly prohibited. F If you.pre NOT"W6 intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and'any copies_of thine=mail and any attachments thereto: Froin:,Jolliffe, Stacey Sent: Thursday, September 03; 2009 8:54 AM To lhzmadarian@sbcglobal.net' Subject: ornnipoint tower off Riverside Dr, UP06-0017 Hello Jerry, ' 1 am looking for your help in getting this -UP to hearing or,closed out. As you may be aware, project Planner Chris Tolley was, laid off, so; forgive me, I need to ask a couple clarifying questions. 1: I see from the site plan dated 06-10-06, that the location of the.site is approximately 45' from the northern property .line. Please confirm I am working .off the most 'recenUcorrect site plan. The. recent'codefix' for modifying setbacks for communications towers is not applicable in the AR -1 zone in which the, property; is located. So I need •to confirm my understanding that the property owner has not agreed to move the cell tower to the south; because he wants it to.be shielded'from view. In notes to file, it was noted that Mr. Rackerby understood that he could'move the tower over 66 or so feet. He said that this would not be acceptable because it places the equipment, fence and tower base in full view of the neighbors to the lake. As ,proposed, the ,equipment, fence and tower,base is'blocked by the existing barn. Please let me know within the next -week, or so, if the proposed location of the cell tower has changed. 2. The Zoning code does: not provide authority to approve the tower as currently proposed, so as things stand there are'three choices: take it forward for denial, withdraw the application, or move the tower location. Please let me know your thoughts in a week or so. I'd be pleased to speak with you, and help out however I am able. My direct number, for your convenience is 530-538-6573. Stacey, Jolliffe Principal Planner, Current Planning Section Butte County Dept. of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Phone: 530.538.7541; FAX 530.538.2140_ Email: siolliffe@buttecourity.net' Website: www.buttecounty.net/dds. COUNTY OF BUTTE EMAIL DISCLAIMER: This email and any attachment thereto may contain private confidential, and privileged material'for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying-, or distribution of this e-mail (or any attachments thereto) by other than the County of Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and -any, copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto. 10/2.1/2009 i n tee:. t 3 +y Av y Mme• ,,y� • w ';iii Top of 45 Pt scale pole with gyred balloon • . L t Es = - OrOvIlleCA 5; 66 - �. Proposed 120 ft tree pole E .} - ' t?v '�+.' i''� - � i����� 'cam: r Y�` c ►., ' rte' ' �i`� •.��' ,1�� , �- . < < ,. {% .J j •I yl � i. e+('Y. .- �J � ' 'ti �.•B ,{ ''�`� �'y.i �e =.n..^{1 .� L�.w� �i•��..J�: ...r.�W_.. J � ,1'. � " � +'' ' June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking southwest from Kelly Ridge Road. June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking west from the Saddle Dam. .-,.w t ��." - - - 4k -1 TEX,M .41 Proposed 120 ft tree pole A —;–, ---- - .... - .. NAM, A91,Y11, 6 Oroville Dam 135 Riverview Drive Oroville, CA 95966 SC15420 7 Z-� �UAI 0 3M - , ... T—Mobilee Copyright 200& Arvistialists Inc- all rights reserved. Ac=acy of this photosirmlation based upon information provided by project applicant Questions? Call 1.877.7993210 or visit WWW.PHOTOSIM.COM GENERAL NOTES ., oa�Arera .wew wTw° u o.T�omm�brom 'w.eaxa�. `OO�T.c . . �.uT�, .MOwawHi10oeeo°VEUDea w°f'�Oeo:.."ceno.e+• m mxcn �:'® '. ,. ,TDoe M TMe a� +ndW Or Gq, M edrrawCTOW Onll./t0 G141 `aGT ra xe yx 4m r,rvuu°zs n,heeaG wrM wu ovartwe AwG:nxc I1Z IRTPID rPO.eCT W M iM¢ <[Gq,OVITigW�CTNMAI AND raefaKT T �N CQA�r�T TOT CY � . ■ ■ . 0� I ( � ■ TTtNr+Or v na ADD,T[CT a rairmrooD�wne ti�ioM9Va�Oa�r°Y,¢rnv10brT�i+owwct d'�ixrT�irei,°.uf 1 �6p2.p(MTJgY'Y1DW¢D OY T�N�6{{f�6ptlp 3 fM1�KT DDGP.WCI. .•ID rOR CMtMUQ TYY. ..LL iY:OTOb�OAd�T� tv WR�`NDTHT a tue rQ faKTCR G 4Y O,TgL Yw eo am r 4a ureau , O M N I P O I N T COMMUNICATIONS wtroamn ro n4.iwcrugT,rr vemcaTs ssaezei` � anree�Omuee.S° oeMos,e¢ 04 .amm .ecu. root, oa o,oa+,n �` naMawaaeDOMrattYAaDnrawuwswumGwaetw 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive Suite 190 Sacramento CA 95833 ,rIOGT .aoaD4ltt b♦w .V. w,aa.�.a. aerswwT+oo, Oro r. coati :.roe:w.cTw aro. xsvca wr na vrmmcT Gx w sw. xr a �, e¢00pwgnfjii°O�IT`°R° TC U06 0T'. uTFC�O ie21°u w�M1NJ• • 0.TUU fOWIWM O I1L0 MpIfLT GTV f Jun rR I!r TOY iirew°TD er nas uxnriwnn. rmueT uaw wTm onsaaae. Y. 'xf):t 1 ,CVJDfD aDRa AIR �u/LLT WTp�YDO OMW bb OtlKT Of �bpl 1T+109 efCgff(.Tlpp rtwY Y O,t.TT m fOWTeOn bt 1�'��T� tlW '..YW MdfK�T�OU 0[ pCwOtD b Vµ1Y Of T+G LEGEND PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET INDEX �.ay.+:i .aaam e..Teo,..s a .aa,e.D.e TD Tlm r.e��n Aen oz °anlaT m e TE MATTE. ° D°^ T TITLE 94EET wona[ w foaT.ae sRe Drr•IanGr� roto .. OwTun a ear uae niw ,-. • •Irrumw ueie C�swe LaOlA:OJ ,ere ea�emttt. �-nn'o A�arrA oaai r e,ieKrw � �n asra*r: To .0 roman v a¢ wwrcr .__ n, ticoartaAcroa,w,....,R Mteese.rry rcarJaen re faexcr nmrr,n rEiawiwe 9[AI/iDE (wswe tsaouMD iac arv[arna+ oaNe C-1 SURVEY 5WEET u�acvmekre u�twvr�nel (vpAowew�, saymayw�. sex. awn mnrw.cnaa T ) s.Te .aw¢ss� IIMP rdMAK PK TO f(a6rmK,+P+ p carowr nH fR[aultt T E A'HfA OCNveGE (w9WCGRWIOJOROv�u.e cA rtwa o. a,+rawcTw vr4• sw.r anua4..aac wv. v tear aro w,o srre carrier. mar owaea M.rAao �aw�mne.�Twarnar �mG:no�p�,a� � � eaawD aua.(wDwe GaaaWJ nx-ew•ra A=1 SITE PLAN T°�y{'oce, a � eu,w° LSM VraTW nnD IIC3 f2v1 a.�Df PWCR 'JweD w Kura ¢KJ(tRpT .. A•nnTrere.w.ae¢w �wre n.DD nem urear To Gn vea:u • vrF,aw eAse (euweD) f4aar rausT A-2 ELEVATICNV5-DETAIL5 ' owracnw Aso r0/OtA[T DDa,axrD ra CO,R.ETe xove o'fr o`a¢A •DOaeD1 t,si arvTavee. Daae ,oec rareer°a, Gown Tae a 4R vearue,eia uuraMeo nor .ro:at•/,Otl ae [Ra°a, N TK a1w,0eY, 4a aR OP¢MUTIPn • T TEtEr'u01re 9PRYCe (Buu£DJ 04oru¢. Cw ear»e si° ear,uerea fvoT cow.erea rve p�Dp� __ �O e. °rTauu ee w na aro wr» iTM n�0 t+ie a ?vMER seliYl (e—m) wRO,TtLTinryepr v paOt. DtLOe�i Op aq]pp0 •GRI(A Ts ADORE59, TIOK. utO M100d,wt rTx atLOL4oE pu[, CQve :: M°Lorm'evu„•�,ne �eD an�oe. roue ,wa riD4! fconT O�o oaNe O � emwD w.a leuweDJ scare eaD VICINITY MAP ( CONTACTS Mater COFV,niUTlar9 WC. hA0.Y a(/tIREA MA etl-Oc,T �iTE�IDE 0404 DRM e� C�CRTIDN �DIc. owcawr,cerro, cu,ToaMiw neva scan Ma - . _ - s�aunorro, cwtve,Enw axes 1 ZX. uON ,TREET DRIVING DIRECTIONS nm, pwr a,a•u oue wa,om.wt ,�upa1 �epeTr patmW ieaura mro 4M a wi O'3 eMfbfM DOTY. ODA1uE. G s,ess>ozs aacec w+rm�(sh ow-,co.me OROV I I_ L E DAr-11 Site No. SCIS420 T -MONDE ,+n.us as � Pn0Of7,lY DDveao OGeSt. PT. SITE ADDRESS Iffi gush a Dalve DRPntAE. u asw,a T• Mobile- oryo)n-r ce>aEMuxeci.Tcoxs masa Oa MUNIC w IOD Peek Site—Com .053 LrtK0V1 WOT, 5oitet061 lwbvn, LD!ifoYDD 55603 PMn (530) 895-6W0 _ REVISIONS I� a% Za1OID Doc.Y cy0-m i•P 1' I I I OROVILLE DAi TITLE SHEET TPd U. wEc»e A8 aOxO J T-1 eam s-w.a 13 • OVERALL SITE PLAN O KD za .otl GW ,u� .•. Ta, GENERAL NOTES, A Rt ]?[ CRNIIAf'E SRAIy N. OK[AT[D aT slTc [aRR>loo & m ME�910 I�CPtY� &K4 1 Hb[ �RxTE�IW+CAE, CRAM[ ACLO'v AND WO5UPa1G. C. 9 LMW[T]' KYH ARE rtlT TO w MT.utED. CMTRKTOR TO PRPnD[ R[s, 1>•Y30. 44:C. CRrSTY sRlc9 BQ• w wu Cd10wT9 RE90C94CRT 90R MLRY l.�BO1ET0. YENLARGED SITE PLAN auu vA•. r -o• KEY NOTES: ]NEM BTa —TB NW T96W fwBR 9 xpa w w PPC EIfiCTlb PED. Nd W .09 wCCM* GATE a NBx �NpaRE —W OwfDc aROwV x!la PR6-/A9 CdY CABIe 4? T OPEN � T W-010MM-9-11- eET a AGM W T TO tWIA1T TO WSTGOT VNW O>u BUC: NAIL APPROx. W B1Ca1 b NPA aOB. BRE LK T wT tl m. x 'EN T•f10BgE NIItEL[.b A "cm FOR rTV / ^ER a[crae n n O�LRAA D•TaX:1l AIX wxW W004f.1.0 TE4 RDN xW W' Tl[c, CPK• 540 .atM w REBAR AT n` ac. a• %A x.» AT raD, 9OVER IN CRu91.o xeue OX 5 e• WADI 4a0[ F9KL ' M K ARE am EABI n xH04sauce" Box Pd! TUTURe Brs CAB SITE ADDRESS T.Mobile- O����T COMMUNMAT30NS:. Peek Site -Com /T/� 853 LkiwM ttDye sae !DG �\4.�i/t w,aun, eairmee 9Sso3 8 (550) 805 -GW a'• vel �P+Qyp4••1[u wo o's eremr rb, � b •ate .mw:as REVISIONS OROV I LL E DAPI SITE PLAN /�•� i� Tom' p S08KV RwOu 14 Isle Eta 96 e 0 ? 7 Ea a< �E g gg p CC rFa s4F R ( s if a{ S fill I it t 111.1 $4111IN €fill 11 , [Bill 911f l _ a4, ,�� T • -Mobile • # gx II► �fpi411&9go OMMIPOINT COYYUMICATIONS Y qt 1,755 C1tEgKSIDE OAKS /190 Cil "C SACRACENTO, CALIFORNIA 95833 TYP. BTS DETAIL wr To scow 59' TOP W, 3 FRPTr NEM sloe V, . TYP. ANTENNA DETAIL wr To SCAM I 3 O - SOUTH ELEVATION erne us- • i.P KEY NOTES: NOW BTS W n 1 RFN 1GOA iER . rwN BRFARR 8CT 9 NDEA- �� S CAE Tr . MEN TO.CO CASWET d UNISTROT $UVPRRTS e FO.9u IT PGauE wllNrm varac exnee c Pooe T WOW OPS g WEOPw 110A(ICD TO uusrROT P(r eNEN C!N BIA. u APP3p�X. W Milt 9 NBW each sm "aff wT V ACt I NB'I Ty+f((.OJItS vnREtE56 PAm A%f@A4lr 1T'ro0YAL�Oi JpPROiV9ED PPR sKTOR JI iffN 6' TNCfQIL .SLAB NRM et MAR AT '1' 0.. G1G NAT AT too. U'a Q CR .• CRoSRPO PC- BASe n No+ J, rxv ee�N urx cu+ce 0 &ISTw0 BARN TO ACI u mnsTmc ROCeNAu TO REJW# SITE ADD2E55 ORGA.Lda v�uc T i -Mobile iro j i Jolliffe, Stacey From: Jolliffe, Stacey Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 2:43 PM To: 'jimrackerby@att.com' Subject: Use Permit UP06-0017 (Omnipoint) • 1 Hello Mr. Rackerby, Thank you for taking my call this afternoon and informing me about the status of the above - referenced use permit. (I have been unable to contact new representatives referenced by former. representative Jerry Jazmadarian.) ; Would you please confirm my understanding that the project has been abandoned by OmniPoint' (now T -Mobile) and that the application should be closed? Thank you for your assistance. Stacey Jolliffe Principal Planner, Current Planning Section Butte. County Dept. of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA' 95965 Phone: 530.538.6573; FAX 530.538.2140 Email: sjolliffe(a)buttecounty.net Website: www.buttecounty.net/dds COUNTY OF BUTTE EMAIL DISCLAIMER: This email and any attachment thereto may contain private confidential, and privileged material for the sole use'of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this eomail (or any attachments thereto) by other than the County of Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto. • Page 1 of `? Jolliffe, Stacey . From: 'Jolliffe, Stacey Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 11:.10 AM To: 'doug.murphy@t-mobile.com'; 'bruce.piland@t-mobile.com' Subject: FW: omnipoint tower -off Riverside Dr, UP06-0017 Importance: High Hello Dennis, and/or Bruce, Please call me at 530-538-6611. Do you know the status of the use permit request UP06-0017 off Riverside Drive? We are planning to take the project forward for denial... Would like to speak with you. Stacey Jolliffe Principal Planner, Current Planning Section Butte County Dept. of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA '95965 Phone: '530.538.6573; FAX 530.538.2140 Email: siolliffe@buttecountv.net Website: www.buttecountv.net/dds COUNTY OF BUTTE EMAIL DISCLAIMER: This email and any attachment thereto may contain' private confidential, and privileged material.for the sole use of the -intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this e-mail (or any attachments thereto) by other than the County of Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you. are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original: and any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto. From: Jolliffe, Stacey Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 9:34 -AM To: 'dmurphy@t-mobile.com'; 'bpiland@t-mobile.com' Subject: FW: omnipoint tower off Riverside Dr, UP06-0017 Hello Gentlemen, Jerry asked me to, forward this email to you as he is no longer the representative. Would one of you kindly provide me with the status. of this project, your site number SC15420? Stacey Jolliffe Principal Planner, Current Planning Section Butte County Dept. of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA' 95965 Phone: 530.538.7541; FAX 530.538.2140 Email: siolliffe@buttecounty:net Website: www.buttecounty.net/dds COUNTY OF BUTTE EMAIL DISCLAIMER: This email and any attachment thereto may contain private confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient: Any review, copying, or distribution of this e-mail (or any attachments thereto) by other than the County of 10/21/2009. • • Page 2 of 2 Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. Ifyou,are NOT the intended'recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and'any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto From: Iolliffe, Stacey Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 8:54 AM To: 'jazmadarian@sbcglobal.net' Subject: omnipoint tower off Riverside Dr, UP06-0017 Hello Jerry, I am looking for your help in getting this UP tohearing or closed out. As you may be aware, -project Planner Chris Tolley was. laid off, so, forgive me, I need to ask a couple clarifying questions. 1.: I see from the site plan dated 06-10-06, that the location of the site is approximately 45' from the northern property line. Please confirm I am working off the most recent/correct site plan. The. recent'code fix' for.modifying setbacks for communications towers is not applicable in the AR -1 zone in which the property is located. So I need to confirm my understanding that the property owner has not agreed to move the cell tower to the south, because he wants it to be shielded from view. In notes to file, it was noted that Mr. Rackerby understood that he could move the tower over 60 or so feet. He said that this would not be acceptable because it places the equipment, fence and tower base in full view of the neighbors to the lake. As proposed, the equipment, fence and tower base is blocked by the existing barn. Please let me know within the next week, or so, if the proposed location of the cell tower has changed 2. The Zoning code does not provide authority to approve the tower as currently proposed, so as things stand there are'three choices: take it forward for denial, withdraw the application, or move the tower location. Please let me know your thoughts in a week or so. I'd be pleased to speak with you, and help out however I am able: My direct number, for your convenience is 530-538-6573. Stacey Jolliffe Principal Planner, Current Planning Section Butte County Dept. of Development Services. 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Phone: 530.538.7541; FAX 530.538.2140 Email: sjolliffe@buttecountv.net Website: www.buttecounty.net/dds COUNTY OF BUTTE EMAIL DISCLAIMER: This email and any attachment thereto may contain private confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this e-mail (or any attachments thereto) by other than the. County of Butte o - the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any.copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto. 10/21/2009 E COUNTY OF BUTTE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA s u P Chico Enterprise Record P P.O. Box 9 L Chico, CA 95927 I Account number 016410 E R • FIELD PURCHASE ORDER Issued By Department NUMBER F 10-0.70 10-071 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DATE QNTY INVOICE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CHARGE TO W. O. # 3/6/08 NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC 440-001-537 PLEASE FURNISH TWO COPIES OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION AND TEAR SHEET BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIV. 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CA 95965 ATTENTION - Stacey3olliffe 538- 6573 To be published in the Chico ER on 11/03/09 Legal Notice for UP06-0017 (Omnipoint) and 08-0006 Kuehner TOTAL I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above have been performed or delivered or, where authorized, are hereby contracted for and that there is a Budget Appropriation for the same. Dated: V0636 SUPPLIER NO. Department Head or Authorized Deputy F 10-070 10-0'71 DEPT ACCOUNT NO. PROJECT NO. INVOICE NO. INV. DATE ENCUMBRANCE AMOUNT 1 2 3 4 5 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Butte County Planning Commission will conduct a hearing on November 12, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA. Projects to be heard include.but are not limited to: Proiect: Use Permit UP06-0017 (Omnipoint Communications) Location: 135 Riverview Drive, east of Oroville, CA Request: To construct and operate a 120' wireless communications tower with 12 panel antennas and associated ground equipment Recommendation: The Butte County Department of Development Services is recommending the project application be denied by the Planning Commission. Such a denial does not require environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Use Permit UP08-0006 (Patricia Kuehner) Location: 10 Menzie Lane (cross street: Bald Rock Rd) Berry Creek, CA Request: To allow an existing 800 sf building plus a 140 s.f. expansion with a 346 sf storage building to be used for a cafe/restaurant, open daily between the hours of 6:00 AM to 9:00 PM Recommendation: The Butte County Department of Development Services is recommending that the Planning Commission find the project categorically exempt from CEQA per a class 3 exemption, and approve the Use Permit The above mentioned applications are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the , Butte County Development Services Department, Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive,. Oroville, California. For information call or send an email to Stacey Jolliffe, (530) 538-7376 or sjolliffe@buttecounty.net. Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address. Comments may be submitted in writing at any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. If you challenge any of the above application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearings described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to the public hearings. Butte County Planning Commission Tim Snellings, Director of Development Services To be published one time only in the Oroville Mercury Register on Monday. November 2, 2009. Page 1 of 1 Jolliffe, Stacey From: Jolliffe, Stacey Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 8:54 AM To: 'jazmadarian@sbcglobal.net' Subject: omnipoint tower off Riverside Dr, UP06-0017 Hello Jerry, I am looking for your help in getting this UP to hearing or closed out. As you may be aware, project Planner Chris Tolley was laid off, so, forgive me, I need to ask a couple clarifying questions. 1. 1 see from the site plan dated 06-10-06, that the location of the site is approximately 45' from the northern property line. Please confirm I am working off the most recent/correct site plan. The recent'code fix' for modifying setbacks for communications towers is not applicable in the AR -1 zone in which the property is located. So I need to.confirm my understanding that the property owner has not agreed to move the cell tower to the south, because he wants it to be shielded from view. In notes to file, it was noted that Mr. Rackerby understood that he could move the tower over 60 or so feet. He said that this would not be acceptable because it places the equipment, fence and tower base in full view of the neighbors to the lake. As proposed, the equipment, fence and tower base is blocked by the existing barn. Please let me know within the next week, or so, if the proposed location of the cell tower has changed. 2. The Zoning code does not provide authority to approve the tower as currently proposed, so as things stand there are three choices: take it forward for denial, withdraw the application, or move the tower location. Please let me know your thoughts in a week or so. I'd be pleased to speak with you, and help out however I am able. My direct number; for your convenience is 530-538-6573. Stacey Jolliffe Principal Planner, Current Planning Section Butte County Dept. of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Phone: 530.538.7541.; FAX 530.538.2140 Email: sjolliffe(cbbuttecounty.net Website: www.buttecounty:net/dds COUNTY OF BUTTE EMAIL DISCLAIMER: This email and any attachment thereto may contain private confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this e-mail (or any attachments thereto) by other than the County of Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto. 9/3/2009 • • Page 1 of 3 Jolliffe, Stacey From: Jerry Jazmadarian Dazmadarian@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 10:30 AM To: Jolliffe, Stacey Subject: Fw: SC 15420 Lake Oroville --- On Thu, 9/3/09, Jerry Jazmadarian <jazmadarian@sbcglobal.net> wrote: From: Jerry Jazmadarian <jazmadarian@sbcglobal.net> Subject: SC15420 Lake Oroville To: "StaceyJolliffe" <SJolliffe@buttecounty.net> Cc "Doug Murphy" <doug.murphy@t-mobile.com>, "Bruce Piland" <bruce.piland@t- mobile.com> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009, 9:46 AM Stacey: The email information that I gave you was incorrect. Here are the correct emails for Doug & Bruce. I will cc: them on this correspondence so they are aware of your concerns. Thanks, ferry On Thu, 9/3/09, Jolliffe, Stacey <SJolliffe@buttecounty.net> wrote: From: Jolliffe, Stacey <SJolliffe@buttecounty.net> Subject:omnipoint tower off Riverside Dr, UP06-0017 To: jazmadarian@sbcglobal.net Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009,'8:53 AM Hello Jerry, am looking for your help in getting this UP to hearing or closed out. As you may be aware, project Planner Chris Tolley was laid off, so, forgive me, I need to ask a couple clarifying questions. 1. 1 see from the site plan dated 06-10-06, that the location of the site is approximately !-- 45' from the northern property line. Please confirm I am working off the most �,--(l6 recent/correct site plan. a 9/8/2009 • Page 2 of 3 The recent'code fix' for modifying setbacks for communications towers is not applicable in the AR -1 zone in which the property is located. So I need to confirm my understanding that the property owner has not agreed to move the cell tower to the south, because he wants it to be shielded from view. In notes to file, it was noted that Mr. Rackerby understood that he could move the tower over 60 or so feet. He said that this would not be acceptable because it places the equipment, fence and tower base in full view of the neighbors to the lake. As proposed, the equipment, fence and tower base is blocked by the existing barn. Please let me know within the next week, or so, if the proposed location of the cell tower has changed. 2. The Zoning code does not provide authority to approve the tower as currently proposed, so as things stand there are three choices: take it forward for denial, withdraw the application, or move the tower location. Please let me know your thoughts in a week or so. I'd be pleased to speak with you, and help out however I am able. My direct number, for your convenience is 530-538-6573. Stacey Jolliffe Principal Planner, Current Planning Section Butte County Dept. of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Phone: 530.538.7541; FAX 530.538.2140 Email: siolliffe@buttecounty.net Website: www.buttecounty.net/dds COUNTY OF BUTTE EMAIL DISCLAIMER: This email and any attachment thereto may contain private confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this e-mail (or any attachments thereto) by other 9/8/2009 • Page 3 of 3 than the County of Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto. 9/8/2009 • From: John Nylund [mailto:jjnylund@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 1:41 PM To: Jolliffe, Stacey Subject: UP06-0017 I am a resident of 158 Riverview Dr. near the proposed site for the 120 -foot wireless communications tower I am opposed to siting the tower at this location. Visibility.of the tower would be objectionable, especially if the transmission panels are anywhere on the lower part of the tower . Guy wires would be necessary for a tower of that height and would extend well over and onto adjacent properties. The service buildings necessary for the tower function would themselves be inappropriate for an already -poorly -zoned residential area. The entire construct. would be expected to have a negative effect on property values. There are a number of superior sites along the ridge on which site is located, including . but not limited to, the north end of Oroville dam on state property. Here there would be no obstruction to line -of -sight, superior elevation, and no residential or other objection. Service access would be equally good if not better. Hazard to aircraft and indirectly to subjacent housing would be. eliminated. Please print this email and present it to the hearing panel on November 12, as I cannot attend due to prior appointments. An email from you acknowledging my request would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, John Nylund BUTTE Project: Use PermiC-0017 NOV 0 9 2009 -DEVELOPMENT SERVICES w [ Omnipoint Communiations ] To construct and operate a 120' wireless communications. tower,.:, ETC. We are adamantly against this tower. Especially since I already have two close proximity residents with mercury vapor lights that shine into my back yard. This tower would probably have numerous blinking red and white lights. Therefore my wife and I are opposed to the tower. Place it at the end of the street at River View and Heritage way and raise the heighth of the tower. Respectfully Tom K. Smith Patricia A. Smith Date 0 `-J I El El T 0 VMW I r July 7, 2006 BUTTE Butte County COUNTY Department of Development Services JUL 0 6 2006 7 County Center Drive DEVELOPMENT Oroville, California 95965 SERVICES . Dear Development Services: Omnipoint Communications Inc. (T -Mobile) respectfully submits the enclosed application to develop a wireless facility in the Oroville area. The subject property is located at 135 Riverview Drive along Kelly Ridge in Oroville, Assessor's Parcel Number 069-360-008. The property is owned by James and Ruth Rackerby and is currently zoned AR -1. The parcel is 12.73 acres and presently contains a 1950 square foot residence along with a barn and a lean-to for recreational boat storage. On this property, T -Mobile proposes to develop and operate a 120' stealth monopine communications tower. The structure will be designed to resemble a typical pine tree. At the base of the structure, T -Mobile proposes to locate three equipment cabinets within a 30' X 30' leased area. The entire compound will be enclosed with a chain-link fence. The purpose of this project is to develop a facility that will provide enhanced wireless services throughout the eastern portion of the Oroville area and Lake Oroville. T - Mobile currently has extremely limited service in this area. The overall height of the facility was necessitated by the fact that the location is approximately fifty feet downhill from the crest of the ridge. This decrease in ground elevation has necessitated the slight increase in overall height in order to achieve the required coverage objective. The facility is proposed to be located east of the barn on this property. At its planned location, the facility will be completely outside of the view of any residences. The parcel directly north is vacant and undeveloped. Prior to selecting this location, T -mobile conducted an exhaustive research of any co - location possibilities in this general area and found no existing towers or vertical T -Mobile - 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 190, Sacramento, CA 95833 - (916) 743-8775 elements that could be used for this project. The only existing communications facility is a wooden pole tower located at APN 069-360-010 on property owned by Jeffrey Holland. The residence on this property is currently rented. The wood pole appears to be owned by Ubiquitel (Sprint). The equipment is located in the back of the home on this parcel. The tower is relatively unattractive and there are panel antennas and a microwave dish on the wood pole. A co -location at this location would add to the considerable visual impact of the existing facility. T -Mobile made several attempts to contact this landowner to gauge any interest in leasing additional ground space for a possible co -location. All attempts at communication remained unanswered. We assumed that the landowner is not interested in another wireless carriers placement at this location. We also contacted the landowners of APN 069-360-009, Mr. Jack Burns and Ms. Jackie Burns. Mr. Ft Ms. Burns are presently divorced and living separately. Mr. Burns lives in Butte County and Ms. Burns lives in Orange County. While Ms. Burns was supportive of this project, Mr. Burns felt that this project would impede the total development of this parcel and could not support this effort. Based on these two prior attempts, we subsequently contacted Mr. Rackerby, the owner of the parcel that is the subject of this application. Mr. Rackerby was supportive of our effort under the caveat that the entire facility could not be visible to any of his neighbors. it was on this basis that we developed this project. T -Mobile feels that this is an outstanding project that will bring valued wireless services to this portion of the County and to the nomadic users in the recreational areas. We appreciate your review and consideration of our application and the supporting documents. If you require any additional information, please contact me at 916.743.8775 or by email at jazmadarianCsbcglobal.net. Thank you very much, Respectfully submitted, &7ewy &74ZW4d4PV40r T -Mobile - 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 190, Sacramento, CA 95833 - (916) 743-8775 u^ ] T nm -e mo from HEF, August 21, 2006 Wr Chris Tolley Associate'Plariner Butte Courify' :, • r ,: ,!� Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 Re: Application Completeness - Use Permit (UP 07-02), APN 069-360-008 Dear Mr. Tolley: Thank you very much for your letter of August 9, 2006 regarding the above referenced project. Let me please respond to the concerns you have detailed in your letter. Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 24-262(e)(5) Prior to selecting this location, T -mobile conducted an exhaustive research of any co -location. possibilities in this general area and found no existing towers or vertical elements that could be used for this project. The only existing communications facility is a wooden, pole tower located at APN 069-360-010 on property owned by Jeffrey Holland. The residenke on this property is currently rented. The wood pole appears to be owned by Ubiquitel (Sprint). The equipment' -is 'located in the back of the home on this parcel. The tower is relatively unattractive and there are panel antennas and'a microwave dish on the wood pole. A co -location at this location would add to the considerable visual impact of the existing facility. T -Mobile made several attempts to contact this landowner to gauge any interest in leasing additional ground space for a possible co -location. All attempts at communication remained unanswered. We assumed that the landowner is not interested in another wireless carriers placement at this location. Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 24-2621e)t9 The proposed facility has been designed to resemble the various `digger pines' that are prevalent in this general area. The digger pine is a typical conifer with branches that begin at about fifty feet above ground and the foliage is of medium density. Several other designs were considered for the project including a brown -painted monopole and•a' lattice -type tower. In reviewing these alternate designs, it was the general consensus that the treepole was most appropriate for this location. Please know, however, that T -mobile would be please to construct a facility of .any design that is specified by the County. Reservation of rights T -Mobile understands and will comply with the County ordinance relative to the retention of a third party independent consultant review of this project. As always, if you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 916.743.8775 or by email at jazmadarian@sbcglobal.net. Thank you very much, BUTTE Respectfully submitted, COUNTY T AUG 2 3 200 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES T -Mobile - 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 190, Sacramento, CA 95833 - (916) 743-8775 • • Page 1 'of 2 Tolley, Chris From: Tolley, Chris Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:44 AM To: 'Jerry Jazmadarian' Subject: RE: MUP 06-09 & UP 07-01 Jerry, Good morning! I am beginning the staff report for the MUP, and expect that it will be on the Planning Commission agenda for September 28 or October 12. Regarding Use Permit 07-01, the project has been deemed incomplete. The application will be considered complete once technical information verifying the need for the tower height and location are submitted and reviewed by staff. The .intent is that the information will establish: 1. WHY the tower is placed in the proposed location, versus other locations that may pose less of an impact (including other types of zones... commercial or industrial); and 2. WHY the tower is proposed at a certain height; and 3. WHY a new tower is being proposed instead of a collocation, or WHY it is infeasible. Please review the excerpt from Zoning Code section 24-262, below, that identify the County's goals: (1) Encourage the location of new monopoles, towers and/or antennas in non-residential areas and minimize the total number of antennas throughout the county; (2) Encourage collocation of facilities at appropriate new and existing new monopoles, towers and/or antenna sites; (3) Encourage wireless communication providers to locate new monopoles, towers and/or antennas in areas where the adverse impact on residential neighborhoods, agriculture, and air navigation is minimal; (4) Require wireless communication providers to design and configure wireless communication facilities in a way that minimizes adverse visual impacts; (5) Protect the public's interest in the safe operation of emergency services which include, but are not limited to, air ambulance, medical and emergency evacuation, firefighting, law enforcement, search and rescue, vector control, and resource management; and (6) Allow reasonable opportunities for providers of wireless communication services to provide such services to the community in a safe, effective, and efficient manner. Essentially, this information is verified in the by providing: (5) A discussion of and supporting information regarding the alternative site selection of at least a minimum of three (3) to four (4) other sites, if available, including collocation opportunities, and a statement as to why these alternative sites and/or collocation opportunities were rejected. (9) Written evidence demonstrating that the selected facility structure or tower design is as visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical and engineering considerations, which indicate what type of facility is required to provide reasonably effective. service and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. The use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness is mandatory. Please let me know if you have any questions. -Chris From: Jerry Jazmadarian[mailto:jazmadarian@sbcglobal.net] 8/31/2006 •1 • Page 2 of 2 Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:46 AM To: Tolley, Chris Subject: MUP 06-09 & UP 07-01 Chris: Good morning. Can you please advise the status of MUP 06-09. This was the co -lo in North Chico. Is this application required to go before the Planning Commission. Also, I hope you have received my response to your letter regarding UP 07-01, Rackerby in the Oroville Lake area. If you -need any additional information, please let me know. The landowner, Jim Rackerby, sent me the attached news article in support of his project and would like to have it included with the application if that is possible. Thanks again very much, Jerry Jazmadarian 916-743-8775 8/31/2006 Page 1 of 3 Tolley, Chris From: Jerry Jazmadarian Uazmadarian@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:58 PM To: Tolley, Chris Subject: RE: UP 07-01 Chris: I am available tomorrow afternoon, the later the better. Please let me know the best time for you. Thanks greatly for your consideration; -i"- jerry ; V . "Tolley, Chris" <ctolley@buttecounty.net> wrote: Jerry, � � , � , 4 Good afternoon! As we discussed before, I'm able to meet regarding this project. The best date and time is tomorrow afternoon. The Use Permit is considered incomplete, because the information regarding the towers height and location is insufficient. The County is asking for information that describes the necessity of proposing a tower of a certain height (i.e. if the proposed tower is 140' feet high... why must it be that high versus a 100' tower) and in a certain location (i.e. if the proposed tower location is the best possible location... what other sites were evaluated, and why was this location selected?). -We want to evaluate the options that were entertained and how the proposed site was selected over other sites, and why the tower is proposed at the certain height. This information should be conveyed; in a technical and understandable manner. Keep in mind that these towers should be proposedin locations that'•pose the least impact on surrounding residents, and the facilities are only as tall as need to be -to sufficiently serve the area. Please let me know if you are able to meet tomorrow afternoon. -Chris y From: Jerry Jazmadarian[mailto:jazmadarian@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 4:16 PM To: Tolley, Chris Subject: RE: UP 07-01 Can we please meet at your office. I am available anytime/anyday next week. Please let me know the' best time/date when you are available. thanks kindly, 9/6/2006 f OV�fA 5 brblc/L CAF/21r,0/5- AA -1 .. Coj j --,O Z "'' 6^lr)l'-r rMF O whQ • • Page 2 of 3 jerry "Tolley, Chris" <ctolley@buttecounty.net> wrote: Jerry, I was not able to contact you regarding UP 07-01, and I will not be in tomorrow. I'd like to give you a call on Tuesday, or we can meet in the office. Please let me know. which you would prefer. -Chris From: Jerry Jazmadarian[mailto:jazmadarian@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:52 AM To: Tolley, Chris Cc: Jim Rackerby Subject: UP 07-01 Chris: Please call me at 916-743-8775 to discuss UP 07-01. I believe.that I have previously responded to the concerns which you have mentioned and I am not sure what additional information I can provide regarding these matters. Thank you very much, Jerry Jazmadarian "Tolley, Chris" <ctolley@buttecounty.net> wrote: Jerry, Good morning! Regarding Use Permit 07-01, the project has been deemed incomplete. The application will be considered complete once technical information verifying the need for the tower height and location are submitted and reviewed by staff. The intent is that the information will establish: 1. WHY the tower is placed in the proposed location, versus other locations that may pose less of an impact (including other types of zones... commercial or industrial); and 2. WHY the tower is proposed at a certain height; and 3. WHY a new tower is being proposed instead of a collocation, or WHY it is infeasible. Please review the excerpt from Zoning Code section 24-262, below, that identify the County's goals: (1) Encourage the location of new monopoles, towers and/or antennas in non-residential areas and minimize the total number of antennas throughout the county; (2) Encourage collocation of facilities at appropriate new and existing new monopoles, towers and/or antenna sites; 9/6/2006 • � Page 3 of 3 (3) Encourage wireless communication providers to locate new monopoles, towers and/or antennas in areas where the adverse impact on residential neighborhoods, agriculture, and air navigation is minimal; (4) Require wireless communication providers to design and configure wireless communication facilities in a way that minimizes adverse visual impacts; (5) Protect the public's interest in the safe operation of emergency services which include, but are not limited to, air ambulance, medical and emergency evacuation, firefighting, law enforcement, search and rescue, vector control, and resource management; and (6) Allow reasonable opportunities for providers of wireless communication services to provide such services to the community in a safe, effective, and efficient manner. Essentially, this information is verified in the by providing: (5) A discussion of and supporting information regarding the alternative site selection of at least a minimum of three (3) to four (4) other -sites, if available, including collocation opportunities, and a statement as to why these alternative sites and/or collocation opportunities were rejected. (9) Written evidence demonstrating that the selected facility structure or tower design is as visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical and engineering considerations, which indicate what type of facility is required to provide reasonably effective service and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. The use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness is -mandatory. Please let me know if you have any questions. -Chris 9/6/2006 • Page 1 of'3 Tolley, Chris From: Jerry Jazmadarian Dazmadarian@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 9.24 AM To: Tolley, Chris Subject: MUP 06-09 & UP 07-01 Attachments: 62382126-SC15420_120ft_3levels.jpg; 390196856-SC15420_100ft_31evels.jpg; 3100884998 - SC 15420_80_3_levels. jpg Chris: Good morning. First, thank you very much for your support of MUP 06-09. I did spend some time meeting with the landowner after the meeting and I hope that he will address his financial concerns about this project to the tower owner, American Tower. Regarding UP 07-01 (Rackerby), I am working on providing the required documentation/justification for that project. From your list below, Item 2 indicates that T -Mobile is required to justify the proposed height of the monopine as the minimal acceptable height. Attached please find three (3) propagation maps. These maps were created to demonstrate the signal propagation of the proposed tower at 80 feet, 100 feet and the requested 120 feet height. Please note that green is in -building coverage, yellow is in -vehicle coverage, and the gray is coverage out in the open like standing on the street. We have also indicated the existence of the nearest hand-off site. -It is critical that the yellow signals of the neighboring sites coincide or the sites will not handoff. Essentially, as a nomadic user is traveling from one destination to another, the call will drop if. the signals are not sufficient to allow the user to handoff to the next site. You will note that, at 80 feet and 100 feet, the yellow signals do not overlap. If the network was designed in that fashion, the caller would not have continuous coverage. It is only with the proposed site at 120 feet do we accomplish a handoff between sites. I hope this explanation helps the County's understanding of our need to develop this tower at the proposed height. I will continue my efforts on the remaining two issues which you have mentioned below in your email. Thank you very much. Jerry 11/2/2006 0 0 Jerry, Page 2 of 3 Good morning! I am beginning the staff report for the MUP, and expect that it will be on the Planning Commission agenda for September 28 or October 12. Regarding Use Permit 07-01, the project has been deemed incomplete. The application will be considered complete once technical information verifying the need for the tower height and location are submitted and reviewed by staff. The intent is that the information will establish: 1. WHY the tower is placed in the proposed location, versus other locations that may pose less of an impact (including other types of zones... commercial or industrial); and 2. WHY the tower is proposed at a certain height; and 3. WHY a new tower is being proposed instead of a collocation, or WHY it is infeasible. Please review the excerpt from Zoning Code section 24-262, below, that identify the County's goals: (1) Encourage the location of new monopoles, towers and/or antennas in non- residential areas and minimize the total number of antennas throughout the county; (2) Encourage collocation of facilities at appropriate new and existing new monopoles, towers and/or antenna sites; (3) Encourage wireless communication providers to locate new monopoles, towers and/or antennas in areas where the adverse impact on residential neighborhoods, agriculture, and air navigation is minimal; (4) Require wireless communication providers to design and configure wireless communication facilities in a way that minimizes adverse visual impacts; (5) Protect the public's interest in the safe operation of emergency services which include, but are not limited to, air ambulance, medical and emergency evacuation, firefighting, law enforcement, search and rescue, vector control, and resource management; and (6) Allow reasonable opportunities for providers of wireless communication services to provide such services to the community in a safe, effective, and efficient manner. Essentially, this information is verified in the by providing: (5) A discussion of and supporting information regarding the alternative site selection of at least a minimum of three (3) to four (4) other sites, if available, including collocation opportunities, and a statement as to why these alternative sites and/or collocation opportunities were rejected. (9) Written evidence demonstrating that the selected facility structure or tower design is as visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical and engineering considerations, which indicate what type of facility is required to provide reasonably effective service and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. The use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness is mandatory. 11/2/2006 • Page 3 of 3 Please let me know if you have any questions. -Chris From: Jerry Jazmadarian[mailto:jazmadarian@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:46 AM To: Tolley, Chris Subject: MUP 06-09 & UP 07-01 Chris: Good morning. Can you please advise the status of MUP 06-09. This was the colo in North Chico. Is this application required to go before the Planning Commission. Also, I hope you have received my response to your letter regarding UP 07-01, Rackerby in the Oroville Lake area. If you need any additional information, please let me know. The landowner, Jim Rackerby, sent me the attached news article in support of his project and would like to have it included with the application if that is possible. Thanks again very much, Jerry Jazmadarian 916-743-8775 11/2/2006 • • Page 1 of 2 Tolley, Chris From: Jerry.Jazmadarian Dazmadarian@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 4:13 PM To: Tolley, Chris „ Subject: UP -07-01 Attachments: 2744511992-Canyon_drive_self storage.jpg; 4201229633-Lakeside_Market.jpg Chris: In an earlier email, you advised that the application for this project has been deemed incomplete and that I needed to address two (2) issues relative to this project. The first issue was relating to the requested height on the monopine. In a previous email, I have sent to you an explanation and supporting documentation that details the expected propagation -of the proposed facility at various lower heights. I explained why the 120' height is the minimum height that will accommodate the needs of the T -Mobile network. I hope you have found that information sufficient. Let me now please address the County's second concern, that which relates to the proposed location of this project. I T -Mobile evaluated various locations around the County before selecting the property at the Rackerby residence. Our underlying criteria is that we were to select a location which could provide coverage to the Lake and to the eastern portions of. the City of Oroville and surrounding County areas. In order to accomplish that goal, we felt it important to locate somewhere along Kelly Ridge, a geographic occurrence that provides a "view" of the Lake and portions of the County. During the selection process, we did evaluate a few other locations that we felt might offer the potential. to provide the required service. Those locations were are follows: Canyon Drive Self -Storage, 16 Canyon Drive, Oroville, APN 068-130-137 This location is zoned commercial and offers an excellent view of the eastern portion of the City of Oroville and County areas. It is, however, blocked from a view of the Lake by Kelly Ridge and was consequently eliminated from consideration. Please see the propagation map attached which indicates the possible coverage of this location. Lakeside Market, 5250 Olive Highway, Oroville, APN 069-520-025 This location. is zoned commercial and offers a good view of the Lake. It is, however, blocked from a view of the eastern portion of the City and County areas and was consequently eliminated from consideration. Please see the propagation map attached which indicates the possible coverage of this location. Jackie Burns, 6342 Woodman, Oroville, APN 069-280-070 Ms. Burns contacted me about possibly developing a wireless facility on this property. This parcel has an excellent view of the Lake and could provide the required coverage for the Lake Oroville objective. However, thi parcel is zoned `residential' and was subsequently removed from consideration. Jeffrey Holland, 107 Riverview, Oroville, APN 069-360-010 11/2/2006 Page 2 of`2 As discussed in some earlier correspondence, this location was considered because there is an existing wireless communications facility on this property. All attempts to contact the landowner to discuss a co -location were not successful I hope this discussion will, adequately address the County's requirements and that the application can now be considered complete. If you need any additional information, I hope you might please contact me. Thank you very much, Jerry Jerry, The Use Permit is considered incomplete, because the information regarding the towers height and location is insufficient. The County is asking for information that describes the necessity of proposing a tower of a certain height (i.e. if the proposed tower is 140' feet high... why must it be that high versus a 100'. tower) and in a certain location (i.e. if the proposed tower location is the best possible location... what other sites were evaluated, and why was this location selected?). We want to evaluate the options that were entertained and how the proposed sit: was selected over other sites, and why the tower is proposed at the certain height. This information should be conveyed in a technical and understandable manner. Keep in mind that these towers should be proposed in locations that pose the least impact on surrounding residents, and the facilities are only as tall as need to be to sufficiently serve the area. -Chris 11/2/2006 • • Page 1 of 1 Tolley, Chris From: Tolley, Chris Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:34 PM To: Wannenmacher, Felix Subject: UP06-0017 (old number UP 07-01) - New wireless communications facility Attachments: UP06-0017 (ArcMap export).pdf Felix, Can we discuss this project tomorrow after IDR? I've collected some more information dealing with other available facilities in the area. Basically there are two towers in the vicinity; however, one is a television antenna and the other is a hex transmission tower (I've got no idea what that means). It doesn't appear that they towers (i- the television antenna still exists) are cellular towers. Anyway, this is the new information. I'll have some aerials prepared for out meeting. The attached PDF is from GIS. The antennas (purple) that I'm referencing are south of the project site (which is outlined). The antenna near the project site is a utility pole collocation. -Chris Christopher J. Tolley Associate Planner Butte County Planning Division Direct (530) 538-7603 Fax (530)-538-7785 www. buttecounty. net/dds 12/20/2006 Canyon Drive Self Storage coverage at 120 ft. T -Mobile- 0 0 . 771, lot SC15420 ;elf Storage @12 Ib: 4 Au i4C I if kff _1D 0 '0 Lakeside Market coverage at 120 ft. r 0( CP F Nbrket., 120 U U Lu AD '\'I Lj TEJI'a-5 LS_ jlrnj=.'� u'l 7 0 L' _D IF, F-1 55 rl Ll 93 I L LY V f7 SC15420 coverage at 120 ft. 0 SC16420 coverage at 140 ft. - s + - .-# p6 SFS . Cr §2 h Lm,ppl QkpCY �Yr 1 - t a' h Sc1.5?0 n?100ft� f 0 ile- SC16420 coverage at 80 ft. T!m Mob Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile www.buttecou nty. net/dds www buttegeneralplan.net ADMINISTRATION *BUILDING *PLANNING April 4, 2007 Omnipoint Communications C/o Jerry Jazmadarian 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive Sacramento, CA 95833 Application Completeness: Use Permit UP06-0017 (APN 069-360-008) Dear Mr. Jazmadarian: The Department of Development Services and other responsible agencies, have preliminarily reviewed the above referenced project, and determined that the application and project are "complete." This determination was made on March 20 2007. i Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, I can be reached between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, at (530) 538-7601, or via e-mail at ctolley@buttecounty.net. tS' re , is olley Associate Planner Cc. James & Ruth Rackerby 0 Butte. County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile www.buftecounty.net/dds ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * PLANNING November 30, 2006 Omnipoint Communications C/o Jerry Jazmadarian 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive Sacramento, -CA 95833 Re: Application Completeness — Use Permit UP06-0017, APN 069-360-008 Dear Mr. Jazmadarian: Thank you for the submittal of the information regarding completeness on October 26th and November 1St. The project application and related items have been reviewed,,by the County and other applicable agencies to determine if the application is complete, and contains information necessary to process the request. Your application. has been deemed incomplete and remains incomplete at this time. Specifically, the following additional information is required before the application can be accepted as complete, and the items must be adequately addressed: Pursuant to Zoninp, Code Section 24-262(e)(5) A discussion of and supporting information regarding the alternative site selection of at least a minimum of three (3) to four (4) other sites, if available, including collocation opportunities, and a statement as to why these alternative sites and/or collocation opportunities were rejected. Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 24-262(e)(9) 2. Written evidence demonstrating that the selected facility structure or tower design is as visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical and engineering considerations, which indicate what type of facility is required to provide reasonably effective services and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. The use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness is mandatory. Reservation of rip -lits The County reserves the right, pursuant to Butte County Code section 24-262(f)(16), to retain an independent consultant at the applicant's sole expense, for the purpose of a review of and advice regarding either individual elements of or the entire application package. The County may in its sole discretion elect to hire an independent consultant at any time during the approval process for the proposed project, up to and including an appeal to the Board of Supervisors, of a project approval/denial by the Planning Commission. Notice of incomplete application Butte County Code section 24-262(a) sets forth the goals and policies which drive the County's regulation of wireless communications facilities. Among those .goals are minimizing the total number of monopoles/antennas in the County, encouraging collocations of facilities, encouraging the location of monopoles/antennas in nonresidential areas and minimizing adverse the visual impacts imposed by monopoles/antennas and other facilities. In this regard, please provide information explaining why it is necessary to: install a monopole in the proposed location, as opposed to installing a monopole in other locations more consistent with the above goals or collocating an antenna on an existing monopole. Further, please provide information explaining why it is necessary to install a monopole of the height proposed, as opposed to a shorter monopole, in the proposed location. It is possible that cogent explanations concerning the necessity of the proposed:location and the proposed tower height may obviate the necessity of hiring an independent consultant, pursuant to Butte County Code section 24-262(f)(16). i 4 Because your project has been deemed incomplete and remains incomplete, no additional processing of your application will occur until the two items listed above are resolved. Please contact me at (530) 538-7603 if you have any question. Sin ely Chris Tolley Associate Planner Cc. Butte County Department of Development TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile www.buttecounty.net/dds August 9, 2006 Omnipoint Communications C/o Jerry Jazmadarian 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive Sacramento, CA 95833 4 services ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING' PLANNING Re: Application Completeness — Use Permit (UP 07-02), APN 069-360-m 008 Dear Mr. Jazmadarian: Thank you for the submittal of the above referenced application. The project application and related items have been reviewed by the County and other applicable agencies to determine if the application is complete, and contains information necessary to process the request. Your application has been deemed incomplete at this time. Specifically, the following additional information is required before theapplication can be accepted as complete, and the items must be adequately addressed: j Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 24-262(e)(5) ' i 1. A discussion of and supporting information regarding the alternative site selection of at least a minimum of three (3) to four (4) other sites, if available, including collocation opportunities, and a statement as to why these alternative sites and/or collocation opportunities were rejected. 1 Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 24-262(e)(9) s 2. Written evidence demonstrating that the selected facility structure or tower design is as visually unobtrusive as possible, given technical and engineering considerations, which indicate what type of facility is required to provide reasonably effective services and also the best technology and/or construction available to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness. The use of best available technology and/or construction to maximally achieve visual unobtrusiveness is mandatory. , Reservation of rights The County reserves the right, pursuant to Butte County Code section 24=262(f)(16), to retain an independent consultant at the applicant's sole expense, for the purposeof a review of and advice regarding either individual elements of or the entire applicationpackage. The County may in its sole discretion elect to hire an independent consultant at any.tirne during the approval process for the proposed project, up to and including an appeal to the Board of Supervisors, of a project approval/denial by the Planning Commission. Notice of incomplete application Butte County Code section 24-262(a) sets forth the goals and policies which drive the County's regulation of wireless communications facilities. Among those goals are minimizing the total number of monopoles/antennas in the County, encouraging collocations of facilities, encouraging the location of monopoles/antennas in nonresidential areas and minimizing adverse the visual impacts imposed by monopoles/antennas ar_d other facilities. In this regard, please provide information explaining why it is necessary to install a , monopole in the proposed location, as opposed to installing a monopole in other locations more consistent with the above goals or collocating an antenna on an existing monopole. Further, please provide information explaining why it is necessary to install a monopole of the height proposed, as opposed to a shorter monopole, in the proposed location. It is possible that cogent explanations concerning the necessity of the proposed location and the proposed tower height may obviate the necessity of hiring an independent consultant, pursuant to Butte County Code section 24-262(f)(16). Because your project has been deemed incomplete, no additional processing of your application will occur until the two items listed above are resolved. Please contact me at (530) 538-7603 if you have any question. Sirely, Chris Tolley Associate Planner Cc. - I Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR { 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile www.buffecounty.net/dds ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * PLANNING August 4, 2008 Jerry Jazmadarian Omnipoint Communications a 1755 Creekside Oaks Dr. Sacramento, CA 95833 { Subject: Butte County Wireless Communications Facilities Code Section 24-262, 1:1 fall-zone/setback, relative to UP06-0017. Dear Mr. Jazmadarian: } We had previously informed 'you that The Butte County Board of Supervisors would be meeting on Tuesday, August 5 to receive analysis and recommendations from Pacific Municipal Consultants (PMC) regarding potential amendments to the 1:1 setback currently required in our Wireless Communications Facilities Code Section 24-262(g) 2.b. At the Board's direction this issue will be heard at their regular meeting on Tuesday August 19, 2008 at 10:40 am. We apologize for this change in schedule.; Once again, we encourage you to attend PMC's presentation to the Board, now rescheduled for Tuesday August 19, 2008 at 10:40, and to offer your own observations and recommendations as a representative of the wireless communication's industry. As it becomes available (about one week prior to the August 19 Board meeting) we will provide you with a copy of the Board report through the mail (at the address identified above) and at this email address: jazmadarian@sbcglobal.net. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (siolliffee-buttecounty.net) (530) 538-6573. 1 Since" , FV/2 Stacey Jolliffe Principal Planner I �- PROJECT COORDINATION FORM. DATE of IDR: V — g 1, PLANNER: Vl PROJ. NAME: ( C pri 11 PROJ. NUMBER: TYPE: Cpm APN: DEPARTMENT COMMENTS PLANNING S �� PUBLIC WORKS- No U READY FOR HEARING? ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SN. Co?4;opS -1-6z M4�rlAk /w "40r INCOM���G. COUNTY COUNSEL i�I1�Q�S cm COn''�)0�L O��ICC��'1 Fia e.1�/rl evitlCnC� e�A.��o °�SS�s`�'�"� IQ BUILDING 1 o l)l WS ASSESSOR FIRE S�� ��✓� C K:/IDR Agendas/Project Coordination Form.doc IDR Meeting Project Date Issues: e - sxxJ167 W S -t-tr uo4 ) ' r 0 -Department- . _ .. -- - ..... _ _ - - .' LsSueS .... - . _...._.... - Planning -Decision CDP Building Ag Commissioner Public Works t4o OSS S G Env Health � `r'-�� (�'G cSi��Q�'�' • Assessor County Counsel VC ���• Cho t�O/ Page 1 of 1 Tolley, Chris From: Jones, Darren Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:18 AM To: Tolley, Chris Subject: Omnipoint Communications, Riverview Dr. UP 07-01 Omnipoint Communications tower site O.K. Application complete with the following condition: . Submit a Hazardous Materials Release Response Plan to Butte County Environmental Health as required by Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code. Contact Butte County Environmental Health at 530-891-2727 for more information. Darren Jones Environmental Health 08/02/2006 • 350 Salem Street Pacific Gas and Chico, CA 95928 & Electric Company 530/896-4257 FAX 530/896-4254 September 11, 2006 Chris Tolley Butte County Department of Development Services, Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 RE: Use Permit -(Omnipoint Communications) File: UP 07-01, APN: 069-360-008 Dear Mr. Tolley: We have reviewed -the subject site map. *Don Chambers Technical and Land Services Chico Office BUTTE COUNTY SEP - 13 2606 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Any relocation or rearrangement of any existing PG&E facilities in the area to accommodate this project will be at the expense of the developer. There shall be no building of structures, or the storage of any materials allowed over or under any existing PG&E facilities, or inside any easements that exist, which infringe on PG&E's easement rights. Thank you for the opportunity to review this matter. If you have any questions, please call me in Chico at 896-4257. Sincerely, Donald W. Chambers Land Agent (file: UP07-01.doc) • � Page, l of I Tolley, Chris From: Jacob F. Morley [morleyjf@cityoforoville.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:33 PM To: Tolley, Chris Subject: UP 07-01 - Omnipoint Communications Chris - The City of Oroville has no comment on this project. Jacob Morley Assistant Planner City of Oroville Phone (530) 538-2430 Fax (530) 538-2426 morleyjf@cityoforoville.org 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 1 • i Tolley, Chris From: Schroth, Eric Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:38 PM To: Tolley, Chris Subject: UP 07-01 Attachments: UP 07-01.doc E -file not received. Application is complete. Conditions attached. Eric A. Schroth Butte County Public Works Land Development Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Phone: (530) 538-7266 FAX: (530) 538-7171 08/02/2006 BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT APPLICANT: DATE: AGENT: APN: FILE #: UP 07-01 PLANNER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS: --" A. STREETS ® 1. Prior to the issuance of use permit, obtain an encroachment permit and improve all new and existing driveway approaches to publicly maintained roads as specified in the County Improvement Standard. and the terms of the encroachment permit. ❑ 2. Prior to the issuance of use permit, deed to Butte County in fee simple I feet of right-of-way from the centerline of I along the entire property frontage. The right-of-way shall be sufficient .for the installation of Improvement Standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. ❑ 3. Prior to the issuance of use permit, submit road and draina a im rovement plans for the installation and construction of the street frontage improvements on to County Improvement Standards. Improve parcel I frontage to a 'h+ 12' / full street section onj to an RS J road standard including, bu: not limited to curb, gutter and sidewalk for parcels with gross acreage of one acre or less. Construct or install the required improvements. ❑ 4. Prior to the issuance of use permit, relinquish abutter's rights of access to Butte County along the frontage of parcels 11 except at approved access points. B. DRAINAGE ❑ 1. Prior to the issuance of use permit, a plan for a permanent solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall detail existing drainage: conditions and shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained or retained on- site and/ or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. ❑ 2. Prior to the issuance of use permit, establish 100 year flood plain elevations and the lowest floor elevations for any structures, in accordance with Butte County Code §26-25. Show on the additiona_. map sheet the elevations (by contours) and the location of an accepted NGVD29 (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929) benchmark and a temporary benchmark on-site. C. LEGAL LOT STATUS ❑ 1. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit, prove to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works that the parcel of the subject application is a legal parcel. Butte County DeWment of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile August 2, 2006 To: Inter -Departmental Review Committee Subject: Evaluation and Completeness of Application Applicant: Omnipoint Communications,, UP 07-01 Planner: Chris Tolley APN: 069-360-008 Location: on the east side of Riverview Drive, 1,145 feet (.2 miles) north of the Gleness Drive -Riverview Drive intersection (135 Riverview Drive, Oroville) 30 -Day Complete 8/4/2006 - Date of IDR 8/2/2006 This application is being provided to you for comments. Please see attached documents. A hard copy of the application, including maps, has been sent to Environmental Health, Building Manager, LAFCo, Agricultural Commission, Public Works, Assessor, and CDF. All Environmental Health correspondence is routed through Karen Frederick at 7 County Center Drive. The purpose of this notice is to give you the opportunity to comment on the completeness of this application electronically to the planner, so that preparations can be made for the IDR meeting on 8/2/2006. Do you find this application complete? ❑ NO. Please respond prior to or at the IDR meeting07/31/06, regarding completeness of application. What is needed to make the application complete? X YES. My Department's conditions and/or mitigation measures are attached or will be provided at the IDR meeting. If conditions cannot be provided at or prior to the IDR meeting they must be provided no more than 1 week after the meeting. Standard Conditions are attached for your convenience. (PLEASE SEND YOUR RESPONSE TO: mmichelenammichelena@buttecounty.net). Signature: Darren Read Department: _ CDF Date: 7/26/06 K:/Planning/Projects/A New ROM Memos/IDR Completeness 8/30/05 APPLICANT: AGENT: FILE #: • BUTTE COUNTY • STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT Omnipoint Communications, Jerry Jazmadarian UP 07-01 DATE: 7/6/2006 APN: 069-360-008 PLANNER: Chris Tolley PROJECT DESCRIPTION: new 120 'wireless communication tower with 12 (6 immediate - 6 future) panel antennas at the 100' height, and associated ground equipment._ Future collocations are possible, but not specified at this time Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS: A. STREETS ❑ I. Prior to the issuance of building permits, obtain an encroachment permit and improve all new and existing driveway approaches to publicly maintained roads as specified in the County Improvement Standards and the terms of the encroachment permit. ❑ 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, deed to Butte County in fee simple _ feet of right -of -wag from the centerline of along the entire property frontage. The right-of-way shall be sufficient for the installation of Improvement Standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. ❑ 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, submit road and drainage improvement plans for the installation and construction of the street frontage improvements on to Count - Improvement Standards. Improve parcel frontage to a streev section on to an RS-_ road standard including, but not limited to curb, gutter and sidewalk for parcels with gross acreage of one. acre or less. Construct or install the required improvements. ❑ 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits, relinquish abutter's rights of access to Butte County along the frontage of parcels , except at approved access points. B. DRAINAGE ❑ 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a plan for a permanent solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall detail existing drainage conditions and shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained or retained on- site and/ or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. ❑ 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, establish 100 year flood plain elevations and the lowest floo- elevations for any structures, in accordance with Butte County Code §26-25. Show on the additiona! map sheet the elevations (by contours) and the location of an accepted NGVD29 (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929) benchmark and a temporary benchmark on-site. C. LEGAL LOT STATUS ❑ 1. Prior to the issuance of the Use Permit, prove to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works tha- the parcel of the subject application is a legal parcel. C1 9 BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT APPLICANT Omnipoint Communications, DATE: 7/6/2006 AGENT: Jerry Jazmadarian APN: 069-360-008 FILE #: UP 07-01 PLANNER: Chris Tolley PROJECT DESCRIPTION: new 120 'wireless communication tower with 12 (6 immediate - 6 future) panel antennas at the 100' height, and associated ground equipment. Future collocations are possible, but not specified at this time Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS: D. E. F. G. SEWAGE DISPOSAL AREAS 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall meet the sewage disposal requirements of Butte County Code Section 26-26 for the installation of sewage disposal systems within a flood plain/floodway. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, those wells indicated on the site plan that are proposed to be destroyed in order to provide required usable sewage disposal areas, shall be destroyed under a valid Butte County Environmental Health Division permit. 3. In the nitrate area record executed Future Sewer Service and Storm Drainage Agreements. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, meet the requirements of the (Watershed Protection Zone) (Villa Verona Moratorium Area) (Cohasset Specific Plan). INDIVIDUAL WATER SUPPLY 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, provide a source of domestic water for the building on (lot) (parcel) 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, verify that domestic water can be provided to meet minimum standards for and other suspected contamination. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, verify that domestic water can be provided to meet minimum standards for and other suspected contamination. EXISTING COMMUNITY SEWER 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, under a permit issued by the Environmental Health Division, abandon the septic tank and connect the dwelling(s) on (lots) (parcel(s)) to public sewer. APPLICANT: AGENT: FILE #:' 0 BUTTE COUNTY • STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT Omnipoint Communications Jerry Jazmadarian UP 07-01 DATE: 7/6/2006 APN: 069-360-008 PLANNER: Chris Tolley PROJECT DESCRIPTION: new 120 'wireless communication tower with 12 (6 immediate - 6 future) panel antennas at the 100' height, and associated ground equipment. Future collocations are possible, but not specified at this time Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS: H. BUILDING PERMITS ❑ 1. Building Permits Required. Prepare # sets of construction plans and make an application for permit. Construction shall comply with federal, state, and local regulations. Plans shall be prepared, sealed and signed by a California Licensed Architect or Registered Engineer for non-residential buildings and certain residential buildings. ❑ 2. Proposed improvements constitute a "change in use" or "change in the character of use" as stated in the building code. Improvement plans shall incorporate all code -required elements for the new use. ❑ 3. All structures shall be made accessible to the disabled. Disabled accessible parking and an accessible path of travel shall be provided. ❑ 4. Proposed improvements shall comply with Title 24 energy conservation regulations. Appropriate compliance forms (two sets) shall be submitted indicating compliance with those standards. ❑ 5. Proposed improvements shall comply with Butte County Code and FEMA Flood Hazard Prevention regulations. A FEMA Elevation Certificate, prepared by a qualified professional, shall be completed and submitted with improvement plans for the Building Division. ❑ 6. Proposed improvements shall comply with recorded map conditions applicable to construction. ❑ 7. Proposed improvements shall comply with Public Resources Code 4290 Fire Safe Construction standards. ❑ 8. Development fees for the proposed residential or non-residential improvements shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. The fees shall be those in effect at time of application, and shall include, but not be limited to, School Fees, Park and Recreation District fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, Permit and Plan Check fees, and Fire Protection Fees. I. EXISTING STRUCTURES ❑ I. Comply with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. ❑ ' 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended new use of the building(s) or the existing building(s) shall be demolished. • BUTTE COUNTY 0 STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR USE PERMIT APPLICANT Omnipoint Communications, DATE: 7/6/2006 AGENT: Jerry Jazmadarian APN: 069-360-008 FILE #: UP 07-01 PLANNER: Chris Tolley PROJECT DESCRIPTION: new 120 'wireless communication tower with 12 (6 immediate - 6 future) panel antennas at the 100' height, and associated ground equipment. Future collocations are possible, but not specified at this time Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS: J. FIRE CLEARANCE X 1. Construction, installation or development of buildings and/or roads, driveways, gates and bridges on parcels/lots shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations—Public Resources Code 4290, 4291 and current Butte County Improvement Standards, whichever is stricter. ❑ 2. Prior to construction, a pressurized community water system for fire protection is required. Bonding may be allowed with the approval of the County Fire Chief. Average required hydrant spacing is feet, hydrant size inches, and residual fire flow o- GPM. Fire hydrant identification, road reflectors or post reflectors acceptable to the County Fire Chief shall be installed or bonded, prior to Parcel or Final map recordation, Submit plans to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction. ❑ 3. Place a note on a separate document and recorded concurrently with the Parcel, Final map or an additional map sheet stating that "Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed ir. all new residential dwellings in accordance with NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurizes community water system with hydrants that meet Fire Department specifications serves the property." A note stating "Automatic Fire Sprinklers conforming to NFPA Standard 13L - required" is to be added to all affected building plans. ❑ 4. In lieu of hydrant installation, prior to recordation of the Parcel or Final map, payment shalt be made into the hydrant fund at the current rate per lineal foot of street frontage. ❑ 5. Prior to building construction, provide an all weather access of at least 10 feet wide ane. vertical clearance of 15 feet that will allow for ingress and egress and accommodate Z. 40,000 -pound fire apparatus to within 150 feet of all structures. X 6. Place a note on a separate document, which is to be recorded concurrently with the Parcel or Final map, or on an additional map sheet stating, "Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the time of permit issuance and maintained continuously thereafter. i` Friday, July 07, ioos � M: _ M Develo ' ment-Servlces 1 .PLANNING DIVISION ver. 1.0 Counter Person Chr�^ is DDS Planning $2,970.00 (General Fund) Payment Date 7/6/2006 $0.00 Public Works $165.00 $0.00 (Land Development) Receipt Number 456095 — Environmental Health $404.00 CDF (Fire Department) 1E - $347.00 Received From Omnipoint Communications . . / NOE Fee)7 $36.00 - Applicant Same :,NOD (Recording Aunt Minnie $0.00 Application Number UP 07-01 1$1, 500 or $2,000 or In Reference To Planning Review / EIRF $0.00 Parcel Number 069-360-008 Check Number / Cash 0483213 Total.Rtacived _.....__._,. 7--13-954.501-1 Total Fees is $3,954.50^— - f Fish/Game $0.00 ALUC (Aii-poit Land $0.00 Non Sufficient Funds ($25.00 Fee) Cell Tower ($2500.00) $0.00 Public Sales /Copies � ' 1 -$0-0 000 Other:�- T �$32.50 C:OUN OF BUTTE 456095 OFFICIAL RE EIPT OFFICE OR DEPgRTMENT ISSUING RECEIPT {p L&ceivedom _T The Sum of ForLzvP 07 — Q Received: CASH [� CHECK otic? nal � DAVCO BUSINESS FORMS - (530) 743-8511 Form f DO NOT ACCEPUHIS ,&/ or6 -?. Received �By�A��i� Title ', By \PAY NINE`FI YE F CT ♦ i$, i % 1 •(.. *Three'Thousand Nlne Hundreffifty<.Ad t , � Dollars I ` it °To; COUNTY OF BUTTE (CA) The 7 COUNTY CENTER DR Order. OROVILLE, CA 95965-3334 s Of - - a e1 \� 5 50 `�. cum �,\� �� r'\�\. 'e �';,:✓'i, a4 hj,. �� f/ d�50'Cents \'-••t , f rx*#rt**}F*xrti}rt#�#*rt**+rt#Jfrrt*�lixrtix+*+#krt#xrt+fF*x*x***rt#*#x#:x*x#rt*#x## `• -' VOID AFTER 180',.DAYS THIS CHECK CLEARS THROUGHP..OSITIVE PAY 11'00004.8 3 2 1311' x:0330116011:4 006111 2:'�, THE ORIGINALDOCUMENTIHAS'A'REFLECTIVE WATERMARK ON THE$ACK.n�K" '"� - _�SHOLD" `AT AN"ANGLE TO VIEWDO NOT CASH IF MISSI_NG� Y i; ��`�.. -GENERAL NOTES I' NGI IET o wii°maI. I'crtii°deo ioiae ue¢o ioR us LTi f' A"DPa D x. TNe aexeau epN�rtAG S ECONE N µKTTNYMA 9Nu1G oTERIN9 QQ :;t.T1 AN D+• OC ED N[CL5 I T COMP1liE' - IN]TLL1Aigl9 U Df9LRIBCD R[R[W, RAG C. [TN"�JOBOY [ ��lu�ip" p Z[&TgiGUf�v8Q9U"CwI.IITf i. LOR9Ca01 OND5�4IPLC1, TMDrOSUMP D B.o CD IyPROU��OSTPR ATO ER,Yp t NITITMLE ONSTAUC - DNS' .T=CMI IN 9 XREPANCIIS AR2E r0 BE 9RpKNi- i0 nIE CNTiM w THE 'A�uIpECTNCNGRIE[I II(\ I 1 S. TLE GCNERAL (ONTRACIM PULL RLCCNE NRITTCN AUTNON12ATKNIEB TO NOT 11 BEII-E. —9TPo L Gpl]TF CTIpia1—Nd ACRI( DRAw CCON CA OOC-CNTa. A TWE CMI-- SMALL SUPERPAI. AND .1.1 IN. PROJECT 0115CR10ID NERC W. TWE CpII-- ]MALL BE ]0.111 RE9PW]IELE — ALL AND C�OWf�T.t1G LAL=dT =` TE! IEOU&NEI D 0111115 • I HE OTRKTDR ]MALL INITALL ALL [ON—AN AND MIIERNLLB O M N I P O I N T COMMUNICATIONS A OUK O IUNMK�LCR'9f VENOORI ]P[GP14TKN]MV — NOT[D 9E OR tyG[OnS oR wONAK[9 TAKf DOKl. •' pTRK .EE.CONRCTTORENAA`p EAllW1!R[G1NT[i0F—ALL" 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive Suite 190 • Sacramento, CA 95833 5TR.T EE. CONTRACTOR SNRALL GIVE ALL NOTKCI AND COR1N wTD ALL µ.W " Ib.BL'l.N"id Nra n ETBMSVAMiY EPECI1 uTIDDNnS D% jY Le K 1 SDK ATC LR >OKTIWAL CODA SEABNG ON TNC PERIDR:(AKE w TI[ r, GENEAAL iNTRACTOR MALL PRM DE AT TWE PROJECT SITE A PULL III OF CONSTRUCTION OOC1RtENT5 UPOATED TMC 1(LBLATT5TPREVISCI N9 AND ADC[ OO I5 OR CIARIFICATILN5 FOR U RSwNCI INVOLVED [ PROJECT, A ALTERED. OTUT— (d]TINLKT PR—ENTI OF TMDJ —I NOTE.QEMRME NOT TO BE 51, R, D AllS INCLUDED NfREW ARE INTENDED TO SPOON END RESULT OF DE— SITUAT10N% AND SUCIN egpllUT� 5 ENALL BE INLUDE'EDp S PART OF THE p. BEALPENETRATIONSTIROJGNPRE•RATCOMW—U,I LISTED OR EIRE d[D M TERTRB,Nr —I LI, LEGEND I PROJECT SUMMARY TO IN. 1ACILITT AND pi _CCY I. _ 2 12. NIGH STREET UBURN U R%03 (9501 SAS -0121 I1 RN e A PORTABLE PI(A.i EKIT{I�NCUISNER KTN A RATING p NOT L 5 THAN 2•A SITE MME, ORpn E DAM OR OEC ICT"M5I""TRu[YgN! vLl pSTANtC TO ALI: PoRTOI] w TNC PROJ[CT - A __ ANTENNA CABLE (ABODE GkV.D) SITE NIRIBE0., SC - 12. TLE (dTRACiO1 IM.LLL MAE.NIiCCLSBMr PRMSKNS TO PROTE<T [A191TIxf. I PROVEMENTS WOUNTS, PAVINW, (ARO WG, CTC, WRING CLN9TRUCTION. UPwN YartierkN w INaRK wlrRAnoR T T1IEPHCNE SERVICE (-6-E G0.CVNO) SITE AODRE59, 13S RIVERVIEW DRIVE SNLLL REPAR MY DAn.Be rNAT E (KCURFD we ib CMSTRUCTKN w OR ABOIi THE PRwe0.TT. ORO✓ILLE, CA RSRIS 13. CONTRACTOR INALL Ie. TO IT THAT GENERAL NORK AREA IS REPT CLEAN AND E PONE. SERVICE (ABOVE 4ROUND) SITE CCNTACTN JERRY CNM0.CR Nw1ARD WE DIRIRIYi CMH— AND dIPOB, w ALL ORT, DDERII, VIOv[ [pAPn[M NOT 1-1ICD U REMANWG ON TN G GRCLIND RING (ABOVE GROUND) ]SO-aL]•T5A2 PRCPFJRTT. P0.WY] SNKI BE I.— CAVI CCNpT AND 1RC1 FROt PAINT SPOTS, WIT, OR —.E. w YUME. ' DINNER.JAMES I RUIN RKJCCRBY u. THE APCNIT ENGINCERI NAVE IVM EVERT tf—T To SET PORIN IN A ANTENNA CABLE (BURIED) FAMILY TRUST INEuLTKN AND CONTRACT OOCLInENTS TNI LOr0.[Te SCOP[ w CCNTRK— BODING TWE JOB ARE xCVLRTREU!" CALI—ED THAT OWNER ADDRESS, 135 RIVERVI EW DRIVE CTVT15w1 OR OMNING5 AND OI IP[CITCµ1.— BNALL NOTCONGAS[ RKTOt PROi CLTIPIeTNG TNryPROJECTAw T TELEPHONE SERVICE (BURIED) ' eNOVILLf. LA 95RIW. I OANLE KIN INE INTENT w ]WALL BEM N[ RESPON]IdUTT w NOTIPTWG (II NRITIN 1 III TME E POKER APPLICANT, OMNIPO"I CC4NUNICATICNS C, RDOER CNTECTNENGINEER w ANY C(?1IlKi5 [RRON] CR 01u5]tl1] SERVICE (BURIED) APPLICANTS ADDRESS, OPERATIONS. LLC PRION, TO TN[ SUBMI]]KN w CCNTRKMrS I'RdPoSAL. W YNE N[M w BALAC]C]] -1 OT�TOR —L IRKS TWf —1 COBTLT OR LK —I G GRWND RING (BURIED) - -1 CREEK91DE OAKS DRIVE ].ITE Uro VICINITY MAP CONTACTS c P RutONSTRICTION M AC� ORaPO1NT CO " ICATIONS INC. JERRY CHANDLER (530) 540-0,132 I765 CREEK91DE OAFS DRIVE SUITE IRO "PCH I COIMNICATICNS INC. -5 CREf —E OAKS DRIVE EAC.—E-0,CAUEDip1A R9B33 SUITE SAn�NTO, U1IFORMA g5833 AIRY FI' GEIL ENGINEERING 12. NIGH STREET UBURN U R%03 (9501 SAS -0121 DRIVING DIRECTIONS F:Ti 1.1Y W RI ORO,IUE�ItIONKF i14x R NiTM ILiW RKAD NN IN.W2 ONE MR SplTN.[A9T DMI LETT ORO ""O ROAD AgNKEAT UsNM C0 R.1' LO DIM, OEMII[, G OA A55L550R5 PARCEL NU eR(5), OAA-ISO•Wa SHEET INDEX T TITLE, SWEET C -I SURVEY SWEET A -I SITE PLAN A-2 ELEVATIONS -DETAILS J OROV I LLE DA[I Site No. SC15420 T -MOBILE ER DALs DAZE PROPERTY z0NWG CONST, R.(. SITE ADDRESS 35 RIVLDRIVE OROVILLE, E, CA CA 94RLG •" 11!I.Obv e, O 'NIPCiA4M UINiCATIO�NS Peek Site—_Com 853 U—M WDy, SDile 106 ANbl , CaIYN>rila 45603 Ph— (530) 805-6160 REVISION5 1' -ROLZ(YJfN4-DOC:'S'- S -TONG', TAP ,Z �OOY'2ONING'pOC.'S d�1p-06- CW E OROVILLE DAM' TITLE SHEET TAP~ SCIS,120 ((�TpEIRNR� 3 AS -DIED .tl0]LL4T%�� A-I�-DG -T-1 4O CUI� Y OVERALL SITE PLAN D IOD' MO .DDS LOO' 5uic r• zaa GENERAL NOTES: A. ON ]ITE DRAINAGE ]MALL BE OCTATCD BY SITE COMOt KN5 0. IN ADDITK. TO COUIPMENT AMD Tp EQ BPA`!RELU-ENT9 LEASED AREA BMOULD CONSIDER 5UW ITVI9 AS, MA1NTlNAM[!, CRANE ACCESS AM. LANDBCAPIMC. C. IF CABINET] :N,or ARE NOT TO Be 1N]TALLLD. CONTRACTOR NO PROVIDE NEL'j IrX3I COMC. CR15TY BPLK! 00% .V ALL COIOUITB EB5E55ARY COR PUTURE CAButET5. a ENLARGED SITE PLAN BEALE I7A•:1•-O• KEY NOTES: NEM BTB UNIT5 O MEw TELCO CABINET 3 NEw MD AMP PPC ELEE_' PED. ME. IO .IDE ACCE]] GATE ! NEw MOCPINE PAINTED DARK Ply' N L NEIN PRE -FAD coAx CABLE TRAY OPEN GNRE{ANTE NO - N -BLIP wALKTTPE. T NEW GU%ArVETE&j �4y .ucER REBET e LEE�I&PT UNIT TO MOUNT TO 1205TRUT 9 ME. CITU 13 K. WAIL APPROX. WMIOM IO NEw 30Pu -CYTE LIGHT AT 7e' ACA 11 NEw i-1'10�1E. NI EIE59_AIfTEIMA] TYP. OF I1� ED�PER SEC'I'OR f R A TOOT L,OF :'1'V _ 11 NEW UNDERGROUND EIEG- RI- RUN 19 NEw UNDEROROUMD =TELCO'.RUN 19 ME. R TMK. COC: AC. WITH :RA REBAR lAT eR OC: IEKN WAY :AT MIO. BLAB OVER A'CRUSMEO;�Egl: •BASE Is ME i' TALI CH..N'L.NK FENEE IiFUTURE BTS CABINET IT NEw SPLICE BOX FOR FUTURE -BTS CAB'. SITE* ADDRESS 'I 5s OROV1wE, MLLSORNC E, S. 95966- -oble• O.gNIPOINTCOMSfUNICATIONS ti'g1:e: SYI.'1p..f.u..ers. V lN:.I Peek Site -Com 853 L'uraln WDyI Since 101PF—'(530) B85-6160 � �wPW000.�-�fli�jyl+n�Aslis s�Is++ mn .nwWy�IIr� µa.:M;efYSau1'L4imia: iu.n'asN 'RE V ISION5 12 I _ ZONINGOOC.'5 L-10-04 T- i IDmzONiriB-D s L -Do -0L cw' OROVILLE DAI SITE PLAN TAP n SCPiiM pm, - al y ���'• a R� E„�R. NOTED a W.If —1.v Pm M1-30-0.APm U9.-1 frL/ / 069-]60-00` I� LAN,RA[ MrOR 1 R N0.R / 1 GR W, wRr[TI a) -x)-01 DRb+Tm R a uNou dMc,DN an RpIMRx a apL LCL 11161 •^^•I[D d ra cavern OI aVR[. RAT[ If uwa1RA e[. N OW LIaRI AM aFem VON YOMMNR IINO AID MOWm droRYFmx. TNR R NOT A --PT RY[T. p7YA1DNe OIOrM ON IMR dAN M[ eA3[D UPON V.L L MAY.0. Y pATIH. AeOY[ YGN IIA LLM uxUn OINGRTII NORa x.0.YD. lete coRMCIDNr M L71' TROY p7YFT10NS p10Rr. ON OR d1IRYAN 1 R. • Tx[ UTRUDC AND IDIIOIND[ rdc RiRY01[D IlDxO tPI= "O -R 0.1.. ANO IRSRdO MNDCII aIle[ pRtRp1OLL CORIRCTDN SORrAM Ai ra IDCA,1011 aorN MRCON. UT.1 if]OYLaI• xAp 61 IPDA lxl-M...61' NA. R d .T. -n-M...• MAD IDNo.r I2r2Wo1.13• NAD R " SUR.'[T' .[CTS O11 R' — IM IA AC UV i . Tom• me NAYc A NYYem oROYTut oAY / II1/1» OROVILLE, CA - VICINITY MA ' xx LI[ AOOMSS, is eIY[RYI[w DO,Y[ IoaDYlut u SSRRR 0 CyV/JIOCNCxi APM 069-x60-009 Pm 009-x60-061 \\/\ // i •,)�,, I N Mal swMn Nan ary WIM v p«lly N W 0 N Me M �YN. Rkyba Tn i, UN Nv. ae v RvvvaM al Bed 11 Wif 4 ena Mf,ryry1, dpMM1•I ReeerVe 5»INa•Y � N fMly i. TeyvNw IS NSM, Rana 1 Gtl YDY. R Y. WMR men ea.nM•rry anvll.a •. IA - —1.v Pm M1-30-0.APm U9.-1 frL/ / 069-]60-00` I� LAN,RA[ MrOR 1 R N0.R / 1 GR W, wRr[TI a) -x)-01 DRb+Tm R a uNou dMc,DN an RpIMRx a apL LCL 11161 •^^•I[D d ra cavern OI aVR[. RAT[ If uwa1RA e[. N OW LIaRI AM aFem VON YOMMNR IINO AID MOWm droRYFmx. TNR R NOT A --PT RY[T. p7YA1DNe OIOrM ON IMR dAN M[ eA3[D UPON V.L L MAY.0. Y pATIH. AeOY[ YGN IIA LLM uxUn OINGRTII NORa x.0.YD. lete coRMCIDNr M L71' TROY p7YFT10NS p10Rr. ON OR d1IRYAN 1 R. • Tx[ UTRUDC AND IDIIOIND[ rdc RiRY01[D IlDxO tPI= "O -R 0.1.. ANO IRSRdO MNDCII aIle[ pRtRp1OLL CORIRCTDN SORrAM Ai ra IDCA,1011 aorN MRCON. UT.1 if]OYLaI• xAp 61 IPDA lxl-M...61' NA. R d .T. -n-M...• MAD IDNo.r I2r2Wo1.13• NAD R " SUR.'[T' .[CTS O11 R' — IM IA AC UV i . Tom• me NAYc A NYYem oROYTut oAY / II1/1» OROVILLE, CA - VICINITY MA ' xx LI[ AOOMSS, is eIY[RYI[w DO,Y[ IoaDYlut u SSRRR T-YOpI[ �ISIi�/ ORO.1LL7 0.W De.erRYly Pm 009-x60-061 \\/\ elms touNn IONdOI N/A F34SSdYR 1)RC6 NVYI[N pFiRO-OOS ORN[R(Sb JAYS R RUIx RFfR[IRf IAYRT 1RVR N Mal swMn Nan ary WIM v p«lly N W 0 N Me M �YN. Rkyba Tn i, UN Nv. ae v RvvvaM al Bed 11 Wif 4 ena Mf,ryry1, dpMM1•I ReeerVe 5»INa•Y � N fMly i. TeyvNw IS NSM, Rana 1 Gtl YDY. R Y. WMR men ea.nM•rry anvll.a •. IA - duMMC I➢N MCOaNT NCRpN RTOIouT IKrDRa Ppn16)ION 33 e1YtRw[w s.. OROYIUL G RSRRR Cann»tln1 n M mM xerIN1NY neer N Me aNw SCALE In a 200' SfT[ CdrtFtTl RRA 0IAMd1R 070-en-)llx M.rlal 0 aM rvnNn1 IN.nw SMT Mia' CM RLNM 1M al»e d. NarMNly WSMary N. »b 1N 4 M»e. Na fnR »l6 6wnaRry s.YM icRM iR.oR IM ro u. Trw IaM N eyb nal m....n.. .,am Ma PNn1 R) JOINT IIRYICC Id[ (I) Ir ACC]Sf LA1p1IXr \ \ I \ \ r 1 l \ tt> 1MSC / \ \ GEM ENGINEERING udxando • aAvrnNo • rtudlNo 112E Ric" STREE7 AlJR11Rx, C.W)'fJRIfIA 9]60] N N tl.pinnbN Wud MSI'xa tan ]oDO I.sN d»»WYM b)1'111.' M.D0.00 I..N dyy NanN Sfil'x1' W1v1 �a� Mlrl» NMA 11'}0'11• [M DO ' MN. ' 6vetnnllp. TMS dalnNo n CawnlaN,fD AID a ra rlrwd« Nd a, »..myt r« a.».. vert«.•• .Ic:I : v:n SOIi PROPOIR OI Cpl u$C Bl T-Y[O er TpN1M 11 PRWIMiO W, d IE pIIW IM OaNMIm N .Rk1 I. a»«1510 el fNloli:" - 6.RNnNIa n e YIUtlr e.ar. Herd afll'R6'�Ni 1;6'11 L duMMC I➢N MCOaNT NCRpN RTOIouT IKrDRa Ppn16)ION IM Irem IM —1d. «Maly ean« el M. •1wl �aekxsw I»» a.« a,w rvnnnle 1NNNN e»d irxa'll•-w«i sane y Otb 1.0.et O 6 �DOBIim. Au RNRR] Its. me IMI dys. eMN 11.11.17' LAM 1LM IMI M.•« Jev16 ]1•})'x1' LAM R1) IMt ebn« SLAIN .)'}1'}1• rw1 lV 1).1] 1MI INsw. MsrM ef1}'1 x' LAM I)JS JMI INww. xMN afiTlx• LAM IL R 1wN Mn« NMN }r11'ot' • cM' 10au Ieeli Mam Nra 1fa•II• rM 1eLx fM 111. prMv Ned N M ma. »a,mstll Nlv.n e. RbaM» DLA... • Y« NR•M« NM y y.1r,NN1 f« ��11D�N� R�«P..» p. IM b MM IM N. ayl«Ona N,IQ b 1...flW •. fv0e.0 blab,nine N . RnIII » M ManNSMp11 Ov,rMST N de ►► o algw a.wM.eN•» e.w YSlen p»n S«rtN Sf11•xY [M IM fr«n IM mv.1 lrR,vel1 tent« III.r•N ant 0 YM -dM M»» MMA ."x0• [M Sloe Irry &~N«M war rM x147.2.2 a 1M m.. «.I«. N a.,adR• nAca TILL caYPFNT rs7 Na. nalY .1 Nar. I.le-RxR ILA ems uvrcwcD rvro rt w+MARf rwe No eAsarllrs carter ra --_._---- Paortn ARu u s1oYN NCRcoN. Pa,mab. • s.,.ym • N.«bl IRJ nYe w..r - A.i«w renN«L.waan' V»«, Ne1e)ern•r.0 p.Nlno-u« GEM ENGINEERING udxando • aAvrnNo • rtudlNo 112E Ric" STREE7 AlJR11Rx, C.W)'fJRIfIA 9]60] N O ' Li Qv 0y �� rp � C O ::3 )� lV lsJ Q pU LO F � YO • �.. C WH Ll W ►► o 0 N T -H bcr Orv")t Cw..YJcatl 1775 Cn , 0— 1110 M319etpmeel Ada G6Nnay Ie,m ' IRe4O' M1 )10 NIwb00.'Hf< bM nm•n n,n.«, .W,wMr .i �wavmanp.J� �DD+R eo�aw aaRns, ,�v.FJei newe, flu l�nme, 0�ppt1 gM,'p��,x�q r'bM�U6N6i NY1O OYM.mNn.nn OYLM e -)PCf;dry: p0« q _�. / Fa„1«yTevye• VNab fNYN Cenemue. YONYM) .!LR I (I) T -III sr LLFFMA a1xL0Oo�hls6aiv. un w Ir7o'ea.11• SC 15420 IJdd r 1xl•xe'1o.u• (xADe7) "e1e1 NL a.>enll:.n OROVILLE DAMI.vnlWs: w ar AT11w•Nf alw NOVSS.INAIrosI ' Ifuro•y4 SURVEY a.6M J.we„«nO ri.«iw uYvo, e..m.yelewe.4mi.,• .v xuveaar.� utrPAA ASA[bNm.tlmiNb el<Oy. e1� e 1n = _20•e C _ 1 PRbJECT AREA ENLARGEMENT `TYP, BTS DETAIL NOT TO SCALE TOP VIFW FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW TYP.. ANTENNA DETAIL NOT TO SCALE II 13 L l- 9 3 1 Z 12 b 14 SOUTH ELEVATION - - SCALE 12' . 11•0' .. .. KEY NOTES, NEW BTS UNITS 2 NEW ]ODA -TER . ti... BREAKER SET ON — UNISTRui SUPPORTS 9NEW MO — PPC ELECTRICAL. CIHINET NEW TELCO CABINET ON UNIBTRUT 9UPPORT9 9 NEw M1lFIOPINE PAINTEDDARK 9R1?W 6 HEW .G GRADE 1 NEW .STM.T ENNA �IOINTF.O TO UNI9TRUT 9UPFORT B NEW C ELK. WALL APP.ROX,'%' M1G1 R 'NEW SOOIu .511'ELIGNT ATP' AOL F(�1 IO NEW T=tgB)llE WiREIESS-P_ANEI ANTENNAS TOTAL��4(�R)��ED �P,EV'SECTCR NEWMTN 6' K,-CCNC.,.SLiB Iej REBAR T Y'OC EAGH,i. At AIIO. IO SLAB CHER A' CRtS ED ROCK "w IA ID NE 6 T C"IN L N• PENCE ID EXISTING BARN TO EIIAIN �'���!' � lXISTING ROCK WALL TO 3EtUNN "x Y^ �. E, . SITE ADDRESS ,..� 1!S RIVlRVIlW DRWE OROVILLE,�C<'.6—, to � i = - T 'l.oble r 5OM VIPOENTCOMTi IJN [CAT(ONS ~� Peek Site -Com TI CCD Wayl Sui[e 106 (j Auburn, Dlifomr0 95603 I I� PhO'e (530) 085-6160 �I & t=Mail' In(o9peekeitecom.con 'REVISIONS _ iro x�tt.wlnx urt i 50i2d+ING DOC '9 -6-1 -TAT, f IOOt ZONING -DOL.'S o -]O -q COWa- v OROVILLE DAI1 �ELEVATION5-DETAILS � i--- TSP ~ 9CISQ0 �WI AS NOTED s, ; ,qT.gib_ 't¢4LI" T n P."c .v AV m VICINITY MAP t OMN fs\ Lake Oroville Project Location 7.\-7 11 URk- 069-360-008 1POiNT Aa - Top of 45 ft scale pole wit r. t j� OZ Wooh �•'•- orevine o cODsoraUIa JUL 0 6 2006 DEMVIMNTT June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking southwest from Kelly Ridge Road. ALC.'" f y.A. j -"k, bC�- COUNTY iVTY JUL 0 6 2a 'DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking west from the Saddle Dam. BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPIV Em SERVICES ho 1A .• �,r�i x� rrt. t_:�fot• 't•! '"�•} "K:� ? T- --y a.�) fie.,.• � • - .. }. i 'y �,a ��"i tA•. `-? 't r t z r �j �� }�4.e�,f � "�, - � .!fti.c � 1 � jor Top of 45 ft scale pole witi► eiiiafloon> y. t • . - EX,�pst6�ng Orovill_ Drive, -Mobile Proposed 120 ff free pole ,� • �, •fiYy{��� y bz Y�.`��,.!'C'/`-�•Ty7./V,.t 7 `_ » � '�9, ; I I �' RNW ..I 'i1 �I ` T.rt ,fii' � .�'' ��.. ? � � tea. '+ �,`••-. 4'; 1""»'''x i`�. •. - BUTTE f COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVEWJPMEN7 SEBVICys - .071, T.Dp of 4Z ft scale pole wr ALI- flooh Z LBrnvliltm-k 11 sura COUP JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES y. 'Top of 45 ft scale pole wit t 13MV1119% 11 ��Vextaunq 5'1 'Mr Ov t 13MV1119% 11 : BUTTE Clouu, ' JUL 0 6 2006 DEVEWiPWI SERVICES" dib t Top of 4[' ft scale p6le wif a 13mviII& 11 mumuTrIIIII F BUTTE COUNT* JUL 0 6 DES ER" 1VT L 4 rp of 45 X scale pole redmah Ilirnvkll^ 11 Proposed I-- Ic t Ae r -.P, loc. to BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SIMVICES Top of 45 ft scale pble M'h rled.ballb6h 1h ; �rnvmip iE BUTTE ` COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SEBVIC r 46 Top of 45 ft scale p Ve vo;� MMAaij ZJ, 'Irdwaligh In a JUL 0 6@Q� June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking southwest from Kelly Ridge Road. 0 CopyrWR 2006, Previsualists Inc., all rights reserved. Accuracy of this photoskWation based upon Information provided by project applicant. Questions? Call 1.877.799.3210 or visit W W W.PHOTOSIM.COM Pmlwall Is slaw AlQ LtiRao1 9ooz 9 o i(If June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking southwest from Kelly Ridge Road. jc.,►. uy.►. iw•w, �c BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking southwest from Kelly Ridge Road. i4A -k. ,.K,b-- BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Y*1 I Yl�. 14W I a Existing IN.W TAT, Rev A "0 1, Al 47 7- frill, 'P. Illy, :Al Ot- de' P "' w* Eornuallab c 41 ff } BUTTE '' COUNTY JUL 0 0 2008 DEv���� . 5 June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking southwest from Kelly Ridge Road. 0 Copyright 2006. Previsuaiists Inc., aN rights reserved. Accuracy of this photositnufation based upon information provided by project applicant. Questions? Cal 1.877.799.3210 or visit W W W.PHOTOSIM.COM S A. COU TE N1'!' JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking southwest from Kelly Ridge Road. BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVEWPMENT SEca June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking west from the Saddle Dam. Proposed 120 ft tree pole .t. .I. -+ ,.I� ,{�.'?"�'�11 J•. �? _. �e, yam. ;f ��w .� - _ .��-'`�f` _•.rim '�.`:.�"� _•i� ; �:.' Y :y �� �r � . , D.2 - a -4 .W .n t - _ _ ♦ KYY'aV w • �r� .. t Previsualists Inc., aW rights reserved. Accuracy of this photosinwlation based upon information provided by project applicant. Questions? Call 1.877.799.3210 or visit VW W ..PHOTOSIM.COM Oroville Dam 135 Riverview Drive Oroville, CA 95966 SC15420 • T • -Mobiles c® C W F co �� J June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking west from the Saddle Dam. 91IM&M IMM&OWAZO 9002 9 o inr June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking west from the Saddle Dam. c ? COU JUL 0 9 2006 June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking west from the Saddle Dam. © Copyright 2006, Previsualists Inc., aN rights reserved. Accuracy of this photosimulation based upon information provided by project appNcant Questions? Call 1.877.799.3210 or visit W W W.PHOTOSIM.COM t.:n. cy.a. r..pa, c ou JUL 0 6 IDE June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking west from the Saddle Dam. ® Copyright 2006. Previsualists Inc, all rights reserved Accuracy of this photosimulation based upon Information provided by project applicant. Questions? Call 1.877.799.3210 or visit W W W.PHOTOSIM.COM r.,n. ry.c. (,.y4i,as no YJUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking west from the Saddle Dam. BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES -N June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking southwest from Kelly Ridge Road. 2 .� +`�°+-'� p . . r � • � t .�� .SQL► � �,:r q f ,ri, � 1" ' I - ° r '" til `�. � c 4� t- ; � � , y ! � 'y ` � � �, `t' • �. •....._ _fes,. - .. _ - 1 Oroville Dam 135 Riverview Drive Oroville, CA 95966 SC15420 • T • -Mobile-, 0 Copyright 2006, Previsualisu Inc., all rights reserved. Accuracy of this photoslmulation based upon information provided by project applicant Questions? Call 1.877.799.3210 or visit W W W.PHOTOSIM.COM Pro, a; i BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 16, 2006 Photosimulation of view looking west from the Saddle Dam. ie.," t y...;, a, BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES t i 0 BUTTE COUNTY JUL 0 6 2G06 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES A A I M- I A A A I* i 0 COUTA JUL 0 200 xIE8 l sv��� COTTA JUL 0 6 2006 DEVEIA�A.t SES GENERAL NOTES 1. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED, WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE, AND THIS SET OF PLANS 15 INTENDED TO BE USED FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, LABOR, AND ANYTHING ELSE DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE INSTALLATIONS AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. 2. PRIOR TO THE SUBMIS51ON OF BIDS, THE CONTRACTORS INVOLVED SHALL VISIT THE JOB 51TE AND FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE PROPOSED PROJECT, WITH THE CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONFIRM THAT THE PROJECT MAY BE A,;C,A Ir Li.,0cr1 A.) Ji -kit 111 rrwri TO rrcc;ccDw6 MITI I ,3113TRUCTIJN. ALIT ` ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR DISCREPANCIES ARE TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. 3. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO STARTING WORK ON ANY ITEM NOT CLEARLY DEFINED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS/ CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S/ VENDOR'S SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE. 6. ALL WORK PERFORMED ON PROJECT AND MATERIALS'INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITYMUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND 5TATe JURISDICTIONAL CODES BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. 7. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AT THE PROJECT SITE A FULL SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS UPDATED WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS AND ADDENDUMS OR CLARIFICATIONS FOR THE USE BY ALL PERSONNEL INVOLVED WITH THE PROJECT. 8. THE STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THIS PROJECT SITE/ FACILITY ARE NOT TO BE ALTERED BY THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. q. DETAILS INCLUDED HEREIN ARE INTENDED TO SHOW END RESULT OF DESIGN. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUIT JOB CONDITIONS OR SITUATIONS, AND SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK. 10. SEAL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE -RATED AREAS WITH U.L. LISTED OR FIRE MARSHALL APPROVED MATERIALS IF APPLICABLE TO THIS FACILITY AND OR PROJECT SITE. f II. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2-A OR 2-AIOBC WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. 1 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROV15ION5 TO PROTECT EXISITING IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, PAVING, CURBING, ETC. DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE Or -CURED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. t' 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL SEE TO IT THAT GENERAL WORK AREA 15 KEPT CLEAN AND • HAZARD FREE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND REMOVE EQUIPMENT:NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY. PREMISES SHALL BE LEFT IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF -ANY NATURE. 14. THE ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS HAVE MADE EVERY EFFORT TO SET FORTH IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF is WORK. CONTRACTORS BIDDING THE JOB ARE NEVERTHELESS CAUTIONED THAT �+ MINOR OMMISIONS OR ERRORS IN THE DRAWINGS AND OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT EXCUSE SAID CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLETING THE PROJECT AND IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS. THE BIDDER SHALL BEAR THE RESPONSIBILITY OF NOTIFYING (IN WRITING) THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS ERRORS OR OMISSIONS PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL. IN THE EVENT OF J` DISCREPANCIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRICE THE MORE COSTLY OR EXTENSIVE WORK, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. VICINITY MAP N.T.S. • r 0 e ` C) 03U y JUL 0 6 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 190 • Sacramento, CA 95833 LEGEND PROJECT SUI" II" IARY SITE NAME: OROVILLE DAM A ANTENNA CABLE (ABOVE GROUND) SITE NUMBER: 5C-15420 T TELEPHONE SERVICE (ABOVE GROUND) SITE ADDRESS: 135 RIVERVIEW DRIVE E POWER SERVICE (ABOVE GROUND) SITE CONTACT: G GROUND RING (ABOVE GROUND) A ANTENNA CABLE (BURIED) T TELEPHONE SERVICE (BURIED) E POWER SERVICE (BURIED) G GROUND RING (BURIED) CONTACTS R.F. ENGINEERING: OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS INC 1755 CREEKSIDE OAKS DRIVE SUITE 190 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95833 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: JERRY CHANDLER (530) 840-0432 OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1755 CREEKSIDE OAKS DRIVE SUITE Igo SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95833 SURVEY GEIL ENGINEERING 1226 HIGH STREET AUBURN, CA 85603 (530) 885-0426 DRIVING DIRECTIONS EAT WHY 7010N OROVILLE D BLVD // RICINALE TURN RIGGHTTM TURN OUTH RIGHT ON 5R-162 OLIVE HWY S -EAST TURN LEFT ONTO HERITAGE ROAD TURN LEFT ONTO RIVERVIEW ROAD ARRIVE AT 135 RIVERVIEW DRIVE, OROVILLE, CA OWNER: OROVILLE, CA 95966 JERRY CHANDLER 530-863-7342 JAMES 6 RUTH RACKERBY FAMILY TRUST OWNER ADDRESS: 135 RIVERVIEW DRIVE OROVILLE, CA 95866 APPLICANT: OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS CAF APPLICANT`_i ADDRESS: OPERATIONS, LLC 1755 CREEKSIDE OAKS DRIVE SUITE IGO SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 85833 ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER(5): Olq-360-008 SHEET INDEX T TITLE SHEET C-1 SURVEY SHEET A -I SITE PLAN A-2 ELEVATIONS -DETAILS X. OROVILLE DAN- 51.te No. SC15,420 a 011111 T -MOBILE INITIALS DATE PROPERTY ZONING CONST. R.F. SITE ADDRESS 135 RIVERVIEW DRIVE OROVILLE, CA 85966 T .. Mobile OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS 1755 Creelcae Oaks Drive, Suite 190 w Sacramento. CA 95875 Peek Site -Com 853 Lincoln Way, Suite 106 Auburn, California 95603 Fhone (530) 885-6160 E -Mail info@peeksitecom.com This Emwinp contains ' lormolion which is the p,opNalory er du pea on Yol Jl OE4GNERe o oanonio mot o� eeonlau,ea pl'herein, without the ezpresan .Atte, consent. REVISIONS NO DESCRIPTION DATEBY 1 g0% ZONING DOC.'5 6-10-06 TAP 2 100% ZONING DOC.'5 6-20-06 CDH 3 REV 100% ZONING DOC.'5 6-28-06 JMR PROJECT OROVILLE DAI"I DRAWING TRLE TITLE SHEET SEAL •..• •.., • L TA• '•: :m 0' �j II NO. O AD401 9 "••..,. IV •• ..` Q' CAI.\� DRAWN BY PROJECT NO. TAP 5015420 CHECKED BY CARD TILE NO. DRAWING N0. AS NOTED DATE T _ PRINTED SHEET OF APN, 069-360.4010 SEE PROJECT AREA \ ENLARGEMENT oa��l APN: 069-360-009 APN+ 069-360-060 APN: 069-360-008 .(APN: 069-360-007 --- APN, --\PN, 069-360-061 BALLANN . 2 MANOR UNIT UNIT N0. 2 (E) JOINT SERVICE POLE M.N. 177V IV SCALE 1" = 200' OVERALL SITE PLAN \ \\\\\ (P) 6' UTILITY EASEMENT / (P) 12' ACCESS EASEMENT \ \ r (P) 12' ACCESS EASEMENT DATE OF SURVEY: 05-25-06 SURVEYED BY OR UNDER DIRECTION OF: KENNETH 0. GEIL, R.C.E. 14803 LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON MONUMENTS FOUND AND RECORD INFORMATION. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED UPON U.S.G.S. N.A.V.D. 88 DATUM. ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. N.G.V.D. 1929 CORRECTION: SUB. 2.31' FROM ELEVATIONS SHOWN. CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1 FT. THE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE WERE DETERMINED USING TRIMBLE GEO-XT G.P.S AND UTILIZING PFINDER OFFICE DIFFERENTIAL CORRECTION SOFTWARE AT THE LOCATION SHOWN HEREON. LAT.: 39'30'55.53" NAD 83 LONG.: 121'28'10.33" NAD 83 LAT.: 39'30'55.94" NAD 27 LONG.: 121'28'06.45" NAD 27 THIS SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS FAA 1A ACCURACY TOLERANCES. SITE NAME & NUMBER: OROVILLE DAM / SC15420 SITE ADDRESS: 135 RIVERVIEW DRIVE OROVILLE, CA 95966 BUTTE COUNTY ZONING: N/A ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 069-360-008 OWNER(S): JAMES do RUTH RACKERBY FAMILY TRUST 135 RIVERVIEW DRIVE OROVILLE, CA 95966 SITE CONTACT: JERRY CHANDLER 530-863-7342 OROVILLE, CA THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTED AND IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF GEIL ENGINEERING. IT IS PRODUCED FOR USE BY T -MOBILE. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USE OF THIS DRAWING OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CEIL ENGINEERING IS PROHIBITED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 2006 PLACER TITLE COMPANY FILE NO. 1415-8729 HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND IT APPEARS THAT NO EASEMENTS AFFECT THE PROJECT AREA AS SHOWN HEREON. M.N. 17'30 1" = 20' PROJECT AREA ENLARGEMENT r -- y N.T.S. VICINITY MAP T -MOBILE SC15420 / OROVILLE DAM Lease Area Description All that certain lease area being a portion of Lot 8 of the Glendale Ridge Tract, Unit No. 1 as is Recorded at Book 11 Of Maps at Page 25, Official Records of Butte County, California and being 'a portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 12, Township 19 North, Range 4 East M.D.B. @ M. being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most Northerly comer of the above reference Lot 8and running thence South 64'56' East 272.73 feet along the Northerly boundary of said Lot 8; thence leaving said boundary South 29'09'28" West 36.10 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence from sold point of beginning South 61'43'01" East 30.00 feet; thence South 28'16'59" Wesl 30.00 feet; thence North 61'43'01" West 30.00 feet; thence North 28'16'59" East 30.00 feet to the point of beginning. Together with an easement for access purposes twelve feet In width the centerline of which is described as follows: beginning of a point which bears South 61'43'01" West 6.00 feet from the most Northwesterly corner of the above described lease area and running thence South 28'16'59" West 14.28 feet; thence South 76'19'57" West 26.04 feet; thence North 58'40'03" West 28.87 feet; thence North 13'40'03" West 64.37 feet; thence North 26'19'04" East 35.17 feet; thence North 66'04'59" West 185.2 feet more or less to the public right of way more commonly known as Riverview Drive. Also together with an easement for utility purposes six feet In width the centerline of which Is described as follows: beginning at a point on the Northeasterly boundary of the above described lease area which bears South 61'43'01" East 3.09 feel from the most Northerly corner thereof and running thence North 14'36'22" East 33.75 feet; thence North 64056' West 267.2 feet more or less to the public right of Way. Gell logineedng Engl eA 5 Swell g a Flaming hot Aubre, Cdfamlo 95603-5015 Phma (530) 685-0426' Fee (SSD) 923-1309 T-Nobi6 / OmelpW Co nmudwOda PCS Equipment ASAC. SWwy Form ft*d No./Nmne: SCI5420 / Oraelte Dom N*W SBe Lata#m: 135 IOwrrke Of. ft4k CA 95966 Dote of Obs—fisc 05-25-06 Eq.0ned/Inxedure Used to OW. Coord le : �PatMinder airxa�airca — Trye of kd— Nmrlh Proposed Nmopok Number of Anlemm Obsoeed: 0 Lafte: N 39' SO' 5553' longitude'. W 121' 28' 1033' OVATION of Waled of Bm of Sbudum (MAW) eft CEAfIRGillltt I, the u d,*Ixd, do b -by arlih drmkn 611ed cbme 6 based on o fieM swveE done under my sM.'sion and Od the aaaect of Raw domfim coed or exceed I -A Standards as W.,d'n Its FAA ASIC biamo8on Shat 9M old Ud they are true and ocasde to Poe bed of mf bodedge and betel. 6tnmM 0. Calf Collamu 9.C.L 1180.3 Date GEIL ENGINEERING ENGINEERING v SURVEYING a PLANNING 1226 HIGH STREET AUBURN, CALIFORNIA 95603 phone: (530) 885-0426 fax: (530) 823-1309 DATE: 05-25-06 SURVEYOR: K. GEIL DRAWN BY: N. ROHDE REVISIONS: DATE I DESCRIPTION INITIAL 06-01-061 90X CHECK PRINT NR 06-01-06 "UTILITY POLES ADDED NR 06-08-06 TITLE REVIEWED KG 106-29-061rev. lease area/access I dg RF ENGINEERING T -Mobile Omnipoint Communications 1755 Creekside Oaks #190 Sacramento, CA 95833 Phone: (530) 863-7342 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR T -Mobile Omnipoirh Connunicntions 1755 Creekside Oaks 0190 Sacramento, CA 95833 Phone: (530) 863-7342 Jerry Chandler BOUNDARY SHOWN IS BASED ON MONUMENTATION FOUND AND RECORD INFORMATION. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. THIS IS A SPECIALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC MAP WITH PROPERTY LINES AND EASEMENTS BEING A GRAPHIC DEPICTION BASED ON INFORMATION GATHERED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES OF RECORD AND AVAILABLE MONUMENTATION FOUND DURING THE FIELD SURVEY. NO EASEMENTS WERE. RESEARCHED OR PLOTTED. PROPERTY LINES AND LINES OF TITLE WERE NOT INVESTIGATED NOR SURVEYED EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. NO PROPERTY MONUMENTS WERE SET. SC15420 OROVILLE DAM SURVEY 1n � Z A O ~ a M O � O � Z < O Q � O J W Q U � U Z W H — W Z O Cf Lit U M Q U-)tY Z Lf� U N O RF ENGINEERING T -Mobile Omnipoint Communications 1755 Creekside Oaks #190 Sacramento, CA 95833 Phone: (530) 863-7342 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR T -Mobile Omnipoirh Connunicntions 1755 Creekside Oaks 0190 Sacramento, CA 95833 Phone: (530) 863-7342 Jerry Chandler BOUNDARY SHOWN IS BASED ON MONUMENTATION FOUND AND RECORD INFORMATION. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. THIS IS A SPECIALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC MAP WITH PROPERTY LINES AND EASEMENTS BEING A GRAPHIC DEPICTION BASED ON INFORMATION GATHERED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES OF RECORD AND AVAILABLE MONUMENTATION FOUND DURING THE FIELD SURVEY. NO EASEMENTS WERE. RESEARCHED OR PLOTTED. PROPERTY LINES AND LINES OF TITLE WERE NOT INVESTIGATED NOR SURVEYED EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. NO PROPERTY MONUMENTS WERE SET. SC15420 OROVILLE DAM SURVEY • OVERALL SITE PLAN 0 100' 200' 400' 600' SCALE 1"e 200' r 4 GENERAL NOTES: A. ON 517E DRAINAGE SHALL BE DICTATED BY SITE CONDITIONS - B. IN ADDITION TO EQUIPMENT AND TOWER SPACE REQUIREMENTS, LEASED AREA SHOULD CONSIDER SUCH ITEMS AS, MAINTENANCE, CRANE ACCE55 AND LANDSCAPING. C. IF CABINETS SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INSTALLED. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE NEW 17"X30" GONG. CRISTY SPLICE BOX W/ ALL CONDUITS NE55E55ARY FOR FUTURE CABINETS. ENLARGED SITE PLAN 0 2' 4' B' 12' SCALE 1/4"- I'-0" KEY NOTES: INEW BTS UNITS 2 NEW TELCO CABINET 3 NEW 200 AMP PPC ELECTRICAL PED. 4 NEW 10' WIDE ACCESS GATE 5 NEW MONOPINE PAINTED DARK BROWN 6 NEW PRE -FAB COAX CABLE TRAY OPEN GRATE NON -SLIP WALK-ON TYPE. 7 NEW 200A METER t MAIN BREAKER SET ON NEW UNISTRUT SUPPORTS 8 NEW GPS UNIT TO MOUNT TO UNISTRUT SUPPORT. 9 NEW CMU ELK, WALL APPROX. 36' HIGH 10 NEW 300. 517E LIGHT AT 8' AGL II NEW T -MOBILE WIRELESS ANTENNAS FOR TdTAL OF POSED PER SECTOR 12) 12 NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL RUN 19 NFW I INDFRr,ROI IND TF.I (n RUN 14 NEW 6" THK. CONC. SLAB WITH tt4 REBAR AT 12' OC. EACH WAY AT MID. SLAB OVER 4' CRUSHED ROCK BASE 15 NEW 6' TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE 16 FUTURE BTS CABINET 17 NEW SPLICE BOX FOR FUTURE BTS CABINET SITE ADDRESS 135 RIVERVIEW DRIVE OROVILLE, CA 95%6 T .. M oblIP• OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS 1755 Creekside OAks Drive, Suite IW a Secrnmmto. Cd 9= Peek Site -Com 853 Lincoln Ways Suite 106 Auburn, California 95603 Phone (530) 885-6160 E -Mail inFo@peek5itecom.com This d—i,g contofna formationv4i 1, is the Provrfetoy property of DESIGNER. No"` th,411sd recon or duplication of mese Plans Or any Information mined herein. without the e.pres3 .item consent. REVISIONS NO DESCRIPTION DATE BY . I 90% ZONING DOC.'S 6-10-06 TAP 2 100% ZONING DOC.'S 6-20-06 CDH 3 REV 100% ZONING DOL.'S 6-28-06 JMR PROJECT OROV I LLE DAM DRAWING TITLE SITE PLAN SEAL �y..y.p.. .., ` G'r fQ(Y'•., •' _0 ? (3 V `: ` NO. C DDAm� ,DATE DRAWN BY PROJECT NO. TAP 5015420 CHECKED BY CADD PILE NO. SCALE DRAWING N0. AS NOTED AA / \ PRINTED SHEET OF TYP. BTS DETAIL NOT TO SCALE: SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/8' - I'-0' KEY NOTES: INEW BTS UNITS 2 NEW 200A METER 6 MAIN BREAKER SET ON NEW UN15TRUT SUPPORTS 3 NEW 200 AMP PPC ELECTRICAL CABINET 4 NEW TELCO CABINET ON UN15TRUT SUPPORTS 5 NEW MONOPINE PAINTED DARK BROWN 6 FINISH GRADE 7 NEW GP5 ANTENNA MOUNTED TO UN15TRUT SUPPORT 8 NEW CMU BLK. WALL APPROX. 36' HIGH q NEW 300w SITE LIGHT AT 8' AGL 10 NEW T—MOBILE WIRELESS PANEL ANTENNAS TYP. OF 4 PROPOSED PER SECTOR TOTAL O 12) II hIE1.1 y' TIIY rnhlf SI AR WITH ttd REBAR AT 12' OC. EACH WAY AT MID. SLAB OVER 4' CRUSHED ROCK BASE 12 NEW 6' TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE 13 EXISTING BARN TO REMAIN 14 EXISTING ROCK WALL TO REMAIN SITE ADDRESS 135 RIVERVIEW DRIVE OROVILLE, CA g5g66 T .. Mobile- OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS 1755 Ceeekeide Oaks Dri•e, Suite Igo a Ssmamenlp, CA 95U3 Peek Site -Com 9553 LincolnWay, Suite 106 Auburn, California 95603 Phone (530) 885-6160 E -Mail info@peeksitecom.com This droving conlaiea informationwhich is the pmprielory property of DESIGNER. No unauthorized re or duplicotlon of mese plena o om ieformottoe contained herein, without the eaprem rritlen eonaenL REVISION5 NO DESCRIPTION DATE Dy I 90% ZONING DOC.'S 6-10-06 TAP 2 100% ZONING DOG'S 6-20-06 CDH 3 REV 100% ZONING DOL.'S 6-28-06 JMR PROJECT OROV I L L E DAI"I DRAWING MLI ELEVATIONS -DETAILS SEAL ••.. ' � JQ�,'•., �`•® a txi�•cc `• No. c 3asmt GINL 9 •`..........� ' cpI DRAWN By PROJECT NO. TAP 5CI5420 CHECKED BY GADO L1LE NO. SCALE DRAWING NO. oATE NOTED PRIMED SHEET or