Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPRED 02-08_PLANNING 2� SEPARATOR SHEET q,„ 072-/�-o13 r LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: PRED 02-08 AP# 072-180-013, 052 APPLICANT: Robert M. Taylor, 505 South Villa Real, Suite 201, Anaheim, CA 92807 OWNER: same REPRESENTATIVE: BBA Engineering, 2060 Park Avenue, Oroville, CA 95966 REQUEST: Pre Development reviewing of a 49 lot residential subdivision in the FR-40 zone SIZE: 89.47 acres LOCATION: east of Oroville on the east side of Oroville Quincy Hwy, approximately 1.3 miles north of Forbestown Road, Oroville area SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT# 1 EXISTING ZONING: FR-40 (Foothill Recreational, 40-acre parcels) ZONING HISTORY: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: SITE HISTORY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Agricultural Residential APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: ASSIGNED PLANNER: Stephen Betts Date Application Received 6/13/02 Date Project Assigned 6/13/02 30 Day Complete n/a Preset Hearing Date n/a Cy "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: AP# 072--l,FD- or 3 oS� 2,Y-/40/0 APPLICANT: Rolr 4 T'�-„a2. 5'OS Seo✓44 Vi/[A A-4 5'u�-�e dD1 AAA4 4&,-,e,G( `fa 807 OWNER: 5A-1;4 c REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSED REQUEST: (to be filled out by person taking in application) s 4A Ig /off AerL �1AL [Av 4-6 r-2-YJ 2o,✓G,. FINAL REQUEST: (to be filled out by project.planner) �y SIZE: 1 7,Y'7 LOCATION: DAvr o vr`l2 i e- Oville AA1 az G -m S ® SOA 0, ��nr-n�c„N►g�\,r (.3 vin:ks SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT# EXISTINGZONING: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: e-&iAean ZQJ ASSIGNED PLANNER: PLANNERS INITIALS ' Date Application Received f 3 7v,-J 0 2L Date Project Assigned 30 Day Complete 1 Preset Hearing Date N� COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST, APPLICATION: DATE: County Offices and Cities: _Chief Administrative Officer -2L Develop.Services Director -Z--Public Works Director X Environmental Health X Assesor _Building Manager _Sheriff _BCAG _ALUC X LAFCo _Air Quality Mgmt. _Butte Co.Farm Bureau Biggs _Gridley _Chico Oroville _Paradise _Chico Airport Commission Information Systems Dept _Animal Control -X-Agricultural Commission Irrigation District: Butte Water —Biggs/W.Gridley Water _Durham Irrigation OWID _Paradise Irrigation _Rlchvale Irrigation _Table Mountain Irrigation _Thermalito Irrigation _Other Domestic Water _Butte Water District _California Water Service Co. _Del Oro Water Co. OWID _Thernalito IrrigationDistrict _Other Sewer _Butte Water District _Themalito Irrigation _Sterling City Sewer Main _Skansen Subdivision(CSA 21) _L.O.A.PUD Fire Protection -X-California Department of Forestry _EI Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts _Chico Area Recreation _Durham Area Recreation _Feather River Rec.&Park _Paradise Recreation&Park _Richvale Recreation &Parks Utilities PG&E North-Chico _Chambers Cable TV _Pacific Bell PG&E South-Oroville _Viacom Cable TV State Agencies Y CalTrans(Traffic) 11 Dept of Water Resources Dept.of Fish and Game Forestry(Attn:Craig Carter) _Dept of Parks and Rec. Highway Patrol Central Reg.Water Quality Cont _Caltrans,Aeronautics Program _Off.of Governmental&Env.Relations _Department of Conservation _Off.of Mining Reclamation _Dept.Social Services,Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies US Forest Service _US Bureau of Land Management _US Fish&Wildlife Service _Army Corps of Engineers _National Marine Fisheries Sservice Other Districts,Agencies,Committees,etc. Lime Saddle Dist _Community Association School Districts nro• f 5 Drainage _Butte Env.l Council _Reclamation _Cal Native Plant Society & Butte Co.Mining Committee _Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. _Butte Ck.Watershed Conservancy Mosq.Abatement.Oroville/Butte Co I I K:\PLANNING\FORMS\DISTR.LIS DEPARTMr"TT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTL .:OUNTY UNIFORM APP__CATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANTS NAME(If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: Robert M. Taylor 072-180-013."& 052 ADDRESS: CITY,STATE&ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) 505 South Villa Real, Suite 201, Anaheim, CA 92807 FRED OZ -O$ NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT(If any) TELEPHONE Sierra-Vista Subdivision (714 ) 974-1010 LOCATION OF PROJECT(Major cross streets and Address, if any) Highway 162 / Oro-Quincy Highway GENERAL INFORMATION TION RE UIED OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE Robert M. Taylor ( 714 ) 974-1010 ADDRESS: CITY,STATE&ZIP CODE: 505 South Villa Real, Suite 210 Anaheim, CA 92807 ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE(in Square Feet or Aar-) FR-40 A-R Vacant 89.47 EXISTING STRUCTURES(in Square Feu) PROPOSED STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) N/A N/A (Check One) (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON microseptec ! PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION REQUESTED ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ REZONE ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ USE PERMIT D E C E 0 E WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE JUN 13 2002 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ MINOR VARIANCE CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PE BUTTE COUNTY MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN PLANNING DIVISION ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT D OTHER PreDevelopment Conference :>• - JECT RO DESCRIPTION ... . . ..:.. .. P .. . . .. . . . : ........:... FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT(Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division,describe the number and size of parcels.) The projectproposesthe-'subdivision ofSee Attached Gat two existing parcels into approximately 49 res0entialparcels to help meet the demand for upscale residential lake view parcels. Domestic water is proposed to be served by on-site wells, gravity storage tank and distribution system. Sewer will be by individual or parcel clusters treated by "micro-septic" systems. (see attached literature). OWNER ATI N O O CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER 1 ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE IN1;ORMATTON IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized,execute an affidavit ofauthorization a the affidavit with this application.) DATE: June 11, 2002 SIGNATURE: r it 'I n"i 13 �, LIM AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; Alan Brown, BBA Engineering 534-1911 Print Name of Agent and Phone Number 2060 Park Avenue Oroville, CA 95966 Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for Robert M. Taylor on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number 072-180-013 & 052 This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals,etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Robert M. Taylor Print Name Print Name Signature signature D E � E o W {� Architect and/or Engineer: �C �1 �f �C i BBA Engineering (530) 534-1911 JUN 1 3 2002 ` Print Name of Architem'Engineer and Pbone Number BUTTE COUNTY 2060 Park Avenue Oroville, CA 95966 PLANNING DIVISION Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: Total Amount Received: AP Number(s) Legal Description Owners Authorization Zoning Requirements _ .Project Description _ , : . _._ �Copies of_plot..plan -- Taken by� Receipt No. 5 E.H. LD Plan.. FD Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ as of Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". IJI7J t ' J COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed_ Z('3 6 2 General Information: 1. Name and address of owner,and/or developer,and/or project sponsor: Robert M. Taylor 505 South Villa Real, Suite 201, Anaheim, CA 92807 2. Address of project: Oro-Quincy Highway at Loafer Creek Assessor's Parcel Number: 072-180-013 & 052 3. Name,address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concernipg this project: Bob Taylor 505 South Villa Real, Suite 201 AnahPim, CA 99Rn7 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project,including those required by city,regional,state and federal agencies: Caltrans Right-of-Way Encroachment for drive improvements. 5. Existing general plan designation: A-R 6. Existing zoning district: FR-40 7. How is land currently used? Vacant S. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Residential Gated SLibdivi si on Project Description: 9. Site size: 89.47 (Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: N/A Compact: N/A 11. Plans attached Yes No D C E O `E 12. Proposed development schedule N/A 13. Associated projects N/A Pi ANNmr, DIVISION 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development 4 phases Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential,include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. Approximately 49 residential parcels. Home size range- 2500-4500 sf; parcel price $100,000-200,000. 16. If commercial, indicate the type,whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. N/A 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division C1 1 Ira 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities,and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/A 19. If the project involves a variance,conditional use,rezoning application,or any development permits,state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit Rezone to permit parcel sizias; Caltrans Encroachment Permit for drive improvements along Oro-Quincy Hwy. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills,buttes,canyons ' or substantial alteration of ground contours. _ X 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. _. X 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. X 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. _ X 24. Change in dust, ash,smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _ X 25. Change in bay, lake, river,stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. X 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. _ X 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. - X _ 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, X such as toxic substances,flammable or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire,water,sewage,etc. including special districts). _ X 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity,oil, natural gas,etc.). X 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. _ X 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division U 2 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the projectsite as it exists before the project,including information on topography,soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. See Attached 33. Describe the surrounding properties,Including Information on plants and animals and any cultural,historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial, etc.),intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses,shops,department stores,etc.),and scale of development(height,frontage,set-back, rear yard,etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be*accepted. Certification See Attached I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability,and that the facts,statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Sign June 11, 2002 -- K:\F0RMS\SUBMlTTAL\ENV-lNF0 p ECEPWE J U N 13 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division U 3 Fill 32) The site has sloping topography ranging in elevation from 1100' to 1400'. Slope varies from 15% to 40%. It is covered with heavy to dense vegetation consisting of native Pine and Oak trees, Chapparell, Manzanita and other natural understory plants. There are no known cultural, historical resources on the vacant site. 33) Lands to the North and East are undeveloped or developed with single family houses on existing parcels. Adjacent land to the South is undeveloped and further to the South is the approved specific plan for the Stringtown project. Westerly is Loafer Creek SRA and across the lake viaw is Kelly Ridge Estates Development. D EC COVE J U N 13 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION I will 4"M ,; - u e oun y _2 LAND OF NATU R A L W EALTH AN D BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH October 31,2002 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Robert M. Taylor 1.31 8-B County Center Drive El 411 Main Street [W7 County Center Drive Ofoville,CA 95965 PO.Box 5364 Oroville,CA 95965 505 South Villa Real, Suite 201 TEL:(530)538-7282 Chico,CA 95927 TEL:(530)538-7281 Anaheim,CA 92807 FAX:(530)538-2165 TEL:(530)891-2727 FAX:(530)538-7785 FAX:(530)895-6512 Re: Pre-application for Sierra Vista subdivision,Oro Quincy Hwy.,APN.-_ 072-180-052 Thank you for you letter of October 28,2002 and the information regarding A B 885. We are pleased to be able to meet with you and provide needed information. To recap our meeting,we have received a letter from LOAPUD that specifies that they are not able to provide a community sewer system. To the best of our knowledge,the soil conditions on your parcel will not be adequate to satisfy our minimum development standards for individual on-site septic system's under Appendix VII of the Subdivision Standards,on the size of parcels you have proposed. Therefore,in accordance with Section 11.01-2 of the Butte County Subdivision Improvement Standards your option for liquid waste disposal is to provide your own community sewage treatment and disposal system. The sheer quantity of liquid waste generated by your project requires that you satisfy the requirements of the RWQCB and obtain sewage system plan approval and Waste Discharge Requirements directly from them. Due to the rapid approach of the wet season it is imperative that you contact RWQCB as soon as possible and begin your soil explorations. As also discussed,a CSD will be a necessary entity to ensure the continued long-term operation and maintenance of all the public service infrastructure for your proposed subdivision;community sewerage system,community water system,storm-drainage system,etc. Therefor?,we also recommend that you begin this creation process as soon as possible. In summary,to obtain a pre-application approval letter from our office we minimally need the following: 0 essential approval of your community sewerage system from RWQCB, 0 the creation of a CSD to act as your oversite entity,and 0 complete design approval of your community water system plan through our office. Our pre-application approval letter is necessary.in order for you to provide a complete application packet to the Department of Development Services. A complete application facilitates their processing of your project and avoids it being declared incomplete and delayed upon submittal. If you have further questions please do not hesitate to contact me at the above noted location. Y s Doug F e, y s Doug 4Fe 0, S vi ro Supervi Oroville Environmental Health E 6(0, E CC:RWQCB D �._> Water system program Butte County Planning No 4 2002 BBA Engineering BUITE COU[J'i PLANNING DIVISION _J 1 � f� �' (J r-� , a t i I 01 : 21p Bob Beeler (530) 538-6881 p, 2 q 16001%002 42601 09:41 FAX 590 508 2165 DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH nlil Butte coqnts i T , LAND OF NATURAL WCAITH AND OF. AUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Oc ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH THOMAS REID,DIRECTOR 18.6 County Cenlcr Orrve Oro-ille,California 95965 30)53 March 26, 2001 Tele F x- (530)538-21865-7292 Robert M. Taylor, President Post-11*Fax Not= 7671 Dare pa°ges� The REMM GroupTo - From 505 S. Villa Real, Suite 201 CO/Dept. Co. Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 Phone Phoned Fax h ..3�` / RE: MicroSepTec Fax 7 Dear Mr. Taylor: Thank you for the information you provided related to MicroSepTec products that are being considered for usage adjacent to the Stringtown project area. The following suggestions are being offered to assist you with development of a plan to proceed with a project application. The MicroSepTec treatment system includes ,ethnology that requires effective monitoring and maintenance. Provisions of these services will require a strong operational component of a responsible oversight entity. It is recommended that you begin an evaivaticn of options for effluent disposal that will meet public health, water quality and planning criteria. The choice will in part depend upon area soil type, depth, annual rainfall, watershed issues and water availability. • Wastewater facilities will be required to operate in accordance with Waste Discharge Requirements issued by the Regional Waste Quality Control ; Board. Mr. Ron Dykstra (530-224-4858) can provide you with an application packet. If you wish to schedule a courtesy discussion with Ron, this Department will gladly participate In the discussion. • A new project requires consideration of zoning, general plan, drainage, transportation, fire protection, etc. issues. You may wish to contact County Planning and schedule a pre-development conference. Various agencies are invited to the informal meeting that is designed to provide an initial overview 01 : 21p Bob Beeler (530) 538-6881 p , 3 /01 09:41 FAX 530 538 2165 DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH Z002/002 �iY'• �{f The Remm Group March 23, 2001 Page 2 of possible issues to be considered. Please contact County Planning (530- 538-7601)to schedule a pre-development conference. If at any point in your planning process, you wish- to evaluate wastewater options separate from other issues and prior to submitting a full County map application, you may submit a pre-application to this Department. It is likely that a determination of wastewater disposal and domestic water provisions will be necessary for a map application to be considered complete. Please feel free to contact Department staff or myself if you have additional questions or we may be of further assistance. Sincerely, Thomas Reid, Director Division of Environmental Health TR/mlf Cc: Bob Beeler Doug Fogel Craig Erickson Planning The Remm Group 3/26/01 r , n( HOWE. Tuesday, June 12, 2001 Bob Beeler .- S— 3 Butte County Supervisor 1230 Egli Street Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Supervisor Beeler: Thank you, for your *interest, questions and comments regarding MicroSepTec. The EnviroServer is an on-site wastewater treatment system that eliminates sludge on site an produces a high quality de-nitrified and disinfected effluent, offering minimal darger of ground or surface-water contamination. The operation of this system is continuously monitored by an on-site electronic system having communication capability with the MicroSepTec Performance Assurance Center. The Nation'al Sanitation Foundation(NSF)certified the EnviroServer in December 1999. It has also been extensively evaluated at the University of California, Riverside. -It is ideally suited for use in residential, commercial, and light industrial applications. Through a combination of dehydration and thermal decomposition, along with our unparalleled water treatment process, this exclusive technology is being hailed as a breakthrough in mankind's attempt to maintain a safe and reassuring relationship with our environment. I encourage you to visit our web site at www.microseptec.com. Enclosed you will find literature regarding MicroSepTec and support material for the questions you have expressed. I have included for your review the following: • Draft Design Criteria for Drip Irrigation Dispersal of High-Quality Effluent • NSF paper describing MicroSepTec Remote Monitoring • The EnvirciServer Specification Book ® MicroSepTec Regulatory References • University of California Evaluation of MicroSepTec ® NSF International ANSYNSF Standard 40 Final Report • Response to the question as to what would happen if MicroSejTec were unable to perform maintenance and monitoring services. Please contact me with any additional comments or questions. Sincerely, Michael Harbushka ull;: Hd�s Vice President Sales& Marketing C. A/1'a k in cy- You-r On Tuesday, June 12,2001 Bob Beeler Butte County Supervisor 1230 High Street Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Bob: The MicroSepTec EnviroServer is the only onsite wastewater treatment system that combines the benefit of safe centralized maintenance of multiple residential systems. It is computer controlled at each site and uses thermal decomposition to eliminate sludge on site. Thus, eliminating the requirement for the pumping and hauling of sludge. In addition, the on board computer is e-connected to MicroSepTec's Performance Assurance Center via telephone lines assuring the homeowner a flush and forget system. In response to your question regarding the unlikely event that MicroSepTec was unable to perform the fore mentioned services what would the homeowner do? What dilemmas would face the County? Could the existing septic industry, the County and the homeowner continue to enjoy the same level of environmental safety and ease of operation without the benefit of MicroSepTec? The answer is absolutely, yes. The EnviroServer is not only a very efficient onsite wastewater treatment system it is amazingly simple in its design and operation. There are no filters or membranes to change, maintain, or clean. No sand filters to replace, or chemical additives to calculate and determine dosage. In fact, the system could readily be reconfigured to operate with off-the-shelf components and still be a highly effective onsite septic system. Specifically, if MicroSepTec were to disappear the following procedure would be recommended, and could be incorporated into our operating agreement. The results of these simple operating procedures would mean the same high quality effluent would be discharged into the ground. The homeowner would enjoy nearly the same level of service of their appliance, and very little adjustment would be required. To further simplify the operations and reduce dependence on any one company or proprietary systems the following guidelines could be utilized. Detailed below are the generic operational requirements for the continued operation of the onsite system. Refer to Figure A, which depicts a cut away of the EnviroServer and Table B that details the components required. It is assumed that at some point critical proprietary components of the system would fail. _'Fhesel- i components are either the on-board computer, or the thermal processor. The critical,., functionality of the computer could be replaced with a simple electro-mechanical timer andcrelay:.i�. V_F. based.controller. The remote monitoring function and the thermal processor function would be ie.i= .`n�. M'akinc Youi, IlVoi,lla` r' ;;edonRec dcc°o:r lost but the critical water purification performance of the system would still be intact. We will be developing a design for such a controller and providing the design as part of the system documentation. In the event of thermal processor failure or removal of the thermal processor in conjunction with a post-MicroSepTec controller retrofit, sludge would no longer be eliminated on-site and would have to be pumped at some interval. It is recommended that the sludge level be measured every six months. When the sludge reaches a level of 24" inches in chamber one, a sludge pumper is contacted for a conventional septic pumping operation. Access to the tank is via the manhole cover. Sludge build up depends upon the number of occupants of the home, the amount and type of waste that is disposed of, i.e., garbage disposal, etc. It could be anticipated that pumping would be required every one to two years. The aerobic digestion could and should be maintained. The air compressor is readily available through standard industrial catalogs, and industrial suppliers. The recycle pump would be governed by a timer that operates for 50 seconds each hour, thus eliminating the requirement for our proprietary onboard computer. The timer and sludge pump are also available from industrial suppliers. Disinfection should be continued and is a simple process of adding chlorine tablets into a column. The tablets are readily available through pool supply merchants. (However, only non-stabilized chlorine tablets, which do not contain cyanuric acid, should be used.) Chlorine is added by liquid passing through a tube as chamber five is filled. Thus only minimal chemical monitoring or measuring would be required. The effluent would then be pumped via the effluent pump. Level switches and a commercially available timer control the effluent pump. The effluent pump can be obtained at an industrial supplier. i Simply put, were MicroSepTec to go away, the homeowner and the County could expect the same quality of effluent, with little or additional effort or technical expertise. The established septic industry could continue to provide maintenance as required. The downside is that sludge would periodically have to be pumped. This letter is meant to provide an overview response to the question, "what if'. We would be pleased to meet wit you and members of the County and MicroSepTec technical staff to examine in detail the requirements. Please contact me with any additional comments or questions you might have. Sincerely, Michael Harbushka Vice President Sales &Marketing Air Computer Control Compressors System Thermal Processor Chlorinator Bio-Meadia Sludge Pump Aeration Effluent Diffuser Pump Recycle Pump Table B Components Required, MST Part Number Description Vendor Vendor Number 480011 000 ISwitch,pressure(Diaphram) Micro Pneumatic X08621 400005 I 120 Compressor, 120 LPM Pacific Air LA 120 400002 010 Pump, Effluent,Type 10S030A-110 Grundfos 96033906 400002 j 006 IPump,Sewage,Grundfos SE 40 Grundfos 96001461 - 390003 000 ITimer,Cycle,Model C8825 Grainger 2E408 480002 I 001 ISwitch, Float, Pump Master SJE Rhombus ( 1002719 41 MicroSep `Tec Inc. - C PE CF ' Vc Friday, March 09.1 2001 MAR 13 2001 Bob Beeler R Butte County Supervisor 1230 High Street Oroville, CA 95965 RO) Dear Supervisor Beeler! Thank you, for taking time to review and study the information provided to you by MicroSepTec and the University of California Riverside. In response to your questions about monitoring and maintenance of installed systems, please review the following: The MicroSepTec EnviroServer is the only onsite wastewater treatment system that combines the benefit of safe centralized maintenance of multiple residential systems. It is computer controlled at each site and uses then-nal decomposition to elirriNnate sludge onsite. Thus, eliminating the requirement for the pumping and hauling of sludge. In addition, the on board computer is e-connected to MicroSepTec's Performance Assurance center via telephone lines assuring the homeowner a flush and forget system. The Enviro.--erver is NSF International certified and complies with ANSINSF 40. Extended Maintenance and Monitoring Agreement. NSF certification of the EnviroServer requires that a two-year warranty be included in the purchase price. In addition, NSF requires that a trained technician conduct an onsite inspection at least once every six months. Each EnviroServer is sold with a. requisite Extended Maintenance and Monitoring Agreement (see attached) and the owner is charged $28 a month. The agreement made by the property owner is a covenant running with the land and therefore is binding upon future property owners. The agreement provides monitoring of the system by MicroSepTec's Performance Assurance Center via the Internet and requires that a trained technician per-form all maintenance. There are no serviceable items for the homeowner to maintain. In addition to the MicroSepTec Performance assurance center, County and State regulators can monitor the information regarding each system. It Is as simple as connecting to our web site, xvww.microseptec.com, scrolling to the bottom of the horne page and then.clicking on the connect to a reinote systein link. See enclosed computer screens. The regulator then can access lab data, alarm status reports, recent upgrades and any services performed by MicroSepTeC26601 Cabot Road technicians. In short,the regulator has the ability to monitor without leaving the office. Laguna Hills Cabfornia 92653 Tel 949.367.8686 Fax 949.367.8655 Making Your World A Better Place Printed on Recycled Paper 1 MicroSepTec Technicians MicroSepTec seeks out septic professionals within.the local geographic area of installations to perform service. MicroSepTec NNU train and provide continuing education to the service personal. These relationships assure the regulators that septic systems will be properly maintained and will not be left to the homeowner. Please contact me with any additional comments or questions you may have. I ncerely ichael Harbushka Vice President Sales & Marketing Enc. Cc: Bob Taylor MCM mm�EAI I IL wall t. fo An —x 4, 'Ao* ij File-- Edit—View Go_Favorites—Help --- _^ _ _ —_ -- `N Back Fcmrr,_rnj Stop Refresh Home I Search Favorites History Channels I Fullscreen Mail Print Edit Address �]http:l/e-connect/SPReportAlaTm.asp?FromDate=0110112000?ToDate=0310812000 Links , •e. d ,R "l. ,,> •'�'x,2' ��' �i' t`„m,'�fls. -�"'+'�c� s(�,c-ror� e: `?r>4.-Av� .,,Y, `FTE. 3> .d,aO .*, s4 r„,xf � ' SN.wNI GSi� Y� cc tuu p a e .�E! 1 WN -I Report T e: Alarm Report Ij yp From: I January - 01 - 2000 TO: Imarch 08 2000 j i Submit. i i i Alarm Report Date - Time SystemlD I -Alarm Type Alarm Status Alarm Description Homz I Technical Into I Regulators I builders!Developzrs I Homeouvnzrs Distributor NeDrdork I Process Description I Corporate Overview I Contac4 Us so m MicroSepTec,All Rights Reserved 28801 Cabot Road Laguna Hills,CA 92853 (877)4SEPTIC L'1.. _.. d. a"•.Local intranet zone vL..�wd. :EXPlOFeF ems Icloso ei�it a`si�tk sist ..,-Wastewater, nt' KIM ........... MO. ,0§ g"R z 8M- Pill MicroSepTec Inc. Extended Maintenance & Monitoring Agreement Address Phone: 26601 Cabot Road, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 (949) 367-8686 Date q Agreement: Start-Up Date: !f Sales Rep: Sales Order Number. INSTALLATION ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NUMBER: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (If more than one MicroSepTec EwmiroSenersystem is covered by this Agreement,see Addendum "A listing each specific systent) Model 9: Serial # Capacity (gpd) The EnviroServer consists of the following standard components: Thermal Processor, Controller, Aeration pump, underground processing tank, Re-circulation pump(s), Sludge pump(s), conti-ol sensors, alarm and connectors. This system(s)is installed to service (#)structure(s). IMPORTANT:All provisions on the face hereof, as well as Monthly cost ofi. all conditions on the back and any addendum attached is part of' this Agreement. Read them carefully. No substitutions or changes will be effective without joint written approval of property owner and MicroSepTec Inc. AnnualTotal: Extended Maintenance and Monitoring Agreement fees are payable monthly or annually in advance. Monthly fees are billed against a Visa or Master Card account on file. Annual fees can be invoiced or billed against a Visa or MasterCard account on file. Please check appropriate box R Visa r-IMasterCard ❑Monthly billing-Credit Card Only E] Annual Billing E] Credit Card [I Invoice Name as it appears on credit card Credit Card Account Number: Expiration Date: F1 Other Billing: Signed by: Signed by: Purchaser(Signature must be notarized MicroSepTec State of California County of On Before me, personally appeared i personally known to me(or proved to me the basis of satisfactory evidence)to be the person(s)whose name(s)is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(As), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (Seal) Signature 31812001 Page 1 of 1 Documenr#1 00031-000 Maintenance and Monitoring Extended Terms and Conditions 1. General Undertaking: (a) woe of Coverage. During die term of this Agreement,MicroSepl'ec,inc.,or Licensed Dealer,(hereinafter referred to as"Company"),shall perforin the Preventative Maintenance Services and on-site Remedial Maintenance Service with respect to die System specifically identified by model and serial number on Ilia face of this Agreement. Company shall perform maintenance Services in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and NSP Standard 40 certification requirements. (b) Chan8es in Covered Equipment. 'Ilia Covered Equipment information may from time to lime be modified by mutual agreement of the parties memorialized by a signed amendment to the Agreement. Such changes may result from additions or deletions of items occasioned by Property Owner requirements or by applicable manufacturer's engineering changes. Any change in equipment shall include a price adjustment or a notation that no adjustment is required. (c) Exclusions from Covered Equipment. 'rhe Covered Equipment includes only the EnviroServer(& identified by serial number. Covered Equipment does not include any residential electrical or telephone wiring,plumbing,drainage or addilienal disposal systems)external to tie Covered Equipment. (d) Authorization. Property Owner authorizes Company to perform work as described in Section 1(a), including all service, parts and miscellancou4 materials necessary to complete the described work. Property Owner agrees to an express service lien on the property until all amounts due on account are paid for in full. Property Owner grants permission to Company and its employees to operate the System as necessary for testing and inspection. Property Owner will not ]hold Company responsible for damage to or loss of the SystLin in case of fire, theft, accident or other causes beyond Company's control. 2. Limited Warranty (a) What is Covered, (i) MicroSepTec inc. ("MicroSepTec") warrants the parts in each EnviroServerBi System to be free from defects in material and workmanship and provides maintenance and monitoring for a period of liA)(2)years from actual start-up date in accordance with NSF Standard 40 requirements. ilia cost is included in the initial purchase price. (ii) Extended Maintenance and Monitoring fees commencing at the termina=ion of NSP required service policy, shall be required. Ilia monthly fee shall cover monitoring and maintenance and only. Maintenance shall tx:done by a MicroSepTec technician. All parts oosts will be the responsibility of the owners. (b) What MicroSepTec Will Do To Correct Problems. MicroSepTec's sole obligation tinder this warranty is to f lfill this warranty by repairing or exchanging,at the sole discretions of MicroSepTec. (c) What This Warrnn[y Does Not Cover; (i) This warranty covers only nornal residential use in the United States. MicroSep'No;is not responsible for warranty service should the MicroSepTcv label,logo,the rating label,or serial number be removed or should the product fail.to be properly maintained or fail to function properly as a result of misuse,abuse,improper installation,neglhct, improper shipping,damage caused by disasters such as fire, earthquake, Gooding by external means, lightning, improper wiring or electrical current, interaction with non-MicroScpl'ce products, service other than by a MicroSepTec authorized servicer or die discharging of hnzardous,or Gammnble materials, construction debris,or excessive amounts of household cleaning materials Brough(lie system. (e) This warranty applies only to the EnviroScrverO System and does not include the chlorine disinfection consumables, (if applicable) or any of the residential wiring,plumbing,drainage,or additional disposal system. U addition to,and not in limitation of anything else contained in tris warranty, MicroSepTec is not responsible for any delay or damages caused by defective components or material,or for loss incurred because of interruption of service, or for any other special or consequential damages or incidental expenses arising from the manufacture, sale, or use of the EnviroScrvei0 System. (1) MicroSepTec reserves the right to revise,change or modify the construction and design of the EmiroScrvedg)System or any eompcmenl part or parts thereof without incurring any obligation to make such changes or modifications in previously manufactured equipment. MicroSepTec also reserves the right,in making replacements of component parts under this warranty,to furnish a compon:nt pact which,in its judgment,is equivalent to the company part replaced. (g) in addition to and not in limitation of.anything else contained in this warranty,under no dreurnstances will MicroSepTec be responsible for any other, direct or consequential damages including,but not limited to lost profits,lost income,labor charges,delays in production,and/or idle production which result from defects in material and/or workmanship of die EnviroServere System. 3. Equipment Maintenance Services (a) Preventative Maintenance Service. Company shall, from time to lime, perform sched.iled Preventive Maintenance Service for the System and Additional Equipment during the Company's normal business hrnas. All Preventive mai-itenance Service shall be performed on-site at the property address of the System identified on the face of this Agreement. Preventive Maintenance Service means die cleaning, lubricating, inspecting, testing, sampling and adjusting of Covered Equipment and the replacement of defective parts. Preventive Maintenance Service also includes upgrades required for the Covered Equipment to the extent die manufacturer or third party suppliers make such upgrades available. (b) Remedial Maintenance Services. Company shall be available seven O days per week,tw:nty-four(24)hours per day(Emergency On-Call Flours)to provide on-site Remedial Maintenance Service in response to an"Alarm One"reported by Properly Owner,or by the on board computer. Alarm One means an Alarm indicated by visual and Audible notification at the Property Address of System prompted by a malfunction on the Covered Equipment preventing it from operating within manufacturer's operation specifications. Problems w.th die Covered Equipment other than Alarm One shall be addressed as Preventive Maintenance Service during normal business hours. (i) Notice of Alarm Ones, Property Owner shall notify Company of Alarm.Ones by telephone. Property Owner shall cooperate with Company's reasonable requests for information and answers to questions corder Company's standard"trouble report"to determine die cause of die reported problem and whether a Remedial Maintenance Service visit is required. (ii) Response to Alarm Ones. If Company cannot reasonably determine front the trouble report that an Alai-in One received during Emergency On-Call hours was caused by something other than a malfunction in Covered Equipment,Company shall,within four(4) hours of receiving and acknowledging receipt of Property Owner's Alarm One,dispatch a service technician to the Property Address of the System as specific on the face of this Agreement. Upon arrival, Compnny's service technician shall be given all necessary egress to die premises. (iii) Delay in Response. Company shall be excused from delays in responding to Service if caused by force Majeure, fires, weather conditions,labor controversies,delays in procurement of parts or supplies,or other causes beyond the control of Company. 4. Cg-Iain Propc�y Owner Responsibilities (a) Generally, Property Owner shall ensure that: (i) No repair attempts or other changes are made to Covered Equipment,by anyone other then Company's certified service technician. (ii) The Covered Equipment is not been mishandled,misused,neglected,abused,vandalized,damaged by fire,lightning or water, subjected to hazardous chemicals,or otherwise subjected to unusual electrical or physical stress beyond die manufacturer's specified operating capabilities. Property Owner understands that there are no owner serviceable items on the System and that Company's certified service technicians using only manufacturer-approved parts must conduct all repairs and service. (iii) Property owner is responsible for maintaining continuous phone and electrical service to the Enviro5'erver4D, (b) Failure to Comply, To the extent any Preventive Maintenance Service is required because of'roperty Owner's failure to comply with Ilia terms of Section 3(a),the Company may treat any such work as Billable Services at die Company's dxn current and applicable Regular Service Rate or Emergency Service Rate. 5. PaMent. The Annual Maintenance Fee shall be paid as detailed on the face of this Agreement. Nyment should be made to die Company at the indicated Address. Any amounts due hereunder,including applicable Billable Services shall be paid in full as services are rendered. Any late payment shall be subject to any costs of collections,including reasonable legal fees,nod shall bear interest at the rate of one and one-half percent(1.501x)per month,or fraction thereof,until paid. 6. TcrrrL Termination, The term of this Agreement("Term")shall commence as of the date of start-up of the EnviroServerlu and shall continue in full force and effect during die life of the System,unless terminated earlier by Company due to Property Owner's failure to comply with any temp or provision of this Agreement.Esca]ator Clause, All Fees and Rates quoted herein are subject to annual review at die anniversary date of Agreement and shall automation I ly be adjusted up or down based on current labor and parts rates. However,that adjustment shall be limited to and not exceed the percentage change in the CPI 7. (Consumer Price Index)as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics U.S.Department of Labor. Any such changes shall become effective on the first day of the month immediately following the amuversary date. 8. L'abi ii s. EXCEPT FOR DAMAGES ARISING FROM BODILY INJURY CAUSED SOLELY BY THE NEGLIGENCE OF COMPANY,COMPANY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY AMOUNT EXCEEDING THE TOTAL. OF 'HIE Mi,,roSep'rec CONTRACT PRICE ACTUALLY PAID BY PROPERTY OWNER. IN NO EVENT SMALL COMPANY BE LIABLE, WHETHER IN STRICT LIABILITY, CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE, FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING ). ., WIITIOUT I.,IMITA-TION, LOST PROFIT OR BUSINESS WI-ERRUPTION EVEN IF NO"I'IFLED IN ADVANCE OF SUCH POSR! !,ITY, OR CLAIMS OF PROPERTY OWNER ARISING OUT OF OR PERTAINING TQ"IT fl S[TBJECT MATIT R OF ITIIS AGRf:EMEN'f. THIS,WARRANTY AND REMEDY PROVIDED ABOVE ARE EXCLUSIVE AND 1N LIEU OF ALL. OTHER EXPRESS WARRAN LIES AND, UNLESS STATED HEREIN, ANY STATEMENI'S OR REPRESENTATIONS MADE BY ANY O'11IER PERSON OR FIRM ARE VOID. THE DURATION OF ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ON YOUR F,NVIROSERVER SYSTEM SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE DURATION OF THE EXPT-:ESS WARRANTY SET FORTH ABOVE. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN THIS WRITTEN WARRANrY, NEITHER MicroSep'rec NUR ITS AFFILIATES SMALL BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS, INCONVENIENCE, OR DAMAGE INCLUDING DIRECT,SPECIAL,INCIDENTAL,OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM-ITIE USE OR INABILITY TO USE Tl-lE ENVIROSERVERrIb SYSTEM WHETHER RESUUrWG FROM BREACH OF WARRANTY OR ANY OTHER LEGAL THEORY. 10. Independent Contractor Status. Company and its officers,directors,agents,representatives,servants and employees are independent contractors in relation to Property Owner with respect to all matters arising under this Agreement. Nothing herein shall be deemed to establish a Partnership,joint venture, association or employment relationship between the parties. Company shall remain responsible"and shall indemnify and hold harmless Property Owner,for the withholding and payment of all Federal, State and local personal income,wage earnings,occupation, Social Security, unemployment and sickness and disability insurance taxes,payroll levies,or employee benefit requirements (under ERISA, State law or otherwise) now existing or hereafter enacted and attributable to Company and its officers,directors,agents,representatives,servants,and employees. 11. Covenants Running with the Land. It is agreed and understood that this Agreement is made and accepted by the Property Owner as a`covenant running with the land"and that this Agreement shall apply to and be binding upon all successive future owners and occupants as it is to the original Property Owner herein. The Property Owner acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement creates a lien upon the described land and said lien may be foreclosed against said properly or owner upon non-payment of Maintenance Fee charges when such non-payment exceeds a period of thirty(30)days. The Property Owner, by executing this Agreement,expressly vests in Company,or its successors and assigns,the right to bring all actions against the owner of the property as herein described or any part hereof for the collections of the maintenance charges. 12. Rimbt of Way and Easement. Property Owner and its successors and assigns,does hereby grant and convey unto Company, its successors and assigns,a perpetual right of way and easement for access,ingress and egress,on,over,above,across and wider the property for the purpose of inspecting,maintaining, repairing,replacing,operating,and removing the System,Additional Equipment and/or Covered Equipment. I. LAND OF NAT URAL bvEAL T AND 3EA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 18-8 County Center Drive 01411 Main Street 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 P.O.Box 5364 Oroville,CA 95965 TEL:(530)538-7282 Chico,CA 95927 TEL:(530)538-7281 FAX:(530)538-2165 TEL:(530)891-2727 FAX:(530)538-7785 June 19,2002 FAX:(530)895-6512 Robert M. Taylor 505 South Villa Real, Suite 201 Anaheim,CA 92807 Re: Pre-application review and pre-development review conference for a proposed 49-lot subdivision on Oro-Quincy Hwy,Oroville CA (APNs 072-180-013 and 052). We received the pre-application review request on June 13,2002 and the pre-development request on June 18,2002. Our department has entered into an agreement with.the Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB) that any prgposed development of this size will require their approval of the sewage disposal system design prior to tentative map approval by our office. Therefore,by means of this letter I am notifying RWQCB of their need to attend the predevelopment conference for the project. Our knowledge of the soils in the project area,generally quite shallow(i.e., less than three feet of clay loam over an impervious strata) confirms that an alternative design septic system would be necessary for this development. The parcels as proposed would not be expected to meet the minimum requirements of Butte County Subdivision Improvement Standards for standard septic systems. i You have also proposed a community water system to service this development. A water system of this size would be regulated as a community water system under state requirements. Our office administers this program. By way of this letter I am also requesting our water program specialist attend your predevelopment conference in order to provide you with the needed detailed information regarding the water system. Our office is also jointly involved with Butte County Public Works in regulating the drainage from the site. I am looking forward to seeing you at the predevelopment conference. If you have any questions please feel free to direct them to me personally. rs Doug F 1, Supervisor Oroville Environmental Health CC: RWQCB Water system program Butte County Planning BBA Engineering #+ Is. _ tte Count $011- LAND OF NAT.UR.AL WEALTH AND BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH �18-B County Center Drive 411 Main Street ®7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 P.O. Box 5364 Oroville,CA 95965 TEL:(530)538-7282 Chico,CA 95927 TEL:(530)538-7281 FAX:(530)538-2165 TEL:(530)891-2727 FAX:(530)538-7785 November 22,2002 FAX:(530)895-6512 BBA Engineering 2060 Park Avenue Oroville,CA 95966 Re: Pre-application for subdivision for Taylor,Oro-Quincy Hwy.,APN 072-180-013&052. You should have recently received a notification from our office indicating that our normal groundwater- monitoring period for land division projects begins November 15L. To date we still have not received any indication that soil mantels are ready for inspection or that groundwater-monitoring pipes are in place on this project. We are attempting to work in close association with RWQCB on this project and intend to do joint inspections with them when we receive notice. We should also have a map indicating the location of the test pits and groundwater-monitoring pipes to use during our inspection. The wet season is now upon us. Without a map of the parcel indicating the location of groundwater- monitoring pipes on the parcel our staff will not be able to provide the degree of oversite of the project necessary in order for us to properly assess the potential environmental impacts and their proposed mitigations. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me at the above noted office. Aruly, og so Cc:RWQCB l Department of Development Services Robert Taylor EE­D C V E NOV 2 2 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION r � �-� ,. . � � , _ � 'r-� � ;', �: 114!111 Suite c®��t LAND OF NATURAL W E A L T H AND BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH R18-B County Center Drive 0411 Main Street R 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 L"_J PO.Box 5364 Oroville,CA 95965 TEL:(530)538-7282 Chico,CA 95927 TEL:(530)538-7281 August 21, 2002 FAX:(530)538-2165 TEL:(530)891-2727 FAX:(530)538-7785 FAX:(530)895-6512 Robert Taylor 505 South Villa Real, Ste. 201 Anaheim, CA 92807 RE: Proposed 49 Lot Subdivision(Sierra Vista), Oro Quincy Hwy, Oroville AN 072-180-052 & 013 Dear Mr. Taylor: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on your proposed project. Members of this department attended a pre-development conference on July 18, 2002, at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville. This meeting was convened for the purpose of allowing you the opportunity to present your project to the county staff and interested agencies in an informal setting. This letter confirms our initial review and discussions at that conference. First, it is apparent that you will need to apply for a rezone and possibly a general plan amendment before you file your map. We may incorporate some of our comments in this letter into those applications when they are circulated. With that said,please consider the following: 1. Your project is adjacent to the Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (LOAPUD). The county's subdivision improvement standards require that you annex and connect to an existing public or community system if it is reasonably close. If you believe that connection to LOAPUD is not feasible, you and your engineer must file a petition to the county supporting your case. nMWE 2 6 2002TTE COUNTYNING DIVISION Page 2, Taylor/Sierra Vista, August 21, 2002 2. Apparently your project lies within the Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District (OWID). If the physical infrastructure is within 700' of your project, county improvement standards require connection to the existing water system. If you believe that your project does not meet the criteria for mandatory connection and wish to provide your own water system, you will be required to meet specifications set forth in the Safe Drinking Water Act of the California Health and Safety Code as well as section 12.01-5 of the county improvement standards. Some of the more important items you will be expected to provide are: (a) legal entity to build, maintain and operate the system, (b)wells constructed under Appendix VI and Chapter 23B of the Butte County Code, and (c) any other additional items needed to meet state and county's permitting process for operating a public water system. You should contact this Department's water system staff at 538-7282 (Scott Bechard) for further information. 3. If you are successful with our petition to not connect to an existing sewer, then Y Y p g you can(a)propose individual on-site sewage disposal systems, or (b)propose your own community system. 3a Based upon a preliminary review of the project,together with our Oroville staffs general knowledge of the soil in that area, it is almost certain that your project won't qualify for individual on-site sewage disposal systems under county improvement standards (Appendix VII). It appears that much of the project exceeds 30% slope and has shallow soil depth. Either one of these constraints could prohibit parcels from meeting the Subdivision Ordinance requirements for onsite sewage disposal. 3b That basically leaves the option of providing your o1AM community sewage system with treatment and disposal facilities. If you propose such a facility, you will be required to (a)provide for the establishment of a pubis is entity empowered and adequately funded to maintain and operate the system, and(b) obtain waste discharge requirements from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Page 3, Taylor/Sierra Vista, August 21, 2002 Regarding the above option: A. The county no longer entertains the formation of County Service Areas (CSA) for the purpose of providing oversight of community systems. Our recommendations will be to form a strong oversight entity such as a Community Service District(CSD) to operate and finance a system the size you're proposing. B. Your proposal to provide individual treatment package systems for each lot and dispose of effluent on-site will have to be approved by the Regional Board. Such a proposal will not have the support of this department for the following reasons: (1) In this county, your proposed treatment mitigation(sequencing batch plants with sludge incinerators) must be considered experimental and as such, to date, the county does not have a program or permit process to entertain such installations. (2) The units themselves are fairly complex and maintenance dependent,+ particularly when compared to a standard septic tank and effluent pump package (STEP). (3) By installing the units on every lot the complexity and maintenance responsibilities are compounded. (4) Also, because the treatment component is,packaged in the septic tank, the bulk of the maintenance liability and cost is placed on the individual homeowner. (5) Your proposal specifies a specific brand of treatment plant almost insuring the use of one vendor. This county has resisted proposals that will necessitate proprietary dependent solutions for future homeowners. (6) The basic plan of individual mitigations on each lot does not meet the intent and purpose of Section 11.01-2 of the Improvement Standards which calls for community sewer systems with treatment and disposal facilities. As communicated to you during the pre-development conference, if you propose a community system, we suggest a design more in the mold of a traditional STEP system, Page 4, Taylor/Sierra Vista, August 21, 2002 utilizing a technology that is simpler, based on redundant passive designs. The disposal field should be a community field placed on the best soil available on the project site. In any case, you should submit a plan together with an application for a Report of Waste Discharge to the Regional Board(Redding office) as soon as possible. Until you have a complete application accepted by Regional Board staff and have obtained tentative requirements from them, we will be reluctant to deem any county map application complete. If you plan to do any soil work for this project we strongly suggest you coordinate with this office and the Regional Water Quality Control Board in Redding so that both divisions are present during soil work and thus can become familiar with the soif-arid. subsequent descriptions. Please contact Doug Fogel in our Oroville office (538-7271), and Ray Bruun in the Redding office of the Regional Board(224-4845)to schedule a mutually acceptable time. Very truly yours, 4�1 Michael Huerta Interim Program Manager Division of Environmental Health MH/gl/land/sierravistatsmproposal cc: Doug Fogel, Environmental Health, Oroville Ray Bruun, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Redding Steve Betts, Planning Div:v" ,S _421 A L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH A N D B E A U T Y DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH �18-B County Center Drive F-1411 Main Street ®7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 P.O. Box 5364 Oroville,CA 95965 TEL:(530)538-7282 Chico,CA 95927 TEL:(530)538-7281 FAX:(530)538-2165 TEL:(530)891-2727 FAX:(530)538-7785 December 5,2002 FAX:(530)895-6512 BBA Engineering 2060 Park Avenue Oroville,CA 95966 Re: Pre-application for subdivision for Taylor,Oro-Quincy Hwy.,APN 072-180-013&052. This letter will confirm our meeting with Mr.Doug Sutherland of your office on this project site on December 4,2002. During this visit we inspected about 10 soil mantel holes dug on the site. We were shown two areas that had the deepest soil found on the parcel during your recent soil explorations. Each area had three or four holes with a red mountain clay loam soil to a depth of between 4 and 5 feet on average. Below this clay loam was a layer of yellowish clay material. From my experience the clay loam material percolates at a rate of between 60 and 90 minutes/inch. The yellow clay layer acts as F_barrier to further water penetration. Typically the clay loam soil depth on the entire parcel is from 2 to 3 feet. The average slope in the areas with these soil mantels was 10 to 20 percent. Applying this data to our Table 1 chart in Appendix VII of the Butte County Standards for Subdivisions indicates that a usable sewage disposal area of about 65000 square feet would be necessary on each proposed parcel in order to subdivide this land. None of the proposed parcels in the entire subdivision have a gross area,minus drainage detention ponds,of 65000 square feet. Therefore we can now say conclusively that the subdivision as proposed will not be able to meet the requirements of Subdivision Standards for the creation of parcels with individual septic systems of any kind. As previously noted,you of course have the option of designing and installing a community sewerage system. The Regional Water Quality Control Board regulates this work If you intend to proceed with this project as designed we recommend that you immediately contact RWQCB and begin the process. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me at the above noted office. Yotrs truly. AougFo 1, Supervis Cc:RWQCB _ D E _ E -V E Department of Development Services Robert Taylor DEC 5 2002 Pie A IP��► PLANNING DIVISION .. _ �, j �-^i �� � , 'f ,�� �l .:. . . • _ I MEMON MON: - N\� MAP 11 am.-'WE 1 '� � � ... � ► �ti.�� � .cam►/ � ��, � ��. .� . . ��� ♦♦ � .,,erg, , /, Eved INS Fj 11 w '1111 �,, � � ♦..;�■G �� � 1 NO Mal 'OF.//�— :�� °�+ •r� � '�•�� � /�,� IIRA I VAR Vii'/_� �� �. L•.� � .�' � `\ ��, I . •. �� IMF "1 ONgoo '_` ems.. .A �- /� �� � ► , MAWM PI 55, 11.E `,.OB . ` ���---�■��/,�i• ��,•' � — �� .+�.��/�/ �`� ,`i xwp) K ' + n.,h"+7�'�'iG b� .•�a.oe.-�1J; B�qM � �' ��,: p ,�� ^rI Z y�{ � � r� "9 t7 14' 'f'. q. ti .�:L. �l:: +' �►.�� � 'i �;,�•1•i# \�Y df,.�; ''��,•u. � t,%Z*4 'y ' C ,+"'�r/ S • -,hy`r1 ' J•��"• •� PF` Lpr,. `t� a ✓�=v5r Qct,.#&i�'� Tktaa x;f yt'i bcF Ty�.�nff�.S fa�+ •n-' .� _ �� Y d. ,7pr� a `4b'7tzs 4><a !� �'4� �Srq r � 7 Y' �-'r �� i -.'. F' •• i �$ _ � � +��'����� .K-� Ntl.' zk r z r '� R r.•. s\y.y}� .eA1 JY'ti 2 :: , �2' A s ti?bt��}a + +.,�Z'�i`,,"5{off'� ���"``y� ���, dJ �A,r-r•s �y'••t �cafOKJ .. '�jt.iQ., ���"1• ./: � •per. �` j %-,� � ������� c fAWN 1.71 AK VW lave `.rxe}, ., _ „�, •. �,..4� ., V < yrs �;; ; rry�r c —. ,. rr .. •.� . s..�r7 �'s� �� �?�'+§y"��'Via. l � .� � � •� `,D•.�, ,_ _y,:'• ��J .✓�wr "ice.. �'.��� �� �(.:r�i�� ';,�� .� `• 1�- �i ,3. b•'�•j� f•: Ll r j"�d..�� C�.r s'_��'7� --d� •O. •�l�i�lr(i�s� ! � .4•. a �r •r' .T fi t ► ' 1 u... Table of Contents IState of Arizona Approval IState of Delaware Approval State of Georgia Approval IState of Maine Approval State of Maryland Approval IState of Massachusetts Approval State of Nevada Approval 1 State of New Hampshire Approval State of New Mexico Approval San Diego County Approval State of Texas Approval State of Washington Approval State of West Virginia Approval Ventura Regional Sanitation District Letter Alberta, Canada Approval NSF Approval Letter NSF Website Listing NSF Certificate Reference Letter, Dr. John Fishburne, Arizona ECUENTRANCO Letter of Recommendation Reference List Retail Sales tit lCk)SO.I,1I L11'Ali AN AN 981M `11TH !umrl> ! oe ZL ii 1 I 1 ! II 1 � ■ r •n law A. '�-"` .°37 I _b .. •rI SVP _ • � r 1 t :(iii'CCt' �.• .ii�� 10--Jo UtW Ht't' NO.034 P002/012 ARIZONA J 'VARTMENT OF E ONNFNT j '\UALTTY GENERAL CL_JFICATE OF OVAL TO wONSTRUCT STANDARD DESIGN ON-SITE SEWAGE T TMENT & DISPOSAL FACILITIES Page-I of I ADEQ FILE NO: 980181 } STANDARD DESIGN NAME: MicroSepTec 600 gallons-per-4y EnviroServer Onsite Wastewater Treatment Facility i ed to property discharge to GwFlow Wasteflow E subsurface drip irrigation disposal line. PROJECT MANUFACTURER: MicroSepTec, Inc.; 26601 �abot Road; Laguna Hills, CA 92653 PROJECT OWNER: To be established by SiWVcciflc Application for val to Construct OWNER'S ADDRESS: To be established by Sit-specllic Applitailon for Approval to Ctmsisttct r PROJECT LOCATION: To be established by Siwspccifie Application for Appr-oral to Construct PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: 600 Gallons per Day (GPD) Env' rver w Pacilim shall t consist of: 2-chmnber below-grade 1,250 gallon Norwesco Mod 140325 tank with centered baffle(separating t equal size compartmnts), first chamber providing primary aettl' ig, second chamber (fitted with assembly of 12 ! "air stones" on 1-inch and 0.75 inch PVC distribution) prDVidiN primary aeration, then flowing by gravity to a second 2-ebamber below-grade 1,250 gallon Norwesco Model 40325 tank with centered baffle, the first 1 compartment providing final aeration (fitted with assembly of 12 additional "air atones") and second compartment f providing final settling before gravity discharge through a tablet hlorinator (3-inch vertical PVC tube holding stack of calcium hypochlorite tablets) and then on to a chlorine ntact/effluent pumping tank of sufficient volume to provide 90 minutes contact time and one-day emergency overl ow volume above the "pump-on" level. The 1 final clarification chamber incorporates a recirculation pump whi h pumps wastewater and solids back to the primary settling chamber(anaerobic environment), wherein a A ge pump removes primary sludge and settled recirculated sludge and discharges them weekly to a "thermal pr or" wherein a stainless steel screen traps solids and allows filtrate to return to primary settling tank. sufficient solids accumulate on the screen, the solids are converted to ash by microwave dehydration then elect 'c incineration. Visible/audible alarm warns of pump and other failures, automatic phone dialer notification of q Wified servicing staff also incorporated. The disposal system incorporates GeoFlow Wasteflow PC (or eq ivalent) drip disposal piping (maximum spacing between emitters = 24 inches, maximum spacing between adjact nt pipes — 24 inches) installed according to i ADEQ guidance for subsurface drip disposal of domestic wast er and accordin to manufacturer's guidelines. BASIS OF APPROVAL. This approval for the above,-describL4 i product is based upon the following approved i j plan documents: 1. Application for Aggroval to Construct Sgyary Facilities si on Aril 9 1998. t General Approval to Construct is hereby given for the wastewater fa ilities described above in "Product Description" and as represented in the approved documents on file with the Arizona eparunent of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), and is subject to the Provisions which appear on Pages 3 through 8. The Srore raw.A.R.S.§49.104.$.10, regtdrea than connrucdon of At pmjea m=sr In aceordimtce**h ruler mud regulations of rhe Arimna Deparmtenr Of Envbanmenral QWfiry. r EKS:JIS:jis • r:re+13Dn�coNAocs�eotAuastr Russel F. Rhoades, Director Arizo arttri of aro tal Quality S By: EdwirtK. Swanson .E. Approval Date t Wastewater Engin ring Review Water Quality Division cc: F+nglneer9ng Retdesv F&No:980181 Apse County Health VW. Coconino County Health Dw. Goa County Health Dept. Madcopa County EnThontatuad scmtea { Nobave County Health Depwttowt Navajo County EnviroamwW Rvwwcw Agency, G � t Yavapai County 211 roamental Services Department Final County Heahh Depuu aet I Manubtetu vr.?4krag pTeq Ia. Northern Regional orrice So,Acm Regional office j Water Quality Enfamanent Unit &agiruering?tevlew 1�-.s~b4 1 NO.034 P003/012 ` ARIZONA; 'PARTMENT OF EN ONMENTA�, UALITY GENERAL`%,iRTMCATE OF APPROVAL TO C(x4STRUCT ' STANDARD DESIGN ON-SITE SEWAGE TREMMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES l = Page 2 of 11 ADEQ FILE N0. 1980181 MCROSEPTEC 600GPD ENVIROS VER Treatment Facility Equipped for disposal by GeoFlow subsurface drip disposal system BASIS OF APPROVAL, cominued 2. "Final 600 GPD EnviroServer Design - MicroSepTec" drawing sealed by Dennis R. Clift, P.E., Certificate No. 23721, on October 10, 1998, 1 sheet. 3. Binder with title page "MicroSepTec, Inc. - EnviroS rver ADEQ Application for Certification" dated October 8, 1998 delivered to ADEQ in persony Robert Spurgin (MicroSepTec) on November 5, 1998, 271 pages, including product design specifications and drawings, installation procedures, and basic operation and maintenance marual. 4. Stress-test procedure certification letter by George M Wesner, P.E., Certificate No. 10917, dated December 9, 1998, 3-page letter with 5-page attachm Mt. 5. Prototype testing results for greater than 60 days of s ogle-residence wastewater testing at the University of California - Riverside (August 31, 1998 to November 20, 1998), 45 pages. 1 6. Prototype testing results for two weeks of stressed-lo evaluation conducted at MicroSepTec test facility in Laguna Hills, California from November 25, 1998 to December 4, 1998, 27 pages (additionally; 20 pages of testing results at sante facil ty prior to stressed-loading evaluation). ti t U10J'.�I1Ll3S0.131Ul' t_ILiyl ILI,��r)i�ILLI t�i�i!I_�cLli�tLU MLLt'_t t)tii)\'L9''6hh :I'_L Zt 'SIM eu11�;e1 Mi \. 1 'tj 1 , 1 tom. 1 ' � I i 1 STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 89 KINGS HIGHWAY DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 October 16,2000 L•'nvirotcc Joe Link P.O. Box 651 S Columbia, MD 21045 RE:Approval for the MicroSepTec Enviroserver Dear Mr. Link: The Department has received and reviewed your request for aporuval of the MicroSep('ec Lnvirosavrr pretreatment trait. rite UepOn-li t Iecis that this unit meets the "Regulations Governing the Design, InstalLition and Operation of Un Site Wastmater Treat111eltl atld UiSpUSaI 5y-sten-i.1' I'll's tltllt IS theretbre approved for sale in the State of Delaware. Please keep in minil that the; Department approves each individual permit on a case by case basis. Hence, tliere may be applications where the Department feels that Ihi�purticulnr unit is nor suiced and thcrcParc the ticllllit will uut be appruycd. ' Should you have an y questions please feel free to contact me at (302)739-4762. Sincerely, Rodney L. W,y It 1 Program M ' ger f-o urges Section I i 1 i J ,. u:Iw1�.21uuU37,.doc i i t r t ..PPP.•. .�_ 1 l lAl 1 1 xy s T•1 M1 c 1 o �.' �`�J ��C 1 k yh MicroSepTec Inc. X Kl 26601 Cabot Road Laguna Hills,California 92653 1-877-473-7842 fry. y -J Tel: 949.367.8686 Fax: 949.367.8655 5; }�,•_,,,... _,_: Email:microseptec(iumicroseptec.com www.microseptec.com U.S.k Foreign Palcnls Pending 11(100}.00) rDHRGary B.Redding, Acting Commissioner Kathleen E Toomey.M,D. M.P.H..Division D'r�ector Oeorgla Department of Human Resources+Division of Public Health -Environmental Health&injury Control Branch 2 Peachtree Street NW- Suite 16.227 Atlanta,Georgia 30303-3186 +Tel:404-637-6534•Fax 404.657.6533 January 18, 2001 1 Mr. Kimball L. Peed JMG Interactive, Inc. Suite 100, Building 15 4227 Pleasant Hill road Duluth, GA 30096 lRe: Approval of the MicroSepTec EnviroServer ENFG 600, 1200, 1500 Wastewater Treatment Units Dear Mr. Peed, �J I In accordance with the Georgia Department of Human Resources Rules and Regulations for On Site Sewage Management Systems, Chapter 290.5.26, the DHR Technical Review Committee approved the MicroSepTec EnviroServer ENFG 600, 1200 and 1500 for use with on site sewage management systems. Continued approval of the above referenced units is contingent on the requirements set forth in Section D of the Department's Manual for On Site Sewage Management Systems, We request you provide 20 copies of the appropriate manuals) for the EnviroServer 600, 1200 and 1500 for distribution to our Environmental Health District Directors. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at 404-657-6534. i Sincerel , t Scott A.Uhlich Program Manager Cc Jeff Gary, Director Environmental Health Section Environmental Health District Directors Technical Review Committee File Equal Opportunity Employer wwwAhnstate.ga.us � a t -' .r.; .�, ru���i:,�':u,'I�'d uii,o i,,.l•l' I 1 lt!(1J'J,'11I,1C0.111 tU'.\'\.\\.\\ 'til mJ arse tier _Ls I :trr; UILLIu�1 e s 1 eunae I Cf I 1 1 1 I I ! 1 • Jan 19 00 09: 11 MicroSepTec 480 607 5051 P• 4 � STATE OF MAINE p�ti.p DUPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVIC rS DivIs10N OF HEALTH ENGI'NEEKING I IO STATE HOUSE :5TAT[ON I A0101 AUGUSTA, MAINE 04335-0010 ANGUS S.KING,JR. KE`;IN w:C(:)NCANNON GOV=RNOR COMMI;:,10NEA I , January 10, 2000 i I I MicroSepTec, Inc. Attn.: Robert A. Spurgin 7373 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite C-146 i Scottsdale, AZ 85253 Subject: Product Registration, MicroSepTec EnviroServer 600/1200/1500 Dear Mr. Spurgin: Thank you for your letter dated January 6, 2000, and supporting documents regarding your company's product. Under provisions of Section 1902 of the Maine State Plumbing Code, Subsurface Wastewater Disposal Rules (copy enclosed), any manufacturer or distributor submitting a new product for code registration needs to demonstrate that: I 1. The product is designed to protect public health, prevent the creation of any nuisance, and prevent environmental pollution to the same extent as comparable products presently authorized by Department for use in this code, and 2. The product is based on sound engineering principles and can be expected to provide the same 9 9P P P level of protection to public health and the environment as offered by the authorized products presently authorized by the Department for use in this code. According to the information you provided, MicroSepTec EnviroServer 600/1200/1500 has received Standard 40 approval from the National Sanitation Foundation. On that basis,.the Division has determined that MicroSepTec EnviroServer 600/1200/1500 is acceptable for use in the State of Maine, provided that it is installed, operated, and maintained in conformance with the manufacturer's directions. Because installation and owner maintenance has a significant effect on the working order of onsite I sewage disposal systems, including their components, the Division makes no representation or guarantee as to the efficiency and/or operation of MicroSepTec EnviroServer 600/1200/1500. Further, registration of this product for use in the State of Maine does not represent Division preference or I recommendation for this product over similar products. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (207) 287-5695. ISincerely, I ganager James A. Jacobsen Wastewater and Plumbing Control Program I Division of Health Engineering e-mail:james.jacobsen@state.me.us I xc: Product File j.•, rR11TF.PUu 11h:rc_in rArfil OFFICE • 157 CAPITOL STREET TTY (207) 287.2070 FAX: (207) 287.4172 �.�\rig •e}'! �' LLIO:,'J2iLI,)SO.IJILL!'h\:\\:1\ LIJSL'..!:l!L!! ZtBL-CLt-LL8-1 CW6 elLl.lol!II'..) -SIPH peon Iogw ION\)C >.:• ! ,rr/.�d1daSrr.r,,r/1r t I 1 I I i I i ( ,i -T �J OIL I I I 1 . Jan 19 00 09 : 11 MicroSepTec 480 607 5051 p . 3 f. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT MDE2500 Broening Highway 10 Baltimore Maryland 21.224 1 (410) 631- 3000 • 1- 800 -633-6101 • http:// www, mde. state. md. us Parris N. Glendening Jane T. Nishida iGovernor Secretary January 10, 2000 I Mr. Robert Spurgin MicroSeptTec Inc. 7373 Scottsdale Road, Suite C-146 Scottsdale AZ 85253 Dear Mr. Spurgin: I am in receipt of your request for approval to use the MicroSepTec EnviroSener in the State ot'Maryland as an alternative to primary septic systems. Please be advised that Maryland does not approve secondary treatment as an alternative to a septic system. However we do approve the use of aerobic treatment units as a replacement for, or in addition to a septic tank. They may also be used for existing lots of record to extend the maximum percolation rate from 30 to 60 minutes per inch. It has been the recommendation of this Office that waste treatment systems used as part of an individual soil absorption system be approved by the National Sanitation Foundation or by Baylor University's Individual On-Site Waste Water Treatment System Testing and Certification Program. These programs are fully accredited by (.he American National Standards Institute(ANSI)to evaluate waste treatment units. Having obtained NSF certification, use of the MicroSepTec EnviroServer is consistent with the above recommendation. We realize that third party accreditation does not assure a superior product and that failure to obtain accreditation may not indicate an inferior product. However, it is beyond the ability of this office to evaluate each individual treatment unit that is or may become available to the public. If you have any questions on this matter, please call me at (410) 631-3780. Sincerely, PTa er, Chief Onsite Sewage and Water Supply Groundwater Permits Program JP:je cc: J. James Dieter Jane Gottfredson Regional Consultants TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 "Together We Can Clean Up" via Maryland Relay Service - TI ! qta,- 1 1! . I C L ,e of ►. ii i ..6i..•1 ray. - ! X ic'ro.SepTec•inr. 26001 Cabot Road Lei'dna Hills. California 92053 1-877-473-7842 Tel: 949.367.86M Fav 1149.307.Wz Emmil: \N 11'\N.I111CfOlCI)ItC.00111 4 '{�,; r¢ S'�f` 1 I. S &hyeiCn Paiem,Pendine -ri 1 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Y EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS t d DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617-292-5500 i ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI BOB DURAND Governor Secretary ' JANE SWIFT LAUREN A. LISS Lieutenant Governor Commissioner 1 t October 18, 2000 Robert A. Spurgin MicroSeptec, Inc. 26601 Cabot Road Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Re: Application for BRP WP61 b Piloting Approval for Alternative System Trade name of technology and model: MicroSeptec EnviroServer 600, EnviroServer 1200, and EnviroServer 1500 Transmittal Number: p27791 Dear Mr. Spurgin: The Department of Environmental Protection completed its review of your application for approval of the above referenced technology and, on September 8, 2000, issued a proposed Piloting Approval. We provided a 30 day comment period,however, we did not receive any comments during that time. The Department,therefore, is pleased to issue the enclosed Piloting Approval. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, or should you wish to meet with us to discuss any concerns that may arise,please do not hesitate to contact Steven H. Corr, of my staff, at (617)292-5920. Sincerely; 1 1 ennhas,Dirt ctor Division of Watershed Management Enclosure: MicroSeptec Piloting Approval This information is available in alternate format by calling our ADA coordinator at(b1')57 4487,24. DEP on the World Wide Web: http:/Avww.state.ma.us/dep Z�J Printed on Recycled Paper i .l COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS � o DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617-292-5500 i �,H Sve�y S ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI Governor BOB DURAND i JANE SWIFT Secretary Lieutenant Governor LAUREN A. LISS Commissioner PILOTING APPROVAL Pursuant to Title 5, 310 CMR 15.000 Name and Address of Applicant: Robert A. Spurgin MicroSeptec, Inc. 26601 Cabot Road Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Trade name of technology and model: MicroSeptec EnviroServer 600, EnviroServer 1200, and EnviroServer 1500(hereinafter the "System"). Transmittal Number: p27791 Effective date: October 18, 2000 Expiration date: October 18, 2005 Authority for Issuance { Pursuant to Title 5 of the State Environmental Code, 310 CMR 15.000,the Department of Environmental Protection hereby issues this Approval to MicroSeptec, Inc., 26601 Cabot Road, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 (hereinafter "the Company"),to Pilot in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts the System described herein. Sale and use of the System are conditioned on and subject to compliance by the Company and the System owner with the terms and conditions set forth below. Any noncompliance with the terms or conditions of this Approval constitutes a violation of 310 CMR 15.000. Am4elo I aas, ire for ate Division of Watershed Management Department of Environmental Protection This information is available in alternate format by calling our ADA Coordinator at(617)574-6872. DEP on the World Wide Web: http://www.state.ma.us/dep Z�J Printed on Recycled Paper i i { MicroSeptec Piloting Approval I . I I. Purpose 1. The purpose of this Approval is to provide field testing and technical demonstration of I the System in Massachusetts, on a Piloting Approval basis, so as to evaluate whether the System can function effectively. 1 2. With the necessary permits and approvals required by 310 CMR 15.000, this Pilot ` Approval authorizes the use and installation of the System in Massachusetts, and requires testing so that the Department can determine whether the System consistently can or cannot function to effectively reduce total nitrogen (TN)to less than 10 mg/L. 3. The System may only be installed on facilities that meet the criteria of 310 CMR t 15.285(2). II. Design Standards 1 1. The System shall be installed in series between the building sewer and the soil absorption system (SAS) of a standard Title 5 system constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.100 - 15.279, subject to the provisions of this Approval. The use of a septic tank is not required. 2. The MicroSeptec EnviroServer is a fixed film-suspended growth extended aeration wastewater treatment system. Raw sewage enters a primary tank where settling occurs and the clarified sewage overflows to aerobic reaction chambers where the wastewater is aerated and nitrified. The wastewater then flows to a second settling tank where excess microorganisms(sludge)settle to the bottom. This sludge is then recirculated back to the first chamber for denitrification. Periodically,sludge is pumped from the bottom of the primary tank to a thermal oxidizer where it undergoes a thermal decomposition process. Effluent from the System discharges to the soil absorption system. III. General Conditions 1. No more than 15 Systems may be installed under this Approval. 2. All provisions of 310 CMR 15.000 are applicable to the use of this System, the System owner and the Company, except those that specifically have been varied by the terms of this Approval. 3. Any required operation and maintenance,monitoring and testing shall be performed in accordance with a Department approved plan. Any required sample analysis shall be conducted by an independent U.S. EPA or DEP approved testing laboratory, or a DEP approved independent university laboratory, unless otherwise is provided in the Department's written Approval. It shall be a violation of this Approval to falsify any data collected pursuant to an approved testing plan,to omit any required data or to fail to submit any report required by such plan. 4. The facility served by the System and the System itself shall be open to inspection and sampling by the Department and the local approving authority at all reasonable times. 5. In accordance with applicable law, the Department and/or the local approving authority may require the owner of the System to cease operation of the system and/or to take any Page 2 of 5 i MicroSeptec Piloting Approval other action as it deems necessary to protect public health, safety, welfare and the environment. 6. The Department has not determined that the performance of the System will provide a ' level of protection to public health and safety and the environment that is at least equivalent to that of a sewer system. Accordingly, no System shall be installed, if it is feasible to connect the facility to a sanitary sewer, unless as allowed by 310 CMR 15.004. 7. Design and installation of the System shall be in strict conformance with the Company's ' DEP approved plans and specifications, 310 CMR 15.000 and this Approval. IV. Conditions Applicable to the System Owner 1. The System is approved in connection with the discharge of sanitary wastewater only. Any non-sanitary wastewater generated or used at the facility served by the System shall not be introduced into the System and shall be lawfully disposed of. 2. Effluent discharge concentrations from the System shall meet or exceed secondary treatment standards of 30 mg/L biochemical oxygen demand (BODS)and 30 mg/L total - suspended solids(TSS). The effluent pH shall not vary more than 0.5 standard units from the influent water supply. 3. For both residential and non-residential uses,the TN concentration in the effluent ' discharged from the System shall not exceed 10 mg/L. 4. Operation and Maintenance agreement: i. Throughout its life,the System shall be under an operation and maintenance (O&M) agreement. The initial O&M agreement shall be for at least two years. Subsequent agreements shall be for at least one year. ii. No System shall be used until an O&M agreement is submitted to the Department and the local approving authority which: a. provides for the contracting of a person or firm competent in providing services consistent with the System's specifications and the operation and maintenance requirements specified by the designer and any specified by the Department; b. contains procedures for notification to the Department and the local approving authority within five days of a System failure or alarm event and for corrective measures to be taken immediately; C. provides the name of an operator, which must be a Massachusetts certified operator as required by 257 CMR 2.00,that will operate and monitor the System.The operator must operate and maintain the System at least every three months and anytime there is an alarm; d. includes an agreement with the Company to monitor the System as specified in Section V paragraph 5 of this Approval. s 5. The owner of the System shall at all times have the System properly operated and maintained in accordance with the Company's and the designer's operation and maintenance requirements and this Approval. 6. The owner shall furnish the Department any information, which the Department may request regarding the System, within 21 days of the date of receipt of that request. Page 3 of 5 f Micr.oSeptec Piloting Approval 7. The owner of the System shall provide a copy of this Approval, prior to the signing of a purchase and sale agreement for the facility served by the System or any portion thereof, to the proposed new owner. V. Conditions Applicable to the Company 1. By January 31 of each year,the Company shall submit to the Department a report, signed by a corporate officer, general partner or Company owner, that contains information on the System, for the previous calendar year. The report shall state: the number of units of the System sold for use in Massachusetts during the previous year; the address of each installed System,the owner's name and address,the type of use(e.g. residential, commercial, school, institutional) and the design low; and for all Systems installed since the date of issuance of this Approval, all known failures, malfunctions, and corrective actions taken and the address of each such event. 2. The Company shall notify the Director of the Watershed Permitting Program at least 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer of ownership of the technology for which this Approval is issued. Said notification shall include the name and address of the proposed new owner and a written agreement between the existing and proposed new owner containing a specific date for transfer of ownership, responsibility, coverage and liability between them. All provisions of this Approval applicable to the Company shall be applicable to successors and assigns of the Company, unless the Department determines otherwise. 3. The Company shall furnish the Department any information that the Department requests regarding the System,within 21 days of the date of receipt of that request. 4. Prior to its sale of the System, the Company shall provide the purchaser with a copy of this Approval.In any contract for distribution or sale of the System,the Company shall require the distributor or seller to provide the purchaser of the System, prior to any sale of the System, with a copy of this Approval. 5. For systems serving a facility with a design flow less than or equal to 2,000 gallons per day(gpd), effluent from each installed System shall be monitored monthly for the first six months and quarterly thereafter. At a minimum the following parameters shall be monitored: pH, BOD5i TSS,and TN. Each time the System is monitored, a water meter or equivalent method for recording water use shall be recorded. For systems serving a facility with a design flow greater than 2,000 gpd,both influent and effluent from each installed System shall be monitored monthly for the first twelve months and quarterly thereafter. At a minimum,the following parameters shall be monitored: pH,BOD5i TSS, 4 TN, ammonia, and alkalinity. Each time the System is monitored, a water meter or equivalent method for recording water use shall be recorded. All monitoring data shall be submitted to the Department within 30 days of the sampling date. After 18 months of monitoring and at the written request of the Company,the Department may reduce or eliminate the monitoring requirements. 6. Should the effluent TN concentration from a System exceed 10 mg/L on two consecutive sampling events,the Company shall within 60 days submit a report to the Department on the reasons for the exceedances with recommendations to preclude future violations. 7. If the Company wishes to continue this Piloting Approval after its expiration date,the Company shall apply for and obtain a renewal of this Approval. The Company shall submit a renewal application at least 180 days before the expiration date of this Approval, unless permission for a later date has been granted in writing by the Department. Page 4 of 5 1 MicroSe tec Piloting Approval P g � jVI. Reporting 1. All notices and documents required to be submitted to the Department by this Approval shall be submitted to: Director Watershed Permitting Program Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street- 6th floor Boston, Massachusetts 02108 VII. Rights of the Department 1 1. The Department may suspend,modify or revoke this Approval for cause, including, but not limited to, non-compliance with the terms of this Approval, non-payment of the annual compliance assurance fee,for obtaining the Approval by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts or any change in or discovery of conditions that would constitute grounds for discontinuance of the Approval, or as necessary for the protection of public health, safety,welfare or the environment, and as authorized by applicable law.The Department reserves its rights to take any enforcement action authorized by law with respect to this Approval and/or the System against the owner, or 1 operator of the System and/or the Company. VIII. Expiration date 1. Notwithstanding the expiration date of this Approval, any System sold and installed prior to the expiration date of this Approval, and approved, installed and maintained in compliance with this Approval (as it may be modified) and 310 CMR 15.000, may remain in use unless the Department,the local approving authority, or a court requires the System to be modified or removed, or requires discharges to the System to cease. I� 1 ' I microseptec piloting p27791.doc I i 1 1i I .. Page 5 of 5 rYa t:�s,,:,,, i #4`3' uli dwpu�� ul2ttau ia� Y S I r},r te' U10, -N)Jd,So.IJIIUAX:N\;�� Fiat"S +:si".'��v'`swkY: t'A.d '.iii7"';):ll it •� i - � jP{"„�.tii:6 PH ti)�'L 1 Gt(i :lal 1 ZtC-,:9-h elu.lo.4!II'.J ' II!H eunaeJ peod (oqi?:) (099E I t t _ 1 s. 41 t I 1 } YV ' 1 A - I I I tea'' YVONNE 6YLVA 808 MILLER .-'l 1 ,ouve'nur c : . Admirust"to, C1lAnLOTiE CR•1WFi7F10 p J I VACANT Oucrnr aha���::�" Stale Nealln Olhcir STATE OF NE`/ACA I DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESDURCES HEALTH DlVGON GUFIEAU OF HEALTH PROTECTION SERVICES I ;utxaV ldmiui5lydliUu IUU'ahviewOrrve April 21, 1998 Suite 201 1 Carson City, NV 89701 5405 (7U2)637.6353 R.C. Shades, Chairman/CEO rax(702)W-5197 M1cruSeptic Inc. tr,'7ublic Hcalth engineering 26601 Cabot Road 1179 Fairview Olive Laguna I•Iills, California 92653 ( Suite 101 Ntson City, NV 89701.5.105 1702)687.4754 RE: MICRUSEPTIC E`IVIROSERVER D Adutnlugicil lieaUlt 1500 GALLON WASTEWATER TREATNIENT SYS'I'I-:M FOR INDIVIllUAL jI inview Drive Suite 102 SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS ' 1 Carson Ci!y, NV 99701.5405 In reply, please refer to project number(,W-7810-RAR)A (702).681.5394 Fax 11021 681•5/5' Dcar Mr. Shades: t • 1.1 En-Alonnlentel Health 1179 Fairview Drive 1 Suite 104 1l!e Nevada State Healdi Division, Bureau of Heal(lr Protection Services, has re;vicwed the Carson City, HV 89701-5405 Microsellcic Etiviroscrvcr 1500. gallon per day wastewater treatment system for individual (702)687.4750 sewage disposal system (ISDS) applications and approves Uic product for use in Nevada. (7) Fleallh Prutection servicrs 6:9 Belrose Street 1 s"ilea T11� Nevada State Board of Hcaldl has adopted Nevada Adrninistrativc Code, Chapter 444, Lis Vegas.NV 89107 Regulations Governing Individual Sewage Disposal System which set a minimum standard for Ingulcerin0 2112 Funn the installation of an ISDS. According to NAC 444.784, each application of the lvficrosc tic (702)486 5U88 $ pP P Rauimogical Hcanh Enviroservt:r wastewater tr.aLTncnt system along with the soil absorption system must be t {T02) 486.52BO reviewed and approved by the appropriate halth authority before installation. 7a.(702)40BS024 U l+canh rrolaction Services Ifvou have any q ue5zjons, lease call me at 702 687-4734, extension 230. 8:0 Elm Street P ) Ellin. NV 898(11.3349 1� 1)153 113811140 Sincerely, 1*1 Ileallh Proteelion Services 475 W.Haskell Sired � fioom 38 _ /1 L7c.• (mob � �l��"' Winnemucca. NV 69445 (71.12)623-0588 Rick Reighley, P.E. i (.1 He,lth Protection Services Public Health Engineer 87 S. Laverne Sifed Fatton.NV 894400.700.3 324 Bureau of Health Protection Se:-viccs (702)423.2281 173 Ilealih Ptulee;tiun SurviCes cc: Jon Palm, Maiiagcr, Public Hralth Engineering P.O. Brix 939 All BHPS Environmen(al health Specialist Staff Ely.t+v 8301.093y ((102)289.33325 NDEP, Durcau of Watcr Pollution Control 1 l Carson City District Health Depa=cnt U P0.BoxKcAll s6671ien Services Clark County District Health Department l Tonopah,NV 89049.0667 Washoe Cowlty District Health Department {7nz) 482J991 All County Building Departments AA1Vm NV7AIM1A1 ! I roi t�or I k TNI - ;. StatU/--- of 1 � lA f Apl^ roval- MicroSel.)Tec- f I , I d t 26601Cabot Rodd 1 Laguna Hills, California 92653 1-877-473-7842 �.: ;• �Nsr, w 1 Tel: )4).367.8686 Fax: 94Q.367.8,65, Erdal inicr)su)trc;,l C j iiilCi'ii�Cj�il is.00ii1 %•+'?.r•Fi,:.,pie'... ' * r r Y 3,t,♦ t 1 C s i State of New Hampshi;•e �ptrt o, S �A DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES &- NHDES 6 Hazen Drive, P.O. Box 95, Concord, NH 03302-0095 0 "q (603) 271-3644 FAX (603) 271-2181 1 I ! May 23, 2000 I Mr. Robert Spurgin I MicroSepTec, Inc. 26601 Cabot Road Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Re: EnviroServer 600 Residential Wastewater Treatment System w Dear Mr. Spurgin: The NH Department of Environmental Services (DES) has reviewed material submitted in which you request approval of the referenced treatment unit under NH Administrative Rule Env-Ws 1024. Parts of the submittal package were received on January 7, March 28 and April I -18, 2000. Based on material submitted, DES approves the use of EnviroServer Model 600 treatment units (the "EnviroServer unit") for general use per Env-Ws 1024.06(d), subject to the following limitations: 1. Units must be installed in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. 2. This approval applies only to applications with designs flow less than or equal to 600 gallons per day (four bedrooms). 3. A leach field used for disposal of treated effluent from an EnviroServer unit may be reduced up to 50% of the size listed in Env-Ws 1014.07. However, please understand that double reductions will not be allowed. For example, you may not claim the allowable reduction for chambered leach fields in a residential use, and then claim a 50% reduction of that reduced size. DES will not allow leach fields any smaller than 1/2 of the size listed in Env-Ws 1014.07. 4. For any installation using a reduced leach field size per No. 3, above, except where the EnviroServer unit is proposed to replace an existing failed system on an existing lot that predates DES subdivision regulations, the designer must include information on the design plans sufficient to document that it is possible to construct a full size leaching facility on the property. 5. All other details of the overall wastewater disposal system using EnviroServer units must comply with the provisions of NH Code of Administrative Rules, Chapter Env-Ws 1000, except that a septic tank (in addition to the treatment unit) is not required for systems which use a EnviroServer unit. 6. Please review the requirements in Env-Ws 1024.03. A renewable maintenance. contract must be sold with each EnviroServer unit. hctp://www.state.nh.us TDD Access: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964 R. Spurgin EnviroServer Treatment Unit May 23, 2000 page 2 7. Maintenance must be performed by a licensed wastewater treatment plant operator. A I fact sheet on DES's licensure program is attached. For small residential applications, a Grade 1 license will be sufficient. 8. Use of the disinfection units for effluent is not necessary. 9. Per Env-Ws 1024.06(c), a copy of this letter shall accompany any specific design involving the use of the EnviroServer unit under this approval which may be submitted to DES. 10.At your earliest convenience, send DES ten (10) copies of a brochure and drawings of the EnviroServer unit for staff use in reviewing design submittals. Thank you for the chance to review this material. If you have questions, please feel free to call me at the Water Division at (603) 271-2941 . Sincerely, Robert P. Minicucci 11, PE Innovative Technology Coordinator Att: Fact sheet MCROSPTC5-2000 CC: William Evans, PE, DES/SSB Collis Adams, PE, DES/SSB Steven McCann, DES/SS6 James Falicon, DES/SS8 TM 1 1 StatU/--%. _. t •' App, oval 11 1 I 1 l � r1/ic•roSel)Tec hic. 4 , 266tH Cabot Road La2LIna Hills. California 9265; 1-877-473-7842 t Tel: 949.367.8686 Fax: 949.307.,N()-;= Email: mici-oseptec(ii:lillGro.�el)irC.Cpi11 WWW.III Icroseplec.00i11 L &For:ign Paiwn<Ptn:iin^ da`t State of New Mexico gem �. ENYIRON.MENT DEPART_WENT ,eiz• Community Services Bureau 525 Camino de los Marques Suit:4 Santa Fe,NM 87505 (SOS) 82 7-7541 (505)476-8638 FAX GARY JOHNSON PETER MAGGIORE Governor Secrerary June 14, 1999 Mr. J. Russell Smith, Vice-President MicroSepTec Inc. 26601 Cabot Road Laguna Hills, CA 92653 { RE: CONDITIONAL PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR MICROSEPTEC ENVIRPSERVER TREATMENT SYSTEM IN NEW MEDICO Dear Mr. Smith: I We have reviewed the submittal for the latest design of the MicroSepTec EnviroServer wastewater treatment system. The current design of the MicroSepTec EnviroServer is substantially different than the one previously authorized on the June 19, 1998. However, this letter shall serve as notice of approval for both designs. The MicroSepTec EnviroServer is hereby approved for a period of one year under Subpart III, Section 306 "Alternative Systems"of the Liquid Waste Disposal Regulations (LWDR) 20 NMAC 7.3 with the following.conditions: 1. The MicroSepTec Enviroserver system may be installed,without the need of a variance, on any site where a conventional septic tank and absorption system may be installed. i 2. If the MicroSepTec EnviroServer system is proposed to overcome a site limitation where ti.:. a conventiona-1 septic tank and absorption system may not be installed, the variance process in Subpart II of the LWDR must be followed. The specific condition to be varianced must be cited and supporting documentation be submitted to provide reasonable assurance that the system will provide equal or better treatment than provided by the varianced requirement. As part of the variance: A. The Department has the right to enter the property and inspect and test the system at reasonable times; B. Quarterly on-site testing and evaluation paid for by the permit applicant or variance petitioner will be required for a period of one (1) year from start-up of the system; and, t State of New Mexico ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT 92 0 Community Services Bureau 525 Camino de los Marquez,Suite 5 Santa Fe,NM 87501 (505)476-8531 GARY E.JOHNSON PETER MAGGIORE Governor secretary January 4,2001 MicroSepTec, Inc. 26601 Cabot Road Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Attn: J. Russell Smith, Vice President RE: PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR MICROSEPTEC,INC.ENVIROSERVER 1200 AND 1500 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS IN NEW MEXICO Dear Mr.Smith: The Liquid Waste Program of the New Mexico Environment Department,Community Services Bureau has reviewed the submittal for the MicroSepTec,Inc.EnviroServer 1200 and 1500 Wastewater Treatment Systems. The EnviroServer 1200 and 1500 meet ANSI/NSF Standard 40 as certified by NSF International.. The MicroSepTec, Inc.EnviroServer 1200 and 1500 Wastewater Treatment Systems are hereby approved under Subpart III, Section 306"Alternative Systems"of the Liquid Waste Disposal Regulations(LWDR)20 NMAC 7.3 with the following conditions: 1. The EnviroServer 1200 and 1500 may be installed,without the need of a variance,on any site where a conventional septic tank and absorption system may be installed. 2, If the EnviroServer 1200 and 1500 are proposed to overcome a site limitation where a conventional septic tank and absorption system may not be installed,the variance process in Subpart 11 of the LWDR must be followed. The specific condition to be varianced must be cited and supporting documentation be submitted to provide reasonable assurance that the system will provide equal or better treatment than provided by the varianced requirement. 3. The EnviroServer 1200 and 1500 will be sold with a two(2)year minimum operation and maintenance agreement and a two(2)year minimum repair/replacement warranty. 4. The EnviroServer 1200 and 1500 may be allowed a reduction in drainfield sizing as prescribed in the LWDR Subpart IV, Section 403-404. However,multiple reductions on a single system are not allowed. That is,a reduction for a drainfield product and for the treatment system cannot both be taken. 5. MircoSepTec, Inc. or its authorized representative must maintain a record of all installations and any repair or replacement of any installation. This record must be submitted to the appropriate Environment Department Field Office and to the Community Services Bureau,Liquid Waste Program, located at 525 Camino de los Marquez, Suite 5, Santa Fe,NM 87501. MicroSepTec, Inc. shall provide this information to all distributors or representatives selling your product in New Mexico. 6. The Department has the right to enter the property and inspect and test the system at reasonable times. i i 8. Quarterly on-site testing and evaluation paid for by the permit applicant or variance petitioner may be required to verify the treatment efficiency of the unit. The sampling protocol shall be pre-approved by the Liquid Waste Program Office. Test results shall be submitted within thirty(30)days of sampling to the Community Services Bureau, Liquid Waste Program, located at 525 Camino de los Marquez, Suite 5, Santa Fe,NM 87501. 9. A contingency plan shall be included to provide liquid waste treatment that meets the requirements of the Liquid Waste Disposal Regulations if the system fails. 10. Effluent disposal shall be in accordance with the Liquid Waste Disposal Regulations. 11. The EnviroServer 1200 and 1500 must be installed by an installer licensed in New Mexico. If you have any questions,please feel free to contact me or Brian Schall of the Liquid Waste Program at(505)476- 8531. Sincerely, ca��9;; Steve Walker,Manager Environmental Services Program SW:RBS Xc: Cecilia Williams,Chief, Community Services Bureau District Managers NMED Field Offices NMED Groundwater Protection and Remediation Bureau Bernalillo County Environmental Health Department City of Albuquerque Environmental Health Department Jeff Mumma,MicroSepTec, Inc., Scottsdale,AZ TNI COU-1-Ity, Of San L), ieo-, o- APproval't . ' .. 01 "t -,q 1 � { u,�•-zea•' •. x=; X icroSep7ec inc. 26601 Cabot Road a La-Una Hills. California 92653 } N, 1-877-473-7842 16, ; ;n . Tel: 949.367.86,6 Fax: 949.307.X65 =` { EtiiBit: IiilCroSc•j)ieCii/filil'rO<e'pic•C.com -•�. _- w.microseptec.com 1:.ti8'FurckmPawni<P;ndin. + ^r L O � i County of San Diego DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH GARY W.ERSECX Land and Water Quality Division RICHARD HAAS DIRECTOR 5201 Ruffin Road, Suite C ASSISTANT DIRECTOR San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 505-51731(800) 253-9933 FAX (853) 594-3105 March 3, 2000 Jim Vance, Senior Vice President& General Manager MicroSepTec Inc. 26601 Cabot Road Laguna Hills, CA 92663 USE OF iIUCROSEPTEC UNITS LN SAN DI:EOO COU'INTY Dear Mr. Vance: This is in response to your letter dated September 17, 1999, and the meeting with our staff on November 30 1999, regarding the use of "MicroSepTec units" in San Diego County. Your letter refers to "MicroSepTec units". This Department interprets this to mean the MicroSepTec aerobic treatment tank only. The letter requests permission of the Department of Environmental Health (DEH) to allow MicroSepTec Inc. to sell, install, monitor and maintain anaerobic treatment unit within the County of San Diego under the following options: 1. Repair and replacement of existing systems using only the NficroSepTec unit; 2. As an alternative to existing systems in high nitrate areas; 3. As an alternative to existing systems in high groundwater areas, using pressurized drip irrigation; 4. For use with new construction where conventional septic disposal systems have been approved. DEH will permit the installation of your unit on any parcel in the County currently served by a septic tank and subsurface disposal system when the septic tank will remain part of the system. These cases will be treated as a. repair/replacement. A fee of$190 will be charged for the inspection. DEH approval must be obtained prior to issuance of a septic system installation permit. Before further consideration of option R 1, please provide the following: a. Written documentation of NSF certification. b. Written documentation of IAPMO certification. C. Copies of typical agreements and contracts that are part of a purchase agreement between MicroSepTec and the customer. d. If not included in c. above, explain who would accomplish the disinfection. e. Installation parameters specific to the MicroSepTec unit. "Environmental and public health through leadership,partnership and science" MicroSepTec Response.3 3 0000 —2— January 31, 2000 f. Address the conclusion regarding baffle failure in the Express CAD Engineering report dated November 23, 1999. Regarding option 42, additional acreage requirements are unnecessary to mitigate impacts of nitrates on 1 Groundwater in any developments in the County. However, the DEH would encouraae the use of treatment systems such as yours to reduce nitrates reaching groundwater from septic system effluent in sole-source laquifers used for potable drinking water. Once requested information in option "l is provided, reviewed and accepted, the DEH could approve option T3 in situations where a catastrophic failure of the system has occurred due to high groundwater, sewer is not available and the property is subject to condemnation. However, design standards recognized by other jurisdictions in the nation would have to be met before a permit could be issued. 1 Regarding option Y?, the DEH has the ability to issue up to 25 permits for "experimental systems' where Iconventional systems have been approved. Before such permits are issued, a deposit`account-Frust be.set up with an initial deposit fee of $500. This account is for review of engineering reports, design standards, installation standards, monitoring standards, right of entry agreements between the County and the homeowner 1 and agreements between the County and the homeowner regarding malfunctioning of the experimental system. Several inspection permits may be required depending on the complexity of the installation and testing required before final approval. An annual permit will be required for system inspection and monitoring. The annual permit will be required for a minimum of three (3) years (assuming satisfactory operation). Since there is no provision for onsite 1 wastewater annual operating permits in the County Code of Regulatory Ordinances, the existing deposit account would have to be used for that purpose. Prior to issuance of installation permits, the deposit account balance would have to be no less than 5500. Permits for experimental systems will be issued on a first come, first served, basis. Therefore we cannot guarantee all 25 permits would be available -,o MicroSepTec. Be aware that DEH has not vet developed a procedure for review, permitting, inspection and monitoring of experimental systems. The Department is awaiting the first request for approval of an experimental system before developing the procedure. The procedure and guidelines will undoubtedly include some or all of the suggested elements in the June 1996 San Francisco Bay Region; California Regional Water Quality Control Board, guidelines. Before experimental systems can be considered conventional systems, an engineering report will be required from the proponent of such systems. The report must include recommendations for design, installation; monitoring and maintenance standards. The DEH and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board must approve and/or modify such standards. The County will require a finding of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act prior to countywide use of alternative on-site wastewater treatment systems for new construction and subdivision of land. You should determine from the Regional Board whether a Basin Plan amendment would be required to allow this Department to issue permits for alternative systems for other than a mound or ET/ETI system, for new construction or subdivisions. t If you have any questions regarding the above, please call mea(858) 694-3718. Sincerely, FRANK GABRIAN, Supervising Environmental Health Specialist t Land & Water Quality Division FG: cc: Chris Gonaver, Bob Giesick, Kerry McNeill, Larry Newcomb, Tom Lambert, Llew Munter Bob Morris, CRWQCB t TNI 1 C TV J 1 J is ti i State OfTexas Y I Apl^troval .. 1 "..6 i" f I j I I 1 } 4i: �,�.•9., � 27 3.'�ty ='`s.. cui G AlicmSeh7ec 26601 Cabal R,nai! P.i m Lmwna Hills. California )_(i�i 1-877-473-7842 .1; "=" Tel: 949.367.86861=ax: 94� 107.\(,5. sw` " ✓nnaii: r1 iCTl.i:i?rifZCi!(liiiiCl'Ct�c"Jic'C.i:Uiil '?n s "'e, . IY.d�y �ti�i Y�,r www.microsepiec.com 1...: iC Porei�n P:tirnt5 P,•miiii;_ .,, "rr;iY:. 'as.'s,._f. 1 Mar 14 00 13: 20 MicroSepTec 480 607 5051 p . 2 + .N T 0�`. Robert J.Huston, Chairman R.B."Ralph"Marquez,Commissioner John M.Baker,Commissioner j Jeffrey A,Saitds,Executive Director i TEXAS NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSIO'q Protecting Texas by Reducing and Preventing Pollution March 7, 2000 I i Mr. Robert A. Spurgin Vice President Governmental Affairs MicroSepTec, Inc. 7373 North Scottsdale Road, Suite C-146 Scottsdale, Arizona 85253 Re: Approval of MicroSepTec, Inc. Individual Wastcwater Treatment System Model #EnviroServer ENFG 600 Dear Mr. Spurgin: Since NSF International has certified that Model #EnviroServer ENFG 600 has met all of the requirements of NSF Standard 40, this model will be added to the approved list of individual wastewater treatment systems in Texas. Until the approved list is updated and distributed to the Authorized Agents throughout the state, this letter will serve as our official approval. The EnviroServer ENFG 600 can be installed in Texas without a pretreatment tank. If.you have any questions, please feel free to call (512/239-4799). Sincerely, j Warren D. Samuelson, P. E. Team Leader On-Site Sewage Facilities Program, MC-178 WDS/amm cc: Rich Haffner,NSF-Intemational 1 p.0.Box 13087 0 Austin,Texas 78711-3087 • 512/239-1000 • Internet address:www.tn? _.statl�.tx.us .'a.3`;F'z._,xw�rr':"`:�•ri'�l It�r,��'��1r��C�,1�llllait���4�i:o.lJlll! :IIP.!!I� : 9595 L9£ 616 la•L 1 clQ9Z6 l lu.lol!IU'J•SII H �''l � $ A ! eunat P' 21 q'J 10992 rat+'rn:±.tsM;t•, t7,� :?::�.��. :riot: --�•,.> �- - i - I i' 1 i II 1 I JE.AOjddv U 0_ ul ® I ' I •wa ' I STAre oA o` £ m �9 Oy 1889 a STATE OF WASHINGTON I DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY I 7171 Cleanwater Lane, Building 4 • P.O. 47825 Olympia, Washington 98504-7825 TDD Relay Service (800) 833-6388 June 8,2000 i Robert A. Spurgin MicroSepTec, Inc. 26601 Cabot Road _ Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Dear Mr.Spurgin: . Thank you for your submittal to our office received on May 8,2000. The contents of this submittal requested listing of the MicroSepTec EnviroServer 600 on the Washington State Department of Health List of Approved Systems and Products. After review of this information the EnviroServer 600 have been Accepted for inclusion on the"List of'Approved Systems and Products" as a Residential Aerobic,, Treatment Unit meeting NSF Standard 40(1999)as a Class I unit. The NSF International Performance Testing and Evaluation Report received for EnviroServer 600 showed a CBOD5 30-day average(arithmetic mean)of 22 mz1L,and a TSS K-day average (arithmetic.mean)of 16 mg/L. These results would place the above referenced EnviroServer 500 unit in Column D of our Recommended Standards and Guidance for Effluent Quality-Based Lrainfields, a copy of which is i attached. The EnviroServer 600 is considered a Category 1 ATU in Washington State. Category 1 ATU(designed to j treat typical-strength residential wastewater)performance must be equal to, or better than, those specified ! and required by NSF for either NSF Class I or Class II certification. Category 1 ATUs are reviewed, approved, and listed based upon the results of performance testing. ATUs are listed by manufacturer and model,with corresponding performance testing results. For purpose of identifying which brands and ' models qualify for use at sites that require systems meeting Treatment Standards 1 or 2, the maximum thirty-day average for CBOD5,TSS, &fecal coliform—if available—is provided. The performance information is excerpted from the test results reported by the independent testing entity, consistent with the protocol, such as calendar thirty-day averages based on all data point::collected(see subsection 1.2.2). The j EnviroServer 600 does not meet Treatment Standard 1 or 2 described below. Treatment standard 1 means a thirty-day average of less than 10 milli,ams per liter of biochemical oxygen demand(five-day BODS),a thirty-day average of less than 10 milligrams per liter of total suspended solids (TSS), and a thirty-day geometric mean of less than 200 fecal coliform per 100 milliliters. [a thirty-day average of less than 8.3 milligrams per liter of carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (five-day CBOD5)is accepted in lieu of the BODS value whea data are submitted in the course of NSF Standard No. 40 testing and reporting protocols] Treatment standard 2 means a thirty-day average of less than 10 milligrams per liter of biochemical oxygen demand(five-day BODs), a thirty-day average of less than 10 milligrams per liter of total suspended solids (TSS),and a thirty-day geometric mean of less than 800 fecal coliform per 100 milliliters. [a thirty-day average of less than 8.3 milligrams per liter, of carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (five-day i CBOD,) is accepted in lieu of the BODS value whea data are submitted in the course of NSF Standard No. 40 testing and reporting protocols] The above referenced EnviroServer 600 unit will be placed on our List of Approved Systems and Products as a Category 1 unit meeting the NSF Standard 40 Class 1 performance designation. We appreciate your interest in becoming listed in Washington State. A notice of update to the List of Approved Systems and Products%vill be available to the public within 90 days. If you should have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at(360) 236-3090 or by email at laura.bene Fie ldr:doh.wa.eov. In compliance with replations establishing a schedule of fees for review of proprietary devices, an itemized bill will be sent to you by our clerical staff. Sincerely, i Laura A. Benefield - Public Health Advisor Wastewater Management Program Enclosure: cc: project file file correspondence I ' I :.cam. r •� TNI , M r c_:-1?0 5.1 h� i 1 tate of vi1nia y . I Ap-t'% roval- NZI "t,5fi 0i A4icrnS(pkt Inc. 26601 Cabo Road ` Laguna Hills. California 926i' 1-877-473-7842 �j�•.`; ate''fir �;r Tel: 949.367.80W-) Fax: 941).3(7.8 0 "yiiz ',X 1=n?2111: KIT a C ^tiU' . \\'W III ICI"Ose)1cc.conl l'.5 R horeien Paicmi Nrndin, Mar 06 00 10: 15 MicroSepTec 480 607 5051 P . I I " m0 �9 0 m > 1 I I STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA ' DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES ' Cecil H. Underwood Joan E.Ohl Governor February 28, 2000 Secretary l Mr. Robert A. Spurgin MicroSepTec Inc. 7373 N. Scottsdale Road Suite C-146 Scottsdale, Arizona 85253 t Re: MicroSepTec FnviroScrver On-Site Wastewater Treatment Dear Mr. Spurgin: This will acknowledge your request for approval to install the above-captioned on-site wastewater treatment.system in West Virginia. The MicroSepTec l-HnviroServer Models 600, 1200, and 1500 are in compliance with NSF's Standard 40 designation. Model 600 is approved for use on single family homes and small commercial facilities where the daily design sewabe flow does not exceed 600 gallons per day and the sewage is domestic type waste. Wastewater treatment plants for i applications exceeding 600 gallons per day design flow are reviewed on a case-by-case basis through our Environmental Engineering Division. This office reserves the right to restrict the use of the system if the operation of the system or new information indicate the system will not meet standards. This letter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute endorsement of the system. i Sine . y, 4*ondK. Forren, Director Public Health Sanitation Division i RKF:sl cc: Lural Health Departments District Sanitarians Public Health Sanitation Division Staff Barbara Taylor t.. BUREAU FOR PUBLIC HEALTP Office of Environmental Health Services 815 Quarrier Str«t..Suite 418 Charleston,West Virginia 25301.2616 'Telephone:(304)558.2981 'r 1 EM -1 A Ventura 1\"q,"po-. -L1a1 +�4t an taton. ct Letter t .. ... A"N i, ON I i i I _ `T• 26601 Cabot Road � s I_aauna Hills,California 926i3 ;r ; 1-877-473-7842 Tel: 949.367.8686 Fay: 949.307.865i \\`W\\.nlll'rOSe)tel'.00n1a"`�'s��"` ""��%� l KI_tkt?lti�tey•F roit3t:�'r`t Pnri^_n Pair.nis Vendin-v fill,, L 1 . A Public t IQ .E Waste y Management 1001 PARTRIDGE DRIVE, SUITE 150 • VENTURA, CA 93003-0704 Agency L y July 7, 2000 Michael Harbushka 1 MicroSepTec Inc. 26601 Cabot Road Laguna Hills, California 92653 1 SEPTIC TANK NUTRIENT REMOVAL DEMONSTRATION As you have discussed with Steve Braband.of Biosolutions and me, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) has awarded Ventura Regional Sar_itation District a $130,000 grant to test onsite wastewater treatment plants for use in Southern California. The Septic Tank Nutrient Removal Project seeks to prove individual home wastewater treatment systems are viable solutions for meeting basin water quality objectives. The SWRCB selected Ventura Regional Sanitation District (VRSD) to manage the grant project and VRSD wants you to participate in the Septic Tank Nutrient Removal Project. VRSD considers the MicroSepTec product to be one of the 4 or 5 systems capable of meeting Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board's goals for individual home treatment systems. i VRSD is expending its funds as part of the required grant matching funds. I would like to include } your company's contributions as matching funds also. This is possible if VRSD contracts for the service and you provide documentation of the service value. Please execute the attached contract. Copies of the SWRCB Contract Scope of Work and the Quality Assurance Program Plan are attached for your records. The SWRCB has authorized July 15" as the first day our efforts can count as matching funds. Accordingly, VRSD would appreciate your treatment unit arriving between July 15`s and July 31St. Camrosa Municipal Water District is hosting the demonstrations at their wastewater treatment plant 1900 Lewis Road, Camarillo,California 93012. To coordinate your treatment unit delivery, or if you would like to volunteer assistance in addition to that of participating as system manufacturer, or have comments on the contract,please call me at 805-658-4606 or fax: 805-658-4633 or e-mail: markcapron@vrsd.com. MARK E. CAPRON-SENIOR ENGINEER Encl. Agreement SWRCB Contract Scope of Work Quality Assurance Program Plan Ventura County • CITIES:Camarillo • Fillmore • Ojai• Oxnard • Port Hueneme • San auenaventura • Santa Paula • Thousand Oaks SPECIAL DISTRICTS:Camarillo Sanitary • Camrosa Water • Channel Islands Beach Commu:iity Services • Montalvo Municipal Improvement Ojai Valley Sanitary • Saticoy Sanitary 9 Triunfo Sanitation 9 Ventura County Waterworks Nos. I and 16 . M I c ro I t ( f Alberta Approval , 17 1 t _ 1 � k 'IflcroSepkc lnc. 6601 Cabot Road Laguna Hills, California 92653 1-877-473-7842 Tel: 949.36i.lS Faa: 949.367. (,; ! Email: Ii11lrV1cl%��(<i!i1i'ICr\l:i(;�l �.�\iiiir�:.c�t��,;::_ -•��-r+ I is c set.tec.c \\'\V W'.11 I'1' 1 l nlF'tkYi,' t 4, �J r�!37s� C"ice'i��.•��.t k��.�i n't�h'� <6rie. f:jiY':!'�3'•tTr�,ti:l c.�:.'i L... fi Foreign I'airnis Penclim�, SEP-25-00 MON 01 :50 PM FAQ, NO, 400 261 6809 P. 02/02 Alb-j7ta a MUNICIPAL,AFFAIRS Safety Si; TNI M I c i o S- C 1 y 6` N-rSF ........... :vt 1 J r ; J Cx�( AllcroS'ehTee hic. x 26601 Cabot Road La_una Hills.California O26 az; :.. V 1 :. Yk"iu't 877-473 e I Tel: 9=19.367.56~6 F ) ;r _;: vww coill ,\Porri_n P�iCnit Nrnrlin_ r:n: „ ;: t' % r ki>' 1 DEC, 22. 1999 3:53P,9 NSF [NTERNnTIONni, 7R 913 5735 N0, 7425 P. V2 NSF International Ann Arbor, MI - Sacramento, CA ' Washington, D.C- - 6rusyels, Belgium ! Post-ito Fax Note 7671 �- 1 70 . From �MAAIE BELANGER CaJ080L NSF INTERNATIONAL J December 22, 19910 P*,one q i (Phone� 734 913-5742 Fax a _ - Fax x 734 913-5736 1 i � MR. NVIL SP!RS { MICROS2PTEC TRIC 26601 CABOT ROAD UG-JNA E7LLS, C- 92653 1 Re: Official Listing 1 Standard 40 Oea_ Mr. Spears. 1 It is my pleasure to corflirm your CcmzanV's OT-_-C=al Llst-nCT =or NSF Standard 4-0 . i K?CROSEPTEC, INC. is authorZed to use the NSF Ka:"-_ for products [ specified on the enclosed Listing. . . As an NSF Listed Company, you are r:sporsi'^l: o= compliance with all i NSF :ecu=rements -Or Certlrication services. Ple-ase note that your L1sted I products must bear the NSF Mark unless spec'--'ica_1v exe-mDted by uolicv. The enclosed certificate(s) , suitable for =wining, may be displaved at you-. Corporate location and each VSr^-L ?t_d :aci1 ty. Additional copies gay be purchased by contacting your NSF Program Representative, Richard Haffner at 800-NSF-`??RK or 73x/769-5277. Please contact your NSF Procra-m Representati-,;,a if you have aunv c esti ons. Sincerely, Connie L. Berry, Manager Certiiication Records enc-. OT*icial Listing Certificates) Certification Policies NSF Mark Facsimiles Tnformati or- for Purchasi-gr M?r:cs P.O.Box 130140 Ann Arbor,Mliciligan 48113-01.40 USA 31430 : 734-769-8010 1-800-NSF-MARK Fax 734-769-0109 E-Mail: info@nsf.org Web:hq://,aww.nsi.org NSF Certified Products - Wastewater Treatment Units and Related Products, components a.. Page 1 of 1 Ploduct Download Hmo Datahase Standards ThisSite NSF NSF Certified Product • i These Listings were Last Updated on Tuesday, October 03, 2000 at 8:00 PM Eastern Standard Time. Please contact NSF International to confirm the status of any Listing, report errors, or make suggestions. ANSI/NSF STANDARD 40 Residential Wastewater Treatment Systems MICROSEPTEC, INC. Comoany'i Website)' 26601 CABOT ROAD LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653 949-367-8686 Plant at: LAGUNA HILLS, CA Model Number Rated Capacity Classification Callons/Day EnviroServer ENFG 1500 1500 I EnviroServer ENFG 1200 1200 1 EnviroServer ENFG 600 600 I Number of matching Manufacturers is I Number of matching Products is 3 Processing time was 1 seconds Copyright©2000 NSF International. All rights reserved. No portion of this material may be reprinted in any form without the expressed written permission of NSF International. i http://nsf.com/Certified/Wastewater/Listings.asp?Company=314?0&Standard=04 0 10/04/2000 NSF International R LCOGN I ZES MICROSEPTEC, INC. LAGUNA HILLS, CA AS COMPLYING WITH ANSI !NSF 40. PRODI.- CIS APPEARING IN' THE :NSF OFFICIAL LISTING ARL, AUTHOT-ZIZED 1.0 BEAR THE NSF MARK . .................. %d ittu l I- 'I homas J. Ill utir,cla.',cc ticna mjjI.jg,:I CvI I I!I.::I(v Fnvjronmc!mal md Rcscmch S.:rvl1:cS f. I i `r Reference etter - �t " r •rel "( .. >eaa;,r,-: �l ............ 1 ny f 8 tt . ...... t:r i rY7y'•�",f'-',p aYi-Y' Y_r.fr: • .h4�.s 3.,:a jai r'{}�rlc'S:Sii%�{`. -;y a tji'a yes`tr F R, a! Iv. ?i. ..................... MrcroSepTec•Mr. :P�f3 �` `F. 26601 Cabot Road LaOLIna Hill c 2 :.k Hills.California )_6j3 '� kriw�'{ 1-877-473-7842 Tel: 949.367.8666 Fax: 941).367.865i '_ It. a . m oseptcc(c-or,rcroseptec.con, _az_.,•, _ .. wniicroseptec.com U.S.&Foreia_n Pmemt PenAim• i September 14, 2000 Ms. Pat Everts MicrosepTec 26601 Cabot Road • Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Dear Ms. Everts: I am writing to let you know how pleased my wife and I are with the MicroSepTec sewage treatment system which we had installed in our new home last year. The company representatives stayed with the installation job until they were convinced that it was perfect, even though at one point it meant digging up the tanks again to ascertain that no rocks would puncture them. The maintenance throughout the year has been exemplary and we have had no problems at all with the system. The effluent is used to irrigate an area, which we have now landscaped, and assures the luxuriant growth of our plants. It is comforting to know that our system is in constant communication via computer and phone lines with your company and that service/technical help is available at a moment's notice if we should encounter a problem. Thanldully, there have been no problems at all. Furthermore, I am happy to report that although the older evapo-transpiration systems in our neighborhood sometimes give off an unpleasant odor, there is absolutely no odor detectable with the MicroSepTec system. All in all, we are delighted with our private, self-contained sewage treatment plant and wanted to let you know how fortunate we consider ourselves to have installed your system. Sincerely, J I. Fishburne, MD, Program Director Phoenix Integrated Residency in OB/GYN Dept. of OB/GYN, and Women's Health Mancopa Integrated Health System Professor of Clinical OB/GYN University of Arizona School of Medicine NMI, 3... 1 Letter of t ........... Recommendation . ........... i O:• �.s�jt 4-:�Yli: y k?:. "g,: :rte'•`R',�`�;; .. >Yr. ,Uj; hlicroSepTec inc 26601 Cabot Road ? s' Laguna Hills.California 92653 -877-473-7842 Tel: 949.367.8686 Fay: 949.367.865� --Ern aih-mic os ptec(.r.:, ic:o>.ptcc.c;;;;; mak., LLrww.microsehtec.com U S.R F,rei,_n Palow Pendw un l - ��p•ry��+ 4�Y� 3�a l )1;ill: t"i,A`w h.'"l�i;�.�'P:.R'•y'.: ti MEMORANDUM 1 i TO: ECl/ENTRANCO Clients Seeking Alternative Wastewater Systems FROM: David M. Robbins, R.S., Operations Manager RE: MicroSepTec Wastewater Treatment Systems DATE: )uly 23, 1999 1 EC1/ENTRANCO is pleased to recommend the MicroSepTec Wastewater Treatment System as a preferred alternative for installation on sites in Arizona which are not suitable for a standard septic FLAG"AFF system. A cost./benefit analysis reveals high scores For MicroSepTec over other alternative systems, primarily due to specific advantages, several of which are outlined below: ARIZONA 8000 -� MicroSepTec provides consistently high quality effluent with significantly better treatment than sand filters, biofilters, or aerobic treatment plants. Better effluent quality translates as less intricate and smaller disposal systems, resulting in a more environmentally friendly system. TEL"c?liONE -� MicroSepTec systems are adaptive for both full-time and intermittent use homes. The energy '2°"13 4827 saving vacation swirch secures continuation of the wastewater treatment process. Unlike either the sand Miter or biofilter systems, which each require significant start-up time and are subject to upset during low use, MicroSepTec's vacation swirch ensures perseverance of the treatment TcL5%AX process, even during such low flow conditions. $20 713 4829 -c5 The MicroSepTec system comes complete with remote operation capabilities, which continuously monitor the system at several points throughout the treatment process. Simple operation and maintenance of the system results in significant monetary savings, and in the unlikely event of an operation problem, a speedy resolution. A LiMiT.O ' -a Unlike some alternative systems, such as biofilters and sand filters, MicroSepTec's advanced LIA81L!TY _..treatmen-, of effluent empowers their � system to be considered as a possible alternative where CORPOAA710N groundwater.and nitrate contamination is prevalent. .6 Cost: MicroSepTec systems can generally be designed and installed for approximately the same cost as either the biofilter or sand filter system. Additional gratification is realized though the CONTRAC'JR'i significantly reduced cost of MicroSepTec's simplified operation and maintenance routine, as compared to other alternative systems. � Lic_Nsa= ECI/ENTRANCO is now applauding the use of MicroSepTec equipment in the development of alternative wastewater systems. To all of our clients who .are, or will be, installing alternative i wastewater systems, we strongly urge consideration of MicroSepTec systems for the development of 1 your project Please give our staff a call at 520.773.4827 to arrange your site specific consultation, and gain assistance toward determining if this system is rQht for your project. Or, you may also call MicroSepTec directly at 480.607.5040. V �. TIM 1 I m- . ro a Reference _ 1 II 1 - •.. fir''.., {: I ;�<!' 1?s3J,}, Yit, Qpt3 0ayr��W ?6601 Cabot Roadtt. v' 1Cx�V S r%t y, La;,�una Hills, California Q_2653 1-877-473-7842 " � 1 i 1 Tel: 949.367.8686 Fax: )4).i(,7.�{6�� rl.";� . liil�^,r'v'S.1,iClit7,niiCri,�CliiCi:.Ci!iii ��n.,, � `'--•��T-==�. \'Y\\'\\:.ni c rose lli,'cxo n'i - r � �.< �•�r '`,j .'.S L\Frn'riLr Pmcm;I'rndn',_, MicroSeDTec Reference List References Reference 1: Professor Anders Wistrom University of California, Riverside 1 909-787-8476 i Reference 2: Dr. & Mrs. John Fishburn 7060 Hillside Drive Paradise Valley, AZ 85253 602-649-8489 1 Cooper Reference 3: Dr. &Mrs. Peter Coo � p 825 Flintridge Avenue La Canada, CA 91011 818-952-6135 Reference 4: Mr. Frank Gabrian County of San Diego Dept. of Environmental Health 5201 Ruffin.Road San Diego, CA 92123 619-694-3718 Reference 5: La Vida Hermosa Rt. 27, Box 331-T Santa Fe, NM i Xfllca— Customer—_� —� Location Application Banvard, Navy _ �f Malibu, CA ^---�� Residential Brian Ziegler �i Paradise Valley, AZ Residential _ Coast Wastewater —Bend, Oregon Industrial Colison, Ronald _ i; Anne Arundel, MD _��R is dentia] _ Cooper, Judy _ ��La Canada, CA _JI Residential Costner, Cindy �j La Canada, CA —J' Residential Fiegler, Peter _ t Vancouver, Canada Residential Fishburne, Dr. John L Paradise Valley, AZ I Residential Forked Lightening Ranch IF Rowe, NM �i Residential Fortner Vancouver, Canada } Residential I Griffin, Ed Vacaville, CA I Group Home for mentally i challenged Harbin, Randy Anne Arundel, MD II Residential Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe , Eureka, CA -- IF- Industrial Isla Trade Corporation ( Caribbean . ji Commercial Las Arenas San Felipe, Baja Las Mobile Home Park 4 California, Mexico J Las Flores Corporation Malibu, CA � Residential j Valley Center, Lilac Elementary School Commercial CA McDowell, Richard L Carson City, NV ^�� Residential ' Meyer Vancouver, Canada f Residential Miller, Melissa LMalibu, CA ��Residential i Morris, Cory Reno, NV —� Residential Navarra Brothers' Tracy, CA ���Commercial Perry, Tony Lamy, NM Commercial Prechel, Dave White Mountains, AZResort Residential - formerly I Rudolph, Scott ` San Diego, CA condemned for failed septic l system Safdov Development, LLC Paradise Valley, AZ Santa Fe Builders =L[ Santa Fe, NM j— FARegualtor Book\Retail Sales.doc Page I of 2 Confidential Page 1 1/30/2001 , i ~ .ZCYDSeliT ec Shahmoradi, Bijan Malibu Residential ySikh, Dharma _jr Espanola, NM _ I�Compound Residential - failed septic Storm, Carey San Diego, CAsystem ; �! Test Unit - 3 bedroom home on� UCR - I Riverside �i campus Vanburen Lakeside, AZ _ _ JI _Residential ' Vance, Jim Paradise Paradise Valley, Az— �� Residential 1 Ventura Regional Sanitation J Ventura, CA �L Commercial Test Unit Westarz/Kim Westberg _ Paradise Valley (AZ)V_ Residential Yardman, Frank Santa Fe, NM �� Retirement Home —'— Distributor Sales --� Canada - 71 1. Mid Atlantic - 10 _ �1 ' Hawaii - 5 t , FARegualtor BookUtetail Sales.doc Page.2 of 2 Confidential Page 2 1/18/2001 MicroSepTec SEPTIC NEWS Volume 1, Issue 1 June 2002 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: MALIBU' S ANSWER TO SEPTIC PROBLEMS MicroSepTec System 2 Design Sooner or later,septic sys- tems fail. The lifetime of a Why is MicroSepTec 2 house is around 100+ ` Better than Tradi- years,but a typical septic tzonal/Conventional system is good for only about 20-30 years if it is { NSF and What it 2 properly maintained under the best conditions. Unfor- Means to Consumers tunately,a number of homeowners are not aware of the system failure until it Internet-Based Septic 3 is too late. Is there a rem- edy to cure homeowners' Monitoring System i septic headaches. � � 1 Why Do Traditional/ 3 MicroSepTec is the first Conventional Septic intelligent onsite wastewa- Systems Fail? ter treatment system that will outlast traditional/ MicroSepTec installations in Malibu { conventional septic sys- j terns and remedy home- owners'septic headaches an on-site electronic system sively evaluated at the Univer- once and for all. MicroSepTec directly linked with the Mi- sity of California, Riverside, eliminates sludge on-site and croSepTec Performance As- and the Ventura Regional produces a high quality,de- surance Center.This gives Sanitation District and re- nitrified and disinfected efflu customers peace of mind by ceived high accolades. ent,offering minimal danger truly knowing that they can of ground or surface-water "flush and forget." MicroSepTec is Malibu's an- contamination.The destruc- swer to septic problems. tion of sludge on-site perma- The National Sanitation Foun- nently eliminates pumping. dation(NSF)certified Mi- The operation of this system croSepTec in December is continuously monitored by 1999.It has also been exten- t { HEALTH & ENVIRONMEI*ITAL HAZARDS CAUSED BY IMPROPERLY TREATED WASTEWATER f Untreated or unsuitably diarrhea,nausea,chills,and Iem in many parts of the US. 23112 Alcalde Dr.,Suite C treated wastewater contains fever are just a few symp- High nitrate levels in drinking Laguna Hills, CA 92653 diseases caused by a number toms. While the great major- water can cause Toll Free.877.4SEPTICity of people recover quickly 11methmoglobinemia". After of different bacteria,viruses, when infecteo, g severe illness ingestion,nitrate is reduced to Tel. 949.855.3500 worms,fungi and protozoan. Fax. 949.855.3515 Example of these diseases and deaths do occur. nitrite in the stomach. The ab- include cholera,typhoid,sal sorbed nitrite reacts with the I WWW.mICCOSepteC.COm monella, hepatitis A,and Contamination of ground gastroenteritis. Vomiting, water with nitrates is a prob (continued on page 3) Page-2. Volume 1, Issue 1 MICROSEPTEC SYSTEM DESIGN i The MicroSepTec system con- sors and on-site controller. the first compartment where sists of one fiberglass tank The tank contains five com- primary clarification takes 1 installed below ground and partments,which can be ac- place. The primary clarified two enclosures installed cessed through four different wastewater along with the above ground,typically on the man-ways that extends up to floatables including grease outside wall of the house, ground level. All the equip- then overflows to the first which hold the air compres- ment inside the tank is made aerated compartment where so it can easily be re- it undergoes aerobic diges- placed or serviced tion. Biological CBODe re- through the four man- moval and nitrification takes ways. place in this and the subse- quent aerated compartment. ` To promote CBOD5 removal The system itself oper and nitrification both com- ates continuously and partments contain moving Qon demand. The influ- media for attached biofilm I ent feed from the resi- growth. Biologically treated dence is by gravity flow wastewater underflows into similar to an activated sludge plant. Resides the forth compartment reac Available in three sizes tial wastewater enters for where final clarification 600 gpd 1200 gpd 1500 gpd takes place. WHY IS MICROSEPTEC BETTER THAN TRA`DITIONAL/ CO`NVE•NTIO"NAL SEPTIC ? ` Our mission is to While traditional septic costs kill the bacteria, virus and environmentally safe •water much less, the technology is fecal coliform. Most counties that then can be used for provide wastewater quite primitive. The main require a 100% set-aside for' landscape irrigation, thus principal is to hold sewage leach lines, due to the fact conserving water. The on-site systems thatprotect the until sludge forms, and the that the soil will eventually fail treatment occurs-within the public health and liquid waste begins a naturally and become fouled in its at- tank and therefore does not occurring anaerobic bacteria tempt to purify waste. depend on the soil. Mi- preserve the environment digestion. Then the liquid croSepTec can be utilized in overflows from the tank into The MicroSepTec system is areas not permitted for sep- the soil. The soil then must state-of-the-art, continually tic, or areas where environ- purify the waste and hopefully monitored, and produces mental concerns have re- quired enhanced treatment.. NSF AND WHAT IT MEANS TO CONSUMERS ' "NSF International,founded It involves annual inspection, dard(s)and that the manufac- in 1944 as the National Sani- periodic re-testing,and,if turers'claims are true. " tation Foundation, is known necessary,enforcement —Information from NSF for the development of stan- through product recall, public website ' dards, product testing and notification,de- Almost half of the 50 states in certification services in the certification,etc. the US use the NSF Interna- areas of public health,safety tional certification as a means and protection of the environ- NSF does not to evaluate and approve the ment. recommend,rate, technology for the effective or compare prod- treatment of wastewater. The NSF Mark is placed on ucts. Instead, millions of consumer,com- they test and mercial,and industrial prod- verify that each certified prod- ucts annually. NSF Certifica- uct meets all of the require- tion equire tion is not a one-time activity. ments of the specified stan- MicroSepTec 23112 Alcalde Dr.,Suite C,Laguna Hills,CA 0653 Toll Free 877ASEPTIC or 949.855.3500 Page 3 INTERNET-BASED SEPTIC "Living nanaationarea re beach contamination and MONITORING SYSTEM pollution roudo sayth tIam,iam proud to say that I am doing my part to preserve the envi- ,l All the MicroSepTec control- • Allow Service Person- ronment by installing your lers connects to a central nel to quickly set system... monitoring computer. The " parameter values, Dunie main purpose of connecting poll status info,or I all treatment units to a cen- review historical re- San Felipe,Mexico tral monitoring station is to cords from the units give customers a"flush and already deployed forget"system,and still en- without physically t sure that the system is being having to visit the -- ^_ properly maintained. units. ��- • Allow County Heath Specific goals: Officials to monitor • Provide a mechanism in the status of the units in their jurisdiction Provide reports on all which MST can call the parameter variations main monitoring system • Allow customers to moni- duringthe lifetime of the in case of malfunction- for the systems they own tank } ing. The main system will to make sure they oper- in turn alert a service ate within the specifica- rep. - tion and provide feed- back WHY DO TRADITIONAL/ CONVENTIONAL SEPTIC MTEMS"FAIL?� �.. The most common cause for usually too late to pump the tank. chemicals such as toilet bowl early malfunction is lack of Poor percolation and improper cleaners may kill the.microbes MicroSepTec is the last maintenance. When a system design,construction or installa- responsible for breaking down s is inadequately maintained tion can also cause a system to the waste, lir*:fr6m'.v4shing septic decisionyou will (not pumping on a regular breakdown. A leaching system machines fail ng to settle in the basis),solids build up in the placed in unsuitable soil,a sys- tank and clogging the pipes ever have to make! tank,and then flow into the tem that is too small for the can all cause a system to fail. leachfield clogging it beyond house it serves,or an improperly repair. It is essential that constructed system may lead to Sometimes even with proper septic systems be pumped early failure. Soil compaction maintenance,systems fail due every year,depending on size from vehicles driving over the to out of date technology. and• leachfields,common household HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS CAUSED BY IMPROPERLY TREATED WASTEWATER (CONT. CONT. FROM PAGE 1 MST effluent,as reported by and boating,and affect water 4 hemoglobin in the blood, the University of California, quality for fish and wildlife habi- forming methemoglobin. This Riverside evaluation,contains tat. results in oxygen starvation. less than 10 mg/I of total nitrogen. In infants,this is commonly yr t Atrocious odors,soggy soil or referred to as"blue baby" liquid waste could travel di- syndrome. To prevent these Failing septic systems allow rectly into nearby surface wa- health risks,the maximum excess nutrients to reach ters and causing health and contaminant level of nitrate in nearby lakes and streams, environmen_al hazards.To pre- drinking water has been set promoting algae"and weed vent these dangers from hap- at 10 milligrams per liter(10 growth. Algal blooms and pening,it is essential to get the mg/1)as nitrate nitrogen by abundant weeds make the wastewater into a sufficient the US EPA. lake unpleasant for swimming treatment system. .� MicroSepTec 23112 Alcalde Dr.,Suite C.Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Toll Free 877.4SEPTIC or 949.855.3500 ✓ Presrt.Std. MicroSepTec U.S. ge Malibu,CA 23112 Alcalde Dr., Suite C Permit No. 163 Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Is your septic system contaminating the environment and endangering your family? MICROSEPTEC TO EXHIBIT AT THE 66th ANNUAL EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION IN MINNEAPOLIS, MN Presented by the National Environmental Health Association MicroSepTec will be exhibiting at the National Environmental Health Association 2002 Annual Educational Conference and Exhibition from June 30—July 1 at the Minneapolis Hilton Hotel in Minneapolis, MN. This is a four-day educational event and will cover a wide variety of environmental health and protection edu- cational topics and features Get your FREE MST a stimulating two-day exhibi informational CD to- tion. It is the only confer- ence onfer � Q p ' o ence that encompasses all - r'�"k�`Q o a ° day! Just email us at areas of environmental miCroseP- health and protection. Stop 00 N ° teC@nliCrOSepteC.COm by our booth#124 to learn Q G more about our advanced onsite wastewater technol- �' oo ogyl Roa . u O .. O poQ O ��•� a Date 08/14/02 Development Services Department Time 11:13 am Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 1 PRED 02-08 Robert M. Taylor 505 South Villa Real , Suite 201 Anaheim, CA 92807 Rounding : None Full Precision No Last bill Last charge 07/19/02 • Last payment / / Amount $0 . 00 Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL 06/08/02 Steve B. / P 3 . 50 206 . 50 DO NOT BILL #40685 Processing 59 . 00 06/08/02 Diane L. / C 2 . 00 68 . 00 DO NOT BILL #40843 Clerical 34 . 00 06/22/02 Steve B. / P 1 . 50 88 . 50 DO NOT BILL #40969 Processing 59 . 00 07/06/02 Steve B. / P 6 . 00 354 . 00 DO NOT BILL 441082 Processing 59 . 00 TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES 0 . 00 $0 . 00 TOTAL DO NOT BILL TIME CHARGES 13 . 00 $717 . 00 TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS $0 . 00 TOTAL NEW CHARGES $0 . 00 PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 06/13/02 Deposit - Receipt #20593 (59 . 00) TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS ($59 . 00) NEW BALANCE New Current period (59 . 00) TOTAL NEW BALANCE ($59 . 00) Date 08/14/02 Development Services Department Time 11: 13 am Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 1 PRED 02-08 Robert M. Taylor 505 South Villa Real, Suite 201 Anaheim, CA 92807 Rounding None Full Precision No Last bill Last charge 07/19/02 Last payment / / Amount $0 . 00 Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL 06/08/02 Steve B. / P 3 . 50 206 . 50 DO NOT BILL #40685 Processing 59 . 00 06/08/02 Diane L. / C 2 . 00 68 . 00 DO NOT BILL #40843 Clerical 34 . 00 06/22/02 Steve B. / P 1 . 50 88 . 50 DO NOT BILL #40969 Processing 59 . 00 07/06/02 Steve B. / P 6 . 00 354 . 00 DO NOT BILL #41082 Processing 59 . 00 TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES 0 . 00 $0 . 00 TOTAL DO NOT BILL TIME CHARGES 13 . 00 $717 . 00 TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS $0 . 00 TOTAL NEW CHARGES $0 . 00 PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 06/13/02 Deposit - Receipt #20593 (59 . 00) TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS ($59 . 00) NEW BALANCE New Current period (59 . 00) TOTAL NEW BALANCE ($59 . 00) Date 07/24/02 Development Services Department Time 4 : 05 pm Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 1 PRED 02-08 Robert M. Taylor 505 South Villa Real , Suite 201 - - - - - Anaheim, CA 92807 P p Oa�O'g Rounding None I� '`^`'J`- 69q o� Full Precision No _ �✓J C,Ce�u— 6$ 0-7 Last bill / / `) 1 7- Last charge 07/19/02 - -- — Last payment / / Amount $0 . 00 ` r Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMO TOTAL 06/08/02 Steve B. / P 3 . 50 206 . 50 #40685 Processing 59 . 00 06/08/02 Diane L. / C . 00 68 . 00 #40843 Clerical 34 . 00 06/22/02 Steve B. / P 1 . 50 88 . 50 #40969 Processing 59 . 00 07/06/02 Steve B. / P 6 . 00 354 . 00 #41082 Processing 59 . 00 TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES 13 . 00 $717 . 00 TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS $0 . 00 TOTAL NEW CHARGES $717 . 00 PAYMENTS REFUNDS CREDIT –/ 06/13/02 Deposit - Receipt #20593 (59 . 00) TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS ($59 . 00) NEW BALANCE New Current period 658 . 00 TOTAL NEW BALANCE $658 . 00 514 C-4 IL C7. lw lb rf� .ty 6'i ry .. 1 : - •,.i I .- a .. t„ a�_,:+,,y'er '. 'i Vj 1 FonBoard Computer High Efficiency Blowers Disinfection Unit Thermal At Ground Level Processor 4 Primary � a Compartment Bio Solid Transfer & Sludge Transfer Pump Aeration Diffusers Denitrification Pump IAPMO TANK CERTIFICATION FOR: 600 Gallon per day - 1200 Gallon per day - 1500 Gallon per day ' �. ! � -.• - :np Ti' ,ref �Ke. •� A: •,s �+ '' � i Ht ;t. � s•++ �' S _ •[ � � ; ��fa�yy}��Y e.ii�pyi��+.7ry.. l � C: !i � �. r} • r 4 a=e o noo 0 0 n oA o ° v p egets ED d @ i e 004 a o' n � � o 04, ' ° a 0� �a ol�� o kr 1p '` qN` 1 0 � ! tl ._ o ` _ f i?l • f f� q� Ef U _ 4 � �� b � �j 4•':�F�l+V� fj`�i1+� .j�,� t se•��rl'i yt+1�'��t' eY' ����d r'� �I��f_ f��" Eu.. � '���� tt t~ r �,'� ' � �filw��� '�'. I•_�..,. �2 9' Jg��,��= �i�t r �7 r, / . 4 E i t',i5 ' glt.v t� `i$'�;! �`"•'•¢�;' f.. -•ry.i�i 11 .-.r_��•ill°y.",•+ ,�. +' '��:a.r,'��>. �f x'1:1 � -•'^n:.t 1 `A �t — 9. �. IF !i rvf '. t'• •f P l s �, �x7 xl � 1 9 W. IV d �9. 1 f + 1 3 S s�il1 �IrJ Y,tJ��s+.,�.,• � ,� ��l .'�:. rt � 4. p ' 4C�-��F ¢• ' X11 i= i`"* i g �b ��u 1 f i '�,f ..+•¢i"'•r�i�ll�i�� §� {1 ��'.ai ��,Ryyti. .s� Wit' { .R � :+J����� 9 �, .71,w� s� � �:•�fj� � ��•* Y^^•�; r � s' fir« ='•I � 4•fi.�••♦t "t ' � 41' •�i; �r j'y•' Y., l .�' 1 .; x z••{,.s ;. C••, r ''/'y �{,•f}pht^� -rel. ,',�� '• . i ��.=+.r,.�:.ri'�> �s,,,�.,,�' a►r/f�• Y-�J,^ ,sal i!•. } r ' Vit ;• -..i^?f' yam.. /•.S.• •� .f.. �7 N ___.. Ll r f',+�yJ!�•.r•.,i\: •, �-;--'nor?-1.v•�f��w�:Y�:_.=�` � •. .. � ' t, .. � � �"� --� ,- ,..'6pr`:-�'^.`;- "'} "•�.\ '� =v,,"'_:mss..] f�lf.'��•��'��-� ���'�� +,,•s l,.K • ��� a. �f3�� v,� � I ;;�'-x`...Y /y s .'� >r 't'` � ,y,.• .i7L S �' j j.0 "is` w 1,�. � ``1� '''•• '•.i�nj ✓.c�4-`-. L'�t vri.�,�t W A� ❑on�� lU�o �0 v `+�8� °Q ��0 o u� �a ° �� i11 0 U4° - 0 'ao � •�i� �Q 4 � . "14° °� w � �,., o a ra u Da ° 60 rn ' ¢ u V I' V- Jppy ��. ��, 1, � p � I•� � .° o�� x a 4 � ° ,jrrfJ d � Q'"•�p o gU[10� (lb � �2 ��� n�.���°4�+�� •,.� Ili � Ok o� rAj AD �0L �A p r' A a� �0�i�hp �,,�,�°o°410 !! ❑ . �„ ° � 4 � t � I r <'Fi. F,, . .r �,a 3•'�:+. �it Tl 7 '1: 1rI 11 4 �°:•'� �i+ i� wig �..�,��• .� � ^'4 .�' �.,j, r� - ,jam ��� �:-'.� .. ��`},,rr.'ra'h�t°�•� iy - .. .t� y ,FV. e `��—'' S�lr3'...r,;wtt.i213 _^ '~ �� • -y"y'., f '"a �✓ f°r'h..S.y, /�'.red: -+-o._ ry f r IN i ,s i t 1 ��ewv�a { m4aw f��_ - y «wa:'•j" ^"��s.. •f / Y.. q .. tar °' If ,Aa q r �aj1 r qc�y P'4 C'+1yt'�Yttc� S Jtcyiy,,.S•s � � S� } '}, ! r J' •.• •Jay K,1 t°�'e: t 1 � J t 8� .Yl t�`j�• M, ���Py+f 1y1 a"tH r �i t y s � �A . V. - l f E 1 AIt All itj] l�. ,a✓.ji. >i 1. '• �yt��' /k ' �! ' �� �{�F+r jt. � :��,^�Sji i° iu�ari'�', Fe c ♦- if; e i � ',r �F 3. / y /, rs ._ t'�3 <% �.tt� LIRi��; iS t/• F1 }J. -T°!� .�f%i �/ ,! q f -.�... � P�/. s� .�� _. � •. �q ,�lr�, ��y:ht � tf. S.. .. t� ` 'i, I���rl �yry y' ^`r.��Fe�f'. ��t lJ�°;r�'f• ,~ - // 1�,!{`r �">z:�`��" =.,, ' yTt' 8 t {'2 11 a i1 �.flyS `w'�t l�i fj .r. .i y��`°� 1 j FJ�'rP'`��9 ({Cli'�t",��`f� � 4, '4 � •'. •+- . f`'d t,�Y.'Ct°y. ,: 7R�i � •``� � o{15ISj• �+! (,�/a',j. S �,�¢�yif•> )fF N�i°: �•. � `��� 4{S'` t. '� t� 's� '}, � IH'r ���r,}r7��'�3��.'.,r�J! ��'1S .r;((.'x'.717 _ °all t.�a•.ip}� s ir'� '� J •(i' ,.lf 'r ' 'lrC� 7�.('; `I�� '•F}��j. etet<'�jj *- 4. rra; . ! � '2•i t•rf.y + e" t,a trt..<.p <ji A,3 �4 ; ij mo �i. ;.sF'S-� F f d' Gr '•._,#• S' ly - rl F, "I.s` .:. •�L -Z• �A 6 - 'r'•2•�,."tr-!���v a,9'a��� }ib'TY xl1 Z <1_-_.�n� r'".♦ x i! J, 5 i •tT 1 f-_�� x <+ ,,r" -.a z•' i -° ! '+.'ife a Y yf, _ e it 9.r:t a,dl"•.v�i L a n +; ..�,ati`I. m. +, :' �'`s� zRB L.F1^ , 4i %• .. f �, rirr' i a 't.,�,.:�f4•� v'1 f '4 4-rr'v ,jj oy r f •y�i' 9 , J' et ,��3 4 F: f rs? , a •4rti,. •. tr +z '? ,i k Jr M ) ,- . ��id'�1��- '-s` .'Y y �••7�i- -.8h i�`f.�' 3 F "r4i xr Y.f ar ` f�'"1 � '} { t,' "T t' '� �: - - �..v:3�y�fi:a, f'S :i, F a,a = }r`� �-�c�" yt 'a r'•�• ' "' { ! �yt �, . ;i•) Fry.. `�'? �•�'� . 'i - •� +.ALf d• i�'g•a, b'art h i rl�,T.( �,s r t. ." _ .. •9c li. �'��,. 'cl -to"uF.h'� i�i P r-'4 •i-a,t+-al F � r�"S pEr F�� .. a F ai., s �!•y'� ,� 6 a� a.r et r !f i r r.tti 1 �, •, F A rJ,?4 •cy"r1 �w'r'"L� -If",ir;�u, ' ' ,x+k'r !aV , F �} aJ S ? dr••i,-° .71 !il ", n , }�F r,l, x S ti -.'trLE a :1� , .J"�'• - Fs t^ S n t r-•••�.,x,ay t },•,,�' o'- 'j r` a 2 r; , ,t ,1.:, ` is e-v Ra s - �tr`s f ^?� S s}! a `$ ✓„ s! 4`15 s tiF 3 Lt # d S. i4!`1tt1 CI uc..:•5 zy<"*,11rL �.°�. gip" Ertxlnr.l al i' a F rF i _ L. a ' A '•,I3F i�. `do; "' .. d`ra'ti r .d S •'�a9r q ,'` t y r'h'y ti -1 z.: e v t1::dK4 ��•p +yF Erb a 1,R xx�t _p'a„d c)ta# r �°z,z '",$„r- ! _ :+saaaa t _ ��, ��,°• P a''C>;e:t�s•-.q�t°'�� `� "''.c'5,�.�!'aSr 4b .r° , Af„ ,,( y�, qui .tc f7 , r a a16'(4"'1,{R •� 4it'4 t' ''@" d;4 �}"�15aRF T r�'�i 41't S Fy a Z''" 64 {{ ti 4 �£ q la Npfe' `� m d• ��t j—Al�Fjvi ,yt','�cr i}•w .5. `r y;4.lerc .<+i. -"-. u tF-'+ S!'r clr'� c. },�i r.. �..,5:�.f,, W0.5. A;, 4 1t F`r_ai1'Y,t,� 3�, r:t ! c 1 e r ) ; ..m,� 't t4 t s'' 91•h e d 1 .:� .,}. ad .( 1" 'L;} :!•af n' r- 114 '`Y� 'Bt e r ri,� �+. � 3. lrt7n t f ? L itF Z•1 a. tf". .21s laY °-. rl,°'+'S K�� };.YF ,) i u�' �,. + ,�.1` s^- ba�i .1 i /• rP» �4. /".r 3'},hF r wrd'•k°tzil •l �."" .!•` .P•'- }k� F ����ro F`* ,np '�f�'+- ''�'y b� ly,,'(t' 3 a !"',� •5• ywt 4 t.� :��a�' J;spy E ",wt sx°'f ',,� .+,j ( 'i°�•p;F"rq,C sN arx'a.?.i y e i° .. y i,.,( 1 �-'� F`sb•eti`4 sj ''t�-bR,.e.jt VIA-. o-' dF< {` �' �r a '+:: "4 at�-<( r <,•' . r F' - /•«. S ,,,l, 9 W Rh 'i d s m-' - ��,,•y ka, ' a�, r't Py tl 7rv°z'•11S ,�f a �.t�y*sr LS i` .'+w-• t,1• �1 - Y�'�'9 C .1 P" .d; « .� ` »- T 'r jry 19! ,�,,,., '•� ;�. - � J � P �At t4f yTMi✓i��i �i- 5 � '+15.5 +it 3 ; p .^,�.asp if�1 �.�r'�+°.:::�-`>w�a •F Yvle%li o„ tj n« XY Y Fi , iryu ffa'��.t- t •1�t y .rte. EF""-z. Y tY4$x t>• " r . `), ...}rh a r�; ' a14 ..7�'~a�1 lr` < x ° r s!'`�d,�„ �.,` •,.. ","•• r - ro , 1v ti rt3 y7d,' ;'+., }[ INN!4.�� 11 `v� ,.. ,;� y t< n..:.aY•fa-�u++�. �?jb.s.'•i.,�L•b F" a`"�" +t+,$. (SV�'� 4t(e 7 xi!': „a.D ?t a� y[.:. Y �.�. ,�,�,� SpY't '•k.dRk p .!c> P! x kis �6,a ty ri*i 4y! r ygnt` � �QLi' �' ,R•,F-il 4"" lny�,•S'4• ri .ar �.0 ',..c�cm "q;,^�.C-a„� ✓+k: t�! N'1°I�'92 ZMiC•n.�sS e� 1 tltl f., ', "d-+�"�t�,S•J 1 t��, py- 4'''' ,y 'yG i - TS.t "rg. ��td' L n .r 1 ,�.'.,=z,!y � `S+ s�b�+.'p •a '?!x Is+ �.a,�'yr-r 7�4'd,'��; e.,l�+ h�'''rl',��t y fl�r � 7� r�,} 3' •„� ey �" , "i, L F b i11��,t(� 1''1�^ Y" c t� �CF'' t 33''485 L <ka ( S�,• y -N(ta f i;' 4 �i•F"� q"F."�`�L.rAf��"�"a4't yy" ,tFc� ? E ti�r`Eh, ri'Src.,Y•'�,tf,.id tit za '/'S� ^' 'a'^�'S}a_.�`a°c Y �'SS''h�k"t'�nr;r ti'�iR'.r ,' �t .H.71:�� atll��p� 'sT,7„�•••Z'�,�'at tis'{y�,,, 4�,r,3r,•Sr ksr "g`'°4` �r,,ar •3 I _ .. rf1'i 'WF' i.�.a a! kr d<t � xi�°{"4yk tt'�'f z At i„W;��y'f.,� t,zt`f,�ft'!•ar•�rµ�.l'r, 3. ,.' °L�^'Y r” �Jr• R' t ' � R 1, � �. ''t ,Y� a,+vj�rtr�d �� i;t S�Gy{'f• ,�,n +�1�1' �-P F��°ht'°Av�"4.�'"�� � �yR^}� 1 F "xt =:44 1,„s-•ri, � .. z fi_ ra r. L.d ky`t T {-• $ r y r .7 rr a }. ,''" `! �ti✓a`lr �_ , ; F. W, a, t ec. ' as LC. .?�,y ,g x,fit A 1•i Y, r ro ? +>•.y'�- _^c')' f.9 -yam. i !`„-2'3,'. ifi yr 'd 't+ (S^3'S,t, r ( Aa` Ki }�a r u�8]tt� res rr� )< �� 4 � 'tx• G � i d�' LXy.T'.G.'1)r �F� 1.�' -b � C ,,�,a <E••, 1'7" f -01,. 9 r ,." yq 'PtAAf S"H'•SY. p = +_ 'R pTi. „ ,. �1 w u cF 'Y• fart<A r�.joa .. 3r C„ :� �pp1a rah y'��'iT' !•k !s��"',,JJA�-'��S•• v�tea+• a y, "�� _ai 5s 1 ”;1 U Fegt rr•M �- '+ry S T�3 +4,u. pub .r, .fid' , }"�.+r. y4 s T Yet f ,�"c ,{s,is, ; F `7'�'R ���Pts � ? 4yl� mkt S� ' �Z C�Cfr l ogy;`it m.a-'"F•.�''3«r���� Ixka� `�ru� fd'� mss.! ; r � � ,f �" � . x ' � :1F�t ' t"i�,..`9 a '' �r.� � sts �, g'' �•�s jr��c�k,�e 1 '�a4rrrf,,�r�"F3uYc3a�,.� � - P ""� :���;•!'�.�f'ti`y'>g p� a'iy t-"�,.,��+�ua���sF";�..�`>:., u 3'Sy� �'!?`��j�{�+7r �`?}.�:3L"�J,�,�.C', 'r�, - t _Q A +�,4'r 1 �C`f A is°"l "j 1,x' W!^ F�"'S"j. .fin 'c�uE W5 a� __ !' `Y.,T arf '�''1• - s- 2�•� r��.+er o- •"� r -}x.e�n ce�; +,,° .�,s f Yt.. i? e� - ---- . �r a 3�a,, -' - i t? r.a' .. 1�,_f, J. - .y t �`5•t;�Md 1+i•.dtl K - �' t;: r-r� i F. w. + fir'*' ''f,§-r F• •r.�`ri) dBaP�;i'' t�•t t r a~t.i�a+�i'�w��'i" �£-S�.A-i #,.i 1i..a rj,A.si l! i�-r 1•,x.1 ry ,lC +£`rfr,'Sn. - t{4v- £s ;«rP - r },1 x,1 = a+ t'Fal-rr'�t+t.r3t'G'1 haSMrt, dui 'r y'i�.l; ! a ,Pti n .L�� "i�'F-} �,2' A3•i rh,4..'•'s•'t3s.�' f'F t�''f�V S Y T�aF.}.� '�'c�'���f�_ �i +��� ��so:ai'��ta< a`� L.� tz•4 ws•k� ''� �}"„ ;�,z;� a Y!'o. :. 5v 'E.ti.F;« !�a•�, S i'' � � `Sl'rx,t t€i�,�-rr<'trF�J .ra�.f �`r��`. p yt a!, M t 4 6��a'.�r.'ra t- d- sP;�L`t d � ,�•�da„y�{}.�,, [Y��• e—, �Y, N�•'Ep Y S d�°� - V oy�, � ;Y � P 'Y -t}if. Y��.�jy�y� Ls, -8 f;')d�_� �t .1 �!t +1K rY R:. � #'y tj --1�''o F,f�3�� F�„`r�F`i�:<f�IF{;=tiFl�St�ra�,r f i ��." �T�'• ,.r A, es• 'ZF .,,,� 's.. '' 1� h r Wit•-�,'>;�,t:� � � "' v r fy et moi, � • ..��rt,,, <�{ ° �ut '',� J•W 4)r "s� � a�(��31t,,'viE P��r y-.r��f 1s'rr ii ,��'�� %; r? 4 � .F ,4JYt' T� J �'rz �'r+i•� +!. '* int r z a d 3 v r••n.r F ' 1 f �� a~r,< �'?�{ �. , :±"r 1' r •, f• •rc et°f-( r- �,.r-tx.�� �e r��t 4 k q�°r 6< a}•� j 'F f�,fv d �'�,;re i�,� "'r'+"1 r . ytr ,t kt11NW,! 1 . C.cr , '!a� L4s° y I r vtw 1"' ��r �t� F•�.. �.1T>337'Cj '�F�•-.t� d;- F y •? ,` tit�� I hy�yi !i 2F e'/'hs Ilo- - rL °bC lrti 1'y� �-"• yiE`�t'"``o'`��y. ���., '!`�i r� 't z��°`'�/{°1���Ly�r �;+'��,F! �'P.F s 1��µ =r�,��• < " r ��4'f;'er��' r•„� a t LF d Yr i tF 9�t#`ctS+;`�a°,�„Y r .y y fit, 1 Yt¢f;y. , 6• 1 �q+� �' 7 i 'w �A ,+�A 1 Lr r y-F '�i,k;'��' ^,i '!'y r!><S,�"a 5��,....- E'f. ��1K. r.iF `({'`�� e,',4•„ '�'*.. / I (!•:.;rye- ,,V ijtl •�i�• �• ( � I •� .\ ��'/f t ��C.r'-}�1jI,�`i•.',�asjd: ';Lid � �' ��-.:ar,�I'� 'r� � Y';� �i r Lam'v �•�ii:'� ►'-• •`�� wi sop ;�� r , f - i .-tel;- _..: `�`} .`->:� `r=^:•--. -' ' !y,.i_.N,,,�., �. •yam,.:: .,i,•. .f �J— •; �y � � � .. - .-� .R'�v f f •:�- "^•- "+i;• ._f•�',z' �:`�'��'�-. _ ...'J7F t•; O � j .� �saw`: °'��.� • IfF'�W '' :-� :fes L"�.f � ��•��+,r i 41 PB31 n dna j 4ub .�, • J _;:�.,�i'��, f 1.. din-. � ��. ,�, " .f. '�r1 y.."••�1%. is•S.. t �5:f•.i.ri3.rTr '' 1 •.i 1.5 t.•t,,.`i.l r 5 r ! f • �`` �� __Z�•�.Y'yam—. `.��,�••�• a j•� ,. 1 rl\il t• -I -, - f .bfi•�,�i:'Ci� � 5 l .41 ,,y fit- -�,��.,_, y l S3• '. R. 5 f,,;,-'Sl`' y wy J .�t. t1,. • r�i��1 ti. A65 N '•.1 � ��•�r, I p b. is tl,.n .,r VV�`'t',iCri'! >+.� \��i c T '•-'ar.V'^"� ',:�! c I. •, � •''.' .1 -,!1 � ,�. may,. • 4 VI • i. Ori.. �. tin it dol- ' rr rr r v9 1' t"3 7 ��•a •t+�•t��R�� y,-�y}����r. (� ,'Fri Vol NZ 4 X7- ' � • •I . r`I '711 ...'� _r- �.• � ,kir '. ,._—_ _ �l/ H��11 �.�' �S.•.l.�.eY,.k'.`a ;'�:' _' � i' ", •IVB �'C�;�i�'i-`e,••' - .. j' `. 'moi ": .': '"�•' - _. W `ray `,',.:��`'l�e liVt��•: •- 'z ��;. �� { 1I� •� I r� '�,`? Ali• t•`ii�' -��•��.� 41. .. '•.•�.'- ,, ,�'• �ti('• / i it c•1 • 'j� y� 1J .�e'S r ( t • S �•"r.•ISI,,,- J .�S t-�. _ d .ca• • I y.. i y .• �1- c •{::'+r""s 1•?i;;Iti� •.e'..,�r•',�`'..r7, •�,� -a- <.��,, �j�.,, -a+' t { it It x iJr t/ r r t .-,.\, .t-.y: r ',Y��I[{f^r i...//// F• �1 /� 7'/ 71 t,.�,�'; �/�, '•;AJ-::\.t't ��, r �' s•�, ,. �t •1"J` �•/+s , '•� �' �.] 1 1 l'.� l�r+r�r$' r s!l!' �, � fi;'—' --' f r?t:1 `. ./+� (yl 4/` '• Id!�,G (r 7/1� may. r• j.t�!�i#t f:r Jt t .,J,"•� t ''!,� �,; .r '~ 1 .��' � rJ`�l���� 49 ' � •//r4��� °j� :t' —� � t ��l,J,ttf -.���jr r� Iy:,J•�t• �"� J� � r ...'r'�ry �r'-w•"r\`� .� •,�•.r1•I� �r. '�4. il. •' •,-.•ter. 7 -, • :-`�ji i s}P• 1 ( / "j•✓r Irl,)-� it � .l • '� Irl r. .1�" q•+ �1'r � fly��-� tj'��ibr� �.\ •'l .�+.' i tz ytyj.�, �. sir _,"� ..�;}�'rs�l �� .►.� u' �;� . IN �, i,a `f• �r�'�rl,Gr y�r/,�(yr� �yh� ��� '� a�• i •' jy�'1li�� \' ` \t,ir,ty3 � 7 J J�fJ'/ b � / •(• ^'•IIJ .; i ,,t It i �!1'%'i it yl f, .Jy�l�� `I•r�'y.. r ' tt d t.��J i �r ' �t a (`. J':t.•�E ' �� `.r/! , iJ• J t r .,r( Y s. . :..; f�{�f' t t; �I•. ( r. . �. .. •J" Jc} 1 ��,�! t "'j..-rCi qr„• 4' 'i. r r i 1, .I ,4 •S{ • � �• `'`°: s = sit. �{v�.. ..�..4 ►.►,III�I►�i►►I�I� 111!1 �1.1 ►i1� 1}�:�:, r �. �_�..,. s. � ';I i},� •„� �^•— .I Ifni ��. yt _ aate�..� •� � �, � i � � � ', e � 73 J� "w1 di'a, + Y 0 e o �b� �� $�'Y��;t ° �,��� ��,. �Y���.' •���.. e� o ori . rk . i�,- -.6 .� �y. <. _ nil° of v �� , ,�, � as � �" e '� � � " . —'ate u l Vie;;, � :e. a a��,S, „��� _� , a _ v ' � - � � �� o . „. � �. " � � e �, d �. " `� ��. -� a e 7 �e' e � :., .� � �• t ^ es. °�"�p�°.fid � �,�, � �� -Ao° e , oF�'� .� � � ° y ti �.p.°° 0<t ��� � �� ,s � �°� � .. � 4p�d ��� A° ,e M1� °� a � 8 ° o a .fie . `e'"3•' o ° � ° � ,�^ _\�.- eQ .�'° _� ° a�,e ' 11 °e 4 �� ° , 'yl � m.1'� _ _ ��C �•, ,ee ei¢°i � �� F, e'I� ;da � e ,m cam,- F , - ��.��.~ •�, __.._ .,.,�. . t .'�" ,o.w-a 'R'K S , Af S, ,t•�L k�.� L.. )..Mr ,a"Mw 'f` Z '.•a•<'- 'rla. LL 'y- ,� '.. �Yt'�yTY- .td�2:-"z--}-. - .. -- � -t • G,., .64,' �4e ""t 1 VW� +L `.3,•'�7- 4}. :l?t.�C• � �' � j , ,S• �_�r,,:-� {...?`s-a•±�:'="y: y .y fe'•:~. � - .s. r i� � �''fx C`�: ., .. _ 11! ! ' i�r'���••�S } e�+ tz � �'1 � -. t .-, c ,a � i� t•,•-T Y+} � :•���v�r.'t } _ _ �� _. � t - w. 1.y3E ^-•r a .r.__" - L` ( A4 j •' 1• _ -_`.fi ...�- 1. �'' gf-'� �• x„��i' <.�..�. ,i ! + ;yl �.._-'�s-- � ,,�-•'�`-•-�'�' _•. r ,.,. .,:.+. '.�_Gi a;` w � - '� r iSw 't � '-,� ` f. Ali T•r•t tt f '-' S � Y--�.` ...-�..1:� k. .��,_-.,..� i � _ {. ti 1_'`�X ��a•.-ate k ,.. -� ,o,,�,oiu,, c__ r r .� _ „_ .,"'��-�,`• F e. �.r �` I_! e .`.� �'>w�?a�". _ ;,= ? -_ -� _ 'r-.._.<.�4h�-= fit:. _ _ •t G--•••+ -✓ -� .r n, '� ���_ �' t' ', _ :.W-_ :�,. rpt ,r :L, �.,'.•r�>{ J - � .sF�k't' :7�, � f'� = .�i?s'�': ,.-.4- t-'` "<°' 3.,�;,%="„J':i`y-.�'- ��,:a-=.'n -'�:%-'^• }� S �sc �ay�-. ,�. �,� , � •t�.��-uhf`--`..,^'' 4 ^' - - t'. -. +�^,'K...�(. -a�-. 'a' 't__'rii.�-.` yy. " l .r s!D.''.�•e-'��,1'.ic:' _J 'T' 'C r ,^ i-C,J-'�L-;','%,.--�,e=_/;�:K•��.•• �,:.• n '�'•za -'1:I, e�-'•�' .�=.1 v v� "fit _--} i.. �� z,.. f.i�- ia-.r�,,:�-�!�TC;'i<� i.�:roX�.'_ .'(1! •.i. <4._. !, �•��"�.�.•�'N :i.''S•% - �� y �.r _ ...f `:•.,-',R-,:=: i.t sT:`•..✓j, �`�� r•.%.,r1 ���•,-� ��)•'t"�a Fear.,r tir d �>�-ar? � -s ' �'� ' 4r ,•,'' ,, ,_ . ��'-�{rC� �ti Jit ��-•,-! �} i'St-rF}t`�� c Yti. y � •X` �.""t• 'cc � •�t, _ t -rt r �'��•,. ! ..,r. •i• fir_ �.LY:,i. _ .a-..1,.�.S.i !YR-a,.,�. ' '�. <.,�y.1 ;e' },K.�nr^•Y rfi}.a•-,... - w, �. I , ,!!'t11 t t 'S =,�� t �xY'C'�c.3,',4"i .: w � ,><,y,� '`k� � .:-- b,••. ice. •v .�., ��° ' Ov G r-.�.� ���.. L.titLv'.i �•�� �ti •�,'r: l � Y, �� ��{, �'#���__..11�1-G'�+tG'r� -u {�`�iw , . i .'� ':,'tz.•�ti:S:�,,��.<< `"�1• K,�y�• a- ./ �.•� T 2 .�. w :_ ��" •C'.!3' �.. Via, ..i �� `�� t t' try k - a �y.� •�. `,ee„ �, -,"' •'� L_'epi .o� - _ � I -•. '• i�' � ice- \rbc z `vr s� ���e�}r.� �, i. - ; � 1 , Fe' cal Coliform q Rr;��W-Rl TWO .,C.FU/10.0 n-d,' &NM "N' INI, 4%,,110"ilill."ImIll- Gib . try ` iMl I Ir l.! .�. q• ••�•'9 J. l r, 1 -!A.�, `ct�YA,Y< � -Q�.�•1 3 d > ,•?�• _`{'may' .��• � ✓� �e•il i Z ar '•.�.� � .'- - {f Pr / til :� r.. r i 1 .y.�r, '. ..,� .. ��• a• _ 'tet fF�•_ •:�•�i +fir✓/ :7 ,� / JJ_^VAi, � J' 's-.: c:!-• ?`J`,( �� r..: s: .. / •��ir SIA ,f, `.. j. _ ,..�. 'a- ..S ��'/-' �� ;; ?" '' ,% :moi /j � t ✓�.,t+. .... • t-dam � •�I� •�/.y _ .�.i r sr sr _ :S �` thy:- ,� f. .. r. ` —.':w? '6Y. - S"t.✓ .✓- r ✓ ..� '. .)., .. - _tte•Mr�_ '':,•.•%�aC':+-"�y 4"'sf�-:•'�.,�- -:�.•-i�� :('�'r •�•''r"�; -:.' .. - f' A •'%. '�• ` _ P' -_ C J~ ���� - -.'f•,'r-:�,-�_.?C'--T+Y•Y }nom.. -+_���• •r; C•.�j'- - - _ r �-•- - �`:�JM 1 ..`-.'� a �•' !v_ �r v �'' -'-_'-�,:lJ-=ti_2'_-- � :.M --`a.•: .n..� c,� - -'`°i-la rt J�+�j-,-...7 c��-�'�f S,c' S.1�Y_:���',:.r - A.+ �� r "• ,�/ �'rti .: •15ye��!'� • .L..�'11RY� t`}�;''.y:i;�S.>.�d•�t'!i�y4 I'12 Aio•cl' ..� rlvR±.'�-. .. .,�,h.. • '' 'I EY{ ' ,J! ^ti'/;'rp. ,+r. ,f_�al:��; ' -+1.�r�•.�ih•�`E,•+.'�l'K,.<4' �• er' �•,�.. •. .��'t'�:'�'• x._3•. ,�. • �• / :/1�� i * •, I��+ r "�..f� LP..�£1`4a y' �?� l �Q� �^ Vtr� A Y_:.r: 13 .yM s � ,J -iP♦• .�' •�a� .• A� `y .',� 'I..a1.. ^� %G'O.�e.Y .,.• ' t -�♦y��! '•:Sh �,,. s�����. '���,i-. r►ON t•'``:tp %t ''{' -�, i�C r.�s• i •.��C,l,1- •:b''�"•'�I rr; �r ll j �J�..�• *,•. "LQV'e'� I'„ i.s.yL. d• ;, :��i"/'+ .'. .1.N" • rI•., �/yrte• w ,.-r�_ -C� ` �' .l :ts�^!�.•: yw i �\.l "•� sA.• �.�i�r� fn- A7�1 - _ _ ti .� } �.����i .`yi�''a�:� r%Ci i �, '•'`'r'. 9•'i•a��}�,•?••%•' 'fr°�� r�}�. 1� `jV1C� '%a r•�':` t'..v htr�'L.• •w 3,�y_. �' •.�:�, ,p.�w 't',: M=Ml• ,• ,�' 1.1,1. ��.,. ..yam .l�a>ti.^-Y�� •/��,,, :.�'��''�� �:aT_L•',�,t"�:.y,ry'Lr�+.^JIJI: .:p�+!'!/S �� `t ,E :�... I ', ••.... u r�.. '�': `'rY+♦ ' fes' t L � '!� r 6 f •`r�I-i`1T^r LL a:r,/�:L.^. ���4,!~�+ry+ i: 'i -# r-tier,� j, A�,j t �S S.�%: f'-,o��i��i�:;"•e'Y�' -.�,T r y •-P,f _•4..rf r �.. .�:=�4-� �".'it � •'�I '• .r!f�Z 'c .-• .� � y�� '"'-. ..- •t ' `:� ��?t• � ;.'4.ry •'R�. T-�►�.•^•',y,t�j1 �'7�. /,;•�a1�' K'?c:>`'yt/�YIY�e .��K F ��i� i � ,• 15M., yf:. },^• _] .-`ra .f�sy1r� :N•'- }l:S µr:.j':1F::0.'ri q. I'ca!A - �(A'`? ira.:`•``4.+',ia.�%��j � x_4�•�w ��Fj" ,c t f.'R'� ��';�• • •'�.sb ��1.,�,4�,'-':':='�: +) ;h' ��%'� yy� e v �'�'*a .1, J Erb !;•:�:-:, :ti E- 7='• ',` t1^C.1 � � �E d'� '.,�i r•�� �' �. �:hi � N i �'LI«. �int .. �5.;�,rr+. .�,1.7•?...t �^ s.e..''s:: r- �i��>4 r.+i;s * � °+�jZ t ,�..�, t', ,a_ Lj}.rt',- 1 y r 5 r'..�l •w•S`.:f r, '-;• _^:,��.'_,�f;wt.ij►� dyl.0uy:�"T.y>•i'��.!i�ft:• ,�i" �,�,,�� .y.A. ' :.rr,. :G±h�/• �•'f,4`:Jffg�(��'-� Y�„� e� '{�N f'��Sy¢p��li�'"''="s' t:� ��r >r ~•Ar ! e, ,� .er" rlyii•�' ZY✓,.>i�.CY�•1,..�� ��%��j� � !:: rlr}tllll;',L,tft •%y..y 'vi �►iJc� j�� .c`��'OY,f(iL,, ��:may` � :�-� i,�/p! .. " .. .rN.t �y.,�••'�•(� fir'/.,s J•,y ��.,,•i•�. � � �rll R. 'r•: ;='„�� .SI'.J :Vf�.+ L'!!.` `� ,r�.� i�l�)1 ''f ref .. ::y,fr ts. •7�-a�--r8 .-4��-rf��r`oi�, ��, r�,,rv.i,,,-�;�F.. - r� i • i FINAL REPORT - December 15, 1999 i EVALUATION OF MICROSEPTEC I ENVIROSERVER RESIDENTIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM I F r Prepared for: MicroSepTec Inc. 26601 Cabot Road Laguna Hills, CA 92653 i z %r3 .�s: •a o _ X y , •f b8• i J Prepared by: J Anders O. Wistrom and Mark R. Matsumoto Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering University of California, Riverside J December 1999 J s 1 i Table of Contents Tableof Contents............................................................................................................... 2 Listof Figures.................................................................................................................... 3 Listof Tables...................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction..................................................:................................................................. 6 Objectives................................................................................_..................................................6 Scopeof Work.............................................................................................................................7 Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................................7 2. Background.................................t................................................................................. 8 TraditionaiOn-site Systems......................................................................................................8 High Efficiency On-site Systems...............................................................................................9 3. Experimental Facilities............................................................................................... 11 TestFacilities............................................................................................................................11 Principlesof Operation............................................................................................................13 4. Methods and Procedures ................ 1 5 ............................................................................ Measurement of Physical and Chemical Parameters............................................................15 Characterization of Household Wastewater..........................................................................16 Long-term Evaluation..............................................................................................................16 ExtendedLoading Study..........................................................................................................17 S. Experimental Results.................................................................................................. 19 Characterizationof Household Wastewater..........................................................................19 Long-term Evaluation of Treatment Performance...............................................................23 ExtendedLoading Study............................................................_.............................................36 6. Conclusions................................................... 4.. ...................... .............................. 38 References........................................................................................................................ 39 a Final Repoli 12-15-1999:4 2 i t List of Figures. t Figure 1 a. Schematic of the pilot facilities. Figure lb. Schematic rendering of the commercial EnviroServer 600 residential treatment unit. Figure 2. Average hourly flowrates with error bars showing one standard deviation Figure 3. Frequency distribution of hourly flowrates. The hydraulic residence time in a compartment having a volume of 950 L (250 gal) exceeded 4 hours for 99.7 % of the time during the evaluation period Figure 4. Average influent and effluent TOC,BODS, and COD concentrations. Error bars show one standard deviation. (N=31). Figure 5. Average influent and effluent TKN, Ammonia-N, and Nitrate-N concentrations. Error bars show one standard deviation. (N=24 for TKN, and N=31 for NH3 and NO3) Figure 6. Average hourly flowrates for weekday track study. Error bars show maximum and minimum values. (N=4) Figure 7. Hourly influent and effluent COD concentrations for weekday track study. Error bars show maximum and minimum values. (N=4) Figure 8. Hourly influent and effluent TSS concentrations for weekday track study. Error bars show maximum and minimum values. (N=4) Figure 9. Hourly influent and effluent TKN concentrations for weekday track study. Error bars show maximum and minimum values. (N=4) f Figure 10. Hourly influent and effluent Ammonia-N concentrations for weekday track study. Error bars show maximum and minimum values. (N=4) Figure 11 Hourly influent and effluent Total-P concentrations for weekday track study. Error bars show maximum and minimum values. (N=4) Figure 12. Effluent COD concentration for longterm evaluation study (normal loading) and for extended loading rates of 135%, 160% and 173%based on a nominal daily wastewater flow of 600 L/day. Figure 13. Effluent TKN concentration for longterm evaluation study (normal loading) and for extended loading rates of 135%, 160% and 173% based on a nominal daily wastewater flow of 600 L/day. s Final Report 12-15-1999:4 3 List of Tables Table 1. Flow- and mass-loading rates of added nutrients for Extended Loading Study. Table 2. Measured concentrations of influent wastewater constituents from on-site ' residential wastewater treatment study. Samples collected from sample well on influent line. Table 3: Typical concentrations of influent household wastewater constituents in residential wastewater. Table 4. Measured concentrations of effluent wastewater constituents and average removal rates in percent from on-site residential wastewater treatment study. Samples collected from chlorination tank. i Table 5. Frequency in percent of wastewater constituent concentrations from on-site residential wastewater treatment study exceeded 20, 15, 10, 5, and 2 mg/L in effluent. 24-hour composite samples collected from chlorination tank. N is the number of samples. i Final Report 12-15-1999:4 4 i I , Disclaimer The statements and conclusions of this report are those of the authors and are not i necessarily those of the University of California. The University of California makes no warranty, expressed or implied, and assumes no liability for the information contained in this report. i Final Report 12-15-1999:4 5 1. Introduction An innovative residential wastewater treatment plant process has been developed and tested by MicroSepTec Inc. of Laguna Hills, California, for on-site treatment of residential wastewater. In February of 1999 MicroSepTec authorized the Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering at the University of California, Riverside (UCR) to conduct a full-scale treatment study to evaluate the capabilities of the Enviroserver, a proprietary residential wastewater treatment process manufactured and sold by MicroSepTec. Studies were conducted at the UCR campus where an Enviroserver 600 gpd treatment unit, complete with sampling and monitoring equipment, was connected to a University owned single-family residence occupied by a family of four. Objectives The primary objectives of the study were to assess effluent quality that can be achieved using the Enviroserver treatment system connected to a single household and to develop data that would provide additional insight regarding the mechanisms for enhanced nutrient removal and treatment efficiency under varying loading conditions. Specific objectives were: 1. Quantification of average 24-hour influent and effluent concentrations and flow rates. 2. Quantification of temporal influent and effluent concentrations and flow rates at hourly time intervals for four 24-hour periods during weeldays. 3. Evaluation of long-term performance of Enviroserver treatment system operated in automatic mode. 4. Evaluation of stress loading. Optimization of the treatment process for effluent quality in general or enhanced nutrient removal and sludge management in particular were not part of this study. i 1 i Final Report 12-15-1999:4 6 Scope of Work The evaluation was conducted in three main parts: 1) initial acclimation period, 2 ) long- term removal efficiency, and 3) stress loading study. Unaltered, raw wastewater from a single-household residence located on the UCR campus was used as influent to an Enviroserver 600 residential wastewater treatment unit provided by MicroSepTec. Performance and effluent quality were measured in terms of total dissolved solids (TDS), total suspended solids (TSS), total organic carbon (TOC), carbonaceous biological oxygen demand (CBOD5), total Kjeldahl nitrogen(TKN), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), total phosphorus (TOT-P), reactive phosphorus (PO4-P), total coliform (COL-T), fecal coliform (COL-F), free chlorine(CHL-F), and total chlorine (CHL-T). ` Acknowledgements The completion of this investigation would not have been possible without the cooperation and assistance of numerous individuals. The authors are indebted to Engineering Manager Christina Edvardsson and Engineering Technician Todd Long of MicroSepTec; Maria Martinez, John Nosacka, Bassam Bahhour, Rob Scholl, and Chanh Vu, Student Research Assistants at the Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering and staff from the Physical Plant, at the University of California at Riverside. i Final Report 12-15-1999:4 7 2. Background Wastewater management systems in metropolitan areas are most likely to be conventional activated sludge plants where wastewater is collected from individual households through an extensive wastewater collection network. Economies of scale make the use of centrally located treatment plants justifiable for large communities but exceedingly expensive for smaller communities and for sparsely populated areas. Special problems faced by small communities and isolated households in rural areas include limited finances, high per capita costs for a centrally located treatment facility, and limited operation and maintenance capability. Restrictive discharge requirements may also impose treatment requirements that must be met considering the potential assimilation capacity of leach fields and receiving water bodies, the potential for on-site or off-site reuse, and final disposal. Traditional On-site Systems The septic tank is the most widely on-site wastewater treatment alternative in the United States. Today, approximately 25% of the new homes being constructed in the United States use septic tanks for treatment prior to disposal of residential wastewater. Septic tanks are buried watertight receptacles designed and constructed to receive residential wastewater with the primary purpose of solids separation and to discharge the clarified liquid for further treatment via natural treatment mechanisms in the leach field. Residential wastewater enters the septic tank where incoming solids and partially decomposed sludge settle to the bottom of the tank to form a sludge layer; oils, greases, and other lightweight materials rise to the top to form a scum layer. In most instances, septic tank effluent is discharged to a soil absorption field for additional biological treatment utilizing the assimilative capacity of naturally occurring microorganisms. Typically, a soil absorption system consists of a series of narrow, deep trenches filled with gravel. Perforated pipe is used to distribute the septic tank effluent throughout the trenches which then infiltrates into the soil mantle. In areas where conditions are not suitable for wastewater infiltration due to either soil characteristicsfor shallow groundwater tables, septic tank effluent can in some cases be discharged to engineered A. Final Report 12.15.1999:4 8 mounds that serve as biological filters or to constructed wetlands for treatment. Alternatively, a high efficiency on-site residential treatment unit can be employed to I positively control treated effluent water quality. High Efficiency On-site Systems In areas with shallow ground water tables, adjacent to sensitive receiving water bodies, or areas where discharge of treated wastewater effluent from a typical septic tank is either 1 limited or prohibited, high efficiency treatment units are required that can produce an effluent to near-potable or potable water standards. In areas subject to periodic drought there is also a need for a reliable source of water. The benefits with high efficiency treatment also include a reduced demand for potable water by substitution, which would lessen overall water consumption. High efficiency treatment of household wastewater may encompass in-house recycle of treated wastewater either as a separate source of non- potable water for washing and flushing and/or as a source of irrigation water. Recycled water, if it is suitable for a direct beneficial use, is a valuable resource provided the use of the water will not adversely affect downstream water quality, plant life, fish or wildlife or pose a threat to public health. The effects of physical and chemical parameters for non-potable uses of reclaimed wastewater are, for the most part, well understood and criteria have been established. Health related microbiological limits are more difficult to quantify as evidenced by widely varying standards and guidelines throughout the world. Because domestic sewage is a potential public health concern regulatory controls related to the use of reclaimed water are principally directed at public health protection. As a consequence the required degree of treatment and microbial quality increase as the likelihood of human exposure to the reclaimed water increases. A high efficiency on-site treatment of residential household wastewater, which includes complete effluent disinfection, should produce an effluent water quality that is safe for on-site, non-potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater. An innovative residential wastewater treatment plant is currently being tested. The treatment process is unique in that excess biomass is periodically decomposed to carbon and inert.-ash in a thermal processor as opposed to periodic wasting and subsequent disposal in conventional i Final Report 12-15-1999:4 9 I I . biological treatment systems. Hereby, an effluent with low suspended solids concentrations can be produced without a final filtration step. The residential treatment is monitored and controlled by a computer control system and is maintained by trained service technicians, not the occupant, a practice which represents a departure from conventional on-site residential wastewater treatment. I i ' y Final Report 12-15-1999:4 10 3. Experimental Facilities I The evaluation was conducted at the University of Califcrnia, Riverside campus using a residential wastewater treatment unit supplied by MicroSepTec. The test unit was a full- scale residential treatment unit, Enviroserver 600, equipped with an above ground thermal processor and computer control system for local and off-site control and process monitoring. The test facility and principles of operation are described below. Test Facilities The test facilities used in this study included a reactor tank with compartments for primary and secondary clarification,compartments for biological oxidation, recirculation and discharge pumps, thermal processor, air compressor and air diffusor pipes, and controls. A schematic of the UCR test facilities is shown in Figure I a. In the test , facility the thermal processor was located above ground and the chlorination contact chamber was installed as a separate tank. In the commercial version of the Enviroserver the chlorination contact chamber is incorporated into the reactor itself and the thermal processor is installed below ground in the first riser, Figure lb. l All wastewater from the residence enters the inlet to the treatment unit via a 4-inch diameter PVC conduit by gravity feed. Treated effluent was returned to the existing house connection, which is connected to the city wastewater collection network. The Enviroserver 600 treatment unit was constructed of glass-fiber reinforced plastic with an overall volume of 7.6 m3 (2,000 gal.) with a diameter of 1.5 in (5 ft.) and a length of 3.4 m (11 ft.). The test plant was divided into four equal sections separated by baffles set at an overflow height of 1.21 m (4 ft.). The first compartment, having an effective volume of 1.21 m3 (320 gal.), was employed to provide primary sedimentation and an anoxic or pre-react zone, mixing incoming wastewater influent with partially treated wastewater and solids. The second and third compartments of the reactor, each with an effective volume of 0.95 m3 (250 gal.), were individually aerated using air from a compressor supplied by header pipes equipped with membrane diffusers. In addition, each aerated s Final Report 12-15-1999:4 11 I _ CATALYTIC CONVERTER THERMAL PROCESSOR AIR COMPRESSOR iCOMPUTER I I �ill 0 I I DISINFECTION i SAMPLING SAMPLING I INFLUENT.,_ EFFLUENT I RECIRC. PLMP (2) AERATION MANIFOLDS (P) BIO-HEDEA SLUDGE PUMP Figure 1 a. Schematic rendering of the UCR test facility, an Enviroserver 600 residential treatment unit with separate chlorination tank. COMPWER AIR COMPRESSOR GROUND SURFACE (TYPICAL) THERMAL PROCESSOR NO EX m /�T IN OU'EN� EFFLUENT PUMP DLSINFECMDN RECIRC PUMP BIO-MEDIA ' (2) AERRNTON MANIFOLDS SLUDGE PUMP Figure lb. Schematic rendering of the commercial EnviroServer 600 residential treatment unit. i Final Report 12-15-1999:4 12 i. I compartment also contained fixed film support for attached biofilm growth in the shape of cylinders, diameter 90 mm dia(3.5 in.) and length 90 mm (3.5 in.), having a surface area to volume ratio of R=105 m2/m3 which provided a total of approximately 50 m2 of surface area for fixed film growth in each compartment. The fourth compartment, having a volume of 1.21 m3 (320 gal.), served as the secondary clarifier and temporary storage for excess and sloughed biomass. Treated wastewater was discharged from the secondary clarifier by gravity flow to the flow-through chlorinator for disinfection and held in the chlorination contact tank with an effective volume of 2.14 m3 (300 gal.) prior to discharge. Principles of Operation The Envirosdrver unit operates continuously and on demand. The influent feed from the residence is by gravity flow similar to an activated sludge plant. Residential wastewater enters the first compartment where flow equalization and primary clarification takes place. Because the contents of the first compartment is anoxic it also serves as a pre-react zone where soluble CBOD removal is enhanced by adsorption onto existing microbial flocs. Biological CBOD removal and nitrification takes place in the subsequent two aerated compartments. To promote CBOD removal and nitrification both compartments contain fixed media for attached biofilm growth. Depending on bulk oxygen concentration in the aerated compartments and thickness of the attached biofilm it is also possible that some denitrification takes place in the biofilm layers closest to the support where NO3-N is available as the terminal electron acceptor. Biologically treated wastewater overflows into the fourth compartment reactor where secondary clarification takes place. Excess biomass including biomass sloughed of the fixed film support is wasted using a thermal process that converts biological solids to a residual consisting of carbon and inert ash. Periodically, a small submersible pump is activated to return settled biomass from the secondary clarifier to the primary clarifier(pre-react zone). Settled biomass from the primary clarifier is periodically pumped from the-bottom of the compartment to the thermal processor where the solids are retained by a stainless steel sieve and the water is S Final Report 12-15-1999:4 13 drained back to the primary clarifier. After a set number of pump cycles the control system initiates the thermal decomposition of the retained solids which includes drying, gasification, and pyrolysis at controlled temperatures. The end product is an inert residual of carbon and ash that is flushed out the next time'the primary clarifier recirculation pump is turned on. Recirculation of settled biomass from the secondary clarifier to the primary clarifier in combination with periodic thermal processing also help maintain low effluent TSS concentrations. Enhanced nitrogen removal also becomes possible when the aerobically treated and nitrified wastewater from compartment two and three is recycled from compartment four to compartment one if a carbon source is readily available and the first compartment is free of dissolved oxygen, e.g. anoxic.-The NO3-N in the aerobically treated wastewater serves as the terminal electron acceptor and the raw wastewater influent entering the first compartment serves as the necessary carbon source for the denitrification reactions. Anoxic conditions are normally maintained throughout the day because the pre-react zone in compartment one is not aerated and because incoming raw wastewater quickly depletes any available oxygen despite the periodic influx of dissolved oxygen that is introduced into the pre-react zone during recycle pumping. The effect of biomass recycle and biomass conversion to ash in the thermal processor on treatment performance and operation strategies for optimizing enhanced nitrogen removal was not studied as part of this evaluation. The clarified and treated wastewater next flows through a chlorination contact tank , which comprises a flow-through cell with a receptacle containing calcium hypochlorite (CaC12O2) tablets. The chlorination contact tank is designed for a hydraulic residence time of 90 minutes for complete coliform destruction. i i I ' 1 ' I ` s f Final Report 12-15-1999:4 14 i 4. Methods and Procedures i Experiments were conducted at the University of California, Riverside campus, using an Enviroserver 600 treatment unit supplied by MicroSepTec. Evaluation of the r Enviroserver treatment unit was carried out from January 1999 to July 1999. At the ' beginning of the experimental operation, the Enviroserver treatment unit was filled with I influent wastewater from the City of Riverside Waste Reclamation Plant and seeded with the fixed film support having attached biofilm growth. The experimental procedures, analysis methods, and wastewater characteristics are described in this section. Measurement of Physical and Chemical Parameters Since flowrates and mass loading rates to a residential wastewater treatment unit are highly variable, special provisions were necessary to characterize influent and effluent water quality. A sample well equipped with a mixer to homogenize incoming raw wastewater was installed on the influent line. The sample well volume was matched to the pump capacity and purge volumes of the automatic sampler and to the size of the plastic storage containers used for collecting composite influent wastewater samples at selected time intervals. 1 A flow meter complete with datalogger was installed on the residential water line to measure the potable water consumption on a continuous basis. Because all water consumed by the residents was discharged to the test facility a representative estimate of 4 wastewater flowrates were obtained assuming that the time delay between usage and discharge did not adversely affect the analysis. Wastewater samples were automatically collected on an hourly basis and a 24-hour composite sample was obtained in the laboratory by manually blending hourly samples in proportion to actual water usage. Samples for water quality analysis were collected from the influent sample port, secondary clarifier(compartment 4), and the chlorination contact tank. The location of sample points is shown in Figure 1 a. All samples were collected in polypropylene bottles designed for use with automatic samplers. All samples were either analyzed directly or stored on ice prior to analysis. In s Final Report 12-15.1999:4 15 were analyzed on an hourly basis to provide a measure of short-term variability of flow- and mass loading rates. Wastewater samples were collected using an automatic sampler i and the collected samples were stored in an ice-cooled container prior to analysis. l I Extended Loading Study The long-term evaluation period was terminated by an extended loading study whereby the reactor influent was augmented with a pre-mixed synthetic waste. The study was performed to investigate the effect of a controlled addition of nutrients on overall ' treatment efficiency. A synthetic wastewater was made by mixing 0.82 g of dark corn syrup (Karo), with COD concentration of 915 g/L, and 94.33 mg of (NH4)2SO4, with 1L ` tap water to yield a synthetic wastewater with a COD concentration of 750 mg/L and NH3-N concentration of 20 mg/L. The selected synthetic wastewater strength was based on the average of measured COD and NH3-N concentrations in the influent for the long- term evaluation. The synthetic wastewater was prepared fresh every day. The synthetic wastewater was added to the influent port using a small gear pump operated on a timer. Additions were made during four hours in the morning (6AM-1OAM) and four hours in the evening (5PM-9PM) to coincide with the periods of largest daily wastewater flows (Figure 2). Actual flowrates and mass-loading rates of added nutrients are shown in Table 1, Composite 24-hour samples were collected and analyzed in the same manner as described earlier. Final Report 12-15-1999:4 17 i Table 1. Flow- and mass-loading rates of added nutrients for Extended Loading Study. k Time AM PM Added Loading ; Period Volume Factor Flowrate COD NH3-N Flowrate COD NH3-N L/day L/hr g/hr g/hr L/hr g/hr g/hr 1 22.5 16.875 0.450 30.0 22.500 0.600 210 135 i} 2 45.0 33.750 0.900 60.0 45.000 1.200 420 173 2� 3 90.0 67.800 1.800 1 ) 1) 1) 360 160 2) Pump malfunction. Z) Loading factor is the ratio of total volume of influent wastewater to the nominal daily wastewater flow of 600 L/day([210+600]/600=1.35x100%) t 1 i i. 1 1 Final Report 12-15-1999:4 18 5. Experimental Results The long-term performance of the Enviroserver treatment unit the influent wastewater flow was characterized both in terms of quality and quantity. In a single household little 1 or no "averaging" of wastewater composition and flowrates take place over time as _ activities in a single residence are sequential. Consequently, the large variations in wastewater composition, constituent concentrations, and flowrates observed during the acclimation phase, which reflect the diverse activities and varying schedules in a single household, are to be expected. In this section results from the wastewater characterization study, long-term treatment performance, four 24-hour track studies, and the extended loading study are reported. Characterization of Household Wastewater The on-site test facility was installed and connected to a single-family residence located on the northeast side of the University of California,Riverside campus. The residence was.occupied by a family of four during the evaluation period. Acclimation Period Between 22 February 1999 and 31 March 1999 grab samples were collected once per day, usually in the morning, from the primary clarifier and from the chlorination contact tank. The collected data were useful for monitoring the acclimation process of the treatment unit but not sufficiently detailed for performance evaluation. First, the operational requirement of periodic wastewater recycling from compartment four to compartment one effectively diluted the incoming wastewater influent and, as a result, samples collected from the first compartment severely underestimated the strength of influent wastewater. Second, sampling only one time per day was deemed to be i inadequate because of highly varying flowrates and composition during the day. i s Final Report 12.15-1999:4 19 Composite Sampling Beginning on 21 May 1999 and extending through 31 July 1999, all wastewater samples were collected on a composite basis. A sample well equipped with a mixer to homogenize incoming waste was installed on the influent line. Hourly samples were collected using an automatic sampler and flow averaged 24-hour composite samples were obtained by combining hourly samples weighed with the actual hourly flowrate. Measured concentrations of influent wastewater constituents are found in Table 2. The importance of flow averaging is shown in Figure 2 where the average and standard deviation of hourly flowrates are plotted. Over a 24-hour period average water usage follows the classical diurnal pattern with a morning and an evening peals but variations from hour to hour and from day to day were considerable. The average hourly flowrates ranged from zero to about 80 L/h (20 gph) during a 24-hour period. The variation of the hourly flowrate from day to day, measured as one standard deviation, was of the same magnitude as the hourly average and is shown in Figure 2 as error bars. In Figure 3 the frequency distribution of hourly flowrates is plotted to provide a quantitative measure of how often a particular flowrate is expected to occur. Based on nearly seven hundred hourly flowrate recordings an influent flow smaller than the average hourly flowrate 6.5 L/hour (1.7 gph) is expected to occur 50 % of the time, a flowrate smaller than or equal to 100 L/hour (26 gph) is expected 94.1 % of the time, and a flowrate smaller than or equal to 235 L/hour(60 gph) is expected 97.7 % of the time. The latter flowrate translates into an expected hydraulic residence time of four hours or more for any of the two 0.95 m3 (250 gal) Enviroserver reactor compartments or the chlorinator tank. The hydraulic residence time for the maximum flowrate measured during-the study, 920 L/hour (245 gph),which corresponds to more than 20 times the hourly average, would be somewhat longer than one hour. Examination of the chemical analysis data of wastewater constituents in the 24-hour composite samples also revealed large day to day concentration variations. The influent wastewater was characterized by.a typical CB OD concentration averaging 212 mg/L but with a standard deviation of 101 mg/L, which testifies to the large yariations of 4 Final Report 12-15-1999:4 20 Table 2. Measured concentrations of influent wastewater constituents from on-site residential wastewater treatment study. Samples collected from sample ! well on influent line. (5/21/99-7/30/99) r Constituent Units Average Influent Std. dev. Concentration [N=31] Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L 212 101 Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L 727 481 Totaf Organic Carbon mg/L 121 153 Total Suspended Solids mg/L .267 185 Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 653 348 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen mg/L as N 43 24 Ammonia mg/L as N 20 17 Nitrate mg/L as N 1.1 0.9 Reactive Phosphorus mg/L 12 6 Total Phosphorus mg/L 19 8 Fecal Coliform CFU/100 mL 490,000 180,000 Total Coliform CFU/100 mL 860,000 230,000 Turbidity NTU 80 102 Conductivity µmho/cm 525 77 pH ----- 7.5 0.6 s Final Repoli 12-15-1999:4 2] ► 250 J 200 � L O J 150 3 100 U- 50 I 1 0 0:00 4:00 800 12:00 16:00 20:00 Time of Day Figure 2. Average hourly flowrates with error bars showing one standard deviation. 100 --------s9.� `��------ ------------- 90 o I 80 ' U C i cr 70 ; � I LL 60 CD 50 I 1 10 100 1000 Flowrate, L/hour Figure 3. Frequency distribution of hourly flowrates. The hydraulic Jesidence time in a I compartment having a volume of 950 r(250 gal) exceeded 4 hours for 99.7 % of the time during the evaluation period. I i Final Report 12-15-1999:4 22 U wastewater strength and composition originating from single households. Nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus follow a similar pattern. The large variations in flowrate coupled with large variations in wastewater composition and strength offer no alternative testing methodology other than composite, flow averaged, sampling for evaluating removal efficiency of on=site residential wastewater treatment systems. Information on typical individual household wastewater quantity and quality is relatively scarce in the literature. For example, a typical water consumption rate between 150 to 190 L/d per person (40 to 50 gpd per person) for households residing in apartments and mobile home parks that include little or no water for landscaping or irrigation is often used for water resources planning purposes. These numbers are comparable to the average flowrates measured in this study. Equally important from a design and performance_point of view are data on expected concentration ranges of wastewater constituents. Unfortunately, there appears to be no published data on single household wastewater quality with which to compare findings from this study. In Table 3 typical concentrations of wastewater constituents commonly used for the design of large municipal wastewater treatment plants are listed. Comparison between typical design ' concentrations and the measured concentrations of wastewater constituents in this study reveal that concentrations are very similar with only phosphorus concentrations being noticeably higher in the present study. Also, coliform counts in typical municipal wastewater are 100-1000 times higher than the number measured in the UCR study. A possible explanation is that growth occurs during transport from the source to a centrally located municipal wastewater treatment plant. I Long-term Evaluation of Treatment Performance The evaluation of the Enviroserver long-term treatment performance is based on 24-hour i composite samples of influent and effluent collected between 21 May 1999 and 30 July 1999. Removal rates for suspended solids, carbon, and nutrients for the Enviroserver operating continuously and on demand are discussed in terms of an average removal efficiency as well as from a frequency analysis to-provide a measure of robustness. 4 Final Repoli 12-15-1999:4 23 I ' ' Table 3: Typical concentrations of influent household wastewater constituents in residential wastewater i i Constituent Units Concentration Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L 220 I Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L 500 t Total Organic Carbon - mg/L 160 j Total-Suspended Solids mg/L 220 Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 500 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen mg/L as N 40 Ammonia mg/L as N 25 Nitrate mg/L as N 0 Reactive Phosphorus mg/L 5 Total Phosphorus mg/L 8 Total Coliform CFU/100 mL 10e7— 10e8 Tchobanoglous,G.T. and E.D. Schroeder, Water Quality,Addison-Wesley s Final Report 12-15-1999:4 24 I ' From average influent and effluent concentrations of the measured household wastewater 1 constituents, an average removal efficiency was calculated for each constituent and is ' tabulated in Table 4. i Final Report 12-15-1999:4 25 tl r Table 4. Measured concentrations of effluent wastewater constituents and average removal rates in percent from on-site residential wastewater treatment study. Samples collected from chlorination tank. (5/21/99-7/30/99) Constituent Units Average Eff. Std. dev. Average Concentratio [N=31] Removal Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L 5.7 3.1 97.3 Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L 54 21 92.6 Total Organic Carbon mg/L 18 7.6 85.1 Total Suspended Solids mg/L 5:9 4.1 97.8 Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 543 143 - Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen mg/L as N 7.0 1) 4.61) 83.7 Total Inorganic Nitrogen 2) mg/L as N 2.2 1.5 89.6 Ammonia mg/L as N 0.1 0.1 - Nitrate mg/L as N 2.1 1.5 - Reactive Phosphorus mg/L 1.3 0.6 89.2 Total Phosphorus mg/L 2.0 0.7 89.5 Fecal Coliform 3) CFU/100 mL <2 0.0 - Total Coliform 3) CFU/100 mL <2 0.0 - Total Chlorine 3) mg/L 12 20 - Free Chlorine 3) mg/L V+ 9 18 - Turbidity NTU 5.1 4.6 - Conductivity µmho/cm 599 120 - pH ----- 8.0 0.3 - Temperature °C 17.0 3.9 - 1)N(number of samples)=24: 2)Total Inorganic Nitrogen here defined as NH3-N+NO3-N. i 3) Results reflect disinfection after modifications were carried out on the.through-flow chlorinator. After modification all Total and Fecal Coliform counts were less than or equal to 2 CFU/100 mL. Final Report 12-15-1999:4 26 Carbon and Solids Removal Average removal for CBOD5 was 97.3 percent and for TSS 97.8 percent with an average ' effluent concentration of 5.7 and 5.9 mg/L, respectively. Suspended solids and carbon i removal efficiencies are summarized in Table 4. Maximum recorded effluent CBOD5 and TSS concentrations were 14.0 mg/L for both constituents. Average influent and effluent TOC, CBOD5, and COD are also plotted in Figure 4 where the error bars indicate one standard deviation. The frequency in percent that a wastewater constituent in the effluent exceeded a specified concentration is shown in Table 5. For example, CBOD5 in the effluent exceeded 5 mg/L in slightly more than half of the 24-hour composite samples analyzed in the long-term study but was greater than 10 mg/L in only twelve percent of the time. Similarly, TSS concentrations in the effluent exceeded 10 mg/L in less-than one fifth of the time. The low TSS concentrations in the effluent is in part due to excellent solids settling characteristics with an average sludge volume index (SVI) in the secondary clarifier being 75 mL/mg and never exceeding 150 mL/mg. (Samples for TSS determinations were collected while the reactor contents were well mixed). The effectiveness of the sludge recycle pumping from the secondary clarifier to the primary clarifier and periodic decomposition in the thermal processor was evidenced by the average TSS concentrations tapering from a high 5,600 mg/L in the first compartment to a low of 450 mg/L in the fourth compartment. Nutrient Removal Some nitrogen and phosphorus are removed by assimilation into new cell mass and subsequently removed from the reactor by thermal conversion to ash. Maintaining both aerobic and anoxic zones in the reactor allows for additional amounts of nitrogen to be removed. Nitrogen is biologically removed by nitrification followed by denitrification. In both instances, an organic carbon and energy source are required. The absence of ammonia in the effluent indicate that complete nitrifipation was achieved during the study period. The average daily ammonia concentration in the effluent was s Final Report 12-15-1999:4 27 4 j Table 5. Frequency, in percent of wastewater constituent concentrations, from on- site residential wastewater treatment study exceeded 20, 15, 10, 5, and 2 �. mg/L in effluent. 24-hour composite samples collected from chlorination j tank. N is the number of samples. (5/21/99 - 7/30/99) i - Constituent Concentration in mg/L i N 20 15 10 5 2 } Biochemical Oxygen Demand 31 0.0 0.0 12.0 52.0 100.0 Total Suspended Solids 31 0.0 0.0 17.3 62.1 82.8 1 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen-N 24 0.0 10.9 17.4 60.9 97.2 i Total Inorganic Nitrogen-N 31 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 50.0 ' Ammonia-N 31 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Nitrate-N 31 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 46.7 Final Report 12-15-1999:4 28 1400 j J 1200 ® Influent E 1000 0 Effluent 0 800 m 600 c 400 C: 0 U 200 0 TOC CBOD5 COD Figure 4. Average influent and effluent TOC, BOD5i and COD concentrations. Error bars show one standard deviation. (N=31) 70 J 60 ® Influent E 50 p Effluent. 0 40 30 c 20 c � U 10 0 - TKN Ammonia-N Nitrate-N Figure 5. Average influent and effluent TKN, Ammonia-N, and Nitrate-N concentrations. Error bars show one standard deviation. (N=24 for TKN, and N=31 for NH3 and NO3) i Final Report 12-15-1999:4 29 i 0.1 mg/L with a standard deviation of 0.1 mg/L and a maximum of 0.2 mg/L. Ammonia oxidation results in nitrate formation but the average nitrate concentration in the effluent was only 2.1 mg/L with a standard deviation of 1.5 mg/L and a maximum of 8.7 mg/1. The inorganic nitrogen, calculated as (NH3-N+NO3N), removal efficiency was 89.6 percent (Table 4). The high percentage removal suggests that both nitrification and denitrification reactions take place simultaneously. To achieve simultaneous removal of both ammonia nitrogen and oxidized nitrogen both aerobic and anoxic micro- environments must exist within the reactor. The pre-react zone is kept anoxic which would permit oxidized nitrogen removal to take place as readily available carbon is continuously being added to the reactor. It is also probable that ammonia oxidation and-oxidized nitrogen removal take place within the biofilm in coppartments two and three where the thickness of the biofilm could limit oxygen mass transfer and thus render parts of the biofilm anoxic. But the relative importance of the pre-react zone and biofilm is unknown and the relative efficiency is hypothesized to be ultimately controlled by site specific conditions. Influent and effluent TKN,NH3-N, and NO3-N concentrations are plotted in Figure 5. Nitrogen removal, measured as TKN, was 83.7 percent with an average concentration of 7.0 mg/L in the effluent. Phosphorus removal, measured as TOT-P,was nearly 90 percent with an average effluent concentrations for the Enviroserver of 2.0 mg/L with a standard deviation of 0.7 mg/l (Table 4). Such high removal rates were not expected because no operational provisions were made for a "feast-and-famine" strategy to develop and maintain a phosphorus accumulating biomass. Instead, excess biomass was wasted by thermal decomposition at temperatures reaching 600°C which is well above the boiling point for many phosphorus compounds including elemental phosphorus,phosphoric acids, and phosphorus oxide. However, phosphorus removal by evaporation cannot be confirmed until the exhaust gas from the thermal processor is analyzed and a complete mass balance for phosphorus is performed. Until then, reported phosphorus removal rates should be regarded as preliminary only. s Final Report 12-15-1999:4. 30 Disinfection The clarified and treated wastewater is disinfected as it passes through a flow-through chlorinator, a receptacle containing calcium hypochlorite (CaC12O2) tablets. Disinfection efficiency is a function of both the concentration of the disinfectant i (chlorine) and the contact time. During the study the receptacle containing the hypochlorite tablets was clogged by partially dissolved tablets which hindered new ' tablets from entering the flow-through cell resulting in little or no dissolution of ' hypochlorite and hence little or no disinfection. Before the problem was identified ' chlorine concentrations in the chlorination contact chamber were erratic and hence also only partial disinfection. Clogging is now prevented by diverting a small stream of air from the compressor unit to the receptacle holding the hypochlorite tablets. Ample contact time is provided in the 0.95 m3(250 gal) chlorination contact chamber. In Figure 3 the frequency distribution of measured hourly flowrates to the wastewater treatment unit is plotted. For example, the hydraulic loading rate smaller than 235 Uh is expected 97.7 percent of the time and which corresponds to an hydraulic residence time in the ' chlorinator contact chamber of four hours or more. i Disinfection efficiency is measured as the number of colonies of total and fecal coliforms ' produced per 100 mL of sample after an incubation period. After the modification of i. the hypochlorite receptacle both total and fecal coliform numbers, measured as CFU/100 mL,were consistently below 2 CFU/100 mL. Track Studies To gain a better understanding of the effect of the inherent variability of influent flowrates and wastewater composition on removal efficiency over the short-term 24-hour track studies were performed on four weekdays during the study period. A track study typically included influent and effluent samples collected every hour. Samples were analyzed for the following constituents: total dissolved solids (TDS), total suspended solids (TSS), total organic carbon (TOC), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total .71 Kjeldahl nitrogen(TKI), ammonia nitrogen(NI-L-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), total phosphorus (TOT-P), and reactive phosphorus (PO4-P). 4 Final Report 12-15-1999:4 31 4 Average hourly flowrates for the four weekdays (26 May, 8 June, 24 June, and 1 August) i are plotted in Figure 6 where the error bars show maximum and minimum values. Maximum recorded hourly flowrate was 212 L/hr compared to a daily average of 17 L/hr. Again, hour to hour variations were large as well as day to day variations which testifies I to the importance of composite sampling for the evaluation of residential wastewater 4 treatment processes. In Figures 7-11 influent and effluent wastewater concentrations, COD, TSS, TKN, Ammonia-N, and TOT-P, are plotted as a function of time of day. When high concentrations were found in the influent then effluent concentrations are also somewhat elevated for the same time interval. For example, elevated effluent COD concentrations appear to coincide with high influent concentrations (Figure 7). This observation is consistent with the hydraulic performance of a treatment process with recycle. The recycle stream dilutes incoming wastewater and at the same time disperses the contents of the four compartments to modify effluent water quality in the chlorinator tank and discharge. Even.so, average COD concentration in the effluent was 50 mg/L, which corresponds to approximately a CBOD5 concentration of 10 mg/L or less, based on linear correlation of the COD and CBOD5 influent data. Similarly, TSS and TKN concentrations in the effluent were consistently low despite large fluctuations of both influent concentrations and flowrates. The correlation between influent and effluent concentrations is relatively weak for the same time interval and does not appear to affect effluent water quality over subsequent time periods. Examination of track study results show a strong correlation between high water flowrates and high phosphorus mass loading rates. For example, total phosphorus loading rates exceeding 0.5 g/h were generally associated with high water flowrates, which suggests that the source of phosphorus was washing detergents. If warranted, a simple substitution of household detergents is all that is required to lower phosphorus concentrations in the effluent. I Final Report 12-15-1999:4 32 I i i 300 250 I 200 L o 150 0 100 C 50 0 0:00 3:00 -6:00 9:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:00 Time of Day Figure 6. Average hourly flowrates for weekday track study. Error bars show maximum and minimum values. (N=4) 4000 ® Influent 3500 p Effluent E 3000 — m E 2500 J_ E 2000 E 1500 m 1000 i` 500 0 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 0:00 3:00 6:00 9:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:00 Time of Day Figure 7. Hourly influent and effluent COD concentrations for.weekday track study. Error bars show maximum and minimum values.•(N=4) b Final Report 12-15-1999:4 33 i 1200 ® Influent i 1000 -- SEffluent,m � E p ; 800 E i CD 600 E ` J I 400 I E J 200 i 0 IL L UL 0:00 3:00 6:00 9:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21 :00 Time of Day Figure 8. Hourly influent and effluent TSS concentrations for weekday track study. Error bars show maximum and minimum values. (N=4) 160 ' 140 120 N Influent _- El Effluent 100 E 80 i -j60 � 40 ' 20 o l 0:00 3:00 6:00 9:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:00 Time of Day i ! Figure 9. Hourly influent and effluent TKN concentrations for weekday track study. Error bars show maximum and minimum values., (N=4) i 4 Final Report 12-15-1999:4 34 i i 1 . Extended Loading Study An extended loading study was performed by controlled addition of a synthetic wastewater to investigate the effect of increased mass-loading rates on treatment performance. A synthetic wastewater with a COD concentration of 750 mg/L and a NH3-N concentration of 20 mg/L was added to the Enviroserver in addition to the normal influent (Table 1). For comparison daily effluent concentrations for COD and TKN are plotted for the Longterm Evaluation Study and the Extended Loading Study in Figures 12 and 13. Observed effluent concentrations for the extended loading study are comparable with the i average effluent concentrations for the longterm evaluation study. Measured effluent concentrations were always below average plus one standard deviation which suggest that the removal efficiency is independent of the extended loading rates investigated. s Final Report 12-15-1999:4 36 1 • 120 0 Longterm Study I� 100 J I ■ Extended Loading Study (f vi J 80 ' I E 60 1 J -- — — — ---- ----- — -- -- — — — — E 40 20 p ` 1:1lilt , Figure 12. Effluent COD concentration for longterm evaluation study (normal loading) and for extended loading rates of 135%, 160%and 173%based on a nominal daily wastewater flow of 600 L/day. Dotted lines represent average and average plus one standard deviation for effluent COD concentrations for the Longterm Evaluation Study. 20 El Longterm Study v05 ■ Extended Loading Study E J E a,10 -- - ------ --------- --------------------- E -------- - ---------------- E J E - = --- -- ---- -- ------- ------- - � 5 - - 0 0 Figure 13. Effluent TKN concentration for longterm evaluation study (normal loading) and for extended loading rates of 135%, 160% and 173%based on a nominal daily wastewater flow of 600 L/day. Dotted lines represdnt average and average plus one standard deviation of effluent TKN concentrations for the Longterm Evaluation Study. . 4 Final Report 12-15-1999:4 37 6. Conclusions The principal conclusions resulting from the evaluation of the Enviroserver 600 residential wastewater treatment unit are as follows: 1. Average carbon, as BODS, and solids, as TSS, removal rates were 97.3 percent and 97.8 percent, respectively. 2. Despite large variations in hydraulic and mass loading rates less than one fifth of all 24-hour composite samples exceeded 10 mg/L for both BODS and TSS. 3. Nearly complete nitrification and denitrification was obtained. Average removal rates for TKN and inorganic nitrogen was 83.7 percent and 89.7 percent, respectively. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification yielded a total inorganic nitrogen concentration rarely greater than 5 mg/L. 4. The thermal processor combined with recycle pumping of settled solids from the secondary clarifier to the pre-react zone produced a tapered solids concentration from approximately 5,600 mg/L in the first compartment to about 450 mg/L in the fourth compartment with subsequent low TSS concentrations in the effluent. 5. An effluent free of detectable total and fecal coliform, <2 CFU/100 mL, was consistently achieved using a bypass contact chlorinator using calcium hypochlorite in tablet form. 6. Hourly and daily variations of influent flowrates and mast-loading rates had little or no effect on effluent water quality. 7. The Enviroserver 600 treatment unit is capable of handling additional influent flow and mass-loading while maintaing effluent water quality. 4 Final Report 12-15-1999.4 38 I " t References American Public Health Association, (1989), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 17`h ed., New York. Tchobanoglous, G.T. and E. D. Schroeder, (1985), Water Quality: Characteristics, modeling, modification,Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley, i Metcalf& Eddy, (1991), Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, disposal, and reuse , (1991), Eds. Tchobanoglous, G.T.and Burton, F.L., 3rd Ed.,NewYork, McGraw-Hill. Odegaard, H.(1990), "Small Wastewater Treatment Plants," Water Science and Technology, 22, 3-4, 9-10. Pochana, K,.J. Keller and P. Lant, (1999), "Study of Factors Affecting Simultaneous Nitrification and Denitrification," Water Science and Technology, 39, 1, 235-243. t Scheiner, D., (1976) ,"Determination of Ammonia and Kjeldahl Nitrogen by Indophenol li Method," Water Research, 10, 1, 31-36. Wistrom, A.O. and E. Schroeder, (1996), "Enhanced Nutrient Removal by Limiting Dissolved Oxygen Concentration in a Continuously Fed, Intermittently Decanted, i - j Activated Sludge Plant," Environmental Technology, 17, 371-380. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; On-Site Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Systems, U.S. EPA, 1980. Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook 7`h ed. (1997),McGraw-Hill,New York. i i I Final Report 12-15-1999:4 39 i j California 1%.cgional Water Quality fiolntrol Board Central Valley Region �— Robert Schneider,Chair Winston H. Hickox Cray Davis Secretaryfor Redding Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.a,ov/rwgcb5 Protection 415 Knollcrest Drive,Suite 100,Redding,California 96002 Phone(530)224-4845•FAX(530)224-4857 BUTTE COUNTY 3 March 2003 MAR 0 5 2003 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Doug Fogel Butte County Division of Environmental Health 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 PRE-APPLICATION FOR TAYLOR SUBDIVISION (SIERRA VISTA), APN 072-180-013 & 052, BUTTE COUNTY We received a copy of your 20 February 2003 letter to NorthStar Engineering and wish to comment. Regional Board staff has also been aware that NorthStar has installed monitoring wells on the proposed Sierra Vista Subdivision property. We understand that the purpose of the monitoring wells is to gather information on groundwater.levels,during-the present wet season in support of a suitable wastewater disposal;alternative. :.Unfortunately.we have notyet been given any specific information on the wells. Therefore we are unable to comment'on.,thelwells' placement, construction, monitoring frequency, etc. We are concerned about this lack of communication on the part of NorthStar and The REMM Group. Our 14 February 2003 letter to Robert.Taylor states: "It is vital that you gather site data and information in close coordination with staff of the Regional Board and the Butte County Environmental Health Division. Otherwise, if the current wet season ends without enough data or information having been obtained, the project could be delayed . . ." If you have any questions, please contact me at (530) 224-3249 or the letterhead address. v( Ray Bruun, P. . Associate Engineer Shasta-Cascade Watershed RB: sae cc: Butte County Planning Division, Oroville '-'Robert Taylor;'The REMM Group, Anaheim Hills• `t' Mark Adams,NorthStar Engineering, Chico California Environmental Protection Agency Ca Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs,see our Web-site at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/ {I i I 1I� �I I i I j I all � a� I I ipaa /�j Il. � I Qo(uu� � 1 —9N U I\ VvC)O-- -- - - ---------- �I�� General Information: Zoned FR-40 (Foothill Recreational, 40-acre minimum parcel size) General Plan—Agricultural Residential (1-acre minimum parcel size) Not in 100-year flood zone In deer herd critical winter range—40-acre minimum parcel size. No California Land Conservation Act agreement In OWID for irrigation water, domestic water across SR 162 No mapped faults High soil erosion potential High archaeological sensitivity area May Need: Rezone to a zone that allows for small parcels - .5-acre, maybe 1-acre minimum. PUD zone possible. R-1, A-R General Plan Amendment if parcels less than one-acre in size are proposed. May be okay with PUD zone. Low Density Residential may be more appropriate. Archaeological survey Biological survey—deer herd impacts, eagle habitat, Botanical survey—springtime study — V'.a ;�ex- 4 L' — S J S�- Q Vs Vehicle traffic analysis (impacts to Highway 70) Visual impact analysis (impacts to users in the adjacent State Park) Geologic/geotechnical study Hydrology study I/ Environmental Impact Report may be required due to size and complexity of project. Approval from Fish and Game (deer head issues) Approval from Regional Water Quality Control Board " Approval from Butte County Air Quality Management District- Homeowners association & CC&Rs for roads,water system, open areas. V ddb o� s��� �- � C, d � �wo� v►t`o J b • /��• � ° ��nJ C�C�b C..��V1 'E'b �y;� p o OVA p � ► '�a M uo �ba5 i C-1.S Z a ,J baJ b 0$ 1 r' r' ���p • �C�up,�tel°�-� o u . �s c► w,fs�s Z V\A o I 1�.c.., _ Ysc, way 6u o-1 , �J S,j> >� +vu s� T! Ot ; i Doul ���"yS BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP APPLICANT: Sierra Vista DATE: 07-17-2002 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PSM AGENT: APN: 072-180-013 Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS A. STREETS 1. Prior to, or concurrently with the recordation of the Final Map, provide a fully executed road maintenance agreement on the County approved form. X 2. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the Final Map. Street names shall be approved by the County Address Coordinator prior to the recordation of the Final Map. Submit a minimum of 5 alternate names for each new street to the County Address Coordinator for approval. _X_ 3. Obtain encroachment permit for all new or existing driveway approaches and construct them to County standards, as specified in County Improvement Standards. X 4. Provide a cul-de-sac, designed and constructed to county standards as specified in the County Improvement Standards. The Final Map shall show the cul-de-sac. X 5. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, prove, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, that there is approved access in compliance with County standards to each parcel from a publicly maintained road. X 6. All access rights shall be reserved by deed, per County Ordinance, and offered for dedication and depicted on the Final Map. _X_ 7. Developer shall provide all necessary traffic safety signs including stop signs, and shall place a note on a separate document, which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet of the Final Map stating "The property owners are responsible for the maintenance of all private road safety signs, including stop signs. _X_ 8. Pay the recording fees then in effect for recording the Final Maps and related documents. ■ Tentative Subdivision Map Standard Conditions- Butte County■ 1 .ry 9. Deed to Butte County, in fee simple, _feet of right-of-way from the centerline of . The right of way shall be sufficient for the installation of standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. X 10. Construct FULL street section on INTERIOR STREETS to RS-4B geometric standard. Min6num structural section to be 2 " AC and 8 " AB, SC 250 prime, fog seal and.95% relative compaction. Submit design to Land Development Division for approval. "R" value determination and other data may be required to support section design. _ 11. Construct street section on to RS- road standard with curb, gutter, and sidewalk and " AC, " AB, SC 250 prime, fog seal and 95% relative compaction. Construct street section on to RS- access road standard with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Minimum structural section to be " AC and " AB with fog seal and 95% relative compaction. Submit design to Land Development Division for approval. "R" value determinations and other data may be required to support section design. _X_ 12. Dedicate a one foot "no access strip" or relinquish abutters rights to Butte County, along the_OROVILLE QUINCY HIGHWAY frontage of parcels, except at approved access points. _X_ 13. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, obtain an encroachment permit and construct a 5-18 standard road approach , in accordance with County Improvement Standards, AND PROVIDE Adequate sight distance at EACH intersection of access road and OROVILLE QUINCY HIGHWAY shall be provided. _X_ 14. Show on the additional map sheet or document to be recorded concurrently with the Final Map a 50_ft. building setback from the centerline of INTERIOR STREETS AND A 25' SETBACK FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OROVILLE QUINCY HIGHWAY. B. DRAINAGE _X_ 1. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map a plan for a permanent solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained on site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. 2. Establish 100 year floodplain elevations and the lowest floor elevations for any structures. Show on the additional map sheet the elevations (by contours) and the location of an accepted NVGD benchmark and a temporary benchmark on-site. 3. Pay the applicable drainage fees in effect at the time of recordation of the Final Map for the drainage area. (The current fee is now $ /acre.) ■ Tentative Subdivision Map Standard Conditions- Butte County ■ 2 C. FINAL MAP 1. New lot lines shall comply with the applicable setback requirements of the Butte County Zoning Ordinance and the County adopted Uniform Building Code. _X_ 2. Show all easements of record on the Final Map. _X_ 3. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Final Map, pay in full any and all delinquent, current and estimated taxes and assessments as specified in Article 8, of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7, of the California Government Code commencing with Section 66492. 4. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, prove, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, that the parcel to be divided is a legal parcel. 5. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Final Map, pay all applicable assessments established by affected assessment districts, in full. _ 6. MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CALTRANS FOR ACCESS TO AND IMPROVEMENT OF OROVILLE QUINCY HIGHWAY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF LEFT TURN POCKETS AND PUBLIC ROAD APPROACHES AT EACH ACCESS ROAD INTERSECTION WITH OROVILLE QUINCY HIGHWAY ■ Tentative Subdivision Map Standard Conditions- Butte County ■ 3 38' MIN. ' L 5' 19' MIN. 18' MIN. 5' 1' r---- -29G -2% =-T 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE MINIMUM STRUCTURAL SECTION �t3•� DITCH SECTION FOG SEAL HINGE POINT BACKFILL WITH SELEC 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE ',TYPE B. Y4"MAX.. MED. GRAD.) TI=4.5 MIN. IMPERVIOUS MATERIAL HINGE POINT AND FLOW UNE LIQUID ASPHALT, (PRIME COAT) FILL SECTION TO TOP OF DIKE 12" CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE (Y4"MAX. GRAD.) 19' MIN. TO CENTER LINE GENERAL EARTHWORK NOTE: (FOR SECTIONS A, B & C) )HINGE (1) EARTHWORK SHALL BE AS PER SECTIONI9, "EARTHWORK"TYPE "A" DIKE OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STRUCTURAL SECTION COMPONENTS 4' MIN r— -2% STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AS SHOWN ABOVE ARE THE MINIMUM.(2) ONLY 1HE TOP 6" Of SUBGRADE WITHIN EXCAVATION AREAS WHEN SOILS DICTATE, THICKNESS OF STRUCTURAL SECTION SHALL BE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95z R.C. INCREASED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AC DIKE SECTION 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE DITCH OR REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT A.C. DIKE AS APPROVED BY BUTTE OF PUBLIC WORKS. TI AND R VALUES POINT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. MAY BE USED TO JUSTIFY STRUCTURA, SECTION. EXISTING PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROADS NOTE: 60' MINIMUM R WIDTH 28' MIN. !� 5' 14" MIN. 13' MIN. $' 1' f- -2z -2% --i 3 sppE 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE MINIMUM STRUCTURAL SECTION DITCH SECTION FOG SEAL HINGE POINT BACKFILL WITH SELEC 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE (TYPE 8, Y4"MAX., MED. GRAD.) TI=3.5 IMPERVIOUS MATERIAL HINGE POINT AND FLOW LINE LIQUID ASPHALT, (PRIME COAT) FILL SECTION TO TOP OF DIKE 8" CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE (Y4"MAX. GRAD.) 15' MIN. TO CENTER UNE 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE DITCH OR A.C. DIKE AS APPROVED BY BUTTE TYPE "A" DIKE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 4' MIN f— -2% STRUCTURAL SECTION COMPONENTS AS SHOWN ABOVE ARE THE MINIMUM. WHEN SOILS DICTATE, THICKNESS OF STRUCTURAL SECTION SFALL BE INCREASED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. AC DIKE SECTION TI AND R VALUES MAY BE USED TO JUSTIFY STRUCTURAL SECTION. HINGE POINT INTERIOR SUBDIVISION STREETS NOTE: 60' MINIMUM R/W WIDTH 26 MIN. 5 13' MIN. 12' MIN. 5' .40 low 1' -.f--- -2z -2% ---- BACKFILL — BACKFILL WITH 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE IMPERVIOUS MATERIA DITCH SECTION HINGE POINT TI=3.5 TO TOP OF DIKE HINGE POINT AND FLOW UNE FILL SECTION MINIMUM STRUCTURAL SECTION 15' MIN. TO CENTER UNE FOG SEAL STRUCTURAL SECTION COMPONENTS !� " 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE (TYPE B. -Y4"MAX., MED. GRAD.) AS SHOWN ABOVE ARE THE MINIMUM. TYPE A" DIKE LIQUID ASPHALT, (PRIME COAT) WHEN SOILS DICTATE, THICKNESS OF 4' MIN -2x 8" CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE (Y4"MAX. 3RAD.) STRUCTURAL SECTION SHALL BE •0— INCREASED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE DITCH OR REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT AC DIKE SECTION A.C. DIKE AS APPROVED BY BUTTE OF PUBLIC WORKS. TI AND R VALUES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. MAY BE USED TO JUSTIFY STRUCTURAL HINGE POINT SECTION. SHORT CUL-DE-SAC ROAD ( < 500' LENGTH NO ONSTREET PARKING) NOTE: 60' MINIMUM R/W WIDTF TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR ds'?wTm "T RURAL — HILLSIDE MOUNTAIN, RECREATIONAL ROAD ° •.� COUNTY STANDARD NO. ° ' RS-4 1 • • 4 L .Lt �e N.T.S. _ L 10 I .44d = / t fa _ , .. ........::::�..... '- -'• mac:. Or 'Lake-4rortle_ .i.��;•.51ia._L... 162 4.. j M rina Vista j Project Site - F; 162 Loafer Creek Rd - - A Fo a to n R k7 • i CRITICAL WI T R RANGE, 40-ACRE MINIMUM LOTS i i � d -- \ av i � _ — � \ \ ��� �� � �,` � r i D-d Ob-2� } BUTTE COUNTY Inter-Departmental Memorandum To: Steve Betts, Senior Planner From: Ted Crawford, Fire Department Subject: Pre-Development Review for Robert Taylor Sub., AP# 72-18-13 and -52 Date: July 10, 2002 The following are the Butte County/ California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection requirements for the proposed 49 parcel subdivision on Hwy 162 approximately 1 mile north of Forbestown Road in the Oroville area. 1. Construction, installation or development of structures or facilities on the parcels/lots shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, (Public Resources Code 4290), and all other applicable State and County codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of application for improvement permits. 2. A 100 foot greenbelt/fire break will be required around the perimeter of the subdivision and maintained to the satisfaction of GDF/BCFD. 3. A pressurized community water system for fire protection is required. The specific locations and fire flow requirements shall be in accordance with the Fire Department specifications and to the satisfaction of the County Fire Warden. Average required hydrant spacing is 500 feet, hydrant size is 6 inches, and residual fire flow in 1000 gallons per minute for 2 hours. Submit plans to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction of facilities. 4. Use of a private water system for fire protection will require one of the following acceptable entities to maintain the system: A.(Formation of a Mutual Water Company. B. Formation of a new County Service Area. C. Annexation to an existing County Service Area with the same level of service. D. Establishment of another entity as approved by the Butte County Fire Department. 5. All electric operated gates used to control access shall be equipped with an emergency vehicle strobe detector to open the gate unless approved by the Butte County Fire Department. These requirements are preliminary and may change as the project continues. I will be unable to attend the meeting on July 17. Please call me at 538-7994 if there are any questions. CC: M. Shorrock W. Wilson D E C E V E Chrono J U L 10 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION ILI Pacific Gas and Electric company 460 Rio Lindo Avenue .,vn Chambers Chico,CA 95926 Chico Land Rights Office 530/8944423 FAX 530/894-4414 July 1, 2002 Mr. Stephen Betts Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 RE: Pre Development Conference, Sierra Vista Subdivision (Robert Taylor) Dear Mr. Betts: PG&E has electric facilities in the area and is capable of serving this project. Any relocation or rearrangement of any existing PG&E facilities in this area to accommodate this project will be at the expense of the developer. There shall be no building of structures, or the storage of any materials allowed over or under any existing PG&E facilities, or inside any easements that may exist. We request that a 10-foot wide P.U.E. be dedicated along all street lot frontages. If there are specific questions with regards to our electric facilities,please contact Mr. Rod Wetmore in our electric engineering department in Chico at 894-4451. Thank you for the opportunity to review this matter. If you have any questions, please call me in Chico at 894-4423. Sincerely, Donald W. Chambers Land Agent . . . (file: SierraVista.doc) D J U L 2 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION rN INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION To: Doug Fogel, Environmental Health From: Steve Betts Subject: Taylor Pre-Development Conference, APN 072-180-013 and 052 Date: June 25, 2002. Attached is information on the MicroSepTec system that the applicant proposes to use for a possible subdivision. The pre-development meeting is scheduled for July 18 at 10:00 a.m. I hope you or a representative can attend. p ._v . �., suite oun y LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 June 18, 2002 To Whom It May Concern: The Butte County Development Service Department has received a request for a pre- development conference regarding a proposed forty-nine lot residential development on two parcels that have a combined acreage of 89.47 acres. The parcels are located on the east side of Highway 162 (Oroville-Quincy Highway), approximately 1.3 miles north of Forbestown Road, east of Oroville, and are identified as APN 072-180-013 and 052. Please refer to the attached area map showing the location of the project site. The purpose of the meeting is to inform the applicant of local or state requirements that may apply to their project. This allows the applicant to incorporate those requirements into the design of the project when the actual application is made. The sizes of the proposed single-family residential lots range from 29,738 square feet to 55,580 square feet. The project includes common areas for water detention ponds and wildlife movement corridors. Domestic water would -ie obtained from a common well and sewage disposal handled by micro-septic systems. The project site is within deer herd critical winter habitat. The site is zoned FR-40 (Foothill Recreational, 40-acre minimum parcel size) and is designated by the Butte County General Plan as Agricultural-Residential. The pre-development conference will be held in the Development Services Department conference room located at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville on Thursday, July 18, 2002, at 10:00 a.m. If your department or agency has concerns or comments regarding the proposal, please have someone attend or submit written comments to this department prior to the meeting. Comments may be faxed to (530) 538-7785 attention Stephen Betts. If you have any questions, please contact me at (530) 538-7153, or via e-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Butte County Environmental Health Butte County Local Agency Formation Commission Butte County Public Works Butte County Assessor Butte County Agricultural Commissioner Caltrans Butte County Fire Department/CDF California Department of Fish and Game California Department of Water Resources California Regional Water Quality Control Board PG&E—Oroville Highway Patrol Oroville Union High School District Oroville Elementary School District Oroville Irrigation District �v 1.3-01 vasv-3 311.3 7S ,s'cf GG y j 11RA 614-1✓�'vt/1�.�lG Bo q a��al.c�cv,.;r� RF_CFIPI' TOTM. PUBLIC PUBLIC, ENV. NOF/NOD LIME NO. RFCEIVED WORKS LAFCO PLANNING SALES HEALTI/ FIRE F/G FEE O711FR APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM RECEIPT 20593 fee OFFICIAL RECEIPT ...111 COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ISSUED BY p J y y1Sf ' +'/ ,[ '�'F�wt�.T+y}IiL1 -, a -v �+'..' 1 v 957 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK,FA #BBA ENGINEERING r `CIVIL ENGINEERS-LAND SURVEYORS 90-716OROVIL/3 22 95986 2080 PARK AVE. PO BOX 1578 90-7182/3222 1498 CHECK NO. OROVILLE,CA 95988 .oa.��. 530-534-1911 FAX 530-534-0908 Y U eo m ************ Two Hundred Forty Three & 00/100 Dollars o 0 DATE AMOUNT 8 PAY. 6/11/02 *******243.00 V RTHEDER Y Butte Count c ORDER O OF d / ILL U AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 11'00895711' 1: 32227L6271:87911-033323,,1611l BBA ENGINEERING TRANSMITTAL e s' A California Corporation _I O� l U 2060 Park Avenue • P.O. Box 1576 • Oroville, CA 95965 DATE: JOB NO. 0 (530) 534-1911 • (530) 533-6457 • FAX (530) 534-0908 SUBJECT: kUbe —FO-4-4 I Q C I JL- TO:ok-VALC ATTENTION: �( I L APs ENCLQStD PLEASE FIND THE FOLLOWING 'HEREWITH ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA ❑ Application Cl Computations ❑ Authorization `.J Owner's Certificate j ❑ Calculations ❑ Description ❑ Check For S .J Rodd Maintenance ❑ Design ❑ Deeds ❑ BBA # Client# Agreement ❑ Estimate Cl Final Map ❑ Environmental ❑ Street Sign Application ❑ Original ❑ Plat ❑ Public Report ❑ Test Results ❑ Prints# ❑ Tentative Map ❑ Subdivider Statement ❑ Specifications ❑ Title Report# ❑ Zoning&General Plan THESE ARE TRANSMITTED FOR: ❑ YOUR APPROVAL ,d— YOUR INFORMATION &YOUR FILES ❑ CHECKING ❑ RECORDING ❑ REVISION ❑ SIGNATURE )a FOLLOW UP ❑ PER YOUR REQUEST REMARKS: COPY TO: SIGNED: C�%� .: fie- u Coun y t L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 18-6 County Center Drive 411 Main Street 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 P.O.Box 5364 Oro,011e,CA 95965 TEL:(530)538-7282 Chico,CA 95927 TEL:(530)538-7281 FAX:(530)538-216E TEL:(530)891-2727 FAX:(530)538-7785 June 19,2002 FAX:(530)895-6512 Robert M. Taylor 505 South Villa Real, Suite 201 Anaheim,CA 92807 Re: Pre-application review and pre-development review conference for a proposed 49-lot subdivision on Oro-Quincy Hwy,Oroville CA (APNs 072-180-013 and 052). We received the pre-application review request on June 13,2002 and the pre-development request on June 18,2002. Our department has entered into an agreement with the Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB) that any proposed development of this size will require their approval of the sewage disposal system design prior to tentative map approval by our office. Therefore,by means of this letter I am notifying RWQCB of their need to attend the predevelopment conference for the project. Our knowledge of the soils in the project area,generally quite shallow(i.e., less than three feet of clay loam over an impervious strata) confirms that an alternative design septic system would be necessary for this development. The parcels as proposed would not be expected to meet the minimum requirements of Butte County Subdivision Improvement Standards for standard septic systems. You have also proposed a community water system to service this development. A water system of this size would be regulated as a community water system under state requirements. Our office administers this program. By way of this letter I am also requesting our water program specialist attend your predevelopment conference in order to provide you with the needed detailed information regarding the water system. Our office is also jointly involved with Butte County Public Works in regulating the drainage from the site. I am looking forward to seeing you at the predevelopment conference. If you have any questions please feel free to direct them to me personally. Yrs , Doug F 1, Supervisor Oroville Environmental Health CC: RWQCB Water system program Butte County Planning BBA Engineering E (� Dl� JUN 2 0 2002 BUTTE COUNTY pLpNNING DIVISION CCi.:'i� _ BBA ENGINEERING Alan G• Brdw'n, P.E.*1MW_jj1,jM1j7MM* V. , A California Corporaflon ' -June.11, 2002 r. Carl Darling Butte'County Planning Department . 7-County"Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 RE: -Sierra•Vista•Subdivision Preliminary Application Dear NVIr.-Durling: ; A'PreApplication and fee along with:I. lit ofthe.Sierra Vista Subdivision Development ; are attached for your review and processing. If you need anything further, please.call�me. .Thank you,for your assistance: ` Very truly yours, J. . BBJjkENG ERING: r Alan G.'Brown,,P.E. Principal Engineer Cc: Robert Taylor,w/enclosure Ted'Bischak;w/enclosure ' E .0 ,W E Job#01-067. D 4; �lUN 1 3. 2002 BUTTE COUNTY' PLANNING DIVISION" 2060 Park Avenue7 5 P.O: Box 1576 . Oroville:CA' 95965 '(530) 534-1911 (530) 533-6457 FAX (530) 534-0908 n , .. . - � -� � • .. � P J i ` • .. ' �yY-�+ ire`. _ ,, ,' '. - - � ... + - � � , . � 1 ' •v.,ra.zs l.ii.. _ - za�ww.:s r,Yc..:zssmw►s:� S r a;.s-.-.ate..,..r..._. s-,.w:. zzr- _-•.ssJ,�rrs,::s:aiccas;:wva ::aaaal� �.cr,�a.�..mior.asc+amocl:a...:.aa:�rs: ..-Ss�oR.'a�cior..wcx:sr�cwa�.r c.a- - Ia ,•�.,,•-- - :: � aRaiaYz�.iiG+i�ia�1G.- _ .�' G:I.,i:ai' RRGTy •-'K..asii.T. •.it..ai �:, _-- - .y»}' ... Aa'ii.i.. 1 �-.iir�IT 11 Iliia�..\ - 4 i..'a i/GnL�fwL .G.TiYGi...._Y�Qiw• ihY���Fi6L'iY►'>3i10.1.i.M�:�L.i - — •••. .+.:. J�i.F.4•:Y.iG YJi'F ._ _Ss wwi:iia.A4...a.w. 4Yi - � +w.. -wYtM...aii',+3•r - •SCa- tiieiY-'l.'LS•i'a�4v-'iPlfiAiilLl .-�':•• t��w+ -.N.3.�Y�CQf ^^_• _ '-�. - ii.+'4__� a.i.tii.PiiKi.i:ri��1'iY.:.i}__'.i_..T.ii3.. .• r w `t�i�_t ' - - 'T� :.1f �R µ .A 1iRa<.• f �' .p. ...O.MdLi'.Y�iVw. 'aR'iY OSG.i•i.. - - v:t .....a< - - '- � w.•al .u_. .:'.s r s.cza:s� -aw..:.s;. - .� a- gala.: -+.s•5.. ..a •.e.a.+r.s�a�s w_ c...a,...-us\ a �:�.v�..aaniwasau..a � �ur.ea - . +;,>..._.. . - .,..u.c._...c.+wxr«raa__..usc..xuaaa�,.w R-.•+-i-.-:z-s.s•.sec� - __� - a a:-" ,.aur_•xr�....aw_,-s.:::a•.ax-�- - „a...-..�.':.• �t„t.�c,..rr - - ... s.--sar.s.�:-aa.... - _- J.a .:.��v...xt xa'.:tt.._ .�.�.._.._..,... _.._._-e.�^ate;,._..__,-�=�:v'�..__...,..._.-._. _ nr-•.'•�.�.�_. -.nilm m.xcaaaa.. Ar.a _.__..___ , .. - ..rr.•uccaaass::. .�acwz•-� _ _ _ - __ .•. .:w..row, .,aa.Yi.t:'.vati,a.:aYc.' - < .- -..-•. .�_.�.�.�_.,.__�.y .. � '. _S•l� '•.:-u:-a[:AF�tii':C::'•. .. Ya>IVCaIY:f"1 i:+•a.aiaaa •_- - + +iaa�. _:., +. '..e.-+.e-..�:aPRa✓<a4'�:w :t:s:.avai: �: xn'rcaai�=_..___._....._........._._._....� _ _ , �•7;._.Laa'.++sa{dAcwY3./ca.3.�D.p..._^.,. Fvl'..=—•'/ \\��_ •_alrla't- Tiata �iw�.wy �'YS=...�._� � .. x_.scabs:.T..tS+.afiobli9CJ"i�.� - �y -�.�' -liac.l�.'•--��•.'-�.-•a•• � v•_ .���sr'r"-^M.ra'..��"a.ii.ilY - --- .. •-a^"�"'�' -J i ia¢r iii"-.ti:tt.-� _. .ir-aN:i.itis"S iY"ir1iY.Yr.3.. _ __-i:�•� S" �t�.'.`v� _�i0i 6fif--•-_'•"•.:� iari:ciw"—••LSiJ34 RI-•.� -si IIG^• •_..Y• .. �_r-- �_e mG��t ---�...,�,_iiiiG4i+"v Vi' �� -••i GR�fAAGIi.�':f �--- Lake�Oi-oville-�a --�--- .i+f+vbRAl'mui-Jill .mt�iiNPai':4.1 y--"•. �• -ra.A.•. . aJ„-an�is.aaaca:�1•----•—.aa.>= �•_.. 162 __.__ z.:�-a::ia:a�. _ _ •F yr : •�..aaaam..'`-tpa:'-�,_•..•'�:�.:.J4c:Y1ti'>:.i.aata:�fli:JA.:Ii}i.SFY.::i; j�•••••. M rina Vista T.s,__._. mai '-:Ca.:3S.� -._'____�• �At. lac�I:.:+sl�:..zs:a.;rvts.-asrs:;.,' �-an•a.:sara�v. .;" rc.:� •a w..__ __slaw>a.msa�r..rc� •..r:„:acaaac...:+ouu::>•. ``'s_.._..-•zraseRcvw:wa:.rxrs a.• !_>rw:zra�:`;aalw•� .. ,,._�+c+x.z.aws,.:.sx..:,aw+mw•..t�.e; ca....c�«�'. ..aca iGi'iiiYlaRid:O--: i��1 F:r..";IIil -• f .x..asz+czcaarJis"r � r..a. •.ii -' } le,,,r'44S �l Project Site • _ .a - .z. .ie V4M.� / 162 Loafer Creek Rd ca I - aza _ it Fo be to n R i NUN MEMN ME � � � 4 �\� � �'�.:'� � � �ti.�� � cam►/ � AM- ggq,.�� ��� r , . �►����\ :. .: fig\�� ��♦�� �, ����,�, �� VIFN � � •1:11: •►-�•�j��' � ```�� �`�� `_� � . �I�� �� ,� MO MIX OF .sill mg OAF MON 04 Lo 02 Q_A 47IODINE' mr,"",ggll , 11 111, 04.6 o1 1611 �_ ��� RON • � �sun `—��•JIM�. �►.���_ ._.����� Vii,-�•-�� �. WNO �� � .�� . . , - ✓����\ �✓ Mill sunOiln :.j� `�� I 1 r _' - �.:��� •��1 x,11 lolf ll PMP_ MOR IN ` ` ♦ , 111 1i�� • � � �� Awn 0 o le ftli� �:W. lRoti '� . ' • �, � ��� FAMP 3,poo .ice- -�..- jo �`-7i ••y ��� low, 'Wer gpm PRI gov"I wm _ 10,1 W / �- � 4 •1�►�j���� fir/►i�� �\ V� • ��� est.. .: V���i�1� �1 � 1•�, an —�— �_\� �� 0j7 `���� mill poll IRWIN ORO -W, w;m - M �.v ROM �0/ ��. � �� � . . ��� �♦ \ .,,erg. i I I � ``fir ♦ ��_; /, � ♦ , ■ tom♦ .,�j I ■�� � mgON 1� ♦ �.� Mw IN 00 1 NO --.W-6-0401 OVA b%:Ill:11;20 giva V. Ml SM-I • �! �� \��� �\������� Oji`, //►� MAI PRI 'IN OAF q IF ��_,;,. �-___.=-�-----�`� ,mil ��i I ��� _ '�v.��� ,� :• � ��t► wd R PRO ill I I EZ11"MAN PO ONINS'' 1 • -1 FRI ,1r "i. , •: WON OAF Rl 7AMM M- ZMMIM Wa `___ ,. � ,1, � . .�► -� ms`s► �. — - ... : MORA 15O '�'� �. , - IP Ma � .•y am\� RIF IL 0 0 WE MIN ft .moo:.•,.. �. � - � � Ra � 1 �1 ►� �.�� / , OFF Mom IMMIN •, OrROOM! I PRIMIM �__....., , �� ►.�. ----- lam. MM NO ��'"PEW1 •j - C111 I D_.c+