Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
REZ 03-01_PLANNING
SEPARATOR SHEET aoN n 3 — 360 U -15 PROJECT NUMBER RrZ � � - OI i • r PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET ' FILE#: 'REZ 03-01 PROJECT TYPE: Rezone APPLICANT: Fourteen Mile Hourse, Inc. ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1700,Chico,CA 95927 OWNER: Same REPRESENTATIVE: Rolls, Anderson,and Rolls ADDRESS: . 115 Yellowstone Drive, Chico,CA 95973-5811 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezone 43.24 acres from PUD(Planned-Unit Development)to FR-2(Foothill Recreational-2 acre parcels) PROPERTY ZONED: PUD(Planned Unit Development) LOCATED: on the east side of Deer Creek Highway,at Black Oak Terrace about 2 miles south of Forrest Ranch. AP#: 063-360-018 TOWN/AREA: Forest Ranch GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: AR I. Application accepted: December 30, 2002 Amount: $2,516.00 Receipt#: 20914 2. Comments sent to: EH, PW, Sheriff, Assessor, LAFCo, Ag. Comm.,CDF, CalTrans, Dept. of Conservation, Fish and Game, US Fish and Wildlife 3. Comments received from: 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 5. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 6. Assigned To: Craig Sanders 7. Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No: C tegorical Exemption-CEQA# egative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Subject to Fish&Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. -CEQA# 15061.(bx3) Other 8. Staff Report: Project Video: 9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: 10. Publication Notice Written: T���O 3 Display Ad Prepared: IL Notices Mailed: S 03 Number of Notices: 12. Newspaper Publication Date: 3 l�z 3 0 C P 'G B 13. Planning Commission Hearing(s): S — D 3 Action taken: r 14.. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): D Q3 Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: !� 7- 03 15. Type Rezone/Send for signature: 16. N.O.E./-N.O.D./APPENDIX G: Fish&Game Fees Paid: Yes No 17. Send validated Rezone: 18. Assessor's Memo: - 19. Copy of Rezone/Variance to Planning Technician: r t4�i w -7 County Center Drive -Oroville,California 95965 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES-SEPTEMBER 23,2003 03-265 21 . Fourteen Mile House, Inc. - Rezone Report - pursuant to Butte County Code Sections 24-25.30 and 24-25. 40 (a) and (b) , the department submits the Butte County Planning Commission Report for applicant Ray Johnson, Fourteen Mile House, Inc. , regarding a proposed rezone of 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road, approximately two miles south of Forest Ranch. The applicant is requesting a rezone of the property from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) - action requested - ACCEPT REPORT; AND DIRE CT _A.. . -. PUBLIC HEARING BE SET FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE MATTER FOR- TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2003, AT 10:30 A.M. BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES—September 23, 2003 " Fourteen Mile House, Inc., proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding environmental impacts and Rezone from for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32,across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation—2- acre minimum parcel size. The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41,7.24, 17.79,and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank, and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone,and residential development has been completed in the first two"units" of that development. The subject property is the third"unit"of that residential development, but is subject to a separate homeowners association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. The property is located on the east side of Deer Creek Highway,at Black Oak Terrace,about two miles south of Forest Ranch. APN 063-360-018 (CS) (REZ 03-01) Mr. Sanders gave a brief summary of the project. He said that if this rezone is approved there would potentially be 19 parcels allowed instead of 4. He noted letters from Dan Batt and Thomas Hunter. The hearing was opened to the public. -Ray Johnson said the parcel is 43 acres. He said the CC&Rs state that the maximum number of parcels that can be developed is 12. He said there is an existing Homeowners Association. He said there is no,advantage in leaving this as a PUD zoning. He said there is no common area to maintain currently under the PUD. He discussed how much land each of the four parcels would have to give up to common space if the PUD zoning stayed in effect. Chairman Lambert asked if the requirements for the open space could be combined into one area. Mr. Johnson said the other owners have not submitted their maps, but he asked for a ruling today because he is ready to submit a Tentative Parcel Map application. Commissioner Leland discussed the CC&Rs and asked who was a party to the CC&Rs. He asked if there are just the four property owners there now. Mr.Johnson said the CC&Rs run with the title of the ground and recorded on the entire 43 acres. He said the CC&Rs fall under a Homeowners Association. Commissioner Leland pointed out that if the four property owners get together they could vote to eliminate the CC&Rs Mr. Johnson said he did not see the CC&Rs being eliminated. Commissioner Leland said he did not see a problem with eliminating the common area requirement by rezoning this property. There was a brief discussion on why the applicants are requesting a FR-2 zoning. ■BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION■MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 11, 2003 ■PAGE 9 ■ Mr. Sanders said a Conditional Zoning could be approved to limit the development of the 4 lots to 12 lots. Mr. Johnson said he had no objections to limiting the property to 12 lots,but wanted to make sure the lots were as stated in the CC&Rs , i.e., Lot 1 would be 2 lots, Lot 2 for 4 lots, Lot 3 for 2 lots, and Lot 4 for 4 lots. Bud Bouttote said the property owners went to a great expense to insure that the CC&Rs limited this property to a maximum of 12 lots. He said he was concerned with what to do about water. He said he was almost hit by a logging truck. He said there is a sharp turn on Highway 32 that is a blind intersection given that CalTrans has not done their pruning job. He said if the density is increased he would like to see a requirement to improve the sight distance on Highway 32. He said that four people own the lots and he would like to see a copy of the information being discussed between the original developer and Mr. Sanders be sent to all the owners. Al Worley said he did not have a problem limiting the maximum lots to 12. He said he was also concerned with Highway 32 where the speed limit is 65 mph. He said he is going to contact CalTrans to try to reduce the speed. Mr.Johnson said he has the same concerns with Highway 32. He said CalTrans has not cleared the sight distance and are not maintaining the road. He agreed that CalTrans needs to reduce the speed on Highway 32. � Y 'Debbie Jean agreed to a condition of 12 lots maximum.if the property is rezoned to FR-2. Barbara Bouttote said she was concerned that the existing well can only support the four houses and what will happed if they have to drill more wells. She said she wanted the CC&Rs transferred if the property is split. Mr. Wannenmacher said the CC&Rs are recorded with the property and have nothing to do with the zoning. He said CC&Rs are a private matter. Mr. Sanders discussed the requirements for providing water. Mrs. Bouttote asked about future road improvements. Mr. Sanders said the owners doing individual maps would be responsible for improvements to the -- road. There was a discussion on the Homeowners Association and a Road Maintenance Agreement. ?Richard Mondon said he has the 32 lot subdivision across the road. He said he is concerned with .water,avail ability if the lots are increased from Mr. Johnson's project. He was also concernedwith` Additional leachfields. :�111)oug Fogel,EnVironfhental Health,said the soils in the area are adequate to support sewage disposal ;systems. He said there may be some restrictions on where the septic systems can be placed'due to ;slope and drainage. r ■BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION■MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 11, 2003 ■PAGE 10 ■ Commissioner Marin asked what the required distance was for a septic system from a well. Mr. Fogel said a well has to be 100 feet from the septic tank. He said there is no contamination of the existing wells in the area. He discussed availability of water in the area. Commissioner Leland asked how long the existing wells have been in place. Mr.Fogel said the well has been in existence at least 15 years: He said 4 houses can be connected to a single well; anything over 4 dwellings and there would have to be other wells or hook up to a public water supply. _._.Ted.Crawford,.CDF,said.the fire station is six miles away and is fully staffed. He said he would deal with any future development at the time it is proposed. Commissioner Leland said the traffic on this road is already dangerous and the applicant is asking . • the Commission to approve more houses and more traffic and to make a dangerous situation worse. He noted that the Commission and the County do not control CalTans. Commissioner Evans stated that each tentative parcel map would come forward with CalTrans problems and conditions to be dealt with at the time. Mr. Sanders pointed out that the pruning of the trees is a CalTrans problem. He said CalTrans could come in and prune the trees and then not maintain them. He said there is already_a left turn lane,but he did not know what the stacking lengths are. He said the left turn lanes were installed as per CalTrans requirements. There was a brief discussion. Mr. Worley said the left turn lane is dangerous coming down the hill. He said a sign placed at the top of the hill stating that there is cross traffic ahead would help. Mr.Johnson said the speeders are a big issue. He said the speed on Highway 32 is 65 mph and needs to be reduced and the County needs to resolve the sight problems with the trees. He said he can not go into CalTrans' right-of-way to prune or remove trees to clear the sight distance. Commissioner Evans said the contractor can prune the trees if they make an application for an encroachment. He said when the map goes in,Mr.Johnson will get to initiate the tree pruning action _. because.the condition will be placed on the map. He suggested the owners ask the Highway Patrol to come by more often. He said the problems can be handled at the subdivision hearings. Mr. Sanders said the applicant has an existing road and provided that the road is adequate and CalTrans does not want any additional improvements, the applicant would not have to get additional . encroachment permits.-He said if CalTrans wants additional improvements within the right-of-way, then anew encroachment permit would be issued for that work. Commissioner.Leland asked if the Commission could condition further subdivision on having adequate sight distances which would require the applicants to go to CalTrans and get the ■BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION■MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 11, 2003 ■PAGE 11 ■ encroachment permits and clear the sight distance. (Mr. Sanders said"yes".) Commissioner Leland said there are people complaining about the danger and proposing to add more traffic to the highway. Commissioner Evans said the ones doing the complaining are the ones who want to subdivide the property. He said the people subdividing the property will be the ones to solve the problems when they come forward with their next request. He said they have the opportunity to resolve the issue as it comes forward. A zone change does not add traffic or owners. He said it is at the subdivision process where the Commission can apply conditions. Commissioner Leland said the Commission should condition this approval for the rezone on adequate sight. Mr. Sanders said if the Commission is looking to do a conditional zoning to limit the number of lots they can also add a condition that any future map application for the property address the issue of site distance by vegetation removal within the CalTrans right-of-way. Mr. Wannenmacher said the Commission can make a recommendation that the rezone be a conditional rezone. Mr. Sanders said the lots should be allocated as stated in the CC&Rs to limit the lots to 12. The hearing was closed. It was moved by Commissioner Leland,seconded by Commissioner Marin,and unanimously carried to recommend to the Board of Supervisors approval of a rezone for REZ 03-01, Fourteen Mile House,Inc.,to FR-2(Foothill Recreational—2 acre parcels)subject to the findings listed below and .adding a Conditional Zoning Agreement with the following conditions: I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study did identify the potential for increased light and glare; a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. B. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. C. On the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Agenda Report and any comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the Rezone for Fourteen Mile House (Ray Johnson),Planning Division File No.REZ 03-01,will have a significant effect on the environment. D. Find that the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County,which is the Lead Agency. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION■MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 11, 2003 ■PAGE 12 ■ E. Recommend adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts. H. The design of the proposed project will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a"de minimis" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR 753.5, is not required. The project site is not known to contain any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat; have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act;interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources; or, conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. III. Recommend approval to the Board of Supervisors of Rezone REZ 03-01 for Fourteen Mile House(Ray Johnson)on APN 063-360-018 from PUD(Planned Unit Development)to FR- 2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) on a 43 (+/-) acre parcel, and recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance rezoning said property with the following findings: A. The project is consistent with the conditional zoning and development criteria of the Agricultural Residential (1 to 40) General Plan designation as follows: 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. I. The project is not adjacent to any agricultural uses. Some timber management or harvesting may take place on surrounding parcels,but the proposed residential uses would not conflict with these activities. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. Based on information received from the Butte County Environmental Health Division, the project appears to be able to meet the County's water and sewage disposal requirements. There is an existing well on-site that can provide potable water and the soils are suitable for septic system installation. 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. The site is located approximately 6 miles from the nearest year around manned fire station north of Forest Ranch on Highway 32. The closest volunteer station is approximately 1.7 miles away in Forest Ranch. This is seen as adequate for fire protection because the ultimate division of the property will include the requirement for a pressurized water system with hydrants. This will provide a much higher degree of fire protection that serves the surrounding area. ■BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION■MINUTES■ SEPTEMBER 11, 2003 ■PAGE 13 ■ 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area: All traffic generated by the project will utilize State Highway 32 for access. Major commercial services and intermediate and high schools are in Chico,approximately 13 miles to the southeast.Traffic volumes on area roads are relatively low. The 2001 CalTrans counts for Highway 32 show that adequate capacity exists to handle the traffic generated by the project. (See the Environmental checklist for a complete discussion of the traffic impacts) 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. The nearest full commercial services are located in Chico approximately 13 miles away via a well maintained high-speed roadway. A small market and gasoline service is available in Forest Ranch, approximately 2 miles away. Intermediate and high school services are also located in Chico. N: Conditional Zoning Agreement Conditions of approval: 1. The rezone be a Conditional Rezone limiting the number of homes to be built on these four _ parcels to 12 allocated according to the existing CC&Rs, but specifying in Conditional Zoning Agreement the number of parcels that can be created on each of the existing 4. parcels. 2. The applicant prior to any further subdivision adequately the sight line distances of Highway 32 near the intersection of their access road and Highway 32. Mr. Sanders said he will contact CalTrans. There is a 10-day appeal period on all decisions with the Clerk of the Board ■BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION■MINUTES ■ SEPTEMBER 11, 2003 ■PAGE 14 ■ Ray Johnson, 14 Mile House, proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts and Rezone for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32,across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation—2 acre minimum parcel size. The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank, and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone,and residential development has been completed in the first two "units" of that development. The subject property is the third "unit" of that residential development but is subject to a separate homeowners association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. APN 063-360-018 (CS) (REZ 03-01) Mr, Sanders gave a brief summary of the project. Commissioner Nelson asked if the applicant would go with a cluster concept. Mr. Sanders said that was the PUD. Commissioner Nelson said one of the handouts in the packet is a about an unsafe water alert. Mr, Sanders said the community water system is required to do routine testing of the water, and in that instance noted in the flyer, some E. coli was found in that particular sample. He said he spoke with Greg Vugrenes, the person who is in charge of monitoring that particular well, and Mr. Vugrenes said he has had a couple of instances where the E. coli has shown up. He said Mr. Vugrenes has traced this incidence of E. coli to the testing method, and has adjusted his testing method and the way'the spigot of the faucet is cleaned off. He said there is no indication of contamination of the well itself. He said the well is over 500 feet deep and has a sanitary seal that runs to the depth of 85 feet, so there is a distinct separation between the strata that is being used for septic tank and water. Mr. Sanders said there was a geologist report that was done specifically to address the issue of contamination as well as water availability,and that was done when neighbors n Phase I were wondering if the well for Phase H was going to affect the amount of water they had. He said a pump test was done where they pumped over a hundred gallons per minute for 12 hours, and there was no draw down on the Phase I well. He said the other well came back to 93%of its original level within 40 or 45 minutes. Commissioner Nelson stated that the density was about the same as the other developed area. 4r. Sanders said the overall density on the other side of Highway 32 is about one dwelling unit per 4 acres,but you are taking into account 65 acres of land that's really steep and could not be otherwise developed anyway. Chairman Lambert asked if the tentative map approved for Phase 3 that expired had the same density of approximately 21 units. Mr. Sanders answered"No, it was 4 lots." E _ ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■MINUTES ■MAY 8,2003 ■PAGE 1 ■ Chairman Lambert asked if it was the same 4 lots shown on the map in front of them. Mr. Sanders said it was a different configuration. Chairman Lambert said if you could get the density of 21 units by doing a PUD, would that be an advantage. Mr. Sanders said he didn't know if that would be an advantage to what the desires of the property owners are, and he would let the applicant speak to that more. He said it was his understanding that there are 4 existing parcels of which 3 are intended to be sold, and the individual property owners would then decide whether or not they want to further divide. He said apparently there has been some interest, stated by the potential buyers, that they would like to further split those parcels. He added that under a PUD, each of the parcels would have to come in through a Rezone and get approval from all of the other property owners;it would be a much more complicated matter in order to divide. He added the applicant would have to have a tentative subdivision map coming into such a proposal, so everyone would have to know exactly•how they wanted to divide it right now. Mr. Wannenmacher said the property to the east of this property is designated Grazing and Open Land and property that abuts Grazing and Open Land should have a 300 foot buffer on it. He said P P Y g P until they make a determination that it's not appropriate for this property,the 300 foot buffer should be included as part of a conditional zoning agreement,along with the ordinance that would rezone it if you determine that it should be rezoned. Commissioner Nelson said this is just that area that abuts the TM-40,not the area that abuts the TM- 5 to the north. Mr. Wannenmacher said "that's right." He said the property to the north appears to be AR (Agricultural-Residential). Mr. Sanders said at this point in time it could be an onerous restriction on the property because the P P P Y , property is not used for any agricultural purpose and is not used for grazing. He said it is very different than the project that the DRC looked at earlier today. He said if the 300 foot buffer is put on as a condition to the zone, and if the Agricultural Commissioner did not really feel it was necessary or appropriate in this instance, then the applicant would have to go back through a rezoning application to get relief from the condition. He said if the Agricultural Commissioner does want a 300 foot setback, the appropriate time would be to apply it at the time of subdivision map. Chairman Lambert said then you would be applying it to each individual parcel as it came through father than applying it to the entire parcel. Mr. Wannenmacher said that would not give somebody the expectation, when they were creating parcels later on or buying a bare parcel at this time,that 300 feet from the east of the property might not be buildable. He said that might be a late point if someone wants to sell these larger chunks and the buyer does not see any reference to the 300 foot buffer, and it turns out that that is in fact the case. Commissioner Leland said"not to mention, these may not be subdivided." He said someone may ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ MINUTES ■MAY 8, 2003 ■PAGE 2 ■ build a big house and if the Planning Commission wants the restriction, it should be applied now. Mr. Sanders said the Agricultural Commissioner's office reviewed this proposal and they said"no significant agricultural issues"; they did not ask for a 300 foot buffer. Chairman Lambert said this morning the Agricultural Commissioner said they have been applying the 300 foot buffer and Stu Edell said the Agricultural Commissioner had been applying it consistently. Mr. Sanders said where there are actual grazing uses,the 300 foot buffer has been applied. He said that is not the case in this instance. There was further discussion,about the 300 foot buffer along the eastern boundary of the property. Commissioner Nelson said he wanted to put a statement in the record that there may be an issue with the agricultural setback. Commissioner Evans said the General Plan is reflected in red on the exhibit map, and the interface between Grazing and Open Land(GOL) and Agricultural Residential(AR) is a line roughly shaped like an "S" that is dividing the page in half east/west. He said the project location is the hatched area. Mr. Sanders said that's correct, so it really does not abut GOL. Commissioner Evans said he'd be surprised if the project is 300 feet from Grazing and Open Land at the closest AR designation, so the Commission spent 10 minutes talking about something that is moot. The_Commissioners and County Counsel discussed the General Plan designations on the exhibit . map. Commissioner Evans said the area designated AR does not touch the project, and the PUD, that would be known as Unit One,would have to have no houses on it because it's GOL. He said Unit One does have houses on it, so there is no 300 foot setback applied to it. Chairman Lambert said it complies. Commissioner Evans concluded that now the record knows that in the future,be prepared for the 300 foot setbacks adjacent to Grazing and Open Land, until the General Plan is changed. The hearing was opened to the public. Chairman Lambert noted that there are 4 letters in the file, some were received today and one is in the packet. Mr. Sanders said he wanted to make sure the Commissioners and Chair had 4 letters. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■MINUTES ■MAY 8,2003 ■PAGE 3 ■ • Chairman Lambert said there are letters, one each from Mike Barham, Eric Cadd, Dan Batt, and Thomas Hunter and the "Unsafe Water Alert." She read through the letters per Ray Johnson's request. Mr. Wannenmacher stated that he had not seen the letter from Thomas Hunter, received by Development Services May 0,or the letter from Eric Cadd,received by Development Services May 2nd Mr. Leland said there should be a 3 day cut-off,for letters received on a project for the record; the notice for these hearings should say anything received after 3 days before the hearing will not be considered. He said if a letter is received,put it in the folder,but do not make it a part of the record. He said if correspondence comes in before the 3 day period,FAX or mail them to people so they can read them before the hearing. Mr. Baker said the problem is that because this is a public hearing, someone can come in up to the moment that the public hearing closes and say"I would like to submit something for the record for the public hearing." He said when a project is advertised as a public hearing,we have an obligation to receive comments to the end, do we not. Mr. Wannenmacher said"yes,we do." He added that a newspaper advertisement is not going to be seen by many people,and 300 feet from the property line might not encompass verymany homes,so the County's complying with legal requirements in terms of direct notice doesn't get to the people who could be impacted by the cumulative affect of this project. He said it could be suggested that the Planning Commission wait until later if you need more time to understand all the material and are unable to make a•decision on it. He said if you have new material,you might want to wait. He said he has concerns after reading the report because this property was initially a 3 Phase PUD,and there wasn't any explanation as to whether this last project, the third phase, was supposed to be a particular type of project in relation to the first two that were done. He said this project is now a zone that we are asking to change without any specific history as to why it was part of the original PUD. He said Mr. Sanders did discuss some of that today, but there might be additional things that could be looked at. He said a PUD is not simply a zone that is not called appropriate anymore;it is a planned zone. He said if you are changing from a planned zone, there may be more that the Commission needs to look at,such as the prior history. He stated that one individual raised the issue of 4 homes, which may have been part of the original PUD 3 Phase project, and it is not an unreasonable issue to be raised. He said the Negative Declaration issue is one that he would appreciate more time to discuss with staff. Mr. Sanders clarified that Phases H and III were separate PUDs. He said they originally were to stand on their own separate homeowners associations and separate developments. He said there is no harm in rezoning Phase III to the overall plan of the property. Phase H stands on its own and meets the General Plan density requirements and Open Space requirements. He explained that the PUD isn't a zone that is to reflect some grand scheme or plan for an area, it is developed and designed to allow property owners and developers alternatives to the normal County development standards. Mr. Wannenmacher said it hasn't been clear to him that the County's development standards are different in terms of Public Works standards for PUD zones and other zones. He said maybe he will ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■MINUTES ■ MAY 8, 2003 ■ PAGE 4 ■ see that, but he doesn't think there are different development standards for PUD zones. Commissioner Evans said we do have different standards that allow an applicant to submit a proposal based on his particular situation. Mr. Wannenmacher said that is a proposal that is made by the applicant which is tied to the development,but in this case,he could not see why there was a 4 lot PUD. He said it doesn't make any sense to say it was just a zone when in fact it was a PUD. Commissioner.Nelson said it sounds like one of the neighbors to this project is bitter because he feels like he was misled. The neighbor thought there would be 4 parcels, and now there will be 21 parcels. Chairman Lambert said she has always supported the PUD. She said from the County's standpoint, it is something that can be relied on, and that is what the neighbors felt they had. She said she doesn't object to 41 units being placed on this area,but she would prefer to see it in a PUD. She said she also understands why the developer wouldn't want to. She said if the applicant could still -accomplish something that is beneficial to the developer and still make a good project, have the Open Space and the separate homeowner's agreement,then that project is better than 4 parcels that will have to be dealt with individually later. Mr. Sanders said individual development of 4 parcels is what currently exists. Commissioner Leland said if the zoning is changed, the Commission would be looking at denser subdivisions one parcel at a time instead of looking at the overall 40 acres. Commissioner Nelson said the applicant went to the PUD because there are some slopes of 30 degrees on the property that cannot be developed, so they basically did a cluster PUD; otherwise there would have been fewer houses on at least the first phase. Ray Johnson,current owner of the site,said it is in 4 pieces. He said these parcels were developed as 3 Planned Unit Developments. He said he has been working on this site over 20 years. He said the first subdivision, Humboldt Highlands, was 25 lots. He said then he did Unit 2, which was Humboldt Woodlands, and at the same time, did not know how to handle the site across the street, which is currently Unit 3. He said initially he called the site across the street remaining lands because he did not know how he was going to develop it and left is as 4 parcels. He said he was required to show access to the remaining lands so they,(Rolls,Anderson and Rolls and Mr.Johnson) drew a"T"road to the site. He said Lots 1,2, and 3 are currently in escrow,and he is going to keep Lot 4. He said he has been working with these prospective owners to proceed with this rezone, thinking it would cost them less to do this and satisfy their needs. He understood that he could go ahead and do this under the PUD. He said he already has a homeowners association in place.- He then explained'how he and the prospective owners of the property would like to split the recorded map of the site. He said he and the prospective owners re-recorded Article 9.3 on the C.C.& R.s, which is called the revision of the re-subdivision of lots on April 10,2003. He said it is set up in the C.C.&R.s so that when people buy in here,they have recorded C.C.&R.s on Article 9.3 on page 18, which read as follows: "The re-subdivision of lots. Lot 1 may be further subdivided and thereby create a maximum of 2 lots. Said lots shall be initially labeled 1.A and I.B. Lot 2 may be further ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■MINUTES ■MAY 8,2003 ■PAGE 5 ■ subdivided and thereby create a maximum of 4 lots. Said lots shall be initially labeled 2.A,23,2.C, and 2.D. Lot 3 may be further subdivided and thereby create a maximum of 21ots. Said lots may be initially labeled 3.A, 3.B. Lot 4 may be further subdivided and thereby create a maximum of 4 lots. Said lots shall be initially labeled 4.A, 43, 4.C, and 4.D. The final approving authority for the lot numbers will be provided by Butte County." He said that is the best way he knows to handle the development of this project. He said they are requesting this rezone because it is the best way for the prospective owners, as well as himself, to have this project the way that they want it. He said secondly, when you step out to the edge of this property, there is about a 300 to 400 foot drop. He said concerning water, he has a well which was built in 1990 on the existing site, and the standing water level is 546 feet and has not fluctuated in 13 years, even though there are 2 operating subdivisions next to the property which have been pumping water for years. He said he is not sure that the new owners on Lot 3 will ever subdivide their property at all. Commissioner Leland asked if the recorded document Mr. Johnson referred to previously that imposes restrictions on lots is on the map before the Commissioners. Mr. Johnson said"yes." Chairman Lambert said the map before the Commissioners is a recorded map under the PUD zone of 1992. She said it says that the map approved in 2002 is not consistent with the original PUD zone. Mr. Sanders said the original PUD zone needed to have 10± acres of open space. Mr. Johnson pointed at that the 10 acres Mr. Sanders was referring to is what butts up against Highway 32. He said when the property is re-subdivided as he is proposing,there will be almost the same exact open area as originally planned, but it will be maintained by private homeowners. Chairman Lambert asked if the 10± acres of open space was for common ground. Mr. Sanders answered originally, yes, it would have been a commonly held parcel. Mr. Wannenmacher said the existing homeowners association was under the initial PUD,and that is no longer in existence. Mr. Sanders said yes. He said there is a homeowners association for the 4 lots that are there. Chairman Lambert said if we are going to a straight zoning for the area, why is a homeowners association necessary. Mr, Sanders said the homeowners association is needed for the roads and the water systems. 'Mr. Wannenmacher said there are issues that could be discussed further to help the Commission make their determination, and one of them is the environmental document. Mr. Johnson asked what the concern was about the environmental document. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■MINUTES ■MAY 8, 2003 ■PAGE 6 ■ Mr. Wannenmacher said a Negative Declaration without mitigations is something that the County would have to be very sure of. He said he was not able to evaluate it. Mr.Johnson said the C.C.&R.s reflect the mitigations for the oak trees,and everything that was done prior to this project. - Mr. Wannenmacher stated that the County has an independent duty to evaluate the discretionary actions that it is taking and must evaluate the impact of this discretionary action. He said maybe there is no impact that rises to significance, and the County can do a Negative Declaration,but the fact is, it is relative easy to overturn a Negative Declaration when you go to court. He said the County should be very sure. Commissioner Nelson said the first Negative Declaration was done on 4 parcels, wasn't it. Mr. Sanders said the Negative Declaration addressed the potential for approximately 19 parcels,and that was the discussion and assumption made based upon the configuration of the existing 4 parcels being divided into 2-acre parcels. He said the discussions in the Negative Declaration do address what mitigations would be appropriate at the time of a future subdivision map. He said the rezone itself does not allow any physical change in the property until a subsequent subdivision map is approved. He said you could conceivably try to guess exactly how the lots are going t be configured and apply all of the conditions and potential mitigations as a conditional rezone to the property. He said it's legally defensible or less likely to be challenged. Commissioner Nelson asked if the environmental documentation wasn't supposed to be done in a , worst case-scenano type of setting. He said once this rezone is approved, the County is giving the applicant the right to do what he wants to do. Mr. Sanders replied that is why staff chose 19 lots. He asked if Commissioner Nelson was saying the Negative Declaration should.have been done on 21 lots instead. Commissioner Nelson said Mr. Sanders was saying that he addressed everything he thought needed to be addressed. d Mr. Sanders said he addressed everything for this action,and the mitigations would be appropriately applied at the time of subdivision. He said then you have the actual development of the property. Mr. Baker said Mr. Sander's logic is that the Negative declaration is not on the development of the parcel itself, but is a Negative Declaration on the change to the zoning. Mr. Sanders said"that's correct." Mr.Baker stated that Mr. Sanders is saying that the change to the zoning creates no impacts,because the 4 lots continue to exist. Mr. Sanders said there are mitigations associated with that 4 lot map. Mr. Wannenmacher said 4 lots continue to exist but we may now have given additional uses to them, or,things like that. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■MINUTES ■MAY 8,2003 ■PAGE 7 ■ Commissioner,Nelson said if someone comes in and wants to develop each lot one at a time,there would still be Negative Declarations. Mr. Sanders said at this point, a building permit application is not a discretionary action and you, would not do a CEQA analysis. He said that was addressed in 2002. Commissioner Leland said he is inclined to postpone this hearing to give County Counsel adequate time to review this proposal. It was moved by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Commissioner Leland, and unanimously carried to continue this hearing open to May 22, 2003. There is a 10-day appeal period on all decisions with the Clerk of the Board. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■MINUTES ■MAY 8,2003 ■PAGE 8 ■ Ray Johnson, 14 Mile House, proposed, Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts and Rezone for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32,across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation—2 acre minimum parcel size. The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41,7.24, 17.79,and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank,and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone,and residential development has been completed in the first two "units" of that development. The subject property is the third "unit" of that residential development but is subject to a separate homeowners,association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. APN 063-360-018 (CS) (REZ 03-01) Mr. Sanders asked for a continuance to revise the environmental documents. It was moved by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Mr. Evans, and unanimously carried to continue this hearing for Ray Johnson, off the Agenda. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■MINUTES ■ MAY 22, 2003 ■PAGE 4 ■ f � County of Butte Oroville, California . ' GENERAL CLAIM DATE OF CLAIM: February 24,2004 IMPORTANT: CLAIMANT: Fou - SEE INSTRUCTIONS ADDRESS: ° 'c BELOW CITY,STATE: Chico;°CA:95927pw_ � �• 1. �� SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR1SERVICES DATE , DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM(DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY) AMOUNT February 24,2004 REFUND of remaining funds on application`REZ 03-01,AP#063-360-018,a completed and approved project. $ 149.63 , • TOTALI $ 149.63 • I,the undersigned,declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered,and that this claim is true and correct as stated. _ _ : "2aryy . y„ n Sig I,the undersigned,hereby certify that,to the best of my knowledge,the services or articles specified abov been " performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriation'❑ or Specific Board Appro . Check one)for the same. , Dated this _day of03 Lmr� ,200,at . Oroville Calif. Department Head or Authorized Deputy - INSTRUCTIONS TO CLAIMANTS All claims against the County must be itemized,giving dates and character of service rendered or work performed,quantities,description and unit prices of articles furnished or delivered. Claims must be certified by the claimant and submitted to the Department head for approval. Upon approval,the Department head will ` forward claim to the County Auditor for payment. Do Not file with the County Auditor first. Claims should be presented to officials for approval immediately upon completion of services requested or material ordered. Compliance with the above instructions will expedite payment of claim. Failure to do so may delay payment. Dept. Exp. Code 440-001 Code 4210900/101001 PAYABLE FROM GENERAL FUND - DO kOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-AUDITOR-P USE ONLY DEPT&SUB. PROD. SUB.OBJ. CLAIM NO. INV.NO. I V.DATE CUMBER. GROSS AMT. Claimant-Submitted for your approvabsignature. Please return signed form to: Development Services.Department a Accounts Receivable 7 County Center Drive Oroville,CA 95965 County of Butte Oroville,California GENERAL CLAIM DATE OF CLAIM: February24,2004 IMPORTANT: CLAIMANT: Fourteen Mile House ' A ,. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ADDRESS: P O. Bpx 17:00 �� n: . °: " :. ��iu r._;a a. ?,,.„m..N;.3m _.. e + ,,,., ..,,a,eW.� z�..�J•��'3, a .,s���._,'�1�� "� BELOW CITY,STATE: Cfrco;CA95.927, , -. x v SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES DATE DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM(DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY) AMOUNT February 24,2004 REFUND of remaining funds on application REZ 03-01,AP#063-360-018, a completed and approved project. $ 149.63 TOTAL $ 149.63 I;the undersigned,declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered,and that this claim is true and correct as stated. zV211Datedttiis � � day of X2003°at ,� Calif { 1 ,r r, Signature of Claimant I,the undersigned,hereby certify that,to the best of my knowledge,the services or articles specified above have been performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriation ❑ or Specific Board Approval ❑(Check one)for the same. Dated this day of 2003,at Oroville Calif. Department Head or Authorized Deputy INSTRUCTIONS TO CLAIMANTS All claims against the County must be itemized,giving dates and character of service rendered or work performed,quantities,description and unit prices of articles furnished or delivered. Claims must be certified by the claimant and submitted to the Department head for approval. Upon approval,the Department head will forward claim to the County Auditor for payment. Do Not file with the County Auditor first. Claims should be presented to officials for approval immediately upon completion of services requested or material ordered. Compliance with the above instructions will expedite payment of claim. Failure to do so may delay payment. Dept. Exp. Code 440-001 Code 4210900/101001 PAYABLE FROM GENERAL FUND DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-AUDITOR' USE ONLY DEPT&SUB. PROJ. SUB.OBJ. CLAIM NO. INV.NO. I W.DATE E CUMBER. GROSS AMT. Claimant-Submitted for your approval/signature. Please return signed form to: Development Services Department Accounts Receivable 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 • Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services V T Administration-AR o� TF 0 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville,CA 95965 0 0 o - - o (530)538-7601 Telephone o —"`{_"'' o Rezone File:.REZ 03-01 APN: 063-360-018 Applicant: Foureen Mile House Date: February-24;2004 P.O. Box 1700 Chico, CA 95927 REFUND REZ 03-01 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice,the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program. There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program,and are not reflected on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed,you will receive a FINAL INVOICE. The following payments have been applied to the processing of your application: Deposit Date: Dec.-30,2002 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PLANNING DEPOSIT $ (2,000.00) Receipt: 20914 Deposit Date: June 30, 2003 1;613:30 Receipt: 21263 TOTAL PLANNING DEPOSITS $ 3,613.30 Deposit Date: 'December 30,2002 NOD/NOE Filing Fee Paid$36.00 Receipt: .20914 The following charges have been applied to the processing of your application: Professional Planner $ 1;619.57 Mapping 147.50 Clerical 764.26 Publication 932.34 PLANNING CHARGES $ 3,463.67 Butte County Code 3-44 Hourly fees; deposits;billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to an amount equal to 25%of the original deposit,no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore a balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit,or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event the applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application,the application will be denied. Please sign and return the enclosed General Claim form. Should you have any questions,please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m.to 4 p.m.,Monday through Friday. .REFU.ND DUE.TO YOU K TISCAL ADMINIBILLINGS 8 REFUNDSIREFUNDS\Fourteen REZ 03-01 Ref 022404.xls 2/23/2004 Butte County Department of Development Services 3:06 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 1 Nickname Fourteen.REZ 03-01 1 REZ 03-01 Full Name Fourteen Mile House Address P.O. Box 1700 Chico CA 95927 .Business Fax Home Other Project Type Rezone P lawn W t 1 (.0 ' /q,S Deposit Status Deposit Project clulCAP °� & Planner 'Craig Sanders ff V'' ✓f14.7 �� Salutation �� �/ -}- ���•J�`t'`...u��, Date . Employee Rate Hours Amount To al k& Task Markup % 'DNB Time DNB Amt 1/7/2003 Craig 59.00 0.25 14.75� Billable Circulation -Planner "// ,n Determine an application's completeness/circulate for staff° 7 CAV comments/analysis. r 3lv t 3.'3v 14414T 1/7/2003 Lynn 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable Clerical Activities File set up 1/14/2003 Diana 59.00 2.50 147.50 Billable Mapping Labels 1/28/2003 Craig 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable Circulation - Planner Determine an application's completeness/circulate for staff comments/analysis. 2/5/2003 Craig 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable CEQA Prepare initial studies, mitigations, neg. dec EIRs including analysis. 2/6/2003 Craig 59.00 3.25 191.75 Billable CEQA Prepare initial studies, mitigations, neg. dec EIRs including analysis. 2/6/2003 Craig 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable Site Review Field review of project site/vicinity including travel time. 3/18/2003 Craig 59.00 5.33 314.67 Billable Report &/or Project Analysis Reports & analysis related to the application/report. 3/19/2003 Craig 59.00 0.75 44.25 Billable Report &/or Project Analysis Reports & analysis related to the application/report. 2/23/2004 Butte County Department of Development Services 3:06 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 2 Fourteen.REZ 03-01:Fourteen Mile House (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 3/20/2003 Craig 59.00 2.50 147.50 Billable Report &/or Project Analysis Reports & analysis related to the application/report. 3/21/2003 Craig 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable Report &/or Project`Analysis 'Reports & analysis related to the application/report. 4/15/2003 Lynn 45.00 0.70 31.50 Billable Notification -Clerical Notification activities related to applicants. 4/15/2003 Lynn 45.00 0.15 6.75 Billable Clerical Activities proof 4/29/2003 Lynn 45.00 0.30 13.50 Billable Correspondence- Planner Letters 4/29/2003 Lynn 45.00 0.62 27.75 Billable Packets -Clerical Prepare packets for meetings/mailings. 5/8/2003 Craig 59.00 1.08 63.92 Billable Hearing -Planner PC Hearing 5/8/2003 Craig 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable Meeting -Planner Meeting with applicant 5/8/2003 Roni 34.00 1.00 34.00 Billable Clerical Activities Minutes 5/15/2003 Craig 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable - Mtg -Clerical Arrange/attend associated with project review(not incl Public Hearings). 5/19/2003 Roni 34.00 1.95 66.30 Billable Minutes -Clerical Clerical application processing (not categorized elsewhere). 5/21/2003 Craig 59.00 2.00 118.00 Billable CEQA Prepare initial studies, mitigations, neg. dec EIRs including analysis. 2/23/2004 Butte County Department of Development Services 3:06 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 3 Fourteen.REZ 03-01:Fourteen Mile House (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total Task Markup% DNB Time DNB Amt 5/22/2003 Craig 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable CEQA Prepare initial studies, mitigations, neg. dec EIRs including analysis. 5/22/2003 Craig 59.00 0.08 4.92 Billable Hearing -Planner Public hearings including continuances 5/22/2003 Lynn 45.00 0:40 18.00 Billable Mtg -Clerical Arrange/attend associated with project review(not incl Public Hearings). 5/22/2003 Lynn 45.00 0.07 3.00 Billable Letters -Clerical Prepare & process correspondence. 5/28/2003 Lynn 45.00 0.10 4.50 Billable Minutes -Clerical Minutes related to application. 7/8/2003 Craig 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable CEQA Initial Study 8/12/2003 Lynn 45.00 1.03 46.50 Billable Publication -Clerical Time spent preparing & publishing for Hearing related to applicant. 8/13/2003 Craig 59.00 1.33 78.67 Billable Report &/or Project Analysis Reports & analysis related to the application/report. 8/13/2003 Craig 59.00 0.06 3.43 Billable Phone Calls/Counter-Planner Making/receiving phone calls and counter contacts regarding the project. 8/13/2003 Joe 59.00 0.31 18.22 Billable Management Review Management Review 8/13/2003 Craig 59.00 0.09 5.26 Billable Report &/or Project Analysis Reports & analysis related to the application/report. 8/15/2003 Lynn 45.00 0.16 7.03 Billable Clerical Activities Clerical application processing-proofing t , 2/23/2004 Butte County Department of Development Services 3:06 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 4 Fourteen.REZ 03-01:Fourteen Mile House (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total Task Markup% DNB Time DNB Amt 8/18/2003 Craig 59.00 0.27 15.67 Billable Phone Calls/Counter- Planner Making/receiving phone calls and counter contacts regarding the project. 8/19/2003 Craig 59.00 0.05 3.00 Billable Phone Calls/Counter- Planner Making/receiving phonecalls and counter contacts regarding the project. 9/2/2003 Craig 59.00 0.15 8.67 Billable Report &/or Project Analysis Reports & analysis related to the application/report. 9/3/2003 Roni 34.00 0.84 . 28.45 Billable Packets -Clerical Prepare packets for meetings/mailings. 9/11/2003 Craig 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable Hearing -Planner 9/12/2003 Lynn 45.00 0.08 3.75 Billable Mtg -Clerical Arrange/attend associated with project review(incl. Public Hearings) 9/12/2003 Lynn 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable Mtg -Clerical Arrange/attend associated with project review(incl. Public Hearings) 9/12/2003 Lynn 45.00 3.00 135.00 Billable Minutes -Clerical Minutes related to application. 10/8/2003 Craig 59.00 1.92 113.38 Billable Report &/or Project Analysis Reports & analysis related to the application/report. 10/9/2003 Craig 59.00 0.86 50.45 Billable Report &/or Project Analysis Reports & analysis related to the application/report. 10/10/2003 Lynn 45.00 3.00 135.00 Billable Packets -Clerical Prepare packets for meetings/mailings. 10/14/2003 Lynn 45.00 2.52 113.23 Billable Packets -Clerical - - Prepare packets for meetings/mailings. 2/23/2004 Butte County Department of Development Services 3:06 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 5 Fourteen.REZ 03-01:Fourteen Mile House (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total Task Markup% DNB Time DNB Amt 10/14/2003 Joe 59.00 0.00 0.23 Billable Management Review Management Review 10/15/2003 Craig ' 59.00 0.17 9.83 Billable Report &/or Project Analysis Reports & analysis related to the application/report. h 10/27/2003 Steve 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable Report &/or Project Analysis Reviewed project materials in prep. for BOS hearing 10/28/2003 Steve 59.00 0.42 24.58 Billable Hearing -Planner BOS hearing 10/28/2003 Steve 59.00 0.33 19.67 Billable Report &/or Project Analysis Reviewed project materials in prepl. for BOS hearing TOTAL Billable Fees 47.87 $2,531.33 Date Employee Price Quantity Amount Total Expense Markup% 4/16/2003 Lynn 111.04 1.000 111.04 Billable Publishing Expense Publish in Newspaper-Chico Enterprise Record on Friday, April 18, 2003 8/15/2003 PUBLISH 123.60 1.000 123.60 Billable Publishing Expense Publish in Newspaper Chico Enterprise F273565 11/7/2003 PUBLISH 348.85 1.000 348.85 Billable Publishing Expense Publish in Newspaper-Chico Enterprise Record on 11/7/03 11/7/2003 PUBLISH 348.85 1.000 348.85 Billable Publishing Expense Publish in Newspaper Chico ER 11/7/03 TOTAL Billable Costs $932.34 2/23/2004 Butte County Department of Development Services 3:06 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 6 Fourteen.REZ 03-01:Fourteen Mile House (continued) Amount Total Total of Fees (Time Charges) $2,531.33 Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $932.34 Total new charges $3,463.67 Accounts Receivables Date Type Description 12/30/2002 CRIED Credit-Initial Deposit, Receipt 20914 ($2,000.00) 12/30/2002 INV lnwice-NOD/NOE filing fee due $36.00 12/30%2002 PAY Payment -Thank you ($36.00) 6/30/2003 PAY Payment -Receipt 21263 ($1,613.30) Total Accounts Receivable ($3,613.30) Total New Balance ($149.63) Amount to replenish account to$2,000.00 $2,000.00 COUNTY OF BUTTE. • FIELD NUMBER OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA PURCHASE ORDER F 22997 S U Attn: Donnas Business Office P Enterprise Record Issued By P D. 0• Box 9 Department Development Services o Planning E Chico, CA -95927 I E R DATE QNTY INVOICE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CHARGE TO W.O. 10/30/63 Ordinance No. 3562 Fourteen Mile douse C, J �'-00- Please publish once in 5-pt type on Friday, November 1, 2003 sending two copies of your Affidavit of publication and two copies of your statement of charges to the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive,• Oroville, CA 95965. T777 TOTAL 2 41 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above have been performed or delivered or,where authorized,are hereby contracted for and that there is a Budget Appropriation for the same. -C Department F 322997 Dated: �- ,. l, �� 3 R, tC Department Head or Authorized Deputy SUPPLIER NO. _ DEPT -j NO, , PROJECT NO. INVOICE NO. INV.DATE ENCUMBRANCE AMOUNT 2 3 4 5 6 Submit WHITE,CANARY and PINK to PURCHASING SERVICES with supplier's invoice. Retain GOLDENROD. COUNTY OF BUTTE FIELD NUMBER OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA • PURCHASE ORDER 273565 S Chico Enterprise Record U Attn: Donna P P.O. Box 9 P Chico, CA 95927 Issued By Department DDS/Planning Division I E R DATE QNTY INVOICE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION MOUNT CHARGE TO W.O.# 8/12/03 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING . C 40-001-53 To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record Friday, August 15, 2003 Please furnish this office two copies of the affidavit of Publication. {-Fourteen Mile House - REZ 03-01r Butte County Planning Lynn - 538-7602 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 TOTAL / -6'C' I,the undersigned,hereby certify that,to the best of my knowledge,the services or articles specified above have been performed or delivered or,where authorized,are hereby contr d that there is a Budget Appropriation for the same. --)2 ' F 273565 Date: D mt ' ' e men a orImthonzerueputy SUPPLIER NO. DEPT ACCOUNT NO. PROJECT11C. INVOICE NO. INV.DATE ENCUMBRANCE AMOUNT 2 3 4 5 6 Submit WHITE,CANARY and PINK to PURCHASING SERVICES with supplier's invoice. Retain GOLDENROD 1 t 7/11/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 1:19 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 1 Selection Criteria Applicant (hand sel Include: Fourteen Mile House REZ 03-01 Nickname Fourteen Mile House REZ 03-01 1 REZ 03-01 A Full Name Fourteen Mile House, Inc. Address P.O. Box 1700 Chico CA 95927 ? / 03 Phone 1 (530)893-1700 Phone 2 Phone 3 Phone 4 In Ref To Fees Arrg. By billing value on each slip Expense Arrg. By billing value on each slip Tax'Profile Exempt Last bill Last charge 5/28/2003 Last payment 6/30/2003 Amount $1,613.30 Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID. Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 1/7/2003 Craig S. 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable 41904 P Processing 1/7/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable 41906 C Clerical SET-UP 1/14/2003 Diana S. 34.00 2.50 85.00 Billable 42302 Mapping Labels 1/28/2003 Craig S. 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable 42197 P File Comments 2/5/2003 Craig S. 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 42275 CEQA Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes analysis 2/6/2003 Craig S. 59.00 3.25 191,75 Billable 42317 CEQA Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes analysis 7/11/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 1:19 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 2 Fourteen Mile House REZ 03-01:Fourteen Mile House, Inc. (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 2/6/2003 Craig S. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable 42318 Field Review Field Review includes travel time 3/18/2003 Craig S. 59.00 5.33 314.67 Billable 42742 Reports ,Reports &'analysis on applications 3/19/2003 Craig S. 59.00 0.75 44.25 Billable 42784 Reports Reports & analysis on applications 3/20/2003 Craig S. 59.00 2.50 147.50 Billable 42785 Reports Reports & analysis on applications 3/21/2003 Craig S. 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 42786 Reports Reports & analysis on applications 4/15/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.70 31.50 Billable 42964 Clerical/N Publish 4/15/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.15 6.75 Billable 42966 Clerical Proof 4/29/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.30 13.50 Billable 43116-Correspondence Letters 4/29/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.62 27.75 Billable 43118 Clerical Packets 5/8/2003 Craig S. 59.00 1.08 63.92 Billable 43223 Hearings PC Hearing. 5/8/2003 Craig S.. 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable 43224 Meetings Meeting with applicant 5/8/2003 Roni Thornton 340 1.00 34.00 Billable 43234 Clerical/Min 1 Minutes related to applications a ^ 7/11/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 1:19 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 3 Fourteen Mile House REZ 03-01:Fourteen Mile House, Inc. (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 5/15/2003 Craig S. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable 43247 Meetings Arranging and attending meetings (does not incl. public hearings) 5/19/2003 Roni Thornton �a-60 � 2.00 68.00 Billable 43307 Clerical/Min Minutes related to applications 5/21/2003 Craig S. 59.00 2.00 118.00 Billable 43332 CEQA Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes analysis 5/22/2003 Craig S. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable 43333 CEQA Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes analysis 5/22/2003 Craig S. 59.00 0.08 4.92 Billable 43335 Hearings Public hearings including continuances 5/22/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.40 18.00 Billable 43355 Meetings Arranging and attending meetings (does not incl, public hearings) 5/22/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.07 3.00 Billable 43361 Correspondence Letter 5/28/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.10 4.50 Billable 43391 Clerical/Min Minutes related to applications TOTAL Billable- Fees 28.58 $1,502.26 Date Employee Price Quantity Amount Total ID Expense Markup % 4/16/2003 Lynn R. 111.04 1.000 111.04 Billable 43098 Publishing Publishing in newspaper-Chico Enterprise Record on Friday, April 18, 2003 -TOTAL Billable Costs $111.04 7/11/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 1:19 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 4 Fourteen Mile House REZ 03-01:Fourteen Mile House, Inc. (continued) Calculation.of Fees and Costs Amount Total Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable time slips $1,502.26 Total of Fees (Time Charges) $1,502.26 Costs Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable expense slips $111.04 Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $111.04 Total new charges $1,613.30 Accounts Receivables DatelID _ Type Description 12/30/2002 CRED Deposit - Receipt #20914 ($2,000.00) 2014 12/30/2002 CRED Deposit NOD/NOE Recording Fee ($36.00) 2513 12/30/2002 TRNF Transfer to funds $36.00 2514 6/30/2003 PAY Payment ($1,613.30) 2515 Receipt #21263. Check No. 2924 Total Accounts Receivable ($3,613.30) New.Balance Current $1,613.30 Unapplied ($3,613.30) Total New Balance ($2,000.00) 'Amount to replenish account to $2,000.00 $1,964.00 f ' :omw OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT UROWLE E, CO. ATR NO, 65032 RECEIVED FROM PIAEP NtNG SAO#316 DATE 7W72403 FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE:.: 7_.1 , RECEIPTS: 21280-21294 E?L ENING APPL FEES GENL 0010 44=1 421W00 104,0 1 2.613.30 — - —--� Pruiect Number _ Amount of Fee 4053-250-028;055-370-137 D ishi 557 53-31 _$i,090 #063-360 8 Fourteen Mile House RE?Q3-09 $1,613.301 1✓ LAND.DEVELOPMENT — GENL (5116 4M04 4611700 S01to1 3M.W Project Number _ Amount of Fee #053-26fA28;055-370-Q37 D Eshi TPIQ3-31 $330 ENPARONMEENTAL GENL Colo 54MM 4644901 101001 483.00 Project Number Amount of Fee _ #053-250.0,28;055-3213-€3a7 Q lshi TFE�il3-3f X83 FIRE PLNG ADPL FEE FIRE PROTECT 0100 4617240 101001 129.00 Pro,;ect Number _...._.. Amount-cif Fee... #063-250-028:055.37tf'QIshi TPM03-31 $129 `1 ODIN 3E CLERK'S FILftNG FE GENL €010 470001 4612315 101001 3G. ✓ (M) Project Number Amount of Fee #553-250-Q:28,055-370-337 0 Ishi i"!'IAQ3~31 X36 I,.O.T'_-ALUC PLAWNG GEWL X10 440MI 46172.11 901001 3W.60 Project Dumber _ Amount of Fee R OUTSIDE PURCHASE RFND GENL 0010 440 x1 4712531 109001 99.00 APA) ;o y 8'- 30-o09`�1O,o IE, OI a- Pcl.sev 1 c-�e�.cQ as l� 3O0 FY 02W TOTAL 399090.34 . t APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY-. AUDITOR-COWROLLER TREASURER ' ., lfty S4 V: Bv:- f/11V J� a'ste a su€ r pink--auditor canary--depositor golden rod=file k RECEIPT JOURNAL e�TE REwo.�T Heesrvee wenee �'"'co itI1MmE1 E HeurH PIRR /PRE OTHER •wuOANT R.--I... .l 30-,,,103 a�3(,0 19`/j 330 /aor7 q83 /a4 / ��'�'� SsW= 370-0 / c S✓AvL' iw C-LO6&J7 30,zD-"3 Id-6 3S°� 35- din;xSa r . ds^370`0 7�' �G SG38 10l�103�3/ - oyg•� cx�y,lc,u x'/.03 pa a• S `1D 3f-b _ 03-0� 001 30 03 �I a6 l3 1 6'. Q P tie Z 03 01 t 9 6 3o u. 2120 99' ci4 ,J- I4zCZ?09609- 3.L--)p cam— • COUNTY OF BUTTE OFFICE OF PLANNING 6-13o14)3 �l a6316r3::, ezi3 0/ RECEIPT' TOTAL` PUBLIC"• PUBLIC ENV. NOE/NOD ' v ...' T ;4 s. l 7 DATE NO. RECEIVED WORKS LAFCO PLANNING SALES HEALTH FIRE F/G FEE OTHER 'APPLICANT` - BECEIVED.FRGM. 45� RECEIPT 21263 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING , 5 ISSUED BY ----�_' i"� :� j/ .� ' �. f (..Q ;1 .�. �i �I wll 1 O 1 ' �� � '� i � ;� 'i �Y �( I �I ', �I y`� 1 p6V t 1e. {a1j' P� �. �f V �. r. r (/� I' � � 1,� �: ;� l t .i �� c C _� i � u� �) �' � . ��` :.w p..: r #;..""t �,X : � �:'at rt �'� ..uk2+�`i �.,� 1 K�, eK•,-r. � k h _Jh `c :,T'.•.(:; � , -. .. rr? �' �f , f ` k s I_� Jrr� «' f I,rc`- ,y'R !/x: `•c' -;;`'. _�.- .q j6- - .3, f y ,.t �• a 4_ rti p V_i a,1. Y C:'4t� ..r - _ w }< � ' ', f. 'I.tc,r. 1 . FOURTEEN"MILE HOUSE, INC. WELLS FARGO BANK 2924 P.O.BOX 1700 CHICO,CA 95926 CHICO,CA 95927 91-119/1221(1) - :(530).893-1700. 6/24/2003 • o PAY TO THE _BUtte'Couhty• $**1,613.30 ORDER-Or- 7 Ori- Tli6usand Six Hundred Thirteen and 30/100******************************************* DOLLARS ci — = Butte County. . � I Z g _ 0 N rezone#REZ 03-01 MEMO HP 00029.240 e: i22, 10ii.9D: 0515 1.036871I' RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC PUBLIC ENV. NOEMOD DATE NO. RECEIVED WORKS LAFCO PLANNING SALES HEALTH FIRE FIG FEE OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM . I RECEIPT 21263 OFFICIAL RECEIPT • COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ISSUED BY _ JUN 2 3 2003 Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services T Administration-AR CBUTTE OUNTY 0 wTF0 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville,CA 959650 0 JUN 3 0 2003 (530)538-7601 Telephone o "= 0 DEVELOPMENT DU N'� SERVICES Rezone, File: REZ 03-01 -'APNc 063-360-018 rApplicant: Fourteen Mile House, Inc. - Date: June.19,2003 P.O. Box 1700 Chico, CA 95927 N V 0 1 C E REZ 03.01 r,aa±=4'l.f. :., Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice,the following,charges had,been,recorded.and,,entered into our.bi1ling:program: :There.may be additional charges in the,processing of your.application that have not yet been entered into the billing program,and are not reflected on this irivoice:Charge`s entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequentbillings. At the time all charges a�e;entered,and billed,)ygu will"receive a FkAC INVOICE:` The following charges have been applied to the processing of your application: Professional Planner $. .1065:26, Mapping85:00 Clerical 252:00 Publishing 111.04 TOTAL CHARGES: $ 1;613.30' The following payments have been applied to your application: Deposit Disbursement: Deposit Date: December 30,2002 Eh*o6merital Health $287..00 Receipt: 2091°4. Larid Development $.150:00 Total Payment2:5$ , 16:00 CDF/Fire.Deoartinent $43:00 NOD/NOE Filing:Fee $36.00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES-PLANNING DEPOSIT 2000:00' The costs thus far in processing your application have exceeded the-deposited/paid amount by: $ (386.70) An additional deposit Is required to continue processing this application $1,613.30 f I P i i -1.q... �.,,e, i Butte County Code 3-44.Hourly.fees;deposits;billing procedures.'County code requires,when the initial deposited,funds:are depleted,to,an amount,equal to,25%:of a he,o'hginal.deposd no,processing of the'application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit,or a lesserµamount�as determined by the-Director of.Development Services"•In the event the' applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application,the application will.be denied. Make checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address. Should you have any questions,please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m.to 4 p.m.,Monday through Friday. W- :.5 .:r.-..-X. k, 4 :. ,. :,:aa-ai'� "Pi :t�' '� <b"..---• �: ,fir''�8.s a x Biller.CS K TISCAL ADMINSLLINGS&REFUND&SENT BILLINGSTourteen REZ 03-01 061603.xis s" Butte County Department ofDevelopment.Sertices �uTTF Administration-AR o 0 7 County Center Drive 0 0 Oroville,CA 95965 0 — 0 (530)538.7601 Telephone 0 ` ==a 0 UN Rezone. File: REZ'03,01 . APN: 063-360-018 Applicant: Fourteen'Mile House; Inc. Date::June 19;:2003 P.O. Box 1700 Chico, CA 95927 INVOICE REZ03.01 Planning charges are captured in arrears. At the date of this invoice,the following charges had been recorded and entered into our billing program. There may be additional charges in the processing of your application that have not yet been entered into the billing program,and are not reflected on this invoice. Charges entered after this invoice date will be reflected on subsequent billings. At the time all charges are entered and billed,you will receive a FINAL INVOICE. The following charges have been applied to the processing of your application: Professional Planner $ 1,1165'26- Mapping 85'00' Clerical 252.00. Publishing 1:11'.04- TOTAL CHARGES: $ 15613:30, The following payments have been applied to your application: Deposit Disbursement: Deposit Date: December 30. 2002 Environmental`Health $287.00 Receipt: 20914 Land.Development $150.06 Total Payment $2,51&00 CDF/Fire Department $43.00 NOD/NOE Filing:Fee $36.00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES-PLANNING DEPOSIT, $2,000.00; The costs thus far in processing your application have exceeded the deposited/paid amount by: $ (386.70) An additional deposit is required to continue processing this application $1,613.30 Butte County Code 3.44 Hourly fees;deposits;billing procedures. County code requires when the initial deposited funds are depleted to an amount equal to 25%of the original deposit,no processing of the application will occur until the applicant deposits sufficient funds to restore a balance equal to the amount of the initial deposit,or a lesser amount as determined by the Director of Development Services. In the event the applicant does not provide sufficient funds to continue processing an application,the application will be denied. Make checks payable to: Butte County Treasurer and send it to us at the above address. Should you have any questions,please call Accounts Receivable from 8:00 a.m.to 4 p.m.,Monday through Friday. All AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE ° � � � June 30, 2003 $ 1,613 30 Biiler.CS. K:IFISCAL ADMIMBILLINGS 8 REFUNDSISENT BILLINGSWourteen REZ 03-01 061603.xls �Z06-c 6/19/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:19 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 1 Selection Criteria Applicant (hand sel Include: Fourteen Mile House REZ 03-01 .70 Nickname Fourteen Mile House REZ 03-01 1 REZ 03-01 Full Name Fourteen Mile House, Inc. Address P.O. Box 1700 Chico CA 95927 Phone 1 (530) 893-1700 Phone 2 Phone 3 Phone 4 In Ref To Fees Arrg. By billing value on each slip Expense Arrg. By billing value on each slip Tax Profile Exempt Last bill Last charge 5/28/2003 Last payment Amount $0.00 Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 1/7/2003 Craig S. 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable 41904 P Processing 1/7/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 1.00 45.00 Billable 41906 C Clerical SET-UP 1/14/2003 Diana S. 34.00 2.50 85.00 Billable 42302 Mapping Labels 1/28/2003 Craig S. 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable 42197 P File Comments 2/5/2003 Craig S. 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 42275 CEQA Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes analysis 2/6/2003 Craig S. 59.00 3.25 191.75 Billable 42317 CEQA Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes analysis .S l a 6/19/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:19 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 2. Fourteen Mile House REZ 03-01:Fourteen Mile House, Inc. (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup% DNB Time DNB Amt 2/6/2003 Craig S. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable 42318 Field Review Field Review includes travel time 3/18/2003 Craig S. 59.00 5.33 314.67 Billable 42742 Reports Reports & analysis on applications 3/19/2003 Craig S. 59.00 0.75 44.25 Billable 42784 Reports Reports & analysis on applications 3/20/2003 Craig S. 59.00 2.50 147.50 Billable 42785 Reports Reports & analysis on applications 3/21/2003 Craig S. 59.00 0.50 29.50 Billable 42786 Reports Reports & analysis on applications 4/-15/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.70 31.50 Billable 42964 Clerical/N Publish 4/15/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.15 6.75 Billable 42966 Clerical Proof 4/29/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.30 13.50 Billable 43116 Correspondence Letters 4/29/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.62 27.75 Billable 43118 Clerical Packets 5/8/2003 Craig S. 59.00 1.08 63.92 Billable 43223 Hearings PC Hearing 5/8/2003 Craig S. 59.00 0.25 14.75 Billable 43224 Meetings Meeting with applicant 5/8/2003 Roni Thomton 34.00 1.00 34.00 Billable 43234 Clerical/Min Minutes related to applications 6/19/2003 Butte County Department of Development Services 2:19 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 3 Fourteen Mile House REZ 03-01:Fourteen Mile House, Inc. (continued) Date Employee Rate Hours Amount Total ID Task Markup % DNB Time DNB Amt 5/15/2003 Craig S. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable 43247 Meetings Arranging and attending meetings (does not incl. public hearings) 5/19/2003 Roni Thornton 34.00 2.00 68.00 Billable 43307 Clerical/Min Minuteslelated to applications 5/21/2003 Craig S. 59.00 2.00 118.00 . Billable 43332 CEQA Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes analysis 5/22/2003 Craig S. 59.00 1.00 59.00 Billable 43333 CEQA Initial studies, mitigations, negative declarations and EIRs-includes analysis 5/22/2003 Craig S. 59.00 0.08 4.92 Billable 43335 Hearings Public hearings including continuances 5/22/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.40 18.00 Billable 43355 Meetings Arranging and attending meetings (does not incl. public hearings) 5/22/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.07 3.00 Billable 43361 Correspondence Letter 5/28/2003 Lynn R. 45.00 0.10 4.50 Billable 43391 Clerical/Min Minutes related to applications TOTAL Billable Fees 28.58 $1,502.26 Date Employee Price Quantity Amount Total ID Expense Markup % 4/16/2003 Lynn R. 111.04 1.000 111.04 Billable 43098 Publishing Publishing in newspaper-Chico Enterprise Record on Friday, April 18, 2003 TOTAL Billable Costs $111.04 M � o 6/19/2003 . Butte County Department of Development Services 2:19 PM Pre-bill Worksheet Page 4' Fourteen Mile House REZ 03-01:Fourteen Mile House, Inc. (continued) Calculation of Fees and Costs Amount Total Fees Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable time slips $1,502.26 Total of Fees (Time Charges) $1,502.26 Costs Bill Arrangement: Slips By billing value on each slip. Total of billable expense slips $111.04 Total of Costs (Expense Charges) $111.04 Total new charges $1,613.30 Accounts Receivables DatelID Type Description 12/30/2002 CRED Deposit - Receipt#20914 ($2,036.00) 2014 12/3012002 REF NOD/NOE FEES PAID #20914 $36.00 2015 Total Accounts Receivable ($2,000.00) New Balance Current $1,613.30 Unapplied ($2,000.00) Total New Balance ($386.70) Amount to replenish account to $2,000.00 $2,000.00 ' . r JNTY OF BUTTE FIELD NUMBER '�ROVILLE, CALIFORNIA PURCHASE ORDER 0 292622 s Chico Enterprise RecordI 0 U Attn: Donna J ,�,I PP.O. Box 9 Issued B L Chico, CA 95927 Department DDS/Planning Division E R DATE QNTY INVOICE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CHARGE TO W.O. # 4 r 4/15/03 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 40-001-53 To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Frida , April 18, 2003. Please furnish this office two copies of the affidavit of Publication. 1-(Ray Johnson, 14 Mile House - RZ 03-01 Butte County Planning L nn - 538-7602 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 TOTAL "/711/ I, the undersigned, hereby certify that,to the best of my knowledge,the services or articles specified above have been performed or delivered or,where authorized,are hereby contracted for and thaLthere is a Budget.Appropriation for the same. ' 4 1! x y�` F 292.622 Date: rt Plepartment Heador Authorized Deputy SUPPLIER NO. DEPT ACCOUNT NO. PROJECT NO. INVOICE NO. INV.DATE ENCUMBRANCE AMOUNT 1 - 2 3 4 5 ' 6 Submit WHITE,CANARY and PINK to PURCHASING SERVICES with supplier's invoice. Retain GOLDENROD CGU 4F BUTTE AUMTORS CE WILATE AND TREASURER'S REGEiPT CROVILLE, CA ATR I40 10133 RECEWE€3 FROG PLANNING BAG 0 3M DATE M311241@2 FU14D FUND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCR€P'nON TITLE GIDE CODE CODE GORE AMOUNT NT DEPOSIT DATE: 1e2-u1' RECEIPTS: 20813-20815 PLANNING APPL FEES OEML € u0 49=1 421OSM oalcol 2,3Xj.W P'mjeot Number Amount of Fee 0063-360.018 Fourteen Mile House REZQ3-09 $2.000 #0r%14CLG79 Bell Henderson AJfv?:.13-i0 $300 DOCUMENTTCC€PY SALES GEML 0910 4.4=1 4711910 101001 15.00 LAND DEVELOPMENT GENL 8c9d 44W. U 461170 101M1 15D.0:ID Pm.ject Number Amount of Fee --#063-360-Qi8 Fourteen Mile House REZ 03-01 16© ` .RONMIENTAL HLA-@ GENL 0010 540M 491 1 101¢011 237-03 Project Number Amount of Fee X053-360-049 Fourteen Whle House REZ 63-09 $287 FIRE PLNG APDL FEE FIRE PROTECT 01CO 4617240 i0i= 43.00 Project Mummer Amount of Fee X63-36Q-099 Fourteen Wle'Wouse REZ 03-04 $43 Nt WN0E CLERK'S FILING FEGEHL W10 470 1 46iZ-319 101001 38.00. ($n)_Prosect Dumber Amount of Fee 0763-360-018 Fourteen f4ile House RE'03-09 $36 TOTAL 29831.00 APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR-GC WROLLER TREASURER Y: r r Ljv�1 SI Joy V 3o' � �qu"' �.' 43°� 77/6 fare4cay.M,I� FDvSP �I1� S f DATE RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC LAFCO PLANNING PUBLIC ENV. FIRENOE/NOD OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM . . •' NO. RECEIVED WORKS SALES HEALTH F/G FEE p RECEIPT 20914 1 C a03-0 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ISSU BY FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE, INC. WELLS FARGO BANK 2881 P.O.BOX 1700 CHICO,CA 95926 CHICO,CA 95927 91-11911221(1) (530)893-1700 12/30/2002 c PAY TO THE Butte County Treasurer ) $ **2,516.00 ORDER OF y' Two Thousand Five Hundred Sixteen and U DOLLARS 8 ff z Butte County Treasurer z 0 o - 0 m #063-360-018 application fee MEMO "p 11'00288LII' l: i22i0ii9LI: 05 15 103687u' COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND TREASURtR'S RB=CEIPT OROV@LLE, CA ATR NO 10133 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING SAO 0 329 DATE 1213112002 FUND FUND DEPT ACCT CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CGDE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 12-31 RECEIPTS: 20913-20916 PLANNING ADPL FEES' GENL 0010 440MI 421 101001 2,300.00 Project Number Amount of Fee #4013-3010=418 Fourteen Mile House REZ0,M`l $2,000 #06 140-47®'Deli-Henderson ADM-,9Y10 $300 DOCUMENT®C©PY SALES GENL Co19 4400911 4711911:9 101001 15.00 LAND DEVELOPMENT GENL •. 0010 44OW4 4911700 101001 150.E Pmject Number Amount of Fee —.0063-360-418 Fourteen dile House REZ 03-01 $150 ENVIRONMENTAL HL-hH GENL 0;10 540M 4614901 1011301 287.00 Project Number Amount of Fee #0013-364-018 Fourteen Fife House REZ 03-01 $287 FIRE PLNG ADPL FEE FIRE PROTECT 0100 4617240 101001 43.E' Project Number Amount of Fee #063-360-018 Fourteen Mile House REZ 03-U1 $43 NODINOE CLERIC'S FILING FE GENL 0010 470MI 4612319 101001 36.0 (M) Project Number Amount of Fee #083-380-018 Fourteen dile House REZ 03-01 $36 TOTAL.. 29831.00 .00 t P APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TREASURER I r. Ry. BY. _�_... b white=treasurer pink=auditor canarf-dep€asitor golden rod=fite COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITORS CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEIPT OROVILLE, CA ATR NO 10133 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAG 0 328 DATE 12131/2002 FUND FUND DEPT ACCT" CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: 12-31 RECEIPTS: 20913"20915 PLANNING ADPL FEES GENL 0010 44=1 42109M 101001 2,3W.00 Project Number Amount of Fee #063-380-048 Fourteen Mile House RE.Z03-04 $2,000 #068-940-079 Dell Henderson ADM 03-10 $300 DOCUMENTICOPY SALES GENL 0010 440001 4791910 101001 15.00 LAND DEVELOPMENT GENL.• 0010 4400D4 4511700 901001 950.00 Project Number Amount of Fee —,.#063-360-018 Fourteen Mile House REZ 03-04 $450 ENVIRONMENTAL HLTH ` GENL 0010 540003 4614901 901001 287.00 Project Number Amount of Fee #083-360-098 Fourteen Mile House REZ 03-09 $287 FIRE PLNG ADPL FEE FIRE PROTECT 0100 4617240 101001 43.00 Project Number Amount of Fee #083-360-018 Fourteen Mile House REZ MN $43 NODBNOE CLERK'S FILING FE GENL 0010 470MI 4612319 101001 35.00 ( )-Pfbjec;f Number Amount of Fee #053-360-018 Fourteen{dile House REZ 03-09 $36 TOTAL 29831000 F APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TREASURER r• l�Y: aite=treasurer pink---auditor 'canary--depositor golden m&file lC t ` C F. D' Vol" / �✓�lOo 7"rn fou✓T�+'n��lt F79vSP ��L 5} v .. 1 RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC /N PUBLIC ENV. NOEOD • DATE NO. RECEIVED WORKS LAFCO PLANNING SALES HEALTH •FIRE F/G FEE OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM RECEIPT 20914 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ,SSU BY FOURTEEN MILE-HOUSE;.INC. WELLS FARGO BANK 2881 P.O.BOX 1700 CHICO,CA 95926 CHICO,CA 95927 91-119/1221(1) -(530)893-1700 12/30/2002 0 $ PAY TO THE Butte County Treasurer � � � **2,516.00 ORDER OF Two Thousand Five Hundred Sixteen and 00/100******************************************* DOLLARS b Butte County Treasurer z o a _ 0 w rn Azw MEMO #063-360-018 application fee ZNP 11600 2813 1116 _i: 12 2 10 4 L9 1l: 0 S L S LO 368.71,' DEPARTME DEVELOPME �' SERVICES AUZY BUTTE UNIFORM APPLI TION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME(If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: Fot,{Or6Er l M tL ."5 M44c. 04503—3C0o ADDRESS: CITY,STATE&ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) Po t oo c eco, C-A- 95 2'i RFS v3-19 NAME OF.PROPOSED PROJECT(If any TELEPHONE F�Zue•c-L�.' AAL& 4use- u kr 3 cs3� ) s93 - 1—toc, LOCATION OF PROJECT(Major cross streets and Address, if any) 44(A)L? 32 AT AUmr3e tLV ' 1ZA0c (:�A' , GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE -700 P)aaTE;GJ A41L&- kkas'e-, Z1.4 Sq3 t ADDRESS: CITY.STATE&ZIP CODE: ►100 1592-7 ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE(in Square Feet or Acres) pLAT> AVAe- .-.i r 43 .2 A--¢C-5 EXISTING STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES(in Square Feet) tilt s AMMC�c 45,goo 54R FT (Check One) (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER M PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ■ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION REQUESTED777 ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP REZONE (.� ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ USE PERMIT a _ C3 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP C1MINOR USE PERMIT DEC 3 0 2002 C3BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ MINOR VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY 13 CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PER P�ANNTNG DfV15TON ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT(Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division,describe the number and size of parcels.) FOLAOXS�lj IL-4�7440-gL'-Omwe- CE45LO 16, EkaftSuAb -M D 1 L 45 2P,1T1AL- Fnuz. LA i t-4 c Ac 2 /milirytom c.t o Lor ACJ To �tM-Z or.l t OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER.I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized,execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.) DATE: i2 ,3p .O2 SIGNATURE: C t�GSIDc (' AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services, r !1A►t4-- �/R.� 530- Sq 7 - t42Z Print Name of Agent and Phone Number Czou�� ��to,;�s�l tZOu,s l l5 �tudw5-ro�E 'Drt•, !�- 4-`40 A CA- 959'73 Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for i^ PTCZtel AAtt,C— J;CmscL:C'.tc- on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number D&3 - 3`0 - o t 8 This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. i a - C C� EaWE Owner(s)of Record: (sign and print name) v DEC 3 0 2002 ��rr .1 M I L& + C.1 si;� 7-4.4 CL Print Name Print arae BUTTE GOON PLANNING DIVISION r a e Signature Architect and/or Engineer: MIKE 5-YRD 630 — 15—J4 ZZ Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number U.S, A I DEeL j t?D" l 15 VEUDAw 1?V-. 4t41, .O. X59 7 3 Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: 1-7 a Total Amount Received: AP Number(s) Legal Description c/ Owners Authorization Zoning Requirements Project Description Copies of plot plan Taken by WS Receipt No. 2(M E.H.20,a.) LD 145b°a Plan 2fiW FD S Ivo0_2L, Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) a will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ '2-1 S)tol as of O I Z57l 0-7, Make check payable to"Butte County Treasurer". t } ECEOW E COUNTY OF BUTTE DEC 3 0 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FO M (To be Completed By Project Applicant) BUTTE COUNiI' PLANNING DIVISION Date Filed 1 General Information:' 1. Name and address of owner, an /or developer, and/or project sponsor: _ >tA.mt*e.1 Mttti Po V�0)4 I-100 G.%AtCc. , CA, 9597.1 2. Address of project:j}u`n5.. ..o,r- ekgML. -ow-A ice- ►gajm� Assessor's Parcel Number: oep3 - 3e - o t S 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: RA,e E ZaAbAse.l . ae- PD 15OX 1"760 �CA f1S921 5 30- f3q 3- l Ivo 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing general plan designation: Ar V, 6. Existing zoning district: Pt V 7. How is land currently used? s/A e-Ae.-W 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): tZ.g-Stpc#JTtAL. Project Description: 9. Site size: 43.24- Ae_ - (Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: M/A- Compact: Total:' 11. Plans attached Yes 1( No _ 12. Proposed development schedule' Cc+JtM2AJLT -5%A&Dt.ttsLtp" ImPa.vE„nES,,z IY1aY 03 , 13. Associated projects_ toc t,exsa-� Mlt.�- t�.tS6-, L�� ►t- �a(� Uw)t r'Z 14. - Anticipated incremental or phased development 744 . t4 Tik--• 510AL- DA45f= Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. /7e& NotE 4_ IS/ 47t'CYlcL1�p 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. lA/A- 17. A17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading /A. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ l i i i , .•i`.,. +�'. .. �' � t:.YCl�.. � • r`1.�'i'i�. �. .a . ..,s a �� 5 'W4 � 1 .^t �':`!,+ — I``;:'• ; '"I a i,: 'i .._sK. �. ..e;i.'i:.:.' . '`~.;.f.,. + 01,; 1 V facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 19. If the project involves.a variance,conditional use,,rezoning application,or any development permits,state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit 5 EE flan- sk L9 Arrck�. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. _ 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _ 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. _ �C 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _ _C 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. _ _c 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. _ �c 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). _ 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). _ X 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. �C _ I LS DEC 3 0 2002 BUTTE COON i; PLANNMC DIVISION 6 ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 2 t Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 5- - t.10%- -t� -57- 33. Z33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one- family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. . Date Signature for R%Ae;r c,1 MMS rpusc, T...lc- Z-30. 02 49 1'...L i- &,i K:\FORMS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO EPE VE LEC 3 0 2002 BUTTE COUNTY w. PANNING DIVISION ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 3 ECEOWE County of Butte Environmental Information Form 0 EC 3 0 2002 BUTTECOUNif 15. We are proposing an 18 to 20 lot single-family residenti I subdiGisio'rS?G T ' IaN minimum home size of 2250 square feet has already been specified in the recorded CC&Rs. Starting sales prices of $335,000 are anticipated and the initial "spec" homes are being designed to serve a family of four. 19. We are requesting a change in zoning to Foothill Residential with a 2 acre minimum rather than the surrounding AR zoning. The FR-2 zoning is more restrictive than AR zoning and therefore is more desirable for the needs of this proposed project. The existing PUD zoning is unnecessary because no common area is proposed due to the proposed large lot sizes. 27. The site has some slopes of 10% or more and can be seen on the attached topography map. 29. Please see the attached documents relating to municipal services and special districts as follows: County CSA# 163 (3 page doc.) County Notice Of Determination (1 page doc.) County letter dated 12/19/02. RE: water and sewage (1 page doc.) Fourteen Mile House letter dated 9/19/02. RE: septic (1 page doc.) County Well Compliance certificate dated 12/12/02 (1 page doc.) CEQA Issues —Agenda Report (2 page doc.) Mandatory Findings of Significance — Unit 3. (8 page doc.) 31. Fourteen Mile House, Unit 1 and Unit 2 are the predecessors. Unit 3 will complete the project. 32. Unit 3 is shown as the remaining lands of Unit 1 and Unit 2 subdivision maps. This site was originally the property of Claude Willis. Mr. and Mrs. Willis maintained both their residence and commercial well drilling business for many years at this location. We have removed the residence and all out buildings from the site and abandoned the 40' deep hand dug well as directed by the county. The easterly property line faces Little Chico Creek canyon and has views of the mountains, canyons and valley. See attached civil engineer report concerning soil stability dated 11/18/02. 33. See attached map labeled Item 33 and titled Butte County Development Review Committee. East of the project is Little Chico Creek canyon and far beyond that is the city of Paradise. To the South is Unit 1, a 25 lot + subdivision. To the West is Unit 2, a 32 lot subdivision. To the north are single-family residences. The four residential properties that abut this property vary in size and use as follows: 1 ac. Mobile home site, 1.19 ac. Mobile home site, 2.65 ac. home site with attached mobile home, and a 4.5 acre home site with a separate mobile home on the property. -CAMy Documents\Subd HftutteElF.doc 4$ Application Packet Checklist Explanations 2. This rezone involves 4 parcels created by a recently recorded subdivision map of which the owner currently holds title to all 4 parcels. Assessor parcel numbers have not yet been assigned for these 4 new parcels. 3. The Grant Deed to 14 Mile House, Inc is attached and page two gives the legal description of said property. Said parcel was recently subdivided into 4 parcels, and one set of the 3 page recorded subdivision map is also included. E � W E Li DEC 3 0 2002 BUTTE COUNT; PLANNING DIVISION CAMy Documents\Subd HRApplication Checklist Explanations.doc , , 94 - 0 -3 Recorded at the Request d Mid Yat .J it:6dOW tntpsnr ` Other No. t % Escrow No. 139MBO Loan No. 94-0063741 Rec Fee 9.00 WHEN'RECORDED MAIL TO. f PCG 20.00 Recorded 1 Cheek 29.00 FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE INC. official Records 1 P.O. Box 1700 County of 1 Chbo.CA 95W Butte 1 i Candace J. Grubbs 1 I Recorder 1 St00miss 10-Feb-94 I "VTC JR 2 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS M. DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX 9=116 _ f?snOhMO m M oorhstlMMtor1 err hiMN d pfspnd aawM4 011 - SAME AS ABOVE CM*Md an 11he araNMadon of eWrlsas IM of etonlbMpM ' ' �d aaa'd MdL Thin fmrfarskmed GrAnMr de lmru 61pnWn d Deds snl.or Apaal dwnNttip vis-`Nim He" GRANT DEED041 _00tUOT l;;ctt)sracr• i 063-0100 .147 Ce�drmmnd :Sccditt:.b"J:aRieAlMiT 060-010-007 o c4mw& FOR A VALUAKE CM40MTIOK MOW of w ch Is hereby&*Mbdp4 . RAY E.JOHNSON,JR.,a manied man, as his sols and separde propedr, and WARY LOU JOHNSON, a single woman;and LORRAINE C.JOHNSON,a widow I • hereby GRANTM to i. t FOURTEEN WLE HOUSE INC.,a Calitomis Colporatlon t thea rod property In the Cly d Unincorporated,Area Couttpr of Butts .Sleee dCdbr K dttttolbe4 d SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION The.grantors and the grantees in this cmweyame are comprised.of the.same parties vfio cofitinue to hold the same p gmrftmte interest In the property. R A T 11923(d).' n 230' n E U UF. i U i DEC 3 0 2002Lj E ' I . BUTTE COUNTY K ANNING DIVISION Dated Fsthamej A JIMM _ STATE OF CAU Ip' `/�w ✓Ih✓ � llllo COUNTY OF 1 on y` C I fly apps cd i Dwaaha'Vknd4 to ow.We povad to ma on the bub of solsfadory redone) to be the person(:)whoa names)Ware arbscrtbed to the wllhuh Insuumad and aknawbepod to me that tielshelthoy haatod the "me in lwsllw vwr suthorvod capwty(ies), and that by NUIhorNhotr once.ou► atpnatunUl on the irotrhmheM the perlon(s)or IM Nhlity,urfori bahaB Of which ba perwn(s)acted.a,oeut YutrunwnL i W J.t30LUN0 w worra+IUWC''Cxrrdlra WITNESS my hand and offid se Cour.ly or suns N, EwwN 9*0.20:19" • Slpnatura ' ; ) y I � _.. 94 - 06311 ORDER NO. BU—'139529 'DP i DESCRIPTION ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL.PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BUTTE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: I . PARCB It LOTS NUMBERED 2, 7, 8, 13 AND 14 AND SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, .TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, 'M.D.B. 6 M. EXCEPTING THEREFROM. ALL THAT' PORTION DEEDED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 7, 1961, IN BOOK 1147, PAGE 471, OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN, THAT— CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED, "FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE, A PLANNED UNIT i DEVELOPMENT", WHICH MAP WAS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE,OF THE RECORDER - OF THE.COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON NOVEMBER-22, 1985, IN BOOR 100 OF MAPS, AT PAGE(S) 72, 73, 74, 75 AND 76. CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION, RECORDED NOVEMBER 6, 1986, UNDER BUTTS COUNTY R90ORDERIS SERIAL NO. 86-39447. PARCEL III LOT 1, OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, M.D.B. 6 M. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY DEED RECORDED JUNE .19, 1961, IN .BOOK 1122, PAGE 38, OFFICIAL.RECORDS. `I II PARCEL IIIc THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP-23 NORTH, ` RANGE 2 EAST, M.D.B. 6 M. r[D �A 3 0 2002 ' BUTTE 003UNi1` PLANNING DIVISION i • OF DOCUMEW r• .. - �_ ; :',L:,- :::^%rte' . REZONE DEC 3 0 . 2002 APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIS �uTi*tc u e PLANNING DIVISION This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their application packet.. Please include this checklist along with you submittal. Applicant Planner . 1. © A completed, signed, Uniform Application and Environmental Information form. If the application is signed by an agent for the property owner, an agent authorization form must be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 2. © ❑ If the rezone involves more than one parcel, a petition signed by a minimum of 60% of the Or owners of the parcels affected, must be submitted. 5se- . oT -- -*LZ ATrzx+kcp 3. © lla A Co of the Grant Deed,a ma of-propertyshowing the precise boundaries and/or a legal PY P b description. -mac- �.1cvE tL', Amra4Aev .4. lJ Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of the deposit will be returned upon final action, if any remains). (Plannner advises applicant) 5. © lid' Thirty-five(35)copies of plans which shall include a detailed site plan drawn to scale. All plans shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no greater than 24" X 36". The finished plans shall be folded to 8 1/2" x 11". The detailed site plan must include: a. Name and address of Applicant, Engineer and/or Architect b. ❑ Assessor Parcel Number(s) and the street address. c. ❑ Property lines, lot dimensions, city and special district boundaries (if applicable), existing general.plan,and zoning designations for the property and within 100 feet of the boundaries of the property. d. ❑x L1 Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the property q� (including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, parking areas, wells, septic tanks and leach fields). For vacant property,or in other circumstances, this requirement may IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 1 r i be waived by the Director of Development Services or the Director's designee. Waved ❑ YES ❑ NO `e. © For vacant or substantially undeveloped land, show contours as per USGS maps or better. f. ❑ LvJ Distances from any significant natural and man-made features of theproperty, such as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains. bodies of water, railroads, to the property lines. `7 S'cA-Le o n, nti•Aj�l North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an engineering scale with the preferred scale of 1" =20', with a north arrow preferably oriented to the ton of sheet. h. © VicinityMap P I. +LTJ All plans must be clear and legible. 6. Q LJ One copy of an S 1/2" x 11" transparency reduction of the detailed site plan. Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify; correct or otherwise supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. - Signature: Date: 12 - 30 •o2. epresentative Signature: Date: 1-?d D z,,,- PliAnina Receiving Application Dt c E i DEC 3 0 2002 K:\forms\submital\rezone.frm RL, - BUT11 COON i f PANNING DIVISION IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 2 ' 1 11\• In�' r 1 I' 1 I I'1 r I 1 1 1 11 1------------- -- I __________- ------ 860-09£ 90 dd 33, 60-£0 Zia 11 11 tl 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Rl ;l 11 1 ......:.....:...... .................... 4 I!� 1,11J+ Ip b 1 191 DNI011vw j i=" IrI 4 • 1 , i � r ' r � 1 Ty UF-I,03 r .} r . ♦ � -� � � fit ' -•smooth Feed Sheets7m Use template for 5160® K:\Planning\PROJECTS\REZ\Fourteen FOURTEEN MILE HOMES INC ROLLS ANDERSON&ROLLS PO BOX 1700 115 YELLOWSTONE DR Mile House,Inc\mailing labels.doc CHICO CA 95927 CHICO CA 95973-5811 056010021000 063130001000 063130003000 KNAPP ERIC H FORNER STEPHEN D&LINDA LEE GRANTHAM BARRY&CINDY L 2 VALLOMBROSA CIR 725 STILSON CANYON RD P 0 BOX 637 CHICO CA 95926-2814 CHICO CA 95928 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 063130015000 063130016000 063130018000 BATT DAN JOHNSTON GREG ROBERTSON ANTHONY KENNETH& PO BOX 134 P 0 BOX 387 P 0 BOX 902 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 FRIANT CA 93626 HAMILTON CITY CA 95951 063130022000 063130024000 063320003000 JOHNSTON GREG PAUL&SHARON HAHNE MAURICE&JOAN MOZZINI LOUIS A&MARI S P 0 BOX 387 963 MYRTLE 14936 EAGLE RIDGE DR FRIANT CA 93626 CHICO CA 95926 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 063320004000 063320005000 063320006000 BARHAM MICHAEL J&ADRIENNE L VUGRENES GREGORY A&AFRA C PARSONS WAYNE E&SANDRA J 1306 NORMAL AVE 14906 EAGLE RIDGE DR 14898 EAGLE RIDGE DR CHICO CA 95928-6541 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9707 063320007000 063320008000 063320009000 ENYEART BRUCE G&POLLY W WILSON J B&EVONNE HUNTER THOMAS H&DIANE C TR 14888 EAGLE RIDGE DR 1207 WINDECKER DR 14868 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD FOREST RANCH CA 95942 CHICO CA 95926 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 063320010000 063320011000 063330001000 WATERS JERRY DEE CURTIS GORDON RICHARD&SHIR FRANKEN WILLIAM S &RANDELLE A 14954 EAGLE RIDGE DR 14950 EAGLE RIDGE CA PO BOX 599 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9707 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 063330002000 063330003000 063330004000 SMITH JAMES L&NANCY D JT THOMPSON JAMES J ANDERSON MARVIN 14846 EAGLE RIDGE DR 14836 EAGLE RIDGE DR 5584 LITTLE GRAND CYN DR FOREST RANCH CA 95942 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 PARADISE CA 95969-4935 063330005000 063330006000 063330007000 CADD ERIC&LINDA MOUNTSIER JASON L&MARI L FROHARDT NORMA E TRUSTEE 14820 EAGLE RIDGE DR 14810 EAGLE RIDGE DR 14800 EAGLE RIDGE DR FOREST RANCH CA 95942 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9701 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 063330008000 063330009000 063330010000 OWENS WILBUR A&CARLENE G BRITTON ROBERT H&JUDDENE A TENNIS LANCE D TRUSTEE ETAL 14790 EAGLE RIDGE DR 14780 EAGLE RIDGE DRIVE 14770 EAGLE RIDGE DRIVE FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9701 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9701 A� AVERY@ Address Labels Laser 5160® Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 063330011000 063330012000 063330013000 BEHRING FAMILY LLC NORLUND COMMUNITY PROPERTY JOHNSTON KENNETH H&MICHEIL 321 LEGION AVE P 0 BOX 162 14799 EAGLE RIDGE DR CHICO CA 95926 DURHAM CA 95938-0162 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 063330014000' 063330015000 063330016000 KLINE WILLARD &MARIE TRUSTEES FOGARTY THOMAS V&MARY R T MCGUIRE ERIC&CAROL 14809 EAGLE RIDGE DR 500 LYNDSEY LN 14831 EAGLE RIDGE DRIVE FOREST RANCH CA 95942 YUBA CITY CA 95993 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 063360001000 063360002000 063360003000 MEGHDADI CHANDESE D ETAL GARDEMEYER DIANE MONDON RICHARD A&JOANN TR 15111 WOODLAND PARK DR 23 UPPER LAKE CT 15093 WOODLAND PARK DR FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9747 CHICO CA 95928-2335 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9747 063360004000 063360005000 063360006000 GAINES WILLIAM S&IDA JEANNE MILLER D KENNETH&CHRISTINE L KURUNG FRANK C&CAROL H TRU 1444 FORTRESS ST 15071 WOODLAND PARK DR 15061 WOODLAND PARK DRIVE CHICO CA 95973 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9747 063360007000 063360009000 063360010000 DOWD WILLIAM HOWARD&CARO VICKERY THOMAS R&SHEILA E TR DILLMAN BRUCE&JOLONDA TRS 15051 WOODLAND PARK DR 15029 WOODLAND PARK DR 1027 COLMENA DRIVE FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9747 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 CHICO CA 95926 063360011000 063360012000 063360013000 PERRY SCOTT K&LINDA C TRUST BODNEY TERESA D NELSON HAROLD I SR&VICTORIA M 6881 ANTIGUA WAY 14979 WOODLAND PARK DR 14984 WOODLAND PARK DR SACRAMENTO CA 95831 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9746 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9746 063360014000 063360015000 063360016000 NYSTROM JOHN A III MCCRADY MICHAEL W TRUSTEE STROMER CARLA J PO BOX 1114 15004 WOODLAND PARK DR 15014 WOODLAND PARK DR DURHAM CA 95938-1114 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9742 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9746 063360019000 063360020000 063360021000 HOLROYD DOUGLAS L&SUSAN E MCCR.ADY MICHAEL W TRUSTEE GUERRERO DOUGLAS &MARY K 14969 WOODLAND PARK DR P 0 BOX 903 708 OAKMONT CT FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9745 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-0903 DANVILLE CA 94526-6218 r 063360022000 063360023000 063360024000 SPEARS ERNEST&KARYN TURNER WALTER JOE&NANCY B SEREDA THOMAS M&KATHY L 3 DOVE CREEK CT 14931 WOODLAND PARK DR 2191 NOEL CT CHICO CA 95926-1625 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9745 CHICO CA 95926-2152 063360025000 063360026000 063360027000 PETERSON HAROLD L&WANDA R DEADMOND G W&JANET CONDOS ROBERT W&NANCY H 14913 WOODLAND PARK DR 14905 WOODLAND PARK DR 14900 WOODLAND PARK DR FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9745 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9745 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9745 AVERS @ Address Labels Laser 5160® i Im®®th Feed Sheetsym Use template for 51600 063360028000 063360029000 063360030000 LAMPE DONALD &MARGARET HARFORD DENNIS D&JANICE L STRAIN ARTHUR W&RENE 14906 WOODLAND PARK DR 14920 WOODLAND PARK DR 14932 WOODLAND PARK DR FOREST RANCH CA 95942 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9745 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9745 063360031000 063360032000 063360033000 VITTON PAUL E&BETTY DAWSON J GREGORY&SHELLY R JONES FLOYD S JR&DEBRA A 2684 KENNEDY AVE 14954 WOODLAND PARK DR 14964 WOODLAND PARK DR CHICO CA 95973-9607 FOREST RANCH CA 95942-9746 FOREST RANCH CA 95942 - .063360034000 DEMMER.LAWRENCE R&ANNETTE 14974 WOODLAND PARK DR FOREST RANCH CA 95942 �� AVERW Address Labels Laser 5160® Cn(o goo q,� 20 0 Loa, keel qoo �� ��,.��� N -, ► o = � ����s zo0 - Iii _ _ IIS cA, -57o`°Sz`-oi � Nnn�l ����-�a.►.�z� 200 ,.._2�, 7 ►��' _�--���w 100 -09�-�`� 0 4 �a�cv<-cQ c� �. ZO' ��i E)l 111 Z I 0 s W l io ��o 010 -�90 �# •a o- ! i i � Y IlL � Ic r I}+ t 3 • • f u� 17 BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES -OCTOBER 28,2003 pgJ�7f 03-307 Public Hearing - Rezone - Fourteen Mile House, Inch - consideration of a Rezone for 43`2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreational-2 acre minimum parcel size. This is a project on which notice of intent to adopt a negative declaration with mitigation measures regarding environmental impacts has been given. The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5 .41, 7 .24, 17 . 79, and 12 . 79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tanks, and water would be obtained from a well on the project site. The property was. rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development has been completed in the first two "units" of that development . The subject property is the third "unit" of that residential development, but is subject to a separate homeowners association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone, and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. The property is located on the east side of Highway 32, across from Woodland Park Road, about two miles south of Forest Ranch, and identified as APN 063-360-018,. The Butte County Planning Commission has recommended approval of the project (CS [REZ 03-01] ) - action requested: -1 . SUBJECT TO FINDINGS I (A-E) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED OCTOBER 28, . 2003, ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION; 2 . FIND THAT THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT CAUSE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE TO FISH OR WILDLIFE OR THEIR HABITAT AND APPROVE A "DE MINIMUS" EXEMPTION TO THE COLLECTION OF FEES PURSUANT TO FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 711 .4 AND 14 CCR 753 .5, AS THE PROJECT SITE IS NOT KNOWN TO CONTAIN ANY SPECIES IDENTIFIED AS A CANDIDATE, SENSITIVE, OR SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES IN LOCAL OR REGIONAL PLANS, POLICIES, OR REGULATIONS, OR BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME OR THE UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. THE PROJECT WILL NOT: HAVE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON ANY RIPARIAN HABITAT; HAVE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON FEDERALLY PROTECTED WETLANDS AS DEFINED BY SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT; CONFLICT WITH ANY LOCAL POLICIES OR ORDINANCES PROTECTING BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES; OR CONFLICT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF AN ADOPTED HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN. THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR IMPACTS TO OAK WOODLAND HABITAT WHICH WILL OCCUR AT THE TIME OF SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT AND THE APPROPRIATE FISH AND GAME FEES WILL BE COLLECTED AT THAT TIME; AND 03-307 3 . SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III (A AND B) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED OCTOBER. 28, 2003, APPROVE REZONE REZ03-01 FOR FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE (RAY JOHNSON) ON APN 063-360-018 REZONING FROM PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) TO FR-2 (FOOTHILL RECREATIONAL - 2 ACRE PARCELS) A 43± ACRE PARCEL; ADOPT AN ORDINANCE REZONING SAID PROPERTY AND APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL ZONING AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN. (FROM 9- MINUTES _Cfn 1 _ OCTOBER 28,2003 --� - BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES -OCTOBER 28,2003 23-03 [3 .211 ) (2782) PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: 10 :37 A.M. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 10 :41 P.M. MOTION: SUBJECT TO FINDINGS I (A-E) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED OCTOBER 28, 2003, I MOVE TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION; FIND THAT THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT CAUSE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE TO FISH OR WILDLIFE OR THEIR HABITAT AND APPROVE A "DE MINIMUS" EXEMPTION TO THE COLLECTION OF FEES PURSUANT TO FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 711.4 AND 14 CCR 753 .5, AS THE PROJECT SITE IS NOT KNOWN TO CONTAIN ANY SPECIES IDENTIFIED AS A CANDIDATE, SENSITIVE, OR SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES IN LOCAL OR REGIONAL PLANS, POLICIES, OR REGULATIONS, OR BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME OR THE UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. THE PROJECT WILL NOT: HAVE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON ANY RIPARIAN HABITAT; HAVE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON FEDERALLY PROTECTED WETLANDS AS DEFINED BY SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT; CONFLICT WITH ANY LOCAL POLICIES OR ORDINANCES PROTECTING BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES; OR CONFLICT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF AN ADOPTED HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN. THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR IMPACTS TO OAK WOODLAND HABITAT WHICH WILL OCCUR AT THE TIME OF SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT AND THE APPROPRIATE FISH AND GAME FEES WILL BE COLLECTED AT THAT TIME; AND SUBJECT TO FINDINGS III (A AND B) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED OCTOBER 28, 2003, FURTHER MOVE TO APPROVE REZONE REZ03-01 FOR FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE (RAY JOHNSON) ON APN 063-360-018 REZONING FROM PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) TO FR-2 (FOOTHILL RECREATIONAL - 2 ACRE PARCELS) A, 43± ACRE PARCEL; ADOPT ORDINANCE 3862 REZONING SAID PROPERTY AND APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL ZONING AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR TO SIGN. M S VOTE: 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 Y (Unanimously Carried) x . MINUTES - __d3`E 2 OCTOBER 28,2003 4�. ORDINANCE NO. 3862 1 AN ORDINANCE ZONING A PORTION OF THE COUNTY OF 2 BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AN FR-2 (FOOTHILL 3 RECREATIONAL) DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-25.40. 4 The Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, 5 under and pursuant to Section 24-25.40 of the Butte County Code, ORDAINS, as 6 follows: 7 SECTION I. The hereinafter described area situate in the County of 8 Butte, State of California,' shall be and it is hereby zoned as an FR-2 (Foothill 9 Recreational — 2 acre parcels) District, and such area shall be subject to the 10 11 restrictions and restricted uses and regulations pursuant to Butte County Code 12 Section 24-110. t 13 Said area so zoned being located in the unincorporated area of Butte. 14 County, Forest Ranch, more particularly described as follows: 15 Being a portion of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 3 East, 16 M.D.M. and being Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 as shown on that certain Vesting Subdivision Map for Ray Johnson Jr., known as Fourteen Mile 17, House Unit 3, which map was filed in the Office of the Recorder of the 18 County of Butte, State of California, on December 13, 2002 in Book . 155 of Maps at pages 88, 89, and 90. 19 SECTION 2.. Conditional Zoning. The zoning reclassification enacted 20 21 by this ordinance is subject to condition(s)imposed pursuant to Butte County Code 22 Section 24-25.40, subsections'(c) and (d). The conditions are as specified in a 23 Conditional Zoning Agreement to be signed by the Owner(s)of the property and by 24 the County. Said Agreement shall be in substantially the form attached hereto as 25 Exhibit A. The description of the property which is the subject of this rezoning shall 26 1 be the same in the Agreement as set forth in Section 1 above. The Chair of the, 1 Board of Supervisors is authorized and directed to sign the Agreement on behalf of 2 the County of Butte. 3 4 SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be and it is hereby declared to be 5 in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after the date of its passage, 6 and before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage,.this Ordinance shall 7 be published once with the names of the members of the Board of Supervisors 8 voting for and against'it in the , a newspaper published in the County of Butte, State 9 of California. 10 11 .PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the 12 County of Butte, State of California, on the 28th day of October , 2003, by the 13 following vote: 14 AYES: Supervisors Dolan, Houx, Josiassen, Yamaguchi and Chair Beeler 15 -NOES: None ABSENT: None 16 NOT VOTING: None 17 R. I BEELER, CHAIR Butte County Board of Supervisors 18 19 ' ATTEST: PAUL MCINTOSH, Chief Administrative 20 Officer and Clerk of the Board 21 22 23 eputy y 24 '25 26 2 Exhibit A County of Butte And When Recorded Return to Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 ` CONDITIONAL ZONING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 2003, by and between Ray E. Johnson Jr., Debbie Jean, H. L. and Wanda Peterson, and William and Barbara Bouttote, herein called "Owner", and the COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California, herein called "County". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of real property, herein called the "Property", situated in the County of Butte, which Property is described as follows: All that certain real property situated in the County of Butte, State of California, being more particularly described as follows: Being a portion of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 3 East, M.D.M. and being Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 as shown on that certain Vesting Subdivision Map for Ray Johnson Jr.,known as Fourteen Mile House Unit 3,which map was filed in the Office of the Recorder of.the County.of Butte, State of California, on December 13, 2002 in Book 155 of Maps at pages 88, 89, and 90. WHEREAS, the Property is now zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development) and is designated as Agricultural Residential by the Butte County General Plan; and WHEREAS, Owner has applied for a reclassification of zoning of the Property from its present classification to FR-2 (Foothill Recreation 2. acre minimum parcels); and WHEREAS, public hearings have been held upon said application before the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, and after having considered the matter presented, the Board has determined that certain conditions to the zoning reclassification and General Plan re-designation of said real property must be unposed so as not to create any problems inimical to the health, safety and the general welfare of the County of Butte. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that inasmuch as the reclassification to FR-2 is being granted and will be enacted by ordinance, the said reclassification shall be subject to the following condition(s): 1. This Agreement is made pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-25.40 (c), between the property owner and County of Butte, and includes the following provisions: 1. The lots shown on the.map recorded in the Office of the Butte County Recorder in Map book 155 at pages 88-through 90 may be divided as follows: Lot 1 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of two (2) lots; Lot 2 may be fiuther subdivided to create a maximum of four (4) lots; Lot 3 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of two (2) lots; and Lot 4 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of four (4) lots. The total number of resulting lots will be not more than twelve(12) on the entire 43.2 acre parcel. 2. Obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans to remove the existing sight-obstructing vegetation in the Highway 32 right-of-way along the frontage of parcel 2 as shown on the map recorded in the Office of the Butte County Recorder in Map book 155 at pages 88 through 90. Vegetation removal shall be performed prior to the recordation of any subsequent land division on the land being rezoned by this action. H. In the event Owner, any successor in interest of Owner, or any person in possession of the Property, violates or fails to perform any of the conditions of this Agreement within thirty (30) days after notice thereof as provided in Paragraph 3, the Board of Supervisors of County may instruct the County Counsel to institute legal proceedings to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. The Board of Supervisors of County may also initiate proceedings to rezone the property to the classification to which it is now zoned or any other suitable classification and to redesignate the property to its present General Plan designation. I ; III. Notice of violation of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be sent to Owner or successor at the address of the then current owner as identified on the current tax roll. IV. In the event suit is brought by the County Counsel of County to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, Owner agrees to pay to County a reasonable sum to be fixed by the Court as attorney's fees. V. Each and every one of the provisions of this Agreement herein contained shall run with the land and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the successors in interest of Owner and County, in the same manner as if they had been expressly named . herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement _ the day and year first above written. Dated: By: Ray E. Johnson Jr. By: Debbie Jean By: H. L. Peterson ' By: ,Wanda Peterson By: William Bouttote By: Barbara Bouttote COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California Dated: By: Bob Beeler, Chair Butte County Board of Supervisors [Attach Notary form] • OFFICE OF •Ri; efA: Date: 10/30/03 *' *� '•� °�;•'�� CLERK OF THE BOARD Board Action Date: 10/28/03 �••.�°' �j" +.• COUNTY Minute Order No.: OCT 3 12003 VELOP Route:® Referral:F1DESERVICESxT Department Document Action Requested ❑Administration ❑Agreement(s) ®File ❑Agriculture ❑Application(s) ®Information ❑Assessor ❑Budget Transfers ®Necessary Action ❑Auditor-Controller ❑Certified Minutes ❑Signature ❑Behavioral Health ❑Claims ❑Recommendation ❑Child Support Services ❑Correspondence ❑Record ❑County Clerk-Recorder ❑Deed(s) ❑Report to Board • ❑Elections ❑Notice of Completion ❑Return Copy to: ❑County Counsel ®Ordinance(s) ❑Return Original to: ®Development Services ❑Resolution(s) ❑W/O Enclosures ❑Planning ❑ ❑Building ❑District Attorney ❑Employment & Social Services ❑Farm,Home&4-H ❑Fire Department ❑General Services ❑ ❑Human Resources ❑Information Systems ❑LAFCo ❑Library ❑Probation ❑Public Guardian ❑Public Health ❑Environmental Health ❑Public Works ❑Land Development ❑Sheriff-Coroner ❑Superior Court ❑Treasurer-Tax Collector ❑Water&Resource Conservation Agenda Item: 5.06 Comments: Ordinance No. 3862, Foureen Mile House rezone and conditional zoning agreement 6 a county LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 October 28, 2003 Ray Johnson Fourteen Mile House, Inc: P.O. Box 1700 , Chico, CA 95927 Re: Conditional Zoning Agreement, File REZ 03-01, APN 063-360-018 Dear Mr. Johnson: Enclosed is the Agreement recommended for approval by the Butte County Board of Supervisors on October 28,2003. The signature must be Notarized before this Agreement can be recorded. Please have this Agreement signed and notarized and returned to this office for submittal to the Board of Supervisors as soon as possible in order to publish the rezone ordinance. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant 1� /lr t Enc.. J 1wpdocs/Agrees/Letter.not County of Butte And When Recorded Return to Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 CONDITIONAL ZONING AGREEMENT THIS.AGREEMENT made this. 28th day of October, 2003,.by and between Ray E. Johnson Jr., Debbie Jean, H. L. and Wanda Peterson, and William and Barbara Bouttote, herein called "Owner", and the COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California, herein called "County". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of real property, herein called the "Property", situated in the County of Butte, which Property is described as follows: All that certain real property situated in the County of Butte, State of California, being more particularly described as follows: Being a portion of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 3 East, M.D.M. and being Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 as shown on that certain Vesting Subdivision Map for Ray Johnson Jr., known as Fourteen Mile House Unit 3, which map was filed in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Butte, State of California, on December 13, 2002 in Book 155 of Maps at pages 88, 89, and 90. WHEREAS, the Property is now zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development) and is designated as Agricultural Residential by the Butte County General Plan; and WHEREAS, Owner has applied for a reclassification of zoning of the Property from its present classification to FR-2 (Foothill Recreation 2 acre-minimum minimum parcels); and WHEREAS, public hearings have been held upon said application before the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, and after having considered the matter presented, 'the Board has determined that certain conditions' to the zoning reclassification and General Plan re-designation of said real property must be imposed.so as not to create any problems inimical to the health, safety and the general welfare of the County of Butte. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that inasmuch as the reclassification to FR-2 is being granted and will be enacted by ordinance, the said reclassification shall be subject to the following condition(s): I. This Agreement is made pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-25.40 (c),between the property owner and County of Butte, and includes the following provisions: 1. The lots shown on the map recorded in the Office of the Butte County Recorder in Map book 155 at pages 88 through 90 may be divided as follows: Lot 1 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of two (2) lots; Lot 2 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of four (4) lots;Lot 3 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of two (2) lots; and Lot 4 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of four (4) lots. The total number of resulting lots will be not more than twelve (12) on the entire 43.2 acre parcel. 2. Obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans to remove the existing sight-obstructing vegetation in the Highway 32 right-of-way along the frontage of parcel 2 as shown on the map recorded in the Office of the Butte County Recorder in Map book 155 at pages 88 through 90. Vegetation removal shall be performed prior to the recordation of any subsequent land division on the land being rezoned by this action. H. In the event Owner, any successor in interest of Owner, or any person in possession of the Property, violates or fails to perforin any of the conditions of this Agreement within thirty (30) days after notice thereof as provided in Paragraph 3, the Board of Supervisors of County may instruct the County Counsel to institute legal proceedings to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. The Board of Supervisors of County may also initiate proceedings to rezone the property to the classification to which it is now zoned or any other suitable classification and to redesignate the property to its present General Plan designation. III. Notice of violation of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be sent to Owner or successor at the address of the then current owner as identified on the current tax roll. IV. In the event suit is brought by the County Counsel of County to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement,.Owner agrees to pay to County a reasonable sum to be fixed by the Court as attorney's fees. V. Each and every one of the provisions of this Agreement herein, contained shall run with the land and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the successors in interest of Owner and County, in the same manner as if they had been expressly named herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. Dated: By: Ray E. Johnson Jr. By: Debbie Jean By: H. L. Peterson By: Wanda Peterson By: William Bouttote By: Barbara Bouttote COUNTY OF BUTTE; a political subdivision of the State of California Dated: By: R.J. BEELER, Chair Butte County Board of Supervisors [Attach Notary form] Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services o�u T TFo PLANNING DIVISION o 0 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville, CA 95965 0 _ . o (530) 538.7601 Telephone c�U N'�y (530) 538.7785 Facsimile ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * GIS * PLANNING October 28, 2003 Ray Johnson Fourteen Mile House, Inc. P. 0. Box' 1700 Chico, CA, 95927 Re: Rezone, REZ 03-01, 063-360-018 Dear Mr. Johnson: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors held October 28,2003,Ordinance No. 3862 was adopted which rezones from PUD to FR-2 (Foothill Recreational — 2 acre parcels) subject to a Conditional Zoning Agreement. The property is located on the easterly-side of Highway 32, Forest Ranch. The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Judicial review must be sought not later than the 90th day following the date on which this decision becomes final, except that where a shorter time limit is provided by State or Federal law, such shorter time limit shall apply. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen Betts at 538-7153 at the Planning Division between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday. Sincerely, 6Richardson Planning/Administrative Support.Service Assistant CC: Rolls,Anderson, and Rolls Ar NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO: _ Office of Plan.&t Research Dept. ('3 Fr 1400 Tenth Street :; k Sacramento,CA 95814 OCT 30 2003 4 i� X Butte County Clerk _ -RKk FROM: Butte County Planning �C AND,,CE 7 County Center Dr.,Oroville 95965 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: REZ 03-01,Rezone AP Number: 063-360-018 Applicant: Fourteen Mile House,Inc.,P.0.Box 1700,Chico,CA 95927 State Clearinghouse Number(If submitted to clearinghouse): Contact Person: Craig Sanders Telephone Number: 538-7601 T Project Location: on the east side of State Route 32,across from Woodland Park Road Project Description: Rezone 43.24 acres from PUD(Planned Unit Development)to FR-2(Foothill Recreational,2-acre parcels) This is to advise that the Butte County Butte County Board of Supervisors has approved the above-described project on 10/28/2003 and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will, X will-not,have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures_were, X were not,made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations_was, X was not,adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR,with comments and responses and record of project approval,is available to the general public at: Date received for filing and posting at OPR Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Driv oville,CA 95965 V11onne Ch V pher Director- lopment Services �. DECLARATION OF FEES DUE (California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4) V NAME-AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: Fourteen Mile-HouSe,<Inc: +:f P. 0.Box 1700 Chico,CA',95927 FILING NO. Project Title/File Number: Rezone,REZ 03-01 APN: 063-360-018 CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION O A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $36.00 Clerk's'Documentary Handling Fee (X) B. De Minimis Impact-Certificate of Fee Exemption $36.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION-FEE REQUIRED O A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $36.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee O B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $36.00.Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3. O OTHER(Specify). $36.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT/NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. (X) PAYMENT: The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s): #20914 2. ( ) NON-PAYMENT: The above fees are required.Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: Yvonne Christopher Title: Director-Development Services Lead Agency: Butte County'Department of Development Services Date: October 29,2003 . TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FILING FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding (Fish and Game Code Sec.711.4;Section 753.5c,Title 14,California Code of Regulations) Project Title/Butte County Location: REZ 03-01,on the east side of State Route 32,across from Woodland Park Road Project Description: Rezone 43.24 acres from PUD(Planned Unit Development)to FR-2 (Foothill ; L' Recreational,2-acre parcels) Findings of Exemption(attach as necessary): L. The County of Butte has conducted an Initial Study and prepared a.Negative Declaration so as to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact: 2. When considering the record as a whole,there is no evidence before the County that the project will have potential for an adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat + upon which the wildlife depends. ' 3. The County of Butte has,on the basis of substantial evidence,rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5 (d),of Title 14,California Code of Regulations,if applicable. 4. The project is hereby found to be de minim9s in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Certification: - I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources,as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. By: a 4- J' fn- Fector Chn opher D -De elopme Services Lead Agency: County of Butte Date: October 29,2003 COUNW OF Btu AMTOR'S CERTIFICATE-Af--J}TREASURER'S REGEEPT OWALLE, CA ATR t-40 110133 RECEIVED FROM RLAE*r4EW-7 BAG'w--323 DATE 121° 11202 FUD FUND DEPT CCT CASH DESC Rini-F 6 TITLE CODE CODE CCc:DE CODE MMOUNT DEPOSIT FATE: •12 1 RECEIPTS: 20913"2015 PLANNING APDL FEES GE-M. L 00400 M Q 4210M 101001 2= .0 pmjptt Number Amount of Fee 3'3-330-€48 Fourteen bile House REZ03-09 $2.090 *062-4-I•:-079 Dell Henderson AD14 0140 ISO FCCUM-PUMFfY SALES GEML 0010 440MI 471fi3101 M001 15.00 LM,dD 00iEMPMENC GENL 0901 440M. 4 46117M 101MI i5a.00 ePmjeat Number Aee omt of Fee —#063-360-048 Fourteen Mile House DEZ 03-04 $00 WAROMEf ML HL a H GEN-L 0310 54COM 4149,01 10101 237.00 t mjeot Number Amount of Fee 53-330-349 Fourteen Wife House RF-7 0 -0l $287 FIRE P°LNG ADPL.FEE FIRE PROTECT 0100 4617240 101M 43.M Projeot Number Amount of Fee MI33-aF,Q-M Fourteen Dile House RP7 033-04 3 MODME E CsLERK`s MING FE GEML M10 4701 4612319 101031 38.00 ($M) Project Number Amount of Fee 33-36M18 Fourmen faiile House RE'02 04 $33 T6TAL $ 29031.00 rAf�'t C�°'EQ f ly: RECrENEF BY: AUDITOR-CON- TROLLER TROLLER TREASURER r v}l ite=tmasurer pirck-- frog 0&l3ry=depa_star golden.rale X1 e o' �`�� SI fog �p 7,10 �~ 4.3 �bfo/}o,�.Wo lyse �„ 74 RECEIPT TOTAL PUBLIC PUBLIC ENV. NOE/NOD DATE NO. RECEIVED WORKS LAFCO PLANNING SALES HEALTH FIRE F/6 FEE OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FRON RECEIPT 20914. OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE _ STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ISSU BY _:� FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE, INC. WELLS FARGO BANK 2881 P.O.BOX 1700 CHICO,CA 95926 CHICO,CA 95927 91-119/1221(1) (530)893-1700 12/30/2002 tCt�, T 8 PAY TO THE Butte County Treasurer $ **2,516.00 e ORDER OF c ' Two Thousand Five Hundred Sixteen and 00/100******************************************* '= DOLLARS 8 z _ Butte County Treasurer f Z 0 Fr . w rn #063-360-018 application fee MEMO 111110028811116 4: 1, 22LOLL90: OSIS L03687116 l 1f BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA REPORT — OCTOBER 28, 2003 Applicant: Ray Johnson Location: Located on the easterly side of .File#: REZ 03-01 Highway 32, approximately 7,500 feet south of Forest , Request: A rezone on 43.2 acres from Ranch. PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 Parcel Size: 43:2 (+/-) acres •" (Foothill Recreation 2-acre minimum parcels size). The Zone date: July 13, 1993 property is currently divided into four residential parcels. Supervisor District: 3 The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres in size. Attachments: A. Conditional Zoning Agreement G.P.: Agricultural Residential (I to B. P.C. Agenda report/minutes 5/8/03 40 acre parcels) C. P.C. Agenda report/minutes 9/11/03 D. Correspondence received Zoning: PUD (Planned Unit E. Initial Study ,Development) F. Site Plan APN: 063-360-018 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Commission has recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the requested rezone subject.to a Conditional Zoning Agreement and the findings and conditions contained herein. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is a request to rezone four parcels totaling 43 acres from PUD (Planned Unit Development)to FR-2 (Foothill Recreation 2 acre minimum parcel size). The project site is located on the easterly side of State Highway 32, approximately 1.4 miles southerly of the small commercial center of the community of Forest Ranch. 'The rezone would result in the potential for approximately 19 lots to be created on the 43 acre parcel. However, the Planning Commission, in agreement with all four property owners,has recommended a that the Board adopt a Conditional Zoning Agreement which limits development on the site to a maximum of 12 lots, inclusive of the existing four parcels. The project site is surrounded by undeveloped and residential parcels,ranging in size from 1 to 198 acres. Both existing and proposed parcel sizes are larger than the surrounding residential parcels, BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION■AGENDA REPORT■ PAGE 1 ■ which are predominantly half-acre or one-acre lots. Zoning on the surrounding parcels is TM-40 (Timber Mountain, 40-acre minimum), TM-5 (Timber Mountain, 5-acre minimum), and Planned Unit Development (PUD). PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: ► Slopes on-site vary from 5%to 30% with the average slope being about 10%. ► No homes are currently developed on the property. The four existing lots can be developed with one home each. ► Individual septic systems and shared private wells will serve the property. ► Vegetation is mixed conifer/oak woodland. No. The site is not located within a 100-year flood zone or floodway. ► Elevations range from approximately 2,200 feet to 2,320 feet above sea level. ► Roadway improvements including left turn lanes already exist on Highway 32 to serve the project. ► Both the PUD and FR-2 zones allow for single family residential development. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Land Use and Zoning ► The FR-2 zone is conditionally consistent with the Agricultural Residential Land Use designation, if the Conditional Zoning and Development criteria are met as stated in the General Plan (see findings). ► The single family and agricultural uses allowed in the FR-2 zone are compatible with the Agricultural Residential land use designation and surrounding rural residential uses. 00- The .project is consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act.. Traffic ► The project will generate approximately 76 additional average daily vehicle trips. ►` Local area roadways are all paved and have the capacity to handle the increase in traffic. Testimony at the Planning Commission hearings identified a sight—distance issue for westbound traffic approaching the entrance to the project. This issue is addressed by the ■BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT■ PAGE 2 ■ • Conditional Zoning Agreement. Drainage Issues ON. Caltrans indicated a potential for drainage impact to Highway 32 which must be addressed at the time of subdivision map application. Water Quality Issues ► A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan would be required from Regional Water Quality Control if more than 1 acre (cumulative) is to be disturbed. ANALYSIS: The following conditional Zoning and development criteria must be met to find the proposed zone i consistent with the Agricultural Residential Land Use designation: 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. The project is not adjacent to any agricultural uses. Some timber management or harvesting may occur in the area, but the proposed residential uses would not conflict with these activities. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. The Butte County Environmental Health Division has indicated no particular objections to the project. The existing well shows proof of available water. 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. There is a year around.manned fire station 6 miles to the north and a volunteer station 1.7 miles to the north in Forest Ranch. 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. Based on latest traffic counts Highway 32 has the capacity to serve the project without affecting the Level of Service. 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. Full commercial services area available in Chico approximately 13 miles away. Basic services are available in Forest Ranch, approximately 2 miles away. ISSUES RAISED AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION ►' Total development potential of 19 lots was too high. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■AGENDA REPORT■PAGE 3 ■ The Commission recommends a Conditional Development Agreement to limit the total lots to no more than 12. ► Traffic safety eastbound entering the project. The Commission recommends a Conditional Zoning Agreement requiring vegetation removal along the Highway 32 frontage to improve the sight distance. CEQA ISSUES /ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: ► An initial study was performed for the project and a mitigated negative declaration is recommended. ► The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts that could affect the following resources: aesthetics;temporary air quality issues during construction;oak tree habitat;deer herd habitat; archaeological; erosion; fire safety, and impacts to public services. ► Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to alleviate these potentially significant impacts. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the Board find the project consistent with the General Plan and that the proposed environmental determination is applicable. The following actions are recommended: I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study did identify the potential for impacts to aesthetics;air quality during construction;oak tree habitat;deer herd habitat; archaeological; erosion; fire safety, and impacts to public service;a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. B. The Board of Supervisors has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. C. On the basis of the whole record before the Board of Supervisors, including the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Agenda Report and any comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the Rezone for Fourteen Mile House (Ray Johnson),Planning Division File No.REZ 03-01,will have a significant effect on the environment. D. Find that the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■AGENDA REPORT• PAGE 4 ■ E. Recommend adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts. 6 II. The design of the proposed project will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a"de minimis" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR 753.5, is not required at this time. The project site is not known to contain any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat;have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources; or, conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan;there is a potential for impacts to oak woodland habitat which will occur at the time of subdivision development and the appropriate Fish and Game Fess will be collected at that time. III. Approve Rezone REZ 03-01 for Fourteen Mile House(Ray Johnson)on APN 063-360-018. from PUD(Planned Unit Development)to FR-2(Foothill Recreational-2 acre parcels)on a 43 (+/-) acre parcel and adopt an Ordinance rezoning, including a conditional zoning agreement, f6r said property with the following findings: A. The project is consistent with the conditional zoning and development criteria of the ' Agricultural Residential General Plan designation as follows: 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. The project is not adjacent to any agricultural uses. Some timber management or harvesting may take place on surrounding parcels, but the proposed residential uses would not conflict with these activities. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. Based on information received from the Butte County Environmental Health Division, the project appears to be able to meet the County's water and sewage disposal requirements. There is an existing well on-site that can provide potable water and the soils are suitable for septic system installation. 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. The site is located approximately 6 miles from the nearest year around manned fire station north of Forest Ranch on Highway 32. The closest volunteer station is approximately 1.7 miles away in Forest Ranch. This is seen as adequate for fire protection because the ultimate division of the property will include the requirement for a pressurized water system with ■BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION•AGENDA REPORT ■PAGE 5 ■ hydrants. This will provide a much higher degree of fire protection that serves the surrounding area. 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. All traffic generated by the project will utilize State Highway 32 for access. Major commercial services and intermediate and high schools are in Chico, approximately 13 miles to the southeast. Traffic volumes on area roads are relatively low. The 2001 Caltrans counts for Highway 32 show that adequate capacity exists to handle the traffic generated by the project. (See the Environmental checklist for a complete discussion of the traffic impacts) 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. The nearest full commercial services are located in Chico approximately 13 miles away via a well maintained high-speed roadway. A small market and gasoline service is available in Forest Ranch, approximately 2 miles away. Intermediate and high school services are also located in Chico. B. The conditional zoning agreement shall contain the following conditions: 1. The lots shown on the map recorded in the Office of the Butte County Recorder in Map book 155 at pages 88 through 90 maybe divided as follows: Lot 1 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of two(2) lots); Lot 2 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of four(4)lots;Lot 3 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of two (2) lots; and Lot 4 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of four(4)lots. The total number of resulting lots will be not more than twelve(12)on the entire 43.2 acre parcel. 2. Obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans to remove the existing sight- obstructing vegetation in the Highway 32 right-of-way along the frontage of parcel 2 as shown on the map recorded in the Office of the Butte County Recorder in Map book 155 at pages 88 through 90. Vegetation removal shall be performed prior to the recordation of any subsequent land division on the land being rezoned by this action. ■BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT■ PAGE 6 ■ C � g Vicinity Map s m m a PROJECT LOCATION rown o �0 oa REZ 03-01 AP 063-360-018 FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE INC. IO-£0 ZWIR 810-09£-£90 :ON lowed jossassd £# ws!Q (sib am Z-Iguopmwa IMM :;san6ag 3 �uosrnaadns N (1umdoiamm mn Pmmid)cnd :Ouoz 8upspa -w-E 0£:O i @£00Z`8Z mgoM mpa SupsaH aus :lauesp -3uI`asnoH 2PW u04n03 :;uv3gddV SHOSIA2IHditS 30 C[HVOS A.LAt(1OJ UJAH PIM WA om owl 000« om 000s o009 WL 0009 0005 0004 0008 ME 0006 0 M 1 -` E � / ! Jay f f �'�• A.n,1, jh� - y r _ l Zl1' 1 •I1 rI { { It h vh ppaa..N: �� LI .Il. �/♦V-.• 1 • � J F 'r s '�{ 3 t4. � i 'fY rc {f y Ste. ��..:r.�� '��:� c~ r�:YE.+•fi G$ r.•.*.. : } .. K-D �0,;��/07;�/V O�d i .........• ::5::::iC: hF+1v.,. y 4Y r{ f�"�I`� �f T , , - Y c .♦,•d • ....... SPC 3 d .. ., t:'::• :h 3F +�lF fiF Y+i ✓bs^ ,r�xr •£.+^ d� •• Y R �4 t �• }. } rr`n r � +�L r�h N ir-:;r2Y• - `� "kri _r'. •p„ay-v } �S J: F 1, S x N :wr N •J 1 14^� W-fr ` 7 -d °{ °.6.11 c},_+c f• �` �d Q V n,_ N I." ✓ls" r 99�iss ,ti. r� ^"i:i• _ ,1. r _ HUK A. / 1 Y ILIA ok 'f'r .`: r 5 v.r.If� ll{i G r 1• :J'• 4 hh r IK-r 1 ;: x.1 ;y �:V1 11' 1/ R:. H �` {h{y Yr+'•� �F8;�}ih r ' 1; .. _" � '.' a^ it ••" fl - �rYV '• Board Transmittal Sheet Board Agenda Report TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Attachment A: Conditional Zoning Agreement 1 Attachment B: P.C. Agenda Report/minutes 5/8/03 4 Attachment C: P.C. Agenda Report/minutes 9/11/03 20 Attachment D: Correspondence received 31 Attachment E: Initial Study 42 Attachment F: Site Plan County of Butte And When Recorded Return to Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 CONDITIONAL ZONING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 2003, by and between Ray E: Johnson Jr., Debbie Jean, H. L. and Wanda Peterson, and William and , Barbara Bouttote, herein called "Owner", and the COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California, herein called "County". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of real property, herein called the " "Property", situated in the County of Butte, which Property is described as follows: All that certain real property situated in the County of Butte, State of California, being more particularly described as follows: Being a portion of.Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 3 East, M.D.M. and being Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 as shown on that certain Vesting Subdivision Map for Ray Johnson Jr., known as Fourteen Mile House Unit 3, which map was filed in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Butte, State of California, on December. 13, 2002 in Book 155 of Maps at pages 88, 89, and 90. WHEREAS, the Property is now zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development) and is designated as Agricultural Residential by the Butte County General Plan; and WHEREAS, Owner has applied for a reclassification of .zoning of the Property. from its present classification to FR-2 (Foothill' Recreation 2 acre minimum parcels); and WHEREAS, public hearings have been held upon said application before the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, and after having considered the matter presented, the Board has determined that certain conditions to the zoning ` reclassification and General Plan re-designation of said real property must be imposed so as not to create any problems inimical to the health, safety and the general welfare of the County of Butte. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that inasmuch as the reclassification to FR-2 is being granted and will be enacted by ordinance, the said reclassification shall be subject to the following condition(s): I. This Agreement is made pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-25.40 (c), between.the property owner and County of Butte, and includes the following provisions: 1. The lots shown on the map recorded in the Office of the Butte County Recorder in Map book.155 at pages 88 through 90 may be divided as follows: Lot 1 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of two (2) lots; Lot 2 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of four (4) lots; Lot 3 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of two (2) lots; and Lot 4 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of four (4) lots. The total number of resulting lots will be not more than twelve (12) on the entire 43.2 acre parcel. 2. Obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans to remove the existing- sight-obstructing vegetation in the Highway 32 right-of-way along the frontage of parcel 2 as shown on the map recorded in the Office of the Butte County Recorder in Map book 155 at pages 88 through 90. ` Vegetation removal shall be performed prior to the recordation of any subsequent land division on the land being rezoned by this action. II. In the event Owner, any successor in interest of Owner;or any person in possession of the Property, violates or fails to perform any of the conditions of this Agreement within thirty (30) days after notice thereof as provided in Paragraph 3, the Board of Supervisors of County may instruct the County Counsel to institute legal proceedings to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. The Board of Supervisors of County may also initiate proceedings to rezone the property to the classification to which it is now zoned or any other suitable classification and to redesignate the property to its present General Plan designation. III. Notice of violation of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be sent to Owner or successor at the address of the then current owner as identified on the current tax roll. IV. In the event suit is brought by the County Counsel of County to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, Owner agrees to pay to County a reasonable sum to be fixed by the Court as attorney's fees. V. Each and every one of the provisions of this Agreement herein contained shall run with the land and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the successors in interest of Owner and County, in the same manner as if they had been expressly named herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement . the day and year first above written. ' Dated: By: Ray E. Johnson Jr. r By: Debbie Jean By: H. L. Peterson By: Wanda Peterson By: William Bouttote By Barbara Bouttote COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California Dated: By: Bob Beeler, Chair Butte County Board of Supervisors [Attach Notary form] s ----- - .. - �����• 4 7� ' 1 '. tv. fi 7, x •S ♦.moi Y'.. » >. u f44i M Ir MINIMmm (4, tk 1 � r ' fps ...... ...... .. . . .. .. .. .. a• ;tg p ky �• sir '•� •:i i, ik. Woodland : C....7• �: Pro ect Location M. i f 7 r f' /) •.57:!!!::x.!'::::: S ) !t f. r7� iE fi ....... > - Z�i f`. 'eyk 7+illw. r M. ..iPoC� NM Z. if 4 K. j� )e f 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 Fest BUTTE COUNTY BOARD of SUPERVISORS Applicant: Fourteen Mile House,Inc. Owner: Same Hearing Date: October 28,2003 @ 10:30 a.m. Existing Zone: PUD(Planned Unit Development) N Supervisorial Request: Rezone to FR-2(Foothill Recreational-2 acre parcels) District#3 Assessor Parcel No: 063-360-018 Fite:REZ 03-01 aa•wcr�..wxr+r.r�sar:.arra�a,w.►+r•.ww•�rrr r.wcs.rwa.+•xvr .enw7w...•rar..ayiw. bgLCCI JAM OQ3-3(q)-OI �dssczr: ��rautr,.� k:.f5 -3 0,00,P)t iScc':'rtlouflJ ;3ctr L:imr e) I i�r..Yt;ttw►)ass: t r'; ,art �r'' S4>!)i �� �'s 3ik'r s �t; .�zx�ctt; ►u�: bnb nuq 1)r-ArJOIJIJton _�...._(},riurC 431br. -ate+.raw..,w,mw�rw�w.w�awr�t,u..w�r«ra+rr•.nw+..war..�.-sw.rr�.rrgw-,�.-r-.-._s..+�wa+ur.a....wwq.tic-yT - w,rrw.wirw,Ks�.r� rtM��.�-��L««.'�Mf�'�,iC.r i'" =•�+ 6�G7A'"S7�•R:1N,= ]f'�L �•��; "A°CR,�1_. =,�C4,�I�iw N133 'KA'4 4l.1_4 200 E.M AVO c{A'= MG JC:7tr ilk, l;.4`{)o t OtSJ 0,14 • ,� •:�; '�-•: � ' - Hca i � • 1u '40 �•,•,� a,-�;�±,.r•�•re.•x.,�F,'- -fin:xx:��aao.- .:.+y�- illwq • � � S i i= i�r s r r�= � �. ��a sio�ia�n:cr�t� . _ ._ w�• t _�; i' 1�"{�i �Lj'�"','��� I(Y�`�'� elf_ ._ � 1 13$►•4t„� i — •J �•7i7-r..ti�i)f1� i i tl 4 t 1 r �. .:e.r .{,� �' •• 4' - "it+�wac:` .�'d��i`��•tw.'lr:.'• .��wYat'tt�'�s^'amrlu` -... ..{�e�o�uwp,e.-+pr.,. �f�7 �iC JUN-Sp r �t•,i •��TYe' :,F' S t. _ .,3 `�...,.w•o..r..n..aG.winwrw..,..w,..a..i...w..nw.aa,rt�..i..,na.,r+ ran..nw.,-...�.....a:...».�...a..•a�"�'p`r;.:.o+...Kr.n....,w+....,.:.�....` � - B..UTtE COUNTY • CLEW, OF THE BOARD USE ONLY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING DATE: AGENDA TRANSMITTAL AGENDA ITEM: Ray Johnson, Fourteen Mile House, Inc, Rezone, Report to the Board AGENDA TITLE: DDS, DATE: 10/14/03 MEETING DATE 10/28/03 DEPARTMENT: Planning REQUESTED: Craig PHONE: 7603 REGULAR CONSENT X CONTACT: Sanders DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Ray Johnson, Fourteen Mile House, Inc., Rezone on 43.2 acres from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 (Foothill Recreation — 2 acre minimum parcel size). The property is currently divided into four residential parcels. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres in size. The property is located on the east side of Highway 32, approximately 7,500 feet south of Forest Ranch, APN 063-360-018 (CS) (REZ 03-01) ACTION REQUESTED: See attached AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTALS REQUIRE THE ORIGINAL (1) IN A FORMAT THAT CAN BE REPRODUCED BY STANDARD OFFICE EQUIPMENT ATTACH EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM AND OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION AS NECESSARY Budgetary Impact: Yes No x CAO OFFICE USE ONLY If yes, complete Budgetary Impact Worksheet on back Budget Transfer Requested: Yes No x Administrative Office Review If yes, complete Budget Transfer Request Worksheet on back. Administrative Office Staff Contact (Deadline is one business day prior to normal agenda deadline.) 4/5/s Vote Required: Yes: _ No: Will Proposal Require an Agreement: Yes No x Auditor-Controller's Number(if Date Received by Clerk of the Board: required): County Counsel's Approval: Yes No x Will Proposal Require Additional Personnel: Yes _ No x Number of Permanent: Temp Extra Help Previous Board Action Date: Additional Information Attached: Yes x No Describe: memo Rev. 06/02 M1 • I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study did identify the potential for impacts to aesthetics;air quality during construction; oak tree habitat;deer herd habitat;archaeological; erosion; fire safety, and impacts to public service; a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. B. The Board of Supervisors has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. C. On the basis of the whole record before the Board of Supervisors, including the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Agenda Report and any comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the Rezone for Fourteen Mile House (Ray Johnson),Planning Division File No.REZ 03-01,will have a significant effect on the environment. D. Find that the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County,which is the Lead Agency. E. Recommend adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts. II. The design of the proposed project will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a"de minimis" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR 753.5, is not required at this time. The project site is not known to contain any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat;have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources; or, conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan;there is a potential for impacts to oak woodland habitat which will occur at the time of subdivision development and the appropriate Fish and Game Fess will be collected at that time. III. Approve Rezone REZ 03-01 for Fourteen Mile House(Ray Johnson)on APN 063-360-018 from PUD(Planned Unit Development)to FR-2(Foothill Recreational-2 acre parcels)on a 43 (+/-) acre parcel and adopt an Ordinance rezoning, including a conditional zoning agreement, for said property with the following findings: A. The project is consistent with the conditional zoning and development criteria of the Agricultural Residential General Plan designation as follows: L Compatible with neighboring*agricultural activities. ■BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION■AGENDA REPORT■PAGE 1 ■ The project is not adjacent to any agricultural uses. Some timber management or harvesting may take place on surrounding parcels, but the proposed residential uses would not conflict with these activities. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. Based on information received from the Butte County Environmental Health Division, the project appears to be able to meet the County's water and sewage disposal requirements. There is an existing well on-site that can provide potable water and the soils are suitable for septic system installation. 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. The site is located approximately 6 miles from the nearest year around manned fire station north of Forest Ranch on Highway 32. The closest volunteer station is approximately 1.7 miles away in Forest Ranch. This is seen as adequate for fire protection because the ultimate division of the, , property will include the requirement for a pressurized water system with hydrants. This will provide a much higher degree of fire protection that serves the surrounding area. 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. All traffic generated by the project will utilize State Highway 32 for access. Major commercial services and intermediate and high schools are in Chico, approximately 13 miles to the southeast. Traffic volumes on area roads are relatively low. The 2001 Caltrans counts for Highway 32 show that adequate capacity exists to handle the traffic generated by the project. (See.the Environmental checklist for a complete discussion of the traffic impacts) 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. The nearest full commercial services are located in Chico approximately 13 miles away via a well maintained high-speed roadway. A small market and gasoline service is available in Forest Ranch, approximately 2 miles away. Intermediate and high school services are also located in Chico. B. The conditional zoning agreement shall contain the following conditions: 1. The lots shown on the map recorded in the Office of the Butte County Recorder in Map book 155 at pages 88 through 90 maybe divided as follows: Lot 1 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of two (2)lots);Lot 2 may be further subdivided to create a maximum of four(4)lots;Lot 3 maybe further subdivided to create a maximum of two (2) lots; and Lot 4 may be ■BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■AGENDA REPORT■ PAGE 2 ■ further subdivided to create a maximum of four(4)lots. The total number of resulting lots will be not more than twelve(12)on the entire 43.2 acre parcel. 2. Obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans to remove the existing sight- obstructing vegetation in the Highway 32 right-of-way along the frontage of parcel 2 as shown on the map recorded in the Office of the Butte County Recorder in Map book 155 at pages 88 through 90. Vegetation removal shall be performed prior to the recordation of any subsequent land division on the land being rezoned by this action.. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■AGENDA REPORT ■PAGE 3 ■ l ORDINANCE NO. 1 AN ORDINANCE ZONING A PORTION OF THE COUNTY OF 2 BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AN FR-2 (FOOTHILL 3. RECREATIONAL) DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-25.40. . 4 The Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, 5 under and pursuant to Section 24-25.40 of the Butte County Code, ORDAINS, as 6 follows: 7 SECTION I. The hereinafter described area situate in the County of _ 8 Butte, State of California, shall be and it is hereby zoned as an FR-2.(Foothill (Foothill 9 Recreational — 2 acre parcels) District, and such area shall be subject to the 10 11 restrictions and restricted uses and regulations pursuant to Butte County Code 12 Section 24-110. 13 Said area so zoned being located in the unincorporated area of Butte 14 County, Forest Ranch, more particularly described as follows: 15 Being a portion of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 3 East, 16 M.D.M. and being Parcels 1,:2,. 3, and 4 as shown on that certain 17 Vesting Subdivision Map for Ray Johnson Jr., known as Fourteen Mile House Unit 3,which map was filed in the Office of the Recorder of the 18 County of Butte, State of California, on December 13, 2002 in Book 155 of Maps at pages 88, 89, and 90. 19 SECTION 2. Conditional Zoning. The zoning reclassification enacted. 20 21 by this ordinance is subject to condition(s) imposed pursuant to Butte County Code { 122 Section 24-25.40, subsections (c) and (d). The conditions are as specified in a 23 Conditional Zoning Agreement to be signed by the Owner(s)of the property and by 24 the County. Said Agreement shall be in substantially the form attached hereto as 25 Exhibit A. The description of the property which is the subject of this rezoning shall 26 J t� ♦ r iT be the same in the Agreement as set forth in Section 1 above. The Chair of the 1 Board of Supervisors is authorized and directed to sign the Agreement on behalf of ? the County of Butte. 3 4 SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be and it is hereby declared to be 5 in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after the date of its passage, 6 and before the expiration of fifteen (15)days after its passage, this Ordinance shall 7 be published once with the names of the members of the Board of Supervisors 8 voting for and against it in the , a newspaper published in the County of Butte, State 9 of California. 10 it PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the 12 County of Butte, State of California, on the day of , 2003, by the 13 following vote: 14 AYES: t 15 NOES: ABSENT: 16 NOT VOTING: 17 R. J. BEELER, CHAIR Butte County Board of Supervisors 18 19 ATTEST: PAUL MC.INTOSH, Chief Administrative 20 Officer and Clerk of the Board 21 22 By 23 24 25 26 2 ' t MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO Butte County Assessor's Office FROM: Butte County Planning Department SUBJECT: Fourteen Mile House, Inc., FEZ 03-01 DATE: September 25,2003 Pursuant to Section 65863.5 of the Government Code, the following parcel, identified as APN: 063-360-018, was: %f Rezoned from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) Granted a variance to Issued a conditional w BUTTE COUNTY CLE F THE BOARD USE ONLY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING DATE: AGENDA TRANSMITTAL AGENDA ITEM: Ray Johnson, Fourteen Mile House,-Inc, Rezone, Report to the Board AGENDA TITLE: DDS, DATE: 9/12/03 MEETING DATE 9/23/03 DEPARTMENT: Planning REQUESTED: Craig PHONE: 7603 REGULAR CONSENT X CONTACT: Sanders DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Planning Commission Action Report to the Board of Supervisors for Ray Johnson, Fourteen Mile House, Inc. for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is FR-2 (Foothill Recreation — 2-acre minimum parcel size). The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank, and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development has been completed in the first two "units" of that development. The subject property is the third "unit" of that residential development, but is subject to a separate homeowners association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. The property is located on the east side of Highway 32, across from Woodland Park Road, about two miles south of Forest Ranch APN 063-360-018 (CS) (REZ 03- 01) Pursuant to Butte County Code Sections 24-25.30 and 24-25.40(a) & (b), the Board shall set this Rezone for a public hearing within ninety days of receiving the Action Report from the Planning Commission and shall give notice of the hearing date at least ten days prior to the hearing. If no action is taken by the Board within the ninety days, the proposed Rezone shall be deemed denied. AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTALS REQUIRE THE ORIGINAL (1) IN A FORMAT THAT CAN BE REPRODUCED BY STANDARD OFFICE EQUIPMENT ATTACH EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM AND OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION AS NECESSARY Budgetary Impact: Yes No x CAO OFFICE USE ONLY If yes, complete Budgetary Impact Worksheet on back Budget Transfer Requested: Yes No x Administrative Office Review If yes, complete Budget Transfer Request Worksheet on back. Administrative Office Staff Contact (Deadline is one business day prior to normal agenda deadline.) 4/5/s Vote Required: Yes: _ No: Will Proposal Require an Agreement: Yes No x . Auditor-Controller's Number(if Date Received by Clerk of the Board: required): County Counsel's Approval: Yes No x Will Proposal Require Additional Personnel: Yes _ No x Number of Permanent: Temp Extra Help Previous Board Action Date: Additional Information Attached: Yes x No Describe: memo Rev. 06102 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION REPORT APPLICANT: Ray Johnson, Fourteen Mile House, Inc. OWNER: Same FILE#: REZ 03-01 REQUEST: Proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding environmental impacts and Rezone for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is FR-2 (Foothill Recreation—2-acre minimum parcel size). The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41,7.24, 17.79,and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank, and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development has been completed in the first two"units"of that development. The subject property is the third"unit"of that residential development,but is subject to a separate homeowners association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. LOCATION: The property is located on the east side of Highway 32, across from Woodland Park Road,about two miles south of Forest Ranch.APN 063-360- 018 (CS) (REZ 03-01) i I DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: December 30, 2002 ACREAGE: 43.2 acres ' PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AND SUPPORTING FINDINGS: I. Recommends Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study did identify the potential for increased light and glare; a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. B. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. C. On the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Agenda Report and any comments received,.there is no substantial evidence that the Rezone for Fourteen Mile House (Ray Johnson),Planning Division File No.REZ 03-01 will have a significant effect on the environment. D. Find that the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. E. Recommend adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts. H. The design of the proposed project will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a"de minims" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR.753.5,.is not required. The project site is not known to contain any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans, policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat; have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act;interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources; or, conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. III. Recommend approval to the Board of Supervisors of Rezone REZ 03-01 for Fourteen Mile House(Ray Johnson)on APN 063-360-018 from PUD(Planned Unit Development)to FR- 2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels)'on a 43 (+/-) acre parcel, and recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance rezoning said property with the following findings: A. The project is consistent with the conditional zoning and development criteria of the Agricultural Residential (1 to 40) General Plan designation as follows: 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. The project is not adjacent to any agricultural uses. Some timber management or harvesting may take place on surrounding parcels,but the proposed residential uses would not conflict with these activities. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. Based on information received from the Butte County Environmental Health Division, the project appears to be able to meet the County's water and sewage disposal requirements. There is an existing well on-site that can provide potable water and the soils are suitable for septic system installation. 3. Availability of adequate fire protection-facilities. The site is located approximately 6 miles from the nearest year around manned fire. station north of Forest Ranch on Highway 32. The closest volunteer station is approximately 1.7 miles away in Forest Ranch. This is seen as adequate for fire protection because the ultimate division of the property.will include the requirement for a pressurized water system with hydrants. This will provide a much higher degree of fire protection that serves the surrounding area. 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. All traffic generated by the project will utilize State Highway 32 for access. Major commercial services and intermediate and high schools are in Chico,approximately 13 miles to the southeast.Traffic volumes on area roads are relatively low. The 2001 CalTrans counts for Highway 32 show that adequate capacity exists to handle the traffic generated by the project. (See the Environmental checklist for a complete discussion of the traffic impacts) 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. The nearest full commercial services are located in Chico approximately 13 miles away via a well maintained high-speed roadway. A small market and gasoline service is available in Forest Ranch, approximately 2 miles away. Intermediate and high school services are also located in Chico. -IV: Conditional Zoning Agreement Conditions of approval: 1. The rezone is a Conditional Rezone limiting the number of homes to be.built on these four parcels to 12 allocated according to the existing CC&Rs, but specifying in Conditional Zoning Agreement the number of parcels that can be created on each of the existing 4 parcels. 2. The applicant prior to any further subdivision shall adequately clear the sight line distances of Highway 32 near the intersection of their access road and Highway 32. VOTE: 4-0-1-0 AYES: Commissioners Marin,Leland,Evans, and Chairman Lambert NOES: No one ABSENT: Commissioner Nelson ABSTAINED: No one DATE OF LAST HEARING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION: September 11, 2003 J AWPDOCS\BOARDLTS\REZ 13.MRG t Butte County Department of Development Services o�13TTF0 PLANNING DIVISION o 0 7 County Center Drive o 0 Oroville, CA 95965 0 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile *� ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * GIS * PLANNING September 12, 2003 Ray Johnson Fourteen Mile House, Inc. P. 0. Box 1700 Chico, CA 95927 .d Re: Rezone, REZ 03-01, AP: 063-360-018 Dear Mr. Johnson: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held September 11, 2003, your request for a Rezone.to FR-2 on property located on the east side of Deer Creek Highway, at Black Oak Terrace, about two miles south of Forrest Ranch, was recommended for approval as a Conditional Zoning. A report of this matter will be made to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at which time she will set the public hearing date. You will be notified of the date and time. Should you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact Craig Sanders at 7603 between .8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Services Assistant /lr kWettens/merge letters/APPRDIMUP.dot • - ..,��••�.mss--.�'_ . � r -• . .. utte oun� �6 LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH A.ND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES =y . 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 September 4, 2003 Mr. Ray E. Johnson, Jr. President Fourteen Mile House, Inc. P. 0. Box 1700 Chico, CA 95927 RE: REZONE, APN 063-360-018, REZ 03-01 Dear Mr. Johnson: Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Rezone of 43.24 acres from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) located.on the easterly side of Highway 32, approximately 7,500 feet south of Forest Ranch. Should you have any concerns with the report or conditions of approval, please contact us in advance of the meeting so that we may work together to resolve your concerns. A public hearing has been set for September 11, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Craig Sanders of this office at 538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. j Sincerely, , Rom Thornton Office Assistant II Enc. cc: Rolls, Anderson, and Rolls I � BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT - SEPTEMBER 11, 2003 Applicant: Ray Johnson APN: 063-360-018 File #: REZ 03-01 Location: Located on the easterly side of Request: A rezone for 43.2 acres on the Highway 32, approximately east side of State Route 32, 7,500 feet south of Forest across from Woodland Park Ranch. - Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation — 2 acre Parcel Size: 43.2 (+/-) acres minimum parcel size. The property is currently Zone date: July 13, 1993 configured in four individual parcels for residential Supervisor District: 3 development. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 Attachments: acres in size. A. P.C. Agenda report 5/8/03 G.P.: Agricultural Residential (1 to B. Initial Study 40) C. Letters received Zoning: PUD (Planned Unit Development) STAFF COMMENT: Staff recommends that the PlanningCommission recommend approval of this project to the Board of pP Supervisors with findings. DISCUSSION: This project was continued from the Planning Commission's May 22, 2003, meeting with the direction for staff to revise the initial stud to address concerns raised b neighbors. The initial stud Y Y � Y has been revised and mitigation measures included to address potential environmental impacts. A Negative Declaration with mitigation measures is recommended. The characteristics of the requested rezone from PUD to FR-2 have not changed and all of the . information and discussions contained in the original staff report are still applicable. The original " report is attached as Attachment"A". . t - - ■BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■AGENDA REPORT■PAGE 1 ■ CEQA ISSUES: Staff originally preared an initial study that did not identify any significant or potentially significant impacts of the rezone and a Negative Declaration was recommended. The original initial study did acknowledge that approval of the rezone would result in a potential for additional development on the proj ect site. The Initial Study evaluated the extent of the potential development and looked at the feasibility of mitigating the impacts if and when a tentative parcel map or subdivision map is submitted for consideration. No physical changes to the site would be permitted by the approval of the rezone. It was explained that any future map application must have a subsequent environmental review and that the actual,mitigation measures would be applied to the map project, which creates the physical change to the site. The Commission directed staff to amend the initial study to include all applicable mitigation measures in the environmental document for the rezone rather than addressing them at the map stage. The attached initial study now contains eleven mitigation measures that would be applicable to the ultimate development of the site. Mitigations included addressing potential impacts from street lighting,building aesthetics, dust generation,oak tree removal,winter deer range, erosion, and fire safety. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission accept the proposed environmental document and recommend that the Board of Supervisors approve the requested rezone. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: Should the Planning Commission find that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and the proposed environmental determination is applicable, staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions. I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings: A.,_ An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study did identify the potential for increased light and glare; a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. B. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. C. On the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Agenda Report and any comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the Rezone for Fourteen Mile House (Ray Johnson),Planning Division File No.REZ 03-01,will have a significant effect on the environment. D. Find that the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. •BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION•AGENDA REPORT ■PAGE 2 ■ E. Recommend adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts. H. The design of the proposed project will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a"de minimis" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife.or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR 753.5, is not required. The project site is not known to contain any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat; have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act;interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources; or, conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. Ill. Recommend approval to the Board of Supervisors of Rezone REZ 03-01 for Fourteen Mile. House(Ray Johnson)on APN 063-360-018 from PUD(Planned Unit Development)to FR- 2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) on a 43 (+/-) acre parcel, and recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance rezoning said property with the following findings: A. The project is consistent with the conditional zoning and development criteria of the Agricultural Residential (1 to 40) General Plan designation as follows: 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. The project is not adjacent to any agricultural uses. Some timber management or harvesting may take place on surrounding parcels;but the proposed residential uses would not conflict with these activities. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. Based on information received from the Butte County Environmental Health Division,,the project appears to be able to meet the County's water and sewage disposal requirements. There is an existing well on-site that can provide potable water and the soils are suitable for septic system installation. 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. The site is located approximately 6 miles from the nearest year around manned fire station north of Forest Ranch on Highway 32. The closest volunteer station is approximately 1.7 miles away in Forest Ranch. This is seen as adequate for fire protection because the ultimate division of the property will include the requirement for a pressurized water system with hydrants. This will provide a much higher degree of fire protection that serves the surrounding area. t ■BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■AGENDA REPORT■ PAGE 3 • I� 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. All traffic generated by the project will utilize State Highway 32 for access. Major ` commercial services and intermediate and high schools are in Chico,approximately 13 miles to the southeast.Traffic volumes on area roads are relatively low. The 2001 CalTrans counts for Highway 32 show that adequate capacity exists to handle the traffic generated by the project. (See the Environmental checklist for a complete discussion of the traffic impacts) 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. • -The nearest full commercial services are located in Chico approximately 13 miles away via a well maintained high-speed roadway. A small market and gasoline service is available in Forest Ranch, approximately 2 miles away. Intermediate and high school services are also located in Chico. T ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION■AGENDA REPORT■PAGE 4 ■ Ali mom A .1r66� :i•Y� ~ . 6� f /L t •< �. ................ ............. ; >................ ............... :::.:;.: rh b { S:> R : r 1 � ! •4 n RK g•. �r R Mf n LOFi•. 'o �e as ( I l !R l r S �Vf h ;xL :'k0 KXX.4 d0 kph 2' X•Y• Y :?! 1 3 1 BUTTE I `>#> ,o- i. S i 'r is COUNTY1NG COMMISSIO Applicant: Fourteen Mile House,Inc. HearingDate: September 11,2003 @9:30am. Existing Zone: PUD(Planned Unit Development) Request: Rezone to FR-2(Foothill Recreational-2 acre parcels) Assessor Parcel No: 063-360-0181 1 i ._�.� ._______.�.__. ____ ,� t(1.2f2�0E.�tit.G6}y►x,: UE�3-3t'U-t)t� i H`�iS}�C 03-Cil Krdnr,?t- Kr.Nour_. LK -;(1:,,(jtN,'! Kr.autimiul-5 u r,bmcgi ) { i�irr�ft t13 }}r,:r>►u t)stE; �rl,tr,,►>�rr !" ;()Q3 ;t%rl:�1�'tir a;zyuo \Y,i2c: (1)15uucq fmu}fie,61o1r!:r.r• vl;bj}cl,ut: prt4v , vj !r, yr,ti,,,f,.' nuc ,coo , „ w Iia 1000 aka KID 100o PDOO ikto0 is x. 44--1 ,,ar: ,.•.rho t Csf AN bnD Mto b►.c1cC rgcsticw .i -3� t ,• vnD ' 'r 1 t Ir'`r�sr11;'Ur1 PIF 1}C � ' VB-2 w-so i - I t. ` .1vr- PrI on !r!r. i.i-.7 T 7.�J 1.T1 ,!•,:, .-i f 1 — "I�i'1 77N:! 1 Ia .�!!, 31 COUNTYBUTTE ICOMINUSSION Applicant: Fourteen We House,Inc. (Nmer: Same Hearingis ub2003 • 1 &m I x 071 I .7-7, PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION REPORT APPLICANT: Ray Johnson, Fourteen Mile House, Inc. OWNER: Same FILE #: REZ 03-01 REQUEST: Proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation measures regarding environmental impacts and Rezone for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is FR-2 (Foothill Recreation—2-acre minimum parcel size). The property is currently 1 configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41,7.24, 17.79,and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank, and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development has been completed in the first two"units"of that development. The subject property is the third"unit'of that residential development,but is subject to a separate homeowners association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. LOCATION: The property is located on the east side of Highway 32, across from Woodland Park Road,about two miles south of Forest Ranch,APN 063-360- 018 (CS) (REZ 03-01) DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: December 30, 2002 ACREAGE: 43.2 acres PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AND SUPPORTING FINDINGS: I. Recommends Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study did identify the potential for increased light and glare; a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. B. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. C. On the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Agenda Report and any comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the Rezone for Fourteen Mile House (Ray Johnson),Planning Division File No. REZ 03-01 will have a significant effect on the environment. D. Find that the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. E. Recommend adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts. II. The design of the proposed project will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat, and a"de minims" exemption regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and 14 CCR 753.5, is not required. The project site is not known to contain any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat; have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act;interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources; or, conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. III. Recommend approval to the Board of Supervisors of Rezone REZ 03-01 for Fourteen Mile House(Ray Johnson)on APN 063-360-018 from PUD(Planned Unit Development)to FR- 2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) on a 43 (+/-) acre parcel, and recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance rezoning said property with the following findings: A. The project is consistent with the conditional zoning and development criteria of the Agricultural Residential (1 to 40) General Plan designation as follows: 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. The project is not adjacent to any agricultural uses. Some timber management or harvesting may take place on surrounding parcels,but the proposed residential uses would not conflict with these activities. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. Based on information received from the Butte County Environmental Health Division, the project appears to be able to meet the County's water and sewage disposal requirements. There is an existing well on-site that can provide potable water and the soils are suitable for septic system installation. 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. The site is located approximately 6 miles from the nearest year around manned fire station north of Forest Ranch on Highway 32. The closest volunteer station is approximately 1.7 miles away in Forest Ranch. This is seen as adequate for fire protection because the ultimate division of the property will include the requirement for a pressurized water system with hydrants. This will provide a much higher degree i of fire protection that serves the surrounding area. 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. All traffic generated by the project will utilize State Highway 32'for access. Major commercial services and intermediate and high schools are in Chico,approximately 13 miles to the southeast.Traffic volumes on area roads are relatively low. The 2001 CalTrans counts for Highway 32 show that adequate capacity exists to handle the traffic generated by the project. (See the Environmental checklist for a complete discussion of the traffic impacts) 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. The nearest full commercial services are located in Chico approximately 13 miles away via a well maintained high-speed roadway. A small market and gasoline service is available in Forest Ranch, approximately 2 miles away. Intermediate and high school services are also located in Chico. IV: Conditional Zoning Agreement Conditions of approval: 1. The rezone is a Conditional Rezone limiting the number of homes to be built on these four parcels to 12 allocated according to the existing CC&Rs, but specifying in Conditional Zoning Agreement the number of parcels that can be created on each of the existing 4 parcels. 2. The applicant prior to any further subdivision shall adequately clear the sight line distances of Highway 32 near the intersection of their access road and'Highway 32. VOTE: 4-0-1-0 AYES:. Commissioners Marin, Leland,Evans, and Chairman Lambert , NOES: No one ABSENT: Commissioner Nelson ABSTAINED: No one DATE OF LAST HEARING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION: September 11, 2003 JAWPDOCS\BOARDLTS\REZ 13.MRG 09-02-03 11 :09AM FROM RAY JOHNSOHEWOR P01/03 BUILUEW . Post Office Box 1700 Chico, California 85827 Ray L Johnson. Jr. Calif. Lic. No. 390354 Devc Ar. Inc. Facsimile Transmittal from: Dote: Ray E.Johnson,Jr., Oeycor, Inc. To: ?LA o, , phone Number (530) 893.1700 Attention: G eAte-', Fox Number..(530)893-1352 Fox Number: AS38 " 775S Orlglnnl to fallow: ❑yes 9 no No. of pages (Including transm"al page) ram _AT M�t -c 4fi-maji-r,. 7c sk-tI iPa 1'� �-•�_ I��sih 'Y7a TQC' t:r. rVlMtSi it�•.,�,c, . t� ...�1f�.2Y1#.� CL'�Na 1T••( ~ ! , A J-e * i wtf� S�a , 09-02-03 11 :09AM FROM RAY JOHNSON, DEVCOR P02/03 View Listings • • Page l of 2 Listing Detail O s~en MLS N 1023928 Beds 3 Status Active Bathe 3.5 Type SFDOL Floors 1 Story .-jmp,Address4688 EAGLE RIDGE D Garage Yee Cross Street Hlg way 32 Fireplace Yes City Forest Ranch Pool Yes State CA Zip 95942 Area 1 H-Forest Ranch Class Residential Price$ ` $735,000 SalelRent For Sale IDX Include Yes " +� • DUS1�s� ► ��OCoeS� Take a Virtual Touf General List Agent MARY ANN DOREMUS -DIR List Office COLDWELL BANKER/DUFOUR REALTY- (530)896.3120 Oft(530)895-1545 Variable No Selling Office 3 Commission Fee List Dots 8/13/20 Expire bate 6/1/2004 County u e County Complex Humboldt Highlands Yr Olt 1991 Approx.ftFt 4,082 Lot Wt- 32,000 Acreage 0.73 Lot Dimension 160 x 200 HOA Dues 140 AP Book 063 AP Page 320 AP Parcel 009 City/County County —ljr Oce Name unter,Thomas Diane Occ Phos 898-3120 or 521-0297 Need Photo es Owner's Name Hunter Under Cont No Addendum Yes Showing Appt Only Key Location Other Original Price $735,000 Days On Market 20 Prioe/Sq.FL $160.95 Features SEWER EXTRA ROOMS SIDING SPECIAL FEATURES Sewer Ottice/Den Stucco Sec System GARAGE Computer Rm Brick/Stone Central Vac Attached 3+ LAUNDRY YARD LOT FEATURES HEATING Inside Fenced Full View Forced Ali DINING AREA Sprnk Full Paved Street Gas Formal Spmk Auto DETACHED STRUCTURES AIR CONDITIONING PATIO Mature Trees Storage _ Forced Air . Concrete WATER COMPLEX AMENITIES FIREPLACE Covered Private Assoc/Dlst Pool Masonry STYLE GAS&ELECTRIC RV Storage KITCHEN Ranch Propane RV AREA Gas RwVe/Oven . CONSTRUCTION ENERGY FEATURES Existing Disposal Wood Frame Dual Pane POSSESSION Dishwasher FOUNDATION Coning Fan COE+ Microwave Slab Attic Fan Dining Nook ROOFING Tile Remarks htT://chicoaor.fnismis.com/Paragon/Search/ListingDetaillnit.asp?view-22&ListingID=1023928 9/2/2003 09-02-03 11 .09AM FROM RAY JOHNSON,"DEVCOR P03/03 View Listings • Page 2 of 2 Spectacular views from this gorgeous,custom home.Beautiful maple cabinets,hrdwd firs&granite throughout.The 30'x24'great room has striking cathedral callings set off by a massive rock wall FP.All rooms have breathtaking views from windows. Addendum Agent must accompany all showings.Call agent for appt:896-3120 or 521-0297. I'll be readily available most often. Separate storage unit&RV parking at top of hill available w/thts property.Seller requests that agents prequality buyers before showing.Sq footage from County records.Two HVAC units are new.Two laundry rooms. Diaclaimsr This Information Is deemed reliable.but not guaranteed.Neither the Chico Assoclal)on of Realtors,nor the listing broker,not their agents or subagents,are mponsible for the accuracy of this Information.The buyer is responsible for verifying all informatlon.This iMormatlon Is pr*Msd by the Chico Association of Realtors for use by Its members and Is nen Intended for use for any other purpose. { http://chicoa4r.fnismis.conVParagon/Search/ListingDetAilinit.asp?view=22&ListingID=1023928 9/2/2003 NOTES 1.STREET LIGHTING AND EXTERIOR SECURITY LIGHTING SHALL USE LOW PRESSURE SODIUM VAPOR LAMPS OR OTHER SIMILAR LIGHTING THAT IS IRECOGIZED TO REDUCE LIGHT _ _ _ r _ PMW71ON AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A MANNER TO REDUCE UNDUE GLARE I I .—._.—.—._.—.--.—._._. 2.WOW STOVE AND FIREPLACE INSERTS INSTALLED w ANY HOME WITHIN TIES SUBDIVISION SHALL BE EPA APPROVED AND DESIGNED TO MEET EMISSIONS STANDARDS OF THE CALIFORNIA CLEAN AR ACT OF 1888 AS AMENDED. m I 3.DEER MITIGATION FEES ARE ED BE PAID AT THE TIME OF OBTAINING BINDING PERMITS I I I w IF SUCH FEES HAVE BEEN ADOPTED BY THE BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. SH NOTE: I 4. GUILD GRADING ACTIVITIES REVEAL THE PRESENCE OF CULTURAL RESOURCES Q.E. I ARTIFACT CONCENTRATIONS INCLUDING ARROWHEADS AND OTHER STONE TOOLS oR THIS ADDITIONAL MAP SHEET SHOWS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WHICH CHIPPING EOM CANS.GLASS ETC:STRUCTURAL RIIAwS HUMAN SKELETAL IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.DESCRIBING CONDITIONS AS I I g I REMADE•W�WITHIN 90 FEET OF TIQ TOED sHFd.L LSAg HMMEDIATELY UNTIL A OF THE DATE OF APPROVAL, AND IS NOT INTENDED TO AFFECT 1 REMAINED PROFESSIONAL ARCHAEOLOGIST CAN BE CONSULTED TO EVALUATE THE RECORD TITLE INTEREST. PARCEL T ( REMAINS AND GIPS BE ENCOUNTERED.APPROPRIATE M TE LAW PROCEDURES SHOULD IROMAN SKELETAL RENINS BE IASTATE UW REWIRES VIII. SHO LD7HUMA ION S.BSL 7.24 aeras OF THE COUNTY CORONER. SHOULD THE COUNTY CORONER DETERMINE THAT SUCH REMAINS ARE IN AM AROHAEOLoCGL CONTEXT.THE NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE 5 BSL COMMISSION N SACRAMDOO SHALLSE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. PURSUANT TO STATE LAW,TO ARRANGE FOR NATIVE AMERICAN PARTICIPATION w OETE WIMNr THE DISPORT=OF SUCH REMAINS II PARCEL 2 J L Z I S. LIMIT EARTHWORK TO THE Pam DISPORT= ARMI AND Nov.15 ALL AREAS MERE THE SOD"HAS BEEN DISTURBED OR WHERE THE VEGETATION HAS BEEN REMOVED SHALL r' 1 DE PROTECTED FROM EROSION USING STANDARD EROSION CONTROL METHODS ACCEPTED BY CVL ENGINEERS VEGETATION IN THE FUEL REDUCTION AREA SMALL NOT I I I m BE REMOVED TD THE EXTENT THAT EROSION OCCURS, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE VEGETATION REMOVED FOR FIRE PROTECTION BE CHIPPLD OR MULCHED AND THEN I APPLIED TO THE CLEARED AREAS FOR EROSION CONTROL" I I I Lam, I L..—.—-—'—'—_'—_'_— —_"—'_'— — _ _ _ —.J K.HOLIES CO STRUChD ON THESE LOTS SHALL BE DESIGNED ED MNIW ZE CRApNG AND Iv F- _ TO UTILIZE THE EXISTING GRADE TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE THROUGH THE USE a MULTI 45 BSI'" A' 50•esl.—� i I I .—._.l LEVEL 57R11CiURES - - lb 1 I I 7,HOMES SHALL 13E CONSTRICTED MIN EXTERIOR MATERIALS THAT ARE FIRE RESISTANT. \� I I i r— so-BSL m I SIDINGOFS NG T THAT IS TREBE ATED TO I#"TRESRELL BA N�'DECKS MASONRY.OR OVER MAN THE I 1 CANYON SHALL DE INCLOSED FROM BELLOW MTH FIRE RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION. O I PARCEL 2 m 30•BSL�! W AR�o�CHMAPATCERT yam,AR°HnaE SHERIFFS THEBUBUTTECOORRn�COPAID DDE.PRIPURSUANT R TO DANCE OF BUILONc PERMITS THE PEE ANOINT WILL BE DETERMINED AND CALCULATED AS OF 17.79 acres THE DATE OF APPLICATION FOR THE BUILDING,PERMIT. 9.DUST OF GENERATED BY UST ON THET ACTMTIES SMALL BE KEPT 10 A IIDOYIDI MTX A 1 I GOAL RETAINING DUST w THE SITE FOLLOW THE DUST CONTROL MEASURES LISTED / 1 BELOW ' 1 m A DUPoNC CL TAT,*GRADING,EARTH MOVING.EXCAVATION OR iRANSPONTAnON DE CUT ON FILL YATETW WATER iRllC(S ON SPRIIQER SYSTEMS ARE TO BE USED TOAIPSR,Elkl17 DUST FROM LEAVING THE .� i / ,\ \ e'[(JJ• ` .—.—. —.—._ I SITE AND TO CREATE A CRUST MERE DAYS ACTIVITIES CEASE —.j—.J S.DURING CONSTRUCTION.MATER TRUCKS OR SPRINKLER SYSTEMS SHALL BE • USED TO KEEP ALL AREAS OF VEHICLE MOVEMENT DAMP ENOUGH TO �.. •'ma y, PARK.---- � E--- T— '.O' — r 1 wNQUUDDET WEETTTIiNGGDOWN AVING THE SuUCH ARREASS IN THE LATERRI MORHM.mGSAND�MER WO COMPLEXED FCR THE DAY AND WHENEVER MND EXCEEDS 15 MITES CEPT MT TSTOCKPILED D WORE M LBINDERERS 7D PRE SIVE T DUSTT GENENERATIOON. Re I 1a PRIOR TO BUDDING PERMIT ISSUANCE FDR A NEIN RESIDENTIALDENT FEES AT WEWAPPLICANT SMALL NCWIT(ES THE50•BSL m TIME OF ACCEPPTANCE E APPLICATIONN.AY ALL APPUCABLE SUCH FEES MAY INCLUDE.BUT NOTECT AT PARCEL 3 I BE LIMITED TTI.PARK FEE SOmOL FEE•DRAINAGE FEE PERMIT AND PLAN CECKING 50•BA IST 5.41 acres LEACHFIEID I FATS,WATER AND SEWER SERWHI FEES.FIRE PROTECTION FEES L--------1 �S m FREE SETBACK FROM 11.ROAD PROPERTY SIGNS, I ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE a ALL PRIVATE N EXISTING WELL I ROAD SAFETY SIGNS,wCDNNG STOP SIGHS I s 12.IF ANY DWEL NC IS LOCATED WITHIN 28D FEET FROM THE CENTER UNE OF STATE IED — -� I HIGHWAY 32,SOUND ATTENUATION METI1005 SHALL BE USED TO REDUCE OUTSIDE � LEVELS BELOW 85 CNEL A NOISE ANALYSIS SHALL BE USED TO DETERMINE L ' —._I \ `----------------.J (— — — — —'—'—'--—--- 13�TER WELL MAY BE PLACED WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE USABLE SEWER DISPOSAL .— - -'— —'—"—' J \ I N"WATER WELLS MAY HAVE TO BE DRUM DEEPER THAN 700 FEET N ORDER TO OBTAIN V E S�T�I�N�GpSUBDIVISION� FF�M A P T m 30`BSL+ ADEauATE SUPPLIES G"POTABLE WATER FOURTEEN��+rr MLE FIOUSE VFWF F 3 m N 19 COFSIRUC INSTALA71pN,oR DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURES OR FACILITIES ON THE PARCELS 075 sNnLL COAPLr MTN THE}ATEsr CALIFORNIA FIRE SAFE PARCEL 4 REGUUTIP0R5.(PUBLIC RESOURCES COOS 4290),AND ALL OILIER APPLICABLE STATE A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND COUNn LADES,ORDINANCES.AND REGULATIONS N EFFECT AT THE TIME OF FOR \ \ 12.79 acres APPLICATION FOR IMPROVEMENT PERMITS RAY JOHNSON JR. \ 16.BUILDING IDENTIFICATION AND M ADDRESSES SHALL BE IRWALLED IN CONFORMANCE CyJ ol \N MTH PUBLIC RESOURCES CONE 4290 AND SHALL BE POSTED AT THE BEGINNING OF A DIVISION OF REMAINING LANDS' OF FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE BUILDING CO STRUCTION AND MAINTAINED CONTINUOUSLY THEREAFTER. .UNIT 2— PHASE 1 BOOK 135 OF MAPS PAGES 30 THRU 35 %�N OPE ,(� A,' 17.FUND.DEVELOPMENT OF THESE LOIS MAY REWIRE PAYMENT INTO THE WATER TENDER ' ,SECTION 18, T. 23 N., R. 3 E., M.D.B"&M. � "\\ 03�w ABLE FI�R�\ MND. - BUTTE COUNTY.� - CALIFORNIA "�........ _ — — ��A \EE �`\'TT�MF.A`\� — — �1\\\1111\1\� 18.FIRE SUPPRESSION SPRINKLER SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL NEW RESIDENTIAL RAR — "_ — — STANDARD S R ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL BRE PROTECTION AND TWO FA STANDARD FGR THE INSTALLATION OF SPRINKLER ARD SYSTEMS S O¢AND TRIO FAMILY ROLLS ANDERSOIJ& ROLLS COMMUNITY AND MOBILEYS HODS NEPA ANTS THAT 13D UEtRE A PRESSURIZED T crvH�WwoHnHLene - COIAWCATI MATER SYSTEM WITH HYDRANTS THAT YE T FIRE DEPARTMENT . 'W`�aaW•a�04 IWfa1u P.aNa�2V SPEMCADONS,SELVES THE PARCELS NOVEMBER, 2002 01072 SHEET 3 OF 3 ` ,Oouk /sf p�'A Qo 1 ^ FOUND 5/8•REBAR NOTE: WITH PLASTIC CAP THE EXACT ROUTE OR LOCATION OF THE EASEMENT/RIGHT OF WAY MARKED RCE 28998 RECORDED IN BOOK 1726.PACE 491,OFFICIAL RECORDS AND RECORDED FOUND 1-1/4•IRON IN BOOK 1726.PAGE 493.OFFICIAL RECORDS IS NOT DEFINED OF RECORD PIPE WITH PLASTIC CAP` 4 PER(Rl) BASIS OF BEARING AND MAY OR MAY NOT AFFECT PARCELS 1 7HRWfiH 4. MARKED RCE 28998 \\\\ R 5 88'24'38•E(RPER(R1) 1534. ,M) R 774.79' N v6'01,M) 79•(R12 (C) 760.00' _ 0 / PACIFIC BELL AND !2 1 P.G'&E. EASEMENT ? RELINQUISHMENT OF / Bk. 1085 O.R. Pg. 331 - ABUTTER'S RIGHTS To / PARCEL 1 LOCATION MAP Q THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA / N 7,24 odes ONE TABLE Bk. 1122 O.R. Pg. 38 v LINE BEARING I LENGTH CURVE DATA / Q Lt CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH g L2 1• . 4. 6 C1 4• 7 L3 '14' 102'41'28' 1 D, PARCEL 2 L7 L8 L5 5} •1{ r C451'22"24* 7 • q- cs 60.00' i '41'28• 107.54' / 1 4 S 00'02'28•W L7 J C6 51'19'04" 17.01' / BO.00' 760.00' LB 8 {' .W L9 34.51' C864'18'26' & dLIO N 7 C9 00' 118'12'12' 41.6• / / Ltl 7 22'E 73. CIO .00' 1'08' / 30.00• ' Jo.00' 30.00•) L12 c11 17,91' 60 FOOT WIDE OR WIDER ROAD AND "�'T'-f` _ m Nao'24'38'W 9696' / UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE RESERVED IN ml$�I L1J N 1'}' C12 6 1 '08• 107.411' DEEDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF EACH LOT of m�ITn L14 �• C13 0.00' S1T9bt' 17. I� z L75 N '35' C14 6O.00. 1 74' / $ C7 _ I 3 '�"� PARCEL 2 = LIG N 1. 'E 7. C76 0�.Ci5 20.00! 517 93 / (z $ I 1 L17 N 4' 'W $ �, m I 17.79 acres :91-5N40.31' C77 0 V. C20 �\ I r OI 3 L78 '2 00. C18 0 ' 7 L19\ SEE DETAIL A L20 N l4'{ 1 00' 20 200.00• 147854' L19 / 'L°j �'� L20 20. 9 I I L21 28 '40' S. N 87'30.54'E(RI., / p' C� `� G.:(/ 1y C�ml Y' g 33.9r(R1.c) 8 C12 247.88' 4s LEGEND RADIAL BEARING- Z C4 C�i �`J �' `RF------ ---- Ttt,�L9 p CALCULATED PONT,NO MONUMENT FOUND OR SET S 59'56'28•W(C) N�-A•- \ �$�` LIO N 8a'24'38•W 760.00• ` A SET BUTTE COUNTY SM.S-IIA MONUMENT STAMPED RCE 28998 _ 30.00' ONE FOOT ACCESS STRIP OFFERED FOR DEDICATION / PjIR�(N 8824'38•W DRIyf 359.W q SET 5/B'REBAR W11H PLASTIC CAP MARKED R.C.E.28M 5 3229'06•E(R1,C) _ TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE IN FEE SIMPLE Jm�l •¢------- --- I J 60.00' (RI,C) -�LI9 mC�6 254.60' -C 1111 30.00' • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED �.�' S 11'35'22'W / In S Cigyy_-- (R) RECORD RDIRENCE \ - MEASURED S 27-30•sa•W(R1,C) 107.3x' X117 1: L12 - (C) CALCULATED 34.19'(RI,C) m s 00'02'28•W Lt6 297.11' V to I PARCEL 3 BASIS OF BEARING 30.00' 1 30.00• 5.41 OdOR es d THE NORTHERLY UNE OF'REMAINING LANDS'AS SHOWN ON 1.35M30 _ TAKEN BETWEEN MONUMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON.SAID BEARING BEING SOLIDI 882438•EAST. 1_88'-n RECORD REFERENCES __--24 � $. 25.55' �- --TL74 (RI) RECORD DATA PER MAP OF'FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 2-PHASE I- <0- • y ' 290.55' H 8824'38"W 760.00' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BOOK 135 OF MAPS PAGES 30 THRU 35 - 319.73' --- --�Lls / (R2) RECORD DATA PER MAP OF'FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE'PLANNED ` 30.00• UNIT DEVELOPMENT BOOK 100 OF MMS PAGES 72 THRU 76 m VESTING SUBDIVISION MAP FOURTEEN NILE HOUSE UNIT 3 C = PARCEL 4 = A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT N 8824'38•W RELINQUISHMENT OF ABUTTER'S 12.79 acres n FOR 25.55• 780.gD' RIGHTS TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA n RAY JOHNSON JR. 8k.1122 O.R. Pg.38 FOUND 1-1/4'IRON L21/' 9 sJ. -5 00'02'28'W PIPE WITH PLASTIC CAP A DIVISION OF 'REMAINING LANDS' OF FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE MARKED RCE 28998 UNIT 2- PHASE 1 BOOK 135 OF MAPS PAGES 36 THRU 35 PER(R1) SECTION 18, T. 23 N., R. 3 E., M.D.B.&M. \- BUTTE COUNTY CALIFORNIA WPLASTIC CAP N 8 297.11' FOUND PLASTIC REBAR �� �1 RAR DETAIL A MARKED RCE 32143 824'38 W(Ri,M) 982.73'(RI,M) ROU.S ArmER50N&ROLLS -� SCALE: 1'e20' PER(Rz) 100M72 C1-@Na1Ne... a•�-bn amC aW cusa4w ' NOVEMBER,2002m reaalmt •01072 SHEET 2 OF 3 ROOK qtr PHGE d'9 OWNER'S STATEMENT ENGINEER'S STATEMENT RECORDER'S STATEMENT FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE INC..A CAUFORNIA CORPORATION AS OWNER OF THE LAND SHOWN THIS MAP OF FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE.UNIT 3 WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION FILED THIS J'1174 DAY OF DFGE/18FA 200E ATA/ M.,IN_ ON THE ANNEXED MAP AND MID VALLEY TITLE&ESCROW COMPANY,A CAUFORNIA AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BOOK lSf OF MAPS AT PAGES IP AT THE REOUEST OF ROLLS,ANDERSON CORPORATION.AS TRUSTEE UNDER DEED OF TRUST RECORDED UNDER BUTTE COUNTY SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF RAY JOHNSON IN AND ROLLS. RECORDER'S SERIAL NUMBER 2002-0035639,DO HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE ONLY DECEMBER 2001. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE PARTIES WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS CLEAR TITLE TO SAID LAND AND THAT CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP,THAT THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SERIAL NO.loll-69f9� WE CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION OF THIS MAP. SHOWN,AND THAT THE MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN SET AND ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED AND ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE E, WHEREBY,OFFER FOR DEDICATION, AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. THE FOLLOWING: _ (A)THE ONE-FOOT ACCESS STRIP ADJACENT TO HIGHWAY 32. AS SHOWN ON THE CANDACE J.GRUBBS, ANNEXED MAP IS HEREBY OFFERED FOR DEDICATION TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE IN COUNTY RECORDER FEE SIMPLE. ��,F '�•� (8)A PUBUC SERMCE EASEMENT(PSE)OVER,ON AND UNDER HUMBOLDT PARK DRIVE 9�"' BY:711. -' AND BLACK OAK TERRACE AS SHOWN ON THE ANNEXED MAP. �S`�,L 8.e - DEPUTY WE HEREBY CREATE FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES THE FOLLOWING: (1)HUMBOLDT PARK DRIVE AND BLACK OAK TERRACE AS A 60 FOOT WIDE OR WADER ROAD "� E.N.289M �" R.E 28998 DATE AND UTIUTY EASEMENT TO BE RESERVED IN DEEDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF EACH LOT FOR ,p" QFAR REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 03/31/03 INGRESS AND EGRESS TO HIGHWAY 32 AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING, ®d RECONSTRUCTING,OPERATING AND MAINTAINING A PRIVATE ROAD AND APPURTENANCES, PRIVATE STORM DRAIN FACILITES,PRIVATE SEWER LINES PRIVATE WATER LINES AND OTHER PRIVATE FACILITIES AS REQUIRED. JOH PRESIDENT - 1Y PRESIDENT FOUR LLE HO INC., MN VALLEY TITLE&ESCROW COMPANY A CAUFORNIA CORPORATION A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION COUNTY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT Po.BOX 1700 Denlwl F-Hvnf CHICO.CA 95927 I,STUART EDELL,DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE,STATE OF CAUFORNIA.DO HEREBY STATE THAT HAVE EXAMINED THE SUBDIVISION MAP OF FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 3. THAT IT IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SANE AS APPEARED ON THE STATE OF CAUFORNIA TENTATIVE MAP AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF.THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE 17u}it SUBDIVISION MAP ACT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND LOCAL ORDINANCE HAVE BEEN COUNTY OF COMPLIED WITH AND I AM SATISFIED THAT THE MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. ON THIS 21"DAY OF 110-1 2007,BgEFORE ME.THE UNDERSIGNED. PERSONALLY APPEARED pwwlci F• Wu 2 PERSONALLY KNOWN /pCtE35ic, TO ME(OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE)TO BE THE PERSON(S)WHOSE NAME(S)IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND i •��?;+ �0,� �� ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THOR SICNATURE(S)ON THE ¢ w• 29132 STUART EDELL DATE. INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S)OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) y DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. CML R.C.E. 29132 R7 CAL REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 03/37/04, WITNESS MY HAND NO'SEAL REWIRED. SIGNATURE �UIn1Ii/ M aLkW111 �)TiwrwK,H AiL�M.kw,I/ PRINTED NAME COMMISSION EXPIRES OCA L-).ZOOS G171w Bul4c CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR'S STATEMENT NOTARYS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS 1,PAUL MCINTOSH.CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPVf�ORS OF COUt{TY OF BUTTE.STATE (CITY&COUNTY) OF CALIFORNIA,DO HEREBY STATE THAT ON THE JE_�DAY OF,,;�"@pC,-2001THE BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OFFICIALL APPROVED FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 3 AND THAT DEDICATION(A)AS SHOWN ON THE ANNEXED MAP AND THE OFFERED FOR STALE OF CALIFORNIA DEDICATION TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE IS HEREBY ACCEPTED IN FEE SIMPLE.ITEM(B)OF THE COUNTY OF 12u1t� OWNER'S STATEMENT IS HEREBY ACCEPTED ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC AS A PUBUC SERVICE EASEMENT. SHOULD THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DETERMINE PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66477.5.THAT THE PUBLIC PURPOSE FOR WHICH SAID PROPERTY WAS ON THIS " DAY OF A.JO-1. 200E BEFORE ME.THE UNDERSIGNED, DEDICATED IN FEE SIMPLE NO LONGER EXISTS,THE COUNTY OF 61377E SHALL RECONVEY SAID PERSONALLY APPEARED / PERSONALLY KNOWN PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON THE MAP,TO THE SUBDIVIDER WHOSE NAME AND ADDRESS IS TO ME(OR PROVED TO ME O 7HE BASES OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE)TO BE THE SHOWN IN THE OWNER'S STATEMENT,OR TO THE SUBDIVIDER'S SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. PERSON(S)WHOSE NAMEHI S)IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND VESTING SUBDIVISION MAP ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES),AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S)ON THE FOURTEEN LILE HOUSE UNIT 3 INSTRUMENT D EXECUTEDTHE PIINNSTRUMENTE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(s) A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR WITNESS MY HAND NO SEAL REWIRED. RAY JOHNSON JR. 1I DATE: /.l�/D�o2 BT /XC bssvw.r(�t�L� _ SE SIGNATURE JCNA1r</ M1AL.k.11 J(MAM14�L/ A - UNIT 2- PHRASE 1 BOOK 1A DIVISION OF -REMAJNING 35 OF• OF PAGES 30TEEN 1THRULE 0355 PRINTED NAME SECTION 18, T. 23 N., R. 3 E., M.D.B.&M. COMMISSION EXPIRES 10'L7-09 BUTTE COUNTY CALIFORNIA NOTARYS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ROLLS MIDERSON 6AROLLS (CITY&COUNTY) ervl�a emaene m�ela�smw ml[.oHm,wraau amra0en NOVEMBER, 2002 D1D72 SHEET 1 OF 3 /3 0 6 A /SY- PA-69 AV 000 10091990 � ►� J y � ��d/• 1Sa�o� 'yo� .►,a��n bo �yb� Z Zhh b� Yvc MrnxAs INMbtidoUAW Booz-s 0 d3S . IuNnoj _ luaff l 4 - 40le yn ® VJG / I 41-0 T .L "SI�J•�'0 2 b o %r4 o+ y 1jyat/o�G� -a I /ipli p X0 4 or 2) b 'C / IlG yp j�si '4f0`� �riy�/lyyb j/ - � �ly1o � 2ftOCY yb.Dc i BUTTE COUNTY August 12, 2003 SEP 0 9 2003 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DEVELOPMENT •- SERVICES 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on September 11, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at 9:30 a.m. regarding the following item -- -� In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for the following project. Therefore, Planning Division staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/REZONE Fourteen Mile House, Inc., Rezone from for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation—2-acre minimum parcel size. . The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the r project would be provided by individual septic tank, and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, -and residential development has been completed in'the first two "units" of that development. The subject property is the third "unit" of that residential development, but is subject to a separate homeowners association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was .prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. The property is located on the east side of Deer Creek Highway, at Black Oak Terrace, about two miles south of Forrest Ranch. APN 063-360-018.(CS) (REZ 03- 01) The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project are on file for public review starting, August 15, 2003, through September 10, 2003, at the Butte County Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. All interested persons are invited to review the document. Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address. If you challenge either the Mitigated Negative Declaration or the Use Permit in .court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the public hearing. For further information regarding this project, please contact Craig Sanders, project planner;at the Butte County Planning Division at (530) 538- 7153. YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Friday August 15, 2003 f BUTTE COUNTY AUG Z 9 2003. August 21, 2003 (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, Ca. 95965-3397 Attn: Craig Sanders, Project Planner POSITIVE IMPACT ON PARCEL APN 003-360-018 (CS) (REZ 0301) 1. Hard lava rock fractures allows contaminants to Humboldt Highlands Community Water Supply of both fecal and bacterial. If County approves the proposed dense building and it affects our water supply, you will open the door for possible multi-millions of dollars if Supervisors approve. Recommend Supervisors have legal department review for County liability. The State of California should be advised and do a complete investigation on this matter. 2. Excess traffic — ingress and egress onto Hwy 32 is a traffic hazard for this proposed density. Recommend the Board not rezone for a third time. Logging trucks, tanker hazard plus work traffic, we would recommend to 4-acre minimum density (10 homes only). 3. Fire hazard. Volunteer Fire Department at Forest Ranch currently handles Humboldt Highlands, Humboldt Woodlands and proposed development. This is sorely lacking in the event of a ridge fire (which has happened in the past). 4. Extreme water shortage that could affect Humboldt Highlands current water supply. Current water pressure is only 40. 5. Water runoff from rain, snow and streets in proposed project could inundate Humboldt Highlands property causing potential property damage. County liability. 6. Electric power. This developer had PG&E install for project only single phase 440. Developer should be required to supply 440 — 3 phase — for conservation of energy. 7. Developer has previously violated covenants and restrictions that he wrote by requiring home builders to install fireproof tile roofs but he installed composition, non-tile roof at the pool house. Potential fire hazard. 8. The Planning Commission's August 12, 2003 notice of public hearing on APN- 063-360-108 (CS) (REZ 0301) is incorrect. This property is not on Deer Creek ' Highway that is approximately 23 miles away. Rather this property is on Highway 32, approximately 11 miles from Highway 99. . . , .:.. , . . �a� : , ' � ♦: ��:: 1 In summation, this developer is only trying to maximize density of homes in this area and over build. Since you, the Board of Supervisors, have acquiesced changes three times, we believe the Negative Mitigated Declaration should be rejected and overrule Planning Commission. VOTE NO. We have over 200 voters in this area and elections will be coming up. Listen to them. Finally, a comprehensive, complete Federal and State EIS on proposed property due to the substantial, potential liability. Thank you, Thomas unter Property Owner 14868 Eagle Ridge Dr. Forest Ranch, Ca. 95942-1907 4 •. ,, . �:� �- ` , , y fr August 12, 2003 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on September 11, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at 9:30 a.m. regarding the following item In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for the following project. Therefore, Planning Division staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/REZONE Fourteen Mile House, Inc., Rezone from for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation—2-acre minimum parcel size. The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project Would be provided by individual septic tank, and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development has been completed in the first two "units" of that development. The subject property is the third "unit" of that residential development, but is subject to a separate homeowners association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. The property is located on the east side o D - t, ' Black Oak Terrace, about two miles south of Forrest Ranch. APN 063-360-018 (CS) (REZ 03-/ 01) The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project are on file for public review starting, August 15, 2003, through September 10, 2003, at the Butte County Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. All interested persons are invited to review the document. Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address. If you challenge either the Mitigated Negative Declaration or the Use Pe�ruLin court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the public hearing. ' For further information regarding this project, please contact Craig Sanders, project planner, at the Butte County Planning Division at (530) 538- 7153. YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Friday August 15, 2003 • �, �,.• y M ,,��.:. ut�e ount LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY r PLANNING DIVISION z ;z DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES • a `, sfr:,,,�,;;.t,••,-� 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 ` 4L TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 August 12, 2003 To: Craig Erickson, Butte County Environmental Health Division Stuart Edell, Butte County Land Development Division Ted Crawford, Butte County Fire Department/CDF Department of Fish and Game CalTrans Re: NOTICE OF INTENT - To Adopt a Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for a Rezone, File # REZ 03-01, for Fourteen mile House. Inc. on APN 064-360- 018 The Butte County Planning Division has completed an Initial Study, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of potential environmental consequences anticipated in connection with the above-mentioned projects, a copy of which is enclosed. This letter serves as a Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration to allow responsible and trustee agencies a 20-day review period in accordance with Sections 15072 and 15105 of the CEQA Guidelines. Please review the enclosed Initial Study and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration. This review should focus on your department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. The project has been scheduled for the September 11, 2003, Planning Commission meeting and any comments to the enclosed initial study must be received prior to that meeting. If you have any questions regarding the enclosedtenvironmental'document, please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. I can be reached directly at (530) 538- 7603 or via e-mail at csanders@buttecounty.net Sincerely, Craig Sanders ` Senior Planner cc: Ray Johnson, Applicant MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Larry Painter FROM: Lynn A! SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR EXHIBITS AND PUBLIC NOTICE LIST DATE:. August 12, 2003 Project Name: Fourteen Mile House File #: REZ 03-01 THIS IS A REQUEST FOR: Number of Meeting DateCopies Black &white reproducible exhibit map Planning Commission 9:00 a.m. 9/11/03 1 Vicinity Map " Extension of Time Exhibit Map Color Planning Commission Exhibit Map " Color Board of Supervisors Exhibit Map Public Notice List Special Exhibits Backread Ordinance Public Notice List and Labels: Special instructions: The above request is due no later than 8/14/03 Special Instructions and/or research: NOTE: Exhibits should be saved until project is through process, which includes appeal period. FILE SAVED AS: REQUEST-MAP Aug 28 03 o2:28p Mary Anne Houx 530-891-2877 P• 3 August 12, 2003 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE.OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on September 11, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at 9:30 a.m. regarding the following item In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),an Initial Study has been prepared for the following project. Therefore, Planning Division staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/REZONE Fourteen Mile House, Inc., Rezone from for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation—2-acre minimum ` parcel size. The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79,and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank,and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development has been completed in the first two "units" of that development. The subject property is the third "unit" of that residential development, but is subject to a separate homeowners association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. The property is located on the east side o , Black Oak Terrace, about two miles south of Forrest Ranch. APN 063-360-018 (CS)(REZ 03- 01) The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project are on file for public review starting, August 15, 2003, through September 10, 2003, at the Butte County Planning Division,7 County Center Drive,Oroville, California. All interested persons are invited to review the document.'Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address. If you challenge either the Mitigated Negative Declaration or the Use PermiLin court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the public hearing. For further information regarding this project, please contact Craig Sanders, project planner, at the Butte County Planning Division at(530)538- 7153. YVONNE CHRISTOPHER,DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Friday August 15, 2003 Aug 28 03 02:28P Mary Anne Houx 530-891-2877 P. 1 D - E � V E ADS 2 8 MW BUTTE COUNTY August 21, 2003 PIANNING.OIVISION Butte County Planning Divisionpp . Fax Note 7671 001 go, 7 County Center Drive � �� Oroville, Ca. 95965-3397 c ti co. Phone R Phone• Attn: Craig Sanders, Project Planner Fax R Fex R i POSITIVE IMPACT ON PARCEL APN 003-360-018 (CS)(REZ 0301) L Hard lava rock fractures allows contaminants to Humboldt Highlands Community Water Supply of both fecal and bacterial. If County approves the proposed dense building and it affects our water supply, you will open the door for possible multi-millions of dollars if Supervisors approve. Recommend Supervisors have legal department review for County liability. The State of California should be advised and do a complete investigation on this matter. 2. Excess traffic— ingress and egress onto Hwy 32 is a traffic hazard for this proposed density. Recommend the Board not rezone for a third time. Logging trucks, tanker hazard plus work traffic, we would recommend to 4-acre minimum density(10 homes only). 3. Fire hazard. Volunteer Fire Department at Forest Ranch currently handles Humboldt Highlands, Humboldt Woodlands and proposed development. This is sorely lacking in the event of a ridge fire(which has happened in the past). 4. Extreme water shortage that could affect Humboldt Highlands current water supply. Current water pressure is only 40. 5. Water runoff from rain, snow and streets in proposed project could inundate Humboldt Highlands property causing potential property damage. County liability. 6. Electric power. This developer had PG&E install for project only single phase 440. Developer should be required to supply 440—3 phase— for conservation of energy. 7. Developer has previously violated covenants and restrictions that he wrote by requiring home builders to install fireproof tile roofs but he installed composition, non-tile roof at the pool house. Potential fire hazard. 8. The Planning Commission's August 12, 2003 notice of public hearing on APN- 063-360-108 (CS)(REZ 0301) is incorrect. This property is not on Deer Creek Highway that is approximately 23 miles away. Rather this property is on Highway 32, approximately 11 miles from Highway 99. RV FIVE. 1L) AUG 2 5 2003 y cx A. . t .,• t i, �`t.'}! '' •,='�_ `iii: ;t p, ! �. -'j ,. }3�",: ;,,i.�,: i1"s ;?t'.. i•i.i.•s.•+.z.�'.t y'illy ..,i:". ! ,j� !,'` F�. .,� +!:: ( t - r _ , ., r• .fit �.j �r ;7'ti•:- t�i: f' .f `t mar •.. 1 � .. .i. til.,t ' ` 4r t s . ,k it . . ,r• , •+�, - w?! rrce i"< . 1, s��'";(:"• JJ IF `� L'r.., "2��fi.:. i`rl+.�i.� :!. `.+.ls��r .r=1.�.'..,�rN.�� •�r� , �•. �- I.l: � �::`.'.� ':tr. r ��°.:.. '}:, � � w+:�.t •,•. e ;�-t.3l.. r 'i. v t�tr ;4>1.•" ;' - • x '. (�r(..i,i�, ♦(.,511','t Hr•.. • ; t-i •f, ;" ., ir'3:/.)1: {i_�ti:i l�.jl, �.w�i(i 4J,v ,�l.f s ..tl ,'',f}. 1 � • ' ft,5� ...(` •.+l . err/t;f. •I,F''i�•:+- .1. . �: `•.-•r .sl.. • ! �:f/,•jJt:i`'+ 1 t if >• •� ,�� tit✓, �}+ I rs 7 V- .r�,', t��' 'j rt: ' f� _. l.t/�� r(.` ' r !, d I :i,!• }„1 + Shit `14'. 1 �.,/:. I � 1. ..+ �:� , .a •.-,.. .. 1, � .. �. r i '''a .� �.:� �� ;r.�"' '-iN�.� t(+.�.�• }••�f(.x i::c' •i C: ! -:tit's.» ' Rug 28 03 02: 28p Mary Rnne Houx 530-891-2877 p.2 In summation, this developer is only trying to maximize density of homes in this area and over build. Since you, the Board of Supervisors, have acquiesced changes three times, we believe the Negative Mitigated Declaration should be rejected and overrule Planning Commission. VOTE NO. We have over 200 voters in this area and elections.will be coming up. Listen to them. Finally, a comprehensive, complete Federal and State EIS on proposed property due to the substantial, potential liability. Thank you, Thomas unter Property Owner 14868 Eagle Ridge Dr. Forest Ranch, Ca. 95942-1907 h . Aug 28 03 02: 28p Mary Anne Houx 530-891 -2877 p. 3 Ir • August 12,2003 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE, OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on September 11, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at 9:30 a.m. regarding the following item In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for the following project. Therefore, Planning Division staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration. NUTIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/REZONE Fourteen Mule house, Inc., Rezone from for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation—2-acre minimum parcel size. The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79,and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank,and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development has been completed in the first two "units" of that development. The subject property is the third "unit" of that residential development, but is subject to a separate homeowners association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. The property is located on the east side o t Black Oak Terrace,.about two miles south of Forrest Ranch. APN 063-360-018 (CS)(REZ 03- 01) The Initial Study and -Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project are on file for public review starting, August 15, 2003, through September 10, 2003, at the Butte County Planning Division,7 County.Center Drive,Oroville,California. All interested persons are invited to review the document. Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address. If you challenge either the Mitigated Negative Declaration or the Use PeIDaiLin court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or.someonc else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at,or prior to, the public hearing. For further information regarding this project, please contact Craig Sanders, project planner, at the Butte County Planning Division at(530)538-7153. YVONNE CHRISTOPHER,DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Friday August 15, 2003 08/16/2003 11:06 5308935610 D PAGE 01 i 7 July2003 jo: Butte County Planning Department Attention: Craig-Sanders From: Debbie Jean ..... AP#063-360-035 ` , J 'Re:' . Zoining Change for Fourteen Mile House,Unit 3 (Humboldt Park) Please be advised thatI purchased-my Tot with the knowledge-that Ray-Johnson had. submitted a request for a zoning change from PUD to FR-2. I request that the FR-2 zoning be approved. Thank you for your consideration of this ' ...request. e xe Jean 14061 Kelsey Drive Chico,OA-95973 '44 s UJ i "T (.�c (J 49 Gv.4, f i t Y � 1• ' y • ' r,C a r .. ' + .f �• � r � 1 � '.S 4 ��' ��� �� �� �� . , � IN THE SUPE OR COURT OF THE STATE (*CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE In The Matter Of Notice of Public Hearing. No `j_X: U COUNTY r `those a issues, you{or AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PLANNIC 'OFIRMISSION$ someone"else raised at. �:��NOTICE OF'PUBLIC Z?' the,_,:.public`':.hearing • i.� - !�;r•Z�HEARING'ANDiV�; described,•in 1his notice;. NOTIOE•OF.INTENT.:TO a' or.in.writtencorrespon- State of CaliforniaADOPT A MITIGATEDt'Y 8ence�delivered�to;the SS. NEGATIVE DECLARATION 'Planning'tDiwsion at;`or s Notice'is hereby given'.'pr'icr to the publ1 hear-- County of Butte byT theButte. County' ing '.,.� •r ,, Planningf .Commisswn ( For,furthermformation that`a public hearing will regarding kthis.,project; The undersigned resident of the county of i be'heldTonlSept'emb`?rl,pleaser4contd6W`,Craig Butte, State of California, says: ! .11;'2003?at 9 00 a:m m'•Sanders'�prolect•'plan. Y the'Butte County�Poard ,ne(at the`,Butte County `iofupervisors Room P,lammngK 1• ision,;at County.2Admimstration (530)538 7153 s:c,; That I am, and at all time herein mentioned n Center,.25 county Cen �YV NNE CHRISTOPHER; was a citizen of the United States and notapartyter Drive;OrovilleC,ali r; 3DIRECTOR.OF,' ': forma;`'%at9.30y,a m; iDEVELOPMENTSERVICES. to nor interested in the above entitled matter i regarding;thefolowing ' ,;,T,P273565 r'+ Y PUbllshiAug:;15,`.2003 that I am the principal clerk of the printer and item..,< s ., , .- P P p In`accordance;with),ther publisher of California Environmental auality'Act(CI=..QA);`an' InitialiStudy fiaszbeen. The Chico Enterprise-Record prepared for.the•folow= mg.-project:„ Planning The Oroville Mercury-Register Division,staff'is.recom- mending is: Mitigated ' Negative Declaration: That said newspaper is one of general circula- ` MITIGATED NEGATIVE• '4''•,,DECLARATION/,•;r;' tion as defined by Section 6000 Government „ "i'= REZONE ;�,: Code of the State of California, Case No. 26796 ';Fourteen:£..;^.;'Mne House;;Inc, 5 Rezone by the Superior Court of the State of California, from for_43.2pacres;on in and for the County of Butte;that said newspa- the{'easrsidero},state, .Route:32,-across:'from per at all times herein mentioned was printed l Woodland,Perk1Road� Isi and ublished daily to the Ci of Chico and File requested zone 2- p Y City I Foothill"Recreation=2-. County of Butte;that the notice of which the acres minimum`xparcel size.7he,?.pToperty'is. annexed is a true printed copy, was published in currently configu' in-, said newspaper on the following days: four enual,parcels for ressi denttial develop; ment.',The,,parcels;are. 1;1, 4,A , 9 And,, ' 12:79:�acres�"?in'�� : �-• Sewage idisposasizeth�fot Aug. 15, 03. the., , he p,roject woul&be:. .provided by1ndiyid4i septic tank,,and.water. wouldk' be.V,obtained ' / 'from a well.on the'site. Dated September 4, 2003. tiTt;e property* :was rezoned,as.,alpartopf at Chico, California. thio �( U moo Houset6 P.l 13 a4rezoW, and residential,devel- opment,has been comm Si nat pleted•in the,fir'st.two g "units"of.thet.dm(el-' opment.'"The!,subject property*ts tthe'third: ;'unit";of-Ahat`residen, tial!development;:but Is''subject oto t a:sepa- rate;^3,&r=homeowners association.,�A n t envi- ronmental ..-4 analysis was:conducted prior;to ,the,'approval"oi;--said' rezone"and'lan6ther; "environmenfal�revievu; was-°prepared;,for ahe' subdlvision,,:;,4 approval;that,created the four parcels.'The' Iproperty;is located-on the'easuside,1of Deer Creek-�r Highway;. ' et Black`s Oak v.-,Terrace, about two miles south f ofiForest Ranch:APN 063-360;018(CS)(REZ 03-01) ;I;The'Initial'$tu y�•and Proposed `s.Mjtigated •.Negative Declaration for this project areon;file for public ii review: starting August';+l'15,4y,;2003, ' throughtSeptember,l0, 2003;at the Butte.Coun- ty Plan6ingDivisi6n,-,7 County, Centec;l-Drive, Oroville Californiar'`'All interested f persons;are to review I .6'doc- ument_'t',,Whtten=`•�:com mentsjwill be^accepted by.the Planning Division at the aboyd address.;' If you challenge:either the''Mitiq� ted Negative Declaration or,the"Use - Permit'in court;you may . .,.be limited to.raising only l . .... I� ,;..do-. ... ..• AUT,.... _ ite county LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES „��„�i.z��.r .•a. , u7Ob NTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 ' AUG ) TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 R AUG 1 3 2003 g FAX: (530)538-7785 August 12, 2003 hCAPlDFCE AJ*, 3S,(` CLERK �vyv __ _ '---DEPUTY BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on September 11, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at 9:30 a.m. regarding the following item In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for the following project. Therefore, Planning Division staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/REZONE Fourteen Mile House, Inc., Rezone from for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation— 2-acre minimum parcel size. The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank, and wafer would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as apart of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development has been completed in the first two "units"'of that`development. The subject property is the third "unit" of that residential development, but'is subject to a separate homeowners association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. The property is located on the east side of Deer Creek Highway, at Black Oak Terrace, about two miles south of Forrest Ranch. APN 063-360-018 (CS) (REZ 03- 01) The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project are on file for public review starting, August 15, 2003, through September 10, 2003, at the Butte County Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. All interested persons are invited to review the document. Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address. If you challenge either the Mitigated Negative Declaration or the Use Permit in court, you may. be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the public hearing. For further information regarding this project, please contact Craig Sanders, project planner, at the Butte County Planning Division at (530) 538- 7153. YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 'To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Friday August 15, 2003 t ' t7 1 August 12, 2003 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on September 11, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at 9:30 a.m. regarding the following item In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for the following project. Therefore, Planning Division staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/REZONE Fourteen Mile House, Inc., Rezone from for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation— 2-acre minimum parcel size. The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank, and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development has been completed in the first two "units" of that development. The subject property is the third "unit" of that residential development, but is subject to a separate homeowners association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. The property is located on the east side of DceF4 it gl y, about two miles south f Fo)Yest Ranc . AP 063-360-018�(CS) EZ 03- The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project are on file for public review starting, August 15, 2003, through September 10, 2003, at the Butte County Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. All interested persons are invited to review the document. Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address. If you challenge either the Mitigated Negative Declaration or the Use Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the public hearing. For further information regarding this project, please contact Craig Sanders, project planner, at the Butte County Planning Division at (530) 538- 7153. YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Friday August 15, 2003 z tr DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT BUTTE COUNTY INITIAL STUDY AND PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR RZ03-01 (Ray Johnson — 14 Mile House) Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,Re REZ 03-01 • COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY T FOR .TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 02-03 (Ray Johnson — 14 Mile House, Unit 3) 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: Ray Johnson B. Staff Contact: Craig Sanders,(530)538-7603 C. Proiect Name: 14-Mile House D. Proiect Location: State Highway 32 south of Forest Ranch E. Type of Application(s): Rezone From PUD to FR-2 F., Assessor's Parcel Number: 063-0360-018 G. Proiect Site Size: 43.2 acres H. 'Current Zoning: Planned Unit Development(PUD) I. General Plan Designation: Agricultural Residential 1 J. ' Environmental Setting: The project site is located in the northern portion of Butte County, an unincorporated area of Butte County,northeast of the city of Chico. Located in a rural foothills setting,the project site is surrounded by undeveloped land and low-density'residential uses. The undeveloped site has moderate topography, which rises from southwest to northeast. Vegetation on the site includes yellow pines, California black oaks, and other plants and trees associated with the Yellow Pine Forest and Chaparral habitats. The western side of the site, which abuts State Route 32, is partially cleared and the . vegetation generally is denser further east on the site. The project site is not within a 100-year flood zone or within an airport overflight zone. K. Surrounding Land Uses: The project site is surrounded by undeveloped and residential parcels, ranging in size from 1 to 198 acres. Both existing and proposed parcel sizes are larger than the surrounding residential parcels, which are predominantly half-acre or one-acre lots. Zoning on the surrounding parcels is TM-40 (Timber Mountain, .40-acre minimum), TM-5 (Timber Mountain, 5-acre minimum), and Planned Unit Development(PUD). L. Proiect Description: Ray Johnson, Jr. is requesting approval of a rezone.for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation — 2 acre minimum parcel size. The.property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank, and water would be obtained from one or more private wells. . One well already exists on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development , 'has been completed in the first two "units"of that development. The subject property is the third"unit"of that residential development but is subject to a separate homeowners, association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. • ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 1 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,FPe#REZ 03-01 M. Public Agency Approvals: Butte County Development Services Department 2.0 DETERMINATION [ ] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [X] I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will " NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [ ] I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. l ,[ ] I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment,but at least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures . based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project,nothing further is required. 03 Prepare Craig Sanders AICP, Senior Planner Date 03 Rev' e by: Joe Baker,Planning Manager Date 3.0 POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS CHECKLIST SETTING A. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: .The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [X] 4.1 Aesthetics [ ] 4.2 Agriculture Resources [X] 4.3 Air Quality [X] 4.4 Biological Resources [X] 4.5 Cultural Resources [X] 4.6 Geologic Processes [X] 4.7 Hazards/Hazardous Material [ ] 4.8 Hydrology/Water Quality [ ] 4.9 Land Use [ ] 4.10 Mineral Resources [ ] 4.11 Noise [ ] 4.12 Housing [X] 4.13 Public Seryices [ ] 4.14 Recreation [ ] 4.15 Transportation/Traffic [ ] 4.16 Utilities/Service Systems [ ] 4.17 Mandatory Findings of Significance ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 2 ■ a Rezone,Fi•REZ 03-01 • Project Name: 14-Mile Hous B. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A"No Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved(e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact' answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards, (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a project-specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on-site,cumulative as well as project-level,indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or . less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made,an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact'to a"Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures,and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from.Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced). 5) "Reviewed Under Previous Document." Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case,a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures: .For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 4 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold,if any,used to evaluate each question;and b) The mitigation measure identified,if any,to reduce the impact to less than significant. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 3 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,Fite REZ 03-01 • 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 4.1 AESTHETIC/VISUAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?, X b. Substantially damage scenic resources,including,but not limited to,trees,rock outcroppings,and historic X buildings within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or X qualityof the site and its surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views X in the area? Impact Discussion: The project would result in the potential 19 single-family residential parcels of four parcels (a net gain of fifteen parcels more than the four current parcels). With the existing rural residential uses.found in the project area, no substantial conflicts with the established character or function of the surrounding community are anticipated. The project site is currently undeveloped and the site is partially cleared of trees, particularly on the side of the property near State Route 32. Residential development on the parcels would introduce light and glare into the area for safety and security purposes. The impacts of light could have an adverse impact to vehicles using Highway 32 and to individual homes within the subdivision. The original PUD approval incorporated a mitigation measure to reduce glare which would be appropriate to be carried forward as mitigation measure#1 below. The project site is not located along any section of State Route 32 that is designated as a State or County scenic highway(Butte County Scenic Highway Map/CalTrans comments). Scenic views of the Little Chico Creek Canyon are available toward the eastern side of the project site. This area of the project site is not accessible to the public and no public view of the canyon will be obscured by the project. CalTrans has commented that depending on the visibility of structures, architectural design, heights, and setbacks of future structures and subdivision lots, a vegetative screening or other mitigation may be appropriate along the Hwy 32 frontage. A mitigation has been proposed for subdivision approval if the current four lots were to be further divided, requiring architectural design controls, such as color, texture, and foram, that blend with the natural background be contained in the development CC&Rs. This project would not significantly impact a scenic vista. The additional development would result in the removal of several trees in order to make room for roads and homes. Current mitigation for the existing lots requires replacement of any oak trees removed. This would continue to be applied as a mitigation for future subdivision applications. Mitigation Measure#1: Street lighting and exterior security lighting shall use low pressure sodium vapor lamps or other similar lighting that is recognized to reduce light pollution and shall be installed in a manner to reduce undue glare. Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown or noted on any proposed Final Map. Timing: The mitigation measure shall be implemented upon approval of a future land division. Monitoring: The Public Works Department shall review plans and determine compliance, then inspect during construction to ensure compliance. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 4 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone OFie REZ 03-01 Mitigation Measure # 2: Architectural design controls, such as color, texture, and form, that blend with the natural background shall be contained in the development CC&Rs. Plan Requirements: The building plans shall demonstrate compliance with the above mitigation measure. Timing: The mitigation measure shall be implemented upon approval of a future land division. Monitoring: The Department of Development Services shall review building plans and determine compliance. Building inspectors shall spot check and ensure compliance on-site. 4.2 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under f Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farmland),as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the X Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or X a Williamson Act Contract? c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which,due to their location or nature,could result in X conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural use? Impact Discussion: The project site is designated Agricultural Residential in the Butte County General Plan and is zoned for residential development. None of the adjacent land is in active agriculture, and the project site is not designated as Prime or Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (California Resource Agency), nor is the project site designated as Agricultural Preserve area in Butte County. No agricultural uses are currently established on the site or on the adjacent parcels. As a part of the processing of this development application, comments were sought from the Agricultural Commission, who provided no comments regarding agricultural issues or impacts associated with the proposed project. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.3 Am QUALITY: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the X applicable air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality X violation? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 5 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,Ft #REZ 03-01 • -Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient X air quality standard(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial X number of people? Impact Discussion: Both the California Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency have established air pollution standards in an effort to protect human health and welfare. Geographic areas are designated "attainment" if these standards are met and "nonattainment" if they are not'met. In addition, each agency has several levels of classifications based on severity of the problem. Butte County and all northern Sacramento Valley Air Districts have been designated as "moderate" nonattainment areas for the state standards for ozone and fine particulate matter (PM10). Currently, Butte County is in attainment for all the federal (less stringent) air quality standards. Development of the project site would result in a cumulative impact on air quality created by the increase in vehicle traffic,the potential use of wood burning devices in the new residences, and dust from vehicular traffic on unpaved driveways on the site. The additional vehicle traff c is not anticipated to be significant because only fifteen potential parcels could be created by the project. The proposed lots are well below the level determined to be significant byu the Butte County Air Quality Management District for additional air-quality analysis(1997 Air Quality Attainment Plan). The air quality impact of additional wood stoves is addressed through existing building code requirements calling for wood stove and fireplace inserts installed in any home to be EPA approved and designed to meet emissions standards of the California Clean Air Act of 1988 as amended. The project may create fugitive dust emission during site development activities, such as grading, excavation for foundations and utilities, road construction, and other soil work. The Butte County Air Quality Management District (BCAQMD) recommends incorporating measures to control fugitive dust emission for all road and other construction activities during project development,using such methods as site and driveway watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. A mitigation to address this potential future impact would best be applied any future tentative map. No impacts will occur unless another map is approved for the site. At that time, a mitigation measure to address dust control would be appropriate. Mitigation Measure#3: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems are to be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered,kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation." Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown on grading and building plans. Timing: Condition shall be applied to future land division approvals. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 6■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,F1#REZ 03-01 Monitoring: The Department shall ensure that measures are indicated on the plans. Public Works Grading and Building inspectors shall spot check; Grading and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Pollution Control District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or ' through habitat modifications,on any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status X species in local or regional plans,policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies, X regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 or the Clean Water Act(including,but not limited to,marsh, X vernal pool,coastal,etc.)through direct removal, filling,hydrological interruption,or other means)? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish and wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory X wildlife corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree X reservation policy ordinance? L Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation X Plan,or other approved local,regional,or state habitat conservationplan? G A reduction in the numbers,a restriction in the range, ' or an impact to the critical habitat of any unique,rare, X threatened,or endangered species of animals? h. A reduction in the diversity or numbers of animals onsite(including mammals,birds,reptiles, X amphibians,fish or invertebrates)? i. A deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat(for X foraging,breeding,roosting,nesting,etc.)? j. Introduction of barriers to movement of any resident X or migratory fish or wildlife species? k. Introduction of any factors(light,fencing,noise, human presence and/or domestic animals)which could X hinder the normal activities of wildlife? i Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 7 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,Fe#REZ 03-01 Impact Discussion: Vegetation on the site consists of trees, shrubs, and grasses typical of the yellow pine forest and chaparral habitats, including yellow pine,black oak, manzanita,buckbrush, toyon, scrub oak,poison oak, silk tassel bush, pitcher sage, and others. Wildlife is expected to be similar to that of similar habitats in Butte County. Wildlife likely to be encountered on the site include striped skunk, pocket gopher, gray squirrel, black tail deer, American robin, hermit thrush, Brewer's blackbird, house fmch, goldfinch, mourning dove, common flicker, Stellar's jay, scrub jay, common crow,turkey vulture,and western fence lizard. No riparian vegetation exists on the site (site visit and Department of Fish and Game ASBI Maps on file in the Butte County Department of Development Services). The site does not contain wetlands. The project is not located in any wildlife conservation areas identified in the Butte County General Plan. Impacts on vegetative resources and habitat would be reduced by Mitigation Measure PUD-1, which was included in the Negative Declaration that was adopted prior to the rezoning of the project property to PUD in 1993. No rare or endangered animal species are found on the project site. Construction activities and the residential use on the project'site would cause some of the animals currently utilizing the project site to move to new areas. It is expected that up to 10 acres of timber could be affected by the ultimate development of this site with 19 homes. Typical of this area, homeowners try to retain as many trees as possible but there is no County ordinance to do so. The existing lots are under a mitigation to replace lost oak trees as follows: A. Individual trees or groups of trees that are retained as a function of project design should be fully protected to the extent possible both during and after construction. In order to protect the root zone during construction a root protection zone (RPZ) should be established using stakes and flagging material. The RPZ should be an area that is 1.5 times the distance from the trunk to the dripline. Within this protective buffer, no grading, trenching, fill,or vegetation alteration of any kind should be allowed. B. Individual trees that are unavoidably lost due to project implementation should be replaced by planting oak seeds (acorns) or seedlings that are obtained from the local generic stock of the same species. A replacement rate of 5:1 and container size of no less than 15 gallons shall be used for trees that are two inches or greater in diameter measured at breast height (dbh). A replacement rate of 1:1 and container size of no less than five gallons shall be used for all trees less than two inches dbh. Every effort should be made to retain large oaks. Oak plantings shall be maintained for a period of five years. C. A five-year maintenance and monitoring plan shall be completed for all oak mitigation plantings. The monitoring plan should include appropriate irrigation schedules, as well as criteria for success and reestablishment during the five-year period. Any trees planted as remedial action for failure of initial planting shall be monitored for five years in a similar fashion to the initial planting.The goal is to achieve an 80-percent success rate at the end of the five-year monitoring period.Homeowners shall be responsible for re-planting and maintaining oaks removed from their lots to accommodate improvements. D. Following project construction, a fact sheet describing the value and care of native oaks shall be distributed to all residents. At a minimum, this fact sheet should encourage homeowners to avoid unnecessary pruning, educate them on the water needs of oak tees, and encourage, except where it would be a safety hazard, the retention of snags and downed trees.This fact sheet shall also be referenced in the CC&Rs. This mitigation would be included in any future land division application on this property. Removal of conifers on the property would not be significant as these trees are in abundance and the loss of 10 acres in relationship to the approximately 375,000 acres of timberland in the County is not significant. The project is located within an area identified by the California Department of Fish and Game as Critical Winter Deer range for the East Tehema Deer Herd. Department of-Fish And Game was contacted but has not responded with any concerns. The Department of Fish and Game did not oppose the original project approval based on certain mitigations being included in the project. Because the Critical Winter range calls for 40 acre minimum parcels sizes for viable habitat, the existing four parcels represents land that is not viable habitat under the Department of Fish and Game criteria. Land divisions resulting from the rezone to smaller parcels would be required to mitigate impacts to deer habitat by limiting fencing type and paying habitat impact fees. The project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 8 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,F•#REZ 03-01 The proposal would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local,regional, or state habitat conservation plan as there are no adopted plans affecting the project site. No direct impacts would occur as a result of this project because no physical changes can occur without another discretionary application and subsequent environmental review. All of the potential impacts would occur only if additional lots are proposed changes to the environment will occur. Mitigation Measure#4: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "A plan prepared by a certified arborist, botanist or landscape architect that shows the existing on-site mature oak trees, located in any area proposed for buildings and vehicular access,' and provides for methods to protect the trees identified to be preserved, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits and/or prior to grading or vegetation removal. The removal of mature oak trees shall be minimized, where possible. A mature tree shall be defined as a tree with a trunk measuring 4 inches in diameter, 4 feet from ground level. Mature oak trees removed shall be replaced on a 3- to-1 ratio, utilizing existing oak tree stock. Each oak tree to be preserved shall be surrounded by a circular zone (minimum 40-foot radius) identified by an orange fence during construction activities. No vegetation removal, soil disturbance,or other development activities shall occur within the fenced area." Plan Requirements: The above note shall be placed on any the Final Map recorded within the project site. Timing: The tree plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review with future building permit . applications. Monitoring: The Department of Development Services and Public Works Department shall ensure the note is placed on the Final Map. Public Works Grading and Building inspectors shall spot check; Grading and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. t Mitigation Measure#5: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet which states: "Fencing for areas other than residential areas shall be limited to a maximum of five (5) wire strands. The lowest strand shall be at least sixteen(16) inches above the ground and the upper strand shall be no higher than forth-eight(48)inches above the ground." Plan Requirements: The above note shall be placed on any future Final Map. Timing:The note shall be reviewed prior to recordation of future maps approved within the project area. Monitoring: The Department of Development Services and Public Works Department shall ensure the note is placed on the Final Map. Building inspectors shall spot check;and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Mitigation Measure#6: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with any future map or on an additional map sheet that states: "At the time of building permit application, if a Deer Herd Impact fee(s)is currently in effect,it shall be paid prior to the issuance of the building permit." Plan Requirements: The required notes must be placed upon future recorded maps or on an additional map sheets. Timing: The required fee shall be paid at time of building permit issuance, if adopted or in force at the time of application. Monitoring: The Department of Public Works and the Planning Division shall ensure that the required notes are placed upon the map. The Building Division shall collect the fees at the time of building permit issuance if the County adopts the fees. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 9 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,FiI•REZ 03-01 • 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance X of a historical resource as defined in§15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X an archaeological resource pursuant to§15064.5? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X resource or site or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains,including those interred outside of foal cemeteries? X rm Impact Discussion: Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites; historical features, such as rock walls, water ditches and flumes, and cemeteries;and architectural features. Cultural resources consist of any human-made site, object(i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past. No structures or sites are known to be located on the subject site. Prehistoric resources have been found nearby in the course of environmental review of the previous phases of the 14-Mile House subdivision and residential development. Often such sites are found in foothill areas,areas with high bluffs, rock outcroppings, areas overlooking deer migratory corridors, or above bodies of water. Though no cultural resources are known to exist on the site, the potential for uncovering cultural resources during excavation exists. The site was once traversed by the Humboldt Toll Road running from Chico to the gold mines of Idaho. 14 Mile house, located southerly of this site was the location for a stage stop and overnight station. Some historic artifacts may still remain in the area. Development of the property is currently subject to a provision to cease work if any historic or cultural resources are discovered. The same mitigation would be applied to any future subdivision map. Because no additional soil disturbance would be authorized by the rezone,no mitigation is currently needed. Mitieation Measure#7: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with any future map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Should grading activities reveal the presence of cultural resources(i.e.,artifact concentrations, including arrowheads and other stone tools or chipping debris, cans, glass, etc.; structural remains; human skeletal remains), work within 50 feet of the find shall cease immediately until a qualified professional archaeologist can be consulted to evaluate the remains and implement appropriate mitigation procedures. Should human skeletal remains be encountered, State law requires immediate notification of the County Coroner. Should the County Coroner determine that such remains are in an archaeological context, the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento shall be notified immediately, pursuant to State law, to arrange for Native American participation in determining the disposition of such remains". Plan Requirements: The required notes must be placed upon future recorded maps or on an additional map sheets. Timing: This measure shall be implemented during site preparation and construction. Monitoring: Should cultural resources be discovered, the Planning Division shall coordinate with the developer and appropriate authorities to avoid damage to cultural resources and determine appropriate action. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 10 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone Fi•REZ 03-01 • 4.6 GEOLOGIC PROCESSES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the X State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? X 3. Seismic-related ground failure,including X liquefaction? 4. Landslides? X b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or that would become unstable as a result of the project, X _ and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide,lateral spreading,subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil,as defined in Table 18-1- B of the Uniform Building Code(1994),creating X substantial risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal X system where sewers are not available for the disposal or waste water? Impact Discussion: The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone or an aftershock zone. The only known active fault in Butte County is the Cleveland Hill fault, located approximately 25 miles from the project site, where activity on August 1, 1975 resulted in the Oroville earthquake.' This earthquake had a Richter magnitude of 5.7 and resulted in approximately 2.2 miles of ground rupture along the western flank of Cleveland Hill. In the northwest corner of Butte County near Chico there are a series of short, north-northwest trending faults similar to the Cleveland Hill fault. These faults appear to be an extension of the Bear Mountain Fault or Foothills Shear Zone. Minor seismic activity has occurred in the area of these short faults; however, other geologic evidence indicates these faults are not active(Butte County General Plan 1977). The Butte County GIS Fault Lines theme shows that an inferred fault is located approximately 10 miles to the west of the project site. This inferred fault is a part of the Foothill Shear Zone and has not experienced any known movement during historical times. No impacts are anticipated since no rupture of a known earthquake fault exists in the project area. The 80-mile-long Midland-Sweitzer fault is located approximately 50 miles southwest of the project site. This fault is considered active and has caused historic earthquakes of Richter magnitudes between 6 to 6.9 in the area in 1892. There is some speculation as to the exact location of the historic earthquake epicenters and some question if they actually occurred on the Midland-Sweitzer fault(Butte County, 1977). ■ Butte County Department of Development Services"■Planning Division■ Page 11 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone File#REZ 03-01 Approximately 5 miles west of Butte County there is a north trending fault system known as the Willows fault. This fault is approximately 40 miles long and displaces Cretaceous sediment in the Sacramento Valley. It does not appear to displace surface sediment and has been mapped principally by geophysical methods. However,there have been enough historical seismic events in the vicinity of this fault to conclude that it should be considered potentially active(Butte County General Plan 1977). Like most of central California, the site can be expected to be subjected to seismic ground shaking at some future time. Accordingly, all buildings, pipes, light poles, roadways, and other improvements would be designed and installed in accordance with Uniform Building requirements. Because the project appears to be located such that the probability of significant groundshaking is low, and because the structures would be designed and installed in accordance with Uniform Building Code standards for the appropriate Seismic Hazard Zone, potential geologic impacts would be less than significant. The Butte County Seismic Safety Element's Liquefaction Potential Map indicates that the site has a low potential for liquefaction. The impact would be less than significant. The Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that there is a low to moderate potential for landslides in this area. Grading standards required to be met for the issuance of a grading permit would reduce any potential impact. The soil erosion potential for the project site is slight, according to Butte County General Plan GIS data. Standard construction techniques are required as part of the construction process of this project that would help prevent significant soil erosion impacts. As a condition of the issuance of a building permit permit,the developer is required to include erosion control measures and, if necessary, detention facilities to control erosion and runoff. Cut and fill slopes are limited and revegetation of disturbed slopes is required as conditions for a site development and building permits under the current subdivision requirements. The included mitigations were applied to the original PUD rezone and have been applied to past subdivision maps. They would also be applied to any future subdivision map. It is expected that the development of the site including roads, driveways, septic leachfields, and houses would impact more than one acre of land and would therefore require a Construction stormwater permit from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. Stormwater permits are intended to minimize water quality impacts of development As this is a statutory requirement no mitigation is necessary. A condition will be included as part of the recommendations for the project. The Conservation Element's Expansive Soils Map indicates that the project site has low to moderate expansive soil potential. The Building Division may require that the foundations of future dwelling on the site be designed and constructed to handle the shrink/swell characteristics of expansive soils. Standard grading and foundation design would reduce any potential impacts. No direct impacts would occur as a result of this project because no physical changes can occur without another discretionary application and subsequent environmental review. All of the potential impacts would occur only if additional lots are proposed changes to the environment will occur. Mitigation Measure#8: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with any future map or on an additional map sheet that states: Limit earthwork to the period between April 1 and Nov. 15,unless an erosion control plan prepared by a registered civil engineer or other qualified professional has been prepared for wet weather operations.. All areas where the soil has been disturbed or where the vegetation has been removed shall be protected from erosion using standard erosion control methods accepted by civil engineers. Vegetation in the fuel reduction area shall not be removed to the extent that erosion occurs. It is recommended that the vegetation removed for fire protection be chipped or mulched and then applied to the cleared areas for erosion control... Plan Requirements: The required notes must be placed upon future recorded maps or on an additional map sheets. Timing: This measure shall be implemented during site preparation and construction. Monitoring: The Department of Development Services and Public Works Department shall ensure the note is placed on the Final Map. Building inspectors shall spot check;and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 12 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,Fill"#REZ 03-01 Mitigation measure#9: Homes constructed on these lots shall be designed to minimize grading and to utilize the existing grade to the extent feasible through the use of multi level structures. Plan Requirements: The required notes must be placed upon future recorded maps or on an additional map sheets. Timing: This measure shall be implemented during plan check for building permits. Monitoring: The Department of Development Services and Public Works Department shall ensure the note is placed on the Final Map. Building inspectors shall spot check;and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. 4. 7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Potentially Less Than Less Than 1\o Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environmental through the routine transport use,or X disposal of hazardous materials? b. . Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and X accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,substances,or waste within one- X quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result, X would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the X project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people X residing or working in the project area? g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency X evacuationplan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,including X where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Impact Discussion: The project site is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials and would not create any hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services■Planning Division■ Page 13 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-0 The property is not located within the vicinity of an airport, airport land-use plan, or private airstrip, and does not interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact is anticipated. The California Department of Forestry has reviewed the project and doesn't have any specific recommendation with regard to the rezone. Subsequent applications to divide the property will result in a number of conditions being applied to address fire safety. Public Resources Code 4290/4291 is applicable to the project site and the provisions of that code will be applied to future land divisions. The impact is less than significant at this time because no additional construction would be allowed by the rezone. The project is located within a State Response Area for wildland fires and construction of homes in this area makes fighting wildland fires more difficult because fire resources must protect structures before wildlands. The nearest fire station is Station# 23 (full time), located approximately 6 miles away, to the northeast along Highway 32. A volunteer station is located approximately 1.7 miles away in Forest Ranch. The Butte County Fire Department/CDF states that any development of lots in high and very high fire hazard areas requires that State and County Fire Safe regulations be followed. One of these provisions includes fuel reduction areas within 30 feet of all structures. Because of this 30-foot fuel reduction requirement,the current 5-foot side and rear yard building setbacks of the proposed FR-2 zone are not adequate. To allow all property owners to have control over fuel reduction around structures, a 30-foot side and rear yard building setback is required. This would be a condition of any future map. Mitigation Measure# 10: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "The building setback from the side and rear property lines shall be at least thirty(30)feet to satisfy Public Resources Code 4290(Fire Safe Regulations)." Plan Requirements: The required note shall be placed on the Final Map. The Fire Department and Public Works Department shall ensure that the note is placed on the Final Map. Timing: At the time of building plan checking, building and site plans shall,be checked for compliance with the condition. Monitoring: The Building Division and the Planning Division shall check building and site plans for compliance prior to issuance of a-,building permit. Building inspectors shall ensure compliance by conducting an on-site inspection prior to the final inspection. 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g.,the production X rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 14 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal' Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course X of a stream or river,in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or X amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage X systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade waterquality? ' X g Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped by Federal Flood Hazard Boundary,Flood Insurance Rate Map,or other flood hazard delineation X map? . h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures X which would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury,or death involving flooding,including flooding as X a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j. Inundation by seiche,tsunami,or mudflow? X Impact Discussion: The project would provide for an additional build out of 15 more residences,bringing the total to 19 dwellings on the east side of Highway 32. 'An existing well on the property will be use to provide domestic water to all lots. According to the applicant, a second well and water storage tanks for 5,000 gallons will be provided to serve future development. The existing well has been tested and produces an adequate supply to meet the demand for both domestic and fire purposes. The proposed project would include individual septic systems for sewer treatment. The County Environmental' Health Department has reviewed the project and has no objections to the rezone. Future land divisions will have to meet County standards for sewage disposal and water. The project would essentially be a third, yet separate,phase of a PUD subdivision and residential development, the first two phases of which have been completed and are occupied. The septic systems for those developments were approved by the County Environmental Health Department based on soils on those sites. Adherence to existing County requirements for well and septic tank installation will ensure that there are no impacts to surface water or ground water in the area as a result of the project. The use of individual septic systems would not trigger waste discharge requirements from the Stare Regional Water Quality Control Board. This project would ultimately result in the creation of new impervious surfaces such as houses, accessory structures, and driveways. The amount of impervious surface area relative to parcels of 2 acres in size could result in a significant contribution to peak flow runoff. Detention facilities conforming to the County's requirement that development not increase peak flow runoff, will have to be installed if and when additional lots develop. This is a requirement of the Butte County Code and would be a condition of any future parcel or subdivision map. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood zone or 500-year flood zone as shown on Butte County GIS maps,which are based on a Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map,dated June,2000. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 15 ■ t Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 • The property is not located in an area prone to seiche,tsunami,or mudflow. No impact would occur with respect to these natural hazards. Septic systems are proposed for sewer systems on the parcels and will be required to comply with the County Improvement Standards. Mitigation Measure: None required., 4.9 LAND USE: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Physically divide an established community? X b. Conflict with an applicable land use plan,policy,or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project(including,but not limited to,the general X plan,specific plan,local coastal program,or zoning . ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation X plan or natural community conservation plan? Impact Discussion: The proposal rezone 42 acres in a current configuration of four parcels of 5.41,7.24, 17.79,and 12.79 acres to an FR-2 zone permitting parcels as small as 2 acres. A total of 19 parcels could potentially be a developed. The property is designated as Agricultural Residential in the Butte County General Plan Land Use ' Element. Consistent zones listed for this designation are A-20, A-40, TM-20, TM-40, FR-20, FR-40, and CF. All of these zones have a minimum parcel size of 20 acres or larger. Zoning districts with a minimum parcel size less than 20 acres may be consistent with the land sue designation provided the following five criteria can be met: 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. The project is not adjacent to'any agricultural uses. Some timber management or harvesting may take place on surrounding parcels but the proposed residential uses would not conflict with these activities. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. Based on information received from the Butte County Environmental Health Division, the project appears to be able to meet the County's water and sewage disposal requirements. 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. The site is located approximately 6 miles from the nearest year around manned fire station in north of Forest Ranch on Highway 32. The closest volunteer station is approximately 1.7 miles away in Forest Ranch. This is seen as adequate for fire protection because the ultimate division of the property will include the requirement for a pressurized water system with hydrants. This will provide a higher degree of fire protection than serves lots that re in within a PUD development. 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 16■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,Fite#REZ 03-01 • All traffic generated by the project will utilize State Highway 32 in order to get to anywhere. Major commercial services and intermediate and high schools are in Chico, approximately 13 miles to the southeast. Traffic volumes on area roads are relatively low. 2001 CalTrans counts for Highway 32 show that adequate capacity exists to handle the traffic generated by the project. A more complete discussion is contained on Section 15 of this document. 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. The nearest full commercial services arelocated in Chico approximately 13 miles away. A small market and gasoline service is available in Forest Ranch, approximately 2 miles away. Intermediate and high school services are also located in Chico' The property is not within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact would be incurred. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.10 MnNERAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the X residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local X general plan,specific plan,or other land use plan? Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to known mineral resource areas. The project is located at least five miles from mining activities, according to Butte County GIS data. Therefore,the project would have no impact on mineral resources. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.11 NOISE: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan X or noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X ground borne vibration or ground bome noise levels? c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noiseIL X levels in the project vicinity above levels existing ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 17 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,Fid#REZ 03-01 • Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated without theproject? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above X levels existing without theproject? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, X would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? L For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working X in the project area to excessive noise levels? . Impact Discussion: The project site is subject to noise originating from vehicles on State Route 32,which abuts the project site to the west. The vehicle noise emanating from this roadway may result in significant impacts to future residents of the homes planned for development as a part of the proposed subdivision. The right-of-way along Highway 32 is 30 feet on each side. The required setback for the project property is 25 feet. According to 2000 traffic counts, the average daily number of trips along this section of State Route 32 is approximately 3000. According to 1998 Caltrans truck traffic counts (the most recent available), the level of truck traffic near the project site is between 38 and 45 percent. The Butte County Noise Element states that for high-speed roadways carrying 5,000 to 20,000 Average Daily Trips (ADT), the 65 dB noise contour will be between 100 and 200 feet of the centerline of the travel lane. Given that the current ADT is less than 5,000 trips the 65 dB contour should be less than 100 feet away from the travel lane. If homes are ultimately proposed within 100 feet of the highway a related noise mitigation to attenuate interior noise level would most likely be proposed as part of he subdivision map approval. Since no homes will currently be allowed within 100 feet of the highway by this action, no mitigation is necessary at this time. Construction activities on the site would temporarily generate high noise levels on and adjacent to the project site intermittently during project development activities. During construction,the highest noise levels would result from operation of heavy earthmoving equipment, which can be expected to generate noise levels of between 85 to 90 decibels (dBA) at a distance of 50 feet from the source. Noise levels will be reduced, however, by a factor of six dBA with each doubling of distance from the noise source and by intervening topography. Adjacent residences are at least 500-600 feet from construction staging activities that would be associated with residential development at the project site. The subdivision proposed in this project creates parcels on the northeastern portion of the existing parcel,which is the side of the property furthest from the adjacent residential development. The General Plan Noise Element establishes a conditionally acceptable community noise level of up to 70 dB CNEL for construction activities. Given the size of the parcels and significant distance from the nearest residential structure, construction noise would not have a significant impact on nearby residence. Furthermore, any such noise disturbance would be intermittent and short-term in nature. Because of the relatively small increment of traffic added to the local roadways, the project would not significantly affect future traffic noise levels. The project is not located in the vicinity of an airstrip or within an airport land use plan. No impact would occur.. Mitigation Measure: None required ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 18 ■ r ' Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,Me REZ 03-01 • 4.12 HOUSING: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Induce substantial population growth in an area,either directly(for example,by proposing new homes and X businesses)or indirectly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing X elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people,necessitating X the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Impact Discussion: Butte County population has grown at a rate at or below official population projections for the past 10 years. Projected population for 2000 was 207,159, while the actual census population was 203,171. The growth rate for Butte County between the 1990 and 2000 was 11.6%, or 1.1% per year. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map would create four parcels, with a net increase of three parcels for residential development. This project has the potential to add an estimated 36 people to Butte County(15 units x 2.414 persons/unit—.assuming all occupants are new residents to Butte County). This is not considered a significant amount and is consistent with the estimated 2% annual growth rate for the County. The project would not significantly affect the population of the area because the proposed density is consistent with the surrounding area. The project would not displace individuals or housing. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.13 PUBLIC SERVICES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered .governmental facilities,the construction of which X could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times,or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b. Fireprotection? X c.. Police Protection? X d. Schools? X e. Parks? X L Other public services? X Impact Discussion: The project site is located in an area designated as having a high to very high fire hazard according to GIS data from the California Division of Forestry. Fire protection services for the project site are ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 19 0 Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,FRe#REZ 03-01 • provided by the Butte County Fire Department in coordination with the State Division of Forestry. The closest station is Volunteer County Station #24 in Forest Ranch, approximately 1.7 miles north on State Route 32. The nearest year around manned station (Station 23) is located approximately 6 miles away, northeast of Forest Ranch. The project has various conditions with which to comply to reduce wildfire risk and impacts on fire service to a less than significant level. The developer is required to coordinate with the Butte County Fire Department in meeting the aforementioned conditions. The Butte County Fire Department/California Department of Forestry states that cumulative development in rural areas would impact their ability to provide fire protection services. This agency states that the installation of automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems in residential structures, the use of fire resistant building materials and the availability of water supply systems would reduce the demand for fire protection services. As a mitigation of project approval, all new dwelling units on the site are required to be equipped with an automatic fire suppression sprinkler system unless the parcel is connected to a pressurized community water system and has a fire hydrant available to serve the parcel in accordance with.CDF/Butte County Fire Department standards. The proposal would result'in an incremental increase in demand for police protection services. The cumulative impacts of increased residential development in the County affects the ability of the Sheriffs Department to adequately provide police services to outlying areas. Sheriffs facilities fees are required to be paid prior to issuance of building permits for any dwelling units placed on the project site; this would reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. The proposal would result in an incremental demand for school facilities in the area. The project site is located in the Chico Unified School District. The applicant is required to place a note on the map that states: "A development impact fee for school facilities shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. The fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permits." While school districts maintain that these fees do not fully mitigate the impacts of the project, the Countyis precluded from imposing additional fees or mitigation by state legislation. The project would result in the potential development of fifteen additional dwellings, which would not create significant impacts to area parks and facilities. A less than significant impact is anticipated to other public services. Mitigation Measure#11: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized community water.system,with hydrants that meet Fire Department specifications,serves the parcels." Plan Requirements: The note shall be placed on the Final Map Timing: Interior fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures at the time of building construction. Monitoring: Building Division plan checkers shall ensure that the building plans for residential structures include . interior fire sprinkler systems. Building inspectors shall ensure all residential structures have a functioning interior Mire sprinkler system prior to the final inspection,by conducting an on-site inspection 4.14 ' RECREATION: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services■Planning Division■ Page 20■ Project Name: 14 Mile House Rezone,F�REZ 03-01 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such X that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities X which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Impact Discussion: The project site is not located within any established park and recreation district. The site is located within 13 miles of recreation facilities in Chico and 15 miles of National Forest lands where recreation opportunities can be found. There are no neighborhood recreation facilities in the Forest Ranch area and no recreation facilities are proposed as part of this project. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system(i.e.,result in a substantial increase in X either the number of vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio on roads,or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed,either individually or cumulatively,a level of service standard established by the county congestion X management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in X location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or X incompatible uses e.g.,farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? X L Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g. Conflict with accepted policies,plans or programs supporting alternative transportation(e.g.,bus X turnouts,bicycle racks)? Impact Discussion: The future parcels created in compliance with the requested zoning would access State Route 32 via an approved 60 foot wide easement. Encroachment permits for new access onto State Route 32 must be ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 21 ■ Project Mame: 14-Mile House Rezone,fFt #REZ 03-01 obtained from the-California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) prior to construction of the roadway on the site. State Route 32 has an average daily traffic',load(ADT) of approximately 3000 for the segment near the project site. The rezone of the project property and surrounding property to PUD as a part of the 14-Mile House development required the developer to construct a left turn lane for the north bound (uphill) lane of State Route 32 to Caltrans specifications. The project could potentially result in the creation of fifteen additional parcels for residential development a left turn lane is already in place to serve the development off of Highway 32 in both directions. The proposed rezone would create nineteen individual parcels for a net increase of fifteen parcels. Thus, the development has the potential to generate approximately 143 additional traffic trips per day based upon 9.55 vehicle trips/day per dwelling unit as projected by the Trip Generation Manual of the Institute of Traffic Engineers for a single family residential use. The increase in vehicle traffic generated by the project would raise the AADT to approximately 3,150 which would represent a volume to capacity ratio of approximately 17.5% (3,150 trips/18,000 capacity).This ratio is still a level of service(LOS)A and the impact would not be significant. The Public Works Department requires that a 60-foot right-of-way be established as access to each parcel. There several existing rights-of-way on the property serving the existing four parcels. Additional right-of-way would be needed if the full development potential is to be achieved. Butte County Code Section 24-240 (b) requires two off-street spaces per dwelling. The parcels of 2 acres in size will have no problem meeting this requirement. This proposed rezone would not conflict with accepted policies, plans. or programs supporting alternative transportation. Mitigation Measure: None Required. 4.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of X existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing X facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and X resources,or are new or expanded entitlements needed? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services■Planning Division■ Page 22 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone, REZ 03-01 • Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the X project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? L Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste X disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state,and local statutes, and X regulations related to solid waste? Impact Discussion: The proposed project would include individual septic systems for sewer service. Thus, the project would not have a significant impact on any wastewater or water treatment facilities with the incorporation of mitigation measures specified below. Some on and off-site storm water drainage improvements may be required due to development of the project site. No significant environmental impacts would be anticipated because any improvements do not appear to be extensive. The Butte County Public Works Department would determine the need for on and off-site storm water facilities and would ensure the necessary improvements are installed when a proposal to divide the property is received. The project would increase the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill by a minor amount. According to the Butte County Public Works Department, the Neal Road Landfill is expected to reach maximum holding capacity by the year 2018. The project is required to comply with the mitigation measures specified below, which would reduce the impacts on solid waste facilities in the region and provide for the long term maintenance of other facilities. No impact would occur with respect to federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste with the incorporation of mitigation measures specified below. If the future subdivision is developed similarly to the other two adjoining subdivisions developed by the same owner, the homeowners within the area would be responsible for the maintenance of all common areas, roads, swimming pools, storage buildings, waste water treatment facilities, and street lighting. A CSA would also be formed to act as an umbrella entity to insure that the homeowners association carries out it's duties for maintaining the roads, streetlights, and sewage disposal system and to take over those duties in the event that they are not being performed adequately. As long as the homeowners association is adequately maintaining the facilities, the CSA may only assess fees to cover the cost of reviewing the maintenance documentation. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 23 ■ ' Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,IR REZ 03-01 • 4.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (SECTION 15065: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal X community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection X with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects)? c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human X beings,either directly or indirectly? The project does not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment beyond the impacts discussed in the previous sections of this Initial Study. The project will not make a significant contribution to any identified cumulative impact. The impact to air quality would be insignificant in the long term and short term impacts during construction could be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Cumulative traffic and ground water impacts are less than significant as discussed in sections 4.15 and 4.8. Air quality impacts were not identified as significant and the addition of 15 homes does not represent a significant cumulative impact to the Air basin. Cumulative impacts related to loss of oak trees will be mitigated by re-plantings No direct impacts would occur as a result of this project because no physical changes can occur without another discretionary application and subsequent environmental review. All impacts identified are based on the premise that that the existing four parcels will,at some point in the future,be developed to their fullest potential. 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: Mitigation Measure#1: Street lighting and exterior security lighting shall use low pressure sodium vapor lamps or other similar lighting that is recognized to reduce light pollution and shall be installed in a manner to reduce undue glare. Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown or noted on any proposed Final Map. Timing: The mitigation measure shall be implemented upon approval of a future land division. Monitoring: The Public Works Department shall review plans and determine compliance, then inspect during construction to ensure compliance. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 24 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,V#REZ 03-01 • Mitigation Measure # 2: Architectural design controls, such as color, texture, and form, that blend with the natural background shall be contained in the development CC&Rs. Plan Requirements: The building plans shall demonstrate compliance with the above mitigation measure. Timing: The mitigation measure shall be implemented upon approval of a future land division. Monitoring: The Department of Development Services shall review building plans and determine compliance. Building inspectors shall spot check and ensure compliance on-site. Mitigation Measure#3: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems are to be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation." Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown on grading and building plans. Timing: Condition shall be applied to future land division approvals. Monitoring: The Department shall ensure that measures are indicated on the plans. Public Works Grading and Building inspectors shall spot check; Grading and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Pollution Control District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. Mitigation Measure#4: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "A plan prepared by a certified arborist, botanist or landscape architect that shows the existing on-site mature oak trees, located in any area proposed for buildings and vehicular access, and provides for methods to protect the trees identified to be preserved, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits and/or prior to grading or vegetation removal. The removal of mature oak trees shall be minimized, where possible. A mature tree shall be defined as a tree with a trunk measuring 4 inches in diameter,4 feet from ground level. Mature oak trees removed shall be replaced on a 3- to-1 ratio, utilizing existing oak tree stock. Each oak tree to be preserved shall be surrounded by a circular zone (minimum 40-foot radius) identified by an orange fence during construction activities. No vegetation removal, soil disturbance,or other development activities shall occur within the fenced area." Plan Requirements: The above note shall be placed on any the Final Map recorded within the project site. Timing: The tree plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review with future building permit applications. Monitoring: The Department of Development Services and Public Works Department shall ensure the note is placed on the Final Map. Public Works Grading and Building inspectors shall spot check; Grading and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Mitigation Measure#5: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet which states: "Fencing for areas other than residential areas shall be limited to a maximum of five (5) wire strands. The lowest strand shall be at least sixteen(16) inches above the ground and the upper strand shall be no higher than forth-eight(48)inches above the ground." Plan-Requirements: The above note shall be placed on any future Final Map. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 25 ■ ProjJect Name: 14-Mile House Rezone FT#REZ 03-01 • Timing:The note shall be reviewed prior to recordation of future maps approved within the project area. . Monitoring: The Department of Development Services and Public Works Department shall ensure the note is placed on the Final Map. Building inspectors shall spot check; and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Mitigation Measure#6: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with any future map or on an additional map sheet that states: "At the time of building permit application, if a Deer Herd Impact fee(s)is currently in effect,it shall be paid prior to the issuance of the building permit." Plan Requirements: The required notes must be placed upon future recorded maps or on an additional map sheets. Timing: The required fee shall be paid at time of building permit issuance, if adopted or in force at the time of application. Monitoring: The Department of Public Works and the Planning Division shall ensure that the required notes are placed upon the map. The Building Division shall collect the fees at the time of building permit issuance if the County adopts the fees. Mitigation Measure#7: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with any future map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Should grading activities reveal the presence of cultural resources(i.e.,artifact concentrations, including arrowheads and other stone tools or chipping debris, cans, glass, etc.; structural remains; human skeletal remains), work within 50 feet of the find shall cease immediately.until a qualified professional archaeologist can be consulted to evaluate the remains and implement appropriate mitigation procedures. Should human skeletal remains be encountered, State law requires immediate notification of the County Coroner. Should the County Coroner determine that such remains are in an archaeological context, the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento shall be notified immediately, pursuant to State law, to arrange for Native American participation in determining the disposition of such remains". Plan Requirements: The required notes must be placed upon future recorded maps or on an additional map sheets. Timing: This measure shall be implemented during site preparation and construction. Monitoring: Should cultural resources be discovered, the Planning Division shall coordinate with the developer and appropriate authorities to avoid damage to cultural resources and determine appropriate action. Mitigation Measure#8: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with any future map or on an additional map sheet that states: Limit earthwork to the period between April 1 and Nov. 15, unless an erosion control plan prepared by a registered civil engineer or other qualified professional has been,prepared for wet weather operations.. All areas where the soil has been disturbed or where the vegetation has been removed shall be protected from erosion using standard erosion control methods accepted by civil engineers. Vegetation in the fuel reduction area shall not be removed to the extent that erosion occurs. It is recommended that the vegetation removed for fire protection be chipped or mulched and then applied to the cleared areas for erosion control. Plan Requirements: The required notes must be placed upon future recorded maps or on an additional map sheets. Timing: This measure shall be implemented during site preparation and construction. Monitoring: The Department of Development Services and Public Works Department shall ensure the note is placed on the Final Map. Building inspectors shall spot check;and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Mitigation measure #9: Homes constructed on these lots shall be designed to minimize grading and to utilize the existing grade to the extent feasible through the use of multi level structures. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services■Planning Division■ Page 26■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,FOR REZ 03-01 • Plan Requirements: The required notes must be placed upon future recorded maps or on an additional map sheets. --Timing: This measure shall be implemented during plan check for building permits. Monitoring: The Department of Development Services and Public Works Department shall ensure the note is placed on the Final Map. Building inspectors shall spot check;and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Mitigation Measure# 10: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states; "The building setback from the side and rear property lines shall be at least thirty(30)feet to satisfy Public Resources Code 4290(Fire Safe Regulations)." Plan Requirements: The required note shall be placed on the Final Map. The Fire Department and Public Works Department shall ensure that the note is placed on the Final Map. Timing: At the time of building plan checking, building and site plans shall be checked for compliance with the condition. Monitoring: The Building Division and the Planning Division shall check building and site plans for compliance prior to issuance of a building permit. Building inspectors shall ensure compliance by conducting an on-site inspection prior to the final inspection. Mitigation Measure#11: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or. on an additional map sheet that states: "Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all.new residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes,NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized community water system, with hydrants that meet Fire Department specifications,serves the parcels." Plan Requirements: The note shall be placed on the Final Map Timing: Interior fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures at the time of building construction. Monitoring: Building Division plan checkers shall ensure that the building plans for residential structures include interior fire sprinkler systems. Building inspectors shall ensure all residential structures have a functioning interior fire sprinkler system prior to the final inspection,by conducting an on-site inspection ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 27 ■ ' Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,Vie REZ 03-01 • ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL: 1. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map,established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville,CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Mai), Oro'ville,CA: James P.Manning, 1983. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map, Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County GIS Data. Oroville,CA:November 2001. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Environmental Checklist Form,Evaluation of Environmental Impact. File Number 93-15. Oroville,CA: February 8, 1993. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2,Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. t 8. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3, Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. 'Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential May 11-2, Seismic Safely Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 10. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes MaR 111-4, Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 11. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 12. Butte County Planning Department. Notice of Determination,Rezone 93-15,Ray Johnson.Filed with State Clearinghouse,Office of Planning and Research. July 13, 1993. 13. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 14. Butte County Planning Department. School District Man. Oroville,CA. 15. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1, Safety Element. Oroville, CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 16. California Department of Transportation,Traffic Operations Division.2000 All Traffic Volumes on California State HighwaySystem. 2001. 17. California Department of Transportation,Traffic Operations Division. 1998 Truck Volumes on California State Highway System. 1998. 18. California Department of Transportation,Traffic Operations Division. 1998 All Traffic Volumes on California State Highway System. 1998. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 28 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone, REZ 03-01 • 19. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Mans. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1989. 20. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map,Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency, State of California, 1983. 21. USGS Quad Maps. 7.0 CONSULTED AGENCIES: [X] Environmental Health [X] Public Works [ ] Building Manager [ ) BCAG [ ] ALUC [X] LAFCo [X] Assessor [ ] Development Services [ ] Chico Unified School Distr. [X] Air Qual.Management Dist. [ ] City of Chico [X] Sheriff [ ] City of Gridley [ ] City of Oroville [ ] Town of Paradise [X] CA Department of Forestry [X] _ Caltrans(Traffic) [ ] Central Reg.Water Quality .[X] Department of Conservation [X] CA Dept. of Fish and Game [ ] Highway Patrol [ ] Army Corps of Engineers [X] US Fish&Wldlife Service [X] Agricultural Commissioner [ ] Butte Co.Farm Bureau [X] Oroville Union School Dist. [ ] Feather River Rec.Dist. [ ] El Medio Fire Dept. [ ] OWID [ ] LOAPUD [ ] PG&E [ ] Pacific Bell [ ] Palermo Union School Dist. A Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 29 ■ ' r r Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,te REZ 03-01 8.0 PROJECT SPONSOR(S) INCORPORATION OF MITIGATION INTO PROPOSED PROJECT: I/We have reviewed the Initial Study for the Ray Johnson Rezone (APN # 063-360-018) application and particularly the mitigation measures identified herein. I/We hereby modify the application on file with the Butte County Planning Department to include and incorporate all mitigations set forth in this Initial Study. tA'A 2- Pr onso77PrqJeQL.Aent Date Project Sponsor/Project Agent Date 4 1 7 ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 30 a, .. : . � � ` � t � �, ~,`� ~ 1 i • BUTTE COUNTY /o e�3 JUL 1 1' 21003 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES �o/ �P As- 0 /' . 3e, r_ 4f o e--ve- vm 60A ,e J p �19�� �,� y r . y �59 72 7 July 2003 To: Butte County Planning Department Attention: Craig Sanders From: . H. L. and Wanda Peterson , AP #063-360-036 Re: Zoning Change for Fourteen Mile House, Unit 3 (Humboldt Park) Please be advised that we purchased our lot with the knowledge that Ray Johnson had submitted a request for a zoning change from PUD to FR-2. We request that the FR-2 zoning be approved. Thank you for your consideration of this request. H. L. Peterson Wanda Peterson 14913 Woodland Park Drive Forest Ranch, CA 95942 i BUTTE COUNTY MAY 0 21003 DEVELOPMENT Eric Cadd SERVICES 14820 Eagle Ridge Drive Forest Ranch, CA 95942 Butte County Planning Commission 7 County Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 Attn: Craig Sanders Re: Negative Declaration/Rezone Dear Sir: My family has lived in Humboldt Highlands (a development by Ray Johnson) " since 1990 and has learned much about how Ray Johnson does business. One of many examples of how I was deceived after purchasing our home was the property line boundaries. I was shown property line stakes by Ray Johnson to indicate my boundaries but later found these to be grossly inaccurate by a professional surveyor. The latest inaccuracy from Ray Johnson was realized after reading your letter about rezoning the property owned by Johnson directly above Humboldt Highlands. My wife and I as well As other property owners were told by Ray Johnson that this property would never have more than four parcels for use by only four houses. My concern is the possible degradation of our own water system if a large development is allowed to proceed. All of these years I did not worry about a four-house development above ours. I knew that would have very little or no impact on our subdivision. I am totally against his new plan to build more than the four houses that the current zoning permits. Therefore I would urge you to leave the zoning as it now stands. r Sincerely, ' Eric Cadd " I `•i i a s.riil,�,i .'i1tlfEll; iifrs!'.' .rr }tl: S.,". 3 .,:1i:1•`' (fi?�;� 'r{ :1 � •'•4yi,;. 1l.%—^ i t . 3c ��• :L ': i ;�•+f r .t •rt r t• ;r y rr '� ^;! a {!^ t''I 'vr z tf t}t..7 t's_fi j4.+Itati r.,r�i ��. •(:.. } :i., '?ia�f... '3,., ii•%'; { C ii., r Frt.(e, jt.• 1���`i E..! , j.l: t..t ?�•_. 1' r. .;t ;.t }' ,ri r a ;1' '!)} i {!iri ! r`:i • t O PRO, fiC, ,•si. .,.J�i it; s�i:r; ;. t lir.' i_S4t rt ;, i 4 J `f! t � � ,.�}.� :•i�.s� iJi. �r } . �rSi, ..:tl:t_tr1 Rt' f�i", :1:�'i:'•1.'•:`. :`��:iiLN��'.�l�lc:1E„��(::iE.}.!%�EI:tN.;,1.�V.....;,t�"�.' �.? Fr;i.�' I ��::)�.. {SY.ri: ,'J r; I:'il:.'-,l�t' ii;l. llii:.i ::II O}i :, i,'F}1:. �i(}!};�ri3• � j y... - •. ! J! 't i I F •tel •;r• r � '• r p r1arre e ��,� rCi f Y' ii.i.'".�i. t?. ':tj, .} lit..:t /:".f;t.�: �.>i''•� fi.• �;:trr •F�.4}?,{aiS'ii�:l: t�31i. JE..:I.+�j_jr", il.�:• Eaj }r�';, r. IJ:C3S:`•;t,' .:ir}!{( ?1, ;f't!y ii '} : 1}.f.�` 7„ �c t's; }. �� ja'77 ERetl:f}!f !r' ! :! ' t•- i„ l • . rv. j• fj t r: } 1; ;'t •r:" � ': (: ( r `;t'-+ f �'i�J f., T"Y ? 1� T '+" K`f /' �<i•r';�P; r 1' . ,+i• ;j;c,:_ i`•i fl '':i."3 2��. .,ir i}. jv ?), ;.i ,r. 4ti ..}�•�• + !'L:'! �7lf' : ' . i-rr,: }t; Y vT r✓,� n �1 r • r i .i ., �; �t .;r, fr, _x j: „r': �e,.r, j;�sru �; to lt�.,.:��. iJ> •-.�r.:ilil r:;;� '; }';+ !'`:'t r rr f'r^tIr ;,rr r - I•Y4: c•„r Il }• . _ .} +. ti. j .+ . 1 r.6}1',�tt ;ISia'-.i, �J.3�..}..! rrlfe filsi.� .+..,C� lr:�� i�JG rt..•)�Jei. .r }:tiv � �i..:•r. ;'i }:.`f +'l i' ;�,",.Jit; Y Wr ft! tiV1;' 1:01f• ?!f'A ? F4:}d %!"Af �iiFit' � it:.'I J ' ? �j.•.iis t'k Eii ei}J, • ,< �'' ''. ; :' r;i ; , 'T}! t c J 1 f•.f==� •}3,, velf al, ,�`,,.' �C?};'!"i' rr•r �:{.r!�:}(,j r:• e�i✓:�.Sl:^i}i.l:} ;��v�i 3tlr� >,..yr f't tt�tl. :j: I*:r� .i1;!! } ..:4:.}t i.•yJJl: i �a�St BUTTE qb COUNTY MAY 0 .1 2003 DEVELOPMENT April 25, 2003 SERVICES Butte County Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965-3397 5 Attn: Craig Sanders " Challenge To Negative Declaration" We object and challenge a negative/declaration rezone covering parcel APN 063- 360-018 (CS).(REZ 03-01) to be heard on May 8, 2003 by the Butte County Planning Commission. 1. The4 parcels of 5.41, 7.24, 17.79 and 12.79 acres in size; are in violation of County and Board of Supervisors previous declaration of only allowing 4 residential dwellings. This is just another subterfuge to circumvent development. 1 a the above 4 parcels are designated by the Butte County Board of Supervisors and agreed to by developer for the 43.2 acres. This does not mean a 2-acre minimum that would allow 21+ homes. This land is unsuitable and should remain zoned as the County Board of Supervisors approved previously. Do not let the promoter/developer pull the wool over your eyes. Density is too great to go from 4 homes to 21+ homes. Keep it at 4 only. Again, this was previously agreed to by developer as a condition for his development of Humboldt Woodlands. Here, again, he comes to planning and Board of Supervisors for more deviations. Do not be fooled by any further changes. Severe environmental impact. Vote no to rezone. Enough is enough! 2. The developer and Planning Commission must be required to submit a thorough and complete comprehensive environmental impact study and not a piece meal effort. This developer has fooled the County long enough. An example is his first development, Humboldt Highlands, where owner's property lines are not as recorded on County maps. VIOLATION. 3. Water is from wells and the State of California Water Board has previously warned Humboldt Highlands, neighboring to this parcel, about fecal contamination. This is an extremely serious health hazard. Butte County Health Dept. has previously warned Humboldt Highlands and threatened to close water source if we continue failing water tests. This would curtail all potable water. : . . - , ,. . . ;, ,�_ . ,, R. - n � �� i � � � � '' �� t�j��' ti y, a 4. Leech field for pressure system at Humboldt Highlands cannot be used by development as proposed and not connect to Humboldt Highlands system. Possible litigation could be forthcoming concerning items 3 and 4. Also, California Fish and Game must give clearance for run-off into creek below development. 5.. Planning Commission Paragraph 4 states: "The initial study for proposed project does not identify a potentially significant environmental effects. In summation: If a comprehensive EIS covering all, not partial effects, are not undertaken by Butte County, we would consider asking the Grand Jury to investigate and hold the County of Butte liable for any and all errors and omissions. Do not become a rubber stamp and we recommend disapproval since this is an extremely positive declaration. Be aware of the following: Traffic and Safety (unsafe cliffs) How was developer allowed to build roads on Property prior to any zoning? This was another ruse to change density for his personal interest. Strong impact—Planning states "Subsequent Environmental will be required to divide this property". How can they turn around and recommend a negative declaration. They are not doing their job and should be rebuffed and admonished. This is just another slip-shod method for the developer who is trying to circumvent Board of Supervisors. We will review comprehensive final report when County completes same. Thomas H. Hurftr 14868 Eagle Ridge Dr. • Forest Ranch, Ca. 95942-9707 N. . i ` �� 1. \� .. g. ' _ �;-' BUTTE COUNTY MAY 0 12003 DEVELOPMENT April 29, 2003 SERVICES Humboldt Highlands Homeowners Association 14956 Eagle Ridge Drive Forest Ranch, CA 95942 Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Comments on APN•063-360-018 (CS) (REZ 03-01) Ray Johnson, 14 Mile House Rezone As the neighbor adjacent and south of the subject property and also on well water, we are concerned about the number of lots and ultimate population of the subdivision. Has the developer and the County considered the effect of the proposal on the ability of the existing well to serve the development,and not adversely impact neighboring wells? We presently seem to have adequate capacity in our well to sere Humboldt Highlands and would like to have some assurance that further development in the area would not cause us a water shortage in the future. Are all proposed lots to have their own leach fields or will there be a common w community leach field such as in Humboldt Woodlands and Humboldt Highlands?? How much sewage can be leached.before water quality may be affected?? Mike Barham President Humboldt Highlands Homeowners Association _ I P o ' 40 00 s + ON y � I, N w U f ,! �3�,t�}� �.. - -- BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT - MAY 89 2003 Applicant: Ray,Johnson a separate homeowners,,, association. " File #: REZ 03-01 G.P.: Agricultural Residential (I to Request: A rezone for 43.2 acres on the 40) east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Zoning: PUD (Planned Unit Road. The requested zone is Development) Foothill Recreation — 2 acre minimum parcel size. The APN: 063-360-018 property is currently configured in four individual Location: Located on the easterly side of parcels for residential Highway 32, approximately development. The parcels are 7,500 feet south of Forest 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 Ranch. acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be Parcel Size: 43.2 (+/-) provided by individual septic tank, and water would be Zone date: July 13, 1993 obtained from a well on the site. The property was Supervisor District: 3 rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD Attachments: rezone, and residential development has been 1. Vicinity Map completed in the first two 2. General Plan/Zoning Map "units" of that development. 3. Comments received The subject property is the 4. Initial Study third "unit" of that residential 5. Site Plan development, but is subject to STAFF COMMENT: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of this project to the Board of Supervisors with findings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: This project is a request to rezone approximately 43 acres, currently in four separate parcels, from PUD to Foothill Recreation 2 acre minimum parcel size. Given the existing parcel configuration, ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT■ PAGE 1 ■ the rezone would create the potential for the creation of approximately 19 lots for single family residential development. The project site is located in the northern portion of Butte County, an unincorporated area, northeast of the City of Chico. Located in a rural foothills setting,the project site is surrounded by undeveloped land and low-density residential uses. The undeveloped site has moderate topography, which rises from southwest to northeast. Vegetation on the site includes yellow pines, California black oaks, and other plants and trees associated with the Yellow Pine Forest and Chaparral habitats. The western side of the site,which abuts State Route 32 is partially cleared, and the vegetation generally is denser further east on the site. Slopes on the property vary form 5%to 30%with the average slope being about 10%. The project site is not within a 100-year flood zone or within an airport overflight zone. The project site is surrounded by undeveloped and residential parcels,ranging in size from 1 to 198 acres. Both existing and proposed parcel sizes are larger than the surrounding residential parcels, which are predominantly half-acre or one-acre lots. Zoning on the surrounding parcels is TM-40 (Timber Mountain, 40-acre minimum), TM-5 (Timber Mountain, 5-acre minimum), and Planned Unit Development (PUD). ANALYSIS: Project background This acreage was originally Phase 3 of the Fourteen Mile House Planed Unit Development(PUD). Phase 1 was processed as a separated PUD in 1983 and Phases 2 and 3 were approved together in 1993. The PUD zone allows for the creation of lots based on density rather than an absolute lot size. Phases 2 and 3 covered a total of 175 acres and were approved for 32 lots in Phase 2 and four lots in phase 3. A PUD zone approval carries with it an approval for a tentative subdivision map. Phase 2 was developed under the tentative map submitted with the original application. The tentative map approved for Phase 3 was not developed and expired necessitating a new tentative re-submittal which was approved in 2002. However, the map approved in 2002 was not consistent with the original PUD zone nor did it meet the requirements of the PUD ordinance. Since the two phases were essentially separate PUDs with separate homeowners associations, open space requirements needed to be met on both phases. Phase 3 should have included 25%of the project(10.69 acres)as commonly owned open space. This was not made a condition of the recently approved map. Prior to the approval of the PUD zone,the property was zoned TM-5,C-1, SH and U. The subject parcel was in a TM-5 classification. Removal of this 43 acre site does not affect the remaining PUD development(Phase 2)with respect to requirement that a PUD to meet the General Plan densities. With 32 lots on 132 acres, 67 of which are designated Agricultural Residential,the density is within the lower limit of 1 dwelling unit per acre. General Plan Consistency As previously stated the property is designated as Agricultural Residential in the Butte County General Plan Land Use Element. Consistent zones listed for this designation are A-20, A-40, TM- 20, TM-40, FR-20, FR-40, and CF. All of these zones have a minimum parcel size of 20 acres or ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT■ PAGE 2 ■ larger. Zoning districts with a minimum parcel size less than 20 acres may be consistent with the land use designation provided the following five criteria can be met: 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. The project is not adjacent to any agricultural uses. Some timber management or harvesting may take place on surrounding parcels,but the proposed residential uses would not conflict with these activities. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. Based on information received from the Butte County Environmental Health Division, the project appears to be able to meet the County's water and sewage disposal requirements. There is an existing well on-site that can provide potable water and the soils are suitable for septic system installation. 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. The site is located approximately 6 miles from the nearest year around manned fire station north of Forest Ranch on Highway 32. The closest volunteer station is approximately 1.7 miles away in Forest Ranch. This is seen as adequate for fire protection because the ultimate r division of the property will include the requirement for a pressurized water system with hydrants. This will provide a much higher degree of fire protection that serves the surrounding area. 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. All traffic generated by the project will utilize State Highway 32 in order to get to anywhere. Major commercial services and intermediate and high schools are in Chico, approximately 13 miles to the southeast. Traffic volumes on area roads are relatively low. The 2001 CalTrans counts for Highway 32 show that adequate capacity exists to handle the traffic generated by the project. (See the Environmental checklist for a complete discussion of the traffic impacts) 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. The nearest full commercial services are located in Chico approximately 13 miles away via a well maintained high-speed roadway. A small market and gasoline service is available in Forest Ranch, approximately 2 miles away. Intermediate and high school services are also located in Chico. This is seen as adequate to serve the proposed parcel sizes. If the Planning Commission agrees that the project meets these conditional criteria then an examination of the zoning factors would be appropriate. The Agricultural Residential land use designation list 11 factors to consider when deciding on a zone for an area as follows: 1. Existing parcel sizes and residential densities. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT■ PAGE 3 ■ Residential parcels sizes in the area vary significantly. In Fourteen Mile House Phase 2 the parcels range from 0.37 acres to 1.5 acres. The density is approximately one dwelling unit per 2 acres within the developed part of the project and approximately one dwelling unit per 4 acres when the 65 acres of unbuildable canyon land is factored in. 2. Slope. Generally the higher the slope,the larger the appropriate parcel size,however there is no set. formula to determine an appropriate parcels size. The parcel range in the AR designation is between 1 and 40 acres. The average slope on the parcel is approximately 10%with areas of slopes of less than 5%and some land over 30%. About 80%of the site has a slope less than 20%. The site appears to be physically suitable to accommodate parcels as small as 2 acres. . But,this doesn't mean that the entire property can be developed at 2-acre minimums and the ultimate subdivision map will probably include a range of parcel sizes up to 5 acres, based on road layout an topography. 3. Soil conditions and water availability. The existing well on the site, if combined with a,storage tank can adequately supply water for the development. Base on preliminary information from the Butte County Environmental Health Division, the site has soils that are suitable for septic systems. But, this doesn't guaranty that the entire site can be developed with 2-acre parcels. 4. Effects on adjacent uses, crop production, livestock grazing,forestry, resources extraction and wildlife habitat. There are no adjoining agricultural uses. Some limited timber harvesting may occur on isolated properties,but large scale timber operations are not common to the area due to a mix in ownership and existing smaller parcel sizes. Two acre parcels would not conflict with adjoining land uses. 5. Proximity to public roads and other public facilities. The site has very good public road access.And smaller parcels can be supported by the road system. Highway 32 has the capacity to handle the increased traffic and left turn lanes have already been installed to serve the project. 6. Distance from airports, railroads and industrial uses. As these uses can conflict with the residential uses,the higher density of the AR designation should not be applied near these.features. This site is not near any airport, railroad or industrial lands and 2-acre parcels are compatible. 7. Existing utilities and drainage.facilities. Electrical service is available to the site. Sewage disposal will be handled by on-site systems. Drainage will be addressed at the time of land division, but on-site detention . ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 4 ■ appears to be entirely viable, if required. 8. Potential for surface cracking, landslides and erosion. The property is not in an area prone to surface cracking, has moderate land slide potential and a slight erosion potential, according to the Butte County Safety Element. 9. Effects on noise, traffic flow and safety, water quality, air quality, wildlife habitat and general environmental quality. f As evaluated in the environmental document prepared for the project, there may be potentially significant environmental impacts related to a subdivision of the land subsequent to the rezone. Any subdivision application would require an additional environmental review. Base on the initial study, the impacts of 2-acre parcels can be mitigated to a level that is not significant. 10. Local desires. Through the public hearing process,the Planning Commission will have the opportunity to gauge local desires related to the project. 11. Potential for pest insect breeding. The higher density of 2-acre parcels will not increase the potential for pest breeding in the _ area. This criterion is more applicable in agricultural areas Based on the above zoning criteria, it appears that the request to rezone the parcel to a zoning with a 2-acre minimum would generally be consistent with the site location and physical characteristics. The applicant has requested an FR-2 zone. Surrounding parcels are zoned in the TM series. The FR and TM zones are very similar. Both zones are suitable for rural residential areas of.the County. The main difference in the two zones is in the uses allowed by Use Permit. With a Use Permit, the TM zones allow multiple dwellings Q or more),feed lots,slaughterhouses,airports,and commercial wood processing facilities which the FR zones do not. The FR zone is probably more suitable for this site because it is not a true timber area. The TM zones were originally applied because the FR zone did not exist in County Code at the time of zoning (1976). Surrounding Uses and Compatibility The subject parcel is adjacent to residential development on the west and south sides both of which are part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD. The property to the north is zoned FR-5 and the parcels range from 1.2 to 10 acres in size. To the east the land drops off into Little Chico Creek canyon and the property is zoned TM-40 on two sides. No additional development is likely to occur on any adjacent properties given the current zoning and parcel configuration. Residential uses on the subject property would be compatible with adjacent parcels. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT■ PAGE 5 ■ CEQA Review An initial study was prepared for this project and a Negative Declaration is being recommended. Though the ultimate development of the site through a subdivision map application could have potential significant environmental impacts,this rezone will not allow any physical development to occur on the site until a subdivision map is applied for and approved. Mitigations for potential impacts are tied to the subdivision map and many may be dependant on the ultimate design and number of lots. The initial study did not identify any impacts that could not be mitigated at the subdivision review level. Additional environmental review will be required at the time of subdivision map application. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: Should the Planning Commission find that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and the proposed environmental determination is applicable, staff recommends that the Planning Commission,take the following actions. I. Recommend adoption of a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts to the Board of Supervisors, with the following findings: A. Find that an Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and that said study identified no significant environmental effects that would occur as a result of this project,and that a Negative Declaration is proposed. B. Find that the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. 6. Find, that on the basis of the whole record before the Planning Commission, including the Initial Study and any comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the Fourteen Mile House (Ray Johnson) Rezone, Planning Division File No. RZ 03-01, will have a significant effect on the environment. 7. Find that the proposed Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. 8. Recommend adoption of a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts. II, The design of the proposed project will not cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife - or their habitat,and a"de' inimus" exemption-regarding impact to fish and wildlife or their habitat is recommended. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3)and 14 CCR 753.5, is not required. The project site is not known to contain any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans, policies,or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat; have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; interfere substantially with the movement of any native ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT ■ PAGE 6 ■ resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; conflict with any local policies or ordinances protection biological resources; ,or, conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. III. Recommend approval to the Board of Supervisors of Rezone REZ 03-01 for Fourteen Mile House(Ray Johnson)on APN 063-360-018 from PUD(Planned Unit Development)to FR- 2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) on a 43 (+/-) acre parcel, and recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt the Ordinance rezoning said property with the following findings: A. The project is consistent with the conditional zoning and development criteria of the Agricultural Residential (1 to 40) General Plan designation as follows: 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. The project is not adjacent to any agricultural uses. Some timber management or harvesting may take place on surrounding parcels,but the proposed residential uses would not conflict with these activities. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. Based on information received from the Butte County Environmental Health Division, the project appears to be able to meet the County's water and sewage disposal requirements. There is an existing well on-site that can provide potable water and the soils are suitable for septic system installation. 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. The site is located approximately 6 miles from the nearest year around manned fire station in north of Forest Ranch on Highway 32. The closest volunteer station is approximately 1.7 miles away in Forest Ranch. This is seen as adequate for fire protection because the ultimate division of the property will include the requirement for a pressurized water system with hydrants. This will provide a much higher degree of fire protection that serves the surrounding area. 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. All traffic generated by the project will utilize State Highway 32 in order to get to anywhere. Major commercial services and intermediate and high schools are in Chico, approximately 13 miles to the southeast. Traffic volumes on area roads are relatively low. The 2001 CalTrans counts for Highway 32 show that adequate capacity exists to handle the traffic generated by the project. (See the Environmental checklist for a complete discussion of the traffic impacts) 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT■ PAGE 7 ■ The nearest full commercial services are located in Chico approximately 13 miles away via a well maintained high-speed roadway. A small market and gasoline service is available in Forest Ranch,approximately 2 miles away. Intermediate and high school services are also located in Chico. This is seen as adequate to serve the proposed parcel sizes. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ■ AGENDA REPORT■ PAGE 8 ■ � da ap M. b. f `y 1 i - �F: ` - w Nl AR." A AR-5 d a + 1 ;: 44 TV Ti t > .•� W '. •:__IT. ftect Location �ti Stf a iE 44 V4PA 1l w , r rr a r +y t Vit; "�," '+�, �'• 4�w4 � -0 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 Feet BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CONMUSSION Applicant: Fourteen Mile House,Inc. Owner: Same Hearing Date: May 8,2003 @ 9:30 am. Eidsting Zone: PUD(Planned Unit Development) N Supervisorial Request: Rezone to FR-2(Foothill Recreational-2 acre parcels) District#3 Assessor Parcel No: 063-360-018 F11e:REZ 03-01 •...' ......._.... JI is /: Vicinity Map , - r mpg '` J,�•.�- __ � , � !' •' i V _ _ _ U a TM 20 r fir', Ir D Project Location '(! AR-5 >; TM-20 ---------- Ter - - Ter -- Woodland k Dr , d ar U r Pro ect Location M --_- ` / r i ---- -- -- ---- ° = PUD r TM-40 ', .•; Jam} ._ / z:.o - -__", - TM ` 7f 10 Atha t Iden 1000 0 low 2000 3000 4WD 50W 6000 7000 -` 8000 SM 100W 110W 12000 13OW Feet i d� f' rf BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CONMUSSION REZ 03-01 Applicant: Fourteen Mile House,Inc. Owner: Same AP 063-360-018 Hearing Date: May 8,2003 @ 9:30 a.m. E3dsting Zone: PUD(Planned Unit Development) N •T FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE INC Request' Rezone to FR-2(Foothill Recreational-2 acre parcels) Supervisorial District#3 - Assessor Parcel.leo: 063-360-018 ne:REZ 03-01 q ........... 'eutte, coun fq LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 May 22, 2003 Fourteen Mile House, Inc. P.O. Box 1700 Chico, CA 95927 Re: Rezone, AP 063-360-018, REZ 03-01 Gentlemen: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held May 22, 2003, the public hearing was continued open off the agenda to consider your application for a Rezone 43.24 acres from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels).. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California and you will be notified of the date and time. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Craig Sanders at this office i between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative ' -Support Services Assistant /lr cc: Rolls, Anderson, and Rolls Oforms\coati nue.fan 75 nt LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 May 8, 2003 Fourteen Mile House, Inc. P.O. Box 1700 Chico, CA 95927 Re: Rezone, AP# 063-360-018, REZ 03-01 Gentlemen: " At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held on May 8, 2003, the public hearing was continued open to May 22, 2003 to consider your application for a Rezone for 43.24 acres from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels). This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Craig Sanders at this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, eynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Services Assistant cc: Rolls, Anderson and Rolls k:\forms\crnriinue.frm " 05-01-03 04:0OPM FROM RAY ONNSON, DEVCOR P01/08 BUILDER.'. Post Office Box 1700 Chico. California 93927 Ray E. Johnson. Jr. Calif, Uc. No. 390354 Deworms Inc. Facsimile Transmittal from: Date: 7 Ray E,Johnson,Jr,, Devcor, Inc, To: Phone Number. (S 30)893-1700 Attentlon• 4-4f3Ol=-a6 Fax Number.,(530)893-1352 Fax Number: ��� "' !7785 Original to follow: Oyes no No. of pages (Including trowni tal page) ~ 8 8 +-7) �.1?�1ln "�„'Y,a4C.a�� 1Qil��' 'd. '17y� V� vY► G, .I'�'r LP�Q Arta. T —rrk-E -,IAALA M �,►A vn MGVWO 401 diINOM V WOJ 1N9WNOMIANS dIV W000NI NVI10 V •uoTjuajui ;uvxxTW joaj;sj 04 ubTosp joaCoxd saapdq -t •xsjumpunoab ;o xgttenb pus XjTju0nb uo 0400;;• weaxasuxop po;vdt0t4ue ;o ;xodex ast601096 a eptAOxd £ xs��eax6 so 9' st (0) jtoo ag; ;o AgToadaoy jssodstp oftmes ®xsgro 9oxs us ut p011101®ut PietROeel aqa RITC► w0;sd9 0T-4daq I ubTsaa OZ soslayd psuuo jd 911 ;o; pus jaeposd eaT;Ue eq1 ac; smog absr►es peloa;oxd oplAoxd 'T :sego 1 jo; se ail X4iodoad a1gj ;o j1$Aosdde AQ; Q juewastnbax 2np •AI29doxd Pa3to enogs OR; ;o auoxax pe;sonbos anod ;o 4jod4ns UT psgjtwgns 44ep xs;sr► pus i109 e44 par:otAos ssq juow;3Qdsp STgj :uo#Ugoc -IN ilea . GZ6Sb V0 'oaTq� gau0g jsexod 'et 410M146TK DOLT xo6 '0'd sPvDjp0014 1PI1DnK M Alm £66T 'OZ jt2dV "1318CS late)I+nd 809$•64$(W)1904010L tegL•ltl 1$18)couoydgil LZU-1,6$1$le1 I00001101 sells vIwoyloo 1981pslod Isola OIUJG; o 191I1AaO eggs$111Jio11100'CCNO prod Ubull LCL Q MPO Jquio AJUND L Pootl 313I04"m IM NNW H11ViN 1V1N3WNOYIAN1110 NOISIAM Hilvim 0nand 401NSWINVOCI 1 ,�un0 ails ^K....^ A aeseugw Uvaboad 'uYsene9 ®aunA .oa tb/HMS tj�ieag joIuvwuoa;nuS ;o uaisTnjQ 'pa1B'M set�ega IXIO2OOUTS �tapsangy g6no2q; AspuoW 6.92pKeen wvop:6 pug weoo;g u86144eq ao;33o. . oa;u� eco 4l ow ;os;uoo a®eoid 'suet-A6enb dus •AVR rod pinoge L *Bud E66t 'OZ ;tads epueipaoM 1piogWnH/uoeugor 80/cod ROOARQ 'NOSNHOf AVI WOa8 U0010 £0-LO-50 05-07-03 04:00PM FROM RAY OHNSONIEWOR PO4/08 An Investigation of the Ground Water Supply for Fourteen Mile House,Unit Number 2 By Jerold J.Behnke,PhD, Consulting Hydrogeologist rA . April 1993 �f;-Q 1w., , iehnke • N • .�fo. 1246 f • �• 1 Jerold J.6chnke,PhD. 6ate ' 6 05-01-03 04:00PM FROM RAY OHNSONIUCOR P05/08 Introducdoe I was retained by Mr. Ray Johnson,Jr.,to evaluate the quantity and quality of the ground water supply(Well Number 2)for Fourteen Mile House Unit Number 2. Well Number 2 is located on the west side of Highway 32 approximately one-quarter mile above Fourteen Mile House Unit Number 1. Both subdivisions are in the NW corner of Section 18,723N,R3E. (See Figure 1) Fourteen Mile House Unit Number l is a 25 lot subdivi- sion accessed by Fourteen Mile House Drive and served by well 1. Fourteen Mile House Unit Number 2 is a 32 lot subdivision supplied by well 2. ' Well 1 was drilled in 1980 and is currently serving the water needs of Fourteen Mile House Unit Number 1,This well has survived the recent seven year drought,which was one of the worst droughts in California's recent history. Both wells penetrate and draw water from the Tuscan Formation, I supervised well tests for well I and well 2 on Tuesday and Wednesday, April 27th and 28th, 1993.The remainder of the data for this report was obtained from the files of Mr.Ray Johnson,.Jr. ' Geology of Wells Number.l and 2 Figure 2 shows the geology penetrated by wells I and 2.The geology was obtained from drillers'logs supplied by Mr. Ray Johnson,'Jr. Both wells were drilled by Mr.Claud L.Willis. Well 1 was drilled in June of 1980 and well 2 in May of 1990.When completed well I had a saturated depth of 169 feet and well 2 a saturated depth of 175 feet.Both wells penetrate geo- logic units within the Tuscan Formation which consists of tuff breccia.lapilli tuff,minor lava flows,flow breccias,tuff,and volcanic conglomerates,sandstones and siltstones,as described by Lydon in Geological Society of America, Memoir 116. Well I is drawing ground water from volcanic ash deposits which are considerably finer grained than the lava and sandstone and gravel encountered in well 2.Well 2 draws water from 47 feet of fractured lava and 10 feet of sandstone and gravel. Thirty three percent of the saturated depth of well 2 consists of more permeable units than'those encountered in Well 1 (47 t 10/175 x 100=33%), Considering the geology in the saturated zones,well 2 should have a substantially higher water yield than well 1.Figure 2 also shows that the standing water levels in the two wells are 05-07-03 04:OOPM FROM RAY OHNSONIENOR P06/08 "/'wee— 11 ; I >>`!II41 VA'lj�'Vlfl 1 •C../ N/ , Y �! . .I If ! 1 - • . r J 111 `�{•. .�.'i q ,. .. 01 r . r elil • 1.r , PARADISE WEST, CALIF. GWA PARAMBI le• OYADRAPOI.Q ;J N3945-W12137sn.5 1960 ; \ SCALE 1;24000 1 NILE 1000 0 1000 1000 1000 4000 6000 0000 T000 0`19T 1 1 • 1 .6 0 1 RIIOMETEA CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 Figure 1. Well locations for Fourteen Mile House Units 1 and 2. #10 = Well for Unit#I #2 0 = Well for Unit#2 2 05-01-03 04:OOPM FROM RAY J NNSON, DEVCOR P07/08 ==`=,.�./ctiwc! C�illi,��/990) __�_ -:�'.:::�w._'=_.�.��_:_:�_ _ ---_.__..__-='_: rr ---1W I —T loll ILI : L, 510 w I J-1 i Figure 2. Geology from Driller's Logs for Wells Number I and 2. 3 05-07-03 04:00PM FROM RAY J NSOR DEVCOR P08/08 essentially the same,even though one well was drilled 10 years earlier than the other.These. nearly identical water levels suggest that the two wells penetrate the same ground water system. Well Tests for Wells Number l end'Number 2 - Weli Number 1 Figure 3 shows two'well tests for well 1.The older 1986 well test represents a good sustained yield well test as pumping levels were measured for 12.5 hours.The sustained yield was 51 gal/min with a drawdown of 47 feet, which provides a specific capacity of 1.08 gaUmin- ft. (S.C.=Q/S=51/47 = 1,08). Unfortunately,no recovery data was taken in 1986 and water levels in well 2 were not observed while well 1 was pumping,so another well test was run on Tuesday,April 27, 1993 to further evaluate the well's performance.The sustained yield was 56 gaUmin with a drawdown of 35 feet which gives a specific capacity of 1.60 gal/min-ft. (S.C. =Q/S=56/35= 1.60).The increase in specific capacity is probably due to continues! well development resulting from using the well for eight years. The recovery test shown in figure 3 shows 93 percent rebound in 30 minutes. Such rapid water level recovery indicates good permeability and local recharge. Additionally,the static water level in well 1 was not affected by pumping well 2 continuously for 12.0 hours. Figure 4 indicates that static water levels may have been declining since 1986. Because r the monthly static water levels are unknown,it is difficult to know how much of the apparent decline is due to seasonal (monthly)static water level vitiations or to reduced annual recharge resulting from California's protracted drought which ended this winter. A monthly static water level monitoring program should be implemented for both wells in order to properly evaluate the ground water system. Well 1 may be stabilizing;as the static water level increased in 1991 and is virtually the same in 1992 and 1993, Water levels should recover substantially in the near future due to increased recharge following the end of our current drought, Weil Number 2 Figure 5 shows the well test data for well 2. Because; the two previous well tests con- ducted in 1993 were of short duration,lacked data points,had fluctuating pumping levels and had no mcovery data,another sustained yield well test was run on Wednesday April 28, 1993. 4 S j iagwn�l llaM joj s1sa.L IloA1 '£antp'll . . u��•K�o -''��%E-tS .., .: ��� fib.(�� C Apt M/ -•-•--•----- -----�--. .. ..---------_..._.,__._ -__..._-._....�,+�`.. .7'ls�lrl._....�_____-_------_. ops/--•--- .... 80/10d MAMMA! AVE Nag WRO 10 CO-LO-50 5 4 •j lagwnN I1aM Jo3 sJana-1 nllM. (apEIS) 8utpums taatcojstH -6 ainat3 VOooeV 80/ZOd MAM 'N A AVE KOH Wo to 80-LO-50 • L . 'Z iagwnN 119M JOJ SIS31 IIaM 'S ain8ia J_ 1 1.1T I I�ILIh}�.1; r1. , ..1.. , I I••I .�I,r',.•�.�.7'(. ! ! j•, y,.��/ _.J.;'' -r1 7' '' J} ! _�.1'1_i. 1._�.1 • I.�_: .I.1 ' I : ! ' Iii 6� "'.�,. i ����4/�f/,�O'S.•�ri. f�a �� 'T •''L-r'�. .i.::rJ�, :'r.y''.•�i -:i.:.; „I•I � i i.i� .�.�.I�I j: ; I �. ( .../ .., ,. �� .I.+ 1...1 ••i I � I � f I III• ': zt ITI (' f��.A.7992✓:.�._ti T 'E''_ �'': �'�� '' i i.' : I•''I' BL I _. -..._,. _,...;..mow :•- "�_''"-- - '" -•- ;/ 1 I•, swoo TITri, T. _._i .I.. � � f• r -f �~"I' ..;.1 L.. I,�1_'_�.,.r.�•7.•'I• - . 1. .f.:. '.� .t .I �� i.i I . . . I ' �' ••-` J -!� _~,� ._l. .{. .I_ _i.i `... ..... .., : -'-- - � � x.11-,. ,• ,..• I • :... � ._ � ..... •,__! - -��"��6/�y/. +foo J-r'-_=�_:r,::: .: _ .:� I . _ .,..,. _I �• . 80 £Od 103ASQ 'NOSH AVE WOU NLO 10 £O-LO-50 05-01-03 04;07PM FROM RAY JO NSON. DUCOR PO4/08 The new test had a sustained yield of 119 gal/min,with a drawdown of 44.0 feet,yielding a specific capacity of 2.70 gal/min-ft, (S.C. =Q/S = 119/44=2.70).Additionally,95 percent recovery was obtained 40 minutes after pumping ceased.The higher specific capacity supports the geologic inferences discussed earlier In this report. Also,the static water level in well 2 was not affected by pumping well l for 4 hours. Nater Quality Wells 1 and 2 penetrate the same aquifer and well I is acceptable as a domestic supply so it is likely that well 2 will also be acceptable. Nonetheless,well 2 was sampled during the test conducted on April 28, 1993,and the results of the chemical evaluation for potability will be made available as soon as they are received.The drillers'logs show both wells as having a sanitaryseal.Well 1 has a stucco sand and cement seal to a depth of 85 feet and well 2 has a seal to a depth of 55 feet.The material used for the seal was not specified on the driller's log, but there is a 2'x 2'concrete pad around the casing,so the seal is probably also cement. Ray Johnson,Jr, said he saw the cement truck at well site 2 installing the sanitary seal.The pad has some cracks so it should be replaced and enlarged. ' Figure 6 shows photographs of wells I and 2.The photos show that both well heads are elevated to prevent surface water ponding. Portions of the sanitary seals are also visible in both wells. Sewage contamination should not be a problem for either well.The community leach' field at Unit 2 has good filtration and bioremediation properties so bacteria would be removed from the leachate and the biochemical oxidation demand would also be considerably reduced by, bacterial metabolism.The depth to ground water beneath the Unit Number 2 leach field is ap- proximately 498 feet.With approximately 498 feet of Tuscan Formation overlain by a thick soil sequence it is,highly unlikely that any leachate would reach the aquifer.The units contained in the Tuscan Formation in the area strike northwest and dip 2 to 5 degrees to the southwest. Any leachate encountering impermeable layers in the Tuscan Formation beneath the leach field would move in a southwesterly direction. In the unlikely event that some treated leachate reached ground water,the ground water gradients in the area are to the south or southwest. Surfacing treated effluent along Highway 32 would be prevented by the 2 to 5 degree inclination to the southwest of the geologic units in the Tuscan Formation. I a "c Pur, I aagwnN sll?:k,=o3 slrn kmilur••s •g aj•413 Z sagcunN [laM 1 f I .t?gwnN 11% i •� i r •S..y1 tic I i i 80/50d 800ARQ 'NOS -LO-50 NHOf 1►tlg LadddLO 60 10 05-01-03 -04:01PM FROM RAY NSONISCOR P06/08 Summary and Conclusions Based upon an interpretation of the geology and pump tests April 1993,well 2 has a sustained yield of approximately 119 gaUmin.Because well 2 taps the same aquifer as well 1, which has been a domestic water supply for eight years,well 2 is probably also potable.The chemical analyses for potability are being conducted by Monarch Laboratories,and will be available in approximately 30 days.The chemical results will be forwarded to the appropriate agencies as soon as they are completed. A static ground water level monitoring program should be established for both wells 1 and 2.7be water displacement pressure in the air lines(lbslin�should be read monthly along with the water meter readings.In order to assure that a pressure reading represents a static water level,the pump must not have been running for at least 4 hours. Based upon a long duration pump test where the standing water level in well 1 was not affected by pumping well 2 at 119 gal/min for 12 hours,it is unlikely that extracting water from well will affect future water levels in well 1. It is unlikely that well 2 will be pumped,continu .' ously for a consecutive time period greater than 12 hours in the near future.furthermore,if the water level monitoring program shows that well 2 extraction is adversely influencing water levels in well 1,staggered pumping schedules could be instituted to ameliorate such a circum- stance. i i 10 , i 05-07-03 04:01PM FROM RAY J SONIEWOR P07/08 Bibliography Burnett,J.C, and Ford,R.S.,Geology of the Richardson Springs Quadrangle,ralifornia,Califor.. nia Division of Mines and Geology,Map Sheet 13, 1969. Greeley,R.S.,Geology of the Oroville Quadrangle,California Division of Mines and Geology. Bulletin 184,•1965. Harwood,D.S.,Helley,E.J.,and Doukas,M. P,,Geologic Map of the Chico Monocline and Northeastern Part of the Sacramento Valley,California,U.S.Geological Survey,Map I- 1238, 1981. Harwood,D.S.and Helley,E.J.;Late Cenozoic Tectonism of the Sacramento Valley,Califor nia,U.S.Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1359, 1987, Lydon,Philip A.,Geology and Lahars of the Tuscan Formation,Northern California,Geological Society of America,Memoir 116. r • LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 April 29, 2003 Ray Johnson Fourteen Mile House, Inc. P.O. Box 1700 Chico, CA 95927 Re: Rezone, AP 063-360-018, REZ 03-01 Dear Mr. Johnson: Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Rezone 43.24 acres from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) on the east side of Deer Creek Highway, at Black Oak Terrace about 2 miles south of Forrest Ranch.. Should you have any concerns with the report or conditions of approval, please contact us in advance of the meeting so that we may work together to resolve your concerns. A public hearing has been set for May 8, 2003, at 9:30 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Craig Sanders of this office at 538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, I 1 f Z�� Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Services Assistant Enc. cc: Rolls, Anderson, and Rolls j:\wpdocs\pclts\schedule.mrg BUTTE COUNTY APR 2 2 2003 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on May 8, 2003, at 9:30 a.m. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at 9:30 a.m. regarding the following item In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for the following project: NEGATIVE DECLARATION/REZONE Ray Johnson, 14 Mile House, Rezone for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation — 2 acre minimum parcel size. The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank, and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development has been completed in.the first two "units" of that.development. The subject property is the third "unit" of that residential development but is subject to a separate homeowners, association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. APN 063-360-018 (CS) (REZ 03-01.) The initial study for the project does not identify a potentially significant environmental effects. The project will not directly result in physical change to the site. Subsequent environmental review will be required to divide the .property. Therefore, Planning Division staff is recommending a Negative Declaration. The Initial Study and Proposed Negative Declaration for this project are on file for public review starting, April 18, 2003; through May 7, 2003, at the Butte County Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. All interested persons are invited to review the document. Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address. If you challenge either the Negative Declaration or the Use Permit in court, you may be.limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the public hearing. For}fur her information regarding this project, please contact Craig Sanders at 7603, project planner, at the Butte County Planning Division at(530) 538- YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES . _ To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Friday; April 18, 2003. Ce' a` ..".plutcu ui 'ne first two "units" of that) development. The sub- ject property is the third • ntial ,development but"unit"of that sesub- ject to a separate home= owners association. An (SPACE FOR FILING STAMP ONL' environment`•-analysis was conducted prior to he,approval -of s said rezone . and another IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, r_environmental'-review was prepared'for�the subdIN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE approval t' `map , approval that created ••the four''parcels. APN -063-360-01'8,(CS)(REZ In The Matter Of 03-01).:,..;,,:." ,5Y,.The initial study for the project does not identify Public Hearing. BUTTE COUNI '"potentially 1. significant TY ti t NO PLANNING COMMISSI N "effects.; Subsequent enGirorjmentaf f review NOTICE OF will be re-hired to divide .q,PUBLIC HEARING AND t #;the property.-TheFefore; v -NOTICE OF INTENT-TO dq �Plannin`Division staff is AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ' ' ADOPT A NEGATIVE t" 1 srecommenaing'a Nega- '. x+ DECLARATION -.'Notice is hereby given tive:Declaration. ;'F b- the Butte 'Count "'.'The Ihitial`Stbdy and ..Planning %Commission ora on oosed N thas�project ve Dec- State Of California `that aublic hearing will p g "Tare-on:file;for ublic ss. F•be held on May 8,2003,1 f;ireview starting,April 18, County of Butte a,at 9:30 a:m.in the;Butte LY 2003, through..May•7,' County Board of,Super-; ;��2003,at the Butte Coun- ,evisors"Room;'+County 1,2; 'Plannin The undersigned resident of the county of x'Administration;:center;'y , CPd6ty-1Cent Division,--7 Drive 25 County Center Drive;. 'obville;California7l'AII Butte, State of California, says: ,oroviue; California; at;a`interested'personstare x:9:30 a.m.`regarding the ,,,invvited to-review the do-c-- ..';following items, ?, F:�,ruments-Written:``com- That I am, and at all time herein mentioned n r :►n accordance with the ;�me`nts''will be accepted =`-'California Environmenta;;: �by the Planning Division was a citizen of the United States and not a party �;,?Duality Act,(CEQA),.ars, '`,at the above address:t to nor interested in the above entitled matter; Initial'Study?has7beei;' ;Y If.you"challenge either ,:prepared for,the follow follow"..,; Negative Declaration that I am the principal clerk of the printer and mgproject; ; .j ,1 j, ;; orlthe r.Use�,Permit in rk;NEGATIVE DECLARATION/ e'couet,-r`ou may,publisher of ,•. REYONE : . 11 y y,be-limit- RE : _,,ed to raising only"those- (4,,,Ray'Johnson,l4Mile ,- issues you ov someone ,:House; Rezone; .foi,:;'- The Chico Enterprise-Record : else raised at'the public " :43.2 a,the St the eut' hearing described in this of;the State Route, ;: tice,or in.written cor- The Oroville Mercury-Register 321across;from'Wood ,';�'respondence delivered hand ParkARoad-JFie r"to the Planning Division { requested).,zone �, at;or prior to;`the public That said newspaper is one of general circula- i Foothul I3ecreationr 2. >hearing: (." acresdminimum>-, ar.cel.s;: tion as defined by Section 6000 Government P [ -•Forfurther information `ji-size.T116 property is.cur-;.,'regarding this project, Code of the State of California, Case No. 26796 ,.gently configured_in four} -please contact Craig by the Superior Court of the State of California individual:,.parcels'.,for Sanders;;project;plan- }residential development. 'ner,:at the Butte Count in and for the County of Butte;that said news pa- '` 4 The.parcels iiare 5:41, t y p _''7:24,°17.79;'and 12:79 .•Planning r Division at per at all times herein mentioned was printed „1 acies:-in�size.�Sewa e, (530)538-7603.:�"__. and published daily in the City of Chico and r disposal`for the.project '�YVONNE CHRISTOPHER would•tbe-provided.,by DIRECTOROFh County of Butte;that the notice of which the :,,indiyidual''seipti6- tank,' DEVELOPMENT.SERMES annexed is a true printed co and water would be jL;r.'4F292622'=„k•;- p copy, was published in !ffobtained from a well.on Publish:April•18;2003 said newspaper on the following days: ;jthe j site.'•.The property A was rezoned:as a part of. -_S the Fourteen Mile House April 18, 03. ,0."PUD reione;`,,and resi- :a`'dential- ve delopment ha§ 'been:completed.�in;the first twot-"units"..ofalhat �i=d6bloprnen't', e_�sub ct property,isthe third °unit".of.that residential Dated Anril 18, 2003. development but is"sub- ;z ject;to a separate home- at Chico, Cali ornia. owners`.association.;An ,;=environment-,;'analysis "was.'conducted s"prior"to -the?;approval, of„said. ;rezone.,an`d•; .another (Signat e) ;..�I environmental:`•;review l `<was p`repare dforthe j subdivision c)k-`<`map 7 approval''that'-.created .the.:four parcels:%APN :063 360 018 (CS)(REZ Tlie initial'study'for'the` 1.projectdoes?not identify potentially '`significant effects. Subsequent :;env_ironmentalh,";revrew M , county _ L'AND -0 F . NATURAL WEALTH SAND BEAUTY t l u PLANNING DIVISION -- DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES t� !1 •7 NTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 ✓`• j,��` `�' ^' - ' IiPQ� �j 2GU3 TELEPHONE: (530)538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 April 15, 2003 �Y,yp E RUBES !TE DODEPUTY BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on May 8, 2003, at 9:30 a.m. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at 9:30 a.m. regarding the following item In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for the following project: NEGATIVE DECLARATION/REZONE Ray Johnson, 14 Mile House, Rezone for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation — 2 acre minimum parcel ;size. The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank, and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development has been completed in the first two "units" of that development. The subject property is the third "unit" of that residential development but is subject to a separate homeowners, association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. AIN 063-360-018 (CS) (REZ 03-01) The initial study for the project does not identify a potentially significant environmental effects. The project will not directly result in physical change to the site. Subsequent environmental review will be required to divide the property. Therefore, Planning Division staff is recommending a Negative Declaration. The Initial Study and Proposed Negative Declaration for this project are on file for public review starting, April 18, 2003, through May 7, 2003, at the Butte County Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. All interested persons are invited to review the document. Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above j :address. j j If you challenge either the Negative Declaration or the Use Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written;correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the public j hearing. For further informaiion regarding this project, please contact Craig Sanders at 7603, project planner, at the Butte;County Planning Division at (530) 538- YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Friday, April 18, 2003. i t _ r , i 1 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION s NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION . Notice is.hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on May 8, 2003, at 9:30 a.m. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center,.25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at 9:30 a.m. regarding the following item In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for the following project: NEGATIVE DECLARATION/REZONE Ray Johnson, 14 Mile House, Rezone for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32,•across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation— 2 acre minimum parcel size. The property is'currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development., The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank, and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development has been completed in the first two "units" of that development. The subject_ property is the third "unit" of that residential development but is subject to a separate homeowners, association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. APN 063-360-018 (CS) (REZ 03-01) The initial study for the project does not identify a potentially significant environmental effects. The project will not directly result in physical change to the site. Subsequent environmental review will be required to divide the property. Therefore, Planning Division staff is recommending a Negative Declaration. t The Initial Study 'and Proposed Negative Declaration for this project are on file for public review starting, April 18, 2003, through May 7, 2003, at the Butte County Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. All interested persons are invited to review the document.'Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division at the above address. If you challenge either the Negative Declaration or the Use Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those 'issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the public hearing. i ' t For further information regarding this•project, please contact Craig Sanders at 7603, project planner, at the Butte County Planning Division at(530) 538- YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Chico'Enterprise.Record on Friday,April 18, 2003. f S t • f f son • T TM40 - MLI,=--1 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION hr lr�l fin=(� �"'!'i 3 ',1�i'. �'7 ! 't 'r� Il. 1 •1 �r e Rr { el ar 10 ' I ~. yP 7 ,r P y �, Jillwl, ` i i� L� r "_ • f 7 S: 1 C v A ?w : r • .fin. "��`" _��� :��� MO BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CONMUSSION tt Fourteen Mile House, Hearing 1 : Existing r 1 : tn_fUnitDevelopment) u- f Request: f1 to If 1RIecreadonal parcels) 1 t Assessor No: 063-360-0181 1 �. .�. .. ." -� ti.:'�.._�'..wk ":.".w-.. �:M :✓.-*'M--n- ":..... 1-.S:lM4.-_'"H! _ :w�. :-V'-J:Wei-� .: IM - ':.-. - .,w»!.1.! M.aM .-. --Y .."--M- y r 1 7 4 i4{ ' I - r i� 1 i r r . t i :' �� � ,I � Illllllllllillllllllllllllllllllll - � t 2003-04522610 Recorded I REC FEE 10.00 I Official Records I t County Of CANDACEUTTEJ. GRUBBS I RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Recorder I MID VALLEY TITLE ROSEMARY DICKSON I Assistant I Marti RECORDING REQUESTED BY: 10:56AN I"pr-2003 I Page 1 of 2 Fourteen Mile House, Inc. WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO: ` Fourteen Mile House, Inc. P.O. Box 1700 I Chico, CA 95927 THIS SPACE FOR RECORDERS USE ONLY AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF FOURTEEN,MILE HOUSE,.-UNIT 3 HUMBOLOT PARK DECLARANT hereby declares that the following (1) one amendment is hereby made in the above-named Declaration as recorded on 13 December 2002, under Butte County Recorder#2002-0068591: 1. On page 18, Article 9.03 is changed to read: "Re-subdivision of Lots: Lot 1 may be further subdivided and thereby create a maximum of two (2) Lots; said Lots shall be initially labeled lA and 1B.Lot 2 maybe further subdivided and thereby create a maximum of 1bur(4) Lots; said Lots shall be initially labeled 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D. Lot 3 may be fiuther subdivided and thereby create a maximum of two(2)Lots; said Lots shall be initially labeled 3A and 3B. Lot'4 may be further subdivided and thereby create a maximum of four(4)Lots; said Lots shall be initially labeled 4A, 4B,4C and 4D.The final approving authority for Lot numbers will be provided by Butte County." I IN WITNESS WEREOF, the undersigned, being the Declarant herein, has executed this Amendment to the Declaration this 2 day of April 2003. Fourteen Mile House, Inc. I n, Jr. President I I f COMMUNICATION RESULT REPORT RAY JOHNSON, DEVCOR 05-07-03 04 : 11PM MODE MEMORY-S TIME RESERVED INOI TEL RESULT 01 5387785 GOOD s • 05,-01-03 04:01PM FROM RAY NSOR DENOR P08/08 I _ . � ....� ���� llillllllll�lllilil�llllnl � ��'mm3--•�Ab�$ES 1 m • Recorded I NEC FEE 18.88 OftiCoount Records abs 1 BUT I A� R1cJ. a I RECORDING REQUESTED 9Y: Ry pjDMM I MID VALLEY TIRE Assistant i Nvti RECORDING REQUESTED BY: 10:564111 10-Apr-+M I Page i of 2 Fourteen Mlle House,Inc, WHEN RECORDED,MAIL TO: Fourteen Mile House, Inc. P,O. Box 1700 Chico, CA 95927 THIS SPACE FOR RECORDERS USE ONLY , AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE,,-UNIT3 HUMBOLDT PARK DECLARANT hereby declares that the following (1) one amendment Is hereby made In the above-named Declaration as recorded on 13 December 2002,under Butte County Recorder#2002.0088591. 1. On page 18, Article 9.03 Is changed to read: `Re-subdivision of Lots: Lot 1 may be further subdivided and thereby crate a maximum of two (2)Lots;said Lots shall be initially labeled lA and 18.Lot 2 may be further subdivided and thereby create a maximum of four(4)Lots;said Lots shall be initially labeled 2A,2B,2C and 2D. Lot 3 may be farther subdivided and thereby create a maxiinum of two(2)Lots;said Lots shall be initially labeled 3A and 3B. Lot 4 may be further subdivided and tbareby create a mAximum of four(4)Lots;said Lots shall be initially labeled 4A,4B,4C and 4D.The final approving authority for Lot numbers will be provided by Butte County" IN WITNESS WEREOF, the undersigned, being the Declarant herein, hes executed this Amendment to the Decleratlon this_, J_day of April 2003. I Fourteen Mile House, Inc. I kwn Jr. President I i DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT BUTTE COUNTY INITIAL STUDY AND PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR RZ03-01 (Ray Johnson — 14 Mile House) ' 4 Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#UZ 03-01 COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY i FOR TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 02-03 (Ray Johnson — 14 Mile House, Unit 3) 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: Ray Johnson B. Staff Contact:+.Craig Sanders,(530)538-7603 C. Proiect Name:' 14-Mile House D. Proiect Location: State Highway 32 south of Forest Ranch E. Type of Application(s): Rezone From PUD to FR-2 F. Assessor's Parcel Number: 063-0360-018 G. Proiect Site Size: 43.2 acres H. Current Zoning: Planned Unit Development(PUD) 1. General Plan Designation: Agricultural Residential J. - Environmental Setting: The project site is located in the northern portion of Butte County, an unincorporated area of Butte County,northeast of the city of Chico. Located in a rural foothills setting,the project site is surrounded by undeveloped land and low-density residential uses. The undeveloped site has moderate topography, which rises from southwest to northeast. Vegetation on the site includes yellow pines, California black oaks, 'and other plants and trees associated with the Yellow Pine Forest and Chaparral habitats. The western side of the site, which abuts State Route 32 is partially cleared, and the vegetation generally is denser further east on the site. The project site is not within a 100-year flood zone or within an airport overflight zone. K. Surrounding Land Uses: The project site is surrounded by undeveloped and residential parcels, ranging in size from 1 to 198 acres. Both existing and proposed parcel sizes are larger than the surrounding residential parcels, which are predominantly half-acre or one-acre lots. Zoning on the surrounding parcels is TM-40 (Timber Mountain, 40-acre minimum), TM-5 (Timber Mountain, 5-acre minimum), and Planned Unit Development(PUD). L. Proiect Description: Ray Johnson, Jr. is requesting approval of a rezone for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32; across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation — 2 acre minimum parcel size. The property is currently configured in four individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be provided by individual septic tank, and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development has been completed.in the first two"units"of that development. The subject property is the third"unit"of that residential development but is subject to a separate homeowners, association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. Throughout the environmental analysis that follows, mitigation measures that were a part of the Negative Declaration for the PUD rezone are included as Mitigation Measure PUD-1,PUD-2, and so forth. These mitigation measures are numbered not by the ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 1 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 order in which they appear in this document, but by the order they appear in the previous Initial Study, Negative Declaration,and conditions for approval. M. Public Apency Approvals: Butte County Development Services Department 2.0 DETERMINATION [X] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [ ] I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [ ] I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [, ] I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant' effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project,nothing further is required. 3 tv o 3 Prepared b - Craig Sanders AICP, Senior Planner Date Reviewed by:"Joe Baker,Planning Manager Date 3.0 POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS CHECKLIST SETTING A. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [ ] 4.1 Aesthetics [ ] 4.2 Agriculture Resources [ ] 4.3 Air Quality [ ] 4.4 Biological Resources [ ] 4.5 Cultural Resources [ ] 4.6 Geologic Processes [ ] 4.7 Hazards/Hazardous Material [ ] 4.8 Hydrology/Water Quality [ ] 4.9 Land Use [ ] 4.10 Mineral Resources [ ] 4.11 Noise [ } 4.12 Housing [ ] 4.13 Public Services [ ] 4.14 Recreation [ ] 4.15 Transportation/Traffic [ ] 4.16 Utilities/Service Systems [ ] 4.17 Mandatory Findings of Significance ■ Butte County Department-of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 2 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 B. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A"No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved(e.g.,the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards, (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a project-specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on-site,cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead'agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be'significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made,an EIR is required. 4), "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact"to a"Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures,and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced). 5) "Reviewed Under Previous Document." Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case,a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier"Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the r scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold,if any,used to evaluate each question;and I b) The mitigation measure identified,if any,to reduce the impact to less than significant. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 3 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 41 AESTHETIC/VISUAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal- Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous i Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b. Substantially damage,scenic resources,including,but not limited to,trees,rock outcroppings,and historic X buildings within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or X quality of the site and its surroundings? d.. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views X in the area? j Impact Discussion: i The project would result in the potential 19 single-family residential parcels of four parcels (a net gain of fifteen parcels more than the four current parcels). With the existing rural residential uses found in the project area, no substantial conflicts with the established character or function of the surrounding community are anticipated. The project site is currently undeveloped and the site is partially cleared of trees,particularly on the side of the property near State Route 32. Residential development on the parcels would introduce light and glare into the area for safety and security purposes. The impacts of light are reduced by Mitigation Measure PUD-11,which was required for the approved tentative subdivision map. No additional mitigation is needed at this time but would be appropriate if a future subdivision map is proposed. The project site is not located along any section of State Route 32 that is designated as a State or County scenic highway(Butte County Scenic Highway Map/CalTrans comments). Scenic views of the Little Chico Creek Canyon are available toward the'eastern side of the project site. This area of the project site is not accessible to the public and no public view of the canyon will be obscured by the project. CalTrans has commented that depending on the visibility of structures, architectural design, heights, and setbacks of future structures and subdivision lots, a vegetative screening or other mitigation may be appropriate along the Hwy 32 frontage, however, no mitigation is needed at this time. A mitigation has been incorporated into the subdivision approval for the current four lots requiring architectural design controls, such as color, texture, and form, that blend with the natural background be contained in the development CC&Rs. This project would not significantly impact a scenic vista. The additional development would result in the removal of several trees in order to make room for roads and homes. Current mitigation for the existing lots requires,replacement of any oak trees removed. This would continue to be applied as a mitigation for future subdivision applications. Mitigation Measure: None required , ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 4■ t Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 4.2 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant • Impact Under Impact - with Impact Previous Mitigation Document '. Incorporated a. Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farmland),as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the X Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or X a Williamson Act Contract? c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which,due to their location or nature,could result in X conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural use? Impact Discussion: The project site is designated Agricultural Residential in the Butte County General Plan and is zoned for residential development. None of the adjacent land is in active agriculture, and the project site is not designated as Prime or Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (California Resource Agency), nor is the project site designated as Agricultural Preserve area in Butte County. No agricultural uses are currently established on the site or on the adjacent parcels. As a part of the processing of this development application, comments were sought from the Agricultural Commission, who provided no comments regarding agricultural issues or impacts associated with the proposed project. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.3 AIR QUALITY: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: 1 Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous I Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the X applicable air qualityplan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality X violation? t c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient X air quality standard(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial X number of people? I t ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 5 ■ r • i • Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 Impact Discussion: Both the California Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency have,established air pollution standards in an effort to protect human health and welfare. Geographic areas are designated"attainment" if these standards are .met and "nonattainment" if they are not met. In addition, each agency has several levels of classifications based on severity of the problem. Butte County and all northern Sacramento Valley Air Districts have been designated as"moderate"nonattainment areas for the state standards for ozone and fine particulate matter (PMio). Currently,Butte County is in attainment for all the federal(less stringent)air quality standards. Development of the project site would result in a cumulative impact on air qualitycreated by the increase in vehicle traffic,the potential use of wood burning devices in the new residences,and dust from vehicular traffic on unpaved driveways on the site. The additional vehicle traffic is not anticipated to be significant because only fifteen potential parcels could be created by the project. The proposed lots are well below the level determined to be significant byu the Butte County Air Quality Management District for additional air-quality analysis(1997 Air Quality Attainment .Plan). The air quality impact of additional wood stoves is addressed through existing building code requirements calling for wood stove and fireplace inserts installed in any home to be EPA approved and designed to meet emissions standards of the California Clean Air Act of 1988 as amended. The project may create fugitive dust emission during site development activities, such as grading, excavation for foundations and utilities, road construction, and other soil work. The Butte County Air Quality Management District (BCAQMD) recommends incorporating measures to control fugitive dust emission for all road and other construction activities during project development, using such methods as site and driveway watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. A mitigation to address this potential future impact would best be applied any future tentative map. No impacts will occur unless another map is approved for the site. The existing lots are subject to a dust control mitigation measure as follows: Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials,water trucks or sprinkler systems are to be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered,kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation." No direct impacts would occur as a result of this project because no physical changes can occur without another discretionary application and subsequent environmental review. All of the potential impacts would occur only if additional lots are proposed changes to the environment will occur. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or X through habitat modifications,on any species ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 6■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans,policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies, ' X regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 or the Clean Water Act(including,but not limited to,marsh, X vernal pool,coastal,etc.)through direct removal,. filling,hydrological interruption,or other means)? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish and wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory X wildlife corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree X reservation policy ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation X Plan,or other approved local,regional,or state habitat conservationplan? G A reduction in the numbers,a restriction in the range, or an impact to the critical habitat of any unique,rare, X threatened,or endangered species of animals? h. A reduction in the diversity or numbers of animals onsite(including manunals,birds,reptiles, X amphibians,fish or invertebrates)? L A deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat(for X foraging,breeding,roosting,nesting,etc.)? j. Introduction of barriers to movement of any resident X or migratory fish or wildlife species? k. Introduction of any factors(light,fencing,noise, human presence and/or domestic animals)which could X hinder the normal activities of wildlife? Impact Discussion: Vegetation on the site consists of trees, shrubs, and grasses typical of the yellow pine forest and chaparral habitats, including yellow pine, black oak, manzanita,buckbrush, toyon, scrub oak,poison oak, silk tassel bush,pitcher sage, and others. Wildlife is expected to be similar to that of similar habitats in Butte County. Wildlife likely to be encountered on the site include striped skunk, pocket gopher, gray squirrel,black tail deer, American robin, hermit thrush, Brewer's blackbird, house finch, goldfinch, mourning dove, common flicker, Stellar's jay, scrub jay, common crow, turkey vulture, and western fence lizard. No riparian vegetation exists on the site (site visit and Department of Fish and Game ASBI Maps on file in the Butte County Department of Development Services). The ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 7 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 site does not contain wetlands. The project is not located in any wildlife conservation areas identified in the Butte County General Plan. Impacts on vegetative resources and habitat would be reduced by Mitigation Measure PUD-1, which was included in the Negative Declaration that was adopted prior to the rezoning of the project property to PUD in 1993. No rare or endangered animal species are found on the project site. Construction activities and the residential use on the project site would cause some of the animals currently utilizing the project site to move to new areas. It is expected that up to 10 acres of timber could be affected by the ultimate development of this site with 19 homes. Typical of this area, homeowners try to retain as many trees as possible but there is no County ordinance to do so. The existing lots are under a mitigation to replace lost oak trees as follows: A. Individual trees or groups of trees that are retained as a function of project design should be fully protected to the extent possible both during and after construction. In order to protect the root zone during construction a ' root protection zone (RPZ) should be established using stakes and flagging material. The RPZ should be an area that is 1.5 times the distance from the trunk to the dripline. Within this protective buffer, no grading, trenching, fill,or vegetation alteration of any kind should be allowed. B. Individual trees that are unavoidably lost due to project implementation should be replaced by planting oak seeds (acorns) or seedlings that are obtained from the local genetic stock of the same species. A replacement rate of 5:1 and container size of no less than 15 gallons shall be used for trees that are two inches or greater in diameter measured at breast height (dbh). A replacement rate of 1:1 and container size of no less than five gallons shall be used for all trees less than two inches dbh. Every effort should be made to retain large oaks. Oak plantings shall be maintained for a period of five years. C. A five-year maintenance and monitoring plan shall be completed for all oak mitigation plantings. The monitoring plan should include appropriate irrigation schedules, as well as criteria for*success and reestablishment during the five-year period. Any trees planted as remedial action for failure of initial planting shall be monitored for five years in a similar fashion to the initial planting.The goal is to achieve an 80-percent success rate at the end of the five-year monitoring period.Homeowners shall be responsible for re-planting and maintaining oaks removed from their lots to accommodate improvements. D. Following project construction, a fact sheet describing the value and care of native oaks shall be distributed to all residents. At a minimum, this fact sheet should encourage homeowners to avoid unnecessary pruning, educate them on the water needs of oak tees, and encourage, except where it would be a safety hazard, the retention of snags and downed trees.This fact sheet shall also be referenced in the CC&Rs. This mitigation would be included in any future land division application on this property. Removal of conifers on the property would not be significant as these trees are in abundance and the loss of 10 acres in relationship to the approximately 375,000 acres of timberland in the County is not significant. The project is located within an area identified by the California Department of Fish and Game as Critical Winter Deer range for the East Tehema Deer Herd. Department of Fish And Game was contacted but has not responded with any concerns. The Department of Fish and Game did not oppose the original project approval based on certain mitigations being included in the project. Because the Critical Winter range calls for 40 acre minimum parcels sizes for viable habitat, the existing four parcels represents land that is not viable habitat under the Department of Fish and Game criteria. No additional mitigation is required at this time. The project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. The proposal would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local,regional, or state habitat conservation plan as there are no adopted plans affecting the project site. No direct impacts would occur as a result of this project because no physical changes can occur without another discretionary application and subsequent environmental review. All of the potential impacts would occur only if additional lots are proposed changes to the environment will occur. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 8 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 1 Mitigation Measure: None required 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal:: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance X of a historical resource as defined in§15064.5? 'b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X an archaeological resource pursuant to§15064.5? C. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X resource or site or urn ue geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains,including those interred X outside of formal cemeteries? Impact Discussion: , Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites;historical features, such as rock walls, water ditches and flumes, and cemeteries; and architectural features. Cultural resources consist of any human-made site, object (i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past. No structures or sites are known to be located on the subject site. Prehistoric resources have been found nearby in the course of environmental review of the previous phases of the 14-Mile House subdivision and residential development. Often such sites are found in foothill areas, areas with high bluffs,rock outcroppings,areas overlooking deer migratory corridors,or above bodies of water. Though no cultural resources are known to exist on the site, the potential for uncovering cultural resources during excavation exists. The site was once traversed by the Humboldt Toll Road running from Chico to the gold mines of Idaho. 14 Mile house, located southerly of this site was the location for a stage stop and overnight station. Some historic artifacts may still remain in the area. Development of the property is currently subject to a provision to cease work if any historic or cultural resources are discovered. The same mitigation would be applied to any future subdivision map. Because no additional soil disturbance would be authorized by the rezone,no mitigation is currently needed. Mitigation Measure: None required 1 , ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 9 a Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 4.6 GEOLOGIC PROCESSES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the X State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? X 3. Seismic-related ground failure,including X liquefaction? 4. Landslides? X b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or that would become unstable as a result of the project, X and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide,lateral spreading,subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil,as defined in Table 18-1- B of the Uniform Building Code(1994),creating X substantial risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal X system where sewers are not available for the disposal or waste water? Impact Discussion: The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone or an aftershock zone. The only known active fault in Butte County is the Cleveland Hill fault, located approximately 25 miles from the project site,where activity on August 1, 1975 resulted in the Oroville earthquake. This earthquake had a Richter magnitude of 5.7 and resulted in approximately 2.2 miles of ground rupture along the western flank of Cleveland Hill. In the northwest corner of Butte County near Chico there are a series of short,north-northwest trending faults similar to the Cleveland Hill fault. These faults-appear to be an extension of the Bear Mountain Fault or Foothills Shear Zone. Minor seismic activity has occurred in the area of these short faults; however, other geologic evidence indicates these faults are not active (Butte County General Plan 1977). The Butte County GIS Fault Lines theme shows that an inferred fault is located approximately 10 miles to the west of the project site. This inferred fault is a part of the Foothill Shear Zone and has not experienced any known movement during historical times. No impacts are anticipated since,no rupture of a known earthquake fault exists in the project area. The 80-mile-long Midland-Sweitzer fault is located approximately 50 miles southwest of the project site. This fault is considered active and has caused historic earthquakes of Richter magnitudes between 6 to 6.9 in the area in 1892. There is some speculation as to the exact location of the historic earthquake epicenters and some question if they actually occurred on the Midland-Sweitzer fault(Butte County, 1977). ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 10■ r Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 Approximately 5 miles west of Butte County there is a north trending fault system known as the Willows fault. This fault is approximately 40 miles long and displaces Cretaceous sediment in the Sacramento Valley. It does not appear to displace surface sediment and has been mapped principally by geophysical methods. However,there have been enough historical seismic events in the vicinity of this fault to conclude that it should be considered potentially active(Butte County General Plan 1977). A moderate earthquake occurred on the afternoon of Friday, August 10, 2001, centered about nine miles west of Portola, California, and about 50 miles east of the project site. Very little damage occurred as a result of this earthquake, which was had a magnitude of 5.5,but brief groundshaking was felt in Chico during the earthquake and the aftershocks. This earthquake occurred in the Mohawk Valley Fault Zone,and this area of California experiences a magnitude five or higher earthquake approximately every 20 years, according to the University of California, Berkeley Seismological Laboratory. Historical events in the area include the following: i Table 1 Historical Seismic Events near Recent Portola Event Near Portola—Mohawk Valley Fault Zone Year Magnitude Location 1875 6.2 40 km to the NNE near Janesville 1888 6.2 • 20 km to the SSW near Blairsden 1959 5.6 40 km to the ESE near Verdi 1966 1 6.0 60 km to the SSE near Truckee 'Source.-Adapted from information provided by the California Division of Mines and Geology andposted on the UC- Berkeley Seismological Laboratory web site(http://www.seismo.berkeley.edu/Seismo). Like most of central California, the site can be expected to be subjected to seismic ground shaking at some future time. Accordingly, all buildings, pipes, light poles, roadways, and other improvements would be designed and installed in accordance with Uniform Building requirements. Because the project appears to be located such that the probability of significant groundshaking is low, and because the structures would be designed and installed in accordance with Uniform Building Code standards for the appropriate Seismic Hazard Zone, potential geologic impacts would be less than significant. The Butte County Seismic Safety Element's Liquefaction Potential Map indicates that the site has a low potential for liquefaction. The impact would be less than significant. The Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that there is a low to moderate potential for landslides in this area. Grading standards required to be met for the issuance of a grading permit would reduce any potential impact. The soil erosion potential for the project site is slight, according to Butte County General Plan GIS data. Standard construction techniques are required as part of the construction process of this project that would help prevent significant soil erosion impacts. As a condition of the issuance of a building permit permit,the developer is required to include erosion control measures and, if necessary, detention facilities to control erosion and runoff. Cut and fill slopes are limited and revegetation of disturbed slopes is required as conditions for a site development and building permits under the current subdivision requirements. The following mitigations were applied to the original PUD rezone and have been applied to past subdivision maps. They would also be applied to any future subdivision map. Mitigation measure: Limit earthwork to the period between April 1 and Nov. 15. All areas where the soil has been disturbed or where the vegetation has been removed shall be protected from erosion using standard erosion control methods accepted by civil engineers. Vegetation in the fuel reduction area shall not be removed to the extent that erosion occurs. It is recommended that the vegetation removed for fire protection be chipped or mulched and then applied to the cleared areas for erosion control. Mitigation measure: Home constructed on these lots shall be designed to minimize grading and to utilize the existing grade to the extent feasible through the use of multi level structures. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 11 ■ r Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 The Conservation Element's Expansive Soils Map indicates that the project site has low to moderate expansive soil potential. The Building Division may require that the foundations of future dwelling on the site be designed and constructed to handle the shrink/swell characteristics of expansive soils. Standard grading and foundation design would reduce any potential impacts. No direct impacts would occur as a result of this project because no physical changes can occur without another discretionary application and subsequent environmental review. All of the potential impacts would occur only if additional lots are proposed changes to the environment will occur. , Mitigation Measure: None Required 4. 7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: 4 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal:, Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environmental through the routine transport use,or X disposal of hazardous materials? :::I b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and X accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,substances,or waste within one- X quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result, X would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the X project result in a safety,hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people X residing or working in the project area? g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency X evacuationplan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including X where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Impact Discussion: The project site is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials and would not create any hazardous materials: No impact is anticipated. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 12 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 i The property is not located within the vicinity of an airport, airport land-use plan, or private airstrip, and does not interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact is anticipated. The California Department of Forestry has reviewed the project and doesn't have any specific recommendation with regard to the rezone. Subsequent applications to divide the property will result in a number of conditions being applied to address fire safety. Public Resources Code 4290/4291 is applicable to the project site and the provisions of that code will be applied to future land divisions. The impact is less than significant at this time because no additional construction would be allowed by the rezone. The project is located within a State Response Area for wildland fires and construction of homes in this area makes fighting wildland fires more difficult because fire resources must protect structures before wildlands. The nearest fire station is Station # 23 (full time), located approximately 6 miles away, to the northeast along Highway 32. A volunteer station is located approximately 1.7 miles away in Forest Ranch. The Butte County Fire Department/CDF states that any development of lots in high and very high fire hazard areas .requires that State and County Fire Safe regulations be followed. One of these provisions includes fuel reduction areas within 30 feet of all structures. Because of this 30-foot fuel reduction requirement, the current 5-foot side and rear yard building setbacks of the proposed.FR-2 zone are not adequate. To allow all property owners to have control over fuel reduction around structures, a 30-foot side and rear yard building setback is required. This would be a condition of any fuiure map. r Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a.' Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g.,the production X rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level • which would not suppoh existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area;including through the alteration of the course X of a stream or river,in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area.,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or X amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result - in flooding on-or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage X systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? ; ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 13 ■ i • Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 • Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped by Federal Flood Hazard Boundary,Flood X Insurance Rate Map,or other flood hazard delineation map? I h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures X which would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury,or death involving flooding,including flooding as X a result of the failure of a levee or dam? J. Inundation by seiche,tsunami,or mudflow? X Impact Discussion: The project would provide for an additional build out of 15 more residences bringing the total to 19 dwellings n the east side of Highway 32. An existing well on the property will be use to provide domestic water to all lots. A 60,000 gallon storage tank with back-up water source and back-up power supply is proposed by the applicant. The well has been tested and produces an adequate supply to meet the demand for both domestic and fire purposes. The proposed project would include individual septic systems for sewer service and individual wells for water service. The County Environmental Health Department will review has no objections to the rezone. Future land divisions will have to meet County standards for sewage disposal and water The project would be an addition to the. third phase of a PUD subdivision and residential development, the first two phases of which have been completed and are occupied. The septic systems for those developments were approved by the County Environmental Health Department based on soils on those sites. In order to ensure that there are no impacts to surface water or ground water in the area as a result of the project,Mitigation Measure#5 is recommended. This project would ultimately result in the creation of new impervious surfaces such as houses,accessory structures, and driveways. However, the amount of impervious surface area relative to parcels ranging from 5 to 17 acres in size would generate a less-than-significant increase in surface water runoff. Mitigation Measure PUD-4 limits the hard surfaces on any parcel to 4,000 square feet, which ensures the impacts would be less than significant regarding the increase in runoff. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood zone or 500-year flood zone as shown on Butte County GIS maps,which are based on a Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map,dated June,2000. The property is not located in an area prone to seiche,tsunami, or mudflow. No impact would occur with respect to these natural hazards. Septic systems are proposed for sewer systems on the parcels and will be required to comply with the County Improvement Standards.' Mitigation Measure: None required. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 14 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 i 4.9 LAND USE: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under ' Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Physically divide an established community? X b. Conflict with an applicable land use plan,policy,or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project(including,but not limited to,the general X plan,specific plan,local coastal program,or zoning ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation X plan or natural community conservation plan? Impact Discussion:- The proposal rezone 42'acres in a current configuration of four parcels of 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres to an FR-2 zone permitting parcels as small as 2 acres. A total of 19 parcels could potentially be developed. The property is designated as Agricultural Residential in the Butte County General Plan Land Use Element. Consistent zones listed for this designation are A-20, A-40, TM-20, TM-40, FR-20, FR-40, and CF. All of these zones have a minimum parcel size of�20 acres or larger. Zoning districts with a minimum parcel size less than 20 acres may be consistent with the land sue designation provided the following five criteria can be met: Parcel sizes less than 20.acres may be found consistent with the General Plan only if all or the following criteria are met: . 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. The project is n`ot adjacent to any agricultural uses. Some timber management or harvesting may take place on surrounding parcels but the proposed residential uses would not conflict with these activities. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. Based on information received from the Butte County Environmental Health Division, the project appears to be able to meet the County's water and sewage disposal requirements. i 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. The site is located approximately 6 miles from the nearest year around manned fire station in north of Forest Ranch on Highway 32. The closest volunteer station is approximately 1.7 miles away in Forest Ranch. This is seen as adequate for fire protection because the ultimate division of the property will include the requirement for a pressurized water system with hydrants. This will provide a much higher degree of fire protection that serves the surrounding area. 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. All traffic generated by the project will utilize State Highway 32 in order to get to anywhere. . Major commercial services and intermediate and high schools are in Chico, approximately 13 miles to the southeast. Traffic volumes on area roads are relatively low. 2001 CalTrans counts for Highway 32 show that adequate capacity exists to handle the traffic generated by the project. A more complete discussion is contained on Section 15 of this document. 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services■Planning Division■ Page 15 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 The nearest full commercial services are located in Chico approximately 13 miles away. A small market and gasoline service is available in Forest Ranch, approximately 2 miles away. Intermediate and high school services are also located in Chico. This is seen as adequate to serve the proposed parcel sizes. The property is not within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact would be incurred. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.10 NIINERAL RESOURCES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the X residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local X general plan,specific plan,or other land use plan? Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to known mineral resource areas. The project is located at least five miles from mining activities, according to Butte County GIS data. Therefore,the project would have no impact on mineral resources. v Mitigation Measure: None required 4.11 NOISE: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan X or noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X ground bome vibration or ground borne noise levels? c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing X without theproject? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above X levels existing without theproject? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services s Planning Division■ Page 16■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03 01 t Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document i Incorporated or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? L For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working X in the project area to excessive noise levels? r Impact Discussion: The project site is subject to noise originating from vehicles on State Route 32, which abuts the project site to the west. The vehicle noise emanating from this roadway may result in significant impacts to future residents of the homes planned for development as a part of the proposed subdivision. The right-of-way along Highway 32 is 30 feet on-each side. The required setback for the project property is 25 feet. According to 2000 traffic counts, the average daily number of trips along this section of State Route 32 is approximately 3000. According to 1998 Caltrans truck traffic counts (the most recent available), the level of truck traffic near the project site is between 38 and 45 percent. The Butte County Noise Element states that for high-speed roadways carrying 5,000 to 20,000 Average Daily Trips(ADT),the 65 dB noise contour will be between 100 and 200 feet of the centerline of the travel lane. Given that the current ADT is less than 5,000 trips the 65 dB contour should be less than 100 feet away from the travel lane. If homes are ultimately proposed within 100 feet of the highway a related noise mitigation to attenuate interior noise level would most likely be proposed as part of he subdivision map approval. Since no homes will currently be allowed within 100 feet of the highway by this action,no mitigation is necessary at this time. , Construction activities on the site would temporarily generate high noise levels on and adjacent to the project site intermittently during project development activities. During construction,the highest noise levels would result from operation of heavy earthmoving equipment, which can be expected to generate noise levels of between 85 to 90 decibels (dBA) at a distance of 50 feet from the source. Noise levels will be reduced, however, by a factor of six dBA with each doubling of distance from the noise source and by intervening topography. Adjacent residences are at least 500-600 feet from construction staging activities that would be associated with residential development at the project site. The subdivision proposed in this project creates parcels on the northeastern portion of the existing parcel,which is the side of the property furthest from the adjacent residential development. The General Plan Noise Element establishes a conditionally acceptable community noise level of up to 70 dB CNEL for construction activities. Given the size of the parcels and significant distance from the nearest residential structure, construction noise would not have a significant impact on nearby residence. Furthermore, any such noise disturbance would be intermittent and short-term in nature. Because of the relatively,small increment of traffic added to the local roadways, the project would not significantly affect future traffic noise levels. The project is not located in the vicinity of an airstrip or within an airport land use plan. No impact wouldoccur. Mitigation Measure: None required ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 17 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 4.12 HOUSING: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Induce substantial population growth in an area,either directly(for example,by proposing new homes and X businesses)or indirectly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing X elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people,necessitating X the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Impact Discussion: Butte County population has grown at a rate at or below official population projections for the past 10 years. Projected population for 2000 was 207,159, while the actual census population was 203,171. The growth rate for Butte County between the 1990 and 2000 was 11.6%, or 1.1% per year. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map would create four parcels, with a net increase of three parcels for residential development. This project has the potential to add an estimated 36 people to Butte County(15 units x 2.414 persons/unit—assuming all occupants are new residents to Butte County). This is not considered a significant amount and is consistent with the estimated 2% annual growth rate for the County. The project would not significantly affect the population of the area because the proposed density is consistent with the surrounding area. The project would not displace individuals or housing. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.13 PUBLIC SERVICES: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which X could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times,or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b. Fireprotection? X c. Police Protection? X d. Schools? X e. Parks? X f. Other public services? X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 18 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 Impact Discussion: The project site is located in an area designated as having a high to very high fire hazard according to GIS data from the California Division of Forestry. Fire protection services for the project site are provided by the Butte County Fire Department in coordination with the State Division of Forestry. The closest station is Volunteer County Station #24 in Forest Ranch, approximately 1.7 miles north on State Route 32. The nearest year around manned station (Station 23) is located approximately 6 miles away, northeast of Forest Ranch. The project has various conditions with which to comply,to reduce wildfire risk and impacts on fire service to a less than significant level. The developer is required to' coordinate with the Butte County Fire Department in meeting the aforementioned conditions. The proposal would result in an incremental increase in demand for police protection services. The cumulative impacts of increased residential development in the County impacts the ability of the Sheriffs Department to adequately provide police services to outlying areas. Sheriffs facilities fees are required to be paid prior to issuance of building permits for any dwelling units placed on the project site; this would reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. The proposal would result in an incremental demand for school facilities in the area. The project site is located in the Chico Unified School District. The applicant is required to place a note on the map that states: "A development impact fee for school facilities shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. The fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permits." While school districts maintain that these fees do not fully mitigate the impacts of the project, the County is precluded from imposing additional fees or mitigation by state legislation. The project would result in the potential development of fifteen additional dwellings, which would not create significant impacts to area parks and facilities. A less than significant impact is anticipated to other public services. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.14 RECREATION: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such X that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities X which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Impact Discussion: The project site is not located within any established park and recreation district. The site is located within 13 miles of recreation facilities in'Chico and 15 miles of National Forest lands where recreation opportunities can be found. There are no neighborhood recreation facilities in the Forest Ranch area and no recreation facilities are proposed as part of this project. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 19 ■ i i Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 Mitigation Measure: None required 4.15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Cause an increase in traffic which is'substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system(i.e.,result in a substantial increase in X either the number of vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio on roads,or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed,either individually or cumulatively,a level of service standard established by the county congestion X management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in X location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or X incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? X f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g. Conflict with accepted policies,plans or programs supporting alternative transportation(e.g.,bus X turnouts,bicycle racks)? Impact Discussion: The future parcels created in compliance with the requested zoning would access State Route 32 via an approved 60 foot wide easement. Encroachment permits for new access onto State Route 32 must be obtained from the California Department of Transportation(Caltrans)prior to construction of the roadway on the site. State Route 32 has an average daily traffic load(ADT) of approximately 3000 for the segment near the project site. The rezone of the project property and surrounding property to PUD as a part of the 14-Mile House development required the developer to construct a left turn lane for the north bound (uphill) lane of State Route 32 to Caltrans specifications. .The project could potentially result in the creation of fifteen additional parcels for residential development a left turn lane is already in place to serve the development off of Highway 32 in both directions. The proposed rezone would create four individual parcels for a net increase of three parcels. Thus,the development has the potential to generate approximately 143 additional traffic trips per day based upon 9.55 vehicle trips/day per dwelling unit as projected by the Trip Generation Manual of the Institute of Traffic Engineers for a single family residential use. The increase in vehicle traffic generated by the project would raise the AADT to approximately 3,150 which would represent a volume to capacity ratio of approximately 17.5%(3,150 trips/18,000 capacity). This ratio is still a level of service(LOS)A and the impact would not be significant. The Public Works Department requires that a 60-foot right-of-way be established as access to each parcel. There. several existing rights-of-way on the property serving the existing four parcels. Additional right-of-way would be needed if the full development potential is to be achieved. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 20■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 Butte County Code Section 24-240 (b) requires two off-street spaces per dwelling. The parcels of 2 acres in size will have no problem meeting this requirement. This proposed rezone would not conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. Mitigation Measure: None Required. 4.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water QualityControl Board? X b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of X existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing X facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources,or are new or expanded entitlements X needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the X project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste X disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state,and local statutes,and X regulations related to solid waste? Impact Discussion: The proposed project would include individual septic systems for sewer service and individual wells for water service. Thus, the project would not have a significant impact on any wastewater or water treatment facilities with the incorporation of mitigation measures specified below. Some on and off-site storm water drainage improvements may be required due to development of the project site. No significant environmental impacts would be anticipated because any improvements do not appear to be extensive. The Butte County Public Works Department would determine the need for on and off-site storm water facilities and would ensure the necessary improvements are installed when a proposal to divide the property is received. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 21 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 The project would increase the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill by a minor amount. According to the Butte County Public Works Department, the Neal Road Landfill is expected to reach maximum holding capacity by the year 2018. The project is required to comply with the mitigation measures specified below, which would reduce the impacts on solid waste facilities in the region and provide for the long term maintenance of other facilities. No impact would occur with respect to federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste with the incorporation of mitigation measures specified below. If the future subdivision is-developed similarly to the other two adjoining subdivisions developed by the same owner, the homeowners within the area would be responsible for the maintenance of all common areas, roads, swimming pools, storage buildings, waste water treatment facilities, and street lighting. A CSA would also be formed to act as an umbrella entity to insure that the homeowners association carries out it's duties for maintaining the roads, streetlights, and sewage disposal system and to take over those duties in the event that they are not being performed adequately. As long as the homeowners association is adequately maintaining the facilities, the CSA may only assess fees to cover the cost of reviewing the maintenance documentation. 4.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (SECTION 15065: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal X community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection X with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects)? c. Does the project have environmental effects which Will cause substantial adverse effects on human X beings,either directly or indirectly? The project does not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment beyond the impacts discussed in the previous sections of this Initial Study. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 22 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 The project will not make a significant contribution to any identified cumulative impact. The impact to air quality would be insignificant in the long term and short term impacts during construction could be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Cumulative traffic impacts are less than significant as discussed in section 4.15. Air quality impacts _ were not identified as significant and the addition of 15 homes does not represent a significant cumulative impact to the Air basin. No direct impacts would occur as a result of this project because no physical changes can occur without another discretionary application and subsequent environmental review. All of the potential impacts would occur only if additional lots are proposed changes to the environment will occur. 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: } None required 1 - T i r ' 1 1 ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 23 ■ • • Project Name: 14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL: 1. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map,established by Resolution No. 67478. Oroville,CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville,CA: James P.Manning, 1983. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Ma. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County GIS Data. Oroville,CA:November 2001. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Environmental Checklist Form,Evaluation of Environmental Impact. File Number 93-15. Oroville,CA: February 8, 1993. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2,Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3, Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2,Seismic Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 10. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 11. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 12. Butte County Planning Department. Notice of Determination,Rezone 93-15,Ray Johnson.Filed with State Clearinghouse, Office of Planning and Research. July 13, 1993. 13. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 14. Butte County Planning Department. School District Map. Oroville,CA. 15. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1, Safety Element. Oroville, CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 16. California Department of Transportation,Traffic Operations Division.2000 All Traffic Volumes on California State Highway System. 2001. 17. California Department of Transportation,Traffic Operations Division. 1998 Truck Volumes on California State Highway System. 1998. 18. California Department of Transportation,Traffic Operations Division. 1998 All Traffic Volumes on California State Highway System. 1998. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 24 ■ Project Name:.14-Mile House Rezone,File#REZ 03-01 19. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1989. 20. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map,Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency,State of California, 1983. 21. USGS Quad Maps. 7.0 CONSULTED AGENCIES: [X] Environmental Health [X] Public Works [ ] Building Manager [ ] BCAG [ ] ALUC [X] LAFCo [X] Assessor [ ] Development Services [ ] Chico Unified School Distr. [X] Air Qual. Management Dist. [ ] City of Chico [XJ Sheriff [ ] City of Gridley [ ] City of Oroville [ ] Town of Paradise [XJ CA Department of Forestry [X] Caltrans(Traffic) [ J Central Reg.Water Quality [X] Department of Conservation [X] CA Dept. of Fish and Game [ ] Highway Patrol [ ] Army Corps of Engineers [X] US Fish&Wldlife Service [X] Agricultural Commissioner [ ] Butte Co.Farm Bureau [X] Oroville Union School Dist. [ ] Feather River Rec.Dist. [ ] El Medio Fire Dept. [ ] OWID [ ] LOAPUD [ ] PG&E [ ] Pacific Bell [ ] Palermo Union School Dist. 8.0 PROJECT SPONSOR(S) INCORPORATION OF MITIGATION INTO PROPOSED PROJECT: I/We have reviewed the Initial Study for the Ray Johnson Rezone (APN # 063-360-018) application and particularly the mitigation measures identified herein. Me hereby modify the application on file with the Butte County Planning Department to include and incorporate all mitigations set forth in this Initial Study. Project Sponsor/Project Agent Date Project Sponsor/Project Agent Date ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 25 ■ vUiUt Ur W—MU ••tit► UVU UUU L1U'! LD ruma t UEAJ.kxj !(fa VUG 1 Unsafe Water Alert, Humboldt Highlands Mutual water System June 10, 2002 A routine water sample collected from the above water system on June 6,2002,was found to be positive for total coliform and E. coli bacteria. The laboratory reported the sample results on June 9, 2002. The reason for the-positive test result is not known at this time. Additional testing will be " conducted in the near future by a water distribution operator. The water system may be .1 disinfected with chlorine. _ The California Department of Health Services sets drinking water standards and°'}has determined that the presence of feel coliform or E.coif is a serious health concem�.Fecal coliform and E. coli are generally not harmful themselves, but their presence in`drinking water is serious because they usually are associated with sewage or animal wastes. The presence of these bacteria in drinking water is generally a result of a problem with water v treatment or the pipes which distribute the water, and indicates that the water may be -" contaminated with organisms that can cause disease. Disease symptoms may Include diarrhea,cramps,nausea,and possibly jaundice,and associated headaches and fatigue. These symptoms, however, are not just associated with disease-causing organisms in drinking water, but also may be caused by a number of factors other than your drinking water. The Department has set an enforceable drinking water standard for fecal coliform and E. coli to reduce the risk of these adverse health effects. Under this standard all drinking water samples must be free of these bacteria. Drinking water which meets this standard is associated with little or none of this risk and should be considered safe. The Department recommends that consumers take the following precautions: i Until further notice is given, use an alternative source of water, such as bottled water, or boil the tap water for drinking and food preparation for at least two (2) minutes prior to use. This recommendation shall remain in effect until another written notice from the Butte County Division of Environmental Health Is Issued. I This notification of the public is being done in compliance with the California Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring Regulations as a means of keeping the public informed. For additional information, please contact the following representative of the Humboldt Highlands Mutual water`system: q-7 i 1 1 f I ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF HUMBOLDT WOODLANDS MUTUAL WATER COMPANY 1 .. I. NAME The name of the corporation is HUMBOLDT WOODLANDS MUTUAL WATER COMPANY. ; Il. PURPOSE (a) ! This corporation is a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation organized under .the Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law. The purpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a corporation may be organized under such law. (b) ; The specific and primary purpose for which this corporation is organized and operated is to acquire, develop, distribute, supply and deliver water for domestic and irrigation purposes within the'meaning and intent of Sections 330.24 through 331, inclusive, of the California Civil Code, to all members of this corporation who own lots or parcels of real estate within the ] Service Area. Any water or water rights acquired by this corporation or made available for use by this corporation shall be used only by its members. III. AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS The name and address in the State of California of the corporation's initial agent for service of process is i [name and address of agent] { IV. MEMBERSHIPS This corporation is authorized to issue only one class of memberships. Only those persons who become owners of lots or parcels of real estate within the Service Area shall be eligible to become members of this corporation. One (1) membership shall be issued to the owner of each lot or parcel of real estate within the Service Area. If the lot or parcel of real estate is owned by more than one (1) person, the single membership shall be issued in the names of the owners. No fractional membership shall be issued. A person entitled to membership by reason of the ownership of more than one (1) lot or parcel of real estate within the Service Area may hold a separate membership for each such lot or parcel of real estate. V. SERVICE AREA The ServicejArea of this corporation shall be that real estate described in the bylaws. VI. APPURTENANCY The memberships shall be appurtenant to the lands within the Service Area described in the certificate issued therefor. A membership shall only be transferred with the lands described in such certificate, except as to any sale or forfeiture of a membership for delinquent assessments thereon as permitted under Section 331 of the California Civil Code. I , i i ' } - 1 - VII. ASSESSMENTS The Board of Directors of this corporation is hereby authorized from time to time to levy and collect assessments upon all memberships of this corporation and to charge for water delivered '. or made available to members in the manner set forth in the bylaws of this corporation. All assessments and water charges shall be a lien upon the lands on which the assessments or water charges are made from the time such assessments or water charges become due and payable, and if such assessments or charges become delinquent, such lien may be enforced by the following: (a) In the manner provided by law for the foreclosure of mortgages of real property; or (b) By sale and transfer of the membership without said lands, in the manner provided for in Section 331 of the California Civil Code; or (c) By judicial action against the member who is delinquent in payment of such assessments or water charges. If a person's membership is withdrawn or terminated in accordance with this provision, his or her equitable interest in this corporation will not be forfeited. VIII. TAX EXEMPTION PROVISION i This corporation shall receive at least eighty-five percent (85%) of its receipts from amounts i collected from members for the sole purpose of satisfying the losses and expenses of the corporation. Funds in excess of those necessary to meet current losses and operating expenses shall be retained only to the extent of the corporation's reasonable needs for normal business purposes, such as retiring indebtedness, expansion or maintaining reserves for necessary purposes. Earnings in excess of reasonable needs will be returned to the members in proportion to the amount of business done with the corporation. This corporation will keep records that show the amount of business done by each member on the basis of its annual accounting period and of each member's rights and interest in the assets of this corporation. This corporation shall not distribute any gains, profits, or dividends to its members except upon the dissolution of the corporation. Upon dissolution, the corporation shall distribute all of the remaining corporate assets in the manner provided for in Sections 8715 to 8717, inclusive, of the California Corporations Code or. any successor statutes thereto, after determining that all of the known debts and liabilities of the corporation have been .paid or adequately provided for during the process of winding up and dissolving the corporation. If this corporation has gains from the sale of an appreciated asset, upon dissolution, it must distribute, to the extent practicable, the gains as well as other funds, to all persons who were members during the period in which the assets were owned by this corporation in proportion to the amount of business done by such members during that period. The remaining corporate assets shall be distributed to the members in accordance with their respective rights. IX. AMENDMENT These articles may only be amended by the vote or written consent of members representing 66-2/3% or more of the voting power of the corporation. [INSERT NAME], Incorporator I hereby declare that I am the person who executed the foregoing Articles of Incorporation, .which execution is my act and deed. [INSERT NAME] j16humboldtianicles - 2 - 6 FEB 2003 Mr. Craig Sanders Butte County Planning RE: Fourteen Mile House Unit 3 Rezone—PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM Dear Mr. Sanders: Please note that we ate proposing a second source of water in the same manner the conditions of approval were previously met for Unit 1 and Unit 2, as follows: Nye anticipate installing the following water system as designed by Rolls, Anderson and Rolls, with approvals by Butte County: Additional 6", 4" and/or 2"water mains 60,000 gallon water storage to provide 2 hours of water at 500 gpm Fire hydrants as specified by fire dept 25 hp well pump that will produce approx. 100 gpm 2 booster pumps at 25 hp each 1 self starting diesel generator Telemetry and warning system The above water system will be maintained and serviced as directed by the mutual water,company. The mutual water company does not yet exist; however, it will be very similar to the mutual water companies that serve Unit 1 and Unit 2. Yours truly, Ray E Johnson Jr (Via email attachment) Page 1 of 2 3g 32 GLE GLENN COUNTY t Aft 11. g3 32 GLE ©0 JCT. RTE. 5 1 Pfe.hr Mo AAvl430 5700 5300 g3 32 GLE © 0.46 ORLAND, 6TH/SWIFT STREETS 430 5700 5300780 9100 8500 g3 32 GLE © 0.54 ORLAND, 6TH/WALKER STREETS IE80 9100 8500910 11700 10000 n3 32 GLE 1.3 COUNTY ROAD M 910 11700 10000 630 8200 6900 g3 32 GLE 0 COUNTY ROAD P 630 8200 6900 810 F8400 F8000 q3 32 GLE 4.1 MILEPOST EQUATION =R4.23 g3 32 GLE 9.63 JCT. RTE. 45 SOUTH; HAMILTON CITY, WEST 790 8300 8100 1100 12300 11800 g3 32 GLE 10.91 GLENN COUNTY-BUTTE COUNTY 1100 12300 11800 1100 12300 11800 g3 32 BUT 4.17 MERIDIAN ROAD I 1100 12300 11800 1150 12000 11200 g3 32 BUT 5.02 MUIR AVENUE I 1150 12000 11200 1300 12700 11600 g3 32 BUT 6.24 EAST/NORTH LINDO AVENUES I 1300 12700 11600 1350 14600 13700 g3 32 BUT 6.46 WEST LINDO AVENUE I 1350 14600 13700 1.450 14400 13800 g3 32 BUT 7.11 WEST 8TH AVENUE I 1450 14400 13800 1600 16900 16200 32 BUT7.79 ICHICO, WEST SACRAMENTO AVENUE 1800 19100 18200 2050 23900 22600 g g BUT® 8.37 CHICO, WEST 1ST STREET2050 23900 22600 1800 22700 19000 �32 BUT® 8.62 CHICO,WEST 5TH STREET Ing 22700 19000 1500 16000 14600 g3 32 BUT® 8.87 ICHICO, 9TH/WALNUT STREETS I 1500 16000 14600 n3 32 [BU]TnR[;jRAVELCHICL E T . . EASTBOUND . . . ONE WAY n3 32[BU]TW[8.87 STR O ON 9TH STREET AT WALNUT ET 840 8400 7900 CHICO, ON 9TH STREET AT ORANGE n32FBUT]W[ ISTREET 840 8400 7900 890 8800 8400 g3 32 BUT® 9..13 CHICO, ON 9TH STREET AT IVY STREET890 8800 8400 950 9600 9000 g3 32 BUT® 9.46 CHICO, ON 9TH STREET AT BROADWAY950 9600 9000 1100 10700 10300 g 32 BUT[ff9.57 ICHICO, ON 9TH STREET AT MAIN STREET1100 10700 10300 1300 14800 14000 E3 32 BUT 9.41]ICHICO, ON 9TH STREET AT PINE STREET I 1300 14800 14000 1700CHIC18100 17700 n3 32 BUT F9.4]6 ISTREET0 ON 9TH STREET AT CYPRESS 1700 18100 17700[140]0 14700 14000 g3 32 BUT 10.19 CHICO, ON 9TH STREET AT JCT. RTE. 99 1400 14700 14000 950 9800 9500 N3 32 BUT 10.28 CHICO, ON 9TH STREET AT FIR STREET 950 9800 9500 670 7000 6900 CHICO, END OF EASTBOUND COUPLET APPROXIMATELY HALF MILE EAST OF FIR 3 uu 10.74 STREET 670 7000 6900 n3 R BUT nR 8.91 TRAVEL COUPCHICL E T . . WESTBOUND . . . ONE WAY n3 R32 [BUT]WF8.9]1ISTREETO ON 8TH STREET AT WALNUT [97]0 11300 10800 n32 FBTlWFq-04jSTREETCHICO ON 8TH STREET AT ORANGE 97011300 10800 Fil00 12100 11800 N3 32 BUT® 9.17 CHICO, ON 8TH STREET AT IVY STREET 1100 12100 11800 1050 11800 11500 Ng BUT® 9.5 CHICO, ON 8TH STREET AT BROADWAY1050 11800 11500 1150 13900 12400 n3 32 BUT® 9.57 CHICO, ON 8TH STREET AT MAIN STREET I1150 13900 12400 1200 16200 14400 E3 32 BUT 9.4 ICHICO, ON 8TH STREET AT PINE STREET 1200 16200 14400 1450 18400 16100 nnn n CHICO, ON 8TH STREET AT CYPRESS nnnnnn hq://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/saferesr/trafdata/2001 all/docs/rtO22-33.htm 2/6/2003 y Page 2 of 2 " LTJ13211BUTJ L9.46(STREET 11450 18400 16100 1400 14700 14000 32 BUT 10.19 CHICO, ON 8TH STREET AT JCT. RTE. 99 IF1400 14700 14000 950 9800 9500 32 BUT 10.28 CHICO, ON 8TH STREET AT FIR STREET950 9800 9500660 8200 7800 CHICO, END WESTBOUND COUPLET APPROXIMATELY HALF MILE EAST OF FIR 3 32 BUT 10.74 STREET 660 8200 7800 32 BUT [JC0UPLET . . END . . . . BEGINTWOWAY U32BUT10.74OFIFIR STRE OXIMATELY HALF MILE EAST 1450 16500 1154001 q3 32 BUT 11.01 CHICO, FOREST AVENUE I 1450 16500 15400 950 12200 11100 g3 32 BUT 11.27 CHICO,.EL MONTE AVENUE 950 12200 11100 1000 11700 10200 a3 32 BUT 11.7 BRUCE ROAD I 1000 11700 10200 530 5600 4900 a3 32 BUT 15.21 HOG SPRINGS, HUMBOLT ROAD 530 5600 4900 340 3300 2900 a3 32 BUT®23.87 FOREST RANCH, NOPEL AVENUE 330 3000 2450200 2000 1500 Q3 32 BUT®24.12 MILEPOST EQUATION =24.14 0g00� 00E 0 3 32 BUT R 36.93 LOMO, HUMBOLT ROAD 200 2000 1500 220 1750 1150 95-2] BUT 37.75 BUTTE-TEHAMA COUNTY LINE 220 1750 1150 E32 TEH E=qBUTTE-TEHAMA COUNTY LINE http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/saferesr/trafdata/2001 all/docs/rt022-33.htm 2/6/2003 STATE 0fl CIFORNIA—BUSINESS TRANSPOF99KION AND HOUSING AGENCY GRAY DAMS Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 703 B STREET P. O. BOX 911 Flex your powerl MARYSVILLE, CA 95901-0911 PHONE (530) 741-4025 Be energy e(f?ciend ientl FAX (530) 741-5346 TTY (530) 741-4509 RECEIVED . 30 January 27, 2003 DEVELOPNmNT SERVICES 03BUT0001 03-BUT-32 PM 22.25 Fourteen Mile House Rezone 03-10 Application " Craig Sanders Butte County Department of Development Services, Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 , Dear Mr. Sanders, Thank you for the opportunity to review the Fourteen Mile House Rezone 03-10 Application. We have the following comments: • This project, by itself, would not have significant traffic impacts to State Route (SR) 32. o The topography in the immediate area of the project site slopes primarily to the. southwest toward SR 32 and then back to the southeast in a shallow Swale. Surface water (storm water) runoff from this site would naturally run parallel to the highway and then down into the Little Chico Creek Canyon and on to Little Chico Creek. Any regrading of the site that would alter this natural flow pattern must be mitigated to ensure that there would be no adverse drainage impacts to the State's highway right-of-way or to Caltrans' highway drainage facilities. Any cumulative impacts -to Caltrans drainage facilities, bridges, or other State facilities arising from effects of development on surface water runoff discharge from the peak (100-year) storm event, should be minimized through project drainage mitigation measures. • Increases in peak runoff discharge for the 100-year return storm event to the State's highway right of way and to Caltrans' highway drainage facilities "Caltrans improves mobility across California" TT t T i r r 3 w y E'g 9 loin ' � wwNvoR.w.Y+.nnv+•u.•na�Isnw+��w�� s Craig Sanders January 27, 2003 Page 2 must be reduced to, or below, preconstruction levels. All runoff from the project area that will enter the State's highway right. of way and Caltrans' -highway drainage facilities must meet all Central Valley.Regional Water., Quality Control Board•water quality standards. The cumulative effects on drainage due to development within the region should be considered. • Although this portion of State Route (SR) 32 has not been officially designated as a State Scenic ,Highway, and is not listed on the current eligibility list, improvements associated with this project may impact the State right of way (ROW). While rezoning will not affect the visual or physical integrity of the corridor, the development of homesites will. During review of further entitlements and design review for structures, Caltrans may comment regarding concerns -with screening and visibility of structures, architectural styles, height and setbacks of buildings and other structures affecting the visual integrity of the corridor. Please provide our office with any O pKrHactionser garding this project including the design review. If you—have—any'questions regarding these comments, please contact Ronald Hall, Local Devee pmIent Review Coordinator, at (916) 274-0617. Sincerely, �7't')t rs!+a 1/,IIPM t fr�i'y------ BRUCE DE TERRA, Chief Office of Regional and Transit Planning . "Caltrans improves mobility across Califomia" y r r ^ t S3UL1213S.L.�3I�dU'I3A3Q AIM10U 3.LLIIS OE r i L r t ` n N DEPARTMENT OFOEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION environmental Heald, o�UTr�o p 0 0 7 County Center Drive JAN 0 8 2003 0 o Oroville,CA 95965-3397 - ' = oo Telephone: (530)538-7601 Chico, Califomia cOUN�� FAX: (530) 538-7785 TO: Environmental Health FROM: Craig Sanders, Butte County Planning Division JAN 2 3 2003 SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Applic ion APPLICANT: Fourteen Mile House Inc., Rezone - REZ 03-01 DATE: January 7, 2003 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING OIVISICN The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. If a response cannot be submitted prior to Ja_nunry 21, 2003;, please call Craig Sanders at (530) 538-7603. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for May 8, 2003 before the: Planning Commission Development Review Committee F� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezone 43.24 acres from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) PROJECT LOCATION: on the east side-of-Deer-(reek Highway,at Black Oak Terrace about 2 miles south of Forrest Ranch., Identified a5,AP_N#063-360-018 County Supervisor District No: 3 COMMENTS: (Please be specific. Letters or additional comments may be attached): This office clops not objert to fine rezone....Applicant s1 n.1ld be made &are that f6b.Tre..smbdivision proposals W.1 be 9 bje--t to setiage aryl drinking tiater .regArenents set forth in the Canty Subdivision Qrdii are axl. In pmvemt Starr rds. This rmy irx-11.de soil tests a-d prof of potable tinter availability. 44 4 By: Date: 1/72 EnvironmeHealth JAN 0 7 2003 7 County ContOr,Orsve Oroville,Ca ✓ r DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT-SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION o��TTFo 0 0' 7 County Center Drive c __ _� G Oroville,CA 95965-3397 0==v_a+- - o Telephone: (530)538-7601 c�UN'�y FAX: (530) 538-7785 TO: Public Works FROM: Craig Sanders, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Fourteen Mile House, Inc., Rezone - REZ 03-01 DATE: January 7, 2003 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. If a response cannot be submitted prior to January 21, 2003, please call Craig Sanders at (530) 538-7603. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for May 8, 2003 before the: Fx I Planning Commission Development Review Committee PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezone 43.24 acres from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) PROJECT LOCATION: on the east side of Deer Creek Highway,at Black Oak Terrace about 2 miles south of Forrest Ranch., Identified as APN#063-360-018 County Supervisor District No:"3 COMMENTS: (Please be specific. Letters or additional comments may be attached): �t/dy✓l✓� By: Date: Z d 3 RECEIVED JAN 2 2 W_ RECEIVED BUTTE COUNTY JAN 0 7 20031 DL•N'I:t,OPNIEir f SERVICES COUNTY OF BUTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT DIV. Lid ct)f"yu N t 1 i s Nod DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOP E �a2003 PLANNING DIVISION E (.f ��� W E � �o� o�vTrF°° D -----1 C7UA , 7 County Center Drive 4 ° �_� ° Oroville,CA 95965-3397 JAN 2003 �� ° Telephone: (530)538-7601 coUN'�y FAX: (530)538-7785 BUTTE COVVY TO: Agricultural Commissioner FROM: Craig Sanders, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Fourteen Mile House, Inc., Rezone - REZ 03-01 DATE: January 7, 2003 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area,of expertise and jurisdiction. t If a response cannot be submitted prior to January 21, 2003, please call Craig Sanders at (530) 538-7603. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for May 8, 2003 before the: Fx� Planning Commission Development Review Committee PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezone 43.24 acres from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 • (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) PROJECT LOCATION: on the east side of Deer Creek Highway,at Black Oak Terrace about 2 miles south of Forrest Ranch., Identified as APN#063-360-018 County Supervisor District No: 3 COMMENTS: (Please a specific. Letters or additional comments may be attached): to By: 1—UDate: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES o�%03T PLANNING DIVISION 0 0 7 County Center Drive 0 o o Oroville,CA 95965-3397 "-' ' Telephone: (530)538-7601 cOUN'�y FAX: (530)538-7785 D TO: Sheriff FROM: Craig Sanders, Butte County Planning Division aN 13 SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Applicatio APPLICANT: Fourteen Mile House, Inc., Rezone - REZ 03-01 DATE: Januar 7, 2003 BUTTE Y DEVELOPMENN T SE IMCFS9 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. If a response cannot be submitted prior to January 21, 2003, please call Craig Sanders at (530) 538-7603. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for May 8, 2003 before the: FlPlanning Commission F-1 Development Review Committee PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezone 43.24 acres from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) PROJECT LOCATION: on the east side of Deer Creek Highway,at Black Oak Terrace about 2 miles south of Forrest Ranch., Identified as APN#063-360-018 County Supervisor District No: 3 COMMENTS: (Please be specific., Letters or additional comments may be attached): The proiPrt will ranti nna to i arreag,e •the pnntil ati on of this rural arca- The Sheriff's Office will continue to serve the area at current service levels. No significant mitigation is requested by the Sheriff's Office. By: C:. 3 ,c_.c/� Date: 1 0` 3 Captain C.R. Waugh Butte County Sheriff's Office Operations Division a r;o.ix . VyMBwwM�Y+l�aww.M..w•w,rinr,.wc"*..q..a.A . r i The project will continue to increase the population of this rural area. The Sheriffs Office will continue to serve the area at current service levels. No significant mitigation is requested by the Sheriffs Office. I DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION LAFCo _ °�UTTF0 7 County Center Drive ° _.._ ° Oroville,CA 95965-3397 JAN 0 9 2003 ° -' ° Telephone: (530) 538-7601 �+ y FAX: (530) 538-7785 Orovill8, California TO: LAFCo RECEIVE FROM: Craig Sanders, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Appl icc tion JAN 1 3 APPLICANT: Fourteen Mile House, Inc., Rezone - REZ 03-01 DATE: January 7, 2003 BUTTE COUNTY The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. Ls provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. If a response cannot be submitted prior to January 21, 2003, please call Craig Sanders at (530) 538-7603. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for May 8, 2003 before the: [x-1 Planning Commission Development Review Committee PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezone 43.24 acres from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) PROJECT LOCATION: on the east side of Deer Creek Highway,at Black Oak Terrace about 2 miles south of Forrest Ranch., Identified as APN#063-360-018 County Supervisor District No: 3 067,O 1 g COMMENTS: (Please be specific. Letters or addi//tional comments may be attached): • I• �,.� �o. �OfFttf�e (ow�tol HDn�tA77oN �AT?J S0�1c f[�✓.G[J Y'O 6c /�+rl� �ai 2. C-U.S. D. �Cs4 16T -- CSd 163 is 74 0'.frrc �do��/lL�/ o,.-,e .' �. Qu� lolleu� C(A' 16Z 6k-b-1W- 1hpA4.,4f) natr 4. Csq 1c1 By: bate: os 6 c0r;41A DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPC o�A3TTFo PLANNING DIVISION RIVEIJ 0 0 7 County Center Drive o o Qroville,CA 95965-3397 on=y='e►= o Telephone: (530)538-7601 �+ y FAX: (530) 538-7785 DUN'S SUTm COUNTly SERVICES TO: CDF FROM: Craig Sanders, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Fourteen Mile House, Inc., Rezone - REZ 03-01 DATE: January 7, 2003 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to.your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. If a response cannot be submitted prior to January 21, 2003, please call Craig Sanders at (530) 538-7603. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for May 8, 2003 before the: Planning Commission F-1 Development Review Committee PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezone 43.24 acres from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) PROJECT LOCATION: on the east side of Deer Creek Highway,at Black Oak Terrace about 2 miles south of Forrest Ranch., Identified as APN#063-360-018 County Supervisor District No: 3 I COMMENTS: (Please be specific. Letters or additional comments may be attached): ILZ By: Date: / +y t I • ♦ 4� ' s»,..«.LiiR3£I`C?SI�tlii"1 JMLLM�:i3f!'JJh NEC-PE "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET FILE NO: R Cz' O 3- O( Ap# Y93-170 0 APPLICANT: FowA ze-n 11,41e kvg, �.�c.y f0 &K t Zoe 64,ego UO t'TSa Z OWNER: �'�4 y►�u' REPRESENTATIVE: ��✓� T2. PROPOSED REQUEST: (to be filled out by person taking in application) FINAL REQUEST: (to be filled out by project planner) SIZE: LOCATION: 7 c(e vl &-,94 cep c� c✓ .4 m PA.?'4L ,Q �0!/lr-sT A4Nct SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT# 3 EXISTING ZONING: PUD GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: A/Z ASSIGNED PLANNER: ��� PLANNERS INITIALS _ Date Applimfion Received 30 JG ©a- Date Project Assigned 30 Day Complete 10 J-+N 0'i Preset Hearing Date kYL4!7 Mo , fi COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST APPLICATION: DATE: County Offices and Cities: Chief Administrative Officer -Develop.Services Director X Public Works Director Environmental Health X Assesor _Building Manager Sheriff _BCAG _ALUC LAFCo _Air Quality Mgmt. _Butte Co.Farm Bureau Biggs _Gridley _Chico _Oroville _Paradise _Chico Airport Commission Information Systems Dept. _Animal Control _2L Agricultural Commission Irrigation District: Butte Water —Biggs/W.Gridley Water _Durham Irrigation OWID _Paradise Irrigation —Richvale Irrigation —Table Mountain Irrigation _Thermalito Irrigation _Other Domestic Water Butte Water District _California Water Service Co. _Del Oro Water Co. _OWID _Therrnalito IrrigationDistrict Other Sewer —Butte Water District _Themalito Irrigation _Sterling City Sewer Main Skansen Subdivision(CSA 21) _L.O.A.PUD Fire Protection X California Department of Forestry _EI Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts Chico Area Recreation _Durham Area Recreation _Feather River Rec.&Park _Paradise Recreation&Park _Richvale Recreation &Parks Utilities PG&E North-Chico _Chambers Cable TV _Pacific Bell _PG&E South-Oroville _Viacom Cable TV State Agencies ` CalTrans(Traffic) _Dept.of Water Resources Dept.of Fish and Game _Forestry(Attn:Craig Carter) _Dept of Parks and Rec. _Highway Patrol Central Reg.Water Quality Cont. _Caltrans,Aeronautics Program. _Off.of Governmental&Env.Relations Department of Conservation _Off.of Mining Reclamation —Dept.Social Services,Comm.,Care Licensing Federal Agencies US Forest Service _US Bureau of Land Management US Fish&Wildlife Service _Army Corps of Engineers _National Marine Fisheries Sservice Other Districts,Agencies,Committees,etc. _Lime Saddle Dist _Community Association School Districts _Drainage _Butte Env, Council _Reclamation _Cal Native Plant Society _Butte Co.Mining Committee _Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. _Butte Ck.Watershed Conservancy _Mosq.Abatement.Oroville/Butte Co K:\PLANNING\FORMS\DISTR.LIS RAR 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO,CALIFORNIA 95973-5811 • TELEPHONE 530-895-1422 FAX 530-895-1409 ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS CIVIL ENGINEERS April 29, 2002 Mr. M.A. Meleka Butte County Department of Development Services _ Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 SUBJECT: FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 3 Dear Mr. Meleka: Condition 11 of the Conditions of Approval requires that "A CSA shall also be formed to act as an umbrella entity". Fourteen Mile House Unit 3 was included in CSA 162 which was formed for • Fourteen Mile House Unit 2. Attached is a copy of the CSA 162 plat and legal description for your review. Based on this information, no further action on Condition 11 should be required. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely,, ROLLS, ANDERSON & ROLLS Michael S. Byrd cc: Stuart Edell Ray Johnson d WE DEC 3 0 2002 ---BUTTE COUNT`,' PLANNING DIVISION \1Surtuu nne-a%PROJECTS101012Weleka42902.wpd i r _ f +COUNTY RECORDER SERIAL NO. r 0 500 1000 I LAFCO CHAIRMAN EXECUTIVE OFFICER POINT OF BEGINNING I� CONDUCTING AUTHORITY 'V S 88024'38E 1817.21' 1287. NT5001 40 E 2 1 I ' I • / 3 i8 M 4 z 4 /� 2 M 5Co N Q COMMON AREA 6 7 �\ P 3 °00 0 8 N 116 y�9 v ,5 C' 1220.96' �i0 N 88024'38"W 1 14Z Co 11 I i 13 Co v 1 12 Co o h� 0 17 j 32 \ E C E I! W" E Z PQ 18 1131 [RL �. + 19 1130 LOT 8 D E 3 0 2002 0 1;29 COMMON AREA 128 -' 81 71•E CGIJNi`1'" a�I 27 PLA INING DIVISION 2 1 — 23 1261.96 0� S 84013' 14" 24 W 25 Q P LEGEND NOTE r COMMON AREA 0 STREET LIGHT LOCATION Co o WELL LOCATION THIS COUNTY SERVICE AREA IS FOR THE IT 2O ——— WATER MAIN PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING STREET LIGHTS, – FIRE PROTECTION AND DOMESTIC WATER C 3 14 MILE til FIRE HYDRANT FACILITIES AND SEWER FACILITIES ONLY w IF THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AND is4 B � :�` —•— SEWER MAIN MUTUAL WATER COMPANY DOES NOT MAINTAIN Cv HOUSE OR. THESE FACILITIES. 0 ® LEACHFIELD AREA 0 0 0 ---------- z LINE DATA T - 5 4F� Ol S 32'22'25' E 617.32' / ............... ...r- 2 S 44'33'00' W 658.06' 1 ; U3 N 78'32'31' E 23.16' /) a 1 .® S 19'32'50' E 23.16' Ia � 10 5 S 20'02'44' W 245.43' , SITE I � ' CURVE DATA I 24 1 Ia AO R- 880.00' D - 78'24'00' L - 1204.14' © LOCATION MAP R- 1120.00' D- 02'29158' L - 48.85' © R - 1140.00' D- 01'00'19' L - 20.00' 1.QO R - 1120.00' D- 23'58'37' L - 468.69' COUNTY SERVICE AREA # 162 V I FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE A•P•NO• GROSS AREA NET AREA 0 A.P. 56-40-07, A.P. 63-10-01. gp1931 63-01-0I 57.36 Acres 50.81 Acres & A.P: 63-10-147 11 63-01-147 43.70 Acres 43.70 Acres ��molls,RnGsrson Is molls CIVIL ENGINEERS 56.04-07 75.92 Acres 75.92 Acres _ 99991R ST9IET.CHICO.CAUEORNIA 95979-TEEE9HONE 919 ISS-1422 170.43 Acres JUNE, 1994 92098 w / COUNTY SERVICE ARE 62 FOURTEEN MILE HO E AP 56-04-07, AP 63-01-01 & AP 63-01-147 JUNE 1994 All that certain real property situate in the County of Butte, State of California, described as follows: A portion of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 2 East, M.D.B. & M., and a portion of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 3 East, M.D.B.& M., more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said Section 18; THENCE South 88°24'38" East along the north line of said Section 18, a distance of 1817.21 feet; THENCE leaving said north line of Section 18, South 00°02'28" West, a distance of 1375.37 feet; THENCE North 88°24'38" West, a distance of 1220.96 feet, to a point on the westerly right-of-way line of State Highway 32; THENCE along said westerly right-of-way line, South 32°22'25"East, a distance of 617.32 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a tangent bearing of South 33°51'00" East; THENCE continuing along said westerly right-of-way line; along said curve having a radius of 880.00 feet, through a central angle of 78°24'00", an arc length of 1204.14 feet, having a tangent bearing of South 44°33'00" West; THENCE continuing along said westerly right-of-way line, South 44°33'00" West, a distance of 658.06 feet, to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left; THENCE continuing along said westerly right-of-way line, along said tangent curve having a radius of 1120.00 feet, through a central angle of 02°29'58", an arc length of 48.85 feet, having a tangent bearing of South 42°03'02" West; THENCE continuing along said westerly right-of-way line, North 78°32'31" East, a distance of 23.16 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a tangent bearing South 41°27'30" West; `�- THENCE continuing along said westerly right-of-way line, along said curve to the _ —deft, having a radius of 1140.00 feet, through a central angle of 01°00'19", an arc {� � (� length of 20.00 feet, having a tangent bearing of South 40°27'12" West; ►4' - E5 L� 3� Li THENCE continuing along said westerly right-of-way line, South 19°32'50" East,.a j1distance of 23.16 feet, to the beginning of a curve to the left having a tangent EC 3 0 2002 `bearing of South 39°51'39" West; D �1 1 THENCE continuing along said westerly right-of-way line, along said curve to the -- lseft, having a radius of 1120.00 feet through a central angle of 23°58131", an arc . BUTTE COUNTI'� length of 468.69 feet, having a tangent bearing of South 15°53'02" West; PLANNING DIVISION _,_j ` THENCE continuing along said westerly right-of-way line, South 20°02'44" West, a distance of 245.43 feet, to a point on the westerly line of said Section 18; - r THENCE leaving said right-of-way line along said section line, North 00°02'28" East, a distance of 1448.78 feet; THENCE leaving said Section line, South 84°13'14" West, a distance of 1261.96 feet; THENCE North 00°18'48" East, a distance of 2545.28 feet, to a point on the north section line of said Section 13; THENCE along said north section line of said Section 13, North 75°01'40" East, a distance of 1287.31 feet to the Point of Beginning; The above described parcel contains 176.97 acres, more or less. QVVESS/oNq L S. C z Uj No. 28998 m a i ail S. Byrd (P R.C.E. 28998 fq� CMI Registration Expires 03/31/95 F 0 CAI1F�� OOTICE OF DETERMINATION 0 TO: _ Office of Plan.& Research Dept. 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 X Butte County Clerk FROM: Butte County Planning CANDAA 1 1 CO.CLERK DEPUT 7 County Center Dr., Oroville 95965 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Ct,� _ Project Title: TSM 02-03, Tentative Subdivision Map D E �E E i AP Number: 063-360-018 Q DEC 3 2002 �! Applicant: Fourteen Mile House, Inc. ATTN: Ray Johnson, F.O. Box 1700, Chico, CA 95927-1700 - BUTTE COUNT`' PLANNING DIVISION State Clearinghouse Number(If submitted to clearinghouse): Contact Person: Stephen Betts Telephone Number: 538-7601 Project Location: on the east side of Highway 32, across from Woodland Park Drive, south of Forest Ranch. Project Description: Tentative Subdivision Map to divide a 43.2-acre parcel into four parcels: 5.41 acres, 7.24 acres, 12.79 acres, and 17.79 acres. Access to the site will be from Highway 32. This is to advise that the Butte County Development Review Committee has approved the above- described project on January 24, 2002, and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will, X will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. ' 3. Mitigation measures X were, were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, X was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is .available to the general public at: Date received for filing and posting at OPR Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Ce ter Drive Oroville, 5965 M.A. Melek Principal PI nner 1y��A : ty LAND OF NATURAL WEAITI1 AND BEA LI TY 2120 02 - . . DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL.HEALTH 918-B County Center Drive E]411 Main Street F�7 County Center Drive oville,CA 95905 P.O, Box 5364 Qro%hlle,CA 95965 TEL;(530)538-7282 Chico,CA 95927 TEL(5W)638-7281 Sacramento District Office FAX;(530)538-2165 TEL(530)891-2727 FAX;(530)538-7785 Department of Real Estate FAX:(&30)895-6-512 P.O. Box 187005 Sacramento, CA 95818-7005 RE: Fourteen Mile House Unit 3 Gentlemen: This office has reviewed the above subdivision based on the map recorded December 13, 2002 in Book 155 on pages 88-90. The subdivision is located on Hwy 32, Lower Forest Ranch, CA and contains four lots ranging in size from 5.41 acres to 17.78 acres in area. It is our understanding that domestic water for all lots in the subdivision is to be supplied from individual wells. Individual wells drilled on each lot can, be expected to supply adequate quantities of potable water for a single family residence. If prospective purchasers wish to drill their own well, they should be made aware that water wells may have to be drilled deeper than seven hundred feet (700') in order to provide adequate amounts of potable water, Sewage disposal by individual septic tank systems is proposed for each and every lot. Under present regulations, this Department will issue a sewage disposal permit an each lot. The subdivision is satisfactory to this office. Prospective purchasers should be advised that permits are required for both wells and . septic tanks systems prior to any construction. The Environmental Health Division may specify well and sewage disposal sites on each lot. Sincerely, E E E Vance Severin, Director DEC 3 0 2002 Division of Environmental Health. VS/m19Land/reletter/fourteen mile house unit 3 BUTTE COW i)' PLANNING DIVISION 12-20-02 01 : 25PM POP Fourteen We House, Inc. P. O. Box 1700 Chico, CA 95927 • (916) 693-1700 Date: 19 September 2002 To: Department of Environmental Health County of Butte From: Ray E. Johnson, Jr. Re: Fourteen We House, Unit 3 - "Humboldt Park"-AP #063-360-018 Please be advised that we have found no evidence or indication of any septic tank on the above-mentioned parcel in the area where the old Willis house was located, or in any other area on this property. Therefore, we request that your Department grant clearance to have the final map recorded as soon as the abandonment of the old hand-dug well has been approved. Thank you. Yours truly, ID � I D EC 30 2002 BUTTE COUN i 1` PLANNING DIVISION -- -� 411 MAIN STREET P O BOX 5364 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Cx1CO,CA 95927-5364 DIVISION OF .ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (530)891-272769+fa 7 County Center Drive FAX(530)895-6512 iferR+ 8 Oroville,California 95965 ( (916)538-7281 WELL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE n Public Water Supply Individual Well destruction Owner l-' /rJQ OA/ Assessor's Parcel No. �/( �� .�' 3((� Location r, V City Driller's Report Approved: F] (New Wells) Report No. ' Driller's Log Received: ®'Destruction Report Approved Disinfection Report Received Satisfactory Final Inspection Date of Final Approval (when required) 17 E. H.S. Present for Sealing nes FJNo Comments The well as installed meets the minimum requirements of the Butte County Co , Chapter 23B Environmental Health Specialist Date DP,) DEC 3 0 2002 .,.BUTTE COUN1)' PLANNING DIVISION .,t•-. .. of the proposed access road for standard road improvements, and requires that construction of the access road be in accordance with County-specified road standards. The Department requires street name review, traffic signs, and other standard requirements as indicated on the standard conditions form in the project file. The Department also requires a drainage plan. The residential development that would be developed should the subdivision be approved would have direct access from State Route 32. The project would increase vehicle traffic with a net increase of three additional residential lots, which has the potential to generate approximately 30 vehicle trips per day. The increase in vehicle traffic generated by the project would be minor and would not cause any significant impacts to vehicle circulation in the area. Caltrans will review the project and attach further conditions for its approval, including the potential for installation of a left turn bay. The Butte County Air Quality management District (BCAQMD) recommends incorporating measures to control fugitive dust emission for all construction activities during project development. Dust control measures have been incorporated into project conditions. No significant agricultural issues or impacts were identified by the Agriculture Commissioner for the proposed project. Conditions to safeguard the subsequent residential development from fire are required. These conditions are specified in the standard conditions form in the project file. Compliance is to be coordinated with the Butte County Fire Department. Mitigation measures are incorporated that ' require fire-resistant building materials. CEQA ISSUES: The project was reviewed for environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with State Law. The following discussion summarizes those issues and impacts identified in the Initial Study. These issues resulted from the preparation of an initial study. Air Qualityz The project may create fugitive dust emission during site development activities, such as grading, excavation for foundations and utilities, and other soil work. The Butte County Air Quality Management District (BCAQMD) recommends incorporating measures to control fugitive dust •emission for all road and other construction activities during project development, using such methods as site and driveway watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. A mitigation measure, in the form of a note on the Final Map,will require that dust control measures be conducted during site development activities. Cultural Resources Prehistoric resources were found nearby in the course of environmental review of the previous phases of the 14-Mile House subdivision and residential development. A mitigation measure will 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Agenda Report 0 Page 3 0 f i i require that all construction activities cease should any evidence of cultural resources be uncovered during project excavation, site preparation, or construction. Hydrology/Water Quality The proposed project would include individual septic systems for sewage service and individual wells for water service. The County Environmental Health Department will review the proposal and require appropriate testing to ensure that the project site has adequate soils for the proposed four- parcel split. In order to ensure that there are no impacts to surface water or ground water in the area as a result of the project, a mitigation measure, in the form of a condition on the map, will require that location and separation of septic and water well facilities be located in accordance with Butte County Improvement Standards. The project is a third unit of a larger residential development project, the first two units of which have been constructed and are occupied. When the first two units were under review, groundwater levels were assessed and determined to be adequate for the 32 residential units across State Route 32 and 25 residential units adjacent to the project on the south. The additional three parcels eligible for residential development under this project would not generate water demand that would significantly impact the groundwater supplies. The septic systems for those developments were approved by the County Environmental Health Department based on soils on those sites. Public Services The proposal would result in an incremental increase in demand for police protection services. The cumulative impacts of increased residential development in the County impacts the ability of the Sheriffs Department to adequately provide police services to outlying areas. In order to ensure that this impact is reduced to a less-than-significant level, a mitigation measures, in the form of a condition on the map, will require payment of Sheriffs facilities fees prior to issuance of building permits for any dwelling units placed on the project site. ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Committee take the following actions: I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study identified significant environmental effects and included mitigation measures that would mitigate such effects below significant levels; and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. B. The Development Review Committee has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration together with comments received during the review process. C. On the basis of the whole record before the Development Review Committee, including the Initial Study and any comments received, there is no substantial 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Agenda Report 0 Page 4 0 tj DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT BUTTE COUNTY INITIAL STUDY AND PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TSM 02-03 (Ray Johnson - 14 Mile House, Unit 3) ECEHE D i DEC 3 0 2002 ��-BUTTE COUNTY �. PLANNIPIG DIVISION i Project Name: 14-Mile House Unit 3,Tentative Subdivision Map,File#TPM 02-03 4.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (SECTION 15065: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal X community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection X with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects)? c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human X beings,either directly or indirectly? The project does not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment beyond the impacts discussed in the previous sections of this Initial Study. The project has the potential to contribute impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable with respect to Initial Study Checklist.Items 4.1 -Aesthetics,4.3 -Air Quality,4.4-Biological Resources,4.5—Cultural Resources, 4.7 —,Hazards/Hazardous Material, 4.8 — Hydrology/Water Quality, 4.13 - Police Protection Services, 4.15 —Transportation/Traffic, and 4.16 — Utilities/Service Systems. Cumulative impacts to these areas would be mitigated due to the inclusion of mitigation measures specified throughout this document and summarized in the next section. 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: Mitigation Measure PUD-11: Street lighting and exterior security lighting shall use low pressure sodium vapor lamps or other similar lighting that is recognized to reduce light pollution and shall be installed in a manner to reduce undue glare. Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown or noted on Final Map and building plans. ' Timing: The improvement plans shall demonstrate compliance with the above mitigation measure. Monitoring: The Public Works Department shall review plans and determine compliance, then inspect during construction to ensure compliance. Mitigation Measure#1: Architectural design controls,such as color,texture,and form,that blend with the natural background shall be contained in the development CC&Rs. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services■Planning Division■ Page 24■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Unit 3,Tentative Subdivision Map,File#TPM 02-03 Plan Requirements: The building plans shall demonstrate compliance with the above mitigation measure. Timing:-Requirements of the condition shall be adhered to during grading and construction periods. Monitoring: The Planning Division shall review building plans and determine compliance. Building inspectors shall spot check and ensure compliance on-site. Mitigation Measure#2: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems are to be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum,this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation." Plan Requirements: The note shall be placed on the Final Map. All requirements shall be shown on building plans. Timing: Requirements of the condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction periods. Monitoring: The Planning Division and the Public Works Department shall ensure that the note is placed on the Final Map. Building inspectors shall spot check and shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Pollution Control District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. Mitigation Measure PUD-10: Place a note on the additional map sheet that states: "Wood stove and fireplace inserts installed in any home within this subdivision shall be EPA approved and designed to meet emissions standards of the California Clean Air Act of 1988 as amended." Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown or noted on Final Map and building plans. Timing: Prior to issuance of building permits, compliance with above mitigation is required to authorize fireplace or wood stove inserts. Monitoring: The Building Division shall review EPA approval for applicable building permit applications and shall inspect improvements to ensure construction in compliance with approved permit(s). Mitigation Measure PUD-1: , The following mitigation measure for oak trees shall be incorporated into the project and shall be included as CC&Rs: , A. Individual trees or groups of trees that are retained as a function of project design should be fully protected to the extent possible both during and after construction. In order to protect the root zone during construction a root protection zone (RPZ) should be established using stakes and flagging material. The RPZ should be an area that is 1.5 times the distance from the trunk to the dripline. Within this protective buffer, no grading, . 6 trenching,fill,or vegetation alteration of any kind should be allowed. B. Individual trees that are unavoidably lost due to project implementation should be replaced by planting oak seeds (acorns) or seedlings that are obtained from the local genetic stock of the same species. A replacement ■ Butte County Department of Development Services■Planning Division■ Page 25 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Unit 3,Tentative Subdivision Map,File#TPM 02-03 rate of 5:1 and container size of no less than 15 gallons shall be used for trees that are two inches or greater in diameter measured at breast height (dbh). A replacement rate of 1:1 and container size of no less than five gallons shall be used for all trees less than two inches dbh. Every effort should be made to retain large oaks. Oak plantings shall be maintained for a period of five years. C. A five-year maintenance and monitoring. plan shall be completed for all oak mitigation plantings. The monitoring plan should include appropriate irrigation schedules, as well as criteria for success and reestablishment during the five-year period. Any trees planted as remedial action for failure of initial planting shall be monitored for five years in a similar fashion to the initial planting.The goal is to achieve an 80-percent success rate at the end of the five-year monitoring period.Homeowners shall be responsible for re-planting and maintaining oaks removed from their lots to accommodate improvements. D. Following project construction, a fact sheet describing the value and care of native oaks shall be distributed to all residents. At a minimum, this fact sheet should encourage homeowners to avoid unnecessary pruning, educate them on the water needs of oak tees, and encourage, except where it would be a safety hazard, the retention of snags and downed trees.This fact sheet shall also be referenced in the CC&Rs. Plan Requirements: The above mitigation shall be incorporated into CC&Rs for the affected property. Timing: Requirements shall be adhered to during all grading,construction, and ongoing as required by the CC&Rs. Monitoring: The Planning Division shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with applicable County codes and permit requirements. Mitigation Measure PUD-2: Place a note on the Final Map stating that Deer Mitigation fees are to be paid at the time of obtaining building permits if such fees have been adopted by the Butte County Board of Supervisors. Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown or noted on Final Map. Timing: Required fees shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. Monitoring: The Building Division shall require payment,if applicable. Mitigation Measure#3: Should grading activities reveal the presence of cultural resources(i.e.,artifact concentrations,including arrowheads and other stone tools or chipping debris, cans, glass, etc.; structural remains; human skeletal remains), work within 50 feet of the find shall cease immediately until a qualified professional archaeologist can be consulted to evaluate the remains and implement appropriate mitigation procedures. Should human skeletal remains be encountered,State law requires immediate notification of the County Coroner. Should the County Coroner determine that such remains are in an archaeological context, the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento shall be notified immediately, pursuant to State law, to arrange for Native American participation in determining the disposition of such remains. Timing: This measure shall be implemented during site preparation and construction. Monitoring: Should cultural resources be discovered, the Planning Division shall coordinate with the developer and appropriate authorities to avoid damage to cultural resources and determine appropriate action. Mideation Measure#4: The developer shall provide for percolation and other tests deemed necessary by the Department of Environmental Health for the septic system proposed on-site. All feasible measures recommended by the Department of Environmental Health to reduce potential impacts associated with the septic system shall be implemented. 4 Timing: The Final Map shall demonstrate the location of septic system components as recommended by the Department of Environmental Health. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services■Planning Division■ Page 26 a Project Name: 14-Mile House Unit 3,Tentative Subdivision Map,File#TPM 02-03 Monitoring: Building inspectors shall spot check and shall ensure compliance'on-site. Mitigation Measure PUD-9: Limit earthwork to the period between April 1 and November 15. All areas where the soil has been disturbed, or where the vegetation has been removed, shall be protected from erosion using standard erosion control methods accepted by civil engineers. Vegetation in the fuel reduction area shall not be removed to the.extent that erosion occurs.It is recommended that the vegetation removed for fire protection be chipped or mulched and then applied to the cleared areas for erosion control. Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown or noted on Final Map and building plans. Timing: Requirements of the conditions shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction periods. Monitoring: The Planning Division and the Department of Environmental Health shall ensure that the note is place don the Final Map. Building inspectors shall spot check and shall ensure compliance on-site. Mitigation Measure PUD-12: Home constructed on these lots shall be designed to minimize grading and to utilize the existing grade to the extent feasible through the use of multi level structures. Plan Requirements: The building plans shall demonstrate compliance with the above mitigation measure. Timing: Requirements of the condition shall be adhered to during grading and construction periods. -Monitoring: The Planning Division shall review building plans and determine compliance. Building inspectors shall spot check and ensure compliance on-site. Mitigation Measure PUD-5:' Homes shall be constructed with exterior materials that are fire resistant. Roofs shall be class A Siding shall be stucco,masonry,or a treated wood siding that is treated to be fire resistant.All decks that over hang the canyon shall be enclosed from below with fire resistant construction. Plan Requirements: The building plans shall demonstrate compliance with the above mitigation measure. Timing: Requirements of the condition shall be adhered to during grading and construction periods. Monitoring: The Planning Division shall review building plans and determine compliance. Building inspectors shall spot check and ensure compliance on-site. Mitigation Measure#5: Place the following conditions on the map: - Identify the usable sewage disposal area proved to meet the requirements of the County Improvement Standards Appendix VII. - Place a note on the map that states that no water well may be placed within 100 feet of the Usable Sewage Disposal Area. - Identify on the additional map sheet a 100-foot leachfield free setback from each existing well. - Place a note on the map that states water well may have to be drilled deeper than 700 feet in order to obtain adequate supplies of potable water. Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown or noted on Final Map and building plans. Timing: The Final Map shall include required information and requirements of the condition shall be adhered to during grading and construction periods. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services a Planning Division■ Page 27 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Unit 3,Tentative Subdivision Map,File#TPM 02-03 Monitoring: The Planning Division and the Public Works Department shall ensure that the note is placed on the Final Map. Building inspectors shall spot check and shall ensure compliance on-site. Mitigation Measure PUD-4: Include a provision in the CC&R's that limits the amount of irrigated landscaped area to 4,000 square feet per parcel. Hardscape such as swimming pools,decks,and patios shall not be counted as landscaped area. Plan Requirements: The above mitigation shall be incorporated into CC&Rs for the affected property. ,Timing: This measure shall be implemented in conjunction with,or subsequent to,issuance of building permit. Monitoring: The Planning Division shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with applicable County codes and permit requirements. Mitigation Measure#6• Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "A development impact fee for Sheriffs facilities shall be paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article 11 of the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of building permits. The fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permit." Plan Requirements: The required note shall be placed on the Final Map. The Planning Division and the Public Works Department shall ensure that the note is placed on the final map. Tinning: The required Sheriff's impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit Monitoring:The Building Division shall collect the Sheriff's fees prior to issuance of a building permit. Mitigation Measure PUD-13: 'If required by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), install a left turn lane in the downhill direction in conjunction with the recording of 14 Mile House Unit 3. Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown on Final Map.. Timing: If required by Caltrans,implementation of the above mitigation is required in conjunction with recordation of the Final Map. Monitoring: The Planning Division and the Public Works Department shall review the Final Map and determine compliance,if applicable. Mitigation Measure PUD-3: The homeowners association shall be responsible for the maintenance of all common areas,roads, swimming pools, storage buildings, waste water treatment facilities, and street lighting. A CSA shall also be formed to act as an umbrella entity to insure that the homeowners association carries out it's duties for maintaining the roads, streetlights, and sewage disposal system and to take over those duties in the event that they are not being performed adequately. As long as the homeowners association is adequately maintaining the facilities, the CSA may only assess fees to cover the cost of reviewing the maintenance documentation. Timing: Requirement for above mitigation is ongoing,commencing with the fust occupancy permit. -Monitoring: Building inspectors will spot check to ensure compliance. Mitigation Measure PUD-7: Include in the CC&Rs a requirement for the residents to have garbage service. If possible, the residents should contract with a disposal service that also provides a recycling service. If not, an area should be set aside to provide ■ Butte County Department of Development Services■Planning Division■ Page 28 ■ • Project Name: 14-Mile House Unit 3,Tentative Subdivision Map,File#TPM 02-03 for recycling containers for residents.This area shall be fenced'and maintained in a clean manner. Plan Requirements: The above mitigation shall be incorporated into CC&Rs for the affected property. Timing: Service shall be provided commencing with the occupancy of the first home. Monitoring: The Planning Division shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with applicable County codes and permit requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL: 1. Butte County Association of Governments. Regional Travel Demand Model. Information extracted in personal correspondence with Chris Devine of the Butte County Association of Governments staff. December 4,2001. 2. Butte County Board of Supervisors. A1Zricultural Preserves Map,established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville,CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity May. Oroville,CA: James P.Manning, 1983. . 4. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities MV. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County GIS Data. Oroville,CA:November 2001. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1,Seismic Safety Element. Oroville,CA: C112M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Environmental Checklist Form,Evaluation of Environmental Imi)ct. File Number 93-15. Oroville,CA: February 8, 1993. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Map 111-2,Safety Element. Oroville,CA: C112M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3,Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 10. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2,Seismic Safety Element. Oroville,CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 11. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4,Safety Element. Oroville,CA: C112M Hill, 1977. 12. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV-1,Scenic Highway Element. Oroville,CA: C112M Hill, 1977. 13. Butte County Planning Department. Notice of Determination,Rezone 93-15,Ray Johnson.Filed with State Clearinghouse,Office of Planning and Research. July 13, 1993. 14. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1,Scenic Hi hway Element. Oroville,CA: C112M Hill, 1977. r 15. Butte County Planning Department. School District Man. Oroville,CA. 6 16. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1 Safety Element. Oroville, CA CH2M Hill, 1977. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services■Planning Division■ Page 29 ■ Project Name: 14-Mile House Unit.3,Tentative Subdivision Map,File#TPM 02-03 7.0 CONSULTED AGENCIES: [X] Environmental Health [X] Public Works [ ] Building Manager [ ] ' BCAG [ 1. -ALUC [X] LAFCo [X] Assessor [XI Development Services [X] Chico Unified School Distr. [X] Air Qual.Management Dist. [ ] City of Chico [ ] City of Biggs [ ] City of Gridley [ ] City of Oroville [ ] Town of Paradise [X] CA Department of Forestry [X] Caltrans(Traffic) [X] Central Reg.Water Quality [ ] Department of Conservation [X] CA Dept. of Fish and Game [ ] Highway Patrol [ ] Army Corps of Engineers [ ] US Fish&Wldlife Service [ ] Agricultural Commissioner [ ] Butte Co.Farm Bureau [X] Oroville Union School Dist. [ ] Feather River Rec.Dist. [ ] El Medio Fire Dept. [ ] OWED [ ] LOAPUD [X] PG&E [X] Pacific Bell [X] Palermo Union School Dist. 8.0 PROJECT SPONSOR(S) INCORPORATION.OF MITIGATION INTO PROPOSED PROJECT: We have reviewed the Initial Study for the Ray Johnson Tentative Subdivision Map (APN # 025-170-024) application and particularly the mitigation measures identified herein. We hereby modify the application on file with the Butte County Planning Department to include and incorporate all mitigations set forth in this Initial Study. --XzAr Proje �Sor/iprject Date Project Sponsor/Project Agent Date EICI� r, 14 'E i---, DEC 3 0 2002 BUTTE COUN i i' PLANNING DIVISION " ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■Planning Division■ Page 31 ■ - RAR 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO,CALIFORNIA 95973-5811 • TELEPHONE 530-895-1422 • FAX 530-895-1409 ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS CIVIL ENGINEERS i November 18, 2002 Mr. Stuart Edell Land Development Division Department of Public Works County of Butte 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 SUBJECT: FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 3 1. SOIL CONDITIONS Dear Stuart: A total of 11 backhoe test holes were excavated across the area included in Fourteen Mile House Unit 3. Based on these test holes, the surface soils across the site are generally 3 to 4 feet deep and composed of a reddish-brown, sandy clay which will support foundation loads of 1500 pounds per square foot. Any other'soil types encountered should be evaluated by a registered civil engineer or geotechnical engineer. Q�pF ES S/pyo Signed: 0 z w Na 28998 m d Exp.03-31-03 -�D Dat K * CIVIC safe of Ca�do��\� E � LQ X Ell D DEC 3 0 2002 - BUTTE COU^,TY PLANNING DIVISION CADalaTROJECTS1010721EAeIN I1802.wpd DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION o )TlFo ° ° 7 County Center Drive ° Oroville, CA 95965-3397 c ':-'- o Telephone: (530) 538-7601 c0UN'�y FAX: (530) 538-7785 TO: FROM: Craig Sanders, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Fourteen Mile House, Inc., Rezone - REZ 03-01 DATE: January 7, 2003 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your.opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of "this application, and to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. If a response cannot be submitted prior to January 21, 2003, please call Craig Sanders at (530) 538-7603. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for May 8, 2003 before the: Fx I Planning Commission Development Review Committee PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezone 43.24 acres from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to FR-2 (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre parcels) PROJECT LOCATION: on the east side of Deer Creek Highway,at Black Oak Terrace about 2 miles south of Forrest Ranch., Identified as APN#063-360-018 County Supervisor District No: 3 COMMENTS: (Please be specific. Letters or additional comments may be attached): . By: Date: PTN. SEC. . 13 T.23N. R.2E. Mo' D.B. & M. 63 . ' 36 PTN. SEC. 18 T.23N - R.3E. M. D,*B. & M. I FBI ® C o REM. LANDS UNIT 2 PHASE 1 r �4 ? '�Z G_) - F 1204.14 43.24 Ac ti Nil LOT. 8 UNIT 2 PHASE 1 999 COMMON AREA 21.10 Ac 5.98 Ac 999 998 LOT C UNIT 2 PHASE 1 6.59 Ac 26 25 2 7 a7 16 31 28 5 1 3 27 16 15 14 13 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 1.17,Ac LOT 8 UNIT 2 PHASE 2 1.72 Ac s99 499 CODU 14 t0 AREA 2 COMMON.,REA L0 '1999 25 26 COMMON AREA LOT D 10 11 12 19 2050 1 UNIT 2 PH 1 LOT A 3.14 Ac 7 9 21 22 23 24 3. dd 6 8 77 Ac •65 A .6 Ac.61 .6 Ac q 22 r 5 7 .83 Ac 1.59 Ac GI O O 6 .92 Ac 66 FO WTEE I N E NO= lME 2 PN. 2 N �.. .8 AC ,73 Ac 1.15 Ac 1.11 Ac 1.2.1 Ac 95 Ac c r NOTE, These parcels are for assessment purposes Fol RFM WLE HOIUE LUT 2 PEL 1 only and may not constitute legal parcels. LOT C UNIT.2 PHASE 2 56-01 COMMON AREA 39.62 Ac 25.52 Ac LOT E UNIT 2 PHASE 1 P,EVISED: 10-96 Assessor's Map No. 63-36 County of Butte, Calif. FOMMM MaE HMSE WT 2 PW►SE 1 135 uAL 3o/35 9-15-" LUM 119 AJe= 5fi-043 s FOURM WE NMM W 2 PW& 2 136 MAR 56/81 6-15—M L015 17/32 A= "810 1 r�A; I } `� .� t �S i � I� 1 A ,� '1 � � •� � i '' t - ,f� I � _" - n,_` - � ... .. ..- .a.-... ,,. ,.ta•.�'?''""'.y��+-.r:�'t*.^A c.�`.�..... _..-�__.. - �..b� � � � �mow-.-a .. A� V `a U Mcg.''I I - SPUD Knolti,Qr- AR-5 Project Location 198.97 ac .......... TM-20 PUD TM-10 TM-40 PUD /* D EC 3 0 2002 .4r —BU-TITT C,760-q'N TY- -1; PLANN'$NG CILVISION Fou W I e HOU44'Ro, I' U 0 700 0 700 MW 2100 2800 3500 4200 4900 5800 6300 7000 7700 8400 9100 9800 MW Feet BUM COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMTTEE Applicant: Fourteen Mile House Owner: Same Hearing Date: January 24,2002 @ 8:00'&m Existing Zone: PUD(Planned Unit Development) N Supervisorial Request: Tentative Subdivision Map to create dm pa=ls,one 5.41 acre parcel,one 7.24 acre parcel District#3 and one 17.79 acre parcel. I Assessor Parcel No:,063-360-018 Fue:TSM 02-03 --�LTEE 33 \ NOTES: LEGEND �E THERE ARE NO EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THIS SITE. PROPOSED PARCEL LINE 9 NO PORTION OF THIS SITE IS WITHIN THE FEMA IDENTIFIED 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. ---------------------- EXISTING OR PROPOSED EASEMENT SI TE CULVERTS WILL BE INSTALLED DURING ROAD CONSTRUCTION AS NECESSARY. PARCEL 2 PROPOSED PARCEL NUMBER WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANKS AND LEACH UNES i NO ACCESS LINE(ABUTTERS RIGHTS)ON EACH PROPOSED PARCEL RELINOUISHED PER BOOK 1122 4 DOMESTIC WATER TILL SE PROVIDED TO EACH PARCEL BY INDIVIDUAL WELLS. O.R. PACE 38 N PARCEL AREAS E Gill � s — D EXISTING PARCEL: 93.23 AC g� PROPOSED:PAR (} f�,n{//� } d d PARCEL 2 17,79 AC j 43 0 rU`j2 PARCEL 3 12.7 AC PARCEL 4 1279 AC TOTAL 43.23 AC. SCALE 1.-200, LOCATION MAP a rlu TE COLMTY NO SCALE ,I .,i; ;rLAtJFlltl�'a bNi5iC1RI S 88�4'36'E 77.79' � _`" 769.00' I,•I : •:5:::,':. OWNER &SUBDIVIDER FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE. INC. .... ' ':,�:•� ; PO BOX 1700 `CCNTCRUNE. .. I ::sl:•;.�}::.y �• EVSD,Ic PAC .. CHICO CA 95927-1700 AND P91,1 EASEMENT . .?' '(530) 893-1700 9N Ioee.o.N,Pc'>3( PARCEL.1 u a•':' :,A';t`t. 7.24 AC. F��``^,-' ENGINEER ROLLS. ANDERSON &ROLLS %I APARCEL•"Z': '�',$', MICHAEL S. BYRD. RCE 28998 . $ . �,r-•30.90' �; �1, ;ii' 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE ' 1 :.•'. CHICO. CA 95975 Qxg (530)B95-1422 •PROPOSED 60'•ID[ACCESS II•A:; :;�., v C weuc un81[s'Tw9nENc ` , '•1 A.P. NO. 063-360-018 1 ��60.00' 0'•.:1 :I. PARCEL 2:' i•''i,£• LAND USE PRESENT- UNDEVELOPED 17:79-AC:' I PROPOSED - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL i 30.Od-'" r�_�. _`Z7•. '� I 1` ♦ `60.00' R�60.ar,�'- t ZONING PUD r '30:07.x•' ' OEQSEDJs� ' I " .785.55. GENERAL PLAN AR S`a �30.ar R 69`00' '.1 700.• ,CR 1010 ATE .v'v 1 10 BER VED—/ �. ,', . .,`�' /---Y----__-- __ 3..19,. ' `l 1 "° ""'i TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP RARCEL 3, ` [1"'.':l FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 2-PHASE 3 +� ,o..'::':_.••' •:.:.5.41_AC. ':: A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT .760,00'. •,,,�:': - .. '• A DIVISION OF'REMAINING LANDS'AS SHOWN PRDPDSED..SC9wIg1Np' ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED S 4q2TBAUNE.' FOURTEEN WE HOUSE UNIT2 PHASE 2 y PARCEL;4' ` 12.79')kC. —• RECORDED W BOOK 138 OF MAPS AT PAGES 58 THRU 61 COUNTY OF E.CALIFORNIA TA PORTION OF SECTION 18,TOWNSHP 23 N,RANGE 3 E. 60' ACCESS EASEMENT 'I N eaz-�s@.r= . "Z73'.r''.^'. MDB.BM:' 1'SHOULDER 10'PAVED 10'PAVED 1'SHOULDER \ ... - .:rte -_. FOR . r= SLS— $ FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE, INC. BY �1 RAR ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS RS TYPICAL SECTION 96 YEUOWS0cME ORrEVILE�NECNiOOR A 959r3-569 TELEPHONE 530-695-u79 FOR PROPOSED PRIVATE STREET H9 SCAu SEPTEMBER, 2001 01072 SHEET 1 OF 1 \ NOTES: LEGEND THERE ARE NO EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THIS SITE. PROPOSED PARCEL LINE NO PORTION OF THIS SITE IS WITHIN THE FEMA IDENTIFIED 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. ----------------------• EXISTING OR PROPOSED EASEMENT SITE CULVERTS WILL BE INSTALLED DURING ROAD CONSTRUCTION AS NECESSARY. PARCEL 2 PROPOSED PARCEL NUMBER q WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANKS AND LEACH LINES � NO ACCESS LINE(ABUTTERS RIGHTS) Yrs ON EACH PROPOSED PARCEL. RELINQUISHED PER BOOK 1122 P - DOMESTIC WATER WILL BE PROVIDED TO EACH PARCEL BY INDIVIDUAL WELLS. O.R.PACE 38 PARCEL AREAS. t� EXISTING PARCEL: 43.23 AC PROPOSED: - - B PARCEL 17.24 AC / d PARCEL 2 17.79 AC PARe 5y PARCEL 4 12.79 AC TOTAL 43.23 AC. , LOCATION MAP SCALE N 1•-2W NO SCALE 1 '.......-..-. $L . .... 'S`BBZ4138^.E.- 780.00'• ';:::'J'''~••'•" "'� • {` "'I '� OWNER&SUBDIVIDER FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE.INC. ._..-. ' PO 80X 1700 CENTERLINE .. y :{ ; 'CHICO CA 95927-1700EXSIING PAC BELi - ._ 'ANq PCJE EASEUENT. - (330) 893-1700 8N,ow p.R.,PG;pi PARCEL.1 .'•,G ir!, ^::`<`: �t 7.24 AC. '$`?'` ENGINEER ROLLS. ANDERSON&ROLLS ill d�ARCEL...2:;'; '�•(. •, •i ::i'.';.. MICHAEL S. BYRD, RCE 28998 •$" `'} ,,rJ0.00' `• �I 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE ' t.•."—.•.1 I .I 1 I i�'':.',:i'',:�.1 CHICO.CA 95973 ll D U I 760LOW (530)895-1422 i,•PROPOSED 80'-40[ACCESS i i `� ... !I; �3,':`•: '��`i r' r- ` r-� ,N uo wmx uruT[S;uv[nr; J: `SOD, a: E:.;::.'. A.P.NO. : 063-360-018 Z C c � "•�` .,00'00•' ' I`{ PARCEL T : '''J"�`�`'•" LAND USE: PRESENT- UNDEVELOPED 17:79-AC:' ` �•`.. :�ii,Vit' PROPOSED- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL '\' �G \ �`, I ('60.00' R�6U.ar.r• % �f P.'„ ZONING PUD QQ 0 [�'�] = .�: .G7Nsr4. jT 1 _`J__S______J _� - 'P311,00 GENERAL PLAN AR 't `� .785,55' ^' '..� C -80,04 Z F\7 rATE OO 4� 10 OE R VED—/ �. 1 ; EIOSIING `\ ', .. �:'s' I 603-"" TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP BARGEE 3' 5.41-AC: 'I: FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 2—PHASE 3 ti.., �I�..::a-:_.'�•'�`r:'.. :i' +.l', ` '(?'. �`' ` ''`'`'= aaDD' : ..: a •:' A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT S J.. 760.00•.' 1A {; '� ''�' - .' ,- ':,. ...... � :•` A DIVISION OF LANDS'AS SHOWN :'PRGPosEe n pure '.'I' -'rr ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED 4SEMA%' ' FOURTEEN MULE HOUSE LINT 2 PHASE 2 y BARGEE.4 w .. %> :',: W RECORDED 800K 138 OF MAPS AT PAGES 58 THRU 61 12.79-A c.. COUNTY OF BUTTE,CALIFORNIA T9 �? { A PORTION OF SECTION 18,TOWNSHP 23 N.RANGE 3 E. 7. 60' ACCESS EASEMENT - :.. Jj ..N 88-24'39'.._ 982:73'•:;i.'.': :._•_ 1' SHOULDER 10'PAVED ll 10' PAVED 1'SHOULDER 'Ike, - - A" • FOR � ' ' FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE, INC. —�\ RAR ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS TYPICAL SECTION ,e TEL pNS0 Ev0 WE EN '04=EC EA fORWSA 95973-5811 FOR PROPOSED PRIVATE STREET TELEPINNE 530-895-W29 NO SCALE SEPTEMBER, 2001. 01072 SHEET 1 OF 1 r i �o N OTES: LEGEND THERE ARE NO EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THIS SITE. PROPOSED PARCEL LINE NO PORTION OF THIS SITE IS WITHIN THE FEMA IDENTIFIED 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. ---------------------- EXISTING OR PROPOSED EASEMENT SITE CULVERTS WILL BE INSTALLED DURING ROAD CONSTRUCTION AS NECESSARY. PARCEL Z PROPOSED PARCEL NUMBER WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANKS AND LEACH LINES '�r7������i NO ACCESS LINE (ABUTTERS RIGHTS) a ON EACH PROPOSED PARCEL. RELINQUISHED PER BOOK 1122 DOMESTIC WATER WILL BE PROVIDED TO EACH PARCEL BY INDIVIDUAL WELLS. O.R. PAGE 38 PARCEL AREAS „pry - EXISTING PARCEL: 43.23 AC PROPOSED: PARCEL 1 7.24 AC PARCEL 2 17.79 AC PARCEL 3 5.41 AC PARCEL 4 12.79 AC TOTAL 43.23 AC. =200' LOCATION MAP � SCALE 1" NO SCALE o �O S 8824'38" E 1534.79' N N N 7714.79' 760.00' i i� OWNER & SUBDIVIDE. FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE, INC. PO BOX 1700 CENTERLINE o CHICO CA 95927-1700 EXISTING PAC BELL i AND PG&E EASEMENT 4� ��_ (530) 893-1700 BK 1085 O.R. PG 331 in PARCEL 1 15 2 N 7.24 AC. iN �N N ENGINEER ROLLS, ANDERSON & ROLLS s s i h'OARCEL .2 MICHAEL S. BYRD, RCE 28998 o ; 30.00' ; 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE jP r 760.00' cn CHICO CA 95973 _. (530) 895-1422 PROPOSED 60' WIDE ACCESS AND PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENTi o A.P. N0. 063-360-018 --i �- 60.00' `=100.00' ' + PARCEL 2 1ul LAND USE PRESENT — UNDEVELOPED 33.97' �! tigi s 17.79 AC. iN PROPOSED — SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 30y.00- R=60A0' ' ` ZONING PUD I 60.00' 30.00j PPROPOSED' -,, GENERAL PLAN AR GA `-- _---_— --- , 785.55' ��--'�-R=60.00' �� - - - i 760.00' , ��r�`z -30.00' -- ---------� i EXISTING ATE - EXISTING TO BE RE VED 34.19' aaso j ► DOMESTIC WELL j w W TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP PARCEL 3 � 5.41 -AC. w FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 2--PHASE 3 i _ , . -60.00' i s - A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT s,. ; 760.00' 25° tsJ` 001 � 2 A DIVISION OF "REMAINING LANDS" AS SHOWN PROPOSED 30' BUILDING i ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED sETBAe ;o LINE FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 2 PHASE 2 y� o PARCEL 4 22 I J 12.79 AC. RECORDED IN BOOK 138 OF MAPS AT PAGES 58 THRU 61 COUNTY OF BUTTE, CALIFORNIA A PORTION OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 3 E. 60' ACCESS EASEMENT � � M.D.B.&M, Jo N 88'24'38" W 982.73' 1' SHOULDER 10' PAVED 10' PAVED 1' SHOULDER �y N FOR FOURTEEN /BILE HOUSE, INC. S_2% S-2% BY RAR ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS CIVIL ENGINEERS TYPICAL SECTION 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973-5811 TELEPHONE 530-895-1422 FOR PROPOSED PRIVATE STREET NO SCALE SEPTEMBER, 2001 01072 SHEET 1 OF 1 i o NOTES: LEGEND �s THERE ARE NO EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THIS SITE. PROPOSED PARCEL LINE NO PORTION OF THIS SITE IS WITHIN THE FEMA IDENTIFIED 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. ---------------------- EXISTING OR PROPOSED EASEMENT S( TE CULVERTS WILL BE INSTALLED DURING ROAD CONSTRUCTION AS NECESSARY. PARCEL Z PROPOSED PARCEL NUMBER WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANKS AND LEACH LINES ON EACH PROPOSED PARCEL. NO ACCESS LINE (ABUTTERS RIGHTS) 4io RELINQUISHED PER BOOK 1122 DOMESTIC WATER WILL BE PROVIDED TO EACH PARCEL BY INDIVIDUAL WELLS. O.R. PAGE 38 PARCEL AREAS �ry P EXISTING PARCEL: 43.23 AC PROPOSED: PARCEL 1 7.24 AC 9 PARCEL 2 17.79 AC PARCEL 3 5.41 AC Pad ' PARCEL 4 12.79 AC Z TOTAL 43.23 AC. LOCATION MAP � SCALE 1}'=200' NO SCALE o M O - N n. 0 40 N N N S 88'24'38" E 1534.79' 77A.79' 760.00' OWNER & SUBDIVIDER FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE, INC. PO BOX 1700 CENTERLINE `g i CHICO CA 95927-1700 / EXISTING PAC BELL / AND PG&E EASEMENT � ��_" (530) 893-1700 ° ' i BK 1085 O.R. PG 331 cn PARCEL. 1 iU' ry i N o 7.24 AC. ENGINEER ROLLS, ANDERSON & ROLLS �40ARCEL Z i MICHAEL S. BYRD, RCE 28998 _ - o 30.00' ; 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE o jPq"/ i cn. CHICO CA 95973 I 760.00° I , . - /, I I I o (530) 895-1422 0 PROPOSED 60' WIDE ACCESS j j I rl i AND PUBLIC U11UWS EASEMENT I I I i 60.00' _ A.P. Nn. 063-360-018 I c� 1 i - =100.00' ' I PARCEL Z � LAND USE : PRESENT - UNDEVELOPED 33.97' /� �°�j''- �� i I 17.79 AC.,� PROPOSED - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 30.00--.� i ��-_�` s3s, 60.00' R=60.00' i 30.00' ZONING : PUD JP PROPOSED �`` ��� I �- ;1 '� GENERAL PLAN : AR PP� / GATE ��� ��--� -----� , 785.55' R=60.00' �� - - - t 760.00' -- ----= EXISTING ATE ✓J9F 30.00' /' l ! ��__� EXISTING TO BE RE OVED -- `34.19' so �� DOMESTIC WELL ;W j TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 'P PARCEL 3 'A 5.41 Ac. v FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 2—PHASE 3 ; - A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Sj, ooi 760.00' 2z5° I Too A DIVISION OF 'REMAINING LANDS' AS SHOWN PROPOSED 30' BUILDING -�''�I ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED PARCEL 4 sETg 2C LINE �N FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 2 PHASE 2 12.79 AG RECORDED IN BOOK 138 OF MAPS AT PAGES 58 THRU Eel COUNTY OF BUTTE, CALIFORNIA so' ACCESS EASEMENT A PORTION OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 3 E. M.D.B.&M. R N 88'24'38" W 982.73' h 1' SHOULDER 10' PAVED 10' PAVED 1' SHOULDER o� FOR c� FOURTEEN MILE DOUSE,, INC. S=2% BY RAR ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS CIVIL ENGINEERS TYPICAL SECTION 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973-5811 TELEPHONE 530-895-1422 FOR PROPOSED PRIVATE STREET NO SCALE SEPTEMBER, 2001 01072 SHEET 1 OF 1 OWNER'S STATEMENT ENGINEER'S STATEMENT RECORDER'S STATEMENT FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AS OWNER OF THE LAND SHOWN THIS MAP OF FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE, UNIT 3 WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION FILED THIS t f14DAY OF PEC-6M $ lt�& 2002 AT q�G/ R. M., 1N ON THE ANNEXED MAP AND MID VALLEY TITLE & ESCROW COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BOOK 1�r OF MAPS AT PAGES 1. JR AT THE REQUEST OF ROLLS, ANDERSON CORPORATION, AS TRUSTEE UNDER DEED OF TRUST RECORDED UNDER BUTTE COUNTY SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF RAY JOHNSON IN AND ROLLS. RECORDER'S SERIAL NUMBER 2002-0035839, DO HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE ONLY DECEMBER 2001. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE PARTIES WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS CLEAR TITLE TO SAID LAND AND THAT CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, THAT THE SURVEY 13 TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SERIAL NO. ZD01 WE CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION OF THIS MAP. SHOWN, AND THAT THE MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN SET AND ARE OF THE WE, HEREBY, OFFER FOR DEDICATION, AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR SPECIE IC PURPOSES, CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED AND ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. THE FOLLOWING: (A) THE ONE--FOOT ACCESS STRIP ADJACENT TO HIGHWAY 32, AS SHOWN ON THE CANDACE J. GRUBBS, ANNEXED MAP IS HEREBY OFFERED FOR DEDICATION TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE IN COUNTY RECORDER FEE SIMPLE. (B) A PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT (PSE) OVER, ON AND UNDER HUMBOLDT PARK DRIVE Qe,OFESSipN9 BY: AND BLACK OAK TERRACE AS SHOWN ON THE ANNEXED MAP. �� ti� S, DEPUTY s, WE HEREBY CREATE FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES THE FOLLOWING: "—' � � z ICHAEL S. BYRD DATE Na 28998 R.C.E, 2F3998 (1) HUMBOLDT PARK DRIVE AND BLACK OAK TERRACE AS A 60 FOOT WIDE OR WIDER ROAD cL 1=X0,03.31-03 a AND UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE RESERVED IN DEEDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF EACH LOT FOR CIVIC. # REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 0:3/31/03 INGRESS AND EGRESS TO HIGHWAY 32 AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING, Of 0 RECONSTRUCTING, OPERATING AND MAINTAINING A PRIVATE ROAD AND APPURTENANCES, PRIVATE STORM DRAIN FACILITIES, PRIVATE SEWER LINES, PRIVATE WATER LINES AND OTHER PRIVATE FACILITIES AS REQUIRED. �Ak�l JR., PRESIDENT PRESIDEENT FOE HO INC., MID VALLEY TITLE & ESCROV, COMPANY A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION �A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION COUNTY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT PO. BOX 1700 ©0,ylICA F-- FFUn#' CHICO, CA 95927 I, STUART EDELL, DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR OF THE COU,'?TY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THI: SUBDIVISION MAP OF FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 3, THAT IT IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOI, THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE STATE OF CALIF RNQ (A SUBDIVISION MAP ACT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND FOCAL ORDINANCE HAVE BEEN COUNTY OF ��}t COMPLIED WITH AND I AM SATISFIED THAT THE MAP IS TECINICALLY CORRECT. ON THIS Z`sr DAY OF I .Q� _ , 2002, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, PERSONALLY APPEARED otnl F N L,•� t" PERSONAL;_Y KNOWN CtiESSle. TO .* PERSON(S)OPROVED WHOSE NOME AME SON THE S AREBASIS SUBSCRIBEDOTITOACTORY THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT T UMENT AND TO BE THE ����� ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY NIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THIN LLJ No. 29132 4 STUART EDELL DATE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S) OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSONS) DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEY05 ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. sr� CIVIL , R.C.E. 29132- QF 9132QF c REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 03.1,31/03, , WITNESS MY HAND NO SEAL REQUIRED. SIGNATURE JNylt MA PRINTED NAME COMMISSION EXPIRES Od Z. . zoop CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR'S STATEMENT NOTARY'S PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS I PAUL MCINTOSH, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUP V ORS OF T COU TY OF BUTTE, STATE (CITY & COUNTY) OF CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY TATE THAT ON THE DA,' OF , 200,2,THE f BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OFFICIALLY APPRO\.7-D FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 3 AND THAT DEDICATION (A) AS SHOWN ON THE ANNEXED Mfi' AND THEREIN OFFERED FOR a STATE OF CALIFWNi,A DEDICATION TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE IS HEREBY ACCEPTS ) IN FEE SIMPLE. ITEM (B) OF THE COUNTY OF Fitt FK OWNER'S STATEMENT IS HEREBY ACCEPTED ON BEHALF OF HE PUBLIC AS A PUBLIC SERVICE - E EASEMENT. SHOULD THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DETERMII:E PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT �,� CODE SECTION 66477.5, THAT THE PUBLIC PURPOSE FOR WI'ICH SAID PROPERTY WAS ON THIS 2ZDAY OF L002 BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, DEDICATED IN FEE SIMPLE NO LONGER EXISTS, THE COUNTY OF BUTTE SHALL RECONVEY SAID PERSONALLY APPEARED ,�.o►-tnst�►, Jr. PERSONALLY KNOWN PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON THE MAP, TO THE SUBDIVIDER WHOSE NAME AND ADDRESS IS TO ME(OR PROVED TO ME ON-)THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE SHOWN IN THE OWNER'S STATEMENT, OR TO THE SUBDIVIDEF'S SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND VESTING SUBDIVISION M A P ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SNE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT 3Y HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 3 INSTRUMENT P � ?R OMENTTHE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTEDTHE NST A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR WITNESS MY HAND NO SEAL REQUIRED. RAY JOHNSON JR. DATE: BY'- A DIVISION OF "REMAINING LANDS" OF FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE SIGNATURE ��tGt � �I ��i UNIT 2— PHASE 1 BOOK 135 OF MAPS PAGES 30 THRU 35 PRINTED NAME SECTION 18, T. 23 N., R. 3 E., M.D.B.&M. BUTTE COUNTY CALIFORNIA COMMISSION EXPIRES I ~ L� �� RAR NOTARY'S PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS �i{�IIt4 &u4lG ROLLS ANDERSON & ROLLS CIVIL ENGINEERS (CITY 8C COUNTY) 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO. CALIFORNIA 959TS-5811 NOVEMBER, 2002 01072 SHEET 1 OF 3 FOUND 5/8" REBAR NOTE: WITH PLASTIC CAP THE EXACT ROUTE OR LOCATION OF THE EASEMENT/ RIGHT OF WAY 4" IRON MARKED RCE 28998 RECORDED IN BOOK 1726, PAGE 491, OFFICIAL RECORDS AND RECORDED FOUND 1-1/4" R1 9 PER ( ) IN BOOK 1726, PAGE 493, OFFICIAL RECORDS IS NOT DEFINED OF RECORD PIPE WITH PLASTIC CAP cy s� BASIS OF BEARING AND MAY OR MAY NOT AFFECT PARCELS 1 THROUGH 4. MARKED RCE 28998 SITE `�-- S 88'24'38" E (R1,M) PER (R1) RAD{ 774.79' 1534.79' (R1,M) b o N 7g 26��ARING� 760.00' � o�yo ry I'I` (C I � I/ Lo o t1 / 6 PACIFIC BELL AND P.G.&E. EASEMENT _W RELINQUISHMENT OF / 8k. 1085 O.R. Pg. 331 PARCEL 1 LOCATION MAP o f ABUTTER'S RIGHTS TO o THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA / 00 7.24 acres LINE TABLE CURVE DATA / Bk. 112-2 O.R. P 38 / N LINE BEARING LENGTH CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH / ¢ L1 N53'56'14"E 62,86 ' C3 20.00' S3'222453 17.93' 1 " L2 N61'45'20"W 62.86' C2 60.00' 102°41'28" '107.54' i L3 _N53'56'14"E 54.63' C3 20.00' 51`19'04" 17.91' / L4 N53'56'14"E 58.37' C4 20.00' 51'22'24" 17.93' PARCEL 2 / L7 L8 L5 N53°56'14"E 69.98' C5 60.00' 102'41'28" 107.54' D / / L6 N53'56'14"E 69.98' S 00`02'28" Wj L7 N88'24'38"W 30.03' C6 20.00' 4 51.19'04" 17.91' C7 130.00 6418 26 145.91 60.00' L8 N88'24'38"W 30,01' C8 70.00' 64"18'26" 78.57' cn N 88°24'38" W 760.00' O L9 N88'24'38"W 34.5'1' ., �'.. 0 - C9 20.00 1381212 41.26 <� / I o L10 N01'35'22"E 17.00' C10 20.00 88'27'06" 30.88' - I Lll N01'35'22"E 73.00' , - - �` 30.00 �' L11 w13 20.00 5119'04" 17.91 � / 60 FOOT WIDE OR WIDER ROAD AND 30.00 -,!--�j- j--30.00 N88'24'38"W 96.96 C12 60.00' 102'38'08" 1+37.48' _� / I UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE RESERVED IN - �, o U I L13 N11'35'22"E 82.58' Ci3 20,00' 5]"99'04" 17.91' -- // DEEDS FOR 1IiE BENEFIT OF EACH LOT K)1 0 I� L14 N01'35'22"E 30,00' C14 60.00' S1°19'04" 53.74' V_ N C4 I v-3 L15 N01'3522"E 30.00, l `�o _ C7_ _ "''I �' I „ C15 20.00' 51'19'04" 17.91' I I ? '`� PARCEL 2 L16 N11'35 22 E 17.23 C16 20.00' 80'{30'00" 27.93' �0' �N ! 42 �:\ I j I L.17 N78'24'38"W 30.00' , 7 1, , h C20 17.79 acres L18 N11'35'22"E 100.00' C17 20.00, 8827,06�t _.30.88, C18 20.00 73'20 42 25.60 x� SCS �` S 6j `fig U I „ C19 200.00 11'32 54 40.31 ,? I L19 N53'56 14 E 1.00 , , c� �' I .-- SEE DETAIL A L20 N28'14 40 E 15.00 , " +a / L19 �-h�. \,6 L20 ¢`'2pry�.� i I ' L21 N28'l 4'40"E 9 5.00' C20 100.00 64'18 26 112.24 i o � �'j F Gg �Iml / o N 87`30'54" E R1,C i / 6 ��� ¢9 o C12 ( ) ik v -f9 ?9 k o 33.97' (R1,C) �j �y c,61 gyp, 2 �<� �- ? r1,_ - �'>� ,� N C', LEGEND l / ( ` 247.88 �= - --�'N 3 RADIAL BEARING- `� C4 G5r - - - --- - L9 0 CALCULATED POINT, NO MONUMENT FOUND OR SET S 59'56'28" W (C) �,� - 1 _ L1 N 88'2438" W 760.00' �� O SET BUTTE COUNTY STD. 5-11 A MONUMENT STAMPED RCE 28998 30.00' ONE FOOT ACCESS STRIP OFFERED FOR DEDICATION J `�_ PARK N 88°24`38" W �R�VE X59 pa SET 5f8" RE'?AR WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED R.C.E_ 28998 S 32'29'06" E Rl,C 40 THE COUNTY OF BUTTE IN FEE SIMPLE ( -s�` - --- - - -- - 1 ( (^ ) L19 " J JG�� 254.60' C I Li 1 30.00' R RECORD0 FOUND MONUMENT RE _2ENCE S NOTED 60.00' R1,C) `�_ '' ._ ` W 'o 30.00 „ / di n o S 27'30 54 W (R1,C) 107.34 -L12wJJ �,� 4 L12 (M) MEASURED 34.19' (R1,C) L16� 029071+28 W It (C) CALCULATED 14PARCEL BASIS OF BEARING }--25.54' 5.41 acres a THE NORTHERLY LINE OF "REMAINING LANDS" AS SHOWN OJT (R1), 135M30 - 30.00' �- 30.00TAKEN BETWEEN MONUMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON, SAID BEARING i� � o BEING SOUTH 88'24'38" EAST. �,�_ vi cs j� 1� o = NI �J In C17 241.88' _ RECORD REFERENCES \ �_ L14 (R1) RECORD DATA PER MAP OF "FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE UNIT 2 - PHASE 1" 0, = I N 88'24.'.38" W 760.00' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BOOK 135 OF MAPS PAGES 30 THRU 35 290.55' -` ' L15 (R2) RECORD DATA PER MAP OF "FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE" PLANNED pJ - 319'75, ij 30.00' UNIT DEVELOPMENT BOOK 100 OF MAPS PAGES 72 THRU 76 VESTING SUBDIVISION MAP FOURTEEN_ ILS HOUSE- UNII* 3 -� PARCEL 4 : A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT N 88'24"38" W RELINQUISHMENT OF ABUTTER'S 12.79 acres FOR 25.55' RIGHTS TO THE STATE. OF CALIFORNIA RAY JOHNSON JR. 760.04 _Bk. 1122 O.R. P 38 ----- � �J• FOUND. 1-1/4" IRON L21i� b' -6- S OO°02'2$" W PIPE WITH PLASTIC CAP A DIVISION OF "REMAINING LANDS" OF FOURTEEN MILE HOUSE • 13.00' MARKED RCE 28998 UNIT 2-- PHASE 1 BOOK 138 OF MAPS PAGES 30 THRU 35 A 2 98 a'F - PER (R1) SECTION 18, T. 23 N., R. 3 E., M.D.B.&M. BUTTE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 1 FOUND 5/8REBAR -.�..�._._ RAiI� WITH PLASTIC CAP --�'� N 88'24'38" W (R1,M) 982.73' (R1,M) ROLLS AN[�ERSOIV & ROLLS DETAIL A MARKED RCE 32143 PER (R2) 100M72 CIVIL ENGINEERS SCALE: '{"=2fl' 1S5 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95973-5811 NOVEMBER, 2002 01072 SHEET 2 OF 3 NOTES 1, STREET LIGHTING AND EXTERIOR SECURITY LIGHTING SHALL USE LOW PRESSURE SODIUM VAPOR LAMPS OR OTHER SIMILAR LIGHTING THAT IS RECOGNIZED TO REDUCE LIGHT POLLUTION AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A MANNER TO REDUCE UNDUE GLARE. — — — ' — ' -' — — --- --- ---- - ---_ . . _ 2. WOOD STOVE AND FIREPLACE INSERTS INSTALLED IN ANY HOME WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION J SHALL BE EPA APPROVED AND DESIGNED TO MEET EMISSIONS STANDARDS OF THE I ( CAUFORNIA CLEAN AIR ACT OF 1988 AS AMENDED. m 3. DEER MITIGATION FEES ARE TO BE PAID AT THE TIME OF OBTAINING BUILDING PERMITS `o IF SUCH FEES HAVE BEEN ADOPTED BY THE BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. 4. SHOULD GRADING ACTIVITIES REVEAL THE PRESENCE OF CULTURAL RESOURCES (I.E., NOTE: ! ARTIFACT CONCENTRATIONS, INCLUDING ARROWHEADS AND OTHER STONE TOOLS OR 'oma CHIPPING DEBRIS, CANS, GLASS, ETC.; STRUCTURAL REMAINS; HUMAN SKELETAL THIS ADDITIONAL MAP SHEET SHOWS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WHiC {S FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, DESCRIBING CONDITIONS A`; ��� � REMAINS), WORK WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE FIND SHALL CEASE IMMEDIATELY UNTIL A jl QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ARCHAEOLOGIST CAN BE CONSULTED TO !;VALUATE THE OF THE DATE OF APPROVAL, AND iS NOT INTENDED TO AFFECT PARCEL REMAINS AND IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE MITIGATION PROCEDURES. SHOULD HUMAN { RECORD TITLE INTEREST. I .- SKELETAL REMAINS BE ENCOUNTERED, STATE LAW REQUIRES IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION i -�-- 5' BSC 7.24 acres OF THE COUNTY CORONER. SHOULD THE COUNTY CORONER DETERMINE THAT SUCH REMAINS ARE IN AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXT, THE NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION iN SACRAMENTO SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY, PURSUANT TO STATE 5, BSL LAW, TO ARRANGE FOR NATIVE AMERICAN PARTICIPATION IN DETERMINING THE DISPOSITION OF SUCH REMAINS. 5, LIMIT EARTHWORK TO THE PERIOD BETWEEN APRIL 1 AND NOV. 15, ALL AREAS WHERE PARCEL- 2 -j THE SOIL HAS BEEN DISTURBED OR WHERE THE VEGETATION HAS BEEN REMOVED SHALL L-- -i RE PROTECTED FROM EROSION USING STANDARD EROSION CONTROL METHODS ACCEPTED BY CIVIL ENGINEERS VEGETATION IN THE FUEL REDUCTION AREA SHALL NOT r - BE REMOVED TO THE EXTENT THI,T EROSION OCCURS IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE I VEGETATION REMOVED FOR FIRE PROTECTION BE CHIPPED OR MULCHED AND THEM I�. APPLIED TO THE CLEARED AREAS FOR EROSION CONTROL.I W L_ . ` . . . = i — 4 6. HOMES CONSTRUCTED ON THESE LOTS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE GRADING AND I U TO UTILIZE THE EXISTING GRADE TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE THROUGH THE USE OF MULTI LEVEL STRUCTURES. X54 5C:' BSL = -F- `� 43 7. HOMES SHAT,-L BE CONSTRUCTED WITH EXTERIOR MATERIALS THAT ARE FIRE RESISTANT. o 1 I I ROOFS SHALL BE CLASS A. SONG SHALL BE STUCCO, MASONRY, OR A TREATED WOOD 50' BSL m SiDING THAT IS TREATED TO BE ;"IRE RESISTANT. ALL DECKS THAT OVER HANG THE -to1 CANYON SHALL BE ENCLOSED FROM BELOW WITH FiRE RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION. 30 BSL 8• A DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FOR SHERIFF'S FACILITIES SHALL BE PAID PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 3 ART±CLE Il OF THE BUTTE COUNTY CODE PARCEL 2 � + PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. THE FEE AMOUNT WILL BE DETERMINED AND CALCULATED AS OF 17.79 acres THE DATE OF APPLICATION FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT. � � \ - I •`t I Co 9. DUST GENERATED BY DEVELOPMFNT ACTIVITIES SHALL BE KEPT TO A MINIMUM WITH A o GOAL OF RETAINING DUST ON THE SITE. FOLLOW THE DUST CONTROL MEASURES LISTED f ` BELOW: m ' A. DURING CLEARING, GRADING, EARTH MOVING, EXCAVATION, OR TRANSPORTATION OF CUT C� FiLL MATERIALS, WATER TRUCKS OR SPRINKLER SYSTEMS ARE TO BE USED TO PREVENT DUST FROM LEAVING THiE SITE AND TO CREATE A CRUST AFTER EACH DAY'S ACTIVITIES CEASE. _ 1 B. DURING CONSTRUCTION, WA'ER TRUCKS OR SPRINKLER SYSTEMS SHALL BE CZ) — , __ USED TO KEEP ALL AREAS OF VEHICLE MOVEMENT DAMP ENOUGH TO ' DRl1�E _ --- PREVENT DUST FROM LEAVIAG THE SITE. AT A MINIMUM, THIS WOULD ' � PARK - ' ---, INCLUDE WETTING DOWN SU ' ; AREAS IN THE LATER MORNING AND AFTER !! WORK iS COMPLETED FOR THE DAY AND WHENEVER WIND EXCEEDS 15 MILES PER HOUR. im 1 t C. SOIL STOCKPILED FOR MORE: THAN TWO DAYS SHALL BE COVERED, KEPT Lo ! MOIST, OR TREATED WITH SOIL BiNDERS TO PREVENT DUST GENERATION. �• ...... 10. PRiOR TO BUILDING PERMIT lSSUI,NCE FOR A NEW RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT(S), THE APPLICANT SHALL PAY ALL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT FEES AT THE RATE iN EFFECT AT 50' BSL---t-1 i (�-- m THE TiME OF ACCEPTANCE OF TI-E APPLICATION. SUCH FEES MAY INCLUDE, BUT NOT PARCEL 3 BE LIMITED TO: PARK FEE, SCHOOL FEE, DRAINAGE FEE, PERMIT AND PLAN CHECKING I I o 5.41 acres FEES, WATER AND SEWER SERVICE FEES, FIRE PROTECTION FEES. 50 BSL ;n 100 LEACHFIELD FREE SETBACK FROM 11. THE PROPERTY OWNERS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL PRIVATE I EXISTING WELL. ROAD SAFETY SiGNS, INCLUDING STOP SIGNS. 1v L 12. IF ANY DWELLING iS LOCATED WiTHIN 280 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 32, SOUND ATTENUATION METHODS SHALL BE USED TO REDUCE OUTSIDE ONOISESES BELOW 65 CNEL. A NOISE ANALYSIS SHALL BE USED TO DETERMINE 1 L - - -- - --- - - - - -- -- - - - - j 1~ 13. NO WATER WELL MAY BE PLACED WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE USABLE SEWER DISPOSAL �- — — • — • . _� . _ . AREA. 14. WATER WELLS MAY HAVE TO BE DRILLED DEEPER THAN 700 FEET IN ORDER TO OBTAIN VESTING SUBDIVISION MAP ADEQUATE SUPPLIES OF POTABLE WATER. 'j t'�' m 15. CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION, OR DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURES OR FACILITIES ON FOUREETHE PARCELS/LOTS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST CALIFORNIA FIRE SAFE PARCEL 4 o REGULATIONS, (PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE 4290), AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE STATE A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ` t 'n AND COUNTY CODES, ORDINANCES, AND REGULATIONS IN EFFECT AT THE TiME OF FOR \ 12.79 acre,, APPLICATION FOR IMPROVEMENT PERMITS. RAY JOHNSON JR. ` 16. BUILDING IDENTIFICATION AND/OIZ ADDRESSES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE --- - - -' \ WITH PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE 4290 AND SHALL BE POSTED AT THE BEGINNING OF �, m EA I EXCESS OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED CONTINUOUSLY THEREAFTER. A DIVISION OF REMAINING LANDS OF FOURTEEN MiLE HOUSE \ \ \ N UNIT 2— PHASE 1 BOOK 135 OF MAPS PAGES 30 THRU 35 Ln \`30� GROUND SLOPE 17. DEVELOPMENT OF THESE LOTS MAY REQUIRE PAYMENT INTO THE WATER TENDER NOT SUITAB�E,F©R FUND. SECTION 18, T. 23 N., R. 3 E., M.D.B.&M. LEACH FIELD INSTALLAITI N BUTTE COUNTY CALIFORNIA — _ � 18. FIRE SUPPRESSION SPRINKLER 5Y5TEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED iN ALL NEW RESIDENTIAL TION ASSOCIATION STRUCTURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTEC � RAR STANDARD FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN ONE AND TWO F,� AMILY ROLLS AiVDERSON & ROLLS DWELLINGS AND MOBILE HOMES, NFPA STANDARD 13D, UNLESS A PRESSURIZED CIVIL ENGINEE13S COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEM WITH HYDRANTS THAT MEET FIRE DEPARTMENT 115 YELLOWSTONE DRIVE • CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95913-5811 SPECIFICATIONS, SERVES THE PARCELS. NOVEMBER, 2002 01072 SHEET 3 OF 3 August 12, 2003 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held on September 11, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, at 9:30 a.m. regarding the following item In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for the following project. Therefore, Planning Division staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/REZONE Fourteen Mile House, Inc., Rezone from for 43.2 acres on the east side of State Route 32, across from Woodland Park Road. The requested zone is Foothill Recreation—2-acre minimum parcel size. The property is currently configured.in four .individual parcels for residential development. The parcels are 5.41, 7.24, 17.79, and 12.79 acres in size. Sewage disposal for the project would be.provided by individual septic tank, and water would be obtained from a well on the site. The property was rezoned as a part of the Fourteen Mile House PUD rezone, and residential development has been completed in the first two "units of that development. •The subject property is the third "unit" of that residential development, but is subject to a separate homeowners association. An environmental analysis was conducted prior to the approval of said rezone and another environmental review was prepared for the subdivision map approval that created the four parcels. The property is located on the east side of Deer Creek Highway, at Black Oak Terrace, about two miles south of Forrest Ranch. APN 063-360-018 (CS) (REZ 03-' 01) The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project are on file for public review starting, August 15, 2003, through September 10, 2003, at the Butte County Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. All interested persons are invited to review the document. Written comments will be accepted by the Planning Division.at the above address. .If you challenge either the Mitigated Negative Declaration. or the Use Permit in court, you may be.limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the public hearing. . For further information regarding this project, please contact Craig Sanders, project planner, at the Butte County Planning Division at (530) 538- 7153. YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Friday August 15, 2003 COUNTY OF BUTTE OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT �(O BUTTE 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE COUNTY �� a'c�J 0 .2 �'-� .1 60 3 /, (l.3. POSTAGE. ** asa ae * OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 ; * APR 2 3 2003 > gTrall � 7126422 RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED DEVELOPMENT A ID SERVICES, PUBLIC 063330006000 &PAT�CIA HANSEN LARRY' J �Fo 4810 EAGLE RIDGE DR HEARINGREST 1ZANCPICA942--- NOTICE RETURN * 9594aSENDER 1602 27 Oti/19/03 RETURN TO SENDER HANSEN ' LARRY J 2009 ROSEMARIE LN APT 273 STOCKTON CA 95207-7600 RETURN TO SENDER ..._�.,.-.•. •--•• l;l-1 11 11 111!111 l i 1 1 l l toll 11 i,-1 11111111111.11111 1 e=a= '--1. COUNTY OF BUTTE r� _ OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT " 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE e �� � u� so� • � I -- 0 .35 OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 r� p NE' R O - ��T#� {.. cA �$$ w.3. POSTAGE * RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED p AS �'� rQ sBUTTE P MOD L Hc COUNTY 063360023000 AUG 19 2003 TURNER WALTER JOE & H EA'IKC NANCY B DEVICES 2644 ESCALI-ONIA WY SERVICES CHICO CA 95973 NOTHCE . FID • `=�=' �a�,►,��S�fi#�:i;�•i���;�as�i�i; . _••"..t,:its„-t;f, �71,:,�1)r`liirrf„rll,l,,J,`i,�t,t„t l •