Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREZ 93-20_PLANNING 11111111.1111111111 IN '1111111111 Hill Hill� IV �� � � I� V� � � SEPARATOR SHEET a,,, (750 - 2 &0 - o (I PROJECT NUMBER Re Z 93 'Zb PROJECT SUMMARY SHEEN F2� Permit No. File No. Andrew & Winifred wiiiinmq L & L SURVEYING Applicant Representative ADDRESS. 2024 Merrill Rd - & /3AB w 7/ 66 7/ Paradise , a i 9 /.� ?J 61-D ' PHONE: Property Owner, Address D� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REZONE TQ 4R-1 ATuF FAST 63n _9T. 8P SAID PAr GEI AT THE EAST END OF MERRILL ROAD , EAST OF UPPER on property zones( S�M-1-SF'Rls�a�d \� FR-40 PENTZ RD. AT 2024 (FORMERLY 2015 ) MERRILL RD. identified as AP 050-960-01 4Z! town/area PARADISE. C A . WAWNts General Plan Designation Map a DATE Pre-App Fee Paid: $ Receipt Na: Application Accepted: Z� Final App. Paid: $ Receipt Na: Rezoning Petition signatures checked Percentage ?O Mailing List Prepared Notices Mailed Number: News: Public: Legal Description prepared Publication Notice Written Display Ad Prepared Newspaper Publication O C P G B R Date of Pub.: Initial Study Prepared Environmental Determination: _ Categorical Exemption Nagative Declaration Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Impact Report Other State Clearinghouse Number: Applicant/Representative Notification of Environmental Determination Planning Commission Hearing(s): Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): '�° �� 'g ' ' Resolution Number (GPAs) Adopted: 9 ? Ordinance Number Adopted: ��U`ry C 93-297 Public hearing - AndrelP and Winifred Williams consideration of a rezone (proposed negative declaration regarding environmental impacts) from FR-40 (foothill recreational - 40 acre parcels) to SR-1 (suburban residential - one acre parcels) , property located at the east end of Merrill Road, approximately 3,400 feet east of Pentz Magalia Highway, AP 050-260-021, Paradise area. (2038) MOTION: I MOVE TO FIND THAT (A) THE REQUIREMENTS OF CEQA HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND CONSIDERED IN MAKING THIS DECISION AND ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; (B) FIND THAT THE REZONE CONFORMS TO THE POLICIES, INCLUDING THE TEXT AND MAP OF THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN, BECAUSE THE PROPOSED ZONE MEETS THE CONDITIONAL CRITERIA 93-297 --' OF THE AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION AND THE ZONING FACTORS; (C) ADOPT ORDINANCE 3085 REZONING TO SR-1 THAT PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS AP 050-260-021 (WILLIAMS) ; AND (D) ADOPT A RESOLUTION 93-123 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL ZONING AGREEMENT ON PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS AP 050-260-021 (WILLIAMS) SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1. THE DIVISION OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN THREE PARCELS AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT A, ALLOWING FOR MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE MAP IN CASE OF LEACHFIELD NEEDS. S M VOTE: 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 Y (Unanimously Carried) BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES — August 10, 1993 ... r - A 1+ 9:00 a.m. Andre and Winifred Williams - proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts and Rezone from FR-40 (Foothill Recreational - 40 acre parcels) to SR-1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acre parcels) located at - ! the east end of Merrill Road, approximately 3,400 feet east of Pentz Magalia Highway, identified as AP 050-260-021,.Paradise. (CBS) (File 93- Staff gave a summary of the project. The Commission waived the reading of the Staff Finding. Staff said that access to this property is through the Town of Paradise. Commissioner Nelson asked how many lots this rezone would allow? Staff said there is a potential for 8 lots, but there are some constraints due to slopes. Staff said the owner is proposing 4 or 5 lots. Chairman Lynch asked if the large parcel to the north and the two small parcels in the south would be coming in for rezone in the future? Staff submitted a map showing the topography of the area. Staff said there is not as much buildable land on the adjacent parcels. Staff said that most of Merrill Road is in the Town of Paradise. Commissioner Lambert asked if the parcels created by Gift Deed were in the SR-1 zoning. Staff said this is correct. The hearing was opened to the public. Hollis Lundy, L & L Surveying, said in 1965 half the property was rezoned. He said the owner split the property by gift deed. He said the applicant wants to keep the property in the family. He said this will not cause a high density at this time and only one additional dwelling in the future for his son. He said he wants to split the 8 acre parcel in a 2 acre and 6 acre parcel. Chairman Lynch asked where the SR-1 zoning was on the adjacent property? Mr. Lundy submitted a map showing the final results of this rezone. j Commissioner Nelson asked if the Commission could condition this zoning toy adhere to the map submitted by the applicant? Commissioner Lambert also wanted to tie approval of this request to the map submitted. Lee Cage, Paradise, discussed a condition to improve',the County part of-Merrill Road- at the time the Town part of the road is improved. She said the property is being considered for annexation to the Town of Paradise. BUTTE COUNTY PLANN,I-NG ,,COMMISSION MINUTES - June24 , w1.993 _ --- - {•-: '�~.��`\ �f� i a The hearing was closed. Commission Lambert said she would support this project, but she would like to incorporate the map into the approval. Staff suggested the condition be that the project be tied to three parcels and not necessarily the map: Staff said the Commission could do a motion of intent so staff could confer with County Counsel. �— It was moved by Commissioner Sessions, seconded by Commissioner Lambert, and unanimously carried for approval as follows: _ A. Find that the requirements of CEQA have been completed and considered in making this decision and adopt a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts; and B. Find that the rezone conforms to the policies, including the text and map of the Butte County General Plan, because the proposed zone meet the conditional criteria of the Agricultural Residential General Plan designation and the zoning factors; and C. Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance rezoning to SR-1, that property identified as AP 050-160-021 (Winifred Williams); and D. Recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt a Resolution approving a conditional zoning agreement subject to Exhibit D restricting the development to a maximum of 3 lots allowing for minor modifications to the map in case of leachfield needs. i i BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION -MINUTES June . 24.; ,WA19.9,3.Y __ J i"� .. - 1 � � y �� ��"�` 1 ;� r FILE NO.: 93-20 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - May 20, 1993 APPLICANT: Winifred Williams OWNER Same REQUEST: Rezone from FR-40 to SR-1 AP NO.: 050-260-001 SIZE: 8.4 acres LOCATION: Located at the easterly end of Merrill Road, Paradise EXISTING ZONING: FR-40 ZONING HISTORY: Zoned FR-40 on,Feb. 22, 1982 by Ord. 2267 r SURROUNDING ZONING: SR-1, FR-40 SURROUNDING LAND USE: Rural residential, Town of Paradise GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Agricultural Residential, Grazing and Open Lands APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Butte County Code Sections 24-26 through 24- 29, 24-162, 24-112.7 COMMENTS RECEIVED: Public Works: "Roads leading to this area are in the Town of Paradise." County Fire Department/CDF: "This individual rezone .has no impact on the Fire Department, but the accumulative affect of rezoning to higher density developments is increased demand for fire protection services and higher costs to the County." 1 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - May 20, 1993 Environmental Health: "See letter dated 4/15/93" Town of Paradise: "Strong concerns regarding potential impacts related to traffic circulation, public services, community charter/aesthetics, their removal, and sewage disposal. Very much interested in reviewing and commenting on environmental document." ANALYSIS: This is a request to rezone approximately 8.5 acres from FR-40 to SR-1. The property is located at the easterly end of Merrill Road, adjacent to the Town of Paradise and lies at the edge of the canyon formed by the West Branch of the Feather River. The area to be rezoned was part of a larger parcel that was split by a zone line with SR-1 to the west and FR-40 to the east. The applicant has already created three parcels by gift deed within the SR-1 zone leaving as a separate parcel the area within the FR-40 designation. Both the SR-1 and FR- 40 zones were adopted in 1982 as part of the Paradise Area General Plan and Rezone. As previously stated the property is located at the transition line between the Paradise ridge top and the canyon that drops down into the West Branch of the Feather River. Approximately 30% to 40% of the site has a slope of 30% or greater. The balance of the property has gentle slopes and could, from a topography stand point, accommodate parcels of 1 acre. Water and adequate soil for sewage disposal have not been proven for 1 acre parcels yet but there are other parcels in the area that have homes on 1/2 to 1/3 acre parcels. Merrill Road serves the subject parcel and approximately 112 other lots in the area, most of which are in the Town of Paradise. There is no circulation for traffic on this road and the addition of any new parcels is a concern for both the town of Paradise and the County. The lack of circulation could be critical in the event of a major fire on the ridge. All traffic from the area must use Pentz Magalia Hwy. and traffic volume on this road is high. The Town of Paradise is currently contemplating the adoption of traffic impact fees for Pentz Road and it's collector streets but have not adopted a fee at this time. The actual impacts to traffic will occur when the property is divided and would be best addressed at that time. The project site is designated by the Butte County General Plan as Agricultural-Residential on the ridge top and a small amount of Grazing and Open Land in the canyon area. The Agricultural Residential designation requires that the following findings be made and zoning factors be considered when approving a rezone to less than 20 acre parcels. CONDITIONAL ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA: 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. (Yes) 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. (Unknown at this time 2 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - May 20, 1993 but there are similar sized parcels in the area.) 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. (Yes) 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. (Merrill Road appears be adequate for the existing development but there is a lack of circulation for emergency purposes.) 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. (Yes) ZONING FACTORS: 1. Existing parcel sizes in residential densities. (There are 1 acre and smaller parcels to the west.) i 2. Slope. (Approximately 60 to 70% of the site is suitable for 1 acre parcels.) 3. Soil conditions and water availability. (The soil is generally deep and there are other small parcels in the area.) 4. Effects on adjacent uses, crop production, livestock grazing, forestry, resource extraction and wildlife habitat. (This project will not be incompatible with adjacent uses.) 5. Proximity to public roads and other public facilities. (Merrill Road serves the property and can be improved to meet subdivision standards.) 6. Distance from airports, railroads and industrial uses. (No conflicts with these uses.) 7. Existing utility and drainage facilities. (Utilities exist and drainage can be handled on site or dispersed into the canyon.) 8. Potential for surface cracking, landslides and erosion. (Steeper slopes can be avoided to reduce erosion.) 9. Effects on noise, traffic flow and safety, water quality, air quality, wildlife habitat and general environmental quality. (The project is consistent with the surrounding properties. Traffic generation can be partially addressed through road improvements. Circulation and cumulative impacts to the region cannot be mitigated at the rezone level and will require the adoption of traffic impact fees by the town of Paradise for future land divisions.) 3 i i BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - May 20, 1993 10. Local desires. (Unknown, other than these of the applicant.) 11. Potential for pest insect breeding. (No significant effect) For the most part the proposed zoning can be supported by the conditional criteria and zoning factors. Traffic concerns and a solution to circulation can not be addressed at this time. In the overall picture of traffic on the ridge, it is doubtful that 4 new parcels will really have a significant impact on the existing transportation system. This parcel is not needed to provide future circulation for the area. RECOMMENDATIONS: A. Find that the requirements of CEQA have been completed and considered in making this decision and adopt a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts; and B. Find that the rezone conforms to the policies, including the text and map of the Butte County General Plan, because the proposed zone meets the conditional criteria of the Agricultural Residential General Plan designation and the zoning factors; and C. Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance rezoning to SR-1, that property identified as AP No. 050-260-021 (Williams). CBS:cs Attachments to Commission and Cities: Environmental Documents Site Plan Location Map 4 ! r ; f Meu tte, ount 4--, _ - :fes L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Address [] 1469 Humboldt Road 7 County Center Drive NVI Reply to: 747 Elliott Road Chico, California 95928 Oroville, California 95965 Paradise, California 95969 Telephone: (916) 891-2727 Telephone: (916) 538-7281 Telephone: (916) 872-6308 Fax: (916) 538-2140 April 15, 1993 Larry Painter Butte Co . Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville CA 95965-3397 Subject: Williams - Rezone; east end of 'Merrill Rd, Paradise: APN 050-260-019 This office has reviewed the aforementioned project and has the following comments: 1 . Much of the area designated for rezone would have to be qualified as unusable for sewage application. Therefore any subsequent land divisions will have to meet the Improvement Standards for Subdivisions as they relate to onsite sewage disposal , specifically those minimum criteria set forth in Appendix VII . 2 . Drinking water is now supplied to existing development via an off site source (spring) and a well that is in the proposed rezone . Depending upon future development, project may have to qualify for small water system permit or prove quantity and quality of source. Please call this office if you have any questions . Very truly your Michael Huerta RENS cc. L&L Surveying Craig Erickson �� A CLEAN INDOOR AIR ENVIRONMENT FOR A HEALTHIER TOMORROW 1• 'r ( r 1}� jr4.'`.S` •Y iflr.,l' �• j' .Tt (�c � " �, , ' Ji. _L .* ,. �� "Otif t { aL f Lit. it1+i 1 + ( 2 ' ' i r j jiC. r irr.• , r' tr(' e% r"'j' �lJ• �•e Ifl� •;' d AC UI r � 1 t . rr , -r,•r! jr *41 'h•j sj+{,' j rl i + T '1 _'+ "f:! � +."ted',r• . t ; + F ..I,L.T,f, jy+iWJ ..}'L•Jr.` t r t V12110.1,0S APPLICATION FOR REZONING � b199 C001r1a BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT: Read and follow instructions set forth on last page of this form. Applicant's Name Andrew E. & M. Winifred Williams Phone No.877-2039 Applicant's Mailing Address 2024 Merrill Road Applicant's Interest in property(Owner, Lessee,Other) Owner Owner's Name and Address Andrew E. & M.Winifred Williams Contact Person for Project(if other than applicant) L & L Surveying 877-4300 Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 050-260-019-000iKti Present Zoning SRI & FR 40 Requested Zoning SR. 1 �� 2(DU � D Z Location,dimensions and size of area(s)to be rezoned `.8.69 Acres W* a a w H ZZ' Street Address(if applicable) 2024 (formerly 2015) Merrill Rd.., Paradise, CA 95969 "' a Directions for travel to property(rural and mountainous areas only) East end of Merrill Rd. a a+ off upper Pentz Rd. Applicant's reasons for rezoning Gift Deeds - To comply with our wishes in our Last Will and Testaments. FR-40 is gentle slope more suitable for homesite than SRI which is steep hillside. Proposed scheduling/Associated projects(formation of service district,etc.) None Anticipated incremental development(future development plans subsequent to rezone): None Existing/proposed sewage disposal method: Septic tanks Proximity of power and phone lines: Pre-existing - utility companies have been given right-of-ways 19istance to natural water course or storm drain: 1 Describe anticipated on and off-site drainage improvements(PUD,MHP): Describe how on-site and downstream drainage channels will be affected(PUD,MHP): None Water source: Springs & Wells Proximity of water for fire fighting purposes(hydrants.ponds,etc.) pond - 4000 gallon in yard, fire hydrant in front lawn Will excavation or grading be necessary? Cubic yards(estimate)? leveling List and describe and other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city,regional,State and Federal agencies: a a GL, If residential, include the number of units, whether units are single or multi-story in height, schedule of H unit sizes,and type of household size expected. Z U3 (single) small homes for retirement a p,, If commercial indicate the type, whether neighborhood city or regionally oriented square footage of sales area, and loading facilities wholesale nursery If industrial,indicate type,estimated employment per sHft,and loading facilities. single family small business If institutional indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities,and community benefits to be derived from the project. No employees - family run - beautification of local area ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Identify potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the rezone. What project design features or special conditions of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential environmental impacts? No environmental impact 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topgraphy, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. 1920's 3 homes existed &'r.: l cabin - 1 home has been torn down and the cabin. 1 small glass house and` 1 medium size glasshouse, 2 lathe houses, 1 ware- house, 1 old garage, 1 garage/home, horse & barn Williams' Feather View Nursery - Head quarters Z W Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, 1.4 historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, setback,rear yard,etc.). Z UOne family homes - Azalea & Dogwood tree nursery - part of the Cherokee Ditch a At which furnished water for hydraulic mining of Cherokee in early days runs through property. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read and understand the instructions and that the foregoing statements are true,complete and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Applicant's Signature Dated: Property owner's signatures ,/?, Project File Number a General Plan Designation Request Consistent? Z Request: Rezone to W Location and size of parcel(s) W U 0-4w w O 3 Verify: A.P. Number(s) Location Description a OOwnership Legal Description of Area P,�vtA Vi to/1411 W Proof of Agency(if needed) �' Maps of Area/Development Mple W) Plan for PUD's W Present Zoning by U Reproducible Master Map of Wo Development Plan(PUD's only) O �= Date of Application received 3 ZlO 93 $ �21 s Receipt No.-I--34-69 Application Taken By Vf Uj 4 t . , . , • ' :. ., :�, � � r„ + , v o50 - 2,(,o - � � q DISTRIBUTION LIST FOR COMMENTS RESORIICE MANAGEMENT County Public Works County Environmental Health State Water Resources Dept. County Building Department U.S. Forest Service City of Biggs U.S. Bureau of Land Management City of Chico Butte County Mining Committee City of Gridley _ State Department of Fish & Game City of Oroville California Native Plant Society Town of Paradise State Div. Forestry- attention Planning Department Craig Carter State Transportation Department _< Regional Water Qual. Control Bd. DOMESTIC WATER SEWERS Butte Water District Richvale Sanitary District California Water Service Co. North Burbank Pub. Util. Dist. Del Oro Water Co. Skansen Sub. (CSA #21) OWID Stirling City Sewer maint. Dist. Thermalito Irrigation District Thermalito Irrigation District. Other UTILITIES IRRIGATION WATER PG&E North (Chico) Biggs-W.Gridley Water District PG&E South (Marysville) Butte Water District Pacific Bell Durham Irrigation District State TV Cable OWID Viacom TV Cable Paradise Irrigation District Richvale Irrigation District FIRE PROTECTION Table Mountain Irrigation Dist. E1 Medio Fire Protection Dist. Thermalito Irrigation District County Fire Department/CDF DRAINAGE DISTRICT MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT Durham, Oroville or Butte County RECLAMATION DISTRICT POLICE PROTECTION State Highway Patrol — County Sheriff OTHER COMMITTEES1COMMISSIONS SCHOOL DISTRICT RECREATION FACILITIES Paradise Pines Architectural Chico Area Recreation District Control Committee Durham Area Rec. & Park Dist. Butte County Farm Bureau Feather River Rec. & Park Dist. Community Association: Paradise Rec. & Park Dist. Richvale Rec. & Park Dist. State Parks & Rec. Dept. 'TE COUNTY PLX� NINO COMMI ON 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 (916) 538-7601 TO: DATE: March 26 , 1993 RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Williams Rezone #93-20 Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project• Rezone to SP.-1 the east 630 ft . of said parcel . AP#050-260-019 8 . 69 acres located at the east end of Merrill Rd . east of upper Pentz Rd . at 2024 (formerly 2015) Merrill Rd . Paradise Zoned SR-1 , FR-40 We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures .or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) . Please provide any factual statements; ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above-noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, Larry Pa ' er Planning Technician Comments• Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) . Yes No PROJECT NAME n SCH # AP # 1 FILE # 30 Day Review Period Ends SCH Review- Period. Ends OUT-GOING ACTIVITY Date Action ' r cl /v/J!� � � W � �n/.�:C�J�ys•-� [�4 /?`rlJ 1^'�- /Z( O(i(7'L ecl� 1 I I . I j i PROJECT NAME SCH AP # FILE # 30 Day Review Period Ends SCH Review Period Ends CORRESPONDENCE/ COMENTS RECEIVED Date Agency/Person /,A �eZ;o %Z O 1A 17-- d7a-_ - _ - - -- -- o = - -- -r ------ - ,► --- �.: ;; _ _ .} ---- -, - - -� - - - tr - _ _ _ ._ .. _ _. r _ _ �_ _ ,� - ... �r - - - � - - - -- t � � _ __ _ +} - .. �. H. _ _ - � _ ._ - _ �..�. � � _ ..i. _ _ ��. _ � _ :} i _ �.�_ .� ' 1' ■ of-o �60oa � , z6 ,li.lilll':;1.)Id L-_`lla_YI-I 14 1'. 164131-1W ,JI OJ^o 0 0/1�1 WILLIAMS REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS TRUST 2015 MERRILL ROAD WIL.IIAMS ANDREW E & M WINIFRED TRUSTEE 2015 MERRILL RD PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISF. CA 95969 L: 050 230 008 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 260 002 000 STATUS: ACTIVE BURROUGHS .MARION R & LORINE M POPE EDWARD H & MARY A 6695 SHAY LANE 402 I..I_OYD AVE PARADISE CA 95969 SAN IFANDRO CA 94578 L: 050 230 009 000 STATUS: ACTIVE FORD JAMES T L: 050 260 003 000 STATUS: ACTIVE . JOHNSON RALPH W & EVELYN W CP 1882 JUNE WAY 2015 MERRILL RD PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE CA 95969 L: 050 230 010 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 260 004 000 STATUS: ACTIVE MCVEA HELEN L REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS TR NUGENT STEWART ALAN ETAL MCVEA HELEN L TRUSTEE 6691 SHAY LN P 0 BOX 3298 PARADISE CA 95969LAKE R i L: 050 230 011 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 260 014 000 STATUS: ACTIVE HANSON PAUL M & GENEVA CP SONNTAG WALTER & DIANE CP d 2289 SHAY LANE 6009 PENTZ ROAD PARADISE CA 95969 w PARADISE CA 95969 L: 050 230 012 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 260 014 000 STATUS:' ACTIVE PAISLEY DONALD J & MILDRED H REV TRUST SONNTAG WALTER & DIANE CP ; PAISLEY DONALD J & MILDRED H TRS 6009 PENTZ ROAD 6687 SHAY LANE °d PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE CA 95969 L: 050 260 012 000 STATUS: ACTIVE' L: 050 230 013 000 STATUS: ACTIVE p WILLIAMS DAVID DEANE SS DONNING JOHN L & VIRGINIA L 4n,, 3288 LARKIN ROAD 6685 SHAY LN BIGGS CA 95917 PARADISE CA 95969 i L: 050 260 006 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 230 014 000 STATUS: ACTIVE INGOGLIA JOSEPH A & ARLENE N ETAL TC ROCKLEIN MICHAEL W & MADELEINE V 6683 SHAY LANE 6250 MTN VIEW DRIVE PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE CA 95969 L: 050 260 007 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 230 015 000 STATUS: ACTIVE STUTTS LEMONT S & ETHEL M TRUST BRYON HERMAN ESTATE OF STUTTS LEMONT S & ETHEL M TRUSTEES C/O TRAVERS DONALD R 1955 STARK LANE 529 PEARSON RD PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE CA 95969 L: 050 260 015 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 230 016 000 STATUS: ACTIVE SONNTAG WALTER M & DIANE R CP ROBINSON MARY E SS 6009 PENTZ RD P 0 BOX 3214 PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE CA 95969 L: 050 260 1017 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 230 017 000 STATUS: ACTIVE GAYLORD WILLIAM DAVID JR NIELSEN ELMER & MILDRED 2016 MERRILL RD 6677 SHAY LANE PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE CA 95969 L: 050 260 018 000 STATUS: ACTIVE , L: 050 230 018 000 STATUS: ACTIVE GAYLORD WILLIAM D & ANDREA L JT SUNDWELL OTTO M & BEE L C/O WILLIAMS ANDREW E & WINIFRED 2015 MERRILL RD 6675 SHAY LANE PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE _ CA 95969 L: 050 260 019 000 STATUS: INACTIV L: 050 230 020 000 STATUS: ACTIVE WILLIAMS REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS TRUST CARR WILLIAM C. & CAROLINE M WILLIAMS ANDREW E & M WINIFRED TRUSTEE 2015 MERRILL RD P 0 BOX 1204 PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE CA 95967 OJ o s yo o y1 p J!o, 3 a o -,14 1 I-0iIli t_I �•Ii Ic�.il,.l.I'I L. l.,liiit l_.lall. .1I 10,4 U His, 6789 CRITTERS LANE 6674 SHAY- LANE PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE CA 95969 L: 050 220 026 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 230 022 000 STATUS: ACTIVE BRYANT FRED C & MELODY A JT MOHRHARDT REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS TRUST MOHRHARDT DOROTHY D TRUSTEE 1903 MERRILL RD 130 CONIFER LN PARADISE CA 95969 WALtIL,IT CREEK CA 94598 L: 050 220 085 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 230 023 000 STATUS: ACTIVE PIERCE RALPH MARLIN & ESTHER BERNICE TRAUTVETTER REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS TRUS TRAUTVETTER RICHARD E & JUNE E TRUSTEE 1826 MERRILL RD 6678 SHAY LN PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE CA 95969 L: 050 220 086 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 230 024 000 STATUS: ACTIVE BIGGS MICHAEL DOUGLAS & MICHELLE L ETA BALOGH JOHN SS 1921 MERRILL RD 6680 SHAY LANE PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE CA 95969 L: 050 220 109 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 230 026 000 STATUS: ACTIVE FLESHMAN WOODROW W ESTATE OF GARBER ALLEN J JR NARBERES KAREN ETAL 3707 RIO GRANDE DR 6684 SHAY LN ANTIOCH CA 94509 PARADISE CA 95969 Le 050 220 110 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 230 027 000 STATUS: ACTIVE HENRICHS ROY J & MARY K TC ROSS ARNO & LILLIAN C 6759 MATELL ROAD 6688 SHAY LANE PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE CA 95969 LE 050 220 084 000 ' STATUS: ACTIVE ' L: 050 230 028 000 STATUS: ACTIVE KELBY VERONICA E TRUST ROSS ARNO & LILLIAN C KELBY VERONICA E TRUSTEE P 0 BOX 642 6688 SHAY LANE PARADISE CA 95967 PARADISE CA 95969. L: 050 220 124 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 230 029 000 STATUS: ACTIVE KELBY VERONICA E TRUST REPLOGLE REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS TRUST KELBY VERONICA E TRUSTEE REPLOGLE ALLEN D & DELMA J TRUSTEES P 0 BOX 642 6690 SHAY LN PARADISE CA 95967 PARADISE CA 95969 L: 050 260 021 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 230 030 000 STATUS: ACTIVE WILLIAMS REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS TRUST RICKSON PAUL C & MARY K JT WILLIAMS ANDREW E & M WINIFRED TRUSTEE 2015 MERRIL RD 6692 SHAY LANE PARADISE CA PARADISE CA 95969 L: 050 260 014 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 230 031 000 STATUS: ACTIVE SONNTAG WALTER & DIANE CP SYFERT GARY G & MAUREEN 0 6009 .PENTZ ROAD 6696 SHAY LANE PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE CA 95969 L: 050 230 019 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 260 022 000 STATUS: ACTIVE LEE THOMAS & MARGARET JT WYLLIE DANIELLE K C/O WILLIAMS WINIFRED 6673 SHAY LN 2015 MERRIL RD PARADISE CA 95969 PARADISE CA L: 050 230 025 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 050 260 023 000 STATUS: ACTIVE STRAUSS SHERYL A ETAL WILLIAMS ANDREW E JR C/O WILLIAMS WINIFRED 14847 ANSFORD STREET 2015 MERRIL RD HACIENDA HEIGHTS CA 91745 PARADISE CA L: 050 260 024 000 STATUS: ACTIVE WILLIAMS REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS TRUST WILLIAMS ANDREW E & M WINIFRED TRUSTEE 2015 MERRIL. RD PARADISE CA fi , t ±3 ' y v�3 !7M1P +�"�+i��icfa' @NRt^7.'4�}°�w •;Y' �:rn w'<. s sagr':r. 5� ` ��y t %+'S'7's•.'._,y '1.1 I'°'�y,..�r^;. A r Date September 1' , t1993 Board Action Date 9/14/93 r •.. �-; .'•E,•COli ��•° •.......... Route XXX Referral OFFICE OF CLERK OF THE BOARD Department Document Action Requested Administration Agreement(s) File Agriculture Application(s) _0—Information Assessor Budget Transfer(s) .__,Necessary Action Auditor Certified Minutes _ Obtain Signatures County Clerk/Elections Claims Recommendation County Counsel Correspondence 1 Record District Attorney Deed(s) Report to Board Environmental Health Notice(s) of Completion 1 Return Copy Fire Department Ordinance(s) to Clerk Bd Library Penalty Abatement Requests 1 _Return Original Mental Health g_Resolution(s) 93-123 to Clerk Bd Personnel W/O Enclosure _2_',Pl anni ng/LAFCo Probation Public Health Public Works Purchasing 1 Recorder Risk Management Sheriff/Coroner Treasurer/Tax Collector Welfare ! Additional Information r i � 5 9 RA smbo I C6-deS-OZ muZo s s 1 I japsoaeg I eggnso •r eoepuuo 0 ;o I4uno3 .' . • • I up.�oasg TuZa'f��l] I po'piooea. I . 00 • 10401 I iytt '"'"' . Iyv 10 LInvo-vo-C76 vVirovo-E6 �i�i�iofio-£6 l r � FiEQUiE TED8Y' . 93 - 35402 cF S�QcrJ�SOrS This document is being re-recorded to reflect a -correction made on Exhibit 1 of agreement I 93-0354021 Total . 00 93-040444 �p\,N0IAA I Q.�( pOOV00CX 04f- ' Recorded 1 � Official Records I County- of I $EP 2 0 t993 _—. Butte . I -- Candace J. Grubbs I Recorder I 8:02em 17-Aug-93 I COMS FM 7 r Y` Resolution No.93-123 RESOLUTION FOR AN AGREEMENT RELATING TO RECLASSIFICATION OF ZONE FOR ANDRE AND WINIFRED WILLIAMS BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors be and is hereby authorized and directed to execute an agreement on behalf of the County of Butte relating to reclassification of zoning with: ANDRE AND WINIFRED WILLIAMS and to do and perform everything necessary to carry out the purpose of this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Butte County Board of Supervisors on the 10th day of August , 1993, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Meyer, Dolan, McLaughlin, Thomas and Chair Houx NOES: None ABSENT: None NOT VOTING: None MARYE HOUX, CHAIRMAN Butte Cou ty Board of Supervisors ATTEST: JOHN S. BLACKLOCK, Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk of the Board By _ 93 - 35402 CONDITIONAL ZONING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this 2lrw day of • , 19X3, by and between "First Party", as identified in item (a) of Exhibit 1 of this Agreemedf, and the COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California, herein called "Second Party". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, First Party is the owner of real property, herein called the 'Property', situated in the County of Butte, which Property is described in Item (f) of Exhibit I of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Property is now zoned as specified in Item (b) of Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, First Party has applied for a reclassification of zoning of the Property pursuant to which application the Property is being reclassified from its present classification to the classification or classifications specified in Item (c) of Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, public hearings have been held upon said application before the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, and after having considered the matter presented, it has been determined that certain conditions to the zoning reclassification of said real property must be imposed so as not to create any problems inimical to the health, safety and the general welfare of the County of Butte. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that inasmuch as the reclassification specified in Item (c) of Exhibit 1 is being granted, the said reclassification shall be subject to the conditions specified in the following paragraphs: 1. That Exhibit 1, as completed and attached hereto, is incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. 2. That First Party shall construct and comply with all the following conditions: 2a. The division of the property.shall be lira ted to no more than three parcels as shown on Exhibit A, allowing for minor modifications to the map in case of leachfield needs. 3. In the event First Party, any successor in interest of First Party, or any person in possession of the property described in Item (f) of Exhibit I violates or fails to perform any of the conditions of this Agreement within thirty (30) days after notice thereof as provided in Paragraph 5, the Board of Supervisors of Second Party may instruct the County Counsel of Second Party to institute legal proceedings to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. The Board of Supervisors of Second Party may also initiate proceedings to rezone the property to the classification specified in Item (b) of Exhibit I or any other suitable classification. 4. Notice of violation of provisions of this Agreement shall be sent to First Party at the address specific in Item (d) of Exhibit 1 and to the street address of the property 93 - 35401 described in Item (d) of Exhibit 1. Any subsequent title holder, any lien holder, or party in possession of the property shall also receive notice of such violation at an address other than as specified in Item (d) of Exhibit 1 by filing with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Second Party the address to which the notice is to be sent, with reference to this Agreement and the Resolution authorizing its execution. 5. In the event suit is brought by the County Counsel of Second Party to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, First Party agrees to pay to Second Party a reasonable sum to be fixed by the Court as attorney's fees. 6. Each and every one of the provisions of this agreement herein contained shall bind and inure to the benefit of the successor in interest of each and every party hereto, in the same manner as if they had herein been expressly named. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. COUNTY OF BU7E, a political $ubo' ision of t State of Cal'fornia Aw By j Ch ' erson of the Board d Supervisors AUG 10 1993 "Second Party" ATTEST: — Clerk of the Board of Supervisors No. CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT 9 3 - 3 5 4 0-2 so OPTIONAL SECtION State of ' ` — CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER Though statute does not require the Notary to County of �-s— fill in the data below, doing so may prove invaluable to persons relying on the document. t ,I ❑INDIVIDUAL before me, arooac n--- • , On — I NAME,TITLE OF OFFICER-E. JANE uut,rvv,„r+, ❑CORPORATE OFFICER(S) DAA TE personally appeared TITLES) p Y P a r ^ NAMES)OF SI NER(S) PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED personally known to me-OR-❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence ❑ ❑ GENERAL to be the person.(ewhose name(O is/afe ❑ATTORNEY-IN-FACT subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that hefshe/"executed ❑TRUSTEE(S) the same in h ether/t4e•if authorized ❑GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR capacity(LOS), and that by h+s/her/t wir s HER: signatures) on the instrument the persoro), or the entity upon behalf of which the personfA acted, executed the instrument. SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: •t CAROL ROACH N OF PERSON(S)OR ENTMjIES) Comm.#968956 z WITNESS my hand d official seal. Notary Public—California v o- BUTTE COUNTY • My Comm.Expires AUG 7.1996 SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL SECTION THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT Though the data requested here is not required by law, $IGNER(S)07HER THAN NAMED ABOVE it could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this forth. ©1992 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION•8236 Remmet Ave.,P.O.Box 7184•Canoga Park,CA 91309-7184 ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT T No.5779 State of CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER County Of INDIVIDUAL ( ❑ CORPORATE /9� G,o�a14t' l�xiaE Lavoy �o �v � OrS �efore me, 1460 OFFICERS) DATE NAME.TITLE OF OFFICER-E.G.,'J E DOE,NOTARY PUBLIC' TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED �jA1���?�J Lf/tt�C.r�rrl.5 personally appeared NAMES)OF SIGNER(S) ❑ GENERAL ❑ATTORNEY-IN-FACT personally_known to me-OR-❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence ❑TRUSTEE(S) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the withininstrument and ❑GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR acknowledged to me that he/she/they ❑OTHER: -- executed the same in his/her/their 'r OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL authorized capacity(ies), and that by LCRRf%!'LF A"I?'E LUNDY t, 4:,.,,;;_ _C i:._- his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument tis:n. .mia Pi:yCcT..nElurjC>,pr SJ+NCVo3,19]5 " the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of SSIG oER RSaREoRfSENENG: �•�u which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witne s my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY ATTENTION NOTARY:Although the information requested below is OPTIONAL,it could prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to an unauthorized document. THIS CERTIFICATE Title or Type of Document MUST BE ATTACHED Number of Pages Date of Document TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other than Named Above 01992 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATInN. oe..,...,.•A- ALL-PURPOSE ACK - n�� ��N la CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER State ofS XINDIVIDUAL County OfyTE [:] CORPORATE t I_ OFFICERS) TITLE(s) On I�.PTATE 9� before me,1j NAME,TITLE OF OFFICER-E. .. JANE DOE,NOTAR"PUBLIC E] PARTNER(S)PARTNER(S) ❑ C.C./ ❑ GENERAL personally appeared NAME(S)OF SIGNER(S) ❑ATTORNEY-IN-FACT roved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence ❑TRUSTEE(S) personally known to me-OR-❑p ❑GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/the f ❑OTHER: executed the same in hs/her/t authorized capacity(ies), and that by OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument HOLLIS LUNDY n behalf of SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: Notary Public—California the person(s), or the entity u� NAME OF PERSON(S)OR ENTITY(IES) ` ."� BUTTEcouNTY which the person(s) acted, executed the y W Comm.Expires DEC 08,1995 Y, instrument. �. Witness my hand a official seal. 0 r. r, SIGNA RE OF NOTARY ested below is OPTIONAL,it couid prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to an unauthorized document. ATTENTION NOTARY:Although the information requ i• Title or Type of Document THIS CERTIFICATE Date of Document MUST BE ATTACHED Number of Pages TO THE DOCUMENT ` DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other than Named Above ' Of 992 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION•8236 Remmet Ave.,P.O.Box 7184•Canoga Park,CA 91304-7184 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No.5192 State of ��OPTIONAL SECTION�■� CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER County of Though statute does not require the Notary to fill in the data below, doing so may prove pinvaluable to persons relying on the document. On 9 - it] , 3 before mea a C Vo T i� 6 ❑INDIVIDUAL , DATE NAME,TITLE OF OFFICER-E.G'.'JANE DOE,NO• RY PUBLIC, ❑CORPORATE OFFICERS) personally appeared NAME(S)OF SIGNER(S) TITLE(S) /personally known to me-OR-❑ e ❑PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED to be the personj4 whose named} is/aft ❑ GENERAL r subscribed to the within instrument and ac- ❑ATTORNEY-IN-FACT knowledged to me that Me/she/t4ey executed ❑TRUSTEE(S) the same in h�s her/them authorized / ❑GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR capacity(Wo), and that by l&/her/tl;air �OT R: signature(jr) on the instrument the FersonA, or the entity upon behalf of which the 'r— person(sj acted, executed the instrument. CAROL ROACH SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: " COMM.*968956 z WITNESS my hand a fficial seal. NA E OF PERSON(S)OR ENT (IES) `m Notory Public— California v "�• BUTTE COUNTY '. .My Comm.Expires AUG 7,1996 0, (ti SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL SECTION THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT Though the data requested here is not required by law, it could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. SIGNER(S)OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ©1992 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION•8236 Remmet Ave.,P.O.Box 7184•Canoga Park,CA 91309-7184 93 - 35402 p f EXHIBIT 1 Agreement (a) "First Party", as used in this Agreement, includes each and all of the following: Andre and Winifred Williams. (b) The property is now zoned: FR-40 (c) The zoning reclassification of the property is from its present zoning to: SR-1 (d) Notice to First Party pursuant to Paragraph No. 4 shall be addressed to: Andre and Winifred Williams, 2024 Merrill Road, Paradise. (e) The change in zoning classification pursuant to Paragraph No. 4 shall be to: SR-1 (f) "Property", as used in this Agreement, includes: All that certain real property situate in the County of Butte, State of California described as follows: The E 630.40 feet of the N 520 ft. of the M'1/2 of the SW'1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 7, 722N, R4E MDM, and a portion of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7 described as follows: Beginning at the SE corner of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7; thence, along the E line of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7, N 0° 17' 18" W 100.00 ft.; thence N 89° 02' 22" W and parallel with the S line of said NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section, a distance of 385.63 ft.; thence, S 68 ° 35' 38" W, a distance of 262.73 ft. to the SW corner of the E 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7; thence, along the S line thereof, S 89° 02' 22" E, 630.77 ft. to the point of beginning. s - xr w 368. . w MERRIL RD. lamw = 4M4Vfm 23-07m s qa. J = 6.17 ACKS e� 3.60 ACRES 1.60 ACRES s manir t 450.37ti 2701 OR 316 1'=200' * ' A I tao w t 412.43• 1 6S'* L N agwigr w 1 6 looFm SEC 7 EXHIBIT "A" BOUNDARY UNE MODIFICATION PLAT FOR OWNER: WINIFRED WILUAMS BEING A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF WINIFRED WILUAMS THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 7,T22N, R4E MDM L dt L SURVEYING 2015 MERRIL RD. 1007 BILLS ROAD PARADISE, CA. 95969 PARADISE. BUTTE CO.. CALIFORNIA PARADISE, CA. 95969 AP 50-26-16 PTN. (916)- 877-4300 ( CERTIFICATE OF DEATH 9 3 - 3 5 4 0 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE FILE NUMBER USE BLACK INK ONLY LOCAL REGISTRATION DISTRICT wNn CERTIFICATE NUMBER IA. NAME OF DECEDENT-FIRSTI 1B. MIDDLE IC. LAST (FAMILY) 2A. DATE OF DEATH-MO. DAY. YR;2B. HOUR 3. SEX (GIVEN) Andrew Ellison Williams April 13 , 1993 ' 1721 MalE 4. RACE S. HISPANIC-SPECIFY 6. DATE OF BIR-H-MO. DA.Y, YR 7. AGERN ' IF UNDER 1 YEAR IF UNDER 24 HOVRs YEAS MONTHS DAYS HOURS MINUTES Caucasian ❑ YES ® NO November 15 1906 86 DECEDENT S. STATE OF 9. CITIZEN OF WHAT IDA. FULL NAME OF FATHER IDB. S-ATE OF I IA. FULL MAIDEN NAME OF MOTHER I IS. STATE OF PERSONAL BIRTH COUINTRY B'-RTN 1 BIRTH DATAUSA net Dean Williams Mass. I Lillian Walden Alaska 12. MILITARY SERVICE7 13. SOCIAL SECURITY NO. 14. MARITAL STATUS IS. NAME OF SURVIVING SPOUSE IIF WIFE.ENTER MAIDEN NAME) 19 _ TO 19_ ® NONE 569-03-0786 Married Minerva Winifred [lig pp 16A. USUAL OCCUPATION 16B. USUAL KIND OF BUSINESS 16C. USUAL EMPLOYEE. 16D.YEARS IN 17.EDUCATION-YEARS COMPLETED OR INDUSTRY 1 1 O.CUFATION Mpchanic Public Works Butte County 20 12 ISA. RESIDENCE-STREET AND NUMBER OR LOCATION 1188. CITY I18C.ZIP CODE USUAL 2024 Merrill Road ' Paradise ' 95969 IESIDENCE IBD. COUNTY IBE. NUMBER OF YEARS )OF.STATE OR FOREIGN COUNTRY 20. NAME. RELATIONSHIP. MAILING ADDRESS ' IN THIS COUNTY I AND ZIP CODE OFINFORMANT Butte ; 76 ; California M.Winifred Williams-Wife 19A. PLACE OF DEATH 1913. IF HOSPITAL, SPECIFY 19C. COUNTY 2024 Merrill R d. 1 ON • IP, ER/OP. DOA 1 Paradise , California PLACE Feather River Hosp. ' P 1 ButteOF _ DEATH 190. STREET AUDiiLSS--STREET AND NUMBER OR LOCATION 19E. CITY - TIME INTERVAL 22. WAS DEATH REPORTED TO CORONER? ONSET ED 5974 F e n t z P,c a d ; Paradise IBE, DEATH REFERRAL NUMBER resR93-a55 [a NO 21. DEATH WAS CAUSEp BY: (ENTER ONLY ONE CAUSE PER LINE FOR A. B.AND CI I 23.WAS BIOPSY PERFORMED? IMMEDIATE t > , I CAUSE IA1 �LL�1'Uli=�'�'��- 1 • ❑ YES NO CAUSE 1 r 24A. WAS AUTOPSY PERFORMED? OF / J f /l DEATH DUE TO r "` " L%Vt ,1 �" El YES YES �J NO 24B.WAS M USED IN DETERMINING CAUSE DUE TO ICI I'T I f ! /` 4 S L( C- Ll, ��.a;'� sz ! YE i C'C-Gr ' , C��C� ❑DEATH'{�,• p NO " 25. OTHER SIGNIFICANT CONDITIONS CONTRIBUTING TO DEATH BUY NOT RELATED TO CAUSE GIVEN IN 2 26. WAS OPERATION PERFORMED FOR ANY CONDITION IN ITEM 21 OR 257 IF YES,LIST TYPE OF OPERATION AND DATE. Lef t Hi 0r' 1 CERTIFY THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE DEATH 27B. SIGNATURE A DEGREE OR TITLE OF GERIFIER 27C.CERTIFIER'S LICENSE NUMBER 270. DATE SIGNED PHYSI- OCCURRED AT THE HOUR,DATE AND PLACE STATED FROM THE1 i iC 1 CIAN'S CAUSES STATED. 1 27A.DECEDENT ATTENDED SINCE DECEDENT LAST SEEN ALIVE R ICIAN'S .ERTIFICA- MONTH. DAY, YEAR i MONTH.DAY,YEAR PE ATTENDING NAME AND ADDRESS TION I(W 19 C�3 1 7 J.W. Corn M.D. 6009 Pentz Rd. Paradise CA. I CERTIFY THAT IN MY OPINION DEATH OCCURRED AT 28A. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CORONER OR DEPUTY CORONER G //^ '28B. DATE SIGNED THE HOUR. DATE AND PLACE STATED FROM THE CAUSES STATED. � Deputy Coroner, N`�'i / LAIC-�K .5 DRONER'S 29. MANNER OF DEATH-SPI!0 J One:natulal, accident. 30A. PLACE OF INJURY 308. INJURY AT WORK ; MONTH. DA30C. DATE OF INJURY 31. HOUR USE SulXqde.borbKlqe.Pending Investlgat on or could not be determined 1 Y,YEA ONLY Accident IResidence ; ❑ YES ® NO 'p ril 3 1993 1930 32. LOCATION(STREET AND NUMBER OR LOCATION AND CITY) 33. DESCRIBE HOW INJURY OCCURRED(EVENTS WHICH RESULTED IN INJURY) 2015 Merrill Rd. , Paradise,CA 95969 Fell while going to another room FUNERAL 34A' DISPOSITION(SI 1 348. PLACE OP FINAL DISPOSInON-NAME AND ADDRESS I 34C. DATE 35A. SI GNATURE OF;E�.,BALI`tfi 35B. LICENSE ])RECTOR CRE-BU ; Paradise Cemetery, Paradise,CA ;Apr16,1993 �Jzcd�-P .�� ,474 NUMBER LOCAL 36A. NAME OF FUNERAL DIRECTOR(OR PERSON ACTING AS SUCH) 1 368. LICENSE NO. 37. SIGPIyTidl`tE OF LOCAL.,AND 5E,5ISTRA 38.REGISTRATION DATE F 809 ►l.�f)4k� =�'.. '#= �'° �>� ,/- /-:s EGISTRAR Paradise Chapel of the Pines -93 . STATE A. B. C. D. E. F. CENSUS TRACT 'EGISTRAR -11 (REV.3-911 MAKE NO ERASURES.WHITEOUTS.OR OTHER ALTERATIONS CERTIFICATION STATEMENT 1'llis is to certify that Lite attached is a true and correct copy of the vital record which is on file in this office and of which I am the .legal custodian. VREGISTRAR OF r VITAL STATISTICS SICMIURE (A' WWfjf.YlIj 017FICIAL � (UTFILW.1 ?TILE Butte County Department of Public Health 18 B County Cent.cr Drive,- Uroville, CA 95965 APR 51993 •11A(1, OF U.MIF1CAI'lUIl DAIS OF C1uz1'IF1c 1'1LN END OF DOCUMENT ' 1 To c r �'�, r ❑ AM ❑ate- Time ❑ PM WHILE OU WERE OUT M 1 s of '-7 37 Phone ) l Area Code Number Extension TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT RETURNED YOUR CALL Message Z I 1' l Operator ASTMAN (�. 4C200 a ` ° 3 - 40444 REQUESTED 13Y 02 C�e�.l� mrd cs-r S..P This document is b-i-ge—recl6rded to ref.l.ect a correction made on Exhibit I of agreement 93-0354021 Total . 00 I Recorded I Official Records I County- of I f 1 Butte 1 Candace J. Grubbs 1 Recorder I l\ 8:02am 17-Rug-93 I COMS FM 7 Resolution No.93-123 RESOLUTION FOR AN AGREEMENT RELATING TO RECLASSIFICATION OF ZONE FOR ANDRE AND WINIFRED WILLIAMS BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors be and is hereby authorized and directed to execute an agreement on behalf of the County of Butte relating to reclassification of zoning with: ANDRE AND WINIFRED WILLIAMS and to do and perform everything necessary to carry out the purpose of this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Butte County Board of Supervisors on the 10th day of August 1993, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Meyer, Dolan, McLaughlin, Thomas and Chair Houx NOES: None ABSENT: None NOT VOTING: None , MARY ANE ROUX, CHAIRMAN Butte Cou ty Board of Supervisors ATTEST: JOHN S. BLACKLOCK, Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk of the Board 93-04044411 Total .00 ( I 1 By l � Recorded I Official Records I County of I Butte 1 Candace J. Grubbs 1 Recorder I 0:02am 20-Sep-93 I COMS FM a. O ,�, �� �� � �� �� ���� � ko, i � -�- �� � � � . �,��� �; 93 - 40444 '93 ' 1?.4I CONDITIONAL ZONING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this 2___1?1day ofa-1-y•, 19 3, by and between "First Party", as identified in item (a) of Exhibit l of this Agreemerr{((,, and the COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California, herein called "Second Party". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, First Party is the owner of real property, herein called the "Property", situated in the County of Butte, which Property is described in Item (f) of Exhibit I of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Property is now zoned as specified in Item (b) of Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, First Party has applied for a reclassification of zoning of the Property pursuant to which application the Property is being reclassified from its present classification to the classification or classifications specified in Item (c) of Exhibit I; and WHEREAS, public hearings have been held upon said application before the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, and after having considered the matter presented, it has been determined that certain conditions to the zoning reclassification of said real property must be imposed so as not to create any problems inimical to the health, safety and the general welfare of the County of Butte. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that inasmuch as the reclassification specified in Item (c) of Exhibit 1 is being granted, the said reclassification shall be subject to the conditions specified in the following paragraphs: 11 That Gxhibit I, as completed and attached hereto, is Incorporated into and made it part of this Agreement with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. 2. That First Party shall construct and comply with all the following conditions: 2a. The division of the property shall be limited to no more than three parcels as shown on Exhibit A, allowing for minor modifications to the map in case of leachfield needs. 3. In the event First Party, any successor in interest of First Party, or any person in possession-of the property described in Item (f) of Exhibit I violates or fails to perform any of the conditions of this Agreement within thirty (30) days after notice thereof as provided in Paragraph 5, the Board of Supervisors of Second Party may instruct the County Counsel of Second Party to institute legal proceedings to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. The Board of Supervisors of Second Party may also initiate proceedings to rezone the property to the classification specified in Item (b) of Exhibit I or any other suitable classification. 4. Notice of violation of provisions of this Agreement shall he sent to First Party at the address specific in Item (d) of Exhibit I and to the street address of the property 9.3_.•350 . 9 3 ' 4 0 4 4 4 J described in Item (d) of Exhibit 1. Any subsequent title holder, any lien holder, or party in possession of the property shall also receive notice of such violation at an address other than as specified in Item (d) of Exhibit 1 by filing with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Second Party the address to which the notice is to be sent, with reference to this Agreement and the j Resolution authorizing its execution. 5. In the event suit is brought by the County Counsel of Second Party to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, First Party agrees to pay to Second Party a reasonable sum to be fixed by the Court as attorney's fees. 6. Each and every one of the provisions of this agreement herein contained shall bind and'inure to the benefit of the successor in interest of each and every party hereto, in the same manner as if they had herein been expressly named. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political �Ubo'. ision oft c(S!te of Cal'fornia By Ch8• person of the Board d Supervisors AUG 10 1993 "Second Party" ATTEST: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT 9 3 —3 5 4 0 71 Ne.541 State of OL 1h A OPTIONAL SECTION a•tlllliv �/{� CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER County of 8 �T7 Though statue does not require the Notary to fill In the data below,doing so may prove- -p Invaluable to persons relying on the document. On Q ' f t?' 3 before me, C(L(,► 1l 6 Cl C f)-,-r)n,re r•I f it h i l L ❑INDIVIDUAL DATE //NAME•TITLE OF(IOFFICER•E.G..'JANE DOE.NOTA PUBLIC ❑CORPORATE OFFICER(S) personally appeared ��r 4rF n e {-(Sr. _. j NAMEIS)OF SI NERIS) TITLE(S) personally known to me-OR-❑proved to me on the basis cf satisfactory evidence ❑ PARTNER(S) LIMITED to be the person•(.ewhose name(s) is/are ❑GENERAL subscribed to the within instrument and ac- ❑ATTORNEY-IN-FACT knowledged to me that he/she/"executed ❑TRUSTEE(S) / the same in his/her/their authorized ❑GUARDIAWCONSERVATOR capacity(ias), and that by his/her/tpeir H signature(s)on the instrument the person(•s) HER: , or the entity upon behalf of which the —� person,(a)acted,executed the instrument. QyCARO(ROACH SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: COMM'0 968956 2 NA E OF PERSON(S)0R ENTITY(IES)Notary Public—California y WITNESS my hand d official seal. '� P n e9UTTE COUNTY e ' ' T''Comm.Expires AUG 7.1996 SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL SECTION THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT Though the data requested here Is not required by law, It could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. SIGNER(S)OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 01992 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION•8236 Rommel Ave.,P.O.Dnx 7104•Canoga Park,CA 91309.7104 ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Ne.S179 State of ,c� CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER County of vy/ INDIVIDUAL / � ❑`CORPORATE O�Q7/CrrisT Z,Lf:Aefore me,1,0ey-G7iitl,' AtW4 LvNDy 16D2 dire. C'FICER(s) DATE NAME.TITLE OF OFFICER•E.G..'J E DOE,NOTARY PI:FLIC- TITLE($) ❑PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED personally appeared LC/iNiJ ��w 4s��` GENERAL NAME(S)OF SO4ER(S) ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT personally known to me-OR- proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence �TRUSTEE(S) • to be the person(s) whose name(s) istare subscribed to the within Instrument and ❑GUAROIAWCONSERVATOR acknowledged to me that he/she/they ❑OTHER: - executed the same In his/her/their OFF1r,A.Lf:7TARv,EAL i' authorized capacity(les), and that by �:«;i, -•I_ N ,,,,r..:•,••;, -.r;. .•;,;, I, his/her/their signature(s)on the Instrument the person(s),or the entity upon behalf of SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: �,y.••, L:yCc?.n.:;ap'ori rlCVG�,19]S I• which the person(s) acted, executed the NAME OFPERSON(%ORENTITY(IE9) Instrument. Witne s my hand and olflclal seal. SIONATunEOF NOTAnY ATTENTION NOTARY:Aldtougn the Information requested below Is OPTIONAL,It ceuld prevent hAudul"I Altachment of this certificate to an unauthortted document. THIS CERTIFICATE Title or Type of Document MUST BE ATTACHED g TO THE DOCUMENT Number of Pa es Cato of Document DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signor(s)Other than Named Above 01002 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION•023E Rommel Ave.,P.O.Doi 7104•Canoga Park,CA 91004.7104 ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT t.1 No!179 State of CALL F-O ZN►A CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER County of k-3' y'I I F XINDIVIDUAL EPr )% �pLG/S L1,1N�y IVOrarzy tP013( /C []CORPORATE On — before me, OFFICER(S)DATE/ NAME,TITLE OF OFFICER•E. 'JANE DOE.NOTARY PU9LII' TITLES) []PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED personally appeared LJI i!!i✓2 E L7 C,�! �-!A ti7!!5 E]GENERAL NAMEIG S)OF SNERS) []ATTORNEY-IN•FACT personally known to me-OR- proved to me On the basis o1 satisfactory evidence TRUSTEE(S) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrumeit and ❑GUAROIAWCONSERVATOR acknowledged to me that he/shs/they ❑OTHER: executed the same in his/her/their OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL authorized capacity(tes), and that by HOLDS LUNDY his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument NotaryPublic—California the person(s),or the entity upon behalf of SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: BurrE COUNTY which the person(s) acted, executed the NAME OF PERSON(S)OR ENTITY(IES) my Comm.Expire; DEC 08.1995 instrument. Witness my hand a official Seal. Z�� sir,NAAIRE OF NOTARY ATTENTION NOTARY:Although the information requested 9elow,is OPTIONAL,it maid prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to an unauthorized document. THIS CERTIFICATE I ilia or Type of Document MUST BE ATTACHED Number of Pages Date o`Document TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s)Other than Named Above 01992 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION-8236 Remmet Ave..P.O.Box 7184•Canoga Park,CA 91904.7184 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Na.s197 State of jrn OPTIONAL SECTION 1ttt.tts CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER County Of Though staMe does riot require the Notary to 1111 In the data below,doinq so may prove Invaluable to persona relying on the document. On ` before me, ��r I �'i r, , A Ta,_, (A 6 {,` C]INDIVIDUAL DATE NAME,TITLE OF OFFICER•E.G..*JANE DOE,NOTARY PUBLIC' �CORPORATE OFFICER(S) personally appeared A n a PI 11 L_ NAME(S)OF SIGNER(S) TITLE(S) personally known to me-OR-❑ e PARTNER(S) C]LIMITED to be the person;4 whose nameW islaFe []GENERAL 1 - subscribed to the within instrument and ac- ❑ATTORNEY-IN-FACT 1 knowledged to me that 4e/she/t4"executed ❑TRUSTEE(S) the same in h4e/her/the4 authorized GUARCIAWCONSERVATOR capacity(Wo), and that by laic/her/tl.Qir 0,6TR: signature()on the instrument the personje�, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s�acted,executed the Instrument CAROL ROACH SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: sy COMM.0 968956 � WITNESS my hand:rIfILc.1aI seal. N OFPERSW(S]ORENT (TEs) Nolory Pubf,c-Cakroinro BUTTE COUNTY Comm.Expires AUG 7.1996 I (� .rte. _ SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL SECTION THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT THE DOCUMENT DESCnIBED AT RIGHT: NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT Though rhe data requested hard Is not factored by law, it coua prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. SIGNER(S)OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE h 01992 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION•8236 Rommel Ave.,P.O.Doo 7184•Garage Park,CA 91309.7184 93 - 40444 93 - 35402 EXHIBIT 1 Agreement (a) "First Party", as used in this Agreement, includes each and all of the following: Andre and Winifred Williams. (b) The property is now zoned: FR-40 (c) The zoning reclassification of the property is from its present zoning to: SR-1 (d) Notice to First Party pursuant to Paragraph No. 4 shall be addressed to: Andre and Winifred Williams, 2024 Merrill Road, Paradise. (e) The change in zoning classification pursuant to Paragraph No. 4 shall be to: SR-1 (f) "Property", as used in this Agreement, includes: All that certain real property situate in the County of Butte, State of California described as follows: The E 630.40 feet of the N 520 ft. of the.':':'1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 7, 722N, R4E MDM, and a portion of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7 described as follows: Beginning at the SE corner of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7; thence, along the E line of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7, N 0° 17' 18" W 100.00 ft.; thence N 89° 02' 22" W and parallel with the S line of said NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section, a distance of 385.63 ft.; thence, S 68° 35' 38" W, a distance of 262.73 ft. to the SW corner of the E 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7; thence, along the S line thereof, S 89° 02' 22" E, 630.77 ft. to the point of beginning. �I 7 :f C3 rnMERRIL RD. _. . : --------- 1/01 '/01° FM 23-07se a C". s V7 AClKS N � Z77.14� ,�a pyo I I RSM :3'-W237 !� 1.60 ACRO cr) = 3.60 ACRO Iq 'Q y M P xi a T c" $ 2701 CR sta N $4 �` y`b► I SCALE 1'200' H 1 WOa' e.Oa loopL SEC 7 EXHIBIT "A" BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION PLAT FOR OWNER: WINIFRED IMLLIAMS WINIFRED WILLIAMS BEING A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF L & L SURVEYING 2015 MERRIL RD. THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 7.T22N. R4E MOM 1007 BILLS ROAD PARADISE. CA. 95989 PARADISE. BUTTE CO.. CALIFORNIA PARADISE, CA. 95969 (916) 877-4.300 AP 50-26-16 PTN. _ 9 3 - 4 0 4 4 4 CERTIFICATE OF DEATH 23 - 3 5 4 0 2 J STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE FILE NtIMOCR USE BLACK INK ONLY rOC AI . wrf.T • Nw!• IA.NA-C OF OECCOENI- .1I 10 M1 11 IC,LAST IF KII 21.DAIE!•^OEATM-MO.DAY.,Y 'M"OUP ] SC' IGrvl Nl 1 Andrew Ellison Williams April 7.3, 1993 .1721 YMai•= ..PACE HI.NANK-SICC�P♦ 6.OAIt OF BIR TN-MO.111,YA 1.ACE IN '•'UvnEN 1 I!•N UNOtw 24.'OIn�• EARS riot.:nr.[I 0A1S •NO-- i-rNUr!• C a u c a s i a n , rE. ® ND November 15, 1906 186 •ICC CDf NT S.STATE OF I D CITIZEN OF T LOA,FULL NAME OF FATHER 'LOO.$t At!O• I IA,FULL MAIOEN NAME OF MC:TMER 110!SIAII O• �E PSONAL BIRTH 1 COL1NTRv ; .OInrN i RIOT. DATA I�I� E.Yr1e-fit Dean Williams I Mass. Lillian Walden Alaska 12.MILLI ART SERVICC7 F. SOCIAL SECU.111 NO. 14 MAAII AI SLATY{ 13,NAME OF SURVIVING•SPOUSE III MPI.lNTLw NA IDEM N•-!. 1D_ TO IA_ NONlI 569-03-0786 Married Minerva Winifred Lapp 16A.V3VAl DEEUTA TION 160.U!Y•L KING OIDU31NE 53 116C.USUAL ENR01_w 16D.I'EARS IN 17.EDUCATION-TQA"l CO-IIEI[D Ow INIAJSrw1 OCCYIATION echanic Public Works Butte Coun--y 20 12 ISA.RtfI0ENCI-STPt[1 ANO NU I.Ow LOCATION 1 ISO,CIII ISC.ZIP GOO[ USUAL 2024 Merrill Road ! Paradise 95969 1ESIDENCE IBD.CO,H,1 ISE.N­Eft OF YEARS IGF.STAT[On FOREIGN COUM,I 20.NA-E.R,LAINT SNIP,MAILING^001433 Butte 1 M T 7[7"" I O 21P COD[OF INIOw-AN, CaliforniaM7 .Winifred Williams-Wife IDA.PLACE OF DEATH I IBB.IF M03N1AL,SIECIII I IBC-COUNTY 2024 Merrill Rd. 1 PLACE Feather River Hosp. 1�O�e; P,ER/OP,OOAI� Butte_ Paradise, Cali•:Ornia _ Ow IDG STRCEI Aunn;.SS-• .TKltl AH4 Nu-n[w Ow 1pl:w l,OH '%9E.CITY 1TI- _ DEATH 1 [IN,twvwl 22.WA/D[AT-REPORTED TO COwON[1/ 5974 Pentz Road ParadiseD[TNaNlN3[� ® ...R93-35561wQ No I AND Dt ATN 21.DEATH WAS CAUSED BY: TENTER ONLT ONF CAUSE PER LINE FOR A.O.AND CI 23.Ww/0I0I{1 P/wlOw MlO1 CAUS8 ATE rAt T 6LLl'iN.E"T'L 1 �J": c' ❑ ... El NO CAUSE L, ` I 34A.WA{AVTOP6�1�'/-Py�IRIDw-[07 or DEATH DUE TO IBI �^\';•' 7I rTf^ -I.c.0.1 1 `i ❑ Y[! I• NO - _ __ -__- _-- I 248. --I V..G IN O[TlR-WINO CAU.[ r ❑OI 'SAYNI[a. out TO I. f r r x 2 S Li `'�c. '•. Lt Fl.:.' 1f:cL �.•l :Lr> 1.0 NO 23.OTNSR SIGMPICANT CONDITION[CONTRIBUTING TO 0[A1.8V1 NOT AS—.TO CAV.!GIVEN IN i 1 26.WAS DIEwAIION P.-O....10.ANT CO01DTODN IN IT,-21 OR 231 IP"S.LIST-It OI OI... "0.AND OAT,. Left H' 1 CSw TII1 TNA,TO TM[et3T OI MI INOWL[OG1 OEA1N 278.SIRNw TVG■ DtOA![011 TITLS OI Ctw 27C.CE wT1I1lA'a LJCINSR NY-BEA 270.DAT[3KINEO ►HY31. OCC YAw[D AT IN,HOUR.DAT[AND PLACE STATED FRO-INS I 9 C L`J\A CIA 01'3 CAU{!{STATED. I -'(: K• �'V'� i•I) 27A.O9C2O9NT ATIENO[D SINCE D[C[D[AR LAST BtlN ALIVE ERTIPICA. MONIH.OAT,YEA, I MONIY,DAT,T[Aw D-7� y a ATTENDING D ICIAN'3 NAME ANO ADDRESS TION ev 9 �'3 y 3 y 7 J.W. Cornyn, M.D., 600 Pentz Rd., Paradise,CA. 1 C,w11I1 THAT IN MY OPINION OATH OL'CURA[O AT '2BA.SIGNATURE AND TITLE 01 CORONER OA 1111 T1 CO,ONE, ,1 1288.DATE 51001!0 THE HOUR.DAT[AND PUCI 3TATE0 PROM TM[CAUSES 3T. Op. nD. Deputy Coroner ORONEWS 29.MA....OP 09=-KEIRT SIA I.A.Jf[I«N. ]OA.PLACE OP IN-11 ]OB.INJURY AT WORK 30C.OAT!OI INJLPII ]1.MOVI1 US[ WrCtOelQen`.N01rLOlOn>r«w wa««IOIIlME Residence -ONTN.D 11.v1A ONLY J(� d L. ❑ YE+ ® ND Apr 3 1993 1930 32.LOCATION ISIA[ET AND NU-O,R OR LOCATION AND CITYI ]].DI{Cwl11 NOW INJY,T OCCURRED 1l1'!NT{WMCN R[{IA1,D IN IIAJIIIIII 2015 Merrill Rd., Paradise,CA 95969 FelI while going to another room AUNCRAL 34A.DUPOSITION131 I]4e.PLACE OP ANAL DI/IOSITION-NA-[ANO 10DR9// I]4C.DATE ]IA.SIGNATURE OA[-AAL ase.11 3C AO. Ar,1!Aw J/I��I// � /J � � NUMBER 71R AND CRL-BU ; Paradise Cemetery, Paradise,CA ; r.l� 1993 792cc%f�.d"du•k.(A,4784 ANO ]BA.-.-.S-;-..Al OIwtCTOA IDR....ON wC AS/UCNI I]SB.LICGNS[NO. ]7.31Op,A T,NA[OP LOCA%EG.3TRA 3e.REGISTRATION OATS LOCAL !1 E01STRAR ParadiChapel of the Pines ; F 803 ►L'04k�.-:=+'• •'�� � �-i�-93 : .l STATEII A. B. C. O. E. I P. CENSUS TRACT [OISTRAIR .l I IREV.]•D 11 MARE NO ERASURES.WMITEOUTS.OR OTHER ALIERATIONS C RTIF1CATION STA'1'IsPUT This is to certify that: elle attached is it true and correct coP,v of the vital record which is on file in tills office and of which 1 am the legal custodian. V 0aRWI-STRAR OF Vi'1'PIL S'1'A'f1S'1'1CS Sl(11A•IUt-'(A'U)(I'l iii 0IT-IC1AIJ (iifil(:W, 1'1'1LC Butte County Deprnrlmeut of Public )leuleh 18 11 Colnit.y Ccutrr Drive, Otuville, (:A 95905 APR 15 ?993 •1111(.L U`U]i!'11'1(Y'1'ildl UVIL•'U'U1t11F1CA'11U1 END OF DOCUMENT' X90 or DOCUMENT HEMES1,EU-BY'l _� �C' 93-0354021 Total . 00 1 Recorded I Official Records I County of I �- Butte Candace J. Grubbs I Recorder I 8:02am 17-Aug-93 I COMS FM 7 Resolution No.93-123 RESOLUTION FOR AN AGREEMENT RELATING TO RECLASSIFICATION OF ZONE FOR ANDRE AND WINIFRED WILLIAMS BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors be and is hereby authorized and directed to execute an agreement on behalf of the County of Butte relating to reclassification of zoning with: ANDRE AND WINIFRED WILLIAMS and to do and perform everything necessary to carry out the purpose of this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Butte County Board of Supervisors on the loth day of August , 1993, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Meyer, Dolan, McLaughlin, Thomas and Chair Houx NOES: None ABSENT: None NOT VOTING: None MARY ANNE HOUR, CHAIRMAN Butte County Board of Supervisors ATTEST: JOHN S. BLACKLOCK, Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk of the Board By s 9 93 - 35402 CONDITIONAL ZONING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this 2'lrw day of" f�• , 19X3, by and between "First Party', as identified in item (a) of Exhibit 1 of this Agreemerff, and the COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California, herein called "Second Party". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, First Party is the owner of real property, herein called the 'Property', situated in the County of Butte, which Property is described in Item (f) of Exhibit I of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Property is now zoned as specified in Item (b) of Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, First Party has applied for a reclassification of zoning of the Property pursuant to which application the Property is being reclassified from its present classification to the classification or classifications specified in Item (c) of Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, public hearings have been held upon said application before the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, and after having considered the matter presented, it has been determined that certain conditions to the zoning reclassification of said real property must be imposed so as not to create any problems inimical to the health, safety and the general welfare of the County of Butte. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that inasmuch as the reclassification specified in Item (c) of Exhibit 1 is being granted, the said reclassification shall be subject to the conditions specified in the following paragraphs: 1. That Exhibit 1, as completed and attached hereto, is incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. 2. That First Party shall construct and comply with all the following conditions: 2a. The division of the property shall be limited to no more than three parcels as shown on Exhibit A, allowing for minor modifications to the map in case of leachfield needs. 3. In the event First Party, any successor in interest of First Party, or any person in possession of the property described in Item (f) of Exhibit I violates or fails to perform any of the conditions of this Agreement within thirty (30) days after notice thereof as provided in Paragraph 5, the Board of Supervisors of Second Party may instruct the County Counsel of Second Party to institute legal proceedings to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. ' The Board of Supervisors of Second Party may also initiate proceedings to rezone the property to the classification specified in Item (b) of Exhibit I or any other suitable classification. 4. Notice of violation of provisions of this Agreement shall be sent to First Party at the address specific in Item (d) of Exhibit 1 and to the street address of the property 93 - 35402 described in Item (d) of Exhibit 1. Any subsequent title holder, any lien holder, or party in 1 possession of the property shall also receive notice of such violation at an address other than as specified in Item (d) of Exhibit 1 by filing with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Second Party the address to which the notice is to be sent, with reference to this Agreement and the Resolution authorizing its execution. 5. In the event suit is brought by the County Counsel of Second Party to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, First Party agrees to pay to Second Party a reasonable sum to be fixed by the Court as attorney's fees. 6. Each and every one of the provisions of this agreement herein contained shall bind and inure to the benefit of.the successor in interest of each and every party hereto, in the same manner as if they had herein been expressly named. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California Chairperson of the Board d Supervisors AUG 10 1993 "Second Party" ATTEST: 1� �.�-- Clerk of the Board of Supervisors �AL-IFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT 9 3 - 3 5 4 0 '4 No.519? State of itl'_ P n - - OPTIONAL SECTION �o CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER (iOUn Of -1 1T hough statute does not require the Notary to Countyof— in the data below, doing so may prove ^ invaluable to persons relying on the document. _ I; . '� /� C' I r'CL C.n_ n r T'F _I it I I L ❑ INDIVIDUAL On before me, NAME,TITLE OF OFFICER-E.G.,"JANE DOE,NOTA Y PUBLIC DATE ❑CORPORATE OFFICER(S) personally appeared TITLE S) NAME(S)OF SIGNER(S) � PARTNER(S) E]'personally known to me-OR-❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence ® 0 LIMITED GENERAL to be the personkewhose nameW is/afe subscribed to the within instrument and ac- ❑ATTORNEY-IN-FACT knowledged to me that hefshe/they executed ❑TRUSTEE(S) the same in h+s0er/the4f authorized ❑GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR capacity(ue's), and that by h+s/her/t.4e+r signature(s) on the instrument the erso 9991 HER: I or the entity upon behalf of which the person.(s) acted, executed the instrument. SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: CAROL ROACH COMM.#968956 Z NA E OF PERSON(S)OR ENTITY(IES) QPMy Notary Public—California > WITNESS my hand. d official seal. rBUTTE COUNTY °U Comm.Expires AUG 7. 1996 i SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL SECTION THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT Though the data requested here is not required by law, OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE it could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. SIGNER(S) ©1992 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION•8236 Remmet Ave.,P.O.Box 7184•Canoga Park,CA 91309-7184 v4i6 .-rvnry*e AVRImVWLEDGMENT No.5179 State of C4-rll Fe" i4/GL CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER County of LJ�� i�� INDIVIDUAL ,q,,� �J ❑ CORPORATE Orf "'�5— 2,/94 fore me GO�Ai�t�i �yA/E Lv�t/oy /UD TIy}+ey/ /uG1�c'' OFFICER(S) DATE e ' NAME,TITLE OF OFFICER-E.G.,*JANE DOE,NOTARY PUBLIC TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) LIMITED personally appeared ��a�� Rl"cz-" 4",. ❑ GENERAL NAME(S)OF SIGNER(S) ❑ pATTORNEY-IN-FACT personally known to me-OR-❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence ❑TRUSTEE(S) be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR acknowledged to me that he/she/they ❑ OTHER: -- executed the same in his/her/their OFFICIALI''DTAR';7 authorized capacity(ies), and that by `y � '` p ,_ LCRP;iI, A"1?'E LU\DY 1 his/her/their signature(s)nature( )s on the instrument '''•'.::L''—r..�i°;.rli3 ING(i?nE CCS J 17Y C Ftheperson(s), or the entityupon behalf of SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: ,:y c^:r,.C=xp ros NOV 03,19::5 y p NAME OF PERSON(S)OR ENTITY(IES) which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witne s my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY ATTENTION NOTARY:Although the information requested below is OPTIONAL,it couid prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to an unauthorized document. THIS CERTIFICATE Title or Type of Document MUST BE ATTACHED g TO THE DOCUMENT Number of Pages Date of Document DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other than Named Above 93 - 5402 EXHIBIT 1 Agreement (a) "First Party", as used in this Agreement, includes each and all of the following: Andre and Winifred Williams. (b) The property is now zoned: FR-40 (c) The zoning reclassification of the property is from its present zoning to: SR-1 (d) Notice to First Party pursuant to Paragraph No. 4 shall be addressed to: Andre and Winifred Williams, 2024 Merrill Road, Paradise. (e) The change in zoning classification pursuant to Paragraph No. 4 shall be to: SR-1 (f) 'Property", as used in this Agreement, includes: All that certain real property situate in the County of Butte, State of California described as follows: E The E 630.40 feet of the N 520 ft. of the W'1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 7, 722N, R4E MDM, and a portion of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7 described as follows: Beginning at the SE corner of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7; thence, along the E line of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7, N 0° 17' 18" W 100.00 ft.; thence N 89° 02' 22" W and parallel with the S line of said NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section, a distance of 385.63 ft.; thence, S 68° 35' 38" W, a distance of 262.73 ft. to the SW corner of the E 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7; thence, along the S line thereof, S 89 ° 02' 22" E, 630.77 ft. to the point of beginning. 1 N W MERRIL RD. N Mawz Oso. 1r8 RSN 53-07238 �A y z 8.17 ACKS € E RSI 83-07237 � �, t &W ACM .so AdlES e+ - i iol , N ; i 2701 OR 318 SCALE 1"=200' 180.00• 460.34' 412.43• �` 1 03'• b05 8 N 891wir W1280.6 !0;mSEC 7 EXHIBIT "A" BOUNDARY UNE MODIFICATION PLAT FOR OWNER: WINIFRED WILLIAMS WINIFRED WILLIAMS BEING A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF L dt L SURVEYING 2015 MERRIL RD. THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 7.T22N, R4E MDM 1007 BILLE ROAD PARADISE, CA. 95969 PARADISE. BUTTE CO., CALIFORNIA PARADISE, CA. 95969 (916) 877-4300 AP 50-26-16 PTN. CERTIFICATE OF DEATH 9 3 - 3 5 4 0 2 ° STATEOF CALIFORNIA STATE FILE NUMBER USE BLACK INK ONLY LOCM REGISTRATION nISTRICI AND CERTIFICATE NUMBEI- ` I IA. NAME OF DECEDENT-FIRST 1 18. MIDDLE1C. LAST (FAMILY: 2A. DATE OF OEATH-MO. DAY. YR12B. HOUR 3. SC, i (GIVEN: Andrew Ellison Williams April 13 , 1993 ; 1721 Ma- 4. RACE S. HISPANIC-SPECIFY 6. DATE OF BIRTH-MO. DAY, YR 1 7. AGERN ' IF UNDER 1 YEAR ,IF UNDER 24 Hou- YEA OUR.' YEAS MONTHS : DAYSHOURS ;MINUTES Caucasian I ElYES ® NO I November 15, 1906 86 1 I 1 7ECEDENT 8. STATE OF I 9, CITIZEN OF WHAT OA. FULL NAME OF FATHER 1 OB. STATE OF 1 IA. FULL MAIDEN NAME OF MOTHER 1 1 B. STATE OI °ERSONAL BIRTH ( COUNTRY I BIFTH 1 BIRTH DATAUSA IE'rnest Dean Williams Mass. Lillian Walden Alaska 12. MILITARY SERVICE7 13. SOCIAL SECURITY NO. 14. MARITAL STATUS S. NAME OF SURVIVING SPOUSE (IF WIFE. ENTER MAIDEN NAME 19 TO 19_ ® NONE 569-03-07£36 Married Minerva Winifred Knapp 16A. USUAL OCCUPATION 16B. USUAL KIND OF BUSINESS 16C. USUAL EMPLOYER ''6D.YEARS IN 17.EDUCATION-YEARS COMPLETE_ OR INDUSTRY I I OCCUPATION Public Works Butte County 20 12 IBA. RESIDENCE-STREET AND NUMBER OR LOCATION 1 18B. CITY I 1 BC. ZIP CODE USUAL 2024 Merrill Road Paradise ' 95969 !E$IDENCE IBD. COUNTY IBE. NUMBER OF YEARS 18F. STATE OR FOREIGN COUNTRY 20. NAME. RELATIONSHIP. MAILING ADDRESS IN THIS COUNTY I AND ZIP CODE OF INFORMANT Butte 76 California M-Winifred Williams-Wife 1 9A. PLACE OF DEATH 119B. IF HOSPITAL SPECIFY ' 19C. COUNTY 2024 Merrill R d . ON t IP. ER/OP, DOA Paradise , California PLACE Feather River Hosp . I QIP Butte__ OF 190 STREET AUDnL'SS--STREET AND NUMBER OR LOCATION 19E. CITY I DEATH TIME+ gVAL 22, WAS DEATH REPORTED TO CORONER? I _ 5974 P e n t z P,c a d ; F a r a d i s e IBE ANDEDEATHET YES I�.'_"'� REFERRAL NUMBER ISI R93-355 NO 21. DEATH WAS CAUSED BY: (ENTER ONLY ONE CAUSE PER LINE FOR A. B. AND C) 1 23. WAS BIOPSY PERFORMED? IMMEDIATE "- ""�� pop-: (L] CAUSE TAI �.y(,L•ti1(r�A'f'l.w ti C YES NO CAUSE I 24A. WAS AUTOPSY PERFORMED? OF DEATHDUE TO I IDYES EZNO 24B.WAS IT USED IN DETERMINING CAUSE �j OF DEATH? DUE TO (C) f P C�X Li C'_ -. i ❑ YES © NO 25. OTHER SIGNIFICANT CONDITIONS CONTRIBUTING TO DEATH BUT NOT RELATED TO CAUSE GIVEN IN 21 26. WAS OPERATION PERFORMED FOR ANY CONDITION IN ITEM 21 OR 257 IF YES.LIST TYPE OF OPERATION AND DATE. Left Eli Or'f 1 CERTIFY THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE DEATH I 27B. SIGNATURE A DEGREE OR TITLE OF CER IFIER 27C.CERTIFIER'S LICENSE NUMBER 270. DATE SIGNED PHYSI- OCCURRED AT THE HOUR.DATE AND PLACE STATED FROM THE' I CAUSES STATED. CIAN'S TI 27A.DECEDENT AT-TENDED SINCE DECEDENT LAST SEEN ALIVE .ERTIFICA- MONTH, DAY. YEARI MONTH.DAY,YEAR I PE ATTENDING R ICIAN'S NAME AND ADDRESS TION 4=,7'Z Is y_7 ; J.W. Cornyn, M.D. , K09 Pentz Rd. , Paradise,CA. I CERTIFY THAT IN MY OPINION DEATH OCCURRED AT 28A. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CORONER OR DEPUTY CORONER 28B. DATE SIGNED THE HOUR. DATE AND PLACE STATED FROM THE CAUSES STATED. ► � � Deputy Coroner, �/ (/[•G `�� / ,i�.J/ I DRONER'S 29. MANNER OF DEATH-SoeCI(y one:natula(. accident, 30A. PLACE OF INJURY 308. INJURY AT WORK 13DC. DATE OF INJURY 31. HOUR USE talc dl. nar�lDqe. bending InveSllgallon or could not be determined I I MONTH, DAY. YEAR ONLY AcclClent Residence ; ❑ YES ® NO �. ri1 3 1993 1930 32. LOCATION ISTREET AND NUMBER OR LOCATION AND CITY) 33. DESCRIBE HOW INJURY OCCURRED(EVENTS WHICH RESULTED IN INJURY) 2015 Merrill Rd. , Paradise,CA 95969 Fell while going to another room FUNERAL 34A. DISPOSITION(S) I 348. PLACE OF FINAL DISPOSITION-NAME AND ADDRESS I 34C. CATS 35A. SIGNATURE OF EMBALIUA 358. LICENSE MO. DAY. YEAR NUMBER )IRECTOR CRE-BU ; Paradise Cemetery, Paradise,CA ;Apr.16 1993 7 [ LEc�- � 4784 AND 36A. NAME OF FUNERAL DIRECTOR(OR PERSON ACTING w55UCH) 368. LICENSE NO. 37. SIGpa19T,L�tE OF LOCAL 5EC5.ISTRA 3B. REGISTRATION DATE LOCAL I (Paradise Chapel of the.. Pines nes F 80_ ►144 ''.' ' EGISTRAR ' � .. .. STATE I A. B. I C. D. E. I F. I CENSUS TRACT 'EGISTRAR I -1 i (REV.3-911 MAKE NO ERASURES.WHITEOUTS.OR OTHER ALTERATIONS CERTIFICATION STATEMENT This is to certify that Lite attached is a true and ccrrect copy of the vital record which is on file in this office and of which I am Lite legal custodian. V � REGIS'1'HAR OF C Vi'1'AL STATISTICS Sl(. :URE OF Q1 017 01F1C1AL OIFICZAI.1 Tl'11L Butte County Department of Pubaic Ileal.th 18 B Comity Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 APR 1 5 X993 f911(L UI' (.7x1'1P1(11'1JU1J DAIS U. U-:U F1C 1'IW END OF DOCUMENT NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO: Office of Planning and Research FROM: Butte County Planning Department 1400 Tenth Street 7 County Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95814 Oroville, CA 95965 or X County Clerk County of Butte SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 2152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: Rezone 93-20 AP Number: 050-260-021 Name: Winifred Williams State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to clearinghouse): None Contact Person: Paula Leasure Telephone Number: 538-7601 Project Location: At the east end of Merrill Road, east of upper Pentz Road, at 2024(Formerly 2015) Merrill Road. Project Description: Rezone from FR 40 to SR-1, on the east 630 feet of said Parcel This is to advise that the Butte County Board of Supervisors has approved the above described project on August 10th, 1993 and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will,_X will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. _X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were, X were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, X was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965. Date Received for Filing and Posting at OPR 0/.L& Z""_Z Signature Paula S. Leasure Assistant Plannine Director Title lJ� .......... .:.. ... . ... .. r RECEIPT IOTA l.uL., LAFCO USE VARIANCCS PV B1'IC TONING ENV OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM NO. RECEIVED WORKS PERMITS DOCUMENTS HEALTH RECEIPT 13764 �3 u OFFICIAL RECEIPT ' COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ISSUED BY 1'%4 -- DECLARATION OF FEES DUE (California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Winifred Williams 2024 Merrill Road Paradise, CA 95967 CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION [ ] A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25. 00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - NO FEES 2. [X] A. DeMinimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3 . NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED [ ] A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25. 00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee [ ] B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25. 00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 4. [ ] OTHER (Specify) $25. 00 -Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT/NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. [X] PAYMENT. The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s) . 2. [ ] NON-PAYMENT. The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: Paula Leasure Assistant Planning Director Lead Agency: Butte County Board of Supervisors TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding (Fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14, California Code of Regulations) Project Title/ Butte County Location: Winifred Williams - Rezone 93-20 -Located at the east end of Merrill Road, east of upper Pentz Road at 2024 (formerly 2015) Merrill Road, Paradise. Project Description: Rezone to SR-1 from FR-40, on the east 630 feet of said parcel. Findings of Exemption: 1. The County of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a Negative Declaration so as to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact. 2. When considering the record as a whole there is no evidence before the County that the project will have potential for adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. 3. The County of Butte has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5(d), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations, if applicable. 4. The project is hereby found to be de minimus in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Certification: I herebycertify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of fY tY g exemption and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on "wildlife",as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Paula Leasure Assistant, Planning Director By: Lead Agency: Butte County Board of Supervisors Date: August 19, 1993 g S L61 L SURVEYING 1007 Bille Rd. - P. O. Box 671 - Paradise, CA 95967-0671 Telephone: (916) 877-4300 - FAX: (916) 877-2251 Planning DaPartment August 17, 1993 AUG 181993 Oro lfie,California Butte County Planning 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 Att: Craig Re: Winifred Williams Rezone Agreement Dear Craig, Unfortunately there was an error in the Legal Description of the Rezone Agreement for Mrs. Williams. Please find enclosed the correct description that should be used. The Plat that was used is correct and shows the correct area, but there was a typo in the Legal Description. Please let me know of I can be of any further assistance in this. Thank you. Sincerely, �i orraine Lundy "DESCRIPTION OF REZONE" All that certain real property situate in the County of Butte, State of California, described as follows : The East 630. 40 feet of the North 520 feet of the East half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 7, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, M. D. M. , and a portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 7 described as follows : BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 7 ; thence along the East line of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 7, North 00 17 ' 18" West 100. 00 feet; thence North 89°02 ' 22" West and parallel with the South line of said Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section, a distance of 385. 63 feet ; thence South 68035 ' 38" West, a distance of 262. 73 feet to the Southwest corner of the East half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 7; thence along the South line thereof , South 89002 ' 22" East, 630. 77 feet to the point of beginning. ...... ....... _ utte DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916)538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 MEMORANDUM TO: Butte County Board of Supervisors FROM: Bill Farrel, Director of Development Services Craig B. Sanders, Project Planner SUBJECT: Andre land Winifred Williams, Rezone File 93-20, Board Agenda 8/10/93 DATE: July 19, 1993 REQUEST/RECOMMENDATION Andreand Winifred Williams - proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental review and Rezone from FR-40 (Foothill Recreational - 40 acre parcels) to SR-1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acre parcels) located at the east end of Merrill Road, approximately 3400 feet east of Pentz Magalia Highway, identified as AP 050-260-021, Paradise. Staff recommends the Board concur with the Planning Commission and approve the rezone. ANALYSIS: This is a request to rezone approximately 8.5 acres from FR-40 to SR-1. The property is located at the easterly end of Merrill Road, adjacent to the Town of Paradise and lies at the edge of the canyon formed by the West Branch of the Feather River. The area to be rezoned was part of a larger parcel that was split by a zone line with SR-1 to the west and FR-40 to the east. The applicant has already created three parcels by gift deed within the SR-1 zone leaving as a separate parcel the area within the FR-40 designation. Both the SR-1 and FR-40 zones were adopted in 1982 as part of the 'Paradise Area General Plan and Rezone. As previously stated the property is located at the transition line between the Paradise ridge top and the canyon that drops down into the West Branch of the Feather River. Approximately 30% to 40% of the site has a slope of 30% or greater. The balance of the property has gentle slopes and could, from a topography stand point, accommodate parcels of 1 acre. Water and adequate soil for sewage disposal have not been proven for 1 acre parcels yet but there are other parcels in the area that have homes on 1/2 to 1/3 acre parcels. Merrill Road serves the subject parcel and approximately 112 other lots in the area, most of which are in the Town of Paradise. There is no circulation for traffic on this road and the addition of any new parcels is a concern for both the town of Paradise and the County. The lack of circulation could be critical in the event of a major fire on the ridge. All traffic from the area must use Pentz Magalia Hwy. and traffic volume on this road is high. The Town of Paradise is currently contemplating the adoption of traffic impact fees for Pentz Road and it's collector streets but have not adopted a fee at this time. The actual impacts to traffic will occur when the property is divided and would be best addressed at that time. The project site is designated by the Butte County General Plan as Agricultural- Residential on the ridge top and a small amount of Grazing and Open Land in the canyon area. The Agricultural Residential designation requires that the following findings be made and zoning factors be considered when approving a rezone to less than 20 acre parcels. CONDITIONAL ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA: 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. (Yes) 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. (Unknown at this time but there are similar sized parcels in the area.) y 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. (Yes) 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. (Merrill Road appears be adequate for the existing development but there is a lack of circulation for emergency purposes.) 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. (Yes) ZONING FACTORS: 1. Existing parcel sizes in residential densities. (There are 1 acre and smaller parcels to the west.) 2. Slope. (Approximately 60 to 70% of the site is suitable for 1 acre parcels.) 3. Soil conditions and water availability. (The soil is generally deep and there are other small parcels in the area.) 4. Effects on adjacent uses, crop production, livestock grazing, forestry, resource extraction and wildlife habi.at. (This project will not be incompatible with adjacent uses.) 5. Proximity to public roads and other public facilities. (Merrill Road serves the property and can be improved to meet subdivision standards.) 6. Distance from airports, railroads and industrial uses. (No conflicts with these uses.) 7. Existing utility and drainage facilities. (Utilities exist and drainage can be handled on site or dispersed into the canyon.) 8. Potential for surface cracking, landslides and erosion. (Steeper slopes can be avoided to reduce erosion.) 9. Effects on noise, traffic flow and safety, water quality, air quality, wildlife habitat and general environmental quality. (The project is consistent with the surrounding properties. Traffic generation can be partially addressed through road improvements. Circulation and cumulative impacts to the region cannot be mitigated at the rezone level and will require the adoption of traffic impact fees by the town of Paradise for future land divisions.) 10. Local desires. (Unknown, other than those of the applicant.) 11. Potential for pest insect breeding. (No significant effect) For the most part the proposed zoning can be supported by the conditional criteria and zoning factors. Traffic concerns and a solution to circulation can not be addressed at this time. In the overall picture of traffic on the ridge, it is doubtful that 4 new parcels will really have a significant impact on the existing transportation system. This parcel is not needed to provide future circulation for the area. i PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission heard testimony regarding this project. The Commission took an action to recommend approval of the rezone. RECOMMENDATIONS: A. Find that the requirements of CEQA have been completed and considered in making this decision and adopt a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts; and B. Find that the rezone conforms to the policies, including the text and map of the Butte County General Plan, because the proposed zone meets the conditional criteria of the Agricultural Residential General Plan designation and the zoning factors; and C. Adopt an ordinance rezoning to SR-1, that property identified as AP No. 050- 260-021 (Williams) subject to the following condition: 1. The division of the property shall be limited to no more than three parcels as shown on Exhibit A, allowing for mincr modifications to the map in case of leachfield needs. CBS:lr COUNTY OF BUTTE OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 DAVE RICE C/O FRANKLIN CONSTRUCTION, INC. 4405 AIRPORT RD PARADISE, CA. 95969 1 r„ NOTICE OF DETERIVIINATIC-. TO: Office of Planning and Research FROM: Butte County Planning Department 1400 Tenth Street 7 County Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95814 Oroville, CA 95965 or X County Clerk County of Butte SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 2152 of the Public Resources Code. 11 Project Title: Rezone 93-20 1 L AP Number: 050-260-021 AUG 2 7 1993 Name: Winifred Williams CAAD.QCE J.GRUBES,Butte Co.Clerk State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to clearinghouse): None By A. Killer Deputy Contact Person: Paula Leasure Telephone Number: 538-7601 Project Location: At the east end of Merrill Road, east of upper Pentz Road, at 2024(Formerly 2015) Merrill Road. Project Description: Rezone from FR 40 to SR-1, on the east 630 feet of said Parcel This is to advise that the Butte County Board of Supervisors has approved the above described project on August 10th, 1993 and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will,_X will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for',this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were, X were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, X was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965. Date Received for Filing and Posting at OPR Lh— Signature Paula S. Leasure Assistant Planning Director Title 9nd aUowljuc'Ca OUJU4lsid DATE RECEIPT TOTAL PVBL1f LAFCO VSE VARIANCES TVBLIC ZONING ENV OTHER APPLICANT RECEIVED FROM NO. RECEIVED WORKS PERMIT5 pOCUMENTS NEALTN , RECEIPT 13764 �3 y OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING ISSUED BY $llClt�ia��w°��3i1��9tt��d i 1, DECLARATION OF FEES DUE (California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Winifred Williams 2024 Merrill Road Paradise, CA 95967 CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION [ ] A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25. 00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - NO FEES 2. [X] A. DeMinimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3 . NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED [ ] A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25. 00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee [ ] B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25. 00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 4. [ J OTHER (Specify) $25. 00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT/NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. [X] PAYMENT. The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s) . 2. [ ] NON-PAYMENT. The above fees are required. Not paid. Chief Planning Official By: Paula Leasure Assistant Planning Director Lead Agency: Butte County Board of Supervisors TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. t01® G � and �. ;;J 6upuuc-la i CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding (Fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14, California Code of Regulations) Project Title/ Butte County Location: Winifred Williams - Rezone 93-20 -Located at the east end of Merrill Road, east of upper Pentz Road at 2024 (formerly 2015) Merrill Road, Paradise. Project Description: Rezone to SR-1 from FR-40, on the east 630 feet of said parcel. Findings of Exemption: 1. The County of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a Negative Declaration so as to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact. 2. When considering the record as a whole there is no evidence before the County that the project will have potential for adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. 3. The County of Butte has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5(d), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations, if applicable. 4. The project is hereby found to be de minimus in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Certification:. I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of exemption and that the. project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on "wildlife",as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Paula Leasure Assistant Planning Director By: Lead Agency: Butte County Board of Supervisors Date: August 19, 1993 �G6� 6 end - Eutte oun y DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916)538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 August 12, 1993 Andrewand Winifred Williams 2024 Merrill Road Paradise, CA 95969 Re: Rezone, File 93-20 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Williams: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors held August 10, 1993, Ordinance No. 3085 was adopted which rezones from FR-40 to SR-1 that property located at the east end of Merrill Road, identified as AP 050-260-021, Paradisz% The Board adopted Resolution No. 93-123 approving a Conditional Zoning Agreement subject to the following condition: 1. The division of the property shall be limited to no more than three parcels as shown on Exhibit A, allowing for minor modifications to the map in case of leachfield needs. Recently enacted legislation (AB 3158, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990; effective January 1, 1991) requires that the Department of Fish and Game impose and collect filing fees as specified to defray the cost of managing and protecting fish and wildlife trust resources. These filing fees are collected during the environmental review process and are to be paid at the time the County files a "Notice of Determination" with the County Clerk of the County in which the project is located. This' procedure is required pursuant to Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code. To increase administrative efficiency, the statute delegated the collection of filing fees to the County Clerk and provided the County authority to collect a $25.00 documentary handling fee. The fee for a De Minimus Negative Declaration is the $25.00 documentary handling fee. A check made payable to the County in the amount of $25.00 should be submitted to the County by August 17, 1993. The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Judicial review must )e sought no later than the 90th day following the date on which this decision becomes final, except that where a shorter time limit is provided by State or Federal law, such shorter time limit shall apply. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this Department. Very truly yours, W' am Farrel Development Services Director WF:lr _ - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE-OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 : TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 July 29, 1993-- Andre 993Andre and Winifred Williams 2042 Merrill Road Paradise,-CA 95969 Re: Rezone Agreement, File 93-20 - Dear Mr. and Mrs. Williams: Enclosed is the Agreement recommended for approval by the Butte County Planning Commission on June 24, 1993. Please have this Agreement signed and notarized and returned to this office for submittal to the Board of Supervisors at their meeting of August 10, 1993. This Agreement will be recorded, if approved, and a copy sent to you for your records. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, UA-,Q- Paula S. Leasure Assistant Director of Planning PSL:lr Enc. CONDITIONAL- ZONING-AGREEMENT' :- — THIS AGREEMENT made this. day of -; 19 , by and between "First - Party", as identified in item (a) of Exhibit 1 of this Agreement, and the COUNTY -OF BUTTE, - a political subdivision of the State of California; herein called "Second Party". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, First Party is the owner of real property, herein called the 'Property", situated in the.-County of Butte, which Property is described in Item (f) of Exhibit I of this .Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Property is now zoned as specified in Item (b) of Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, First Party has applied for a reclassificatiori of zoning of the Property pursuant to which application the Property is being reclassified from its present classification to the classification or classifications specified in Item (c) of Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, public hearings have been held upon said application before the Board of Supervisors of.the County of Butte, State of California,-and after.having considered the matter presented, it has been determined that certain conditions to the zoning reclassification of said real property must be imposed so as not to create any problems inimical xo the health, safety and the "general welfare of the County of Butte. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that inasmuch as the reclassification specified in Item (c) of Exhibit 1 is being granted, the said reclassification shall be subject to the conditions specified in the following P g 1. That Exhibit 1, as completed and attached hereto, is incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. 2. That First Party shall construct and comply with all the following conditions: 2a. The division of the property shall be limited to no more than three parcels as shown on Exhibit A, allowing for minor modifications to the map in case of leachfield needs. 3. In the event First Party, any successor in interest of First Party, or any person in possession of the property described in Item (f) of Exhibit I violates or fails to perform any of the conditions of this Agreement within thirty (30) days after notice thereof as provided in Paragraph 5, the Board of Supervisors of Second Party may instruct the County Counsel of Second Party to institute legal proceedings to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. The Board of Supervisors of Second Party may also initiate proceedings to rezone the property to the classification specified in Item (b) of Exhibit I or any other suitable classification. 4. Notice of violation of provisions of this Agreement shall be sent to First Party at the address specific in Item (d) of Exhibit 1 and to the street address of the property described in. Item (d) of-.°Ekhibit 1. Any subsequent title holder, any lien holder, or party. in., .,Possession of_the_propeity shall also receive notice of such violation at an address.other than as specified in Item.(d) of:Ekhibit.T by filing with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Second Party the address' to which the notice is.to be sent, with reference to this Agreement -and the Resolution authorizing its execution. 5. In :the event suit is brought-by.the .County Counsel .of Second Party .to enforce any of the provisions of this'Agreement, -First Party,agrees.to pay to Second Party a reasonable sum to be fixed by the Court as attorney's. fees. 6. Each and every one of the provisions of this agreement herein contained shall bind and inure .to the benefit of the-successor in interest of each and every party hereto, in the same manner as -if they.had herein been expressly named. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above .written. . _ COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California By Chairperson of the Board d Supervisors "Second Party" ATTEST: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors r- - EXHIBIT 1 Agreement (a) "First Party"; as used-in this Agreement, includes each and all of the following: Andre and Winifred- Williams. jb) The property is now zoned: .FR-40 (c) The zoning reclassification of the property is from its present zoning to: SR-1 (d):. Notice to First Party pursuant to Paragraph No.. 4. shall be addressed to: Andre and Winifred Williams, 2024 Merrill Road. Paradise. (e) - The change in zoning.classification pursuant to Paragraph No. 4 shall be to: SR-1 (f) "Property", as used in this Agreement, includes: All that certain real property situate in the County of Butte, State of California described as follows: The E 630.40 feet of the N 520 ft. of the W 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 7, 722N, R4E. MMM, and a portion of *the N_W 1/4 of-the NE 1/4 of said. Section 7 described as follows: Beginning at the SE corner of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7; thence, along the E line of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7, N 0° 17' 18" W 100.00 ft.; thence N 89° 02' 22" W and parallel with the S line of said NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section, a distance of 385.63 ft.; thence, S 68° 35' 38" W, a distance of 262.73 ft. to the SW comer of the E 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7; thence, along the S line thereof, S 89° 02' 22" E, 630.77 ft. to the point of beginning. t Coun LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY ,J DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES a .. 'l` y.a.Qa,.,"-•,•; ;;, � 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 � TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 " FAX: (916)538-7785 MEMORANDUM TO: Butte County Board of Supervisors FROM: Bill Farrel, Director of Development Services Craig B. Sanders, Project Planner SUBJECT: Andre and Winifred Williams, Rezone File 93-20, Board Agenda 8/10/93 DATE: July 19, 1993 REQUEST/RECOMMENDATION Andre and Winifred Williams - proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental review and Rezone from FR-40 (Foothill Recreational - 40 acre parcels) to SR-1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acre parcels) located at the east end of Merrill Road, approximately 3400 feet east of Pentz Magalia Highway, identified as AP 050-260-021, Paradise. Staff recommends the Board concur with the Planning Commission and approve the rezone. ANALYSIS: This is a request to rezone approximately 8.5 acres from FR-40 to SR-1. The property is located at the easterly end of Merrill Road, adjacent to the Town of Paradise and lies at the edge of the canyon formed by the West Branch of the Feather River. The area to be rezoned was part of a larger parcel that was split by a zone line with SR-1 to the west and FR-40 to the east. The applicant has already created three parcels by gift deed within the SR-1 zone leaving as a separate parcel the area within the FR-40 designation. Both the SR-1 and FR-40 zones were adopted in 1982 as part of the Paradise Area General Plan and Rezone. As previously stated the property is located at the transition line between the Paradise ridge top and the canyon that drops down into the West Branch of the Feather River. Approximately 30% to 40% of the site has a slope of 30% or greater. The balance of the property has gentle slopes and could, from a topography stand point, accommodate parcels of 1 acre. Water and adequate soil for sewage disposal have not been proven for 1 acre parcels yet but there are other parcels in the area that have homes on 1/2 to 1/3 acre parcels. Merrill Road serves the subject parcel and approximately 112 other lots in the area, most of which are in the Town of Paradise. There is no circulation for traffic on this road and the addition of any new parcels is a concern for both the town of Paradise and the County. The lack of circulation could be critical in the event of a major fire on the ridge. All traffic from the area must use Pentz Magalia Hwy. and traffic volume on this . road is high. The Town of Paradise is currently contemplating the adoption of traffic impact fees for Pentz Road and it's collector streets but have not adopted a fee at this time. The actual impacts to traffic will occur when the property is divided and would be best addressed at that time. The project site is designated by the Butte County General Plan as Agricultural- Residential on the ridge top and a small amount of Grazing and Open Land in the canyon area. The Agricultural Residential designation requires that the following findings be made and zoning factors be considered when approving a rezone to less than 20 acre parcels. CONDITIONAL ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA: 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. (Yes) 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. (Unknown at this time but there are similar sized parcels in the area.) 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. (Yes) 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. (Merrill Road appears be adequate for the existing development but there is a lack of circulation for emergency purposes.) 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. (Yes) ZONING FACTORS: 1. Existing parcel sizes in residential densities. (There are 1 acre and smaller parcels to the west.) 2. Slope. (Approximately 60 to 70% of the site is suitable for 1 acre parcels.) 3. Soil conditions and water availability. (The soil is generally deep and there are other small parcels in the area.) 4. Effects on adjacent uses, crop production, livestock grazing, forestry, resource extraction and wildlife habitat. (This project will not be incompatible with adjacent uses.) 5. Proximity to public roads and other public facilities. (Merrill Road serves the property and can be improved to meet subdivision standards.) 6. Distance from airports, railroads and industrial uses. (No conflicts with these uses.) 7. Existing utility and drainage facilities. (Utilities exist and drainage can be handled on site or dispersed into the canyon.) 8. Potential for surface cracking, landslides and erosion. (Steeper slopes can be avoided to reduce erosion.) 9. Effects on noise, traffic flow and safety, water quality, air quality, wildlife habitat and general environmental quality. (The project is consistent with the surrounding properties. Traffic generation can be partially addressed through road improvements. Circulation and cumulative impacts to the region cannot be mitigated at the rezone level and will require the adoption of traffic impact fees by the town of Paradise for future land divisions.) 10. Local desires. (Unknown, other than those of the applicant.) 11. Potential for pest insect breeding. (No significant effect) For the most part the proposed zoning can be supported by the conditional criteria and zoning factors. Traffic concerns and a solution to circulation can not be addressed at this time. In the overall picture of traffic on the ridge, it is doubtful that 4 new parcels will really have a significant impact on the existing transportation system. This parcel is not needed to provide future circulation for the area. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission heard testimony regarding this project. The Commission took an action to recommend approval of the rezone. RECOMMENDATIONS: A. Find that the requirements of CEQA have been completed and considered in making this decision and adopt a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts; and B. Find that the rezone conforms to the policies, including the text and map of the Butte County General Plan, because the proposed zone meets the conditional criteria of the Agricultural Residential General Plan designation and the zoning factors; and C. Adopt an ordinance rezoning to SR-1, that property identified as AP No. 050- 260-021 (Williams) subject to the following condition: 1. The division of the property shall be limited to no more than three parcels as shown on Exhibit A, allowing for minor modifications to the map in case of leachfield needs. CBS:lr 365.63 MERRIL RD. _ M47s QIM 0-072M N x 6.17 ACRES E 45Q N 6 j �i ••�i R�1 637337 1.60 ACRES R+ 3.60 ACRES d � P y � � y 2701 OR 315 SCALE 1"=200' rn 16aoo' 4ft3f �,. • 4,213' 13ILK 6.65 N 1 .6 . SEC 7 op K EXHIBIT r� BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION PLAT FOR OWNER: WINIFRED WILLIAMS WINIFRED WILLIAMS BEING A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF L dt L SURVEYING 2015 MERRIL RD. THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 7.T22N. R4E MDM 1007 BILLE ROAD PARADISE, CA. 95969 PARADISE, BUTTE CO.. CALIFORNIA PARADISE, CA. 95969 (916), 877-4300 AP 50-26-16 PTN. i Zj �' �''.—ter--- ` � � / / -- � � _,\• ���� ��''c�./_..___�_- 1 TENTATIVE MAP SUNBRIDGE ESTATES r n r, ^ 3 LIPPINCOTT SURVEYING S L4 1007 BILLE ROAD•P.O.BOX 671 PARADISE,CA 95967.•(916)877-4300 -I Y� 5665 Recreation Drive Paradise Paradise, California 95969 Unified Telephone: (916) 872-6400 Fax: (916) 8726409 School (t*%,� District p/ann, Richard T. Landess, Ed.D. District Superintendent �q y 2 Stephen A. Jennings May 24, 1993 Oro ` 1993 Assistant Superintendent, Personnel Ronald Schmidt Business Manager Mr. Larry Painter Planning Department Department of. Public Works 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Larry: Thank you for your notice regarding the preliminary initial en- vironmental assessment study of the Winifred Williams (AP# 050-260- 019) tentative parcel map. _ The District is concerned about the increased enrollment that would be generated by the additional residences to be built if this pro- ject is approved. Based- upon existing enrollments and projected enrollments from already approved developments, the District cur- rently is at or over capacity to house additional students gener- ated by new development. As a consequence, the Board of Education has approved a policy which requires new development within the District to fully mitigate its impact on school facilities. The District estimates that approximately 3. 12 new students will be generated by this new development (based on a .39 student yield factor per home) . The current developer revenue accounts for only 400 of the cost of permanent facilities, interim facilities, trans- portation, and administrative support facilities. The District is willing to allow the development to mitigate this impact by paying the total current, 1991/92, mitigation amount of $43, 136.00; ($5, 392 per residential unit) , subject to change an- nually. This amount includes the $1 . 65 per square foot developer fee. The position of the District continues to be that new development be approved only it ifs impact on schools is fully mitigated. Please contact us if you require further information. Sincerely, Ronald S idt Business Manager R.S: js inti bN:1,..n A,n. ! t' ♦ulii G1!"'lM :fit.- Board of Trustees Frances D. Main, President Stephen Hight, Clerk Donna C. Nichols ,Marilyn C. Connor, V.P. John D. Lanam 16 .,. Eutte oun DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 July 7, 1993 Andre & Winifred Williams 2024 Merrill Road - Paradise, CA 95969- Re: Rezone, File 93-20 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Williams: The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors set a public hearing date for August 10, 1993 at 10:30 a.m, to consider your request for a rezone from FR-40 to SR-1 located at-the east end of Merrill Road, approximately 3,400 feet east of Pentz Magalia Highway, identified as AP 050-260-021, Paradise. The meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this Department. Very truly yours, GWilliam Farrel Development Services Director WF:lr - suite coun PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916)538-7785 June 24, 1993 Andre and Winifred Williams - 2024 Merrill Road Paradise, CA 95969 Re: Rezone, File 93-20 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Williams: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held June 24, 1993 . your request for rezoning from Rezone from FR-40 to SR-1 for property located at the easterly end of Merrill Road, identified as AP 056-260-021, Paradise, was recommended for approval subject to the map configuration submitted by the applicant. A report of this matter will be made to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Pursuant to the provisions of Butte County Code Section 24-28.1, an estimated publishing fee of the rezone ordinance shall be deposited with the Clerk of the Board prior to the Board setting a public hearing. Your rezone -application has been reviewed and the estimated cost of publication and staff time is $100.00. Accordingly, we would request that you forward your check for $100.00 to the Clerk of the Board 25, County Center Drive, Oroville, Ca. 95965, made payable to the 'Butte County Treasurer." Upon receipt of the monies the Board of Supervisors will be asked to set a public hearing. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, Paula S. Leasure Assistant Director of Planning PSL:lr cc: Clerk of the Board Butte Fount PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CEN-ER DRIVE- OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 May 21, 1993 Andre and Winifred Williams 2024 Merrill Road Paradise, CA 95969 Re: Rezone, File 93-20 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Williams: Enclosed is a copy of the Staff Findings concerning your application for a rezone from Fr-40 to SR-1 for property located at the easterly end of Merrill Road, Paradise. A public hearing has been set for June 24, 1993 at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. In the event that no one will represent the applicant, please contact the Planning office prior to the scheduled public hearing. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, B. A. Kircher Director of Planning C Craig B. Sanders Associate Planner CBS:lr Enc. P'N / stonehill F aV I Cl V;uage F yl pqa enc ryl P�Oai'i Rusn o 6 Gol 'd ` cn `' 4 MAGALIA a °° (r` og gn o 3�vr: o n / / p z n. as W MacALI c pa S2 �R o 0 -� on erose Wy. ondef(tsa r PINES 1.:,.• 17pP1 HIIICF7 7_� rl''�''�. Lftf 9 L;.. J�'`'r.4 rY •:, y, cnooL <e'' /m r- cP t,a• I:�Q/'NAT' Rk:l'HESELZYR,,�' • ' �••ri���. .i" 4� `lti� G' LemarCt. ��' nm>a V/�L®�. I G! s. :�:. .i.• '<;'{.;;r.rl h,/ '!) sba j8�'Huron Ct. o Oe r,. \¢ Pine Can on1-•:`,.��- :�_i_�:_?0��="-�.a��----_."a 3. .'I h C it ,F� n. ._...... _..._e�J_. .__.__.—....._._._...._...._ .. _.._ _ vCr. + � Fp O a „ •.y'Mi/t eV GAL o A IA- eC et m� nrfe ip:. 2 pr G. G m a� r fsZl .. .. Gri / �aPecY. ?4 i� '1� a2ea' v ^•'a eke Ct. //'c= Cemeteyy oG� Poel �-8- �Oar Rd. DCFU q . a v+ F / 22C ei Om q�P florabo h STA. �hr r C,►•(t° r.,; O¢a �:., m U Ln. Elc 3a Pu bill oe;:) 'ac' ,r` 5�°" Indian r.D 4.oup fnreevr PARADISE Ifhi Dr. r•D °Ileovo�a314771 Y 'r n6 $"' a Oise:. :!: ' 1•INLS�,/ yvhi V� n Z 2 t3 r. i e Al ea Ill n l � tus arti(u D "e�r4 �erCt. / Woodb e're Smi sCr. Marin �id esa Ci \4 £ •31 rj Nimshew Run Y" n O< Ranger Lane Daley Salk Cl. O CO. g "Crmonson Saye' o fn� RIDG EVIEW s stoup Cr. acko r'�'<�' Andover Cr\ nom. CONI 1 i a0 g coa �' Zuckerman �e C} 1 HI. Or: O J 'kD, '� P P Ga. F S3 a ; Ct. Cr a Hone cackle Pasa Wa t V c a I c` �J ('f:NII:R1'11.1.E Pf:M. o P/ ,. tans Ir sensor \ Gat Z ; victoria Wy. `calnut 1:conners EI Ln. /' so !mv P:ne7 RidgePARADISE r I I I. / o\a O RaVlinn Ln. Drover Dr. Dell .. 1 �IMktlow Sunrise Ln. Wee Deelll L Ln. OB v t.v.Mlddl.°/gk flieee a "• Franke Ln.L^. 1 '• R 0 0 �v' PP. Jusla fl. `—, d E mr Multlorf%Ln. c ? /.¢e O V...wv. +B „ccm �_Warren Rd wav Klrgdom Ct. E � a •\ Vr 'e > ad, >r Kimbeney Lane ! Dean Road 6 3 - J 5 to •. ` /—_ _ % (' 7 CD F aTA,a 3 V Tin, Ln. J 5 J w 6°t \ tom• ~ � / �^ rTe 10r aO For st Service RoadEIT«o cnt o Firland Ln : ease Timber w ik Cl. >< 'L^ $ -Oar S F `v si Gr. Ln. Rock House c I 1 /• \�� /� r rive Ot 'a` c C�rig Sal- YE °a J r:s'it raase press m S Moll Rd. O O WAY��pJ Eco f xm�°I- m 'E Q $moi a j VVV r cry P\at Adams Rd. _ 3 Q 6 3oe a man <` MaVhew Ln. ¢ n ]3 Y F oc, Kindio o Oeer Cn. zA drea Ln.. Orookw. \QeP o\t`a f q� /Ben Jones Ln. o R'bin Merrill oRead Ln Q c m Dr. _ Kemen �esp�/ Ln. PeFj n^ OFns 1000' 2000• 3000' 117f10' 5000' c'{cS\.� L aq �f We onerl''Rd. Ln. dei Ln. 4 03 Jc a O O In mr. r mi. G ✓ \/ PFD SL c 0 Kiiomann JSOtm ikm 9 t�tafl > 5 Road 3 J WdG$TAFF 3 ¢ f a ¢ ROAD LL i/i I o ' e E c >c y4/ owllske } c _-a' June WV J"^ o E - A � a VICINITY MAP ANDRE WILLIAMS REZONE 050 -2,100-021 01% 2.0 f s r . Y 'µ1 s:... �.< ��� s. . F � i . y <: r 4 ' . - � t ' f e r F ��a C., .' �_� i E u f / / i�t}�n 1 yk �� �r d F:�Sa:�' (_�}7' �,�j{. .�.. i i 4 .:. i 'r 4 ��� ` � � � � � � � �� � j �� � - �� •. . � ► . � -- I� > j �N � j � � �- � I • O - � . � O � � , � � ; � 0 � � � � �� � • • � � � � ., �� � - ��. ''� - � w :� �� p � � � ., � �� • • ,. ��� �� � o ,,� �: ,, �; -� ..,_ . . � �` �� �_ �\ � � \ • �� � � t ti �' � . / � ` / � .� s � . �: : :::: .:.: :.:: .::. :�: �= �� � . . �. �y ,�, �., ,i i;FN� K�. � ' t • aN.,t• i .,r;--.. 1 :� _ , � 7 r f �; t i 1 r i�1111� ������t�■ r ' HOME .■I11 ol ® ME ME X18 ���� �C ■: .� = �, _4I"-PROJECT SITE _� \� ::MI =. ZONE2267NNE� No BUTTE • w w . w • COUNTY • • �HEARING DATES:. TUNE 'L41 jqqj . - - . � • . OWNER: • • • • : ww i $ 4.r j. :' c • .. '.h {..r � 1^ � + a. , � �.�. Ry .y, .4.T�� ..!«R i' i 7 yi. t APPENDIX I z. ........................................................................................... ......*......... .......................................................... ......................................................... ... ...... ................................... . . ............... ............................ ... ...... ......... ......... ... ............... ... .............. .......................................... ............... ... ...... ............... ......... .............. ................... ....... ..................... ................ .......­..................... ........ ....... ..... .. .......... ......... ........................... ........ .............. ..................... ....... ............ ....................... .......... ..................... .......... ...... ............ ............ ............................ ..... X .......... ........... . ..... ........*.... ...... ... .. ........ ................ Y<< :.::<>>; ::>:>: -X .. ................................................................... . . ........ ..... ........................................................... ... : :.B ........ CO. NTOF <>'< .......... .................. ...... .. ....... ........ .... .. ................... ....... .... . .................................... ........... ................. ....... ........ ..... ....................................................... ....... ............ `>;'">>'.:.`.>'.< ....... ........ ............. ...................................................... ........ .... ...... .. . ............. .......... .......... ................................ ::: ..... ................ . ..... ..................... ............ x...... ........ . .......................... X.:... RONMENT. ORM ::: .. ..................................................... ................................. .... .. ...... .. . ............ ............................. ..................... . .......... ...........%..................... ........... ........................ ..................... ..................... ....... .... ........ . ...... ...... ...... . .:.: .......... ........ ......... ..... ............ ....... ........ ................. ........ .. ............%................ .. .... ..... . ............ ........... ........ .. .............. ..................... ...... ...................... ... ........ ...................................... ........................... ........ 0 :*:E :'AX ......... ...... ........ ................... ...................... ....... ....... ................. ............... .. .................. X X ......... .............. ONF I W. .............. . ... .. ........................ OWENT. PAC ............. ..................*`. ............... .......... .............. ......... ... ..... .... ........ ............ . ................................ . ....... .......................... ............................... ......................... ........ ..................................x ........................................... ........ ............... ............ .......... ............ ........................ ........ ........... ........ .... .............. ...... ..................... ..... ........... ... .... . . ...................................................................... ..................%.......... .................................................................................... .................................................................................... File No. 93-20 AP No. 050-260-019 1. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Andrew & Winifred Williams 2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable): 2024 Merrill Rd. Paradise, CA 95969 3. Project description: Rezone from FR-40 to SR-1 YES MAYBE NO DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION II . MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality X This proposal will not significantly degrade the environment. of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory? 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term X This proposal will not impede long-term environmental g6als. benefits to the detriment of long-term environment goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts will endure into the future.) 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually X This proposal will not have a significant cumulative impact on the limited but cumulatively considerable? (A project may environment. impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will X This proposal will not have a significant adverse effect on human beings. cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I/WE find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I/WE find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MEASURES described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I/WE find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. COUNTY OPFUTTE. DEVE ENTSE VICES DEPARTMENT Z DATE: May 7, 1993 By: A —Craig anders Reviewed by: ':':``::::'':i:::':::::i:::............... i::i?::::::i:::`::isi::::::i:":i:::"'::::::'::::"::i::::'.: :::::::'::::::'+.:i::y"':::i::'::::::::::::::%:::i::i:::: `:::::::i::y::::::"_:i:::<.::2::::::� isi)::::`:::i::::::i:'X..:<:::'�?'`::::::; "�':::::::i::::::i:::::::::::?:''::::i:::::::::::i::i::::::i::::i::<::::::!:: !::'::;:�::::':::!:':::j:::::::::i:::':: ij:�:::::::::::::J::::i::j::::c:::::`:i�: sisi::::i::::i::::i::i::::i::::::ii::::::::::::::::::..!:::::::::i::::::i::::i::: .:.. .. .:..... .:..... ii: L.. .:'7{::i .. ..:'..... t .::::Ev 1 ti n f::Envir: nm n I >Im #::>::::>::...:>::::>': .>::::;.:.:: Env..ironmentai:i:C:hecki s.. . :. a:ua .o:.:::o.. o:.:::. e:.to ac:.::::. ..::::.::.:.::.:. .:: ... ....... ................:':.X ...................................................:...........P............. . .............. ............ :::... ............... ...... ..... ......... .......... .. ......... ....... IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS YES MAYBE 140 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: a. Unstable earth conditions, or changes in geologic X The proposal will not affect subsurface earth conditions. substructures? b. Disruption, displacement, compaction or X This proposal will result in some disruption, displacement, compaction and j overcovering of the soil? overcovering of the site as a result of development of structures, driveways, parking areas, etc. If the property is developed to the greatest extent allowed by the proposed zone, there will be eight 1+ acre parcels and corresponding homes. Most of the site will be disturbed when improvements are installed and it is expected that at "least 35 to 40%of the property will be overcovered. This will result in an increase in storm water runoff from the site. These impacts are directly related to the future subdivision and development of the property, not the rezone, and can be better addressed at the time of land division. C. Change in topography or ground surface relief X Some minor land levelling can be expected when the parcel develops. The features? property is level to gently sloping over approximately 60% of the site. The rest of the property has slopes ranging from 30% to 60+%. Significant amounts of earthwork would be necessary to develop on the steeper areas of the site. Areas with slopes exceeding 30% should be avoided to reduce erosion and earthwork impacts and to reduce the possibility of landslides since this is a high rainfall area. d. Destruction, covering or modification of any X The site has no unique physical features. unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, X The rezone proposal will not cause erosion but future development might. The either on or off site? property sits on the edge of the feather River Canyon and the slopes to the east are significant. Runoff from the site, if concentrated and directed over the edge of the canyon, could cause some on and off site erosion. On site, the development of 1 acre parcels will probably not result in significant erosion as long as standard engineering practices are used during construction and slopes over 30% are not developed. If areas of 30% slope or greater are proposed for structures all foundations and earth work should be designed by an architect or engineer. This can be better addressed at the time of land division based on the lot configurations and density. f. Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, X The proposal will not affect the deposition of soil or erosion in any or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion waterbody. which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils X This proposal does not represent a significant loss of prime agricultural outside designated urban areas? soils. h. Exposure of people or property to geologic X All of Butte County is in a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, Construction of buildings to Uniform Building Code standards for seismic zone mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? 3, as required through the building permit application, will provide adequate protection to occupants in case of seismic activity. 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air X The proposal will not affect air quality because the increase in the number quality? of vehicle trips is not significant. b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or X The rezone proposal will not result in any direct impacts to air quality. fumes? The future development of the site may. Local air quality may be affected by emissions from fire places and wood stoves. When the property is • subdivided, a condition should be imposed to require the installation of EPA approved wood stoves and fireplace inserts. ..................................... X:............... ........ ...... ................. .........­................ ................ ..................................... .......................... .................................. .................. ... ....... .................... .................. ................... ........ X .......................................................... .................... ..................... ............... .................................................................. ...................................... ...... ............................ . ...... ... ........ .. ............. ...................... ........ ......... ... ....................................................................................... ............................... ':':­* ....... ........... .......... .............................. .... .... .......X., .. ....... ............ ...... .............. ........ ........... ...... ........ ................ XX ............................. .... ........ ...... .. ................................................. ......... ................ ................................. .................................... ....... vironmen .....moad ....................................... n . .................... Envirdfi­ffi......On tiiii.7h k1i _Ath""n::::::. E"*' ':"*"""',*"*,:,,*,*,:"*,",:*"**""""Ul ,:I "",",":"", I .... ....... x "a 0* ,: .......................... ....... .. ............. ...................... ............................................. .......................................... . ...... . . ....... ....... ............... ......................................................... ................. . ............... ...... ff: ................. ... ..... ..................XX. ........ ........ ............... ........ ................ :::::_: ....... . ...... ...................... xx ......... ........ * ............. ........ ........ . ............................X X.: .......%.................. ........... ....... .......... .............:­- %...................................................................................................................,..................................... ........ ........ ...........................I.......................................... ............................................................... ................ ................................. .................................................................. C Alteration of air movement, moisture or X The proposal will not affect the atmosphere. temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction X The proposal will not affect any watercourse. The Feather River is of water movements in either marine or fresh approximately 1600' away from the property. waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, X Future development that will be allowed as a result of this rezone will or the rate and amount of surface runoff? result in an increase in surface water runoff due to reduced absorption from impervious surfaces, and in a change in the drainage pattern on the site. Storm water- runoff that is concentrated and directed into the Feather River may cause some erosion. Because of the distances involved it is unlikely that any sediment or silt will reach a water course. Runoff will not be able to reach the Feather River because it will be intercepted by the Miocene Canal which flows into Kunkel Reservoir. These impacts are best addressed at the time of land division when the lot configuration and density can be taken into consideration. It does not appear that there are any drainage or erosion problems that cannot be mitigated through proper engineering techniques at the time of subdivision. C. Need for off-site surface drainage improvements, X No off site drainage improvements will be required for this project. including vegetation removal, channelization or culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood X The proposal will not significantly affect any flood control channels or waters? watercourses. e. Change in the amount of surface water in any X The proposal will not affect any watercourse. water body? f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any X The zoning proposal will not significantly affect surface water quality. alteration of surface water quality, including However, future development proposals may significantly affect surface water but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen quality due to siltation resulting from erosion caused by road and driveway or turbidity? construction and grading of building sites. This may be mitigated through the use of standard construction practices to minimize erosion, limiting the time of year site preparation may occur, and stabilizing disturbed slopes. 9. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X The proposal will not affect the direction or flow of ground waters. ground waters? h. Change in the quantity or quality of ground X Water to serve future development will have to come from individual wells waters, either through direct additions or unless a coiniiiunity water system is extended to serve the area. Sufficient withdrawals, or through interception of an groundwater to serve new homes has not been proven and may not be available. aquifer by cuts or excavations? Proof of adequate water will have to be shown before new parcels are approved. i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise X The project will not affect any public water supply. available for public water supplies? j. Exposure of people or property to water-related X The proposal will not expose people or property to flooding. hazards such as flooding? 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of X The proposal will not affect the diversity of plant life on site. any species•of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? ........ ... ............. ........... ............................ ........... . ............... .... ....... ... ............ .......... ............ ....... ....... .............................................................. ................................... .......... X s: :. "'­'' '*....:.. :........ ................................................. .............. ........................... .............................. ........ ...... ... ......... .......... ............................................... ........ ....... ................ X. ........ ............................................................... ... ....... ........ ....... ........................................... .............. .................... .......................................... ............ ........ ................ ............................................................ ................. ............................. .......... ........... —............ ...... -X-X-X-: .......... .... ................... ................................. .................... ........ Env"ironmen1"Clh iiEnvi :........... .......Womb Uilm' b ......... . .......... . .. ............. . ........... .... .......................... ................................ ....... .... ......................... . .............. .................... ............... ...........­................ .................................. .................. ................................ .......................................................................................... b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X The site contains no rare plants. endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an X The proposal will not affect existing plant life. area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X The site does not contain any agricultural crops and is presently developed with residential uses. 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers X The proposal will not significantly the diversity or number of animal life of any species of animals (birds, land animals because the site does not support significant animal life or habitat. including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or X The site contains no rare animals. endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an X The proposal will not affect existing animal life. area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife X The site contains no significant wildlife habitat. habitat? The proposal could result in a incremental reduction in Oak Woodland habitat. This habitat is considered important because it provides most of the life sustaining requirements needed by numerous animal species. There has been significant cumulative losses of oak woodlands in California due to residential, commercial, and other development projects. The California Dept. of Fish and Game recommend several mitigation measures to protect this habitat. 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X The proposal will not result in a substantial increase in noise created on site or in the vicinity. b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X The proposal will not expose people to severe noise levels. 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant X The proposal will not result in a substantial increase in light or glare light and glare? - created on site or in the vicinity. 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial X The proposal will not alter the land use in the area. The property Abuts SR- alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 1 tuning and there is similar development in the area. The extent of I acre zoning is limited by the terrain. To the east the property is too steep to support small parcels and the FR-40 zone is appropriate. 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural X The proposal will not affect any natural resources. resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? X The proposal will not deplete any natural resources. 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: . ...................................................................................................... ............................... .................................................. ........ .... ................ ......................... ......................... .............................. ........ ....... ............... ................ ........ .. ......... ................ ....... ....... ..... ................ .................................... .......... .. ............. ....... ..................................... ................ .......... ........ ...... .......... ........ ... ....... ....... ... .... .................. .................................... .......... :X .. ... X .......... ................. ....................... ............... X ........ .......... XX -ohm" ..-IM-p . ..................� xxxx ....... ......... ........ Envirldnmldh t.'.Ch' k1i I dtidnli!. ....................................... ...... ..... ..... .... ... ..........11......--... #t.................. .... - .!iEhVi­.......*........e..... F: . . . ... .............................. .... .............................. ...........W ....... ....-- --...... .........................................:' ............ ........................ .................................... ......... ....... ..... .. ................... ............................. ........... ........ ....... .......... ................ .... ... ........ ........................................... .. ............... ........................................................................ ............ ........ ....... ......%.........................................-.-.-......................�...................................... .................................. ............................... ......................................................................... . ......... ....... .......................................................................................... a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous X The proposal will not involve the use of hazardous materials, nor is located substances (including, but not limited to, oil, close to any facilities which store or utilize such materials. pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response X The proposal will not affect any emergency services. plan or emergency evacuation plan? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter location, X The proposal will not significantly affect the population of the area because distribution, density or growth rate of the human the proposed density does not exceed that planned and being developed in the population? area. 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or X The proposal will not significantly affect housing demand. create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle X The proposal will represent a minor increase in traffic on Merrill Road and movement? an incremental increase in traffic in the Paradise area. All traffic will have to through the town of Paradise. Merrill Road is basically a cul-de- sac road with no circulation. It now serves approximately 112 parcels of which maybe 85 to 90 are already developed. Assuming a full build out of 8 parcels, this project could generate between 50 and 70 additional ADT. This impact could be mitigated by the imposition of the same traffic impact fees that are collected for the town of Paradise at the time of land division. This would be a better time to address it since the number of lots and the exact impact is not known at this time. b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand X The proposal will not affect parking because the proposal will have to comply for new parking? with the parking requirements contained within Butte County Code section 24- 35. C. Substantial impact on existing transportation X The proposal will represent a minor nor i.ncrease in congestion and maintenance systems? requirements on area roads when the property is divided in accordance with this rezone. The last 500' of Merrill Road is not paved at this time. Road improvements will be required at time of land division. d. Significant alterations to present patterns of X The proposal will not alter the present pattern of circulation in the area. circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X The proposal will not affect rail or air traffic. f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, X The proposal will result in an incremental increase in traffic and related bicyclists or pedestrians? traffic hazards in the area when the property is developed. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services: a. Fire protection? X The proposal will result in an incremental increase in demand for fire protection in the area. The Butte County Fire Department/California Division of Forestry has indicated that cumulative development in rural areas will impact their ability to provide fire protection services. They have stated that installation of a pressurized community water system with fire hydrants or automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems in residential structures, the use of fire resistance building materials and water supply systems adequate to support the sprinkler system will reduce the demand for fire protection services. .b. Police protection? X The proposal will result in an incremental increase in demand for police protection in the area. The Board of Supervisors has adopted a Sheriff impact mitigation fee that is collected at the time of building permit submittal. This condition reduces the impact to police services to a less than significant level. 6 Environmental Checklist * Evaluation of Environmental Impact c. Schools? X The proposal will result in an incremental increase in demand for school servicesin the area. All new residential units allowed by this project will be subject to the collection of school impact fees, as allowed by the School Facilities Law and adopted by County ordinance. These fees are collected at the time of building permit application. While the school district maintains that the allowed fees do not fully mitigate the impacts of the project, the County is precluded from imposing additional fees and takes the position that the existing fee structure addresses the impacts of the project. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X The proposal will result in a minor incremental increase in demand for park and recreation facilities in the area. At this point in time, the Paradise Area Recreation District has not identified a significant impact nor have they implemented impact fees. e. Maintenance of public facilities, including X The proposal will result in minor ineremenidl increase in the need for roads? maintenance of roads and other public facilities in the area that can be addressed at the time of land division through traffic impact fees. f. Other governmental services? X The proposal will result in a minor incremental increase in demand for all other governmental services in the area that will be partially off set by new property tax revenues. 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X The proposal will not utilize substantial fuel or energy. b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing X The proposal will not substantially increase the demand for energy. sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas? X The proposal will not affect electrical power or natural gas distribution systems. b. Communications systems? X The proposal will not affect communication systems. C. Water availability? X The proposal will not affect public water systems. Water for the area will have to be supplied by individual wells. d. Sewer or septic systems? X The proposal will have to meet the requirements of the Butte County Environmental Health Dept. There is some question that 1 acre parcels will be able to support individual septic tank systems. Soils information will have to submitted at the time of land division. There are smaller lots in the area that have septic systems so the possibility that soils will be available has been shown. e. Storm water drainage? X The proposal will have to provide a permanent solution for drainage. f. Solid waste and disposal? X The proposal will not affect solid waste disposal. 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential hazard X The proposal will not create any health hazard. (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X The proposal will not expose people to any health hazard. 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction X The proposal will not result in an aesthetically offensive view because it of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the is consistent with surrounding development. proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically 7 .....................:::::.........:.:. .:. i� t Ev 1 ti n Ener: nm n I Im t:>:::::::::>::::>::::>:::::>:::>::::>:::>:::»:::>:: ::>:::>:::>::: :>::>:<>: ::>::>>: >:::<> ::<::>::.>:: >>:: »:>: nv�ronmental....C..heck s. .:::...:. ... .a. ua o ......:: o . . a ..to :::. .. ac...... .................................................. ......... . .. ........ ::::::::::::::::::::..:.::.:::.:::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::..:...::::.:..::::............:.:::::..P:::::..:..::: :::...................... ::..:..:::::...::..::.:.::....:::.. :.:.:....:::...:...:::..:.:.:.:...:.:.:.:::::::::::.:. offensive site open to the public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the X See the discussion for item 14d. quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration or X The proposal will not affect archeological sites. destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or X The proposal will not affect historic sites. aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or'object? C. _ _Does the proposal have the potential to cause-a-- - X The proposal will not affect cultural resources. ---� physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or X The proposal will not affect religious resources. sacred uses within the potential impact area? .......... .......... ...... .................................................... ........................... .. ......... ..... .................. ............. j$x: .................... .................................. ......................................... X X.: ....... ... ........... ...... 8 ............................... ... ................................. ......... ..... .... .......... .......... ........ .................................. ............................ ................................. .......... ............ ........................ ... ............................................................... ....................... ... .............................. ........................................... ........ ................................ .................................. ......................... ................................ ............... .............................. ............... ` ..................................................... ................. ............. .............. ........ ... ... ...onmen kI qW.......................ronmieltalii�] '.Oc I myl E fiv W* .................tAF:Ch :':E.v . .................. ....................................... ................ . .... . .......................... .......... ................................. ........... ....... .................................................. V. SUGGESTED MITIGATION MEASURES 1. No mitigation measures are recommended at this time. There are no direct physical impacts associated with this project. The impacts of development will occur after a parcel or subdivision map has been approved and should best be addressed in the environmental documents prepared for that project. The mitigation measures can be made more precise and will better reflect the impacts if they are adopted for a specific development proposal. .................... ....... ....... ................... ..... ................................... . ........................... X ...................... ..... .. ................. .......... ................ .................... ..... .......... -- .....:......... ............................... ... ......... ....... ...... - .: : .::::::1%; ........ ............................. ........... ...... X-X... .................. ............................ ............ ............................ ........ ........... ......... ..... ........ .................... ...............................`-'-X.:.X.:::::.::":'.' ........................ .............. ...... ... . .. ...:::::,. _,X...............;>;;;::...:.*:.;:::X:.:......... .......... ........ ...... . X ::::: ­*...: ....................... ...*....... ............. .... ................ ................ ........ ..........*............. ............ :::: ................ ........ . ................. ....**" :::.................. ...................................... .............................:.:.:::::::X. ........... En rJi ....................h FCh k il h ............................... ........ ........... ........... ................................ .............................. ........ ..... ................... ........ ......... ....... ........ ... ....... ........ ... . ............................................................................... ................ ........ ...................... ... DATA SHEET A. Project Description 7. Air Quality: Good, except during periods air inversion when 1. Type of Project: Rezone smoke from wood stoves and vehicle emissions degrade the quality. 2. Brief Description: Rezone from FR-40 to SR-1 Biological Environment: 3. Location: Located at the end of Merrill Road, Paradise a. Vegetation: Mixed conifer/hardwood forest 4. Proposed Density of Development: 1 dwelling per acre 9. Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals common to conifer forests. Non-critical winter habitat for the deer herd. 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing; Moderate. Cultural Environment: 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): the property has frontage on Merrill Road 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Low sensitivity area 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septir,%yFtomc. 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Agricultural Residential 8. Source of Water Supply: Individual wells. and a small area of grazing and Open Land 9. Proximity of Power Lines: To property. 12. Existing Zoning: FR-40 10. Potential for further land divisions and development: Under the 13. Existing Land Use on-site: Residential proposed zone 7 additional parcels could be created. 14. Surrounding Area: B. Environmental Setting a. Land Uses: Rural Residential b. Zoning: SR-I, FR-40 Physical Environment: C. Gen. Plan Designation: Agricultural Residential, Grazing and Open Land 1. Terrain d. Parcel Sizes: 40+ acre parcels to the east, 2 acre and a. General Topographic Character: Uneven mountain terrain at smaller to the west the edge of a major canyon e. Population: Limited b. Slopes: 0 to 60+% C. Elevation: 2150 feet above sea level. 15. Character of Site and Area: Rural urban fringe d. Limiting Factors: Areas of very steep slope near the canyon edge 16. Nearest Urban Area: Paradise town limits within 1/2 mile 2. Soils 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: Town of Paradise a. Types and Characteristics: Aiken soil series - 60 to 140" thick, loam clay, dark brown to yellowish-red, slow 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area: No permeability, well drained, moderate to high erosion hazard. 19. Fire Protection Service: b. Limiting Factors: Permeability a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Station # 34, Magalia, approximately 2 miles away. 3. Natural Hazards of the Land b. Water Availability: Fire tankers only. a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity zone VIII. b. Erosion Potential: Moderate to high 20. Schools in Area: Paradise Unified School District. C. Landslide Potential: High on steeper slopes, especially if vegetation has ben cleared d Fire Hazard: Very high e. Expansive Soil Potential: Low 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: None on site b. Ground Water: Unknown, potentially limited. C. Drainage Characteristics: The parcel drains to the east towards the Feather River d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 55 to 60 inches per year. e. Limiting Factors: Erosion on steeper slopes S. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good, excellent views exist to the east. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. 10 *... kl� t:::::.:::Ev I >Im nm n L. hec s al ti n. f Enver: nm en .. act:.:::::::::::>;>:>::>::>::::<:::>:>:::>>::: ......::::::;::>::.::::>::... >::: ::> :::>::::<::> n.v....�ro .... a...ta...0. . .. ..... . ..... ......... ua. o...:::o .:.......... o ......e.... . ... .. P::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::.::.:::.::.::: ::.:.:::::::.:::.....:..:....:.:.....:..::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthcruake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: 2. Butte County Planning Department. Licruefaction Butte County Planning Department, 1987. Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety element. oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate maps. Federal Emergency Butte County Planning department. Subsidence and Management Agency, 1989. - Landslide Potential Map 111-1, Safety Element. _ oroville, CA:= CH2M Hill, 1977. 14. USGS Quad Maps, Paradise East, Calif. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion 15. Soil Map, chico (1925) /oroville (1926) Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: Area. United States Department of CH2M Hill, 1977. Agriculture. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils 16. Soil Survey of Chico (1925) /oroville Map 111-3, Safety element. oroville, CA: CH2M (1926) Area. United States Department of Hill, 1977. Agriculture. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise element 17. Butte County Planning Department. Butte Map IV-1, Scenic Highway element. Oroville, CA: County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and CH2M Hill, 1977. Facilities Map. Butte county fire Department and California Department of 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Forestry, 1989. Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Map. Oroville, CA 11. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency, State of California, 1983. FILE NO.: 93-20 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - May 20, 1993 APPLICANT: Winifred Williams OWNER Same REQUEST: Rezone from FR-40 to SR-1 AP NO.: 050-260-001 SIZE: 8.4 acres LOCATION: Located at the easterly end of Merrill Road, Paradise EXISTING ZONING: FR-40 ZONING HISTORY: Zoned FR-40 on Feb. 22, 1982 by Ord. 2267 SURROUNDING ZONING: SR-1, FR-40 SURROUNDING LAND USE: Rural residential, Town of Paradise GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Agricultural Residential, Grazing and Open Lands - APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Butte County Code Sections 24-26.through 24- 29, 24-162, 24-112.7 COMMENTS RECEIVED: Public Works: "Roads leading to this area are in the Town of Paradise." County Fire Department/CDF: "'Phis individual rezone has no impact on the Fire Department, but the accumulative affect of rezoning to higher density developments is increased demand for fire protection services and higher costs to the County." 1 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - May 20, 1993 Environmental Health: "See letter dated 4/15/93" Town of Paradise: "Strong concerns regarding potential impacts related to traffic circulation, public services, community charter/aesthetics, their removal, and sewage disposal. Very much interested in reviewing and commenting on environmental document." ANALYSIS: This is a request to rezone approximately 8.5 acres from FR-40 to SR-1. The property is located at the easterly end of Merrill Road, adjacent to the Town of Paradise and lies at the edge of the canyon formed by the West Branch of the Feather River. The area to be rezoned was part of a larger parcel that was split by a zone line with SR-1 to the west and FR-40 to the east. The applicant has already created three parcels by gift deed within the SR-1 zone leaving as a separate parcel the area within the FR-40 designation. Both the SR-1 and FR- 40 zones were adopted in 1982 as part of the Paradise Area General Plan and Rezone. As previously stated the property is located at the transition line between the Paradise ridge- top idge.top and the canyon that drops down into the West Branch of the Feather River. Approximately 30% to 40% of the site has a slope of 30% or greater. The balance of the property has gentle slopes and could, from a topography stand point, accommodate parcels of 1 acre. Water and adequate soil for sewage disposal have not been proven for 1 acre parcels yet but there are other parcels in the area that have homes on 1/2 to 1/3 acre parcels. Merrill Road serves the subject parcel and approximately 112 other lots in the area, most of which are in the Town of Paradise. There is no circulation for traffic on this road and the addition of any new parcels is a concern for both the town of Paradise and the County. The lack of circulation could be critical in the event of a major fire on the ridge. All traffic from the area must use Pentz Magalia Hwy. and traffic volume on this road is high. The Town of Paradise is currently contemplating the adoption of traffic impact fees for Pentz Road and it's collector streets but have not adopted a fee at this time. The actual impacts to traffic will occur when the property is divided and would be best addressed at that time. The project site is designated by the Butte County General Plan as Agricultural-Residential on the ridge top and a small amount of Grazing and Open Land in the canyon area. The Agricultural Residential designation requires that the following findings be made and zoning factors be considered when approving a rezone to less than 20 acre parcels. CONDITIONAL ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA: 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. (Yes) 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. (Unknown at this time 2 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - May 20, 1993 but there are similar sized parcels in the area.) . 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. (Yes) 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. (Merrill Road appears be adequate for the existing development but there is a lack of circulation for emergency purposes.) 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. (Yes) ZONING FACTORS: 1. Existing parcel sizes in residential densities. (There are 1 acre and smaller parcels to the west.) 2. Slope. (Approximately 60 to 70% of the site is,suitable for 1 acre parcels.) 3. Soil conditions and water availability. (The soil is generally deep and there are other small parcels in the area.) 4. Effects on adjacent uses, crop production, livestock grazing, forestry, resource extraction and wildlife habitat. (This project will not be incompatible with adjacent uses.) 5. Proximity to public roads and other public facilities. (Merrill Road serves the property and can be improved to meet subdivision standards.) 6. Distance from airports, railroads and industrial uses. (No conflicts with these uses.) 7. Existing utility and drainage facilities. (Utilities exist and drainage can be handled on site or dispersed into the canyon.) 8. Potential for surface cracking, landslides and erosion. (Steeper slopes can be avoided to reduce erosion.) 9. Effects on noise, traffic flow and safety, water quality, air quality, wildlife habitat and general environmental quality. (The project is consistent with the surrounding properties. Traffic generation can be partially addressed through road improvements. Circulation and cumulative impacts to the region cannot be mitigated at the rezone level and will require the adoption of traffic impact fees by the town of Paradise for future land divisions.) 3 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - May 20, 1993 10. Local desires. (Unknown, other than those of the applicant.) 11. Potential for pest insect breeding. (No significant effect) For the most part the proposed zoning can be supported by the conditional criteria and zoning factors. Traffic concerns and a solution to circulation can not be addressed at this time. In the overall picture of traffic on the ridge, it is doubtful that 4 new parcels will really have a significant impact on the existing transportation system. This parcel is not needed to provide future circulation for the area. RECOMMENDATIONS: A. Find that the requirements of CEQA have been completed and considered in making this decision and adopt a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts; and B. Find that the rezone conforms to the policies, including the text and map of the Butte County General Plan, because the proposed zone meets the conditional criteria of the Agricultural Residential General Plan designation and the zoning factors; and C. Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance rezoning to SR-1, that property identified as AP No: 050-260-021 (Williams). CBS:cs Attachments to Commission and Cities: Environmental Documents Site Plan Location Map 4 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings will be held on Thursday, June 24, 1993, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following item at the following time: ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED ED Andre and Winifred Williams - Rezone from FR-40 (Foothill Recreational - 40 acre parcels) to SR-1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acre parcels) located at the east end of Merrill Road, approximately 3400 feet east of Pentz Magalia Highway, identified as.AP 050-260-021, Paradise. (CBS) (File 93- 20) ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION MEASURES REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED 10:30 a.m. L & L Surveying - General Plan Amendment from Public to Agricultural Residential and Rezone from "U" (Unclassified), FR-40 (Foothill Recreational - 40 acre parcels), and R-C (Resource Conservation) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for property located on the west side of Pentz Road, opposite Kunkle Reservoir Road, identified as AP 041-470-054 and 055-310-007, Paradise. (TL) (File 92-50 A & B) The above mentioned applications, maps, and Negative Declarations are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Comments may be submitted in writing any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as continued to a later date. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION B. A. KIRCHER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING To be published on Thursday, May 20, 1993 in the Paradise Post. B1---E COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS:---N -- 7 County Center Drive F Oroville, CA 95965-3397 Mann (916) (916) 538-7601 APR 01 1993 TO: PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 26 , 1999f"'11e1�,aiiis�r�ia RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Williams Rezone #93-20 Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: Rezone to SR-1 the east 630 ft . of said parcel . AP #050-260-019 8 . 69 acres located at the east end of Merrill Rd . east of upper Pentz Rd . at 2024 (formerly 2015) Merrill Rd . Paradise Zoned SR-1 , FR-40 We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) . Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise j that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above-noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, Larry Pa ' er Planning Technician Comments: ca Lem-��_' 7415-• c4"eu. ac-✓e T 1 Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) . Yes No , COUNTY OF BUTTE MAR 2 9 1993 .and Development'Sec. C lis B 'E COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS )N 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 Planning®ppartment (916) 538-7601 APR 01 1993 TO: COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT/CDF DATE: March 26 , 19930rovE;c,�Caiifornia RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Williams Rezone #93-20 Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: Rezone to SR-1 the east 630 ft . of said parcel . AP#050-260-019 8 . 69 acres located at the east end of Merrill Rd . east of upper Pentz Rd . at 2024 (formerly 2015) Merrill Rd . Paradise Zoned SR-1 , FR-40 We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report.' (EIR) . Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical,. social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above-noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. E () E ( V E lU1 �C �jU � Sincerely, MAR 3 01993 7' t:P�'a' DEPARTMENT of FORESTRY Larry Pa' er BUTTE COUNTY Planning Technician Comments Ms no rmpeaon Ow Fire Depar%w but the accumulative affect of rezon' n to high" agnsily dove! m is iacreosed demand for fire pr0"n smkm and hipper costs to the e___ Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) . Yes No Mot QC4 ot P fft M WP, Lftv C ok Fenk Bl E COUNTY PLANNING COMMISS f r 7 County Center Drive Environmental Heaitn APR Oroville, CA 95965-3397 (916) 538-7601 MAR 2 9 1993 TO: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DATE: MARCH 26 , 1993 proville,California RE: PROJECT REVIEW & j ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION i WILLIAMS — REZONE # 93-20 Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: Rezone to SR-1 the east 630 ft . of said parcel . AP 050-260-019 8 . 69 acres located at the east end of Merrill Rd . east of upper Pentz Rd . at 2024 (formerly 2015) Merrill Rd . Paradise . Zoned SR-1 , FR-40 We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) . i Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above-noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall he assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, EP1VeRQtS. TAI.HRALTH Larry Pa' er M 3 p 1993 Planning Technician p t3RA�4;�:,vary. Comments: 41 ? Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) . �- yes No i I V Ae �!� t T f. y, �rT r- B' 'E COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS J County Oro ille, CA Center 95965-3397 e 40 4,0- (916) 538-7601 ®Pd�rir 0 ., 8 1gg2 TO: TOWN OF PARADISE DATE: March 26-, . 1993 RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Williams Rezone #93-20 Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: Rezone to SR-1 the east 630 ft . of said parcel . AP#050-260-019 8 . 69 acres located at the east end of Merrill Rd . east of upper Pentz Rd . at 2024 (formerly 2015) Merrill Rd . Paradise Zoned SR-1 , FR-40 We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures. or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) . Please provide any factual statements; ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above-noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. i We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, 0 0 -�. MAR 3 01993 Larry Pafafer TOWN OF PARADISE Planning Technician COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. comments: S �o"6 /� �� � �r;'�''!7�'�� Gls2GyL�`/�s'J,�U3G/G J�ii/L✓/G.�s. GOr`�sM�lw/�/ ��'�:'✓Y�?�t�/�5?.7i1-�7GS , �72� /���v-7/✓i�L, �il� Sirti✓�� //JS�o-`�'�z/,. !/Jfii� /`l!/C�51 //vr`.�`��5�� /�/ i��ii��ie✓6 ¢-- �v��,ur✓lrYiV if Uy'✓ Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) . ' � f Yes No e • r _ � e �o C r ' Y• n ' i • 1 I l it - � � � � � _• ;�, . k �a�r� \ �• rl t :: :r• :.:..::. � 204 . � - � �` • K i V� � Y• 1 � r ,• h� r .._— ` t xS'> ,� � � iF r t` � ,. � �� II� s' '� `_�, :.. �( � r %� ��� . �' ..1 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings will be held on Thursday, June 24, 1993, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following item at the following time: ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED H��D Andre and Winifred Williams - Rezone from FR-40 (Foothill Recreational - 40 acre parcels) to SR-1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acre parcels) located at the east end of Merrill Road, approximately 3400 feet east of Pentz Magalia Highway, identified as AP 050-260-021, Paradise. (CBS) (File 93- 20) ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION MEASURES REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED 10:30 a.m. L & L Surveying - General Plan Amendment from Public to Agricultural Residential and Rezone from "U" (Unclassified), FR-40 (Foothill Recreational - 40 acre parcels), and R-C (Resource Conservation) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for property located on the west side of Pentz. . Road, opposite Kunkle Reservoir Road, identified as AP 041-470-054 and 055-310-007, Paradise. (TL) (File 92-50 A & B) The above mentioned applications, maps, and Negative Declarations are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Comments may be submitted in writing any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as continued to a later date. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION B. A. KIRCHER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING To be published on Thursday, May 20, 1993 in the Paradise Post. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings will be held on Thursday, June 24, 1993, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following item at the following time: ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED 9:00 a.m. Andre and Winifred Williams - Rezone from FR-40 (Foothill Recreational - 40 acre parcels) to SR-1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acre parcels) located at the east end of Merrill Road, approximately 3400 feet east of Pentz Magalia Highway, identified as AP 050-260-021, Paradise. (CBS) (File 93- 20) ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION MEASURES REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED 10:30 a.m. L & L Surveying - General Plan Amendment from Public to Agricultural Residential and Rezone from "U" (Unclassified), FR-40 (Foothill Recreational - 40 acre parcels), and R-C (Resource Conservation) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for property located on the west side of Pentz Road, opposite Kunkle Reservoir Road, identified as AP 041-470-054 and 055-310-007, Paradise. (TL) (File 92-50 A & B) The above mentioned applications, maps, and Negative Declarations are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Comments may be submitted in writing any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as continued to a later date. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION B. A. KIRCHER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING To be published on Thursday, May 20, 1993 in the Paradise Post. APPENDIX I COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL .IMPACT File No. 93-20 AP No. 050-260-019 I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Andrew & Winifred Williams 2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable): 2024 Merrill Rd. Paradise, CA 95969 3. Project description: Rezone from FR-40 to SR-1 II. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE YES MA" NO DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1. Doesthe project have the potential to degrade the quality X This proposal will not significantly degrade the environment. of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory? 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term X This proposal will not impede long-term environmental goals. benefits to the detriment of long-term environment goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts will endure into the future.) ' 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually X This proposal will not have a significant cumulative impact on the limited but cumulatively considerable? (A project may environment. impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will X This proposal will not have a significant adverse effect on human beings. cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? I III. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I/WE find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I/WE find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MEASURES described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I/WE find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. COUNTY OF /JUTTE, DEVE ENT SE VICES DEPARTMENT DATE: May 7, 1993 By: /6 Craig nders Reviewed by: r Environmental Checklist'* Evaluation of Environmental Impact:. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS YES MAYBE No DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: a. Unstable earth conditions, or changes in geologic X The proposal will not affect subsurface earth conditions. substructures? b. Disruption, displacement, compaction or X This proposal will result in some disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of the soil? overcovering of the site as a result of development of structures, driveways, parking areas, etc. If the property is developed to the greatest extent allowed by the proposed zone, there will be eight 1+ acre parcels and corresponding homes. Most of the site will be disturbed when improvements are installed and it is expected that at least 35 to 40% of the property will be overcovered. This will result in an increase in storm water runoff from the site. These impacts are directly related to the future subdivision and development of the property, not the rezone, and can be better addressed at the time of land division. C. Change in topography or ground surface relief X Some minor land levelling can be expected when the parcel develops. The features? property is level to gently sloping over approximately 60% of the site. The rest of the property has slopes ranging from 30% to 60+%. Significant amounts of earthwork would be necessary to develop on the steeper areas of the site. Areas with slopes exceeding 30% should be avoided to reduce erosion and earthwork impacts and to reduce the possibility of landslides since this is a high rainfall area. d. Destruction, covering or modification of any X The site has no unique physical features. unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, X The rezone proposal will not cause erosion but future development might. The either on or off site? property sits on the edge of the feather River Canyon and the slopes to the east are significant. Runoff from the site, if concentrated and directed over the edge of the canyon, could cause some on and off site erosion. On site, the development of 1 acre parcels will probably not result in significant erosion as long as standard engineering practices are used during construction and slopes over 301/ are not developed. If areas of 30% slope or greater are proposed for structures all foundations and earth work should be designed by an architect or engineer. This can be better addressed at the time of land division based on the lot configurations and density. f. Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, X The proposal will not affect the deposition of soil or erosion in any or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion waterbody. which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils X This proposal does not represent a significant loss of prime agricultural outside designated urban areas? soils. h. Exposure of people or property to geologic _X All of Butte County is in a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, Construction of buildings to Uniform Building Code standards for seismic zone mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? 3, as required through the building permit application, will provide adequate protection to occupants in case of seismic activity. 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air X The proposal will not affect air quality because the increase in the number quality? of vehicle trips is not significant. b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or X The rezone proposal will not result in any direct impacts to air quality. fumes? The future development of the site may. Local air quality may be affected by emissions from fire places and wood stoves. When the property is subdivided, a condition should be imposed to require the installation of EPA approved wood stoves and fireplace inserts. 3 Environmental Checklist *'.Evaluation of Environmental impact c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or X The proposal will not affect the atmosphere. temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction X The proposal will not affect any watercourse. The Feather River is of water movements in either marine or fresh approximately 1600' away from the property. waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, X Future development that will be allowed as a result of this rezone will or the rate and amount of surface runoff? result in an increase in surface water runoff due to reduced absorption from impervious surfaces, and in a change in the drainage pattern on the site. Storm water runoff that is concentrated and directed into the Feather River may cause some erosion. Because of the distances involved it is unlikely that any sediment or silt will reach a water course. Runoff will not be able to reach the Feather River because it will be intercepted by the Miocene Canal which flows into Kunkel Reservoir. These impacts are best addressed at the time of land division when the lot configuration and density can be taken into consideration. It does not appear that there are any drainage or erosion problems that cannot be mitigated through proper engineering techniques at the time of subdivision. C. Need for off-site surface drainage improvements, X No off site drainage improvements will be required for this project. including vegetation removal, channelization or culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood X The proposal will not significantly affect any flood control channels or waters? watercourses. e. Change in the amount of surface water in any X The proposal will not affect any watercourse. water body? f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any X The zoning proposal will not significantly affect surface water quality. alteration of surface water quality, including However, future development proposals may significantly affect surface water but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen quality due to siltation resulting from erosion caused by road and driveway or turbidity? construction and grading of building sites. This may be mitigated through the use of standard construction practices to minimize erosion, limiting the time of year site preparation may occur, and stabilizing disturbed slopes. g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X The proposal will not affect the direction or flow of ground waters. ground waters? h. Change in the quantity or quality of ground X Water to serve future development will have to come from individual wells waters, either through direct additions or unless a community water system is extended to serve the area. Sufficient withdrawals, or through interception of an groundwater to serve new homes has not been proven and may not be available. aquifer by cuts or excavations? Proof of adequate water will have to be shown before new parcels are approved. i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise X The project will not affect any public water supply. available for public water supplies? J. Exposure of people or property to water-related X The proposal will not expose people or property to flooding. hazards such as flooding? 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of X The proposal will not affect the diversity of plant life on site. any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? 4 Environmental Checklist:* Evaluation of:Environmental Impact b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X The site contains no rare plants. endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an X The proposal will not affect existing plant life. area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X The site does not contain any agricultural crops and is presently developed with residential uses. 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the propnsal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers X The proposal will not significantly the diversity or number of animal life of any species of animals (birds, land animals because the site does not support significant animal life or habitat. including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms gr inserts)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or X The site contains no rare animals. endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an X The proposal will not affect existing animal life. area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife X The site contains no significant wildlife habitat. habitat? The proposal could result in a incremental reduction in Oak Woodland habitat. This habitat is considered important because it provides most of the life sustaining requirements needed by numerous animal species. There has been significant cumulative losses of oak woodlands in California due to residential, commercial, and other development projects. The California Dept. of Fish and Game recommend several mitigation measures to protect this habitat. 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X The proposal will not result in a substantial increase in noise created on site or in the vicinity. , .b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X The proposal will not expose people to severe noise levels. 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant X The proposal will not result in a substantial increase in light or glare light and glare? created on site or in the vicinity. 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial X The proposal will not alter the land use in the area. The property abuts SR- alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 1 zoning and there is similar development in the area. The extent of 1 acre zoning is limited by the terrain. To the east the property is too steep to support small parcels and the FR-40 zone is appropriate. 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural X The proposal will not affect any natural resources. resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? X The proposal will not deplete any natural resources. 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: 5 Environmental::Checklist * Evaluation of Environmental Impact a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous X The proposal will not involve the use of hazardous materials, nor is located substances (including, but not limited to, oil, close to any facilities which store or utilize such materials. pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response X The proposal will not affect any emergency services. plan or emergency evacuation plan? 11. POPULATION. 'Will the proposal alter location, X The proposal will not significantly affect the population of the area because distribution, density or growth rate of the human the proposed density does not exceed that planned and being developed in the population? area. 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or X The proposal will not significantly affect housing demand. create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle X The proposal will represent a minor increase in traffic on Merrill Road and movement? an incremental increase in traffic in the Paradise area. All traffic will have to through the town of Paradise. Merrill Road is basically a cul-de- sac road with no circulation. It now serves approximately 112 parcels of which maybe 85 to 90 are already developed. Assuming a full build out of 8 parcels, this project could generate between 50 and 70 additional ADT. This impact could be mitigated by the imposition of the same traffic impact fees that are collected for the town of Paradise at the time of land division. This would be a better time to address it since the number of lots and the exact impact is not known at this time. b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand X The proposal will not affect parking because the proposal will have to comply for new parking? with the parking requirements contained within Butte County Code section 24- 35. C. Substantial impact on existing transportation X The proposal will represent a minor increase in congestion and maintenance systems? requirements on area roads when the property is divided in accordance with this rezone. The last 500' of Merrill Road is not paved at this time. Road improvements will be required at time of land division. d. Significant alterations to present patterns of X The proposal will not alter the present pattern of circulation in the area. circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X The proposal will not affect rail or air traffic. f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, X The proposal will result in an incremental increase in traffic and related bicyclists or pedestrians? traffic hazards in the area when the property is developed. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services: a. Fire protection? X The proposal will result in an incremental increase in demand for fire protection in the area. The Butte County Fire Department/California Division of Forestry has indicated that cumulative development in rural areas will impact their ability to provide fire protection services. They have stated that installation of a pressurized community water system with fire hydrants or automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems in residential structures, the use of fire resistance building materials and water supply systems adequate to support the sprinkler system will reduce the demand for fire protection services. b. Police protection? X The proposal will result in an incremental increase in demand for police protection in the area. The Board of Supervisors has adopted a Sheriff impact mitigation fee that is collected at the time of building permit submittal. This condition reduces the impact to police services to a less than significant level. Environmental Checklist *. Evaluation of Environmental Impact c. Schools? X The proposal will result in an incremental increase in demand for school services in the area. All new residential units allowed by this project will be subject to the collection of school impact fees, as allowed by the School Facilities Law and adopted by County ordinance. These fees are collected at the time of building permit application. While the school district maintains that the allowed fees do not fully mitigate the impacts of the project, the County is precluded from imposing additional fees and takes the position that the existing fee structure addresses the impacts of the project. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X The proposal will result in a minor incremental increase in demand for park -- and recreation facilities in the area. At this point in time, the Paradise Area Recreation District has not identified a significant impact nor have they implemented impact fees. e. Maintenance of public facilities, including X The proposal will result in minor incremental increase in the need for roads? maintenance of roads and other public facilities in the area that can be addressed at the time of land division through traffic impact fees. f. Other governmental services? X The proposal will result in a minor incremental increase in demand for all other governmental services in the area that will be partially off set by new property tax revenues. 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X The proposal will not utilize substantial fuel or energy. b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing X The proposal will not substantially increase the demand for energy. sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas? X The proposal will not affect electrical power or natural gas distribution systems. b. Communications systems? X The proposal will not affect communication systems. C. Water availability? X The proposal will not affect public water systems. Water for the area will have to be supplied by individual wells. d. Sewer or septic systems? X The proposal will have to meet the requirements of the Butte FCounty Environmental Health Dept. There is some question that 1 acre parcels will be able to support individual septic tank systems. Soils information will have to submitted at the time of land division. There are smaller lots in the area that have septic systems so the possibility that soils will be available has been shown. e. Storm water drainage? X The proposal will have to provide a permanent solution for drainage. f. Solid waste and disposal? X The proposal will not affect solid waste disposal. 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential hazard X The proposal will not create any health hazard. (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X The proposal will not expose people to any health hazard. 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction X The proposal will not result in an aesthetically offensive view because it of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the is consistent with surrounding development. proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically Environmental Checklist::* Evaluation of Environmental impact offensive site open to the public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the X See the discussion for item 14d. quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will the proposal result in the alteratinn or X The proposal will not affect archeological sites. destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or X The proposal will not affect historic sites. aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? o. Dena tho proposal have the potential to Cause a X The proposal will not affect cultural resources. physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or X The proposal will not affect religious resources. sacred uses within the potential impact area? 1� Environmental Checklist *<Evaluation. of Environmental:Impact V. SUGGESTED MITIGATION MEASURES 1. No mitigation measures are recommended at this time. There are no direct physical impacts associated with this project. The impacts of development will occur after a parcel or subdivision map has been approved and should best be addressed in the environmental documents prepared for that project. The mitigation measures can be made more precise and will better reflect the impacts if they are adopted for a specific development proposal. A Environmental Checklist * Evaluation of Environmental Impact" DATA SHEET A. Project Description 7. Air Quality: Good, except during periods air inversion when 1. Type of Project: Rezone smoke from wood stoves and vehicle emissions degrade the quality. 2. Brief Description: Rezone from FR-40 to SR-1 Biological Environment: 3. Location: Located at the end of Merrill Road, Paradise B. Vegetation: Mixed conifer/hardwood forest 4. Proposed Density of Development: 1 dwelling per acre 9. Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals common to conifer forests. Non-criLical winter habitat for the deer herd. 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Moderate. Cultural Environment: 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): the property has frontage on Merrill Road - 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Low - sensitivity area. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Tndividual septic systems. - 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Agricultural Residential 8. Source of Water Supply: Individual wells. and a small area of grazing and Open Land 9. Proximity of Power Lines: To property. 12. Existing Zoning: FR-40 10. Potential for further land divisions and development: Under the 13. Existing Land Use on-site: Residential proposed zone 7 additional parcels could be created. 14. Surrounding Area: B. Environmental Setting a. Land Uses: Rural Residential b. Zoning: SR-1, FR-40 Physical Environment: C. Gen. Plan Designation: Agricultural Residential, Grazing and Open Land 1. Terrain d. Parcel Sizes: 40+ acre parcels to the east, 2 acre and a. General Topographic Character: Uneven mountain terrain at smaller to the west the edge of a major canyon e. Population: Limited b. Slopes: 0 to 60+% C. Elevation: 2150 feet above sea level. 15. Character of Site and Area: Rural urban fringe d. Limiting Factors: Areas of very steep slope near the canyon edge 16. Nearest Urban Area: Paradise town limits within 1/2 mile 2. Soils 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: Town of Paradise a. Types and Characteristics: Aiken soil series - 60 to 140" thick, loam clay, dark brown to yellowish-red, slow 16. Improvements Standards Urban Area: No permeability, well drained, moderate to high erosion hazard. 19. Fire Protection Service: b. Limiting Factors: Permeability a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Station f 34, Magalis, approximately 2 miles away. 3. Natural Hazards of the Land b. Water Availability: Fire tankers only. a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity zone VIII. b. Erosion Potential: Moderate to high 20. Schools in Area: Paradise Unified School District. C. Landslide Potential: High on steeper slopes, especially if vegetation has hen cleared d. Fire Hazard: Very high e. Expansive Soil Potential: Low 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: None on site b. Ground Water: Unknown, potentially limited. C. Drainage Characteristics: The parcel drains to the east towards the Feather River d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 55 to 60 inches per year. e. Limiting Factors: Erosion on steeper slopes 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good, excellent views exist to the east. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. R � 10 Environmental Checklist, *'Evaluation of Environmental Impact:' ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Butte County Planning Department, 1987. Potential Map 11-2 Seismic Safety element. oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate maps. Federal Emergency 3. Butte County Planning department. Subsidence and Management Agency, 1989. Landslide Potential Map 111-1, Safety Element. oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 14. USGS Quad Maps, Paradise East, Calif. .4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion 15. Soil Map, chico (1925) /Oroville (1926) Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: Area. United States Department of CH2M Hill, 1977. Agriculture. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils 16. Soil Survey of Chico (1925) /Oroville Map 111-3, Safety element. oroville, CA: CH2M (1926) Area. United States Department of Hill, 1977. Agriculture. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise element 17. Butte County Planning Department. Butte Map IV-1, Scenic Highway element. Oroville, CA: Count Fire Protection Jurisdictions and CH2M Hill, 1977. Facilities Map. Butte county fire Department and California Department of 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Forestry, 1989. Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Map. Oroville, CA 11. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency, State of California, 1983. APPENDIX I COUNTY OF BUTTE NV E IRONMENTAL .CHECKLIST FORM EVALUATION OF .ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT File No. 93-20 AP No. 050-260-019 I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Andrew & Winifred Williams 2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable): 2024 Merrill Rd. Paradise, CA 95969 3. Project description: Rezone from FR-40 to SR-1 II. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE YES MAYBE —N DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality X This proposal will not significantly degrade the environment. of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory? 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term X This proposal will not impede long-term environmental goals. benefits to the detriment of long-term environment goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts will endure into the future.) 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually X This proposal will not have a significant cumulative impact on the limited but cumulatively considerable? (A project may environment. impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will X This proposal will not have a significant adverse effect on human beings. cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I/WE find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect ori the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I/WE find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MEASURES described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I/WE find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. COUNTY OF UTTE, DEVE NT SE VICES DEPARTMENT DATE: May 7, 1993 By: /6 Craig nders Reviewed by: Environmental. Checklist *'Evaluation of Environmental Impact- IV. mpact IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS res MAYBE 140 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: a. Unstable earth conditions, or changes in geologic X The proposal will not affect subsurface earth conditions. substructures? b. Disruption, displacement, compaction or X This proposal will result in some disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of the soil? overcovering of the site as a result of development of structures, driveways, parking areas, etc. If the property is developed to the greatest extent allowed by the proposed zone, there will be eight 1+ acre parcels and corresponding homes. Most of the site will be disturbed when improvements are installed and it is expected that at least 35 to 40%of the property will be overcovered. This will result in an increase in storm water runoff from the site. These impacts are directly related to the future subdivision and development of the property, not the rezone, and can be better addressed at the time of land division. C. Change in topography or ground surface relief X Some minor land levelling can be expected when the parcel develops. The features? property is level to gently sloping over approximately 60% of the site. The rest of the property has slopes ranging from 30% to 60+%. Significant amounts of earthwork would be necessary to develop on the steeper areas of the site. Areas with slopes exceeding 30% should be avoided to reduce erosion and earthwork impacts and to reduce the possibility of landslides since this is a high rainfall area. d. Destruction, covering or modification of any X The site has no unique physical features. unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, X The rezone proposal will not cause erosion but future development might. The either on or off site? property sits on the edge of the feather River Canyon and the slopes to the east are significant. Runoff from the site, if concentrated and directed over the edge of the canyon, could cause some on and off site erosion. On site, the development of I acre parcels will probably not result in significant erosion as long as standard engineering practices are used during construction and slopes over 30% are not developed. If areas of 30% slope or greater are proposed for structures all foundations and earth work should be designed by an architect or engineer. This can be better addressed at the time of land division based on the lot configurations and density. f. Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, X The proposal will not affect the deposition of soil or erosion in any or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion waterbody. which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils X This proposal does not represent a significant loss of prime agricultural outside designated urban areas? soils. h. Exposure of people or property to geologic X All of Butte Count is in a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The � P P P P P Y 9 9� Y q Y hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, Construction of buildings to Uniform Building Code standards for seismic zone mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? 3, as required through the building permit application, will provide adequate protection to occupants in case of seismic activity. 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air X The proposal will not affect air quality because the increase in the number quality? of vehicle trips is not significant. b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or X The rezone proposal will not result in any direct impacts to air quality. fumes? The future development of the site may. Local air quality may be affected by emissions from fire places and wood stoves. When the property is subdivided, a condition should be imposed to require the installation of EPA approved wood stoves and fireplace inserts. 3 Environmental Checklist` * Evaluation of Environmental impact c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or X The proposal will not affect the atmosphere. temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally. 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction X The proposal will not affect any watercourse. The Feather River is of water movements in either marine or fresh approximately 1600' away from the property. waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, X Future development that will be allowed as a result of this rezone will or the rate and amount of surface runoff? result in an increase in surface water runoff due to reduced absorption from impervious surfaces, and in a change in the drainage pattern on the site. Storm water runoff that is concentrated and directed into the Feather River may cause some erosion. Because of the distances involved it is unlikely that any sediment or silt will reach a water course. Runoff will not be able - to reach the Feather River because it will be intercepted by the Miocene Canal which flows into Kunkel Reservoir. These impacts are best addressed at the time of land division when the lot configuration and density can be taken into consideration. It does not appear that there are any drainage or erosion problems that cannot be mitigated through proper engineering techniques at the time of subdivision. C. Need for off-site surface drainage improvements, X No off site drainage improvements will be required for this project. including vegetation removal, channelization or culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood X The proposal will not significantly affect any flood control channels or waters? watercourses. e. Change in the amount of surface water in any X The proposal will not affect any watercourse. water body? f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any X The zoning proposal will not significantly affect surface water quality. alteration of surface water quality, including However, future development proposals may significantly affect surface water but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen quality due to siltation resulting from erosion caused by road and driveway or turbidity? construction and grading of building sites. This may be mitigated through the use of standard construction practices to minimize erosion, limiting the time of year site preparation may occur, and stabilizing disturbed slopes. g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X The proposal will not affect the direction or flow of ground waters. ground waters? h. Change in the quantity or quality of ground X Water to serve future development will have to come from individual wells waters, either through direct additions or unless a community water system is extended to serve the area. Sufficient withdrawals, or through interception of an groundwater to serve new homes has not been proven and may not be available. aquifer by cuts or excavations? Proof of adequate water will have to be shown before new parcels are approved. i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise X The project will not affect any public water supply. available for public water supplies? J. Exposure of people or property to water-related X The proposal will not expose people or property to flooding. hazards such as flooding? 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of X The proposal will not affect the diversity of plant life on site. any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? G Environmental:Checklist * :Evaluation of Environmental Impact b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X The site contains no rare plants. endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an X The proposal will not affect existing plant life. area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X The site does not contain any agricultural crops and is presently developed with residential uses. 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers X The proposal will not significantly the diversity or number of animal life of any species of animals (birds, land animals because the site dues not support significant animal life or habitat. including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or X The site contains no rare animals. endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an X The proposal will not affect existing animal life. area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife X The site contains no significant wildlife habitat. habitat? The proposal could result in a incremental reduction in Oak Woodland habitat. This habitat is considered important because it provides most of the life sustaining requirements needed by numerous animal species. There has been significant cumulative losses of oak woodlands in California due to residential, commercial, and other development projects. The California Dept. of Fish and Game recommend several mitigation measures to protect this habitat. 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X The proposal will not result in a substantial increase in noise created on site or in the vicinity. b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X The proposal will not expose people to severe noise levels. 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant X The proposal will not result in a substantial increase in light or glare light and glare? created on site or in the vicinity. a. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial X The proposal will not alter the land use in the area. The property abuts SR- alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 1 zoning and there is similar development in the area. The extent of 1 acre zoning is limited by the terrain. To the east the property is too steep to support small parcels and the FR-40 zone is appropriate. 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural X The proposal will not affect any natural resources. resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? X The proposal will not deplete any natural resources. 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: Environmental Checklist *::Evaluation of Environmental Impact a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous X The proposal will not involve the use of hazardous materials, nor is located substances (including, but not limited to, oil, close to any facilities which store or utilize such materials. pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response X The proposal will not affect any emergency services. plan or emergency evacuation plan? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter location, X The proposal will not significantly affect the population of the area because distribution, density or growth rate of the human the proposed density does not exceed that planned and being developed in the population? area. 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or X The proposal will not significantly affect housing demand. create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle X The proposal will represent a minor increase in traffic on Merrill Road and movement? an incremental increase in traffic in the Paradise area. All traffic will have to through the town of Paradise. Merrill Road is basically a cul-de- sac road with no circulation. It now serves approximately 112 parcels of which maybe 85 to 90 are already developed. Assuming a full build out of B parcels, this project could generate between 50 and 70 additional ADT. This impact could be mitigated by the imposition of the same traffic impact fees that are collected for the town of Paradise at the time of land division. This would be a better time to address it since the number of lots and the exact impact is not known at this time. b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand X The proposal will not affect parking because the proposal will have to comply for new parking? with the parking requirements contained within Butte County Code section 24- 35. C. Substantial impact on existing transportation X The proposal will represent a minor increase in congestion and maintenance systems? requirements on area roads when the property is divided in accordance with this rezone. The last 500' of Merrill Road is not paved at this time. Road improvements will be required at time of land division. d. Significant alterations to present patterns of X The proposal will not alter the present pattern of circulation in the area. circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X The proposal will not affect rail or air traffic. f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, X The proposal will result in an incremental increase in traffic and related bicyclists or pedestrians? traffic hazards in the area when the property is developed. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services: a, Fire protection? X The proposal will result in an incremental increase in demand for fire protection in the area. The Butte County Fire Department/California Division of Forestry has indicated that cumulative development in rural areas will impact their ability to provide fire protection services. They have stated that installation of a pressurized community water system with fire hydrants or automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems in residential structures, the use of fire resistance building materials and water supply systems adequate to support the sprinkler system will reduce the demand for fire protection services. b. Police protection? X The proposal will result in an incremental increase in demand for police protection in the area. The Board of Supervisors has adopted a Sheriff impact mitigation fee that is collected at the time of building permit submittal. This condition reduces the impact to police services to a less than significant level. Environmental Checklist * Evaluation of Environmental.Impact. : . c. Schools? X The proposal will result in an incremental increase in demand for school services in the area. All new residential units allowed by this project will be subject to the collection of school impact fees, as allowed by the School Facilities Law and adopted by County ordinance. These fees are collected at the time of building permit application. While the school district maintains that the allowed fees do not fully mitigate the impacts of the project, the County is precluded from imposing additional fees and takes the position that the existing fee structure addresses the impacts of the project. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X The proposal will result in a minor incremental increase in demand for park and recreation facilities in the area. At this point in time, the Paradise Area Recreation District has not identified a significant impact nor have they implemented impact fees. e. Maintenance of puhlic facilities, including X The proposal will result in minor incremental increase in the need for roads? maintenance of roads and other public facilities in the area that can be addressed at the time of land division through traffic impact fees. f. Other governmental services? X The proposal will result in a minor incremental increase in demand for all other governmental services in the area that will be partially off set by new property tax revenues. 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X The proposal will not utilize substantial fuel or energy. b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing X The proposal will not substantially increase the demand for energy. sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas? X The proposal will not affect electrical power or natural gas distribution systems. b. Communications systems? X The proposal will not affect communication systems. C. Water availability? X The proposal will not affect public water systems. Water for the area will have to be supplied by individual wells. d. Sewer or septic systems? X The proposal will have to meet the requirements of the Butte County Environmental Health Dept. There is some question that 1 acre parcels will be able to support individual septic tank systems. Soils information will have to submitted at the time of land division. There are smaller lots in the area that have septic systems so the possibility that soils will be available has been shown. e. Storm water drainage? X The proposal will have to provide a permanent solution for drainage. f. Solid waste and disposal? X The proposal will not affect solid waste disposal. 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential hazard X The proposal will not create any health hazard. (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X The proposal will not expose people to any health hazard. 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction X The proposal will not result in an aesthetically offensive view because it of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the is consistent with surrounding development. proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically Environmental.Checklist* Evaluation of.Environmental Impact offensive site open to the public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the X See the discussion for item 14d. quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration or X The proposal will not affect archeological sites. destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or X The proposal will not affect historic sites. aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? C. Does the propnsal have the potential to cause a X The proposal will not affect cultural resources. physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or X The proposal will not affect religious resources. sacred uses within the potential impact area? :.. 8 ~ Environmental `Checklist:*.Evaluafiori of Environ-rt�ental Impact V. SUGGESTED MITIGATION MEASURES 1. No mitigation measures are recommended at this time. There are no direct physical impacts associated with this project. The impacts of development will occur after a parcel or subdivision map has been approved and should best be addressed in the environmental documents prepared for that project. The mitigation measures can be made more precise and will better reflect the impacts if they are adopted for a - specific development proposal. Environmental Checklist * Evaluation of Environmental Impact."., DATA SHEET A. Project Description 7. Air Quality: Good, except during periods air inversion when 1. Type of Project: Rezone smoke from wood stoves and vehicle emissions degrade the quality. 2. Brief Description: Rezone from FR-40 to SR-1 Biological Environment: 3. Location: Located at the end of Merrill Road, Paradise 8. Vegetation: Mixed conifer/hardwood forest 4. Proposed Density of Development: 1 dwelling per acre 9. Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals common to conifer forests. Non-critical winter habitat for the deer herd. S. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Moderate. Cultural Environment: 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): the property has frontage on Merrill Road 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Low sensitivitv area. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual coptic cyotems: 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Agricultural Residential B. Source of Water Supply: Individual wells. and a small area of grazing and Open Land 9. Proximity of Power Lines: To property. 12. Existing Zoning: FR-40 10. Potential for further land divisions and development: Under the 13. Existing Land Use on-site: Residential proposed zone 7 additional parcels could be created. 14. Surrounding Area: B. Environmental Setting a. Land Uses: Rural Residential b. Zoning: SR-1, FR-40 Physical Environment: C. Gen. Plan Designation: Agricultural Residential, Grazing and Open Land 1. Terrain d. Parcel Sizes: 40+ acre parcels to the east, 2 acre and a. General Topographic Character: Uneven mountain terrain at smaller to the west the edge of a major canyon e. Population: Limited b. Slopes: 0 to 60+% C. Elevation: 2150 feet above sea level. 15. Character of Site and Area: Rural urban fringe d. Limiting Factors: Areas of very steep slope near the canyon edge 16. Nearest Urban Area: Paradise town limits within 1/2 mile 2. Soils 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: Town of Paradise a. Types and Characteristics: Aiken soil series - 60 to 140" thick, loam clay, dark brown to yellowish-red, slow 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area: No permeability, well drained, moderate to high erosion hazard. 19. Fire Protection Service: b. Limiting Factors: Permeability a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Station f 34, Magalia, approximately 2 miles away. 3. Natural Hazards of the Land b. Water Availability: Fire tankers only. a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity zone VIII. b. Erosion Potential: Moderate to high 20. Schools in Area: Paradise Unified School District. C. Landslide Potential: High on steeper slopes, especially if vegetation has ben cleared d. Fire Hazard: Very high e. Expansive Soil Potential: Low 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: None on site b. Ground Water: Unknown, potentially limited. C. Drainage Characteristics: The parcel drains to the east towards the Feather River d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 55 to 60 inches per year. e. Limiting Factors: Erosion on steeper slopes 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good, excellent views exist to the east. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. v ► 10 Environmental Checklist: * Evaluation Of.Environmental Impact ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Butte County Planning Department, 1987. Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety element. oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate maps. Federal Emergency 3. Butte County Planning department. Subsidence and Management Agency, 1989. Landslide Potential Map 111-1, Safety Element. oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 14. USGS Quad Maps, Paradise East, Calif. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion 15. Soil Map, chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: Area. United States Department of CH2M Hill, 1977. Agriculture. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils 16. Soil Survey of Chico (1925)/oroville Map 111-3, Safety element. oroville, CA: CH2M (1926) Area. United States Department of Hill, 1977. Agriculture. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise element 17. Butte County Planning Department. Butte Map IV-1, Scenic Highway element. Oroville, CA: County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and CH2M Hill, 1977. Facilities Map. Butte county fire Department and California Department of 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Forestry, 1989. Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Map• Oroville, CA 11. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency, State of California, 1983. j; LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL s L&L SURVEYING 1007 BILLE ROAD• P.O. BOX 671 PARADISE,CA 95967 (916) 877-4300 SU3JECT: /�Z /E 090,0L1C,¢7. 4 FAX (916) 877-2251 -zed - 0/9- ,3� Z 3 -9 DATE i- TO: ,90TM LSD A64if IAJ6- 0E�1' ,7 ATTN: WE ARE SENDING YOU: ❑ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER THE FOLLOWING ITUIS: COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION � 1 V Zoite- -"a2 L' )Orbef, 7p 136f 1-6064JC—P ca droit ��5 /Zs7 o d C1/ , THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: Planning Department PER YOUR REQUEST_ ❑FOR YOUR INFORMATION ��R YOUR REVIEW MAR 2 6 1993 Oroville,California REMARKS: SIGNED JOB NUMBER .. � � ,.. z s• � % � � ' �. ._ .�� �� � j`� . `�. ,, :� �.' 1, •��ti ., RECORDING REQUESTED BY Fly AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO .° i 1911�: 20 0 UL Deane Williams. . LOWS[ KLUENDE11 COU14-1 Y 11EC011131P. Rt. 1. Box Ill FEE 0& L Biggs, California 95917 1-326 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE. MAIL.TAX STATEMENTS TO "The undersignad grantor (s) declare (s): ,meDOCLimentcry t:'ansfer tax is $............Nqpq................ Tax not applicable. Deed is for computed on full value of property conveyed, or _--Lot:-21ne adjustment. liens and G-ricull'ibronces remaining at ti m'e­6Vsale*.,-`- Unincorporated area: City of TO 404 CA (9-68) FJoint Tenancy Grant Deed]'D.T-T. THIS FORM FURNISHED BY TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, E. Deane Williams and Edith M. Williams, his wife hereby GRANT(S) to Andrew Ellison Williams and Winifred Williams, his wife AS JOINT TENANTS, the real property in the ---County-of---Butte 'Me -FA,%t half . of .the Southwest quarter of tlie' Northeast..quarter- and the North 520 feet of the I-Test half of the- Southwest. quarter of the 'NTC77th &5t - Ale qLiarCeZ: C-E OttCL_"CLI 7.v M.D. B. & M. and that portion o.l':' the Nortiniwes,t quarter of the Norr-heas1t: quarter of said Section 7 described as foll -ws : BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of the No-.thwest quarter of� the Northeast quarter of said Section 7; thence along the - East line of the Northwest .qtiarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 7, North 00 171 18" West 100.00 feet; thence, North 8.90 02' 22" West and parallel with the South line of said Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section, a distance of 385.63 feet; thence, South .680 35' 38" West, a distance of 262.73 feet. to the Southwest corner of the East half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 7; thence, aalon&' the South line thereof, South 890 021 22" East 630. 77 feet to the point of beginning. RESERVING THEREFROM a right of.. way- fo.r ,road purposes and utility purposes over all. that portionthereof lying within a strip of land 60.00 feet in width lying 30.00 feet on each side of the following dlesc-tlbed centerline' COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 7, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, M.D.B. & M. ; thence, East along the North line of*.said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter, a distance of 180 feet to the true point of beginning for the line herein described; thence, from said C.3, true point of beginning, South,, parallel with the West line of said Fractional 'Section, a distance of 415.00 feet to the. be of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 105 feet; thence,. Fri along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 580. , an arc distance of 105 feet, more or ,less, to the end of-.said curve; thence' tangent to said curve, South 58°• West60.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 105 feet; thence, along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of- 580 an arc. distance of 1.05;:,feet, more or less, to,. a point which bears East,. , parallel with tAe North line of said Fractional Settiofit a distance of 30.00 feet .from the West 'line of said Fractional Section; thence.' iae. Sou"Ch. -Darallal, an.-I 330.00 f-cet Ea--te-Z-1 said W-cE4-er'1.''r ' ' ' 1AA no 4--4- *n g-lnen, Nnrf-h I i ne of the -South 350.00 feet of the West 1.1. 1J. b. 5.:1 1'1. , L11LL1LL::, ,[.L..iL 4i_VL1b L_1it-;_ L,. -moi. v:_ . "-- -­.- ', r quarter of the Northeast quarter, a distance of 180 feet to the true point of beginning for the line herein described; thence, from said C7. s' true point of beginning, South, parallel with the West line of said Fractional Section, a distance of 415.00 feet tc the. beginning of a' tangent curve to the right having a radius of 105 feet; thence,. { along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 580 , an arc CID distance of 105 feet, more or .Less, to the end of- said -curve; thence, tangent to .said curve, South 58°' West 60.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 105 feet; .thence, along. the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 58° an arc. distance of 1.05 feet, more or less, to' a point which bears East, parallel with the North line of said Fractional Section, a distance of 30.00 feet from the West line of said Fractional Section; thence, with vL. 1 1 . and a 3iv.60 Ec et T-:-. C:.:� _T .�+.^::: said v�L 1. i• U Z;�.�. t C 1. v �. ' 344.09 feet to the" North line of the South 350.00 feet of the West half -of the Southwest alter of the Northeast quarter of said Section . At,SO RESERVING HEREFROM a right of way for road purposes and utl'lity . purposes 30 feet in width 1_ying South and Southeasterly and adjacent to the following described line:. COMMENCING at the Southeast corner of the Northwest quarter of% the Northeast quarter of said Section 7; thence, along the East line of said Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter, North 00 17' 1.811 West a distance of 1.00.00 feet; thence, North 890 02' 22" West and parallel. with the South line of said Northwest quarter of the North- Past auarfter of sa-id Secti^_n_ , u A, Jtance' of 385.6J .-E,- to t'!!e true point of beginning for the following described line; thence, from said true point of beginning South 680 35' 38" West a distance of 262.73 feet to the Southwest corner of the East half of the North- west quamtnr of the Northeast quarter of said Sectio n 7; thence, _ ri `lnLii `ham \ ,ti linn North 890 0211 '22"� I Nest, a distance of 660.77 feet to the West line of t:.e Northeast quarter of said Section 7 and the end of said line. Said above described two rights of way are reserved for the benefit CZ2mi1P' g .-lands of the Grantor lyi ng jai thin. the West half of the Northeast quarter of said Section 7 and shall inure to the benefit. of and may be used by all persons who may hereafter become the owners of said appurtenant property or any parts or portions thereof. EXCEPTING THEREFROM an undivided one half interest in all mining. mineral rights, as provided by that certain Deed from Wm. E. Whitaker and Dorothy D. Whitaker, his wife to J. 0. Wilson, dated April- 29, 1.7 1 6 ai1Q reQ0r6ed i'uiy 3, 19-1 n mook i ov 0z Deeciz�$, 'a i; unC,c 1-t. TOGETHER WITH a right of way for road purposes and utility purposes 30 _feet in width lying North and Northwesterly. and adjacent .to the ::g .-scribed line: COMMENCING at the Southeast corner of the Northwest. quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 7;. thence y along the . East line of said Northt4est quarter of the -Northeast quarters North 00 17 ' 1.8" West a dis snce of 100.00 feet; thence, North 890 02' 22" West and ; .. parallel w .th the South 1_ine of said Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 7, a distance of 385. 63 feet to the true W..: . point...of..-beginning for the following described line; thence, from m said true point of beginning South 680 351 3811 West a distance of 2E2.73 fC.i t0 theof the FVst: klalf Of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter. of said Section 7; . thence, running �. alona, the South line thereof North 590 02' 22" West; a distance of 660. 77 feet to the West litre of the iv'G�tiieast '' -r S _ or. q�i►GbL{...Get ..:1 S�•'_+• mac-..•`t� __ 7 and-fide end' of- said line.-_...._._.. . .... . 5a�3 right of way' is for the" benefit of and appurtenant ..to .:the .lands__.._:.. : described above and shall inure to the benefit of and may be used by all persons who may hereafter become the owners of said appurtenant property or any parts or portions thereof. true point or t�c��a iz�u��� �.i•i �i�� from said true point of beginning South 680 35 ' 38" West a distance of 262.73 feet to the Southwest corner of the East half of the North- west quarar of the Northeast quarter, of sai;d..SeCtip n 7;. thence unri n€ata , ; .the. �+ut.. � ,.ne t►;ereof North 90 cin t '22" , �_ 8. �� fest, a distance Of 660. 77 feet t the crest Line. of t}.e Northeast .quarter of said Section 7 and the end of said line. Said above described two rights .of way are reserved for the benefit Gf ar►u nYv,iLL,l:eaani= to the remaining .-lands of the Grantor .lying within the West half of the Northeast quarter of said erection 7 and shall inure to the benefit, of and may be used by all persons who 'may hereafter become the owners of said appurtenant property or . any parts or portions . thereof. EXCEPTING THEREFROM an undivided one half interest in all mining mineral rights, as provided by that certain Deed from Wm. E.. Whitaker and Dorothy D. Whitaker, hiS wife to J. 0. Wilson, dated April 29, 9 r - 0 reeds, at uacc 'I4. i7 so acid reccr3e,i .`1�iy �3ic �z Book ov or TOGETHER WITH a rig*ht of way for road purposes and utility purposes.- . �30 feet„ * n width lying North and Northwesterly and adjacent to the.. *gig descr, oea ll — COMMENCING at the Southeast corner of the Northwest. quarter of:. the Northeast quarter of said Section 7;. thence` along the . East line of . said Northi,�es.t quarter of the 'l.crtheast quarter; North 00 17' l.8" West a dis snce of 100.00 feet; thence, North 890 02'22" gest and parallel w .th the South Line of said' Northwest quarter cf the Northeast quarter of said Section 7, a distance of 385. 63 feet to the true point-of for the following described -ine; thence, . from m said true point of beginning Scuth 680 35 ' 38" West .a distance::cf 262.73 f zt to theSG.,t}_rrr`et cn=ner of the Fast_ half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast qu quarter of said Section 7; thence, running - along unning "along the South line thereof North 890 02' 22" West, a distance Of 660- 77 feet to the iVic3st iiiie G:i rile iv'Gidicast .(Fuar "r S�Ct101= 1..CL .:1 r,v..'..�:: - - 7 . end tie end of- said line.-......... . .. ......... ... .... _: - .:...: .:. ..:; _ Laid right �of' way''is for the''benefit of and appurtenant , to_-the :lands_.._._:..:.:_: described above and .shall inure to the benefit of and may be used by all persons who may hereafter become the owners of said appurtenant property or any parts or Portio-ns thereof. . S '.:..:" ,.... ._...` `i i!• //_,�....•� /' .. .- � ) 1� '�i it �`- L ZZ leye J .M� i� ` � � ,• � .. ^.,ilk.�'��:�� '' .��.�}�1'� or . .. 1 � � ••� t Ott Y 7't.� 1�t -R t�} ' fy/ ',• • � S a i tt,t �cl.2n ms's. --- •YN -5Ls�:tlrtti:f::t k:ys:;•.,•� V .. � ��.����. ©r��- �� � � � i .. S �>•is `-� •: ..:. '.. 3 - UI • RECORDING REQUESTED BY 93-0072381 Rec Fee 14.00 VV 1 Check 14.00 4' AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO officialrded Records I rinifred Williams County of I Nwrt 2015 Merril Rd. Butte I . Paradise, Ca. 95969' -J Candace J. Grubbs I cITT s Recorder I STAT t I L 8:01am 22-Feb-93 I PUBL MD 4 Escrow No. _ --'- Title order No- -.-TitleOrderNo- SPACE ABOVt:'l Hl- .Ilvc n�rlt MAIL TAX 1TAT[Mt.-TO Documentary transter tax$'Y,�'}.�C.�4�eQ.,•,......• n Computed on full value of propurIy conveyed, or Nwrc Same AS Above l- CumpuLcd un full value Ics:: liens :uui encumbrances ,•euulining hereon at Lime of sale. as declared by the undersigned ••••••• °Tw.t ,itl,a lu r.:.,(dcaln taut ue„heal dele.'nd n:n"b,.—lion n Inbibibual oratlt �Deeb W EDTtnN TITLe FORM NO.10. p�O 7 V GIFT DEED FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Andrew E. Williams and M. Winifred' Williams, as -trustees of the Williams Revocable Inter Vivos Trust created on July 26, 1991 GRANT—to Danielle K. Wyllie, a married wotrtan as her sole and seperate property all that real property situate in ALc Slate of California,described as follows: Countyof Butte I SEE EXHIBIT 1'A" ATTACHED IiM=' AND FADE A PART 017 THIS DOCU"M' .(DESCRIPTION) SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HEREAT AND MADE A PART OF THIS DOCUMENT (PLAT) % r ew E. Williams, trustee o e-- lliams Revocable Inter Vivos Crust DATE �z 7 CC/ d lam/ M. Winifre ' ]iJ.lialns, trustee of the 4lilliams Revocable nter Vivos Trust 1 STATE OF CA COUNTY OF LIFORNIP��f7-E On �zr --O- boforemo, /fir/G/�c�i �N/✓E �ju/Irt personally appeared /SNP'P-ty Lr Mlu"A'-� personally known to me(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)to be the person(s)whose name(s)i�ubscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she he xecuted the same in his/her h jr)authorized capacity(ies), and that by histheq hei ipnature(s)on the instrument the person(s)or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)acted,executed the instrument. OFFICIAL NOTARY3EAL LORRAIN-At•INF.LUNDY (" `m Notary riti!1:­•-Cs;anla WITNESS my hand and official seal. =�y� ^, eu•;TE COUNTY (l s m, NY Comm.Expires NOV 0.3,1695 " Signature_1�'��1 1 �iXiN.l�tl�S� (This arca for ollicial notarial seal) JJ :J LJU l EXHIBIT "A" Being a po.rtion of the Southwest one quarter of the Northeast one quarter of Section 7, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, M.D.M. and being more particularly described as fol ows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Southwest one quarter of the Northeast one quarter of said Section 7; thence Easterly along the Northerly line of said Southwest one quarter of the Northeast one quarter, 180. 00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described parcel of .land; thence continuing along said Northerly line, 450. 40 feet to a point located on the Easterly line of the West one half of said Southwest one quarter of the Northeast one quarter; thence Southerly along said Westerly line to a point located on a line that is 130.00 feet Southerly and parallel with the Northerly line of said Southwest one quarter of the Northeast one quarter; thence Westerly along said parallel line to a point on a line that 180.00 feet Easterly of the Westerly boundary of said Southwest one quarter of the Northeast one quarter; thence Northerly along said parallel line 130. 00 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Southwest one quarter of the Northeast one quarter and the point of beginning. Together with and reserving therefrom a right of way for road purposes and utility purposes over all that portion thereof lying within a strip of land 60. 00 feet in width lying 30. 00 feet on each side of the following described centerline. Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 7, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, M.D.M. ; thence East along the North line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter, a distance of 180 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING for the line herein described; thence from said true' point of beginning, South, parallel with the West line of said Fractional Section, a distance 415. 00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 105 feet; thence along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 580 , an are distance of 105 feet, more or less, to the end of said curve; thence tangent to said curve, South 580 West 60. 00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 105 feet; thence along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 580 , an arc distance of 105 feet, more or less, to a point which bears East, parallel with the North line of said Fractional Section, a distance of 30. 00 feet from the West line from said Fractional Section; thence South, parallel with and 30.00 feet. Easterly from said Westerly line, 344.09 feet to the North line of the South 350. 00 feet of the West half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said section. END OF DOCUMENT � � - ur1 � u Said easement is for the benefit of and appurtenant to the lands described above and shall inure to the benefit of and may be used by all persons who may hereafter become the owners of said- appurtenant property or any parts or portions thereof. Together with an reserving therefrom a non-exclusive easement for road, waterline and public utility purposes over a strip of land 60.00 feet in width lying East of the coincident to the following described line: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the East half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 7, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, M.D.M. ; thence Northerly along the Westerly boundary line of said East half for 350.00 feet the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING for the line herein described; thence from said true point of beginning continuing Northerly along said Westerly boundary line to a point located 260.00 feet Southerly from the Northwest corner of said East half; thence Northwesterly to a point on a line located 30.00 feet Southerly of and parallel to said Northerly boundary line of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter, said point being located 430.00 feet Easterly of the Westerly boundary line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter; thence along said parallel line 430.00 feet to said Westerly boundary line of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and the end of said described line. The sidelines of the above described strip of land are to be lengthened or shortened to intersect property lines. Said easement is for the benefit of and appurtenant to the lands described above and shall inure to the benefit of and may be used by all persons who may hereafter become the owners of said appurtenant property or any parts or portions thereof. AND sG U�`��o�vS L�Gti9F * Exp �i CA1-�F�P� . i - I END OF DOCUMENT I I , j N p CEN. IA—NUM-Mar-L—383.65'l EFKME CL Ui Bsro6'16' ,V— MAO' S - -_- _ 630.400' TTS ,80.00-'�� =_4SO::iO`- .. -.:-:y"-•rte 3 6 FD 3/4' IP LS 3634 t 0 o f t w � 450.37' •. N RsSpdEN,P -rnlp Pi 1"-200' 315gtQS Z% 4 { i BOK 201 OR 315" PC�H FOUND MONUUEN'T AS SHOWN � q i ig s ur { { ,80.00' s i 430 34' i i 230.00' a' �+•D S(i j 1 -'-—' -- S SM'18' E I 'r 1260.67' 40°SY---_-_ �5� vS L(G '9G i i * LS 7 1 i Exp.1 31 9 . 601 {I i FC EXHIBIT "B" _. $ 13 94 64!s f DEED EXHIBIT FOR "'{ ! 0011FRED WILUAMS J BEMC tN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF TME . i NORTNEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 7 .r i /C£N. SECTION 7 i i T 22 N. R 4 E. MOM. BUTTE C0. CA � AP 50-26--19 FEBRUARY. 1993 — S 69'41126'E 1260.23' 1 L do L SL'RVMNG 17Andrew Ellison Williams LOWU KIAJENDER 2196 Merrill- Road asi Paradise, Calif. I L .835,59 'S' USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER. MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO F DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX me < 'O COMPUTED ON PULL VALUE OF P"OPEPITY CONVE OR eel Same as above Ej COMPLIT"D ON [:U:2. ENCU-MO CES eTr REMAINING AT OF SALE .................. Signature of declarant or agent do'formining box - firm name AFFIX TO A04 CA (11-66) FJoint Tenancy Grant Deed] 1. R.STAMPS IN SPACE ATI&E THIS FORM FURNISHED BY TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY . FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, E. DEANE,WILLIAMS and EDITH M. WILLIAMS., his wife., hereby GRANT(S) to ANDREW ELLISON WILLIAMS and WINIFRED WILLIAMS, his wife, AS JOINT TENANTS, the real property in the County of Butte State of California, described as: PARCEL ONE: The East half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and the North 520 feet of the West half of the Soutlivezt quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 7, Township 22 North, Range 4 East., I.I.D.B. & M. RT1..n1R.R1rTNr. TFMf. RP7T?0-Af in -"i glt of wqv. for roarl nurn(,).-,,qs And utility...p1irpos that portion thereof lying within a' strip of land '60 feet in width lying 30 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the Northwest corner of -the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 7, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, M.D.B. & M.; thence East along the North line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter, a distance of 180 feet to the true point of beginning for the line herein described; thenco from said true point of beginning, South parallel with I-lest line of said fractional section, a dis- tance of 415 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 105 feet; thence along the are of said curve, through a central angle of 580 an are distance of 105 feet more or less, to the end of said curve; thence tangent to said curve,. South 580 W:�st 60 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 105 feet;, thence.,aong the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 580 an are distance of 105 feet more or less, to a point izhich,bears East, parallel with the North line of said fractional section, a distance of 30 feet from the West line of said fractional section; thence South,' parallel with and 30 feet Easterly from said Westerly line, a distance of 295 feet to the South line of the North 920 feet of said Southwest quarlk;br of the Northeast quarter of said Section., 7, and the end of said line. ALSO. RESERVTNG. THEREFFROM a right of way for road niirno ses and -Ut4l4t- pj-poSeS QVer the North 30 feet of the West halfofthe Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and over the North 30 feet of the West 60 feet of East half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 7. C__ Said above described two rights of way are reserved for the benefit of and appurten- ant to the remaining lands of the Grantor lying within the West half of the Northeast quarter of said Section 7, and shall inure to the benefit of and may be used by all C persons who may hereafter become the owners of said appurtenant property or any parts or portions thereof. EXCEPTING THEREFROM an undivided one-half interest in all mining mineral rights., as provided by that certain Deed from Wm. E. Whitaker and Dorothy D. Whitaker, his wife, to J. 0. Wilson, dated April 29, 1916 and recorded May 39 1916 in Book 160 of Deeds, at page 14. PARCEL TWO: A right of way for road purposes and utility purposes over the South 30 feet.of the West half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and over the South 30 feet of the West 60 feet of the East half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 7, To�mship 22 North, Rallge ' 4 East, M.D.B. & M. Said right of way is for the benefit of and appurtenant to the lands descrilx)d in PARCEL ONE above and shall inure to the benefit of.and may be used by all persons who may hereafter become the ovners of said appurtenant property or r'.ny parts or Z t IV When -Recorded Mail To: Mr. & Mrs. Andrew Williams 2015 Merrill Road Paradise, CA 95969 21 D E E D O F G I F T KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, ANDREW ELLISON WILLIAMS and WINIFRED WILLIAMS, husband and wife, for and in consideration of the love and affection which we have and bear for our daughter and her husband, ANDREA L. GAYLORD and WILLIAM D. GAYLORD, do by these presents grant and convey to the said ANDREA L. GAYLORD and, WILLIAM D. GAYLORD, husband and wife, as joint tenants, all of our right, .title and interest in and .to .all that certain real property situate in County of Butte, State of. California, described as follows: Being a parcel of land located in the East half of, the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section -7 , Township 22 North;.':-:Range ..4 . East, M.D.B. ' & M. , and being .more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of said East half of the Southwest quarter of the' Northeast quarter of Section 7; thence Northerly along the Westerly boundary line of. said East half for 350. 00 feet to, the true point of beginning for the parcel of land herein described; thence from said true point of beginning continuing Northerly along said Westerly boundary line to a point on a line located 520. 00 feet Southerly of the Northerly boundary line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter; thence following along said parallel line Easterly to a point located on the Easterly boundary line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter; thence Southerly along said Easterly boundary line ' to a point located 350. 00 feet Northerly of the Southeast corner of said South- west quarter of the Northeast quarter; thence Westerly and parallel to the Southerly boundary line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter to said true point of beginning. TOGETHER WITH AND RESERVING THEREFROM a non-exclusive ease- ment for road, waterline and public utility purposes over a strip of land 60. 00 feet in width lying to the right- of and coincident to the following described line: BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of the East half' of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 7 , Township 22 North, Range 4 East, M.D.R. & M. ; thence Northerly along the Westerly boundary line of said East half for 350. 00 feet to .the true point of beginning for the line herein described; thence from said true point of beginnina continuing Northerly along said Westerly boundary line to a point located 260. 00 feet Southerly from the North- west corner of said East half.; . thence Northwesterly to a point on a line located 30, 00 feet Southerly of and parallel to said Northerly boundary. line of the Southwest quarter of the North east quarter, said point being located '430 feet Easterly of the Westerly boundary line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter; thence along said parallel line 430 feet to said Westerly boundary line of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and the end of said described line. The sidelines of the above-described- strip of land are to be lengthened or shortened to intersect property lines. Said easement is for the benefit of and appurtenant to the lands described above and shall. inure to the benefit of and may be used by all persons who may hereafter become the owners of said appurtenant property or any parts or portions. thereof. Grantor reserves therefrom, to himself, his heirs or assigns, as an appurtenance to Grantor' s land or any part thereof an non-exclusive easement and right to take and use for domestic purposes the water .from the existing springs located on the above described property with the additional right of ingress and,e.gress over and on the land to effect the purposes of such easement. ALSO EXCEPTING AND RESERVING THEREFROM an undivided one- half interest in all mining mineral rights, as provided by that certain Deed .from William E. Whitaker and Dorothy D. Whitaker, his wife, to.J. O. Wilson, dated April 29, 1916, and recorded May 3, 1916 , in Book 160 of Deeds at page 14. DATED: February .25, 1982 ANbREW ELLISON WILLIAMS NIFRED WILLIAMS MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: Mr. & Mrs . William Gaylord c/o Mr. & Mrs. Andrew Williams 2015 Merrill Road Paradise, California 95969 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) - ss COUNTY OF BUTTE ) On February 2r , 1982, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and .for said State, personally appeared ANDREW ELLISON WILLIAMS and WINIFRE.D WILLIAMS, known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. WITNESS MY Official Seal. DECLARATION OF GIFT The undersigned, ANDREW ELLISON WILLIAMS and WINIFRED WILLIAMS, of Butte County, California, desire to give the property described in Gift Deed, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, to ANDREA L. GAYLORD and WILLIAM D. GAYLORD, husband and wife, as joint tenants. To carry out their purpose, the undersigned do hereby deliver to ANDREA L. GAYLORD AND WILLIAM D. GAYLORD, the original of said Gift Deed, it being distinctly understood by the undersigned that it is their purpose and intention to invest all incidents of ownership of the property in ANDREA L. GAYLORD and WILLIAM D. GAYLORD, from this time forward. DATED: February 2, , 1982. ANDREW ELLISON WILLIAMS. WINIFRED WILLIAMS • 't Please Record at the Request of : McKERNAN & LANANI M\ KLaw at s Aitorney LAN w � N'AN P. .0. al,x 550 Paridise, (,fflf. 95',69 C'.1w1�(]� OT ..�. r F• r lem:at N s1,1P ati0 R 6 j ,1�. ) y 6 ��� W (Sc_ R,pili�4 �JRv.. /. Pi1r;d' %,-,) e;s 5�") .�tntnt. dd 0 r °n fGi� ..— When Recorded Plail To: Mr. & Mrs . Andrew Williams 201.5 Merrill Road ' Paradise, C71 95969 ....... UR l: :,:; I .I.. [•NCll;d l!>>,`Ia:. •,i....:I: ,. r, ...•.fir. CIIf,1,tUL kr11U•. 1.i 7 Ulgnalure of Un(lafJ•1 or A• I! e.:1-'.ill•,.'1 :.`., ..�. DE E D O F G I F T KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, ANDREW ELLISON WILLIAMS and T,IINIFRED WILLIAMS, husband and wife, for and in consideration of the love and affection which we have and bear for our daughter and her husband, EVELYN W. JOHNSON and RALPH W. JOHNSON, do by these presents grant and convey to the said EVELYN W. JOHNSON and RALPH W. JOHNSON, husband and wife, as joint tenants, all o.f 'our right, title and interest in and to all• that certain real property situate in County of Butte, State of California, described' as follows: PARCEL 1 The South 350. 00 feet of the East half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section •7, Township 22 North , Range 4 Fast, M. D, 9. & 111. PARCEL 2 Being a portion of the West half of the Southwest quarter_ of the Northeast quarter of Sertion 7 , Township 22 North, Range 4 East, M. D. B. & M. , and being more particularly descrihed asfollows : BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said West Half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter; thence following along the Westerly boundary line of said ,Southwest quarter er. i, of. the Northeast quarter for_ 520 . . 0 feet; thence Easterly parallel with the Northerly boundary line of said Southwest }}. quarter of. the' Northeast quarter for J180 . 00 feet to the trt.ir poii,L of begi,nninq for the parcel of land herein descrihed; thence from . said true point of be(linnind continuincl along � •� a line parallel to said Northerly boundary of. the Southwest quarter of the Northeast qul-;rter to a point located in the 4 Easterly boundary line of said West half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter; thence Northerly along said Easterly boundary line for 2.60. 00 feet; thence Westerly parallel with said Northerly boundary line of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter to a point on a line located 180. 00 feet Easterly of and parallel to said Westerly boundary line of the Southwest quarter of the: Northeast quarter; thence Southerly along said parallel line for 260 . 00 .feet to said true point of beginning. TOGETHER WITH AND RESERVING THEREFRCaM a non-exclusive easement for road, waterline and public, utility purposes over a strip of land 6 . 00 feet in width lying to the right of and co- incident to the .following described line: BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of the East half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 7, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, M.D.B. & M. ; thence Northerly along the Westerly boundary line. of said East half_ .for 350. 10 feet to the true point of beginning for the line herein described; thence from said true point of beginning continuing Northerly along said Westerly boundary line to a point located 260. 00 .feet Southerly from the Northwest corner of. said East half; thence Northwesterly to . a point on a line located 30. 00 .feet Southerly of and parallel to said Northerly boundary line of the Southwest quarter. ofthe Northeast quarter, said point being located 430. 00 feet Easterly of the Westerly boundary line of said Southwest quarter of. the Northeast quarter; thence along said parallel line 430 feet to said. Westerly boundary line of the Southwest quarter of the North- east quarter and the end of said described' line. The sidelines of the above described strip of land are to be lengthened or shortened to intersect ,property lines. Said easement is for the benefit of and appurtenant to the lands described above and shall inure to the benefitof and may be used by all persons who may hereafter become the owners of said appurtenant property or any parts or portions thereof. . TOGETHER WITH AND RESERVING THEREFROM a right of way for road purposes and utility purposes over all that portion thereof lying within a strip of land 60. 00 .feet in width lying 30. 00 feet on each side 'of the .following described centerline : COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 7 , Township 22 North, Range.' 4 East, M.D.B. & M. ; thence East along the North line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter, a distance of 180 feet to the true- point of beginning for the line herein described.; thence from said true Point of beginning, South Parallel with the West line of said Fractional Section, a distance of 415. 00 feet to the. beqinning of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 105 feet; thence along the arc of said curve, through a cental an:11e of. 581 , an arc distance of 105 feet, more or less , to the end of �1 .1 �L f..•r said 'curve; thence tangent to said curve, South 58° West 60. 00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 105 feet; thence along the arc of said curve, theough a central angle of 59° an arc distance of.. 105 feet, more or less, ' to a point which bears East, parallel with the North line of said Fractional Section, a distance of 30. 00 feet .from the West line of said Fractional Section; thence a distance of 30. 00 feet . f_rom the West line of. said Fractional Section: thence South, parallel with and 30 . 00 Feet Easterly from said Westerly line, 344 . 09. feet to the North line of the Southe 350 . 00 feetof the West half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of. said Section. Said easement is .for the benefit of .and appurtenant to the lands described above and shall inure to the benefit of and may be used by all persons who may hereafter become the owners of said appurenant property or any parts or portions thereof. Also together with a non-exclusive easement and right to take and use for domestic purposes the water from the existing springs and. the additional right of egress and inaress over, and on such land to effect the purposes of this easement as said easement is provid.ed by. that certain Gift Deed from ANDREW ELLISON WILLIAMS and WINIFRED WILLIAMS, his wife, to ANDREA .L. GAYLORD and WILLIAM D. GAYLORD, her husband, dated February 25 , 1982 and recorded February 26, 1982 , in Book 2697 of Deeds at Page 592-594 in the Official records of Butte County, California . ALSO E.XCFPTING AND RESERVING THEREFROM an undivided one- half interest in all mining mineral ria.hts , as provided by that certain Deed from William E. Whitaker and Dorothy D. Whitaker_ , his wife, to J. 0. 1.1ilson, dated April 29 , 1916 , and recorded. May 3, 1916, in Book 160 of Deeds at page 14 . DATED: March- 116 , 19 8 2. 'ANDREW ELLISON WILLIAMSv IAIINIFR V WILLIAMS 1,4AIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: Mr. & Mrs. Ra.lnb. [tip. Johnson c/o Mr. & Mrs. - Andrew Williams 2015 .Merrill •Road Paradise, California 95969 �• i tYV r:•.:.o, i S'.t'ATE OF CALIFORNIA) ss .COUNTY OF BUTTE ) On March * 11 , 1982, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ANDREW ELLISON WILLIAMS and WINIFRED WILLIAMS, known to me to be the -persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and Official Seal. JOHN D. LANAPA NOTARY PUBLIC Butte County State of California j' My Commission Expires pe!y. 14, 1994 ✓f•baSr+i'i�4✓ri•id�•Fl•Y4••YS••h•S�}A•F•}'S��'/tM*�"� lev. $Alt F,? END Of DC�C,tl�1l:N1 i MRR 36 '93 11:26 714 381 3590 e m plann�n9®epal" 26L& 1993 : :. SURVEYING -7 1007 $illc£load e P.G. $ori 671 = Paradise:, CA 45967• (916) 877.430)• FAX (916) 877.22.51 7E-1 ,FAX 'IYZAAIS 1i1'1'S7AI SHS' MATE: FAX RHONE #: 5319- 77,P:e'" ATTERrION: NAME FROM: ,za rri e. FAX PHONE : (916) 877-2251) NUMBER OF PAGES ( Including this sheet ) JOB NUS BER-':* QTS: ti I r 01041J/6'C9J�JQ�UIg b�gU�Ju� a3 Dsb��wvu{ a ,yMF1R'2 '93 11.26 714 381 35:9GI a' y Nlr Y: "OESCN Z P7'z UN 4P REZONE" All that oartain real property situate in the County of Butte. , State of California desorihed ae follows; The East 530, 40 feet of the North 520 feet. of the West: hal of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Secy ` 7; Township 22 North, Range 4 East, M. D. M. , and a porti this Northwest quarter of the Norte east quarter of Section 7 described as follows- � BEGINNING at the Sov'theast corner of tkae aorthwest quarte' the Northeast quarter of said Section 7 ; thenoe, along East line of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quar°te3, of said Section 7, North'"0° 17 ' 16" Went 100. 00 feet; thence' North 89c 02 ' 22" West and parallel _ with -the Soi,th line of said Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section, a distance of 385. 63 f6et_; thence, South € 8635 ' 38 ' Test, a distance of 252. 73 feet tc the Southwest corner of tht, East half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Seotion 7 ; thence, along the South line thereof , South 89 . 02 ' 22" East, 630. 77 feet to the point of beginning, 4 s 1 93 - 31231 ' RECORDING REQUESTED BY 93-00 237 1 Reee 14. 00 14. 00 I.., Check AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO I Recorded NAME Winifred Williams Official Records I 2015 Merril RdCounty of . 1 ADDRESS I Butte C,TT a Paradise, Ca. 95969 STATE L _J Candace J. Grubbs I Recorder 1 Title Order No. Escrow No.--I8:01am. 22-Feb-93 I PUBL- - MD 4 ' MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TOGift Deed r Documentary transfer tax'$.......................... I [] Computed on full value of property conveyed, or NAME [] Computed on full value less liens and encumbrances ADORES• Same as above remaining thcrcon at time Of sale. C,TT& As declared by the undersigned STATC .......................... ..... SiKunture u[declnrnut or ugcnl.determining Lux—lirul mune 3fubibibuat grant___j ee WESTERN TITLE FORM NO. 104 GIFT DEED FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Andrew E. Williams and M. Winifred Williams, as trustees of the Williams Revocable Inter Vivos Trust created on July 26, 1991 GRANT to Andrew E. Williams, Jr. a married man as his sole and seperate property all that real property situate in the County of Butte ,State of California,described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART OF THIS DOCUMENT (DESCRIPTION) SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART OF THIS DOCUMM _ (PLAT) e Williams Revocable Inter vivos u d . DATE / /! M. Winif Williams, Trustee of the Williams Revocable Inter Vivos Trust } STATE OF CALIFORNIA ✓V/�E }SS. COUNTY OF } / On /�8 /2. /9"P3 before me, _ ZQr/A/nl /�r/N� GUit�(D1 1 231 ... Exhibit "A" Being a portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 7 , Township 22 North, Range 4 East, M. D. M and more particularly described as follows : Beginning at the Nor'thwes't corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 7 ; thence Southerly along the Westerly boundary line of said. Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter for 520. 00 feet ; thence Easterly, parallel with the Northerly boundary line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter , for 180 feet, to a point on line Easterly of and parallel to the Westerly line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter ; thence Northerly along said parallel line, 260 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described parcel of land; thence continuing Northerly along said parallel line, 130 feet to a point on a line that is 130 feet Southerly and parallel with the Northerly line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter ; thence Easterly along said parallel line to a point on the Easterly line of the West half of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter ; thence Southerly along said Easterly line to a point on a line that is 260 feet Southerly and parallel with the Northerly boundary line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter ; thence along said parallel line to a point on a. line that is 180 feet Easterly of the Westerly line of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and -the point of beginning. Together with and reserving therefrom a right of way for road purposes and utility purposes over all that portion thereof lying within a strip of land 60. 00 feet in width lying 30. 00 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 7 , Township 22 North, Range 4 East, M. D. M. ; thence East along the North line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter, a distance of 180 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING for the line herein described ; thence from said true point of beginning, South, parallel with the West line of said Fractional Section, a distance of 415 . 00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 105 feet ; thence along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 580 , an arc distance of 105 feet, more or less , to the end of said curve ; thence tangent to said curve, South 581 West 60. 00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 105 feet; thence along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 580 , an arc distance of 105 feet, more or less , to a point which bears East, parallel with the North line of said Fractional Section, a distance of 30. 00 feet from the West line from said Fractional Section; thence South, parallel with and 30. 00 feet Easterly from said Westerly line, 344. 09 feet to the North line of the South 350. 00 feet of the West half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section. Said easement is for the benefit of and appurtenant to the lands described above and shall inure to the benefit of and may be used byall persons who may hereafter become the owners of said appurtenant property or any parts or portions thereof . Together with and reserving therefrom a non-exclusive easement for road, waterline, and public utility purposes over a strip of land 60. 00 feet in width lying east of and coincident to the following described line: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the East half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 7 , Township 22 North , Range 4 East, M. D. M. ; thence Northerly along the Westerly boundary line of said East half for 350. 00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING for the line herein described ; thence from said true point of beginning continuing Northerly along said Westerly boundary line to a point located 260. 00 feet Southerly from the Northwest corner of said East half ; thence Northwesterly to a point on a line located 3 . 00 feet Southerly of and parallel to said Northerly boundary line of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter , said point being; located 430. 00 feet Easterly of the Westerly boundary line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter ; thence along said parallel line 430. 00 feet to said Westerly boundary line of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and the end of said described line. The sidelines of the above described strip of land are to be lengthened or shortened to. intersect property lines . Said easement is for the benefit of and appurtenant to ' the lands described above and shall inure to the benefit of and may be used by all persons who may hereafter become the owners of said appurtenant property or any parts or portions thereof . v � o .c i LS 6373 ;` ° Exp. i 3i 9 �OF CAS\Fpe' i co cn 61 Ld N - LL m z s�, W All I r.._...._...�....._.__...__.._-. _-._._. . j--• 786.79' t I I g ' i �i X; ODI !� Z �v315 o � _,._,_._....._._..._...�..._...._.. t R� OR ____.�_ S 00'21'43' E H 00'21*4.r w 793.3x' I E � 10 dig 260.00' - —S I _820.00 _ t N 002'1'06` W 1319.A0' i 11 1 __ (_t-C P2SIAS-- YDDG , M -asr.�e�tt naris s;,: =o ezt-p s. c_; s-Zuoc (9) ==s Pop==-P Buz✓-Tdr1;V �o ��TS i�� VZIIVym =:Xylm=z ZA= 2tJDi9'F JD �2TM w I `JM=JSD mm '�'T... m ,nom Ea- m ndy = Sv 6_ � / - �eII � �-•-v- _ QTS a�5 ' _LnQV-%V-1 1dNo►1 - 0 Q-1 M '""I ` I HL O 177-1 n 1 : mrr_ kw '9 20 Nowi �� -fit. a1 �- ?C mamT S l Cj G75d ��` a i '�� !rIl ALL'; 'Z %S1'� 7VMM MIrm ZSL' QkY'I 8D 2Ita `Es"'8F'• Tri __ pa.'-rs Hca l.�riro d •SY •£ 1= pl_� zae� + =� •T AD M 'MC hTr..:IX -- �d3r3S =TZ7FV=g c:-�,_, 8=sniaPV •£ SI D=' 'IYJM xT •�� �i..� rZ =cl�=MQ noG PH 3== r? :I Cllr sn. 'IF-�rarrT -'IY? "'ISI 1F 1 5 C - 7-V C.—Ylr1ZS".$i !tY-AE WED M. :zaa=strosQ 2==wU wr;,7 f,>q PnoT K c: tse saaZ- Sst=zAa;To; a Mume Z. — 050 '(S)h36„Dli ' HFC SrSP .F --� Tv 7.J�G. .5 3 ! 777 w.Ed!�-1! -:M 7?N ; :J1Y�:.a,d�' 'T • :zQS?:'jdar ,d� pt'avIt�� !C C. w-; t��: �. O Z-,% G d {"2' Vires u I J _ s F � � U �-- A MERRIL RD. 180.00, _ 450. Imo— '�° RSN 63-072M z i 6.17 ACRESA JS arwir. E 450. S K 79 RSN 93-07237 g � 3.60 ACRS /, 1.60 ACRES �R+ S i � . 1 $ 2701 OR 315 � - $ y`b+• SCALE 1"=200' rn °fJ i 160A0' 460.34' 41243' 1 a3'- 8.65 N i 1260.6 - - . SEC 7 EXHIBIT $' B„ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICA770N PLAT FOR OWNER: WINIFRED WILLIAMS WINIFRED WILLIAMS BEING A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF L & L SURVEYING 2015 MERRIL RD. THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 7,T22N, R4E MDM 1007 BILLE ROAD PARADISE, CA. 95969 PARADISE, BUTTE CO., CALIFORNIA PARADISE, CA. 95969 (916) 877-4300 AP 50-26-16 PTN. Owl 1 - r BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE .REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP OR SUBD=V=S201*T MAP Items 1-4 .to be completed by applicant: 1. APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS: . � lIJ 1�I F 2�D 1�i L 1�1 A VY\S CIO j— � L n,�3 CA cf,�,q (oq 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:• . 3. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S): 4. PROPOSED USE: �4 0yN--�ES 1 Te S The following items are to be completed by the Planning Department: CURRENT ZONING: LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ACy.— IGS 1 _ Conditional Criteria: AGRICULTURAL-RESIDENTIAL YES NO It is recommended that you perform the 1. Agricultural Compatibility ->< following checked items: 2. Water and Sewer Capacity ARaiAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK 3. Adequate Fire Facilities x BOTARICAL SURVEY 4. Road Capacity and Maintenance 7- GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 5. Access to Commercial and Schools �_ YES NO WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF FISH V ORCHARD AND FIELD CROPS AND GAME DEVELOPMENT ZONE: 1. Predominant 5-10 ac. Parcel Size 2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries WITHIN FLOOD PLAIN: X 3. Ag. Viability not Impaired WITHIN AREA, SPECIFIC OR Staff Determination: Substantially conforms to: LAND USE PLAN: GENERAL PLAN: 1. Land Use If Yes, Z. Conservation Name of Plan 3. Open Space WITHIN URBAN RESERVE: 4. Safety 5. Noise If Yes, Name of Reserve 6. Housing 7. Circulation AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN: \. ZONING: C0:4=: Staff Signature Date AS THE APPLICANT FOR THE REQUESTED LAND DIVISION, I AM AWARE OF THE ABOVE STAFF DETERMINATION REGARDING THE CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING. Dated Signature of Applicant *This report will expire and be discarded six (6) months from the date of the staff signature. LD 1000A (revised 6-87)