Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout028-020-054SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS APPLICANT: Raymond Tendale PLANNER: Craig Sanders FILE # TPM 02-4 a f} ADDRESS,: 725 Central House Road, Oroville, CA 95965 d" OWNER: same, y PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 -ace lots and a 6.28 acre remainder LOCATION: south of Oroville, approximately 1,300 feet north of Central House Road on the west side of the Western Pacific Railroad Tracts, nearest intersection is Central House Road and Lone Tree Road, Oroville. a ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S): 028-020-054 + ZONING: A-5 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels) GENERAL PLAN: Orchard and Field Crops PROJECT CONSISTENT?:_ GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT: NOT REQUIRED LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS?: DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: 1/28/02 AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER: Ron Graves ADDRESS: P.O. Box 986, Oroville, CA 95965 S 3 .3 7 c DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED t ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND DATE CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE FILED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED MIT.NEG.DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED ENV.IMPACT REPORT - DATE CERTIFIED STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. RELEASE TO PUBLISH: G 3 6 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE HEARING DATE APPEALED APPEAL HEARING DATE BOARD ACTION CAT_ 4-0 KA,Gyy Z -j , 2,66± D! 30 QiyV\ COMMENTS FOR PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT ASSIGNED TO DISK RECEIPT NUMBER t'1 u i . 0 / 3. r _ 02-310' Continued Public 'Hearing. - �R�ayrnond T_......................... .. e d_ e - Tentative - Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment -..,Appeal, consideration of,; an appeal +of the Development 'Review µ Committee's denial of`a Tentative,Par,cel.Map and Lot -Line ' t Adjiistment to' divide= a`X46.28 acre..parcel•, into four :10 ` acre lots and aY 6 E28 acre remainder -on property'zoned A-.5 (Agricultural - 5`. -acre parcels) .;. The property is located ,,. app'roxi"mately:. 1,_3001�feet ,north of- Central -House Road' on , the" west side of+`the Western Pacific Railroad,,tracl s, nearh the, intersection of, Central, •House Rodd 'randLone Tree Road,. Orovill'e, Wand identified as-APN 028-020-054 and 046 (CS' [TPM 02-191") :* ,action 'requested. - STAFF RECOMMENDS THE BOARD4,r TAKE _ -THE, FOLLOWING- ACTIONS: ' 1 . SUBJECT TO FINDINGS ^I (A AND, B)• AS DETAILED ,IN THE • -STAFF REPORT DATED AUGUST 27, 2002'•, FIND THAT THE A- 5,. ZONE ' AND, THE PROPOSED PROJECT .I S`aINOT CONS I STENT WITH THE ',BUTTE, COUNTY GENERAL PLAN; AND 2.- ,_''DENY THE -APPEAL FOR'TENTATIVE'SUBDIVISION MAP 02-19 FOR RAYMOND: TEESDALE * : ;.(FROM 8-27-,02 (5.02)) - PUBLIC,' HEARING RECONVENED AT 12:36, P`:M.�,, AND CONTINUED• t` OPEN° 'TO MARCH '23,° 20041_ AT' 10:30 _ A.M. +' ' ' ,.. /. .. t /• 112 • s* - t . .. ,Y r .* •. �F1 .. ,b 1 ,• tet` a . • BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OFSUPERVISORS ` MINUTES September 24,,2002- - t r 1 l4 02-267.. -Continued.Publ'ic,Hearin4 LRaymond Teesdale Tentative L Parcel ' map and and Lot Line Adjustment - - Appeal -• consideration of an appeal••of'the Development Review _ Committee, sldenial of° a .Tentative Parcel "Map and Lot Line Adjustment to (divide 'a 46.28 acre; parcel. into. four 10 _acre, lots,and a 6.'28• acre• remainder on property zoned A-5 (Agricultural -. 5 acre',parcels) ... The property is located, ' approximately 1, 300 'feet . north of •Central• House Road on the 'we'st-"side of the Western Pacific Railroad tracks,' near the intersection of Central House Road and d Lone Tree Road', Oroville, and dentified'as APN`028_-020-054 and 046' (CS {TPM 02'-19]) =action ,requested - STAFF, RECOMMENDS F ' -THE. BOARD TAKE"THE •FOLLOWING ACTIONS: 1 . , SUBJECT TO FINDINGS LL I (A••AND B) AS DETAILED IN THE STAFF'REPORT DATED AUGUST 27,, 2002, FIND THAT:THE ' A -?5 ZONE AND .THE PROPOSED PROJECT ISNOT CONSISTENT WITH -'THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN;• 'AND., 2:+": DENY'THE APPEAL',FOR TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP~ 02-'19 FOR RAYMOND TEESDALE.- (FROM_7-23-02 [5.02].), _ AT,''THE REQUEST, OF THE APPLICANT, THE HEARING WAS -CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER' 24 , 4.2002. (.**79) + .. .. f is �, 4•- _ +, .. F a • •, • r BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INUTES 'August 27,2002f- . " 02'-310 Continued Publc�Hearing Raymond Teesdale Tentative Parcel -.'Map and Lot •L e: Adjustment Appeal - consideration of'an appeal ,of the Development Review Committee's deni'ai of a Tentative Parcel Map and-Lot Line Adjustment, to divide at 46.28 acre parcel into, four 10 acre lots 'and •a'_'6 28 acre' remainder on,property zoned A-5 .(Agri cultural-'5tacre•parcels).. The,property.:is located' approximately ,1;',•3`00 feet north, of Central House Road on the west side of the ;Western Pacific, Railroad tracks; near'the intersection of Central House^Road.;and -'Lbne� Tree Road, Oroville', and identified`•as.APN�028-020-054�and _04.6-_� (CS [TPM 02-T9]w)r- action requested' - STAFF '.RECOMMENDS THE BOARD TAKE THE-FOLLOWING ACTIONS: -1. SUBJECT - TO ?.FINDINGSI (A AND ,B) • AS DETAILED ' IN - THE STAFF REPORT DATED AUGUST'27, 2002, FIND THAT• THE A-5 ZONE\ANDJE PROPOSED PROJECT. IS NOT CONSISTENT ' WITH^ THE BUTTE COUNTY; GENERAL PLAN; . AND. ' 2. DENY THE APPEAL FOR TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 02-19 FOR-RAYMOND,,TEESDALE: (FROM 8-27.z-02 [5.021) -(***227) .PUBLIC HEARING RECONVENED AT 12:36 P.M,. 'Alb CONTINUED OPEN TO MARCH 23, 2004, AT 10:30 A,. M. ' `3 �j •BUTTE_ ,COUNTY.:B.0 D.OF'SUPERVISORSr MINUTES September 24 02 - M w .:I I •'� s - u ..• ,�•' . -sem - — -,1.-,.r• , .-^t-•. P!. W' r `.'.J''^ tbY- i r A+I .,;"-'y"�,,,y. y " a ,,. w• "Y. f L ! -7 y a ' .` " ♦ ,. � 4 4.,� .' . ... 027267• Continued Public'Hearing-<- Raymond Teesdale- Tentative Parcel _'Map,. and' Lot Line_ Adjustment Appeal, - consideration' of ' an appeal' of the Development' Review,.' R committed's,denial of.a TentativeiParcel �Map and`Lot Line' Adjustment• to divide a 46.28'. acre parcel -.into, four 10 acre lots and a 6':28'acre remainder on property zoned A-5_ (Agri cul-tural 5; acre parcels) .`''The property is located yt 'approximately 1,300 feet north of Central -.'House Road on , the ,west side ''of . the 'Western Pacific Railroad, tracks, ' - near the intersection, of 'Central Ho-use_Road an_d Lone Tree - '< Road;-Oroville', and identified as''APN 028-020-054. and 04T (CS [TPM 02-191P action requested STAFF RECOMMENDS f 'THE BOARD TAKE THE FOLLOWING -ACTIONS: ` 4' 1 ''SUBJECT' TO FINDINGS ,I (A AND B) AS DETAILED IN THE. ' ` ,.STAFF REPORT, DATED AUGUST 27, 20.02, FIND THAT THE A-5 ZONE AND THE PROPOSED PROJECT -IS NOT CONSISTENT; r WITH',THE,-BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN; AND 2. �,DENY.THE APPEAL FOR TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION' MAP 02-19 FORr.RAYMOND,TEESDALE. ,'(FROM 7-23-02 ,15.02]) } -AT ".THE r'REQUEST ' • ;OF 'THE APPLICANT, THE -HEARING. WAS CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 24, '2002. • ,(**79) " ., - ads t� 1 r '�: .. - •. - ,• � '� mow.. - ^ ' : , - t •a ' BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF -SUPERVISORS.- MINUTES August 27 2002 i r -'� yam, :...:�... -*^ l 1 _..,, 7.} _r,. _ ..sw...', .. — '-a9r.+.�'.c'Y'�""� • . a , - ' � `f ;. !.._ter+ y �^-�, �- �'� "7., '•!' •3 ! ' � ' � s a •.'r ,., ._...--.,,., �,'4a'' �",,,1 ..... _..- „�;�.. C.+.r - '7�"`..au •s S. _ - a '� �,2'Jg a,.' - 4. ,+. ,14r ,.. .d. t.- y ' . .-. 02-233 Public Hearing -.Raymond Teesdale '-Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment - Appeal -consideration.of an -appeal of'the Development, Review Committee's denial of a Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment to divide ',a 46.28 acre parcel into four40 acre lots and a 6.28 acre remainder on property 'zoned A-5 (Agricultural = 5,ade parcels). The property is located approximately z - 1,300 feet north -of Central House Road on.the west side of the Western Pacific Railroad tracks, near th'e intersection of Central House Road and Lone Tree Road, Oroville, and identified as APN 628-020-054 and046 (CS [TPM 02-19]) -.action . " requested - OPEN HEARING AND CONTINUE"OPEN. TO AUGUST 27, 2002, • -- AT 10:30 A.M. (2722) ; . • . PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: 10:35 A.M. '+ MOTION: ,I MOVE TO ,CONTINUE THE HEARING OPEN TOAUGUST 27, 2002, AT '•.=`. ' 10:30.A.M. VOTE: J 1 Y•2 Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 ;Y (Unanimously Carried) - HEARING CONTINUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT' .�BUTTE;COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES Julyy23, 2002 F - '�1�-r �i- '♦""�• y{, "�'• J .f•y.•• ' '>' :=�L•.C.^^ .- i �L��s� L.:. -+....,•. is #'r[ ` -r A. -I '4 3 - .G. 'i ,• - �4• -� t.17- ../f .+, . ' ! -J �•`'— '."�- iY.� �n : L ' •>irJl '�. '1 Y _-3� .rf e `"�j - ./- y - . ,. :.rid'-. �"y"�-� n , •T +7 • `s- v .Fy.. `4 j' Y°`.+• � � � .r.. Y` `�.4;'♦ 7ae F +•, v .. ' ` F , 3 .. ___. _ _ - , I,ti, -.. .. �` F. ... ♦ .,-r. , i A.. �• �� - w•r,t.- _..� t. Raymond Teasdale, Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 -acre lots and a 6.28 acre remainder on property zoned A-5 (Agricultural — 5 acre parcels). The property is located approximately 1,300 feet north of Central House Road on the west side of the Western Pacific Railroad Tracts, near the intersection of Central House Road and Lone Tree Road, Oroville. APN 028-020-054 and 046 (CS) (TPM 02-19) Mr. Sanders gave a brief summary of the project. Chairman Edell requested that the Lot Line Adjustment deed note be added to Exhibit A. He added "Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map" to Condition 13 and add to Condition 21 "add the standard Lot Line Adjustment deed note". He said that he would talk about Condition 29 if the action was to approve the Parcel Map. Mr. Meleka noted that staff could not make the findings for each of the required General Plan criteria. Mr. Sanders said that with respects to being near urban boundaries, the site. is approximately 6 miles away from Palermo and the same distance to Gridley. He said that the site is closer to Honcut which lacks infrastructures. He commented that the site has been dry farmed in to past and the economics for a 10 -acre parcel is not feasible and the agricultural potential would be impaired which could consequently impair existing adjoining agricultural uses. The hearing was opened to the public. Richard Teasdale said that he has lived in the subject area for 55 years and farms 80 % of the property. He discussed the drainage in the area. He said that he was told he was entitled to four parcels and a remainder and asked that his map be approved. Chairman Edell commented that he did not see an easement on the map for Mathews. Mr. Teasdale stated that he would give an easement to Mr. Mathews if this is approved. Chairman Edell said that the easement can not encumber the house, well, or leachfield. The hearing was closed. It was moved by Mr. Leland, seconded by Mr. Meleka, and unanimously carried to deny the Tentative Parcel Map for Raymond Teasdale and approve the Lot Line Adjustment added the "deed note" to the conditions in Exhibit A. I. Find that the A-5 zone and the proposed project is not consistent with the Butte County General Plan based on the following: A. The A-5 zoning designation was adopted on October 7, 1975, prior to the adoption of the Butte County General Plan in 1979. ---; ■ BC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW_ COMMITTEE MINUTES ■ JUNE 27,'2002 ■ PAGE 8 ■ B.' 'The 1979 General Plan Land Use Element designates the property as "Orchard and Field Crops." Consistent zoning designations with this land use category are A-20, _ A-40,•-and'A-160. The A-5 'and A-10 zones maybe found consistent with this land use designation when three conditional criteria are applicable to the project site and. area. These criteria are: 1: The predominant existirig'parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres: Within a 1 -mile radius of the parcel there are 58 parcels ranging is size from0.4 to 333 acres. The average parcel size is approximately 72. acres. The Median ' parcel size is-38'acres. Of the 58 parcels, 32parcels are over 20 acres in size.. , The predominant parcel,size is not in the 5- to 10 -acre range. 2. The area is adjacent to or in the vicinity,of urban boundaries. The project site is approximately 7.5 miles of driving distance from both Palermo. and Gridley. This is not considered to be in the vicinity of urban boundaries. 3. The present status -of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. ;The proposed 10 -acre parcels will not be agriculturally viable. The soils on site are not prime soils and are not suitable for intense high yield farming. II: Deny the Tentative Subdivision Map 02-19, for,Raymond Teasdale. lIl. Approve the Lot Line adjustment between APN 028-020-054 and 028-020-046 subject to the conditions in exhibit "A." = ' EXHIBIT A 44 Lot Line Adiustment for Raymond Teasdale on APN 028-020-054 and 046, TPM 02-19: An application for a Lot Line Adjustment between two parcels to move a parcel line toremedy a situation where a structure has been constructed over "a property line. This project is located in Supervisorial District 1. I. CONDITIONS OF.APPROVAL:• 1. • New lot of parcel lines. shall comply ,with setback requirements of the applicable zoning and building ordinances. - 2. Deeds and plats (if required) shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works,-. Land Development Division for checking and approval prior to recordation and shall contain the notes specified below. 3. Provide documentation from'a title company of the applicant's choice verifying any deed of trust affected has been re -conveyed of modified to reflect the lot line adjustment and to prevent the creation'of any additional. lot or parcel. 'N ■.ISI.yLr. V r,LVY1V1Ji1V 1 1Ct'. V 11✓ W. l:V1V1M11 1 ttl MIN.0 I tJ ■ � 't JUNE 27, 2002 PAGE 9•w 4. Prior to recordation of deeds, provide documentation verifying payment of taxes as required by Subsection (b) of Section 20-95 of the Butte County Code and as specified in Article 8 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code, commencing with section 66492. Deed Note ' (Tobe placed on any deed to effect lot line adjustment) i .The purpose of this deedis to effect a lot line adjustment as approved by the Butte County Director of Public Works on The above described lands,are ' to be combined with and become a part of those lands as described in the deed to as filed for record in Butte County. Official Records at Serial Number Book Page No additional lots or parcel's are. created hereby. `The scope of review of .s -aid lot line adjustment was limited as specified in Government Code Section 66412(d), and'appr'oval'of it does not constitute assurance that future applications for building permits or other land use entitlements on the modified Pots or parcels will be`approved by the County of Butte. Plat Note s .(To be placed.on any required Plat) This plat does not constitute a•legal description of the lots of parcels depicted and does not show all easements of record on or affecting said lots or parcels.' -There is a 10 -day appeal period on all decisions with the Clerk 'of the Board. ... .fes" • ' , . ■ BC DEVELOPMENT• REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES-rJUNE-27r; 2002`41PAGE`10 ■ "• � �t'"-Y_. .. � .�. �`y.~ _ .,. w' .�,..t.�.�,,,.. _ .. .._ .. -.. .��-� �.�... r _ _ ��..�"- fir•.. " � wrr+- .. . COUNTY OF BUTTE + OFFICIAL RECEIPT 358119 OFFICE R DEPARTMENT ISSUING EC IPT Received from 12z; LL,G e The Sum of -=7rc ':•�'I y , �C;��_ �`'b--_ 0. �U For Received: Received By - j CASH CHECK /\ Title a By DAVCO BUSINESS FORMS . (016) 743-0511 0 .r� Maximum of six additional parcels + $156ft w 'r - o NOTE: Planning will not accept application without prior Environmental Health approval This will most likely mean a pre application review by Environmental Health. Environmental Health office hours are 8:00 - 8:00 am Monday - Friday_ Men submitting application please Include a copy o; of your pre -application review rocelpt. 0 0 ri Day -Ser Foe Slip W31/00 �C + is dl1 y 4� G ( Pr�' n 'lCEL�. LJAN 2 8 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PI-ANNIINiG DIVISION 0 FEE SLIP ONLY THIS IS NOT A CLEARANCE 0 o TO: Development Services FROM: Environmental Health T tQ SUBJECT: ProjectName iG „-� / " Type of Project rpm Appllcant/Engineer ed'- and V l -b APt!y--- DATE,I ;The E nvironmentdl Health total processing fee for the above map will be $ Pre -Application Review Fee S _�• �l . ----- ---------------------------------------------'-- Land Division - 1 to 2 $7 Parcels'" $ 0.1kI w Additional o ' Lot Lina Adjustmerd Recorded Map( } $106-00 W Deeded Map ( ) $231.00 A Waiver $260:00 Questionable $344.00 Certificate of Merger $ 60.00 n ral POCBIS $260.00 CIA =Map(single condition) $2W.00 n Other $�_ 0 .r� Maximum of six additional parcels + $156ft w 'r - o NOTE: Planning will not accept application without prior Environmental Health approval This will most likely mean a pre application review by Environmental Health. Environmental Health office hours are 8:00 - 8:00 am Monday - Friday_ Men submitting application please Include a copy o; of your pre -application review rocelpt. 0 0 ri Day -Ser Foe Slip W31/00 �C + is dl1 y 4� G ( Pr�' n 'lCEL�. LJAN 2 8 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PI-ANNIINiG DIVISION 0 ` FE E: SLIP ONLY{ J TIHIS ISS NOTA CLEARANCE - TO: Cievelopmient Services FROM:E nvlror.�m,antal tial SlfE3JECT: FwojectNiama :',d .TI�'L�__- ` Y•ype of PTOjacl�_ fgpplicitntlErrglrieec _ _ 50 C) (,3 DATE c !• The Environmental'He®liti total processing fee fair tine ;tbove map w111 bE:' , $ _ ��— Pre Applicatlon R616w Feu' Land DI,Wonm I to 2' al. Addilior'al.Pamel§'"' { ) 01 Lot Line: AdluiatmenF - ` Recorded tdla}� (� P ,1U6.00 231.00 , Deeded'Map { ca Waiver: +. $2b0.00 Questionable .. $3.44.00 < Certificate Merger $ 80.00-6f F $260,00 AgrlculCural Parcels < , Revised Map (single Condltior) $260.00 - Other McXiMLlm of six additional parcel -s + $601hr � - NOTE: Plaphning wi tt not MWIDFA Pigileation'wlQhout prior EhVlronme•nt� l s Health approvial. This will most likely rntan a pr®4ppplication rrrview by m _ Environmentat Health. Einvironmenual Health c�ffN e.'tiaiurs are tt.04 - 9;00: JAN' 24 . W a:m- Monday -• Friday, When submidingaapFaliccation pleaar®Sncluiie as copy - - �, I cf your pre•appli►.atlora review reeefht. - 1 • 'BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION N Vev-Set Fee Slip EJ31,100 0 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOP.NIENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UN`IFO,R.N-1 APPLICATION AFMICANT: .-keens mformation to he amvided is un uthom jide: APPLICANT'S NAME ( It 3pipticant is %.Wfe-enl from u-ner an affidavit is —4Uu-, I "SESSOR'S PARCH. NUMBER: _Lwainn4 10zs Z -,o s -q - .. ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE. FILE NUMBER (F.OROFFICc—E;S'-1 11- a &ww 17,57, CCVATlz-KL- Prov&L— Rb -1 6.r-wvu=-rpm 05 -Is NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT ( If say) TELEPHONE -rG-rlrlvT-%\jg7 lPPVQ4Z-(- LOT NL'— *ATUST LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross strm= and Address. If any). C— r"c— ) GENERAL INIMR.NlAliON REQUIRED �7- OVVNr—R*S NANT TELEPHONE ADDRESS: -CITY. STATE ZIP CODE. ZONE GEPMRAL PL -AN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE ( m Square Feet or Aaw) C71L I 'Stl ri 6 14') t ECLSTING STRUCTURES (in Square Face) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Squzre Feet) tQ, FT- C) li (Check One) (Check One) C3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLICWATER &-AOPERTY P'RoPER-ry IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER CATION REQUESTEEk. AppLi F❑ GENERAL PLAN Al -MND 171% TENTATTv,-E SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ re D REZONE PARCEL MAP❑ USE PERMIT iW R OF PARCEL MAP [3 MINOR USE PER. JAN 2 8 2002 OUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION 1:3 VARIANCE LEGAL LOT DEITJL&IINATION ,U -(TE COUNTY [3 MINOR VARIANCE CERTIFICATE OF MERGER [I ADMINISTRATIVE [3 DEVELOPMENT AGR-EE24ENT [3 MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN 1--3 OTHER PROJECT DF—scRnynON FULL Dr-SCgffrnON OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach oecesmy sbeem If this application is for a land division . describe the number and size of pameb.) /0". TV A4r:S V �s, IV G A-0-Tue,-rkeAlT D,0a7--'-rb- 44-ou_S�- OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I A.%j PRXSE-'CMY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHOR(ZM AGENT OF THE OWNER OF Ti IE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FVRTHER,j AC)c4owUMGE THE FILDG OF TIUS APPLICATION AND CF-RTIF_YAL%TALL OF THE ABOVC v%,roRMATION IS TRUE AND ACCUR,'%I(1(.%n 3jent Ls to b,- ludlonzeKt ea"-ule an lirld-k a widwri—iun e the alfa vu 7, DATE: SIGNATURE:1:V AGENT AU'THORMkTION . To Butt �6untty,1 Depasin°ent o�fDevelopiri_erit•Seiyicts; Prin Yatna oCJl�attt �rtt! Ph Number v `� C -A Mat7trts Addtew, _ _ . PA-r� �J*v A -^ J, is hereby authorized to process this application for �r�� A--P-rostM. on my property, identified as Butte County Assessors Parcel Number 02v- ozo - This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc, and .to sign all, doc�.u�ments necessary for said processing, but not including document (s) relating to record title interest. Owners) of Record: (sign and print name) F� ,arA T Mathews - Raymond Teesd le Print Name , Print Naga 4 yr •. , N Siusatttte, c.. Architect and/or Engineer. Pint Name of i,,an&cw wW pbooe Number t ' 9. Nailing Addren , s FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: (� A� 0 ��- Total amount received: Date received:,__8 .,, SAP Numbers) Legal Description , ' -Zoning requirements ,Owners Authorization �� �opies of plot plan -_ Project Description r. �, /a Taken by.`L'/L,,. Receipt No.= E.H- C --LD, 3S ..._ Plan `=___... �--� Application Fee and/bc-Deposit.-(Any_ unused portion of a Payment of the currently required ` deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application` is s � -Vr To as of Z— Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". " i n for Bounda Line Modification �f� '�� JAN 2 8 2002. Applicat o . ry Applicant: Edward J BUTTE COUNTY Mathews 01MION Address: q5� Qi Ar w. tt�� 2- A►V`c�sv �(� G �s D ( _ Phone ft(�2� -7 `i3 - ct OcD O FAX:Z ttl Owner of record 1.: Edward J. Mathews Address: Phone # FAX # Owner of record 2.:Raymond Teesdale (IF MORE THAN ONE OWNER IS INVOLVED) Address: 7m�- ��-a-LA"A C,-2,u( Phone # 536 FAX #' Mail Notice of Hearing to: _ Applicant Owner AP No(s): Parcel Zoning: General Plan Desig.: 99 FG Property location and nearest street: Noy_�E I o Purpose of Modification: cR -0C_ W n/6 l I (we) certify that the above information is true and correct. APPLICANT SIGNATURE DATE OWNER OF RECORD SIGNATURE OWNER OF RECORD SIGNATURE OWNER OF RECORD SIGNATURE OWNER OF RECORD SIGNATURE OWNER OF RECORD SIGNATURE City of Oroville BLM (sass) D EJAN2 8 2002 BUTTE COUNTY , PLANNING DIVISION General Information: Name and address of owner, and/or developer, andel/or projectsp n onsoP r: 1. ' • 2. 3. 4. 5. COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed Address of project: same as aoove Assessor's Parcel Number: - - 054 Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concern N 9596 this project: Ron. Graves & Associates P.O. Box'986 Oroville, CA 530 534 9 List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: N/A Existing general plan designation: ---------------- 6,. Existing zoning district: ' A 7. How island currently used? Residential and grazing Y 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): create 4 homesi es Project Description: g.Site size: '50 acres approximately (Acre's/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size:' N/A Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes No 12. Proposed development schedule N 4, 13. Associated projects NZA 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development NIA Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the. number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. N/A r neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whethe area and loading facilities. N/A 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated; occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/A Planning Division 0 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 1 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach this and indicate clearly why N as, Exhibit Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons X or substantial alteration of ground contours. — — -21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential X areas or public lands or roads. — — 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _ X 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. — X 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors,in vicinity. — X 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality X or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. — — 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels X in the vicinity. — — 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or, more. — X 28.. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, X such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. —. — 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services X (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). — — 30. Substantially.increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.): — x 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. — X 4 lam' � 1 ILI �r JAN 2 8 2002 ,"�;�� LL SUITE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 2 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before thalPofiscenic�casp'ects f Describe any existlng structureormation on topography. soil ts on the plants and animals, and any cultural, historic site and the use of the structures. Attach,photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted.. See Below on ls d any 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including in andatio (residential. I lants n om earc alnetc.) Intensity �of land historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.). anSnapshots or Polaroid photos scale of dvelopment hwill be frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. accepted: See Below Certification n -n the attached exhbits present theand information ata I hereby certify that the statements furnished above abilid land that the facts,fstatements, anddinformation p esented required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ty. are true and correct to the, best of my knowledge and belief.. Date Signature for K:\FORMS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO 32 The property site -as existing°is open, fairly flat ground, topography with native plants and animals. stablesoil, gentle 1 existing home, no cultural, historical or scenic aspects known of. (33) The surrounding properties are much the same. Scattered single family residences with -barnyard animals. No cultural, historical or scenic aspects known_ of. E JAN 2 8 2002 � U BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION o Butte County Department -of Development Services O Planning Division O 3 Form No. 1282 (Rev. 12/15/95) SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to the extent that specific assurances are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: . (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records. (c) (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to main- tain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps or any structure or improvements; or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalid* of any judicial or non - judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. (b) "land": the land described or referred to in Schedule (A)(C) or in Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule (A)(C) or in Part 2, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways. (c) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (d) "public records": records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date": the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as stated herein, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall termi- nate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a defense, as limited in (b), or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shall be liable. hereunder, and shall not'thereby concede lia- bility or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to rep- resent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as permitted by the pro- visions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reason- able aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the n or lawful act Which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. 5. Proof of Loss or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have 'been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or dam- age signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be fur- nished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to exam- ination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized repre- sentative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Com- pany to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information desig- nated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested �i fn�mation or grant permission to secure reasonably sary information from third parties as required (5 continued) in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebt- edness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reason- able attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all lia- bility of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebted- ness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a)•the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligat- ed to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee'is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or dam- age by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The liability of the Company under this Guarantee Assured'shall not exceed the least of: (a) ,the amourit-of liabilty stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; (b) the amount.of the unpaid principal indebted- ness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest theron; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance assured against by this Guarantee. 8. Limitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter assured against by this Guarantee in *a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 9. Reduction of Liability or Termination of Liability. All payments under this Guarantee, except pay- ments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. 10. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty (30) days thereafter. 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee,. all right of subroga- tion shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any per- son or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully the loss of the Assured the Company shall be s gated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the- Assured shall have recovered its principal, interest, and costs of collection. 12. Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pur- suant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitra- ble matters when the Amount of Liability is $1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the Option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is in excess of $1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located permits a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. Liability Limited to This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting . such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant. Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14. Notices, Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement.in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at 114 East Fifth Street, Santa Ana, California 92701. IMPORTANT NOTICE! I) IN ORDER TO CLOSE YOUR ESCROW ON THE DAY' YOU WISH, PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING: OUR COUNTY REQUIRES THAT WE RECORD ONLY AT 9:00 IN THE MORNING MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY. WE WILL NEED YOUR CLOSING FUNDS AND/OR DOCUMENTS TO RECORD BY NOON ON THE DAY BEFORE YOU WISH TO CLOSE.. II) EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1994, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27361 PROVIDES THE RECORDER SHALL CHARGE AN ADDITIONAL THREE DOLLARS ($3.00) PER PAGE OR SHEET OF EACH DOCUMENT IF ANY PAGE OR SHEET OF THAT DOCUMENT DOES NOT CONFORM WITH THE DIMENSIONS SPECIFIED IN GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27361.5 (8 1/2" x 1111). III) SECTION 12413.1 OF THE CALIFORNIA INSURANCE CODE, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1990, REQUIRES THAT ANY, TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNDERWRITTEN TITLE COMPANY, OR CONTROLLED ESCROW COMPANY HANDLING FUNDS IN AN ESCROW OR SUB -ESCROW CAPACITY, WAIT A SPECIFIED NUMBER OF DAYS AFTER DEPOSITING FUNDS, BEFORE RECORDING ANY DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE TRANSACTION OR DISBURSING FUNDS. THIS STATUTE ALLOWS FOR FUNDS DEPOSITED BY WIRE TRANSFER TO BE DISBURSED THE SAME DAY AS DEPOSIT. IN THE CASE OF CASHIER'S CHECKS OR CERTIFIED CHECKS, FUNDS MAY BE DISBURSED THE NEXT DAY AFTER DEPOSIT: IN ORDER TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DELAYS OF THREE TO SEVEN DAYS, OR MORE, PLEASE USE WIRE TRANSFER, CASHIER'S CHECKS, OR CERTIFIED CHECKS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IV) CONTACT THE ESCROW OFFICER WHOSE NAME AND PHONE NUMBER APPEAR ON PAGE 1 OF THIS REPORT FOR ALL INQUIRIES AND CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THE ENCLOSED PRELIMINARY REPORT. PARCEL MAP GUARANTEE PARCEL MAP REF. ORDER NO. BU -185059 LW FEE $250.00 UPDATED -(08/10/200.1). SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HERETO ANNEXED AND MADE A PART OF THIS GUARANTEE. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A CORPORATION, HEREIN CALLED THE COMPANY, GUARANTEES RON GRAVES THE COUNTY OF BUTTE AND ANY CITY WITHIN WHICH THE LAND IS LOCATED, HEREIN CALLED THE ASSURED., AGAINST LOSS NOT EXCEEDING $1,000. WHICH THE ASSURED SHALL SUSTAIN BY REASON OF ANY INCORRECTNESS IN THE ASSURANCE WHICH THE COMPANY HEREBY GIVES THAT, ACCORDING TO THE PUBLIC RECORDS, ON THE DATE STATED BELOW, 1. THE TITLE TO THE HEREIN DESCRIBED ESTATE OR INTEREST WAS VESTED IN THE VESTEE NAMED, SUBJECT TO THE MATTERS SHOWN AS EXCEPTIONS HEREIN, WHICH EXCEPTIONS ARE NOT NECESSARILY SHOWN IN THE ORDER OF THEIR PRIORITY; AND 2. HAD SAID PARCEL. MAP BEEN RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SUCH MAP WOULD BE SUFFICIENT FOR USE AS A PRIMARY REFERENCE IN LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF THE PARCELS WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES. DATED: AUGUST 8, 2001, AT.11:32 A.M. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BY ASSISTANT SECRETARY CLTA'GUARANTEE ORDER NO. BU -185059 LW' TITLE TO SAID.ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: WILLIAM M. MC NABB, JR., AS TO AN UNDIVIDED .ONE-THIRD INTEREST; MARK.H. MC NABB, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED ONE-THIRD INTEREST; AND SUSAN MC NABB .COOK; AN UNDIVIDED ONE-THIRD' INTEREST; ALL AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/10 INTEREST; EDWARD J. MATHEWS AND MICHELLE D. MATHEWS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 3/10 INTEREST; MALLARD R..HUNTLEY, AN UNMARRIED MAN, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/10 INTEREST;, ROBERT J. BARBIERI AND 'KARROL BARBIERI, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/10.INTEREST; WESLEY B. LASHER AND INEZ LASHER, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/10'INTEREST; JEROME C. CRESS AND MARTHA JILL CRESS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS TO 73% OF AN UNDIVIDED 1/10 INTEREST; JEROME C. CRESS AND MARTHA CRESS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS, AS TO 27% OF AN UNDIVIDED 1/10 INTEREST; GEORGINE CASELLA, SOLE TRUSTEE OF THE ALFRED AND GEORGINE CASELLA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/10 INTEREST; DAN DESMOND, LTD., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/10.INTEREST, AS TO PARCELS I -A AND I -B; RAYMOND GENE TEESDALE, AN UNMARRIED MAN, AS TO PARCELS II -A AND II- B THE ESTATE OR',INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS GUARANTEE IS: A FEE AND EASEMENT THE LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL MAP HEREINBEFORE REFERRED TO. IN THIS GUARANTEE IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, .COUNTY OF BUTTE, AND IS'DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONTINUED PAGE 2 CLTA GUARANTEE PARCEL I -A• ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY BEING A PORTION NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED'AS FOLLOWS: • ORDER NO. BU -185059 LW OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 17 BASE AND- MERIDIAN, MORE BEGINNING AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER, OF SECTION; THENCE NORTH 88° 42' 17" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 1657.78 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND GRANTED TO GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY AS RECORDED AUGUST 5, 1908, IN BOOK 108 OF DEEDS, PAGE 32, BUTTE COUNT OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 05°'40' 25" WEST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 2647.96 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SECTION;. THENCE SOUTH 880 32' 05" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH HALF OF SAID SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 1386.29 FEET TO THE CENTER OF SECTION;' THENCE NORTH 000 12' 43" WEST; ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION, 2632.98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL HEREIN IS PURSUANT TO A MERGER APPROVED BY THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, RECORDED AUGUST 8, .2001, UNDER BUTTE COUNTY RECORDER'S SERIAL NO. 2001-35481 AND SHOWN AS EXHIBIT "A" THEREIN. APN: 028-020-046-000; 028-020-048-000 PARCEL I -B: A RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH, BEGINNING AT THE CENTER -OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH; RANGE 4 EAST, M.D.B. & M., AND FOLLOWING THE CENTERLINE OF SECTION 6, SOUTH TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, AND LYING WEST OF SAID CENTERLINE. PARCEL II -A THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, M.D.B. & M., LYING WEST OF THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THAT TRACT OF LAND 100 FEET WIDE, WHICH WAS CONVEYED BY AMOS HOWARD AND HELEN HOWARD TO THE WESTERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY BY THAT CERTAIN DEED DATED FEBRUARY 3, 1906 AND RECORDED FEBRUARY 3, 1906 IN BOOK 90 OF DEEDS, AT PAGE 192, RECORDS OF BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTH 1050.0 FEET AND THE NORTH 950.0 FEET OF.THE SOUTH 2000.0. FEET OF THE WEST 120.0 FEET AS WAS CONVEYED PREVIOUSLY IN A DEED TO RICHARD W. TEESDALE, ET UX, RECORDED MARCH 6, 1968 IN BOOK 1508 OF BUTTE COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS, AT PAGE 363. CONTINUED PAGE 3 0 CLTA GUARANTEE ORDER NO. BU -185059 LW PARCEL II -B: AN.EASEMENT FOR'ROAD PURPOSES.AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 20.0 FEET WIDE LYING EASTERLY OF LAND ADJACENT TO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, M.D.B._& M.; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 2000.0 FEET TO THE END OF SAID LINE. EXCEPTIONS: .THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS 1 THROUGH 8 AFFECT PARCELS I -A AND I -B: 1. GENERAL AND SPECIAL BUTTE COUNTY TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002, A LIEN, BUT.NOT YET DUE OR PAYABLE. 2. ANY TAXES, CURRENT OR DELINQUENT, TAX SALES, STREET ASSESSMENTS, -BONDS, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS, TAX DEEDS, TREASURER'S DEEDS, AND CERTIFICATES OF SALE, WHICH MAY EXIST AS LIENS, CHARGES OR ENCUMBRANCES AGAINST SAID LAND, NO EXAMINATION OF THE RECORDS PERTAINING TO SAID MATTERS HAS BEEN MADE. TAX INFORMATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. AP# 028-020-046-000 3. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 -OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. A REPORT HAS BEEN ORDERED TO DETERMINE IF A SUPPLEMENTAL TAX BILL HAS BEEN SENT OUT. IF A BILL HAS,BEEN SENT, A REPORT WILL FOLLOW PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF ESCROW. RE -CHECK SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF ESCROW. 4. A RIGHT OF WAY AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSE STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES - FOR: ROAD RECORDED: JULY 6, 1934, IN BOOK 116,.PAGE 488, OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS: THE NORTHERLY 10 FEET. CONTINUED PAGE 4 CLTA GUARANTEE ORDER NO.' BU -185059 LW S. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSE STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL 'PURPOSES FOR: WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM RECORDED: JANUARY 23, 1998, UNDER BUTTE COUNTY RECORDER'S SERIAL NO'. 98-02540. 6. A NON—EXCLUSIVE RIGHT OF WAY AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSE STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES FOR: ROAD PURPOSES RECORDED: 'JANUARY 23,, 1998, UNDER BUTTE COUNTY' RECORDER'S SERIAL NO. 98-02540. 7. ANY RIGHTS. .OR CLAIMS BY REASON OF MATTERS THAT MAY BE DISCLOSED BY THAT CERTAIN RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED: FEBRUARY 1, 1999, IN BOOK 146, OF MAPS, AT PAGE(S) 62, BUTTE COUNTY RECORDS. 8. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THAT CERTAIN TRUST REFERRED TO IN THE VESTING HEREIN AND ANY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH .THE TERMS THEREIN. THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS 9 THROUGH 13'AFFECTS PARCELS II—A AND II.— B: I-B: 9: GENERAL AND SPECIAL BUTTE COUNTY TAXES. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002, A LIEN, BUT NOT YET DUE OR PAYABLE. 10. ANY TAXES, CURRENT OR DELINQUENT, TAX SALES, STREET ASSESSMENTS, BONDS, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS, TAX . DEEDS, TREASURER'S DEEDS, AND CERTIFICATES OF. SALE, WHICH MAY EXIST AS LIENS, CHARGES OR ENCUMBRANCES AGAINST SAID LAND, NO EXAMINATION OF THE RECORDS PERTAINING TO SAID MATTERS HAS BEEN MADE. TAX INFORMATION.AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. AP# 028-020-054=000 11. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES ASSESSED.PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. A REPORT HAS BEEN ORDERED'TO DETERMINE IF A.SUPPLEMENTAL TAX BILL HAS BEEN SENT OUT. IF A BILL HAS BEEN SENT, A REPORT WILL FOLLOW PRIOR'TO THE CLOSE_OF ESCROW. 1 e RE—CHECK SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF ESCROW. CONTINUED PAGE 5 9 U CLTA GUARANTEE ORDER NO. BU -185059 LW 12. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSE STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES FOR: TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRICITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RECORDED: JULY 10, 1908, IN BOOK 107 OF DEEDS, PAGE 439, BUTTE COUNTY RECORDS. AFFECTS: THE EASTERLY 100 FEET. 13.. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN •INDEBTEDNESS IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL SUM OF $108,000.00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS AND/OR OBLIGATIONS SECURED THEREBY DATED:' SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 TRUSTOR: RAYMOND GENE TEESDALE, AN UNMARRIED MAN TRUSTEE: ROBIL, INC.,.A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: ROSA A. ANGLIM, WIDOW, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 23.148148% INTEREST; BETTY BILLINGS, AN UNMARRIED WOMAN AND KAY PETERSON, A MARRIED WOMAN AS HER SOLE AND SEPARATE PROPERTY, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 22.222222% INTEREST; HAMILTON BARHYDT AND ELIZABETH BARHYDT, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 13.888889% INTEREST; ROBERT D. HASTON AND IRMA H. HASTON, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS JOINT. TENANTS, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 11.111111% -INTEREST; ROSE I. NORLIN, TRUSTEE OF THE ROSE I. NORLIN TRUST DTD 3/9/92, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 11.111111% INTEREST; DOROTHY H. SWETLAND, TRUSTEE OF THE BRAUN FAMILY TRUST DTD 6/13/86, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 9.259260% INTEREST; TRANSCORP PENSION SERVICES C/F RIC_HARD J. SCHNEIDER IRZ- 2012-OR, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 9.259260% INTEREST; ALL AS TENANTS JN COMMON. RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, UNDER BUTTE COUNTY RECORDER'S SERIAL NO. 96-36011. BENEFICIAL INTEREST THEREUNDER WAS ASSIGNED FROM: ROSA A. ANGLIM, A WIDOW TO: ROSA A. ANGLIM, UTA DATED AUGUST 8, 1996 BY.ASSIGNMENT RECORDED: OCTOBER 31, 1996, UNDER BUTTE COUNTY RECORDER'S SERIAL NO. 96-41516. BENEFICIAL INTEREST THEREUNDER WAS ASSIGNED FROM: HAMILTON BARHYDT AND ELIZABETH BARHYDT TO: HAMILTON BARHYDT AND ELIZABETH ANNA BARHYDT, TRUSTEES OF THE BARHYDT FAMILY 1998 TRUST DATED JULY 23, 1998 BY ASSIGNMENT RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 22, 1998, UNDER BUTTE COUNTY RECORDER'S SERIAL NO. 98-40536. CONTINUED PAGE 6 CLTA GUARANTEE ORDER NO. BU -185059 -LW ITEM NO. 13 - CONTINUED NOTICE OF DEFAULT UNDER THE TERMS. OF SAID DEED OF TRUST, RECORDED: APRIL 27, 2001, UNDER BUTTE COUNTY RECORDER'S SERIAL NO. 2001-17076. NOTE: THE LAND HEREIN WAS CREATED BY MERGER, RECORDED .AUGUST 8,.2001, UNDER.BUTTE COUNTY RECORDER'S SERIAL NO. 2001-35481, AS TO PARCELS I -A AND I -B; AND BY GRANT DEED RECORDED MARCH 6, 1968, IN BOOK 1508, PAGE 363, OFFICIAL RECORDS, AS TO PARCELS II -A AND II -B. THE VESTEE HEREIN ACQUIRED TITLE BY DOCUMENT(S) RECORDED JUNE*3, 1981, IN BOOK 2628, PAGE 93, OFFICIAL RECORDS, JANUARY 23, 1998, UNDER BUTTE COUNTY RECORDER'S SERIAL NOS. 98-02536, 98-02537, 98- 02539 AND 98-02541, FEBRUARY 5, 1998, UNDER BUTTE COUNTY RECORDER'S SERIAL NO. 98-04275, AS TO PARCELS I -A AND II -B; AND BY GRANT DEED RECORDED AUGUST 22, 1988, UNDER BUTTE COUNTY RECORDER'S SERIAL NO. 88-27833. LW:TKH AUGUST 10, 2001 PAGE.7 yO y L pN �'N 4 O co N ' 1-800-345-7334 1 SCALE -IN 1110 OF AN INCH R N6a42'18' T.17N. RAE. M.D.B.&M. - . ___ r ------_ r ----- U_ I -02 I I �i i 9.91ACI 6 I 4S 399 997 43 1.52 AC SB 1 OO46 ae 41.19 59 OI %C N j 182.65 AC 0 �/ $ 125.63 AC bo 32 1,+1200 289.12 AC' ,! a i 18.00 AC 24-2 23 i 29.40 I &08 AC 1 47 1 62 13.64 ACt 517.46 AC I-- , t 660. ------ , W 54 C 39 Cr H i , t 888 t 6.AC Z 26 O O --� to.46 t1.03 i AC±' 81.79 ACt r 36 t 49 _ 317&34 AU - s7 56 I O RS 146-62 I 11.60 ACt 12 so v 33 129.12 AC 21.65 AC I 100.00 AC gi SBF�a8d8 2-_1 �__JJ681r38E--- ---------� 3210.34 u% 1083.40 ---------CENTRA[---- r- Ir -'iiOClSE-"- -------__ i O I !2 O 65.00 O' ' i 13 I IS 155.. 73 Act M O 31 O 30 AC I i i I 87 e a t n 1 Q 515.29 AC , I 160.00 AC 228,00 AC Ci 235.74 AC 80.00 AC t i I , I 4-2 los6.4e --' I 7 M8 ' I 27 ROAD 8 610AU 1650.00 4y 3" 27.58 R u W rAsoalrr t 33 I 16 T Of a1 24 AC 22 0 23 O USA ElSfl1ENf 1 ACt = 83.68 AC HO UT ------ 53 40 100.00 AC $ 60.00 AC ��-{{ r� ------ -J T $ _I I 17 58.90 AC 54 AC a AC 31 I t m ' `--------------- �------- 80.00 AC r - I9 Ac 20 AC --� MIDDLE HONCUT Ia HIM TMR t w "+ pv9mvs , `-� Ae11168e0re bap 990,00 NO. 28-02 ROAD a+r w ,., ,w4 w ksobw Ind puc�la ® Phis map may or may Cou r of Butte. Calif. not be a survey of the land de{�icted hereon, You should not -rely upon it for yJ�_J _J -; 18iNSiDc b-90 any'.purpose other ,. ftn orientation to the general location of the parcel or par- ceft. cfe t ' plc ed. Mld Valley Title and Escrow Company ex. lln" 1 Pressly disclaims any liability for alleged loss or damage tf -ich may re::ult from reliance upon this map, r, • Exhibit "A" Legal Description Matthews to Teasdale C • Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Northeast one quarter of Section 6, Township 17 North, Range 4 East, M.D.M.; thence North 000 12'43" West along the West line of said Northeast one quarter, 25.00 feet; thence leaving said West line, North 880 32'43" East, parallel to the South line of said Northeast one quarter, 199.45 feet; thence South 01' 27' 55" East, 24.99 feet to a point on said South line; thence South 880 32' 05" West along said South line, 200.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 0.11 acres more or less. The Basis.of Bearings for this description is the same as shown on the Record of Survey filed in Book 146 of Maos at Page 62, Butte County Recorders Office. Job# 00-141 A APN 28702-46, 54 ECEILVE i� JAN 2 8 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION BUTTE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, Ca. 95965 (530) 538-7281 Fax (530) 537-7785 PRE -APP REVIEW (Please check appropriate box) Tentative Subdivision ® Tentative Parcel Map Q Use Permit.' ® Lot Line Adjustment Other Location of Property Central House Road Assessor's Parcel Number: 28-02-54 - Project Description: Parcel Map.- Create 4 - 10 acre_ parcels and 10 acres remainder. Applicant: Richard. Teesdale Phone Number 846-53'61 Address: -229 n ral House Road, Gridley, CA 95948 Owner: Same as above Phone Number Address: Engineer or Surveyor: Ron Graves & Associates Phone Number 534-9587 Address: P.O. Box 986 Oroville CA 95965 Mail Correspondence to:—Surveyor Signature C, l ✓`-t,i Date HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Fee Paid: Receipt number Date EHS ® ECa 9WE JAN. 2 8.2002 BUTTE COUNTY� PLANNING DIVISION TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBDIVISION MAP WAIVER APPLICATION APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST C�. JAN 2 2002 8 ' U -. BUTT COUN iY PLANNING DNISKP4 This checklist is designed to assist applicants inmaking sure all necessary information is included in their application packet. Please include this checklist along with you submittal. Applicant Planner 1 • Q A com leted si ed P , . gn ,Uniform Application and Environmental Information form. If the application is signed* by an agent for the owner, an, agent authorization form must be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. 2. 12 --'Payment of the currently required Application Fees and/or Deposits (Any unused portion of the deposit will be returned to the applicant upon final action). (Planner advises applicant) 3• �A preliminary title report showing current ownership and dated within 6 months of the application submittal shall be filed with the application. 4• 0 --Twenty-two (22) copies of the map,, including, a detailed site plan drawn to scale, shall be submitted. Additional copies of the map shall. be made available by the applicant or engineer/surveyor to County Departments upon request. All maps shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no less than 18" X 26". The finished map shall be folded to 8 '/2" x 11 ". The detailed map must include: . a. Name, business address of person who prepared the map. b• E Proposed property lines and lot dimensions. c Assessor Parcel Number(s). The street address (if available). Tract name and date if applicable. ' d. l:d' Vicinity Map indicatingthe location of the land irI relation to the nearest major roads, significant topographic features, surrounding area or region. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. I Submittal Requirements k� ti Vicinity Map indicating the location of the land in relation to the nearest o / major roads, signtopographic ificant features, surrounding area or CO oo region. N - Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed, public and private, improvements on the property (including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, parking areas, wells, septic tanks, sewer lines, leach fields, 1 _utilities, and street lights.) �fR ❑ Wells which are to be abandoned shall be shown and identified as "well to be abandoned". The wells shall be properly abandoned under permit issued by.the Butte County Division of Environmental Health. �I� 0 Buildings which are to be removed will be identified as "building to be removed". The buildings shall be 'properly removed or demolished under permit issued by the Butte. County Building Division. --/The existing and proposed location, name, width, approximate grades and radii of curves of all roads, streets, highways for the subdivision and within. 100 feet of the exterior boundaries. thereof. All streets shall be beled as to whether it is public or private. L/ Topographic contours and water features, at a minimum, to be as shown on the current USGS 7.5 minute quad map. WO For subdivisions that have a density of 4 dwellings/ac or greater in the Urban Area or 1 acre lots, or smaller in the Rural Area and which also have an average slope of 20 % or greater, a conceptual or preliminary grading plan shall be submitted showing the approximate finished pad elevations for each lot and all cut and fill slopes -proposed which are 5 feet or greater in height. This requirement may be waived by the Director of Development Services if it is found not to be needed. �0 Approximate location of all FEMA identified 100 year floodplain areas, if any, and the location, width and direction of flow of all ephemeral ater courses, if any. Sufficient information on the map to, determine adequacy of the proposed drainage and flood control measures, including but not limited o, proposed easements, and facilities.. The approximate widths,- location and purpose of all known existing or proposed easements. O Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division O 2 o t Planner n. North arrow and scale of drawing. All maps shall be drawn to an engineering scale of a size sufficient to reasonably show all required features. A north arrow preferably oriented to the tolD of sheet. If not connecting to public sewer and water, the.following applies: The proposed source of domestic water and proposed method of sewage disposal. If, the project is not served by community sewer and/or community water, include soils/percolation/ground water data and water availability data sufficient to allow the Division of Environmental`Health to complete their review of the project. Your application will be incomplete unless this information is provided or waived, in writing, by the Division of Environmental Health. Environmental Health Waived El YES . ❑ NO �6. ❑ 0/A written request for any exceptions to the subdivision standards pursuant to Section .20-4 of the Butte County Code, if applicable: Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Signature: Applicant/Representative Signature: Planner Receiving Application K:\FORMS\SUBMITAL\CHECKLIS\TT(2)B. WPD Date: / /,2,1— Date: tTfiv✓D D �CELI. WE I n JAN 282002 BUTTE COUNTY L PLANNING DIVISION J IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 3 PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST Project Planners fill out this in-house checklist upon receipt of a new project. Project Number: Project/Application Name: Project Site Zoning: General Plan Designation: APN: Project Planner: Date completed: Is., the project located within any of the following areas? M ❑ North Chico Specific Plan ❑ Oroville Enterprise Zone . ❑ Williamson Act Land CLCA: ACRES: ❑ 100 Year Flood Plaine ❑ Within FEMA Floodway ❑ ' Within DWR Floodway ❑ Dam Inundation Area ❑ Watershed Protection Overlay Zone ❑ East Avenue Specific Plan ❑ Chico Area Greenline (Project in area where Greenline policies apply) ❑ Greater Chico Area Redevelopment Area ❑ Nitrate Action Plan Area ❑ Planning Areas ❑ Urban Reserve Fj Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area ❑ Paradise Urban Reserve ❑ Oroville Area Land Use Plan (Adopted 3/29/84) ❑ Oroville Urban Reserve ❑ Chic o'Area Land Use Plan (Adopted 3/18/90) ❑ Chico Urban Reserve ❑ Gridley -Biggs Land Use Plan (Adopted 8/586) ❑ Gridley Urban Reserve ❑ Honcut Area ❑ Cohasset, Area ,❑ Palermo Area r - ❑ Chapman/Mulberry Planning Area (in process of adoption 9-14-99) ❑ Deer Herd Areas ❑ Designated Development Zone ❑ Winter Range ❑ Critical Winter Range ❑ Summer Range ❑ Critical Summer Range ❑ Major Migration Corridor ❑ Intermediate Deer Range ❑ If Constrained, The Minimum Parcel Size Is acres. ❑ CLUP Area ❑ AIRPORT AREA OF INFLUENCE Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan ❑ Chico ❑❑ Paradise Skypark ❑ Paradise Skypark Ranchero ❑ Ranchero ❑ Oroville ❑ Oroville ❑ Airport Land Use Commission Review (ALUC) Required r I" Agency Special Review ❑ Department of Water Resources (DWR)/ ❑ Urban Area (As defined in Improvement Standards for Chapter 20) Reclamation_ Board' ❑ , City of Chico ❑ Durham ❑ City of Gridley Department of Fish'and Game (DFG) ❑ City of Oroville ' ❑ Mountain Recreational Area ❑ Sphere of Influence ❑ Other ❑ . ❑ City of Chico ❑ City of Gridley ❑ ❑ City of Oroville ❑ City of Biggs ❑ ❑ City of Paradise y ❑ Watershed Areas Comments: ❑ Butte Creek ❑ Cherokee Chico Creek El Wyman Ravine Study Area F-1Little Little Chico Creek, ❑ Rock Creek Study Area ❑ Sacramento River Conservation (SB 1086) ❑ WP Overlay Zone Area Essential Services , ❑ Public Water District ❑ Well(s) ❑ Public Sewer District ❑ On-site Sewer . If well and/or on-site sewage disposal, has Environmental Health determined the application filing requirements? Pre -application review'complete ❑❑ Pre -application review not required ❑ Drainage District/CSA ' ❑ Fire District ❑ Butte County ❑ El Medio Fire District , ❑ Federal Aid Road(s) ❑ Other Permits required from other agencies Agency Special Review ❑ Department of Water Resources (DWR)/ ❑ Office of Mine Reclamation Reclamation_ Board' F1HCD (Mobile Home Parks) ❑ Department of Fish'and Game (DFG) ❑ -Department of Fish and Game ❑ CALTRANS ❑ Other ❑ . Regional Water Quality Control Board ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Butte County Air Quality Control District ❑ Other Comments: ' Version: 9/28/99 CAMy DocumeasTROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST.doc Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® .024230046000 024230047000 . K:\Planning\PROJECTS\TPM\Teasdalelabe PETERSON TIMOTHY S & NICHOL S RASH NEAL D SR & KEREN C Is.doc 519 .CENTRAL HOUSE RD 2065 ESPERANZA AVE OROVILLE CA 959659687 PALERMO CA 95968 024240046000 027220209000 028020012000 HARTER GERALD COOK &BETTY CALIFORNIA OLIVE RANCH INC ARTAMENKO BILL & CARLA 5444 LARKIN RD 1528 COLUSA AVE STE B 889 ELLA AVE LIVE OAK CA 95953 YUBA CITY CA 95993 MARYSVILLE CA 959019614 028020013000 028020017000 028020036000 LANZA ROY & SONDRA FAMILY 'SCHWARTZ ALFRED G REVOCABLE MATHEWS EDWARD J & MICHELLE D PO BOX 591 P O BOX 213 950 RAMIREZ RD MARYSVILLE CA 959010591 CLAYTON CA 94517 MARYSVILLE CA 959019444 028020049000 028020054000 028020056000 D.UENAS RUDY C & TRACIE TEESDALE RAYMOND GENE, RICHARDSON JUDITH M 7918 MCCOURTNEY RD 125 CENTRAL HOUSE RD, 771 CENTRAL HOUSE RD LINCOLN CA 956489452'' DROVILLE CA 95965 - OROVILLE CA 95965 028020057000 RON GRAVES HICKORY JOHN L SR & KAREN D P.O. BOX 986 P O BOX 185. , PALERMO CA 959680185 OROVILLE CA 959,65 k �� AVERS® Address Labels' baser 5160® 1. � r .T.` �. �. S •r '�l+T?y .� !: :{.. z-• c t i. L . +' `, �� _� - �, _' 1 - •' '+- - ab{ p ! _ F\�� '{`• Y. i. •"` ,tom w.r. A �. •t ,' [{ b� i '�iS �5`' �� }-,yF J f � -r n�a J `- - }" i^^ 7+` ++. -: (( .. = i -1r. .ti,Lt li.. ,- �� -. .. _� �• .�+t. �: ,.-et Sf .••R 's .� � . y �T�M p 5 i'. �• .� 1' t sf,: � � W `Ji } it 1 . '?rat �•(�ZZO� 'C�.S�i`p�-o�;1,�' ��� ,�. .. o 2 514 �} , ..� �. l � - row � .. a >a`. S i•,,.i, : «r r..'r + 4•` �w�l i' Ia., :'L +`^LM .4 Y..,Y.K -6i t.1 k4+r. .. r•r ,,• �p2gr-O2� ' .:. L s j•,;,,"`1 •p r'n � ri • �; yL .� 1 ': t �*.• �,;. ,. I �.� � .� ...TM t .. _ .. 1 „ k 'f . 11 . - � r I f_ O �� 4i �V• ��.J �-i M. 3'�+i* R 1 O� ,' i e .. a V J t �} . o- a''•a ,� � ri' � C.: s� +3' i � r` - - h i5 �..e: ; -R Y,t '+1 �� �-� '� M t^ „' � ♦ -.ti psi 7�y y .YN. _ i ....d. T1 }� �. � - Y 9r Y: l ,1 il•�b ... .. *vT ' 4.= �. uk.'• • .i .,,M• . a.- '-i- / ry.*,. • • `� `f -,:-1_7 2110 �J`(p':'ta�r.�r ,p i." �'i? �.4F�.'r .y * �' � '•' •b -F+ ` t/�J� p$� `'n/./a' i�-1�1/�.ry1 �� � +Li ' I © }i. rl �j�`}y `'}`Rf '. � 7 •L-�• -r'�.. � -:'� ( i �� Y•'1 •^!i +• \ f _ J i"�. X � 1 '` {.; � .. ,' '� 1 ., �•.L �.\ �.w.. G.�� � Lam,/ •% � � � r - Y rip r rI ,A.. •-�... �Y #..-. � • „� - .. .� "•,� � b..y q�, �. �I r + _ -S. � � h \ + .e �.-+ ./�,� +t7 � � �� � t. :�.. F -' ,. ��'s}. M pi ,� w _rfl L �-.�®{ .'�� X74 �'�V G.�' / •r G��� "' b M� � S C Sl ]A • ~ ~��'� � K.. IQ.y� s ,�'n �� - J• � ,.� .�s+"'1 !,. T .•pk J.':,, _ W- Y ty'.' � I ��' a i `'emu i^, :. rs . •.' y � , p -, • (• w �� r s*•� • �' � T'. - . J �.. r _ ` �[ 1. � s '47 r y. :i•f - e �q t, S'�S o '!Yt i�. !, �'Y'.. .. .. r Ln •I_^i^ ~ A -�' • p_ i k : d t_ 102:- r• - %` I � � _� Yc� -h - i �i ,.A'V'"� ��� L s; ` ? a.'js' �. � � `., � _ }' I'< '"7.:• iL S 8 O W©' 1 +r ' .� ., +� - '• w.rA 1 '` ' IVr'V.11A-1 Y . . , • • � a ,Y'a �'� 1� , •mow 1. ].- __ .' F `� }`ln.�� � � LI �, .ti `S f � 1 ' "r � p«+ y T y � } ' ! ',o am W._I S a 1 J 4.+ �4 1 1 �If r— Z •�� �t a J sI�• c` 4a:r?s 2}vr�'. .- R ' .. F a' � - - � '� 1. � -+ [ £ • �,'.- ` i. ib�.+i'. h�V' .M1�M e �„ S^ \�i�„ \2� � �! S �r r• E i .• 7V `M ...' .0 -♦. tr_.. .. !L � ,l.Y ^�4 #F� y�b. y tit .,. '�'. ., ti 7- rJ}. . .t =��`'' MrM -. �4 d •;;'. t}#,� s._'w -�.. - . '1V� 'Y^� +...,�- ,W.r . tr .r r?'i`' h Y t i t �+i • . 7r �•' z' f Ii a �t� #�i'qS yt.4 ° �""� _ �'`� >. F w 'P k' i`. _ d:s �� I .:� ?•�� I _., 1 •• � "• ,t �'' � ,,,�e � . � i! ,q ' .. {'3t - . '\. V, .M1 wt ' � 13 .. �• 77 3' � � R n 4t #•� p'�"4}': �f `_ }-'c'i, t oh _.1w:s. •�. -a• �•' � � ��'y .� _ k ,; #�, ��r1� Q.. 4 r �-•n.��������. •h" �* 'w � Tom.• .-:. i � � .v�,L a „• '3 ♦ `f' F © , -' 1 � (/ � � .. F~ •s '� i J v(. i ! fa •; i; •` •' AA 44. 3•yR`s x - )j1 I _ 1a "�' x/� ,1 ~ .� "+r ^ �r �'•-. 5.., .. ' ..` .. 3r- .. + a' , ,' . '1 lit, ter ,L : p�i. ,r �:s-. �§•' •1��.y.y w'T ui �. oz . ><,. ♦ ��_ 1. .: ,r�+l :�� ' 4 , xL �.,, `. .h.,y." Sb i,- Y [ t e'er � �", t.:'�'.: S� _ � �, ' l . a ' 4 1 r' . .ii • � i > . _ �t,�, I err a • rf: ; �+' It« r r yb •r r� " .a, r ,r, '•a. ...a a � �}. - x._ +t •!. -yr�-f .. ;.+. , _ _ n7�,. _il !- .wT',n... i� J'-.�t _ i ��� , ��- .�� �.�xi� �}�wiwi`� �- L •i•. y�.iFL.v:�RiM�,�"�^'!^� i.�'�G..w - � �i rp BUTTE COUNTY BOARD JOUPERVISORS MTES - AUGUST 17, 2004 'Y 0415-011 Continued Public Hearing' Raymond Teesdale Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment.- Appeal - consideration of an appeal of the Development Review Committee's denial of a Tentative IY Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment io divide'd 46.28 acre parcel into four 10 acre lots and'a 6.28 ~' • • ti. -acre rem..a.inder on property hzoned A=5 (Agricultural - 5 acre P.arcels). 'The propertyis• located approximately 1,300 feet n6rth' of Central House Road on the west side` of the Western Pacific T Railroad tracks, near the in of.Central House Road -and Lone Tree Road, Oroville, and identified as APN 028'020-05.4 and 046 (MM [TPM 02-19]) - action 'requested - AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT, CONTINUE THE HEARING TORN UNSPECIFIED DATE. (FROM 3=3-04 [5::01 ]) • (2470) A 0415-011 _ - PUBLIC HEARING RECONVENED AT, 10:56 A.M., AND CONTINUED OPEN TO AN UNSPECIFIED DATE TO ALLOW WORK ON THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TO BE' ' ♦ COMPLETEDf BEFORE THIS ITEM IS CONSIDERED. T' 1, ~r' '•" ._ Imo. • f• � �+ _ •+ -• • tie �-a -...n ^�•:�. _ BUTTE COUNTY MINUTES ; ` PAGE 2 _ AUGUST 17, 2004 ' ./ _ BUTTE,COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , ; 1V11NUTES - MARCH 23, 2004 • PUBLIC HEARINGS AND TIMED ITEMS 0406-009 '. Continu'ed Public Hearing ,LRaymond Teesdale - Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment = Appeal -consideration. 'fan appeal of the Development Review Committee's denial of a Tentative '. 'Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment to divide,a,4618 acre parcel into four 10 acre lots and a 6.28 `'. acre remainder on property zoned A75 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels). The property is located approximately, feet north of Central•House Road on.the west side of the Western Pacific Railroad tracks; near the intersection' of Central House Road and Lone Tree Road, Oroville, and r; identified' as APN 028-020-054 and 046 (MM [TPM 02=19]) : action requested -CONTINUE " PUBLIC HEARING OPEN TO NNE 8, 2004, AT 10:30 A.M. (FROM 9-24-02•[5.06]) (3321) " - PUBLIC `HEARING' RECONVENED AT 10:47 A.M., AND CONTINUED _OPEN. TO AN ti3 UNDETEI&N_ ED. DATE TO ALLOW COMPLETION OF THE GENERAL' PLAN,U_ PDATE. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ._ '� MINUTES • - , y PAGE -1 �, MARCH 23, 2004 , •r r Memorandum Department of Development Services Planning Division TO: Honorable Chair and Supervisors FROM: Mark Michelena; Associate Planner FILE: Teesdale TPM 02-19/APL 03-01 (APN 028-020-054) APPLICANT/.' , APPELLANT: Raymond Teesdale REQUEST: Continue to a date certain (June 15, 2004) of Appeal 03-01 of the Teesdale Tentative Parcel.Map. (TPM 02-19) FOR: Board of Supervisors Hearing on March 23, 2004 STAFF COMMENTS This Tentative Parcel Map (and Lot Line Adjustment) was denied by the Development Review Committee on June 27, 2002 with a unanimous vote. The Committee found that the project was not consistent with the Butte County General Plan, particularly the Conditional Criteria in the Orchard and Field Crop land use designation. The applicant appealed this decision to the Board of Supervisors. The item was set for July 23, 2002 Board of Supervisors agenda. At the meeting the applicant requested the appeal to be continued open until August 27, 2002. At the August 27, 2002 appeal hearing the applicant requested the appeal to be continued open until September 24, 2002. At the September 24,2002 appeal hearing the project was requested by the applicant to continued open until March 23, 2004. The applicant was requesting the continuance in order for the General Plan update to be completed. As of March 3, 2004, the General Plan has not been updated. There is no anticipated completion date for the General Plan update. The applicant is requesting the project to be continued to a date certain (June 15, 2004). ACTION FOR CONSIDERATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors take the following action: I. Continue the Appeal of the Tentative Parcel Map for Raymond Teesdale, Planning Division File TPM 02-,19/APL 03.01, to a date certain (June 15, 2004). ` KAPROJECTSUPATeasdaleWMEMO 3-23-04.dor ■ BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ■ MEMORANDUM■ MARCH 23, 2004 ■ PAGE I ■ . r ` 4 BUTTE COUNTY BOARD of SUPERVISORS Applicant: Raymond Teasdale Owner: Same TPM 02-19 Hearing Date: August 27, 2002 Existing Zone: A-5 (Agricultural, 5 acre minimum) N Supervisorial Request: Appeal of a Denial by the Development Review Committee to allow a Tentative Parcel Map to create District # 1 I two parcels of 75+/- acres and 10+/- acres from a 85 acre parcel. I Assessor Parcel No: 028-020-046 & 0541 File: APL 03-01 1 ' _� __ R j• `328.0'i r } %• t y z t r f z�•rz� F 028-020-M6 �► Project Location `X t b t AFS ' v • ,s., 028-020-054 2$0:2! .. i v , t , • %1 %S j z "�:. � ISS n - :° House Rd Central A-5 ' Y a ,� aCentraldouseRd _, r AR } M'dd ® HonWt Rd p f 7—t HOMA L.QR T Midd t r s . cr.• t No d .r 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 Feet BUTTE COUNTY BOARD of SUPERVISORS Applicant: Raymond Teasdale Owner: Same TPM 02-19 Hearing Date: August 27, 2002 Existing Zone: A-5 (Agricultural, 5 acre minimum) N Supervisorial Request: Appeal of a Denial by the Development Review Committee to allow a Tentative Parcel Map to create District # 1 I two parcels of 75+/- acres and 10+/- acres from a 85 acre parcel. I Assessor Parcel No: 028-020-046 & 0541 File: APL 03-01 1 BUTTE -COUNTY CLW OF THE BOARD USE ONLY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING DATE: AGENDA TRANSMITTAL AGENDA ITEM: Raymond Teasdale, Appeal of a denied Tentative Parcel, APL 03-01/TPM 02 - AGENDA TITLE: 19 DDS, DATE: 8/9/02 MEETING DATE 8/27/02 DEPARTMENT: Planning REQUESTED: REGULAR x CONSENT Craig PHONE: 7603, CONTACT: Sanders DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Raymond Teasdale, An appeal of Development Review Committee denial of an application for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 46.3 -acre parcel into four parcels of 10 + acres and 6.28 acre remainder. The property is zoned A-5 (Agricultural — 5 acre parcels) and is located on the west side of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks approximately 1,200 feet north of Central House Road, Northwest of Honcut. APN 028-020-054 & 046 (CBS) (APL 03-01/TPM 02-19) ACTION REQUESTED: See Attached AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTALS REQUIRE THE ORIGINAL (1) IN A FORMAT THAT CAN BE REPRODUCED BY STANDARD OFFICE EQUIPMENT ATTACH EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM AND OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION AS NECESSARY Budgetary Impact: Yes No X CAO OFFICE USE ONLY If yes, complete, Budgetary Impact Worksheet on back Budget Transfer Requested: Yes No x Administrative Office Review If yes, complete Budget Transfer Request Worksheet on back. Administrative Office Staff Contact (Deadline is°one business day prior to normal agenda deadline.) 4/5/s Vote Required: Yes: _ No: Will Proposal Require an Agreement: Yes No x Auditor -Controller's Number (if Date Received by Clerk of the Board: required): County Counsel's Approval: Yes No x Will Proposal Require Additional Personnel: Yes No x _ Number of Permanent: Temp Extra Help Previous Board Action Date: 7/9/02 Additional Information Attached: Yes x No Describe: memo Rev. 06/02 SHOAL INSTRUCTIONS TO CAW Number of originals required to be returned to Department: "*Please Note"* Department is responsible for returning contract to contractor. Clerk of the Board returns completed Auditor's copy ONLY. Requested Board Action: Ordinance Required _ Resolution Required _ Minute Order Required For Information Only BUDGETARY IMPACT WORKSHEET Current Year Estimated Cost/Funding Source Source of Additional Funds Requested Estimated Cost $ Contingencies $ (Fund Name: (Fund Number: Amount Budgeted $ Unanticipated Revenue $ (Budget Unit Number: ) (Source: (Fund Name: ) (Rev. Code: (Fund Number: )' Other Transfer(s) 1. Complete worksheet below 2. Deadline is one business day prior, To normal agenda deadline Additional Requested $ Total Source of Funds $ Annualized cost $ if also planned for next year. Budget Transfer Authorized By Administrative Office Board Action Required for B -Transfer? Yes Authorized Signature Transfer Request: AMOUNT Date BUDGET TRANSFER REQUEST WORKSHEET Transfer - $ (No Cents) Transfer $ (No Cents) Transfer $ (No Cents) Transfer $ (No Cents) LINE ITEM From From r ` From From To To To To ACTION FOR CONSIDERATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors take the following actions: Find that the A-5 zone and the proposed project is not consistent with the Butte County General Plan based on the following: A. The A-5 zoning designation was adopted on October 7, 1975, prior to the adoption of the Butte County General Plan in 1979. B. The 1979 General Plan Land Use Element designates the property as "Orchard and Field Crops." Consistent zoning designations with this land use category are A-20, A-40, and A-160. The A-5 and A-10 zones may be found consistent with this land use designation when three conditional criteria are applicable to the project site and area. These criteria are: 1. The predominant existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres. Within a 1 -mile radius of the parcel there are 58 parcels ranging is size from 0.4 to 333 acres. The average parcel size is approximately 72 acres. The Median parcel size is 38 acres. Of the 58 parcels, 32 parcels (55%) are over 20 acres in size. The predominant parcel size is not in the 5- to 10 -acre range. 2. The area is adjacent to or in the vicinity of urban boundaries. The project site is approximately 7.5 miles of driving distance from both Palermo and Gridley. This project, therefore, is not considered to be in the vicinity of urban boundaries. 3. The present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. The proposed 10 -acre parcels will not be agriculturally viable. The soils on-site are not prime soils and are not suitable for intense high yield farming that would be required to make a 10 -acre parcel viable. II. Deny the appeal for Tentative Subdivision Map 02-19, for Raymond Teasdale. K:\PROJECTS\TPM\Teasdale\AGENDA2. REP.doc 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Agenda Report 0 Page 1 IN TABLE OF CONTENTS Board Agenda Transmittal Form' Board Agenda Report Attachment A: General Plan/Zoning Map Attachment B: Parcel sizes within 1 -mile Attachment C: Planning commission Agenda Report/Minutes June 27, 2002 Attachment D: Initial Study Attachment E: Site Plan PAGE 1 2 3 19' BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA REPORT —August 27, 2002 Applicant: Raymond Teasdale Location: On the west side of the Union File #: APL03-01/TPM 02-19 Pacific Railroad tracks approximately 1,200 feet Request: An appeal of Development north of Central House Road, Review Committee denial of Northwest of Honcut an application for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 46.3- Parcel Size: 46.3 acres acre parcel into four parcels of 10 + acres and 6.28 acre Supervisor District: 1 remainder. Attachments: G.P.: Orchard and Field Crops A: General Plan/Zoning Map B: Parcels sizes within 1 -mile Zoning: Agricultural 5 -acre minimum C: Planning Commission Agenda parcel size (A-5) Report/Minutes D: Initial Study APN: 028-020-054 & 046 E Site Plan Planner: Craig Sanders STAFF COMMENT: On June 27, 2002, this project was heard by the Development Review Committee. The Committee considered testimony as well as staff's recommendation and denied the project, finding it inconsistent with the Butte County General Plan. The main focus of the Commissions findings was the project consistency with the Conditional Criteria in the Orchard and Field Crops land use designation. The important question is whether or not the A-5 zoning district is consistent with the Orchard and Field Corp designation in this area. The Orchard and Field Crops designation for this site was adopted as part of the 1979 County -wide General Plan revision. The A-5 zoning adopted in October of 1975, predates the General Plan. The A-5 zoning for this area has not been reviewed for consistency with the General Plan policies. The purpose of the Orchard and Field Crops Land Use designation is for the cultivation, harvest, storage, processing, sale and distribution of all plant crops, especially annual food crops. Secondary uses consistent with this designation include animal husbandry, resource extraction, hunting, airports, and residential uses. The zoning districts that are consistent with the Orchard and Field Crops designation are Agriculture -20, -40, and -160 acre minimums. The Agriculture 5 -acre minimum zone is conditionally consistent provided the following three conditions exist: 1) The predominant existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres; 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Agenda Report ■ Page 1 0 2) The area is adjacent to or in the vicinity of urban boundaries; and 3) The present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. Based on these conditional criteria, the present A-5 zoning district in this particular location doesn't appear to be consistent with the General Plan because the conditional criteria do not appear to be evident. The parcel size in the area appears to be predominantly over 20 acres. An analysis of the properties within 1 mile of the subject site reveals that there are 58 parcels averaging approximately 72 acres in size. The median parcel size is 38 acres; 36 of the 58 parcels are greater than 20 acres in size. The site is not adjacent to or in the general vicinity of any urban area. Palermo, the nearest area with urban densities is approximately 6 miles away direct distance and approximately 7.5 miles away driving distance. The agricultural production status of the site would be impaired with the development of 4 residences. Also significant is the typically poor soil in the area that is not conducive to small scale, intensive agriculture. At 10 acres, the proposed parcel sizes will not generally be economically viable for commercial agricultural production. The proposed parcels will, in essence, become residential ranchettes. The 280 -acre property immediately adjacent to the west has just recently been planted in olives. This planting was part of a larger farm consisting of approximately 680 acres. Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act explicitly states that a land division cannot be approved unless the legislative body can find that the project is consistent with the General Plan. Based on this code section, Staff made the recommendation to deny the project and the Development Review Committee agreed. This application is a two -fold project, the tentative parcel map and a lot line adjustment with the property to the north to remedy an encroachment over the property line. The Development Review Committee approved the lot line adjustment portion of the application subject to conditions and no further action is required at this time CEQA ISSUES: If the project is denied, no CEQA findings need to be made. However, if the Board of Supervisors finds that the project does meet the policies of the General Plan and is consistent, there are three mitigation measures in the attached Initial Study that should be included as conditions of the project. If the Board decides to approve the project, a set of findings and conditions are attached as Exhibit «B ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: An Initial Study has been prepared for this project by County staff. Staff has determined, based on a review of the Initial Study, that a significant impact exists with land use issues and policies and a Negative Declaration is not appropriate unless the project can be found consistent with these land use policies. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Agenda Report 0 Page 2 ■ ACTION FOR CONSIDERATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors take the following actions: Find that the A-5 zone and the proposed project is not consistent with the Butte County General Plan based on the following: A. The A-5 zoning designation was adopted on October 7, 1975, prior to the adoption of the Butte County General Plan in 1979. B. The 1979 General Plan Land Use Element designates the property as "Orchard and Field Crops." Consistent zoning designations with this land use category are A-20, A-40, and A-160. The A-5 and A-10 zones may be found consistent with this land use designation when three conditional criteria are applicable to the project site and area. These criteria are: 1. The predominant existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres. Within a 1 -mile radius of the parcel there are 58 parcels ranging is size from 0.4 to 333 acres. The average parcel size is approximately 72 acres. The Median parcel size is 38 acres. Of the 58 parcels, 32 parcels (55°yo) are over 20 acres in . size. The predominant parcel size is not in the 5- to 10 -acre range. 2. The area is adjacent to or in the vicinity of urban boundaries. The project site is approximately 7.5 miles of driving distance from both Palermo and Gridley. This project, therefore, is not considered to be in the vicinity of urban boundaries. 3. The present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. The proposed I0 -acre parcels will not be agriculturally viable. The soils on-site are not prime soils and are not suitable for intense high yield farming that would be required to make a 10 -acre parcel viable. Il. Deny the appeal for Tentative Subdivision Map.02-19, for Raymond Teasdale. K:\PROJECTS\TPM\Teasdale\board reportldoc 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Agenda Report 0 Page 3 0 Sur�oundin�Parcfl �s�us._ �s�� i 762� r 11.1 tx 328.8: 164 62:7T. 78'2 135:4 40.4$3. I �A 1 :40:2 '40.2I I `, 10x2 183:964 1 12.97 10:5— 72 -- 13 39 : tr " r11 48 22 i — — . , :: ,' 970•; "` •� 11:974' 1 i S' .. .12 s' 66:4 33 .3 187 241;5 : 142.9 1 — x126.734: ; I Sur�oundin�Parcfl �s�us._ �s�� • BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT — June 27, 2002 Applicant: Raymond Teasdale File #: TPM 02-19 Request: This is an application for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 46.3 -acre parcel into four parcels of 10 + acres and 6.28 acre remainder. A lot Line Adjustment is also being requested to remedy a structure that was constructed over a property line . G.P.: o Orchard and Field Crops Zoning: Agricultural 5 -acre minimum parcel size (A-5) APN: 028-020-054 & 046 STAFF COMMENT: Planner: Craig Sanders Location: On the west side of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks approximately 1,200 feet north of Central House Road, Northwest of Honcut Parcel Size: 46.3 acres Supervisor District: 1 Attachments: A: Parcels sizes within 1 -mile B: General Plan/Zoning Map C: Initial Study D: Site Plan The project is consistent with the A-5 zoning district, but the A-5 zone does not appear to be consistent with the policies of the General Plan designation of Orchard and Fiend Crops. The zoning predates the General Plan designation and, to date, no findings of consistency have been made in this location. Staff recommends denial of the tentative parcel map subject to the findings included in this report. Staff recommends approval of the Lot Line Adjustment subject to the conditions in Exhibit "A." PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: This subject.property is located in a rural agricultural area of the County. Adjacent land uses include project is a Tentative Parcel Map to divide an existing 46.3 -acre parcel into four parcels of 10+ acres and a 6.28 -acre remainder. The project also involves a minor lot line adjustment with the parcel to the north to remedy an encroachment over the current property line. All proposed parcels are undeveloped. The remainder parcel has a single family residence on it. Sewage disposal for the future dwellings on the site would be handled by on-site septic systems and domestic water obtained from individual on-site wells. All parcels would have access to Central House Road via a 60 -foot wide private road easement. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Agenda Report 0 Page 1 0 The property is relatively level with small hummocks. It appears to have been farmed with seasonal row crops in the past. Elevations range from 95 feet to 110 feet above sea level. The project site has an average slope of less than 5%. Vegetation consists of open grass lands with a few scattered oaks. Surrounding parcels range in size from 6 to 288 acres, with the average being approximately 67 acres. The site is not within a 100 -year flood zone or within an airport overflight zone. ANALYSIS: The project would result in the creation of four parcels and a remainder. Each of the proposed parcels would be vacant and would have the potential to be developed with a single family residence, as well as continue to have general agricultural uses. Based on the responses received from various County agencies, it appears that the site is physically suited to handle the potential development. Adequate water is available and the soils on site should be able to accommodate a septic system for residential purposes. The Orchard and Field Crops designation for this site was adopted as part of the 1979 County -wide General Plan revision. The A-5 zoning, however, predates the General Plan, being adopted, in October of 6975. The A-5 zoning for this area has not .been reviewed for consistency with the General Plan policies. The Orchard and Field Crops Land Use designation is primarily for the cultivation, harvest, storage, processing, sale and distribution of all plant crops, especially annual food crops, Secondary uses consistent with this designation include animal husbandry, resource extraction, hunting, airports, and residential uses. The zoning districts that are consistent with the Orchard and Field Crops designation are Agriculture -20, -40, and -160 acre minimums. The Agriculture 5 -acre minimum zone is conditionally`consistent provided the following three conditions exist: 1) The predominant existing parcel sizes'range from 5 to 10 acres; 2) The area is adjacent to or in the vicinity of urban. boundaries; and 3) The present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. Based upon these conditional criteria, the present A-5 zoning district in this particular location doesn't appear to be consistent with the General Plan because the conditional criteria do not appear to be evident. The predominate parcel size in the area appears to be over 20 acres. An analysis of the properties within '1 mile of the subject site reveals that there are 58 parcels averaging approximately 72 acres in size. The median parcel size is 38 acres; 36 of the 58 parcels are greater than 20 acres in size. The site is not adjacent to or in the general vicinity of any urban area. Palermo, the nearest area with urban densities is approximately 6 miles away direct distance and' approximately 7.5 miles away driving distance. The agricultural production status of the site would be impaired with the development of 4 residences. Also significant is the typically poor soil in the area that is not conducive to small scale, intensive agriculture. At 10 acres, the proposed parcel sizes will not generally be economically viable for commercial agricultural production. The proposed parcels will, in essence, become residential ranchettes. The 280 -acre property immediately adjacent ■ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Agenda Report 0 Page 2 0 11 to the west has just recently been planted in olives. This planting was part of a larger farm consisting of approximately 680 acres. Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act explicitly states that a land division cannot be approved unless the legislative body can find that the project is consistent with the General Plan. Based on this code section, it is recommended that the project be denied. CEQA ISSUES: If the project is denied, no CEQA findings need to be made. However, if the Development Review Committee finds that the project does meet the policies of the General Plan and is consistent, there are three mitigation measures in the attached Initial Study that should be included as conditions of the project. If the Development Review Committee decides to approve the project, a set of findings and conditions are attached as Exhibit "B." ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: An Initial Study has been prepared for this project by County staff. Staff has determined, based on a review of the Initial Study, that a significant impact exists with land use issues and policies and a Negative Declaration is not appropriate unless the project can be found consistent with these land use policies. ACTION FOR CONSIDERATION: Staff recommends that the Development Review Committee take the following actions: I. Find that the A-5 zone and the proposed project is not consistent with the Butte County General Plan based on the following: A. The A-5 zoning designation was adopted on October 7, 1975, prior to the adoption of the Butte County General Plan in 1979. B. The 1979 General Plan Land Use Element designates the property as "Orchard and Field Crops." Consistent zoning designations with this land use category are A-20, A-40, and A-160. The A-5 and A-10 zones may be found consistent with this land use designation when three conditional criteria are applicable to the project site and area. These criteria are: The predominant existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres. Within a 1 -mile radius of the parcel there are 58 parcels ranging is size from0.4 to 333 acres. The average parcel size is. approximately 72 acres. The Median parcel size is 38 acres. Of the 58 parcels, 32 parcels are over 20 acres in size. The predominant parcel size is not in the 5- to 10 -acre range. 2. The area is adjacent to or in the vicinity of urban boundaries. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Agenda Report 0 Page 3 ■ The project site is approximately 7.5 miles of driving distance from both Palermo and Gridley. This is not considered to be in the vicinity of urban boundaries. 3. The present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. The proposed 10 -acre parcels will not be agriculturally viable. The soils on site are not prime soils and are not suitable for intense high -yield farming. II. Deny the Tentative Subdivision Map 02-19, for Raymond Teasdale. III. Approve the Lot Line adjustment between APN 028-020-054 and 028-020-046 subject to the conditions in exhibit "A." B 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Agenda Report 0 Page 4 0 If the Development Review Committee can find that the project is consistent with the General Plan, the following findings would be appropriate: I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study identified significant environmental effects and included mitigation measures that would mitigate such effects below significant levels; a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. B. The Development Review Committee has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. C. On the basis of the whole record before the Development Review Committee, including the Initial Study and any comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the Tentative Parcel Map for Raymond Teasdale, Planning Division File No. TPM 02-19, will have a significant effect on the environment. D. ' The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. II. The design of the proposed project improvements may cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5. is required. III. Approve Tentative Parcel Map/Lot Line Adjustment 02-19, for Raymond Teasdale, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit "B" and the following findings: A. The proposed map is consistent with the Butte County General Plan Goals and Policies, particularly Land Use Element Polices: 3.2.a Residential densities shall be correlated to soil, slope and other natural site characteristics. 3.2.b. Correlate residential densities to availability of water and sewage disposal and proximity -to other public facilities. 3.2.c. Relate residential densities to intensity and compatibility of adjacent uses. 3.2.d. Balance residential densities with traffic -carrying capacities of existing and proposed circulation plans. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services 1i Agenda Report 0 Page 5 0 B. The project meets the conditional site designation criteria for 5 -acre zoning in the 1979 General Plan Land Use Element, "Orchard and Field Crops " designation. The project meets the three following criteria: 1. The predominant existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres; 2. The area is adjacent to or in the vicinity of urban boundaries; and 3. The present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. C. The design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with County standards and policies provided all conditions of project approval are complied with. D. The project is physically suitable for the use and density of the proposed development because of the proposed parcel sizes provide adequate soils for leachfields, well locations and building sites that will not result in significant physical changes to the property. 0 E. The design and improvements of the project will not cause public health or safety problems -due to the large parcel sizes, and because the project site does not contain. any physical characteristics that could cause health or safety concerns with the provided mitigation. F. The design and improvements of the project will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision provided the attached conditions are met. G. Approval of this project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare provided the required conditions and mitigation measures are complied with. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Agenda Report 0 Page 6 0 EXHIBIT A Lot Line Adjustment for Raymond Teasdale on APN 028-020-054 and 046, TPM 02-19: An application for a Lot Line Adjustment between two parcels to move a parcel line to remedy a situation where a structure has been constructed over a,property line. This project is located in Supervisorial District 1. I. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. New lot of parcel lines shall comply with setback requirements of the applicable zoning and building ordinances. 2. Deeds and plats (if required) shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works, Land Development Division for checking and approval prior to recordation and shall contain the notes specified below. 3. Provide documentation from a title company of the applicant's choice verifying any deed of trust affected has been re -conveyed of modified to reflect the lot line adjustment and to prevent the creation of any additional lot or parcel. 4. Prior to recordation of deeds; provide documentation verifying payment of taxes as required by Subsection (b) of Section 20-95 of the Butte County Code and as specified in Article 8 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code, commencing with section 66492. N ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Agenda Report ■ Page 7 ■ 9 EXHIBIT B Tentative Parcel Map/Lot Line Adjustment for Raymond Teasdale on APN 028-020-054 and 046, TPM 02-19: An application for a Tentative Parcel Map/Lot Line Adjustment to divide an 46.3 -acre parcel into four parcels of 10 acres and a 6.28 acre remainder. This project is located in Supervisorial District 1. I. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Planning Division Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems are to be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. C. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation." (Mitigation Measure) Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown on grading and building plans. Timing: Condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction periods. Monitoring: The Department shall ensure that measures are indicated on the plans. Public Works Grading and Building inspectors shall spot check; Grading and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Pollution Control District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. 2. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the final map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Structures (excepting wells), dumping, fill material, vegetation removal and/or excavation other than approved stream crossing for roads/driveways shall not be allowed within the 50 -foot No Disturbance Setback as depicted. Limited vegetation removal necessary for fire hazard reduction is permissible within the No Disturbance Setback, however, all living and thriving native trees shall be ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Agenda Report ■ Page 8 ■ 10 retained and all vegetation removal shall be approved by the Department of Fish and Game prior to removal." The 50 -foot "No Disturbance Setback" shall be measured from the top of the bank along the depicted drainage courses." This setback shall be clearly delineated on the final map. Plan Requirements: The required note and graphic depiction of the setback shall be included on the Final Map. The Department of Development Services shall ensure that the note is placed on the Final Map. Timing: At the time of building plan checking, building and site plans would be checked for compliance with the condition. Monitoring: The Building Division and the Planning Division would check building and site plans for compliance prior to issuance of a building permit. Building. inspectors.would ensure compliance by conducting an on-site inspection prior to the final inspection. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized community water system, with hydrants. that meet Fire Department specifications, serves the parcels." Plan Requirements: The note shall be placed on the Final Map. Timing: Interior fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures at the time of building construction. Monitoring: Building Division plan checkers shall ensure that the building plans for residential structures include interior fire sprinkler systems. Building inspectors shall ensure all residential structures have a functioning interior fire sprinkler system prior to the final inspection, by conducting an on-site inspection. 4. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "A development impact fee for Sheriffs facilities shall be paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of building permits. The fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permit." 5. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "A development impact fee for school ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Agenda Report ■ Page 9 ■ I I facilities shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. The fee amount would be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permits." Land Development Division 6. Prior to, or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, provide. a fully executed road maintenance agreement on the County approved form. 7. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the Parcel Map. Street names shall be approved by the County Address Coordinator prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map. 8. ; Pay the recording fees then in effect for recording the Parcel Maps and related documents. 9. Provide a cul-de-sac, designed and constructed to county standards as specified in the County Improvement Standards. The Parcel Map shall show the cul-de-sac. 10." Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map, prove, to the satisfaction of the Director ° of Public Works, that there is approved access conforming to County standards to each parcel from a publicly maintained road. 11. All access rights shall be reserved by deed, per County Ordinance. 12. The developer shall provide all necessary traffic safety signs including stop signs. A note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet of the Parcel Map stating: "No public entity shall be responsible for the maintenance of the stop sign. In accordance with Civil Code Section 845, maintenance of the road, including the stop sign shall be shared by those properties with a legal interest in the private right-of-way or easement." 13: rovide two-waytra ers ble access to eacpparcel from a County maintained road or from a state highway. Improve parcel frontage and access road to RS -8 LD- II and access road to the parcel being divided to RS -8 LD -I. 14. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map, obtain an encroachment permit and construct a standard road approach, in accordance with County Improvement Standards. Adequate sight distance at the intersection of access road and Central House Road shall be provided. 15. Show on the additional map sheet of the Parcel Map a 50 -foot. building setback from the centerline of the access road. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Agenda Report ■ Page 10 ■ 12 16. Show all easements of record on the Parcel Map. 17. Prior, to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, pay in full any and all delinquent, current and estimated taxes.and assessments as specified in Article 8, of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7, of the California Government Code commencing with Section 66492. 18. New lot of parcel lines shall comply with setback requirements of the applicable zoning and building ordinances. 19. Deeds and plats (if required) shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works, Land Development Division for checking and approval prior to recordation and shall contain'the notes specified below. 20. Provide documentation from a title company of the applicant's choice verifying any deed of trust affected has been re -conveyed of modified to reflect the lot line adjustment and to prevent the creation of any additional lot or parcel. 21. ° Prior to recordation of deeds, provide documentation verifying payment of taxes as required by Subsection (b) of Section 20-95 of the Butte County Code and as specified in Article 8 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code, commencing with section 66492.e Fire Department 22. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 prior to recordation of the Final Map. 23. In lieu of a pressurized water system or water storage tank, payment of $200.00 per created parcel into the Battalion 3 water tender fund, is required prior to the recordation of the Final Map. 24. Provide and all-weather access at least 10 feet wide with a vertical clearance of 15 feet that will accommodate a 40,000 pound fire apparatus. 4 Environmental Health Conditions 25. Identify on the additional map sheet a 50' leachfield setback from the drainageway on parcels 1 and 4. ■ Butte County Department. of Development Services ■ Agenda Report ■ Page 11 ■ 13 26. Identify on the additional map sheet a 100' leachfield setback from the highwater line of the creek on lots 1, 2, 3, and 4. 27. Identify�on the additional map sheet usable sewage disposal area proven to meet the requirements of County Improvement Standards, Appendix 7. Combine with adjacent parcels any parcel not proven to contain the usable area. 28. Identify on the additional map sheet that no water well may be located within 100' of the usable sewage disposal area on parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4. County Counsel 29. If this entire matter or any finding, action or condition of this matter is appealed to the Board of Supervisors, the applicant, or any other subdivider other than the applicant, agrees to indemnify the County of Butte from liability or loss related to the approval of this project and agrees to sign an indemnification agreement in a form approved by County Counsel before the Board's appeal hearing. If the application is not appealed, this condition is deemed satisfied. II. NOTATION A. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. K:\PROJECTS\TPM\Teasdale\AGENDA2. REP.doc ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Agenda Report ■ Page 12 ■ 14 I I I I I III �� ' � ' • • III .�y _ ■ �S%� r �t S'W�{ •C' z��! +�,'>f'. d,�`M1�•'G'�"� � Y. �i P�' to i'� ,� CMMI MW ! +n .a •sa-AGI i,� 5�, �'+ .� ,� g,2., -r F ' mw? 3 , * z• �` F ,F -3A ¢. x,y3 k• FI'7 ' Y�F ".� i !mobf� y rt5 -xpf�C3t�.vt ����'` �W m rad y �- a✓u.. � sre��y .' !'".. � • �� ��• = �,. ■ _ {!-_ �SSZ E a��.-:•. -c� 'eq . a x. � � as tpw, " • � �� �i +2pt !�' � e : F � t ter. �� � • � /1 1 11 11 1'1 :1'1 11 � 1'1 '1'1 .11 :[1'1 11./ /'1 1.1 /-1 •: 1'1 1 1'1 11 1'1 •: 1.1 /'1 COUNTY DEVELOPMENTREVIEW COMMTTEE Applicant: Raymond Teasdale 1 1 11 i 01 1 •• 1 1, 1 1761C.IL111 ,) Itito u, Request:Tentative•1 11 •11.1•Lot LineAdjustment / 11 •.acreparcel 11 11 1 wre lotas remainder • of • 028-0204)46 1 1 I Raymond Teasdale, Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 -acre lots and a 6.28 acre remainder on property zoned A-5 (Agricultural — 5 acre parcels). The property. is located approximately 1,300 feet north of Central House Road on the west side of the Western Pacific. Railroad Tracts, near the intersection of Central House Road and Lone Tree Road, Oroville. APN 028-0207054 and 046 (CS) (TPM 02-19) Mr. Sanders gave a brief summary of the project. Chairman Edell requested that the Lot Line Adjustment deed note be added to Exhibit A. He added "Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map" to Condition 13 and add to Condition 21 "add the standard Lot Line Adjustment deed note". He said that he would talk about Condition, 29 if the action was to approve the Parcel Map. Mr. Meleka noted that staff could not make the findings for each of the required General Plan criteria. Mr. Sanders said that with respects to being near urban boundaries, the site is approximately 6 miles away from Palermo and the same distance to Gridley. He said that the site is closer to Honcut which lacks infrastructures. He commented that the site has been dry farmed in to past and the economics for a 10 -acre parcel is not feasible and the agricultural potential would be impaired which could consequently impair existing adjoining agricultural uses. The hearing was opened to the public. Richard Teasdale said that he has lived in the subject area for 55 years and farms 80 % of the property. He discussed the drainage in the area. He said that he was told he was entitled to four parcels and a remainder and asked that his map be approved. Chairman Edell commented that he did not see an easement on the map for Mathews. Mr. Teasdale stated that he would give an easement to Mr. Mathews if this is approved. Chairman Edell said that the easement can not encumber the house, well, or leachfield. The hearing was closed. It was moved by Mr. Leland, seconded by Mr. Meleka, and unanimously carried to deny the Tentative Parcel Map for Raymond Teasdale and approve the Lot Line Adjustment added the "deed note" to the conditions in Exhibit A. Find that the A-5 zone and the proposed project is not consistent with the Butte County General Plan based on the following: A. The A-5 zoning designation was adopted on October 7, 1975, prior to the adoption of the Butte County General Plan in 1979. ■ BC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES n JUNE 27, 2002 ■ PAGE 8 ■ B. The 1979.General Plan Land Use Element designates the property as "Orchard and Field Crops." Consistent zoning designations with this land use category are A-20, A-40, and A-160. The A-5 and A-10 zones may be found consistent with this land use designation when three conditional criteria are applicable to the project site and area. These criteria'are: 1. The predominant existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres. Within a 1 -mile radius of the parcel there are S8 parcels ranging is size from0.4 to 333 acres. The average parcel size is approximately 72 acres. The Median parcel size is 38 acres. Of the 58 parcels, 32 parcels are over 20 acres in size.. The predominant parcel size is not in the 5- to 10 -acre range. 2. The area is adjacent to or in the vicinity of urban boundaries. The project site is approximately 7.5 miles of driving distance from both Palermo and Gridley. This is not considered to be in the vicinity of urban boundaries. 3. The present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. The proposed 107acre parcels will not be agriculturally viable. The soils on site are not prime soils and are not suitable for intense high yield farming. II. Den)Pthe Tentative Subdivision Map 02-19, for Raymond Teasdale: III. Approve the Lot Line adjustment between APN 028-020-054 and 028-020-046 subject to the conditions in exhibit "A." EXHIBIT A Lot Line Adjustment for Raymond Teasdale on APN 028-020-054 and 046, TPM 02-19: An application for a Lot Line Adjustment between -two parcels to move a parcel line to remedy a situation where a structure has been constructed over a property line. This project is located in Supervisorial District 1. I. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: New lot of parcel lines shall comply with setback requirements of the applicable zoning and building ordinances. 2. Deeds and plats'(if required) shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works, Land Development Division for checking and approval prior to recordation and shall contain the notes specified below. Provide documentation from a title company of the applicant's choice verifying any deed of trust affected has been re -conveyed of modified to reflect the lot line adjustment and to prevent the creation of any additional lot or parcel. ■ BC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES ■ JUNE 27, 2002 ■ PAGE 9 ■ 4. Prior to recordation of deeds, provide documentation verifying payment of takes as required by Subsection (b) of Section 20-95 of the Butte County Code and as specified in Article 8 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code, commencing with section 66492. Deed Note . (To be placed on any deed to effect lot line adjustment) The purpose of this deed is to effect a lot line adjustment as approved by the Butte County Director of Public Works on The above described lands are to be combined with and become a part of those lands as described in the deed to as filed for record in Butte County Official Records at Serial Number Book Page No additional lots or parcels are created hereby. The scope of review of said lot line adjustment was limited as specified in Government Code Section 66412(d), and approval of it does not constitute assurance that future applications for building permits or other land use entitlements on the modified lots or parcels will be approved by the- County of Butte. Plat Note (To be placed on any required Plat) This plat doet not constitute a legal description of the lots or parcels depicted and does not show all easements of record on or affecting said lots or parcels. There is a 10 -day appeal period on all decisions with the Clerk of the Board. ■ BC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES ■ JUNE 27, 2002 ■ PAGE 10 ■ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT BUTTE COUNTY INITIAL STUDY AND PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TPM 02-19 (Teasdale) 19 Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY FOR TPM 02-19 (Teasdale) 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: Raymond Teasdale B. Engineer: Ron Graves C. Staff Contact: Craig Sanders D. Proiect Name: N/A E. Project Location:. Located approximately 1,300 feet north of Central House Road, abutting the Union Pacific Railroad tracks which run along the east property boundary, northwest of Honcut F. Type of Application(s): Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment G. Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 028-020-054 and 046 H. Proiect Site Size: 47 acres I. Current Zoning: A-5 (Agricultural, 5 -acre minimum parcel size) J. General Plan Designation: Orchard and Field Crops K. Environmental Setting: The site is undeveloped and consists of numerous oaks, some brush, and a large cleared open area consisting of grasses. Elevations range from 95 feet to 110 feet above sea level. The project site has an average slope of less than 5%. Vegetation consists of open grass lands with a few scattered oaks. Surrounding parcels range in size from 10 to 191 acres, with the average being approximately 67 acres. The site is not within a 100 -year flood zone or within an airport overflight zone. L. Surrounding Land Uses: Dwellings at rural densities, small olive orchards, and limited livestock grazing. M. Project Description: This is an application for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 47 -acre parcel into four parcels and a remainder of 6.28 acres. The project also involves a minor lot line adjustment with the parcel to the north to remedy a encroachment over the current property line. All proposed parcels are undeveloped. The remainder parcel has a single family residence on it. Sewage disposal for the future dwellings on the site would be handled by on-site septic systems and domestic water obtained from individual on-site wells. All parcels would have access to Centfal House Road via a 60 -foot wide private road easement. . N. Public Agency Approvals: Butte County Environmental Health Department, Butte County Public Works Department, and Butte County Fire Department. 2.0 DETERMINATION [ ] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT 'have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. is Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page I ■ • Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 [ ] I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [X] I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [ ] I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed pon the proposed project, nothing further is required. !o Z Prepared by: C g Sanders, Senior Planner Date Reviewed by: M. A. Meleka, Principal Planner Date 8 3.0 POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS CHECKLIST SETTING A. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [ ] 4.1 Aesthetics [ ] 4.2 Agriculture Resources [X] 4.3 Air Quality [X] 4.4 Biological Resources [ ] 4.5 Cultural Resources [ ] 4.6 Geologic Processes [ ] 4.7 Hazards/Hazardous Material [ ] 4.8 Hydrology/Water Quality [X] 4.9 Land Use [ ] 4.10 Mineral Resources [ ] 4.11 Noise [ ] 4.12 Housing [X] 4.13 Public Services [ ] 4.14 Recreation [ ] 4.15 Transportation/Traffic [ ] 4.16 Utilities/Service Systems [X] 4.17 Mandatory Findings of Significance B. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards, (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a project -specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 2 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is, made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) "Reviewed Under Previous Document." Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) . Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information -Sources:. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 4.1 AESTHETICIVISUAL RESOURCES: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 3 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings X within a state scenic highway? C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or X quality of the site and its surroundings? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 3 ■ • Project Name: Raymond Teasdalentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Would the Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact lander Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated . d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X X Impact Discussion: The project would result in the creation of four new parcels that could be developed with a single family dwelling unit. With the existing rural residential uses found in the project area, no substantial conflicts with the established character or functioning of the surrounding community is anticipated. Future dwellings on the site may have outside lighting for safety and security purposes. Street lighting is not proposed nor required as a part of the project. The relatively large size of the parcels would help attenuate light and glare contributed from development of the project site. The project would not create any significant sources of new light or glare. The project site is not located on a State or County scenic highway (Butte County Scenic Highway Map). This project would not affect a scenic.vista nor would it have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.2 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Would the Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact , with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and X Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract? X c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion X of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Impact Discussion: The A-5 zoning of the site allows most types of agricultural uses as a primary use; residential uses are also a permitted use. The General Plan land use designation of Orchard and Field Crops and agriculture is listed as a primary use and residential uses are listed as Secondary Uses. The site has been farmed with annual row crops. Adjoining agricultural uses include olive orchards and other row crops. It is anticipated that approximately 0.75 acre of each created parcel will be devoted to future residential use, leaving a little over 9 acres for continued agricultural operation. The area for potential cultivation would be under four separate ownerships making economically viable agriculture infeasible. However, the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner's office has reviewed the project and did not have any concerns regarding the division. Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 4 ■ 3 Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 The entire site has soils with a Soil Classification Service Classification of IV. Class IV soil is not considered prime soil and it has some limitations but is generally adequate for agricultural uses (Butte County Master Environmental Assessment, Table LU -4). There is no California Land Conservation Agreement ("Williamson Act") contract affecting this property or any of the immediate surrounding parcels. The project is not subject to the provisions of the Agricultural Element of the Butte County General Plan. Agricultural uses, including grazing, would be possible on the proposed parcels. No significant impact is anticipated to agricultural resources as a result of this project. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.3 AIR QUALITY: Impact Discussion: Both the California Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency have established air pollution standards in an effort to protect human health and welfare. Geographic areas are designated attainment if these standards are met and nonattainment if they are not met. In addition, each agency has several levels of classifications based on severity of the problem. Butte County -and all northern Sacramento Valley Air Districts have been designated as "moderate" nonattainment areas for the state standards for ozone (03) and fine particulate matter (PM 10). Currently, Butte County is in attainment for all the federal (less stringent) air quality standards. Vehicle traffic generated by the project site would result in a cumulative impact on air quality created by the increase in vehicle traffic, the use of wood burning devices in the new residences, and dust from vehicular traffic on unpaved driveways -on the site. This is not anticipated to be significant because only four new parcels would be created. The proposed 4 lots are well below the 97 -lot threshold established by the Butte County Air Quality Management District for additional air-quality analysis (1997 Air Quality Attainment Plan). The project may create fugitive dust emission during site development activities, such as grading, excavation for foundations and utilities, and other soil work. The Butte County Air Quality Management District (BCAQMD) recommends incorporating measures to control fugitive dust emission for all road and other construction activities during project development, using such methods as .site and driveway watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. Mitigation Measure # 1 requires a note be placed on the final map stating that dust control measures shall be taken during site development activities. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 5 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable X air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially X to an disting or projected air quality violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant. for which the project region, is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air X quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X of people? Impact Discussion: Both the California Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency have established air pollution standards in an effort to protect human health and welfare. Geographic areas are designated attainment if these standards are met and nonattainment if they are not met. In addition, each agency has several levels of classifications based on severity of the problem. Butte County -and all northern Sacramento Valley Air Districts have been designated as "moderate" nonattainment areas for the state standards for ozone (03) and fine particulate matter (PM 10). Currently, Butte County is in attainment for all the federal (less stringent) air quality standards. Vehicle traffic generated by the project site would result in a cumulative impact on air quality created by the increase in vehicle traffic, the use of wood burning devices in the new residences, and dust from vehicular traffic on unpaved driveways -on the site. This is not anticipated to be significant because only four new parcels would be created. The proposed 4 lots are well below the 97 -lot threshold established by the Butte County Air Quality Management District for additional air-quality analysis (1997 Air Quality Attainment Plan). The project may create fugitive dust emission during site development activities, such as grading, excavation for foundations and utilities, and other soil work. The Butte County Air Quality Management District (BCAQMD) recommends incorporating measures to control fugitive dust emission for all road and other construction activities during project development, using such methods as .site and driveway watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. Mitigation Measure # 1 requires a note be placed on the final map stating that dust control measures shall be taken during site development activities. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 5 ■ 7 Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Mitigation Measure # 1: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems are to be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation." Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown on grading and building plans. Timing: Condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction periods Monitoring: The Department shall ensure that measures are indicated on the plans. Public Works Grading and Building inspectors shall spot check; Grading and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Pollution Control District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 6 ■ 5 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the.proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or X regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California X Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and'Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 or the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, X etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means)? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish and wildlife species or with X established native resident or migratory -wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy X ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat X Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 6 ■ 5 • Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Impact Discussion: 0 The project site is has been farmed for many years. No significant native vegetation exists on the site. A few mature trees exist along the easterly boundary of the property adjacent to a seasonal tributary to Honcut Creek. The riparian vegetation along -this drainage way plays an important role in providing water for fish and wildlife and linking all habitats in the watershed to the nutrient and energy sources in such ecosystem. Riparian vegetation also acts as a buffer to filter pollutants in runoff and prevent soil sediments from entering drainageways. In order to lessen the impacts on the riparian habitat located on the site, a mitigation measure is proposed that requires a 50 -foot "No Development Zone" along the .drainageway on the site, including intermittent drainages. The distance would be measured from the top of bank or outer edge of the riparian vegetation along the drainageway, whichever is greater. Driveway, road crossings, and domestic wells are allowed within the "No Development Zone," but a Streambed Alteration Agreement must be approved by the California Department of Fish and Game prior to any work within the water course. Limited amounts of vegetation removal is allowed within the "No Development Zone," but approval must be obtained from the Department of Fish and Game. No rare, endangered, or threatened plants are known to exist on the site (California Department of Fish and Game ASBI maps). The project site is not located in deer herd winter range (Butte County Deer Herd GIS coverage). The project would not have a significant impact on deer herd range. The project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. The proposal would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Mitigation Measure #2: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the final map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Structures (excepting wells), dumping, fill material, vegetation removal and/or excavation other than approved stream crossing for roads/driveways shall not be allowed within the 50 -foot No Disturbance Setback as depicted. Limited vegetation removal necessary for fire hazard reduction is permissible within the No Disturbance Setback, however, all living and thriving native trees shall be retained and all vegetation removal shall be approved by ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 7 111 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservationplan? g. A reduction in the numbers, a restriction in the range, or an impact to the critical habitat of any unique, rare, threatened, X or endangered species of animals? h. A reduction in the diversity or numbers of animals onsite (including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish or X invertebrates)? i. A deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat (for X foraging, breeding, roosting, nesting, etc.)? j. Introduction of barriers to movement of any resident or X migratory fish or wildlife species? k. Introduction of any factors (light, fencing; noise, human presence and/or domestic animals) which could hinder the X normal activities of wildlife? Impact Discussion: 0 The project site is has been farmed for many years. No significant native vegetation exists on the site. A few mature trees exist along the easterly boundary of the property adjacent to a seasonal tributary to Honcut Creek. The riparian vegetation along -this drainage way plays an important role in providing water for fish and wildlife and linking all habitats in the watershed to the nutrient and energy sources in such ecosystem. Riparian vegetation also acts as a buffer to filter pollutants in runoff and prevent soil sediments from entering drainageways. In order to lessen the impacts on the riparian habitat located on the site, a mitigation measure is proposed that requires a 50 -foot "No Development Zone" along the .drainageway on the site, including intermittent drainages. The distance would be measured from the top of bank or outer edge of the riparian vegetation along the drainageway, whichever is greater. Driveway, road crossings, and domestic wells are allowed within the "No Development Zone," but a Streambed Alteration Agreement must be approved by the California Department of Fish and Game prior to any work within the water course. Limited amounts of vegetation removal is allowed within the "No Development Zone," but approval must be obtained from the Department of Fish and Game. No rare, endangered, or threatened plants are known to exist on the site (California Department of Fish and Game ASBI maps). The project site is not located in deer herd winter range (Butte County Deer Herd GIS coverage). The project would not have a significant impact on deer herd range. The project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. The proposal would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Mitigation Measure #2: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the final map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Structures (excepting wells), dumping, fill material, vegetation removal and/or excavation other than approved stream crossing for roads/driveways shall not be allowed within the 50 -foot No Disturbance Setback as depicted. Limited vegetation removal necessary for fire hazard reduction is permissible within the No Disturbance Setback, however, all living and thriving native trees shall be retained and all vegetation removal shall be approved by ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 7 111 Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 the Department of Fish and Game prior to removal." The 50 -foot "No Disturbance Setback" shall be measured from the top of the bank along the depicted drainage courses." This setback shall be clearly delineated on the final map. Plan Requirements: The required note and graphic depiction of the setback shall be included on the Final Map. The Department of Development: Services shall ensure that the note is placed on the Final Map., Timing: At the time of building plan checking, building and site plans would be checked for compliance with the condition. Monitoring: The Building Division and the Planning Division would check building and site plans for compliance prior to issuance of a building permit. Building inspectors would ensure compliance by conducting an on-site inspection prior to the final inspection. 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES: Impact Discussion: Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites; historical features, such as rock walls, water ditches and flumes, and cemeteries; and architectural features. Cultural resources consist of any human -made site, object (i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past. No such structures or sites are located on the subject site. The project site is located in a general area characterized as having a low to medium, including unknown, archeological sensitivity. The location of the project is in an area that does not have a high potential for historical or cultural resources. Often such sites are found -in foothill areas, areas with high bluffs, rock outcroppings, areas overlooking deer migratory corridors, or above* bodies of water. While the site is located in a foothill area, it does not contain any of the other physical features where cultural' resources. may be expected to be found. Therefore, no impacts are expected to occur to any historical or cultural resources. Mitigation Measure: None required ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 8 ■ 7 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b. Cause i substantial adverse change in the significance of an X archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X resource or site. or unique. geologic feature?. . d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred X outside of formal cemeteries? Impact Discussion: Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites; historical features, such as rock walls, water ditches and flumes, and cemeteries; and architectural features. Cultural resources consist of any human -made site, object (i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past. No such structures or sites are located on the subject site. The project site is located in a general area characterized as having a low to medium, including unknown, archeological sensitivity. The location of the project is in an area that does not have a high potential for historical or cultural resources. Often such sites are found -in foothill areas, areas with high bluffs, rock outcroppings, areas overlooking deer migratory corridors, or above* bodies of water. While the site is located in a foothill area, it does not contain any of the other physical features where cultural' resources. may be expected to be found. Therefore, no impacts are expected to occur to any historical or cultural resources. Mitigation Measure: None required ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 8 ■ 7 0 Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 4.6 GEOLOGIC PROCESSES: 0 Impact Discussion: The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone. The nearest active fault, the Cleveland Hill fault, is located approximately 10 northeast of the site. The Butte County GIS Fault Lines theme shows that an inferred fault is located approximately 3 miles to the east of the site. This inferred fault is a part of the Foothill Shear Zone and has not experienced any known movement during historical times. No impacts are anticipated since no rupture of a known earthquake fault exists in the project area. The intensity of ground shaking at any specific site depends on the characteristics of the earthquake, the distance from the earthquake, and on the local geologic soils and conditions. At present, there is insufficient data to predict accurately the expected ground motions at various locations in Butte County. However, strong seismic ground shaking is closely related to the proximity of active fault lines. Although there is insufficient data to predict these forces, the closest mapped Fault -Rupture Zone is the Cleveland Hills fault zone, which is located approximately 1.8 miles to the east of the project site. The Cleveland Hills fault line is the only fault line in Butte County that is recognized under the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zones Act to pose a threat from fault rupture. However, new structures placed on the site are required to meet the seismic standards of the Uniform Building Code. Seismic risk is not limited to faults which have been currently identified. Some earthquakes originate from unknown sources sometimes characterized as "background seismicity" or "floating earthquakes". The Butte County Master Environmental Assessment indicates that it is reasonable to assume that background seismicity could produce earthquakes as large as Richter magnitude (modified Mercalli intensity scale) 6.5 virtually anywhere in Butte County. There is no current evidence that an earthquake larger than magnitude 6.5 would occur at this location. Earthquakes at ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 9 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated. on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault X Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? X 3. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? X 4. Landslides? X b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and Y, potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral s readih , subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial X risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system X where sewers are not available for the disposal or waste water? Impact Discussion: The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone. The nearest active fault, the Cleveland Hill fault, is located approximately 10 northeast of the site. The Butte County GIS Fault Lines theme shows that an inferred fault is located approximately 3 miles to the east of the site. This inferred fault is a part of the Foothill Shear Zone and has not experienced any known movement during historical times. No impacts are anticipated since no rupture of a known earthquake fault exists in the project area. The intensity of ground shaking at any specific site depends on the characteristics of the earthquake, the distance from the earthquake, and on the local geologic soils and conditions. At present, there is insufficient data to predict accurately the expected ground motions at various locations in Butte County. However, strong seismic ground shaking is closely related to the proximity of active fault lines. Although there is insufficient data to predict these forces, the closest mapped Fault -Rupture Zone is the Cleveland Hills fault zone, which is located approximately 1.8 miles to the east of the project site. The Cleveland Hills fault line is the only fault line in Butte County that is recognized under the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zones Act to pose a threat from fault rupture. However, new structures placed on the site are required to meet the seismic standards of the Uniform Building Code. Seismic risk is not limited to faults which have been currently identified. Some earthquakes originate from unknown sources sometimes characterized as "background seismicity" or "floating earthquakes". The Butte County Master Environmental Assessment indicates that it is reasonable to assume that background seismicity could produce earthquakes as large as Richter magnitude (modified Mercalli intensity scale) 6.5 virtually anywhere in Butte County. There is no current evidence that an earthquake larger than magnitude 6.5 would occur at this location. Earthquakes at ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 9 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 this magnitude are generally felt by all persons, but damage is generally slight to minor, with fallen chimneys and cracked plaster the most prominent damage. Richter. magnitude 6.5 is not subjectively characterized on the intensity scale, but a magnitude 7 is generally characterized by negligible damage, especially in buildings of good design and construction. Considerable damage can occur. in poorly built or badly designed structures. However, the impact would be less than significant. The Butte County Seismic Safety Element's Liquefaction Potential Map indicates that the site has a low potential for liquefaction. The impact would be less than significant. The Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that there is a low to moderate potential for landslides in this area. No impact is anticipated. The Erosion Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that the soil erosion potential for the project site is low to moderate. The site is relatively level with slopes generally less than 5%. Standard construction techniques are required as part of the construction process of this site, -which would help prevent significant soil erosion impacts. Disruption of soils on the site is not expected to create significant soil erosion due to the moderate slopes on the site. No impact is anticipated from instability, landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. The Conservation Element's Expansive .Soils Map indicates that the project site has a high expansive soil potential. The Building Division may require that the foundations of future dwelling on the site be designed and constructed to handle the shrink/swell characteristics of expansive soils. The Butte County Environmental Health Department does not object to the use of septic systems on the property. Percolation tests were conducted on the site and sewage disposal areas are identified on the tentative parcel map. Septic systems installed on the site are required to comply with the County Improvement Standards. No impact is anticipated. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 10 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environmental through the routine transport use, or disposal X of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident X conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- X quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code X Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 10 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Impact Discussion: The project site is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials and would not create any hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. The property is not located within the vicinity of an airport, or airport land -use plan. A private airstrip is located adjacent to the property along the westerly boundary. This strip is very rough and appears to be seldomly used. It may be utilized for re crop dusting operations. The addition of four potential homes to the area will not conflict with the infrequent use of the airstrip nor does the airstrip pose any significant hazard to future homes. All home locations would be to the side of the runway, not under the approach or take -off areas, and does not interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact would occur. The project is not located within a State Response Area for wildland fires. Butte County Fire/CDF would provide local response for fire protection. The nearest fire station is Station # 75 (full time), located approximately 3 miles to the south in Honcut. A pressurized water system with fire hydrants does not serve the project site. The Butte County Fire Department/CDF uses a water tender truck for fire fighting purposes. This project would be conditioned to contribute $200 per lot into the water tender fund to support the cost of providing this service. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, . X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport; would the project X result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the proiect area? U For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or X working in the project area? g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation X plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where X wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with willdlands? Impact Discussion: The project site is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials and would not create any hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. The property is not located within the vicinity of an airport, or airport land -use plan. A private airstrip is located adjacent to the property along the westerly boundary. This strip is very rough and appears to be seldomly used. It may be utilized for re crop dusting operations. The addition of four potential homes to the area will not conflict with the infrequent use of the airstrip nor does the airstrip pose any significant hazard to future homes. All home locations would be to the side of the runway, not under the approach or take -off areas, and does not interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact would occur. The project is not located within a State Response Area for wildland fires. Butte County Fire/CDF would provide local response for fire protection. The nearest fire station is Station # 75 (full time), located approximately 3 miles to the south in Honcut. A pressurized water system with fire hydrants does not serve the project site. The Butte County Fire Department/CDF uses a water tender truck for fire fighting purposes. This project would be conditioned to contribute $200 per lot into the water tender fund to support the cost of providing this service. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 1 1 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 1 1 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Impact Discussion: All wastewater generated by the future dwellings on the site would be handled by individual, on-site septic systems. The Butte County Environmental Health Division does not object to the use of septic systems on the site. Septic systems placed on the site must meet the requirements of the Butte County Environmental Health Division and Chapter 20, entitled "Subdivision Ordinance,"'of the Butte County Code. No impacts to surface or ground water are anticipated due to the proposed use of septic systems on the site. Domestic water supply for the future dwellings on the site would be obtained from individual on-site wells. The Butte County Environmental Health Division does not object to the use of wells on the site. The project may cause a small reduction -in groundwater in the project area due to the new wells that would supply water for the future residential uses established on the site. This project would ultimately result in the creation of new impervious surfaces such as houses, accessory structures, and driveways. A minor increase in surface water runoff can be expected due to the reduced absorption rate created from the impervious surfaces. However, the low density of development proposed for this project would not significantly increase runoff. Significant changes to the drainage patterns are not anticipated by the construction of four single family residences. In addition, adherence to the drainage standards of the Butte County Public Works Department is anticipated to mitigate possible impacts on the drainage system. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 12 ■ 11 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal' Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of X preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a X stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount X of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage X ' systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g. Place housing within a 100 -year flood, hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood X Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which X would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a X result of the failure of a levee or dam? j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Impact Discussion: All wastewater generated by the future dwellings on the site would be handled by individual, on-site septic systems. The Butte County Environmental Health Division does not object to the use of septic systems on the site. Septic systems placed on the site must meet the requirements of the Butte County Environmental Health Division and Chapter 20, entitled "Subdivision Ordinance,"'of the Butte County Code. No impacts to surface or ground water are anticipated due to the proposed use of septic systems on the site. Domestic water supply for the future dwellings on the site would be obtained from individual on-site wells. The Butte County Environmental Health Division does not object to the use of wells on the site. The project may cause a small reduction -in groundwater in the project area due to the new wells that would supply water for the future residential uses established on the site. This project would ultimately result in the creation of new impervious surfaces such as houses, accessory structures, and driveways. A minor increase in surface water runoff can be expected due to the reduced absorption rate created from the impervious surfaces. However, the low density of development proposed for this project would not significantly increase runoff. Significant changes to the drainage patterns are not anticipated by the construction of four single family residences. In addition, adherence to the drainage standards of the Butte County Public Works Department is anticipated to mitigate possible impacts on the drainage system. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 12 ■ 11 Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map. File # TPM 02-19 The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood zone as shown on the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map 06007C -995C, dated June 8, 1998. The property is not located in an area prone to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact would occur with respect to these natural hazards. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.9 LAND USE: Impact Discussion:. The proposal would divide a 47 -acre parcel into four parcels of 10 acres and a remainder of 6.28 acres. This density is consistent with the A-5 zoning for the property which was adopted in October of 1975. The General Plan Land Use designation for the site, Orchard and Field Crops, was adopted as part of the 1979 County -wide General Plan revision. Once the 1979 plan was adopted, the previously adopted zoning designations were supposed to have been reviewed for consistency with the General Plan. This review, however, has not occurred. The Orchard and Field Crops Land Use designation is primarily for the cultivation, harvest, storage, processing, sale and distribution of all plant crops, especially annual food crops, Secondary uses consistent with this designation include animal husbandry, resource extraction, hunting, airports, and residential uses. The zoning districts that are consistent with the Orchard and Field Crops designation are Agriculture -20, -40, and -160 acre minimums. The Agriculture 5 -acre minimum zone is conditionally consistent provided the following three conditions exist: 1) The predominant existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres; 2) The area is adjacent to or in the vicinity of urban boundaries; and 3) The present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. Based upon these conditional criteria, the present A-5 zoning district is not consistent with the General Plan because the conditional criteria cannot be met. The predominate parcels size in the area is approximately 40 acres. The site is not adjacent to or in the general vicinity of any urban area. Palermo, the nearest are with urban densities is approximately 6 miles away. The agricultural production status of the site will be significantly impaired by the development of four additional dwellings. More significantly, the typically poor soils in the area are not conducive to small scale, intensive agriculture. At 10 acres, the proposed parcel sizes will not generally be economically viable for commercial agricultural production. The parcels will, in essence, become residential ranchettes. The 280 -acre property immediately adjacent to the west has just recently been planted in olives. This planting was part of a larger farm consisting of approximately 680 acres. The site has the physical capability to support one dwelling per 10 acres with causing significant impacts the physical environment. However the area, if it were to develop at the proposed density, does not have the infrastructure to support the increased population. Since the project does not appear to conform to the policies of the General Plan, approval cannot be recommended. This proposal would not physically divide an established community as it is not located near a community. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 13 0 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Physically divide an established community? X b. Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, X local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X natural community conservationplan? Impact Discussion:. The proposal would divide a 47 -acre parcel into four parcels of 10 acres and a remainder of 6.28 acres. This density is consistent with the A-5 zoning for the property which was adopted in October of 1975. The General Plan Land Use designation for the site, Orchard and Field Crops, was adopted as part of the 1979 County -wide General Plan revision. Once the 1979 plan was adopted, the previously adopted zoning designations were supposed to have been reviewed for consistency with the General Plan. This review, however, has not occurred. The Orchard and Field Crops Land Use designation is primarily for the cultivation, harvest, storage, processing, sale and distribution of all plant crops, especially annual food crops, Secondary uses consistent with this designation include animal husbandry, resource extraction, hunting, airports, and residential uses. The zoning districts that are consistent with the Orchard and Field Crops designation are Agriculture -20, -40, and -160 acre minimums. The Agriculture 5 -acre minimum zone is conditionally consistent provided the following three conditions exist: 1) The predominant existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres; 2) The area is adjacent to or in the vicinity of urban boundaries; and 3) The present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. Based upon these conditional criteria, the present A-5 zoning district is not consistent with the General Plan because the conditional criteria cannot be met. The predominate parcels size in the area is approximately 40 acres. The site is not adjacent to or in the general vicinity of any urban area. Palermo, the nearest are with urban densities is approximately 6 miles away. The agricultural production status of the site will be significantly impaired by the development of four additional dwellings. More significantly, the typically poor soils in the area are not conducive to small scale, intensive agriculture. At 10 acres, the proposed parcel sizes will not generally be economically viable for commercial agricultural production. The parcels will, in essence, become residential ranchettes. The 280 -acre property immediately adjacent to the west has just recently been planted in olives. This planting was part of a larger farm consisting of approximately 680 acres. The site has the physical capability to support one dwelling per 10 acres with causing significant impacts the physical environment. However the area, if it were to develop at the proposed density, does not have the infrastructure to support the increased population. Since the project does not appear to conform to the policies of the General Plan, approval cannot be recommended. This proposal would not physically divide an established community as it is not located near a community. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 13 0 Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Surrounding and nearby parcels are zoned A-5 with a General Plan land use designation of Orchard and Field Crops and Agricultural Residential. These parcels range in size from 30 to 280 acres, with the predominant size being in over 40 acres. Existing land uses on surrounding and nearby parcels include dwellings at very low rural densities, large olive orchards, seasonal crop production, and limited livestock grazing. The project is generally not compatible with surrounding parcel sizes or land use. The property is not within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.10 MINERAL RESOURCES: Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to known mineral resource areas. The project is located within an area where there are little or no mineral resources. Therefore, the project would have no impact on mineral resources. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.11 NOISE: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the X X residents of the state? b. Results n the loss of availability of a locally -important X mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general X plan, specific plan, or other land useplan? Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to known mineral resource areas. The project is located within an area where there are little or no mineral resources. Therefore, the project would have no impact on mineral resources. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.11 NOISE: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 14 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Exposure of persons to or generation of'noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or X noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground X bome vibration or ground borne noise levels? c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the X project? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing X without theproject? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 14 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Impact Discussion: The project site is in a very sparsely populated area. Ambient noise is generally very low, with the exception of periodic noise generated by agricultural equipment. The Butte County Noise Element finds that noise levels up to 75 dB CNEL are normally acceptable for agricultural areas. While there may be periods during harvest time where noise levels may reach or exceed the 75 dB level, the overall average level for the site would be significantly lower than the 75dB threshold. The airstrip that exists adjacent to the site is rarely used and does not contribute significantly to the overall noise environment. Construction activities on the site would temporarily generate high noise levels on and adjacent to the project site intermittently during project development activities. This construction noise would not have a sigrlificant impact on nearby residents because the noise would be intermittent and short-term in nature, and due to the low density of the existing residential development in the area. Because of the relatively small increment of traffic added to the local roadways, the project would not significantly affect future traffic noise levels. The proposal would not expose people to severe noise levels because no significant noise generators are near the project site. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.12 HOUSING: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles X of a public airport or public use airport, would the project X expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? L For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, X would the project expose people residing or working in X the project area to excessive noise levels? X Impact Discussion: The project site is in a very sparsely populated area. Ambient noise is generally very low, with the exception of periodic noise generated by agricultural equipment. The Butte County Noise Element finds that noise levels up to 75 dB CNEL are normally acceptable for agricultural areas. While there may be periods during harvest time where noise levels may reach or exceed the 75 dB level, the overall average level for the site would be significantly lower than the 75dB threshold. The airstrip that exists adjacent to the site is rarely used and does not contribute significantly to the overall noise environment. Construction activities on the site would temporarily generate high noise levels on and adjacent to the project site intermittently during project development activities. This construction noise would not have a sigrlificant impact on nearby residents because the noise would be intermittent and short-term in nature, and due to the low density of the existing residential development in the area. Because of the relatively small increment of traffic added to the local roadways, the project would not significantly affect future traffic noise levels. The proposal would not expose people to severe noise levels because no significant noise generators are near the project site. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.12 HOUSING: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 15 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and X businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads -or other infrastructure? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing X elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 15 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Impact Discussion: Butte County population has grown.at a rate at or below all official population projections for the past 10 years. Projected population for 2000 was 207,159, while the actual census population was 203,171. The percentage increase in population for Butte County between the 1990 and 2000 was 11.6%, which equates to an annual growth rate of 1.1%. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map would create four new parcels for residential development. This project has the potential to add an estimated 10 people to Butte County (four dwelling unit x 2.414 persons/dwelling unit). This is not considered a significant amount and is consistent with the planned growth rate for the County of approximately 2% per year. While the project would not have a significant effect on the total county population, the proposed parcels would be out of character with the surrounding lots. The project would.not displace individuals or housing. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.13 PUBLIC SERVICES: Impact Discussion: A less than significant impact is expected to these public service concerns due to the project. The project site is located in an area designated as a low fire hazard area by the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan and is not within a State Response for fire protection. The Butte County Fire Department/California Department of Forestry states that cumulative development in rural areas would impact their ability to provide fire protection. services. This agency states that the installation of automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems in residential structures, the use of fire resistant building materials and the availability of water supply systems would reduce the demand for fire protection services. As a mitigation of project approval, all new dwelling units on the site are required to be equipped with an automatic fire suppression sprinkler system unless the parcel is connected to a pressurized community water system. Due to the impact posed by the project to fire protection services, and in lieu of a pressurized water system or water storage tank, development of the site requires payment of $200.00 per created parcel into the Battalion 7 water tender ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 16 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous ® Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Would the project result in substantial adverse.physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which X could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b. Fireprotection? X c. Police Protection? X d. Schools? X e. Parks? X f. Other public services? X Impact Discussion: A less than significant impact is expected to these public service concerns due to the project. The project site is located in an area designated as a low fire hazard area by the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan and is not within a State Response for fire protection. The Butte County Fire Department/California Department of Forestry states that cumulative development in rural areas would impact their ability to provide fire protection. services. This agency states that the installation of automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems in residential structures, the use of fire resistant building materials and the availability of water supply systems would reduce the demand for fire protection services. As a mitigation of project approval, all new dwelling units on the site are required to be equipped with an automatic fire suppression sprinkler system unless the parcel is connected to a pressurized community water system. Due to the impact posed by the project to fire protection services, and in lieu of a pressurized water system or water storage tank, development of the site requires payment of $200.00 per created parcel into the Battalion 7 water tender ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 16 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 fund prior to the issuance of building permits. This is required by Butte County Code and would be added as a condition of the project. The proposal would result in an incremental increase in demand for police protection services. The cumulative impacts of increased development in rural areas impacts the ability of the Sheriffs Department to adequately provide police services to outlying areas. Sheriffs facilities fees have been adopted by the County and are required to be paid prior to issuance of building permits for any dwelling units placed on the project site; this would reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. The proposal would result in an incremental demand for school facilities in the area. The project site is located in the Oroville Union High School District and the Honcut Elementary School District. The applicant is required to place a note on the map that states: "A development impact fee for school facilities shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. The fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permits." While school districts maintain that these fees do not fully mitigate the impacts of the project, the County is precluded from imposing additional fees or mitigation by state legislation. The project would result in the potential development of four residences in a sparsely populated area and would not create significant impacts to area parks and facilities. A less than significant impact is anticipated to other public services. Mitigation Measure #3: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized community water system, with hydrants that meet Fire Department specifications, serves the parcels." Plan Requirements: The note shall be placed on the Final Map Timing: Interior fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures at the time of building construction. Monitoring: Building Division plan checkers shall ensure that the building plans for residential structures include interior fire sprinkler systems. Building inspectors shall ensure all residential structures have a functioning interior fire sprinkler system prior to the final inspection, by conducting an on-site inspection 4.14 RECREATION: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 17 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial X physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an X adverse physical effect on the environment? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 17 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File ># TPM 02-19 Impact Discussion: The project's outcome, which results in four new parcels, is considered less than significant and would not warrant specific mitigation for area parks and recreation facilities. Generally, residents in the rural areas of the County do not significantly impact existing recreation facilities. No recreational facilities are proposed under this proposal. The project site is located within the Feather River Recreation District. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Impact Discussion The project has the potential to generate approximately 40 additional traffic trips per day based on 10 vehicle trips/day per dwelling unit as projected by the Trip Generation Manual of the Institute of Traffic Engineers for a single family residential use in urban areas, although in rural areas the number of vehicle trips generated by a dwelling unit is usually less. This number of vehicle trips would not significantly impact the local circulation system. All the roads in the project area have a level of service of "C" or better (Butte County Master Environmental Assessment - Existing Conditions) which indicates that vehicle circulation is acceptable. Each of the proposed parcels has frontage on private 60 -foot wide easement which comes off Central House Road which is a County maintained road. Butte County Code Section 24-240 •(b) requires two off-street spaces per dwelling. The .proposed parcels have adequate room to provide two spaces each and, therefore, the project presents no impact relative to insufficient parking capacity. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 18 111 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of X vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of servic%standard established by the county congestion X management agency for designated roads or highways?. c. Result in a change in air traffic patters, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results X in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible X uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? X f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g. Conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, X bicycle racks)? Impact Discussion The project has the potential to generate approximately 40 additional traffic trips per day based on 10 vehicle trips/day per dwelling unit as projected by the Trip Generation Manual of the Institute of Traffic Engineers for a single family residential use in urban areas, although in rural areas the number of vehicle trips generated by a dwelling unit is usually less. This number of vehicle trips would not significantly impact the local circulation system. All the roads in the project area have a level of service of "C" or better (Butte County Master Environmental Assessment - Existing Conditions) which indicates that vehicle circulation is acceptable. Each of the proposed parcels has frontage on private 60 -foot wide easement which comes off Central House Road which is a County maintained road. Butte County Code Section 24-240 •(b) requires two off-street spaces per dwelling. The .proposed parcels have adequate room to provide two spaces each and, therefore, the project presents no impact relative to insufficient parking capacity. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 18 111 Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 This Tentative Parcel Map project would not conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Impact Discussion: Sewage disposal for the new dwellings on the project site would be handled by individual on-site septic systems. The project would not have an impact on any wastewater treatment facilities. Domestic water supply for the new dwellings on the site would be obtained from individual on-site wells. The project would not have an impact on any water treatment facilities. No additional storm water facilities would be necessary as a result of this project. The project would increase -the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill by a minor amount. According to the Butte County Public Works Department, the Neal Road Landfill is expected to reach maximum holding. capacity by the year 2018. The project would not have a significant impact on solid waste disposal. No impact would occur with respect to federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Mitigation Measure: None required ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 19 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X a plicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing X facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the X construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are X new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater. treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has X adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to theprovider's existing commitments? L Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity X to accommodate theproject's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes, and X regulations related to solid waste? Impact Discussion: Sewage disposal for the new dwellings on the project site would be handled by individual on-site septic systems. The project would not have an impact on any wastewater treatment facilities. Domestic water supply for the new dwellings on the site would be obtained from individual on-site wells. The project would not have an impact on any water treatment facilities. No additional storm water facilities would be necessary as a result of this project. The project would increase -the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill by a minor amount. According to the Butte County Public Works Department, the Neal Road Landfill is expected to reach maximum holding. capacity by the year 2018. The project would not have a significant impact on solid waste disposal. No impact would occur with respect to federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Mitigation Measure: None required ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 19 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File tl TPM 02-19 4.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (Section 15065): The project has the potential to contribute impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable with respect to Initial Study Checklist Items 4.3 Air, Quality; 4.4 Biological Resources;. 4.7 Fire Hazards, 4.13 Fire Protection and Police Protection Services. Cumulative impacts to these areas would be mitigated due to the inclusion of Mitigation Measures # 1-7 as itemized under Section 5 - Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Requirements. 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: Mitigation Measure # 1: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems are to be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation." Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown on grading and building plans. Timing: Condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction periods. Monitoring: The Department shall ensure that measures are indicated on the plans. Public Works Grading and Building inspectors shall spot check; Grading and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Pollution Control District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division n Page 20 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a X plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a X project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects)? c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on_human beings,, either X directly or indirectly? The project has the potential to contribute impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable with respect to Initial Study Checklist Items 4.3 Air, Quality; 4.4 Biological Resources;. 4.7 Fire Hazards, 4.13 Fire Protection and Police Protection Services. Cumulative impacts to these areas would be mitigated due to the inclusion of Mitigation Measures # 1-7 as itemized under Section 5 - Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Requirements. 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: Mitigation Measure # 1: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems are to be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation." Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown on grading and building plans. Timing: Condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction periods. Monitoring: The Department shall ensure that measures are indicated on the plans. Public Works Grading and Building inspectors shall spot check; Grading and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Pollution Control District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division n Page 20 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Mitigation Measure #2: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the final map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Structures (excepting wells), dumping, fill material,. vegetation removal and/or excavation other than approved stream crossing for roads/driveways. shall not be allowed within the 50 -foot No Disturbance Setback as depicted. Limited vegetation removal necessary for fire hazard reduction is permissible within- the No Disturbance Setback, however, all living and thriving native trees shall be retained and all vegetation removal shall be approved by the Department of Fish and Game prior to removal." The 50 -foot "No Disturbance Setback" shall be measured from the top of the bank along the depicted drainage courses." This setback shall be clearly delineated on the final map. Plan Requirements: The required note and graphic depiction of the setback shall be included on the Final Map. The Department of Development Services shall ensure that the note is placed on the Final Map. Timing: At the time of.building plan checking, building and site plans would be checked for compliance with the condition. Monitoring: The Building Division and the Planning Division would check building and site plans for compliance prior to issuance of a building permit. Building inspectors would ensure compliance by conducting an on-site inspection prior to the final inspection. Mitigation Measure # 3: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized community water system, with hydrants that meet Fire Department specifications, serves the parcels." Plan Requirements: The note shall be placed on the Final Map Timing: Interior fire sprinkler systems shall. be,installed in all new residential structures at the time of building construction. Monitoring: Building Division plan checkers shall ensure that the building plans for residential structures include interior fire sprinkler systems. Building inspectors shall ensure all residential structures have a functioning interior fire sprinkler system prior to the final inspection, by conducting an on-site inspection. 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL: 1. Butte County Planning Department. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 2. Butte County Planning Department. CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Oroville, CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. CH2M Hill, 1977. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map I I-1, Seismic Safety Element. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 1 I 1-1, Safety Element. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Expansive Soils Map 111-3, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Noise Element Map IV -1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 21 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Man. Oroville, CA. It. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency, State of California, 1983. 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: Butte County_Planning Department, 1987. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1989 and 2000. 14. USGS Quad Maps. 15. Soil Map, Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 16. Soil Survey of Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 17. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. 7.0 CONSULTED AGENCIES: [X) Environmental Health [X] Public Works [ ] Building Manager [ ] BCAG [ ] ALUC [X] LAFCo [ ] Air Qual. Management Dist. [ ] City of Chico [ J City of Biggs [ ] City of Gridley [ ] City of Oroville [ ] Town of Paradise [X] CA Department of Forestry [ ] Caltrans (Traffic) [ ] Central Reg. Water Quality [ ] Department of Conservation [X] CA Dept. of Fish and Game [ ] Highway Patrol [ ] Army Corps of Engineers [ ) US Fish & Wldlife Service [X] Agricultural Commissioner [X] Butte Co. Farm Bureau [X] Oroville Union School Dist. [ ] Feather River Rec. Dist. [ ] E1 Medio Fire Dept. [ ] OWID [ ] LOAPUD [ ] PG&E [ ] Pacific Bell [ ] Palermo Union School Dist. [ ] Oroville Elem. School Dist [X] County Assessor k:\projects\tpm\grant\new grant initial study.doc ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 22 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 8.0 PROJECT SPONSOR(S) INCORPORATION OF MITIGATION INTO PROPOSED PROJECT: I/We have reviewed the Initial Study for the Geraldine L. Grant Tentative Parcel Map (APN # 036-220-174 & 175) application and particularly the mitigation measures'identified herein. I/We hereby modem the application on file with the. Butte County Planning Department to include and incorporate all mitigations set forth in this Initial Study. Project Sponsor/Project Agent Project Sponsor/Project Agent a Date Date ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division Page 23 ■ .roQe� BOARD OF SUPERVISORS R. J. BEELER, Chair. First District `*27, JANE DOLAN t' -ADMINISTRATION CENTER ` 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Second District. TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7224 MARY ANNE HOUX Third District CURT JOSIAS SEN Fourth District KIM YAMAGUCHI Fifth District August 26, 2004-_ Douglas S. Sutherland BUTTE Ron Graves & Associates COUNTY 563 Nelson Avenue AUG 3 0 2004 Oroville, CA 95965 DEVELOPMENT RE: Public Hearing Appeal - Teesdale Tentative Parcel Map SERVICES APN 028-020-054 Dear Mr. Sutherland: This letter will confirm that at the meeting of August 17,2004, the Board of Supervisors continued the above -referenced` hearing to an unspecified future date. Once staff has contacted me to request this item returned to the agenda, you will be notified of the date and time. If you have any questions or concerns about the hearing schedule-' please contact me at -530-538.7643. If you have questions regarding your project, please contract the Development Services Department at 530- 538-7601. Thank you. Sincerely, 1. arion Reeve Assistant Clerk of the Board /mr cV16evelopment Services Raymond' Teesdale, 725 Central House Road, Oroville, CA 95965 BOARD�OF SUPERVISORS •�oF eO.?��`�, R. J. BEELER, Chair fc: First District ADMINISTRATION CENTER +JANE Second Distract •;.00u 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7224 MARY ANNE HOUX Third District CURT JOSIASSEN Fourth District KIM YAMAGUCHI j Fifth District March 24, 2004 Douglas S. Sutherland Ron Graves & Associates Post Office Box 986. Oroville, CA 95965 RE:. Public Hearing - Appeal rj eesdale_Tentative'Parcel Map AAPN 028-020-054 Dear Mr. Sutherland: This letter is to inform you that at its meeting of Maich`23, 2004, the Board of Supervisors, continued the above-referenced matter to an unspecified future'date. Once staff is prepared to return this matter to the Board, you will be notified of the date and time of the continued hearing. If you have any questions or concerns about the.hearing schedule, please contact me at 530-538-7643. If you have..questions regarding your project, please. contract the Development Services Department at 530' 538-7601. Thank you. Sincerely.' . M 'on Re �e's , A sistant Cllerk ofthe'Board cc Development Services ; Raymond Teesdale, 725 Central House Road, Oroville, CA 95965 Bo�c RountyDEpartrnentofDevelopmentServices �UTSTOPHER, MOTOR oTF° ° 7 County Center Drive ° ° Oroville, CA 95965 c �. �_ c (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile cOUN'�y ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * GIS * PLANNING March 16, 2004 Mr. Raymond Teesdale .725 Central House Road Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Hearing for Teesdale TPM 0249 appeal to the Board of Supervisors. Dear Mr. Mathews: At the request of the applicant, the appeal hearing for the Teesdale TPM 02-19BLM will be continued until June 8, 2004 to a time certain. A letter will be sent to you,.informing you of the time of the hearing. Should you have any further questions regarding these requirements. -or process, please contact meat 538-7376. Sincerely; Mark Michelena Associate Planner CC. Edward J. Mathews Ron Graves and Associates emorandum- Department of Development Services Planning Division TO: r Honorable Chair and Supervisors FROM: Mark Michelena, Associate Planner FILE: Teesdale TPM 02-19/APL 03-01 (APN 028 -020 -054) - APPLICANT/ APPELLANT: Raymond Teesdale REQUEST: Continue to a date certain (June 8, 2004) of Appeal 03-01 of the Teesdale Tentative Parcel Map, „ (TPM 02-19) , FOR: Board of Supervisors Hearing 6 March 23, 2004 STAFF COMMENTS This Tentative ParcetMap (and Lot Line Adjustment) was denied by the Development Review Committee on June 27, 2002 with a unanimous vote. The Committee found that the project was not consistent with the Butte County General Plan, particularly the Conditional' Criteria in the Orchard and Field Crop land use designation., The applicant appealed this decision to the Board of Supervisors. The item was set for July 23, 2002 Board of Supervisors agenda. At the meeting the applicant requested the appeal to .be continued open until August 27, 2002. At the August 27, 2002 appeal hearing the applicant requested the appeal to be continued open until September 24, 2002. At the September 24, 2002,appeal hearing the project was requested by the applicant to continued open until March 23, 2004. The applicant. was- requesting the continuance in order for the General Plan update to be completed. 'As of March 3,-2004, the General Plan has not been updated. There is no anticipated completion date for the General Plan update. The applicant is requesting the project to be continued to a date certain (June 8, 2004). ACTION FOR CONSIDERATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors take the following action: L Continue the Appeal of the Tentative Parcel Map for Raymond .Teesdale, Planning Division'File TPM 02-19/APL'03-01, to a date certain (June 8, 2004). K\PROJECTS\TPM\Teasdalc\BDMEMO 3-23-04.doc ■ BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ■ MEMORANDUM■ MARCH 23, 2004 ■ PAGE I ■ w it • . ' . . � � ... 4. lY !Iyy � _ � aF { �.... (, �i -, r r , Y � - . - ' _ � ' w _ � fh� `� +� � yi� r '� .. .. '+� } rIf ry„ f •'• _ ,. _ � _ ±� . ., _ ;� , h - � .' -� ' + � . � . r A r '...� • a Z 1, � •. � � . ' � � �. r � � f ' r � ' e • � � � �, � { f �� • � � k, �' � . ' - . [ +� 4 � + r. / � I 1� � � 1 _ � � � .. � r '.f � � 1� BOARD. SUPERVISORS �" CURT JOSIASSEN, Chair �aTfs Fourth District ADMINISTRATION CENTER R. J. BEELER First District 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE,,CALIFORNIA 95965 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7224 JANE DOLAN Second District MARY ANNE HOUX ' Third District- KIM YAMAGUCHI Fifth District September 26, 2002 ' Raymond and Richard Teesdale ' t • 725 Central House Road Oroville, CA 95965 RE: Public Hearing - Appeal - Teesdale Tentative Parcel Map APN 028-020-054 Dear Messrs Teesdale: This letter is to inform you that at its meeting of September 24, 2002, the Board of Supervisors continued the above-mentioned hearing to Tuesday, March" 23, 2004, at 10:30 a.m. With the continuance being in excess of 12 months, we will re -notice this hearing'prior to it reappearing on the Board's agenda. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this hearing time, please contact me at 530-538-7643. Sincerely, arion Ree s Assistant Clerk the Board /mr ✓ cc: Development Services Douglas S. Sutherland, Ron Graves & Associates, P.O. Box 986, Oroville, CA 95965 SEP 5 20021 /2 •"' �" BOARD OF SUPERVISORSCURT JOSIASSEN, Chair .oa aurgR �i Fourth District . i J ADMINISTRATION CENTER R. J. BEELER f=irst District y4.•,d.�• 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 959.65, TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7224 ... JANE DOLAN Second District MARY ANNE HOUX Third District KIM YAMAGUCHI Fifth District August 30, 2001 Raymond and Richard Teesdale; 725 Central House Road Oroville, CA 95965 RE: Public Hearing - Appeal - Teesdale Tentative Parcel Map APN 028-020-054 - Dear Messrs Teesdale: This letter is to inform you that at its meeting of August 27, 2002, the Board of Supervisors continued the above-mentioned hearing to Tuesday, September 24, 2002. The continued hearing time has been set for 11:05 a.m. The hearing will be conducted in the Board of :Supervisors Chambers, County Administration Building, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville. If you plan to submit information to the Board, you will need to provide a reproducible copy of 'the information to the Clerk of the Board by Monday, September 16, 2002. If you submit, information during the hearing, we request that you submit 8 copies of each item you are submitting. Also, please be aware that any information submitted during the course of the hearing; including photographs, maps, video tapes, audio tapes, or written material, will become part of the public record for that matter and will be retained by the Clerk of the Board. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact meat 530-538-7643. Thank you. Sinc rely, anon eev s Assistant C erk of the Board /mr cc"Development Services Douglas S. Sutherland, Ron Graves & Associates, P.O. Box 986, Oroville, CA 95965 ' r LAND, OF NATURAL WEALTH AN"D BEAUTY 3 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY. CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE,:CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-760.1 FAX: (530)'538-7785 October 22, 2002 Raymond Teesdale 725 Central House Rd Oroville, CA, 95965 Re: Tentative Parcel Map application 02-19 Dear Mr. Teesdale, This is to inform you that your, application to divide. Assessor's .Parcel Number 028-020- 054 into four 10 -acre parcels and a 6.28 -acre remainder is Istill active and has been continued until the March 23, 2004 Board of Supervisor's meeting. Once the issues relatingto the, County's General Plan have been resolved the project will be able.to come forward for final' action. Sincerely, Craig Sanders Senior Planner MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Larry Painter FROM: Lynn SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR EXHIBITS AND PUBLIC NOTICE LIST DATE: August 9, 2002 Project Name: Raymond Teasdale THIS IS A REQUEST FOR: Black & white reproducible exhibit map Planning Commission Development Review Planning Manager Vicinity Map Planning Manager Color Exhibit Map Extension of Time Exhibit Map Color Planning Commission Exhibit Map Color Board of Supervisors Exhibit Map Public Notice List Special Exhibits Backread Ordinance Public Notice List and Labels: Special instructions: File #: TPM 02-19 The above request is due no later than 8/12/02 Special Instructions and/or research: Number of Meeting Date Copies 8/27/02 1 1 028-020-046 1: Projiect Location 028-020-054 g g-�ax' '-g M_ 'V1 1'b� 5f aCfi M 16M $0M."'Al i�"2 "49 .gx Al g. W_,v k a �'�stx ' ';1 -i'`,;> M. -y M -2,R, id Ite, MOV zt �7 K IN s A.4 r �57 .1 �j­- I r- "I 1" 6 rgw ISM EIQI' W-11 4- XA a"KKIM, 0I �' v - 0-Y-" c°` �}sz:t.Zas ry..;.a/ ttx`z x",F{v3S_ 4'� nny �C S ry 1000 rtTM '` V , ��igg y6 ^a:c .r r`? a c' ^�',c� �>�P?y`' >.r+"' ' 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 Feet BUTTE COUNTY BOARD of SUPERVISORS Applicant: Raymond Teasdale Owner: Same TPM 02-19 Hearing Date: August 27, 2002 Existing Zone: A-5 (Agricultural, 5 acre minimum) N — Supervisorial Request: Appeal of a Denial by the Development Review Committee to allow a Tentative Parcel Map to create District# I two parcels of 75+/- acres and 10+/- acres from a 85 acre parcel. I Assessor Parcel No: 028-020-046 & 054 Me: APL 03-01 V08/,23/02 ' 11:03 FAX 530 538; 7120 BtTrE COUNTY, ADMIN. Mol - 611�frl P16 ' 001/001` ' AUG 17 k9? 3 725 Central House Road » " OrovMc CA 959651 , August 23, 2002 Butte County Board of Supervisors Orovilie, CA ¢. Attention: Marion ;1 Reference: Request to Postpone )Board Hearing Dear Marion, I am requesting to postpone my hearing with the Board of Supervisors on August 27, 2002 until the next, meeting. I am unable to attend the August hearing as I will be out of ' the area. ;, 1 I appreciate your understanding in this matter. 4, " ,. Very truly yours, L' " Raymond Teesdale - ' Ppb t .. , •' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS „ AUG-2 2 20021 >.. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CURT JOSIASSEN, Chair f.._ Fourth District �. ADMINISTRATION CENTER R. J. BEELER ibu,rCi`� 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 First District TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7224 JANE DOLAN Second District MARY ANNE HOUX Third District KIM YAMAGUCHI Fifth District July 12, 2002 Raymond and Richard Teesdale 725 Central House Road Oroville, CA 95965 RE: Public Hearing - Appeal - Teesdale Tentative Parcel Map APN 028-020-054 Dear Messrs Teesdale: Following Mr. Richard Teesdale's visit to the Administrative Office on July 10, 2002, I discussed his request to consider this appeal hearing at a later date with Craig Sanders, the planner working on the appeal. Mr. Sanders is also agreeable to a continuance of this matter until August 27, 2002. Butte County Code Section 20-66 (b) indicates that any appeal of this nature shall be set for a public hearing to be commenced within 30 calendar days of the filing ,of the appeal. To meet the statutory timeline, Mr. Sanders has submitted an agenda request for July 23, 2002, recommending the public hearing for this item be opened on that date, and the item continued open without Board action to the August 27, 2002, Board of Supervisors meeting. Once the Board has determined the continuation date and time, I will send you another letter confirming that information. If you have any questions in the meantime, or if I can be of further assistance, please contact me at 538-7643. Thank you. Sincerely,C E V E _ D anon Ree es J U L 1 5 2002 Assistant erk of the Board BUTTE COUNTY /mr PLANNING DIVISION c : evelopment Services Douglas S. Sutherland, Ron Graves &. Associates, P.O. Box 986, Oroville; CA 95965 • :A6 • ,O•• U BOARD OF SUPERVISORS a; �o0= ADMINISTRATION CENTER 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7224 July 3, 2002 Douglas S. Sutherland Ron Graves & Associates Post Office Box 986 Oroville, CA 95965 RE: Public Hearing - Appeal - Teesdale Tentative Parcel Map APN 028-020-054 Dear Mr. Sutherland: CURT JOSIASSEN, Chair Fourth District R. J. BEELER First District JANE DOLAN Second District MARY ANNE HOUX Third District KIM YAMAGUCHI Fifth District This letter is to inform you that the public hearing before the Board of Supervisors for the above -referenced matter has been set for Tuesday, July 23, 2002, at 10:35 a.m. The hearing will be conducted in the Board of Supervisors Chambers, County Administration Building, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville. If you plan to submit information to the Board, you will need to provide a reproducible copy of the information to the Clerk of the Board by July 16, 2002. If you submit information during the hearing, we request that you submit 8 copies of each item you are submitting. Also, please be aware that any information submitted during the course of the hearing, including photographs, maps, video tapes, audio tapes, or written material, will become part of the public record for that matter and will be retained by the Clerk of the Board. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 530-538-7643. Thank you. Sincerely, anon Ree es Assistant erk f the Board /mr cceveloP ment Services Raymond Teesdale, 725 Central House Road, Oroville, CA 95965 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AD nn JUL 0 12002 CIVILG�oassociaws'raves �. q,c,�g� ENGINEERS OROVA$ILILIp 1FORNIA LANDSURVEYORSP.O. BOX 986.Oroville. CA 95965 2060 PARK AVE. FAX: (530) 533-8844 Email: RGraves@cncnet.com June 28, 2002 Butte County Board of Supervisors 25 County Center Dr. Oroville, CA 95965 RE: Teesdale Tentative Parcel Map A.P. #028-020-054 Honorable Board of Supervisors; On behalf of our client, Richard Teesdale, we submit this letter requesting a hearing to appeal the Development Review Committee's June 28th denial of the above referenced Teesdale T.P.M. Enclosed, please find a check made payable to Butte County in the amount of $ 50. Please schedule at your earliest convenience. Sincerely Douglas S. Sutherland D�C0WE JUL 5 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION SURVEYING ENGINEERING = - ut% ount _ L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 June 27, 2002 Raymond Teesdale 725 Central House Road Oroville, CA 95965 RE: Tentative Parcel Map, AP 028-020-054 and 046 Dear Mr. Teasdale: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Development Review Committee held on June 27, 2002, the Commmittee denied your Tentative Parcel Map on the above -referenced property and approve your request for a Lot Line Adjustment subject to the conditions listed in attached Exhibit "A." Should you desire to appeal the decision of the Development Review Committee, you must do so in writing with the appeal fee of $50, to, the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to 5:00 p.m., Monday, July 8, 2002. Should you have any questions regarding this matter,- please contact Craig Sanders this office Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at 538-7601. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant cc Environmental Health Department Ron Graves = 1 Jun•26. 2002 2:53PM r No -3635 P.'1/2 4 -Fax Cover Sheet, TO: COMPANY: 11- c; ��,�`� . '/ f„7 � t FAX: .543 + FROM: DATE: Number of pager including cover shoot: _ For your file Document you requested For your rsvle'w Please sign and return Please., Phone to discuss • Your co mine nts4uggestions would be appreciated Message r Jun•26. 2002 2:53PM No.3635 P - 2/2 .v 110011– wor `# ® 591C I A RANCH`REALTORS — ousa venue Yuba City, Calilornia U.S.A. 95991 SPECIALIZING IN AGRICULTURAL REALESTATE SINCE 1947 (530) 671-2770 www.stromeri,ealty.com , . Fax (530) 674.0651 t June 26, 2002 r. Butte County. Development & Review Committee RE: APN`;02g-020-054 & 056 Owner Raymond Teasdale 46.3 Acres 'Gentlemen We recently<receivi,d a notice where the above-mentioned landowner is asking.to divide his 46,3 acres into 4-10 acre parcels and 1. 6.3 acre parcel. _ I urge the comrruttee to study the break-up of this acreage. A portion of the property is a junkpile now:, .Will the division create 5 junk piles? I don't believe Butte County wants to start another, Honcut! l North and South of -.Mr. Teasdale's property is large acreages committed to Waterfowl Refuge Restoration. This subdivision the .applicant wants to -- create does not blend with. these projects. ZAzz- ican Basin Farms ~l Gordon T. Stromer, Co -Owner of A C � f C s d EXHIBIT A Lot Line Adjustment for Raymond Teasdale on APN 028-020-054 and 046, TPM 02-19: An application for a Lot Line Adjustment between two parcels to move a parcel line to remedy a situation where a structure has been constructed over a property line. This project is located in Supervisorial District 1. I. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: New lot of parcel lines shall comply with setback requirements of the applicable zoning and building ordinances. 2. Deeds and plats (if required) shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works, Land Development Division for checking and approval prior to recordation and shall contain the notes specified below. Provide documentation from a title company of the applicant's choice verifying any deed of trust affected has been re -conveyed of modified to reflect the lot line adjustment and to prevent the creation of any additional lot or parcel. 4. Prior, to recordation. of deeds; provide documentation verifying payment of taxes as required by Subsection (b) of Section 20-95 of the Butte County Code and as specified in Article 8 of Chapter.4 of Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code, commencing with section 66492. Deed Note (To be placed on any deed to effect lot line adjustment) The purpose of this deed is to effect a lot line adjustment as approved by the Butte County Director of Public Works on The above described lands are to be combined with and become a part of those lands as described in the deed to as filed for record in Butte County Official Records at Serial Number Book Page _. No additional lots or parcels are created hereby. The scope of review of said lot line adjustment was limited as specified in Government Code Section 66412(d), and approval of it does not constitute assurance that future applications for building permits.or other land use entitlements on the modified lots or parcels will be approved by the County of Butte. Plat Note (To be placed on any required Plat) This plat does not constitute a legal description of the lots or parcels depicted and does not show all easements of record on or affecting said lots or parcels. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Agenda Report ■ Page 7 0 0 BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT — June 27, 2002 Applicant: Raymond Teasdale File #: TPM 02-19 Request: This is an application for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 46.3 -acre parcel into four parcels of 10 + acres and 6.28 acre remainder. A lot Line Adjustment is also being requested to remedy a structure that was constructed over a property line Planner: Craig Sanders Location: On the west side of the. Union Pacific Railroad tracks approximately 1,200 feet north of Central House Road, Northwest of Honcut Parcel Size: 46.3 acres Supervisor District: 1 Attachments: G.P.: Orchard and Field Crops A: Parcels sizes within 1 -mile B: General Plan/Zoning Map Zoning: Agricultural 5 -acre minimum C: Initial Study parcel size (A-5) D: Site Plan APN: 028-020-054 & 046 STAFF COMMENT: The project is consistent with the A-5 zoning district, but the A-5 zone does not appear to be consistent with the policies of the General Plan designation of Orchard and Fiend Crops. The zoning predates the General Plan designation and, to date, no findings of consistency have been made in this location. Staff recommends denial of the tentative parcel map subject to the findings included in this report. Staff recommends approval of the Lot Line Adjustment subject to the conditions in Exhibit "A." PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SITE CHARACTERISTICS: This subject property is located in a rural agricultural area of the County. Adjacent land uses include project is a Tentative Parcel Map to divide an existing 46.3 -acre parcel into four parcels of 10+ acres and a6.28 -acre remainder. The project also involves a minor lot line adjustment. with the parcel to the north to remedy an encroachment over the current property line. All proposed parcels. are undeveloped. The remainder parcel has a single family residence on it. Sewage disposal for the future dwellings on the site would be handled by on-site septic systems, and domestic water obtained from individual on-site wells. All parcels would have access to Central House Road via a 60 -foot wide private road easement. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Agenda Report 0 Page 1 0 The property is relatively level with small hummocks. It appears to have been farmed with seasonal row crops in the past. Elevations range from 95 feet to 110 feet above sea level. The project site has an average slope of less than 5%. Vegetation consists of open grass lands with a few scattered oaks. Surrounding parcels range in size from 6 to 288 acres, with the average being approximately 67 acres. The site is not within a 100 -year flood zone or within an airport overflight zone. ANALYSIS: The project would result in the creation of four parcels and a remainder. Each of the proposed parcels would be vacant and would have the potential to be developed with a single family residence, as well as continue to have general agricultural uses. Based on the responses received from various County agencies, it appears that the site is physically suited to handle the potential development. Adequate water is available and the soils on site should be able to accommodate a septic system for residential purposes. The Orchard and Field Crops designation for this site was adopted as part of the 1979 County -wide General Plan revision. The A-5 zoning, however, predates the General Plan, being adopted in October of 1975. The A-5 zoning for this area has not been reviewed for consistency with the General Plan policies. The Orchard and Field Crops Land Use designation is primarily for the cultivation, harvest, storage, processing, sale and distribution of all plant crops, especially annual food crops, Secondary uses consistent with this designation include animal husbandry, resource extraction, hunting, airports, and residential uses. The zoning districts that are consistent with the Orchard and Field Crops designation are Agriculture -20, -40, and -160 acre minimums. The Agriculture 5 -acre minimum zone is conditionally consistent provided the following three conditions exist: 1) The predominant existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres; 2) The area is adjacent to or in the vicinity of urban boundaries; and 3) The present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. Based upon these conditional criteria, the present A-5 zoning district in this particular location doesn't appear to be consistent with the General Plan because the conditional criteria do not appear to be evident. The predominate parcel size in the area appears to be over 20 acres. An analysis of the properties within 1 mile of the subject site reveals that there are 58 parcels averaging approximately 72 acres in size. The median parcel size is 38 acres; 36 of the 58 parcels are greater than 20 acres in size. The site is not adjacent to or in the general vicinity of any urban area. Palermo, the nearest area with urban densities is approximately 6 miles away direct distance and approximately 7.5 miles away driving distance. The agricultural production status of the site would be impaired with the development of 4 residences. Also significant is the typically poor soil in the area that is not conducive to small scale, intensive agriculture. At 10 acres, the proposed parcel sizes will not generally be economically viable for commercial agricultural production. The proposed parcels will, in essence, become residential ranchettes. The 280 -acre property immediately adjacent 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Agenda Report 0 Page 2 0 to the west has just recently been planted in olives. This planting was part of a larger farm consisting of approximately 680 acres. Section 66473.5 'of the Subdivision Map Act explicitly states that a land division cannot be approved unless the legislative body can find that the project is consistent with the General Plan. Based on this code section, it is recommended that the project be denied. CEQA ISSUES: If the project is denied, no CEQA findings need to be made. However, if the Development Review Committee finds that the project does meet the policies of the General Plan and is consistent, there are three mitigation measures in the attached Initial Study that should be included as conditions of the project. If the Development Review Committee decides to approve the project, a set of findings and conditions are attached as Exhibit "B." ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: An Initial Study has been prepared for this project by County staff. Staff has determined, based on a review of the Initial Study, that a significant impact exists with land use issues and policies and a Negative Declaration is not appropriate unless the project can be found consistent with these land use policies. ACTION FOR CONSIDERATION: Staff recommends that the Development Review Committee take the following actions: I. Find that the A-5 zone and the proposed project isnot consistent' -with the Butte County General Plan based on the following: A. The A-5 zoning designation was adopted on October 7, 1975, prior to the adoption of the Butte County General Plan in 1979. B. The 1979 General Plan Land Use Element designates the property as "Orchard and Field Crops." Consistent zoning designations with this land use category are A-20, A-40, and A-160. The A-5 and A-10 zones may be found consistent with this land use designation when three conditional criteria are applicable to the project site and area. These criteria are: The predominant existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres. Within a 1 -mile radius of the parcel there are 58 parcels ranging is size from0.4 to 333 acres. The average parcel size is approximately 72 acres. The Median parcel size is 38 acres. Of the 58 parcels, 32 parcels are over 20 acres in size. The predominant parcel size is not in the 5- to 10 -acre range.. 2. The area is adjacent to, or in the vicinity of urban boundaries. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services N Agenda Report 0 Page 3 ■ • The project site is approximately 7.5 miles of driving distance from both Palermo and Gridley. This is not considered to be in the vicinity of urban boundaries. 3. The present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. The proposed 10 -acre parcels will not be agriculturally viable. The soils on site are not prime soils and are not suitable for intense high yield farming. II. Deny the Tentative Subdivision Map 02-19, for Raymond Teasdale. III. Approve the Lot Line adjustment between APN 028-020-054 and 028-020-046 subject to the conditions in exhibit "A." 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Agenda Report 0 Page 4 ■ If the Development Review Committee can find that the project is consistent with the General Plan, the following findings would be appropriate: I. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings: A. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Said study identified significant environmental effects and included mitigation measures that would mitigate such effects below significant levels; a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. B. The Development Review Committee has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with comments received during the review process. C. On the basis of the whole record before the Development Review Committee, including the Initial , Study and any comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the Tentative Parcel Map for Raymond Teasdale, Planning Division File No. TPM 02-19, will have a significant effect on the environment. D. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the County, which is the Lead Agency. II. The design of the proposed project improvements may cause environmental damage to fish and wildlife or their habitat. The collection of fees pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) and 14 CCR 753.5. is required. III. Approve Tentative Parcel Map/Lot Line Adjustment 02-19, for Raymond Teasdale, subject to the conditions found in Exhibit "B" and the following findings: A. The proposed reap is consistent with the Butte County General Plan Goals and Policies, particularly Land Use Element Polices: 3.2.a Residential densities shall be correlated to soil, slope and other natural site characteristics. 3.2.b. Correlate residential densities to availability of water and sewage disposal and proximity to.other public facilities. 3.2.c. Relate residential densities to intensity and compatibility of adjacent uses. 3.2..d. Balance residential densities with traffic -carrying capacities of existing and proposed circulation plans. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Agenda Report 0 Page 5 0 B. The project meets the conditional site, designation criteria for 5 -acre zoning in the 1979 General Plan Land Use Element, "Orchard and Field Crops" designation. The project meets the three following criteria: 1. The predominant existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres; 2. The area is adjacent to or in the vicinity of urban boundaries; and 3. The present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. C. The design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with County standards and policies provided all conditions of project approval are complied with. D. The project is physically suitable for the use and density of the proposed development because of the proposed parcel sizes provide adequate soils for leachfields, well locations and building sites that will not result in significant physical changes to the property. E. The design and improvements of the.project will not cause public health or safety problems due to the large parcel sizes, and because the project site does not contain any physical characteristics that could cause health or safety concerns with the provided mitigation. F. The design and improvements of the project will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at.large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision provided the attached conditions are met. G. Approval of this project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare provided the required conditions and mitigation measures are complied with. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Agenda Report ■ Page 6 ■ • EXHIBIT A • Lot Line Adjustment for Raymond Teasdale on APN 028-020-054 and 046, TPM 02-19: An application for a Lot Line Adjustment between two parcels to move a parcel line to remedy a situation where a structure has been constructed over a property line. This project is located in Supervisorial District 1. I. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. New lot of parcel lines shall comply with setback requirements of the applicable zoning and building ordinances. 2. Deeds and plats (if required) shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works, Land Development Division for checking and approval prior to recordation and shall contain the notes specified below. 3. Provide documentation from a title company of the applicant's choice verifying any deed of trust affected has been re -conveyed of modified to reflect the lot line adjustment and to prevent the creation of any additional lot or parcel. 4. Prior to recordation of deeds, provide documentation verifying payment of taxes as required by Subsection (b) of Section 20-95 of the Butte County Code and as specified in Article 8 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code, commencing with section 66492. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Agenda Report 0 Page 7 0 EXHIBIT B Tentative Parcel Map/Lot Line Adjustment for Raymond Teasdale on APN 028-020-054 and 046, TPM 02-19: An application for a Tentative Parcel Map/Lot Line Adjustment to divide an 46.3 -acre parcel into four parcels of 10 acres and a 6.28 acre remainder. This project is located in Supervisorial District 1. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Planning Division I . Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler. systems are to be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. C. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation." (Mitigation Measure) Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown on grading and building plans. Timing: Condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction periods. Monitoring: The Department shall ensure that measures are indicated on the plans. Public Works Grading and Building inspectors shall spot check; Grading and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Pollution Control District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. 2. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the final map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Structures (excepting wells), dumping, fill material, vegetation removal and/or excavation other than approved stream crossing for roads/driveways shall not be allowed within the 50 -foot No Disturbance Setback as depicted. Limited vegetation removal necessary for fire hazard reduction is permissible within the No Disturbance Setback, however, all living and thriving native trees shall be ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Agenda Report 0 Page 8 0 retained and all. vegetation removal shall be approved by the Department of Fish and Game prior to removal." The 50 -foot "No Disturbance Setback" shall be measured from the top of the bank along the depicted drainage courses." This setback shall be clearly delineated on the final map. Plan Requirements: The required note and graphic depiction of the setback shall be included on the Final Map. The Department of Development Services shall ensure that the note is placed on the Final Map. Timing: At the time of building plan checking, building and site plans would be checked for compliance with the condition. Monitoring: The Building Division and the Planning Division would check building and site plans for compliance prior to issuance of a building permit. Building inspectors would ensure compliance by conducting an on-site inspection prior to the final inspection. 3. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states:: `Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized community water system, with hydrants that meet Fire Department specifications, serves the parcels." Plan Requirements: The note shall be placed on the Final Map. Timing: Interior fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures at the time of building construction. Monitoring: Building Division plan checkers shall ensure that the building plans for residential structures include interior fire sprinkler systems. Building inspectors shall ensure all residential structures have a functioning interior fire sprinkler system prior to the final inspection, by conducting an on-site inspection. 4. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or -on an additional map sheet that states: "A development impact fee for Sheriffs facilities shall be paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article Il of the Butte County Code, ;prior to issuance of building permits. The fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permit." Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or ori an additional map sheet that states: "A development impact fee for school ■ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Agenda Report 0 Page 9 ■ 0 0 facilities shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. The fee amount would be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permits." Land Development Division 6. Prior to, or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, provide a fully executed road maintenance agreement on the County approved form. 7. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the Parcel Map. Street names shall be approved by the County Address Coordinator prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map. 8. Pay the recording fees then in effect for recording the Parcel Maps and related documents. 9. Provide a cul-de-sac, designed and constructed to county standards as specified in the County Improvement Standards. The Parcel Map shall show the cul-de-sac. 10. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map, prove, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, that there is approved access conforming to County standards to each parcel from a publicly maintained road. 11. All access rights shall be reserved by deed, per County Ordinance. 12. The developer shall provide all necessary traffic safety signs including stop signs. A note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet of the Parcel Map stating: "No public entity shall be responsible for the maintenance of the stop sign. In accordance with Civil Code Section 845, maintenance of the road, including the stop sign shall be shared by those properties with a legal interest in the private right-of-way or easement." 13. Provi' d two-waytra ersable access to'each par" cel from a County maintained road or from a state highway. Improve parcel frontage and access road to RS -8 LD- II and access road to the parcel being divided to RS -8 LD -I. 14. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map, obtain an encroachment permit and construct a standard road approach, in accordance with County Improvement Standards. Adequate sight distance at the intersection of access road and Central House Road shall be provided. 15. Show on the additional map sheet of the Parcel Map a 50 -foot. building setback from the centerline of the access road. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Agenda Report ■ Page 10 0 16. Show all easements of record on the Parcel Map. 17. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, pay in full any and all delinquent, current and estimated taxes and assessments as specified in Article 8, of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7, of the California Government Code commencing with Section 66492. 18. New lot of parcel lines shall comply with setback requirements of the applicable zoning and building ordinances. 19. Deeds and plats (if required) shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works, Land Development, Division for checking and approval prior to recordation and shall contain the notes specified below. 20. Provide documentation from a title company of the applicant's choice verifying any deed of trust affected has been re -conveyed of modified to reflect the lot line adjustment and to prevent the creation of any additional lot or parcel. 21. Prior to recordation of deeds, provide documentation verifying payment of taxes as required by Subsection (b) of Section 20-95 of the Butte County Code and as specified in Article 8 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code, commencing with section 66492. UA Fire Department 'J 22. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance. with Public Resources Code 4290 prior to recordation of the Final Map. 23. In lieu of a pressurized water system or water storage tank, payment of $200.00 per created parcel into the Battalion 3 water tender fund, is required prior to the recordation of the Final Map. 24. Provide and all-weather access at least 10 feet wide with a vertical clearance of 15 feet that will accommodate a 40,000 pound fire apparatus. Environmental Health Conditions 25. Identify on the additional map sheet a 50' leachfield setback from the drainageway on parcels 1 and 4. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Agenda Report ■ Page 11 0 26. Identify on the additional map sheet a 100' leachfield setback from the highwater line of the creek on. lots 1, 2, 3, and 4. 27. Identify on the additional map sheet usable sewage disposal area proven to meet the requirements of County Improvement Standards, Appendix 7. Combine with adjacent parcels any parcel not proven to contain the usable area. 28. Identify on the additional map sheet that no water well may be located within 100' of the usable sewage disposal area on parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4. County Counsel 29. If this entire matter or any finding, action or condition of this matter is appealed to the Board of Supervisors, the applicant, or any other subdivider other than the applicant, agrees to indemnify the County of Butte from liability or loss related to the approval of this project and agrees to sign an indemnification agreement in a form approved by County Counsel before the Board's appeal hearing.'If the application is not appealed, this condition is deemed satisfied. IL NOTATION A. Minor changes. may be approved administratively by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. K:\PROJECTS\TPM\Teasda le\AGENDA2. REP. doc ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Agenda Report 0 Page 12 ■ I I I ► ► 1 `I .1 E I • ® L ^.4 4 1► s +y� .s, ► •� 6th a � uTd "7yK i (�A ggOWN S • IQi�I�■1 �� 4 � �R.S- I}fR.yp-� i.'�+` ► h ����- �' �V�1�i1. �' . �� F � 1 i �., � . 6 1 f '., s IR 1/ Yj Mor` ► ���x £�wk.' x r ;'�' �� '-1��■,� � � ._ i � �� °�`� ` ,� �'.� , x-���3�, , m _ � � _ 111 '.1/ 11 1 /`/a 11 11 /1 11 11 // 11 111 11 :•11 1/ ':11 1 11 11 •-11 11 BUTTE DEVELOPMENT ,I COMINUTTEE Applicant:RaymondTeasdale1 '• I -Same i 1 1" 0+ / �O 11 :� l l 1 1 y 11 . 11 1 11 111 S4ervisorial , 1 Request: 1 1 1/ 1 1 / 1/ 1 Line Adj�is�ment1 1 1_.acre,pgdrelinto, 1 1 1acrelots 1 1 remainder1 of 1Assessor28 I W 1 1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT BUTTE COUNTY INITIAL STUDY AND PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TPM 02-19 (Teasdale) } Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY FOR TPM 02-19 (Teasdale) 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION I , A. Applicant/Owner: Raymond Teasdale B. Engineer: Ron Graves C. Staff Contact: Craig Sanders D. Project Name: N!A E. Proiect Location: Located approximately 1,300 feet north of Central House Road, abutting the Union Pacific Railroad tracks which run along the east property boundary, northwest of Honcut F. Tvpe of Application(s): Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment G. Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 028-020-054 and 046 H. Project Site Size: 47 acres I. Current Zoning: A-5 (Agricultural, 5 -acre minimum parcel size) J. General Plan Designation: Orchard and Field Crops K. Environmental Setting: The site is undeveloped and consists of numerous oaks, some brush, and a large cleared open area consisting of grasses.' Elevations range from 95 feet to 110 feet above sea level. The project site has an average slope of less than 5%. Vegetation consists of open grass lands with a few scattered oaks. Surrounding parcels range in size from 10 to 191 acres, with the average being approximately 67 acres. The site is not within a 100 -year flood zone or within an airport overflight zone. L. Surrounding Land Uses: Dwellings at rural densities, small olive orchards, and limited livestock grazing. M. Proiect Description: This is an application for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 47 -acre parcel into four parcels and a remainder of 6.28 acres. ' The project also involves a minor lot line adjustment with the parcel to. the north to remedy a encroachment over the current property line. All proposed parcels are undeveloped. The remainder parcel has a single family residence on it. Sewage disposal for the future dwellings on the site would be handled by on-site septic systems'and domestic water obtained from individual on-site wells. All parcels would have access to Central House Road via a 60 -foot wide private road easement. N. Public Agency Approvals: Butte County Environmental Health Department, Butte County Public Works Department, and Butte County Fire Department. 2.0 DETERMINATION [ ] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 1 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 [ ] I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [X] I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [ ] I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR 'or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed pon the proposed project, nothing further is required. (L,/ ",&, 5/ Il 0 D Z Prepared by. C g Sanders, Senior Planner Date I Reviewed by: M. A. Meleka, Principal Planner Date 3.0 POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS CHECKLIST SETTING A. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [ ] 4.1 Aesthetics [ ] 4.2 Agriculture Resources [X] 4.3 Air Quality [X] 4.4 Biological Resources [ ] 4.5 Cultural Resources [ ] 4.6 Geologic Processes [ J 4.7 Hazards/Hazardous Material [ ] 4.8 Hydrology/Water Quality [X] 4.9 Land Use [ ] 4.10 Mineral Resources [ ] 4.11 Noise [ ] 4.12 Housing [X] 4.13 Public Services [ ] 4.14 Recreation [ ] 4.15 Transportation/Traffic [ ] 4.16 Utilities/Service Systems [X] 4.17 Mandatory Findings of Significance B. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards, (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a project -specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 2 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination�is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) "Reviewed Under Previous Document." Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 4.1 AESTHETIC/VISUAL RESOURCES: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 3 111 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings X within a state scenic highway? C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or X quality of the site and its surroundings? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 3 111 • • Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Impact Discussion: The project would result in the creation of four new parcels that could be developed with a single family dwelling unit. With the existing rural residential uses found in the project area, no substantial conflicts with the established character or functioning of the surrounding community is anticipated. Future dwellings on the site may have outside lighting for safety and security purposes. Street lighting is not proposed nor required as a part of the project. The relatively large size of the parcels would help attenuate light and glare contributed from development of the project site. The project would not create any significant sources of new light or glare. The project site is not located on a State or County scenic highway (Butte County Scenic Highway Map). This project would not affect a scenic vista nor would it have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.2 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Would the proposal: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland Incorporated d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the X area? X Impact Discussion: The project would result in the creation of four new parcels that could be developed with a single family dwelling unit. With the existing rural residential uses found in the project area, no substantial conflicts with the established character or functioning of the surrounding community is anticipated. Future dwellings on the site may have outside lighting for safety and security purposes. Street lighting is not proposed nor required as a part of the project. The relatively large size of the parcels would help attenuate light and glare contributed from development of the project site. The project would not create any significant sources of new light or glare. The project site is not located on a State or County scenic highway (Butte County Scenic Highway Map). This project would not affect a scenic vista nor would it have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.2 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Would the proposal: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Less Than Significant No Impact Reviewed Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and X Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract? X c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion X of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Impact Discussion: The A-5 zoning of the site allows most types of agricultural uses 'as a primary use; residential uses are also a permitted use. The General Plan land use designation of Orchard and Field Crops and agriculture is listed as a primary use and residential uses are listed'as Secondary Uses. The site has been farmed with annual row crops. Adjoining agricultural uses include olive orchards and other row crops. It is anticipated that approximately 0.75 acre of each created parcel will be devoted to future residential use, leaving a little over 9 acres for continued agricultural operation. The area for potential cultivation would be under four separate ownerships making economically viable agriculture infeasible. However, the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner's office has reviewed the project and did not have any concerns regarding the division. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 4 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 The entire site has soils with a Soil Classification Service Classification of IV. Class IV soil is not considered prime soil and it has some limitations but is generally adequate for agricultural uses (Butte County Master Environmental Assessment, Table LU -4). There is no California Land Conservation Agreement ("Williamson Act") contract affecting this property or any of the immediate surrounding parcels. The project is not subject to the provisions of the Agricultural Element of the Butte County General Plan. Agricultural uses, including grazing, would be possible on the proposed parcels. No significant impact is anticipated to agricultural resources as a result of this project. Mitip,ation Measure: None required 4.3 AIR QUALITY: Would the Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air X quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Impact Discussion: Both the California Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency have established air pollution standards in an effort to protect human health and welfare. Geographic areas are designated attainment if these standards are met and nonattainment if they are not met. In addition, each agency has several levels of classifications based on severity of the problem. Butte County and all northern Sacramento Valley Air Districts have been designated as "moderate" nonattainment areas for the state standards for ozone (03) and fine particulate matter (PM 10). Currently, Butte County is in attainment for all the federal (less stringent) air quality standards. Vehicle traffic generated by the project site would result in a cumulative impact on air quality created by the increase in vehicle traffic, the use of wood burning devices in the new residences, and dust from vehicular traffic on unpaved driveways on the site. This is not anticipated to be significant because only four new parcels would be created. The proposed 4 lots are well below the 97 -lot threshold established by the Butte County Air Quality Management District for additional air-quality analysis (1997 Air Quality Attainment Plan). The project may create fugitive dust emission during site development activities, such as grading, excavation for foundations and utilities, and other soil work. The Butte County Air Quality Management District (BCAQMD) recommends incorporating measures to control fugitive dust emission for all road and other construction activities during project development, using such methods as site and driveway watering and/or use of other acceptable soil palliatives. Mitigation Measure # 1 requires a note be placed on the final map stating that dust control measures shall be taken during site development activities. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 5 ■ • 0 Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Mitigation Measure # 1: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems are to be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent .dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation." Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown on grading and building plans. Timing: Condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction periods. Monitoring: The Department shall ensure that measures are indicated on the plans. Public Works Grading and Building inspectors shall spot check; Grading and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Pollution Control District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Less Than Significant No Impact Reviewed Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California X Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California X Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 or the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, X etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means)? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish and wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, X or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy X ordinance? C Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, X ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 6 ■ 0 • Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Would the proposal: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Less Than Significant No Impact Reviewed Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservationplan? g. A reduction in the numbers, a restriction in the range, or an impact to the critical habitat of any unique, rare, threatened, X or endangered species of animals? h. A reduction in the diversity or numbers of animals onsite (including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish or X invertebrates)? i. A deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat (for foraging, breeding, roosting, nesting, etc.)? X j. Introduction of barriers to movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species? X k. Introduction of any factors (light, fencing, noise, human presence and/or domestic animals) which could hinder the X normal activities of wildlife? Impact Discussion: The project site is has been farmed for many years. No significant native vegetation exists. on the site. A few mature trees exist along the easterly boundary of the property adjacent to a seasonal tributary to Honcut Creek. The riparian vegetation along this drainage way plays an important role in providing water for fish and wildlife and linking all habitats in the watershed to the nutrient and energy sources in such ecosystem. Riparian vegetation also acts as a buffer to filter pollutants in runoff and prevent soil sediments from entering drainageways. In order to lessen the impacts on the riparian habitat located on the site, a mitigation measure is proposed that requires a 50 -foot "No Development Zone" along the drainageway on the site, including intermittent drainages. The distance would be measured from the top of bank or outer edge of the riparian vegetation along the drainageway, whichever is greater. Driveway, road crossings, and domestic wells are allowed within the "No Development Zone," but a Streambed Alteration Agreement must be approved by the California Department of Fish and Game prior to any work within the water course. Limited amounts of vegetation removal is allowed within the "No Development Zone," but approval must be obtained from the Department of Fish and Game. No rare, endangered, or threatened plants are known to exist on the site (California Department of Fish and Game ASBI maps). The project site is not located in deer herd winter range (Butte County Deer Herd GIS coverage). The project would not have a significant impact on deer herd range. The project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. The proposal would not conflict with the provisions. of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Mitigation Measure #2: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the final map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Structures (excepting wells), dumping, fill material, vegetation removal and/or excavation other than approved stream crossing for roads/driveways shall not be allowed within the 50 -foot No Disturbance Setback as depicted. Limited vegetation removal necessary for fire hazard reduction is permissible within the No Disturbance Setback, however, all living and thriving native trees shall be retained and all vegetation removal shall be approved by ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 7 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 the Department of Fish and Game prior to removal." The 50 -foot "No Disturbance Setback" shall be measured from the top of the bank along the depicted drainage courses." This setback shall be clearly delineated on the final map. Plan Requirements: The required note and graphic depiction of the setback shall be included on the Final Map. The Department of Development Services shall ensure that the note is placed on the Final Map. Timing: At the time of building plan checking, building and site plans would be checked for compliance with the condition. Monitoring: The Building Division and the Planning Division would check building and site plans for compliance prior to issuance of a building permit. Building inspectors would ensure compliance by conducting an on-site inspection prior to the final inspection. 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES: Impact Discussion: Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites; historical features, such as rock walls, water ditches and flumes, and cemeteries; and architectural features. Cultural resources consist of any human -made site, object (i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past. No such structures or sites are located on the subject site. The project site is located in a general area characterized as having a low to medium, including unknown, archeological sensitivity. The location of the project is in an area that does not have a high potential for historical or cultural resources. Often such sites are found in foothill areas, areas with high bluffs, rock outcroppings, areas overlooking deer migratory corridors, or above bodies of water. While the site is located in a foothill area, it does not contain any of the other physical features where cultural resources may be expected to be found. Therefore, no impacts are expected to occur to any historical or cultural resources. Miti ation Measure: None required ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 8 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an X archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X resource or site or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred X outside of formal cemeteries?. Impact Discussion: Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic period archaeological sites; historical features, such as rock walls, water ditches and flumes, and cemeteries; and architectural features. Cultural resources consist of any human -made site, object (i.e., artifact), or feature that defines and illuminates our past. No such structures or sites are located on the subject site. The project site is located in a general area characterized as having a low to medium, including unknown, archeological sensitivity. The location of the project is in an area that does not have a high potential for historical or cultural resources. Often such sites are found in foothill areas, areas with high bluffs, rock outcroppings, areas overlooking deer migratory corridors, or above bodies of water. While the site is located in a foothill area, it does not contain any of the other physical features where cultural resources may be expected to be found. Therefore, no impacts are expected to occur to any historical or cultural resources. Miti ation Measure: None required ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 8 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 4.6 GEOLOGIC PROCESSES: Impact Discussion: The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone. The nearest active fault, the Cleveland Hill fault, is located approximately 10 northeast of the site. The Butte County GIS Fault Lines theme shows that an inferred fault is located approximately 3 miles to the east of the site. This inferred fault is a part of the Foothill Shear Zone and has not experienced any known movement during historical times. No impacts are anticipated since no rupture of a known earthquake fault exists in the project area. The intensity of ground shaking at any specific site depends on the characteristics of the earthquake, the distance from the earthquake, and on the local geologic soils and conditions. At present, there is insufficient data to predict accurately the expected ground motions atvarious locations in Butte County. However, strong seismic ground shaking is closely related to the proximity of active fault lines. Although there is insufficient data to predict these forces, the closest mapped Fault -Rupture Zone is the Cleveland Hills fault zone, which is located approximately 1.8 miles to the east of the project site. The Cleveland Hills fault line is the only fault line in Butte County that is recognized under the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zones Act to pose a threat from fault rupture. However, new structures placed on the site are required to meet the seismic standards of the Uniform Building Code. Seismic risk is not limited to faults which have been currently identified. Some earthquakes originate from unknown sources sometimes characterized as "background seismicity" or "floating earthquakes". The Butte County Master Environmental Assessment indicates that it is reasonable to assume that background seismicity could produce earthquakes as large as Richter magnitude (modified Mercalli intensity scale) 6.5 virtually anywhere in Butte County. There is no current evidence that an earthquake larger than magnitude 6.5 would occur at this location. Earthquakes at ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 9 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault X Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? X 3. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? X 4. Landslides? X b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and X potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial X risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system X where sewers are not available for the disposal or waste water? Impact Discussion: The Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake fault zone. The nearest active fault, the Cleveland Hill fault, is located approximately 10 northeast of the site. The Butte County GIS Fault Lines theme shows that an inferred fault is located approximately 3 miles to the east of the site. This inferred fault is a part of the Foothill Shear Zone and has not experienced any known movement during historical times. No impacts are anticipated since no rupture of a known earthquake fault exists in the project area. The intensity of ground shaking at any specific site depends on the characteristics of the earthquake, the distance from the earthquake, and on the local geologic soils and conditions. At present, there is insufficient data to predict accurately the expected ground motions atvarious locations in Butte County. However, strong seismic ground shaking is closely related to the proximity of active fault lines. Although there is insufficient data to predict these forces, the closest mapped Fault -Rupture Zone is the Cleveland Hills fault zone, which is located approximately 1.8 miles to the east of the project site. The Cleveland Hills fault line is the only fault line in Butte County that is recognized under the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zones Act to pose a threat from fault rupture. However, new structures placed on the site are required to meet the seismic standards of the Uniform Building Code. Seismic risk is not limited to faults which have been currently identified. Some earthquakes originate from unknown sources sometimes characterized as "background seismicity" or "floating earthquakes". The Butte County Master Environmental Assessment indicates that it is reasonable to assume that background seismicity could produce earthquakes as large as Richter magnitude (modified Mercalli intensity scale) 6.5 virtually anywhere in Butte County. There is no current evidence that an earthquake larger than magnitude 6.5 would occur at this location. Earthquakes at ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 9 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 this magnitude are generally felt by all persons, but damage is generally slight to minor, with fallen chimneys and cracked plaster the most prominent damage. Richter magnitude 6.5 is not subjectively characterized on the intensity scale, but a magnitude 7 is generally characterized by negligible damage, especially in buildings of good design and construction. Considerable damage can occur in poorly built or badly designed structures. However, the impact would be less than significant. The Butte County Seismic Safety Element's Liquefaction Potential Map indicates that the site has a low potential for liquefaction. The impact would be less than significant. The Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that there is a low to moderate potential for landslides in this area. No impact is anticipated. The Erosion Potential Map of the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan indicates that the soil erosion potential for the project site is low to moderate. The site is relatively level with slopes generally less than 5%. Standard construction techniques are required as part of the construction process of this site, which would help prevent significant soil erosion impacts. Disruption of soils on the site is not expected to create significant soil erosion due to the moderate slopes on the site. No impact is anticipated from instability, landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. The Conservation Element's Expansive Soils Map indicates that the project site has a high expansive soil potential. The Building Division may require that the foundations of future dwelling on the site be designed and constructed to handle the shrink/swell characteristics of expansive soils. The Butte County Environmental Health Department does not object to the use of septic systems on the property. Percolation tests were conducted on the site and sewage disposal areas are identified on the tentative parcel map. Septic systems installed'on the site are required to comply with the County Improvement Standards. No impact is anticipated. MitilZation Measure: None required 4.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 10 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environmental through the routine transport use, or disposal X of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident X conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- X quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code X Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 10 ■ 0 • Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Impact Discussion: The project site is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials and would not create any hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. The property is not located within the vicinity of an airport, or'airport land -use plan. A private airstrip is located adjacent to the property along the westerly boundary. This strip is very rough and appears to be seldomly used. It may be utilized for re crop dusting operations. The addition of four potential homes to the area will not conflict with the infrequent use. of the airstrip nor does the airstrip pose any significant hazard to future homes. All home locations would be to the side of the runway, not under the approach or take -off areas, and does not interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact would occur. The project is not located within a State Response Area for wildland fires. Butte County Fire/CDF would provide local response for fire protection. The nearest fire station is Station # 75 (full time), located approximately 3 miles to the south in Honcut. A pressurized water system with fire hydrants does not serve the project site. The Butte County Fire Department/CDF uses a water tender truck for fire fighting purposes. This project would be conditioned to contribute $200 per lot into the water tender fund to support the cost of providing this service. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project X result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? L For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or X working in the project area? g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation X Ian? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where X wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with willdlands? Impact Discussion: The project site is not located on or near any sources of hazardous materials and would not create any hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. The property is not located within the vicinity of an airport, or'airport land -use plan. A private airstrip is located adjacent to the property along the westerly boundary. This strip is very rough and appears to be seldomly used. It may be utilized for re crop dusting operations. The addition of four potential homes to the area will not conflict with the infrequent use. of the airstrip nor does the airstrip pose any significant hazard to future homes. All home locations would be to the side of the runway, not under the approach or take -off areas, and does not interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact would occur. The project is not located within a State Response Area for wildland fires. Butte County Fire/CDF would provide local response for fire protection. The nearest fire station is Station # 75 (full time), located approximately 3 miles to the south in Honcut. A pressurized water system with fire hydrants does not serve the project site. The Butte County Fire Department/CDF uses a water tender truck for fire fighting purposes. This project would be conditioned to contribute $200 per lot into the water tender fund to support the cost of providing this service. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page l l ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page l l ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Impact Discussion: All wastewater generated by the future dwellings on .the site would be handled by individual, on-site septic systems. The Butte County Environmental Health Division does not object to the use of septic systems on the site. Septic systems placed on the site must meet the requirements of the Butte County Environmental Health Division and Chapter 20, entitled "Subdivision Ordinance," of the Butte County Code. No impacts to surface or ground water are anticipated due to the proposed use of septic systems on the site. Domestic water supply for the future dwellings on the site would be obtained from individual on-site wells. The Butte County Environmental Health Division does not object to the use of wells on the site. The project may cause a small reduction in groundwater in the project area due to the new wells that would supply water for the future residential uses established on the site. This project would ultimately result in the creation of new impervious surfaces such as houses, accessory structures, and driveways. A minor increase in surface water runoff can be expected due to the reduced absorption rate created from the impervious surfaces. However, the low density of development proposed for this project would not significantly increase runoff. Significant changes to the drainage patterns are not anticipated by the construction of four single family residences. In addition, adherence to the drainage standards of the Butte County Public Works Department is anticipated to mitigate possible impacts on the drainage system. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 12 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal' Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of X preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for, which pen -nits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a X stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount X of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage X systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? L Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g. Place housing within a I00 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood X Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a I00 -year flood hazard area structures which X would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a X result of the failure of a levee or dam? J. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Impact Discussion: All wastewater generated by the future dwellings on .the site would be handled by individual, on-site septic systems. The Butte County Environmental Health Division does not object to the use of septic systems on the site. Septic systems placed on the site must meet the requirements of the Butte County Environmental Health Division and Chapter 20, entitled "Subdivision Ordinance," of the Butte County Code. No impacts to surface or ground water are anticipated due to the proposed use of septic systems on the site. Domestic water supply for the future dwellings on the site would be obtained from individual on-site wells. The Butte County Environmental Health Division does not object to the use of wells on the site. The project may cause a small reduction in groundwater in the project area due to the new wells that would supply water for the future residential uses established on the site. This project would ultimately result in the creation of new impervious surfaces such as houses, accessory structures, and driveways. A minor increase in surface water runoff can be expected due to the reduced absorption rate created from the impervious surfaces. However, the low density of development proposed for this project would not significantly increase runoff. Significant changes to the drainage patterns are not anticipated by the construction of four single family residences. In addition, adherence to the drainage standards of the Butte County Public Works Department is anticipated to mitigate possible impacts on the drainage system. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 12 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood zone as shown on the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map 06007C -995C, dated June 8, 1998. The property is not located in an area prone to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact would occur with respect to these natural hazards. Mitigation Measure: None required. 4.9 LAND USE: Impact Discussion: The proposal would divide a 47 -acre parcel into four parcels of 10 acres and a remainder of 6.28 acres. This density is consistent with the A-5 zoning for the property which was adopted in October of 1975. The General Plan Land Use designation for the site, Orchard and Field Crops, was adopted as part of the 1979 County -wide General Plan revision. Once the 1979 plan was adopted, the previously adopted zoning designations were supposed to have been reviewed for consistency with the General Plan. This review, however, has not occurred. The Orchard and Field Crops Land Use designation is primarily for the cultivation, harvest, storage, processing, sale and distribution of all plant crops, especially annual food crops, Secondary uses consistent with this designation include animal husbandry, resource extraction, hunting, airports, and residential uses. The zoning districts that are consistent with the Orchard and Field Crops designation are Agriculture -20, -40, and -160 acre minimums. The Agriculture 5 -acre minimum zone is conditionally consistent provided the following three conditions exist: 1) The predominant existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres; 2) The area is adjacent to or in the vicinity of urban boundaries; and 3) The present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. Based upon these conditional criteria, the present A-5 zoning district is not consistent with the General Plan because the conditional criteria cannot be met. The predominate parcels size in the area is .approximately 40 acres. The site is not adjacent to or in the general vicinity of any urban area. Palermo, the nearest are with urban densities is approximately 6 miles away. The agricultural production status of the site will be significantly impaired by the development of four additional dwellings. More significantly, the typically poor soils in the area are not conducive to small scale, intensive agriculture. At 10 acres, the proposed parcel sizes will not generally be economically viable for commercial agricultural production. The parcels will, in essence, become residential ranchettes. The 280 -acre property immediately adjacent to the west has just recently been planted in olives. This planting was part of a larger farm consisting of approximately 680 acres. The site has the physical capability to support one dwelling per 10 acres with causing significant impacts the physical environment. However the area, if it were to develop at the proposed density, does not have the infrastructure to support the increased population. Since the project does not appear to conform to the policies of the General Plan, approval cannot be recommended. This proposal would not physically divide an established community as it is not located near a community. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 13 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: 1 Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Physically divide an established community? X Ii. Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, X local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X natural community conservationplan? Impact Discussion: The proposal would divide a 47 -acre parcel into four parcels of 10 acres and a remainder of 6.28 acres. This density is consistent with the A-5 zoning for the property which was adopted in October of 1975. The General Plan Land Use designation for the site, Orchard and Field Crops, was adopted as part of the 1979 County -wide General Plan revision. Once the 1979 plan was adopted, the previously adopted zoning designations were supposed to have been reviewed for consistency with the General Plan. This review, however, has not occurred. The Orchard and Field Crops Land Use designation is primarily for the cultivation, harvest, storage, processing, sale and distribution of all plant crops, especially annual food crops, Secondary uses consistent with this designation include animal husbandry, resource extraction, hunting, airports, and residential uses. The zoning districts that are consistent with the Orchard and Field Crops designation are Agriculture -20, -40, and -160 acre minimums. The Agriculture 5 -acre minimum zone is conditionally consistent provided the following three conditions exist: 1) The predominant existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres; 2) The area is adjacent to or in the vicinity of urban boundaries; and 3) The present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. Based upon these conditional criteria, the present A-5 zoning district is not consistent with the General Plan because the conditional criteria cannot be met. The predominate parcels size in the area is .approximately 40 acres. The site is not adjacent to or in the general vicinity of any urban area. Palermo, the nearest are with urban densities is approximately 6 miles away. The agricultural production status of the site will be significantly impaired by the development of four additional dwellings. More significantly, the typically poor soils in the area are not conducive to small scale, intensive agriculture. At 10 acres, the proposed parcel sizes will not generally be economically viable for commercial agricultural production. The parcels will, in essence, become residential ranchettes. The 280 -acre property immediately adjacent to the west has just recently been planted in olives. This planting was part of a larger farm consisting of approximately 680 acres. The site has the physical capability to support one dwelling per 10 acres with causing significant impacts the physical environment. However the area, if it were to develop at the proposed density, does not have the infrastructure to support the increased population. Since the project does not appear to conform to the policies of the General Plan, approval cannot be recommended. This proposal would not physically divide an established community as it is not located near a community. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 13 ■ i Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Surrounding and nearby parcels are zoned A-5 with a General Plan land use designation of Orchard and Field Crops and Agricultural Residential. These parcels range in size from 30 to 280 acres, with the predominant size being in over 40 acres., Existing land uses on surrounding and nearby parcels include dwellings at very low rural densities, large olive orchards, seasonal crop production, and limited livestock grazing. The project is generally not compatible with surrounding parcel sizes or land use. The property is not within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.10 MINERAL RESOURCES: Impact Discussion: • The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to known mineral resource areas. The project is located within an area .where there are little or no mineral resources. Therefore, the project would have no impact on mineral resources. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.11 NOISE: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the X X residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important X mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general X plan, specific plan, or other land useplan? Impact Discussion: • The proposed project would not use or extract any mineral or energy resources and would not restrict access to known mineral resource areas. The project is located within an area .where there are little or no mineral resources. Therefore, the project would have no impact on mineral resources. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.11 NOISE: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 14 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No' Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or X noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground X borne vibration oround borne noise levels? c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the X project? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing X without theproject? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 14 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Impact Discussion: The project site is in a very sparsely populated area. Ambient noise is generally very low, with the exception of periodic noise generated by agricultural equipment. The Butte County Noise Element finds that noise levels up to 75 dB CNEL are normally acceptable for agricultural areas. While there may be periods during harvest time where noise levels may reach or exceed the 75 dB level, the overall average level for the site would be significantly lower than the 75dB threshold. The airstrip that exists adjacent to the site is rarely used and does not contribute significantly to the overall noise environment. Construction activities on the site would temporarily generate high noise levels on and adjacent to the project site intermittently during project development activities. This construction noise would not have a significant impact on nearby residents because the noise would be intermittent and short-term in nature, and due to the low density of the existing residential development in the area. Because of the relatively small increment of traffic added to the local roadways, the project would not significantly affect future traffic noise levels. The proposal would not expose people to severe noise levels because no significant noise generators are near the project site. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.12 HOUSING: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles X of a public airport or public use airport, would the project X expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, X would the project expose people residing or working in X the roject area to excessive noise levels? X Impact Discussion: The project site is in a very sparsely populated area. Ambient noise is generally very low, with the exception of periodic noise generated by agricultural equipment. The Butte County Noise Element finds that noise levels up to 75 dB CNEL are normally acceptable for agricultural areas. While there may be periods during harvest time where noise levels may reach or exceed the 75 dB level, the overall average level for the site would be significantly lower than the 75dB threshold. The airstrip that exists adjacent to the site is rarely used and does not contribute significantly to the overall noise environment. Construction activities on the site would temporarily generate high noise levels on and adjacent to the project site intermittently during project development activities. This construction noise would not have a significant impact on nearby residents because the noise would be intermittent and short-term in nature, and due to the low density of the existing residential development in the area. Because of the relatively small increment of traffic added to the local roadways, the project would not significantly affect future traffic noise levels. The proposal would not expose people to severe noise levels because no significant noise generators are near the project site. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.12 HOUSING: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 15 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and X businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing X elsewhere? c.. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 15 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Impact Discussion: Butte County population has grown at a rate at or below all official population projections for the past 10 years. Projected population for 2000 was 207,159, while the actual census population was 203,171. The percentage increase in population for Butte County between the 1990 and 2000 was 11.6%, which equates to an annual growth rate of 1.1%. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map would create four new parcels for residential development. This project has the potential to add an estimated 10 people to Butte County (four dwelling unit x 2.414 persons/dwelling unit). This is not considered a significant amount and is consistent with the planned growth rate for the County of approximately 2% per year. While the project would not have a significant effect on the total county population, the proposed parcels would be out of character with the surrounding lots. The project would not displace individuals or housing. No impact would occur. MitilZation Measure: None required 4.13 PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which X could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b. Fireprotection? X c. Police Protection? X d. Schools? X e. Parks? X L Other public services? X Impact Discussion: A less than significant impact is expected to these public service concerns due to the project. The project site is located in an area designated as a low fire hazard area by the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan and is not within a State Response for fire protection. The Butte County Fire Department/California Department of Forestry states that cumulative development in rural areas would impact their ability to provide fire protection services. This agency states that the installation of automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems in residential structures, the use of fire resistant building materials and the availability of water supply systems would reduce the demand for fire protection services. As a mitigation of project approval, all new dwelling units on the site are required to be equipped with an automatic fire suppression sprinkler system unless the parcel is connected to a pressurized community water system. Due to the impact posed by the project to fire protection services, and in lieu of a pressurized water system or water storage tank, development of the site requires payment of $200.00 per created parcel into the Battalion 7 water tender ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 16 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 fund prior,to the issuance of building permits. This is required by Butte County Code and would be added as a condition of the project. _ The proposal would result in an incremental increase in demand for police protection services. The cumulative impacts of increased development in rural areas impacts the ability of the Sheriffs Department to adequately provide police services to outlying areas. Sheriffs facilities fees have been adopted by the County and are required to be paid prior to issuance of building permits for any dwelling units placed on the project site; this would reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. The proposal would result in an incremental demand for school facilities in the area. The project site is located in the Oroville Union High School District and the Honcut Elementary School District. The applicant is required to place a note on the map that states: "A development impact fee for school facilities shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. The fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permits." While school districts maintain that these fees do not fully mitigate the impacts of the project, the County is precluded from imposing additional fees or mitigation by state legislation. The project would result in the potential development of four residences in a sparsely populated area and would not create significant impacts to area parks and facilities. A less than significant impact is anticipated to other public services. Mitigation Measure #3: Place a note on a separate document which.is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized community water system, with hydrants that meet Fire Department specifications, serves the parcels." Plan Requirements: The note shall be placed on the Final Map Timing: Interior fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures at the time of building construction. Monitoring: Building Division plan checkers shall ensure that the building plans for residential structures include interior fire sprinkler systems. Building inspectors shall ensure all residential structures have a functioning interior fire sprinkler system prior to the final inspection, by conducting an on-site inspection 4.14 RECREATION: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 17 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial X physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an X adverse physical effect on the environment? ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 17 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Impact Discussion: The project's outcome, which results in four new parcels, is considered less than significant and would not warrant specific mitigation for area parks and recreation facilities. Generally, residents in the rural areas of the County do not significantly impact existing recreation facilities. No recreational facilities are proposed under this proposal. The project site is located within the Feather River Recreation District. Mitieation Measure: None required 4.15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Impact Discussion: The project has the potential to generate approximately 40 additional traffic trips per day based on 10 vehicle trips/day per dwelling unit as projected by the Trip Generation Manual of the Institute of Traffic Engineers for a single family residential use in urban areas, although in rural areas the number of vehicle trips generated by a dwelling unit is usually less. This number of vehicle trips would not significantly impact the local circulation system. All the roads in the project area have a level of service of "C" or better (Butte County Master Environmental Assessment - Existing Conditions) which indicates that vehicle circulation is acceptable. , Each of the proposed parcels has frontage on private 60 -foot wide easement which comes off Central House Road which is a County maintained road. Butte County Code Section 24-240 (b) requires two off-street spaces per dwelling. The proposed parcels have adequate room to provide two spaces each and, therefore, the project presents no impact relative to insufficient parking capacity. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 18 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of X vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion X management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patters, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results X in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible X uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? X L Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g. Conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, X bicycle racks)? Impact Discussion: The project has the potential to generate approximately 40 additional traffic trips per day based on 10 vehicle trips/day per dwelling unit as projected by the Trip Generation Manual of the Institute of Traffic Engineers for a single family residential use in urban areas, although in rural areas the number of vehicle trips generated by a dwelling unit is usually less. This number of vehicle trips would not significantly impact the local circulation system. All the roads in the project area have a level of service of "C" or better (Butte County Master Environmental Assessment - Existing Conditions) which indicates that vehicle circulation is acceptable. , Each of the proposed parcels has frontage on private 60 -foot wide easement which comes off Central House Road which is a County maintained road. Butte County Code Section 24-240 (b) requires two off-street spaces per dwelling. The proposed parcels have adequate room to provide two spaces each and, therefore, the project presents no impact relative to insufficient parking capacity. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 18 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 This Tentative Parcel Map project would not conflict with accepted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. Mitigation Measure: None required 4.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Impact Discussion: Sewage disposal for the new dwellings on the project site would be handled by individual on-site septic systems. The project would not have an impact on any wastewater treatment facilities. Domestic water supply for the new dwellings on the site would be obtained from individual on-site wells. The project would not have an impact on any water treatment facilities. No additional storm water facilities would be necessary as a result of this project. The project would increase the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill by a minor amount. According to the Butte County Public Works Department, the Neal Road Landfill is expected to reach maximum holding capacity by the year 2018. The project would not have a significant impact on solid waste disposal. No impact would occur with respect to federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste Mitigation Measure: None required in Butte County Department of Development Services in Planning Division ■ Page 19 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing X 'facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the X construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are X new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has X adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to theprovider's existing commitments? L Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity X to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes, and X regulations related to solid waste? Impact Discussion: Sewage disposal for the new dwellings on the project site would be handled by individual on-site septic systems. The project would not have an impact on any wastewater treatment facilities. Domestic water supply for the new dwellings on the site would be obtained from individual on-site wells. The project would not have an impact on any water treatment facilities. No additional storm water facilities would be necessary as a result of this project. The project would increase the stream of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill by a minor amount. According to the Butte County Public Works Department, the Neal Road Landfill is expected to reach maximum holding capacity by the year 2018. The project would not have a significant impact on solid waste disposal. No impact would occur with respect to federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste Mitigation Measure: None required in Butte County Department of Development Services in Planning Division ■ Page 19 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 4.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (Section 15065): The project has the potential to contribute impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable with respect to Initial Study Checklist Items 4.3 Air Quality, 4.4 Biological Resources, 4.7 Fire Hazards, 4.13 Fire Protection and Police Protection Services. Cumulative impacts to these areas would be mitigated due to the inclusion of Mitigation Measures # 1-7 as itemized under Section 5 — Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Requirements. 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: Mitigation Measure # 1: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems are. to be used to prevent dust from leaving .the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation." Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown on grading and building plans. Timing: Condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction periods. Monitoring: The Department shall ensure that measures are indicated on the plans. Public Works Grading and Building inspectors shall spot check; Grading and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Pollution Control District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 20 ■ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Reviewed Would the proposal: Significant Significant Significant Impact Under Impact with Impact Previous Mitigation Document Incorporated a. Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a X plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a X project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects ofprobable futureprojects)? c: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either X directly or indirectly? The project has the potential to contribute impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable with respect to Initial Study Checklist Items 4.3 Air Quality, 4.4 Biological Resources, 4.7 Fire Hazards, 4.13 Fire Protection and Police Protection Services. Cumulative impacts to these areas would be mitigated due to the inclusion of Mitigation Measures # 1-7 as itemized under Section 5 — Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Requirements. 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: Mitigation Measure # 1: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. Follow the dust control measures listed below: a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems are. to be used to prevent dust from leaving .the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation." Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown on grading and building plans. Timing: Condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction periods. Monitoring: The Department shall ensure that measures are indicated on the plans. Public Works Grading and Building inspectors shall spot check; Grading and Building shall ensure compliance on-site. Butte County Air Pollution Control District inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 20 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 Mitigation Measure #2: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the final map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Structures (excepting wells), dumping, fill material, vegetation removal and/or excavation other than approved stream crossing for roads/driveways shall not be allowed within the 50 -foot No Disturbance Setback as depicted. Limited vegetation removal necessary for fire hazard reduction is permissible within the No Disturbance Setback, however, all living and thriving native trees shall be retained and all vegetation removal shall be approved by the Department of Fish and Game prior to removal." The 50 -foot "No Disturbance Setback" shall be measured from the top of the bank along the depicted drainage courses." This setback shall be clearly delineated on the final map. Plan Requirements: The required note and graphic depiction of the setback shall be included on the Final Map. The Department of Development Services shall ensure that the note is placed on the Final Map. Timing: At the time of building plan checking, building and site plans would be checked for compliance with the condition. Monitoring: The Building Division and the Planning Division would check building and site plans for compliance prior to issuance of a building permit. Building inspectors would ensure compliance by conducting an on-site inspection prior to the final inspection. Mitigation Measure # 3: Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet that states: "Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized community water system, with hydrants that meet Fire Department specifications, serves the parcels." Plan Requirements: The note shall be placed on the Final Map. Timing: Interior fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures at the time of building construction. Monitoring: Building Division plan checkers shall ensure that the building plans for residential structures include interior fire sprinkler systems. Building inspectors shall ensure all residential structures have a functioning interior fire sprinkler system prior to the final inspection, by conducting an on-site inspection. 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL: 1. Butte County Planning Department. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 2. Butte County Planning Department. CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Oroville, CA CH2M Hill 1977. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. CH2M Hill, 1977. - 8. Butte County Planning Department. CH2M Hill, 1977. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 1 1-1, Seismic Safety Element. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, Subsidence and Landslide Potential Map 111-1, Safety Element. Erosion Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Expansive Soils Map 1 1 1-3, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Noise Element Map IV -1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: Scenic Highways Map V-1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 21 ■ Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02-19 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville; CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Map. Oroville, CA. 11. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency, State of California, 1983. 12. Butte County Bbard of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1989 and 2000. 14. USGS Quad Maps. 15: Soil Map, Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 16.. Soil Survey of Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 17. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Mao. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. 7.0 CONSULTED AGENCIES: [X] Environmental Health , [X] Public Works [ ] Building Manager [ ] BCAG [ ] ALUC [X] LAFCo [ ] Air Qual. Management Dist. [, ] City of Chico [ ] City of Biggs [ ] City of Gridley. [ ] City of Oroville [ ] Town of Paradise [X] CA Department of Forestry [ ] CalTrans (Traffic) [ ] Central Reg. Water Quality [ ] Department of Conservation [X] CA Dept. of Fish and Game [ ] Highway Patrol [ ] Army Corps of Engineers [ ] US Fish & Wldlife Service [X] Agricultural Commissioner [X] Butte Co. Farm Bureau [X] Oroville Union School Dist. [ ] Feather River Rec. Dist. [ ] El Medio Fire Dept.. [ ] OWID [ ] LOAPUD [ ] PG&E [ ] Pacific Bell [ ] Palermo Union School Dist. [ ] Oroville Elem. School Dist [X] County Assessor k:\projects\tpm\grant\new grant initial study.doc ■ Butte County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 22 ■. Project Name: Raymond Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map, File # TPM 02=19 8.0 PROJECT SPONSOR(S) INCORPORATION OF MITIGATION INTO PROPOSED PROJECT: I/We have reviewed.�the Initial Study for the Geraldine L. Grant Tentative Parcel Map (APN # 036-220-174 & 175) application and particularly the mitigation measures identified herein. I/We hereby modify the application on file with the Butte County Planning Department to include and incorporate all mitigations set forth in this Initial Study. Project Sponsor/Project Agent Date Project Sponsor/Project Agent Date r f ■ Butte'County Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ Page 23 ■ 9 rp L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D - B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 . June 19, 2002 Raymond Teesdale 725 Central House Road Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Tentative Parcel Map, AP 028-020-054 and 046, TPM 02-19 Dear Mr. Teesdale:: Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda Report concerning your application for a Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 -ace lots and a 6.28 acre remainder south of Oroville, approximately 1,300 feet north of Central House Road on the west side of the Western Pacific Railroad Tracts, nearest intersection is Central House Road and Lone Tree Road, Oroville.. Should you have any concerns with the report or conditions of approval, please contact us in advance of the meeting so that we may work together to resolve your concerns. A public hearing has been set for June 27, 2002, at 8:00 a.m. This meeting will be field in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Development Review Committee recommends that the applicant or their authorized representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Committee may have. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Craig Sanders of this office at 538-7601, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Lynn Richardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant Enc. cc: Land Development Environmental Health Ron Graves BUTTE COUNTY. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Development Review Committee that a public hearing will be held on Thursday, June 27, 2002, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the. following item at the following time: 8:00 a.m. - Raymond Teasdale, Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 -acre lots and a 6.28 acre remainder on property zoned A-5 (Agricultural — 5 acre parcels). The property is located approximately 1,300 feet north of Central House Road on the west side of the Western Pacific Railroad Tracts, near the intersection of Central House Road and Lone Tree Road, Oroville. APN 028-020-054 and 046. (CS) (TPM 02-19) The above-mentioned application and map are on file and available for public viewing at the Office of the Butte County Development Services Department, Planning Division, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. For information call: (530) 538-7601 (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Comments maybe submitted in writing any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may be continued to a later date. Upon action taken by the Development Review Committee on the project an appeal may be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The appeal period is 10 days. If you challenge the above application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Development Services Department, Planning Division, at or prior to, the public hearing. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE To be published in the Oroville Mercury on Thursday, June 6, 2002. 1 BUTTE COUNTY \ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Public Works FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Raymond Teasdale, TPM 02-19 DATE: February 5, 2002 . CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property describedbelow. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: , 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated.. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If.a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 -ace lots and a 6.28 acre remainder on property zoned A-5 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels) located on south of Oroville, approximately 1,300 feet north of Central House Road on the west side of the Western Pacific Railroad Tracts, nearest intersection is Central House Road and Lone Tree Road, Oroville., identified as APN 028-020-054. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - X DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON Mav 23, 2002 COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN • X19 2002. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): // ® By: Date: Q � / Z 1Z0f1-x_ RECEIVED tr FEB D 5 2002 NOUN fY OF SUITE LAND DEVELOPMENT DIV, BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: Raymond Teasdale DATE:. February 12, 2002 AGENT: Ron Graves PLANNING FILE #: TPM 02-19 APN: 028-020-054 X 1 New lot or parcel lines shall comply with setback requirements of applicable zoning and building ordinances. 'X 2 Deeds and plats (if required) shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works, Land Development Division for checking° and approval prior to recordation and shall contain the notes specified below. X 3 Provide documentation from a title company on the applicant's choice verifying any deed of trust affected has been partially re -conveyed or modified to reflect the lot line adjustment and, to prevent the creation of'any additional lot or parcel. X .4 Prior to recordation of deeds, provide documentation verifying payment of taxes as reguired by Subsection (b) of Section '20-95 of the Butte County Code and as . specified in Article 8 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code, commencing with section 66492. 5 Prepare a plat showing approved Lot Line Adjustment. 6 Record plat with deeds if one or more of original lots or parcels was created by map. If a record of survey is prepared to show the lot line adjustment_; recording of a plat is not required. Deed Note' (To be placed on any deed to effect lot line adjustment) The purpose of this deed is to effect a lot line adjustment as approved by the Butte County Director of Public Works on The above described lands are to be combined with and become a part of those lands as described in the deed to as filed for record in Butte County Official Records at Serial Number • Book Page No additional lots or parcels are created hereby.. The scope of review of said lot line adjustment was limited as specified in Government Code Section 66412(d), and approval of it does not constitute assurance that future applications for building permits or other land use entitlements on the modified lots or parcels will be approved by the County of Butte. Plat Note . r (to, be placed on any required Plat) This plat does not constitute a legal description of the lots or parcels depisted and does not show all easements of record on or affecting said lots or parcels. Lot Line Adjustment Standard Conditions - Butte County r i BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: Raymond Teasdale DATE: February 5, 2002 AGENT: Ron Graves APN: 028-020-054 -d' -1 Lp FILE#: TPM 02-19 , PLANNER: Craig Sanders PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 -ace lots and a 6.28 acre remainder Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS A. STREETS r 1. _ Prior to, or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, provide a fully executed road maintenance agreement on the County approved form. r TC 2. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the Parcel Map. Street names shall be approved by the County Address Coordinator prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map. ' 3. Obtain encroachment permit for all new or existing driveway approaches and construct them to County standards, as specified in County Improvement Standards. — Q 4. Provide a cul-de-sac, designed and constructed to county standards as specified in the County Improvement Standards. The Parcel Map shall show the'cul-de-sac. �XQ 5. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map, prove, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, that there is approved access conforming to County standards to each parcel_ from a publicly maintained road. XQ 6. All access rights shall be reserved by deed, per County Ordinance, . 7. The developer shall provide all necessary traffic safety signs including stop signs. A note shall be placed on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with -the map or on an additional map sheet of the Parcel Map stating: "No public entity shall be responsible for the maintenance of the stop sign. In accordance with Civil Code Section 845, maintenance of the road, including the stop sign shall be shared by those properties with a legal interest in the private right-of-way or easement." U/1 X 8. Pay the recording fees then in effect for recording the Parcel Maps and related documents. 9. Deed to Butte County, in fee simple, feet of right-of-way from the centerline of The right of way shall be sufficient for the installation of standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. l 10. Provide two-way traversable access to each arcel from a County maintained road or from a state highway. Improve parcel frontage to RS- 6 . LD - and access road to parcel being divided to RS- LD-r_�. (� p 1s b cre re es o s ' snare ub oa nd a t ic. orks for plan checking an app alp co cti 11. Submit road and drainage improvement plans for the installation and construction of the street frontage improvements on to standard, including but not limited to P.C.C. curb, gutter and sidewalk and the required street section for parcels with gross acreage of one acre or less. Construct or install the required improvements. 12. Dedicate a one foot "no access strip" or relinquish abutters rights to Butte County, along the frontage of parcels , except at approved access points. 13. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map, obtain an encroachment permit and construct a standard road ,approach, in accordance with County Im rovement Standards. Adequate sight distance at the intersection of access road and Ce/i. a 6r yrt = shall be provided. �0 14. Show on the additional map sheet of the Parcel Map a ,5-d ft. building setback from the centerline of Q.Ce� r& -td _ I B. DRAINAGE 1. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map a plan for a permanent solution for drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. The drainage plans shall specify how drainage waters shall be detained on site and or conveyed to the nearest natural or publicly maintained drainage channel or facility and shall provide that there shall be no increase in the peak flow runoff to said channel or facility. . 4 2. Establish 100 year floodplain elevations and the lowest floor elevations for any structures. Show on the additional map sheet the elevations (by contours) and the location of an accepted NGVD benchmark and a temporary benchmark on-site. 3. Pay the applicable drainage fees in effect at the time of recordation of the Parcel Map for the drainage area. (The current fee is now $ /acre.) 4. A Construction Storm Water Permit will be required by the State Water Resources Control Board if the project results in a disturbance (including clearing, excavation, filling, and grading) of five or more acres. Construction activities that result in a land disturbance of less than five acres, but which are part of a larger common plan of development, also require a permit. The Permit must be obtained from the State Water Resources Control Board prior to construction. C. ' PARCEL MAP _ 1. New lot lines shall comply with the applicable setback requirements of the Butte County Zoning Ordinance and the County adopted Uniform Building Code. X-2. Show all easements of record on the Parcel Map. X-3. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, pay in full any and all delinquent, current and estimated taxes and assessments as specified in Article 8, of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7, of the California Government Code commencing with Section 66492. 4. Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map,.prove, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, that the parcel to be divided is a legal parcel. 5. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Parcel Map, pay all applicable assessments established by affected assessment districts, in full. —6. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet of the Parcel Map regarding RECEIVE® FEB 0 5 2002 COUNTY OF BUTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT DIV. BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: CDF FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Raymond Teasdale, TPM 02-19 DATE: February 5, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line'Adiustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 -ace lots and a 6.28 acre remainder on property zoned A-5 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels) located on south of Oroville, approximately 1,300 feet north of Central House Road on the west side of the Western Pacific Railroad Tracts nearest intersection is Central House Road and Lone Tree Road, Oroville., identified as APN 028-020-054. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - X DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON Mav 23, 2002 COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN � 19, 2002. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By:y��� ll" � Date: Z 7 ' BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: Raymond Teasdale DATE: February 5, 2002 AGENT: Ron Graves APN: 028-020-054 FILE#: TPM 02-19 PLANNER: Craig Sanders PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 -ace lots and a 6.28 acre remainder Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS R. FIRE CLEARANCE 1. Construction, installation or development of structures or facilities on the parcels/lots shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, (Public Resources Code 4290), and all other applicable State and Countycodes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of application for improvement permits. 2. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and maintained continuously thereafter. 3. Fire hydrant identification, reflector or post reflectors shall be installed acceptable to the County Fire Warden. 4. In lieu of a pressurized water system or water storage tank, payment of $200.00 per created parcel into the Battalion 3 water tend fund, is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Place a note on the Final Map or on additional sheets that states "Development of these lots may require payment into the Water Tender Fund." —5. A pressurized' community water system for fire protection is required. The specific locations and fire flow requirements shall be in accordance with the Fire Department specifications and to the satisfaction of the County Fire Warden. Average required hydrant spacing feet, hydrant size inches, and residual fire flow gpm. Submit plans to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction of facilities. /k 6. Place a note on a separate document which is to be recorded concurrently with the map or on an additional map sheet stating that: "Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D, unless a pressurized community water system, with hydrants that meet Fire Department specifications, serves the parcels." 7. In lieu of hydrant installation, payment may be made into the hydrant fund at a cost of $1.72 per lineal foot of street frontage. The estimated fee amount is $ 8. Prior to recordation of the Map or application for a building permit, the applicant shall pay the then current established fee for the West Chico Fire Station Fund. 9. Provide an all weather access of at least 10 foot wide and with a vertical clearance of 15 feet that will accommodate a 40,000 pound fire apparatus to all structures. Revised 1/29/98 k:\forms\standcon\tsm TO: FROM RE DATE: BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION E'nvironmenta1H,,, FEB 0 5 ?p Environmental Health CountyC+etlte!Orlye Oroville, Ct Butte County Planning Division al Request for Comments on a Development Application: Raymond Teasdale, TPM 02-19 February 5, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning.Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Tentative Parcel Man and Lot Line Adiustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 -ace lots and a 6.28 acre remainder ori property zoned A-5 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels) located on south of Oroville, approximately 1,300 feet north of Central House Road on the west side of the Western Pacific Railroad Tracts nearest intersection is Central House Road and Lone Tree Road, Oroville., identified as APN 028-020-054 Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - X DEVELOPMENT REVIEWLOMMITTEE ON May 23, 2002 COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN :T-19, 2002. Ijno comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. r E COMMENTS (Attach additionalpagesif necessary): rco i rx pkwnVk, TC,>)QVi' ul f�llXi.ca�� iv.� o - � a J Lin Date: Ic BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: Raymond Teasdale DATE: February 5, 2002 AGENT: Ron Graves APN• 028-020-054 FILE#: TPM 02-19 PLANNER: Craig Sanders. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 -ace lots and a,6.28 acre remainder Those items checked are conditions of approval. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS D. LEACHFIELDS 1. Identify on the additional map sheet a 100' leachfield free setback. from each existing well. —2. Meet the sewage disposal requirements of Butte County Code Section 26-26 for the installation of sewage disposal systems within a flood plain/floodway. 3. Prior to commencing construction or installation of any required site improvements on the property, verify that winter groundwater elevations are in compliance with County Improvement Standards, Appendix 7. 4. Identify on the additional map sheet an area for wells and a 100' leachfield free setback around that area on parcels V 5. Identi y on the additional map sheet a 50' leachfield setback from the drainage way on e<(parcels) n 6. Identify on the additional map sheet a 100' leachfield setback from the highwater line of the creek onlia< (parcels) 7. Identify on the additional map sheet a 100' leachfield setback from the spring on (lots) (parcels) 8. Identify on the additional map sheet a 200' leachfield setback from the highwater line of the lake on (lots) (parcels) 9. Identify on the additional map sheet a leachfield setback for four (4) times the height of the cut on (lots) (parcels) 10. Locate and, if necessary, relocate the sewage disposal systems serving existing buildings on (lots) (parcel) , E. SEWAGE`DISPOSAL AREAS 1. Identify on the additional map sheet those areas with slopes in excess of thirty (30) percent as "Unsuitable for Sewage Disposal". 2. Identify on the additional map sheet usable sewage disposal areas proven to meet the requirements of County Improvement Standards, Appendix 7. Combine with adjacent (parcel(s))(lot(s)) any parcel not proven to contain usable sewage disposal area. 3. Identify on the additional map sheet unsuitable sewage disposal areas. 4. Those wells indicated on the Tentative Map or on Final Map that are proposed to be destroyed, in order to provide required usable sewage disposal areas, shall be destroyed under a valid Butte County Environmental Health Division.permit. 5. Identify on the additional map sheet that no water well may be located within 100' of the usable sewage disposal area on(parcels) —6. Prior to recordation of the Final Map in the nitrate'atea record an executed Future Sewer Service and Storm DrainageAgreement: 7. Meet the requirements of the (Watershed Protection Zone) (Villa Verona Moratorium Area) (Cohasset Specific Plan). F. INDIVIDUAL WATER SUPPLY 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit prove that the required quantities of domestic water are available to (lots) (parcels) —2. Prove that the required quantities of domestic water are available or place the statement on the additional map sheet of the Final Map that "There is no evidence that domestic water is available" for (lots) (parcels) 3. Provide a source of domestic water for the building on (lot) (parcel) y 4. Prior to Final Map verify that domestic water can be provided to meet minimum standards for and other suspected contamination. G. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY Prior to the issuance of a building permit design and construct a new community water supply system in compliance with the California State Safe Drinking Water Acta 2. Prior to recordation of the Final Map provide a letter or other documentation from stating that they are willing and able to supply domestic water to (lots) (parcels) 3 4 H. Place a note on the additional map sheet that states "Development of (lots) (parcels) will require connection to a public water supply". ' Prior to Final Map verify that domestic water can be provided to meet minimum standards for and other suspected contamination. EXISTING COMMUNITY SEWER 1. Prior to the Final Map provide a letter or other documentation from stating that they are willing and able to supply sewer service to (lots) (parcels) 2. Place a note on the additional map sheet .that states "Development of (lots) (parcels) will require connection to a public -sanitary sewer". 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, under a permit issued.by the Environmental Health Division, properly abandon the septic tank and connect the dwelling(s) on (lots) (parcel(s)) to public sewer. I. NEW COMMUNITY SEWER 1. Prior to the Final Map provide community sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities in compliance with California State Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Butte County Code, California Health and.Safety (F�Fg �ECc, 7 2002 BUTTE COUNTY WATI:h DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO:- Ag:Commissioner FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Raymond Teasdale, TPM 02-19 DATE: February 5, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received'a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Tentative Parcel May and Lot Line Adjustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 -ace lots and a 6.28 acre remainder on property zoned A-5 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels) located on south of Oroville, approximately 1,300 feet north of Central House Road on the west side of the Western Pacific Railroad Tracts; nearest intersection is Central House Road and Lone Tree Road Oroville., identified as APN 028-020-054. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) —PLANNING COMMISSION - X DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON May 23, 2002 COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN 19, 2002. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the,,assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. r COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): no srg e By: vh . Date: ; IJP I \J—j. BUTTE COUNTY LAAPCo DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION FEB 0 7 2o�Z TO: ' LAFCo f Orovihe,, Caido > is FROM: Butte County Planning Division. RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Raymond Teasdale, TPM 02-19 DATE: _ February 5, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigatiori measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601, Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Tentative Parcel Man and Lot Line Adjustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 -ace lots and a 6.28 acre remainder on property zoned A-5 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels) located on south of Oroville, approximately 1,300 feet north of Central House Road on the west side of the Western Pacific Railroad Tracts, nearest intersection is Central House Road and Lone Tree Road, Oroville., identified as APN 028-020-054. Supervisorial District No. 1. 09z ono �Y6 f THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - X DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CO MITTEE ON Mav 23, 2002 COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN 19 2002. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): 0 3. Feo-4 C. v s. Orwillt t4ni0- N• S, t). lo: R141 Co f/c 1 By: .f�.L, Z11219� Date: zb"ZoL I I t • ✓ • - � 1� •• • ` rel `� _- _ � , j AP -028 -020-046 ;& 054 Raymond `Teasdale TPM '02-19, t , TI 'II I I I .L. I •I I I• � � �� er 7.: � . ------------ N- ! y •1- Project Location + -------------- ' M SJ • ... • \ t n t: • - , . y n • • • 1. • It ' � t • ' Toi m of Ho w Mailin List Distribution '.f 0- .- 0 c-1 s s aP49 - bnomsFl Ol t-.20 MOIT F ,-- _ r�-—•��=_—_� 11 L l ; _moi a a. ir;`r t f I Ir t fill 0i 'ki h i Ff J r, 1, ',■ FyV .� �_.._ _y._ _ t �� BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMUTTEE Applicant: Raymond Teasdale Owner: Same Hearing Date: Existing Zone: A-5 (Agricultural, 5 acre minimum) N Supervisorial Request: Tentative Subdivision Map and Lot Line Adjustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 acre lots and District # 1 a remainder lot of 6.28 acres. Assessor Parcel No: 028-020-W & 054 Fue:TPM 02-19 i► ( r r r - House Central e e w • Ilt I!i i �rl •'III _ 1- -• ,III III III EIS.-------------_-.--._ Hon -- -- so Mel • r g all 11 1 11 /1 11 // 11 11 •'1/ // 11 111 11 :�11 11 ':11 1 11 11 •/1 `. 11 ylyl y BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMUTTEE Applicant: Raymond Teasdale Owner: Same Hearing Date: Existing Zone: A-5 (Agricultural, 5 acre minimum) N Supervisorial Request: Tentative Subdivision Map and Lot Line Adjustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 acre lots and District # 1 a remainder lot of 6.28 acres. Assessor Parcel No: 028-020-W & 054 Fue:TPM 02-19 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Raymond Teasdale, TPM 02-19 DATE: February 5, 2002 CONTACT PERSON: Craig Sanders The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days'of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Tentative Parcel Map and Lot Line Adjustment dividing a 46.3 acre parcel into four 10 -ace lots and a 6.28 acre remainder on property zoned 'A-5 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels) located on south of Oroville, approximately 1,300 feet north of Central House Road on the west side of the Western Pacific Railroad Tracts, nearest intersection is Central House Road and Lone Tree Road Oroville., identified as APN 028-020-054. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - X DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON May 23, 2002 COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN January 19, 2002. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: - ., i-♦:>....� x > is �.: �. t I I j JAN 28 2002 "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET c u s Li�11NI PL ANINING UIVISION FILE NO: TPIM O aAA AP# 0a 9-0;,a o.r`/ nn APPLICANT: Ko.v (A4(-c3S' Po &)C fs(�4 � 633- Sgyy OWNER: 2a�ru©.v4 � , '7aJ ce A, 14 No�s� RO• , o�vL��=� 09 9r9G1 REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSED REQUEST: (to be filled out by person taking in application) TG-,1iT,F7YGjr 4-444,1-4 yt,i9? '1-0 7- L/ 40 7T ,IAoe� 64' A,4 rr- I I IePl,+ ft�- 0,a,, 4(13 SIZE: A-cle-!r LOCATION: Sm4z7-rf or 1.01,9,D CfX+ .AJ7.4't. o -r C&, ,r&4L. t+OvJ-CL ,eo ran rwc= rvEsr s is or- xfe;;w�sr ,✓ PSC/a« /Let�P.4� T/lifo'T5, .VC�A.2c�-/,,�T�t/1 sY-'G?-c0-u !1' CC.✓T�� [f c4�.J`cs 4LmifA SUPERVISORAL DISTRICT # EXISTING ZONING: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: DAG ASSIGNED PLANNER aAA PLANNERS INITIALS Date Application Received Date Project Assigned l�Lu&-r 7 30 Day CompletePreset Hearing Date r, �7 g too ,)- /`47vt�cW�' COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST APPLICATION: DATE: County Offices and Cities: Chief Administrative Officer X Develop. Services Director X Environmental Health _X_ Assesor Sheriff _ BCAG X LAFCo —Air Quality Mgmt. Biggs _ Gridley _ Oroville _ Paradise _ Information Systems Dept. —Animal Control Irrigation District: Butte Water iggs/W. Gridley Water OWID _Paradise Irrigation —Table Mountain Irrigation _ Thermalito Irrigation Domestic Water _ Butte Water District _California Water Service Co. OWID _ Thennalito IrrigationDistrict Sewer Butte Water District _ Themalito Irrigation _ Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) — L.O.A. PUD Fire Protection X California Department of Forestry _ EI Medio Fire Protection District Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Durham Area Recreation _ Paradise Recreation & Park _ Richvale Recreation & Parks Utilities PG&E North - Chico _ Chambers Cable TV _ PG&E South - Oroville _ Viacom Cable TV State Agencies CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept. of Water Resources . Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rec. Central Reg. Water Quality Cont _ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program Department of Conservation _ Off. of Mining Reclamation DeptSocial Services, Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies _ US Forest Service Army Corps of Engineers Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. Lime Saddle Dist _ Drainage _ Reclamation Butte Co. Mining Committee Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. Mosq. Abatement. Oroville/Butte Co US Bureau of Land Management National Marine Fisheries Sservice _ Community Association _ Butte Env.l Council Cal Native Plant Society Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _ Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy X_Public Works Director Building Manager ALUC _ Butte Co. Farm Bureau Chico Chico Airport Commission X Agricultural Commission Durham Irrigation Richvale Irrigation Other _ Del Oro Water Co. _ Other Sterling City Sewer Main Feather River Rec. & Park Pacific Bell _,&Dept. of Fish and Game _ Highway Patrol Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations US Fish & Wildlife Service School Districts K:\PLANNING\FORMS\DISTR.LIS CIVIL ENGINEERS' LAND SURVEYORS. SURVEYING P.O. BOX 986' 2060 PARK AVENUE SOIL TESTING OROVILLE, CA 95965: , P&N'. 'la9k (530) 533-8844 ENGINEERING. RGRAVES@CNCNET.COM TO: �TILNTION: DATE: O — J B NO.00` SUBJECT' t fr • .. d lL ' T A.P.N. �Z 8— ©C� 0 • .. . We a -re sending you enclosed ❑ Under separate cover via 41NAQ-d f- the following items ,. Conics-- Description Dated FFFFFFFFFF- '—PON 001 i .idtsl nllk�&M MA MA _ 01 U r i IL - L- �4\L- i wNivoiwI I 1 CLJ dJ lAMLIRCU uuww r] For approval i For review and comment ❑ A. f }' t ❑ For your use ❑ Appro' cd as submitted '` ❑ ❑ As inAructed , ❑ Approved as•noted COMMENTS , r Transn-illed,by - , " ; ' Copy to x . Ir TIS ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE Return for corrections, Return for corrections Return for corrections JAN 2 8 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PI A N NINr' MVLSJ. "' anuary utte L'ount LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Mr. Ron Graves Graves & Associates 2060 Park Ave. Oroville, CA 95966 Subject: Application for Tentative Parcel Map, Teasdale Sir: This letter is to inform you that your application for the Teasdale Tentative Parcel Map can not be processed because the Check amount for fees you submitted does not match the fees required. I have tried unsuccessfully to reach you by phone and email to discuss the matter, and have thus resorted to this letter. Please me at 538-7150, or come in to the office, as soon as possible. If I do not hear from you by Friday, 25 January 2002, I will mail the application back to you. Sincerely, Carl L. Durling Associate Planner E C U D JAN 2 8 2002 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION Durling, Carl To: rgraves@cncnet.com 'Subject:- Teasdale application Mr. Graves: Your courier dropped off the Teasdale map application without talking to me. I have tried to reach you by phone with no luck. Also tried Teasdale. I can not take in the application because the check for the fees does not match up with.what I believe the fees to be. Please give me a call or come in. My phone is 538-1750. Carl Durling JAN . 2 8 2002 BUTT�FCFOOIN SION. PIANNNG DNI 1 ' c y L A N D O F. N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 18-6 County Center Drive F] 411 Main Street7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 P0. Box 5364 __,A L`lbroville, CA 95965 TEL: (530) 538-7282 Chico, CA 95927 TEL: (530) 538-7281 FAX: (530) 5381-2165 TEL: (530) 891-2727 FAX: (530) 538-7785 January 23, 2002 FAX: (530) 895-6512 Richard Teesdale 725 Central House Rd Gridley, CA 95948 Re: Pre -Application for Parcel Map, 725 Central House, APN 28-020-054 Dear Mr. Teesdale; This department received a revised copy of your proposed parcel map and because the soil on the "new" Parcel 4 had not been shown to meet depth requirements an, additional soil mantle test was required. The soil appears to be adequate and meets the requirements for sewage disposal as it pertains to Appendix VII of Butte County Code Chapter 20. When your map is submitted it should show the configuration of each parcel, plus the required setbacks from drainage swales, cuts (4 times the vertical height), ponds and water inundated areas. Also, show a minimum two acres set aside for sewage disposal areas on all parcels. Please keep in mind we are only one of a number of agencies that must review this proposal. Conditions of these other agencies may significantly alter your project to the extent that we may need to change our conditions. Our tentative approval of this pre -application must not be interpreted as approval by the county of this proposal. The entire formal review procedure must still be completed through the Development Services Department. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact me Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 4:00 pm Sincerely, Charlotte Walters Environmental Health Specialist Cc: Ron Graves 8 2��2 Butte County Planning 1 JAN 2 ; I SUITE COUNTY-�! M-ANNI G, DIVISION COUNTY OF BUTTE �. LO3'70 OFFICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT .0-97 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE �V11Q_ p�: OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397P u area ...... _ %Q680 'U.S. POSTAQE.. * RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED - PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 024230046000 ' CAMPBELL GARY & SANDRA 519 CENTRAL HOUSE RD \ � � � � OROVILLE CA 95965 JI � 1 _ - - CAMPS19 959652282 1601 27 06/06/02 1 RETURN TO SENDER JUN � O 2002 _ CAMPBELL 6PSOUTH AVE UFO SUTHERLIN OR 97479-9719 RETURN TO .SENDER BUTTE COUNTY S i t PL NG DIVISION �NILidd,id"ulk'hillik-l; - /�� _ �.. {. �� ��� �r • �� � .� /� t S' 1 t, � d...... . \� � .� � �\ • Y �� �\ � .�� ..»..� 3 ' t 7 s, y