Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout030-023-139AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION DATE WHO WHERE 1-2-87 Admin Window & Display Case 1-27-87 Admin Window & Display Case 2-25-87 Admin Window & Display Case 3-27-87 Admin Window & Display Case 4-29-87 Admin Window & Display Case 5-27-87 Admin Window & Display Case 6-25-87 Q Admin Window & Display Case 8-26-87 Admin'Window & Display Case 10-2-87 Admin Window & Display Case 10-29-87 CCS Admin Window & Display Case 12-5-87 Admin Window & Display Case Y CITY OF OROVILLE Attn: Mary Ann Imbiorski 1675 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965 PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538-7601 December 10, 1987 RE: Use Permit for Aztec Development AP#030-23-0-139,140 Dear Ms. Imbiorski : At the regular meeting of the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission held December 9, 1987, the Commission found the proposed Use Permit for Aztec Development conforms to the policies of the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan and recommend that any City approval be made conditional upon the -following: 1. Noise impacts should be addressed in the environmental documents and a survey of the site be performed to determine what building construction standards should be required. 2. Security considerations should be addressed in the event of aircraft incident or accident on the property and the availability and response capabilities of emergency services on the property. 3. Grant an avigation easement to the City of Oroville. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office any weekday between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Director of Planning David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH : j me cc: Gerry DeRoco PLANNING COMMISSION. 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE: 538-7601 December 10, 1987 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Division of Aeronautics Attn: Bill Riesen P.O. Box 942873 Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 RE: School Site in .the Ranchaero Area Dear Dir. Riesen: At the regular meeting of.the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission held December 9, 1987, the Commission found the proposed school site conforms to the policies of the draft Ranchaero Airport Environs Land Use Plan. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office any weekday between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Director of Planning Pte. A �Z David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc 0 December 10 1987 CITY OF CHICO P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 6 V -1-1- P- A N _ AN U U I NAT j ..�.! - A: i PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 338-7601 RE: Prezone for Rick Coletti AP#048-03-3-010 Gentlemen: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission held December 9, 1987, the Commission found the proposed prezone in conformity with the Airport Environs Plan only if development of the property is no greater than six dwelling units per acre. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office any weekday between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Director of Planning David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH: jmc December 10, 1987 CITY OF CHICO P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 41 . �te Old1Zt PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE: 538.7601 RE: Rezone for Drake/Jeffries AP#048-02-0-049 Gentlemen: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission held December 9, 1987, the Commission found the proposed rezone compatible with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan only if the project is conditioned so that no storage of inflammables or other dangerous materials, or large concentrations of people are allowed under the flight corridor as a result of subsequent development. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office any weekday between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Director of Planning David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH : j me 1I A Inter -Depart o _ I Mem®r®ndum C0- 10 TO: Bettye FROM: Dave V" SUBJECT: Response to DeRoco letter of November 25, 1987 DATE: December 7, 1987 PARAGRAPH #1 No Comment i PARAGRAPH #2 .: While this statement may be true, no record of'such:a request,=jf,, exists in the minutes, nor is there any 'Letter on.fi:le-.: Also, the Public Utilities Code (Section 21670,. et •seq.) ` contai risk,r.Vd=,. no requirement for publication or public hearings`by the_ Airport Land Use Commission. , PARAGRAPH #3 A. Nina Lambert is the First Vice Chairman.- B. Notification procedures were discussed regarding Airport- Land Use Plan -hearings only. i.e., Adoption: of -new_ plans, amendments to existing plans, etc. PARAGRAPH #4 The Airport Land Use Commission stated that no final finding regarding conformity with the Airport Land Use Plan'of the proposed prison would be made until further information (to be' provided when application is made to the City) is available. The September hearing regarding the prison was held prior to any application to the City, and comments were based on incomplete data. A motion of intent to find the project in conformity was made at the November meeting and is expected to be approved at the December 9th meeting. PARAGRAPH #5 Projects are referred to.the.Airport Land Use Commission as a responsible Agency by the various jurisdictions. Airport Land Use Commission then makes findings or comments, then forwards those findings or comments to the Lead Agency who then holds public hearings. An example of this same system is the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. i.e., No public hearing is held at their level regarding a Use Permit for a mobile home park in our jurisdiction. PARAGRAPH 06 At this time, Use Permit referrals by other Agencies (Planning Comissions) are for recommendations only. A Planning Commission 1 Bettye Page Two December 7, 1987 PARAGRAPH #6 - Continued is not required by the Public Utilities Code to heed such recommendations unless the Airport Land Use Commission has found this local Agency's General Plan inconsistent with the Airport Land Use Plan and required the Agency to submit all subsequent actions, regulations and permits to the Commission (ALUC) for review. (Reference - Public Utilities Code, Sec. 21676.5). A legislative body (the Board of Supervisors or City Council) could overrule the Airport Land Use Commission as provided for in the Public Utilities Code. To date, the Airport Land Use Commission has not required any local Agency to submit projects for review. If a project were denied by a Planning Commission, it would be necessary for it to be'appealed, to the legislative body. PARAGRAPH #7 See Paragraph 6, above. PARAGRPAH #8 After adoption of the Oroville Airport Environs Land Use Plan on September 16, 1985, the Airport Land Use Commission requested the Butte County Planning Commission to initiate General Plan Amendment and Rezoning procedures on property in the vicinity of the Oroville Airport within County jurisdiction. On September 19, 1985, the Planning Commission initiated the actions. Public hearings before the Planning Commission were set for October 17, 1985, with individual notices mailed to all property owners (including Mr. DeRoco) in the area on October 1, 1985. The General Plan Amendment was forwarded to the Board of Supervisors and adopted by Resolution 85-191 on November 19, 1985. The rezoning was continued by the Planning Commission to December 19, 1985 and then forwarded to the Board of Supervisors who adopted Ordinance 2516 on February 19, 1986 rezoning the clear zones to A-40 and the remainder to various other zones. (See File#84-72) NOTE: Mr. DeRoco spoke at the October 17, 1985 Planning Commission meeting in support of protecting the clear zones. PARAGRAPH #9 A. The Airport Land Use Commission has not made any decisions approving zoning, General Plan, or Use Permits; just recommendations and findings of conformity. B. All actions taken by the Airport Land Use Commission were proper and pursuant to the requirements,of the Public Utilies Code. There is no requirement in the Public Utilities Code Bettye Page Three December 7, 1987 PARAGRAPH #9B - Continued that advertised public hearings be held. All meetings have been noticed pursuant to the requirements of the Brown Act. PARAGRAPH #10 Since all Planning'Commission hearings and Board of Supervisor meetings have been properly notices, heard and in effect for almost 2 years, there is no reason nor justification to recind any action. NOTE: Mr. DeRoco's property in the area is located„entirely within the City;'limits of Oroville.and is not,affected by County zoning. ; DRH:jmc t geraUrrJY. ale 9 oco Awl Uelale Jn..Imenlr Commerrial - Jnduelrial 9' 0 �& 1310 Orwille, Ca. 95965 916% 534-7581 November 25, 1987 Board or Supervisors arodVILLE,CALIFORNIA County of Butte 25 County Center Drive NOV 301987 Oroville, California 95965 Dear Members of the Board of Supervisors: BOARD OFSUPEWSORS Reference is made to the enclosed news article from the November 4, 1987, issue of the Enterprise Record, A.I'.U.C. Agendas for the September 2 and November 4 meetings, and letters from A.L.U.C. to the City of Oroville dated September 4, 1987, and November 5, 1987. At numerous past meetings of A.L.U.C. I have specifically requested that I be notified of any meetings of A.L.U.C. with Agenda Items concerning the area around the Oroville Municipal Airport. Chairperson Nina Lambert has specifically directed staff to establish a procedure to notify affected property owners and their neighbors of proposed actions that may affect their property or property rights. Regarding Item 5 on the November 4, 1987 Agenda, it was my understanding that at the September 4, 1987 meeting of A.L.U.C. this item had been properly and thoroughly addressed (see letter to City of Oroville, dated September 4, 1987) and A.L.U.C. wanted only to review the proposal again during the structure design stage to determine whether noise impacts had been addressed. Now a whole new ball game has commenced. I have stated before in A.L.U.C. meetings, and, I repeat again, I believe the A.L.U.C. failure to notify affected property owners of proposed actions is contrary to the fundamental constitutional procedural due process rights of all those whose significant property, interests are affected. Regarding a Use Permit Application, recommendations or decisions such as these by A.L.U.C. automatically abrogate the specific duty and power of the City Planning Commission FLJw!`a+��swl�". to consider and grant Use Permits because it is not a legislative body empowered to overrule A.L.U.C. decisions. There is something dramatically unconstitutional about a procedure that denies me the right to notice and a hearing on a possible decision by A.L.U.C. which decision in turn denies me the right to a prompt and proper governmental decision by the City Planning Commission because that body is not empowered to overrule A.L.U.C. This same unconstitutional deprivation of property rights without due process has occurred on neighboring properties in the vicinity of the Oroville Municipal Airport as recently as February 1986, when Butte County purportedly rezoned Clear Zone areas to A-40 without giving owners and neighboring property owners notice or an opportunity for a meaningful hearing prior to the deprivation of their significant property rights and, subsequently, an opportunity for judicial review, because these same owners and neighboring property owners have never received notice that rezoning may have even occurred. I hereby request that the Butte County Board of Supervisors rescind any and all improper land use decisions made by A.L.U.C. where proper notice and an opportunity for a hearing was not provided to affected owners and their neighbors., I further request that the Butte County Board of Supervisors rescind recent rezonings in the vicinity of the Oroville Municipal Airport and direct staff and the Butte County Planning Commission to reopen hearings on any proposed rezoning afteri.ving property owners and their neighbors proper advancgrpt,,-I�ce and an opportunity for a proper hearing. Sincer ly ou s, oco 86/Wednesday' j�gvernber 4, 19871Cfitco Enterprise•Recorr -Area Aiq*ft Lmd Use , comnllsgow VlA RiLi�d•6 • f4 fi" ROVILLE The Butte County Airport Land Use Com-. mission will meet at 9 a.m. Saturday in the Board of Super--, visors chamber, 25 County 'Cen- ter Drive. Agenda items include status reportsonLake Oroville sea. . plane landing area, a proposed ' , school site in Chico, and reports on environs of the Oroville, Par- adise and Ranchero airports. 4 86/Wednesday' j�gvernber 4, 19871Cfitco Enterprise•Recorr -Area Aiq*ft Lmd Use , comnllsgow VlA RiLi�d•6 • f4 fi" ROVILLE The Butte County Airport Land Use Com-. mission will meet at 9 a.m. Saturday in the Board of Super--, visors chamber, 25 County 'Cen- ter Drive. Agenda items include status reportsonLake Oroville sea. . plane landing area, a proposed ' , school site in Chico, and reports on environs of the Oroville, Par- adise and Ranchero airports. 0 ���'�l•'�� f�i+..... r. .vim CITY OF OROVILLE Attn: Mary Ann Imbiorski 1735 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965 • bu fie 'oun�, PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538.7601 November 5, 1987 RE: Aztec Development Use Permit AP#30-23-139, 140 For a Correctional Facility Dear Ms. Imbiorski: At its meeting of November 4, 1987, the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission reviewed the -Aztec Development Corporation Use Permit Application to allow a 250 bed correctional facility on AP#30-23-139,140. The Commission adopted a motion of intent - to: A. Find that the project as proposed may result in densities in excess of 25 people per acre in an area that experiences overflight by aircraft in a primary traffic pattern and may in its future stages of development violate the legally required clear zone of Runway 12, and that the Use Permit process does not adequately guarantee the:specific location of improvements; and B. Recommend that the project be pursued as a Planned Development, binding as to site design and facility lo- cation, showing the location and type of future development anticipated and reflecting the concerns listed in Item C, below; and C. Forward the above finding to the City of Oroville for inclusion within their environmental documents and recommend if the project is approved, overruling Butte County -Airport Land Use Commission require that: 1. No permanent structures be allowed in the areas designated for clear zone by the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan. 2. No concentrations of people be permitted in the clear zone. 3. Noisc impacts should be addressed in the environmental documents and a survey of the site be performed to determine what building construction standards should be required. CITY OF OROVILLE Attn:.. Mary Ann Imbiorski November 5-, 1987 Page Two. ti . 1 4. Additional information be submitted with site plans that indicate the usage of'the entire 22 acres. 5. Security considerations should be -addressed in the event of aircraft incident orlaccident on the property and the availability and response.capabilities of emergency services 'on the property. 6. Grant an avigation easement to the City of Oroville. Final action on this item is anticipated to occur at the next Airport Land Use Commission meeting scheduled for December 9, 1987. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact this office any weekday between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, David R. Hironimus Associate Planner. , DRH:jmc t BUTTE COUNTY.AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION AGENDA November 4, 1987 TIME: 9:00 a.m. PLACE: Board of Supervisors' Room County Administration Center 25 County Center•Drive Oroville, CA 95965 I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call III. Approval of Minutes'of.September 2,'1987 IV. Consent Agenda. V. Business 1. Status Report - Ranchaero 2. Status Report - Paradise Airport Environs 3. Status Report--Oroville Airport Environs• 4. Review of TPM for. M. Barboza,. AP#30-47-0-015 5. Review of Use Permit for Aztec Development, AP#30-23-0-139 and 140 6. Review of.school site in the.Chico area 7. Status Report - Lake.Oroville Seaplane Landing Area 8. Amendment to ByLaws - change meeting "date to the second Wednesday of each month. 9. Business from the Floor -(Presentations-will be limited to three minutes. The Airport Land Use Commission is prohibited by State Law from taking action on any item presented if it is not listed on the agenda.) VI. Correspondence VII. Referrals to Staff and.Formation of Committees VIII. Announcements 1. Next meeting will be scheduled for either December 2, 1987 or another date, subject to the result of Item No. 9, above. suite couni --WVA PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER "DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE: 538.7601 September 4, 1987 CITY OF OROVILLE Executive Committee 1735 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Minimum Security Correctional Facility, AP 30-23-139,140 Please be advised that the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission discussed the above -referenced project at its regular meeting held September 2, 1987. The consensus of the Commission was that the project as presented does not appear to conflict with the Oroville Airport Environs Land Use Plan as adopted but that concerns exist as to the noise policies of the plan. While buildings can be constructed to attenuate noise, little can be done to mitigate noise effects on outdoor facilities such as recreation facilities. The Commission wishes to review the project again and make formal findings once a complete application is in process. Noise impacts should be discussed in the appropriate' environ- mental documents. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office any weekday between the hours of 10:00 a -.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH/sjs J �- �� u ®n PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE CONI IT§�MIf01 AGENDA September 2, 1987 TIME: 9:00 a.m. PLACE: Board of Supervisors' Room 25 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Approval of Minutes of July 1, 1987 Consent.Agenda Business 1. Status Report - Ranchaero 2. Status Report - Paradise Airport Environs 3. Status Report - Oroville Airport Environs 4. Status Report - Lake Oroville Seaplane Landing Area 5. Discussion - Butte County Association of Governments Draft Regional Transportation Plan (from July 1, 1987) 6.. Discussion - Senate Bill No. 633 7. Review of Site Plan for a 250 bed minimum security correctional facility on a portion of property identified as AP#30-23-139,140 (approximately 20 acres). 8. Discussion - Meeting Schedule 9. Business from the Floor -,(Presentations will be limited - to three minutes. The Airport Land Use Commission is prohibited by State Law from taking action on any item presented if it is not listed on the agenda.) Correspondence Referrals to Staff and Formation of Committees Announcements 1. Next meeting will be,scheduled for October 70 1987, subject t.o the result of Item No. 5, above. 1� • APPENDIX A STATE AERONAUTICS ACT January 1, 1983. Article 3.3. Airport Land Use Commission Creation; Mentborship; Selection 21670. (a) The Legislature hereby finds and declares that: (1) it is in the public interest to provide for the orderly development of each public use airport in this state and the area surrounding these airports so as to promote the overall goals and objectives of the California airport noise standards adopted pursuant to Section 21669, and prevent the creation of new noise and safety PProblems. (2) It is the purpose of this article to protect public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses. (b) In order to achieve the purposes of this article, every county in which there is located an airport which is served by a scheduled airline shall establish an airport land use commission_ Every county, in which there is located an airport which is not served by a scheduled airline, but is operated for the benefit of the general public, shall establish an airport land use commission, except that the board of supervisors of the county may, after consultation with the appropriate airport operators and affected local entities and after a public hearing, adopt a resolution finding that there are no noise, public safety, or land use issues affectin any airport in the county which require the creation of a commission and dec�aring the county exempt from that requirement. The board shall, in this event, transmit a copy of the resolution to the Director of Transportation. For purposes of this section, "commission' means an airport land use commission. Each commission shall consist of seven -n; embers to be _selected as follows: (1) Two representing'the cities in the county, appointed by a city selection committee comprised of the mayors of A the cities within that county, except that if there are any cities contiguous or adjacent to the qualifying airport, at least one representative shall be appointed therefrom. If there are no cities within a county, the number of representatives provided for by paragraphs (2) and (3)- shall each be increased by one. (2) Two representing the county, appointed by the board of supervisors. (3) Two representing the airports within that county, appointed by a selection committee comprised of the managers of all of the public airports within that county, except that one representative shall be appointed from an airport operated for the benefit of the general public. 7 (4) One representing the general public, appointed by the other six members of the commission. (c) Public officers, whether elected or appointed, may, be appointed and serve as members of the commission during their terms of public office. (d) Each member shall promptly appoint a single proxy to represent him in commission affairs and to vote on all matters when the member is not in attendance. The proxy shall be designated in a signed written instrument which shall be kept on file at the commission offices, and the proxy shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing member. A vacancy in the office of proxy shall be filled promptly by appointment of a new proxy. (e) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1989, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted before January 1, 1989, deletes or extends that date. /dote: The above amendment and repeal of Public Utilities Code Section 21670 (as amended and repealed by Section 3 of Chapter 1041, Statutes of 1432) was made by Section 2 of Chapter 1117, Statutes of 1984. Section 3 of Chapter 1117. Statutes of 1984, provides: SEC. 3. Section 21670 of the Public Utilities Code, as added by Sectiun 4 of Chapter !041 of the Statutes of i982, is amended to read: 21670. (a) Every county in which there u located an airport which is served by a scheduled airline shall establish an airport land use commission. Every county, in which there is located an airport which is not served by a scheduled airline, but is operated for the benefit of the general public, shall establish an airport land use commission, except that the board of superviscrs of the county may, after consultation with the appropriate airport operators 0 • and affected local entities and after a public hearing, adopt a resolution finding that these Litz- no noise, public safety, or land use issues affecting any airport in the count} which require the creation of a commission and declaring the county exempt from that requirement. The board shall, in this event, transmit a copy of the resolution to the Director of Transportation. For purposes of rhi% svrtinn "rnmmiccinn" me;in% an ,tirnnrt land use commission. F.ach commission shall consist of seven members to be selected as follows: (1) Two representing the cities in the county, appointed by a city selection committee comprised of the mayors of all the cities within that county, except that if there are any cities contiguous or ad;acent to the qualifying airport. at least one representative shall be appointed therefrom. If there are no cities within a county, the number of representatives provided for by subdivisions (b) and (c) shall each be increased by one. (2) Two representing the county, appointed by the board of supervisors. (J) Two representing the airports within that county, appointed by a selection committee comprised of the managers of all of the public airports within that county. except that one representative shall be appointed from an airport operated for the benefit of the general public. (4) One representing the general public, appointed by the other six members of the commission. (b) Public officers, whether elected or appointed, may be appointed and serve as members of the commission during their terms of public office. (c) Each member shall promptly appoint a single proxy to represent the member in commission affairs and to vote on all matters when the member is not in attendance. The proxy shall be designated in a signed written instrument which shall be kept on file at the commission offices. and the proxy shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing member. A vacancy in the office of proxy shall be filled promptly by appointment of a new proxy. (d) This section shall become operative January 1, 1989. Action by Designated Body Instead of Commission 21670.1. Notwithstanding any provisions of this article, if the board of supervisors and the city selection committee of mayors in any county each makes a determination by a majority vote that proper land use planning can be accomplished through the actions of an appropriately designated body, then such body shall assume the planning responsibilities of an airport land use commission as provided for in this article, and a commission need not be formed in that county. Applicability to Counties Having Over 4 Million Population 21670.2. Sections 21670 and 21670.1 do not apply to counties of more than 4 million population_ In such counties, the county regional planning commission has the responsibility for coordinating the airport planning of public agencies within the county. In instances where impasses result relative to this planning an appeal may be made to the county regional planning commission by any public agency involved. The action taken by the county regional planning commission on such an appeal may be overruled by a four-fifths vote of the governing body of a public agency whose planning led to the appeal. Airport Owned by a Gty, Distrfet, or County, Appointment of Certain Members by Gties and Counties 21671. In any county where there is an airport operated for the general public which is owned by a city or district in another county or by another county, one of the representatives provided by paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 21670 shall be appointed by the mayors of the cities of the county in which the owner of that airport is located, and one of the representatives provided by paragraph 2 of subdivision (b) of Section 21670 shall be appointed by the board of supervisors of the county in which the owner of that airport is located. This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1989, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute. which is enacted before January 1, 1989, deletes or extends that date. Note: The above amencirr.e:it and repeal of Public Utilities Code Section 21671 (as amended and repealed by Section 5 of Chapter 1041, Statutes of 1982) was made by Section 4 of Chapter 1117, Statutes of 14;4. Section 5 of Chapter 1117, Statutes of 1994, provides: SEC. 5. Section 21671 of the Utilities Code, as added by Section 6 of Chapter 1041 of the Statutes of 1982. is arre.-Zed to read: 21671. In any county where there is an airport operated for the general public• which is owned by a city or district in ar:n'her county or by another county, one of the representatives provided by paragraph ,I) of su'.ldivision (a) of Section 21670 shall be appointed by the mayors of the cities of the county in which the owner of that airport is located, and one of the representatives provided by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 21670 shall be appointed by the board of 5u:-c.,•v1sors of the county in which the owner of that airport is located. This section shall become •4p-c--a:M— !anuary 1, 1989. Term of Office; Removal of Members; Vacancies; Compensation; Staff Assistance; Moe/ings 21671.5. Except for the terms of office of the members of the first commission, the term of office of each member shall be four years and until the appointment and oualification of his successor. The members of the first commission shall classify themselves by lot so that the term of office of one member is one year, of two members is two years, of two members is three years, and of two members is four years. The body which originally appointed a member whose term has expired shall appoint his successor for a full term of four years. Any member may be removed at any time and without cause by the body appointing him. The expiration date of the term of office of each member shall be the first Monday in May in the year in which his term is to expire. Any vacancy in the membership of the commission shall be filled for the unexpired term by appointment by the body which originally appointed the member whose office has become vacant. The chairman of the commission shall be selected by the members thereof. Compensation, if any, shall be determined by the board of supervisors. Staff assistance, including the mailing of notices and the keeping of minutes, and necessary quarters, equipment, and supplies shall be provided by the county. The usual and necessary operating expenses of the commission shall be county charge. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this article, the commission shall not employ any personnel either as employees or independent contractors without the prior approval of the board of supervisors. The commission shall meet at the call of the commission chairman or at the request of the majority of the commission members. Rules and Regulations 21672. Each commission shall adopt rules and regulations with respect to the temporary disqualification of its members from participatin in the review or adoption of a proposal because of conflict of interest and with respect to appointment of substitute members in such cases. initiation of Proceedings for Creation by Owner of Airport 21673. In any county when a commission has not been created by Section 21670, any owner of a public airport may initiate proceedings for the creation of a commission by presenting a request to the board of supervisors that a commission be created and showing the need therefor to their satisfaction. Powers and Duties 21674. The commission shall have the following powers and duties, subject to the limitations upon its jurisdiction set forth in Section 21676: (a) To assist local agencies in ensuring compatible land uses in the vicinity of all new airports and in the vicinity of existing airports to the extent that the land in the vicinity of such airports is not already devoted to incompatible uses. (b) To coordinate planning at the state, regional and local levels so as to provide for the orderly development of air transpportation, while at the same time protecting the public health, safety, and welfare. (c) To prepare and adopt an airport land use plan pursuant to Section 21675. (d) To review the plans, regulations, and other actions of local agencies and airport operators pursuant to Section 21676. (e) The powers of the commission shall in no way be construed to give the commission jurisdiction over the operation of any airport. This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1919, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute which is chaptered before January 1, 1989, deletes or extends that date. Moto: The above amendment and repeal of Public Utilities Code Section 2,674 was made by Section 7 of Chapter 1041, Statutes of 1983. Section 8 of Chapter 1041. Statutes of 1982, provides: SEC. 8. Section 21674 is added to the Public Utilities Code, to read: 21674. The commission shall have the following powers and duties, subject to the limitations upon its jurisdiction herein set forth: (a) To study conditions and make recommendations concerning the need for height restrictions on buildings near airports; (b) To make recommendations for the use of the land surrounding airports to assure safety of air navigation and the promotion of air commerce. (c) To hold public hearings regarding the subject matter in subdwistons (a) and (b) and make findings of fact thereon which ould be advisory. unit' w ;he : a olved jurisdiction. (d) To make and enforce rules -iad regulations for the urderh and lair conduct of such hearings which shall conform as nerty as possible to the proviswus applicable to hearings conducted by local agency forrnatio<i commissions. • ie) To achieve by zoning compatible land uses in the vicinity of all new airports and in the vicinity of existing airports to the extent that the land in the vicinity of such airports is not already devoted to incompatible uses, and to this end the cummis�wns ;hall require that A new construction in such areas shall conform to such standards as the department may from time to time adopt. The powers of the commission shall in no way be construed to give the commission )utuJis.lruu u+vr tiro ulwratruti of any airport. This secliun shall beume utx•rahve January I, 1989. [and Use Plan 21675. (a) Thecommission shall formulate a comprehensive land use plan that %011 provide for the orderly growth of each public airport and the area surrounding the airport within the jurisdiction of the commission, and will safeguard the general welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity of the airport and the public in general. The commission plan shall include a long-range master plan that reflects the anticipated growth of the airport during at least the next 20 vears. in formulating a land use plan, the commission may develop height restrictions on buildings, may specify use of land, and may determine building standards, including soundproofing adjacent to airports, within the planning area. The comprehensive land use plan shall not be amended more than once in any calendar year. (b) The commission may include, within its plan formulated pursuant to subdivision (a) , the area within the jurisdiction of the commission surrounding any federal military airport for all the purposes specified in subdivision (a). This subdivision does not give the commission any jurisdiction or authority over the territory or operations of any military airport. (c) The planning boundaries shall be established by the commission after hearing and consultation with the involved agencies. Review o0 Loco/ Owneral Plans 21676. (a) Each local agency whose general plan includes areas covered by an airport land use commission plan, shall, by July 1, 1953, submit a copy of its plan or specific plans to the airport land use commission. The commission shall determine by Au t 31, 1953, whether the plan or. plans are consistent or inconsistent with the commission's plan. if the plan or plans are inconsistent with the commission's plan, the local agency shall be notified and that local agency shall have another hearing to reconsider its plans. The local agency may overrule the commission after such hearing by a hco-thirds vote of its governing body if it makes specific findings that the proposed action is consistent with the purposes of this article stated in Section 21670. (b) Prior to the amendment of a general plan or specific plan, or the adoption ur approval of a zoning ordinance or building regulation within the planning boundary established by the airport land use commission pursuant to Section 21675, the local agency shall first refer the proposed action to the commission. If the commission determines that the proposed action is inconsistent with the commission's plan, the referring agency shall be notified. The local agency may, after a public hearing, overrule the commission by a two-thirds vote of its governing body if it makes specific findings that the proposed action is consistent with the purposes of this article stated in Section 21670. (c) Each public agency owning any airport within the boundaries of an airport land tise commission plan, shall, prior to modification of its airport master plan, refer such proposed c ange to the airport land use commission. if the commission determines that the proposed action is inconsistent with the commission's plan, the referring agency shall be notified. The public agency may, after a public hearing, overru a the commission by a two-thirds vote of its governing body if it snakes specific findings that the proposed action is consistent with the purposes of this article stated in Section 21670. (d) Each commission determination pursuant to subdivision (b) or (c) shall be made within 60 days from the date of referral of the proposed action. If a cornmission fails to make the determination within thatperiod, the proposed action shall be deemed consistent with the commission's plan.. • This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1989, and its of that date is repealed, unless it later enacted statute, which is chaptered before January 1, 1989, deletes or extends that date. Note: The above amendment and repeal of Public Utilities Crude Section 21676 was made by Section 9 of Chapter 1041, Statutes of 19x2. Section 10 of Chapter 1041• Statutes of 1982, provides: SEC. 10. Section 21676 is added to the Public Utilities Code. to read: 21676. Each public agency having representation un the cumntissiun shall assist in the development of an area plan. All such plans shall -be filed with the commission for its approval. If in the determination of the commission, an action or regulation of any public agency within the boundaries of the area plan is inconsistent %vith the commission plan• then the commission shall hold a hearing to determine whether or not the proposed action is in the best interest of the airport and the adjacent area. If it is determined that the action would be harmful, then the public agency shall be notified and the public agency shall have another hearing to reconsider its action. The public agency proposing the action or regulation, however, may overrule the commission after such hearing by a four-fifths vote of its governing body. Each public agency owning any airport- within the boundaries of the area plan shall file any substantive change in development plans .with the commission for its approval. If such plans are inconsistent with the commission plan, then the public agency shall be notified and shall have another herring to reconsider its action. Stich public agency, however• may overrule the commission by a four-fifths vote of its governing body. This section shall become operative January 1. 1989. Review of Local dons 21676.5. (a) If the commission finds that a local agency has not revised its general plan or specific. plan or overruled the commission by a two-thirds vote of its governing body after making sppeecific findings that the proposed action is consistent with the purposes of thu article as stated in Section 21670, the commission may require that the local agency submit all subsequent actions, regulations, and permits to the commission for review until its general plan or specific plan is revised or the specific findings are made. If, in the determination of the commission, an action, regulation, or permit of the local agency is inconsistent with the commission plan, the local agency shall be notified and that local agency shall hold a hearing to reconsider its plan. The local agency may overrule the commission after the hearing by a two-thirds vote of its:governing body if it makes specific findings that the proposed action is consistent with'tlie purposes of this article as stated in Section 21670. (b) Whenever the local agency has revised its general plan or specific plan or has overruled the commission pursuant to subdivision (a), the proposed action of the local agency shall not be subject to further commission review, unless the commission and the local agency agree that individual projects shall be reviewed by the commission. Morin County Overrido provisions 21677. Notwithstanding Section 21676, any public agency in the County of Marin may overrule the Marin County Airport Land Use Commission by a majority vote of its governing body. Airport Owner's Immunity 21678. (a) With respect to a publicly owned airport that a public agency does not operate, if the public agency pursuant to Section 21676 or 21676.5 overrides a commission's action or recommendation, the operator of the airport shall "be immune from liability for damages to property or personal injury caused by or resulting directly or indirectly from the public agency's decision to override the commission's action or recommendation. (b) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1989, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute. which is chaptered before January 1, 1989, deletes or extends that date. AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY AUGUST,2%-1687 s AMENDED IN SENATEr. NIAY 28t".�987 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL; 28,1067- SENATE 8,1067SENATE BILL Introduced by Senators Rogers, 'Ayala.Kopp and Presley r February 25,'l °» An act to amend Section 65302.3 of the Goveiniilent Cpde,r and to amend Sections 21670, 21670.1,.k67,1 '216732167!1, 21675, 21676, and 21678 of, to add Section 21878, te, azi ­ repeal Sections 21670, 21671, 21674, and 21676 'of,:.the public Utilities Code, relating to airport land uses. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST, s , SB 633, as amended, Rogers.,,,Airport Ian commissions. "�. (1) Under existing law, each County In which there is , an airport served by a scheduled airline and, with-a specified exception, each county with an airport operated for the benefit of the general public, is required to establish art airport land use commission having a specified `membership;' • including 2 members representing airports within the county; appointed as specified. Existing law permits, under specified conditions, another body to be designated to assume the planning responsibilities of the airport land use commission. t This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by requiring that, on and after March 1, 1988, 2 members of a commission be persons having an expertise in aviation, as defined, rather than persons representing airports within the county. The bill would also impose a similar requirement on the other designated bodies. (2) Under existing law, each airport land use commission `-- is required to adopt a comprehensive land use plan providing K::�e. SB 633 -- 2 for the orderly growth of each'public airport an�i,th area . surrounding the airport and is prohibited from amendingA e Llan more often than once each calendar year; -:j! ; i• This bill would retain that prohibition on the fieduericy,,of arncndrnents, but would require' the. plan to be 'reviewed.- as Often as necessary to accomplish its purposes.., , (3) under existing law, a public agency may, pursuant -to specified procedures, override. an: airport -land -,use commission's action or recommendation affecting an airport' Within the jurisdiction of that public agency. Under existing . law, k1116i Ja,urary 1, 1989, the operator of the airport, if other thiol the public agency, is immune from liability for property -1niagc or personal injury resulting from the public.agency's 11cision to override the commission's action or recoinrnendation. This bili would delete the termination date.. A) Under existing law, there is no specified procedure for postponing or invalidating the land use .decisions !O'V lob'al aencies in a county which has no airport land use commission or other designated body or in which the commission or other designated body has .not adopted an airport land use,.plan. This bill would, in such a county, permit any interested parte, as defined, to initiate judicial proceedings to postpone the effective date of a zoning change, zoning variance, the issuance• of a permit, or the adoption of a regulation by a local a11rncV Wli1ch directly affects the use of land within one mile - of the hotuidary of an airport in the county until the county ho:u-d of supervisors either rescinds its Action, adopts a rc'.*3011-1tion declaring that it has determined that the proposed tion of the local agency is compatible with the asafety of air � it anon ,uul the of air commerce. tit the airport, M' ,rrnc'ncls it.; action to make it compatible. 15 i Under- existing law, the general plan and any applicable sp ,cilk plan of a city or county is required, until January 1, 1989, to be consistent with the airport land use plan. •Phis bil! would delete the January 1, 1989, termination date of thi, requireinent. (ti) thuder existing law, various .provisions relating. Jo airport land use commissions terminate on January 1,1989, and on that elate are replaced by other. provisions. ; 96 60 Uva 1.111 ,ue —3— SB 6.33 i 4;, -This bill would delete the January 1, 1989, termination date '61' existing -provisions and would make related changes by repealing specified provisions which would become operative on that date. ' (7) FA494mg law preseribes the pewees mtd duties of eirpert. land use • his bill would authefize a epee deterring that here is an met finaneisl treed, to submit a budget: request to the apprepriate eity er eeanty. • *8 The. California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement, including the creation of a State Mandates Claims Fund to pay the costs of mandates which do not exceed $500,000 statewide and other procedures for claims whose statewide costs exceed $500,000. .This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State rr Mandates determines that this bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to those statutory procedures and, if the statewide cost does not exceed $500,000, shall be made from the State ' Mandates Claims Fund. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. s State -mandated local program: yes. In The people of the State of California do enact as follo- s. 1 SECTION 1. Section 65302.3 of the Cove_ n,.xient 2 Code is amended to read: 3 65302.3. (a) The general prim, and any applicable 4 specific plan prepared pursuant to Article 8 5 (commencing with Section 65450), shall be consistent 6 with the plan adopted or amended pursuant to Section 7 21675 of the Public Utilities Code. 8 (b) The general plan, and any applicable specific plan, 9 shall be amended, as necessary, within 180 days of any 10 amendment to the plan required under Section 21675 of 11 • the Public Utilities Code. 12 (c) If the legislative body does not concur with any 13 provision of the plan required under Section 21675 of the -.4 s SS 633 —4— -. 1 Public Utilities Code, it may saiisfy^the:pioitiAAg 1k MW q 2 section by adopting findings pursuant't0°S di 60 1 w'• 3 the Public Utilities Code. ' ���_`•�•'' ���r+�'_ �.� 4 SEC. 2. Section 21670 of the Public•Utilitiel, 6 s 5 amended by Section 2 of Chapter 1117 of the Sttttuts o , 6 1984, is amended to read: 4W 7 21670. (a) The Legislature hereby fords and declares 5 that: 9 (1) It is in the public interest to provide for `the•orderl� 1U c1cVL•lopment of each public use airport in•this`state°aid - 11 the arca surrounding these airports so as to-piomot© the • a 12 overall goals and objectives of the California airportnoi�e 46 standards adopted pursuant to Section 21669;4nd to, prevcnt the creation of new noise and safety problems'. i5 (2) It is the purpose of this article to protect public 16 health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly 17 expansion of airports and the adoption of land use 18 measures that minimize the public's exposure to 19 excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around 20 public airports to the extent that these areas are not 21 already devoted to incompatible uses. 22 (b) In order to achieve the purposes of this article, 23 every county in which there is located an airport which 24 is served by a scheduled airline shall establish an airport ®� 25 land use commission. Every county, in which there is 26 located an airport which is not served by a scheduled 27 airline, but is operated for the benefit of the general 23 public, shall establish an airport land use commission, 29 except that the board of supervisors of the county may, after consultation with the appropriate airport operators and affected local entities and after a public hearing, 32 adopt a resolution finding that there are no noise, public •33 safety, or land use issues affecting any airport in the 54 county which require the creation of a commission and 3.3 declaring the county exempt from that requirement. The 36 board shall, in this event, transmit a copy of the resolution 37 to the Director of Transportation. For purposes of this 38 section, "commission" means an airport land use 39 c:onunission. Each commission shall consist of seven YU mc•inbers to be selected as follows: x 'i rb ♦1 k > Yk t 1 f C1 t 'r 1 rQt� Jepresenting �the cities' in the: county, Kppoint�dby cityselection committee comprised of the ayor$ of all the cities within that county, except that if "tiR;tbere,Aare�any,Qacities- ,contiguous: or adjacent to the qualifying airport, at; least one representative shall be 6,''appoirited therefrom. If there are no cities within a Z ;..county, the. number of representatives provided for by 8 :.paragraphs (2) and ' (3) shall each be increased by one. -9 .•; (2) Two representing the county, appointed by the "* 10.,= board of supervisors. 11`: (3) .. Two having expertise in aviation, appointed by a 12; selection committee comprised of the managers of all of 13 • the public airports within that county. \ 14 , (4) One representing the general public, appointed by 15, the other six members of the commission. 16. (c) Public officers, whether elected or appointed, max, 17 be appointed and serve as members of the commission 18 during their terms of public office. 19 (d) Each member shall promptly appoint a single I Ah 20 proxy to represent him or her in commission affairs and 21 to vote on all matters when the member is not in 22 attendance. The proxy shall be designated in a signed 23 written instrument which shall be kept on fila at the 24 commission offices, and the proxy shall serve at they 25 pleasure of the appointing member. A vacancy in the 26 office of proxy shall be filled promptly by appointment of 27 a new proxy. 28 (e) A person having an "expertise in aviation" means 29 a person who, by way of education, training, business, 30 experience, vocation, or avocation has acquired and 31 possesses particular. knowledge of, and familiarity with, 32 the function, 33 operation, and role of airports, or is an elt-cted official of 34 a -local agency which owns or operates an airport. Tho 35 commission shall be constituted pursuant to this section 36 on and after March 1, 1948. 37 SEC. 3. Section 21670 of the Public Utilities Code, as 38 amended by Section 3 of Chapter 1117 of the Statutes of 39 1984, is repealed. 40 SEC. 4. Section 21670.1 of the Public Utilities Code is 96 110 1 96 150 f M SB 633 *,n 1 amended to read - 2 21670.1. (a) Notwithsta-na'-mgany .'!o"t er`;:,'p'_FqVxsion,6 r, 3 this article, if the board: 'of,,' s'up'e'rVis'6is:Ga f leW»1 ,- 4 selection committee of may6minthe county;eath;m es 5 a determination by a majority vote-that,propen­afi use` _- 6 planning can be accomplished through-t,he'actionso.' an 7 appropriately designated -body, thew.:- the' bO`d'Y-­'S'O­-,.,. 8 designated shall assume the .planning tiles'ponsibili 'leg .'of 9 *an airport land use commission as providled"foif" S 10 article, and a commission need not. be -formed mi `t__ t C' 11 county. I (b) A body designated pursuant to subdivis'164nin" 13 which does not include among its membershipiat least' * - two members having an expertise in aviation, �as defined' 4 15 in subdivision (e) of Section 21670, shall, when acting in. 16 the capacity of an airport land use cornmission',-be". 17 augmented so that that'body, as augmented, will have ht, - 18 least two members having Ahat -expertise.; `-The' 19 commission shall be constituted pursuant to this section 20 on and after March 1, 1988. 21 SEC. 5. Section 21671 of the Public Utilities Code, as', 22 amended by Section 4 of Chapter 1117 of the Statutes of 20 1984, is amended to read: 24 21671. In any county, where there is an' airport 25 operated for the general public which is owned by a city 26 or district in another county or by another county, one of 27 the representatives p ' rovided by paragraph (1) of 28 subdivision (b) of Section 21670 shall be appointed by the 219 city selection committee of mayors of the cities of the county in which the owner of that airport is located, And mic oftlic representatives provided by paragraph.(2) of 32 subdivision (b) of Section 21670 shall be appointed by the 33 1)oard of supervisors of the county in which the owner of 34 that airport is located. 35 SF.C. 6. Section 21671 of the Public Utilities Code, as 136 amended by Section 5 of Chapter 1117 of the Statutes of 37 198.4, is repealed. .:. 38 SEC. 8. Section 21673 of the Public Utilities Code is 39 amended to read: -1 .1, 40 21673. In any county not having a, commission or a 96 160 V., ou designated -Ao- carry t, the"tesponsibilities of a ;2�N commission,; , any ,owneril of: a public , airport may initiate rprocbedings: for creation ? of;: a commission by J pregenting a!'request to, the.board of supervisors that a be created and showing: the need therefor to 6.. the. satisfaction -of the board,of supervisors. i,. 17,�!i,,,SEC. 9.,,,Section 21674 of the Public Utilities Code, as z `8 amended,by Section 7 of Chapter 1041 of the Statutes of 31. : .,;- 9 1982, is amended to read: Av. 10 21674.:. - The. commission has the following powers and 11-' duties, subject to the limitations upon its jurisdiction set 12:, -forth in Section 21676: 13 (a) To assist Jocal agencies in ensuring compatible 14 land uses in the vicinity of all new airports and in the 15, vicinity of existing airports to the extent that the land in - 16:1 the vicinity of. those airports is not already devoted to 14 17 incompatible uses. - 18 "', (b) To coordinate planning at the state, regional, and 19 - local levels so as to provide for the orderly development 20 of air transportation, while at the same time protecting 21 the public health; safety, and welfare. 22. (c) To, prepare and adopt an airport land use plan 23. pursuant to Section 21675. 24(d) To review th6 plans, regulations, and other actions 25,*,of local agencies and airport operators pursuant to 26. Section -21676. 27 - (e) The powers of the commission shall in no way be 28 construed to give the commission jurisdiction over the 29 operation of any airport. 30 if ft determine 1,11ainaf there is tm unmet 31 fiftm:keW ftee4; 4 shah subtnit to 1 -he t priate e4y 32 elauneil or ee"nty beafd of 9uVefv496" ft budtt,4 f-eEtuest 33 speeifying the ametink requested, the ptifpese fop the 34 reque9t, eAld ju4ifiea6eft fet e-ipendikur s 35 SEC. 10. Section 21674 of the Public Utilities Code, a 36 :added by Section 8 of Chapter 1041 of the Statutes of 1982, 37 i - s repealed. Code is 38 ".. SEC., 1 L: Section 21675 of the Public Utilities 39, amended to read: 40 .-., 21675. - (a) ;: Each commission shall formulate a �`, JI' ,. SB 2 4 7 9 10 11 12 �7 16 17 18 19 20 2.1 22 23 24 2.5 26 27 r�t� 32 33 3.1 3.5 36 37 38 39 A0 i if ,+ .ycy.•i - .• V i" n tdf y IStI �7�11�-W 4. �l 633 • ' _ �,`- t e k!v. t i:y 5 � R t � 4 N .. +� r , e § it comprehensive land ,use+plant`that wnll`;pr6vtleifo7r�tkSe�..; orderly growth of, each- : public,, airport r anitfW61prea� � surrounding the airport•' Within :A of juPisdact' �, :thbk -I commission, and will safeguard the general welfare oir the W.�. inhabitants within the vicinity.of the ;aii]p&C, dd,l he public in general.,The commission plan •shalliriclude �a *- long-range master plan that,' reflects 'the `anticipated growth of the airport during dt.least the next. 20 years. In 4 . { formulating a land use plan, the commission maydevelop height restrictions on buildings, may specify,use;of:land; and may determine building: standards;,::including ° • • soundproofing adjacent to airports ;.within the.planning area. The comprehensive land use plan shall be reviewed. as often as necessary in order to accomplish its purposes, but shall not be amended more than once in any calendar year. (b) The commission may include,. within • its,: plan. formulated pursuant to subdivision (a), the -area within the jurisdiction of the commission surrounding;'any federal military airport for all the purposes specified -in subdivision (a) . This subdivision does not give. the commission. any jurisdiction or authority, over; the territory or operations of any military airport...:,-.!.,: t'-= . (c) The planning boundaries shall be established by the commission after hearing and consultation with the i,ivolved a-aencies. SFC. 12. Section 21676 of the Public Utilities Code, as �u 1)011(lod by Section 9 of Chapter 1041 of the Statutes of 1952 is arnended to read: 2!6m. (a) Each local agency whose general plan ' inckido, arcus covered by an airport land use commission plan shall, by July 1„ 1983, submit a copy of its plan or specific plans to the airport land use commission. The commission shall determine by August 31, 1983, whether the plan or plans are consistent or inconsistent with the commission's plan. If the plan or plans are inconsistent . with the commission's plan, the local agency. -shall be not ified and that local agency shall have anotherhearing to reconsider its plans. The local agency may overrule the commission after such hearing by a two-thirds vote of its i 96 2M '• t �� t ��� SB 633 ill":governing :body if it makes specific findings that the ` I`2 -''proposed action is consistent, with the purposes of this fi 3 article stated in Section 21670. (b) Prior to the amendment of a general plan or plan, or the adoption or approval of a zoning a• A �.r...ti r ` ' 6 + orditlance or building regulation within the planning • boundary established by the airport land use cot ntnission 8 •pursuant to Section 21675, the local agency shall #irsl refer 9 the proposed action to the commission. If the commission _10 -,-determines that the proposed action is inconsistent with 11: ' the commission's plan,. the referring agency shall be 12 •: notified. The local agency may, after a public hearing, 13 --overrule the commission by a two-thirds vote of its 14 governing body if it makes specific findings that the Y5 proposed action is consistent with the purposes of this 16 article stated in Section 21670. - 17 • (c) Each public agency owning any airport within the 18 boundaries of an airport land use commission plan shall, 19 prior to modification of its airport master plan, refer such ' 20. proposed change tothe airport land use commission. If 21 the commission determines that the proposed action is } 22 • inconsistent with- the commission's plan, the referring 23- agency shall be notified.- The public agency may, after a 24 public hearing, overrule the commission by a two-thirds 25 vote of its governing body if it makes specific findings 26 that the proposed action is consistent with the purposes 27 of this article stated in Section 21670. 28 (d) Each commission determination pursuant to 29 subdivision (b) or (c) shall be made within 60 days from 30, the date of referral of the proposed action. If a 31 commission fails to snake the determination within that 32 • period, the proposed action shall be deemed consistc!nt 33 • with the commission's plan. 34 ' • SEC. 13. Section 21676 of the Public Utilities Code, as ;j. •35 added by Section 10 of Chapter 1041 of the Statutes of 36 1982, is repealed. 37 SEC. 14. Section 21678 of the Public Utilities Code is 38: amended to read: ?' { .39 21678. With respect to a publicly owned airport that 4011• a public agency does not operate, if the public agency ' •'`X �� 96 21C nd Elt SB 633 1 pursuant .to. Section..,21676,:nri;216.76.5 ��alverxide 2 commission's action or recomnpendatiQn;tYiei`9perator Qf 3 the airport shall be immune. froin'liability, o' ' atnages to 4 property or personal, injury>caused,...byt.'ot "r'e ting 5 directly or indirectly from:the public agency's;decision to ` 6 override the commission's action;or recommendation.; 7 SEC. 15. Section 21679 is added to the Public Utilities 8 Code, to read: 9 21679. (a) .In any,county in which there' is no airport 10 land use commission or other body designated to assume 11 the responsibilities of an airport.land use. commission, or 12 in which the commission or other designated.:body. has 13 not adopted an airport land use plan, an interested party • 14 may initiate proceedings :in • a . court, of ;competent 15 jurisdiction to postpone the, effective date of. a• zoning 16 change, a zoning variance, the issuance of a permit, or the 17 adoption of a regulation by a local agency, which directly 18 affects the use of land within one mile of the boundary of 19 a public airport within the -county. s 20 (b) The court shall may issue an injunction which 21 postpones the effective date of the zoning change, zoning 22 variance, permit, or regulation until the governing body 23 of the local agency which took the action does eider one 24 of the following: or 25 (1) In the case of an action which is a legislative act, 26 adopts a resolution declaring that the proposed action is 27 compatible with the safety of air navigation and the 28 promotion of ait commerce at the public airport. 29 (2) In the case of an action which is not a legislative 30 act, adopts a resolution making findings based on 31 substantial evidence in the record that the proposed 32 action is compatible with the safety of air navigation and 33 the promotion of air commerce at the public airport. 34 (3) Rescinds the action.; . • 35 (4) Amends its action to make it. compatible with the 36 salcty of air navigation and the promotion of air 37 cornmerce at the public airport, and complies with either 38 paragraph (1) or (2)• of this subdivision, whichever is 39 applicable. t 40 (c) An action brought pursuant to subdivision (a) shall '-11— SB 63: 1 be commenced within 30 days of the decision or within 2 'the appropriate time periods set by Section 21167 of the 3 Public Resources Code, whichever is longer. 4 (d) If the governing body of the local agency adopts . 5 resolution pursuant to subdivision (b) with respect to 6 publicly owned airport that the local agency does no 7 operate, the operator of the airport shall be immune fron 8 liability for damages to property or personal injury fron 9 the local agency's decision to proceed with the zonin,, 10 change, zoning variance, permit, or regulation. 11 (e) As used in this section, "interested party" mean 12 any owner of land within two miles of the boundary of th. 13 airport or any organization with a demonstrated interes 14 in airport safety and efficiency. 15 SEC. 16. Notwithstanding Section 17610 of th 16 Government Code, if the Commission on State Mandate 17 determines that this act contains costs mandated by th 18 state, reimbursement to local agencies and schoc 19 districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 20 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Titl 21 2 of the Government Code. If the statewide cost of th 22 claim for reimbursement does not exceed -five hundre• 23 thousand dollars ($500,000), reimbursement shall b 24 made from the State Mandates Claims Fund. 107, 96W 1 962 • evTr�. Inter -Depart emorandum ocpuptyO TO: Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Paul Farris, Use Permit, AP#030=21-1-026 DATE: December.2, 1987 The above project was forwarded to this Commission for review by the Butte County Planning Department. The project is a request to allow a mobile home as a temporary second dwelling. The subject property consists of 0.27 acres (12,000 sq. ft.). Two homes on site will result in a density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre. A review of the Oroville Airport Environs Land Use Plan indicates that residential "dwellings are subject to Airport Land Use Commission review if they result -in°more han_4 dwelling units per acre underneath downwind and base -legs or departure paths of'frequently used airport patterns. The subject property is under the downwind leg of Runway 12 which is used by most non -jet aircraft 80% to 90% of the time. Significant open space exists nearby in the form of large private holdings and the Oroville Wildlife Area. RECOMMENDATION: Find that, although the project will result in densities greater than those recommended by the Orovil-le Airport Environs Land Use Plan, the use'will be temporary and will not be overly exposed to aircraft hazards due to the existence of substantial open space nearby, most -.,.notably .otably the Oroville Wildlife Area approximately 1/8 mile to the southeastrl DRH : j me ♦ e" ` BUTT'L• COUNTY PLANNING CO1%D1ISS OlN 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 (916) 538-7601 TO: Butte County Airport Land Use Commission c/o Dave Hironimus DATE: 1 I - o U RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or ggenerated concerning the following project: Paul Farris - AP#030-21-1-026-0 Use Permit to allow a temporary second dwelling, located on the west side of Harlan Avenue, 120 feet north of Fresno Avenue, Thermalito. We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental' Impact Report (EIR). Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, Kathryn K Planning echnician Comments:. Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project). YE�-- NO 1 •,Y •�9Y "` a& . !. *. • {I s T "" �; 1V •wet. J STATE HIGHWAY ,o.&& I Io ca h 1 • 5 a s. 7 a THERMAL / M T. /9N. R3E. M. D. S. a M, 2 0,0 ® J9 p 4.5.46. '`^----------------------v N Je ¢ h ,� at Io L ROUTE 2/4 ,.• 400 10B 80, h / •= 200, 2/ 4/ 7.011 AC. / 3.2AC. JJ�• 560 ` 5 1 h m �O ® 2 [22 • 18...6 � 47 7Q J6 G S I! l6 .7S T. s:' G Seo -_.-------.__.-- © O o 7A QJ �m 47tSp� 8.45 AC O JS 11 39 19.7 4C. I m o. � e r 3 3 � ©94 aSo © 1 ; t W® 3 c n o o m o © <.�. 2.O 4 3 O 3/ 6Lu 7 4 In cb ct O 45 S C p rn Z --0-- t 3 n o o m I Qcp w 330 70 BO BO29 J OZ.26'.e � 27 i 2 ,� 0 ` _ 4 R' • Q --- 1310 I ,' $ ze72Q , o t 11 m 2 e0, 7J 4 • 6d //6G' ®0 4 6'O' FRESNO AVE. - 1( B^ Co F6nmg Comm. [27]! op C�sseisor s MNo r ; ABERCROMBIE TR. `•M.O.R. -8K.28 PG 478 48 `OCT.2 198J� { t r HOWARD SUB.'M.O.R..Bk.9Pp.37A rr. , J. a,County of Butte, Calif. 1 +.tTHERMAUTO MO. WALL MAP Na 6 .�% ,'• • r x rw r r s It , Y r "`<':5 .:'�.!: _ �,:k..,,,y; - .K- �"" p?: twdr; a.'», y_:+•^ -'t i.®POVI�►@j VoufO `` ^•,iK ro=3 il c 52. � ' � .�= 'kt �': Gj= '1C.t. v _ ' � - y , u i. ..�'r��A �;�,r � , �.r.. :.s f� - Tom, �:�� v, ;may. � ,*, «�. � . ��y.. � •G...1 t. �.. i . n' t r: - %};: `+ �.3Y=`v iY ...p� _ „? 1 :1".:.:% - f-• -.. �.•u,t,,,, *i �+� ^'f, ,i .....,;.. ._.,ir,-,-i-?"'.,:....ar-` •r�.-,� ..s •,.�3-.-..�-•-=�:. b_.:i�: :R = `ter ,?`'p= ri•= »-t;'?�ii� •- U�0.018.0 z �• E t � O tS 5t t 7.217CC 2 <11 oI L ROUTE 2/4 ,.• 400 10B 80, h / •= 200, 2/ 4/ 7.011 AC. / 3.2AC. JJ�• 560 ` 5 1 h m �O ® 2 [22 • 18...6 � 47 7Q J6 G S I! l6 .7S T. s:' G Seo -_.-------.__.-- © O o 7A QJ �m 47tSp� 8.45 AC O JS 11 39 19.7 4C. I m o. � e r 3 3 � ©94 aSo © 1 ; t W® 3 c n o o m o © <.�. 2.O 4 3 O 3/ 6Lu 7 4 In cb ct O 45 S C p rn Z --0-- t 3 n o o m I Qcp w 330 70 BO BO29 J OZ.26'.e � 27 i 2 ,� 0 ` _ 4 R' • Q --- 1310 I ,' $ ze72Q , o t 11 m 2 e0, 7J 4 • 6d //6G' ®0 4 6'O' FRESNO AVE. - 1( B^ Co F6nmg Comm. [27]! op C�sseisor s MNo r ; ABERCROMBIE TR. `•M.O.R. -8K.28 PG 478 48 `OCT.2 198J� { t r HOWARD SUB.'M.O.R..Bk.9Pp.37A rr. , J. a,County of Butte, Calif. 1 +.tTHERMAUTO MO. WALL MAP Na 6 .�% ,'• • r x rw r r s It , Y r "`<':5 .:'�.!: _ �,:k..,,,y; - .K- �"" p?: twdr; a.'», y_:+•^ -'t i.®POVI�►@j VoufO `` ^•,iK ro=3 il c 52. � ' � .�= 'kt �': Gj= '1C.t. v _ ' � - y , u i. ..�'r��A �;�,r � , �.r.. :.s f� - Tom, �:�� v, ;may. � ,*, «�. � . ��y.. � •G...1 t. �.. i . n' t r: - %};: `+ �.3Y=`v iY ...p� _ „? 1 :1".:.:% - f-• -.. �.•u,t,,,, *i �+� ^'f, ,i .....,;.. ._.,ir,-,-i-?"'.,:....ar-` •r�.-,� ..s •,.�3-.-..�-•-=�:. b_.:i�: :R = `ter ,?`'p= ri•= »-t;'?�ii� •- ®vTr� Inter-Departemorandum 0 0 �oU0% TO: Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: School Site in the Ranchaero Overflight Area DATE: December 2; 1987 The above project was forwarded to this Commission by .the State Department.of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics, for review: The proposed school site is located to.the east of the clear zones and approach zones and under the over- flight zone of the Ranchaero Airport, Traffic patterns at the airport are located to the west and.no significant overflight of the site should occur. A review of the draft Airport Environs Land Use Plan indicates that concentrations of people in excess of 2S persons per acre can be..placed in the overflight zone if they are not under traffic patterns or other areas of heavy aircraft use. RECOMMENDATION: Find that the proposed school .site conforms'to the policies of the-draft.Ranchaero Airport Environs Land Use Plan. DRH : j me Avenue .'NQ1L/YDOG���. A` —a,• v! ca' vlat CI q. \ A L (r vl J i Oar / 6Yav y Oak I �� f.V .._ p Cal Cf c wood Cgffwon Vosw �Ln•AhnendiaQ Or. SITE AVENu SACiiAWiENTO "� = _� ;• o .-`tom . ^, •�' , u e I c AVECL N. + 14tcoCID 0. _ S•ot tidal: G. B'a .��r�� 0 ? Gwkh..a,r 3 r R. J -- park park, r S LEGEND FREEWAY• W,AmmICwnarMwlw INTERSTATE STATE//EOtRAL TS ­. _ r-CVL0 SACS .LAIN THRU ROUTES CITY STREETS mr.!�zrr:n.:�:rR.:•.-:. CITY LIMITS RESERVATION SOUNOA F €jat?n; rE ■ WWXCLS GOLP COURSES PANICS CIVIC WILOIN STATE MISTORICAL LANOMARKS 'EET 1000 7000 3000 _ _ r *KILOMETERS f ;i. r.;V,ift Jgm b co"am M-0 T.` V.odrM. CA r993 Edi s o AIOwtOn Ale, and '�➢+ TrUOntnt P/ant q Of,% g� ve. ,nroln F Q W a Ave C s / It E YNO Q ; ,MICS wN`Ntl Ax 3 Ili hN•u is, t :r�, y Illy '+K O '�S d RANUICHO AIUPUNT I �Y ^ �t?yG /`\ � � ..�. `tib• �r•�F �r ob UES �\ a�4. .�� •M` u` ��0 AK y^ `L7 Lw lrt Ave. .. Gp Webb Ave �wC41 Av �`' rueEn � '� �� •r� Avenue r + 9!y C x g o r, � = M y Clara r �\ ROAD ' RIVER a G� FOttrUt F Los. y L�e C >N 4 aC Q CREEK r CNICO Aye^ve � I P"e c \ I� h,c0 � .nue TO: Airport Land FROM: SUBJECT: • OVTrF • 0 O Inter -Depart emorandum O O �ouht-t Use.;Commission Planning Staff Aztec Development, Use Permit; AP#030-23-0-139,140 DATE: December 2, 1987 The above project was.forwarded to this Commission.for review by the City of Oroville and.was originally discussed at the November 4, 1987 Airport Land Use.Commission.meeting. A motion of.intent was adopted at that time to recommend that the project be processed in some form that would .guarantee that large concentrations of people did not -occur in the clear zone on the southwesterly portion of the property. Since that time, the .Ci.ty. of .Oroville has relocated the thresholds of.both runways,' --resulting in relocation of the clear.zorie off of the subject property. As.such, the conditions to be formulated as a result of the motion of intent are no longer needed. RECOMMENDATION: Find that the .proposed.Use Permit for Aztec Development conforms to the policies of the 0iovil•le Airport Land Use Plan and recommend that any approval be made conditional upon the following: 1. Noise impacts should be addressed in the environmental documents and a survey of the site be performed to determine what.building construction standards should be required. 2. Security considerations should be addressed in the event of aircraft incident or accident on the property and the availability and response capabilities of.emergency services on the property. 3. Grant an avigation easement to the City of Oroville. DRH : j me cc: Gerry DeRoco f O Inter-Departemorandum O O TO: Airport Land Use Commission COU11 FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Rick Coletti, Prezone, AP#048-03-3-010 DATE: December 2, 1987 The above project was forwarded to.this Commission for review. While R-2 zoning is requested, telephone conversations with the City of Chico Planning Department indicate that the applicant does not wish.to build duplexes,,and-.that the R-2 zone was chosen because of its lot size requirements. A review of the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan reveals that this, property is in a Uompatible Land (Use tZoneO(C.L.U.Z.), V which allows maximum densities equivalent to those of the a County S -R (Suburban -Residential) zone which allows up to 6 dwelling units.per acre (on sewers). RECOMMENDATION: Find the proposed prezone in conformity with the Airport Environs Plan.only if development of the property,is no greater than 6 dwelling units per acre. DRH j me City. of Chico REPORT, TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 1987 FROM: ZONING & PERMITS COMMITTEE FILE: A-ZON-3 (112) SUBJECT: PREZONE N0. 112 (COLETTI) GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT:. Rick-Coletti, 2070. Bidwell Ave., Chico OWNER: CIE -Trust -Carole Nystrom,' Trustee 2996 Dearmeadow Dr. Danville, CA. 94526 REQUESTED ACTION.: -Prezone PURPOSE: To prezone -to R-2. Medium Density Residential to.permit .a 22 *lot single family addition LOCATION:1 West side of.Floral Avenue, /3 mile' north 'of .East Avenue .EXISTING ZONING: County S_R '. Suburban.Reside'ntial ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.. 048-03-r3-010.. SIZE: -3-acres, EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant ,SURROUNDING LAND USE: 'N'..- Vacant S, Rural Residential E. Rural Residential W Vacant GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:- LowDensityResidential ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Negative Declaration 3/87 -,— !. 7b 63 M tY! 6b• SS ` GO b6 p�q� if _ I.. .U- - Al_,� FUnJFF ..O• BASC MPJ.lT to % 4 M F, - e GENERAL MOTES, 'LEGEND ' 1. FbP/ER. Pis. .4 M. SDE 3TL'10.-0 'pCArN P1JEM0.!'T . . WATER• • _ t:LL yL°•TER . .. 3' S. 9E WAGE• CITY OP CHICO -�e- PROPOJGD CGM/CR d. TP-LEFHO/JE ZOn11"al F)-,-- - BELL 9R --- PROP65MD S FQ14.OF6414 TENTATIVE' SUBDIVISION MAP LOT 5me. 5600 3q. M. t T. IOTAL ARBA. 3.9 ACRSO ' e A FORTItvi OF T ID OF A. Gaw- PLAN. LOW OE/ W!y FM'-WM1• rAL - . _ TI6 IS -W. 8UBONt9tO/J OF T}IC .pl-IN . 46 I O . ' BIDWOLL RAIZ J . AJ5'5"OWW ON ' . THAT CORTAW MAP PILED M eoDK - - - co OF MAF'3 - AT PAGE 46 ' - - - EUrM COUhJTY OFFICIAL RECORDS • _ _ FOR _ • '. RICW•LEIS^ ODL@TTI ■/�� NorthStar Eaginooring 7/1COM.w*IaDLKT,•NITt.. MOD. m Itttl(till ttl•It00. CIVIL -ENGINEERS • PLANNERS• SURVEYORS 4aR 49 UJ In, A,eo Code 62-26 T . 22 N. R. 1E. M. D. B. & M. 62-60 62-33 62 - 46 62-61 R¢3 • •62-66 r L UVENUE P/N _ _/ _� -_ 1 A > 6 ; 5635 6J5 "5- I /••' 400 3 - i R 'R 0 13 ETAWANDA i4 e 925 24 0 W 3/ ACRES SUB. - R i' 1B� ., 200 r 1 0 e� ,55, �o� 6 5• }. J9 q! 55 - B9 I BB y� b IQ � •. . . �• .•• S/ 303AC /9.,6 AC. /9.9 Ac. 1E n u r t v� 1 \O e 26 03/ Sao 9• o R�3o�. 343 Pg 33 N s�+7.. �E3 o i ,� T „riro /28 OAC. 660 2 _ 35 Io t I ( 23 sa. - 1. 3 6 Z 0 ?� `SLti�JetgC 331-64, Zth R �' 64 _ 36 20o v xoe /2 a . ` a. ye�q 33,q I /4 4 /C660 of 06 3 e s ` 0 ,/5�= 034 •t^ 3T ` 8 80 79 oe . 'JJ 314.8315 I e I 635 1 R 2 tR 93. 33541 81 o..e• 1 - y I k. tit 49-96 i B Pg p5 s s9 X 'A 0{ 94 2o2AG. 630.05 R/5 54.41 I 04 635.0 n / i 12.64 AC 2.64156 Cr. S SUB I e 5L 63413 UN I T NOIJ24 ! ' • 55 s s.a 62 61 , u2 I 9 c _ 1.51 AC tl I i LA MESA t5/4c f:: i` 36 05 SUB. N0. 3 ' r p .69 ,r ssr• IP U)_ Pgl 24 �, 5 P).30� r2 9 9oi ze rt C 63 3 (&@@B I� ;I US . EAST ' 7C oz os 22 OB ... Assessors Map No. 48-03 NOTE. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL BLOCK County of Butte, Calif. Bidwell /prn Sub. MOR. Bk. 6 Pg /O 8 LOT NUMBERS SHOWN !_ Bidwell IS" Sub. MO. R. Bk. 6 Pg. 48 IN CIRCLES Morch, 1955 il! �- z --�- o.ac•nor Te cT• o• c-•ce OHIO $ 1 CERE33 AVENUE NO SCALL 1� _\3� � SIJ � /�32. � rNAR 1 Rum SIA J. ^2�• � 37' AID rICNAIL A DC,,I9t OOAIC 6 •1 291 /1'4-34 1 1 , / LS ITSS ) A TTN, CAALTOo Low" F -uLELEA 281.1 i 27-1, ''>'J5 /' i e COuIIt t I 26—� I : f / 37T• / Q �3�1 495-f 710 - ,• rDrolRDa, DAAQ NONG ..III1 0a CO, CALt7Oxt IA 97971 477-If)1 0,02rrrA1 aot1J. ANoDuoN 1 Into . i\1121 AICAAIL t. STOD, E.C.I. 28991 Y i. • 2t �i �' 41-9' c -SOI > 941 1tA STIMr 114 ` ' DIIWC-w00 is W 1 21-1 1.�42 �49 ' 1 COURT ., \ \` . . 0 / \ 1 I 03 —Oe s10PO1ro - AuxD "%" . 16 171 16 19`. 1 •.• \ \5 II fSt —46 CAu1. NAM SOIVICI SINACAI QTY O► OICO. N' TY►ICAL C-ANwiaL SC'CT,ON 1, A IS- PO9L7C OTTLITT rASDeIfT Hltl. SI D"IcA to Ata* MA LfONT-*1-VAT rAOOTACI, AND A 7' POIUC wrtuTT tASDmrr AOaG ALL SIDE tot Ltxzs f. TQ tri STlll* 87CHVATA LTR to SOT flown NDIQ A DIIAIVAor N CTIAML WILL 02 WILT HITNI■ THS 1SePOlto 10� DNACI WDmIT AND rir tiC"AQ WILL N WITHIN TftfAAIOARNrL. LeoR>•D fo9oTVlAtor •OVrOAAT r71I KING CAOOND ODNTDDA (CRT of CrICIS DAT") DrAICTION O] fDAPAa /7a A'w •.ter LIISTIRO rrofx DIUIN LIR IMPOSED STOAr DAMN LTR -8 PROPOSED rTODI MULIN MOP Inr? PROPOSED SrHO CAR O /No101to Irv= KWHOU! . • PDONfro ar-m CAANDCT LOCAT#ON Te• ;,cTwO NO T4LL o- .o �.� am eTO. D o.w.r eu,ee, euTwwR ♦ yw ,N.T••y CIN e/ LV KO . . /TO.••K•L Cuff. . •urr a W/ .L ROOD ftlr w�.. ri SAl. ROAD t< �10N ilo4 COURT CORY AV7:NU6 Lr-AP,COURT 1000m1000mGO.muaT 4n wucTL.f•L •. C7•DN� l II.aTAw.L t.�V O. 'e O• Of •Hf OP LN1C0 ca `Cu1C0 aTD►� . Vow ITPIC AL,W e� CITV O.Rw. Lufs.4UTRR l FLORAL. "601IN OAK DRIVg�CT10N TJlNTATIVQ !SuDC)IV15101J MAP CERES ESTATES UNIT Z FIP-TE6NRTH1 SUBDIVIS OSI ON, TWL QIOWELL- RANCHO, CITY OR CHICO, COuP'rY 0/ 6uTTG JULY, PISS SHEET IORI 13-7 1 LOCATION MAP NO SCALL WYn' rNAR 1 Rum SIA J. ROMP I ►ATAICIA ACOR, AID rICNAIL A DC,,I9t OOAIC t/O IIID, OPAL .'Art A TTN, CAALTOo Low" f HILIJAMlNn4 Wr . OICO. c•r•r0jwu 97174 495-f 710 - rDrolRDa, DAAQ NONG 1. 0. Sox 1441 0a CO, CALt7Oxt IA 97971 477-If)1 0,02rrrA1 aot1J. ANoDuoN 1 Into . AICAAIL t. STOD, E.C.I. 28991 941 1tA STIMr CNICo. CALL TOAIII► 419-1899 LAND ORI NHL UT _. TLC&" s10PO1ro - AuxD "%" . DTTLrrrrSW CAS a rLICTAICR 1. 0. a R. Trupsm. PLcIrIc SILL TATDII CAu1. NAM SOIVICI SINACAI QTY O► OICO. AASISEWS PAR= PD., 4S-03-89 a 14 IANRAAT Srw= STSTTT I TJlNTATIVQ !SuDC)IV15101J MAP CERES ESTATES UNIT Z FIP-TE6NRTH1 SUBDIVIS OSI ON, TWL QIOWELL- RANCHO, CITY OR CHICO, COuP'rY 0/ 6uTTG JULY, PISS SHEET IORI 13-7 1 OVTT� 0 .:.:.pi+p:, o Inter-Departemorandum 0 0 �Q TO: Airport -Land Use Commission unI� FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Drake/Jeffries, Rezone, AP#048-02-0-049 (ptn) DATE: December 2, 1987 The above referenced project was forwarded to this Commission for review by the City of Chico Planning. Department. A review of the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan reveals that this. site is located in three different Compatible Land Use Zones (C.L.U.Z.). Those zones are IIP, III.and V. The.primary concerns within all of the zones are those of safety and noise affecting residential uses. The proposed industrial zoning would eliminate residential uses from the property, but could result in large concentrations of people or flammables. The only portion of the property where this is a concern is the southerly portion located under the flight corridor. 'RECOMMENDATION: Find the proposed rezone compatible with the Airport Environs Land Use.Plan only_1if the project.is conditioned so that no storage of,inff` mmables or other dangerous materials, or large concentrations of people are allowed under the flight corridor as a,result of subsequent development. DRH: jmc City of Chico REPORT. TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 1987 FROM: ZONING & PERMITS COMMITTEE FILE: A-ZON-3 (392) TO REZONE AREA NORTH OF FOOTHILL PARK FROM MIP.TO M-1 LIMITED SUBJECT: MANUFACTURINGLAND- USE DISTRICT GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT• Drake/Jeffries, P. .O: Box 1448, Chico OWNER: Same REQUESTED ACTION: Rezone PURPOSE:. To rezone from MIP to M-1 Limited Manufacturing . LOCATION• Easterly of Cohasset Road and the Airport Clear Zone,.northerly of Foothill Park, westerly of the future extension of Floral EXISTING ZONING: Ave. MIP - Limited Manufacturing Industrial Park ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: Portion.of 048-02-0-049 SIZE• 140+/- acres EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant Land SURROUNDING LAND USE: N Vacant and small industrial uses S Sycamore Channel/Single Family Residential E Airport Clear Zone W Vacant GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Industry and Heavy Commercial ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Mitigated Negative Declaration 3/87 O y N•� Noe Il LUPIN _ _ _ _ AV. . 4 • .CREEK - D NZ 4 - ,..Butte LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE:. 538-7601 November 16, 1987 W.R. Riesen, Aviation Consultant State Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics P.O. Box 942874 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 Dear Mr. Riesen: In response to your letter of September 15, 1987, regarding the proposed school site on the north side of Eaton Road opposite Godman Avenue in Chico, the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission reviewed the site at their meeting of November 4,1987. Because of its location beneath the light aircraft traffic pattern as shown on Drawing No. CIC -2 in the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan,'and because of information indicating the shift of other traffic patterns into the area, the Commission found that the proposed site does not conform to the Policies of the Environs Plan (Airport Land Use Plan). If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office any weekday between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, David Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc r <fr• ;e Count L A .; 1) , PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE: 538-7601' CITY OF OROVILLE November 5, 1987 Attn: Mary Ann Imbiorski 1735 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965 RE: Aztec Development Use Permit AP#30-23-139, 140 For a Correctional Facility Dear Ms. Imbiorski: At its meeting of November 4, 1987, the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission reviewed the Aztec Development Corporation Use Permit Application to allow a 250 bed correctional facility on AP#30-23-139,140. The Commission adopted a motion of intent to: A. Find that the project as proposed may result in densities in excess of 25 people per acre in an area that experiences overflight by aircraft in a primary traffic pattern and may in its future stages of development violate the legally required clear zone of Runway 12, and that the Use Permit process does not adequately guarantee the specific location of improvements; and B. Recommend that the project be pursued as a Planned Development, binding as to site design and facility lo- cation, showing the location and type of future development anticipated and reflecting the concerns listed in Item C, below; and C. Forward the above finding to the City of Oroville for inclusion within their environmental documents and recommend if the project is approved, overruling Butte County Airport Land Use Commission require that: 1. No permanent structures be allowed in the areas 'designated for clear zone by the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan. 2. No concentrations of people be permitted in the clear zone. 3. Noise impacts should be addressed in the environmental documents and a survey of the site be performed to determine what building construction standards should be required. CITY OF OROVILLE Attn: Mary Ann Imbiorski November 5, 1987 Page Two 4. Additional information be submitted with site plans that indicate the usage of the entire 22 acres. 5. Security considerations should be addressed in the event of aircraft incident or accident on the property and the availability and response capabilities of emergency services,on the property. 6. Grant an avigation easement to the City of Oroville. Final action on this item is anticipated to occur at the next Airport Land Use Commission meeting scheduled for December 9, 1987. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact this office any weekday between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, David R. Hironimus Associate"Planner DRH:jmc To: Butte County Airport Land Use Commission From: Planning Staff Subject: AZTEC DEVELOPMENT, USE PERMIT, AP#30-23-0-139, 140 (Referral from City of Oroville) Date: October 29, 1987 This project is a Use Permit to allow a minimum security prison on property located north of the Oroville Airport between the clear zones of the two runways as shown on the attached exhibit. The location maps provided by the City and the applicant indicate that both of the referenced parcels, totaling approximately 22 acres, are under consideration. The applicant's site plan, however, only indicates that portion identified as AP#30-23-0-139 as being used for prison facilities and recreational facilities. Information supplied by the applicant indicates that population of the prison will be approximately 250 with a staff of 50 to 60. The site plan indicates that the inmates will be located in two dormitories near the administration building and the classrooms. All of these facilities will be located on the easterly two- thirds of the south half of the 9.99 acre parcel (through AP#30- 23-0-139). The recreation and landscaping areas are shown on the northerly portion of that property. The site plan does not indicate any use or plans for the westerly 12 acres identified as AP#30-23-0-140. As such, the constructed facilities will be located on a portion of the property encompassing approximately 3 1/2 to 4 acres. This will result in concentrations of people of approximately 73 per acre on the developed portion of the property. Even higher concentrations will be experienced in spots such as classrooms and administration building or dining facilities. The application carries some indication that there will be recreational uses on the westerly 12 acres of the property identified as AP#30-23-0-140. There is no indication of what kind of recreational uses may take place there. The Airport Land Use Plan policies indicate that there should be no concentrations of people at all nor any permanent structures within the area designated as clear zone. For example, a ball park would be totally incompatible with the clear zone designation, where as garden areas for inmates would be acceptable. Most of the site is located within the 55 dB Ldn noise contour for the Oroville Airport. Buildings within the 55 dB contour should be constructed so as is to yield interior noise levels compatible with residential uses. Standard building construction with attention to window and vent placement should adequately mitigate noise within the buildings. Outdoor noise levels are not as easily mitigated. The Butte County General Plan Noise Element indicates that outdoor recreational facilities are conditionally acceptable within the 55 to 65 dB contours. Most of the site would be located in such a situation. Higher noise levels may be expected near the approach and clear zones and uses should be limited. See also discussion above regarding uses within the clear zone. Institutional uses are permitted within the City of Oroville industrial zoning with a Use Permit. However, it should be noted that establishment of an institutional use may limit the utility of other industrial land nearby and therefore hamper the implementation of the Airport Land Use Plan. Also of concern is, security and emergency response in case of an aircraft incident or accident involving the property. If an aircraft should crash on the property, emergency. services may be hampered by security fences, etc. Also, an accident may destroy sections of security fencing or other' facilities. Provisions should be made for access by emergency services in such a manner that security of the facility would not be impaired, and provisions need to be made so that if security is breached by an accident, the back up measures can be implemented. RECOMMENDATIONS: A. Note that the proposed project as designed will result in densities in excess of 25 people. per acre in an area that experiences overflight by aircraft within the traffic pattern; and find that the project as proposed does not conform to the policies of the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan; and B. Forward the above finding to the City of Oroville for inclusion within their environmental documents and recommend if the project is approved, overruling Butte County Airport Land Use Commission require that: 1. Nopermanent structures be allowed in the areas designated for clear zone by the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan. 2. No concentrations of people bepermittedin the clear zone. 3. Noise impacts should be addressed in-the environmental documents and.a survey of the site be performed to determine what building construction standards should be required. 4. Additional information' be submitted with site plans that indicate the usage of the entire 22 acres. 5. Security considerations should be addressed in the event of aircraft incident or accident on the property and the availability and response capabilities of- emergency services on the property. 6. Grant an avigation easement to the City of Oroville. DRHejmc October 20, 1987 L 1735 MONTGOMERY STREET • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-4897 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: OROVILLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (916)533-0937 Buffe Co. Planning Corn% OCT 22 1y8/ Orovi ie, Galit=4 The City of Oroville is preparing an Initial Study for a proposed 200 to 250 bed minimum security correctional training center (may be expanded at a later date) on 20 acres north of Oro Dam Boulevard West (State Route 162) off 24th Street (see attached map). In order for us to make a realistic assessment of the project please provide us with any concerns you may have on its affect on the Oroville Muncipal Airport or the airport environs. We ld appreciate a written response by October 28, 1987. Chuck Prince Planning Director CP/MAI:mai ECI2.LTR AVE. I dl C 9 �3 2AC.,� _..52.06 .04C. • it QI � 45 59.5AC. R. R I L 645 I I ROAD t 43 2 / Ir, 32.7k 26., 4C t /2 46 61 .3 20.01Ac. L-- - - -- — -- -- I 745 2 iFEATHE 46JAC 1 46;3AC' /. - -- - -t---------------1------- I t I t\� 4 //.OTAC'9.3 I - I .99AC` 4 97 3 o --------X30----- ----- f�-�,�-----��r---- � 3 I c t //.75AC� 1 9.99AC! B� `, i 7 B I 7 I t �L'JF 4 �O \ 40 4C \ Tac /e /V/- G� /f Co:.rse :;PNo. 6 D / �70 O{0, V jAssessor's Map No.30-23 County of Butte, Colif. lI/nrrh /q�3 a5 AC /1 ® ® • I ACI / �70 O{0, V jAssessor's Map No.30-23 County of Butte, Colif. lI/nrrh /q�3 I I .z Ul ACH Of2OVIL�& FIZl`/OF4 451TE, P-I-/*� 10 /3/GG5 0X '� �����AT"I U� il� • . Pim � N I ` LOGAT IOO ` II W N I / g /21170,Co 1;V?1'/cA' OF t O" ? .Q.('/).4, '9COCK/9/ I !N/r!!/NCCEA? IOA/E I A vE ti/I-/E I 1 B0' I eo, ----=--------i------------- ..W I N � o 8 STA TE 1W 1;:;,q GV.4 Y / a do, 0 � tCfe?ro,��Ee�n?��acue�fe I Dr r!/E AIO?r.0 FVO OF � rI r?l/NrV.d y've;9 0/701/we SII I I "tWICIPJZ e;??&?r I a I rh I I /9E/70co � /�O?r/O,(�OF1075 a, 5 DA/OG Iv, /9LOCA' /1G lV/r.�//.V ICfD? IONS � v � o 18 f h 0 /30.SG' 1 8 STA TE 1W 1;:;,q GV.4 Y / a do, 0 � tCfe?ro,��Ee�n?��acue�fe I Dr r!/E AIO?r.0 FVO OF � rI r?l/NrV.d y've;9 0/701/we SII I I "tWICIPJZ e;??&?r I a I rh I I 0lI 0 19.4 M /3 L VO. nA/ICEL / M?f1OAIOA POO?CfL �Virui v cC fv? zO vE --- /.59 AC?ES -- m s7•rrw-------- I ///46;19 Y hl I a 78 GC?E:i 5000/'/S"w m=5;r o VI GIN I V M AI�P .1 OT To •� / i ,� LLjx�C�1t rlf�EBRI sNeET 2 or-,. /9E/70co � /�O?r/O,(�OF1075 a, 5 DA/OG Iv, /9LOCA' /1G lV/r.�//.V ICfD? IONS � /5.54 DC?ES I l0 EXCESS /'D?CEL 18 ar/a sm. Fr.. n. nga7DcvE h 5e/•!/'O1�w /30.SG' 1 i1 0lI 0 19.4 M /3 L VO. nA/ICEL / M?f1OAIOA POO?CfL �Virui v cC fv? zO vE --- /.59 AC?ES -- m s7•rrw-------- I ///46;19 Y hl I a 78 GC?E:i 5000/'/S"w m=5;r o VI GIN I V M AI�P .1 OT To •� / i ,� LLjx�C�1t rlf�EBRI sNeET 2 or-,. .• 0 CITY OF OROVILLE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1675 MONTGOMERY STREET, OROVILLE, CA 95965-4897 (916) 533-4764 APPLICATION FOR: X USE PERMIT ($100.00) VARIANCE ($ 75.00) APPROPRIATE FEE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION. PROPERTY ADDRESS X96-Gro-Dart-B©ulavazd"Ies'ty, Oroville, California 95965 AP NO: Butte County AP 30-23-139 & 140 APPLICANT: APPLICANT ADDRESS: 1--) C C:I . ZONING `1-2 APPLICANT PHONE NUMBER: ( (�. - 6, 7 (1 7 0 6 R APPLICANT INTEREST IN PROPERTY: Purchaser - contractor -'tenant - operator (OWNER, TENANT, CONTRACTOR, ETC.) OWNER: Gerald N. de Roco OWNER ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1310, Oroville, California 95965 OWNER PHONE NUMBER: (916) 534-7581 GIVE REASON FOR APPLICATION, EXPLAIN FULLY: City staff has requested submission of an Application for Use Permit to construct and operate a Privately owned and operated Correctional Traning Center in an M-2 Zone. SIGNATURE USE PERM applicati (W.here appropriate, DATE: /l) please submit the following with A site plan, drawn to scale on an 8-1/2" x 11" sheet, showing existing and proposed.structures, and other relevant features. VARIANCE ,i 1. - Attach a site plan, drawn on an 8-1/2" x 11" sheet, showing the existing structures, streets, and other relevant features. Show clearly the 'areas of variance. ' 2. State what exceptional. circumstances apply the the subject site making the variance necessary. The Planning Commission must make four (4) mandatory findings in order to issue a variance. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM DATE FILED: GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name and address of developer or project. sponsor: O / cit /"c> �. � I (,fA2 0, o 2. Address of project: 2500 Oro Dam Boulevard West Assessor's block and lot number: Butte County AP 30-23-139 & 140 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: /a //// / lU L/!tel CD �i/ y,%„ , ,!f 6Y 4. Indicate number of the permit application: 5. List and describe any other related permits and other public agency approvals for this project, including those required by city, regional, state.and federal agencies: City of Oroville Use Permit, Building Permit and Occupancy Permit. 6. Existing zoning district: MM_2 7. Proposed use of site'(project for which this form is filed). Correctional Detention & Training Facility PROJECT DESCRIPTION 8. Site size: Approximately 20 acres UG 9. Square footage: (Building area) 10. Number of floors of construction: r 11. Amount of off-street parking provided: S �� (_Q 12. Attach plans: 13. Proposed scheduling: 14. Associated projects: Large scale oEE-site improvements to general area. 15. Anticipated incremental development: Future expansion possible. 16. If residential, included number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household expected: N/A 17. If commercial, indicate type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities: N/A 18: If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: N/A 19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: see additional sheets 20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required: An institution is a conditional use allowed in an M-2 Zone with a Use Permit. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss all - items checked yes (attach additional sheets if necessary). YES NO X 21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. X 22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. _ x 23. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. _ x 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. _ x 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. x 26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. _ x 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. _ x 28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or -more. x 29. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. X 30. Substantial change i.n demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). x 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). X 32. Relationship to a larger project or series of.projects. a ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid' photos will be accepted. See additional sheets 34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment house, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. See additional sheets CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and 1,w the s attached exhibits present the date and information required fort initial valua- tion to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and inforiation presented are true and correct to the best ofJny'knowledge a be`lie�� DATE: 11 Wiz:• S nature ' FOR: r� . U GENERAL INFORMATION 19. The major function will be a Correctional Dentention and Training Center. Estimated employment will be 50 to 60 employees. Estimated institutional occupancy is initially 200 to 250. Community benefits derived from the project are many: 1. Private for profit tax paying corporate ownership. 2. 50-60 year-round jobs - approximately $1.3 million payroll. 3. Local construction of $2.5 million facility. 4. Annual operating budget of $3-4 million. 5. Enhancement of retail sales, utility and property tax base. 6. Extension of utilities for further economic development. 7. Clean, non-polluting, non -resource intensive industry. 8. Staff utilization of community resources and business. 9. Citizen participation through local advisory board. 10. ECI participation on community projects - if desired. 11. Community service by program participants, if desired. 12. State carefully screen individuals assigned to facility. 13. Custodial supervision by California Department of Corrections. 14. No unsupervised movement outside facility. 15. Very few visitors and unlikely family relocations to area. 16. Mandatory release to County of commitment, not local area. 32. The area which includes the project site was annexed to the City of Oroville for planned development and community growth. It is anticipated that the development of this project, the City Airport Industrial Park and Linkside Estates will encourage other investment and economic development in this area and the general Oroville Community. Clean, non-polluting, non- resource intensive industry of this type should be encouraged to locate in the Oroville area. 33. & 34. The project site and most of the surrounding area was in one ownership until 1975, and has been historically used for grazing and dry farming grain crops. The site is vacant and for the past 12 years has been used for ORV purposes. The soil is stable and classified as Redding Gravelly Sandy Loam with a profile of shallow top soil underlain by an impermeable hardpan over a gravel and cobble complex. The topography is gently rolling with a knoll centering from East to West. Drainage is by natural channels to the Southwest and Northwest. The native flora and fauna of the area has been generally displaced by past agricultural and ORV activity. No known scenic, archaeological or historical significance has been associated with the project site or surrounding area. The project is surrounded by vacant land. Land to the North, East and South is located within the Oroville City Limits and has a Land Use Designation of Industrial with a consistent Zoning of Industrial. Land to the West is located in the County of Butte with a County Zoning of AR -40 and AR -5. This land in the County to the West is within the City of Oroville Sphere of Influence and has been given an Industrial Land Use Designation in the Oroville General Plan prior to annexation. To: Butte County Airport Land Use Commission From: Planning Staff Subject: M. BARBOZA, Tentative Parcel Map on AP#30-47-0-015. Date: October 29, 1987 This project is a request to divide 5 acres into 4 parcels of 1.25 acres each. The.project site is -located partially under the approach zone on Runway 1-9, as shown on the attached exhibit.. « As such, height limits should be established through an avigation . easement which will properly address -the approach zone and the transitional zones as required by FAA, Part 77 Regulations. The subject property is zoned for industrial uses which are, generally considered compatible with the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan. Industrial uses which Imay result in high concentrations of people or hazardous materials would normally require a Use Permit within the City zoning. It should be noted that such uses are not generally compatible with the policies of the Airport Land Use Plan. Since no specific development of the result in parcels is proposed at this time, the division of the property could be found in conformity with the policies of the plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: Find that the division of 5 acres of industrial zoned land in 4 parcels of 1.25 acres each does conform to the policies of the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan. DRH:jmc LM 1735 MONTGOMERY STREET • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-4897 OROVILLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 533-0970 October 27, 1987 Mr. Dave Hironimus f Butte County Airport Land Use Commission.. 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 U. - RE: Manuel Barboza Tentative Parcel Map Manuel Barboza has submitted a tentative parcel map for a four (4) lot- s pl.i t ot'split on AP No. ,30-47-0-015. Please schedule this map for review by the Butte County`Airport Land Use Commission review on November 4, 1987. r,; 3 Wa lace Boness` Redevelopment Agency Planner WB/MAI:mai z Enclosures p; ' t F • 26-79 LIMITED INDUSTRIAL - M-1 The provisions of Sections 26-42 through 26-54 of this Chapter are made applicable to all M-1 Districts subject to the specific provisions of this section. a. Intent. To provide areas within the City for large scale manufacture, assembly, fabrication, storage and processing of previously processed materials into finished products. Operations shall not create objec- tionable influences such as dust, glare, odor or sound. .Uses in this district may be compatible with adjacent residential uses -.when certain specific regulations are applied. b. Uses Regulations. In the M-1 District, no building or land shall be used and no building shall be erected or structurally altered, unless otherwise provided herein, except for one or more of the following.uses. C. Uses Permitted. 1. Warehousing (including delivery services), moving services, vehicle storage and mini storage. 2. Sign Fabrication. 3. Wholesale activities. 4. Fabrication and assembly of electrical appliances and equipment or electronic assemblies. 5. Assembly or packaging of manufactured components. 6. Publishing and bookbinding. 7. Cold storage plant. 8. 'Furniture manufacture. 9. Medical and pharmaceutical manufacture. 10. Administrative offices for permitted use on the same lot. d. Conditional Uses Requiring a Use Permit. 1. Any u.se permitted in a C-1, C-2, or C -L -M District subject to obtaining a use permit in each case. 2. Offices. . Page 122 I. 0 • 3. Residential use limited to caretaker or security personnel. 4. Public utility buildings and substations. 5. Recreational vehicle parks. 6. Bars, cafes and restaurants. 7. Light metal fabrication, including machine shops and sheet metal work, but not including casting, smelting, drop hammers or punch presses. 8. Food processing and packaging which are not offen- sive or obnoxious due to odor, fumes, refuse *matter or water -carried waste. 9. Any other use of land not specifically set forth in this section that is compatible with the intent of this section as determined by the Planning Commis- sion. e. Development Standards. 1. Lot Area. There shall be no minimum lot area. 2. Lot Width. Ther.e shall be no minimum lot width. 3. Height Regulations. a. The maximum height of ,any main building or structure shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet. b. Accessory buildings shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. C. Additional height may be permitted if a use permit is secured in each case." 4. Yards. a. Front Yard. No minimum except where the frontage in a block is partially in a residen- tial district, in which case, the.front yard shall be the same as required in such residen- tial district or may be indicated on the Official Master Street and Highway Plan or other City ordinances. b. Side Yard. No minimum except where the side of an M-1 use abuts a residential district, in which case, a side yard of ten (10) feet is required. Page 123 C. Rear Yard. There shall be no minimum rear yard unless the rear yard abuts a residential dis- trict, in which case, a rear yard of twenty (20) feet shall be required. 5. Lot Coverage. There shall be no maximum lot coverage. f. Development Standards for Lands Abutting Residential Districts. Within four hundred (400) feet of a resi- dential district, hours of operation are limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Within seventy-five (75) feet of a residential district, the following regulations shall apply in addition to those of Subsec- tion e. 1. Landscaped Buffers/Fencing. A combination of fencing and landscaping shall be provided along all boundaries common to residential districts suffi- cient to provide screening, visual relief and sound barriers. 2. Building Height. No structure shall exceed twenty- five (25) feet in height. 3. Preferred Uses. Within seventy-five (75) feet limited setback, the following are preferred uses: a. Parking lots. b. Loading areas. C. Administrative offices. d. Storage. g. Parking. See Section 26-49. h. Fences and Hedges. See Section 26-48. i. General Regulations. 1. All uses in which open storage is required shall conduct such open storage behind a six (6) foot wall of masonry, wood construction or slatted chain link fence 'so .that the storage area is not visible from street frontages or adjacent properties. 2. Refuse" collection areas shall be provided and im- proved per Section 26-48 of this Chapter. j. Loading Area. Private off-street loading space for handling of all goods, materials and equipment shall be j provided with the location and design for each off - Page 124 street loading space being not less than ten (10) feet by twenty-five (25) feet with a minimum fourteen (14) foot height clearance. The loading area shall not be a part of the required off-street parking. The number, location and design of off-street loading spaces shall be approved by the Development Review Board. k. Site Plan and Development Review. All new construction and major remodel projects in M-1 District shall be subJect -to the approval of site plan and development review by the Development Review Board. Procedure for such submittal and approval is found .under Sections 26- 83'through 26-87. Page 125 '"' •" O�ItT�r � +� Inter-Departemorandunm , To: Airport Land Use Commissione�s�t and Proxies FROM: Dave Hironimus ALUC Staff SUBJECT: ALUC WORKSHOP, AGENDA, MAP & LETTER ATTACHED DATE: October 9, 1987 Let me know by Friday, October 16, 1987, -if you plan to attend, so that Ican reserve seats and perhaps arrange a car pool. The workshop last year was very informative and worthwhile. I urge you to attend if at all possible. DDRHJ: jjmmc STATE Ci'CAL'IFC1RNIA—BUSINESS, TRANSPORTA*AND HOUSING AGENCY • GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS 1130 K STREET - 4TH FLOOR MAIL: P.O. BOX 942874 SACRAMENTO, CA 94274-0001 (916) 322.3090 TDD (916) 323-7665 October 13, 1987 To: ALUC Commissioners & Staff Buff co PlennPng Cbftft OCT 8 )987 Jorowle; catwah Pursuant to our letter regarding an upcoming ALUC Workshop, the Division of Aeronautics is pleased to announce the Second Annual ALUC Workshop for Northern California,.October.26, 1987. -The workshop will be held in the Sacramento Room .of the. Sacramento Community Center (map on reverse side of attached agenda) commencing at 9:00 a.m. with check-in and coffee. A preliminary:_ agenda is attached for your information. Please bring your questions and knowledge to share. This is intended to be an interactive session. This year we do have a larger room, but seating is still limited. Please reserve your space by calling Ken Payne at.916-324-1833 (preferably by October 19) and indicating how many from your ALUC and/or ALUC staff will be in attendance. Sincerely, U JACK D. KEMMERLY, Chief Division of Aeronautics Enclosure SECOND ANNUAL NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ALUC WORKSHOP OCTOBER 26, 1987 AGENDA 9:00 a.m. Check-in and coffee 9:30 a.m. Introduction of program and workshop topics- Division of Aeronautics. --Prepar.ation and Implementation of CLUPs- - Peter Hill, SACOG. --Land-use compatibility/density--Ken Brody. Hodges and Shutt. --Safety zones --Ken Brody, Hodges and Shutt. --Revisions to ALUC statutes --Chris Brittle, MTC. --ALUC's legal authority--Larry-Thelen. Caltrans' Attorney. 10:00 a.m. Break 10:15 a.m. Discussion groups on above topics. 11:00 a.m. Reports from groups and discussion. 11:45 a.m. Lunch 1:15 p'.m. Resume discussion groups. 2:00 p.m. Reports from groups and discussion of selected topics. - 2:45 p.m. Break 3:00 p.m. Final.resumption of discussion groups --topics of special interest. 3:30 p.m. Final reports from groups. 4:00 p.m. Adjourn m G r• G (D N N 0 0 x r cn ca rt LO n �n rt rD rt n (D n (D rr (D rD rt ro rt (D ol (D rt n r• A� G 3 � n x n�ro (D rr ::r 0 D) 0) r - r• �1 n rt C U) 7r C) rS rt rr G :3 �C r• W. art r-3 rNt Z z G G• y n, (D r• (D r O � n rn N � xH-En > o (D -Z) n O rD 0) 3 1-3 G C - ?rrr-Z � ID n > M G 'A) rD n Z rD r• rr (D rt y (D rt r• 0. �t C 2) rt O "C O 0) Fl n (D G r• C7 H. (n (D N rr of 1- (D (D E r• 0 (D 7 n (D 'Q d (D �- rt rr pi (1 =r rr (D r - rt :I t1i :r X (D rt (D (D rr rt (D 0 (D (D G � C � rt or 0 rD x r cn ca rt LO n �n rt rD rt n (D n (D rr (D rD rt ro rt (D ol (D rt n r• A� G 3 � n x n�ro (D rr ::r 0 D) 0) r - r• �1 n rt C 7r rS rt rr G :3 �C r• W. 0 rt bt7 G r• G rn I-- rD 0) a F� G C r • � rr A� G rD r• G) CY 0) Fl n (D (D (D r� (D 0 r• G rt (D 12th Street 13th Street 14th Street z — > d .a X September 4, 1987 CITY OF OROVILLE Executive Committee 1735 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965 �..�'Butte L'o PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER'DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE: 538.7601 Re: Minimum Security Correctional Facility, AP 30-23-139,140 Please be advised that the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission discussed.the above -referenced project at its regular meeting held September 2, 1987. The consensus of the Commission was that the project as presented does not appear to conflict with the Oroville Airport Environs Land Use Plan as adopted but that concerns exist as to the noise policies of the plan. While buildings can be constructed to attenuate noise, little can be done to mitigate noise effects on outdoor facilities such as recreation facilities. The Commission wishes to review the project again and make formal -findings once a complete application is in process. Noise impacts should be discussed in the appropriate environ- mental documents. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office any weekday between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER /'0 ,e.. -- David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH/sjs • •�. ��,,-� ll a ®�� � _ L i, N D O F N A i U F ;. ' E S L` I.1 A i 7 b E A Y PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538-7601 September 1, 1987 Buss Roberts 3083 Clemo Avenue Oroville, CA 95966 Dear Mr. Roberts: Sherry Edwards from the Elections Department called me today. She needs a Form 730, Leaving Office Statement, from you because you were a ALUC Commissioner and have left that office. I have enclosed a Form 730. Please complete and send directly to Elections. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Executive Secretary /C David R. Hironimus Associate Planner D RH : j me Enc. September 1, 1987 Otto Behunin 204 Sheldon Avenue Gridley, CA 95948 L A N D O F N A PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538-7601 Dear Mr. Behunin: Sherry Edwards from the Elections Department called me today. She needs a Form 730, Leaving Office Statement, from you because you were a ALUC Commissioner and have left that office. I have enclosed a Form 730. Please complete and send directly to Elections. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Executive Secretary David -R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc Enc. coun LAND OF N'ATU'RAL. \/VEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 5A-7601 September 1, 1987 Steve Stone Capital Planning Group 5800 Clark Road Paradise, CA 95969 Dear Mr. Stone: Sherry Edwards from the. Elections Department called me today. She needs a Form 730,.Ieaving Office Statement, from you because you were a ALUC Commissioner and have left that office. Ihave enclosed a Form 730. Please complete and send directly to Elections. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Executive Secretary David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc Enc. 0 .;ti a ®ung LAND OF NATURA VV EA LTH AND. B`t;\1J f ffo PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538-7601 September 1, 1987 James Hanna. 1632 Downing Avenue Chico, CA 95926 Dear Mr. Hanna: Sherry Edwards from the Elections Department called me today. She needs a Form 730, Leaving,Office Statement, from you because you were a ALUC Alternate and have left that office. I have enclosed a Form 730. Please complete and send directly to'Elections. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Executive Secretary David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc Enc. L A N D O F N A T 0 R A L W E A L T H A N D B A U T Y PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538-7601 September 1, 1987 Chuck Prince CITY OF OROVILLE 1675 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Prince: Sherry Edwards from the Elections Department called me today. She needs a Form 730, Leaving Office Statement, from you because you were a ALUC Alternate and have left that office. I have enclosed a Form 730. Please complete and send directly to Elections. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Executive Secretary David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc Enc. N Li LAND OF f\JlA T II RAL WEAL T1-. AND PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538-7601 September 1, 1987 Mike Schrader 19 Beverly Drive Oroville, CA 95966 Dear Mr. Schrader: Sherry Edwards from the Elections Department called me today. She needs a Form 730, Leaving Office Statement, from you because you were a ALUC Alternate and have left that office. I -have enclosed a Form 730. Please complete and send directly to Elections. If you' -have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Executive Secretary David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc Enc. Q LAND CF r;AT1iPA Vv EA LTH AND SEAQ rN,' PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538-7601 September 1, 1987 Nina Lambert 1643 River Road Chico, CA 95926 Dear Ms. Lambert: On -July -23,,1987, I sent you a notice that Conflict of Interest Statements for the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission were due September 1,: 1987. Today; Sherry Edwards from the Elections'Department called me to say she had not yet received your Annual Conflict of Interest Statement for ALUC. If it will help, the attached statement, together with a photocopy of your statement filed for your elected office as a Member of the Planning Commission, will fulfill this requirement. Please call me if you need additional forms or assistance: Please send the statement directly to Elections. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Executive Secretary David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc Enc. 0 September 1, 1987 Carl Walter 67 Kokanne Drive Oroville, CA 95966 Dear Mr. Walter: Q LA IV D OF N!A T URAL VV E A L T i -i Ai�I PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE: 538-7601 On July 23, 1987, I sent.you a notice that Conflict of Interest Statements for the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission were due September.l, 1987. Today, Sherry Edwards from the Elections Department called me to say she had not yet received your Annual Conflict of Interest Statement for ALUC. If it will.help, the attached statement, together with a photocopy of your statement filed for your elected office as a Member of.the Planning Commission, will fulfill this requirement. Please call me if you need additional forms or assistance. Please send the statement directly to Elections. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Executive Secretary David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc Enc. ::. Butte ®ung LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAU f PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE: 538-7601 September 1, 1987 John Franklin 946 Easy Street Paradise, CA 95969 Dear Mr. Franklin: On July 23, 1987, I sent you a notice that Conflict of Interest Statements for the Butte County Airport.Land Use Commission were due September 1, 1987. Today, Sherry Edwards from the Elections Department called me to say she had not received your Annual Conflict of Interest Statement for ALUC. Please call me if you need additional forms or assistance. Please send the statement directly to Elections. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Executive Secretary David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc �Y. ,, ue ®ung r�e iAilJD OF NATjPF._ 1V[ LTH :;;.D l� 1 PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538-7601 September 1, 1987 Pat Stevens OROVILLE AVIATION. P.O. Box 2686 Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Ms. Stevens: On July 23, 1987, I sent you a.notice that Conflict of Interest Statements for. the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission were due September 1, 1987. Today, Sherry Edwards from the Elections Department called me to say she had not yet received your Annual Conflict of Interest Statement for ALUC. Please call me if you need additional forms or assistance. Please send the statement directly to Elections. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Executive Secretary David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc Q 9 LA NO OF f�JA, i U L \rVE l i H Af�!LU S�AU 1' PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538.7601 September 1, 1987 Fred Davis. CITY OF CHICO P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 Dear Mr. Davis: On July 23, 1987, I sent you a notice that Conflict of Interest Statements for the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission were due September 1, 1987. Today, Sherry Edwards from the Elections Department called me to say she had not yet received your Annual Conflict of Interest Statement for ALUC. If it will help, the attached statement, together with a photocopy of your statement filed for your elected office as City Manager, will fulfill this requirement. Please call me if you need additional forms or assistance. Please send the statement directly to Elections. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Executive Secretary David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc Enc. P September 1, 1987 Dennis Harvey 2175 Robinson Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Harvey: 6 [ a , i'i i Y 7 CUUN L7 LtNI tK VKIVt — VKUVILLt, %.AIFWMNI is 95965.3397 PHONE: 538-7601 On July 23, 1987, I sent you a notice that Conflict of Interest Statements for the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission were due September 1, 1987. Today, Sherry Edwards from the Elections Department called me to say she had not yet received your Annual Conflict of Interest Statement for ALUC. If it will help, the attached statement, together with a photocopy of your statement filed for your elected office as City Council Member, will fulfill this requirement: Please call me if you need additional forms or assistance. Please send the statement directly to Elections. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Executive Secretary David David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH : j me Enc. - _ r August 6, 1987 Mr._ William Crim 5120 Clear Creek Road Placerville, CA 95667 Dear Mr. Crim: The Department of Transportation. Division of Aeronautics, has been advised that you are operating a private airport in Butte County. A check-of our airport inventory files reveals no record of your airport. 'All airports in California are required to have a State Airport Permit issued by this Department prior to operation. The purpose of the State'permit'is to determine whether the proposed site can be used safely by aircraft. An Airport Permit•is issued only after it is determined that the site meets the minimum safety standards and aircraft operations can be conducted without hazard. to the public: We are enclosing an application-form and pertinent information for your use in initiating the permitting-process. -Your completed application, accompanied by the listed local approvals, should be forwarded to this office. Please be advised that any use of this airport prio-r to-obtaining a State permit is unlawful.' If you require assistance in this process, please contact us. Sincerely, JACK D, KEMMERLY, Chief Division of Aeronautics Betty Cl,arlt ,Permitting Specialist - Enclosures. : ,cc:, David Hirbnimu.s, Butte County Plannin cc, ngnTq HTxOr3«Mr7�3� Jnr&c CnnJra b7�uuTlra ,^,ucTQonzez BGL0T9ZTxJ9 GbucTzrTct purr:i CTffzF DTnTnTou a; VGLOuvr•.rrca IVCK A' Y.RW Juur�I, CFTGI 2TuGGLGTX' bzocbne* by.esec cO"CCCG na' s Gets b,rr*Tr zv rrtslvt��nT' _ T� Inn �e z6dts.TLG orcr:erucs .r�• tprrz go otQrr ruG � tpQr aux rrcG oL ryVTLbotbLrox ,Scvcc crc,ot=xq pC �ozn3r.gGq.:o t;s7a o��,xcv• ca.�bT:.r.cJq ffbux cuS?os • gccorJbunTuq pa circ Trt=sq TOGCT rbbr.onuTe' zoz ,,.onL anc; ;u uTF;sryn& gl` vaz xrrz:i:�. bLacsuv• . �onx sucrouTrit uu ubbTTcHr:FOv-t^Or-tu vuq bGsrrueut ru o.LWvtrou Co gyG bnpTTc' uruugvz qu uuq trrxcxoit. obG: QrTo::s curs pn cbrrgrrctcQ tastpcnt p3s�rq utf 6L TC Te gvCG.rrTUGq_ I:pv C119 :C}:o McGL,c rPry MTUTrJnra. 8ST-r— pe rresq aac %, pa vTzctEr.xG• Vu V;Lbazr tEL'rrcq OUT?. oT. Fpo GFVFc bcr.MTr Ta to g9r.6r.m7rJs (,I.V ZP:3L tTJs bzobonc;q C3 -r,- cvu bsrzrrt xcersq p?, rpTe DGb'ItUr,ur. br.roz to oacLvta'Or' 1Fo brrzbo. a i�IT TLboLra :ru CuT? oxUx, eza LsdarzGq co ;��t�c v GFurti VT!�bOLr O; XOnL 9TrbOL9' CorrutX' V cg,cK Or acct. vxxboml:=;'r-rnFutoza ;7.ca zY�csTu "a r.ncczq pFsu $gnYnsq tyrst. ?ion. El T' obaLcra..��S 8 bLTnu9G QTLbort Tu RaCrc JUG D;,baxtrrcut ot yLstrzrboLr,urrau• DTnrc�rou 0:1- VazousJrrtrce' frac DaaLz. GL7II1: bTac0LnrT.; G' CV i)2@eI 2350 CT" 04Z CLOGrt goaq �. !1 TTTTutu C"' ynCnec e• cvN04 V bl�� 1-0 r�g� 1 %' r_F 0i /. Inter-Departmeaf® 5 Memorandum �°V-�°i m TO: Butte County Airport Land Use Commissioner Franklin FROM: Dave Hironimus, Associate Planner SUBJECT:- APPOINTMENT OF PROXY DATE: July 21, 1987 You are reminded that pursuant to Public Utilities Code -- Section 216._7:0_" Each ;member; shall promptly appoint a single-: proxy to represent him in commission affairs and to vote on all matters when the member is not in attendance: The proxy shall be ;:designated in:a.signed written instrument which shall'be kept on file at the. commission offices, and the proxy ,shall serve 'at the pleasure of -;the; appointment,, member. A vacancy:in*'the-office of proxy shall. be,f11led r _ promptly by 'appointment'of a 'new 'proxy`.:.' `Ze Please forward a letter naming your proxy as soon as possible.. -Thank you. DRH : j me D Erddii.'1�1� f r'3� X.l�dYsi'3�w+�i7"�r/ 4 ni t:(c*a73 xonc I L 3 1lrrro0 9-jU bnr.i :t-i-ngj A yjccucU oj::u3 or �9r,r',.[q 9-1EiSJo-,ZA . au:Iino7i,H :jvb19 .Mogi YXORq qO T`r1a:T::r!?c.LqA 7.�13tJ34S C8t. , yS YluL :3TAa ObOD ZeL� i!JU 011cftiq u- insuaauq isr{# uoy elTjn,o s Jr.iocfgl; ylaq:rrczo Ss: -:.a _od!I dossp a Jasar,Y yJ2 oJ-,r;cJ'tq 9AT .S3o:ISiJri �S ::S �Ur1 c^. t+G, 9!' 9;�� R:Lf.`.:;-5M I r:. lli3 Jtmr,u-4ztanYtI.�r3� r'�t. b^tT'�7 fir' u �Lt �.)jLeiS` x'zu3b od bris 'as -11220 (701F.el.-la-z o oril ;:l. � eta r:r. cd jlS-sia tofr.'Yj �dl9t`Z.�ifiCOCiq.a ar{j o !q%:j-Sorcj- .Od1 fS 9v -sec .tlzr.te irxo*iq:ff-1 bDlilx nd . isda yxcil as gDjj Lo c,61 n, yt)fsoosv may.. xzth= " . YN WEq Os, r19lR fl ► C1Ci C� yd 1ji q "IC Y -4 cz noon .7o:':toj s 67s::..o3 :�zLs Eq\ . Uoy .{nst".v . 9 rdlecoq oOvrrFo lnter-Deparh��®�,ei�e®r®ndum \..._ TO: Butte County Airport Land Use Commissioner Harvey FROM: Dave Hironimus, Associate Planner SUBJECT:.- APPOINTMENT OF PROXY DATE: July 21, 1987 You are reminded that .pursuant to. Public Utilities. Code, _ Section_2167.0,-"Each shall.: promptly appoint, amsingle� =t - _ proxy to _represent him in commission affairs, and, to !vote on all matters when the member is not in attendance-.;,�.The proxy shallt be=. designated in _a,,signed written.7instrument,i��„ L � F= which shall-'be:kept on file ae."the. commission,-offi.ces,f and: � Yf 5 2fyel ,� s'• the proxy.shall serve : at -. the ; pl`easure'. ofd thef pappointmentr� �- member. =;A vacancy. in ;th office`-of._proxyYshalljbd. filled."�:�� � x .� Q,.c'_,sy i..i1a—'i.d'f.,Fiis-t-6rb�S�•�•sr =��, ..n!{�Y: promptlyby appointment`of a new -proxy. ._ _ _ "'yt' .:r......-. ... — �•ierw", �rC1.f•3.'.1.'Sy,�,liefL`:a 1>` 3.. -�- =-u- Please forward a letter. naming your proxy- as 'soon as' - - possible.. -Thank you. -DRH : j me _-i M r!/fstS.Ti. .i`_Oq'.*.IA y[alio• nT K9rirlri� J7r.i 70^3f� , �.s firozi�: 3V �Ci "Oql r,U Q I IR YIUL sJuD .!ozlit `jU o t�u3 0# rf uaxuq 1 rr bs�r�ir.�oY oz.s UoY B Jntocf ;f; .-Ioljusp, Ol :.: rm L53 .ta r o az ri, nco Q.i M -l-; ovGbf:' ''.; ,7 t? S ��?n �: �.,���� •.'.fi.� -szo:�:.f fY;! �: t:'7s8 .F� rzi b3,'�n�i^�t� �:: L _r:� Y:�:oxc' sc :T.r4 �'�� �t;1 :t5 W J�4 r �: Y.:� t� r, -t ril j .Y::O''tJ ZZ r_003 _a y-Ccmq Ycrolr L-,n_mrr. 13:;.;�t .uoY 9rdi� L:Fi�Q Inter-DepartMtq4 Memorandum TO: Butte County Airport Land Use Commissioner Walter FROM: Dave Hironimus, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF PROXY DATE: July 21, 1987 You are, reminded . that pursuant to Public Utilities Code K Section 21630 .-"Each. member-. shall. promptly appoint, a� single proxy -to. represent him in commission affairs and to',,vote-... on all matters.. when -. the member is not in attendance The',. proxy shall bedesignated in a.signed writteninstrumentA.,,.,,.,tz,-.,,�...' which shall' be kept on file. at­the- commissions offices, and­;`� - the proxyshall-. se 'ry e at. the --- pleasure of vthe appointment be%,.,,filled member- .-vacancy,,.: in the- office of proxy, shall'. by-, appointment of a new -proxy.;:" . promptly=. Please. forward a letter y as soon as.ie,,. naming your prox possible..-Thank you. DRH:jmc K I :OT xarrif',, �i 9. ;iooaa2 vr%r:oY1JI ovzc! C^rr_��'r�:s:r I�v:I.:►g4li :rr°.��vt 1 8G.1 �!; yiUt. :: TAS w•an� oo.c�"i� ., ti _ r�� o.: 1nr.J�Xuq �`�riy 6�ac��.me� oYs t�.l t;C_-of•i. O_1 JtIS IT . ���rzsbr�.:��: c:s dor, ai � ^+.�Z � :r r.: ..• ���0:7 t ro llc--:a': fins _ 1 � �:.'.�.. 10 [.� .. :4 ri �._'�� :�ii� �.r �.1.�} Si0 ���,�i: fl l .i .z1�^ i+► ^ii moi = r.. -i; J S �: f•'�. . 1J :�.....�z� �,�' r f; r:. ...cxq �o 00.��30 0:'.� ni �� _�•. ,► :r_M�:7 'rd .:.. r izo- -a OCT ` P ' TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: .rt e0v iF.. G Inter-®epartni a,9 aMemorandum Butte County Airport Land Use Commissioner Lambert Dave Hironimus, Associate Planner APPOINTMENT OF PROXY July 21, 1987 You are reminded that pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section --216.70- "Each_ member-;. shall promptly- appoint proxy, to: represent him in commission. af f airs* and to :vote, on all matters. when:. the_ member. ,Is not in attendance.-:_. The:_, proxy- shall.:be-.:designated..in- a -.signed written -instrument x �. which `shall: be kept om file. at the commission;:offices',: and the proxy shall: serve. -.-at .-the_ pleasure of the ; appointmentq w Y member A :vacancy i:n*-;the-. office'. of .proxy;: shall --be filled r promptlWjby appointment °of anew proxy._. Please. forward a letter. naming your proxy. as soon as possible. -:.Thank -you. DRH:jmc i) I u C . L 0 f-r*,r-� "..I �.lrJn'')U bn..I J-loq a t, � Sufi y:ttt'1u7 � .•ao�- yaCAq '=0 T.1::'T;.-j0gg4 !r'.3LOUe 78PI ,IS ytuL .3"Ae 9ba" aoij�Il J ��i 1. i �.ri -trq �sr'� b��rrlr 3� cxr f:oY :�i�nr:. s 7n�ccq� y%Jr:�:c•-xy .f..:,r�-: ��.i�:� tion:" c7C3tS �:oifc^� vIov of bar, :Y h:; , , T?:S 0�.i ACL_"T::1Jwi11 fT9�? iZY�I {� ii�� t.�. fa i:L ba.:tzr"LJiaeb ed D �a PA no lc!o:f ed .TIz.r:o d0l.1w l Eer"! r.;:C,ir1 ed:t xr, f;,.:?lo ��ri: r..� v_onLcati .-l'-d am xq an rc:ma ;;L; ^Euo t pa-LmLn x 33:t3I r, b7rm-rlol nczol ? `dV'k. July 16, 1987 RE ...... Butte count LAND OF NATURAL VdEALTH JAND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE — OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538-7601 Fred Stewdrt DEPARTMENT .OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS P.O. Box 1499 Sacramento, CA 95807 Dear Mr. Stewart: In -reference to your recent letter requesting copies of the Comprehensive. Land. Use Plans for the Airports within Butte County, please find enclosed copies of the Chico ` Municipal Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the Paradise Skypark Comprehensive Land.Use Plan. These. two plans will bring your office up to date with our program. The Butte County Airport Land Use Commission. is.currently preparing a Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the Ranchaero.Airport, a privately owned, public access airport in the.Chico area. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact -this office any weekday between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, David R. Hironimus Associate Planner D RH : j me Enclosures x Xg V8et '01 yr,L :1xL'-,Jr,_ $ 10-1,1 ZOtx A .' . 'v'OIuIV ftri r:aH .G.q V08ae AD :Jx��:. .�i� • S�f 'tGJ1 .o zn1UC ) r7,aid nov-,L )i Y_'3j--, J jr-Igon':I 1,0l - n rri�let w"� _ �q.c iA or; � xo� gin.. i'. :�vJ EiZr�.: ��f.:a•.3:,9":,,; 100 �r:.; 00irfD 911J 'i r' LCI '00 [br3C �l a�sZ :)fib zLU e v:'ruoD s:f:16I1Q qff- F,- as1Y anis �c*i�r_�ri�iq Ioa : Yc 11s.� ir;g1��,:_ nr Iq - e_' .I?w�?£,Y6q of qu -iuc,-i pri!-id 111-, cnl f101i.� _i%�07 .J b-i;,I�►YC ^ Y -+ rY 'IS2uOSC .�uo0 0 �L�I :�.. riz y ''a f�lY iJ.1 �)� 1�fL �l:'�1� `.7'! S pf; IYJcrrfa Or".C{LCA �,.��►tI470 `����..,`J.L'1[�•f ,:1XCJ��_r r�7Jrf�'�C::�� ^,(j.� ''O�: 'n G ✓ ", .. ^ 9- , [ICV , brt.,i .Sr. CO :0 : !:_:. �d �r�� ': ;c� v115 8311 CrIJ -1ols r,1 c:Uffl.fl0'Y1�'f .fi �ftTJU zo-faLoicii f` b10(22!''MJO c7'viitVi{`.�9 C: EE-z41r7 A,.7R�gtJAJ ,31_Iv�..� 'v YTk— L �� ;OCT. Z V8et '01 yr,L :1xL'-,Jr,_ $ 10-1,1 ZOtx A .' . 'v'OIuIV ftri r:aH .G.q V08ae AD :Jx��:. .�i� • S�f 'tGJ1 .o zn1UC ) r7,aid nov-,L )i Y_'3j--, J jr-Igon':I 1,0l - n rri�let w"� _ �q.c iA or; � xo� gin.. i'. :�vJ EiZr�.: ��f.:a•.3:,9":,,; 100 �r:.; 00irfD 911J 'i r' LCI '00 [br3C �l a�sZ :)fib zLU e v:'ruoD s:f:16I1Q qff- F,- as1Y anis �c*i�r_�ri�iq Ioa : Yc 11s.� ir;g1��,:_ nr Iq - e_' .I?w�?£,Y6q of qu -iuc,-i pri!-id 111-, cnl f101i.� _i%�07 .J b-i;,I�►YC ^ Y -+ rY 'IS2uOSC .�uo0 0 �L�I :�.. riz y ''a f�lY iJ.1 �)� 1�fL �l:'�1� `.7'! S pf; IYJcrrfa Or".C{LCA �,.��►tI470 `����..,`J.L'1[�•f ,:1XCJ��_r r�7Jrf�'�C::�� ^,(j.� ''O�: 'n G ✓ ", .. ^ 9- , [ICV , brt.,i .Sr. CO :0 : !:_:. �d �r�� ': ;c� v115 8311 CrIJ -1ols r,1 c:Uffl.fl0'Y1�'f .fi �ftTJU zo-faLoicii TO: FROM: SUBJECT DATE: �l oevrrf �! Inter-Departemorandum 0 o u caun�� Airport Land Use Commission Planning Staff CHICO SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION COMMITTEE June 23, 1987 The Chico Unified School District is exploring several potential new school sites. One of,those sites is shown on the attached map. Because of the site's.proxiinity to Ranchaero Airport, the State Division of Aeronautics has requested the Commission's findings regarding conformity with any adopted or proposed Airport Land Use Plans. Since the site is located within the area proposed as an approach zone (safety area?), it is recommended that the site be found not in conformity with the.policies of the Draft Ranchaero Airport Environs Land Use Plan. DRH:jmc PIP mi � M �Kvm IT I AN, k I'll I • o Intev-®epa�� e"h 0`, Memorandum TO: Butte County Airport Land Use"rCommission FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: JOHN PAYNE, -TPM, AP#47-37-09 DATE: April 29, 1987 The above referenced project to create two parcels is under the approach zone of Chico Municipal Airport and within the 60 to 65 dB CNEL Noise Contour. (Compatible Land Use Zone (CLUZ) II per the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan). Exhibit 8-1 of the Plan (copy attached) sets out the criteria for compatible land use in the zone. If an avigation easement is granted to the City of Chico and If a note is placed on the map requiring any homes to -be con- structed to multi -family standards for noise attenuation (no noise .standards exist in the building codes for single family dwellings) then the CLUZ II criteria can be met. Recommendation: Recommend approval subject to: 1. Granting an avigation easement to the City of Chico. 2. Place a note on the final map that all residences are to be constructed to multi -family standards regarding noise. /jmc Infev-DepaFfM hl®9` Memorandum ..ACU SFU-fSi� TO: Butte County Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Project Reviews DATE: April 29, 1987 The Butte County Airport Land Use Commission has been re- viewing all projects in the vicinity of Airport for which Airport Land Use Plans (ALUPs) have notbeen adopted, (now only Ranchaero Airport) and.projects within the 55 dB CNEL (or LDN) noise contours and approach zones for area where ALUPs have been adopted. Since Public Utility.Code Section 21676 (attached) only requires review of general plans, specific plans, zoning ordinances or building regulations within the plan boundaries, it is possible that the approval process for projects such as Use Permits, Variances, and Tentative Parcel Maps and Tentative Subdivision Maps could be streamlined by requiring only staff review when a project clearly can meet the policies or criteria of an adopted plan. Recommendation: Direct staff to review and place appropriate conditions on Use Permits, Variances, Tentative Parcel Maps, and Tentative subdivision Maps when such.project.are within areas covered by adopted Airport Environs Land Use Plans. /jmc . - .. Eft C # it- #',f- # •if•',i• # # # •3e• �• #• •::- # •k• # # •ii• •k• •#• # # 3i• # # # 3i• # # -�• •#• •ii• •F # -}i• ii- # p- # �• # -'sf• -'si• -�• •a• ii• # 3i• # •#• # # # # •ii• ii• •�• # # # # # #• # # # •#• •t£• # �' # •�- #' •'.F•'.f• 3i' •�- �' •#• i_EGI•--TECH BILL TEXT REPORT 03/24/87 •�- # # •�• # # �i•r'• # # # ii• •#• �i• # # •� -Zi• # ii• •#• ii- # R• # # # �k- x• # ii• #:• �• # 3i• # 3c ii- # �• # �• •#' # -�• •�• -i# 3i• •!i- # •�- -;r �- �- # #- •#• # •#• •#• 3� # •�. �. •3i• •�• •�. •#. 3i• •�• # •14• •#• •3r 3i• •3i• # •};. # •if• SB 26= PAGE 1 1 Introduced by Senator Rogers(Principal coauthor: Senator 4 Torres)(Coauthors: Senators Craven, Ellis, and Vuich)(Coau.thors: Assembly 5 Members Chandler, Clute, Harvey, and Mountjoy) 6 January 29, 1997 7 R 8 An act to add Part 3 (commencing with Section 24001) to Division 9 of the 9 Public Utilities Code, and to amend Section 7102 of the Revenue and 10 Taxation Code, relating to public finance, and making an appropriation a_. 11 therefor. 12 : 13 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST 14 - .� 15 SEs 263, as introduced, Rogers. Sales and use tax revenues: airport 16 projects. 17 (1) The existing Sales and Use Tax Law provides for the deposit of 18 all state sales and use tax revenues in the Retail Sales Tax Fund, with a 19 specified portion of the revenues, as determined by the estimated 20 increase in sales and use tax revenues resulting from imposing the tax at 21• a 4% rate and on motor vehicle fuel instead of at a 5% rate and not on 22 motor vehicle fuel, in the fund transferred to the Transportation 23 Planning and Development Account in the State Transportation Fund for 24 appropriation for various transportation -related purposes. If that 25 specified portion of revenues 'is less than $110,000,0700, with specified 26 adjustments, an additional amount equal to the difference is required to 27 be transferred to that account from the General Fund in the 19B6!87 28 fiscal year and from certain revenues in the Retail Sales Tax Fund in the 29 1987:88 fiscal year and fiscal years thereafter. Any amount not 0 transferred from the Retail Sales Ta;: Fund is required to be transferred 31 to the General Fund. 32 This bill would provide for the transfer during the 1988:89 fiscal 33 year from the Retail Sales Tax Fund to the Aviation Improvement Fund, 34 which the bill would create, of 20% sales and use tax revenues, less 35 refunds, attributable to taxes imposed upon the sale, use, storage, or 36 other consumption of aircraft jet fuel. For the 1989190 fiscal year, the 37 bill would require transfer of 40% of those revenues, for the 199011991 38 fiscal year, 60 of those revenues, for the 1991192 fiscal year, 80 of 39 those revenues, and for the 1992193 and succeeding fiscal years, all of 40 those revenues. 41 The bill would continuously appropriate the money in the Aviation 42 Improvement Fund to the State board of Equalization to allocate to the 43 Division of Aeronautics of the Department of Transportation amounts 44 necessary for the division to determine the operations of each airport 45 for purposes of the bill pursuant to the California Aviation System Plan, 46 which the bill would direct the division to prepare and submit to the 47 California Transportation Commission together with biennial revisions, 48 and, subject to these allocations, to make allocations for expenditure in 49 counties on the basis of 70% of the money for primary air carrier 50 airports, as specified, and air% for other airports designated in that DELETED MATERIAL. IS IN BRACKETS C7. ADDED MATERIAL IS CAPITALIZED. M x .ss..�. x # :#• .,v..p. s,.� .�..y..� .�..�• :t• r� �if• # 3q..�. yf..�..�c # •1@• •x # �� ;t ;�..p..#. ;� .;_..�• # •iF :#• # # # •�• •3r # •k• # �sf• �it :#• •'t4• •� # -#• •3f..r. # y�..�..�..k. ;c .f..1z..n..R. # •� # ?: •#• # •�• •'s*.• # # iF� # # 3i• # L...EGI--TECH BILL_ TEXT REPORT 03/24/87 # # # •3e• # •3E• :`_' •k• •� ^ •i4• �,: �.'�-.;E• •�-:;• # •� if• #'.4..'#.,;i..�..PF .;e.::.::t.r..:'•; ��'.4..3�..k� # # •ie• �• # •#• # •4• # :#• 3r •� -lE :t• •#..�..k..i�r .�..�..F..'tt ••sE # �• •�• �• •'t4• •�• •if• i4• �t4• •'se..#..'ft # # # •u• •'sr �it• # # •i• # SB 263 NAGE 2 1 plan, in accordance with the ratio of airport operations at each airport 2 to total statewide airport operations, as determined by the division. The bill would direct the Secretary of the Business, Transportation 4 and Housing Agency to designate the transportation planning agency for 5 purposes of authorising, pursuant to criteria developed by the aviation 6 advisory committee, which the bill would require the transportation 7 planning agency to create, distributions by the county auditor, or the 8 county treasurer if there is no county auditor, to airport operators 9 annually for expenditure for approved airport projects in accordance with 10 instructions which the agency may impose. 11 The bill would require the county auditor or treasurer to authorize 12 not more than 2% of the county's allocation for support of the 13 transportation planning agency, and not more than 2% for support of 14 the county's airport land use commission, if the county has established a 15 commission, and would authorize the county auditor or treasurer to deduct 16 from the county allocation an amount not to exceed its reasonable costs 17 under the bill. 18 The bill would, by imposing the above requirements on county agencies, 19 impose a state -mandated local program. 20 (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local 21 agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. 22 Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. 23 This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act 24 for a specified reason. 25 Vote: . Appropriation: yes. Fiscal committee: yes. - 26 State -mandated local program: yes. 27 28 The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 29 30 SECTION 1. Part 3 (commencing_ with Section 24001) is added to Division 31 9 of the Public Utilities Code, to read: 32 PART .?. AIRPORT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCEC 1. A I __ 24001. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the ''Aviation 34 Improvement Act.'' 35 24002. As used in this chapter, ''auditor'.' means the county auditor 36 or the county treasurer if there is no auditor. 37 24001. As used in this chapter, ''board'' means the State Board of 38 Equalisation. 39 2=003.5. As used in this chapter, "commission'' means the California 40 Transportation Commission. 41 24004. As used in this chapter, ''department'' mean's the Department of 42 Transportation. 43 24005. As used in this chapter, ''division'' means the Division of 44 Aeronautics of the department. 45 24006. As used in this chapter, ''fund'' means the Aviation 46 Improvement Fund. 47 24007. There is hereby created the Aviation Improvement Fund. 48 Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government. Code, money in the fund 49 is continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal years to the board 50 for allocation pursuant to this chapter. •#• # •#• •�• -if• ii• # .�..P. # # •�. # ?i• •'ri- # # # # # # # �• •:t ii• # # # •�• x• # 3i• •3i• # •#• # #• # �i• # �- x..}�. y�..R. x .�..�..�..}�. �..�..�..�..�..}t..p. �;..�..�..�..�. �..�. �. •s• # #• �• # •�. x ;;..� �. x �..;r # -'r: LEGI--TECH BILL TEXT REPORT 03/24/87 # .R. x..}f..#- •�• •�• •k• .�c :t• �• # # •#r •3:• if- # # •i#• •k• �• # •� •ii- # #- # # •�..�. x. •k• •k• #'.z• # •k• # # # # # # # n x s. ye #..�. �..p. >. };..�..� .�..�. x .�..�..}�..xf. x..�..�. �:..�. x �. x ;.�. �..�..� �..R. �. �. # .� -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEs 26"' PAGE _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24008. The board shall allocate to the division out of the money in the fund any amounts it finds to be necessary for'the division to determine the operations at each airport for purposes of Section 24011 and to prepare the California Aviation System Flan. 24008.2. The division, in consultation with transportation planning agencies, as specified in Section 24012, shall prepare a California Aviation System Flan which shall include every airport designated'in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems and shall include all of the following elements: (a) A background and introduction element, which shall summarize aviation activity in California and establish goals and objectives for aviation improvement. (b) An air transportation issues element, which shall address issues including, but not limited,to, aviation safety, airport noise, airport ground access, transportation systems management, financing, and institutional relationships. (c) A regional plan alternative element, which shall consist of the aviation elements of the regional transportation plans prepared by each transportation planning agency. This element shall include consideration of air transportation growth, capacity needs, county activity, airport activity, and systems activity in order to evaluate adequately the overall impacts of regional activity in relation to the statewide air transportation system. This element shall propose general aviation and air carrier public use airports for consideration by the commission for funding eligibility under this chapter. (d) A state plan alternative element, which shall include consideration of statewide air transportation growth including, but not limited to, county activity, airport activity, and systemwide activity in order to evaluate adequately the state aviation system and to designate an adequate number of general aviation and air carrier public use airports for funding under this article in order to provide a level of air service acceptable to the public. (e) A comparative element, which shall compare and contrast the regional plan alternative with the state plan alternative including, but not limited to, airport noise, air quality, toxic waste cleanup, energy and economics, and passengers served„ (f) A summary and conclusion element, which shall present the findings ands recommende=d course of action. 2400e. 4. (a) The division shall submit the California Aviation System Plan to the commission, for purposes of Section 24010. The division shall revise and resubmit the plan every two years. . (b) The board shall allocate to the commission out of money in the fund an amount it finds and determines is required for the commission to review, hold public hearings on, and adopt the California Aviation System Flan and its biennial revisions. 24009. Subject to Section 24008, the board shall allocate once each year 70 percent of the money in the fund to the counties operating the following primary air carrier airports; (a) Arcada/Eurek:a. (b) Bakersfield Meadows. �1 2F ******************************************************************************** ' * LEGI-TECH BILL TEXT REPORT 03f24/87 * ******************************************************************************** ________________________________________________________________________________ SB 263 PAGE 4 ________________________________________________________________________________ (c) Burbank. (d) Fresno. (e) John Wayne. (f) Long Beach. (g) Los Angeles. ' (h) Monterey Peninsula. (i) Oakland. � (j) Ontario. . (k) Palm Springs. <� Redding. ^ ` (m) ' Sacramento. . � . (n) 'San Diego. ` - - (o) - San Francisco ' . ' (p) ?rf]an 'Jose. (q)' San Luis Obispo. (r) Santa Barbara. (s) Santa Maria. (t) South Lake Tahoe. (u) Stockton. (v) Any other airport designated by the division as a primary air carrier airport. 24010. Subject to Section 24008, the board shall allocate once each year 30 percent of the money in the fund to counties operating airports designated in the California Aviation System Plan, but not otherwise specified in Section 24009. ` 24011. (a) The allocations to each county under Sections 24009 and 24010 with respect to each airport shall be based on the percentage of operations at the airport in relation to the total statewide operations for all airports of the category to which the airport under consideration belongs. (b) The division shall determine the operations at each airport for purposes of subdivision (a) pursuant to criteria which it shall develop for the purpose. The division may, in this connection, require an audit in the determination of any fact required under this subdivision. 24012. (a) In each county to which an allocation is made pursuant to Section 24011, the Secretary of the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency shall designate the transportation planning agency pursuant to Section 29532 of the Government Code to:determine the distribution of funds allocated under this chapter for expenditure in the county. Upon receipt of an allocation under this chapter, the auditor shall distribute the funds to the operators of eligible airports for expenditure on projectn.weeting the requirements of this chapter. (b) The transportation planning agencies shall each establish an aviation advisory committee consisting of one representative from each airport in the county. The aviation advisory committee shall develop criteria consistent with this chapter for the evaluation and analysis of the requirements of each eligible airport in order to determine -annually the amount of the distribution to the operator of each eligible airport. ,24013. (a) Upon the determination of the aviation advisory committee for a distribution pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 24012, the C`� u ... c .�:. s;..a. • sa. u..i. .. ..... s;. . sr. sc s�_ .�.. �..:�. � .�:.: •.: .�. .,:. x : � :.k:. ..x. �.:. x x.. . i. sc..q.. .s. � .u. x . �. :' Y. .... ,. # ., .... $c. �. n .R..?. 7t .. , •'�' �..� �... „ •fY. ..�..�.. :.ri. �..�' Y; R �• 'f: #:' �i' :�' .. ?.::• .. •r< F 'S2' .`�' �..�..n. S i; �.' Vit' , '�i' iY �' Y ';i• X• 'F 3t"jt' LEGI-TECH SILL TEXT REPORT 03i24/87 � .�..�..�..�..�..�. b. �...3i..ri..R..�..�..�c .�..�. �. �..�. �..y�. a..� �� � •c •�..}�..�. �..�. �. �..� �..�. �. � .i. �. � .�..�. �. �� .�..a. �. �..�. x. �..u..� .;Q. �. �. e.':�'s• �i� :i•'�• � ii' �. ;�..�..�. �. �. �..�. �. �. rv. �. �..�. �. SB :'J? P c AGE: J-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- transportation planning agency shall direct the auditor to make the distribution to the airport operator. (b) At the time the transportation planning agency directs the auditor to make a distribution to an airport operator, the agency shall give to the county auditor and the airport operator any instructions concerning the expenditure.of the distribution that the agency determines advisable or necessary and consistent with the requirements of this chapter. The instructions may require a single payment of the allocation or periodic payments. 24013.5. Whenever any airport for which a distribution has been made from the Aviation Improvement Fund ceases to be used as an airport open to the general.public for more than one year, the airport operator shall pay to the division, for reimbursement of the fund, an amount equalling the total of.- all ,payments made for the airport from the fund during the preceding yip years less `r percent of the amount of each payment multiplied by the number of years since the payment was made. This section is not applicable to an airport that is replaced by a comparable facility, as determined by the division, within one year. 24014. The transportation planning agency may, after a distribution has been made, rescind or revise the distribution or the instructions only under one or more of the following circumstances: (a) The airport operator has appealed to the Secretary of the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency an adverse determination by the transportation planning agency, pursuant to Section 24017. (b) The transportation planning agency finds and determines that the airport operator is spending or is about to spend any part of the distribution for any purpose not authorized under this chapter or contrary to the instructions. (r_) The financial requirements of the airport operator differ from its requirements at the time the allocation was made, due to changed circumstances. 24015. The auditor may distribute not more than 2 percent of the amount of the county's allocation under this chapter for expenditure by the transportation planning agency for its expenses in administering this chapter. 4016. In a county which has established an airport land use commission pursuant to Article 3.5 (commencing with Section 21670) of. Chapter 4 of Fart 1, the auditor may distribute not more than 2 percent of the amount of the county's allocation under this chapter for support of the commission. 4017. The auditor may deduct from the county's allocation.an amount not to exceed its reasonable cost=s under this chapter. 24018. If an airport operator disagrees with any determination by the transportation planning agency that is not resolved to the satisfaction of the operator, the operator may appeal the matter to the Secretary of the Lousiness, Transportation and Housing Agency. The secretary shall conduct an investigation of the matter in disagreement and shall notify the operator and the agency of the decision in the matter. The decision of the secretary is final, subject to judicial review. .�..£. � :q..�..#..�.•. �,<,..�. # it• .R. •�• if..*..}t. x..J�..}{. �..�. �:. �- � �- # # •�• �• •#• �• •�• .z -� -ii• �• •}• •�• •'tt :k. •}..�;. �...�..k• .}F �..�..�..u. ys..� s. ••sE• •� •�'• :i- -ti• -ii- .¢ yp..p..�..�..�. y:. x y, i .�. �: �..R..�c �. x .�. �..x �. L.EGI--'TECH BILL TEXT REPORT 03/24/07 7 SB 26= PAGE 6 1 24019. Every airport operator receiving a distribution under this 2 chapter shall annually prepare and submit to the transportation planning agency an independent audit of airport operations. The audit shall be 4 submitted on or before January 1 of -the year following"the year.in which 5 the audit was conducted, except.that.the transportation -planning agency 6 may grant,_ an extension of time. of not.to,exceed .90 .days: for , good , cause. 7 The audit shallr�'include a finding as towhether the distribution was 8 expended in conformance with this chapter and the instructions of the 9 transportation planning agency. Every audit after the first audit shall 16 also include the amounts audited in.the year preceding.the year of the 11 current: audi t.W.:#`�� 12 24020 ,, (a) T It i s. the{intent ofp the Legi sl-ature ,that funds 'distributed �- 13 to, an* .-airport =operator under "this chapter -be e::pended oto 'meet the ff4 a'!aviation'-needst`of;"tnis Tstate.`Nk 15(b)°t'Subjeiffto instructions issued`tiy`the transportation planning 16 agency"consistent with this chapterlin making a distribution, the 17 following airport -related projects are eligible for expenditure of the 18 funds distributed: 19 (1) Development of runways. 20 (2) Development of aprons. 21 (3) Development of taxiways. 22 (4) Navigational aids. 23 (5) Runway distance to go mark:erse 24 (6) Obstruction .lights. 25 (7) High-speed exit taxiways. , 26 (8) Equipment maintenance. 27 (9) Land acquisitions. 28 (10) Public terminals. 29 (1 1) Security fencing. 30 (12) Removing obstructions and grading on clear cones. ?1- (I ) Construction.on airfield side., =2 (14) Airport administrative costs. __ (15) Economic development at airports. 34 (16) Support facilities, including, but not .limited to,'public 35 buildings, fuel farms, and fire training facilities. 36 (17)` Crash and fire vehicles and equipment. 37 (18) Snow removal vehicles and equipment. 38 (19) Drainage facility construction and maintenance. :39 (20) Vehicle fuel ta"k:s. 40 (21) New utilities. 41 (22) Landscaping and sign improvement. 42 (23) Reconstruction of terminal and control towers. 43 (24) Gas islands. 44 (25) Parking aprons. 45 (26) Acquisition costs of easements and clear zones. 46 (27) Maintenance of airport facilities. 47 (28) Noise abatement capital improvements. 48 (29) Noise monitoring. 49 ( 0) Blast fences. 50 (31) Monitoring of underground fuel storage tanks. n ..., ..., n a. -. i•:�f..;:..;5..;:..)...::.:w.::..;�.�..�..�.,. M.:: � �.�..; ;E r, �s:� :�i.:�. �.:t:.:,:.:�.:;;. �.;�. � .�..�. �.:;.: .: ::f # . Y --d• -� ) . �'r: i...EG I-•-TECI...i BILL TE:X RE::POR-1.. 03/24/87 } :.i. w :i �A.ti..'w.. .1'..i.G .):..iw..:,: i:..i:..4.:w. M1 .. .. S a .w..)�.:�. -' n ) .� .'[. .1<.: �.: -.w4 .�..r. w..M.:� .'arf. a`'.: ..i. .'�.{,. .i• _ n n � �..)�..: :nL 2`.. { h St..•�tl�..1'.: '. SB 263 PAGE. 7 1 (02) Hazardous waste abatement costs. 2 (_:=) Security devices, including, but not limited to, X-ray machines, metal detectors, and guard dogs. 4 (34) Airport people movers and transit buses. J (•J) Short-term and long-term vehicle parking facilities. 6 (36) Baggage claim facilities. 7 (.37) Airport liability insurance costs. S (38) Computer -automated public information systems. 9 (39) Development of public transportation between airports and urban 10 centers. 11 (40) Development of rail rapid transit for access to airports. 12 (41) Development of bus terminals, ramps, shelters, and buildings. 13 (42) Development of entrance roadways, exclusive truck lanes, and 14 joint access roads. 15 (43) Pedestrian walkways at airports. 16 (44) Communications equipment and facilities. 17 (45) Enhancement of airport roadway access. 18 (46) Airport control equipment. 19 (47) Engineering and legal fees. 20 (48) Satellite airport terminals. 21 (49) Public lighting. 22 (50) Other projects, as approved by the transportation planning 23 -agency. 4 24021. Any portion of a distribution to an airport operator- not 25 expended or encumbered within one year shall revert to the General Fund. 26 SEC. 2. Section 7102 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to 27 read., . 28 7102. The money in the fund shall, upon order of the Controller, be 29 drawn therefrom for refunds under this part or be transfer -red in the TO following manner: 31 (a) (1) All revenues, less refunds, derived under this part at the 4 32 percent rate, including the imposition of _sales and use taxes with _3 re=spect to the sale, storage, use, or other consumption of motor vehicle ?4 fuel which would not have been received if the sales and l.lse tax rate had 35 been 5 percent and if motor vehicle fuel, a., defined for purposes of the 06 Motor Vehicle Fuel License Tax Law (Fart 2 (commencing with Section 57 ?301)), had been exempt from sales and use taxes, shall be estimated by 38 a State Board of E_.q!_l .1, i z at i on , with the concurrence Of the Department tment 39 I; of Finance shall be transferred during each fiscal year to the 40 Transportation Planning and Development Account in the State 41 Transportation Fund for appropriation pursuant to Section 99312 of the 42 Public Utilities Code. +3 (2) 1f the amount transferred pursuant to paragraph (1) is less than 44 one hundred ten million dollars ($110,000,000) in any fiscal year, an 45 additional amount equal to the difference between one hundred ten million 46 dollars ($110,000,)000) and the amount :so transferred :hall be 47 transferred, to the extent funds are a'v'ailable, as follows: 48 (A) F=or-. the 1986187 fiscal vear. from the General Fund. 4 l B i F" __ . t. h c? 1987188 a n d each subsequent fiscal ..stateyear, cr 7 r J 7i E : +:1 •_l revenues (.I ! _i e to 'l'. h e:.' imposition o f sales a l"i (:i 1.1 s f:' taxes oil fuel, ci :> defined * LEGI-TECH BILL TEXT REPORT 03/24/87 * ******************************************************************************** ____________________________________-___________________________________________ SB 263 PAGE 9 ________________________________________________________________________________ 1 for purposes of the Use Fuel Tax Law (Part 3 (commencing with.Section 2 8601)). [ ] . 3 (B) THE REVENUES, LESS REFUNDS, DERIVED UNDER THIS PART FROM THE 4 IMPOSITION OF SALES AND USE TAXES WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE, STORAGE, USE, 5 OR OTHER CONSUMPTION OF AIRCRAFT JET FUEL SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE 6 AVIATION IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR ALLOCATION AND EXPENDITURE PURSUANTTO 7 CHAPTER 1 (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 24001) OF PART 3 OF DIVISION 9 OF THE 8 PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE, AS FOLLOWS: 9 (1) IN THE 1988-89 FISCAL YEAR, 20 PERCENT OF THESE REVENUES SHALL BE 10 TRANSFERRED. ' 11 (2) IN'THE 1989-90 FISCAL YEAR, 40 PERCENT OF THESE REVENUES SHALL BE 12 TRANSFERRED. 13 14 (3) IN THE'1990-91 FISCAL YEAR, 60 PERCENT OF THESE REVENUES SHALL BE 15 TRANSFERRED. ` 16 (4) IN THE 1991-92 FISCAL YEAR, 80 PERCENT OF THESE REVENUES SHALL BE 17 TRANSFERRED. ' 18 (5) IN THE 1992-93 AND SUCCEEDING FISCAL YEAR, ALL OF THESE REVENUES 19 SHALL BE TRANSFERRED. [ ] ' 20 (C) The balance shall be transferred to the General Fund. 21 [ ] 22 [ (c)] 23 (D) The estimate required by subdivision (a) shall be based on 24 taxable transactions occurring during a calendar year, and the transfers 25 required by subdivision (a) shall be made during the fiscal year that 26 commences during that same calendar year. Transfers required by 27 paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (a) shall be made quarterly. 28 SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 29 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because this act contains 30 provipions by which local agencies may recover their expenses in carrying 31 out the program contained in this act. 32 0 CITYorCHICO INC wn Amok OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER 196 E. Firth S!reel P.O Box 3420 Chico. CA 95927 (916) 695.4803 ATSS 459.4803 G-GA-2-10/G-GA-1-2/Chrono February 25, 1987 Mr. Martin J. Nichols ' Chief Administrative Officer. County of Butte ' 25 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 RE: AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION' Dear Marty: Reference is made to your letter of September 23, 1986 and my subsequent correspondence -of October 17, 1986 (copies of•which are attached), concerning the County's suggestion that Butte County cities participate in the'cost-of the operation of the Airport Land Use Commission ("ALUC".). As you perhaps know, this matter has*been discussed by the cities on a number of -occasions, and more specifically at.its meeting of,Butte County Association of Cities on January 8, 1987.. - The members of the Association felt it would be appropriate for each city to make -its own comments to the County concerning the .- matter of contribution for the costs of the operation of the ALUC. After reviewing the budget which was attached to your letter of September 23,'1986, it appeared that the cost for the operation of ALUC is relatively nominal; i.e. approximately $5870 per year. Further, since the airports within Butte County serve all'of its residents and State law provides for funding of the ALUC by the County, it appears appropriate that the County should continue'to pay for the operation of the ALUC. A substantial amount of the;cost outlined in your letter related to special studies, such as the Chico Airport Environs Study update. If such a special.study is to be undertaken, my recommendation to the City Council would be that the City"share in the cost of such a special study for the Chico Municipal Airport and its environs just as the original Chico Airport Environs Study was shared between the City, County and the FAA. Martin J. Nichols Page 2. February 25, 1987 If you'have any questions concerning this.matter, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Very truly yours, I Ci y Manager D:je CC: Community Services Director TF: 3-11-87 DCM/ACM-D/ACM-K Info =IT rHICO OI FICE OF 1 HE ` CITY MANAGER 196 E Fd!h Sr. e ei PO Box 3-20 ChiCO. CA c:592 (GIG) 895-416.0111 ATSs a�9 �eG3 G-GA-2-10/G-GA-1-2/Chrono October 17; 1986 Mr. Martin J. Nichols Chief Administrative Officer. County of Butte 25 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 RE: Airport Land Use Commission Dear Martin: As its meeting held Tuesday, October 7, 1986, the City Council acknow ledged receipt of your letter dated September 23, 1986, which provided a breakdown of estimated budget expenditures and a recommended cost distribution relating to the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission. The Council asked that I review the proposal and submit an appropriate recommendation to it at a subsequent meeting. I will provide you with a copy of my recommendation when it is submitted to the Council. If you have further questions concerni this matter in the interim, feel free to call me at your convenience. g please Very truly yours, r� R ED ---`� - City Manager FD:j cc: City Clerk Community Services Director DCM/ACM-D/ACM-K Info. TF: 10-27-86 �'iIILi� nI>MINIS'1'Itn'I'IV�; (�FFICL COLIN'1'1' ()r Illrl'I'li :sCO�uarvcrwtUSu.. o..ov"'I CM1ronrou 6) 53-63t RECEIVED .(..a(Rs OrSNE BOARD SEP 2 91986 MASSCL A. N, INTURr ., .,, ., ..,, ,•:,,. )AMC OOLAN - -'LOA .NECLCR CITY C111K September 23, 1986 EO.,LAUGNUN QTY OE CHKO LIN r... - BY Chico City Council P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95917 Dear Council Members: Re: Butte County Airport Land Use Commission - Cost and Distribution The purpose of this letter is to provide supplemental information from the June 24, 1986 letter sent to you earlier concerning funding support for the Airport Land Use Planning Commission. Please find attached a break. down Of estimated budget expenditures and a recommended cost distribution reflecting: County Cost 5121935 i City of Chico Cost S10.979 v..•.•....• 7 Town of Paradise Cost - S 978 cn --L 1'•'••. •___ City of Orovllle Cost S 978 W : A. It iS requested that your council consider its contribution to the A. —'—Airport Land Use Planning Commission in which the cles were instrumental uin forming. Cr .. rn5 PAn... ... .__� ery.truly yo rS > np, ,, ; 1 °V8' . — Martin lichols °"L dol -1 --_.ii_ Chief InlniStrative Officer PuOu;., ' CODE MJ11i10/vs Incl. N t BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION BUDGET Staff Tlmo Planner 24 days Secretary 6 days Su lies Printing Exp_ cases Travel to Mectingo for Commissioners Membership Total Annual Expenses Consultant Expense for Chico Airport Environs Study Update i 3,937 0 S98 300 1,000 35 $ 5,870 $20,000 RECOMMENDED COST DISTRIDUTION Annual Expenses divided ovonly among the County end three cities with airports. Chico Airpont'Study divided evenly between City and County. Resultant Cost Distribution County Cost Chico cost $12,935 Paradise Cost 10,979 Oroville Cost 978 g78 Total Cost .$25,870 Dear Ms. Imbiorski: The Butte County Airport Land Use Commission during its April 1987 meeting requested a report from the City of Oroville regarding the general plan designations and zoning applicable to the areas covered by the Oroville Airport Environs Land Use Plan and conformance of the general plan and zoning designations to the plan. Also requested was information as to how many overrides of the plan had been made and any plans the City may have for. revising existing designations in order to conform to the.Airport Land Use Plan. Target dates for achieving conformity are also requested. Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 21674(a) the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission wishes to help the local agencies to develop land use plans which will protect the airports and the people residing or working in the areas around the airports. This department will provide what help it can towards achieving these goals. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact this office any weekday between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, David R. Hironimus Associate Planner BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE -COMMISSION DRH:jmc e ('10untg :r z: u - LAND .OF NATURAL V\'EALTH - AND BEAU T Y _ 4 PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 :{v PHONE: 338-7601 April 24, 1987 Mary Ann Imbiorski I Planning Department - - City of"Oroville . 1675 Montgomery Street - Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Ms. Imbiorski: The Butte County Airport Land Use Commission during its April 1987 meeting requested a report from the City of Oroville regarding the general plan designations and zoning applicable to the areas covered by the Oroville Airport Environs Land Use Plan and conformance of the general plan and zoning designations to the plan. Also requested was information as to how many overrides of the plan had been made and any plans the City may have for. revising existing designations in order to conform to the.Airport Land Use Plan. Target dates for achieving conformity are also requested. Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 21674(a) the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission wishes to help the local agencies to develop land use plans which will protect the airports and the people residing or working in the areas around the airports. This department will provide what help it can towards achieving these goals. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact this office any weekday between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, David R. Hironimus Associate Planner BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE -COMMISSION DRH:jmc r v ffutte Counfq- LAN D OF NATURAL W EALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNINGFCOMMISSION 7 COUNTY.CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538.7601 April 24, 1987 The Honorable Jim Nielsen California State Senator 4th Senatorial District State Capitol Sacramento, • CA 95814. RE: SENATE BILL 2.63• Dear Senator Nielsen: The Butte County Airport Land Use'Commission at its April meeting reviewed the provisions of Senate Bill 263 which will provide funding for local airports by reallocating taxes from the sale of jet fuel. The Commission stated that such.a measure is -necessary in order to provide ongoing funding for airport operations in.the State and to provide for adequate planning and administration. The 'Commission voted unanimously to -ask your support for the Bill. it is worthy of note that the'Bill is supported by Governmental Groups, Airport. Operators, Aircraft Operators and the Aircraft Owners and Pilots,Association (AOPA). Members of all of these -groups are represented on the Butte County Airport'Land Use Commission. Thank you for your support in this matter. Sincerely, David R. Hironimus Associate Planner BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION DRH:jmc ® 0 M April 24, 1987 LAN D OF NATURAL W E A L T H AN D EICE AUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538-7601 The Honorable.Stan Statham California State Senator State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: SENATE BILL 263 Dear Senator Statham: The Butte County Airport Land'Use Commission at its April meeting reviewed the provisions of Senate Bill 263 which will provide funding for local airports by reallocating taxes from the sale of jet.fuel. The Commission stated that such a measure is necessary in order to provide ongoing funding for airport operations in the State and to provide for adequate`planning and administration. The Commission voted unanimously to ask your support-.for.the Bill. It is worthy of note that the Bill is supported by Governmental Groups. Airport'Operators, Aircraft Operators, and the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA). Members of all of these groups are represented on'the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission. Thank you for your support in.this matter. Sincerely,' P-or� A. � David R. Hironimus Associate Planner. t. BUTTE COUNTY AIRP6RT LAND USE COMMISSION DRH:jmc y�y ••?l� .^Li `. .. _,fie 2. i li< i •":, April 24, 1987 LAN D OF NATURAL W E A L T H AN D EICE AUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538-7601 The Honorable.Stan Statham California State Senator State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: SENATE BILL 263 Dear Senator Statham: The Butte County Airport Land'Use Commission at its April meeting reviewed the provisions of Senate Bill 263 which will provide funding for local airports by reallocating taxes from the sale of jet.fuel. The Commission stated that such a measure is necessary in order to provide ongoing funding for airport operations in the State and to provide for adequate`planning and administration. The Commission voted unanimously to ask your support-.for.the Bill. It is worthy of note that the Bill is supported by Governmental Groups. Airport'Operators, Aircraft Operators, and the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA). Members of all of these groups are represented on'the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission. Thank you for your support in.this matter. Sincerely,' P-or� A. � David R. Hironimus Associate Planner. t. BUTTE COUNTY AIRP6RT LAND USE COMMISSION DRH:jmc Dear Senator Rogers: The'Butte".County Airport Land,Use Commission at its April meeting reviewed the provisions.of Senate Bill 263 which will provide funding for local airports by reallocating - taxes from the sale of jet fuel. The Commission stated that such a measure is necessary in order to provide ongoing funding for airport operations in the State and to provide for adequate planning and administration. The Commission voted unanimously to ask your support for -the Bill. It is worthy of note that the Bill is supported by Governmental Groups, Airport Operators, Aircraft Operators and the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association'(AOPA). Members of all of these groups are represented on the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission. Thank you for your support in,,this matter. Sincerely, , David:R. Hironimus Associate Planner BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION DRH:jmc ` 4 l coun s LAND OF NAT Ur AL WEAL T AND 5 E A U T Y PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE — OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 538-7601 April 24, 1987 The Honorable Don .Rogers California State Senator State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814. RE: SENATE BILL 263 Dear Senator Rogers: The'Butte".County Airport Land,Use Commission at its April meeting reviewed the provisions.of Senate Bill 263 which will provide funding for local airports by reallocating - taxes from the sale of jet fuel. The Commission stated that such a measure is necessary in order to provide ongoing funding for airport operations in the State and to provide for adequate planning and administration. The Commission voted unanimously to ask your support for -the Bill. It is worthy of note that the Bill is supported by Governmental Groups, Airport Operators, Aircraft Operators and the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association'(AOPA). Members of all of these groups are represented on the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission. Thank you for your support in,,this matter. Sincerely, , David:R. Hironimus Associate Planner BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION DRH:jmc ` 4 l Inter -Departmental Memorandum To: Airport Land Use Commission FROM: David Hironimus, Planning Staff SUBJECT:' MIKE ORR, TENTATIVE PARCEL -MAP, AP#42-16-65 DATE: March 25, 1987 The above referenced project to create two parcels is in the. overflight area around Ranchaero'Airport. While the.project site is not in the normal approach''zone or clear zone.or. within the 55dB LDN contour (noise); it -i-s -in .the general. vicinity of the modified flight path currently..in use at' Ranchaero. The modified flight path generally follows Chico , Creek, -rather than'more-northerly over residential areas.. The proposed development meets the standards for approach zone development adopted for other.airports in the County. Recommendation 1. Recommend approval subject to granting an avigation easement to Ranchaero Airport. DRH:jmc 21 Will Randolph City Administrator CITY OF OROVILLE 1735 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965, RE: DeRoco Tentative Subdivision Map; Zoning, General Plan and Airport Land Use Plan consistency, Dear Mr. Randolph: March 10, 1987 B E A U T Y A 95965.3397 For your information, please find attached copies of legisla- tion pertinant to the lands around the Oroville Municipal Airport. Of particular interest is Section 21676 of the State Aeronautics Act requiring review of local general plans'by the Airport'Land Use Commission (ALUC). Section 65302.3 of the Government Code requiring 'general plans to be consistent with the airport land use plan,,and Government Code Section 65860 requiring zoning to'be consistent with the applicable general plan. The Butte County ALUC has adopted the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) which provides•for clear zones, approach zones and overflight zones. It is the responsibility of the City of Oroville to ensure that the City general plan and zoning conform to the policies of the ALUP and forward any proposed changes or regulations to the ALUC for review pursuant to Section 21676. Please forward the attached information to the Planning Commission and City Counsil for their information and consider- ation, not only in respect to the above referenced project,._._ but any project within the review area set forth in the Oroville ALUP. -If you have any questions; please contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. any weekday. Sincerely, David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc STATE AERONAUTICS ACT January 1, 1985. Article 3.5. Airport Land Use Commission APPENDIX A Croalion; Membo►ship; Seledian 21670. ' (a) The Legislature hereby finds and declares that: (1) It is in the public interest to provide for the orderly development of each public use airport in this state and the area surrounding these airports so as to promote the overall goals and objectives of the California airport noise standards adopted pursuant to Section 21669, and prevent the creation of new noise and safety pproblems. (2) It is the purpose of this article to protect public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land. use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses. (b) In order to achieve the purposes of this article, every county in which there is located an airport which is served by a scheduled airline shall establish an airport land use commission. Every county, in which there is located an airport which is not served by a scheduled airline, but is operated for the benefit of the general public, shall establish an airport land use commission, except that the board of supervisors of the county may, after consultation with the appropriate airport operators and affected local entities and after a public hearing, adopt a resolution finding that there are no noise, public safety, or land use issues affecting any airport in the county which require the creation of a commission and declaring the county exempt from that requirement. The board shall, in this event, transmit a copy of the resolution to the Director of Transportation. For purposes of this section, "commission" means an airport land use commission. Each commission shall consist of seven members to be selected '.as follows: (1) Two representing the cities in the county, appointed by a city selection committee comprised of the mayors of all the cities within that county, except that if there are any cities contiguous or adjacent to the qualifying airport, at least one representative shall be appointed therefrom. If there are no cities within a county, the number of representatives provided for by paragraphs (2) and (3) shall each be increased by one. C (2) Two representing the county, appointed by the board of supervisors. (3) Two representing the airports within that county, appointed by a selection committee comprised of the managers of all of the public airports within that county, except that one representative shalF be appointed from an airport operated for the benefit of the general public. (4) One representing the general public, appointed by the other six members of the commission. = , (c) Public officers, whether elected or appointed, may be appointed and serve as members of.the commission during their terms of public office. (d) Each member shall promptly appoint a single 'proxy to represent him in commission affairs and to vote on all matters when the member is not in attendance. The proxy shall be designated in a `signed written instrument which shall be kept on file at the commission`. offices, and the proxy shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing member. A vacancy in the office of proxy shall be filled promptly by appointment of a new proxy. (e) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1989, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted before January 1, 1989, deletes or extends that date. Note: The above amendment and repeal of Public Utilities Code Section 21670 (as amended and repealed by Soctiori 3 of Chapter 1041; Statutes of 1982) was made by Section 2 of Chapter 1117, Statutes of 1984. Section 3 of Chapter 1117. Statutes of 1984, provides: SEC. 3. Section 21670 of the Public Utilities Code, as added by Sectiun 4 of Chapter :041 of the Statutes of 1982, is amended to read: 21670. (a) Every county in which there is located an airport which is served by a scheduled airline shall establish an airport land use commission. Every county, in which there is located ari airport which is not served by a scheduled airline, but is operated for the benefit of the general public, shall establish an airport land use commission, except that the board of supervisors of the county may, after consultation, with the appropriate airport operators and affected local entities and after a public hearing,'adopt a resolution finding that these ars no noise, public safety, or land use issues affecting any airport in the county which require the creation of a commission and declaring the county exempt from that requirement. The board shall, in this event, transmit a copy of the resolution to the Director of Transportation. -For purposes of this aPrtinn. •'rnmmissinn" meane an airnnrt land lisp commission+Each . commission shall consist of seven members to be selected as follows: (1) Two representing the cities in the county, appointed by a city selection'committee comprised of the mayors of all the cities within that county, except that if there are any cities contiguous or adjacent to. the qualifying airport, at least one representative `shall • be appointed therefrom. If there are no cities within a county, the number of representatives provided for by subdivisions (b) and (c) shall each be increased by one. (2) Two representing the county, appointed by the board of supervisors. (3) Two representing the airports within that county, appointed by a selection committee comprised of the managers of all of the public airports within that county• except that one representative shall be appointed from an airport operated for the benefit of the general public. (4) One representing the general public, appointed by the other six members of the commission. I (b) Public officers, whether elected or appointed, `may be appointed and serve as members of the commission during their terms of public office. (c) Each member shall promptly appoint a single proxy to represent the member in commission affairs and to vote on all matters when the member is not in attendance: The proxy shall be designated in a signed written instrument which shall be kept on file at the commission offices, and the proxy shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing member. A vacancy in the office of proxy shall be filled promptly by appointment of a new proxy. (d) This section shall become operative January 1, 1989. Action by Designated Body Instead of Commission 21670.1. Notwithstanding any provisions of this article, if the board of supervisors and the city selection committee of mayors in any county each makes a determination by a majority vote that proper land use planning can be accomplished through the actions of an appropriately designated body, then stich body shall assume the planning responsibilities of an airport land use commission as provided for in this article, and a commission need not be formed in that county. Applicability to Counties Having Over 4 Million Population 21670.2. Sections 21670 and 21670.1 do not apply.to counties of more than 4 million population. In such counties, the county regional planning commission has the responsibility for coordinating the airport planning of public agencies within the county. In instances where impasses result relative to this planning, an appeal may be made to the county regional planning commission by any public agency involved. The action taken by the county regionalplanning commission on such an appeal may be overruled by a Four-fifths vote of the governing body of a public agency whose planning led to the appeal: Airport Owned by a City, District, or County,'Appointment of Certain Members by Cities and Counties 21671: In any county where there is an airport operated for the general public which is owned by a city or district in another county or by another county, one of the representatives provided by paragraph (1)'of subdivision (b) of Section 21670 shall be appointed by the mayors of the cities of the county in which the owner of that airport is located, and one of the'representatives provided by paragraph 2 of subdivision (b) of Section 21670 shall be appointed by the board of supervisors of the county in which the owner of that airport is located. This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1989, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted before January 1, 1989, deletes or extends that date. Note: The above amendment and repeal of Public Utilities Code Section 21671 (as amended and repealed by Section 5 of Chapter 1041, Statutes of 1982) was made by Section 4 of Chapter 1117, Statutes of 1984. Section 5 of Chapter 1117, Statutes of 1984, provides: SEC. 5. Section 21671 of the Public Utilities Code, as added by Section 6 of Chapter 1041 of the Statutes of 1982, is amended to read: 21671. In any county where there is an airport operated for the general public which is owned by a city or district in another county or by another county, one of the representatives provided by paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 21670 shall be appointed by the mayors of the cities of the county in which the owner of that airport is located, and one of the representatives provided by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 21670 shall be appointed by the board of supervisors of the county in which the owner of that airport is located. This section shall become operative January 1, 1989. corm of Office; Removal of Members; Vacancies; Componaation; Staff Ai sistanco; Meetings 21671.5. Except for the terms of office of the members of the first commission, the term of,office'of each member shall be four years and until the appointment and aualification of his successor. The members of .the first commission shall classify themselves by lot so that the term of office of one member is one year, of two members is two years, of two members is three years, and of two members is four vears. The body which originally appointed a' member whose term has expired shall appoint his successor for a full term of four years. Any member may be removed at any time and without cause by'the' body appointing him. The expiration date of the term of office of each member shall be the first Monday in May in the year in which his term is to expire. Any vacancy in the membership of the commission shall be filled for the unexpired term by appointment by the body which originally appointed the member whose,office has become vacant. The chairman of the commission shall be selected by the members thereof. Compensation, if any, shall be determined by the board of supervisors.' Staff assistance, including the mailing of notices and the keeping of minutes, and necessary quarters, equipment, and supplies shall be provided b} the county. The usual and necessary operating expenses of the commissionshall be a county charge. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this article, the commission shall not employ any personnel either as employees or independent contractors without the prior approval of the board of supervisors. The commission shall meet at the call of the commission chairman or*at the request of the majority of the commission members. Rules and Regulations 21672. Each commission shall adopt rules and regulations with respect to the temporary disqualification of its members from participating in the review or adoption of a proposal because of conflict of interest and with respect to appointment of substitute members in such cases. Initiation of Proceedings for Creation by Owner of Airport 21673.. In any county when a commission has not been created by Section 21670, any owner of a public airport may initiate proceedings for the creation of a commission by presenting a request to the board of supervisors that a commission be created and showing the need therefor to their satisfaction. Powers and Duties 21674. The commission shall have the following powers and duties, subject to the limitations upon its jurisdiction set forth in Section 21676: • (a) To assist local agencies in ensuring compatible land uses in the vicinity of all new airports and in the vicinity of existing airports to the extent that the land in the vicinity of such airports is not already devoted to incompatible uses. - (b) To coordinate planning at the state, regional and local levels so asto provide for, the orderly development of air, transportation, while 'at the same time protecting the public health, safety, and welfare. (c) To prepare and adopt an airport land use plan pursuant to Section 21675. (d) To review the plans, regulations, and other actions of local agencies and airport operators pursuant to Section 21676. (e) The powers of the commission shall in no way be construed to give the commission jurisdiction over the operation of any airport. This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1989, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute which is chaptered before January 1, 1989, deletes or extends that date. Note: The above amendment and repeal of Public Utilities Code Section 21674 was made by Section 7 of Chapter 1041, Statutes of 1982. Section 8 of Chapter 1041. Statutes of 1982; provides: SEC. 8. Section 21674 is added to the Public Utilities Code, to read: 21674. The commission shall have the following powers and duties, subject to the limitations upon its jurisdiction herein set forth: (a) To study conditions and make recommendations concerning the need for height ' restrictions on buildings near airports; (b) To make recommendations for the use of the land surrounding airports to assure t safety of air navigation and the promotion of air commerce. (c) To hold public hearings regarding the subject matter in subdivisions (a) and (b) and make findings of fact thereon which would be advisory only to the involved jurisdiction. (d) To make and enforce rules and regulations for the orderly and fair conduct of such. hearings which shall conform as nearly as possible to the provisions applicable to hearings conducted by local agency formation commissions. ^ (e) To achieve by zoning compatible land uses in the vicinity of all new airports and in the vicinity of existing airports to the extent that the land in the vicinity of such airports is not already devoted to incompatible uses, and to this end the commissions shall require that all new construction in such areas shall conform to such standards as the department may from time to time adopt. The powers of the commission shall in no way be construed to give the commission juribdicliun user the Operation of ally awrpurt. This section shall bcume operative January 1, 1989. Land use Plan 21675. (a) The commission shall formulate a comprehensive land use plan that will provide for the orderly growth of each public airport and the area surrounding the airport within the jurisdiction of the commission, and will safeguard the general welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity of the airport and the public in general. The commission plan shall include a long-range master plan that reflects the anticipated growth of the airport during at least the next 20 vears. In formulating a land use plan, the commission may develop height restrictions on buildings, may specify use of land, and may determine building standards, including soundproofing adjacent to airports, within the planning area. The comprehensive land use plan shall not be amended more than once in any calendar year. (b) The commission may include, within its plan formulated pursuant to subdivision (a) , the area within the jurisdiction of the commission surrounding any federal military airport for all the purposes specified in subdivision (a). This subdivision does not give the commission any jurisdiction or authority over the territory or operations of any- military airport. (c) Theplanning boundaries shall be established by the commission after hearing an consultation with the involved agencies. Review of Local Genera/ Plans 21676. (a) Each local agency whose general plan includes areas covered' by an airport land use commission plan, shall, by July 1, 1983, submit a copy of its plan or specific plans to the airport land use commission. The commission shall determine by August 31, 1983, whether the plan or plans are consistent or inconsistent with the commission's plan. If the plan or plans are inconsistent with the commission's plan, the local a ency shall be notified and that local agency shall have another hearing to reconsider its plans. The local agency may overrule the commission after such hearing by a two-thirds vote of its governing body if it makes specific findings that the proposed action is consistent with the purposes of this article stated in Section 21670. (b) Prior to the amendment of a general plan or specific plan, or the adoption or approval of a toning ordinance or building regulation within the planning boundary established by the airport land use commission pursuant to Section 21675, the local agency shall first refer the proposed action to the commission. If the commission determines that the proposed action is inconsistent with the commission's plan, the referring agency shall be notified'. The local agency may, after a public hearing, overrule the commission by a two-thirds vote of its governing body if it makes specific findings that the proposed action is consistent with the purposes of this article stated in Section 21670. (c) Each public agency owning any airport within the boundaries of an airport land use commission plan, shall, prior to modification of its airport master plan, refer such proposed change to the airport land use commission. If the commission determines that the proposed action is inconsistent with the commission's' plan, the referring agency shall be notified. The public agency may, after a public hearing, overrule the commission by a. two-thirds vote of its governing body if it snakes specific findings that the proposed action is consistent with the purposes of this article stated in Section 21670. (d) Each commission determination pursuant to subdivision (b) or (c) shall be made within 60 days from the date of referral of the proposed action. If a commission fails to make the determination within thatperiod, the proposed action shall be deemed consistent with the commission's plan.. This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1989, and its of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is chaptered before January 1, 1989, deletes or extends that date. Note: The above amendment and repeal of Public Utilities Code Section 21676 was made by Section 9 of Chapter 1041, Statutes of 19h2. Section Ill of Chapter 1041. Statutes of 1982, provides: SEC. 10. Section 21676 is added to the Public Utilities Code, to read: 21676. Each public agency having representation on the commission shall assist in the development of an arca plan. All such plans shall be filed with the commission for its approval. if in the determination of the commission, an action or regulation of any public agency within the boundaries of the area plan is inconsistent with the commission plan, then the commission shall hold a hearing to determine whether or not the proposed action is in the best interest of the airport and the adjacent area. If itis determined that the action would be harmful, then the public agency shall be notified and the public agency shall have another hearing to reconsider its action. The public agency proposing the action or regulation, however, may overrule the commission after such hearing by a four-fifths vote of its governing body. Each public agency owning any airport within the boundaries of the area plan shall file any substantive change in development plans with the commission for its approval. If such plans are inconsistent with the commission plan, then the public agency shall be notified and shall have another hearing to reconsider its action. Such public agency, however, may overrule the commission by a four-fifths cote of its governing body. This section shall become operative January 1, 1989. Review of Local Plons 21676.5. (a) If the commission finds that a local agency has not revised'its general plan or specific plan or overruled the commission by a two-thirds vote of its governing body after making specific findings that the proposed action is consistent with the purposes of this article as stated in Section 21670, the commission may require that the local agency submit all subsequent actions, regulations, and permits to the commission for review until its general plan or specific plan is revised or the specific findings are made. If, in the determination of the commission, an action, regulation, or permit of the local agency is inconsistent with the commission plan, the local agency shall be notified and that local agency shall hold a hearing to reconsider its plan. The local agency may overrule the commission after the hearing by a two-thirds vote of its governing body if it makes specific findings that the proposed action is consistent with the purpposes of this article as stated in Section 21670. (b) Whenever the local agency has revised its general plan or specific plan or has overruled the commission pursuant to subdivision (a), the proposed action of the local agency shall not be subject to further commission review, unless the commission and the local agency agree that individual projects shall be reviewed by the commission. Morin County Override Provisions 21677. Notwithstanding Section 21676, any public agency in the County of Marin may overrule the Marin County Airport Land Use Commission by a majority vote of its governing body. Airport Owner's Immunity 21678. (a) With respect to a publicly owned airport that a public agency does not operate, if the public agency pursuant to Section 21676 or 21676.5 overrides a commission's action or recommendation, the operator of the airport shall be immune from liability for damages to property or personal injury caused by or resulting directly or indirectly from the public agency's decision to override the commission's action or recommendation. (b) This section shall.remain in effect only until January 1, 1989, and as of that date is repealed; unless a later enacted statute, which is chaptered before January 1, 1989, deletes or extends that date. 0 U 46 Stats. 1985, Ch. 1199 and Amended by Stats..1985, Ch. 114. Urgency; effective June 28, 1985.) Addressing local 65302.1. The general plan shall address each conditions of the elements specified in Section 65302 to.the extent that the subject of the element exists in the planning area. The degree of specificity and level of detail of the discussion of each such element shall reflect local conditions and circumstances. However, the provisions of this section shall not affect the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 65302, nor be construed to expand or limit the authority of the Department of Housing and Community Development to review housing elements pursuant to Section 50459 of the Health and Safety Code. The requirements of this section shall apply to charter cities. OPR report The Office of Planning and Research shall submit to the Legislature by January 1, 1985, a report on the effectiveness of the requirements of this section, recommended changes, if any, in such requirements, and recommendations as to the desirability of continuing such requirements in force after January 1, 1986. Repealer This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1986, and as of such date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is chaptered before January 1, 1986, deletes or extends such date. (Added by Stats. 1980, Ch. 837.) (Section 65302.2 repealed by Stats. 1984, Ch. 1009.) Consistency with air- 65302.3. (a) The general plan, and any port land use plans applicable specific plan prepared pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450), shall be consistent with the plan adopted or amended pursuant to Section 21675 of the Public Utilities Code. (b) The general plan, and any applicable specific plan, shall be amended, as necessary, within 180 days of any amendment to the plan required under Section 21675 of the Public Utilities Code. (c) If the legislative body does not concur with any provision of the plan required under Section 21675 of the Public Utilities Code, it may satisfy the provisions of this section by adopting findings pursuant to Section 21676 of the Public Utilities Code. Repealer This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1989, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is chaptered before January 1, 1989, deletes or extends that date. 46 Prezoning zoning consistency with general plan .0 adopted by a four-fifths vote following notice pursuant to Section 65090 and public hearing, in which case it shall be of no further force and effect one year from its date of adoption. After notice pursuant to Section 65090 and public hearing, the legislative body may by a four- fifths vote extend the interim ordinance for one year. When ,any such interim ordinance has been adopted, every subsequent ordinance adopted pursuant to this section, covering the whole or a part of the same property, shall automatically terminate and be of no further force or eff.:!ct upon the termination of the first such ordinance or any extension of the ordinance as provided in this section. This section shall become operative January 1, 1989. (Added by Stats. 1982, Ch. 1108 (operative January 1,.19891. Amended by Stats. 1984, Ch. 1009.) 65859. A city may prezone unincorporated territory adjoining the city for the purpose of determining the zoning that will apply to such property in the event of subsequent annexation to the city. The method of accomplishing such prezoning shall be as provided by this chapter for zoning within the city. Such zoning shall become effective at the same time that the annexation becomes effective. Pursuant to Section 54790, those cities subject to such provision shall complete prezoning proceedings as required by law. If a city has not prezoned territory which is annexed, it may adopt an interim ordinance in accordance with the provisions of Section 65858. (Amended by Stats. 1980, Ch. 1132.) 65860. (a) County or city zoning ordinances shall be consistent with the general plan of the county or city by January 1, 1974. A zoning ordinance shall be consistent with a city or county general plan only if: (i) the city or county has officially adopted such a plan, and (ii) the various.land uses authorized by the ordinance are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs ispecified in such a plan. (b) Any resident or property owner within a city or a county, as the case may be, may bring an action in the superior court to enforce compliance with the provisions of subdivision (a). Any such action or proceedings shall be governed by Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 1084) of Title 1 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Any action or proceedings taken 109 110 pursuant to the provisions of this subdivision shall be taken within 90 days of the enactment of any new zoning ordinance or the amendment of any - existing zoning ordinance asto said amendment or amendments. (c) In the event -that a zoning ordinance becomes inconsistent with a general plan by reason of amendment to such a plan, or to any element of such a plan, such zoning ordinance shall be amended within a reasonable time so that it is consistent with the general plan as amended. (d) Notwithstanding Section 65803, this section shall apply in a charter city of 2,000,000 or more population to a zoning ordinance adopted prior to January 1, 1979, which zoning ordinance shall be consistent with the general plan of such city by July 1, 1982. (Amended by Stats. 1979, Ch. 304.) Procedure without 65861. When there is no city planning eonmission commission, the legislative body of such city shall do all things required or authorized by this chapter of the city planning commission. (Added by Stats. 1965, Ch. 1880.) Hearings for 65862. When inconsistency between the general inconsistency of plan and zoning arises as a result of adoption of general plan and or amendment to a general plan, or any element zoning thereof, hearings held pursuant to Section 65854 or 65856 for the purpose of bringing zoning into consistency with the general plan, as required by Section 65860, may be held. at the same time as hearings held for the purpose of adopting or amending a general plan, or any element thereof. However, the hearing on the general plan amendment may, at the discretion of the local agency, be concluded prior to any consideration of adoption of a zoning change. It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this section, that local agencies shall, to the extent possible, concurrently process applications for general plan amendments and zoning changes which are needed to permit development so as to expedite processing of such applications. (Repealed and added by Stats. 1980, Ch. 1152.) Notice to assessor 65863.5. Whenever the zoning covering a property is changed from one zone to another or a zoning variance or conditional use permit is granted with respect to any property, the governing body of the city or county shall, within 30 days, notify the county assessor of such action. Notwithstanding Section 65803, this section shall apply to charter cities. 110 Inter -Departmental Memorandum TO: Butte County Board of Supervisors FROM: Butte County Airport 'Land Use Commission SUBJECT: OROVILLE AIRPORT ENVIRONS LAND USE PLAN DATE: February. 19', 1987 At the February 4, 198.7-meeting'of the Butte.County Airport. Land Use Commission., impiementation.of.the Oroville Airport, Environs Land Use Plan was discussed. -The Commission unanimously.:voted to request the Butte County Board of.' - Supervisors -and the-.Oroville:City Council initiate action to-implement.the Oroville Airport'Environs Land Use Plan and to protect the ' Ai.rport . f.rom incoinpatible 'development and the public from aircraft hazards.'- The following actions should be'considered A. Initiate rezoning'.of- ciear zone areas to .prohibit' structures # B. Initiate placing an overlay or combining zone on clear zone areas to require site plan approval by.the Airport. Land Use Commi.ssion for all structures. C. Initiate annexation of clear zones and surrounding properties to the City of Oroville. D. And/or any.other things that might come to:their minds that would help to gain control of the clear zones. t Action is necessary in order to ensure that Oroville-Airport retansits status as.an economic asset, not only to Oroville but the entire County. z cc: 'City of Oroville u�% C L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 534-4601 ':FebrVary 19, 1987 CITY OF OROVILLE 1735 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965 RE: OROVILLE AIRPORT ENVIRONS LAND USE PLAN At the February 4, 1987 meeting of the Butte County. Airport Land Use Commission, implementation of the Oroville Airport Environs Land Use Plan was discussed. The Commission unanimously voted'to request the Butte County Board of Supervisors and the Oroville City Council initiate action to implement the Oroville Airport Environs Land Use Plan and to protect the airport from incompatible development and the public from aircraft hazards. The following actions should be considered: . A. Initiate rezoning of clear zone areas to prohibit structures. B. Initiate placing an overlay or combining zone on clear zone areas to require site plan approval by the Airport Land Use Commission for all structures. C. Initiate annexation of clear zones and surrounding properties to the City of Oroville. D. And/or any other things that might come to their minds that would help to gain control of the clear zones. Action is necessary in order to ensure that Oroville Airport retains its status as an economic asset, not only to Oroville, but the entire County. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office any weekday between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc Ri :£ j 1 `. January 28, 1987 Mary Ann Imbiorski-.. Planning.Department City of Oroville 1675 -Montgomery Street'. Oroville,,CA 95965_ 1 -..... ®ung '. LA N.D., OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 534.4601 I t 11 In reference to our telephone.,'coriversat'ion'on,January 26, i 1987 regarding the Airport Land Use Commission action on the 14 -lot industrial''subdivision for Gerry'DeRoco, please 1 find attached a copy of the'minutes-from'that meeting. 1 The Commission referred to the'Oroville Airport Land Use Plan. The Commission determined that the subject property is located within the clear zone area and that'the policies 1 of the plan indicate that industrial development is not compatible within the clear,zones. (See policies within the Oroville Airport Land -Use Plan; especially pages 1.4. through.21). Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office any weekday between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, David R. Hironimus' Associate Planner DRH : j me Attachment 1 1 I I I i 1 I d Inter -Departmental Memorandum TO: City Selection Committee - Attn: Mike Pyeatt FROM: Airport Land Use Commission SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSIONER DATE: January 12, 1987 Commissioner Norman Robert's term as Airport Land. Use- _Commissionerrexpires May of thisyear.. Acti'= on. Requested: Either reappoint Norman Roberts for. a four-year term (to May 4, 1991), or appoint a new Commissioner, as you wish. avid R. Hironimus Associate Planner I DRH:jmc M Z Inter-Departmentu'l Memorandum TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Airport Land Use Commission SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSIONER DATE: January 12,-1987 Commissioner Otto Behunin's term as Airport'Land.Use __ Commissioner _expires , May -_bf,.`this- year Action Requested: Either'r6appoint Otto.n for. e B'h­ -*uni Al 1991), a four-year term-, (to May'.. or appoint a. -new Commissioner, as .You: wish: ---j;!!-.-: David R Hironimus Associate Planner DRH: jmc 4 L CO Bufte Co. Planning Corn DEC 2 9 1986 ®roville; Califormi4 Static Clearinghouse 'December 24. 1986 v Office of Pl_ nnia g and Research 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95514 Attention Norma Wood City of Chico's 1987 Development - Chico Municipal Airport SCH 086120204 'The Department of Tranwportation,';D ivision of Aeronautics, has reviewed the above -referenced document.with respect to those areas germane to its Statutory renponsib l:ities, Said docuxment .appedrs to address all of the is,stes of *conca M to this J3ilrisian and we have no additional Comments at this time. Thrank you for the opportunity, to review,and comment on this. proposal. JACK D. KEMMERLY, Chief ~ Division of Aeronautics, ` Sdndy Iiesnard Envirotmental;. Planner utte Co:cantg ALiYC r Chico Muni` 'Airport i . 1 ' j December 11, 1986 X L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH A N D BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 534-4601 ,A Chuck Prince Assistant City Administrator for Community Services CITY OF OROVILLE 1735 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Prince: In reference to your letter of December 10 requesting information regarding the.Oroville Municipal Airport clear zones, please be advised of the following: 1. County zoning for the Oroville Municipal Airport clear zone is A-40 (Agricultural - 40 -acre minimums). See attached excerpt from Chapter 24 of the Butte County Code. 2. County staff recommendation to the Airport Land Use Commission was that the clear zones were to remain essentially clear of all improvements. 3. The Airport Land Use Commission adopted the Airport Land Use Plan for the Oroville Airport -Environs with stated policies that the clear zone should remain clear of any improvements. 4. County staff recommendation to the Butte County Planning Commission was to zone the airport clear zones for R -C (Resource Conservation) zoning, which does not permit permanent structures-. The Butte County Planning Commis- sion recommended R -C zoning to the Board of, Supervisors. 5. Please find enclosed minutes from the Board of Supervisors' meeting of February 19, 1986. 6. Please find enclosed a copy of the building permit issued for AP 30-29-40. Please note that the building permit was issued on September 27, 1983 and.subsequently renewed on September 27, 1984, May 13, 1986, and September 17, 1986. A field inspection of the site has revealed that 0 Chuck Princes December 11, 1986 Page 2. the proposed building is located approximately in the middle of AP 30-29-40, which is the approximate location of the edge of the clear zone. As such, it is uncertain whether the building is in the clear zone or adjacent to it to the west. Also, please note that the Oroville Airport Environs Land Use Plan was not adopted by the Airport Land Use Commission until September.16, 1985,,. approximately two years after.the original building permit was issued ' 7. Issuance of that building permit required"no findingsr�y y� the Board of Supervisors relative to the Airport LandtUse Commission's land use plan,�as no land use plan had been adopted at that time. !=* If you have any further questions regarding this matter;.: please contact this office any weekday between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Director of Planning David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH/sjs Enclosures .r. 86-116 Board of Supervisors - rezone (item on which an environmental impact _ ! (2821) report has been certified) from U (unclassified) and AR -5 (agricultural \ residential - five acre parcels) to A -R (agricultural residential), --� AR -5, AR -10 (agricultural residential - ten acre parcels), R -C (resource conservation) and A-40 (agricultural 40 acre parcels) property generally located south of Grand Avenue, west of.18th Street and Larkin" 000 Road, north of..: East Hamilton Road, and east of State Highway 99, west., ' of Oroville..'..The project also includes all of the Thermalito Afterbay` Recreation Area.. and property east of Larkin Road southeast of Orovi11 V Airport in the runway clear zone (File 84-72). (from 2/4/86) Motion: MADE MOTION OF INTENT TO LET CITY OF OROVILLE KNOW BOARD.. INTENDS.. TO OBTAIN PROPERTIES TOTALLY CONTINGENT ON ABILITY_ TO GET GRANTS TO DO SO, AND TO BRING SOME EXPERT IN TO HELP A= EVALUATE THE PRICE AND COST OF OBTAINING THESE PROPERTIES.- BOARD ROPERTIES:BOARD INTENDS TO PROCEED WITH THIS PROJECT AND THIS ZONING, INTENDING TO MAINTAIN THE ZONING IN CONFORMITY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN ZONING. NOTED THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA . ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND CONSIDERED IN MAKING THIS DECISION, AND NOTED THE EIR CERTIFIED BY THE BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1985, IN ADOPTING THE OROVILLE AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN, AND BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON .NOVEMBER 19, 1985 IN ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OROVILLE AREA LAND USE MAP OF THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN; AND FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED REZONING- CONFORMS TO THE POLICIES, INCLUDING THE TEST AND MAP, OF THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN; AND ADOPTED ORDINANCE 2516 REZONING THE LAND WITHIN THE OROVILLE AIRPORT ENVIRONS TO A -R, AR -5, AR -10 AND R -C, EXCEPTING THAT WITHIN THE CLEAR ZONES, ZONED A-40 AS PROPOSED. S M Vote: 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 Y (Unanimously carried) I It { � °y ('. - •.� _ _ 6'd! A' � .� Y i i%••; 4 ��-. K1'aj� � i 3 Z M- -*i�*` ?'!:{j'�F�� �`4 1�.i;C V0. *�.3t �'a y�yy,,yyMM p'.. :tE•. W .;'cM•J.. it � ...,.,� :£-. �]: '4Y .,s•`8l �'�}"yut,1._ A 86-78 i �Board of 'Supervisors rezone.. (item - 6n-1.1',-,^which'o',,an-,k environmental impact report has been. certified) from U'' (unclassified)-; and- AR -5- 4 AN (agricultural residential five acrepaicels)4to-A=R- agri6ltural-!��- cu �'tu� .,resi.dential ),--.�IttARL5;*,-,-AR-10,.(ig�i a .res"e a 'tR paroels),t. -C (resource .'4 ns rva on ti a �d;� 40 ��l t ur� ��-(agr -c "acre --p—ar"ce s : 40' --1 )�;"Oropert nii ri a 11 '�l at lit 6�a e south,.of, Avenue west 'of 18th Street and Larkin ;Road;; n h a H ort f. i st. 1 t;n R ad �mi and east of State Highway 99,7' weste project a so 0�0 v I Ili T 1 includes.all of the Thermalito. AfterbO *recre-'a-tion-, area an 'property, -.';of east, of Larkin ko'ad southeast Oroville�.Airp6rti-iri-,:.the-,runway, clear.;'. zone --.,(File!- 84-72).'r--.'� (CONTINUED -EBRUARY�191.�1986;�-A-r�7"-"--'t-- 2:30' P.M.. A 4 AN 2. Kit rezo 86-05 n.4,71 ,�.Hoayv ,of .Supervisors ne (item* ori.-which"an-en�i-r6n**nm-me' e .1 M act, Irom.n — u (Cont'd d irtreport,,, has bee rtified),:f U n si rcel s a�gr ulfuril-,.=-�- e a c re pa F 0 ':AR_lOi.-Jag _C'ultu�al,:`t, �­T� a AR- 5, grilcul-tu e ential 10 acre ' -ic' ls),,'R-C ' (resource , conservationY" 3, pa. e 0 a" ricultural,,.-.�z� 40, acre parcels) property' gen-erally and, -A- 9". ocated,,*1,south,.,,,qf ';,Grand,j,'Avenue,,,�. west .-i-i of.I 18th -i Street-za an Larkin,`ko'ad,-_':_ 'north of East*Hamilt'o-n Road;"and east -o.f,. Si ate trH a �.inc Ar h -project'- lso _includes J Hi ghway;.99 "Z7' west of. Orovi 11 e...'.1' The S Ji�­;�--_- - -.,-allil'of,,th ..,_Thermallto`� A*,ft'e­_rb' a e ay. recreation ea:: and; propkr:ty,_T,.;, ­_� east -.-of--: Larkin,,. Road southeast - --Airporf.?,.in --�the--­' of Oeoville: runway clear zone. (file 84-72) SET HEARING DATE FOR FEBRUARY 4, 1986 AT 3:30 P.M. 'Ma MOM M. R M Pr M I -AM FILE NO.: 84-72 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION r STAFF FINDINGS - October 17, 1985 _•�r !�"' '• - -� r,+ -�^ -� rt- W y :: -r S..'..0 ?I f-><-�:S ":t.,:l„F,' � , ,lf.� .R.J.. u - i:�i +.« it'•�.�,11 �� S '�r.#,�'. >,,�,�,•�t„'APS��FL'/�I�CAN,..�,t��:�m,� �'�=',4�.,�;-r ..,:.: •r, Board hof (Supervisors ��� s�F�y�'„s'�.��. J r*' u�- �i�� #iia<�i"'_ - �,i �7df§tt 3 tri,:, r� �+ g lam„ • �.�r�.�..`.y Z���?.'�. "'�i * `'� �”- ,1� ��•�1 H'..��K.- b '4.R�'" raj, ••'.�.�SF �2"'r,.ew.t ave.. ,�tl.� ra s.'�TFF - ��� ���'^.+--,�,..�wafi ��, �._� r- yi #�•f•.•-..��s•*- -a'�k�`a?#-� 1�r ,•S.. X �s'_r .. -- y--'.:Ym z? 'try ..t';� ' - ia: •`l f x rF;'_� REQUEST - -'--General Plan Amendment and�Rezbi n"' r! compatible with Airport.Environs,P1`an, , �> !� -k r �} t'. �.�1� it� • - .. .. �'..,"..A".'wr..:.- 1� ,i♦ "."c.,a`.A.4.+'""=Cg�is . r; --t��� tMr. -�-..L. �f�-_� aµ„-.TTi.�s:'-semz ,..•a . ._•La. s. __ - _ r�, . s.. -aC.t -doaj¢•ocm. ..rpm -.s -tri- esdboyn :".- t # -he �a+Aid ir/To'Ust •,1'e�+�s * v�•�??a}�n..��a �, liai. � a17 - it ' Pr]di!7,NO '' ,Y 'Y xt•�v� �e+a'Wy•�"'ii^t[•yi6..�q1.'•1 e'�e�•„�tinnt�;= - j. .'�-• � tVarr i ous + y+ - tri.-aysR .. 7 e•.i- � ;� Y. -yr.�.- t� + SIZE: - t - - -- - "- - t'i'S"Tt�*> 1. s 1+: •. f •' �.,-{.L:.k.�>•�x.. #. LOCATION:North of, west of, and at the Oroville Municipal Airport, Oroville. ' EXISTING ZONING: A-2, City of Oroville i r ZONING HISTORY: Zoned A-2 Aug. 29, 1955 Ord. 522 • SURROUNDING ZONING: R -C, A -R, P -O, R-3 SURROUNDING LAND USE: Various. Agricultural to High Density Residential, Commercial and Industrial --- uses. -- GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential, Agricultural 1� •' Residential, Grazing and Open Land, Public, and Industrial" APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Butte County General Plan and the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan, Government Code Section 65302.3 and Public Utilities Code Section 21675,, 21676, and 21676.5. ` COMMENTS_ RECEIVED:- ECEIVED_ Environmental Environmental Health_ "No objection to General -Plan Amendment and � Rezone. Any development subsequent to the Amendment and Rezone shall ? comply with minimum sewage disposal area requirements-and!'water �•_ 1 -'_ availability requirements of the "Soils Butte County Subdivision Ordi nance..f-7 ; - = :� ' Due to poor., in the area., -'a rezone is no• guarantee' of aIapproval "of � + ir �►r ,': any. subsequent'�parcal map.,, rT :r TM _ �.r=.• ;' . " '; 1. Jr '/MwCr' .�`'� , yLt R... T.ft .Y •...• . .M �. ♦ *wit . � w• 1• a#'...)M •'`•iyi A(j:~+."�'�1 l�7i lf, 4.+tl1 i�£�t�•r. ""F 'I•n� '44 ��1 y'i!'Th `.M:..:'�'i'.��1�"'y J�T-��. _ 3R++...re-..: a.. Ats--�4fWFK�C I'.,,F � F. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDING -- October 17, 1985 Page 2 City_of_Oro_ville_ "I believe the General Plan and zoning should be in agreement with the Airport Environs Plan." The Butte County Department of Public Works had no objections or comments. ANALYSIS: Y This project4`is an amendment to the Butte County General Plan•Land Use Element and -associated rezone -for '.the ,'area surrounding the .Or,ovi l l e r This project was original 1y,: initiated :in _49B3 as part,. of, the ? Orovi l l e .Area' General" P1 an amendment and rezone ---'buts was deleted rfrom- ' f ;T that larger -area project when"it was determined'9that`no airport land use .plan had been•adopted by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission. +: 4,= Government Code Section 65302.3, requires that the General Plan and -�_ zoning be consistence with the Airport Land Use Plan. Since no plan had" been adopted 'i t was not possi bl e' to f i nd ` any zoning .• i n • conf ormi ty with A--�"`: the plan. At that time the Butte", County Planning Commission acting ;as Airport Land Use Commission began formulating an • Orovi l l a Airport y Environs Plan. A subsequent reorganizaiton of the Airport Land Use Commission removed those duties from the Planning Commission and formed a separate body. The Butte County Airport Land Use Commission at its meeting of September 16, 1985, certified an Environmental Impact Report' and adopted the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan. Copies of the environmental documents and the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan have been forwarded to the City of Oroville, the Butte County Board of Supervisors, and the Planning Commission. Suggestions regarding appropriate zoning were formulated by the Airport Land Use Commission and forwarded to the Planning staff. The recommendations of this project are based on the Airport Land Use Commission's suggestions. Discussion of the proposed General Plan Amendments and Rezone areas will be broken into smaller areas for ease of discussion. First, the areas located within the city limits of Oroville are proposed for General Plan designation changes only. Those changes will mirror the City's adopted General Plan for those areas, with Low Density Residential located east of 20th Street, and on the south side of Grand Avenue. Public designations on the golf course and airport, Industrial designations on the north side of Oro -Dam Blvd. and on the areas planned for industrial uses on the airport property, and Open Space (Grazing and Open Land) on the clear zone areas. For areas within the County both General Plan Amendment and rezoning is recommended in most cases. For the area between 18th and 20th Streets south of Grand Avenue and north of the Oroville City limits, the General Plan is proposed to remain as Low Density Residential with the zoning being changed from U (Unclassified) to A -R (Agricultural Residential). For the area west of the City limits north of State Highway 162, south of Grand Avenue, and the Thermalito Power Canal, an Agricultural r.. Residential designation is recommended along with AR -5 zoning except for the areas shown within the clear zone as shown in the Oroville Airport t Land Use Plan. For the areas south of State Highway 162 (Oro Dam Blvd. . i BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDING - October 17, 1985 Page 3 course, airport and Larkin) both AR -5 and AR -10 zoning is recommended as shown on the exhibit except for the ares within the clear zone to the southwest of the airport. This area is also recommended for Agricultural Residential General Plan designation. The areas occupied by the Thermalito Afterbay including the area within...'_ the tale line are proposed for Public (Resource area and open space) 4». ; ,- General Plan designation and R -C (Resource Conservation) zonin '.r— ` .. .. �� ..,ji • t. aid 2 ! ' The areas within the unincorporated portion of the -County .locatedoff'"t the ends;,ofw;the,{runways.�and .tothe `northwest, southwest,.�and=southeast- , ' of the Airport -_are designated'clear:zone areas, by the Airport'Land'Use `: _ .47 Plan and ,are recommended for R -C zoning by the Airport .Land Use,'; r.„-.�' Commission. "The Planning Commission may wish to consider a Grazing.and - - ' Open Land designation on these -properties along with an A-40 zone. The'-;'`. R -C zoning -would not . allow , any permanent structures -in the cl ear,= zones „-- -_ area and woold,conform�to th.e polircies,of;the Airport Land Use.,P1an . The A-40 zone'would allow one ­single family dwelling per parcel:=asiwell=-� { as the agricultural - uses •that would also be allowed=. in the R7C-,'zone.`00=It' ' s should be noted that three parcels of the southwest end of the air r are entirely within the areas designated for clear zone and nine other parcels are partically covered by a clear zone. At the northwest and southeast ends of the runways, no parcels are completely covered by clear zone areas. ” The General Plan designations and zones recommended by the Airport Land Use Commission were choosen to reflect existing uses in the area, projected noise levels due to aircraft operations, and existing constraints to development such as water availability and sewage disposal capacity. Larger parcels are recommended in proximity to the Afterbay due to high ground water conditions and biologially sensitive areas. More detailed information can be obtained from the Environmetnal Impact Report certified for the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: ---------------- A. Note that the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEO) have been completed and considered in making this decision, and note the previous EIR certified by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission on September 16, 1985, in adopting the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan; and B. Find that the proposed General Plan Amendments conform to the policies of the Butte County General Plan; and C. Adopt a Resolution Recommending the Board of Supervisors adopt a Resolution for approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment to Agricultural -Residential, Industrial, Public, and Grazing and Open Land on ,property located within the Oroville Airport Environs; and .•10. .}. - I +t} . _ r ..a.. .. i•- 01. �+.PL' � �.}(TiL• • .Z� - - r ''.i«�..d' ..�..^ A•it� ���'r7 �f err. �.. Srrou ,sy,'tKw...�: ...,5: ' ^ ' � BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ! STAFF FINDING - October 17, 1985 Page 4 � D. Find that the proposed Rezoning conforms to the policies, including the text and map, of the Butte County General Plan; and E. Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance rezoning of, land within the Oroville Airport Environs to A DH:'lrl 44 Location Exhibit' Site Plan Env'ironmentcii-Documents (W�Oroville Airport Land Use Plan and EIR) � � ,. � rl 71, 0 X-6 (b) Uses requiring use permits: The following ses are _ permitted subject to securing a use permit in ea c case: f 1) Segregation of homesites, pursuant the require-' ai. �.�i s, ments of section 24=54. ; .. - + ti 1 -v-r f r - .rt3=- :L. Y !`..1.�..-t .....• � r •.'.e•t is ...+:1 � ys.�c�.-•....+..-..�T (2)',' egati6n of agricultural proc sing uses pursua : r d r ))D {r € to t. requirements` of sectio 4=55.!' .. . .�__. �.•._n -.. • : _ .... .. _ .. _. (c) Minimu of area requir : Minimum lot area shall not be' less than t ty (20) c ca) Front yard set +k- i inimum front yard setbacks . r37.%n9 shall be fty50i feefo a center lineofthe road;meXce t-...,. X11 where'the road is'clas' ' ied the county`as a Federal AWE'., a Second s : � r. • � -;; ; ary Road, t minim uilding setback require -r ments shall be fif -five (55) feet the center line of the road. (e) Side d rear yard required: Mini um side and rear yard sha of be less than twenty-five (25 eet. (Ord. No. 1750, , 8-31-76; Ord. No. 2167, § 3, 11-25-8 24-79, 24-80. Reserved. Sec. 24-81. A-40 (Agricultural) Zone. (a) Uses permitted: (1) One single-family dwelling per parcel, including mobile homes; (2) General agriculture farming, horticulture, commercial livestock, poultry production, growing and harvesting forestry products, warehousing and storage; (3) Accessory buildings and uses pertinent to the permitted uses, including agricultural processing planta; (4) Hou3ing facilities (including trailers) to accommodate only employees and their families employed by the owner or operator of the premises; and provided fur- ther that such housing facility shall be considered ac- .. -64- 1 -v... -4 -1.47 c - i -64„v... -i.1.47 �rY •�j�R AN cessory to the main building and shall conform to the Provisions pertaining to required yard and open space for- dwellings; (5) Mining, quarrying, commercial excavation and wood t. processing plants; (6) Hunting and fishing camps, including. those which.__ accommodate recreational vehicles and travel trailers, - providing that said recreational vehicles and travel trailers shall not be used for year-round occupancy. (b) Uses requiring use permits: The following uses are permitted subject to securing a use permit in each case: (1) Segregation of homesites, pursuant to the require- menta of section 24-54. (2) Segregation of agricultural processing uses, pursuant to the requirements of section 24-55. (c) Minimum lot area required: Minimum lot area shall not be less than forty (40) acres. (d) .Front yard setback: Minimum front yard setback shall be fifty (50) feet from the center line of the road; except where the road is classified by the county as a Federal Aid Secondary Road, the minimum building setback require- ments shall be fifty-five (55) feet from the center line of the road. (e) Side and rear yard required: Minimum side and rear yard shall not be less than twenty-five (25) feet. (Ord. No. 1750, § 1, 8-31-76; Ord. No. 2167, § 4, 11-25-80) 24-83. Reserved. A-160 (Agricultural) Zone. ,,.�• _(a). Uses p =-(1) One sine (2) General - Malliv i re -f dw d g per parcel; gri ure, -ng, horticulture, commer- , poultry procluc �s- -65- harveat- products, warehousing 0 [d:-188, 24-140. M2*&14$ 24- •148. 24-146. Sec. 24-147. R -C (Resource Conservation) Zone. (a) .Uses permitted:_ (1) Natural, wilderness and study areas; (2) Preserves for native fish, birds and wildlife; (3) Preservation of water resource areas, including streams, rivers, lakes, swamps, ponds, beaches, riverbanks, lake. shores and watershed areas; (4) Agricultural uses, not including permanent dwellings; (6) Keeping, raising and pasturing of livestock, not includ- ing feed yards; (6) Establishment of archeological and historical sites; (7) Recreational uses not requiring permanent improve- ment, including hunting, fishing, camping, hiking, rid- ing and similar uses; (8) Emergency uses needed for the protection of land and resources from fire, erosion, floods, slides, quakes, in- sects, diseases and pollution. (b) Uses requiring a use permit: (1) Preserves for nonnative wildlife species; (2) Establishment of rest stops, vista points, and bicycle, pedestrian and equestrian trails, not including com- mercial sales and services; (3) Exploration and reconstruction of historical and archeo- logical sites and structures; (4) Permanent improvements needed for the protection of land and resources from fire, erosion, floods, alma„ quakes, insects, diseases and pollution; -126b- (6) MMUOUG to monitor air quality, water quality and Gebmwe amvitles0 (6) Mining and quarrying. This permit does not exclude any other permits as required by other regulatory agencies or from review by said agencies. (c) 'acres. Lot area required: Minimum lot area shall be ten (10) (d)' Front buiZding setback: Minimum front building set- back for structures shall be one hundred (100) feet from the center line of the road. (®) Sign regu&Wow: (1) Signs or advertising displays shall be limited to one sign per lot advertising the sale or lease of that lot or the services rendered on the lot or the products gown or raised on the lot, and one sign advertising sales or services off the premises. (2) Signs to guide traffic to registered historical landmarks are also permitted if -they are installed in accordance with the Planning Manual of Instructions of the De- partment of Transportation of the State of California. (3) Signs must be stationary and 'of a constant color, light and intensity. (4) Signs must not be higher than ten (10) feet above grade and must not be wider than six (6) feet. (6) All signs must be located behind the front setback Zine. (f) Side and rear setbacks: Minimum side and rear building setbacks shall be ten (10) feet from property lines. (Ord. No. 1760, § 1, 8-8176) -127- t GUUN OF BUT) E - UEVAH'I MtN'l Ur HUc; WUHKS PERMIT NO. / ' 7 Count er Drive - Oroville, California 95985 - Tele 916/534-4541 APPLICATION AND PERMIT ASSESSOPARCE! UMBER ZONI G BUILDING PERMIT OWNER D ,p2 TEEL PHONNE SO. FT. DCC. BUILDING VALUATVON OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS '45c� "L !Je: © / o— 3 CONTR C OR'S NA OZI TELEPHONE O _ v 6e ?-!V CONTRACTOR'S MAIL NG ADDRESS Fireplace CONSTRUCTION LENDER UNKNOWN Total Valuation Is '4 5/ Filing Fee $ 10.00 LENDER'S MAILING ADDRESS Permit Fee $ Sri AR NITECT OR ENGINELR LICENSE NO. Plan Checking Fee $ ,� M $ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S MAILING ADDRESS Permit fee $ BUILDING ADDRESS �- PLUMBING PERMIT FllingFee 10.00 Each Trap 2.00 1 . G ter 20.00 7-0,015 Water piping 1 5.00 $,60 DIVISION NAME PARCEL MAP LOT NO. UQJL_114JJ'eV'r1LZ)1J10_y11(1 �(� Each qas water heater or vent 5.00 Gas piping system 1 - 5 outlets 5.00 USE OF STRUCTURE SF Duplex[] Mobllehome❑ Other SPECIFY Building sewer 5.00 Mobile Home S G W O.00e TYPE OF WORK New 10 Addition[] Remodel❑ Utilities[] Installation❑ Other❑ Describe work: Permit Fee $ Contractor ELECTRICAL PERMIT Filing Fee 10.00 Main service 6001 OR LESS 100 AMP OR LESS 10.00 @� t Main service EA. ADD'L 100 AMP 2.50 A& So NEW CONST.DWELLING OCCUP.s - OR ADDNS. ( ACC. BLDGS/7-75 1/2Csgft CONTRACTORS LICENSE LAW I declare under penalty of perjury (check one): ❑ I am licensed under provisions of Chapt. 9, Div. 3 of the Business and Professions Code and my license is in full force and effect. License No. Classification [� I, as the owner, or my employees with wages as their sole compen- sation, will do the work,and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044) ❑ 1, as the owner, am exclusively contracting with licensed contract- ors. (Sec. 7044) ❑ I am exempt under Sec. Business and Professions Code for this reason NEW CONSTR 1.OUTL T NO N.RESID SRANC CI C S 2,50 Be NEW CONSTRPOWER APPARATUS e NON.RESID. (SINGLE OUTLET CIR. Ex. OCCup(OUTLETS OR FIXTURES ;: sao FIXED APPLNS. OR EX. OCCUp. OUTLETS (RESIO.) EA.) 2.00 Temporary service 10.00 MOD Mobile Home Facilities 15.00 Misc. Wiring 15.00 Permit Fee $ Contractor MECHANICAL PERMIT Filing Fee 10.00 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 1 declare under penalty of perjury (check one): ❑ The permit Is for $100.00 (valuation) or less. ❑ I have placed on file with the County of Butte Building Department a Certificate of Workmen's Compensation Insurance or a Certificate of Consent to Self -Insure. ' I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the W. C. laws of California. , Notice to Applicant: If after making this statement, should you become subject to the W. C. provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. Heating 68 Cooling Hood 3.00 6� Ventilation Permit Fee $ Contractor I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information Is correct. I agree to comply to all County Ordinances and State Laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of the Countyot Butte to enter upon the above-mentioned property for inspection purposes. I also agree to save, indemnify and keep harmless the County of Butte against all liabilities, judgments, costs, and expenses which may in any way accrue againVolaid 9.9unty in consequence granting of this permit. X Date Signature of App ant — Owner C actor ❑ Agent ❑ An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construct- ion of structures over3 stories ' i ht.�[ Mobile Home Installation Fee _ ©,C9 TOTAL PERMIT FEE $ 5790 occuP, Roue o TTPc O. CONeT. � PARC PD ND 1ss This permit is hereby issued under sions of the Butte County Code and/or work indicated above for which fees DIRORW�OFLBLIf✓ By PERMIT EXPIRES the applicable provi- resolutions to do have been paid. WORKS Receipt No.� WHIT[ -e.►. W.. 7�0 •A9e[e90R. PINR•INBP6CTOR, GOLO[NROO•APPl1CANT L;U�I�I Y Ur BVI I I_ - UEPHH I MENT OF LIC WORKS �Vll 7 Co(�-J►_enter Drive - Oroville, California 9.5 - T one 916/534-4541 APPLICATIQ&M PERMIT PERMIT NO. ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 30-29-40 ZONING BUILDING PERMIT OWNER Rockey Brantley TELEPHONE SO. FT. OCC. BUILDING VALUA ON OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS P.O. Box 352 Live Oak CA 95953 CONTRACTOR'S NA E TELEPHONE CONTRACTOR'S MAILING ADDRESS Fireplace CONSTRUCTION LENDER - , UNKNOWN: _ Total Valuation $ - ••SI Filing Fee $ 10.00 LENDER'S MAILING ADDRESS Permit Fee or g na $ . ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER LICENSE NO. Plan Checking Fee .-I! Penaltyu,f+,^ ^ _ Xi1i: ::11 .1.. $ ' S •' `=1s 11 =. ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S MAILING ADDRESS - •- • - --- .-..l .._ . • ';' fi f1731` i. t 'v'„ ,, ; tl. }. .T , L -r J f- vt -' 11 h,2! { S,,titn I Permit fee-; R: %re 14* 0,+ - fi ��. -i $ •a .+,,t +• 1•.133.79 BUILDING ADOREss - 4708 Sue Ellen Ct., Oroville PLUMBING PERMIT FIIIrIgFee 10.00 Each Trap ,w. ii 1 •..., .., .. '2.00 . At,, to Solar Water Heater. : •--. - 20.00 Water piping 5.00 LOT NO. SUBDIVISION NAME - �•� ,_. ,_• .- • PARCEL MAP c. Each aas water heater or vent 5.00 Gas piping system 1 - 5 outlets 5.00 USE OF STRUCTURE -. ,.L ,,° : l:h�=_ ? l i :=-r�r:� SFE3X Duplex[:] Mobilehome❑ Other • SPECI FY Building sewer 5.00 Mobile Home-•� S G W .0 - O.00e - TYPE OF WORK. . _ _ ... Nevo ❑ Addition ❑ Remodel ❑ Utilities ❑ Installation ❑ Other ❑ Describe work: lst'renewal/3146-83 • Permit Fee -- . _ $ Contractor ELECTRICAL PERMIT Filing Fee 10.00 Main service 600V OR LESS 100 AMP OR LESS 10.00 Main service EA. ADD'L 100 AMP 2.50 NEW CONST. DWELLING OCCUP,e OR ADONS. ( ACG. SLOGS. 2,/20sQft CONTRACTORS LICENSE LAW declare under penalty of perjury (check one): ❑ I am licensed under provisions of Chapt. 9, Div. 3 of the Business and Professions Code and my license is in full force and effect. /License No. Classification [9/ I, as the owner, or my employees with wages as their sole compen- sation, will do the work,and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044) ❑ 1, as the owner, am exclusively contracting with licensed contract- ors. (Sec. 7044) ❑ 1 am exempt under Sec. , Business and Professions Code for this reason "' NEW.R?s o R BRANCH MULTI.OUTRLCEUTITS)s 2.50 ea NEw CONSTR. POWER APPARATUS e NON.F- ESID. ( SINGLE OUTLET CIR. I Ex. Occup(OUTLETS OR FIXTURES s� eso FIXED APPLNS. OR EX. OCCUp- OUTLETS iRESID.) EA.) 2.00 Temporary service 10.00 Mobile Home Facilities 15.00 Misc. Wiring 15.00 Permit Fee $ Contractor MECHANICAL PERMIT Filing Fee 10.00 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE I declare under penalty of perjury (check one): ❑ The permit is for $100.00 (valuation) or less. ❑ I have placed on file with the County of Butte Building Department a Certificate of Workmen's Compensation Insurance or a Certificate of Consent to Self -Insure. E�-I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the W. C. laws of California. Notice to Applicant: If after making this statement, should you become subject to the W. C. provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. Heating Cooling Hood 3.00 Ventilation permit Fee $ Contractor I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. 1 agree to comply to all County Ordinances and State Laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of the Countyot Butte to enter upon the above-mentioned property for inspection purposes. 1 also agree to save, indemnify and keep harmless the County of Butte against all liabilities, judgments, costs, and enses whi h may in any way accrue agains said my in c sequence grantIN,,f this p t.7/ %� Sipnoture of Ap cant - Owner oefor 1:1 Agent ' An OSHA permit is required for'excovations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construct. ion of structures over 3 stories in height. Mobile Home Installation Fee $ TOTAL PERMIT FEE $ 133.75 OCCUP. GROUP _ I TYPE OF CONST. PARCEL PD ND IeeU[ This permit Is hereby issued under sions of the Butte County Code and/or work, indicated above for which TOR OF PUBLIC IN BY 4 -PERMIT EXPIRES Dat the applicable provi- resolutions to do fees have been paid. WORKS Date � Receipt No. G �7 ?1_2 WHITE-D.P.W.. YELLOW•AEDEeeOR. PINE -INSPECTOR. GOLDENROD -APPLICANT *T r BUT - T OIPBLIC WORKS ,*Til y Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 • phone 916/534-4541 �� APPLICATION AND PERMIT PERMIT NO ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 30-29-40 ZONING BUILDING PERMIT OWNERR Rocke Brantley TELEPHONE SO. FT. OCC. BUILDING VALUATION OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS P.O. Box 352, Live Oak, CA 95953 CONTRACTOR'S NAME TELEPHONE 2nd renewal permit CONTRACTOR'S MAILING ADDRESS Fireplace CONSTRUCTION LENDER _., UNKNOWN, N Total Valuation,, Filing Fee $ 10,00 LENDER'S MAILING ADDRESS - - Permit Fee @ FEE $ 123.75 ARCHITECT. OR ENGINEER, LICENSE No. .Plan Checking,Fee,; ni,r'r.Y4= v !C t f rEnergy, Plan Checking ;Fee,41,; ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S MAILING ADDRESS.-. -• - •, b �,p �•� ✓ua.- tpr.s - • ; , t • ne ^ i yr ' Penalty. : $ BUILDING ADDRESS.. Permit }@@� YJI1"''"s`• $ . •! 133 • 75 -:PLUMBING PERMIT 0.4 t: IFitingFee f 10.00 = 4708 Sue Ellen Ct., Oroville . ; ' ' Each Trap;r : 2.00 Solar or heat pump water heater 20.00 LOT NO. SUBDIVISION NAME --��-h•-, • �' - - ? ^ ' P4RCEL MAP --t •Waterpipin60st--t'(?` ii {swzii il, 3 115.00t Each Qas water heater or vent 5.00 USE OF STRUCTURE ;f.:. -'. -1 a Pa aXa SF� Duplex❑JMobilehome❑ Other SPECIFY Gas piping system 1 - 5 outlets 5.00 iBuilding sewer -r Ovide tfir. ;)r( do it5:00 Mobile Home I S I G I WT 10-00ea TYPE OF WORK New ❑ Addition ❑ Remodel ❑ Utilities ❑ Installation[] Other ❑ Describe work: 2nd renewal of permit #3146-83 (1st renewal/3104-84) Permit Fee ' ; Y $ Contractor ELECTRICAL PERMIT Filing Fee 10.00 V OR Main service 100 AMP LES 10.00 Main service EA. ADO'L 100 AMP 2.50 CONTRACTORS LICENSE LAW I declare under penalty of perjury (check one): F-1NOr:.=ES.O I am licensed under provisions of Chapt. 9, Div. 3 of the Business and Professions Code and my license Is In full force and effect. License No. Classification as the owner, or my employees with wages as their sole compen- sation, will do the work,and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044) ❑ I. as the owner, am exclusively contracting with licensed contract- ors. (Sec. 7044) ❑ I am exempt under Sec. , Business and Professions Code for this r ason -' NEW CONS. ( DWELLING O.CCUP.B)OR 'h¢sgft NEV, CONSTR. r ULTI.OUTLET 2,50 ea BRArJCH CIRC ITS /POWER APPARATUS &) l SINGLE OUTLET CIR, j Ex. Occup(OUTLETS OR FIXTURES 200901 °ALp3o FIXED APLNS.91I, Ex. Occup. OUTLETS _(PR ESID.IREAJ 2.00 Temporary service 10.00 Mobile Home Facilities 15.00 Misc. Wiring 15.00 Permit Fee $ Contractor WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE I declare under enalty of perjury (check one): ❑ The permit is for $100.00 (valuation) or less. ❑ 1 have placed on file with the County of Butte Building Department a Certificate of Workmen's Compensation Insurance or a Certificate of Consent to Self -Insure. I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the W. C. laws of California. Notice to Applicant: If after making this statement, should you become subject to the W. C. provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. MECHANICAL PERMIT Filing Fee 10.00 Heating Cooling Hood 3.00 Ventilation Permit Fee $ Contractor I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply to all County Ordinances and State Laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of the Countyot Butte to enter upon the above-mentioned property for inspection purposes. 1 also agree to save, indemnify and keep harmless the County of Butte against; all liabilities, judgments, costs, and expenses which may in any way accrue Ins4said inty in consequ a granting of this permit. • • - i =' 7'This X Date ignotu/cant - Owner Contractor ❑ Agent ❑ An OSHA ' r: permit is required for escovotions over 5'0" deep and demolit,on'or construct- ion of structures over 3 stories in height. Mobile Home Installation Fee $ Energy Inspection Fee $ TOTAL PERMIT FEE $ 133.75 occl P. coNe,.TrPs ;; .woo PApCCI PD ND Isays permit is hereby issued under the applicable provi- si f the Butte County Code and/or resolutions to do i dicated above for which fees have been aid. p ECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ey Date ,�� �� PERMIT EXPIRES Date 9-27-86 Receipt No. ,��c3 7p d '~1 ANIT[-O. P. w.. ♦sLLow-wseQsaoR, PINK-INDPQC,ap. °OLO[MROD-APPLICANT CTY OF BUTTE - DEPARTMENT OFBLIC WORKS 7 Co Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - phone 916/534-4541 APPLICATION AND PERMIT PERMIT NO. ASSESSOR PARCEL N}J I.•]R c ZONING BUILDING PERMIT Ow r, TELEPHONE SO. FT. OCC. BUILDING VAI tlATVnN Ow 'S 11 DORESS 1 C) / .. % c- ItIa r-e)K CTOq tTAM E f LU 4a TELEPHONE CONTRAC R• MAILING ADD Fireplace CONSTRUCTION LENDER UNKNOWN Total Valuation - $ }' " Filing Fee I in $ 10.00 LENDER'S MAILING ADDRESS Permit Fee 5 r1N ur o $ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER -A�4J• ._y i ., k-.(%- • LICENSE NO. Plait Checking Fee Energy Plan Checking Fee.�� $ _• r.Jl.•• ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S MAILING ADDRESS mss.. _,,. _ f 1 t �q Penalty $ BUILDING ADDRESS Permit fee -. $ -PLUMBING PERMIT FIIIngFee c�.10.00 Each Trap Y 2.00 V,0 r ' Solar or heat pump water heater 20.00 LOT NO. SUBDIVISION NAME .- ++���. } -- - -�•• rT PARCEL MAP Water piping' 10n {'_ "" u 5.00= 1'^ Each qas water heater or vent 5.00 USE OF STRUCTURE 't ,....- - ' t , r •, r't, C ' i f 1:w i pers a SF [� Duplex [j Mobilehome❑ Other ii�� SPECIFY Gas piping system 1 - 5 outlets 5.00 Building sewer rt. ';L-�,: i, t'1e i` �'T SAO Mobile Home S I G 10.00 ea TYPE OF WORK New❑ Addition❑ R model Utilities❑ Ins Ilation❑ Other Describe work' - - 42 Permit Fee $ Contractor ELECTRICAL PERMIT Filing Fee 10.00 Main service 10OV OR LESS 100 AMP OR LESS 10.00 Main Service EA. ADD'L 100 AMP 2.50 CONTRACTORS LICENSE LAW I declare under penalty of perjury (check one): ❑ I am licensed under provisions of Chapt. 9, Div. 3 of the Business and Professions Code and my license IS In full force and effect. No. Classification 1, as the owner, Or my employees with wages as their sole COmpen- nation, will do the work,and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044) ❑ I, as the owner, am exclusively contracting with licensed contract- crs.(Sec. 7044) ❑ I am exempt under Sec. Business and Professions Code for this reason NEW CONST. DWELLING OCCUR.& OR A=.r:S. ACC- BLDGS. 21/2 2SQtt r:EI. =iNST - ULTI.OUTLET 2.50 ea NO'.•==SID BRANCH CIRC ITS /POWER APPARATUS & l SINGLE OUTLET CIR. Ex. OCCUp( OUTLETS OR FIXTURES ewLO 22 License FIXED S. OR EX. Occup.p. OUTLETTSS ((REREST D.1 EA. 2.00 Temcrary service 10.00 Mo`,i•e Home Facilities 15.00 Misc. Wiring 15.00 Permit Fee $ Contractor WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE I declare under penalty of perjury (check one): ❑ The permit is for $100.00 (valuation) or less. ❑ I have placed on file with the County of Butte Building Department a Certificate of Workmen's Compensation Insurance or a Certificate of Consent to Self -Insure. (� I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject `f} to the W. C. laws of Califomia. Notice to Applicant: If after making this statement, should you become subject to the W. C. provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. MECHANICAL PERMIT FiIingFee 10.00 Heating Cling Hood 3.00 Ventilation permit Fee $ Contractor 1 certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply to all County Ordinances and State Laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of the County of Butte to enter upon the above-mentioned property for inspection purposes. also agree to save, indemnify and keep harmless the County of Butte against all liabilities, judgments, costs, and expenses which may in any way accrue against said County in consequence of the granting of this perm• . I X Date Signature of Applicant — Owner Contractor ❑ Agent An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or Construct- structures over 3 stories in height. Mobile Home Installation Fee $ Energy Inspection Fee $ / n TOTAL PERMIT FEE $ 1 oCC1.P. CoNST.TtPa I I PL000 PARCaI .D No sua This permit is hereby issued under sions of the Butte County Code and/or work indicated above for which DIR O4:i;2 B PERMIT EXPIRES Date the applicable provl- resolutions to do fees have been paid. ORKS 4 — te rReceiptNo. O.�. w.. ♦aLLOw-Aseaeso K. INK -INSPECTOR, GOL DCMROO•APPL I CANT ,�00RPORAtEO� Bufte Co.Henning C,�wrm« � . UEC 1 U N86 ..7 ` Orovill®,. Calif 1733 MONTGOMERY STREET OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 9559655 AREA CODE 916 533-0937 December 10, 1986 Mr. Bettye Kircher, Planning Director Butte County 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 OROVILLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Please provide this office with the following information: 1.' County zoning for Oroville Municipal Airport Clear zones. 2. County. staff recommendation to ALUC on zoning of clear zones. 3. ALUC action on zoning of clear zones. 4. County staff recommendation to Board of Supervisors on zoning clear zones. 5. Minutes of Board of Supervisors meeting on zoning of clear zones. 6. Copy of building permit issued for structure located within an Oroville Municipal Airport clear zone. 7. If the issuance of this building permit required findings by the Board of Supervisors relative to ALUC's Oroville Airport Land Use Plan, we need a copy of those findings. We would appreciate receiving this information no later than December 15, 1986. Qc-kjPrince Assistant City Administrator for Community Services CP:MAI/sa/M4 Butfe Co. Q1+nning C DEC 1 1986 �rovJl6, �.aiitnra� State Clearinghouse November 25, 1986 Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Attention Norma Wood City of Chico's DEIR for Rancho Arroyo Specific Plan; SCH 4x86071504 (In Vicinity of Chico Municipal Airport) The Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics, has reviewed the above -referenced document r�ith respect to those areas germane to its statutory responsibilities. Those areas include airport -related noise and safety impacts on a project, the proj- ect's potential impact on airport operations and the issue of compatible land uses in the vicinity of the airport. This document appears to adequately address the concerns of this Division. We have no other comments to add at this time, provided the airport -related mitigation m-e.asures outlined on page 4-83 of this report are implemented. Thank_ you for the opportunity to review and` comment on this proposal. ,TACK D. KEMMERLY, Chief Division of Aeronautics Sandy Hesnard Environmental Planner ccs Butte County ALUC Chico Municipal Airport C.srco ;{rtu ; r c'rbfrT yrbx. or cc: parrs CO,,vrx vpflC RVATLOUMGUg3T LTSUUGL acrucrX jjG-.urrrq W Ar3Tou of VGLOvcftrrcu livcl: D. F:CIuirbTh' CFTC; btoboaeT- ,,Fr;rupc Ion for Fps obboLrauTxI ro r.ctcrmm suq cuumaur ou rprc r;Jro tGbox.F axo TwbTG=Gureq rpo ssLbotg-x.cTvzcq =3rr3sgTou arovonrss onrTTucq ou buCc -b3 of prArarou-• jyG ca,^.e uo crpcL com3oura to crgq rrr rpre rruc' hteATgoq F?au gocnmcur ebbtuLa go vgsdnur.GTX vggroau_ tps coucvLuw of rpre corJbarxoTa Tvk neva Tu rpe Ar CTvT-C% of rpo uTLbott sena borvucTel Tmbecr ou vuq rpc tames ort vrrbotc-LcTvrcq uo;oc vrJq 3s;cra rmbvcra ou v bLolccr' r,sc bLo1_ 8szmvue go 74a 3ru4:nroLa LaeboueTP7TTrsse • S,pofle 9Le9e 7ucjnge LGArgnsq r}:c 3ponv-LGtGtGuccq gocnt7GnF eirrp x.oubveg go rpoee exG-an FO DGbutrmGur 01 Ix -V nbOtc r7.Ov* D;A.-$rou o€ vGr_ouffnrsc3* FJ[ra ZCt t!UOII201 (Iu AicruT9% ox CFTco HcruiczbuT VrLbotr) CTra ol CF TC -O,3 DEIL' tot gsucpo VI:LO sa 2beCTFrc bTvu! VrreurTou HoL>ry Mooq 89cLvmOu9O' CV a281I I#00 yculcp 2gtGer O;ITCH Q; bTtTvurus truq gG96BrGjJ 2ts4c CTautTu8pones API HoAampQx 32, Tage o4t,g r.rLutNd �wtllt� vii? November 12, 1986 � to LAND OF NATURAL WEALTHAND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION. 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 + PHONE: 534-4601 Evelene Payne City Administrator CITY OF GRIDLEY 685 Kentucky Street Gridley, CA 95948 Dear Evelene: It has come to my attention that -the Association of Cities held a discussion regarding the need for an Airport Land Use. ..Commission in Butte County. Please find attached a copy of a'le tter, and an attachment - to that letter which indicates chat an Airport Land Use Com- mission in Butte County is a requirement of.the law at the present time. Statements to the contrary were made at the Thursday, November 6,' 1986 Butte'County Association of Cities meeting. Please contact me if there are questions or you need additional information. Sincerely, .Ao r er Executive Director' BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION BAK/sjs , Enclosures 0 November 12, 1986 i L A N D t O F NATU RAL WEALTH A N D B E A U T Y t PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 534-4601 Will Randolph City Administrator CITY OF OROVILLE' 1735 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Will: It has come to my attention that,the Association of Cities held a,discussion regarding the need for an Airport Land Use Commission in Butte County. Please,find attached•a.copy of a�letter, and an,attachment to that letter which indicates that an Airport Land Use.Com-• mission in Butte County is a requirement.of the law at the present time. Statements to the,,contrary.were made•at-the Thursday, November 6, 1986 Butte,County Association of Cities meeting. L Please contact me if there are questions or you need additional information. Sincerely, ;4�..A. 4�rche Executive Director BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND.USE COMMISSION. BAK/sjs Enclosures r . :..®t u to , LAND OF NATURAL W E A L T H AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION > r »tr IA. 10 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 534-4601 November 12, 1986 a 5;y Y ` Mike'Hays y Town Manager TOWN OF PARADISE 5555 The Skyway Paradise, CA 95969 r Dear Mike: i1 It has come to my attention that the Association of Cities r held a discussion regarding the need for,an Airport Land Use_ Commission in Butte County. Please find attached a copy of a letter, and an attachment to that letter which indicates that an Airport Land Use Com- mission in Butte County is a requirement -of the law at the present time. Statements to the contrary were made at the Thursday, November 6, 1986 Butte County Association of*Cities meeting. Please contact me if there are,questions or you need j` additional information. ' Sincerely, e /B.AA.K4ircher. ' Executive Director BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION BAK/sJs Enclosures t 6090 L A N D; O F NATURA L WE A L T H A N D B E A U T Y �! PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE PRO�� I�LE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 HONE November 12, 1986 Luella Tamagni City Clerk CITY OF BIGGS' 216 B Street `. Biggs, CA 95917 Dear Luella: It has come to my attention that; the Association of Cities held a discussion regarding the need for an Airport Land Use Commission in Butte County. Please find attached a copy of a'.letter, and an attachment to that letter which indicates that an Airport Land Use Com- mission in Butte County is a requirement of the law at the present time. Statements to the contrary were made at the Thursday, November 6, 1986 Butte County Association of Cities meeting. Please contact me if there are questions or you need additional information. Sincerely, - B.A. e4rcher . . Executive Director BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION BAK/sjs Enclosures, Fred Davis � - City Manager CITY OF CHICO P.O. Box 3420 Chico`, CA 95927 • Dear Fred: Enclosed is Article 3.5 of the,State Aeronautics Act. Under Section 21670(b), please find the.statement that, in every county in which there is located an airport which is served by a'scheduled airline, an ALUClshall be established.. I am certain that individual -counties have discretion as to which agency performs the administrative duties for the ALUC, but as long as the Chico Airport continues to have scheduled airline service an ALUC would seem to.be required in the County. This information is being provided`as a follow-up to discussions which occurred at the Association of Cities meeting on Thursday, November 6, 1986. Sincerely, a�L ' Bill Turpin Senior Planner '-BT/sjs cc: Martin Nichols County Administrative Officer p'^�.�� �,'• .... fid � ®i�� q ��,,,,,,.��.v. LAND'•OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 - PHONE: 534-4601 -;' November 10, 1986 ' h h . Fred Davis � - City Manager CITY OF CHICO P.O. Box 3420 Chico`, CA 95927 • Dear Fred: Enclosed is Article 3.5 of the,State Aeronautics Act. Under Section 21670(b), please find the.statement that, in every county in which there is located an airport which is served by a'scheduled airline, an ALUClshall be established.. I am certain that individual -counties have discretion as to which agency performs the administrative duties for the ALUC, but as long as the Chico Airport continues to have scheduled airline service an ALUC would seem to.be required in the County. This information is being provided`as a follow-up to discussions which occurred at the Association of Cities meeting on Thursday, November 6, 1986. Sincerely, a�L ' Bill Turpin Senior Planner '-BT/sjs cc: Martin Nichols County Administrative Officer 0 LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE: 534-4601 September 12, 1986 Mr. Steve Stone CAPITAL PLANNING GROUP, INC. P.O. Box 2229 Paradise, CA 95967 Dear Mr. Stone: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission on September 3, 1986, it was the consensus of the members present that continued representation from the Town of Paradise is important -to the Commission. The Commission has therefore requested that I write to you and ask if you would be willing to accept the position of Member -at -Large, replacing Dave Feiler. Our meetings are now on the first Wednesday of each month, at 9:00 a.m., in the Board of Supervisors' Room. Please contact me prior to September 24, if possible, regarding your decision (our phone hours are 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.). Sincerely,, ,Q David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH/sjs 4 A,UG Y ' Inter -Departmental Memorandum TO: Mike Pyeatt, Administrative Office FROM: Bill Turpin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION DATE: I August 29, 1986. Enclosed is a breakdown of what it costs the Planning Department to run the Airport Land Use Commission. also enclosed is a suggested distribution of those costs. Would you please coordinate with the three cities to.request their participation pursuant to the existing Board of Supervisors policy. If you are asked, the following is the justification for the budget figures displayed. The amount of time estimated is based upon time cards for the previous year. The rate is based upon actual wage, PERS, FICA, unemployment insurance, health insur- ance, workers' compensation insurance,.expenses for the individ- uals on the ALUC. In addition to these costs which come from budget documents, these individuals' yearly hours are reduced for County holidays, the appropriate days of vacation allotted to each of these individuals, and the average amount of sick leave utilized by each of the individuals. The travel to meetings for Commissioners is an estimate based upon the residence of the Commissioners on ALUC at the present time. The membership is for membership in the Aircraft Owners' and Pilots' Association and has already been approved in the County budget. The expense for a consultant to prepare the Chico Airport Environs Study update is an estimate. The'City of Chico is welcome to join with.the'County in the preparation of an RFP and in the review of responses, but should agree to share funding for the study at whatever the cost eventually is. BT/sjs Enclosure - A/ o a BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT*LAND USE COMMISSION' BUDGET Staff Time Planner 24. days. $-3,937 Secretary 6,days 598 Supplies Printing 300 Expenses Travel to Meetings for Commissioners 1,000 Membership -35 Total Annual Expenses 5,870 Consultant Expense for Chico Airport Environs Study Update $20,000 RECOMMENDED COST DISTRIBUTION Annual Expenses divided evenly among the'County and three cities with airports. Chico Airport Study divided evenly between City..,and County- Resultant'C.*ost Distribution County Cost $12,935 Chico Cost 10,979 Paradise Cost 978 Oroville Cost 978 Total Cost $25,870 Buffe Co. Planning Comtel. SEP 2' 1986 Oroville` Ca fotilla CHANGE OF ADDRESS!! CHANGE OF ADDRESS!.! cp.r. OUR.CURRENT D PLEASE CORRECT YOUR RECORDS TO SHOW • Capital MAILING ADDRESS AS: Planning STEVE STONE Group,lnc. CAPITAL PLANNING GROUP, INC. P. O. BOX 2229. INVESTMENT SECURITIES PARADISE CA 95967 5910 Clark Rd., Suite A Quail Run Professional Plaza P.O. Box 2229 Paradise, CA 95967 . 916/872-3662 v . 0 6101�- 14, • MEMORIAL SERVICE FOR • DAVID CHARLES FEILER 19 August, 1932 - 26 July, 1986 FLYING WAS HIS FREEDOM, FLYING WAS HIS EARTHLY END, WHEN OUR TIME IS COME, WE'LL BE WITH HIM AGAIN. July 31, 1986 First Christian Church Paradise, California David Charles Feiler was born on August 19, 1932, in East Orange, New Jersey, the only boy in a family with six sisters. He grew up and attended schools in the neighboring community of Ridgefield Park where he met Judith Lamb during High School. After high school graduation he attended Rutgers University for a while and then toured the United States on a motorcycle, ending up in California. Here he enlisted in the United States Air Force in 1953. His air force career took him to many places in the world and exposed him to many experiences, chiefly associated with transport, and search and rescue missions. He and Judy were married on August 18, 1956; their family includes four sons, Geoffrey, James, Philip and Barry. Dave retired from the Air Force on July 31, 1974, as a Lieutenant Colonel, in San Jose, California. Dave earned a B.A. from Omaha University, an M.B.A., and an M.A. in psychology from California State Univer- sity in San Jose. He was both a licensed real estate broker and a licensed building contractor. As a pilot he held private, instrument, commercial, multi -engine, instructor and Air Transport Pilot ratings. Dave had a lovely voice and was active in several choral groups, particularly church choirs. The Feilers moved to Paradise in 1983 where they purchased the airport and established residence. They were well known in the community and active in the First Christian Church. Dave died in an air crash on Saturday, July 26, 1986. 0 ORDER OF WORSHIP • Prelude Irma Phillips, Organist Call to Worship and Invocation Hymn "Just a Closer Walk with Thee No. 365 Scripture I Thessalonians 4:13-18 Duet "The Lazarus Song" Family Sharing Scripture Meditation Prayer Solo Scripture Committal Hymn Benediction Postlude "Love" Tami Westbrook Susan Haaf John 14:1-6 Pastor Ed Pollard "Nearer, My God, to Thee" Barry Feiler Psalm 23 No. 348 Organist "Return to your rest, O my soul, For the Lord has dealt bountifully with you. For you have delivered my soul from death, My eyes from tears, And my feet from falling. I will walk before the Lord In the land of the living." Psalm 116:7-9 [NKJV] A , J: ~ STAT t J Inuto A' � PLEASE RESPOND TO: SACRAMENTO ADDRESS STATE CAPITOL ❑ SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 TELEPHONE: (916) 445-8498 DISTRICT OFFICES 1326 H STREET ❑ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 TELEPHONE: (805) 395-2927 115 SOUTH "M'r STREET SUITE 3 ❑ TULARE, CA 93274 TELEPHONE: (209) 686-2864 -THIRD DISTRICT July 1, 1986 Mr. David Hironimus Community Services Director Butte County Airport Land Use Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965-3397 Dear Mr. Hironimus: COMMITTEES: 1985-86 Vice Chairman Natural Resources Local Government Public Safety Member Rural Caucus Butte Co. Planning Caim JUL 3 lybd Oroville, Calitornia This week Assembly Bill 3290, my measure to use a portion of the sales tax revenue derived from the sale of aviation jet fuel to improve airports, was killed on the floor of the Assembly. The deciding issue that killed AB 3290 had little to do with the merits of the bill.. The floor discussion, frankly, degenerated into mostly•partisan bickering. I•. This bill is now dead. Enclosed is a copy of the Assembly floor vote on AB 3290. 'Fifty-four votes were needed for its passage. There is, however,• a slim chance to continue with this effort during this Session. If we should meet with success, I'll let. you'know. Beyond that, a new Session of the Legislature will •begin December 1, 1986. At that time, I will reintroduce this proposal as new legislation. I very much appreciate the support you gave AB 3290. With your continued support, we will be successful. Thank you. r , Y truly DON ROGERS DAR:mk Enclosure ----------------------- i T A ^ r SEC�.'..NO. 1.7 F'I:LE Ora AYES 44DATE: i)r NOES 2-10TIME: 1 :3'? FM _ARD READING NV 16 AYES -.44 41",EIA� ,F,ELANDO. ! I - }`E:LL'EY NAYLiiFI hJCiLAN LkDEFa w.4 1:ILLEA "O'LLCOlvIVELL Q. FP FILANTE­: N N Y U WFI ,HT WYMAN BRAD! EY FRAZEE#P'EAC'E LA FOLLETTE ROGERS E�RONZkN FRIZZELLE LANCASTER SEtrSTRkh!D r.41IL!N P r•-• .. ROL-;It�lSCiN� VASC0NCELL0s C LLIT'E Ci�iFTES`E HAUSEf, 111 LEk!I p fj � t J ^TATHAM HERGER 4.H.ii ?�CAL::ISTER: WATERS N DUFFY JOHNSON Mr�r!`inr�rir� M-OJONNIER WFI ,HT WYMAN t\IiEg �:cj #AGNOB HARRIS' '� Mi�Of,.E " TUC.t.ER LANE GONtJELLY #HAYDEN ROL-;It�lSCiN� VASC0NCELL0s FI ISENL'ERG RCICiS #VIGENCIA DER 1FlNivC!Trinl H'A IGAtd MARG�"�LIN. TAA1hJEFi NOT VOTING C A.LDERON @ . D.AV LS I ATS CkMFTiELL FAR.R LEHS: C:HAGCiN" F L Q Y D: VCiTE-CHANGED F.ERhM --FL 6R VQTE ':- DDEDBY, 'E I GNUF DDED :AT M:I_NUTE:; GLEE GUNS.OLE.;. t MR Sr'E..AF::ER t M01ihJT11_oY— FAPA'N FOLA+NC:O STIRLING - - ath Co, Ny LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND B E A. U' T Y 3✓Ny � PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 534-4601 May 22, 1986 Butt Co. RUN" Corm& JUN 2 1986 OMWID, Cato ok Don Rogers, Assemblymember STATE OF CALIFORNIA State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Assemblymember Rogers: 1 The Butte County Airport Land Use Commission wholeheartedly supports the passage of AB 3290. Rural counties such as ours are very much in need of funding to assist in our planning processes, and it has often been difficult for us to get that funding in an era of bare -bones budgets with layoffs in the Sheriff's Department (as well as the County Planning Department, which was reduced in size by nearly one-third last summer). AB 3290 could infuse our Commission's planning for Butte County's airports with some much needed funds for necessary staffing and take some of the pressure off our County's budget. At our meeting of May 12, 1986, we voted our unanimous support for your bill. Sincerely, BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION Fred avis Chairman /ss cc: CM File - G -GA -2-10 Community Services Director Butte County Airpo,ri Land—U-9e Commission Attn: David Hironimus -- % 4 a j�;j7'Tf••��. Inter-Departmen 'I Memorandum ' •COUN��• TO: Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Dave Hironimus, Associate Planner �. SUBJECT: ALUC WORKSHOP IN SACRAMENTO DATE: March 25, 1986 Attached find information regarding an ALUC Workshop organized by CalTrans Division of Aeronautics, set for April 11, 1986. If you plan to attend, call Ken Paynedirectly at (916) 324-1833. Keeping in mind that the mileage budget is limited, and if you wish to carpool, call me at 534-4601 between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. DRH/ss O Q STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS Butte CO. PlanningCON& 1130 K STREET - 4TH FLOOR MAIL: P.O. BOX 1499 MAR 21 lybb SACRAMENTO, CA 95807 (916) 322-3090 C)rW419, CIfonla HO TDD 323-7665 March'14, 1986 TO: ALUC COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF. , As a follow-up to our letter of December 30, 1985, let me thank yot for your enthusiasti.c response to our inquiry about a proposed ALUC Workshop. The concerns and questions we received have been evaluated and an agenda is attached. Please note that the first workshop will be held here i ' n Sacramento, April 11, 1986, commencing at 9:30 a.m. in the Yuba Room of the Sacramento Community Convention Center. Detailed'directions, including parking instructions. and the specific downtown meeting location, are also attached. As this workshop is planned to be interactive, your attendance will be important to all of the participants. Please RSVP by letter or telephone to indicate the number of attendees yo.0 expect from your group so that we may arrange for a larger meeting room if necessary. We look forward to meeting with you on April 11.. You,may call Ken Payne at (916). 324-1833 to register your attendance. Thank you for your-cooperat16h. Sinc rely OLIN WOODS, Deputy Chief Division of Aeronautics Enclosures ALUC WORKSHOP AGENDA April 11, 1986 9:00 a.m. Check -In and Coffee 9:30 a.m. Introduction 9:40 a.m. ALUC Authority; Recent Legislation Chris Brittle, MTC - Review Process - Enforcement - Liabilities 10:30 a.m. Break 10:45 a.m. Airport Noise and Safety Ken Brody, Hodges & Shutt - Forecasting Relative to CNEL - Noise/Avigation Easements . - Practical Noise Mitigation Measures - Height Restrictions - Ultralights - Accident Liability 11:45 p.m. Lunch 1:15 p.m. Alameda County ALUC, Case Histories Betty Croly/Dick Edminster 1:45 p.m. Land Use - Developing Planning Areas Chris Brittle, MTC - Encroachment/Inverse Condemnation Jay White, California Aviation Council - Expansion of Existing Incompatible Uses .Larry Thelen, Attorney, Legal Division 2:30 p.m. Legislative Needs Mark Mispagel/Larry Thelen, Attorneys at Law - Adequacy of Current .Law - Enhancing the Process 3:15 p.m. Break i:30 p.m. Future ALUC Needs Fred Stewart, Chief, Planning Branch, Division of Aeronautics &0. eo. Planning C•aW"' .MAR 21 '1*50 pra4w. C'6tof& 3:45 p.m. Group Discussions of Specific Topics to be Determined 5:00 p.m. Adjournment m c U) (D N In I C, 0 x r cn ca rt n In �* m rt n m n m rt (D m (D rt ro rt (D a (D U) rr n H. A) N F- 0 n k n P.0 m rr O 0 W H- H• In n rt C G O C H• £ b7 n rt rt :3 :1 E H• rr a•°o X a✓y bd � H• ►-� H• (D cn F- rt -- ::;-�K A� (D H• C of y :3 C x_ :5 o (D H• m En O rt rt (D C H• mmH•(n D) rr rr A� N rt- tm (D:K O � 1 (D m m F -- (D :1 H m E-- m rt m v ::;' :� rt m rt rt = �r ::r m m m m CrJ (D C x 0) :3cn rt H rt m a• n, H (D = rt a: H• a, o x r cn ca rt n In �* m rt n m n m rt (D m (D rt ro rt (D a (D U) rr n H. A) N F- 0 n k n P.0 m rr O 0 W H- H• In n rt C a' m H• H• G H - n rt rt :3 :1 H• H• O rr bd � H• G (n of F :3 C :5 (D H• � n N c� a' A� N n (D m m . n m H• rr m 12th Street 13th Street 14th Street � n n � m O n n m X zEn rt .3, O O z > I ` �'il({btfairp xp 14 �L AN ator-Diartemor2dum TO: Supervisors Len Fulton.and Hack McInturf ! FROM: B.•A. Ki , Director of Planning 1 su6JECT: OROVILLE AIRPORT AND MEETING OF MARCH 6, 1986 DATE: February 25, 1986 Staff met with Kirt Hunter, City of Oroville, on February 24, 1986, to discuss the Oroville Airport clear zones and the City's policy regarding the acquisition of said clear zones. 1 There seems to be agreement that the property should be purchased, but the"Cityofficially has no interest. It is staff's understanding that Oroville wants to pursue a grant application and is willing to propose retaining an outside -con- sultant (grantsman). The City may be the lead agency but would like the County to consider supporting the effort, i.e. a joint powers agreement, co-signing as support agency, but also caution that in the event of litigation the County would also be a party to the action. The City is cautious about committing itself (because of -recent litigation.by a property -owner) -regarding acquisition of the clear zones, and fears inverse condemnation or.any action on their part that could have a "chilling" factor on property values.' The City does not intend to annex the clear zones but wants the County to bear the liability, recognizing that*the City would probably also be named in the event of suit. The clear zone properties would have to be appraised prior to a grant application being completed. The City may be willing to arrange for appraisals mid -year 1986.. The City has used CalTrans, but prefers to use either the Assessor,.a private.appraisal service or a combination thereof. The Assessor can appraise,' including capitalization for future value, and may be a source for the property,values for the grant pre -application. An FAA grant must provide for long-term costs. Therefore, the appraisal accuracy is critical inasmuch as.the grant cannot be increased more than 10% at the time of purchase. If property acquisition requires condemnation or other legal actions, the long-term cost must anticipate 4 to 5 years. In addition to FAA trants, CalTrans STIP (State Transportation' Improvement Plan) grants should be explored,"also CalTrans loans. There may also be a possibility of the RDA financing the clear zone acquisitions; this should also be considered. dl • .� I Oroville Airport and„Meeting of_+March 6 98 6 February 25, 1986: Page 2. i It is important to stress that the A-40 (Agricultural - 40 -Acre parcels) zone that was adopted'by the Board,does'not prohibit development, only restricts improvements to one -single-family residence with accessory buildings per parcel: The zone would allow unrestricted agricultural and agricultural accessory use. The clear zone area south of the airport traverses a May -.1889 subdivision which creates 10 -acre parcels. These are legal, developable parcels and would 'require only a:building permit to exercise the development right. Therefore it is in the City's best -interest to proceed as quickly as possible to acquire these properties. The City would prefer that the affected.property owners offer to sell. -their land to the City, but so far -no one has approached the City. Because -of the County's liability it.would be in the Board's best interest to have County Counsel attend the meeting on March 6; 1986. BAK/ss . cc: County Counsel CAO Enclosure: Airport map PPP7- Lu< C4 to 641 , gw " k'o.", gar., 1911 W C106-.10MIR, I", ol , 11-ral I I a Exisr. A -R Excrr Ft -3 r lk'':,4 Y-���'*�'Q,�w ,}. "''' Y. ^�cC„�r-rT,.:!t.� 1-, i _^a','h ',"i::.r� '"�- ..'�T_r .ti �� s:-, � \ [ � 4 c. Appointment to. Airport -Land---Use Commission the term of Commissioner Lambert expires, in-_May. REAPPOINTED NINA LAMBERT TO THE AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION FOR A TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 7, 1990. r � � r S'r'a4t�� ., February 18, 1986 David Everson 314 W. 14th Street Chico, CA 95926 Dear Mr. Everson: t � u to oun L A N'D O F NATU RAL WEALTH A N D B E A U .( Y PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE — OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE: 534-4601 In reference to your letter of February 12, 1986 regarding construction of a hangar at Ranchaero Airport, please be advised that a search of our records and a study of your request yields no information that your proposed hangar can be considered as anything other than the expansion of a non- conforming use, for which a.Use Permit is required pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-37.4. Specifically, aerial photos taken in 1975 and 1981 show no evidence that the proposed hangar site has any historic use as aircraft storage, either as open tie down area or in a hangar. Therefore, a Use Permit is required as indicated above. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact this office.. Sincerely, B.A. IRCHER. Director of Planning BAK/ss � ' ♦ • �� { 1_ ' � ) CCS .+ ' fa f, aJ� � � •� � ;� Mfr `� '��r J " b •!� , � --- • .ter L � � � , � �. '. � � `� � _ i '!4�y,,..�„Sjjf .• f ` v Z-•�. { � � � ” `� t {�.a� L . i` " / � i � + �'r � f• it � J, � t �, . • t1 - 1 � � �y X17 � at ` -.' J j � �' ,.I . t Tf. r U •� � �� �'l � J r � • i 1y- GAJ .,�J •C�V4 � �► A, �«► J . / `^ ,► • • � 1 ` ♦ a • a — r � � i `rel 40 rT 0 IA * t • � t. � fie- .. �' ,:�art:'1. 't .. �w I . ` r `' + - • : r t��,�..t --+!r"S •�/!�•- , . . t '! ` f ..•i � r . L • . r ` � � � yp[p�/- i 1 � �♦ � • � ' �f' �`� .b', " • L . 1. •* s+► I� r, F r e c , tAlm ♦ ' r ✓•.+ t • • Bulls Co. Renning Conor FEB 14 lVba 0"we, c "fortib FEBRUARY 12, 1986 314 W. 14TH ST. CHICO, CA. MRS. BETTYE KIRCHER, 7 COUNTY DRIVE OROVILLE, CA 95965 DEAR MRS. KIRCHER, I'M REQUESTING A BUILDING PERMIT FOR MY HANGAR AT RANCHAERO AIRPORT IN CHICO. IT SEEMS THIS AIRPORT WAS GRANDFATHERED IN ON AGRICULTURE ZONED LAND WHICH IS TO BE REZONED LATER IN THE YEAR. UNTIL THEN ANY "NON—CONFORMING USE" REQUIRES A USE PERMIT. THIS PROCESS EVIDENTLY TAKES 3 MONTHS OR MORE, IS COSTLY, AND HOLDS UP THE BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS. DAVID HIRONIMUS, ASSOCIATE PLANNER, WAS VERY HELPFUL IN EXPLAINING THE USE PERMIT PROCESS AND GUIDELINES. HE POINTED OUT THAT "ANY INCREASE IN INTENSITY OF USE" AT THE AIRPORT IN ITS CURRENT ZONING REQUIRES A USE PERMIT. I BELIEVE THERE WILL NOT BE ANY INTENSITY OF USE, BECAUSE OF MY HANGER, SINCE IT WILL BE LOCATED AT THE END OF THE EXISTING NORTH/SOUTH HANGAR ROW WHERE EXISTING SPACE IS AVAILABLE FOR AIRPLANE PARKING. I. AM LEASING THIS SPACE NOW AND WOULD LIKE TO COMPLETE MY HANGAR TO STORE AND PROTECT AN AIRPLANE FROM THE WEATHER. I ASKED MR. HIRONIMUS WHO THE PERSON OF HIGHEST AUTHORITY IS, TO SUBMIT MY REQUEST FOR A USE AUTHORIZATION (AS MENTIONED ABOVE) BEFORE THE AIRPORT IS REZONED. HE GAVE ME YOUR NAME TO CONTACT: ENCLOSED ALONG WITH THIS REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION IS A SITE MAP OF MY HANGAR LOCATION. -BELOW IS MORE DETAIL OF THE HISTORY OF MY HANGAR PROJECT. WHEN I FIRST REQUESTED PERMISSION TO PUT A HANGAR AT RANCHAIRO THE MANAGERS WANTED THE HANGAR TO BE PORTABLE (SO AS NOT TO HAVE AN EFFECT ON THEIR TAXES). AFTER I HAD'AN AGREEMENT WITH THEM ON LOCATION, RENTAL RATES, AND PORTABILITY, I PURCHASED A HANGAR KIT THAT COULD BE ERECTED LIKE AN ERECTER SET AND MOVED BY DISASSEMBLY OF THE COMPONENTS. I APPLIED FOR A DMV "SPECIAL MOBILE EQUIPMENT" LICENSE BASED ON ITS PORTABILITY. ONCE DMV ISSUED ME THE LICENSE I WENT TO WORK ON CONSTRUCTING THE HANGAR (BELIEVING THIS WAS ALL THE PERMITS REQUIRED), IN DECEMBER OF 1985. THEN PRIOR TO IT'S ERECTION A BUILDING INSPECTOR SAW THE FRAME WORK AND EXAMINED IT ALONG WITH A DIFFERENT DMV REPRESENTATIVE. THEY BOTH BELIEVE IT DOES NOT FALL UNDER THE "SPECIAL MOBILE EQUIPMENT" CATAGORY BECAUSE OF ITS SIZE (42FT. X 48FT.) AND ITS BOLT ANCHORING SYSTEM. UNFORTUNATELY THE 1, . — y. Rt r� • I JA :t sl MANAGER OF THE DMV IN CHICO WHO PROCESSED MY APPLICATION ' RETIRED AND MOVED, .OUT OF STATE SHORTLY AFTER'I RECEIVED THE LICENSE, AND BEFORE THE EXAMINATION PROMPTED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. I'HAVE FOUND OUT THAT OTHER MANUFACTURES OF SIMILAR HANGARS, IN SIZE (EVEN LARGER) AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS, HAVE BEEN LICENSED THROUGH DMV IN OTHER COUNTIES OF CALIFORNIA. DMV IN CHICO AN SACRAMENTO HAS BEEN UNABLE TO CITE ANY CODE DESCRIBING DIMENSIONS OR ANCHORINGS FOR THESE "PORTABLE" HANGARS. THE OTHER DMV REPRESENTATIVE RECALLED MY LICENSE BASED ON THE INSPECTORS OPINION OF ITS PORTABILITY. THERE YOU HAVE IT — THE TRIALS AND TRIBULATIONS OF MY LONG—TIME DREAM OF HAVING A HANGAR, FALLING WITHIN A FEW�DAYS OF COMPLETION AND THEN BEING STUCK IN,CATEGORY REGULATIONS. IT APPEARS IT WOULD BE FASTER AND LESS HEADACHES (I HOPE) TO'JUST APPLY FOR A BUILDING PERMIT AND FINISH THE HANGAR BEFORE THE WEATHER AFFECTS IT, AND THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WANTS IT FINISHED OR TORN DOWN. IF I HAD TO WAIT"3 OR MORE MONTHS FOR A USE PERMIT (THAT PROBABLY WONT BE NECESSARY NEXT YEAR) THE STRUCTURE COULD BE DAMAGED FROM EXPOSUR WHILE I PAY -RENTAL ON A SITE I CAN'T USE. PLEASE CONTACT ME BY MAIL OR PHONE. (893-5029 OR 894-4343) REGARDING AUTHORIZATION POSSIBILITIES OF THIS USE AT THE RANCHAIRO AIRPORT.SO IsCAN COMPLETE THE BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS AND FINNISH THE HANGAR. SIINNC�E•RJELY1 YOURS, DAVID EVERSON 2` a P 79-Vl )"701 . 1 o 4 Q J 1 � V�v .j. OUrTF`• Inter-Depart' l ,IlAemorandum •COUNT{• TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Airport Land Use Commission SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF ALUC COMMISSIONER NINA LAMBERT DATE: -February 10, 1986 Commissioner Lambert's term as Airport Land Use Commissioner expires in May of this year. Action Requested: Reappoint Nina Lambert to the Airport Land Use Commission for a four-year term (to May 7, 1990). David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH/ss 6f e UUP • �vT1E Co. jT f A#/tfoa.r, t.^Wo ✓J!, Comm I s J I oV DeopmAt. t9*lvtffi&41 T415 LeTre--W.. o .j 2 CO J J-2yLJA-r? o %J 4Z'C &AP -01.J& MY A-S.S`a alzf F -f -n4Z ALV C- I�YI�tTw3G IHR• 7AMG-j C- %J LI. 11b ) A koocv. nMCT ihSt boo.dC of. Swr rC coojai"t%, **P#Ab, A 7 ,4v�a;aR w Cm i*c FAA oqojP UTA, t-Lt+s A-&%ew+j qm, Tt rir► y ,a.•_ � -rte= Tb J YICV MJ -rft Q L u ecounty L A N D O F NATURAL. WEALTH AND BEAUTY - 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE.:. 534-4601 .:fir. .�- .��•;.. � January. 8, 1986 TO: AIRPORT MANAGERS Fred Davis, (Chico) Dave Feiler, (Paradise) Patricia Stevens, Oroville Aviation Inc. Mack Hill, (Ranchaero) A meeting.of the.managers of public use airports in Butte -County is being held on'January 13, 1986 in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, immediately following the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission meeting at 1:30 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to appoint a representative to the existing vacancy on the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) pursuant to Sec. 21670 of the California Public Utilities Code. The appointed representative will be seated at the next ALUC meeting and would serve until May 1, 1989. Because of the importance of having a complete commission for upcoming public hearings, you are encouraged to attend. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:jmc A&P/A. 1. REPAIRS SERVICE MAINTENANCE FUEL / • • CHARTER/ AIR TAXI 01 OROVILLE AVIATION, INC..' Oroville Municipal Airport P. 0. Box 2686 Oroville, Calif. 9S96S Mr. Otto Behunin, Chairman AIRPORT LAPID USE. CONTIISSION 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 Dear Mr- Behunin, • &NTAL • INSTRUCTION PRIVATE . INSTRUMENT �aWDECCOMMERCIAL S1. YA 1985 CCF.FI. I. OanoV! CiNit MULTI -ENG . I Phone: S33=1313 December 2, 1935 We thank the Air Port.Land Use Commission for inviting Oroville Aviation, Inc., to nominate a representative for membership. We nominate Mrs. Anna Patricia'Stevens for commission membership. Mrs. Stevens manages the office operations at the Air Port and is a stock holder in the corporation. Sincerely, ��. Steven arson' Orovi-Ile Aviation Inc. G Inter -Departmental Memorandum To: Planning Commission -FROM: Butte County -Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) SUBJECT: OROVILLE AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN (ALUP) , DATE: September 19, 1985 On September 16, 1985, the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission adopted the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan pursuant to the California Public'Utilities Code Section 21675. A copy of the Plan, its Environmental Impact Report, comments received and responses to those comments are -attached. Copies have also been distributed to the Board of Supervisors and the Oroville City.Council. Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 65302.3 and Public Utilities Code Section 21676, the County and the City must now -bring their respective General Plans into conformity with..the Airport Land Use Plan. DRH/ss a Enclosures Inter-Departmental :Memorandum TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Butte County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) SUBJECT: OROVILLE AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN ( ALUP ) DATE: September 17, 1985 On September 16, 1985, the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission adopted the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan pursuant to the California Public Utilities>Code Section 21675. A copy of the Plan, its Environmental Impact Report, comments received and responses to those comments are attached. Copies have also been distributed to the Oroville City Council. Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 65302.3 and Public Utilities Code:Sect"ion"21676, the County and the City must now bring their respective General Plans into conformity with the Airport Land Use Plan. DRH/ss Enclosures • BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 534-4601 June 11, 1985 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Division of Aeronautics 1120 N Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Attn: Betty Clark Re: CLIFF JOHNSEN, PRIVATE AIRPORT, AP 40-02-13S, Butte County, California Dear Ms. Clark: At its meeting of June 10, 1985, the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission found that the proposed airport, located on the south side of Marybill Ranch Road approximately 3/4 mile south of The Midway, south of Chico, California, does not conflict with the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan, and approved the proposed privately -owned, private -use airport subject to the following conditions: 1. All flights to -be conducted in such a manner that aircraft do not pass within a minimum of 500 feet (measured horizontally) of the Little League park property. 2. Applicant must comply with all applicable state, federal and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. Additionally, it was recommended that the applicant obtain an avigation easement limiting the height of buildings to 35 feet from the property owners immediately to the north and south of the proposed runway, to include at least that property within 1000 feet of the end of the runway and within 125 feet of the extended centerline of the runway. Very truly yours, BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION David R. Hironimus, Senior Planner DRH/ss Enclosures: Environmental Documentation 0 r May 14, 1985 Danny Mao, Planning Director COUNTY OF GLENN 125 South Murdock Willows, CA 95988 Dear Mr. Mao: BEAUTY �... __ _.._.. _....... ._.65-3397 PHONE: 534-4601 In reference to your letter of April 29, 1985, regarding Airport Land Use Plans (ALUPs) in Butte County, please be advised that there are two publicly owned public use airports and two privately owned public use airports in Butte County. At the present time only the Chico Municipal Airport has an ALUP adopted and in'effect. That plan was prepared by R. Dixon Speas Associates, Inc. of Los Angeles, CA. The Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Airport Land Use Plans are being drafted by committees formed by the County Airport Land Use Commission. The Chico ALUP is out of print, but the text and maps can be copied for $31.27 including tax. All other draft plans are available for $1.00 for the first page and $0.10 per each additional page. Currently the draft plans consist of 20 to 30 pages each. For your convenience, please find attached a copy of the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission By -.Laws. If you have any further questions please.contact this office. Sincerely, David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH/ss Enclosure �'.�'�`'' tom` � �• � s ..I , BU ti e 'Coull t • _ LAND OF NATURAL' WEALTH AND BEIAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION - ,+;-• 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 - f PHONE: 534.4601 i April 16, 1985 CITY OF CHICO ` Planning Commission'' P.O. Box 3420 t, Chico, CA 95927 Re: Heliport at Enloe Hospital 4 To the,Commissioners: t_ At its meeting of April 15, 1985, the Butte County Airport. Land,,Use Commission found no objections to the proposed project or to the granting of a Use Permit increasing -operations to thirty'• (30)' per month.' t Very truly yours, Z BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT' j LAND USE COAR4ISSION By U9_v_1_d R. Hironimus Associate `Planner DRH/ss " cc: CalTrans Division of Aeronautics Enloe Hospital t- r ' 1 DIVERSIFIED FARMING -whm Wow 1• King" Danny Mao, AICP Planning Director SAVA* Wausllly Y&"#W# W !04�40494ZM6fd . '125 YONA 'Ma4doeof �s�o�es� ��ssssa 95988 �l�o�se (9m) 9.44-5.188 April 29,, 1'985 Ms. Bettye. -A. Kircher, Director Butte County,Planning Dept... Seven'County Center Drive Oroville, Ca. 95965 Dear Ms. Kircher: RE: Airport Land Use Plan and Commission In accordance with Article 3.5 (.commencing with Section 21670) of Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 9 of the Public Utilities Code, the Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance establishing an Airport Land Use Commission for Glenn County effective May 16, 1985. The adopted ordinance also designated that the Glenn County Planning Department shall provide staff assistance to the Airport Land Use Commission. Since your agency has some expertise in this subject matter, would you please provide us with the following information: 1. Who prepared the required Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan for your agency? May we have 'the name, address and telephone number if the Plan was prepared by a private consultant firm. 2. What will be the cost to obtain a copy of the Comprehensive'Airport Land Use Plan and the Implementative Standards adopted by your agency? 3. Do you have "Rules and Regulations" adopted by your Commission ? May we receive one copy -of it. -.. Ad:- .d��•?!�4 \'tel''' ' I ' LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY. PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 534-4601 : March 13, 1985 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Division of Aeronautics .1120 N Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Attn: Betty Clark Re':': C. JOHNSEN, AIRPORT USE PERMIT Dear Ms. Clark: . At its meeting of March ll, 1985, the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission found that this private airport is not in conflict with the Chico Airport Environs Plan and is.in conformance with the General Plan of Butte County. Very truly yours, BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT. LAND USE COMMISSION David R.' Hironimus Associate Planner DRH/ss f. Co, �un LAND O.F NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY. 1,x L' PLANNING COMMISSION 7COUNTY CENTER DRIVE — OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 ' �-w+ ?`r•i; ;c: :? PHONE: 534-4601 March 13, 1985 ' STATE OF, CALIFORNIA Division of Aeronautics. 1120 N Street Sacramento, CA 95814 .Attn: Betty Clark Re: BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S HELIPORT Dear Ms. Clark: At its meeting of March 11, 1985, the Butte County Airport' Land Use Commission found that the Heliport is outside the Airport area of influence, that there is no conflict, and recommended that the City of Oroville approve the operation ' of the Heliport. Very truly yours, BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION .. David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH/ss