HomeMy WebLinkAbout05.30.26 Board Correspondence - FW_ Stop the shots!.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening
attachments, clicking on links, or replying..
From:Clerk of the Board
To:Mutony, Heather
Cc:Lee, Lewis
Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: Stop the shots!
Date:Monday, June 1, 2026 8:09:59 AM
Attachments:image001.png
Please see Board Correspondence -
Lewis LeeAdministrative Technician - ConfidentialButte County Administration25 County Center Drive, Suite 200 • Oroville, CA 95965T: 530.552.3326www.buttecounty.ca.gov | lelee@buttecounty.ca.gov
From: lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net>
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2026 3:39 PM
To: pcbs@countyofplumas.com; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov;
Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov; davidhollister@countyofplumas.com; sheriff@countyofplumas.com;
District Attorney <District_Attorney@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Nicolereinert@countyofplumas.com;
Kitts, Melissa <mkitts@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Soderstrom, Monica
<msoderstrom@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Durfee, Peter <PDurfee@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Ronald Owens
<ronald@muzzledtruth.com>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Pickett, Andy
<APickett@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Teeter, Doug
<DTeeter@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Beaudoin, Jarett <JBeaudoin@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Julie Threet
<julie4butte5@gmail.com>; Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Ritter, Tami
<TRitter@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Teri DuBose <Teri.DuBose@mail.house.gov>; Clerk of the Board
<clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.ca.gov>
Subject: Stop the shots!
Public Record
Arne Burkhardt opened the bodies. What he found should have stopped everything.
Vaccine-derived spike protein in heart tissue. In blood vessel walls. In brain tissue. In
multiple organs across multiple cases. Not in one anomalous death. Consistently.
Repeatedly. With inflammatory patterns and lymphocytic infiltrates that follow directly
from the known mechanism of mRNA vaccination, widespread, systemic spike protein
production that the manufacturers and regulators always claimed would stay local and
resolve quickly. It did not stay local. It did not resolve quickly. Burkhardt found it
persisting in the deceased, distributed throughout organ systems, accompanied by the
exact tissue damage you would predict if you believed Sucharit Bhakdi’s warnings
about endothelial cells producing spike protein and triggering immune attack from
within. The mechanism is not complicated once you accept what the biodistribution data
already showed. Lipid nanoparticles do not remain at the injection site. Pfizer’s own
Japanese biodistribution study, obtained through freedom of information requests,
showed accumulation in the liver, adrenal glands, ovaries, and beyond. When those
nanoparticles reach tissue, cells take up the mRNA, produce spike protein, and display it
on their surface. The immune system recognizes it as foreign and attacks. In the heart,
that means myocarditis. In vessel walls, that means vascular inflammation. In the brain,
that means neurological damage. Burkhardt’s autopsies are not speculation, they are the
physical, histological confirmation of a mechanism that was biologically predictable and
institutionally ignored. In many of these cases, no other plausible cause of death was
identified. These were not people with terminal diagnoses or obvious competing
explanations. They were people who died in proximity to vaccination, whose deaths
were documented, whose tissues were examined by a trained pathologist, and whose
organs showed the fingerprints of spike protein-driven inflammation. That is not a
coincidence. That is evidence. And health agencies have responded to that evidence by
downplaying it, dismissing Burkhardt’s methodology, discouraging thorough post-
mortem investigation, and refusing any systematic, government-funded autopsy
program that might produce data they cannot control. They knew the biodistribution
data before a single dose was administered to the public. They had Pfizer’s own studies
showing the lipid nanoparticles traveled. They authorized anyway. They mandated
anyway. They silenced the clinicians and pathologists raising concerns anyway. And
now, faced with autopsy findings that document spike protein in the organs of the dead,
they respond not with investigation but with institutional silence and the quiet
suppression of inconvenient science. That is not a public health apparatus functioning in
good faith. That is an apparatus protecting itself. The dead cannot demand answers. The
injured, many of whom carry the same spike-driven inflammatory damage in living
tissue, are told their symptoms are unrelated, psychosomatic, or coincidental.
Burkhardt’s work, alongside the vascular findings documented by Bhakdi and
colleagues, represents a body of post-market evidence that should have triggered
immediate regulatory review, mandatory autopsy protocols, and full transparency on
biodistribution. Instead it has been buried, not by counter-evidence, not by superior data,
but by institutional authority and the refusal to look. This is what burying evidence
looks like. It does not always involve shredded documents or deleted files. Sometimes it
looks like a regulatory agency that simply never funds the study, never mandates the
autopsy, never convenes the independent panel and then points to the absence of data it
refused to generate as proof that there is nothing to find.
https://x.com/KennyCarmody/status/2060706991698292886?s=20
diana dreiss