The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08.14.26 Board Correspondence - FW_ We Knew About COVID Vax Miscarriages Before the Fauci Diaries.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. From:Clerk of the Board To:Mutony, Heather Cc:Lee, Lewis Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: We Knew About COVID Vax Miscarriages Before the Fauci Diaries Date:Monday, August 17, 2026 8:52:56 AM Attachments:image001.png Please see Board Correspondence - Lewis LeeAdministrative Technician - ConfidentialButte County Administration25 County Center Drive, Suite 200 • Oroville, CA 95965T: 530.552.3326www.buttecounty.ca.gov | lelee@buttecounty.ca.gov From: lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2026 8:33 AM To: Shared Mailbox Clerk of the Board <pcbs@countyofplumas.com>; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov; Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov; davidhollister@countyofplumas.com; sheriff@countyofplumas.com; District Attorney <District_Attorney@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Nicolereinert@countyofplumas.com; Kitts, Melissa <mkitts@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Soderstrom, Monica <msoderstrom@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Durfee, Peter <PDurfee@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Ronald Owens <ronald@muzzledtruth.com>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Pickett, Andy <APickett@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Beaudoin, Jarett <JBeaudoin@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Julie Threet <julie4butte5@gmail.com>; Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Teri DuBose <Teri.DuBose@mail.house.gov>; Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.ca.gov> Subject: Fwd: We Knew About COVID Vax Miscarriages Before the Fauci Diaries Public Record “The data tells the true motivation. It was clear from COVID’s inception that CDC wanted the jab in every arm. Details from the same advisory reveal:” diana dreiss Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: TruthMonster - by John Anthony from The Truth Monster <johnmanthony@substack.com> Date: August 14, 2026 at 8:10:44 AM PDT To: lancedreiss@att.net Subject: We Knew About COVID Vax Miscarriages Before the Fauci Diaries Reply-To: TruthMonster - by John Anthony from The Truth Monster <reply+3houvh&kcryl&&a73664ad76458be77761b6c92a871468918abfb384 1ac07f88c86051166bfa24@mg1.substack.com> Contempt for pregnant women and the immunocompromised was in plain sight.͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for moreWe Knew About COVID VaxMiscarriages Before the Fauci Diaries Contempt for pregnant women and the immunocompromised was in plain sight. TRUTHMONSTER - BY JOHN ANTHONY AUG 14 READ IN APP The Fauci diaries (actually notes for his planned autobiography) have given Americans the opportunity to see what government operatives are up to when no one can hear or see them. It’s shocking but shouldn’t be. The evidence has been in the public all along. In this article I’ll show how from the initial vaccine rollout the evidence pointed to the COVID-19 shots being questionable for pregnant women. There is much in the news about miscarriages being associated with the COVID vaccines. Generally, those on the left claim there is no increase and on the right it is anywhere from 82% to over 400% in miscarriage . I’m not going to analyze which is more accurate. More important given the absence of any conclusive studies, is the disregard Fauci, Birx, and Walensky showed for pregnant women, as did much of the government health apparatus. Miscarriages a Likely Possibility From the Beginning The initial Pfizer RCT results were submitted and Emergency Use Authorization granted on December 11, 2020. There were no pregnant women in the trial. The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) evidence review makes that clear… “The RCT excluded persons with prior COVID-19 diagnosis, pregnant or breastfeeding women, and persons who were in an immunosuppressive or immunodeficient state,…” In other words, the initial COVID vaccine trials, already shortened from 2 years to 2 months, offered no indication of how the shots would affect pregnant women or their babies. During pregnancy women’s immune systems undergo complex changes. At different times they are stronger and weaker. That was probably the reason for their exclusion. Despite that lack of that important data, during an April 23, 2021 WH briefing CDC Director Rochelle Walensky still encouraged pregnant women to get the COVID vaccine: “CDC recommends that pregnant people receive the COVID-19 vaccine.” She referenced a self-reported study which involved no controls. Four days later, after pushback, the CDC “clarified“ her remark to “pregnant people should be offered the vaccine”. But it was too late. The message was already delivered. No Longer A Subtle Push On September 29, 2021, Walensky again urged “women who were pregnant, planning to become pregnant or currently breastfeeding” to get the vaccine, though little scientific information had changed in the intervening 5 months. The push didn’t stop. That September the CDC issued its strongest recommendation yet in an urgent Health Alert Network (HAN) advisory. HAN is a formal emergency communication to clinicians and holds more weight than the former WH briefing. Walensky added.. “I strongly encourage those who are pregnant or considering pregnancy to talk with their healthcare provider about the protective benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine to keep their babies and themselves safe.” The advisory didn’t stop there: “CDC strongly recommends COVID-19 vaccination either before or during pregnancy because the benefits of vaccination outweigh known or potential risks.” The CDC had no way of knowing if the jab’s benefits outweighed the potential risks. But why so insistent? Did CDC have news studies? No. The CDC still had no randomized, controlled trial attesting to the safety of pregnant women and their babies. Even the strongly worded advisory admitted the best they had was “the evidence continues to build…” The data tells the true motivation. It was clear from COVID’s inception that CDC wanted the jab in every arm. Details from the same advisory reveal: Nearly 97% of pregnant women hospitalized with COVID were not vaccinated, and Only 31% of pregnant women were fully vaccinated as of September 18, 2021 The progressively forceful push to vaccinate pregnant women was not about health, it was not about protecting mothers or their babies, it was about getting the shot in every arm. Vaccine Hesitancy From the early months of the vaccine's release Fauci was obsessed with vaccine hesitancy. The CDC’s own data showed pregnant women were hesitant to get the shots and were not complying at the rate the agencies desired. This is why the push to vaccinate escalated from “eligible and may choose” in March, to “Recommended” in April, and “Strongly recommends” in an urgent advisory on September 29th. But scientific reality had not changed. The randomized control trial…the gold standard study necessary for the protection of pregnant women still did not exist and would not be completed until July 15, 2022, nearly 10 months after this “urgent” advisory and 15 months after the initial recommendation. Observation 1. The Pfizer trial that qualified the COVID shots for EUA approval excluded pregnant women along with the immunocompromised and people previously infected with COVID, and 2. The best the “experts” could do was guess if it was safe for them. The CDC told all of these groups to take the shots anyway. That’s not medical care, that’s a hidden agenda that plays out as a callous disregard for people’s lives. It Gets Worse On July 15, 2022, Pfizer’s pregnancy study was completed. The experts finally had the data proving the shots were safe for pregnant moms. Except that’s not what the results showed. In the next article I’ll break down Pfizer’s C4591015 trial on ‘vaccinated’ pregnant mothers to show 1. how they disregarded one of the FDA’s cardinal rules for studies, and 2. the pattern Pfizer consistently used to gain approval for mass inoculations even among at-risk groups. Share The Truth Monster is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Upgrade to paid You're currently a free subscriber to The Truth Monster. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. Upgrade to paid LIKE COMMENT RESTACK © 2026 John Anthony548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104 Unsubscribe