Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.16.26 Board Correspondence - FW_ “Health Canada strongly recommends the removal of unnecessary DNA elements from the backbone of plasmids to be use….ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. From:Clerk of the Board To:Mutony, Heather Cc:Lee, Lewis Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: “Health Canada strongly recommends the removal of unnecessary DNA elements from the backbone of plasmids to be use… Date:Thursday, September 17, 2026 4:50:30 PM Attachments:image001.png Please see Board Correspondence - Lewis LeeAdministrative Technician - ConfidentialButte County Administration25 County Center Drive, Suite 200 • Oroville, CA 95965T: 530.552.3326www.buttecounty.ca.gov | lelee@buttecounty.ca.gov From: lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2026 10:24 AM To: Shared Mailbox Clerk of the Board <pcbs@countyofplumas.com>; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov; Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov; danpargee@countyofplumas.com; davidhollister@countyofplumas.com; District Attorney <District_Attorney@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Nicolereinert@countyofplumas.com; Kitts, Melissa <mkitts@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Soderstrom, Monica <msoderstrom@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Durfee, Peter <PDurfee@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Ronald Owens <ronald@muzzledtruth.com>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Pickett, Andy <APickett@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Beaudoin, Jarett <JBeaudoin@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Julie Threet <julie4butte5@gmail.com>; Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Teri DuBose <Teri.DuBose@mail.house.gov>; Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.ca.gov> Subject: Fwd: “Health Canada strongly recommends the removal of unnecessary DNA elements from the backbone of plasmids to be use… Public Record By order of the Information Commissioner of Canada, newly unredacted documents show: 1. Health Canada told Pfizer to remove its SV40 promoter sequences from their covid vaccines in 2023. Pfizer refused. Health Canada has continued to approve the DNA-contaminated injections since then anyway. “Health Canada strongly recommends the removal of unnecessary DNA elements from the backbone of plasmids” … “However, the Sponsor only agrees to further evaluate Health Canada’s request”. 2. Heath Canada’s reviewers rejected Pfizer’s justification for keeping the DNA in the shots. “The review team disagrees with this justification”. 3. Pfizer never disclosed the presence of the DNA sequences (this was discovered by independent researchers McKernan et al. and brought to Health Canada’s attention by questioning from Chartier and Horwood at Epoch Times). “should have been disclosed initially”. 4. Parliament was told Pfizer had answered everything. Yasir Naqvi — Liberal MP for Ottawa Centre, as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health (then Mark Holland), told Dean Allison — Conservative MP for Niagara West: “Pfizer provided a reply to address all of Health Canada’s questions.” (Q-2670). False, Pfizer refused Health Canada’s strong recommendation to remove the DNA. 5. The investigation was dropped by someone above the expert staff regulators at Health Canada. The Issue Analysis Summary (IAS) was “deemed to be unnecessary as the residual DNA content… was consistently below… 10 ng/human dose.” This was likely Pfizer’s justification for not cleaning up their product that was rejected by Health Canada: “The review team disagrees with this justification.” The IAS can be found here. diana dreiss Begin forwarded message: From: Jessica Rose from Unacceptable Jessica <jessicar@substack.com> Date: September 16, 2026 at 6:46:45 AM PDT To: lancedreiss@att.net Subject: “Health Canada strongly recommends the removal of unnecessary DNA elements from the backbone of plasmids to be use… Reply-To: Jessica Rose from Unacceptable Jessica <reply+3klh1l&kcryl&&e35483411bca6479c59e3f0f6ea1ef055c5edb284deb52a 29ab585e26ff4bf50@mg1.substack.com> Unacceptable Jessica cross-posted a post from Scoops' Gazette Jessica RoseSep 16 · Unacceptable Jessica Necessary reading. “Health Canada stronglyrecommends the removal ofunnecessary DNA elements from thebackbone of plasmids to be used forthe manufacture of COMIRNATYvaccines for future SARS-CoV-2variants.” Now revealed: Canadian regulators wanted the undisclosed DNA out of Pfizer’s shots in 2023. Pfizer refused. Higher ups in government quashed the investigation. DNA contamination continues to this day. SCOOPS MCGOO SEP 8 READ IN APP Certain redactions lifted 8 September 2026 By order of the Information Commissioner of Canada, newly unredacted documents show: 1. Health Canada told Pfizer to remove its SV40 promoter sequences from their covid vaccines in 2023. Pfizer refused. Health Canada has continued to approve the DNA-contaminated injections since then anyway. “Health Canada strongly recommends the removal of unnecessary DNA elements from the backbone of plasmids” … “However, the Sponsor only agrees to further evaluate Health Canada’s request”. 2. Heath Canada’s reviewers rejected Pfizer’s justification for keeping the DNA in the shots. “The review team disagrees with this justification”. 3. Pfizer never disclosed the presence of the DNA sequences (this was discovered by independent researchers McKernan et al. and brought to Health Canada’s attention by questioning from Chartier and Horwood at Epoch Times). “should have been disclosed initially”. 4. Parliament was told Pfizer had answered everything. Yasir Naqvi — Liberal MP for Ottawa Centre, as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health (then Mark Holland), told Dean Allison — Conservative MP for Niagara West: “Pfizer provided a reply to address all of Health Canada’s questions.” (Q-2670). False, Pfizer refused Health Canada’s strong recommendation to remove the DNA. 5. The investigation was dropped by someone above the expert staff regulators at Health Canada. The Issue Analysis Summary (IAS) was “deemed to be unnecessary as the residual DNA content… was consistently below… 10 ng/human dose.” This was likely Pfizer’s justification for not cleaning up their product that was rejected by Health Canada: “The review team disagrees with this justification.” The IAS can be found here. Three years since these emails, the concerns of staff regulators at Health Canada continue to be brushed aside by both Pfizer and senior government officials. Original release A 2023 000979 OCR - 247... 11.9MB ∙ PDF file Original release A 2023 000979 OCR - 247 pages, with redactions Download Info Commissioner's order to unredact ce... 274KB ∙ PDF file Info Commissioner's order to unredact certain pages Download Page 150, unredacted by order 1.12MB ∙ PDF file Page 150, unredacted by order Download Page 193, unredacted by order 2.48MB ∙ PDF file Page 193, unredacted by order Download Scoops McGoo on X LIKE COMMENT RESTACK Originally posted on Scoops' GazetteScoops McGoo Subscribe © 2026 Jessica Rosejessicarose1974@protonmail.com Unsubscribe